Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "Real Stories" channel.

  1. This doc is a decade old
    1
  2. In Dec 2021, an article was published following up on some of these kids. Do an online search for "Catching Up With 2 of the Kids from ‘Poor Kids'"
    1
  3. Some people are just evil
    1
  4. This was filmed over a decade ago
    1
  5. In Dec 2021, an article was published following up on some of these kids. Do an online search for "Catching Up With 2 of the Kids from ‘Poor Kids'"
    1
  6. There is no question that Marwan was an asset for numerous countries, including Israel and Britain.
    1
  7.  @AndreasEUR  From her grave?
    1
  8. Ten years later, actually. In Dec 2021, an article was published following up on some of these kids. Do an online search for "Catching Up With 2 of the Kids from ‘Poor Kids'"
    1
  9. He was an evil man, and a loser as well.
    1
  10.  @trailerparksupervisor5378  He literally killed innocent people, civilians and police officers alike. They were all innocent people.
    1
  11.  @robertducat-qp7qy  Sad that people exist who would say nice things about a vile murderer of innocents. Who's next on the list? Stalin? Mao? Pol Pot?
    1
  12.  @ronniehopper2726  1. Do you know every police officer in the world? There are millions. 2. He murdered non-cops too. 3. You can't possibly be that stupid.
    1
  13. Timestamp?
    1
  14.  @posticusmaximus1739  Thank you
    1
  15. Looks like two eight-year-olds playing
    1
  16. @grass Sorry you went the childish route once you misunderstood my comment. In fact, the claim that "There are so many innocent people on death row and in prison" is baseless.
    1
  17. @grass Sorry that my choice of words is beyond your third grade level language skills. Improve your grammar and spelling instead of lashing out at those more educated and intelligent than yourself. My comments stand on their own merits. If you can't decipher them, have someone at your local grocery store explain them to you.
    1
  18.  @Dmc841  I have an interest in and knowledge of true crime. Since DNA went mainstream a generation ago in the minds of both law enforcement and juries, very few innocents get convicted, and bad convictions get reviewed. It's a different world than it was.
    1
  19.  @Enoughalready20237  YT disallows links. Ask anyone with a knowledge of true crime, and they can tell you that the mainstreaming of DNA as well as other scientific advances has entirely changed the world of criminology so as to be virtually unrecognizable to what it was as recently as 35 years ago, or even later. Notice that the Innocence Project and similar organizations achieved exoneration for a large number of convicts dating to the 1980s and 1990s, but precious few since. Why? Many cases that resulted in conviction pre-DNA wouldn't even get prosecuted now. Not only is law enforcement far more equipped to solve crimes properly, but juries are infinitely-better informed as to the limitations of previously relied-upon "evidence" such as bite marks, hair consistency, witness identification, and jailhouse snitches. Prosecutors rarely get convictions anymore without airtight evidence, a different world than existed for thousands of years prior to very, very recent times.
    1
  20. In Dec 2021, an article was published following up on some of these kids. Do an online search for "Catching Up With 2 of the Kids from ‘Poor Kids'"
    1
  21. The profile they released was way off. They thought it was a regular Joe working a 9-to-5. Turned out it was a brilliant lunatic living in a cabin off the grid.
    1
  22. In Dec 2021, an article was published following up on some of these kids. Do an online search for "Catching Up With 2 of the Kids from ‘Poor Kids'"
    1