General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Jim Werther
Real Stories
comments
Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "Leonard Thomas Lake: The Boneyard Monster" video.
Hindsight is 20/20. The priority at that moment was nailing down the two killers.
103
@Jennifer Brown Is that a serious question? Would you talk to the cops under that circumstance without immunity?
41
They couldn't find an actor with Asian features who's under 300 lbs?
35
@carolinemaybe A. She still loved him B. Made her look bad or C. Both
29
@phyllisyovone8961 Perhaps you could put your comments through Google translate before posting?
18
@tejasvatisingh4603 14 - 16 actually, but whatever. She clearly had a level of involvement, but did not kill anyone.
16
@TurkeyCreekGal They videotaped much of their violence, and only Lake and Ng were shown. Other crimes happened where the only suspects, based upon ID and other evidence, were Lake and/or Ng. There is zero evidence that she committed any violent acts, nor has anyone even officially suggested that she was directly involved in the violence.
10
@TurkeyCreekGal Easy for you to say, but police and prosecutors actually have to follow the law. Again, there is no evidence whatsoever that she killed anyone. There is no evidence either that you killed anyone, but if you like we can lock you up for life just in case you did.
10
Anyone who has an interest in true crime knows about Leonard Lake and Charlie Chitat Ng.
10
After she received immunity? How does that work?
7
@Smellslikewoodsmokeandrain 👍
6
@TurkeyCreekGal And as to the divorce, I don't know what precipitated it, but the two of them continued their marriage in all but name only until Lake's death.
6
@WandaCasamento59 She wasn't a victim either
6
@haroldcjennettiii Thank you for being the rare commenter interested in seeking out facts instead of an argument 👍
6
@petergault4328 Because they thought Karla was a victim. They thought wrong.
5
No. Only the few moments where the words "file footage" appeared.
4
@hecatommyriagon655 I like facts and evidence, not whining.
4
@daylate Well, Jeez, you're 43 and you haven't got a freaking clue. They gave her immunity on the assumption that she was barely involved and could help them nail Ng and also solve the crimes. That's common sense. It turns out she was far more involved, but they couldn't do anything about it once they gave her immunity, a deal which took place after she interfered with the crime scene. I'm sorry you don't get it. Have a five year old explain it to you.
3
@josephgeorge1785 Certainly not. 1. She was granted full immunity 2. It is long past the statute of limitations
3
@haroldcjennettiii She was not. In fact, no underage person was among the many known victims of Lake and/or Ng.
3
@haroldcjennettiii Let me correct what I wrote above: Obviously, Lake and Ng murdered innocent babies. But there are no known teenage victims of their sexual abuse.
3
@peterjongsma2779 The only non-re-enactments in this video were stamped "file footage", and that only comprises about one minute's worth of this video.
2
@TheSpicyLeg I wonder about your statistic, which sounds like conjecture. Otherwise, excellent comment.
2
@bubbasmith7312 You arr correct, of course.
2
@haroldcjennettiii You greatly overstate your case
2
@haroldcjennettiii I certainly did. She said that she would love to have a good time with teenage girls under 18 whose looks she coveted. Said nothing about murder.
2
@wynottgivemore9274 I also addressed that in my follow-up comment immediately thereafter.
2
Keep the day job
2
@SticksAandstonesBozo Dude, you make Stephen Colbert seem funny by comparison. Don't blame the audience when your material sucks.
2
@katrabbit They did not have enough to charge her for interfering with evidence at the property. At the time that Balazs and Lake's mother were doing their cleanup, the police had no warrant, nor could they later prove what Balazs had done there.
1
No doubt she was involved. But she didn't kill anyone, so there's that. Without immunity, though, she would have gone to prison, no question.
1
@LoudmouthTrucking I don't believe that is what the OP meant
1
Assuming that's the way it really went down. You are quoting a re-enactment.
1
@tempesthamm4855 Maybe. Maybe not. You seem too trusting.
1
@josephgeorge1785 They gave her immunity. We still have a Bill of Rights in this country, or at least we are supposed to.
1
@BeckBeckGo Four replies! Woohoo! How did I earn the honor? PS - The best response was your fifth, addressing Leisa Wilson.
1
@haroldcjennettiii 😊
1
@timothyperschon2455 Actually, one was in a coma and the other on the run, so you got that wrong. Furthermore, law enforcement still needed all the information they could get, and having her work against them seemed unproductive at the time. Hindsight is 20/20.
1
@BeckBeckGo I also addressed that in my follow-up comment immediately thereafter.
1
@wynottgivemore9274 Hindsight is 20/20. The priority at that moment was nailing down the two killers.
1
@frost6653 I don't know what that means
1
@Eddie 1967 Yup. Thank you for some facts, which offends some people's emotions.
1
@Eddie 1967 You clearly know both this case and the law, which puts you into a distinct minority. My question to you regards something else: No periods, no commas, only ellipses. Why is that?
1
@Eddie 1967 Things could be worse. Some YT comments are unreadable. And most are mindless. Ellipses? Not bad, considering.
1
@alexburke1899 Ding 👍
1
@starchilde9560 I have addressed all this already in my earlier comments.
1
@markzenta2631 Astronauts
1
@mariawestman9026 Certainly anyone whose interest in true crime is only a couple of a years old or less would be unlikely to know about serial killers from four decades ago.
1
@mariawestman9026 👍
1
Timestamp?
1
@posticusmaximus1739 Thank you
1