General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Jim Werther
CNN
comments

Comments by "Jim Werther" (@jimwerther) on "Uproar after Moms for Liberty co-founder caught in sex scandal" video.

 @heyheyhey40 When did she ever condemn homosexuality? That is blatantly false.
5
@Nr4747 Depends on how they look. This one here looks fine.
5
@jdmac1475 She never spoke about religion. Moms For Liberty opposes pornographic content for children. Do you believe that adults having a private sex life must support providing porn to children? Seriously??
3
How was she being a hypocrite? Adults having sex behind closed doors is very different than providing pornography to schoolchildren. You don't understand that?
3
@kevinwasserburger3119 You wrote, "She's outwardly, rabidly anti-LGBT..." - please source your claim that she has ever said one word that is anti-LGBT, or that Moms For Liberty has ever done so. They oppose giving pornography to schoolchildren. Do you support that?
3
@golfingfool777 That is extremely vague. "She set herself out as a moral examplar, but failed" might apply to 99% of the populace, yourself included. Moms For Liberty opposes sexualizing little children; she is an adult doing adult behavior in private. You can't see the difference?? Really??!! (I happen to believe that she and her husband should have immediately stepped down from their respective postions. But "hypocrisy" is a very big stretch.)
3
How was she being a hypocrite? Think before you respond, because you won't have an answer that makes sense.
2
@Mugiwara2k Well, your "answer" is fact-free, so you lose. Moms For Liberty wants to remove pornographic content from school libraries. Do you actually believe that any adult who has sex should support pornographic material in school libraries?
2
@Mugiwara2k You wrote, "She's a cofounder of a group that rallies to ban any and everything LGBT related in schools..". But that is utterly false. Moms For Liberty opposes pornography for children, straight or gay. What does that have to do with her private adult sex life?
2
@AkonFenty1992 Your comment is as obvious and straightforward as can be, yet here we have all these leftists utterly refusing to take a moment to just think things through.
2
 @mkb7013 How was anyone being a hypocrite? Think before you respond, because you won't have an answer that makes sense.
2
@jefferypadgett334 She never tried to ban any book, ever. Moms For Liberty is opposed to sexualizing children. Now, what does her provate adult sex life have to do with pornofraphy in school libraries? YOU CAN'T ANSWER THE QUESTION. (It's so much fun to own you dolts.)
2
 @louiseporter8148 I am challenging you leftists in different echo chambers/threads to back up your claims. Why can't any of you do so?
2
Im what way was she being a hypocrite?
2
@joerogain5025 How many trips to Bill Clinton take to Epstein's island?
2
@sisuguillam5109 I asked a question, and you can't answer it.
2
@angelainamarie9656 You wrote two comments, neither of which could answer a basic question, which is why you tried putdowns instead. It isn't working - you have no facts, and your insults can't cover for that.
2
 @colinpryor6590 The parts of the Bible deal with sexual situations is not taught to children for a very good reason.
2
@timogul Please source your claim that "she was pushing Christian values and morals purity onto others, while engaging in conduct that goes against her publicly claimed values". She is part of Moms For Liberty, which opposes sexualizing children. Then she had her own private sex life as an adult. You don't see the difference between those two? Do you actually believe that all adults that have sex should be pushing little children into exploring sexuality?
1
@uvoverdrive4181 In schools? No, I do not.
1
@timogul Your claim is absolutely untrue. The books removed from some school libraries are blatantly pornographic, yet MfL has been bitterly opposed by librarians and various other leftists. Indeed, pornographic material remains in hundreds, or perhaps thousands, of school libraries in the US. MfL does not "attack" LGBT people. That claim is simply false. The internet is available to read up on such matters.
1
@joerogain5025 Bill Clinton visited pedophile island how many times?
1
@uvoverdrive4181 And your point is? Somehow we all survived for thousands of years before sex ed was added to the curriculum, and certainly before perverts started putting condoms onto bananas 30 years ago (which seems almost quaint by today's standards). Did your grandparents come home on their wedding night not knowing what to do next?
1
How was she being a hypocrite? Think before you respond, because you won't have an answer that makes sense.
1
 @ramonlopez5557 No, they are not. They are leftists. No thinking allowed.
1
How was she being a hypocrite? That makes no sense at all.
1
Why do you support giving porn to little children?
1
 @macaronisalad5 If you think it is so easy, why can't you answer the question?
1
 @lucycan6363 In short, you have no answer. Glad we could clear that up.
1
In what way did she do anything that she said not to do?
1
 @Mr_Fairdale You are of course correct. Keep shouting the truth louder than the left's lies.
1
@dallaw9238 Nice try, but false. Sex education in general leads to more sex. When sex ed was introduced in the early 1960s in order to cut down on venereal disease, the almost immediate result was a 50% jump in teen venereal disease. Sex education should not be in schools at all, which should be teaching math, science, history, and ELA. Parents do not send their kids to school so that leftist perverts can talk to children about sex.
1
@patjohnson5586 I notice that you can't answer a basic question, and are trying to cover for your inability by throwing out grammar school insults.
1
@cb4664 When has Bridget Ziegler or Moms For Liberty ever spoken out about the private sex lives of adults?
1
@kims7287 You write false hypotheticals because you can't address a simple question.
1
Whogivsafukaboutmagatears You wrote, "She led a movement against sexual orientation", but she never did anything of the sort. Are you unaware of what Moms For Liberty stands for?
1
@jeffwilliams59 Why do you continue to falsely accuse "hypocrisy" when you know it's false?
1
@mcoguyaj Your claim of banning books about Rosa Parks or black people in general, etc. is patently false. You are repeating pure lies put out by the leftist propaganda machine. If you really believe those lies to be true, please provide a source and no, "Media Matters" doesn't count.
1
@zren2023 Please explain where Bridget Ziegler or Moms For Liberty ever expressed an opinion regarding adults' private sex lives.
1
@ruthannecoro6198 I am waiting for you to give any example whatsoever of her being a hypocrite. It seems you are unable to do so.
1
@someguy5438 You wrote, "She is actively anti gay...". Can you please provide any evidence whatsoever that she or Moms For Liberty is anti-gay? Because neither she nor they have ever said any such thing.
1
@slicklandy7819 I'm not interested in drinking with you, but thanks for offering.
1
@acbulgin2 I will give you credit for at least trying to answer the question, which is more than most of your leftist brethren here have even attempted to do in any serious manner, yet your shot falls way, way short. You are trying to make a massive logical leap which can not be remotely sustained. By your logic, members of Moms For Liberty shouldn't have children either, lest someone in school ask "where do babies come from?". As it happens, children hearing about a scandal can be easily put off with a very vague answer. It has no relationship to placing pornographic books into school libraries.
1
@allanmason3201 Do you realize how you sound when you falsely impugn people's character because they look too squeaky clean? Why would you he so desperate to tear people down?
1
@WorldwideWyatt The history of sex ed shows that the introduction of sex ed led to an explosion of venereal disease among teens. There is no reason for sex ed of any type happening in the first place. School should be for math and science, history and ELA.
1
@nipponsuxs She is not against gays
1
@dcal7301 You proudly support genocidal murderers, baby killers and rapists?
1
@tonyruggiero4168 You wrote, "considering they keep attacking people for what they do in their private lives". Where has Moms For Liberty ever mentioned - let alone attacked - what anyone does in their private lives?
1
@lise1255 You wrote, "She has preached against homosexuality...". Please cite a single example that either Bridget Ziegler or Moms For Liberty has ever said one word against homosexuality. I'll be waiting for your response.
1
@someguy5438 You wrote, "a woman that espouses morality yet breaks their marital vows...". Can you please cite one example of any of that being the case? Moms For Liberty was established to fight draconian reactions to Covid in schools, then expanded to fight the distribution of pornographic material to children. What does that have to do with a private, consensual - no broken vows - aspect to this woman's marriage?
1
@Dutch3DMaster Being opposed to distributing pornography to children or to trying to draw them into the trans cult has no relation whatsoever with an adult's private sex life, obviously.
1
 @intercat4907 Are you able to answer Private Person's question, yes or no? Seems like you can't.
1
 @nerakar6562 #Facts #Preach
1
@arcticgoddess It would be a great answer, if only it was true. "Requiring teachers who are married to same sex partners...to never mention their wives or husbands in front of the schoolchildren in fear of being fired..." That allegation is 100% false. "Banning any book that has two lady penguins who have a daughter" - what are you even talking about??? Moms For Liberty opposes giving pornography - straight or gay - to schoolchildren. That's it. Do you support sexualizing little children?
1
How was she being a hypocrite? Think before you respond, because you won't have an answer that makes sense.
1
@BigBadJerryRogers You obviously have no understanding of what Moms For Liberty does. Originally established to oppose draconian government rules for schools during Covid, they went on to oppose the introduction of pornography into school libraries. When have they commented on same-sex relationships for adults? They haven't.
1
@Woodbug-b7t I notice that you are unable to respond to my question, so you are attacking me instead. Sorry, we're not falling for your attempts at distraction.
1
@Larry-go8bg Where has she not practiced what she preached? Did she force three year olds to wear masks? Did she bring pornography into school lobraries?
1
Because liberty requires showing porn to eight year olds? You people are sick.
1
How was she being a hypocrite? Think before you respond, because you won't have an answer that makes sense.
1
@angelainamarie9656 Lots of ad hominems, yet nothing tangible. Why can't you answer my question?
1
 @_Cetarial Is that why you are afraid to try? Coward.
1
 @jaminova_1969 Moms For Liberty has nothing to do with lesbianism, and everything to do with not providing pornography to children. Again, please highlight any so-called hypocrisy.
1
 @avishevin1976 Moms For Liberty exists to oppose pornography and child mutilation in school. When did she engage in giving children pornographic or child-mutilation material? Think.
1
@VintageFLA You really should stop living in an echo chamber of lies. The books that Moms For Liberty want removed describe gay sex between men and boys, including depictions of boys providing oral sex to men, as well as books which try to persuade little kids that boys might be girls and vice versa. Only a pervert (like yourself?) would want little children exposed to such things.
1
@svenm4740 So, you can't answer my question. Thank you for proving me right. You leftists are so shallow.
1
@galaxyglitterlatte4664 You wrote, "they look down on gays and lesbians". Can you please show me one example of that anywhere? Are you entirely unaware of what Moms For Liberty stands for?
1
@allanmason3201 I asked a question, and you have no answer, which is why you chose to go with a grade school insult instead. Grow up.
1
@tdup191 Thank you. The leftists here can't handle basic truth.
1
@somkit9102 You wrote, "she...publicly condemns lesbian sex". When has either Bridget Ziegler or Moms For Liberty condemned lesbian sex? They never have, as you know, which is why you are instead expressing interest in distributing pornography to children.
1
 @Spectrefox1313 You sound like you are one of the eight year olds trying to get their hands on pornography.
1
 @timogul Why can't you answer the question? Labeling someone a "bot" is a lousy substitute for having an intelligent response. Just admit that you're owned.
1
 @MPHIY17 There is no law called "Don't Say Gay". There is no anti-gay law at all. So try again, but this time stick to actual facts.
1
@joerogain5025 He said that before the truth became known about Epstein. Now, how many times did Bill Clinton visit Epstein's island??
1
@shari9721 You made many claims in your comment - now go back up any of them. When did she say that anyone engaging in same-sex and/or non-monogamous relationships is immoral and shouldn't be involved in education? SHE NEVER DID. See, you can't just make things up and blame someone else for your own inventions.
1
@abrakkehakka1357 Your comment is an attempt at making a gigantic, nonsensical leap. Moms For Liberty was established to oppose extended Covid lockdowns in schools, then went on to fight the distribution of pornography in schools. Those issues are wholly unrelated to one's private marital life. You then made the wild jump to "she favors morality, but acted immorally", which takes on any definition you choose to ascribe to it. Now, I already wrote above that she and her husband should have immediately resigned from their respective positions. But that is very different from alleging hypocrisy, obviously. To speak your language, it's like someone being a member of Habitat For Humanity not supporting the Green New Deal - "what a hypocrite! You claim to care about social justice, but are not pushing for the Green New Deal?!" Well, those two might somehow be related in your mind, but they are separate issues, meaning the charge of "hypocrisy" makes no sense in this context.
1
@someguy5438 Your comment is utterly nonsensical. Are you unaware of the definition of pornography? If so, consult your dictionary.
1
 @anythinggoes5574 Ding! 🎯 Just remember, the left hates facts.
1
Moms For Liberty are American heroes.
1
Utterly false. When did Moms For Liberty ever try to dictate other people's lives? Unless you count not distributing porn to little children. Do you support that?
1
What did she do that she accused others of? She never provided pornography to minors. Think this through
1