Comments by "The Hermit" (@TheOleHermit) on "Institute for Justice" channel.

  1. The FBI executed a search warrant to find evidence of laundering drug money. Of course, they would inspect every box and have dogs detecting the remnants of drugs BFD. Finding criminal evidence, prosecuting smugglers and human traffickers, and convicting them is precisely what we pay the FBI to do. "Largest Armed Robbery in American History" is BS click-bait. These shady looking 'attorneys' are the ones robbing their clients' hidden stashes, "located far enough away from their homes to not be tempting (suspicious)..." Suing the FBI for a % of $billion settlements for personal profit... and their filthy rich clients with more money than common sense fall for their potential scam, with little hopes of winning the case, while being on the 'clock'. /smh
    1
  2. Within less then one minute, this smelled like a fishy anti-gov right wing hit job. So I googled it: "The Institute for Justice (IJ) is a libertarian non-profit public interest law firm in the United States.[4][5][6] It has litigated ten cases before the United States Supreme Court dealing with eminent domain, interstate commerce, public financing for elections, school vouchers, tax credits for private school tuition, civil asset forfeiture, and residency requirements for liquor license. The organization was founded on September 3, 1991.[7] As of 2023, it employed a staff of 157 full-time staff members (including 64 attorneys) in Arlington, Virginia and seven offices across the United States." IOW, this is a small, privately funded "non profit" team of attorneys taking on the FBI. I don't believe this video is telling the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth about the contents of those boxes in the possession of a "private security-deposit box company in Beverly Hills." "Indiscriminately opened" by the FBI. Was this $ stashed by drug cartels or human traffickers, undeclared to the IRS as viable income? NO REPUTABLE LAW FIRM WOULD BROADCAST THIS, PRIOR TO AN ACTIVE COURT HEARING. THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS.
    1