Comments by "kokofan50" (@kokofan50) on "Real Engineering" channel.

  1.  @lawrencewright2816  and they were under british command.
    1
  2. Ben M, anti-tank guns killed the most tanks.
    1
  3. Some Thing, with seawater extraction of uranium, it actually is. However, more importantly, nuclear is sustainable, unlike everything else.
    1
  4. The most energy intensive part of the making steel is heating the crucibles of steel, and that happens 24/7/365.
    1
  5. You live in a fantasy world
    1
  6. You’re conflating nuclear reactors with nuclear weapons. Sure there’s obviously overlap, but that’s like saying conflating fertilizer manufacturing with bomb making.
    1
  7. You have to have both. It’s just that the US and Soviet Union favored different mixes because of their particular needs.
    1
  8. Oil requires life, a lot of it, and geological activity. Even if Mars has small pockets of life, there’s not nearly enough, and Mars has been geologically dead for a very long time.
    1
  9. Jinx Jones, took and IQ test as a kid. I got 130, so even if a lost a few over the years I’m well above average. However, everything I said is based on common knowledge.
    1
  10. If you’re producing more benefit then you’re consuming, you should be able to make a profit, and nuclear does make a profit.
    1
  11. At the time it was called a turo-super charger
    1
  12. No, they’re not cheaper. Moreover, they’re limited to particular places with major drawbacks
    1
  13.  @zen1647  a renewable lobbyist group’s hypothetical doesn’t out do the empirical evidence of the electricity prices in Germany and France. Germany has sky high prices from their solar and wind. France has some of the lowest in Europe with most of their electricity coming from nuclear.
    1
  14. Back then they were called turbo-superchargers.
    1
  15. Every decision they made required more time and maintenance than they could afford.
    1
  16. At the time it was called a turo-super charger
    1
  17. At the time they were called turbo-superchargers.
    1
  18. Sure, you can, but don’t except it to travel very far.
    1
  19. The Sherman was very much meant to fight other tanks. Also, Tigers weren’t common enough to really to justify the logistics and training problems with the 76.
    1
  20. Gwinny Larayette, training crews on a whole other gun was the problem.
    1
  21. At the time it was called a turo-super charger
    1
  22. The moon probably won’t ever rebel because of how close the moon is. Mars, now that’s a different story.
    1
  23. Stainless steel was a common material for rockets back in the 50/60s. It’s properties are well known and advantages in important ways.
    1
  24. No, but the guys who designed the old Atlas rockets and Starship are.
    1
  25. Hey, I’m not the only one to mention Greg.
    1
  26.  @laertesl4324  there’s nothing to apologize for. It was in a reply, but more importantly, I was celebrating the fact another fan of Greg’s channel is here.
    1
  27. It also takes time to install new cranes. It doesn’t matter if you’ve got the best tanks in the world if the fight is over by the time you get there.
    1
  28. The 76 was made out of stronger steel, so it could withstand a larger charge with a higher barrel pressure.
    1
  29. At the time it was called a turo-super charger
    1
  30. There’s a reason the A-10’s official name is Thunderbolt II.
    1