Comments by "" (@charliemoore2551) on "Conservatives 'break the golden rule’ of politics with ‘impossible’ election gap | Ipsos" video.

The debate shouldn't have gone ahead without representation from other parties. The fact is that Starmer is frightened of being challenged from the left. If he had to answer the arguments of Greens, Plaid Cymru and the SNP, it would show that there is little difference between him and Sunak. At the other end of the scale, Sunak would benefit from the opportunity to distance himself from Reform UK. He does himself no favours by competing with them for nastiness.
1
@davecross4493 Thanks for that. I love satire. The one that made me laugh most was the "Labour's Broader vision" paragraph. When I joined the Labour Party 50 years we didn't even have to oppose anyone as right-wing as Starmer. They existed but they were on the most right-wing fringes of the Tory Party. What you call "far-left ideologies" formed the core of the Labour Party's policies at the time. It is quite disgusting that the media protects him from being exposed what he is.
1
@lewis123417 Nope. Starmer has chickened out of them. He's not able to be challenged from the left. It will emphasise the fact that Starmer's Labour Party is, for all intents and purposes, indistinguishable from the Tories
1
@davecross4493 That's very good. Do you patronise people for a living? If not, you should consider taking it up professionally. Labour has to ditch the working class to be electable? What about condoning genocide? Is that a "progressive value". We're told this charlatan is likely to be Prime Minister soon. It won't be with my vote. Most of my work colleagues also won't be voting Labour, nor my working-class extended family, nor my working-class neighbours. I have to wonder where the pollsters are getting their percentages from. Do they know where to find the working class? Or do they just consider those votes to be banked for Labour? If they do, they're in for a nasty surprise.
1