Youtube comments of (@charliemoore2551).
-
726
-
527
-
451
-
308
-
297
-
297
-
275
-
236
-
223
-
169
-
147
-
135
-
131
-
126
-
124
-
109
-
103
-
103
-
97
-
96
-
96
-
83
-
82
-
82
-
79
-
78
-
75
-
74
-
72
-
71
-
70
-
69
-
68
-
67
-
64
-
62
-
61
-
60
-
60
-
59
-
58
-
58
-
56
-
51
-
51
-
49
-
49
-
49
-
48
-
Labour has always had interest groups within it. They range from Labour Friends of Israel, through Christian, Hindu, Muslim groups, Labour Friends of Palestine to the Institute of Workers Control and Blue Labour. All of them are legitimate lobby groups because they are composed of people who are, in the first place, supporters of the Labour Party and promote their specific aims as an adjunct to that support. But the Jewish Labour Movement, of which Akehurst is a member, is a very different creature indeed. It is financed by the Jewish National Fund (the organisation that funds the illegal settlements) and has no interest whatsoever in supporting Labour Party aims in general. It exists purely for the purpose of suborning Social Democratic parties to Israeli interests. It is just as entryist as Militant Tendency with the subtle difference that it has been successful.
If you are right, Damien (and you usually are), this is a very sinister development indeed. It signals that the Labour Party is now a party which is fully under external control. When it's not serving the interests of its rich new donors or doing Genocide Joe's bidding, it's taking its orders directly from the JLM. Sad days!
47
-
45
-
45
-
45
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
40
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
34
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
30
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
If we'd had PR it's unlikely we'd ever have had Thatcher's privatisations, the Falklands War, the disastrous deregulation of financial services, the Poll Tax, the collapse of Council House building, the "reforms" to the NHS, academy schools, the closure of libraries, public toilets etc, the Iraq War and (most disastrous of all, Brexit. Quite simply, the UK would have been a better place to live.
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
I couldn't agree more. When my mother died, many years ago, her savings amounted to a few thousand pounds. The five siblings all agreed that my sister, who had nursed her through the last year or so of her life, should have this to pay for a holiday that she and her husband fully deserved. Apart from that, there was nothing but a few keepsakes, bits of furniture, books etc which we each took something of because they helped us remember her. Apart from that, there was nothing. No property, no stocks and shares, bank accounts etc. I was always glad about that. She left us far more than "stuff". it will last a lot longer and I seriously hope that I will leave the same to my children.
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
This is spot on, Rick. It's commercialisation: The business wants to produce everything cheaper to make and easier to control. People are awkward, greedy, cantankerous, contrary, conceited, prone to tantrums, depression, laziness, arrogance, cheeky, rude, etc etc - OR, as we old fashioned types like to call it, creative!!!!
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
These re-alignments happen periodically and they are related to changes in the economy. The Tories were originally the party of the landed gentry. The Whigs were the party of the emerging bourgeoisie and, as they became the Liberals, more so. If you look at legislation in the latter part of the 19th century, it was the Liberals who were most set on crushing the working class and the Tories who, in a patrician manner, were most likely to look out for their interests. We often forget that reforms like Public Libraries, swimming pools , municipal housing etc came under great Tory reformers like the the Chamberlains.
The biggest turmoil came in the inter-war years when the Tories, under people like Baldwin effectively moved in on the territory of the Liberals and became the party of the bourgeoisie. As Lord Thorneycroft (remember him?) put it, the Tories were now the real Liberals and I think it's true to say that Thatcher was far more in the tradition of Gladstone than that of Disraeli. The Liberals, as we all know, were then squeezed by the emerging Labour Party on their left and very nearly ceased to exist.
In my view, we've entered a similar period of upheaval now. The Tories have been captured by the swivel eyed loons of Tufton Street, the Labour Party have lurched so far to the right that many Tories feel quite at home there and we also have Farage as the Joker in the pack and a substantial number of people on the Left who are now politically homeless. I don't think Farage is serious about taking over the Tories - except maybe as a little ego trip. He's essentially an itinerant con-man on the look out for the next grift. Interesting times!
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Here's the thing, Binyahim, you cannae claim that the UN has failed to condemn the atrocities of Hamas when you have refused to co-operate with independent investigators on the alleged atrocities, proclaiming that there is nothing to investigate: If Israel says there are atrocities, there are atrocities and demanding evidence is therefore an antisemitic act in its own right. In fact, all the claims, so willingly reported by western press and media have been totally discredited. There were no rapes (nor any other kind of sexual assault), no mass murder of children or mutilation of any babies and the high death count appears to be the result of Israeli forces putting the Hannibal Directive into action. Or, to put it another way, gotcha, you liar!
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
I think that Al-Jolani/Al Sharaa's shelf life is very limited. He was put in place to serve Israel's and the US's purpose and that purpose being achieved, they now have no use for him.
We've seen this happen so many times before. I remember when the UK media extolled the good offices of a Libyan Colonel called Muammar Qadaffi, then there was one Idi Amin who was going to bring Uganda back to its senses, there was Saddam Hussein who saved Iraq from Communism, strongman Manuel Noriega was going to look after US interests in Panama and, of course, and we all remember the people that Ronald Reagan called "freedom fighters" in Afghanistan - including one Osama Bin Laden. In the end, none of that mattered. Once they had served their purpose, they were got rid of.
This time around, I think that there may have been a massive miscalculation, though. The crowds that welcomed the so-called "rebels" into Damascus just over a week ago are a wee bit more sophisticated than they're given credit for. They've had secular government, with full freedom of religion (or from religion) for more than half a century now. While no one in their right mind would defend the Assads with their oppression and corruption, I doubt if these hand choppers and beheaders will be welcome for very long either - especially as a pretty big proportion of them aren't even Arabs, let alone Syrian. There is a lot to play out here and I'd hesitate to make any firm predictions but the game is far from over.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@colebehnke7767
Tell me you don't understand Fascism without telling me you don't understand Fascism.
I watched enough of the video to appreciate the fact that the creator is economically illiterate, historically ignorant and ideologically twisted. The bit about the corporations and the banks being public institutions is just pure gibberish. The Right have problems with Fascism. Capitalism is supposed to bring personal liberty, freedom and peace but here you have a version of it directing the minutiae of people's lives, locking them up and murdering them and treating war as virtuous with the idea that each generation should have at least one war to make it manly and heroic.
The problem with his hypothesis about Nazism is that the capitalists and bankers completely bought into it: Not only did it neuter trades unionism and prevent the workers from electing a socialist government, but it also made them more cash than they'd ever make in the liberal environment that capitalists claim to favour. That's why it has repeatedly flared up at intervals since then. There are obvious examples like the parade of US-backed military juntas in South and Central America, the Far East, and Africa from the 1950s through to the 1980s, but you're actually seeing it rise again through the MAGA movement in the US - the last of these being 100% funded, supported and, to a large extent, directed by capitalists.
Basically, Fascism is what classic liberalism does when it's threatened by genuinely progressive movements. The problem is that the German, Japanese and Italian versions in the post First World War period really got bad press. That's why nonsense like this video has to be concocted to disassociate present-day Fascism from them. Even so, we are seeing some rehabilitation of them with people like Steve Bannon and even Trump himself speaking about Hitler and Mussolini positively.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Spot on. New systems and technology could have been used to allow what were then the Inland Revenue, HM Customs, the Dept of Health and Social Security and Dept of Employment to work more effectively - In other words, they could have facilitated able and motivated people to improve the job they were already doing well. They could have improved outcomes. Instead, the systems were deployed in such a way as to achieve the same outcomes but with less people. What's more they also removed much of the skill and motivation. When I joined the Inland Revenue in 1975, it took 12 months to train a Tax Officer. At the end of the training he or she could be deployed without supervision in several different kinds of tax and understood the interaction between all of them. What's more, as you say, they knew their local area, they knew who needed help and they knew the dodgy traders, employers and accountants. It wasn't the best job in the world but I and most of my colleagues took some pride in doing it well. The Tax Officer's modern-day equivalent is trained in a matter of days, works from a script and has little or no idea what the on-screen selections they make mean. More to your point, they don't have a hope in Hades of spotting the organised fraudsters that have evolved to boiler-room scale as a result.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
The real test is endurance. It's 54 years since the Beatles broke up and not only are their songs still played on the radio and their CDs and vinyl still sold, Lennon and McCartney's writing style is still studied by budding songwriters and the changes they made to contemporary music still endure. In 50 years time, the response to someone mentioning Taylor Swift (or Miley Cyrus, or Beyonce or Rihana etc etc) will be "Who?". Meanwhile, the Beatles (and Simon and Garfunkel, Queen, The Who, The Stones, Hendrix, Clapton, JJ Cale etc ) will still be played and still be influencing real musicians and writers long after they are all dead.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
It's just harking back to the gibberish talked by F A Harper - an "economist" much loved by Charles Koch. His line was that things like social security, municipal housing, socialised healthcare, state provided education etc all distorted wages which, if determined by market forces, would settle at the level which would be best for both business and all the individuals concerned, with each then able to make their own choices about how they spent those wages. Utter bollocks, of course.
The magic detail about this branch of "economics" is that it never needs to provide empirical evidence to back it up. Because the policy proposals it results in benefit the ultra rich, there is never any shortage of donations to fund the "educational" institutions which teach it. Were it not for that magic detail, Harper, along with Hayek, Friedman, Von Mises, Laffer etc would never have even made a living, let alone influenced government policy for five decades and creepy little know-nothing rich kids like Shapiro would have to work in a proper job like the rest of us.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Sadly, Richard, Labour's story was always something of a sham. It was always nominally about fighting for workers' rights, abolishing poverty, promoting democracy and opposing colonial oppression. In power, it did do some of those things early in its history: The NHS is obviously its crowing glory but also progressive taxation, improvements in housing, education etc. Even then, many of those things were diluted by people within its ranks who didn't really believe in them. Increasingly, those right wingers have come to rule supreme and have purged from Labour's ranks many of those who did believe in that story. If it has a story at all now, it is to be a vehicle for influence peddling and career progression and everything it once (at least nominally) stood for is what it now stands against
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Yeah! Cos, after privatising everything in sight, the UK is doing SO much better than France, Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark, Norway etc where they didn't. No?
The Channel Tunnel came in at twice its original cost, by the way. In Edinburgh, the private sector built a tram system which cost twice the original estimate for half the project and it was delivered two years late. You're the one living in a fantasy world, chum. PFI is just a way of cooking the books to look as if we're not spending money when we are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
These are almost unknown waters. There is the experience of Pinochet's Chile, which still hasn't recovered nearly 20 years after his death. And we can all see the horror unfolding in Argentina. But this is going to be on a scale, to use Trump's favourite phrase, "never seen before". In a couple of years time, when someone creates one of those word clouds about the US, the standout words will be poverty, oppression, despair, guns, crime. Musk's economic idiocy is going to throw millions into unemployment, possibly tens of millions. A justice department staffed by his cronies is going to facilitate unprecedented white collar crime and general corruption and his goons are going to be breaking down the doors of anyone who stands up against it. And what if, as Richard suggests, he IS unable to get rid of the millions he considers to be undesirable? What then? A final solution?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@andrewhyde2560 "if someone should get paid more to work out of hours, why on earth would I come out of hours to your house for FREE??????"
No. You're talking about two completely different things. If you worked for someone else, they would be paying you. That's the law, it always has been and no one of any political party is proposing to change it. If you're working for yourself, it has nothing whatsoever to do with minimum wages. It's down to commercial practice. For example, if I want building work done, the builder wants the work so he'll come and give me an estimate - or he'll pay someone to do it and work the cost of that into his prices. If I call out a plumber, on the other hand, I'll usually have to pay a call-out fee. It's certainly nothing to do with minimum wage legislation.
I didn't say anything about your spelling, by the way. It's grammar that makes your comments unreadable. When we talk to each other, we use pauses and changes in tone to convey meaning. When we write, we have to use punctuation and capital letters to tell people when we're ending or starting a new sentence or phrase.
1
-
@andrewhyde2560 "Who are you or anybody to start reeling off ideas about increasing pay when I bet you employ not one single person."
I'm a citizen in a democracy, pal. I have the same right as you to "reel off ideas" as you. Employing people does not give you special rights - no matter how much better than other people you think you are.
"Quick question why would it be acceptable for a employer to have to pay someone, but not for you to have to pay someone who is self employed???"
Because I am not employing him. I am contracting him. And you answered your own question when you pointed out that he will factor that time into his overall estimate. He is, of course, free to charge for giving estimates. That's his business decision.
"British industry has been crushed and forced to move aboard due to a complete failure under the past labour government."
I think you'll find that British manufacturing collapsed under Thatcher because her policies favoured finance capitalism. In any case, the following Labour government was no less Tory than she was and pursued the same policies. Blair has fully admitted that.
A last thought for you. If minimum wages and unions are so damaging, why have countries like Sweden, The Netherlands and Germany, which have much stronger unions and higher minimum wages done so well, while the UK has declined? They also have much higher immigration, by the way.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1