Youtube comments of (@charliemoore2551).

  1. 726
  2. 527
  3. 451
  4. 308
  5. 297
  6. 297
  7. 275
  8. 236
  9. 223
  10. 169
  11. 147
  12. 135
  13. 131
  14. 126
  15. 124
  16. 109
  17. 103
  18. 103
  19. 97
  20. 96
  21. 96
  22. 83
  23. 82
  24. 82
  25. 79
  26. 78
  27. 75
  28. 74
  29. 72
  30. 71
  31. 70
  32. 69
  33. 68
  34. 67
  35. 64
  36. 62
  37. 61
  38. 60
  39. 60
  40. 59
  41. 58
  42. 58
  43. 56
  44. 51
  45. 51
  46. 49
  47. 49
  48. 49
  49. 48
  50. 47
  51. 45
  52. 45
  53. 45
  54. 43
  55. 42
  56. 42
  57. 40
  58. 40
  59. 38
  60. 37
  61. 37
  62. 35
  63. 34
  64. 34
  65. 34
  66. 31
  67. 31
  68. 30
  69. 30
  70. 30
  71. 30
  72. 28
  73. 28
  74. 28
  75. 28
  76. 27
  77. 27
  78. 27
  79. 27
  80. 26
  81. 25
  82. 25
  83. 24
  84. 24
  85. 24
  86. 24
  87. 23
  88. 23
  89. 23
  90. 23
  91. 22
  92. 22
  93. 22
  94. 22
  95. 22
  96. 22
  97. 22
  98. 21
  99. 21
  100. 21
  101. 21
  102. 20
  103. 20
  104. 20
  105. 20
  106. 20
  107. 19
  108. 19
  109. 19
  110. 19
  111. 18
  112. 18
  113. 18
  114. 18
  115. 18
  116. 18
  117. 18
  118. 18
  119. 17
  120. 17
  121. 17
  122. 17
  123. 16
  124. 16
  125. 16
  126. 16
  127. 16
  128. 16
  129. 15
  130. 15
  131. 15
  132. 14
  133. 14
  134. 14
  135. 14
  136. 14
  137. 14
  138. 14
  139. 14
  140. 13
  141. 13
  142. 13
  143. 13
  144. 13
  145. 13
  146. 13
  147. 12
  148. 12
  149. 12
  150. 12
  151. 12
  152. 12
  153. 12
  154. 12
  155. 12
  156. 11
  157. 11
  158. 11
  159. 11
  160. 11
  161. 11
  162. 11
  163. 11
  164. 11
  165. 11
  166. 11
  167. 11
  168. 10
  169. 10
  170. 10
  171. 10
  172. 10
  173. 10
  174. 10
  175. 10
  176. 10
  177. 10
  178. 10
  179. 9
  180. 9
  181. 9
  182. 9
  183. 9
  184. 9
  185. 9
  186. 9
  187. 9
  188. 9
  189. 9
  190. 9
  191. 9
  192. 9
  193. 9
  194. 9
  195. 9
  196. 9
  197. 9
  198. 9
  199. 9
  200. 9
  201. 9
  202. 9
  203. 9
  204. 8
  205. 8
  206. 8
  207. 8
  208. 8
  209. 8
  210. 8
  211. 8
  212. 8
  213. 8
  214. 8
  215. 8
  216. 8
  217. 8
  218. 8
  219. 8
  220. 8
  221. 7
  222. 7
  223. 7
  224. 7
  225. 7
  226. 7
  227. 7
  228. 7
  229. 7
  230. 7
  231. 7
  232. 7
  233. 7
  234. 7
  235. 7
  236. 7
  237. 7
  238. 7
  239. 7
  240. 7
  241. 7
  242. 7
  243. 6
  244. 6
  245. 6
  246. 6
  247. 6
  248. 6
  249. 6
  250. 6
  251. 6
  252. 6
  253. 6
  254. 6
  255. 6
  256. 6
  257. 6
  258. 6
  259. 6
  260. "Remarkably small quantities of physical armaments available to us in the UK". I think it's the nature of the armaments which is the problem. For example, a Trident submarine is no use whatsoever in the defence of the UK. It is a part of the US's war fighting capability. We seem to have a preponderance of capability for mounting anti-"insurgent" operations in places like Afghanistan or providing Israel with the aerial intelligence to bomb civilians in Gaza. But none of these things have anything to do with defending the islands on which we live - nor even of defending Europe as part of an alliance. What we are really paying for is to be part of a force which tries to control resources elsewhere as an illusory imperial policy which really amounts to being no more than a proxy for the US. And I can't help thinking that we're drawing the wrong lessons from what has been happening in Ukraine. Russia put all its resources into attempting to invade one of the poorest and most corrupt countries in Europe. It was mightily repulsed. It has managed to hold on to a chunk of territory on which it has some political support and which it can easily resupply because it adjacent to its border but by and large, its project to re-absorb Ukraine into a new Russian empire has failed and it's economy and politics have been severely damaged along the way. Even if had achieved military success, it might have got acquiescence in the East, but it would have needed to permanently station troops in Western Ukraine to hold off Banderite resistance. The notion that such a power could then go on to invade the rest of Europe is risible! But what it has made clear is that a strong and motivated conventional force can hold ground against an invader of vastly superior numbers and simply make invasion too costly in blood and treasure to contemplate. That is the direction in which any genuine defence policy should go.
    6
  261. 6
  262. 6
  263. Boris saying "Let's just fight" actually meant "You just fight": This is the US fighting Russia to the last Ukrainian. That seems to be coming horribly true. This morning I saw a video of a guy called Voha being bullied and taunted by his "comrades" in a Ukrainian trench. He was clearly mentally handicapped and not capable of fighting anyone but here he was, in a trench, drafted to fight in this senseless war. There was no gun available for him, apparently. He was told he should "gain" one in battle! In my view, Putin's invasion was actually the culmination of a successful US plan - a plan similar to the one which resulted in the Soviet Union invading Afghanistan decades earlier. What's more, a plan designed to bring NATO right up to Russia's border. I'm not making excuses for Putin. Military invasion is a war crime and Putin should appear at The Hague for it. Just as Dubyah and Blair should be brought to account for invading Iraq. But there should be no doubt that this affair did not start in February 2022. It didn't even start with the 2014 coup d'etat. US expansionism in Eastern Europe has been going on since 1945 when Ukrainian Fascists (the political forebears of those now in charge) were recruited to undermine the Soviet Union. So of course the US are intent on continuing the conflict. They're getting everything they want from it. As one disgusting US politician put it, "It's bleeding Russia and not costing a single US life". Ukrainian and Russian lives obviously mean nothing at all to them.
    6
  264. 6
  265. 6
  266. 6
  267. 6
  268. 6
  269. 6
  270. 6
  271. 6
  272. 6
  273. 5
  274. 5
  275. 5
  276. 5
  277. 5
  278. 5
  279. 5
  280. 5
  281. 5
  282. 5
  283. 5
  284. 5
  285. 5
  286. 5
  287. 5
  288. 5
  289. 5
  290. 5
  291. 5
  292. 5
  293. 5
  294. 5
  295. 5
  296. 5
  297. 5
  298. 5
  299. 5
  300. 5
  301. 5
  302. 5
  303. 5
  304. 5
  305. 5
  306. 5
  307. 5
  308. 5
  309. 5
  310. 5
  311. 5
  312. 5
  313. 5
  314. 5
  315. 5
  316. 5
  317. 5
  318. 5
  319. 5
  320. 5
  321. 5
  322. 5
  323. 5
  324. 5
  325. 4
  326. 4
  327. 4
  328. 4
  329. 4
  330. 4
  331. 4
  332. 4
  333. 4
  334. 4
  335. 4
  336. 4
  337. 4
  338. 4
  339. 4
  340. 4
  341. 4
  342. 4
  343. 4
  344. 4
  345. 4
  346. 4
  347. 4
  348. 4
  349. 4
  350. 4
  351. 4
  352. 4
  353. 4
  354. 4
  355. 4
  356. 4
  357. 4
  358. 4
  359. 4
  360. 4
  361. 4
  362. 4
  363. 4
  364. 4
  365. 4
  366. 4
  367. 4
  368. 4
  369. 4
  370. 4
  371. 4
  372. 4
  373. 4
  374. 4
  375. 4
  376. 4
  377. 4
  378. 4
  379. 4
  380. 4
  381. 4
  382. 4
  383. 4
  384. 4
  385. 4
  386. It's not the name of the party that matters. It's the people behind it; the ones providing the seed money and profiting from the outcome. The Tories were originally the party of the landed whom they defended against the growing power of the industrial bourgeoisie who were championed by the Liberals. In the period between the 1880s and 1920s they gradually took over that mantel of being the champions of the capitalist class which subsumed the landed class through marriage and other means. In effect, they BECAME the UK's liberal party, leaving the party of Lloyd George to fester as the party of the rump middle class while Labour squeezed them the left. The Tories still retained an element of the patrician "one nation" Conservatism of Peel and Disraeli but that was effectively neutered by Thatcher and finally purged out of existence by Johnson. In so doing, he made the party utterly unelectable as its underlying corruption (always there but hidden) and incompetence has become too obvious to hide. So, enter the new party of the capitalists: Starmer's Labour. To make it acceptable to its new donors it had to be purged of everything progressive. After being weakened by Blair, the left of the party has now been completely destroyed by Starmer and it has become the same racket as the one that Stanley Baldwin snatched off the Liberals in the inter-war years. A different name over the door but, for all intents and purposes, the same enterprise with the same business plan: rob and exploit the poor on behalf of the rich. Richard Murphy is right in one way. The Conservative Party is probably dead now. But only in name. Starmer's Labour is every bit as corrupt and rotten and will carry on the tradition for a while before it's either overthrown by democracy or replaced with another placeholder.
    4
  387. 4
  388. 4
  389. 4
  390. 4
  391. 4
  392. 4
  393. 4
  394. 3
  395. 3
  396. 3
  397. 3
  398. 3
  399. 3
  400. 3
  401. 3
  402. 3
  403. 3
  404. 3
  405. 3
  406. 3
  407. 3
  408. 3
  409. 3
  410. 3
  411. 3
  412. 3
  413. 3
  414. 3
  415. 3
  416. 3
  417. 3
  418. 3
  419. 3
  420. 3
  421. 3
  422. 3
  423. 3
  424. 3
  425. 3
  426. 3
  427. 3
  428. 3
  429. 3
  430. 3
  431. 3
  432. 3
  433. 3
  434. 3
  435. 3
  436. 3
  437. 3
  438. 3
  439. 3
  440. 3
  441. 3
  442. 3
  443. 3
  444. 3
  445. 3
  446. 3
  447. 3
  448. 3
  449. 3
  450. 3
  451. 3
  452. 3
  453. 3
  454. 3
  455. 3
  456. 3
  457. 3
  458. 3
  459. 3
  460. 3
  461. 3
  462. 3
  463. I would never downplay Antisemitism. It is a vile throwback to (mostly) Christian animosity towards Jews as the murderers of Christ (it was actually the Romans) and as moneylenders and usurers (at times when they were actually forbidden to do anything else). Essentially, they have often been the fall guys for ruling classes who needed a scapegoat to escape blame for their own misdoings. We should defend Jews against antisemitic attacks both because it is morally right to do so and because it is in our own interests to look after a community which has historically contributed positively to society. But what has been happening over the last decade or so in the UK is quite simply a witch hunt. Time and time again we got commentators (including Peston) pointing out the number of people complaining about the alleged antisemitism of the left in general and Corbyn and his supporters in particular and exclaiming that there must therefore be a case to to answer. That, of course, is EXACTLY how a medieval witch hunt worked: The number of accusers was evidence in itself. Peston is no fool and must have realised that at the time. But he persisted anyway. He went along with it because it served his career well. I suspect that he is now changing his tune because he has seen the writing on the wall. The great corporate lie machine is failing to sanitise and justify the genocide occurring in the Levant and the tide of public opinion is turning. He simply wants to be on the side of prevailing opinion. Well, Hell mend him. You're quite right to call him out for his hypocrisy, Damien.
    3
  464. 3
  465. 3
  466. 3
  467. 3
  468. 3
  469. 3
  470. 3
  471. These re-alignments happen periodically and they are related to changes in the economy. The Tories were originally the party of the landed gentry. The Whigs were the party of the emerging bourgeoisie and, as they became the Liberals, more so. If you look at legislation in the latter part of the 19th century, it was the Liberals who were most set on crushing the working class and the Tories who, in a patrician manner, were most likely to look out for their interests. We often forget that reforms like Public Libraries, swimming pools , municipal housing etc came under great Tory reformers like the the Chamberlains. The biggest turmoil came in the inter-war years when the Tories, under people like Baldwin effectively moved in on the territory of the Liberals and became the party of the bourgeoisie. As Lord Thorneycroft (remember him?) put it, the Tories were now the real Liberals and I think it's true to say that Thatcher was far more in the tradition of Gladstone than that of Disraeli. The Liberals, as we all know, were then squeezed by the emerging Labour Party on their left and very nearly ceased to exist. In my view, we've entered a similar period of upheaval now. The Tories have been captured by the swivel eyed loons of Tufton Street, the Labour Party have lurched so far to the right that many Tories feel quite at home there and we also have Farage as the Joker in the pack and a substantial number of people on the Left who are now politically homeless. I don't think Farage is serious about taking over the Tories - except maybe as a little ego trip. He's essentially an itinerant con-man on the look out for the next grift. Interesting times!
    3
  472. 3
  473. 3
  474. 3
  475. 3
  476. 3
  477. 3
  478. 3
  479. 3
  480. 3
  481. 3
  482. 3
  483. 3
  484. 3
  485. 3
  486. 3
  487. 3
  488. 3
  489. 3
  490. 3
  491. 3
  492. 3
  493. 3
  494. 3
  495. 3
  496. 3
  497. 3
  498. 3
  499. 3
  500. 3
  501. 3
  502. 3
  503. 3
  504. 3
  505. 3
  506. 3
  507. 3
  508. 3
  509. 3
  510. 3
  511. 3
  512. 3
  513. 3
  514. 3
  515. 3
  516. 3
  517. 3
  518. 3
  519. 3
  520. 3
  521. 3
  522. 3
  523. 3
  524. 3
  525. 3
  526. 2
  527. 2
  528. 2
  529. 2
  530. 2
  531. 2
  532. 2
  533. 2
  534. 2
  535. 2
  536. 2
  537. 2
  538. 2
  539. 2
  540. 2
  541. 2
  542. 2
  543. 2
  544. 2
  545. 2
  546. 2
  547. 2
  548. 2
  549. 2
  550. 2
  551. 2
  552. 2
  553. 2
  554. 2
  555. 2
  556. 2
  557. 2
  558. 2
  559. 2
  560. 2
  561. 2
  562. 2
  563. 2
  564. 2
  565. 2
  566. 2
  567. 2
  568. 2
  569. 2
  570. 2
  571. 2
  572. 2
  573. 2
  574. 2
  575. 2
  576. 2
  577. 2
  578. 2
  579. 2
  580. 2
  581. 2
  582. 2
  583. 2
  584. 2
  585. 2
  586. 2
  587. 2
  588. 2
  589. 2
  590. 2
  591. 2
  592. 2
  593. 2
  594. 2
  595. 2
  596. 2
  597. 2
  598. 2
  599. 2
  600. 2
  601. 2
  602. 2
  603. 2
  604. 2
  605. 2
  606. 2
  607. 2
  608. 2
  609. 2
  610. 2
  611. 2
  612. 2
  613. 2
  614. 2
  615. 2
  616. 2
  617. 2
  618. 2
  619. 2
  620. 2
  621. 2
  622. 2
  623. 2
  624. 2
  625. 2
  626. 2
  627. 2
  628. 2
  629. 2
  630. 2
  631. 2
  632. 2
  633. 2
  634. 2
  635. 2
  636. 2
  637. 2
  638. 2
  639. 2
  640. 2
  641. 2
  642. 2
  643. 2
  644. 2
  645. 2
  646. 2
  647. 2
  648. 2
  649. 2
  650. 2
  651. 2
  652. 2
  653. 2
  654. 2
  655. 2
  656. 2
  657. 2
  658. 2
  659. 2
  660. 2
  661. 2
  662. 2
  663. 2
  664. 2
  665. 2
  666. 2
  667. 2
  668. 2
  669. 2
  670. 2
  671. 2
  672. 2
  673. 2
  674. 2
  675. 2
  676. 2
  677. 2
  678. 2
  679. 2
  680. 2
  681. 2
  682. 2
  683. 2
  684. 2
  685. 2
  686. 2
  687. 2
  688. 2
  689. 2
  690. 2
  691. 2
  692. 2
  693. 2
  694. 2
  695. 2
  696. 2
  697. 2
  698. 2
  699. 2
  700. 2
  701. 2
  702. 2
  703. 2
  704. 2
  705. 2
  706. 2
  707. 2
  708. 2
  709. 2
  710. 2
  711. 2
  712. 2
  713. 2
  714. 2
  715. 2
  716. 2
  717. 2
  718. 2
  719. 2
  720. 2
  721. 2
  722. 2
  723. 2
  724. 2
  725. 2
  726. 2
  727. 2
  728. 2
  729. 2
  730. 2
  731. 2
  732. 2
  733. 2
  734. Floating a theory is not the same as "suggesting" it. I think a more likely scenario is that Netanyahu knew it was coming but did nothing because it would give him an excuse for the genocidal attack now underway and clearly already planned in advance. Of all people the one who made me pause for thought was Charlie Kirk (yes, I nearly threw up at the time but even a broken clock is right twice a day). He pointed out that he had actually recently visited that stretch of the fence and that you couldn't walk a hundred metres without being challenged by heavilly armed IDF. Yet on the day, they appear to have been caught napping. Waters is right to be suspicious, even if he has maybe gone slightly along the wrong track A much clearer conspiracy is that of obscuring the actual details of the attacks. We got a whole slew of reports of gang rapes, beheaded babies, torture etc. There was literally zero evidence for such events but the sheer quantity of second and third hand "eyewitness" evidence ("I spoke to someone who had been told by someone else who was told by...." etc) was enough to make news and discussion outlets (even Damage Report and Young Turks) respond to them as if they were true. But if they were, then Israel would have had the whole site swarming with UN war crimes inspectors by now. Instead they have buried the "evidence" as quickly as possible. The released (yes, not rescued) hostages have given the lie to this too. They report being treated decently by their captors and one witness has told us that IDF tanks deliberately fired ordnance into several houses where they they knew hostages were. (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HugMS0k0kB4 ) Carefully orchestrated "rumours" of beheadings and mutilation give a handy cover to explain the mangled, limbless and headless corpses which would result from close range use of artillery shells. It needs to be noted that the above interview has been censored in Israel. It's likely (not certain) that Waters is wrong about a false flag attack. But it is good that at least someone is listening to the narrative and spotting the holes in it.
    2
  735. 2
  736. 2
  737. 2
  738. 2
  739. 2
  740. 2
  741. 2
  742. 2
  743. 2
  744. 2
  745. 2
  746. 2
  747. 2
  748. 2
  749. 2
  750. 2
  751. 2
  752. 2
  753. 2
  754. 2
  755. 2
  756. 2
  757. 2
  758. 2
  759. 2
  760. 2
  761. 2
  762. 2
  763. 2
  764. 2
  765. 2
  766. 2
  767. 2
  768. 2
  769. 2
  770. 2
  771. 2
  772. 2
  773. 2
  774. 2
  775. 2
  776. 2
  777. 2
  778. 2
  779. 2
  780. 2
  781. 2
  782. 2
  783. 2
  784. 2
  785. 2
  786. 2
  787. 2
  788. 1
  789. 1
  790. 1
  791. 1
  792. 1
  793. 1
  794. 1
  795. 1
  796.  @colebehnke7767  Tell me you don't understand Fascism without telling me you don't understand Fascism. I watched enough of the video to appreciate the fact that the creator is economically illiterate, historically ignorant and ideologically twisted. The bit about the corporations and the banks being public institutions is just pure gibberish. The Right have problems with Fascism. Capitalism is supposed to bring personal liberty, freedom and peace but here you have a version of it directing the minutiae of people's lives, locking them up and murdering them and treating war as virtuous with the idea that each generation should have at least one war to make it manly and heroic. The problem with his hypothesis about Nazism is that the capitalists and bankers completely bought into it: Not only did it neuter trades unionism and prevent the workers from electing a socialist government, but it also made them more cash than they'd ever make in the liberal environment that capitalists claim to favour. That's why it has repeatedly flared up at intervals since then. There are obvious examples like the parade of US-backed military juntas in South and Central America, the Far East, and Africa from the 1950s through to the 1980s, but you're actually seeing it rise again through the MAGA movement in the US - the last of these being 100% funded, supported and, to a large extent, directed by capitalists. Basically, Fascism is what classic liberalism does when it's threatened by genuinely progressive movements. The problem is that the German, Japanese and Italian versions in the post First World War period really got bad press. That's why nonsense like this video has to be concocted to disassociate present-day Fascism from them. Even so, we are seeing some rehabilitation of them with people like Steve Bannon and even Trump himself speaking about Hitler and Mussolini positively.
    1
  797. 1
  798. 1
  799. 1
  800. 1
  801. 1
  802. 1
  803. 1
  804. 1
  805. 1
  806. 1
  807. 1
  808. 1
  809. 1
  810. 1
  811. 1
  812. 1
  813. 1
  814. 1
  815. 1
  816. 1
  817. 1
  818. 1
  819. 1
  820. 1
  821. 1
  822. 1
  823. 1
  824. 1
  825. 1
  826. 1
  827. 1
  828. 1
  829. 1
  830. 1
  831. 1
  832. 1
  833. 1
  834. 1
  835. 1
  836. 1
  837. 1
  838. 1
  839. 1
  840. 1
  841. 1
  842. 1
  843. 1
  844. 1
  845. 1
  846. 1
  847. 1
  848. 1
  849. 1
  850. 1
  851. 1
  852. 1
  853. 1
  854. 1
  855. 1
  856. 1
  857. 1
  858. 1
  859. 1
  860. 1
  861. 1
  862. 1
  863. 1
  864. 1
  865. 1
  866. 1
  867. 1
  868. 1
  869. 1
  870. 1
  871. 1
  872. 1
  873. 1
  874. 1
  875. 1
  876. 1
  877. 1
  878. 1
  879. 1
  880. 1
  881. 1
  882. 1
  883. 1
  884. 1
  885. 1
  886. 1
  887. 1
  888. 1
  889. 1
  890. 1
  891. 1
  892. 1
  893. 1
  894. 1
  895. 1
  896. 1
  897. 1
  898. 1
  899. 1
  900. 1
  901. 1
  902. 1
  903. 1
  904. 1
  905. 1
  906. 1
  907. 1
  908. 1
  909. 1
  910. 1
  911. 1
  912. 1
  913. 1
  914. 1
  915. 1
  916. 1
  917. 1
  918. 1
  919. 1
  920. 1
  921. 1
  922. 1
  923. 1
  924. 1
  925. 1
  926. 1
  927. 1
  928. 1
  929. 1
  930. 1
  931. 1
  932. 1
  933. 1
  934. 1
  935. 1
  936. 1
  937. 1
  938. 1
  939. 1
  940. 1
  941. 1
  942. 1
  943. 1
  944. 1
  945. 1
  946. 1
  947. 1
  948. 1
  949. 1
  950. 1
  951. 1
  952. 1
  953. 1
  954. 1
  955. 1
  956. 1
  957. 1
  958. 1
  959. 1
  960. 1
  961. 1
  962. 1
  963. 1
  964. 1
  965. 1
  966. 1
  967. 1
  968. 1
  969. 1
  970. 1
  971. 1
  972. 1
  973. 1
  974. 1
  975. 1
  976. 1
  977. 1
  978. 1
  979. 1
  980. 1
  981. 1
  982. 1
  983. 1
  984. 1
  985. 1
  986. 1
  987. 1
  988. 1
  989. 1
  990. 1
  991. 1
  992. 1
  993. 1
  994. 1
  995. 1
  996. 1
  997. 1
  998. 1
  999. 1
  1000. 1
  1001. 1
  1002. 1
  1003. 1
  1004. 1
  1005. 1
  1006. 1
  1007. 1
  1008. 1
  1009. 1
  1010. 1
  1011. 1
  1012. 1
  1013. 1
  1014. 1
  1015. 1
  1016. 1
  1017. 1
  1018. 1
  1019. 1
  1020. 1
  1021. 1
  1022. 1
  1023. 1
  1024. 1
  1025. 1
  1026. 1
  1027. 1
  1028. 1
  1029. 1
  1030. 1
  1031. 1
  1032. 1
  1033. 1
  1034. 1
  1035. 1
  1036. 1
  1037. 1
  1038. 1
  1039. 1
  1040. 1
  1041. 1
  1042. 1
  1043. 1
  1044. 1
  1045. 1
  1046. 1
  1047. 1
  1048. 1
  1049. 1
  1050. 1
  1051. 1
  1052. 1
  1053. 1
  1054. 1
  1055. 1
  1056. 1
  1057. 1
  1058. 1
  1059. 1
  1060. 1
  1061. 1
  1062. 1
  1063. 1
  1064. 1
  1065. 1
  1066. 1
  1067. 1
  1068. 1
  1069. 1
  1070. 1
  1071. 1
  1072. 1
  1073. 1
  1074. 1
  1075. 1
  1076. 1
  1077. 1
  1078. 1
  1079. 1
  1080. 1
  1081. 1
  1082. 1
  1083. 1
  1084. 1
  1085. 1
  1086. 1
  1087. 1
  1088. 1
  1089. 1
  1090. 1
  1091. 1
  1092. 1
  1093. 1
  1094. 1
  1095. 1
  1096. 1
  1097. 1
  1098. 1
  1099. 1
  1100. 1
  1101. 1
  1102. 1
  1103. 1
  1104. 1
  1105. 1
  1106. 1
  1107. 1
  1108. 1
  1109. 1
  1110. 1
  1111. 1
  1112. 1
  1113. 1
  1114. 1
  1115. 1
  1116. 1
  1117. 1
  1118. 1
  1119. 1
  1120. 1
  1121. 1
  1122. 1
  1123. 1
  1124. 1
  1125. 1
  1126. 1
  1127. 1
  1128. 1
  1129. 1
  1130. 1
  1131. 1
  1132. 1
  1133. 1
  1134. 1
  1135. 1
  1136. 1
  1137. 1
  1138. 1
  1139. 1
  1140. 1
  1141. 1
  1142. 1
  1143. 1
  1144. 1
  1145. 1
  1146. 1
  1147. I'm 68 years old. In my life I have become aware of the dreadful things done to Jews (and others) by the Nazis. I've also learned about the terrible crimes committed against Jews by the Crusaders, the Inquisition, the English monarchy in the 12th century and in Europe during their wars to claim the French throne. The various pogroms by Russian Tsars are well documented as are the massacres by the "Whites" during the Russian Civil War. There is undoubtedly a long history of persecution of Jews which none of us should forget - especially those who profess the Christian faith. And we should all do everything we possibly can to prevent such persecution from occurring again. But we make a massive mistake in thinking that supporting the palpably evil Zionist state is any part of achieving that aim. It was created by dispossessing and displacing the people who lived there. It was born in the horrific orgy of bloodletting and rape which Palestinians know as the Nakba. It has continued to perpetrate horrific atrocities against the native population and is now stepping up those atrocities with a "final solution" in mind. The perpetrators play mind games with us, evoking the memory of all those tortured and killed historically by Christians so that, in our collective guilt, we look the other way while they visit similar atrocities on others. We have to resist this. The crimes against humanity they are committing have nothing whatsoever to do with the similar crimes historically committed against European Jews. Far from it. Zionists are continuing the very same process: That of the powerful oppressing and displacing the weak. They are dishonouring the victims of the Holocaust and Christian persecution. Thank goodness the UN is beginning to call time on this evil racist colonial project - through the ICJ, the ICC and this calling out of the IDF. But we need to press this home. It's not enough to simply make the Israeli state obey some international laws here and there. It is time for Zionism to end and for a full multicultural democracy to be created in its place.
    1
  1148. 1
  1149. 1
  1150. 1
  1151. 1
  1152. 1
  1153. 1
  1154. 1
  1155. 1
  1156. 1
  1157. 1
  1158. 1
  1159. 1
  1160. 1
  1161. 1
  1162. 1
  1163. 1
  1164. 1
  1165. 1
  1166. 1
  1167. 1
  1168. 1
  1169. 1
  1170. 1
  1171. 1
  1172. 1
  1173. 1
  1174. 1
  1175. 1
  1176. 1
  1177. 1
  1178. 1
  1179. 1
  1180. 1
  1181. 1
  1182. 1
  1183. 1
  1184. 1
  1185. 1
  1186. 1
  1187. 1
  1188. 1
  1189. 1
  1190. 1
  1191. 1
  1192. 1
  1193. 1
  1194. 1
  1195. 1
  1196. 1
  1197. 1
  1198. 1
  1199. 1
  1200. 1
  1201. 1
  1202. 1
  1203. 1
  1204. 1
  1205. 1
  1206. 1
  1207. 1
  1208. 1
  1209. 1
  1210. 1
  1211. 1
  1212. 1
  1213. 1
  1214. 1
  1215. 1
  1216. 1
  1217. 1
  1218. 1
  1219. 1
  1220. 1
  1221. 1
  1222. 1
  1223. 1
  1224. 1
  1225. 1
  1226. 1
  1227. 1
  1228. 1
  1229. 1
  1230. 1
  1231. 1
  1232. 1
  1233. 1
  1234. 1
  1235. 1
  1236. 1
  1237. 1
  1238. 1
  1239. 1
  1240. 1
  1241. 1
  1242. 1
  1243. 1
  1244. 1
  1245. 1
  1246. 1
  1247. 1
  1248. 1
  1249. 1
  1250. 1
  1251. 1
  1252. 1
  1253. 1
  1254. 1
  1255. 1
  1256. 1
  1257. 1
  1258. 1
  1259. 1
  1260. 1
  1261. 1
  1262. 1
  1263. 1
  1264. 1
  1265. 1
  1266. 1
  1267. 1
  1268. 1
  1269. 1
  1270. 1
  1271. 1
  1272. 1
  1273. 1
  1274. 1
  1275. 1
  1276. 1
  1277. 1
  1278. 1
  1279. 1
  1280. 1
  1281. 1
  1282. 1
  1283. 1
  1284. 1
  1285. 1
  1286. 1
  1287. 1
  1288. 1
  1289. 1
  1290. 1
  1291. 1
  1292. 1
  1293. 1
  1294. 1
  1295. 1
  1296. 1
  1297. 1
  1298. 1
  1299. 1
  1300. 1
  1301. 1
  1302. 1
  1303. 1
  1304. 1
  1305. 1
  1306. 1
  1307. 1
  1308. 1
  1309. 1
  1310. 1
  1311. 1
  1312. 1
  1313. 1
  1314. 1
  1315. 1
  1316. 1
  1317. 1
  1318. 1
  1319. 1
  1320. 1
  1321. 1
  1322. 1
  1323. 1
  1324. 1
  1325. 1
  1326. 1
  1327. 1
  1328. 1
  1329. 1
  1330. 1
  1331. 1
  1332. 1
  1333. 1
  1334. 1
  1335. 1
  1336. 1
  1337. 1
  1338. 1
  1339. 1
  1340. 1
  1341. 1
  1342. 1
  1343. 1
  1344. 1
  1345. 1
  1346. 1
  1347. 1
  1348. 1
  1349. 1
  1350. 1
  1351. 1
  1352. 1
  1353. 1
  1354. 1
  1355. 1
  1356. 1
  1357. 1
  1358. 1
  1359. 1
  1360. 1
  1361. 1
  1362. 1
  1363. 1
  1364. 1
  1365. 1
  1366. 1
  1367. 1
  1368. 1
  1369. 1
  1370. 1
  1371. 1
  1372. 1
  1373. 1
  1374. 1
  1375. 1
  1376. 1
  1377. 1
  1378. 1
  1379. 1
  1380. 1
  1381. 1
  1382. 1
  1383. 1
  1384. 1
  1385. 1
  1386. 1
  1387. 1
  1388. 1
  1389. 1
  1390. 1
  1391. 1
  1392. 1
  1393. 1
  1394. 1
  1395. 1
  1396.  @richardhead3062  "Very few deaths were caused by friendly fire". Only if you believe the IDF's version. The Electronic Intifada created a timeline which shows that the Israeli version is laced with lies. At one point, they had to revise down the civilian death count because there were several hundred guerillas mixed in with the bodies. That could only be because they were killed at the same time and in the same way. We know from one eyewitness account that tanks were firing into buildings knowing that both civilians and guerillas were inside. The helicopter gunships (yes. They were there) were ordered to fire on all vehicles heading towards the border fence - knowing that many of the people in those cars would be hostages. And let's not forget the nonsense about mangled babies and systematic rapes - all debunked. There may well have been atrocities committed in the 7 October action but the claims made in the aftermath were mostly concocted with the clear intention of encouraging Israeli "soldiers" to commit atrocities in the ensuing invasion of Gaza. "The Islamic Fascist Fundamentalist H4M45 " A contradiction in terms. Fascism and Islamic Fundamentalism are two mutually exclusive ideologies. Neither of them are very nice but chaining them together in that way renders the sentence into nothing but mindless name-calling. "The issue is that their genocidal ideology does not want peace and they don't care how many of their "Own" people are killed. " Incredible projection. Zionism is a racist colonial ideology and is genocidal by definition. That's why the country that follows that ideology is currently being investigated for plausible genocide and has already been judged to be an apartheid state. And a country which is refusing to negotiate the return of hostages and which put the Hannibal Directive into operation just over 12 months ago is in no position to accuse others of not caring about the lives of their people.
    1
  1397. 1
  1398. 1
  1399. 1
  1400. 1
  1401. 1
  1402. 1
  1403. 1
  1404. 1
  1405. 1
  1406. 1
  1407. 1
  1408. 1
  1409. 1
  1410. 1
  1411. 1
  1412. 1
  1413. 1
  1414. 1
  1415. 1
  1416. 1
  1417. 1
  1418. 1
  1419. 1
  1420. 1
  1421. 1
  1422. 1
  1423. 1
  1424. 1
  1425. 1
  1426. 1
  1427. 1
  1428. 1
  1429. 1
  1430. 1
  1431. 1
  1432. 1
  1433. 1
  1434. 1
  1435.  @lordsoros627  Good grief! What a load of nonsense! Roosevelt was elected in 1933. Between then and 1939 he made very slow progress. But it was progress. That's why he got re-elected. It was the outbreak of the Second World War which really put it into effect. The need to build armaments created demand in its own right but the knock on effect was trade union empowerment and increased wages. The result was the biggest rise in living standards in history which extended well into the 1970s. It was a demand led capitalist boom. Nothing to do with socialism. No. Britain France and Spain did not have equivalents of the New Deal. The Right was in power in all those countries (especially Fascist Spain) until the outbreak of war. Following the war, Britain had a Labour Government, the French had a Gaullist (right wing) government but they both followed similar policies. Do you know why? Because they worked! Again, it was a demand led CAPITALIST boom. Fascist Spain followed a different path and remained one of the poorest countries in Europe until Franco died and it was able to become a democracy and join the EU. There are no "10 planks of the Communist Manifesto" though you will find them mentioned all over the internet. It's put there by people who know that their cuckolds are too stupid and brainwashed to go look for themselves. The HRE was a medieval institution which effectively disappeared as nation states came into being. Its last traces were effectively wiped out when the Austria-Hungary collapsed at the end of the Second World War - Though Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany also claimed to be its successor. Much good it did him! No-one even noticed when he died. The Nazis claimed their state was its third incarnation (ie The Third Reich) but again, a few years and they were gone. It no longer has any meaning whatsoever, no matter what your conspiracy theorising masters tell you.
    1
  1436. 1
  1437. 1
  1438. 1
  1439. 1
  1440. 1
  1441. 1
  1442. 1
  1443. 1
  1444. 1
  1445. 1
  1446. 1
  1447. 1
  1448. 1
  1449. 1
  1450. 1
  1451. 1
  1452. 1
  1453. 1
  1454. 1
  1455. 1
  1456. 1
  1457. 1
  1458. 1
  1459. 1
  1460. 1
  1461. 1
  1462. 1
  1463. 1
  1464. 1
  1465. 1
  1466. 1
  1467. 1
  1468. 1
  1469. 1
  1470. 1
  1471. 1
  1472. 1
  1473. 1
  1474. 1
  1475. 1
  1476. 1
  1477. 1
  1478. 1
  1479. 1
  1480. 1
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510.  @videojgl  Dhimmi was a tax paid to avoid military service. Jews were free not to pay it and be conscripted. Many did that. And yes, they were often refugees from Christian countries where they were mortally persecuted. Thesalonika had a massive Jewish population composed almost entirely of Jews who had escaped the inquisition in the Hapsburg empire. The Ottomans made them welcome because they had useful skills and were generally good for the economy. Equally many of the Jews of North Africa came from persecutions in Spain and France. There were native Jews who were the descendants of those who had been converted over the years too. Jews and Christians in Muslim countries tended to be the better educated and occupied respected professions. This continued right into the twentieth century. And even beyond the so-called "Arab Nakba" there were significant Jewish populations in Iran and most North African countries. And yes, when there were hard times, both Christians and Jews were scapegoated to take the heat of the rulers. But these were nothing compared to the pogroms of the Christians. Your prejudice clouds you to the obvious historical fact that it was in Christian countries that Jews were primarily persecuted. England expelled its Jews after murderous pogroms in the 12th century. France had a wave of pogroms in the 14th century when Jews were blamed for the Black Death. Perhaps you've never heard of The Inquisition in Spain, the Low Countries and Central Europe? The Russians held periodic pogroms, culminating in the 19th and early 20th century when much of its Jewish population was expelled into Eastern Europe. And of course, the ultimate Christian pogrom was the Holocaust when between 5 and 8 million Jews were massacred in Christian countries - often with the open co-operation of priests and local Christian populations. Look up Babi Yar, for example. I'm an atheist. But it's clear to me that all religions (including Judaism) have pretty nasty skeletons in their closets. But Muslims are no more guilty of oppressing others than anyone else is. Certainly not more so than Christians.
    1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. 1
  1541. 1
  1542. 1
  1543. 1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. For at least 50 years, Israel has been in a position where it could have negotiated a peace settlement with both the Palestinians and its neighbours from a position of strength. It's always been clear that the Palestinians have been willing to negotiate and all Israel had to do was accept the same sort of co-existence that all sovereign nations have between each other. But that wasn't good enough. It's become clear that they not only want Gaza and the West Bank, they want to keep a sizable chunk of Syria, of Lebanon and possibly Jordan and even Iraq. Plenty of the maps of "Eretz Israel" circulated amongst Zionist fanatics (some of which are in Netanyahus's coalition) are available on the internet. But now it has crossed a line. It's behaviour even before the current onslaught on Gaza has led to it being investigated for plausible genocide by the international courts. It is losing support in both Europe and the US where loyalty to it was once unassailable. The weak and corrupt dictatorships that it so easily vanquished in 1966 are now strong regional players which have both military might, economic strength and diplomatic clout to be reckoned with. Its allies in the region like Sisi and the vile Mohamed Bin Salman are begging the US to reign it in as their own populations' anger about their complicity in Israel's crimes approaches boiling point. Israel's ship has sailed. The one-state solution - a democracy with the safety and integrity of all guaranteed by all states with a stake in the region - is now inevitable.
    1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. 1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1