Comments by "리주민" (@user-nf9xc7ww7m) on "Iran: Parliament members chant 'death to America' | USA TODAY" video.

  1. Boss: "Ahmed, you weren't enthusiastic enough at our last session. You come off as a more "Bedbugs to America. And I'm gonna need you to come in on Saturday..."
    19
  2. It needs more cowbell
    10
  3. You shall know the memes, and the memes shall set you free. Can I get a "meme wa akbar?" 🥴
    8
  4. All joking aside, by labeling him a terrorist, they can label our generals and troops as terrorists too. Any semblance of law of war goes out the window. And allies dry up without international recognition.
    6
  5. What is a boi? Do you mean buoy? Boy? Or something else?
    3
  6.  @skrillaforilla9665  well in all fairness, the US would shoot down an Iranian drone if it got too close to facilities or ships.
    2
  7. Probably split, like us. Some asking why there troops were overseas and conducting strikes, others praising their leaders for doing something and ragging on opposition calling them names. Most would show support for their fallen general, though, and hold up "support our troops" signs. We're all people.
    2
  8. Yeah they were still kinda pizzed off about the CIA coup that installed the Shah as absolute ruler back in 1953. Sure US would overthrow a coup-imposed president if the roles were reversed. Hopefully, a non-theocratic one, but the Christian right may have more lobbying strength against the secularists than back in the 1780s.
    1
  9. I thought so, but the evidence they had stated never surfaced as they said it would. What was shown looked to be edited some professional said.
    1
  10.  @skrillaforilla9665  guess I'm old fashioned. I like congress to declare war. You know, that pesky constitution that neither party adheres to when they have a president in office. AUMF doesn't work on sovereign nations.
    1
  11.  @skrillaforilla9665  did you miss the next to last sentence I wrote? I blamed both parties. 😁🍻
    1
  12. Could be groovy with Evanescence's touch.
    1
  13. Our Saudi masters wouldn't allow the bacon part. 🍔😋
    1
  14. And the United Arab Emirates sees the free Tibet sign and says "I'll take it."
    1
  15. Well "war is over" ain't happening. "War, what is it good for" is already taken (although I'd edit to include gaining natural resources, weapons selling, leveraging, etc as opposed to absolutely nothing otherwise we'd be out of the war profiting business). How about "this is the war that never ends"? "Congress, don't let your president just send troops without voting" (in style of Waylon Jennings) "Iran...Iran so far away. Couldn't get away" (in style of flock of seagulls)
    1
  16.  t1tacal  because we don't have to sacrifice one. We can do a drone strike. How is that any different? It's like allowing America to define torture so they can torture...excuse me, enhance interrogate.
    1
  17.  @thedeadone9174  Please. We want to better our govt. When antiwar people are in power, we shouldn't say to the pro-war crowd "if they don't like [not drone striking others, being peaceful with one another], they can just leave" like you in the pro-war crowd is doing to the anti-war group. Democracy is about different opinions.
    1
  18.  Dick Biggles  Saudis do too...and they behead people. But can't say anything bad about US "ally"
    1
  19. I started last night too. Trying to finish up last quart of eggnog. Guess eggnog and grapefruit don't mix. 🍺+🍊=💩
    1