Comments by "Mar" (@swunt10) on "The REAL Reason why Hitler HAD to start WW2" video.

  1. not sure hitler started a world war. he and the soviet union started a war with poland to get germany and russia back to pre versailles treaty borders. that's not a world war. only when france and the british empire declared war on germany did it become a world war.
    2
  2.  Frank C. Miller  what you said makes no sense.
    2
  3.  Frank C. Miller  when germany and the soviet union attacked poland. poland only existed as a nation for 2 decades. also I didn't see the UK and france declare war on the soviet union. they only declared war on germany. funny right? almost as if they really wanted war with germany and didn't actually care about poland. also stop that bullshit of 'conquer the world', 'starve and kill entire populations'. do you morion even know what time we are talking about? did 1945 somehow happen before 1940 in your mind? I'm talking about 1939 when germany and the soviet union attacked poland to get back to their pre versailles treaty borders. people say that's the start of ww2 therefore hitler started ww2. but it's a simple fact of reasoning that a border conflict in eastern europe is in fact not a world war. it only turned into a world war when france and the UK decided they wanted war with germany and declared it. then it became a world war. strangely enough neither france nor the UK had the balls to declare war against the soviet union for attacking poland. why is that? if the reason for declaring war against germany was that poland needed to be protected then why did nobody declare war on the soviets? because it's bullshit. just like the UK declaring war against germany in ww1 was not because germany used some belgian roads to get to france. nobody in the UK gives two shits about belgium being used as a short cut and nobody in the UK gave a shit about poland (as demonstrated when the soviets occupied poland during the cold war and nobody cared).
    1
  4. the nazi party did not seize the factories and businesses. maybe you should look that up first. nationalization of businesses in some rare cases is not an argument since even democratic modern nations do this. even the US nationalizes business if that is in the interest of the state, or the other way around if the business doesn't act in the national interest. case in point is the nationalization of banks during the banking crisis. privately owned businesses wanted to e.g. sell, them selling their toxic credits would have collapsed economic growth, the state didn't want that, so the banks were nationalized. does that make the US any less democratic or more nazi? no. also the state nationalizes private property all the time. everytime a new street is build or a big corporation wants to expand a factory and the owners of the land don't want to sell the state nationalizes their property. it's legal if it's done properly. does that make modern democratic nation more nazi? no. so don't use that flawed argument.
    1
  5.  @TheImperatorKnight  yes read the communist that had an agenda. great idea. why not read a nazi book about the soviet union as well. or read what a turkey writes about christmas.
    1
  6.  @thearisen7301  did you miss the part where I explained that even democratic nations do this every once in a while? especially when it's about military interests. but it's not a rule and it doesn't mean that the nazis 'seized all factories' as he said in the video. almost all business in nazi germany where privately owned. unlike in e.g. east germany (1959-1989) where almost no business was privately owned. big difference.
    1