Youtube comments of Mar (@swunt10).
-
493
-
455
-
295
-
238
-
169
-
164
-
156
-
117
-
103
-
96
-
92
-
85
-
83
-
77
-
73
-
71
-
67
-
65
-
63
-
62
-
60
-
59
-
59
-
55
-
54
-
50
-
48
-
48
-
48
-
46
-
46
-
46
-
45
-
45
-
44
-
43
-
42
-
42
-
40
-
39
-
38
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
37
-
36
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
32
-
30
-
29
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
28
-
26
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
25
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Moderne Konstruktionen sind so aufwendig und voll mit dutzenden verschiedener Industriematerialien. Wir haben uns echt von der Industrie und deren Regulierungen einlullen lassen. Einfachere, traditionelle Konstruktionen sind besser, sehen schöner aus, sind reparierbar und günstiger. Ich will das hier nicht schlecht reden, das ist im modernen Sinn handwerklich gut gemacht, aber einfach übertrieben. Da lobe ich mir Altbauten (min. 100-150 Jahre und älter) wie alte Fachwerkhäuser. Sehr viel einfacher konstruiert und so schön und gemütlich. Anstatt Membrane, Folien, Dämmplatten, Bleche und alles in dutzenden Schichten übereinander, hat man früher einfach solide Wände aus Stein oder Fachwerk gebaut und, was heute oft vergessen wird, innen dann mit Holz die Wände verkleidet (Täfelung) was die Dämmung und Wohnlichkeit erzeugt. Dann ein Holzofen ins Haus und fertig. Daran verdient natürlich die Industrie nichts und deswegen ist has heute nicht mehr erlaubt.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
@gazpachopolice7211 I always had a different take on who started a world war. To me the logical start of a world war is the moment, the decision, that turned a "normal" conflict in a world war.
WW1 was therefore started by germany or russia because their actions turned a local conflict into a world war
WW2 was started by france/UK because their actions turned a local conflict into a world war.
Before these actions there was no world war, just some local war or conflict that would have ended in no time, but after these actions (declarations of war really) a world war existed.
I never liked the idea of declaring a country the starter of a world war based on them being the first in a more or less causal chain of events that turned into world wars eventually.
Because technically when germany invaded poland in 1939 (as did the soviet union, people conveniently forget that all of the time) or if you prefer japan invaded china,
that didn't start a world war, just a local regular sized war. Only when other countries joined these wars, did that then create a world war.
It's a bit like the US invasion of Iraq, just a regular war, but what if china would have decided to get involved by declaring war on the US, that would certainly then be a world war. But would we honestly say the US started that hypothetical world war just because they started the first local war? No. We would say china started ww3 because they got involved and their involvement turned it into a world war. So why do we not say the same about ww1 and ww2? That would only be logical.
But I seem to be alone in thinking that way.
6
-
Perverse Männer in Frauenkostüm die unbedingt kleinen Kindern nahe kommen wollen ist nicht sexuell? Warum müssen die sich dann in sexualisierten Kostümen vor Kinder stellen? Warum lesen überhaupt irgendwelche Spinner Kindern vor? Und dann noch geisteskranke Perverse... Klar ist das sexuell, liegt in der Natur der Sache, drum wollen die das ja unbedingt, sonnst könnte ja auch die Lehrerin vorlesen.
In den USA, wo das ja mal wieder her kommt, sind diese drag Story times mittlerweile schon striptease und Stangentanz bei dem die Kinder auch mitmachen. Die linksgrün verblödeten Eltern (vegane alleinerziehende Frauen wenn man sich das Publikum anschaut) schleppen dort bewusst ihre Kinder hin um sie Queer zu erziehen, möglichsts gleich mit Hormonblockkern (also chemischer Kastration) um aus meist Jungen, Mädchen zu machen. Münchhausen Syndrom by proxy eben.
Ist alles schon so Realität in den USA und kommt jetzt natürlich auch hier her. Alles Teil des Kulturkampfs gegen weiße Länder.
Das Endstadium einer Zivilisation eben, Massenmigration von Barbaren, Zersetzung der Moral durch Kulturkampf, wie bei jeder Ideologie Indoktrinierung von Kindern und wirtschaflticher/finanzieller Verfall.
So geht es zu Ende mit Westlichen Staaten. Schade drum, aber bis auf Osteuropa wird es keine weißen Länder mehr geben. Alles nur noch 3. Welt.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Stop the boats and you stop the killing. Leftist are to blame for this just like they are to blame for the outrageous migrant crime and Islamisation in the UK.
You don't invite these people, you send them back immediately and this all stops within no time.
If you let them in illegally and give them free money for live, then more will come. Crime increases and boat drowning increases.
Leftists are murderers.
Strong border defenses, no free money for illegals and a fast acting remigration policy is the only thing that can stop the 3rd world colonization of our European countries.
We are the natives here, it's out land and we don't need these people coming here colonizing us. They are a burden on our society and dangerous, cause a housing crisis and outbreed us.
It's a genocide on us white people and it needs to stop before it's too late.
Fuck leftism and their hatred for their own kind and stop the illegal money coming out of countries like Russia, China and Israel that pays for most of this illegal migration of brown people into white countries.
They want our destruction, they want to see our geocide. It's on us to be stronger and resilient. Stop migration and you solve nearly all problems the west has today.
Migration only weakens us, from crime, low wages, billions on social security spending, high taxes to cover the social security spending on migrants , housing crisis, knife crime, rape epidemic, Islamic terrorism, unsafe schools and the resulting low birth rate of white people (high taxes, no housing, crime ridden streets and unsafe schools cause low birth rates).
We have to stand together and Re-migrate on a large scale.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3 Millionen illegale Migranten seit 2015 , 20 Milliarden Kosten für die Steuerzahler pro Jahr (ohne indirekte Kosten wie Schulen, Kitas, Krankenkassen, Behörden, Justriz usw) Wohnungsmangel überall, keine Kitaplätze, steigende Kriminalität, no go areas, steigende Mieten, trotzdem jedes Jahr noch 100.000 bis 300.000 illegale mehr. Ganze neue Großstädte müssten wir jedes Jahr auch noch ins letzte Naturschutzgebiet bauen. Ich hoffe ihr Bahnhofsklatscher freut euch darüber das Land so ruiniert zu haben. Aber in 2 Jahrzehnten sind deutsche eh eine Minderheit im eigenem Land (OECD). Dann ist eh vorbei, für immer.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
ohmybrowncow germany is sending them weapons free of charge. Full list of the german equipment (I'll try give a translation, link is below):
General equipment (1st and 2nd deliveries in 2014):
700 radio devices, 4000 helmets, 20 metal detectors, 30 mine probes, 40 munitions defusal kits, 680 Night vision goggles, 4000 vests, 25 field kitchens, 125 tents, 1500 binoculars, 4000 ballistic glasses, 270 Medkits
additional 3rd delivery (2015):
6000 helmets, 1500 binoculars, 4000 gas masks (+ replacement filters), 30 mine probes
+ unspecified amounts (it says "large amounts") of winter clothing and medical material
weapons (1st and second in 2014):
8000 G3 (+ 2 million rounds)
40 MG3 (+ 1 million rounds)
8000 G36 (+ 4 million rounds)
30 MILAN ATGM (+ 500 missiles)
200 Panzerfaust 3 (+2500 rockets)
40 Carl-Gustav-launchers (+1000 muniotion, flares only)
100 Flare guns (+4000 flares)
10000 hand grenades
additional 3rd delivery (2015):
30 MILAN ATGM (+ 500 missiles)
200 Panzerfaust 3 (+2400 rockets)
4000 G3 (+2 million rounds)
10 MG3 (508,000 rounds)
another 4 mio rounds for the G36
10000 hand grenades
vehicles (1st and 2nd delivery in 2014):
40 Wolf unarmored (basically Mercedes G wagon military version)
20 Wolf partially armored
40 Unimog trucks
1 Fuel truck
5 Dingo 1
additional 3rd delivery (2015)
10 Unimog trucks (Ambulance version)
10 Dingo
http://www.bundeswehr.de/portal/a/bwde/!ut/p/c4/DcoxDoAwCADAt_gB2N38hbpRJQ1pRVPAJr7e5tbDHQelVzK53EoVV9wOmVOH1E8GFjVi_xguMRuDFaRRAQprweahGZ-yTD8tichm/
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
+alaa llayan I don't know whats funny here
sex-slaves, which are called in the Qur’an by the name milk al-yamin, “that which your right hands possess” [Koran 4:24] The mufti said, “With the law of sex slaves, there must be a Muslim nation at war with a Christian nation, or a nation which is not of the religion, not of the religion of Islam. And there must be prisoners of war.”
“Is this forbidden by Islam?” I asked.
“Absolutely not.
“Allah allows Muslims to rape non-Muslim women in order to humiliate them, claims Islamic professor,” Zee News, January 17, 2016:
Washington: A female Islamic professor has claimed that Allah has allowed Muslim men to rape non-Muslim women in order to ‘humiliate’ them, report stated.
Suad Saleh, who is a professor from the renowned Al-Azhar University in Cairo, Egypt, made the claims during an interview to a TV channel.
According to The Inquisitr News report, in the video posted by LiveLeak, Saleh says that Allah has given the Muslim men a way to have sexual relations with slave women that is ‘legitimate’.
and directly from the koran
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa’id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): 0 Abu Sa’id, did you hear Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-’azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi’l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing ‘azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah’s Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. (Sahih Muslim 3371)
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
This is really nonsense from a scientific standpoint. Cows are, like all other animals, co2 neutral and other gases animals produce, like methane, always break down into co2 (which again is co2 neutral, co2->plants->cows->ch4->co2->plants). There is no long term effect, nothing accumulates, nothing gets added, it's a circle. It is really a pointless debate.
This is really a big facepalm moment for humanity. People have fallen for this narrative that cow's methan is somehow heating up the planet. It clearly isn't. No methane accumulates. we already have as much methan in the atmospehere as we will ever have even in 1 million years in the future when we keep all our cows. No methane can accumulate, it all breaks down into co2 and the balance is already reaced for the number of cows we have. The only way to get more methane into the athmosphere would be to have more cows because than a new balance would be reached (again with no long term effect)
I hate that people have fallen for this fallacy. As an engineer it worries me that people lack simple logic and math skills and our society is then doomed to fall for these obviously nonsensical neratives.
Yes cows produce methane, as do all other animals, but it's not methane from fossile fuel, it's methane from gras and bacteria, it's short term and part of natrues cycle. Nothing gets added, nothing accumulates. It's always at ballance for the current set up. We could have less cows but it would make next to no difference.
Flying in a fossile fueled aircraft to make this "documentary" has done more long term, actually accumulating damage to the atmosphere than any number of cows could ever do.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I would rather have half the population but live among germans than this migrant shitstorm which will destroy us and half of europe forever.
Leftists fucked us over, it's a genocide of us germans and many germans only now start to realize that.
The leftist politics, media and NGOs hate white people, especially germans (basically themselves) and many prominent figures even said that out loud.
We are so stupid to not have stopped these traitors before it's was too late.
The Islamisation of germany (and france and the UK) is the worst thing that will happen to us ever. No plague, no war could do that much lasting damage.
We need to ban the totalitarian islam, it's not a religion, it's an ideology that is invading us, attacking us.
We also need to deport islamists and their supporters (that's probably more than half of all muslims or more)
There is no other way.
Everyone I know agrees and we all hate this migrant politics.
I don't personally know anyone who is in favor of this fake "asylum" nonsense of letting everyone in, even the migrants I know are warning against the people that are coming in.
The next elections will be interesting but I'm afraid it's too late.
The propaganda from politicians, the government media and all the leftists, keeps most people out of touch with the grim reality of our genocide happening right now.
Most people are simply too old, not interested, brainwashed by leftism or just too busy with their lives to inform themselves about this issue outside the government- and leftist media.
If more people would realize that this is our death sentence, that we are destroying ourselves and our country, they would stand up or at least vote differently.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Es müssen eigentlich mindestens 2 Millionen illegale Migranten abgeschoben werden (und das sind nur die Straftäter die mit Gewalt, Diebstahl oder Sozialbetrug aufgefallen sind).
Dann wird es auch wieder freie Wohnungen und geringere Mieten geben, sowie weniger Gewalt.
Es ist echt eine Schande wie der Rechtsstaat beseitigt wurde für ein linkes Völkerwanderungs-Programm.
Migranten wurden zu "Flüchtlingen" erklärt obwohl sie es nicht sind und entgegen dem Eid den Politiker leisten müssen haben sie eben nicht Schaden vom deutschen Volk abgewendet. Sie haben Schaden zugefügt, mit Absicht.
Deutschland war mal ein friedliches, wohlhabendes Land.
Heute kann man sich vor Messerfachkräften und "Jugendlichen" "Männern" kaum noch retten und man traut sich kaum noch die eigenen Kinder in eine Schule zu schicken ohne Bodygard.
Scheiße, in den Kindergärten sind Migrantenkinder schon in der Überzahl weil deutsche Pärchen kein Wohnraum mehr bekommen um eine Familie zu gründen.
Innerhalb von einer Generation hat die Linke Politik Deutschland an die Wand gefahren, ethnisch, finanziell, sozial.
Wenn wir in wenigen Jahrzehnten eine Minderheit im eigenem Land sind, dann ist es das ende unsere Nation mit ihrer Geschichte und Kultur.
Dann sind wir nur ein weiteres 3. Weltland mit Bürgerkrieg, Terror und Korruption wie in Afrika und dem Nahen Osten.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I respect craftsmanship 100%. This is skill, tradition, human.
Such a shame most stuff now is done the wrong way, against nature, against humanity and just generally worse, worse quality, worse working and family live, worse for the environment. We need to seriously go back to the old ways, make things of quality, beauty, things that last and are in tune with nature.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
James The "Верховная Рада Украины приняла Закон «О внесении изменений в некоторые законодательные акты Украины об усилении ответственности военнослужащих, предоставлении командирам дополнительных прав и возложении обязанностей в особый период»
Законодательный акт возлагает на командиров обязанность принимать решительные меры по прекращению совершения уголовного правонарушения подчиненными и восстановлению правопорядка.
Закон также вводит административную ответственность за совершение военных административных правонарушений. В частности, введена ответственность за отказ от выполнения законных требований командира (начальника), небрежное отношение к военной службе, нарушение правил несения боевого дежурства, нарушение правил несения пограничной службы, распитие алкогольных, слабоалкогольных напитков военнослужащими. Командирам предоставлено право составлять административные протоколы.
Закон решает вопрос отбывания наказания в дисциплинарном батальоне военнослужащими военной службы по контракту и призванными во время мобилизации.
Соответствующие изменения внесены в Уголовный кодекс, Кодекс Украины об административных правонарушениях, Уголовно-исполнительный кодекс, Дисциплинарный устав, Устав внутренней службы, Устав гарнизонной и часовой служб Вооруженных Сил Украины и Закон «О социальной и правовой защите военнослужащих и членов их семей».
Закон принят с учетом предложений.
Соответствующий законопроект зарегистрирован под №1762."
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
the RAF fire bombed frankfurt and the official reason given was that frankfurt was the largest medieval city left in europe, with over 90% half timbered houses, so it would burn easily. the first major bombing early in the war was hamburg. the reason they bombed and completely destroyed hamburg was not industry or maybe a military harbour, because they were to the south of the river but they mostly bombed the north, but because they could get there easily since it's easy to find for navigators and because the dense houses would burn down easily. 42000 people died. because the smoke of the burning city the next waves of bomber couldn't find their targets and simply bombed essen instead. or look at the bombing of france by, mostly, the RAF bomber command. quote "Between the time of the German victory in the Battle of France and the liberation of the country, the Western Allies bombed many locations in France. In all 1,570 French cities and towns were bombed by Anglo-American forces between June 1940 and May 1945. The total number of civilians killed was 68,778 men, women and children (including the 2,700 civilians killed in Royan).[1]
The total number of injured was more than 100,000. The total number of houses completely destroyed by the bombings was 432,000, and the number of partly destroyed houses was 890,000. "
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@BallisticSollution does the KF-41 have MUSS? or 20 times magnification? or 2 independent 360 degree optics +the normal camera 360 degree round view along with the normal gunner optics as well as a automatic washer and armor plate for each optic? can it depress it's 30 mm gun to -17 degree or up 60 degrees? No, so... also read this to learn something "In the advertised configurations, it contains as many Rheinmetall-made parts as possible, even if these might not always be class-leading. One example are the optics, which are based on Rheinmetall's own SEOSS (stabilized electro-optical sighting system). This is a purely electronic sight, meaning the SEOSS features no optical connection for the daysight unlike some other optics. It also includes the Rheinmetall-made SAPHIR thermal imager, which performed worse than the ATTICA thermal imager during Bundeswehr testing and hence was not adopted on Bundeswehr combat vehicles." now please don't write a come back just to have the last word, we are not in kindergarden here. only write something if it's actually worth while otherwise let it be. PS also I wrote the puma got it's latest update in february, that's 1/2 a year ago so why do you write nonsense like "After they are upgraded, sure, the Puma might be technically the same, but it's not yet. " just to infuriate me or what? stop talking nonsense. the lynx is a nice afforadable export version from the germans, it's made for countries who don't have the capability to build their own tanks. it's build of proven parts (meaning nothing new), fewer system and less complex/redundancy. the lynx is a run of the mill standard volkswagen and the puma is a custom build mercedes infantry fighting vehicle specifically made for the german style of tank/infantry war fighting and just like the marder it will not be exported (until the germans sell off their old pumas in about 20 years) since other countries don't have a proper armor docrine and don't need a capable vehicle like the puma with a price to match, for most other countries a normal ifv does the trick. the british even decided to dump their warrior ifv and replace it with the boxer because they just don't have a armor war fighting doctrine.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Wir könnten auch selber Sonar, Schleppsonar und anti-Torpedo-Torpedo, sowie 16 VLS Zellen für Bodenluftraketen und Marschflugkörper in die seltsamen Korvetten einbauen.
Oder besser noch man könnte auch endlich mal anfangen richtige Militärschiffe zu bauen. Moderne Schnellboote (minimal größer als die alten, mit "Atlantikbug und mehr Treibstoff, stealth, U-Jadgtfähig), 6000 Tonnen Fregatten (wie Sachsenklasse nur mit min. 48 VLS Zellen und volle Unterwasserausstattung) und 12-15000 Tonnen Kreuzer (die alle Spielereien bekommen). Dann könnte man sich das Rumeiern mit diesen lächerlichen und trotzdem teuren Korvetten sparen, die sowieso einsatzunfähig sind, weil die sich nicht gegen Unterwasserbedrohungen schützen könne, auch gegen Angriffe aus der Luft fast blank (außer Ram) dastehen und dazu noch arsch langsam sind.
Aber die Bundeswehr hat es einfach nicht so mit Waffen und Militär und schießen, das ist immer so laut, da könnten schwangere Soldat*inenennen ohnmächtig werden also bauen wir lieber Friedensdampfer.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@thalorenz warum soll es hier um mich gehen? Es geht darum was hier mit Menschen gemacht wird, was hier einige mit Applaus herbeiwünschen (was schon mal da war Stichwort Stasi). Es geht darum das gesunder Menschenverstand und politische Meinungen die noch vor 10 Jahren Usus waren heute schon "Rechtsextrem" genannt werden. Wie Links-Grüne Spinner hier den Ton angeben und Menschen nach belieben und ohne Gerichtsverfahren zu "Feinden" und "anti demokraten" und "Rechtsextremen" erklären mit denen man dann alles machen kann. Das wenn jemand einen Witz macht oder er eine abweichende politische Meinung hat ihm die Karriere, der Arbeitsplatz und sonnst noch was zerstört wird. Schon alleine deine Forderung das das so richtig ist, verstößt gegen unsere Rechtsstaatlichen Prinzipien denn es gilt immer noch
"Grundsätzlich darf ein Arbeitnehmer nicht wegen seiner politischen Gesinnung gekündigt werden.
Die Kündigung ist nur gerechtfertigt, wenn durch die politische Betätigung die Arbeitstätigkeit beeinflusst wird, also eine Verletzung der arbeitsvertraglichen Pflichten vorliegt."
so und nicht anders auch wenn einige Links-Grüne Ideologen schon heute ihre falschen Moralischen Ideen über das Gesetzt stellen oder sie zu Gesetz machen. Einfach nur 1984 was hier abgeht.
PS wer also gegen den Einmarsch von 1 Million junger Muslimischer Männer ist, ist ein "Menschenfeind" und "Rechtsextrem". wowsa. Dann wäre es doch auch legitim diese 'Menschenfeinde', nicht nur zu zersetzen in dem man ihnen alles nimmt, sondern sie auch aus dem Verkehr zu ziehen nicht war? Also ab ins KZ? mit jedem der nicht möchte das Millionen von Muslimischen Männer ihr Unwesen treiben ('Unwesen' laut BKA Report, mehrere hunderttausende begehen Jedes Jahr Straftaten, ausländerrechtliche Verstoße schon nicht mitgerechnet) oder Hitlerwitze per Whatsapp verschickt? In Afrika gibt es übrigens einige Hundert Millionen Menschen die lieber in Europa leben würden (auch so eine Statistik). Ich hoffe in deiner schönen neuen Welt ist genug Platz für die? Oder ist der ganze quatsch doch etwas Realitätsfern und nichts weiter wie eine weitere deutsche extreme Ideologie an der die Welt genesen soll? Haben wir nicht eigentlich Gesetze in unserem Rechtsstaat die eindeutig sagen wer hier Asyl bekommt und wer nicht und das Asyl nur für Persönlich verfolgte gilt und zwar nur so lange wie sie verfolgt erden.. wie Merkel noch am anfangt erklärt hat die Menschen die kommen gehen ja auch wieder und jetzt heißt es alle bleiben und wer noch nicht da ist kann auch noch kommen. Wie schnell sich alles verändert, wer da was gegen sagt ist also "anti demokrat" und "rechtsextrem"? So kann man auch Bürger verleumden und mit Totschlagargumenten eine Debatte verhindern. Denn mit Rechtsextremisten und demokratiefeinden kann man schließlich nicht debattieren... Man braucht also gar keine Diktatur, man muss einfach nur alle Abweichler zu Feinden erklären, gewürzt mit ein paar bösen Unterstellungen damit man sie Gesellschaftlich unmöglich macht, geltende Gesetzte werden nur angewandt wenn sie nach Gutdünken "Moralisch" gerechtfertigt sind und bestrafen kann man die "Feinde" durch Zersetzung wenn es eben kein Gesetz gibt gegen das sie verstoßen haben. Wer jetzt sagt das das alles gegen das Rechtsstaatlichkeitsprinzip verstoßt wird kurzerhand auch zum Rechtsextremisten und Demokratiefeind erklärt. Ganz einfach. Echt toll was hier abgeht.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@finnmorton6510 Genau darum gehts. Wer entscheidet was OK und plötzlich nicht mehr OK ist? Ab wann werden Existenzen vernichtet aus neuster Interpretierung von political correctness? Wie konnte es soweit kommen das geltende Gesetzte plötzlich nur noch angewendet werden wenn sie durch falsche Moral genehmigt werden und anderseits Menschen außergerichtlich Verurteilt werden selbst wenn sie gegen kein Gesetz verstoßen haben. Linke Spinner haben damit den Rechtsstaat ausgehebelt und werden jeden Tag radikaler in ihren Ansichten. Vor ca 15 Jahren sagte Merkel noch das Massenmigration nicht geht, vor genau 10 Jahren das Multikulti gescheitert ist und vor 5 Jahren das alle Migranten wieder gegangen werden. Wer das heute sagt wird dann gerne schnell noch als "Rechtsextremist" betitelt und somit als Unmensch den man ignorieren kann und mit dem man dann alles machen kann, ja sogar muss. Egal was Gesetze sagen oder nicht. Das man jetzt schon wieder so weit ist in Deutschland dass man für einen Witz seinen Arbeitsplatz und Karriere verliert und zusätzlich noch an den öffentlichen Pranger gestellt wird lässt nichts gutes vermuten.
Wir sind also am Anfang, wenn nicht sogar mitten drin in der neusten deutschen Ideologie an der die Welt genesen soll, die mal wieder für sich reklamiert der einzige wahre Heilbringer für eine Ideale Zukunft zu sein und das gefälligst alle sich eingliedern und Abweichler als Unmenschen ihr Recht verwirkt haben zu Leben. Wer damit einverstanden ist macht Karriere (sieht man z.b. an unserem neuen Verfassungsschutzpräsidenten der artig Räächts den Feind vermutet, sein Vorgänger hatte wohl noch die falschen Daten vorliegen und hat sich öffentlich zu laut gewundert was hier gerade abgeht) und Mitläufer werden belohnt (je Spinnerter man ist um so besser dotiert sind die Posten als Gleichstellungsbeauftragter*innen/e und um so mehr Geld gibt es für Interkulturelle oder antifaschistische Projekte die ja so super beliebt sind das viele dieser Veranstaltungen mehr Akteure haben als Besucher/Zuschauer) das die Medien artig auf Linie gebracht sind z.b nicht mehr berichten wer der Täter in einem Verbrechen ist (außer wenn er deutscher ist) und mittlerweile gar nicht mehr berichten wenn mal wieder ein vergewaltigtes Mädchen tot im Graben gefunden wurde oder von ihrem Afghanischen Freund abgestochen wurde usw führt dann auch dazu das ein guter Teil der Bevölkerung nicht weiß was hier gerade los ist. Kaum einer wundert sich warum seit ein Paar Jahren kaum einer dieser Fälle mehr zur Bundesweite Empörung führt so wie noch die ersten Dutzend fälle 2015 bis 2017 bevor dann die neue Medienrichtlinie in kraft trat.
Wir haben also einen defakto Medienblackout, außergerichtliche Verurteilungen, einen neuen Sprachduktus gibt es auch passend zur neuen Ideologie, jede Ideologie braucht als Legitimation auch einen Feind vor dem sie Schutz verspricht und das sind halt Rechtsextremisten reale und imaginäre, Mitläufer der neuen Ideologie werden brav belohnt und an entsprechende Positionen befördert und wer nicht auf Linie ist wird Zersetzt. Ganz klassisch. Mit etwas gut gemachter Propaganda kommt das ganze dann auch beim Wahlvolk an, muss nur etwas witzig (wie hier) oder Unterhaltsam verpackt sein (wie die ganzen heimelig grusligen aufgebauschten Dokus über Rechtsextremisten und wie sie DER Feind sind und super duper Gefährlich, die seit Monaten auf den öffentlich Rechtlichen laufen).
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
This is really nonsense from a scientific standpoint. Cows are, like all other animals, co2 neutral and other gases animals produce, like methane, always break down into co2 (which again is co2 neutral, co2->plants->cows->ch4->co2->plants). There is no long term effect, nothing accumulates, nothing gets added, it's a circle. The same is true for the nitrate given that the cows only eat local food. It is really a pointless debate.
This is really a big facepalm moment for humanity. People have fallen for this narrative that cow's methan is somehow heating up the planet. It clearly isn't. No methane accumulates. we already have as much methan in the atmospehere as we will ever have even in 1 million years in the future when we keep all our cows. No methane can accumulate, it all breaks down into co2 and the balance is already reaced for the number of cows we have. The only way to get more methane into the athmosphere would be to have more cows because than a new balance would be reached (again with no long term effect)
I hate that people have fallen for this fallacy. As an engineer it worries me that people lack simple logic and math skills and our society is then doomed to fall for these obviously nonsensical neratives.
Yes cows produce methane, as do all other animals, but it's not methane from fossile fuel, it's methane from gras and bacteria, it's short term and part of natrues cycle. Nothing gets added, nothing accumulates. It's always at ballance for the current set up. We could have less cows but it would make next to no difference.
Flying in a fossile fueled aircraft to make this "documentary" has done more long term, actually accumulating damage to the atmosphere than any number of cows could ever do.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Das wäre aber schade denn Obgleich ich die Inhalte der Sendung und ihre Aufbereitung üblicherweise schätze, ist diese Sendung nur bedingt gelungen, da sie zu wenig differenziert.
"Geschlecht" (sex) ist zuvorderst ein biologisches Merkmal; daneben wurde der Begriff des "sozialen Geschlechts", der ein soziales, identitätsstiftendes Konstrukt (gender) beschreibt, in das viele Aspekte (des Individuums wie der Gesellschaft) einfließen, eingeführt.
Biologisch betrachtet definiert nicht das Individuum, sondern die Art seiner Keimzellen (!) die (biologische) Geschlechtszugehörigkeit. Was folgt daraus?
1. Die meisten Menschen - inklusive transidentitärer Menschen (!) - haben ein eindeutiges (!) biologisches Geschlecht: XX für weibliche Merkmalsausprägungen, XY für männliche Merkmalsausprägungen.
2. Probleme mit dieser simplen Einteilung ergeben sich dort, wo chromosomale Abweichungen (wie bspw. beim Turner-Syndrom, Betroffene haben nur ein funktionstüchtiges X-Chromosom, der Phänoytpus ist dennoch weiblich) bestehen oder die äußerlichen Geschlechtsmerkmale uneindeutig sind bzw. der chromosomalen Geschlechtszugehörigkeit nicht (gänzlich) entsprechen. Dies wird mit dem Begriff Intersexualität beschrieben. Es handelt sich hier um ein biologisches Phänomen, dass folgerichtig auch im Tierreich zu beobachten ist. Geschlechtsdysphorie (d.h. Trans"sexualität" bzw. -identität) ist bei Intersexuellen möglich, wenn sie sich mit dem (ihnen einst zugewiesenen) Geschlecht oder dem Phänotypus nicht identifizieren, ist jedoch nicht universal vorhanden.
3. Transidentität existiert im Tierreich nicht, da es ein soziales Konstrukt ist, das nur besteht, weil wir Menschen auch ein soziales Geschlecht und ein Bewusstsein haben, das Geschlechterrollen aufnimmt und im Verlauf der kindlichen Entwicklung eine individuelle Identität ausbildet.
4. Nichtsdestotrotz hat z.B. ein biologischer Mann das Recht, sich entsprechend seiner andersgeschlechtlichen Identität als Frau zu definieren und sein Leben derart zu gestalten (... und das gleiche gilt für eine Frau, die sich dem männlichen Geschlecht zugehörig fühlt, oder für einen Menschen, der sich als divers begreift). Die Anerkennung der biologischen Fakten ist darum keine Hetze gegen transidentitäre Menschen.
5. Inzwischen mehren sich Stimmen von jungen Menschen, die ihre Geschlechtsangleichung bereuen und sie nachträglich als dysfunktionalen Versuch, mit ihren eigentlichen psychischen Problemen und den Entwicklungsherausforderungen während der pubertären (Geschlechts-)Identitätsfindung (wie der weiterhin vorhandene Druck, sich den Geschlechterstereotypen anzupassen, die paradoxerweise auch tlw. durch die Trans-Community befeuert werden) umzugehen, werten. Auch diese Menschen verdienen Gehör, nicht selten werden sie von den einstigen "Leidensgenossen" nicht gehört, mitunter gar mundtot gemacht. Der Umstand, dass diese Gruppe existiert, invalidiert die Erfahrungen von transidentitären Menschen nicht. Eine kritische Haltung gegenüber dem Hype, der sich um psychische Erkrankungen im Allgemeinen und auch Transidentität im Speziellen auf social media entsponnen hat, ist kein Hate gegen Trans-Menschen. Viele junge Menschen sind gerade heutzutage sehr beeinflussbar und werden mit diesen Dingen konfrontiert. Gerade für psychisch labile Jugendliche kann eine vermeintliche Transidentität, die ein Zugehörigkeitsgefühl ermöglichen und weitere emotionale Bedürfnisse befriedigen kann, vorerst ein (indes dysfunktionaler) Ausweg sein. Da die Stigmatisierung von Menschen mit Transidentität im Vergleich abgenommen hat, Transidentität in bestimmten Kontexten sogar positiv konnotiert ist, steigt auch die Attraktivität dieses Störungsbilder. Im Übrigen ein Phänomen, das auch bei anderen psychischen Erkrankungen wie bspw. Borderline oder Autismus zu beobachten ist.
6. Bedenken zu äußern, dass eine mit wenigen Schritten zu erreichende Geschlechtsänderung auf dem Papier Schutzräume für Frauen unsicherer machen könnte, sind für nicht wenige Betroffene, die Gewalt erfahren haben, durchaus real. Diese abzutun, nur weil rechte Strömungen diese für ihre Zwecke aufgreifen, ist nicht im Sinne einer differenzierten, entemotionalisierten Darstellung, die auch dieses Thema braucht.
7. Die Thematik könnte wesentlich vereinfacht werden, würde man neben der Angabe eines biologischen Geschlechts eine weitere Angabe über die soziale Geschlechtszugehörigkeit einführen.
8. Ebenso ist das Aufgreifen von Begriffen wie TERF dem Diskurs nicht zuträglich; die begrenzte und dosierte Anwendung von Begriffen wie "cis" mag in bestimmten Kontexten (wie wissenschaftliche oder öffentlichkeitswirksame Diskurse) durchaus sinnig bzw. teils unvermeidlich sein, um über bestehende Diskriminierungen sprechen zu können. Darüber hinaus jedoch dürfte die sich auch in der Allgemeinbevölkerung abzeichnende Entwicklung, alles und jeden in Kategorisierungen zu pressen, nachteilig auswirken; davon abgesehen widerspricht sie dem Credo der Individualität und der häufig verwendeten Formulierung, dass letztlich nur das Menschsein zähle, nicht die Sexualpräferenz, das biologische Geschlecht oder die Geschlechtsidentität. Für meine Meinungsäußerung (und deren Qualität) spielt es zunächst keinerlei Rolle, als was ich mich definiere. Ich empfinde es als befremdlich, ein "ich bin xy" voranstellen zu müssen, um die nachfolgende Aussage zu kontextualisieren.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
Development started in 2015, so it's not an ad to get a share of the 100 billion. But it's also not ready yet. This is like the teaser or prototype. The hull is still a modified Leopard 2 hull (alto that's not a bad thing, maybe it stays like that) and the turret is also not production ready from my experience. It will probably take another 2 years before we see some field testing or trial of the final product.
PS in terms of economics it's much cheaper and easier to implement suicide drones in a tank instead of ordering a new drone vehicle and creating a new drone battalion (where would that money come from, do you know how much a battalion sized unit costs in terms of personell, support vehicles and command unit, fucking expensive) and then implement this drone battalion into a tank unit from time to time, if they have time.. The training, logistics, command and control would be all over the place. No, if you have an armored unit you want all the necessary components in that unit and not in some other unit that might or might not join you when you need them. That's just not how it works. Loitering munitions like switch blade will be implemented in all sorts of vehicles just like grenade dispensers. You need them, so you carry them and you do it yourself (as main battle tank on the front line of the fight) because only then can you be sure they are present and ready when needed and not being deployed somewhere else. That's just how it is and it works best that way.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
yes, if only you wouldn't start every other comment with "LOL" I would forgive you that you think googling for the wikipedia page of the stuff I just told you made you an instantaneous expert. in fact german scientists stayed on to at least 1955 "by the assistance of captured scientists from the advanced German rocket program,[1][2] was performed mainly by Soviet engineers and scientists after 1955," not to mention those that where never allowed to leave since that would compromise security. even korolev was not known to anyone until after his death, imagine what they did to german engineers that they found where useful? send them back to west germany right into the hands the US for questioning how the secrete soviet ballistic missile program is doing? yeah fat chance, we will never hear from them. but even 1955 is good enough for my point. also this quote I found puts everything into perspective. "After his release from prison, Korolev began by building a replica of the German A4 rocket that Stalin requested. Following the replication of the A4, he went on to develop the R-7 booster, which had five clustered engines each with four thrust chambers.[5] It was the first rocket to pioneer the booster rocket concept." from copying A4's to R-7, just like that. from working on the A4 with 2000+ german engineers and scientists brought to the soviet union, many of whom did not work with von Braun directly but either in production or with other nazi rocket projects, usually detachable rocket boosters for aircrafts and nazi rocket planes. what an odd coincident. but Korolev was a rocket scientist genius that could easily do all of that on his own, right? except for this quote "Although Korolev trained as an aircraft designer, his greatest strengths proved to be in design integration, organization and strategic planning." so he was more the soviet manager type and not the engineer/scientist type of guy. good thing he came up with the glorious R-7 thingy all on his own for the always perfect glorious soviet motherland, completely unrelated to evil german nazis who might or might not have worked on some uninteresting old stuff there at the same time. they just spend their time with polishing their shoes or something, nothing interesting to see here, move on. yeah right. we all know how russia works. I guess they still pretend they developed the atom bomb on their own, completely forgetting the german scientist that gave them the blue prints and data. russian propaganda and self deception at it's finest because mother russia is pure nationalistic glory and everything else is evil counter revolutionism or western propaganda. just like that Kalashnikov farmer boy who just happened to "design" a sturmgewehr on a napkin one day. please everyone lets ignore Hugo Schmeisser and countless other german weapons engineers working in the soviet union at the same time in the same place, all experts in the fields of weapons engineering, die cast parts, metal stamping, and a complete machine-assembly they developed for the Stg 44. just a coincidence. they just polished their shoes as well all day long and didn't work on anything interesting at all. naturally the Ak 47 just fell into the lap of a peasant boy turned tank commander. the ideal soviet propaganda type. isn't that convenient?
PS don't get me started on russian cargo rockets. every time I read up on something that was scheduled to be put into space by russian cargo rockets they just happen to blow up or not work properly every time they carry western satellites or supply missions. if they where so great why not use them for manned missions that where planed to use them or newer types? right..
2
-
I'm not german but I'm 100% certain you are russian. if you ever wanted to know what 100 years of state propaganda does to an impoverished people look no further than russians, wherever they live. all tell the same story, the same way with the same conclusions, always. if the soviets or putin would deny the sun exists then the sun wouldn't exist and there would be no prove in the world to change that opinion, all western (nazi german, US CIA, british colonialists aso.) propaganda as per usual, right? soviets where secret about their weapons programs at the best of times and would've never acknowledged any german contribution to it even if it's a proven fact that thousands of them where milling around the place and somehow what they produced also looked the part and so if something worked it was done by soviet farmers and workers turned soviet heroes just like it was the raison d'etat the state proclaimed. so of course a farmer turned tank driver invented the kalashnikov, I mean, who else could have invented the freedom gun of the soviet empire? nazi engineers, the recent enemies of the soviet people? just because they knew how to do that and did it before and after and some information about it even leaked? no no, and who designed the soviet rocket program that guaranteed a nuclear deterrent? more nazis? just like the nazis in the evil capitalist american rocket program who did the same thing only with more resources and therefore better results? no no. that is completely unreasonable to even think out loud. just because the rocket engineers the soviets abducted where working on boosters doesn't mean that the first rocket they build after the A4, which also had boosters had anything to do with any of the other things. everyone who says that is "racist" and a "russophobe" and an "actual fascist" and all those words. what a great argument. I'm racist, you are racist, everyone is racist. you don't agree with someone, racist. someone challenges your world view, racist. making good points talking about a subject, racist.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
gitana082 Page 1
Name
Year of Birth
Place of Residence
Source
Fate based on this source
Grelling,Margaret 1898 Berlin, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Berkowicz,Khava Pruzany, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Gipfel,Rebekka 1905 Kassel, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Gusyk,Lydia 1909 Berlin, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Biermann,Magda 1915 Nove Mesto nad Vahom, Czechoslovakia Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Reizl Reizel 1892 Turobin, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Fischer,Regina 1895 Mandok, Hungary Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Ada Heda Vrsac, Yugoslavia Page of Testimony Murdered
Buerger,Ernest 1891 Oradea, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Beer,Lina 1910 Vranov, Czechoslovakia Page of Testimony Murdered
Fischer,Hela 1916 Miskolc, Hungary Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Olga 1926 Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Shmuel Smuel Versec, Yugoslavia Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Elza 1903 Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Balassa,Julina Yolanda Mali Idjos, Yugoslavia Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Yitzkhak Avraam 1868 Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Goldsztajn,Rizel Rajzel 1918 Kwasylow, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Mor 1884 Budapest, Hungary Page of Testimony Murdered
Bregher,Lea Leia Arad, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Rakhel 1890 Tatarbunary, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Gross,Sara Sarika 1906 Michalovce, Czechoslovakia Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Dov 1924 Kilija, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Shlomo Slomo 1870 Astyla, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Josef Yosef 1908 Budapest, Hungary Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Shlomo 1896 Artziz, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Bregher,Leib Stefanesti, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Grodka,Franziska 1879 Berlin, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Bragar,Heinich Heinikh 1885 Kishinev, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Herschendoerfer,Selda 1860 Berlin, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Goldschmidt,Erna 1900 Berlin, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Hahn,Emilie 1880 Frankfurt am Main, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Bencz,Feiga Fejga 1911 Ludmir, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Nakhman Nahman 1897 Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Haim Khaim 1919 Rawa Ruska, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Byr,Dyna Dina 1877 Landshut, Germany Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergier,Yitzkhak Jcchak 1920 Kunow, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Berkovits,Roza Rosa 1900 Berehovo, Czechoslovakia Page of Testimony Murdered
Bendek,Karolina Kreina 1899 Nagyvarad, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Butzinski,Chaike Khaika 1898 Grodno, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Pesia 1885 Beresteczko, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Bragar,Tzvi Beniamin 1871 Kishinev, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Berger,Roza Rosalie 1870 Csenger, Hungary Page of Testimony Murdered
Bergher,Rivka Viso, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Benjamowicz,Khasia Naliboki, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Feuerman,Chana Khana Nagysomkut, Romania Page of Testimony Murdered
Tzikert,Sara 1922 Warsaw, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Hannemann,Margarete 1886 Berlin, Germany List of murdered Jews ... Murdered
Tzikert,Sara 1914 Warszawa, Poland Page of Testimony Murdered
Birgher,Haia Khaia 1868 Coma, Czechoslovakia Page of Testimony Murdered
Birgher,Zigfrid
apparently your soviet propaganda arguments and word twisting isn't that effective if you come across a person who can think for themselves (I know, not many of them left in russia). but the fact that we can name millions of victims including where they came from and where they died pretty much is enough to conclude that ww2 happened. it's not necessary to name 100% although when people died other people searched for them at some point so technically it's 100% even if not all of them are on the internet. the girl that didn't die (just like almost all "victims" that putins propaganda invent) didn't exist and the russian journalists even said that themselves. do you call russian journalists who talk off record and in private lairs? how brain dead and stupid do you have to be to believe stupid russian propaganda, it's so badly made and falls apart whenever someone looks into it that only a stupid person would fall for that. are people in russia really that stupid?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Steve Kusaba it was intended as a rhetorical question but that didn't stop you from answering it.^^ you didn't need to show me that you are stupid in that way, that was perfectly clear from the beginning. I just tried to be nice and hoped for the best. but you just couldn't hide your small intellect and started to insult me.
ok, everything step by step.
someone who is suspicious of authority to the point of smart arse internet rambling and being suspicious for the sake of being suspicious is indistinguishable from a conspiracy theorists. that's one part of being anti-social in case you didn't notice.
if you can't see a connection between a working society where authority does exist, is respected and is not constantly undermined by idiots who think they understood everything, and a clearly not working society, where authority doesn't even exist like in somalia, then you are not capable of logical thought.
that's not a "concept", that's you being stupid.
don't you see where anti-social behavior and negative basic attitude against authority leads? you should read up on the definition of 'society' if you still don't get it. btw everything that is against this definition is by definition anti-social.
well but at least you do like to insult people right away, like every advise resistant idiot. that saves time and you use that time well to accuse people of ridicules things that are completely pulled from the air like
"you are a real original thinker, using a several years old focus group meme as if it came from your inspirational musings."
(I never said that did I? and a good example is a good example. you are the one who tried to change the definition of being anti-social, so it's your job of defending your bullshit and not mine)
or "A troll that will not identify himself"
(wow such an original non-argument you must be a real original thinker, using a several years old focus group meme as if it came from your inspirational musings. see what I did there?)
or "breaks down to conduct a grade school quarrel over concepts he can not understand"
(it seems as if you don't even understand your own concept, I understand concepts quite well, thank you)
or "hear your rambling directed at music".
(wow straw-men argument insight)
some people are just born as arseholes, but you could at least try to hide it. but there is nothing you can do about your stupidness, you clearly can't hide that. now go and be some more suspicious of authority and see how smart that is and how well it will play out socially. you better be a world class musician or have other talents to get away with it..
but please don't lecture to many other people on your twisted logic, I don't want the revolution of the stupid, undereducated people and mediocrity to happen in my lifetime.
mhh maybe you shouldn't have answered the rhetorical question in the first place.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
USN1985dos let me paraphrase your comment for the F35b. 'They want the f35's to be anti-air craft/areal patrol, anti-AA, radar counter-measure, bomber, tactical air support, vertical take off, stealth etc...etc..., and to often operate independent of larger forces, yet they gave it a 25mm main gun and only two air-to-air missiles. If it runs into an enemy, it's going to be well & truly fucked because it has no capability to turn or run. It's only hope will be to use it's stealth to hide and hope that the enemy runs out of missiles before the f35 runs out of it's 2 air to air missiles.
ps. the french have a real carrier with catapults, because you said those two glorified british helicopter carriers are the only non US carrier capability the rest of the world has. (even the spanish and italians and greeks have what the UK will get with these new ships)
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
James The yes. if you can read.
here for you again.
http://www.examiner.com/list/russia-s-top-100-lies-about-ukraine
http://nypost.com/2014/07/21/why-russia-buys-putins-lies/
http://www.stopfake.org/top-fakty-rossijskoj-lzhi-ob-ukraine-chast-2/
there is tones more out there. every russian lie is dismantled. the fact that russian propaganda is inconsistent and contraditics it self is also obvious. for putins media it doesn't matter that a lie is poorly constructed. they produce 10 new ones in the time it takes to examine the first one. also that they sometimes contradict each other by giving different explanations for the same thing is normal. putin did the same with russian opposition groups. Vladislav Surkov is behind that strategy. putin and Vladislav Surkov create or support a party or a movement in russian, nazis, liberals, democrats, communists, rights activists everything. they have there hand on the lid. nothing happens in russia without approval of the kremlin. and then they did a masterful thing. they said publicly that they do exactly these things and from that moment on no opposition or supporter group or party could be certain of anything anymore. everything is trivialized and the concept of truth completely destroyed.
" The brilliance of this new type of authoritarianism is that instead of simply oppressing opposition, as had been the case with 20th-century strains, it climbs inside all ideologies and movements, exploiting and rendering them absurd... Its Moscow can feel like an oligarchy in the morning and a democracy in the afternoon, a monarchy for dinner and a totalitarian state by bedtime."
"One moment Surkov would fund civic forums and human-rights NGOs, the next he would quietly support nationalist movements that accuse the NGOs of being tools of the West. With a flourish he sponsored lavish arts festivals for the most provocative modern artists in Moscow, then supported Orthodox fundamentalists, dressed all in black and carrying crosses, who in turn attacked the modern-art exhibitions. The Kremlin’s idea is to own all forms of political discourse, to not let any independent movements develop outside of its walls."
http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2014/11/hidden-author-putinism-russia-vladislav-surkov/382489/#disqus_thread
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
you really should look up the bombing of rotterdam and warsaw first before calling out others for bullshitting. it makes you look like an advice resistant idiot. "At the last minute, the Netherlands decided to submit and sent a plenipotentiary and other negotiators across to German lines. There was an attempt to call off the assault, but the bombing mission had already begun.[86] In legal terms, the attack was performed against a defended part of a city vital for the military objectives and in the front-line, and the bombing respected Article 25 to 27 of the Hague Conventions on Land Warfare.[87]
Whilst German historian Horst Boog says British propaganda inflated the number of civilian casualties by a factor of 30,[91] contemporary newspaper reports show the Dutch legation in Paris initially estimated 100,000 people were killed,[92] the Dutch legation in New York later issued a revised figure of 30,000.[93] International news agencies widely reported these figures, portraying Rotterdam as a city mercilessly destroyed by terror bombing without regard for civilian life, with 30,000 dead lying under the ruins.[82] Neither claim was true. Furthermore, the bombing was against well-defined targets, albeit in the middle of the city, and would have assisted the advancing German Army.[82]"
"Following the attack on Rotterdam, RAF Bomber Command was authorized to attack German targets east of the Rhine on 15 May 1940; the Air Ministry authorized Air Marshal Charles Portal to attack targets in the Ruhr, including oil plants and other civilian industrial targets which aided the German war effort, such as blast furnaces.[97][41] The underlying motive for the attacks was to divert German air forces away from the land front.[98] Churchill explained the rationale of his decision to his French counterparts in a letter dated the 16th: "I have examined today with the War Cabinet and all the experts the request which you made to me last night and this morning for further fighter squadrons. We are all agreed that it is better to draw the enemy on to this Island by striking at his vitals, and thus to aid the common cause."[99] Due to the inadequate British bomb-sights the strikes that followed "had the effect of terror raids on towns and villages."[98] On the night of 15/16 May, 96 bombers crossed the Rhine and attacked targets in Gelsenkirchen. 78 had been assigned oil targets, but only 24 claimed to have accomplished their objective.[100][101][102] On the night of 17/18 May, RAF Bomber Command bombed oil installations in Hamburg and Bremen; the H.E. and 400 incendiaries dropped caused six large, one moderately large and 29 small fires. As a result of the attack, 47 people were killed and 127 were wounded.[103][104] Railway yards at Cologne were attacked on the same night.[104] During May, Essen, Duisburg, Düsseldorf and Hanover were attacked in a similar fashion by Bomber Command. In June, attacks were made on Dortmund, Mannheim, Frankfurt and Bochum.[100] At the time, Bomber Command lacked the necessary navigational and bombing technical background and the accuracy of the bombings during the night attacks was abysmal. Consequently, the bombs were usually scattered over a large area, causing an uproar in Germany."
"Despite the British attacks on German cities, the Luftwaffe did not begin to attack military and economic targets in the UK until six weeks after the campaign in France was concluded.[98]"
when the battle of britain begun
" Hermann Göring's general order, issued on 30 June 1940, stated:
The war against England is to be restricted to destructive attacks against industry and air force targets which have weak defensive forces. ... The most thorough study of the target concerned, that is vital points of the target, is a pre-requisite for success. It is also stressed that every effort should be made to avoid unnecessary loss of life amongst the civilian population.
— Hermann Göring[111]"
"Hitler's No. 17 Directive, issued 1 August 1940, established the conduct of war against Britain and specifically forbade the Luftwaffe from conducting terror raids. The Führer declared that terror attacks could only be a means of reprisal, as ordered by him.[116]"
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is really nonsense from a scientific standpoint. Cows are, like all other animals, co2 neutral and other gases animals produce, like methane, always break down into co2 (which again is co2 neutral, co2->plants->cows->ch4->co2->plants). There is no long term effect, nothing accumulates, nothing gets added, it's a circle. It is really a pointless debate.
This is really a big facepalm moment for humanity. People have fallen for this narrative that cow's methan is somehow heating up the planet. It clearly isn't. No methane accumulates. we already have as much methan in the atmospehere as we will ever have even in 1 million years in the future when we keep all our cows. No methane can accumulate, it all breaks down into co2 and the balance is already reaced for the number of cows we have. The only way to get more methane into the athmosphere would be to have more cows because than a new balance would be reached (again with no long term effect)
I hate that people have fallen for this fallacy. As an engineer it worries me that people lack simple logic and math skills and our society is then doomed to fall for these obviously nonsensical neratives.
Yes cows produce methane, as do all other animals, but it's not methane from fossile fuel, it's methane from gras and bacteria, it's short term and part of natrues cycle. Nothing gets added, nothing accumulates. It's always at ballance for the current set up. We could have less cows but it would make next to no difference.
Flying in a fossile fueled aircraft to make this "documentary" has done more long term, actually accumulating damage to the atmosphere than any number of cows could ever do.
Unfortunately most people are scientific illiterate and so they fall for this methane nonsense. It's really sad for humanity how easily lead on we are.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@joshuaparker9185 well everything you just wrote is wrong or nonsense."we don't live in the past" might as well say nothing right there.. "Who cares if VW produces 10 million cars?" VW and their 10 million new customers probably.. "They cheated the govt. with emissions scandal." which is neither here nor there and surely not the topic here but ok. "Go to Cali today and see, 3-4 out of 10 cars are Teslas." that is demonstrably wrong and also california isn't the world, it isn't even all that important and if "we don't life in the past" is an "argument" then 'we don't live in california' is one too. "wait for" we are always waiting for something... "You’ll see more cybertrucks than f150s" considering that Ford builds and sells about 1 Million F150s a year (as many cars as tesla did build in total in their 20 year history) very unlikely especially with this piece of info in mind "In June 2020, Ford announced the unnamed fully-electric F-150 was to begin production within two years of the introduction of the 2021 F-150; i.e., by 2022." next "Thirdly, people never asked for an electric vehicle." they sure did, they even build them themselves, there was an entire movement before tesla was even invented, it's just that it's niche, which it still technically is but thanks to lithium batteries and other spillover from modern tech industry EVs are more viable now with or without tesla."Tesla has a huge lead on its competitors" considering that Porsche already showed them up by beating tesla in acceleration, braking, cornering, fast charging, design and luxury and matching the teslas in range I really don't see that. tesla is better positioned than most during this improved battery technology, climate change regulations and cities fighting air pollution driven EV ramp up but that will only last so long until the EV market is big enough that every manufacturer will caters to to that market a movement already going on. But right now the EV market is still small, I think they are at 5% EV right now so still niche. "VW have a lot of catching up to do" if you ignore that Porsche belongs to VW just as audi who also build a car on the taycan platform then that might be true... but VW was never the first at anything but they are still the biggest. so there is that. maybe think about it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Leftists like you are so sexist and toxic, just weird.
Enjoy President Kamala Harris, that the deep state will install..
last week everyone said she was too unpopular to replace Biden, now she is AMAZING and just the right candidate.
Who even needs primaries and election when you have a brainwashed population that just falls for any leftist undemocratic trickery.
Everyone gets new propaganda instructions to get their brainwashing updated and overnight Harris turned from being an unpopular simpleton into the perfect candidate..
Isn't that weird?
I'm just waiting for someone, anyone, to ask Kamala Harris unscripted questions like they do with Trump, when they attack him in every interview.
Nobody even asked Harris what her policy is, let her talk freely and really listen, it will be interesting and revealing on the same level as listening to Biden.
Senile Biden and simpleton Harris. They get installed by the deep state, shoved in front of cameras to read the teleprompter every once in a while, but the real decision makers are somewhere else.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@stonerloner668 I really would like to know how you would even find the wiesel, a vehicle known to become invisible behind every little hedge, vanish in every little pit and trench, so small it's easily overlooked even when on full display, known to be as silent as an electric car so much so that it regularly freaks out their own soldiers when driving past because you just can't hear it coming until you get almost run over, giving off next to no heat signature thanks to it's efficient diesel commercial car engine, very difficult to find even with thermal imaging. but let's say you spotted one under battlefield conditions and distances, you spotted one wiesel that didn't spot you first with all it's advanced optics and you got one shot free, I'm sure you can shoot RPGs, known to not be able to hit a circus tent from the inside, over even just a medium distance, at a target as small as 1/8 of a normal tank and usually driving like a bat out of hell all over the place and in and out of cover. do you want to use jedi mind control on the RPG grenade to make it follow the wiesel as if by magic? you must be a wizard then. I can only applaud your military knowledge and insight and your impressive magic forces. really impressive.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@ggoddkkiller1342 S/RES/2292 (2016)
Authorizes, for a period of 12 months, inspections on the high seas off the coast of Libya, of vessels that are believed to be carrying arms or related materiel to or from Libya, in violation of the arms embargo. Requests a report by the Secretary-General, with input from CTED, in close collaboration with the Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team, as well as the Panel of Experts, on the threat posed to Libya and neighbouring countries, including off the coast of Libya, by Foreign Terrorist Fighters recruited by or joining ISIL, Al-Qaida, and their associates.
Resolution link:
S/RES/2292 (2016)
Resolution number:
S/RES/2317(2016)
Resolution Date:
14 June 2016
Sanctions_committees:
Security Council Committee established pursuant to resolution 1970 (2011) concerning Libya
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Evidence? lets take a look. There is an institute in Wuhan that deals with novel coronaviruses and most of their work involves gain of function experiments meaning for example inserting furin cleavage sites into viruses, creating chimeras and passing them through cell cultures/humanized mice to make these viruses more adapted and infectious to human lung cells (all this is published data from a 2015 scientific paper). The track record of chinese and frankly most of the worlds laboratories when it comes to incidental or not so incidental leaks and outbreaks of viruses and bacteria is rather appalling (e.g. Sars 1 got away from chinese labs in Beijing 4 times in a row) and that's why the US under Obama banned this dangerous gain of function experiments.
Now what has happened in the real world. A novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan caused a world wide pandemic, this virus has the human adapted version of a furin cleavage site (the only one in it's virus family) that still cant be explained with evolutionary theory. It is the only novel virus to cause an outbreak/pandemic ever that was perfectly adopted to humans instead of it's host animal from day one, which is very strange to say the least. It all started just down the tram line of the institute in Wuhan and as far as we know the earliest reports came from sick lab workers and since then the CCP in china worked not to help find out what happened, like one would do in a global crisis, but rather they disappear chinese scientists and produce one after the other propaganda story to deflect from the virus lab in Wuhan. The chinese propaganda is aided in no small part by western virologists who, as it turns out, continued their gain of function experiments by financing the Wuhan lab to do some work for them. At the front of the conspiracy is the Wellcome Trust with Peter Daszak who funneled US money to Wuhan to do gain of function research. So lots of western virologists have clear conflict of interests (which they never confessed to in their papers and letters) culminating in some public letters (not scientific papers) to nature and the lancet magazines suspiciously early on in the pandemic calling this virus definitely natural in origin without presenting scientific evidence for that claim (and contradicting their private opinions about the virus looking engineered in private emails sent just days earlier) and calling the lab leak idea a conspiracy theory. The authors of these letters are all gain of function researches who would lose tremendously if gain of function experiments where to be banned again (the Obama ban was lifted under Trump). There are lots of additional circumstantial evidences but that's good enough for starters. Also a big thanks to the media for calling us conspiracy nutters and racists for pointing out dozen's of data points that clearly point to a lab leak. If journalists had done their job and investigated instead of being the echo chamber of chinese propaganda and religious believers of obviously corrupted virologists, we might have had an answer already. Now it's one year later and all the evidence and stories have been cleaned up and it's going to be very difficult to proof anything no matter how obvious.
PS Other interesting facts that are worth looking into is
-the fact that this sars-cov2 virus doesn't seem to infect bats very well which would
be strange for a virus said to come from bats while it readily infects everything else from humans, cats to wild animals.
-the Fauci emails that show that half a dozen Wellcome trust employees somehow have command over the
worlds leading virologists when it comes to making appointments and meetings to discuss subjects (that are unfortunately censored in the emails with the b5 notice next to the censored parts of the emails, but the b5 exemption is only for US government litigation and not for private Trust employees. mhh)
-and the very interesting case of the pangolin RaTG13 Virus the chinese produced in 2020 after the
outbreak started and is said to be the closest link to sars-cov2, it was found in 2013 but the chinese didn't tell the
world about it which is very unusual since a new coronavirus is big news
in the scientific world and always a potential danger. So what did the
chinese do with this virus for 7 years? oh yeah the chinese military
also does bio research in the same Wuhan labs.. no relations^^
also the chinese say the RaTG13 virus only exists in a data base
and that they don't have the virus anymore. I would say this is not a lie
they probably really don't have the RaTG13 anymore.. at least not in it's original form
so they rather not show it to anyone because what they have done to it over the last 7 years
would be the smoking gun. That's probably why nobody gets access to the Wuhan lab,
neither the WHO nor researches to the Wuhan database. But that's just my speculation.
now lets hope that there are at least some journalists around with integrity and hunger for investigative journalism because this subject is rife for some investigation.
1
-
Weil es zu Verstümmelungen, unbehandelten psychischen Störungen und vielen Selbstmorden führt dieser ganze woke Blödsinn.
Quote von einem anderen Kommentar.
Obgleich ich die Inhalte der Sendung und ihre Aufbereitung üblicherweise schätze, ist diese Sendung nur bedingt gelungen, da sie zu wenig differenziert.
"Geschlecht" (sex) ist zuvorderst ein biologisches Merkmal; daneben wurde der Begriff des "sozialen Geschlechts", der ein soziales, identitätsstiftendes Konstrukt (gender) beschreibt, in das viele Aspekte (des Individuums wie der Gesellschaft) einfließen, eingeführt.
Biologisch betrachtet definiert nicht das Individuum, sondern die Art seiner Keimzellen (!) die (biologische) Geschlechtszugehörigkeit. Was folgt daraus?
1. Die meisten Menschen - inklusive transidentitärer Menschen (!) - haben ein eindeutiges (!) biologisches Geschlecht: XX für weibliche Merkmalsausprägungen, XY für männliche Merkmalsausprägungen.
2. Probleme mit dieser simplen Einteilung ergeben sich dort, wo chromosomale Abweichungen (wie bspw. beim Turner-Syndrom, Betroffene haben nur ein funktionstüchtiges X-Chromosom, der Phänoytpus ist dennoch weiblich) bestehen oder die äußerlichen Geschlechtsmerkmale uneindeutig sind bzw. der chromosomalen Geschlechtszugehörigkeit nicht (gänzlich) entsprechen. Dies wird mit dem Begriff Intersexualität beschrieben. Es handelt sich hier um ein biologisches Phänomen, dass folgerichtig auch im Tierreich zu beobachten ist. Geschlechtsdysphorie (d.h. Trans"sexualität" bzw. -identität) ist bei Intersexuellen möglich, wenn sie sich mit dem (ihnen einst zugewiesenen) Geschlecht oder dem Phänotypus nicht identifizieren, ist jedoch nicht universal vorhanden.
3. Transidentität existiert im Tierreich nicht, da es ein soziales Konstrukt ist, das nur besteht, weil wir Menschen auch ein soziales Geschlecht und ein Bewusstsein haben, das Geschlechterrollen aufnimmt und im Verlauf der kindlichen Entwicklung eine individuelle Identität ausbildet.
4. Nichtsdestotrotz hat z.B. ein biologischer Mann das Recht, sich entsprechend seiner andersgeschlechtlichen Identität als Frau zu definieren und sein Leben derart zu gestalten (... und das gleiche gilt für eine Frau, die sich dem männlichen Geschlecht zugehörig fühlt, oder für einen Menschen, der sich als divers begreift). Die Anerkennung der biologischen Fakten ist darum keine Hetze gegen transidentitäre Menschen.
5. Inzwischen mehren sich Stimmen von jungen Menschen, die ihre Geschlechtsangleichung bereuen und sie nachträglich als dysfunktionalen Versuch, mit ihren eigentlichen psychischen Problemen und den Entwicklungsherausforderungen während der pubertären (Geschlechts-)Identitätsfindung (wie der weiterhin vorhandene Druck, sich den Geschlechterstereotypen anzupassen, die paradoxerweise auch tlw. durch die Trans-Community befeuert werden) umzugehen, werten. Auch diese Menschen verdienen Gehör, nicht selten werden sie von den einstigen "Leidensgenossen" nicht gehört, mitunter gar mundtot gemacht. Der Umstand, dass diese Gruppe existiert, invalidiert die Erfahrungen von transidentitären Menschen nicht. Eine kritische Haltung gegenüber dem Hype, der sich um psychische Erkrankungen im Allgemeinen und auch Transidentität im Speziellen auf social media entsponnen hat, ist kein Hate gegen Trans-Menschen. Viele junge Menschen sind gerade heutzutage sehr beeinflussbar und werden mit diesen Dingen konfrontiert. Gerade für psychisch labile Jugendliche kann eine vermeintliche Transidentität, die ein Zugehörigkeitsgefühl ermöglichen und weitere emotionale Bedürfnisse befriedigen kann, vorerst ein (indes dysfunktionaler) Ausweg sein. Da die Stigmatisierung von Menschen mit Transidentität im Vergleich abgenommen hat, Transidentität in bestimmten Kontexten sogar positiv konnotiert ist, steigt auch die Attraktivität dieses Störungsbilder. Im Übrigen ein Phänomen, das auch bei anderen psychischen Erkrankungen wie bspw. Borderline oder Autismus zu beobachten ist.
6. Bedenken zu äußern, dass eine mit wenigen Schritten zu erreichende Geschlechtsänderung auf dem Papier Schutzräume für Frauen unsicherer machen könnte, sind für nicht wenige Betroffene, die Gewalt erfahren haben, durchaus real. Diese abzutun, nur weil rechte Strömungen diese für ihre Zwecke aufgreifen, ist nicht im Sinne einer differenzierten, entemotionalisierten Darstellung, die auch dieses Thema braucht.
7. Die Thematik könnte wesentlich vereinfacht werden, würde man neben der Angabe eines biologischen Geschlechts eine weitere Angabe über die soziale Geschlechtszugehörigkeit einführen.
8. Ebenso ist das Aufgreifen von Begriffen wie TERF dem Diskurs nicht zuträglich; die begrenzte und dosierte Anwendung von Begriffen wie "cis" mag in bestimmten Kontexten (wie wissenschaftliche oder öffentlichkeitswirksame Diskurse) durchaus sinnig bzw. teils unvermeidlich sein, um über bestehende Diskriminierungen sprechen zu können. Darüber hinaus jedoch dürfte die sich auch in der Allgemeinbevölkerung abzeichnende Entwicklung, alles und jeden in Kategorisierungen zu pressen, nachteilig auswirken; davon abgesehen widerspricht sie dem Credo der Individualität und der häufig verwendeten Formulierung, dass letztlich nur das Menschsein zähle, nicht die Sexualpräferenz, das biologische Geschlecht oder die Geschlechtsidentität. Für meine Meinungsäußerung (und deren Qualität) spielt es zunächst keinerlei Rolle, als was ich mich definiere. Ich empfinde es als befremdlich, ein "ich bin xy" voranstellen zu müssen, um die nachfolgende Aussage zu kontextualisieren.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@spikespa5208 you see, you make the same flawed argument. I'm not saying dreadnought was not better than most ships before her. I and luckily a small handful of naval historians who don't fall for simplistic narratives like most do, am saying that ship was not revolutionary, it was very well in line with the constant evolution at the time. so why is the dreadnought seen as the turning point, a revolution, a genus idea? and not for example, and no I'm not american, Indiana (BB1), the first true large caliber battleship. many other ships could be named to cause a stir. every generation produced ships with better everything. but First Sea Lord, Admiral Sir John Fisher, his ego and his self made propaganda make all the difference here. to answer your question which ships at the time of the dreadnought where comparable. the japanese Satsuma was a 12 gun all 12 inch battleship (alto supply issues forced them to fit some 10 inch guns), the US South Carolina also a all 12 inch gun battleship in development well before the dreadnought. to quote Matthew Wright "As we have seen, the all-big-gun armament was entirely in line with existing trend. Furthermore, battleship size, speeds and broadside weights had been rising since the 1880s, and Dreadnought was very much on the curve." "In short, Fisher did not wholly get his way: and if we consider Fisher’s armoured cruiser ideas as the ‘revolution’, then in many ways Dreadnought was more ‘evolution’." "Thanks in part to cost constraints – but also docking limits, which constrained size – she was not radically larger than the Lord Nelson class – 17,900 tons normal load versus the Lord Nelson’s 15,925 tons. This was a lesser jump than between the 12,590 ton battleship Nile of 1888 and the 15,580 ton displacement of her successor Royal Sovereign class of 1889. Further, Dreadnought’s broadside at around 6,600 lb was not radically heavier at intended battle range than Lord Nelson’s 5,200 lb." and "The point that Dreadnought was an evolution that embodied current trends – not a total re-think – was generally recognised within the Admiralty. There were even calls to build more Lord Nelsons, which were liked in service for their handling, and also regarded as effective combatants for some years. Even during the First World War, the pair were stationed off the Dardanelles where they were thought sufficient" in short it can be argued that the step from pre-battleships to battleships or the step to "super dreadnoughts" where far more significant and truly made older ships obsolete. the dreadnoughts where just evolution. well on the curve of the day in line with other ships and the general thinking at the time. but people like simple and decisive explanations and Fishers egoistic propaganda delivered on point.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Arfur Fuxxakes there are already scientists out there who connect the dots.
sky news australia and daily mail quote some scientists "A growing number of scientists say it is possible COVID-19 was created in a laboratory. "Israeli geneticist, Dr Ronen Shemesh, who is working on treatment for COVID-19, said in his opinion the virus was more likely created in a laboratory than evolved naturally in nature.
“There are many reasons to believe that the COVID-19 generating SARS-CoV-2 was generated in a lab. Most probably by methods of genetic engineering,” he said.
“I believe that this is the only way an insertion like the FURIN protease cleavage site could have been introduced directly at the right place and become effective.”
Dr Shemesh points to the insertion of a Furin site as the most unusual aspect of COVID-19.
“I believe that the most important issue about the differences between ALL coronavirus types is the insertion of a Fufin protease cleavage site at the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2,” he said.
“Such an insertion is very rare in evolution, the addition of such 4 Amino acids alone in the course of only 20 years is very unlikely.”
"“What makes it even more suspicious is that fact that this insertion not only occurred on the right place and in the right time, but also turned the cleavage site from an Serine protease cleavage site to a FURIN cleavage site,” he said."
"La Trobe University Chemistry and Physics Professor David Winkler says there are several possibilities for the source of COVID-19 and you cannot rule out the laboratory as one option.
“On the basis of the calculations we’ve done, you can’t exclude that it’s been processed through human cells in a biosecurity lab - but it’s certainly not the only explanation,” he said.
Flinders University Professor Nikolai Petrovsky says COVID-19 is “exquisitely adapted to infect humans”."
the daily mail and sky new australia reported on it. so the media is not completely silenced even though the consensus is that there is only one truth and everything that doesn't match the chinese official story (and some western virologists who where suspiciously loud very early on without any facts at hand) is a conspiracy and right wing and what not. PS google coronavirus gain of function experiment 2015 study.
the chinese inserted a furin cleavage site in coronaviruses in 2015 yet some backwater virologist say this sars-cov-2 CAN'T be man made..
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Wer der bösartigen Propaganda von "Stuck und verspielten Fassaden", die gegen traditionelle Architektur immer wieder verwendet wird, aufgelaufen ist, dem möchte ich darauf hinweisen das traditionelle Architektur nicht unbedingt fassadenschmuck braucht. Selbst viele Gründerzeitler wurden mit schlichten Fassaden gebaut. Beispiele finden sich überall.
Normale Wand aus Ziegeln, Naturstein (oder auch Fachwerk) mit aufrechtstehenden, symmetrisch verteilten Fenstern, eine Tür, Gesims, um den Regen von der Fassade fern zu halten und ein Dach von Zimmerleuten handwerklich gebaut.
Fertig ist ein traditionelles, schönes Gebäude. Ganz ohne Stuck.
Das schlichte Haus das ich gerade beschrieben habe könnte ein weiß-gekalktes englisches Cottage, ein bunt bemalten Stadthaus in einer Kleinstadt in Bayern oder ein Gründerzeit Wohnhaus im Waldstraßenviertel in Leipzig sein (das hatte ich tatsächlich im Sinn).
Also glaubt nicht der linken "modernistischen" Propaganda, die sich selber als "Weltoffen" bezeichnet und richtige Architektur als "Stuckfassaden" verunglimpft.
Traditionelle Architektur ist in Wirklichkeit vielfältig, nachhaltig, zeitlos schön, im menschlichen Maßstab und sehr anpassungsfähig an alle Kulturen und Regionen.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it means what it means. turbo
Etymology 1 Latin
Probably from Ancient Greek τύρβη (túrbē, “tumult, disorder, turmoil”), from Proto-Indo-European *(s)twer-, *(s)tur- (“to rotate, swirl, twirl, move around”); related to English storm.
Verb
turbō (present infinitive turbāre, perfect active turbāvī, supine turbātum); first conjugation
I disturb, unsettle, agitate
I upset
some PCs used to have turbo buttons. nobody complained abut the lack of a turbocharger in a PC with "turbo" written on it either.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1. The diameter of a village or a town should not be more than 1 mile across. That way everyone can walk with ease anywhere within the village/town.
2. Build a main street or a market square or both.
3. Provide different option of housing like town houses, apartment houses, row houses and single family houses and always allow for mixed use.
4. Make sure there are shops, cafes, businesses, schools and all sorts of amenities in the center of the town.
5. And last but not least make it look pretty, this also includes walkable streets, narrow lanes, trees, beautiful traditional architecture and so on.
Boom, you have a guaranteed winner and it's a million times better than suburban sprawl.
It's not that difficult people. Get on it.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is really nonsense from a scientific standpoint. Cows are, like all other animals, co2 neutral and other gases animals produce, like methane, always break down into co2 (which again is co2 neutral, co2->plants->cows->ch4->co2->plants). There is no long term effect, nothing accumulates, nothing gets added, it's a circle. It is really a pointless debate.
This is really a big facepalm moment for humanity. People have fallen for this narrative that cow's methane is somehow heating up the planet. It clearly isn't. No methane accumulates. we already have as much methane in the atmosphere as we will ever have even in 1 million years in the future when we keep all our cows. No methane can accumulate, it all breaks down into co2 and the balance is already reached for the number of cows we have. The only way to get more methane into the atmosphere would be to have more cows because than a new balance would be reached (again with no long term effect)
I hate that people have fallen for this fallacy. As an engineer it worries me that people lack simple logic and math skills and our society is then doomed to fall for these obviously nonsensical narratives.
Yes cows produce methane, as do all other animals, but it's not methane from fossile fuel, it's methane from gras and bacteria, it's short term and part of natures cycle. Nothing gets added, nothing accumulates. It's always at balance for the current set up. We could have less cows but it would make next to no difference.
What we actually need to do is get to organic farming. meaning not using fossile fuel products like fertilizers. One Hectare of permanent grassland can sustain 1 cow indefinitely.
That's the perfect type of agriculture. Don't worry about methane, that's a nonsense argument and the nitrogen runoff is a symptom of non organic farming practices.
Flying in a fossile fueled aircraft to make this "documentary" has done more long term, actually accumulating damage to the atmosphere than any number of cows could ever do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Es kostet nicht mehr traditionell zu bauen. Das ist ein weit verbreiteter Irrtum und wird immer wieder von modernistischen "Architekten" als Ausrede benutz. In Wirklichkeit sind traditionelle Gebäude viel einfacher gebaut, normale gerade Wände, gleichmäßige Fenster, die meisten traditionellen Häuser haben kaum bis gar kein Fasadenschmuck, alles aus natürlichen Materialien gebaut und können von einfachen Arbeitern mit wenigen Meistern hochgezogen werden. Die Leute früher waren nicht dumm, die waren viel effizienter als wir heute, schon aus Notwendigkeit heraus. Lokale, natürliche Baustoffe die nicht vom anderen Ende der Welt angekarrt werde müssen, lokale Handwerker und Arbeiter die alles Bauen anstatt modernistische industrielle Verarbeitung, Architekturfirmen, Berater und riesige Maschinen und am Ende haben die alten Häuser das Potenzial viele hunderte Jahre zu halten anstatt nur 50 Jahre wie der moderne Schund.
Die Rechnung für traditionelles Bauen geht auf. Das Baurecht wurde leider von Modernisten und der Industrielobby geschrieben und wirft jedem Steine in den Weg der das versucht.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
let's face it the challenger is garbage. you need a new gun, everyone realizes that, but because the turret it too small you also need a new turret to mount the new gun (plus new sights and sensors). the hull is compromised by it's weak and old powerpack and it probably couldn't support a larger turret. so you need a new hull as well or at least a new powerpack and major modifications to the hull to support the powerpack and new turret. then you need to add all the modern equipment of sights, sensors and what not. in the end you would "upgrade" the challenger by replacing every single part of it costing just as much as buying a new tank and it would probably end up looking like a leopard 2 and use mainly leopard 2 parts from guns to sights and sensors, but it would be full of bugs since all new developments have problems initially, especially this sort of frankensteins monster upgrade. easy solution, build some leopard 2s and use them for 20 years before switching to the leopard 3. the only other option would be to develop a modern tank from scratch and that would mean billions of pounds in development costs that nobody can afford not to mention the inevitable cost overruns, buying mostly german parts from guns and powerpacks to sensors and sights since nobody in their right mind could justify the costs and time it would take to develop high tech world class equipment like that from scratch while you could just buy it off the shelf from rheinmetall or kmw, at least 10-15 years development time and then a short production run followed by closing everything down again and having to deal with all the teething problems of the new tank before it can be declared operational in about 20 years from now. makes no sense too me. sentimental nonsense will not make the UK military better or prepared for the future. if it was down to sentimental thinking of the lower ranks then everyone would still use ww2 tanks. that's not the way to the future. the argument of the Iraq war just shows how stupid that thinking is. the Iraq war was almost 20 years ago and even then it was a war against an unprepared 3rd world nation with old soviet tanks and badly trained and led crews with no support (satellites, air cover, artillery aso). it has no relevance for anything really.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@LanielPhoto "German "salar"." I'm going to quote trump here "WROOOONG". in german "sailors" are Soldaten or Marine Soldaten. salar isn't even a word in german... the word soldier comes from latin solidus which everyone who had some latin at school should know. through some iterations that became soldier meaning someone who gets paid for military work. so most countries don't have an official or even unofficial "nick" name for all marine soldiers. words like matelot, marinero or Matrose and similar usually only mean enlisted soldiers in the navy or is no longer in common use at all. also me thinks marinero is the wrong spanish word. it should be marino militares. here a quote from wikipedia "A soldier is one who fights as part of a military. A soldier can be a conscripted or volunteer enlisted person, a non-commissioned officer, or an officer.
In other definition, soldiers are military personnel that participate
in ground, sea, or air forces, commonly known as armies, navies, and air
forces, respectively."
must be strange for a mono language speaker that you can't translate everything one to one so that's why I told you. instead of taking that advice you come back with this passive aggressive insult laden comment. so please kindly fuck off.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Modernistische "Architektur" und Städtebau sind ein Krebsgeschwür. Linke Kommunisten (Internationale) haben uns den Scheiß eingebrockt.
Demoralisierung ist die oberste Maxime des Modernismus.
Architektur ist heute ein Selbst-Selektierter Verein. Niemand mit normalem, gesunden Menschenverstand findet Modernismus gut, nur die üblichen 5% der Bevölkerung die aus der Art schlagen finden es schön oder politisch korrekt und das sind diejenigen die dann Architektur studieren gehen.
Ich bin selbst an traditioneller Architektur, Stadtplanung und Handwerkstechniken sehr interessiert, aber keine 10 Pferde kriegen mich dazu mir 5 Jahre lang in einer Uni die modernistische Indoktrinierung anzutun (Somal ich mehr über Architektur und Städtebau weiß als jeder modernistische Architekt, ich hab mir die Unterlagen des Bachelor Architekturstudiums meiner Uni runtergeladen und durchgeschaut, das ist Kindergarten was die da machen, moderne Kunst und Projektmanagement, hat mit Architektur oder Studieren eigentlich nichts zu tun, selbst für eine 3 jährige Ausbildung wäre das zu wenig, absoluter Kindergarten)
Deshalb sind Architekten (und Stadtplaner und Baubehörden die sich größtenteils aus Architekten rekrutieren) heute ein selbst selektierter unfähiger Haufen, der eine ganz anderen Geschmack und Politik verfolgt als normale Menschen.
Ich bin lieber Ingenieur geworden und beschäftige mich nebenbei mit Architektur und Städtebau.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rmr5184 most electric cars from VW and many others are sold out almost a year in advance too. still tesla is worth more than VW, bmw, mercedes combined (according to teslas stock price). that's just nonsense all around. also tesla is not a few years ahead. porsche with the taycan showed that luxury sports cars with equal range and faster charging and faster driving can be had for only a little more moneys (to make up for the higher porsche quality) so where is tesla years ahead exactly? other brands managed to build proper E city cars that just work and are affordable like the peugeot zoe, e-up, e mini and many more, tesla has none of that. most cars in most parts of the world are around golf class in size peugeot, vw, honda, bmw all have EVs in that range and they are perfect little cars for around the same price as regular ICE versions of these cars (including government grands) so are they ahead of tesla or what? the only thing tesla is good at is building really simple E cars in the upper price segment (without having the same upper price segment quality) so basically charging people a lot of money for simple cars with good electric drives. that's nice and all but doesn't make up for all the foul plays they did with their restrictions, law suits and cult following not to mention the financial fair play. I do wonder what sort of dark money is floating around in the US where it's possible to have a company that mainly produces debt and very few cars go and outspend all other companies world wide for a decade or more without going bankrupt. all german brands together put a lot of their money into ionity charging network and it's still more expensive to charge there compared to tesla but tesla build a massive charging network as a really small company with no income and they charge less for the electricity coming out of these chargers. completely unfair financial competition. even if tesla wasn't so restrictive with their car parts and what not, this alone raises my eyebrows. someday a bomb will explode and interesting details will come forth and I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side of that shit storm... or the US is really good at protectionism who knows
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Albertkallal ... modern F16s can go Mach 2 and are therefore faster than the F35 who max out at Mach 1.6...
maybe you skipped physics class but just like the powerful jet engine is no indication for max speed (because the F35 is heavier and less aerodynamic.. fat really than other jets so the more power doesn't translate to more speed) the same is true for fuel capacity. The F35 is a fat brick and needs a large engine which needs more fuel. So the more fuel doesn't translate into more range because the powerful engine and the shit aerodynamics negate it. That's exactly the problem of aerospace engineering (which is what I studied at uni) if you make it slightly heavier or inefficient it bites you on the arse everywhere.
Also conformal fuel tanks exist in case you don't know..
PS the old F16 versions that where used by norway and as red team in the US is not only an older version (modern version of the F16 can go Mach 2+ while the F35 maxes out at Mach 1.6) but it's also a much smaller aircraft. The larger the aircraft the easier it can outrun other aircraft. That's why fighter jets could not keep up with Concorde. Didn't make Concorde a great fighter jet though.
Also these military quotes simpletons like to use are always political. you will never get any negative quotes out of active military personal simply because they like their career and everything they say is closely monitored also most of these positive quotes come from basically lobbyists who already work for or will work for the industry after they leave the military (or they are at least part of the "team" for this program).
If you want to know what they really think you need to look where the money and power is flowing. Here for example from a few weeks ago
"WASHINGTON — The Pentagon and industry agree the F-35 engine needs improvements. But despite years of development and debate, the path forward isn’t yet clear.
With the fifth-generation fighter’s missile capacity, electronic warfare, and targeting systems advancing beyond what was originally conceived, and the U.S. Air Force concerned about the potential for war against China, the service is planning to put more power and cooling ability on the F-35."
"But there remain multiple options for how to get there. One approach is making a series of upgrades to the existing Pratt & Whitney-made F135 engine currently powering the F-35 through the Enhanced Engine Program.
Another potential path is an entirely new replacement engine using cutting-edge technology such as a third stream of air to improve fuel efficiency and thrust. Pratt & Whitney and General Electric Aviation have each developed competing versions as part of the Adaptive Engine Transition Program, known as AETP."
So the fat brick needs a new more powerful engine.. well.. it's not like everyone in the know already pointed that out. Doesn't take a math genius to figure that one out.
Maybe they should also fix the 7G limit for the F35C and F35B version while they are at it because that's embarrassing all around.
They also tried to solve the too small internal weapons bay at some point..
It's a good modern aircraft but as an air superiority fighter it's almost useless, too slow, can't turn. As a multi role jack of all trades it's ok alto too expensive for this secondary role.
In the end everyone will buy it simply because it's modern, has stealth capability, is available and widely used by others. But it's not difficult to imagine a better jet fighter.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@McKenzy1971 Inhalten Konsumiert? Zum Beispiel die Regierungspropaganda die du gefressen hast wenn du den Schwachsinn mit "AfD nicht demokratisch" wiederkäust ,den du vor 5 Monaten das erste mal gehört hast, als plötzlich alle Politiker und Medien damit angefangen haben? Ohne Grund, ohne Anlass und ohne Beweis. Als ich das gleichzeitig von mehreren Politikern zum ersten mal gehört hab hatte ich mir schon gedacht die haben wieder eine neue Propagandaoffensive gestartet. Noch dazu das Wort Demokratie zu missbrauchen, wie es schon die Linken in der DDR (Deute DEMOKRATISCHE Republik) gemacht haben um "ihre Demokratie" zu "schützen". Oh ha, armes Westvolk, dumm und vollgefressen, die merken es nicht mal wenn sie gesteuert werden. So wie ich das sehe hat die anti-AfD hetze der letzten Monate auf allen Kanälen echt Wirkung gezeigt. Dem Dummvolk wurde mal wieder richtig das Gehirn gewaschen, in dem man die schlechten Umfragewerte der Regierung damit bekämpft hat in dem man die Opposition mal eben als anti-demokratisch und sich selbst als Demokratieretter verkauft hat. Grüne und Linke sind dafür sogar zu 10.000en Demonstrieren gegangen. Wie der Manchurian Kandidate..
Derweilen wird Deutschland vom Abschaum dieser Welt überrannt, Millionenfach.
Alle Statistiken zeigen das die Morde, Messerstechereien, Körperverletzungen, Gruppenvergewaltigungen und Sozialkosten für unser Land verherend sind aber an der Umvolkung wird weiter eisern Festgehalten. Die Linken haben ihre Ideologie an der die Welt genesen soll und dann wird Europa jetzt wieder in den Abgrund gestürzt. Wem das nicht gefällt oder wer es versucht zu stoppen muss nieder gemacht werden, denn Linksextremisten dulden kein Widerspruch. Mao, Stalin, Khmer und Stasi haben das schon vorgemacht.
1
-
Inhalten Konsumiert? Zum Beispiel die Regierungspropaganda die du gefressen hast wenn du den Schwachsinn mit "AfD nicht demokratisch" wiederkäust ,den du vor 5 Monaten das erste mal gehört hast, als plötzlich alle Politiker und Medien damit angefangen haben? Ohne Grund, ohne Anlass und ohne Beweis. Als ich das gleichzeitig von mehreren Politikern zum ersten mal gehört hab hatte ich mir schon gedacht die haben wieder eine neue Propagandaoffensive gestartet. Noch dazu das Wort Demokratie zu missbrauchen, wie es schon die Linken in der DDR (Deute DEMOKRATISCHE Republik) gemacht haben um "ihre Demokratie" zu "schützen". Oh ha, armes Westvolk, dumm und vollgefressen, die merken es nicht mal wenn sie gesteuert werden. So wie ich das sehe hat die anti-AfD hetze der letzten Monate auf allen Kanälen echt Wirkung gezeigt. Dem Dummvolk wurde mal wieder richtig das Gehirn gewaschen, in dem man die schlechten Umfragewerte der Regierung damit bekämpft hat in dem man die Opposition mal eben als anti-demokratisch und sich selbst als Demokratieretter verkauft hat. Grüne und Linke sind dafür sogar zu 10.000en Demonstrieren gegangen. Wie der Manchurian Kandidate..
Derweilen wird Deutschland vom Abschaum dieser Welt überrannt, Millionenfach.
Alle Statistiken zeigen das die Morde, Messerstechereien, Körperverletzungen, Gruppenvergewaltigungen und Sozialkosten für unser Land verherend sind aber an der Umvolkung wird weiter eisern Festgehalten. Die Linken haben ihre Ideologie an der die Welt genesen soll und dann wird Europa jetzt wieder in den Abgrund gestürzt. Wem das nicht gefällt oder wer es versucht zu stoppen muss nieder gemacht werden, denn Linksextremisten dulden kein Widerspruch. Mao, Stalin, Khmer und Stasi haben das schon vorgemacht.
1
-
@McKenzy1971 Inhalten Konsumiert? Zum Beispiel die Regierungspr*paganda die du gefressen hast, wenn du den Schwachsinn mit "AfD nicht demokratisch" wiederkäust ,den du vor 5 Monaten das erste mal gehört hast, als plötzlich alle Politiker und Medien gleichzeitig damit angefangen haben? Ohne Grund, ohne Anlass und ohne Beweis. Als ich das gleichzeitig von mehreren Politikern zum ersten mal gehört habe, hatte ich mir schon gedacht die haben wieder eine neue Pr*pagandaoffensive gestartet. Noch dazu das Wort Demokratie zu missbrauchen, wie es schon die Linken in der DDR (Deute DEMOKRATISCHE Republik) gemacht haben um "ihre Demokratie" zu "schützen". Oh ha, armes Westvolk, d*mm und vollgefressen, die merken es nicht mal wenn sie gesteuert werden. So wie ich das sehe hat die anti-AfD hetze der letzten Monate auf allen Kanälen echt Wirkung gezeigt. Dem Dummvolk wurde mal wieder richtig das Gehirn gewaschen, in dem man die schlechten Umfragewerte der Regierung damit bekämpft hat in dem man die Opposition mal eben aus dem nichts heraus als anti-demokratisch gestempelt hat und sich selbst als Demokratieretter verkauft. Grüne und Linke sind dafür sogar zu 10.000en Demonstrieren gegangen. Wie der Manchurian Kandidat..
Derweilen wird Deutschland vom Abschaum dieser Welt überrannt, Millionenfach.
Alle Statistiken zeigen das die Morde, Messerstechereien, Körperverletzungen, Gruppenvergewaltigungen und duzende Milliarden pro Jahr in Sozialkosten für unser Land verheerend sind, aber an der Umv*lkung wird weiter eisern Festgehalten. Die Linken haben ihre Ideologie, an der die Welt genesen soll und dann wird Europa jetzt wieder in den Abgrund gestürzt. Wem das nicht gefällt oder wer es versucht zu stoppen, muss nieder gemacht werden, denn Linksextremisten dulden kein Widerspruch. Mao, Stalin, Khmer und Stasi haben das schon vorgemacht.
PS wegen YT Gh*stblocking Kommentar zensiert, hier der zweite Versuch Meinungsfreiheit irgendwie aufrecht zu erhalten gegen den Linkstotalitarismus
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jean-yveslg719 I honestly don't know. Mostly because of historic reasons, everyone in the industry has to learn it because everyone else has learned it. Try to get a large company to change a software.. that's like moving a mountain. So everyone just puts up with it, while constantly complaining and cursing.
PS I do know how french engineers work. Trial and error is their modus operandi. If they have to build something like a satellite, they just make it up without giving it too much thought.
When it's done they measure it. weight, thermodynamics, electricity consumption, structural integrity.
Then they notice most is wrong so they start over again trying to make the 2nd one better than the first.
In international projects this sometimes leads to violence because most other engineers first calculate, manage, allocate weight-, heat-, electricity- resources, structural requirements and then simulate and only then they build. That method is unthinkable to french people.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Thomas_P_aus_M deutsche sind bis spätestens 2050 eine minderheit im eigenem land. wer die 3. welt nach deutschland holt wird deutschland zur 3. welt machen. schon jetzt brauchen wir plötzlich mehr polizisten, richter, staatsanwälte und gefängnisse sind plötzlich überfüllt obwohl sie noch vor ein paar jahren angeblich leer standen und das obwohl selbst vergewaltiger von unser unfähigen kuscheljustiz auf freien fuß getestzt werden nur weil sie muslimische migranten sind, wie jetzt der fall in dresden mal wieder deutlich machte. natürlich beteuten 2-3 millionen migranten seit 2015 ("flüchtlinge" die ihre papiere "verloren" haben) auch das die mieten steigen. ist halt angebot und nachfrage wenn plötzlich 1 million wohnungen fehlen und der staat (steuergeld) finanziert die migranten und ihre wohnungen in bester lage durch. hunderttausende von denen sind verbrecher laut öffiziellen staatlichen statistiken und das ohne verstöße gegen das aufhentaltsgesetzt und natürlich mit riesiger dunkelziffer. hauptsache wir bezahlen für unseren eigenen untergang in 2 bis 3 stelliger milliardenhöhe. das dann kein geld mehr da ist um das klima zu retten ist klar. also wird die deutsche restbevölkerung noch etwas weiter gegängelt, es wander zwar schon jetzt jedes jahr 200.000 gut ausgebildete deutsche aus und kommen nie wieder aber den rest der hier bleibt will man jetzt auch noch vergraulen. fahrverbote, tempolimit, keine wohnungen für junge deutsche familien und alte menschen, steigende kriminalität und frauen werden am fließband ermordet und vergewaltigt, die medien zensieren sich selber und schreiben nicht mehr darüber bzw nur unter regionales und verschweigen wer die täter sind das es ja rasistisch ist. schöne neue welt, aber wenn das jemand laut ausspricht kann man ihn ja wegen hassrede ins gefängniss stecken, denn leider musste man schon die rede- und meinungsfreiheit auf dem altar der migration opfern. schöne neue welt. das passiert halt wenn man eine ganze generation von weicheiern erzieht die kein selbsterhaltungstrieb mehr haben und denen man 24h am tag nazi verbrechen zur last legt. die gehirnwäsche halt wohl gewirkt. noch nie hat sich ein volk so selbstbereit aufgegeben und jeden der noch vernünftig denken kann als depp oder bot verunglimpft. mit wehenden fahnen in den untergang. das können deutsche gut, einer ideologie verfallen und dann bis zum untergang daran festhalten. schade nur das wir jedes mal auch resteurope mit in den untergrund ziehen müssen. aber im gegensatz zu kriegen ist der bevölkerungsaustausch final. da gibt es kein zurück. irgendwann mal wird man sagen, hier haben mal deutsche gelebt, bis zu ihren untergang, allahu akbar.
1
-
@Thomas_P_aus_M von pispers kenn ich alles. das er 30 minuten über den kapitalismus schimpft finde ich jetzt nicht entkräftend, ist halt schön einfach, es gibt keine probleme... migration, griechenland, gewalt gegen frauen, justizversagen usw gibt es für ihn nicht, für pispers gibt es nur probleme mit kapitalismus, ist klar. mein kommentar kannst du sowieso nicht zerlegen da ich die quellen der statistiken alle habe, OECD, statistisches bundesamt usw stimmung brauch ich auch nicht machen. sind halt alles fakten. das unsere medien sich selbst zensieren ist ja zb keine verschwörung sondern ganz öffentlich im neuen pressekodex. wenn man mal wieder liest das irgendein "mann" oder "männer" jemanden vor die bahn "geschubst" haben oder irgend eine frau getötet wurde weiß man es waren migranten, denn bei deutschen steht es immer dabei das sie deutsch sind. man muss heute wieder zwischen den zeilen lesen können, drum sind ostdeutsche wahrscheinlich auch etwas kritischer, denn die können das noch. zuletzt auch wieder schön in nürnberg oder wo das war, 2 jugendliche auf die gleise geschmissen und tot. da hieß es in den medien die täter waren deutsche. danach wurde nichts mehr berichtet. seltsam. jetzt kam im polizeibericht raus es waren ein türke und ein grieche. sind halt auch irgendwie deutsche. wollen wir mal hoffen das die opfer nicht auch migrationshintergrund hatten sonst wird das wie bei antisemitischen taten pauschal als rechte gewalt eingeordnet in der statistik. so läuft das eben heute. wenn in chemnitz weitgehend friedlich demonstriert wird sind das menschenjagten, in amberg machen 4 asylanten willkürlich jagt auf passanten und niemand nennt es beim namen. man kann gar nicht mehr die augen davor verschließen was hier los ist. es ist viel zu offensichtlich. aber die linksgrünrot verseuchten medien und politiker schaffen das doch irgendwie. wenn hier mehr leute mitbekommen würden was hier los ist, dann wär was los.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
it's called Operation Osoaviakhim. 2200 german rocket scientists where transported to the soviet union and started their rocket program by rebuilding the V2 called the R-1 in the soviet union. altho the soviets couldn't hide it, they said that the germans were sent back in the 50's but some (ca 200) never came back because they still worked on the soviet missile program in the late 50's during the development of the R-7 in "german infested"(according to the KGB) OKB-1 design bureau and it was not desired that when the germans go back to germany that they will tell the americans all the latest news about the russian nuclear deterrence, as you might imagine. unlike the americans the soviets were secretive about all of that so there are very little public sources since the soviets didn't exactly publish anything, but it's still true. also next time don't talk back at me, instead try to look it up first and don't just repeat everything soviet propaganda wants you to believe. I know their storyline too. I don't need a parrot to repeat it back at me. we all know that from rockets, nuclear weapons, concord, space shuttle and first jet airplanes, soviets copied or stole most of their tech before incorporating it in their industry. but they would never acknowledge that even if all the evidence is very clear. russian leaders just like to lie to everyone including their own people (look at the attack on Skripal and all the clear evidence but russians still lie about it or look at the shot down airplane Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, they still deny it though if it's so obvious, or look at all the russian soldiers just happening to be on holiday in the ukrain when they get captured still in their uniform and all the dead russian soldiers being secretly buried in russia and their families send notes that they where killed outside of russia and needed transporting back home and that they are not allowed to talk about it, russian lies are so obvious and they still deny everything)
PS von 'Braun got his knowledge of rocket building from building rockets and not from Tsiolkovsky. also if anything it's worth mentioning that Hermann Oberth was very influential on von Braun according to von Braun.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@jhunt5578 This is really nonsense from a scientific standpoint. Cows are, like all other animals, co2 neutral and other gases animals produce, like methane, always break down into co2 (which again is co2 neutral, co2->plants->cows->ch4->co2->plants). There is no long term effect, nothing accumulates, nothing gets added, it's a circle. It is really a pointless debate.
This is really a big facepalm moment for humanity. People have fallen for this narrative that cow's methane is somehow heating up the planet. It clearly isn't. No methane accumulates. we already have as much methane in the atmosphere as we will ever have even in 1 million years in the future when we keep all our cows. No methane can accumulate, it all breaks down into co2 and the balance is already reached for the number of cows we have. The only way to get more methane into the atmosphere would be to have more cows because than a new balance would be reached (again with no long term effect)
I hate that people have fallen for this fallacy. As an engineer it worries me that people lack simple logic and math skills and our society is then doomed to fall for these obviously nonsensical narratives.
Yes cows produce methane, as do all other animals, but it's not methane from fossile fuel, it's methane from gras and bacteria, it's short term and part of natures cycle. Nothing gets added, nothing accumulates. It's always at balance for the current set up. We could have less cows but it would make next to no difference.
What we actually need to do is get to organic farming. meaning not using fossile fuel products like fertilizers. One Hectare of permanent grassland can sustain 1 cow indefinitely.
That's the perfect type of agriculture. Don't worry about methane, that's a nonsense argument and the nitrogen runoff is a symptom of non organic farming practices.
Flying in a fossile fueled aircraft to make this "documentary" has done more long term, actually accumulating damage to the atmosphere than any number of cows could ever do.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
well you are wrong. no idea why you are so stupid to think the EU started out as some form of capitalistic efficiency project. it just didn't and never was. the european coal and steel community (first iteration of the EU) was a purely political project to make war on the continent impossible by tying german and french coal and steel industry together in a bureaucratic political organization. without coal and steel there couldn't be a new franco-german war. with this new found european political cooperation, as opposed to european military/economic antagony, came the slow process of integration, set out from the start as a political project of deeper integration. from the ecsc, to the eec to the eu. just to quote wiki. "The ECSC was run by four institutions: a High Authority composed of independent appointees, a Common Assembly composed of national parliamentarians, a Special Council composed of nation ministers, and a Court of Justice. These would ultimately form the blueprint for today's European Commission, European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Court of Justice."
ps I actually believe you and your story of having doctor titles (and then bragging with it on the internet) as an engineer I work with 'doctors' all the time. lets just say you fit right in there. I'm surprised you actually know enough to use a computer to write a comment on youtube. well done you. here I give you another doctor title. +++Doctor of Internet Studies from the University of Mar+++ it's as good and real as all your other "doctor titles" verstehst schon, au revoir stronzo.
1
-
germany never imposed austerity on anyone. they all had a choice, austerity, 'not austerity' or bankruptcy. all good options that have been used by many countries in similar situations before and since. but for 'not austerity' you need money. they wouldn't or couldn't get that money on the market because of what they did to themselves by knowingly overspending for years and loosing all trust. so they begged other countries to give them money. but like with all loans, when you want them you have to play by the rules. no bank will give you a loan if you end every month on a loss and already have 100% of your annual income in debt. the bank will tell you that will not work and you will go bankrupt. so you need to learn to spend within your means first. btw that 'german' (really norther european) approach has worked perfectly in ireland, portugal and now spain and it is begging to work in reluctant greece. their economy grows, unemployment is sinking and the government ends every year on a surplus. yes the EU is a supra national institution/state. that's the idea. the EU is something in between the UN and national states just as national states are something in between the EU and regional government just as regional governments are something in between national states and local representatives. if you live in a village you can say I am part of that village, the local constituency, the regional government, the nation, the eu and the UN and in the future probably earth and then inhabited mars will form a political entity as well. who knows. btw what macron wants and what macron gets are two different things and I'm against merkels migrant politics just as much as most people and things are already changing. nothing humans do is ever perfect. that's why there is a politic process. you can vote or get voted in. no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater. I much rather have the EU and everything that comes with it than not having it. there is no common market without a politic institution. there is no common market without things like environment protection and labour rights. if you want an economic block you need people who run it. the EU is just that- there is no conceivable option to have an economic block but not an political entity. you talk about the euro being impossible without a government controlling it, well the same is true for a common market. have your cake and eat it, right? if we would scrap the EU and started over with the intention of having an economic block we would end up with something very similar to the EU again. the only other option would be an undemocratic institution without a parliament, without a council and without a political process. that's not better, that's worse.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@DJWeiWei yes that article. (a article, not a paper and not peer reviewed). they even mention the inserted furin cleavage site as strange but that it has not been "proven" to do anything so it's not evidence for anything. guess what. it has been proven that exactly this furin cleavage site is what makes this virus so well adjusted to humans, as any virologists surly should know if they are not imposters since even biologists know this, none of this is news and everyone knows this. so why did they play dumb in this article? (rhetorical question, most authors of this article are involved with gain of function experiments as are most virologists, for most it's their only grand 'revenue') and why is this article still the main source for the "natural origin" narrative even though it's already outdated? why did they say with certainty this virus is not man made when there is no scientific proof that it is not man made/natural? it's a disgrace of an article that dragged science into the gutters and it was picked up by everyone including scientific papers and media. it's reverenced as source in many papers and the media jumped on it so that the narrative now is settled and everyone who questions or looks into the origin of this virus risks their grant moneys and their reputation. only a few speak out freely but most have been silenced. my best guess is time will tell. there is no way the chinese didn't fuck around with this, the lab shut down in wuhan that was discovered thanks to public phone data, the gene mutations, the gain of function insertion of the furin cleavage site, the fact this virus can jump into dozens of very different species right from the get go which no natural virus can just as if this virus was passed through cell cultures and lab animals (takes about a decade for a virus to jump to one new species in nature), the fact the chinese lied about the origin, the place it first appeared is nowhere near where the 'bats' live but right next to the labs the chinese (civil and military) do their research, the fact many chinese scientists have been disappeared. man if this was a court case it would be clear cut but thanks to a small group of western scientists (with 'special interests') and their nature article that is flawed beyond repair in it's facts and unscientific conclusions we got to the point where pointing out the evidence and the obvious gets you framed as conspiracy idiot and most media doesn't even report on the origin of the virus that fucked our lives.
1
-
1
-
@DJWeiWei there is no evidence that sars-cov-2 has a natural origin, none, yet thanks to one nature article that everyone is referencing (that is deeply flawed, not peer reviewed, not a paper, yet claims in absolute therms 'which is deeply unscientific in itself' and without evidence that this just can't be an escaped lab experiment and the authors are all biased and with financial interests in gain of function experiments some of them with links to the wuhan labs, not to mention is already outdated with their claim that the furin cleavage site, that looks very suspicious, having no affect on how the virus works, basically that entire article is garbage from start to end and needs to be dismissed), a laboratory origin has been decried as conspiracy theory even though there is plenty of evidence. considering everyone who says this is a chinese military experiment gone wrong risks loosing his job and reputation this is as good as it gets. as long as no one can proof this is a natural virus I stand by the facts and they don't look good for the chinese. PS "There seems to be a starting assumption that there must be a conspiracy. " well there seems to be a starting assumption that the wuhan lab and the chinese lying to us about the wuhan virus makes it magically natural, where does that come from? no evidence for a zoonotic origin of this virus even though everyone looked. not even a theory exists how this virus could have evolved. yet the virus broke out in wuhan where the labs are for these viruses, labs which have been found to be unprofessionally run, the very labs that published papers about gain of function experiments by inserting furin cleavage sites into coronaviruses in 2015, the lab where they keep it secret for many years that they have found a new coronavirus Ratg13 which is unheard of but in line with the chinese military research at the wuhan wuhan labs, the labs which had an apparent accident in the very month the virus seems to have jumped to the population based on peer reviewd papers that calculated the time line, the chinese knowingly lying about some fish market bullshit, the virus has been called out by a number scientists (the few who don't seem to rely on grant money and peer pressure including nobel prize winner) to look like a gain of function experiments with insertion of a furin cleavage site and apparently being run through cell cultures and lab animals making it so infectious to surprisingly many animals from the get go, no natural virus has been found that can explain this one, not to mention the strange random mutations patterns that can't be explained by even the most convoluted natural origin theory. by god people, who at this point is stupid enough to believe this is a bat soup accident...
PS of course virologists world wide are now seen as heroes and are showered in research money, it's human nature that they like to be the heroes of the hour and have all the resources they ever wished for, nobody has any incentive to rock the boat and make virologists into the villains of the piece by arguing that it's an escaped lab experiment. that is human nature and I can understand that. hardly a conspiracy, just human nature. but there are scientist who risk their name and reputation and thereby their jobs and financially situation and they have spoken out about this virus looking very much like a chinese lab experiment that escaped. but thanks to a media and peer pressure agenda we don't hear much about that. but the tide is slowly turning. papers are published that go against the dogma that this virus 'can't be' made in lab. some australian news papers put out articles where scientists get to say what they really think. I give another year. right now the media has already decided that this is a conspiracy so they have no incentive to prove themselves wrong, the virologists don't want to be villains of this disaster without a job (gain of function experiments employs most virologists a ban would put them out of jobs) and politicians have no reason to antagonize china or rather trump stopped the ban of gain of function experiments in the US so he will hardly point fingers in his own direction. the truth is out there. we will see in about a year.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1