Comments by "Numbers Stations Archive" (@numbersstationsarchive194) on "Wendigoon" channel.

  1. Some people can't let go of their loved ones.
    66
  2. The doctors and nurses treating him wouldn't have been allowed to end his suffering. The only person who could consent to this was Ouchi himself, and he obviously didn't. He wanted to live and was hopeful to experience the new millenium with his family.
    29
  3. It's also not sensationalist garbage, as most videos on him tend to be. Around the early 2010s a pop-sci article filled with factual inaccuracies (and an infamous misattributed photograph of a burn victim from the US) caused the internet to believe he was kept alive against his will and treated as some kind of medical experiment, which wasn't the case at all.
    11
  4.  Wicker 2  Jessie has left several comments similar to that. I think they may have some kind of sick perverse fetish.
    7
  5. Masato Shinohara fared much better than Ouchi, unlike with Ouchi, Shinohara's skin grafts were successful and prevented severe bleeding and infections. He ultimately died from multiple organ failure in April 2000.
    4
  6. Masato Shinohara, Ouchi's co-worker who received a similar bodily dose, survived for almost a year, much longer than Ouchi.
    4
  7.  @lanac5793  They can, but they didn't. The point is moot because this happened over two decades ago.
    3
  8. No, his digestive tract was bleeding uncontrollably and his organs were failing. After he died it was discovered his stomach and intestines each contained over 2kg of blood. Even if by some miracle he survived the worst of it his body would have been ravaged by cancers.
    3
  9. This is false. The belief that he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    3
  10. They don't graft an entire body worth of skin onto his body at once. They do several small patches every few days. I thought it would be fairly obvious but apparently not.
    2
  11. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
    2
  12. Taxpayers, like in every country other than the US.
    2
  13. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  14. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  15. Ouchi was actually his first name, and it's supposedly a strange romanisation. It would be pronounced something like "oh-oh-chi".
    1
  16. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  17. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  18. Masato Shinohara, who was pouring the liquid into the funnel, recieved a similar dose to Ouchi, although his treatment was more successful and he survived almost a year. The third technician, Yutaka Yokokawa, only suffered from mild ARS and developed mild hair loss and an ulcer in his mouth.
    1
  19. Shame on you and your ignorance. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. At least do some research before spouting such shit.
    1
  20. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  21. The only person who could have provided consent to end his life was Ouchi himself, and he didn't do so, even in the final days he was conscious.
    1
  22. This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  23.  @mossarie  The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. He was not a "medical experiment", stop spouting such bullshit and have some respect for the parties involved.
    1
  24. Uhhh, this didn't happen at Fukushima Daiichi. Wrong power plant.
    1
  25. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  26. That's not true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  27. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  28. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Shame on you. Do some research before spouting such bullshit.
    1
  29. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  30.  @demonoftheblood13  And, of course, that ignorant moron couldn't even reply to you. Shame on them.
    1
  31.  @nh6900  Stop making these untrue comments.
    1
  32. This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  33.  @nh6900  Given you don't even know the name of "the other guy", I don't think you have the tiniest bit of credibility.
    1
  34. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  35. I agree. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  36. His entire digestive tract was filled with blood. I imagine an ostomy bag would cause more harm than good.
    1
  37. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  38. No, because his digestive tract was uncontrollably bleeding and his organs were failing. After he died his stomach and intestines were found to contain each over 2kg of blood. If by some miracle he survived the worst of it his body would've been ravaged by cancers.
    1
  39. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
    1
  40. This is false. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  41. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
    1
  42.  @tonys4396  This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  43. This is false. The belief that he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  44. I don't think fentanyl was even discovered in 1999.
    1
  45. This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  46. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  47. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  48. His coworker lived for almost a year.
    1
  49. This is a myth. The belief that he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1
  50. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
    1