General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Numbers Stations Archive
Wendigoon
comments

Comments by "Numbers Stations Archive" (@numbersstationsarchive194) on "The Most Painful Death Ever (VIEWER DISCRETION)" video.

Some people can't let go of their loved ones.
66
The doctors and nurses treating him wouldn't have been allowed to end his suffering. The only person who could consent to this was Ouchi himself, and he obviously didn't. He wanted to live and was hopeful to experience the new millenium with his family.
29
It's also not sensationalist garbage, as most videos on him tend to be. Around the early 2010s a pop-sci article filled with factual inaccuracies (and an infamous misattributed photograph of a burn victim from the US) caused the internet to believe he was kept alive against his will and treated as some kind of medical experiment, which wasn't the case at all.
11
Wicker 2 Jessie has left several comments similar to that. I think they may have some kind of sick perverse fetish.
7
Masato Shinohara fared much better than Ouchi, unlike with Ouchi, Shinohara's skin grafts were successful and prevented severe bleeding and infections. He ultimately died from multiple organ failure in April 2000.
4
Masato Shinohara, Ouchi's co-worker who received a similar bodily dose, survived for almost a year, much longer than Ouchi.
4
@lanac5793 They can, but they didn't. The point is moot because this happened over two decades ago.
3
No, his digestive tract was bleeding uncontrollably and his organs were failing. After he died it was discovered his stomach and intestines each contained over 2kg of blood. Even if by some miracle he survived the worst of it his body would have been ravaged by cancers.
3
This is false. The belief that he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
3
They don't graft an entire body worth of skin onto his body at once. They do several small patches every few days. I thought it would be fairly obvious but apparently not.
2
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
2
Taxpayers, like in every country other than the US.
2
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
Ouchi was actually his first name, and it's supposedly a strange romanisation. It would be pronounced something like "oh-oh-chi".
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
Masato Shinohara, who was pouring the liquid into the funnel, recieved a similar dose to Ouchi, although his treatment was more successful and he survived almost a year. The third technician, Yutaka Yokokawa, only suffered from mild ARS and developed mild hair loss and an ulcer in his mouth.
1
Shame on you and your ignorance. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. At least do some research before spouting such shit.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have provided consent to end his life was Ouchi himself, and he didn't do so, even in the final days he was conscious.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@mossarie The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. He was not a "medical experiment", stop spouting such bullshit and have some respect for the parties involved.
1
Uhhh, this didn't happen at Fukushima Daiichi. Wrong power plant.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
That's not true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Shame on you. Do some research before spouting such bullshit.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@demonoftheblood13 And, of course, that ignorant moron couldn't even reply to you. Shame on them.
1
@nh6900 Stop making these untrue comments.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@nh6900 Given you don't even know the name of "the other guy", I don't think you have the tiniest bit of credibility.
1
The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
I agree. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
His entire digestive tract was filled with blood. I imagine an ostomy bag would cause more harm than good.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
No, because his digestive tract was uncontrollably bleeding and his organs were failing. After he died his stomach and intestines were found to contain each over 2kg of blood. If by some miracle he survived the worst of it his body would've been ravaged by cancers.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
This is false. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
@tonys4396 This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
This is false. The belief that he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
I don't think fentanyl was even discovered in 1999.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
His coworker lived for almost a year.
1
This is a myth. The belief that he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Do some research before spouting such disrespectful crap. Shame on you.
1
@JessieP07 Did you even read the comment, you disrespectful moron? The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@yourcasualfinn2213 Clearly none of you have ever lost a family member.
1
Found the groomer
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@johnd.2778 Sure, it is selfish of his wife to do something like that, but you would understand if you had ever lost someone close to you in a slow and painful way.
1
It saved his coworker, Masato Shinohara, who survived for almost a year, mostly due to his skin grafts being successful.
1
Your argument is based purely on fearmongering and misinformation. Nuclear power is actually one of the safest and least polluting forms of power.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
The United States is the only country in the world to have medical bills. Japan, and every other country on earth, has free healthcare.
1
Shut the fuck up and do some research before spouting such disrespectful nonsense. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Shame on you.
1
They DID ask him if he wanted to die. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
Coal and oil are slowly ending us, and renewable energy is too inefficient to replace it. Funny how green nuts focus exclusively on nuclear energy killing a few people a year on average in freak accidents, and never on coal or oil killing millions a year from lung cancer, destroying communities by raising the sea level, wiping species off the face of the earth.
1
The skin grafts were conducted successfully, the issue was that his body wasn't accepting the grafts, which caused his skin to become infected.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
How is it possible for someone to make such a callous assumption? You don't know what his family felt, you aren't them, so shut the fuck up and keep your idiotic, disrespectful opinion to yourself.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@ballinonabudget6229 The fact that he allowed doctors to continue to treat him until the end should be proof enough.
1
@ballinonabudget6229 Alright then, keep believing your sensationalised view of events. You really are grasping at straws.
1
How so?
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Have some respect for Ouchi's family, the medical team treating an extremely complex case, and Ouchi himself.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
Did you even watch the video? This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
 @Bewefau It's so obvious that you're trolling. Try harder.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
...No, that's not at all what happened, and that's not how radiation works.
1
That's simply not true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@rustykilt You cannot agree with his own decision to prolong his suffering in the hope that he may survive?
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
Actually, that's not true at all. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
@Chillerll This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The sensationalist bullshit makes me feel sick. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
This simply isn't true. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
They couldn't. The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Shame on you for spouting such ignorant bullshit. Have some respect for the parties involved.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi. Have some respect, do some research before spouting such ignorant nonsense.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness.
1
The false version of events that claims he was kept alive as some sort of cruel medical experiment has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1
The only person who could have consented to ending his medical treatment was Ouchi himself, and he clearly didn't consent to it, even in his final days of consciousness. The belief that he was kept alive against his will as some sort of cruel medical experiment is a myth that has existed since the early 2010s, and can be attributed to a single poorly-researched sensationalist pop-sci article. The same article also misattributed a now infamous image of a US burn ward patient as being a photograph of Ouchi.
1