Comments by "MilesBellas" (@MilesBellas) on "British soldiers use picture of Jeremy Corbyn as a shooting target" video.

  1. They need prosecution, no member of the public or armed forces should suggest or exemplify the assassination of politicians.
    5
  2.  @michaelflanagan7762  Google Jack Renshaw. He is currently on trial for saying the same thing you just wrote about another politician. You realise online statements are not only actively traced by authorities but result in regular criminal prosecutions?
    3
  3.  @michaelflanagan7762  It's called : protecting innocent people from crazy violent people. Political leaders have been assassinated, even in the UK. Threats of violence towards politicians should be traced and those responsible prosecuted.
    1
  4.  @stubbymac1  How?
    1
  5.  @stubbymac1  Explain how. You can't? Your comment is a fake idiom without substance?
    1
  6.  @pippipster6767  Those are acronyms not idioms.
    1
  7.  @pippipster6767  TOPIC They need prosecution, no member of the public or armed forces should suggest or exemplify the assassination of politicians.
    1
  8.  @pippipster6767  Acronym a word formed from the initial letters of a multi-word name Idiom commnly used phrase ie "one of the biggest threats to blah blah"
    1
  9.  @pippipster6767  You are distracting because you made a mistake.
    1
  10.  @pippipster6767  Again another distraction comment. First you distracted "price of....." because you don't know the difference between an acronym and an idiom. THEN you are trying to confuse "what on earth" ....to distract from your mistake .....again. . The topic isn't abput you talking about bread etc... THIS IS THE TOPIC: "no member of the public or armed forces should suggest or exemplify the assassination of politicians." You are writing to address the topic? .
    1
  11.  @pippipster6767  Did you bother to read the article you are commenting on? British forces decided to use a political leader's image to shoot at. If a civilian did this is would potentially result in a trial. THAT IS WHAT I AM WRITING ABOUT THE ARTICLE.
    1
  12.  @pippipster6767  "I can't be...." Translation : you didn't read the article, do not know what idiom means and distract/insult to prevent yourself learning. Face it. Address the topic.
    1
  13.  @pippipster6767  No, I'm not "obsessed" ; wrong again. OMG WTF LOL etc..... a list of acronyms.
    1
  14.  @pippipster6767  You are off topic.
    1
  15.  @pippipster6767  "you are...." Ad Hominem Fallacy. .
    1
  16.  Kenneth Cox  No it's not. Any member of the public engaging in such potentially sinister behaviour would absolutely be questioned by Police or taken to court.
    1
  17.  Kenneth Cox  Remember Jo Cox? You don't believe political figures are targets of dangerous far right extremism ? They are. The British Army is not a training ground of extremism.
    1
  18.  @pippipster6767  "except" OFF TOPIC
    1
  19.  @pippipster6767  People in the British Army who suggest political assasination or encourage extremism need to be court martialed and removed from active service. .
    1
  20.  @michaelflanagan7762  "No doubt you are" Ad Hominem Fallacy Your presumptions are more toxic psychology. FACE REALITY Targeting and threatening political leaders is a crime. Any violent far right memembers of the British Army targetting political leaders for possible assassination or violence should be prosecuted.
    1
  21.  @michaelflanagan7762  You are projecting both your ignorance and fears. . Try understanding.. . "An army spokesperson said: “We are aware of a video circulating on social media. This behaviour is totally unacceptable and falls well below the high standards the army expects, and a full investigation has been launched.”"
    1