Comments by "jean-louis pech" (@jean-louispech4921) on "heretics. clips"
channel.
-
true right wing ideas ( far right, reactionaries, nationalists, bigots , etc... ) are based on negatives emotions fear and anger, and the related binary way of thinking, the mentality based on reject of loss.
True left wing thinking ( then not the wokes or the so called communists in the eastern countries and related regimes ) is based on search of individual and collective gain, and on the related joy and sadness emotions. This is a way a thinking against the binary way of thinking of the true right wing, this is why it is against racial or sexist stereotypes and prejudices for examples.
focus on security is based on fear.
bringing religion first is based on emotions, fear of uncertainty, etc...
etc....
racism is based on fear and anger.
sexism is not rational.
Not allowing medical care for poepels is not rational, it is just personal greed based on reject of loss.
12
-
@MadsterV
you are just making a straw man attack, you don't have any argument support for going against what i say.
your answer is biased by irrational view instead of scientific rational view of antagonisms of ideologies.
The last sentence is based on nothing, this is a pure liar.
I speak about ideas not labels! Then you are a liar.
What i say is just :
historic antagonism between right and left
political analysis based on values, practices related to values, etc...
political psychology
neuro politic (studies about relation between brain usage and ideologies, related to psychology)
And you believe that your poor answer without any argument can have any weight?
This is the consequences of the ideas of right wing based on fear and anger, reject of loss, that makes right wing bad.
Reality doesn't mind about your feelings.
The fatal flaw is in your head, not in what i say. You don't mind rational view about ideologies, you don't care about why there is a conflict between left and right since the revolutions, etc...
5
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@iDEATH
Ignorant is ignorant and is unable to give a good definition of hhe collectivism, and assign to collectivism the values opposed to collectvism..
Icollectivism is qu'outre the power of the collective, it is in the name. You are a clown.
The church or a dictatorial state are not the collective, the collective is the whole majority, and then not the power if thd minorités like xokism.
Changé youd dictionnaire.
In real collectivisme nobody has personnal power, and even less a particular organisations like hhe church.
Power of the church is particularisme, like the woke.
Collectivism isegalitarian, everybody in hhe collectiveis equal,, wokism is anti egalitarian,and all the hhings you say qbout wokism defines it as anti egalitarian, then particularist.
Collective = the whole majorité, wokism is about minorities zgainst majority. Then when you use your brain you understand that xokism is anti collectivist.
If you don't understand the antagonism between the power of vollective and and an ideology that is based on division and minorities, you speak in the void.
1
-
conservatives think men and women relations with their left hemisphere , everybody must be locked in a specific place, there is no place for nuance, freedom. This why conservatives dislike homosexual, dislike free women who don't want to be trapped in the role assigned by conservatives.
Real progressives, liberals, think men and women relation and roles with their right hemisphere, allowing nuances for men and women, and rejecting prejudices and stereotypes based on sex.
And then wokes defending like conservatives the sexist stereotypes like : long hairs = woman, dress = woman, make up = woman, etc... are not in a real progressive mind set, they just claim to be progressive or left wing, they think with the left hemisphere too, and express mental rigidity. They just reverse the expressions of the right wing .
When religion enters in politic, it is under the left hemisphere, with conservative religious, there is no nuance in their world view where the society must be under their rigid view of religion.
1
-
1
-
1
-
there is a confusion between individualism and particularism .
Wokism and all the identity thing is not individualist, it is particularist.
Individualism is about autonomous individuals, not peoples who live by the gaze of others.
individualism is about autonomy, particularism is about differences, showing difference ( not the same dressing than other peoples , not the same look, , not the same car, not the same house, etc... ) , creating difference ( inequalities, stereotypes, prejudices, discrimination, etc... ), viewing differences.
individualism = i do my best, i want become better. ( like musicians who are training their skills with their instrument )
particularism = i want to be the best, better than the others
particularism is related to ego, egocentricism, etc... and wokes are famous for being narcissistic.
the true individualism, who cares about the individualism of others, and not only is own person is antagonist to egocentricism , and has limits, the first limit is the other individuals.
limiting peoples to one identity, one difference, is not individualism, it is opposite of individualism.
Well the confusion comes that individualism and particularism are fused in egoism, and everyone call egoism "individualism".
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@GrnXnham
What i say is not stereotypes this is just knowledge of political sciences , on psy hological and brain level.
Then bringing your ignorance, znd reading my message with your own stereotypes, prejudices, based on your ignorance of political sciences, is not an anwer or an argument.
You don't have any argument that is validate by science, expériences, etc.. unlike me.
Ignorance is not an argument , repeating that what i say us just stereotypes, is not an argument, because you go against sciences, knowledge, logic, understanding of how we think political ideas, etc...
If you don't bring anything that does not come ftom knoledge, like i do, you waste. your time .
Do derious search like me or don't pretend to give me a lesson about what is wrong or not.
Ignorants see politic like a team competition, like blue vs red, where ides, values, etc... do not count, with antagonists ideas inside both side, like democracy and dictatorship.
Peoples with knowledge and understanding, know that the real antagonism left vs right, has its roots in psychology, brain, etc... with full antagonism betxeen ideas of both sides.
Because or brain is based on antagonists "tools", like cognitives process, emotions, etc.. for antagonists drive .
And you are not part of the second case, unlike me who need to have this knowledge for exposing, it.
On scientific level, labels do not care, only the way of thing , the values related, etc... matters.
Only far right people thknk at 100% in rigjt wing mode, moderate right can pick in every others political drive, like liberalism, left/ progressivist, or communautarian. It is le same for True radical left, like anarchism, revolutionary western socialism, etc...
Stalin and Mao are athoritarian rigjt on psychomogical level, then they don't fit in the left wing thinking.
Words have a meaning else for the fool who want meaningless thinking and discution.
1
-
1