Comments by "jean-louis pech" (@jean-louispech4921) on "Rick Beato" channel.

  1. 15
  2. 10
  3. 5
  4. 5
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 2
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. This is about the idea i get about popular music , rock, etc.... Most of the bands make their career and best or more performant albums when they are young. A lot of artist make the core of career, with great success , inside the first decade, and after if they are lucky they have some hits again after , some can just have a new career, etc.... This is the case for most single singer or many bands if they survive. I remember in 82 when the rolling stones made a new album with some hits, it was seen as a feat for a rock band of their age, their was no more a lot of concurrents of the beginning of the 60's around, in the time of punk, new wave, funk , disco, metal, etc... and all the closing genres of the early 80's. I think that for modern music there are two explanations : for rock bands and related modern genres , they are musics about youth, or creativity, new thing like full electronic music (kraftwerk, jarre, etc.... who had their biggest hit in their first decade, before or around their 30 years ), fluid intelligence is the core intelligence, they need to bring new things, even without mastering the theory of music, even if many of them can have some kind of classical formation. Punk music and post punk music are all about fluid intelligence, they build their own music, their style, it is all about progress , novelty, etc.... And for this the early 80's where at the top, many of the new actors were young, without any knowledge on theory, not trained as super musicians who can play "1000" notes or chords per minutes, etc... And at the end of the 80's many of them have stopped to play on the pure fluid intelligence, they were references to knowledge of older genre , music of previous decades ( 60's and 70's , or old rock or American music ) , etc.... For classical music it is another wold, making a good music for an orchestra needs a lot of experience for mastering the place and playing of each instruments, how they can interact between them, etc....then it needs a good crystallized intelligence, based on knowledge, experience. This is why it is after years of formations, training, experiences, testing, etc... that the greater classic composers or movie composers, can build their best music for an orchestra. Second factor is the career in the modern world were there is a big turn over of artists of the year, where artist can be forgotten , outdated if they don't have any hit for a long time, and a career in a more classic domain where it is about the long term, where being good allows you to do a great and long career, and you are not forgotten after 10 years, and where there are less concurrents.
    1