Comments by "jean-louis pech" (@jean-louispech4921) on "Waarom ik links nu links laat liggen" video.

  1. a cosnervative is someone narrow minded, a liberal is someone open minded. What you say is just a false claim, what is say is backed by science.
    3
  2. conservatives positions from conseratives are always conservatives. the real liberal position can't be conserative.
    2
  3. racism bigotery xenophobia homophobia are words with a real meaning : narrow minded and authoritarians beliefs , hating, excluding people for what they are. islamophobia can't have different meaning ranging from hating people with ethnicity linked as muslims (racism, far right), to reject of fundamentalism On the right side you have plenty of peoples who juge people on the skin color, sex, religion, social status, etc... want discriminations following this categories.
    1
  4. you mean peopel are agaisnt them? ... for the white straitght males progressists? Do you realize that LGBT are a minority among the population.
    1
  5. no it is alway actuality. just have to look to people supporting trump, and what we see are narrow minded people, who fear what is different of what they know, who see conflict between differences, etc... Trump targeted the conservatives and far right peoples with agonistic values, ideas, then made for touching narrow minded people.
    1
  6. This not a random assomption, it is some discoveries from psychologists and neurologists. People driven by fear, anger, disgusts are narrow inded, they are unable to manage new things. Thisi why conservatives like men and women pigeonholed in stereotyped categories for exemple and dislke gays.
    1
  7. You have wrote "all" not me. a) Neurology study show, on statistic point of view , that conservative use more their amygdalia thant their ACC, this is the opposite "liberal". Many psychologist studies make a link between conservatism and negative emotions like fear, anger, disgust. On the model of 10 values of schwartz there are values of conservation : tradition ,conformism, defense , focusing on order , preservation of the past, resistance to change. This value define well the conservative philosophy . I would add another value for covering the genral conservative ideology : power. This 3 values have an common interest , with the value of power : prevention of loss. b) The amygdalia manage negatives emotions like fear and anger. prevention of loss is linked to fear and anger. Then from independant way we have always the same conclusion conservatism is linked to fear, and other negatives emotions. And in reality we see many conservatives politicians playing with the fears of the peoples like criminality, immigration, terrorism, etc.... The 9/11 made people more conservatives in opinions after the terrorist attack. Close mindness is routed to fear, fear of unknow, fear of change, fear of difference. Fear of uncertainity is a trait associated to conservatives by many studies, while liberals are associated to openness to uncertainty. And fear of uncertainty is rigid mind. Conservatism contains rigidity in its name : conservation, no change, reject of novelty, etc.... Education by fear and stringent rules, the typical conservative education , make people close mind.
    1
  8. christian garcia I speak of the conservative psychology, the characteristic of the conservative psychology, what make conservatives taking the positions they have. Why conservatives are sexists or hold for religion, for exemepl is linked to the psychologic drives. You are not open minded when you defend a sexist or a racist position. A - Well all what i say can be found in scientifics sources, there are a lot of documents, articles about the subjects. B - No because ideologies are linnked to some psychology. Neurologic stupies point the fact that each ideologic orientation is linked to some cognitive process. sexism , racism, homophobia, prejudice agaisnt poor, etc... are driven by fear, anger , disgust. If a white is not racist face to a black, for exemple, he can't be driven by fear of unknow or difference, but by other cognitive process that alow him to manage somthing unknow, different. By not being racist it opens the way to positive emotion that do not involve fear like love, friendship, fraternity, tolerance. It is other congitive process involved. Your deny does not works, only ignorance. There are 4 majors ideologic orientations, and what concerns the conservative trend does not concern the others , even more true for the antagonist.
    1
  9. The Arsenal Gamer Ignorance is bliss
    1
  10. christian garcia Else ignorance what have you to say? Sexism and racism is defended only in the right wing side. Thisi a common antagonism between the right and the left. Progressive left fights since a long time for more rights and freedoms for women, or blacks in racist societies. Many socialists thinkers were defnding rights for women since the birth of socialism in the 30's and 40's of the 19th century, while the conseratives and laisser-faire bourgeois where very sexists at the same time. About sexism , racism and open mind, well you have no arguemnt else your ignorance. You are realy stupid because in fact you give me the point : Being open minded is not being prejudice agaisnt people, while sexism and racism is all prejudice agaisnt women or racial minorities. Reporting a fact about some ideas is not being close minded, rejecting closemindness of the sexism and racism is what all normal open minded people do. sexism and racism are not new idea but very old and archaics ideas. No argument agaisnt what is say in fact. You are trying to makinbg open mind = acepting close mind. Stupidity at his higher point. Well just this point prove that you have nothing to say about the subject. You are closeminded to scientific knowledge. B- well this is sceinctific knowledge, you onlmy point is yuour ignorance and yourr close minde that forbid you to understand deep concepts. well bye bye you are a lost of time.
    1
  11. Christian Garcia Yes it makes sense, you did not bring any knowledge, just ignorance of some basic knowledge and may fallacies. Argument of omniscience, ROFLOL . No it is just a reality. In fact all your example will be false, because i speak only on idealogical point of view, what is studied by scientist, i don't care about the label of the people. The history show that left have defended equality of freedom for women with men, and black with whites. And this in all countries, while sexism and racism was defended among the right wing against the progressivism of the Left. If you speak to me of people that share the same mental process than the conservatives, well they are not left wing on ideological point of view. And fall in the same range with classical conservatives. The people you are speaking are just people with left label stuck on the front, like we can stick a ferrari logo on a lada, even if the lada is red it is not a luxury sport car because there is the ferrari logo. This statement is just a right wing statement , it follows the psychology of the right wing ideologies. Tjhere are some miror claim from the conservative side, that are regular claim, like women are not legitimate for making this or that, etc.... Come with peoples who defend ideas of Left, defending the equal autonomy of the individuals from all identities categories. lol abolition of slavery, hey man it was in the 19th century. Fallacious argument!!!!! You are hidding the fact that republicans and democrat have switched of camps on the left right scale later!!!! Always playing with label, but totaly void from ideological point of view. And only that matters. Slavery is a far right ideology, it is the absolute hierarchy, and then fit only in right wing ideology. The left is build on equality, against all hierarchies. This is why in France where the Left Right scale was born, it was the Left, equalitarian , that has abolished the slavery twice, while the Right, hierarchic , defended the slavery until is last abolition. At the beginning the republicans were more progressives and then were against slavery. And the democrats where more classic liberal, it was only in the 20th century that they shifted toward more left wing , it begins with Roosevelt . The democrat - republican is not a good model for the left right scale. For the concept linked to left and right just above i am referring to : https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/how-risky-is-it-really/201302/the-cognitive-and-historic-roots-modern-polarization The left pole is egalitarians, the left's ideas are ideas linked to the egalitarian group, and the right ideas pole is the ideas of the hierarchic group . We can find the same relation of ideas with the values of Schwartz, with the interests of values : egalitarians = search of gain hierarchic = prevention of loss communitarians = focus on other "individualist" = ... focus on the person All the rest are void words without meaning, with manipulation, propaganda playing with words, labels, etc... making loose meaning to the words. For serious political psychologist, the conservatism fit the hierarchic group. We can easily recreate all the positions of conservatives against the left.
    1
  12. Ryan Mykytyshyn you are the fool . Just supporting the billionary psychopath trump is the perfect proof.
    1
  13. progresives are humanist, then they are human. people voting for trump ... are not humanists.
    1
  14. footsnowden mental disorder may be , else for intersexuals, sometime they are not assigned to their "natural" sex.
    1
  15. conservatism is authoritarian. The classic left is antiauthoritarian. Being agaisnt sexism, racism, bigotery is being antiauthoritarian. Then the left is antiauthoritarian. Some people confuse hate speech and freedom of speech. They confuse defending egocentric hunger for money and power without limit, and freedom.
    1