Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "Ukraine’s Counter-Offensive Begins: What’s Happened So Far?" video.

Who is progizhin?
4
@Leitosssssss and of course Ukraine showed how much it cared for fellow Ukrainians shelling Donbas civilians for 8 years, cutting off the water supply to Ukrainian citizens in Crimea and burning 46 protesters alive in Odessa, to say nothing of the war crimes committed by Adair and Azov against Ukrainian citizens and the punishment executions to any Ukrainian who accepted food and medicine aid from Russians whilst under occupation. Yes, Ukrainians are very caring to their own people
2
@thornelderfin why weren’t they given the opportunity to vote is the question I’d like to know. They should have conducted a referendum on the Ukrainian side with both under un observers or at least the Ukrainian one. That would add legitimacy to the claim that the people there don’t want to join Russia
2
Sounds like a complete guess to me. I’m sure if the Ukrainians had lost large numbers they’d tell the truth about it though, am I right?
1
@haroeneissa790 that was a nice way to treat all the Ukrainian citizens living there.
1
@WightLad811 yeah but don’t say that because it goes against the authorised narrative and it will upset lots of propaganda bots
1
@SourVodka Ukraine has previously hit the dam with himars so it’s entirely conceivable it did it again, especially as it destroyed the entire Russian front line and a day later Ukraine attack. Bit of a coincidence
1
@valyshknee4203 or the Ukrainians could have hit it with Himars again like they did late last year. It’s wiped out the entire Russian frontline and a day later, the Ukrainian offensive begins. Bit of a convenient coincidence
1
@Leitosssssss why on earth would Russia blow up a dam that wiped out their entire frontline ? And a day later Ukraine attack? What a convenient coincidence
1
@BLMVDV Slovaks? The same ones that Bandera and his Galician SS division slaughtered so many of in 1945 after the Slovakian uprising against the Germans?
1
@kendexter there is proof of that because the Ukrainians have already attacked the dam with himars in a successful test last year. So we know they planned to do it and had successfully tested their capability to do it. The only proof we have of Russian mining it is Ukrainian intelligence claims, which is no evidence at all and just propaganda. The fact that they are making such claims with no sources or evidence suggests that it is in fact subterfuge and deflection, adding to the likelihood that Ukraine did it. Then when you consider the flooding is wiping out the entire Russian frontline that they spent the last 6 months digging and fortifying, losing them equipment, supplies, ammunition and food, and the day after the dam is blown up Ukraine launch an offensive as the Russians are in disarray and scrambling to establish a new front line, the evidence strongly suggests it was Ukraine who did it. It certainly doesn’t seem to have conferred any advantage to Russia and advantage to Ukraine
1
@awesome guy because Ukrainians have really shown they care about their citizens by using them as human shields
1
@kendexter Stalin was Georgian and his politburo was dominated by Ukrainians, who were primarily responsible for the Holodomor, and Ukrainians ran the USSR and dominated the politburo for 30 years after his death. The only prominent Russian in Stalin’s politburo was Molotov, who was minister for foreign affairs, the rest were Ukrainian and Georgian
1
@sylviahutchison5203 it was already damaged from Ukraine’s himars rocket attacks last year
1
@mso1ps4 where’s this footage? Can you prove it’s from the dam and when it was taken? The floods wiped out the Russian frontline which they had to do an emergency evacuation from under Ukrainian shelling, leaving ask their equipment and supplies behind, that doesn’t sound like it was the Russians to me.
1
@K25_the_first propaganda probably
1
@K25_the_first there’s definitely propaganda on both sides, whether it’s equal or not I can’t tell because since they banned RT I’m not exposed to Russian propaganda except that which is heavily filtered by our press. What I do know is that there is an unprecedented and inordinate amount of AI generated propaganda coming out of Ukraine, especially on social media, and in the b western MSM as well . I’ve never seen more unbalanced one sided reporting across the entire media in my life, which is why I know it’s BS. They even denied stuff they reported 8 years and 5 years ago ever happened, despite it still being on video and available on YouTube. I’ve seen history being rewritten before my eyes, and it’s clear there’s a huge agenda behind it. There’s also a massive amount of censorship on YouTube and other Social media comment sections that restrict anything that isn’t in line with the authorised narrative.
1
@sylviahutchison5203 who said that? The Ukrainians? Was this before it after they damaged it with himars in November and December? Why did they shell it if they didn’t think it was going to do anything? How did they manage to damage it if it couldn’t be damaged by himars? Once you’ve damaged the dam it might be only be a matter of time before it breaks if you don’t repair it. They proved they could damage it, we’ve all seen the photos and video and it looks substantial. How on earth can you say for sure more damage wouldn’t have caused this, once it’s weakened structurally the water pressure will do the rest.
1
@Reticulated_Spline ha ha ha and if you believe that you’ll believe anything
1
Depends on the attitude of the people who live there surely?
1
@hungrymusicwolf internationally only four countries recognise Taiwan, does that mean it’s still occupied?
1
@cameron6770 every military is hostile, that’s the point
1
Kosovo‘a vote was considered legitimate and that was under a foreign occulting force @guitarhausdoesntknowwhatac3285
1
@thornelderfin are you saying referendums should be disputed with force?
1
@DreamingSomewhere Polish? The polish are attacking Russia now? Why did they attack civilians and shell their homes?
1