Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "The Mirror" channel.

  1. 11
  2. 10
  3. 7
  4. 6
  5. 6
  6. 5
  7. 5
  8. 4
  9. 4
  10. 3
  11. 3
  12. 3
  13. 3
  14. 3
  15. 3
  16. 3
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. 2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. 2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38.  @georgearthur205  I’ve slipped down plenty of river banks into rivers, it’s difficult to believe an adult body could fall unwillingly into a river without leaving a trace. And sure, you it could be done, but it’s unlikely. Why c would she be right at the edge anyway? Even there she’s still going to fall down the bank, unless she jumped, was pushed or was thrown in. And even if she did somehow fall unwillingly without touching the side it’s unlikely she would hit her head and drown, sure it could happen but it’s unlikely. And even if that did happen, the river was at a slow flow rate, it hadn’t rained for weeks, so the chances of her body being carried far before being fouls are remote. So you’re asking us to believe in a cacophony of coincidences and remote possibilities that there isn’t actually any evidence for at all, despite them spending all their time and resources on looking for some, because it’s more likely than something else they’ve haven’t even looked for evidence of yet? Sorry buddy I don’t buy it. The crime scene was compromised right from there get go, there was no forensics before the press and the public were allowed to contaminate the area, they haven’t collected cctv footage, they haven’t investigated why the only cctv camera that would have seen v what happened stopped working days before, they haven’t even searched the caravan park the gate to which is ten meters from the bench. It seems just as likely if not far more so that she was abducted and taken into the caravan park, possibly into a caravan and then God knows where. They didn’t trace the red van seen leaving the area and they never will now as if it’s involved it will have been destroyed, and if it wasn’t why wouldn’t the owner have come forward? Seems to me that the phone, harness and dog were deliberately left there to make the police jump to the conclusion she’d fallen into the river, quite possibly by someone well acquainted with local police procedures, perhaps someone who knew a newly appointed woman would be in charge of the case. A current or ex policeman maybe. Another Wayne Couzens or Daniel Carrick. The force is full of them. It could even be that the police are covering it up to avoid more political fallout. They covered up for Couzens and Carrick for 20 years.
    2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 1
  45. 1
  46. 1
  47. 1
  48. 1
  49. 1
  50. 1