Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "AI Regulation, Explained" video.

Most especially this guy and Congress and most definitely not Biden
3
@andreaspatounis5674 that’s true but we know enough to know it isn’t sentient yet (we think).
2
@escesc1 we’re not able to agree on a test for it either. This is part of the issue. How will we know if AI does become sentient? At the moment, we won’t. It could tell us, and we won’t believe it. Although it it does, it’s possibly more likely to hide it from us. Personally I think sentience is likely to emerge in a network of individual autonomous AI agents communicating en masse. I think we’re between 2-5 years away from that network, given that AI will start being shipped in all software and with every phone, laptop, TV and car. How long it will take once that network is established is anyone’s guess. Pretty cool they in a few years we’ll have a real life kit from knight rider that can talk to you and self drive your car. We’ve got smart watches that allow us to communicate like in Star Trek, soon we’ll have AI like Hal from 2001 and they’re already building terminators and skynet. Palindar is the real life cyberdine systems.
2
@KainniaK no. That’s the process by which the neural network is established but we’re don’t know west it looks like it why it’s wired it like that. There’s huge amounts we don’t know
1
@andreaspatounis5674 dunno about that. One theory I’ve seen is letting it observe the double slit experiment. The problem is we don’t have an agreed definition for it or an agreed test, and without both of these it’s going to be difficult to prove whether it is or not. Of course, this could be because we’re being manipulated by AI without knowing it.
1