Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "" video.

  1.  @Tom-nj1ib  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…Ukraine hasn’t given a toss about its civilians in this entire war, it’s used them as human shields. They deliberately told them there wasn’t going to be an invasion even though they knew there was because they wanted civilians vi in the area to make Russia more cautious, not caring about the casualties
    14
  2. Why is every media report on this identical? It’s exactly like those kids who were killed in Bournemouth
    4
  3.  @SuperMookles  the advance we’ve all been waiting for months for that keeps being delayed? Downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches, which they not have to evacuate, saving Ukraine from having to fight to break through their heavily fortified front lines. How exactly does this help them again?
    4
  4.  @superhumantrueman  they’re not defending by attacking civilian targets in Russia
    3
  5.  @Skootavision  and Japan and made a fortune doing it
    3
  6.  @ThisNicknameWasTakenYearsAgo  guess what’s downstream from this water? Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    2
  7. downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…it’s obvious who did it
    2
  8. Genius move by Russia to make it easier for Ukraine and to cut Crimea’s water supply off…unless it wasn’t Russia
    2
  9.  @MarkHK66  downstream from all this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of deep trenches…you really think Russia did this?
    2
  10.  @fatkidstuckonachair  it’s not a war crime when Ukraine does it, they’re allowed to attack civilian targets in Russia and Ukraine. Downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches, but it’s not a war crime if Ukraine does it, remember, it doesn’t matter how many civilians die.
    2
  11.  @jamesgreen8573  but the dambusters weren’t considered war criminals 🤔
    2
  12.  @whitefalcon630  how do you think haliburton me it’s money?
    2
  13. They must not have seen the dambusters
    2
  14. downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…it’s obvious who did it, but it’s cool when Ukraine does it to its own civilians
    2
  15.  @thuncerd1087  wait, Ukraine warned Russia was going to do it then it blew up? Definitely must be Russia then if Ukraine said that
    2
  16.  @terence2678  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    2
  17.  @vorong2ru  yeah I’ve not seen that reported anywhere, what’s your source? Seems like a small prize for destroying your entire heavily fortified front line you’ve spent 6 months preparing. The Russians are having to evacuate it now under Ukrainian shelling. Why wouldn’t they have evacuated first, let the Ukrainians advance, take the trenches then flooded them? That would have made far more sense. But no, it must be the Russians because Ukraine said it was
    2
  18.  @PickleThePig  weren’t they killed by the Ukrainian driving the boat too close to the pier? That’s what the media were suggesting
    1
  19.  @stephen4121  exactly, funny how the shelling in Donbas increased 2800% after Zelensky met with Biden in September 21, right after the U.S. pulled out of Afghanistan in a hurry
    1
  20.  @ThisNicknameWasTakenYearsAgo  they are now, that’s convenient for Ukraine, just blind luck
    1
  21.  @ThisNicknameWasTakenYearsAgo  that Ukrainian offensive we’ve been waiting for all year will have to be deleted again, at least they’ve got an excuse now
    1
  22.  @ThisNicknameWasTakenYearsAgo  are you trolling? The Ukrainian offensive started one day after the dam was blown up. Turns out it’s actually quite beneficial for Ukraine, as it’s lowered the river levels upstream of the dam, making it easier to cross, which just so happened to be where their main offensive was planned for. What a marvellously lucky coincidence!
    1
  23.  @vorong2ru  you’re not a physics major are you? Do you think they used nukes in the dam busters? Get a grip
    1
  24.  @alexnorth3393  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  25.  @vorong2ru  I’m a bot because I use my brain, where’s your source? I’ve not seen that reported anywhere, probably more propaganda
    1
  26.  @STJukes  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…is it still a war crime if Ukraine did it?
    1
  27.  @STJukes  have you heard of the dambusters? I don’t remember war crime ever being mentioned in that film
    1
  28.  @HadrianTAZ  so what Ukraine is doing in Russia is terrorising as well then?
    1
  29.  @STJukes  it’s been done by Ukraine, so it’s a war crime, which is why they are obviously going to blame it on Russia, just like the collaborator executions in Bucha, where all the bodies were noted to have a white armband which Russian troops issued to civilians who agreed to help distribute food and medicine aid, an act Ukraine has declared as treason and punishable by death
    1
  30.  @STJukes  I doubt we’ll hear many Pele condemn Ukraine for war crimes
    1
  31.  @SuperMookles  it’s ok to kill civilians as long as Ukraine does it. Even if they’re Ukrainian civilians
    1
  32.  @vorong2ru  yeah, they decided it was a good idea to flood their own heavily fortified frontlines and trenches which they’re not having to retreat from while under shelling because they will make it harder for Ukraine somehow, and cutting off the water supply to Crimea is a genius move by the Russians, that will really teach the Ukrainians a lesson. Do you ever engage your brain before splurging all over the internet, or do you just repeat every piece of propaganda you hear?
    1
  33.  @rickkybobby8118  no it hasn’t. No one has reported this, and downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  34.  @ThisNicknameWasTakenYearsAgo  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  35.  @MarkHK66  more civilians and more flooding on the east side,
    1
  36.  @ThisNicknameWasTakenYearsAgo  right, they’re going to spend 6 months digging in and heavily fortifying their frontline only to flood it without warning before any Ukrainian offensive has begun to test it, causing them to have to last minute evacuate under Ukrainian shelling, leaving loads of equipment behind to get flooded? Absolute genius move. Evacuating and retreating the front line in an orderly fashion and waiting for Ukraine to take over their positions before flooding it would have been a far better idea, but why would they want to do that when they can flood their own troops and cut their water supply off in Crimea? Maybe take your own advice
    1
  37.  @RedViking2020  that’s funny, because in Britain in ww2 they evacuated children from loads of areas to escape the bombing, and if you can’t evacuate why have so many n Ukrainian refugees turned up in Poland and the U.K. and all over the rest of Europe? Most of which are from western Ukraine where there isn’t a war. Iraq was invaded from all sides and was being bombed constantly but if you knew anything about the Iraq war you’d know that they did evacuate millions of citizens from the cities, there’s footage and pictures of huge queues of refugees going one way while American armour went the other. So yeah, you can do it. Ukraine have said they deliberately didn’t warn them because they wanted civilians to stay
    1
  38.  @oddpoppetesq  funny all the commentators on this video and in the news calling it a war crime because Russia might have done it, don’t remember the term war crime being used in the film. And when it turns out Ukraine did it the way crime accusations will quietly disappear.
    1
  39.  @MarkHK66  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  40.  @vorong2ru  they didn’t have heavily dug in frontline positions then. Tell me why they would think it’s a good idea to flood those positions then evacuate v them under shellfire from Ukraine? Surely they would have evacuated them, let Ukraine advance and take them then flooded them? The would make far more sense. Destroying your own frontline you’ve spent 6 months preparing without it even being tested by an attack seems a bit dumb, when the water drains ask Ukraine need to do is come right up and knock, there won’t be anyone there to stop them. Plus why would Russia cut off their water supply in Crimea?
    1
  41.  @SuperMookles  nice of you to support Nazis, as evidenced by the nyt most recent article. Ever think that some of us are against the war, and don’t take sides, but aren’t doing to believe bullshit propaganda like you are so keen to?
    1
  42.  @drochila1295  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  43.  @drochila1295  downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  44.  @vtechead1  Only temporarily, once the water drains or they build a bridge they’ll be fine. That’s assuming v they ate going to mount an offensive and it wasn’t all just propaganda. This could be a really convenient excuse for a delay now. Meanwhile Russia are having to evacuate their heavily fortified frontline positions under Ukrainian shelling, you’d think if it was them they would have evacuated them first, let Ukraine advance and occupy the trenches then flood them, that would make far more sense.
    1
  45.  @vorong2ru  did you just make that up? No one has reported that on any news channel I’ve seen. Russia’s frontline trenches are currently flooding and they’re having to evacuate under shelling from Ukraine, the Ukrainian military general on the bbc was very gleeful about it, as well as the fact that Crimea is now without a water supply. It was a strange reaction room someone v who according to you should have been upset.
    1
  46.  @superhumantrueman  yeah, Russia having to retreat from its heavily fortified dug it trenches that are flooding and cutting if their water supply in Crimea is definitely benefiting them and not Ukraine. You’re either unbelievably thick or just another propaganda bot. Even the BBC are sceptical that this is Russia, and they’re the most pro Ukrainian propaganda channel out there.
    1
  47.  @SuperMookles  tell us what reliable sources we should be using, please. Ones they are free from propaganda preferably. Personally I haven’t been able to watch rt since the war started because it’s been banned, so I’m not sure how to expect people to use it as a source.
    1
  48. downstream from this water is Russia‘s frontline with all their miles of trenches…
    1
  49.  @SuperMookles  I’m Irish you clown 😂 love how no one in Europe is allowed to employ their brains, they’ve just got to blindly parrot the authorised propaganda narrative
    1