Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "Al Arabiya English" channel.

Unfortunately Ukraine has mined the Black Sea so much mines are floating to the coast of Turkey and sinking ships there
52
@42ish32 it wouldn’t clear up the mines floating around the Black Sea and Ukraine doesn’t have any mine sweepers. It will take a fleet of twenty two years to make it safe for commercial shipping.
6
@Burnman83 incorrect. It’s been 8 years since the “heavenly hundred” were shot, a nice round number don’t you think, and not one person has been investigated or stood trial over it, even though, as you say, the police and authorities had snipers everywhere and there has been a full report. I had friends living in Odessa, Mariupol and Donetsk and they told me a completely different story. I say has because they were shot and killed by militias long before this war started. 2 were burnt alive
5
@Burnman83 again you’re gaslighting, because not once have I said that Russia is justified in it’s invasion. Quote the text that I’ve written that says that
5
@victorhopper6774 I don’t have his direct number sorry, I’d imagine he’d say after seeing what NATO has done to Iraq, Afghanistan, Serbia, Syria and Libya, in particular what happened to Gadaffi, having NATO on the borders of Russia represents an existential threat to the the Russian state and a clear and present danger to him personally. I can’t see him wanting to share the same fate as Gadaffi, who was told if he gave up his nuclear weapons program he would be safe
4
@Joren90 Finland is not part of nato and has stayed out of it for over 70 years, and has not been invaded.
4
@Burnman83 I don’t need to read any transcript, I’ve never read any transcript, I’ve listed to it, something you clearly haven’t done, so you don’t even know if the transcript you’ve read is full or accurate. Quit gaslighting
4
@Burnman83 you were impressed with Putin’s performance? It’s people like you, most of the western politicians and press who were also impressed, that have led us to this point. You conveniently ignored his war crimes in Chechnya, as long as Russia could provide Germany and french industry with cheap gas. And you changed your mind about him at the same time as Gadaffi was brutally murdered in Libya after another U.S. backed coup, despite the previous assurances given to him that if he stopped his nuclear weapons program no such attention at a coup would be encouraged or assisted and he and Libya would be safe from outside interference. That is when Putin changed his mind about the west and realised they could not be trusted, and correctly foresaw that this was in fact the fated the west wished to bestow upon him.
4
@victorhopper6774 sorry but you’re talking nonsense
3
@Joren90 it was about to join
3
@ishmamahmed9306 unless it’s an American
2
@42ish32 No. Lavrov is Russian, not American
2
@josuemunoz5455 of course. It could also be different. Or it could be somewhere in between. Everyone thinks this is like Star Wars
2
@josuemunoz5455 according to the USA and nato, yes Iraq is guilty of it’s invasion, they had WMDs remember? And they needed to be liberated. Everyone wants to be liberated by the USA. Ask Serbia, or Libya, or Afghanistan or Somalia, or Vietnam or a South American banana republic dictatorship
2
@josuemunoz5455 you know they were defending it from a British counter invasion to take the territory back? You know they chose not to fight in the residential areas and use the civilian population as human shields? British soldiers who fought in the Falklands reported that they fought and died with bravery and honour like true soldiers. They didn’t hide in residential areas amongst civilians like cowards
2
@jamesthomaspaulJTP *propaganda videos released by Ukraine none of which have been independently corroborated. This from the country that couldn’t show us footage of the missile strike that allegedly sunk the Russian flag ship even though they had a drone over it at the time. They did give us the snake island and ghost of Kiev stories which some people still believe. Most of what comes out of Ukraine is made up for propaganda purposes
1
@Benz2533 except the west won’t let them
1
@jamesthomaspaulJTP lol do you mean the company that makes all its tractors in China and who’s largest shareholders are the vanguard group and blackrock, both of whom are also the largest shareholders in Northrop, Raethean, Lockheed Martin and Boeing, and are front companies for the CIA? That John Deere? Yes, we can definitely trust whatever they say, why they’re as trustworthy as Dick Cheney. Either way, it’s called the spoils of war, the USA has been doing it for centuries
1
@Benz2533 they only reason this war is still happening is because it’s good for arms and oil companies profits. Once the Afghan war ended they needed another one , and this is it. It could be ended tomorrow, instead it will go on for decades unless and until it escalates into nuclear Armageddon
1
@jamesthomaspaulJTP John Deere tractors are made in China. That’s on you and nothing to do with me
1
@jamesthomaspaulJTP You’ve lost the argument badly if that’s your best response pal. The USA has the highest incarceration rate in history, higher than Hitler’s Germany or Stalin’s Russia. Land of the free? More like land of the fee
1
@jamesthomaspaulJTP aha, so you’re saying that we should listen to and believe Russian state news now, it’s no longer all propaganda, that’s what you’re saying? Personally I don’t have that privilege because the government has banned it and censored all it’s content, even historically, so I can no longer watch old reruns about the USA on YouTube even if I wanted to. But seeing as you’re confident that Russian state news is true and factual, could you tell me what else they say about the war in Ukraine? It’s a trusted source after all
1
@mylex817 you can’t spin facts, spinning is just a euphemism for lying, which politicians are particularly adept at and do in abundance, whether western or otherwise
1
He is funny
1
@josuemunoz5455 or strength and resolution based on the foundation of truth. We only think they are the baddies because our governments and media tell us they are. Imagine the Germans surprise in world war 2 ended they were told they were the baddies. It could be us in their position now
1
@odradekk what nonsense
1
@josuemunoz5455 collateral damage, same as Iraq. Caused by Ukrainian insurgents firing on Russians from residential areas using civilians as human shields, same as Iraq
1
@42ish32 nowhere near 100 000. Even Ukraine doesn’t claim anything like those numbers. I support peace but I’m a lone voice in the propaganda filled meme world of all Russians as baddies and Ukrainians can do no wrong. And America is so perfect especially the CIA
1
@josuemunoz5455 fully functional? They’ve conscripted every male between 16 and 65 and have hundreds of thousands of foreign mercenaries and irregular forces, so yes, they are insurgents as much as Iraqi forces were. And to continue the language the media used in the Iraq war, any civilian casualties caused by Ukrainian forces and insurgents fighting in residential areas and using the civilian population as human shields are collateral damage and the fault of Ukrainians. When the British liberated the Falkland Islands from Argentina there were no civilian casualties because the Argentinian forces didn’t hide in civilian areas, they fought and died bravely with honour like real soldiers
1
@josuemunoz5455 people fighting to defend their homeland from a foreign invader were called insurgents in Iraq, so I’m just applying the same definition here. Insurgents using civilians as human shields
1
@thechloromancer3310 and Hunter Biden in whatever his role was in Ukraine. Bribe and backhander collector I think
1
@josuemunoz5455 no one called the Ukrainian army insurgents before 2014
1
@utilizator1701 exactly
1
@42ish32 Russian warships don’t seem to be much of a problem they’re sinking like stones
1
@rododend no one says it was. The eu are also to blame, as is putin and zelensky and Ukraine itself
1
@42ish32 like what
1
@Burnman83 it’s only the CIA who planned and executed the 2014 coup
1
@Burnman83 not as seen on RT, as told by Victoria Nuland
1
@Burnman83 I’ve listened to the conversation not read any transcript and have no idea what headline you are talking about. It’s patently clear Nuland and the US ambassador are organising an armed coup against a democratically elected government and discussing who will be in charge afterwards. The only way any democratically elected government can be charged is through voting. Any coup will inevitably result in civil war, which is of course exactly what the us intended, as per the rand corporation’s pentagon strategy, which you can read
1
@Burnman83 stop gaslighting. They are clearly talking about organising an armed coup and who they will put in power to replace the democratically elected government. When the fact that the EU had agreed and arranged fresh elections to happen immediately, after which Yanokovich would step down, was raised, Nuland can be heard to say “fcuk the EU, we’re carrying out our coup”. The only way a democratically elected government can be ejected from power without causing a civil west is through democracy, but Nuland and the CIA didn’t want that, they wanted a government they could control, so they organised an armed coup before fresh elections that had been agreed by all parties concerned could take place
1
@Burnman83 you’re either lying or woefully ignorant because it’s an absolute fact that after the coup 46 protesters were burnt alive in Odessa by the Adair paramilitary organisation, and high ranking Ukrainian government were involved. All efforts to commemorate their deaths are forcibly removed and destroyed, so there is no trace of them deaths if you visits. It is very easy to corroborate this, you obviously won’t because you prefer to believe the lies you peddle
1
@Burnman83 this obsession over the wording of written agreements is childish. The U.K. government has made it clear that international agreements aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. What is far more powerful is unwritten agreements and understanding, that underpins the sense and spirit them. When Kennedy and Kruschev had their summit to resolve the Cuban missile crisis, there was no written agreement, each took the word of the other as bond, and the agreement was adhered to. Similarly, the Reagan Gorbachev summit ended with no written agreement. Anyone with a basic knowledge of history and a vague grasp of geopolitics knows that Russia sees NATO membership of states on its borders as an existential threat and a clear and present danger. Hence why Finland had remained out of NATO until now, without being invaded I might add. Read the rand corporation strategy document, it clearly states the strategy of arming and training Ukraine, establishing NATO bases there and publicly pushing NATO membership, even though privately admitting it will not happen, in order to provoke Russia into a war that will weaken it and make it ripe for regime change, which you seem you think is the only solution to the current war
1
@Burnman83 no, you’re gaslighting and playing fast and loose with the facts. You add nothing to this conversation, you find it perfectly acceptable that the CIA organise an armed coup against a democratically elected government before agreed fresh elections can take place, but you’re absolutely horrified by the “insurrection” and “attempted coup” that happened on capital hill on January 6th last year. Says it all really
1
@Burnman83 The Kiev regime that the USA imposed upon Ukraine for 8 months after it overthrew the democratically elected government was a carbon copy of the various Latin American dictatorships that the US has imposed and propped up, they had death squads killing dissidents and protesters in the open, opposition political parties and media were banned and their leaders arrested, and that was before the war, since then this has only increased exponentially
1