Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "Al Arabiya English"
channel.
-
52
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Burnman83 this obsession over the wording of written agreements is childish. The U.K. government has made it clear that international agreements aren’t worth the paper they’re written on. What is far more powerful is unwritten agreements and understanding, that underpins the sense and spirit them. When Kennedy and Kruschev had their summit to resolve the Cuban missile crisis, there was no written agreement, each took the word of the other as bond, and the agreement was adhered to. Similarly, the Reagan Gorbachev summit ended with no written agreement. Anyone with a basic knowledge of history and a vague grasp of geopolitics knows that Russia sees NATO membership of states on its borders as an existential threat and a clear and present danger. Hence why Finland had remained out of NATO until now, without being invaded I might add. Read the rand corporation strategy document, it clearly states the strategy of arming and training Ukraine, establishing NATO bases there and publicly pushing NATO membership, even though privately admitting it will not happen, in order to provoke Russia into a war that will weaken it and make it ripe for regime change, which you seem you think is the only solution to the current war
1
-
1
-
1