Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "Jack Rhysider"
channel.
-
67
-
21
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
8
-
7
-
6
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@hydrocarbon82 there’s a huge difference. First off, the Russians didn’t invade Crimea, they were already there, and had been for centuries, Crimea has been Russia’s main southern naval base securing vital strategically and economically important access to the Mediterranean and the Atlantic for over 200 years. There was no invasion, there was no fighting. Secondly, Crimea is over 95% Russian inhabited and they are all still there. Thirdly, Crimea was only given to Ukraine in the 60s by the leader of the ussr kruschev because he was Ukrainian. It’s not mentioned but Ukrainians ran the ussr and dominated the politburo for 30 years. The majority of Crimeans ever wanted to be given to Ukraine but because it was the ussr they didn’t have a choice. So no one lost their homes and had to move. The Turkish invasion of Cyprus was completely different and there was an invasion, lots of people died and lots had to leave their homes, there are still towns in no man’s land that have been abandoned. That didn’t happen on 2014. Most Crimeans were happy to be going back to Russia as they never wanted to leave, being Russian
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1