Comments by "Guinness" (@GuinessOriginal) on "BBC presenter suspended after paying vulnerable teen for explicit images" video.

  1. Why did the mother and her son not go to the police instead of the bbc? Philip Schofield is guilty of much worse, where’s the police investigation into him?
    3
  2. There’s no evidence that these allegations are true. The sums involved sound like blackmail. Nobody pays 35k for a few pics you can get for £20 on OF. That would explain why the now 20 year old and their mother didn’t go to the police about it. It’s a bit peculiar that they went to the bbc and not to the police.
    1
  3. @@jordanjamison-bq3yt The sun has paid plenty of 16 year olds to appear topless on page 3 in the past and no one there was ever prosecuted.
    1
  4.  @chrisreynolds3351  the boys lawyers made a statement saying everything the sun printed was rubbish. Seems like the mother was paid by the sun to make stuff up. Wonder if they’ll be sued, I hope so
    1
  5. The sun has paid plenty of 16 year olds to appear topless on page 3 in the past and no one was ever prosecuted, and it certainly wasn’t shut down. Although I think it should be, but they’ve set a precedent now. Half of Parliament and the church and the judges are at it anyway and always have been, so it’s hot going to change anything until you change the system
    1