Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "Nate The Lawyer" channel.

  1. Based on how the word "racist" is being used these days, at this point, it seems to be a badge of honour... I'd take it as a compliment if BLM called me racist.
    219
  2. 7:48 "What do you think the good people in Michigan are thinking". I don't believe for a second rhey were thinking. I think it went down like this 1. They saw DEM and voted that without regard for the individual candidate 2. They thought he was still their incombant 3. They didn't know about the indictments This is party voting, not candidate voting. That's how things like this happen. Everyone is asleep and voting based in party
    43
  3. I hate that this is even an option in some people's minds. Licensing exists for a reason. If you don't have a license, you shouldn't be driving. Period.
    38
  4. What on earth are you talking about? His "coverage" is literally just playing you clips from MSM and then repeating back what they said. Then he gives his personal opinion on top, which isn't journalism. Where is nate doing better than msm? Get real. His channel is fun to watch for a good summary, but your comment is going way to far
    28
  5. Manslaughter was over the top. Wreckless use of a weapon was where it should have been if anything at all. She didn't want to do it. She's 19. Making the tragedy worse by their kids not only losing their dad but their mother too is absurd. Keep her with her children. Get her involved in some kind of PSA campaign to stop others making similar stupid mistakes in the future.
    23
  6. Isn't youtube part of the entertainment industry?
    17
  7. @nasoca5883  Your personal freedom stops when it impacts on the freedoms and lives of others. No license, no drive, no other options.
    17
  8. I don't understand how anyone could think the court was wrong and it was all just a clerical error. He was at court for driving without a license in the first instance. They don't do that for clerical errors. Certainly your counsel doesn't agree with the judge that it's a driving suspended, no contest, and just stands there stunned. Not only did every "journalist" who fell of this guy demonstrate they're terrible at fact checking, but also they showed us they have non-existent critical thinking skills and personal judgement. That to me makes them all the donkey of the day. He haw.
    17
  9. ​ @TrulyJefferson Nothing to do with field agents. It's up to who those in charge are instructed to protect and who they're instructed to throw under the bus to cover for everyone else involved.
    13
  10. Why make it Nates problem? The images violate the YPP guidelines, so they're blurred.
    13
  11. A regular citizen doesn't work in the same building as the judge, metres from one another every day.
    10
  12. Name a single criminal offence with a jailable sentence guideline you have court admissible evidence of, that would be enough for conviction, demonstrating she has committed such an offence. What's that, you can't? The FBI, state government and the board of trustees can't either. She's just bad at her job and only enough corrupt to not break the law. That's why she's not in jail, and why you shouldn't expect her to be put in jail in the future. Henyard will only leave office when she is voted out. So the people have to get organised.
    10
  13. I called it during the hearing. It was obvious how he was going to rule. This only came about because the lawyers in this county are too friendly with each other. How friendly do you think a judge and a DA who work in the same building metres from each other every day are...
    9
  14. She didn't believe her relationship would ever be found out. Don't forget, they originally lied that they weren't in a relationship. Then when that was unsustainable, it was just a friendship. Then when that was unsustainable it was a relationship but only after Nov 22 but they never went anywhere together. Then when that was unsustainable, ok we went places but she paid him back in cash and don't you know it's legit normal behaviour to keep $15K in cash in your house "in case of emergency" that you cannot document or explain its origin and to use that money to pay your boyfriend back for trips when you pay everyone else with a cashapp?. They're just in damage control trying to only admit to the least amount they can get away with. The reality is almost certainly far worse than the defence even know about.
    9
  15. ​ @NameIsDoc How has a member of Willis' family benefited? 😂 Corruption, sure. Neoptism, no. Wade is not family.
    9
  16. You forgot one also should not vote based on party. Purely and 100% on the individual, their background, merits and specific platform
    7
  17. This data was brought up during questioning of Wade, Willis and Bradley. Trumps lawyer asked for evidence to remain open for these records to be submitted. They only had a draft at that stage and were waiting for the cellphone provider to provide the official copy. This was all covered in the afternoon session on the last day of the hearing after the state closed their witnesses. This is why you shouldn't rely on youtubers to present you with news and should gather it yourself or from traditional sources.
    6
  18. This seems pretty straightforward and not at all complicated. 1. The judge and the sheriff are both implicated in the same scheme 2. The Judge was the sherrifs boss long before he was sherrif. The judge helped him get elected as sherrif. That suggests a further attempt at keeping the scheme underwraps. 3. The scheme was exposed by Sabrina. 4. The Sherrif was deposed. The Judge got nervous the Sherrif would talk 5. The Judge told the Sherrif to meet in his chambers. He tells the Sherrif they, the judge and the others involved, have his daughter and are going to hold his wife and daughter until he does what they want. More extortjon from known extorsionists to make sure the sherrif didn't spill his spaghetti. 6. The judge passes his phone to the sherrif to call his daughter to confirm what he said. The daughters phone number is already in the judges phone. 7. The judge is unalived. 8. The sherriff exits the room, surrenders and says "they were trying to k¡dnap my wife and daughter". It's not exactly rocket science. Pretty easy dots to connect. Sounds like that town needs to completely clean house for their criminal justice system and put everyone currently in office in jail. P.S. Why is there a fee for an ankle monitor in the first place? You didn't ask for it, they're the ones who want you to wear it. That shouldn't be your expense. For profit criminal justice schemes shouldn't be legal.
    6
  19.  @animejanai4657  Stop being melodramatic.
    6
  20. All roles with power involve corruption to some level. It is impossible to have systems of centralised power that have zero corruption. It's just human nature otherwise. You can have the best people in these positions, and they will still end up corrupt. Such is the outcome of power. What is important is to ensure the level or scale of corruption doesn't get too high. That isn't actually that difficult to do, and it doesn't rely solely on impartial third parties. Instead, these are elected positions we're talking about. Just through having a vibrant, engaged voting public does corruption stay under control. When voters aren't engaged, aren't paying attention, aren't voting based on platform but some other factor such that corruption is not punished with removal from office, then it thrives and becomes blatant. All that needs to happen to solve the corruption issue is that voters need to listen to the platforms of the individual candidates and elect based solely on those and no other factor.
    6
  21. ​ @MrBadjohn69 Hunter. He wanted to know where his cut was.
    5
  22. That probably already exists. It wouldn't help this situation because he hasn't been convicted of anything. He's been charged, that's it. But anyone can be charged with anything.
    5
  23. To be clear, no one said he stopped working each day. If you are on a security detail where you do not get rotated off, the time you are sleeping you are still technically at work so you get paid for that. It's very common in emergency medicine to work a 72 hour shift. So you stay at the hospital and sleep there for 3 days. Same for fire fighters who also get paid while they sleep if they're on roster. That doesn't mean there's no corruption going on between them. Only that it is in fact possible that he only got 1 and a half days off in a fortnight. The county board and trustees signed off on his pay that week btw.
    4
  24. Rumour is that's already happening.
    4
  25. @xxmrrickxx  Nate is interpreting the story and telling you his opinion. 🤣😂🤣 No, he doesn't just use* clips that are just the facts, he cherrypicks clips that tell a narrative in line with his opinion and then doesn't show anything that opposes or contradicts that opinion. At least 95% of any of nates videos are created by someone else. It's an entertaining channel, but it isn't journalism or journalistic coverage. Journalism isn't watching the news actual journalists did the leg work to produce and then giving your opinion on it. Nate "reacts" and I think even Nate would agree with that.
    4
  26. I'm not from your country, can you explain what a "write in campaign" means?
    4
  27.  @allegrap1054  What kind of a "platform" is it?
    3
  28. I don't understand. You came up to someone and threatened them, but it's cool because you were doing a prank? Threat of force with a weapon is still an aggravated crime, no?
    3
  29. Lawyers. Journalists can have something and not be allowed to show it because lawyers have blocked them.
    3
  30. For the same reason they watched Honey Boo Boo. Sometimes when a train wrecks, it's hard to not watch.
    3
  31. The problem is "believe all women". It's a stupid sentiment that has no sense to it. Believe individuals on the merits of their claim. An accusation alone should never result in consequences to the accused. Innocent until proven guilty means something.
    3
  32. @xxmrrickxx  The irony of your comment is insane.
    3
  33.  @im2yys4u81  Entertainment? Isn't that why you're here?
    2
  34. Did you not watch the afternoon after his last livestream? There's no further witnesses. They held evidence open for these cellphone records, and that's it. The judge is reviewing Mr Bradley's testimony he claims it is privileged on camera, and if it's not, they MAY be back for half a day. Otherwise, that's it. The judge will take a week of deliberations and decide.
    2
  35. Prediction: Henyard won't be arrested by the FBI. She will see out her term. Will have her corruption fully exposed civilly and even then, will be re-elected as supervisor of Thornton, and who knows maybe even Dolton mayor. Before you jump to deny she'd ever get re-elected, go take a look at the emergency Thornton township meeting called last month to respond to Fox32 reporting on her misuse of township credit cards. Meeting went 3 hours, everyone came out praising Henyard, meeting never covered the credit cards. Just distracted everyone. Go watch.
    2
  36. Flying in people from other states and countries explicitly to vote. Coming soon to an election near you. It seems that in yankville, any old brain far can be taken seriously as "progressive" so long as it attacks the system in some way. At what point do you call a spade a spade and just admit they aren't progressive? They're anarchists. Oh well, lets hope China treats us well.
    2
  37. Centenarians make up 0.1% of the population in yankville. The oldest person still alive is 116 years old.
    2
  38. No, it's not 🤦‍♂️
    2
  39. That was never an option
    2
  40. The city should, of course, pay him a settlement, release his vehicle without charge, and scrub the ticket. The officers involved should of course be disciplined and the senior officer in charge should be fired. But Hayes has some ownership here too. Yes he was detained unlawfully. However, if he had just politely cooperated, they wouldn't have had anything whatsoever to attempt to pin on him. Sure, they may have then resorted to some other crazy means to cover up, but given there were officers there in doubt I don't think so. Always just comply with officer requests even if you disagree with them or think they're acting unlawfully. Leave it for the lawyers to sort out after.
    2
  41. This century? Nate, we can point to Africans with African slaves TODAY 2024. This is really simple, she claimed the bag as her own. Her security had his own bag. Controlled substances were in her bag where it was illegal for them to be. She was caught. She could be purple with pink pokadots, she broke the law. Done. P.S. Cannabis IS NOT LEGAL in the Netherlands, not even in Amsterdam. All cannabis is illegal in the Netherlands, they just have a policy of tolerance for personal use and have DECRIMINALISED (not made legal) amounts under 5g. She was caught with more than that in her belongings, so she was changed.
    2
  42. No one DESERVES anything. People MAKE opportunities, they don't deserve them. Not everyone applyjng legally should be let in either. An immigrant is only good for a country if it fulfills a need of said country giving more back to the country than s/he takes. Immigrants who come to fill a skill in short supply. Great for the economy. Immigrants who come bearing wealth, great for the economy. Immigrants who have skills and ability that will allow them to build their own businesses, great for the economy. Immigrants who have no skills and are seeking no skills or low skills labour, when the economy has moved on from that kind of work? Terrible for the economy. That's importing mass generational welfare. That's why there's an immigration process. To filter the people and make sure they will lift the economy not pull it down. Everyone needs to prove themselves and their worth before opportunity knocks, that includes natural born citizens. Get up and do something.
    2
  43. As an Australian with no skin in the game, I think the issue here is ignorance about the words being used and not the intent of the words. I humbly suggest that the INTENT is to have an uplifting song that recognises "black history" and makes people who need it, feel more equal. Consider it an affirmation. Such an INTENT can be unifying. The execution, however, was to call such an affirmation a "black nation anthem" and, in so doing, undermined itself. Anyone who understands what the words "national anthem" mean knows that's a nonsensical description. In an environment of high sensitivity, using such an erroneous descriptor is divisive. It gives the impression to those who understand the words being used that a cohort wish to separate themselves along racial lines and form their own nation through secession. Whilst I'm sure a small minority of such people do exist, I don't believe that was the actual intent here. I again humbly suggest the intent was to describe a song to unify and uplift a racial group. I suspect that is what Charlemagne is attempting to communicate, yet lacks sufficient vocabulary to articulate it. Charlemagne appears to be making the argument that this is a song that acknowledges the complexities of the past elevated on a national stage (ie. It's sung at important domestic national events) makes him feel like his grievances with the past are taken seriously and presents an opportunity to heal. That I would suggest is where he comes to "if you don't like the song you must still want slavery". The latter, of course, is its own logical fallacy. However, it makes much more sense as I've contextualised it. I suspect when those who gave it such a nickname say "national," they mean the "black" collective as a racial group affected in a historical context but don't have words to express that. Potentially, I could be wrong and it's simply a cynical attempt to use a word to elevate the song in importance. I don't believe the latter however.I feel all parties should be met with good faith until they demonstrate otherwise. I strongly believe this is a misunderstanding based on the erroneous use of a word. The result of poorly educated individuals being elevated into positions they have no business being in on merits, and not understanding the significance or meaning of the words used. I think the problem arises because words have defined meanings not just whatever you feel and not everyone seems to understand that anymore. We see it regularly in online conversation where people use words inappropriately to form seemingly nonsensical sentences then brush the onus of interpretation off to the reader with "you know what I mean". This is what happens when the education system is not adequately designed and supported. It's what happens when the average IQ of a nation is allowed to drop from the global average of 100 down to now 97.3. It's what happens when the correct use of words as unifying labels for communication is not taken seriously or taken for granted. Replacing the word "national" with "american" seems as though it more or less would scuttle the controversy and allow for healing to take place. Calling it such would no less mean it could be sung at domestic national events. Yet such a change would acknowledge the importance of the national anthem as the singular unifying song of the nation.
    2
  44. Typical socialist. Helping himself to other peoples things and money. They literally all call themselves socialists. That's not a coincidence They'll vote Henyard back in too. Watch. They'll vote Khalif in as well. All you need to do to buy votes is pork barrel.
    2
  45. You are wrong, Nate and so is Dr Phil. You aren't listening to her. Take even just the clips of her you played, what is she saying? Firstly she includes white women, the most populous group in the country under DEI. Then she explicitly says "I've worked for 25 years in the industry' "I've worked at these 13 important companies" "I've achieved this" and "I've achieved that". She's talking about merits. Hers. And importantly only hers. Look at the expression on her face when Dr Phil puts things like advocating for equality of outcome to her. It's the same bewildered expression as when she talks about studies that don't support her position and then gets the contents of those studies read to her. She hasn't put any thought into equality of outcome, marxism or any other kind of ideological narrative. She's happy to hitch her wagon to those things if she believes she'll get what she wants, but that isn't what this is about. See what's really being said by her is that she believes her personal merits qualify her to be further in her career than she actually is. But she keeps getting passed over for the promotions that she wants. She decides it must be because she's a woman and not because she isn't as qualified and meritorious as she imagines. She figures others must be in the same boat so she uses them as a cover for her real goal which is just to get herself into the c-suite at which time the moment it becomes viable for her to and remain in position she'll drop DEI like a ton of rocks. She's not a white saviour. She's just a self centred, power/money hungry lunatic who will do or say whatever it takes to get the position, salary and power she feels she "deserves".
    2
  46. @jonWilk8156  No. To regulate driving skill and ability for the safety of all road users. Licenses cost very little money, no department is getting rich off license fees.
    2
  47. @jonWilk8156  Person A doesn't have a license. Let's consider why. Our options are; (1) They never learned how to drive (2) They have been found to habitually drive under the influence (3) They have been found to drive recklessly, been involved in a hit-and-run or vehicular homicide (4) They have lost/accrued (depending on jurisdiction) too many demerit points for traffic violations (5) They have a medical condition that impairs driving What do all of these things have in common? Could it be that they all indicate such a person behind the wheel is a risk to the safety of others on the road? Gee, I wonder how that might infringe on their freedoms if they are in an accident because of someone driving without a license... 🙄
    2
  48. @jonWilk8156  wtf does majhority mean? Listen, your excuses are terrible. Get a license and keep it, or stay off the road. It's that simple. The majority of people agree, that's why these laws exist in the first place. If you can afford a government issued ID, you can afford a driving license. Have a great day.
    2
  49. @markbrown8097  False. In this mans case he is option 1. Never learned how to drive and thus never held a license in his life. That makes him dangerous on the road.
    2
  50. So long for what? FBI aren't omnipotent, and they need to follow the laws in terms of acquiring evidence. "We're the FBI" doesn't just mean they get to see every document. Whilst Henyard is definitely terrible at being a mayor it's hard for anyone right now to point to anything she has done that is actually criminal. InB4, no the stuff covered in this video is not a criminal matter. It's a civil administrative violation. It also isn't a CRIMINAL OFFENCE for a board to vote to donate money to a charity, an administration to fly to vegas, to be terrible at your job and not pay bills or to not renew business licences of operators in your jurisdiction. Improper, sure, but not criminal and the FBI are ONLY concerned with federal criminal matters. They don't care about the appearance of impropriety, that isn't their job.
    2
  51. I really would like to get ground news, but they appear to be US focused. That's a shame, they seem like a great service.
    2
  52. Unlikely she's go to jail
    2
  53. I don't really care about trump and I try to avoid this story. But what I do find interesting interesting is that after denying reality for many years now and making a clown world, the woke believe that a conviction against trump will prevent his election. Maybe in a rational world from just a few years ago it would have. But they turned to world upside down so now being convicted increases his chances of being elected. At some point society has to stop pandering to a group of crying adult-children threatening to throw a temper tantrum if they don't get their way. Until then, things like this will happen
    2
  54. Funny I was wondering during this video why no one calls her out for her cultural appropriation with that hair colour and style?
    2
  55. @darksuns7384  uh oh, someone had a grounded, reality based comment that doesn't satiate the appetite of the mob. 🤣🤣 Grow up drongo.
    2
  56.  @NightWhisper8462  We aren't in the 1600s
    2
  57. @oinkytheink1228  ...which is why you should... what? No source of information outside of your own first-hand observation should be both the beginning and end of your knowledge on a subject. If you have only watched youtubers in this case, then you're missing HUGE and critical sections of information.
    1
  58.  @im2yys4u81  Just youtubers? So you do the equivalent of asking strangers in the street what they read in the news, and then you "make up your own mind"? 🤣 Ok champ. Get something like grounded news, nate advertises it, it's perfect for someone like you to get actual information from reliable sources
    1
  59.  @oinkytheink1228  Fair. My misunderstanding
    1
  60. What you haven't considered in this video is, that the mum intended from the outset for this to turn into a controversy in order to further advertise her page. This video further advertises it because you show the full URL more than a dozen times. Your take is an obvious mainstream take, a fact reflected in this comment section. It added nothing. So why help her advertise her OF even further by covering it and showing the full URL? At least blur the URL which is something you can do in YT Studio without affecting the upload.
    1
  61.  @triamaria  No mate, we're not.
    1
  62.  @MrBulldog855  it's 4 hours and 45 minutes. Mr Bradley did give testimony in that period but he wasn't the only witness. The state gave away evidence and strengthened the defences case during that period. That period is also where they discussed evidence, entering these cellphone records, on camera questioning of Bradley in chambers by the judge, how deliberations would go, etc.
    1
  63.  @triamaria  What are you "tuning in" to exactly? The hearing is over assuming the on camera interview for Bradley by the judge doesn't warrant a half day. Again, these phone records were expected. Evidence is now closed following their submission. What "phase 2" are you talking about? What are you "tuning in" to? There's nothing to watch. We're just waiting to hear the deliberations of the judge.
    1
  64. That subway driver was good being able to stop in time to not injure any of those morons who jumped on the tracks. In Australia, our QR guys would have tried to stop but at least half of those idiots would have gone under the train. Maybe more. Those who didn't get squisjed would have been fined $500 for being on the tracks, and depending how the dpp was feeling, potentially charged with terrorism of transport infrastructure. I wonder if NYC fined or charged any of those morons. Not worth commenting on the case, the outcome is obvious.
    1
  65. For what? You do understand you need to have evidence of a crime suitable for conviction, not just a feeling of injustice.
    1
  66. Sounds like a rigged cuacus. Will you do coverage of the lawsuit she files? Sounds like the story isn't over.
    1
  67. Come on Nate, as a lawyer you should understand the game she's playing. She wants to be a white collar gangster so badly, but doesn't really understand the rules of the game. She's watched a bunch of movies and thinks all she has to do is not have her name on the foundation to rid herself of liability.
    1
  68. There are other candidates too, than just house and henyard. Genuinely hope one of the other candidates wins so this drama can be over. FBI interest in Henyard will evaporate the moment she loses. As predicted she isn't going to jail or being charged.
    1
  69. 11:06 Did he just say that "gas" prices are the lowest they've been since Biden took office and that happened under Biden? Surely not.
    1
  70. But this is what they wanted, it was always the plan. You really think all the prison abolitionists think that if there are no police and no prisons, everyone will just hold hands and be happy? Come on now, they might be a lot of things, but they aren't that stupid. They are the family members of career criminals. They are gang members themselves. They are anarchists. The point of these policies is to hand the country to the cartels and the gangs. The problem is that anyone takes them even remotely seriously.
    1
  71. Crime was down, SO they defunded police.
    1
  72. All the BLM garbage is political justice. Derek Chauvin went to prison as a scapegoat in political justice. I have a question though. If this Fani Willis thing with Trump and Co finds she perjured herself, does that change anything about this case? Can a new DA come in and prosecute?
    1
  73. Bit behind on this one Nate. The repo demand from the bank was last week. They had until Friday and didn't pay. Repo should be any day now. Fox32 confirmed today that the FBI are investigating. They listed the charges. I disagree that she doesn't know what she's doing. She knows exactly what she's doing. You don't do all of these things by accident. She was a trustee for 8 years, she understands the score. She's just simply trying to embezzle money through her dodgy charity and she's gotten others in on it
    1
  74. For the record, the controversy taking place is precisely what Unilever want. Controversy sells. Unilever doesn't just own Dove in the hygiene product category, they own 80% of the brands, and 100% of the popular brands. When you boycott Dove, you buy another Unilever brand and pick up that brands sales. The people on the other side of the issue start buying Dove buy it to counter the boycott and pick up Dove's sales. You're being worked over, they're doing this stuff on purpose.
    1
  75. Without knowing what was in those 3 previous filings, which you didn't show, it's impossible to gauge whether she has shown cause.. What is insane is that you glossed over that this started because the mayor thought she was a rival candidate or campaigning for a rival candidate. No, she wasn't actually doing that but so what if she was. Is El Monte under a Putin'esk rule? Opponents to incumbents in elections have a right to campaign safely without harassment. That in and of itself is a significant problem that deserves proper investigation. If she's harassing and intimidating political opponents, she should be charged and barred from holding office. If she's going after citizens for criticising her, she should be charged and barred from holding office. If she has connections to federal cop killer street gangs, she should be doing time in federal prison.
    1
  76. You guys really need to review how you select judges. Voting through the general citizenry is continually creating situations like this with people who have no business being on the bench. In Australia you ascend to the bench as a promotion from being a lawyer. You need to have a noteable legal career, then have people nominate you for the bench, then the law society votes on your suitability after doing a discovery process. This ensures only people of good quality, standing and character in line with the spirit of the law become magistrates.
    1
  77. @sueallen8188  The consequences absolutely should not include paying for your own confinement. The community wants to make things illegal. The community should pay for the programs they utilise as penalties for those things they deem as crimes. Many crimes, particularly those eligible for home confinement, are arbitrary at best and temporarily crimes most frequently.
    1
  78. 5:15 "We will stop at nothing, to keep you safe" I can think of few more chilling words.
    1
  79. Still no one is talking about the key election driver, the economy. If immigration were high, but prices were low and people could still afford amazing lifestyles no one would care about immigration. If crime was high, but prices were so low that replacing things stolen was trivial, no one would care. The problem they actually care about and actually are identifying is the hit their hip pockets have undergone since covid. Harris was involved in making prices go up and had no well communicated plan to bring them back down. Trump promised to bring prices back down. And he promised to get thjngs under control that push prices up. It's really that simple. The driver was the economy. 10:35 "The main role of government is to protect its citizens" What a disgusting thing to say. The role of government is not and never has been to maternalise the populus. The role of government is to administer public funds in such a way as to support and enable capitalism to take place such that the economy grows. That's it. We don't have laws to protect individuals, we have laws to protect the economy and to create the kinds of conditions where productivity goes up. Schools exist to train employees. Hospitals exist to get people back to peak productivity as quickly as possible. The concept of retirement was invented to get the old, slower workers out of the workplaces in order to increase productivity with a younger, faster workforce. That's how capitalism works. It's an economy that centres society around privately owned economic output. It's also why it succeeds over communism which centres society around government control of economic output. Capitalism and communism are mostly the same system, only in communism it takes the fate of the individual out of their own hands and places it into the hands of the anointed, which tanks productivity. Prop 6 wasn't about slavery. It was about forced labour in prison. Very different. That's why it failed because people understood it and want prisoners to do forced labour. You know, justice.
    1
  80. Sounds like it was always an unconstitutional law that violates the very foundational principles of the legal system. Law should be overturned. All cases that were ruled against an accused under the law should be struck down, and any restitution already paid, returned. Settlements shouldn't be affected.
    1
  81. Not all corruption is criminal. Just because something is wrong in government, doesn't mean anyone is going to get arrested. This is IL we're talking about. Come on. Even where a type of corruption is illegal, you don't just need to demonstrate the corruption happened, you need to demonstrate it happened purposefully as opposed to incompetence. We've seen Henyard, she has a strong case for incompetence. It's an entertaining show, but I really doubt she'll see prison.
    1
  82. No. The FACTS with Floyd are not on his side. The only people still claiming they are, have the same mentality about a "win for my side" as the CNN guy. It's all smoke and mirrors. Floyd OD'd from the massive amount of fent in his system.
    1
  83.  @indogyrsimdead  To be clear, I didn't mention the mayor once... maybe learn how to read, I dunno what to tell you
    1
  84.  @indogyrsimdead  So, you in fact can't read, didn't understand what I previously wrote and don't understand basic punctuation. Gotcha. "I don't know what to tell you" is with regards to the strawman absurdity you are still continuing with. You are making things up and looking like a clown while doing it. Have a nice day
    1
  85.  @paulghignon4092  I mean that's a good try at strawman. Certainly a better job than the last guy. But, strawman is strawman champ. You're arguing against something I never said.
    1
  86.  @paulghignon4092  Now read the first line of the paragraph above that. Come back when you have an argument to something I actually said.
    1
  87.  @paulghignon4092  So, still no argument about anything I actually said? Cool. 🤣 Have a great day.
    1
  88.  @paulghignon4092  You still are strawmanning...
    1
  89.  @mrtodddelaroderie  OP didn't say anything about Hollywood.
    1
  90. If you discriminate against a white person because of the colour of their skin, by saying that because they are white, they must be racist, that is, in fact racism.
    1
  91. In your opinion nate, what law(s) would she have broken? There's no law requiring politicians in Illinois to tell the truth or to be good at their jobs. Personally, I don't see any charges being filed. Lightfood might use her dark sith mind control powers to get the documents (or at claim to have) as a positive PR spin for Henyard. The point of Lightfoot is damage control/PR. Specifically to "clear" Henyard of wrongdoing to improve her public image and kill the story of her corruption.
    1
  92. Cool we finally got the cellphone records. They'd been waiting on those. We're just waiting on the judges' interview of Mr Bradley on camera for the testimony he claims is privileged now so the judge can determine if it actually is or not. Mr Bradley was caught out during cross by the state that at least some of the answers he claimed we privileged to the defence actually weren't. So the judge will now determine what is and is not privileged in private chambers and on video. We may get another half day of the hearing, the on video testimony may be sufficient, or it may actually be privileged. The latter is unlikely, however. Then, the judge will deliberate. He said he's looking at a 1 week timeline for deliberations after evidence closes, which it did with the submission of these cellphone records. Remember Wade was already asked about these records during questioning by Trunps lawyer. He has already claimed during his testimony that he may have gone to "the porshe experience," out to eat, or to play basketball. That's why Trumps lawyer has made such a big deal about these two specific events because no one is out doing those things at that time of day. He's got him.
    1
  93. If the senator doesn't see a problem with the kickbacks based on their value, the state auditor might want to look into that senators dealings.
    1
  94. In many ways I don't think it was a vote for trump, so much as it was a vote against Kamala and the Democrats. I think the biggest driver was the transparent prosecution of a political opponent, and the equally transparent lying. I think that rallied more people to vote than otherwise would have simply because they rejected the prosecution of opponents. I think the next biggest factor was minority politics. Lots of people refer to it as identity politics but it doesn't encompass all of minority politics nor identify the real issue. Being called names is annoying but no one is changing president over it. The president can't stop individuals calling you names. What matters is the LAWS that are passed which grant minority groups greater rights than the majority. This was the majority reasserting their power that they matter more than any minority group. That democracy is for the majority. But mostly what lost the election was people hurting in the hip pocket. Historically, and this applies across every country, if while in office you hurt peoples hip pockets over a sustained period, you have lost the next election unless you can demonstrate a realistic plan to make people's hip pockets great again, and have that plan in action and at least starting to work. Kamala didn't have that. She didn't even campaign on economic policy. Trump did, and he whispered sweet nothings (particularly to blacks and latinos) about how he would make their bank accounts grow. It's that simple. For Kamala to win she needed strong economic policy that would lower prices, lower taxes and increase earnings for the average person. Or at very least she needed to pork barrel by handing out cash to everyone. Instead they focused on a gendered RH issue and name calling Trump. That's a weak leader and the electorate rejected her as a result.
    1
  95. We need to be exceptionally clear here, there are problems with DNA as evidence in general beyond the integrity of the work of the technician. There are a number of studies on how DNA evidence has led to wrongful convictions, and the criminology institute of Australia has a 2012 report highlighting all 20 major issues with using DNA evidence. Any case that rests solely on DNA evidence is a conviction without suitable evidence. If a crime lab mistesting dna in 3K cases puts those cases in jeopardy they never had sufficient evidence to begin with and there thus should be no conviction. There is factually no forensic evidence that is currently without serious flaws. It's not real science, it's mostly feelings.
    1
  96. Can I file for the Chrome Incognito mode if I'm in Australia? Went to the website, cleared the screening but couldn't progress because it didn't lole my phone number?
    1
  97. MSNBC is a network jointly owned by Microsoft (that's the MS part) and Comcast (through its subsidy NBCUniversal.) It's still running because it turns a multibillion dollar profit. The view is a show on a network, not a network itself. So they aren't the same thing. It's still on the air because it has high ratings and turns a substantial profit as a result. All media organisations have some bias, it's unavoidable. In yankville, they lean into it though and align themselves along ideological extremes of a political nature. There are no centrist aligned corporate media stations, and no public broadcaster to fill that spot either. All news in yankville is for-profit. Apparently yankvillians like it that way, because when Chris Licht took over control of CNN he tried to shift the network back toward the centre and real journalism. This upset their audience substantially and they fled the network, causing Licht to be fired and the network to return it left leaning bias. Millennials and Zoomers in yankville have no context for news that isn't an echo chamber for their pre-existent ideas and ideological stance. They can't handle ideas that challenge them and may contradict their opinions.
    1
  98. They knew this would happen. It's part of the plan. What powers do state of emergency orders give them? Seriously, take a look at the NYC Executive Law subsection 24. How much money do you think is going into their own pockets while they roll out these programs. What liberties are given up? 170K migrants is only 2% of the population of NYC. Spread over a year it's enough to make people believe something needs to be done and that state of emergency is justified but small enough that they can actually absorb the people with ease when they choose to. Right now they're making purposefully bad decisions they know will upset people because that in fact justifies the state of emergency order. Stop believing democrat politicians are naive. They aren't. They know what these policies will do, they do them anyway. Ask yourself why.
    1
  99. See, what you don't understand is the class warfare. The elites look down on you, they feel you are beneath them. They see no difference between you and a criminal. But they also acknowledge that if you're spending your time being harrassed by criminals you won't revolt. The Mises Institute has some very good talks here on youtube that explain what is happening from a historical, ideological, and economic standpoint. Also, remember when being called a red anything meant you were a commie. The irony of the doublespeak is insane. They've got you and there's no way out even when you resist you're playing for them.
    1
  100. This video rushed through so much it felt like it exists just to push the sponsor spot
    1
  101. All international sporting bodies are going this route. None of these laws will matter if Roxanne Tickle wins his federal case out of Australia because it involves the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (1979) it would create international legal precedent. If Roxanne Tickle wins his case it will force the legal definition of sex to be redefined to that of gender identity in all 168 signatory countries. Look the case up.
    1
  102. Weak spoilt child, and a power hungry helicopter mum in a position of authority. You think this started at some awards ceremony? Come on, how do you think the kid got the award in the first place?
    1
  103. In Australia the civil SERVICE must be impartial and politically agnostic by law. Is that not the case in yankville?
    1
  104. Wade is corrupt to the hills, and Fani Willis too. But debtors jails should be illegal. Not one should be behind bars for failure to pay child support or alimony. Especially when the child support relates to adult children. You can't fight corruption with more corruption.
    1
  105. Remember when claiming to be something you aren't in order to gain benefits you aren't entitled to was called fraud? If "trans women" were actually women, they wouldn't need to put "trans" in front of it, nor need to invent terms like "cis" to describe actual men and women.
    1
  106. I hope Trump takes the high road and doesn't use this to justify doing anything. I hope he doesn't do anything that would further erode the integrity of the office. I hope he sets an example even as the subversives howl like animals at his door, on how the office should be occupied. All this revenge and retribution people are calling for is folly. An empty minded race to the bottom that only harms everyone. It takes a real leader with integrity to see the mistake in revenge and push forward a future for all. I hope that person is Trump, because all the countries yankville exported this wokey subversive culture too need to heal.
    1
  107. @gfys756  No mate. That you feel justified, doesn't make something justice. It makes it revenge. I think you need to learn the difference
    1
  108. Love it. Systemic incompetence. I'm going to use this term going forward. Whenever someone starts harming on about "systemic racism" they're really telling you about THEIR systemic incompetence. Perfect.
    1
  109. I think it's interesting that the immigrants exploiting this all come from the same geographical area known for telephone scams. Perhaps if more scrutiny were put on country of origin things like this scam wouldn't happen. The shooter should not be charged in relation to the shooting. However, he was on probation and should not have had that weapon. So whatever the consequences of having it are in his probation should apply. Yes it was self defence, but imo that's irrelevant to what you are supposed to possess in the first place.
    1
  110. Because, no one can identify a LAW she has broken WITH EVIDENCE she has broken that law. Is she corrupt? Absolutely. Is she harming her community? Absolutely. Is she incompetent? Absolutely. But that's all that can be demonstrated so far and those things aren't criminal offences, let alone punishable with prison. You have to understand that just because someone does something wrong, doesn't mean they go to prison.
    1
  111. Only 4432 people voted? That's only a ~22% turnout. Not even a quarter of residents cared enough to vote even though they had weeks to do it. Think about that.
    1
  112. @shabeki  No. Apparently, you have no brain. 78% of residents did not care enough about who is the mayor or all the nonsense the mayor was doing to vote. 78%.
    1
  113. It's almost as if forensics isn't actual science and shouldn't be admissible in court. It's almost as if actual scientists have been saying this for decades, and that even the forensics people admit their failings. You think Missy Woods is unique? You think people in her department didn't know what she was doing? That it wasn't just common procedure? 😂😂😂
    1
  114. This video felt low effort. It was just a bunch of news clips and no real commentary.
    1
  115. See it's like this. The courts were allowed to become political entities with political appointees because judges are appointed by general election from the lay public or nomination and approval from whoever is in government. So the judiciary is not destroyed ans is no longer an independent third branch of government. Instead they're an extension of the second branch of government.
    1
  116. This is some falling down
    1
  117. I think you have a governor and a mayor who were virtue signalling. They didn't really ever believe the things they were saying, they just said the things necessary to get elected. Now the voter base has shifted their position, the mayor and governor are shifting there's too. The corporate media are not left or right, they're pro ratings dollars and pro getting paid to run campaigns. They're a for profit business and no one should ever forget that. There will be a sizeable percentage of CNNs audience however who will not be happy with these announcements. Because those people are pro criminal anarchists who wanted the migrant crisis to be doing what it's doing. They wanted the city to be destroyed. That was the point. Just like it's the point behind all the soft on crime DAs, and corrupt officials like in Dolton. They want the place to be run by the gangs and cartels. AOC is one of those people who wants those things
    1
  118. You mean the type of person who would drive drunk and try to get out of it when caught, would also be the type of person to make false SA claims to try and avoid accountability, and then lie about her lawyer? Wow, colour me shocked.
    1
  119. This isn't just a yankville first amendment issue, because they censored the same content across their platforms regardless of which country you are in. I was banned from Facebook because I made posts with medical information and slides of the actual virus and I'm in Australia. They recently deleted my account before I could get back into it. Facebook and the Biden administration have some serious explaining to do.
    1
  120. I'm at the start of the video and I already agree it should have been thrown out. I never thought there was a case against Harvey, because there in fact wasn't. It isn't a crime to gatekeep a role in a production behind personal favours. What Harvey is accused of is what EVERY major producer in the entertainment and fashion industry does. All of them. Even the women. These industries run on personal favours and recreational substances. The Weinstein conviction was a power play to overthrow him to massive way for new management. After his conviction, what happened to films? White men got essentially banned and DEI came rolling through full force. Next we need to see the floyd case cops released. They were railroaded in the same way.
    1
  121. It's hardly a situation unique to NY. This junk is happening everywhere with bail reform. It's a bad policy, but what are you going to do? The criminals and the mentally ill are in charge now.
    1
  122. And this is why abortion needs to always remain a legal option through the first trimester. Or you get this kind of thing happening increasingly from unwanted pregnancies.
    1
  123. So this woman called the police out and invited them into her home. She then proceeded to draw them close to the stove where she had boiling water with the intent of throwing it on the officers. Sounds like premeditation to me. Both cops clearly clocked something was wrong. So now there is an investigation. If they had walked out and she had poured the water on herself, or left and done it to someone else all the criticisers would be out here blaming the officers for that too. "Why did they walk outside instead of controlling the situation". You know that's exactly what would be said. She went down behind the counter and PRETENDED to be submitting. The officer goes in to detain her to get the scene under control and find out what's going down. She throws boiling water on him from a pot she had just concealed. His weapon discharging seems justified to me. Could the two cops have handled the situation better? No idea, I wasn't there and neither were you. What the second body cam should tell you is that video is not a substitute for actually being there, and that video can lie. In the UK right now there's a case in the public domain involving proportional force, where police kicked a man in the head, after he, his brother and other members of his group started throwing punches. Similarly it first started out with a video hiding the punches from the perps and only showing the police force. People were outaged. Now they see the full video, people see it was justified. Same thing here. Police carry weapons. If you do not want to be harmed by police, don't try to harm them first? Seems pretty simple.
    1
  124. Bro, you forgot to mention the crazy testimony from Fani's dad, evidence from the ex-governor that he refused the work because he knew it wouldn't pay much and was surprised at how much Wade got. And most crazy, that Bradley left the legal partnership because he was accused of multiple sx assaults and PAID HIS ACCUSERS OFF. Everyone in this case, all 4 of them are crooked. They've all been exposed as crooks who belong in prison. I don't think this is a case of trusting anyone because I don't think any of them can be believed. I think it's more a balance of what fits behaviour more likely. They should just move the trial already.
    1
  125. Always? That's not true. It's very rarely brought to the light. Corruption is rampant.
    1
  126. ...but ironically now you need to pay tax on that $5K or the IRS will come after you. 😂
    1
  127. Wait. "Miss love"? As in the prosecutor in the YSL case?
    1
  128. If you hire based on the colour of skin or genitalia, even if you find someone qualified, you are not only discriminating but you are leaving others who are more highly qualified locked out. You didn't get the best person for the job, you got a qualified person for the job who has X race or gender. We know they aren't best for the job, otherwise they wouldn't need to be hired on the basis of immutable characteristics. Can you point to someone who was a better fit for the job than Justice Thomas? I can't. I don't think his appointment had to do with anything beyond the fact he was the best person for the job. Equality is a level playing field where everyone can compete equally without regard to immutable characteristics.
    1
  129. P pass. Reverse the gender and he'd have been found guilty on all counts.
    1
  130. They are not models. They are sx workers. Stop legitimising what they do. Edit: Even the media articles are calling them what they are. Why aren't you? Make shame great again.
    1
  131. Think about what it tells you about thornton township that the democrats had to play silly games to get her off the ballot. Which isn't resolved yet, she could still end up on the ballot as a candidate. But just think about that for a moment. You don't need to do that unless you're worried people will still vote for her en masse and she might win an election. That tells you she has way more support in thornton township than Fox32 and others admit to. I'm not sure she's embattled at all. I think most of the voters like all the corruption, and if given the chance will vote for it again. I wonder if that cares to Dolton too. We've certainly seen significantly more opposition for her in Dolton, but I'm not sure that translates into her being voted out if she's on the ticket either. This is why elected public office position salaries should always be linked to the average earnings of the electorate. Poverty breeds stupidity so they're easy to fleece if you aren't careful on what you make the cash and prizes for doing so.
    1
  132. Because a bank says "please don't rob us" where as 84% of Dolton asked her to do this.
    1
  133. I don't think it's possible to make any kind of credible determination from the information we have here. I'm sure you could find others in the same department making big bucks in overtime. Male and female. I'm sure you can find others in different departments making big bucks in overtime. Male and female. That's why the council were upset. But it's what happens when you "defund" police. Maybe they should try funding police adequately again, ironically in order to save money. With the information we have, it's entirely possible the chef did nothing wrong and this woman is just trying to get out of trouble. It's also entirely possible he was paying her for sx. Who knows. Also, the Dolton cop on security detail absolutely could have worked 303 hours in a fortnight. Body guards get paid to sleep if they're on duty. So do firefighters. So do care home workers. So do doctors at hospitals. So do many other roles. He was essentially being paid to live at Henyards house. Did he actually do that? I don't know. But it's absolutely possible and plausible given what he was behaving as a body guard for the mayor. If you look down the list, you can see similar hours are logged by multiple people, and by him on multiple fortnights. That makes it more plausible.
    1
  134. Hold on, the US court case didn't clear him of abuse. He first hand admitted to abuse. They both admitted first hand to physically and mentally abusing each other. Third parties agreed that they were abusive to each other. The verdict in the US case was that each had defamed the other and following the case they both agreed to withdraw their claims. The fact is it was a dysfunctional and abusive relationship on both sides, they both agree on that. They should just stay as far away from each other as physically possible. When Dan says he shouldn't have gotten involved in their toxic relationship he isn't saying anything either of them wouldn't agree with. Indeed it's what Depp wanted from him all along.
    1
  135. I genuinely doubt she'll get arrested at all over anything related to her time as mayor of dolton.
    1
  136. @stayfaded69  No she isn't 🤣🤦‍♂️ She's the mayor of Dolton and the Supervisor of Thornton Township. Supervisor is the equivalent of Mayor to the Township.
    1
  137. I enjoyed that she was dunking on how bad BEVs are and that normal rain destroys them, whilst forcing ordinary people to buy these things if they want a private vehicle remains democrat policy. That was just a bit of a mask slip about the real socialist agenda going on.
    1
  138. A year? Fox32 have been covering the problems in dolton for 2 years... But yes, you are being too hard on the comptroller. Not because of her skin colour, that should never even be brought up or be a factor. But because a comptroller, like all positions of authority, must have evidence to pursue action against someone or an entity. The same is true for FBI, state police, the governor or anyone else. It's often said the wheels of justice turn slowly. But they do so to avoid persecution of innocent people. I'd expect a lawyer to understand these concepts and their importance. I still believe it's unlikely that Henyard does even a day in prison. The FBI are trying to flip her inner circle, that tells you they don't have a case without those people.
    1
  139. It's almost as if positions should be filled based on the merits and character of the individual, not the colour of their skin...
    1
  140. I disagree that Ashley is a quality attorney. I find her naive and unprofessional. But I think that's important. It's precisely that lack of professionalism that I would humbly suggest is the root of her finding out this information from Bradley. To understand what happened we need to remember some important points to contextualise. Please remember, Bradley wasn't just Wade's attorney. He testified that he and Wade had been friends since middle school, that's his childhood friend. The law offices were 3 childhood best friends working together. It wasn't just some professionals who met as lawyers and came together to form a law office for mutual benefit. They were best friends. We're talking people who went to each others weddings, had dinners together as couples, hung out at eat others houses, saw their kids grow up. They have history and over that many years Bradley is going to become just as loyal to Joycelyn as to Wade himself. Think about your best friend and his wife you like, would you be upset if your friend stiffed her? Bradley tried to claim privilege but the judge said no it's not. Because he got the information through friendship and not as an attorney. We need to really understand Bradley and Wade are trying very hard to blur the lines of their friendship into a professional attorney client relationship. But they were just being friends. He was Wade's attorney only really in name. Because remember Wade is himself an attorney, I guarantee Wade wrote many of the filings in the divorce himself and just had Bradley file. They're friends, he's just helping his friend. We also need to put in context that this is happening right after the allegation against Bradley and the dissolving of the partnership. Their friendship was also falling apart at that time, they weren't on good terms. So Bradley is mad over how one friend is treating another in a divorce, and he's mad his friend isn't backing him up in an allegation he claims is false. Willis didn't just call Bradley like some clandestine entity and say "they're investigating us" then hang up. She clearly brought up the allegations against him, that they may be revealed during the open access or that they had already been revealed by the open access. That's why he's calling Ashley to see if he needs representation. Ok, so we have him worried for his own freedom and reputation, mad at his childhood friend for not having his back in an allegation he denies and upset with the same friend at how he behaved in his divorce and wronged Joycelyn his other friend. It's in that context, with all of those emotions going on inside Bradley that you then get 4 lawyers in a conference room chatting while they wait for pleadings. 4 lawyers who are professional acquaintances, work friends really and one of which was a long term actual friend of Bradley whom had socialised with him outside of their professional relationship. The presence of that friend in particular in the room is immediately going to change Bradley's mindset. He isn't a lawyer sitting with opposing counsel. He's sitting in a room with his friend and 2 other work friends. He feels more relaxed and open. Then you have Ashley, this school girl-esque, naive and talkative person you just know is a gossip queen. So she starts yabbering away and its in that context that Bradley starts spilling the beans. I don't think he meant to on the record, I think he just viewed it as gossip between friends with the aforementioned factors in his mind. He has also testified in subsequent interactions he did not wish to be relied upon as a source or testify, and Ashley has confirmed that, as have the text exchange in record. I suspect he got caught up in a conversation, said some things with anger in his heart that he later regretted saying, then either had a sunk cost fallacy or felt compelled to keep giving information. We see evidence of this in how strongly he fought not to testify and how evasive he has been on the stand. I do not believe for a moment that Ashley Merchant created a honeypot for Bradley and used herself as bait. You might make an argument that the naivety and lack of professionalism is all an act and she uses it to throw people off guard and extract information. But a honeypot? I see no evidence of that. What I see evidence of is someone who should only be a junior lawyer being thrust into a case out of her depth and getting lucky on some information due to coincidence and circumstance. P.S. Bradley testified it was $20K and it went to the employee making the allegation. He also testified that it was brokered by Wade.
    1
  141.  @MamaMOB  No. The option only exists in some people's minds. Specifically, dishonest criminal types. Have a great day.
    1
  142. @jonWilk8156  Why do you have a license? Apparently you think they aren't necessary and anyone sensible enough to disagree with your stupidity is apparently a coward. 😂
    1
  143. @jonWilk8156  Why do you have a license, apparently you don't believe they're necessary...
    1
  144.  @Fecker_Carlson  🤣🤡
    1
  145. You can't fault cambridge. The job of dictionaries isn't to define words themselves, it's to report how words are defined in common use.
    1
  146. 15:44 Correct me if I'm wrong, but my understanding of what Lightfoot was saying isn't that the cheques were printed and thd money in the cheques taken without being given to vendors. My understanding is that she was saying at the time the cheque was printed the town did not have enough money in the bank to cover the cheque, so the town printed the cheque but did not issue it to the venue. So my understanding is she's saying there are $6M of unissued cheques in town hall somewhere, because money was being spent from the general fund at a rate beyond income so there wasn't enough money to pay everyone. It doesn't appear to me she was claiming the money is unaccounted for.
    1
  147. When you say "Thursday at 6" what US timezone is that? I'm in Australia so I'm trying to figure out how many hours back I need to go.
    1
  148. They expected wealth beyond their wildest dreams handed to them on a silver platter. Not because of something any particular party said, but because that's the exact fantasy image all movies and television shows coming out of yankville, about yankville portray. It's the propaganda yankville sends out into the world about the nature of the country, its power, its lifestyle, that cause this exact problem. Yes, border controls can help stem a tide, but it's a bit like damming a creek that you're diverting an ocean to.
    1
  149. I see no evidence Henyard will serve a single day in prison for any of this. There's incompetence, there's corruption, and then there's criminal incompetence. Those are different things, and I just don't see the hard evidence to make a case that something criminal has happened. When they start trying to flip people, that tells you they don't think they have the evidence either. Happy to be wrong on this, but I won't hold my breath. Be she gets voted back in to Thornton township.
    1
  150. She's been elected and re-elected how many times? Over what period? And in Florida? That's not DEI, the concept wasn't even mainstream when she first got elected in 2013. BLM was though. And we know BLM is a pro-crime organisation, all about getting criminals elected into positions of power and removing criminal consequence.
    1
  151. Allowed? Oprah was pushing her to make claims of racism the whole time. When she did, oprah fained shock. Oprah wanted explosive allegations for ratings so she'd get more money. How do you think that interview would have gone rating wise if nothing explosive was in it? If it was just self entitled rich people imagined problems? How many people would have actually watched? Oprah needed controversy
    1
  152. If sanctuary city is simply a colloquial term to describe a municipality that aim to create a welcoming environment for immigrants and refugees by not asking about their immigration status, not disclosing that information to authorities, and not denying city services based on their immigration status and they are now doing the opposite, then they automatically cease to be sanctuary cities. Because "sanctuary city" is not a legal term.
    1
  153. It's like when universities kick people out for crimes they haven't been convicted for, or even have been acquitted of.
    1
  154. I'm pretty sure you'll find examples of these kinds of people all across yankville. Probably more than a handful in every state. Pretty sure if you check out the history of small towns you'll find examples of these people going back to foundation. The fewer checks and balances in place, and the fewer resources a town has to implement/enforce such checks and balances, with independent authority, then the more likely you'll find someone like this.
    1
  155. The amount of needless padding in this video is insane.
    1
  156. Bring back democracy first. Minorities have no business running the show. Their opinions are irrelevant.
    1
  157. I do not believe for a moment that Henyard is mentally ill. Everything she does is motivated and purposeful. Sloppy, yes, but purposeful nonetheless. Do I believe it's possible Henyard put a hit out on this woman? Absolutely. Particularly when police wouldn't take a report and Henyard had all the motivation to do so. Henyard is precisely the kind of person the BLM prison abolitionists want in power. I do not believe for a moment it's a coincidence that EVERY elected pro-BLM official across the country happens to be a criminal and engaging in corruption. Mayors like Henyard are on purpose.
    1
  158. It always makes me giggle when youtubers claim "no one is reporting it" about any story. If no one was reporting it then you wouldn't know about it to make the video. Let's be real, you're not doing investigative journalism here. You're just parroting what you heard/read from actual journalists. So some news entities are covering whatever it is in any specific instance.
    1
  159. What two eligible crimes do you suggest she has committed? What evidence for those crimes exists?
    1
  160. I would say if she loses she should have to pay a percentage of her earnings every month for the remainder of her life or 20 years, whichever comes first. That will ensure 1. She is adequately punished 2. Others are adequately disincentised from bringing similar false allegations.
    1
  161. You know, for someone championing DEI and diversity in general for society, government and other people's businesses, she sure seems to have a very specific type of person she hangs around and does her personal business with.
    1
  162. How do you commit a "hate crime" against yourself? That's peak wokeism. False police report charge is fine, but a hate crime against yourself? That's insanity.
    1
  163. "I need to find 11,780 votes" is election interference. That others helped try to make that happen is a criminal conspiracy. But you already knew that, didn't you.
    1
  164. Politics is by its nature corrupt. The argument that these are politically motivated charges seems to be "Well everyone else in politics is doing it, but they aren't being charged, therefore the charges must be illegitimate" It fails to address whether the letter of the law was broken, and if it was, fails to then call on all the other people doing the same thing to also be charged. We can't say whether the mayor is compromised or not without first knowing whether the charges are legitimate. That appears to be undecided and with all due respect the learned opinions of youtubers don't decide a legal issue. Courts do. The court filings don't state that if Adams does what they say they won't refile the charges. The court filings say they'll decide in November. You can make an assumption about it going away if he does what he's told, and that might turn out to be accurate. But as it stands there is nothing stopping the DOJ refining after November even if he does what they want.
    1
  165. Given youtube crosses many nation-state jurisdictions, it is undoubtedly the case that a large proportion of views on any given video are from users outside the jurisdictional reach of Yankville. How do these court ordered demands function on youtube for users not residing inside yankville? Seems like a much bigger issue if the FBI are collecting information of people in countries outside their jurisdiction.
    1
  166. I don't think this is a double standard. They don't cover this stuff from the college circuit either. I think it's just a matter of no one cares about women's sports or knows who the players are. So they don't get national headlines because there's no name recognition. They'd have to explain to everyone who she is and why it matters before they could even tell the story. No one is watching women's sport.
    1
  167. 5:51 Back in my day, being dressed like this meant you definitely didn't present the news.
    1
  168. An economic migrant is by definition a migrant, even if they entered illegally. It is the correct word for them.
    1
  169. @animejanai4657  Not because anything happened. Just because they were weak and melodramatic like you. Nowhere in the west are you anonymous in 2024. Not even if you cover your face. Property damage is a crime. Property damage for extortion is a felony. Stop being a melodramatic whimp.
    1
  170. To be clear Mace DID NOT claim that something did not happen. What she said is, that a civil liability is not the same thing as a criminal conviction. That someone can be found innocent of something criminally but found liable civilly. That's all she's saying. The interview was disgusting. The question IMO is not at all a fair question.
    1
  171. The interview with Michael Shellenberger that dropped at the start of the week with Tucker Carlson is very informative about everything that went wrong and why. Watch as absolutely nothing changes. They'll stick all the blame on a patsy and go on business as usual.
    1
  172. Those are made up rates. The offical rate of divorce is 11%
    1
  173. 17:57 "would you describe someone from Columbia as a migrant" If they have immigrated? Yes? Because they are? I thought you were a lawyer. I'm surprised you don't know the difference between a migrant, an asylum seeker, a refugee, and an irregular border crossing.
    1
  174. It just blows my mind that no one seems to be talking about the thing that actually lost Kamala the election. The economy. More importantly, how the economy affected people individually in their spending power. Kamala didn't address it in her campaign. Trump did. The end. That's the whole story. Trump has a history of a good economy. Kamala has a history of a bad economy and no communicated plan to turn it around. Most voters are simple. They want government to set up conditions for them to do well financially, and then leave them alone. The activists and pundits on both sides don't seem to understand that.
    1
  175. "Those days" never existed.
    1
  176. I'm sure they'll find some reason why the evidence means the DA doesn't have to be removed from the case. Willis will end it with Wad, the evidence won't be enough or something. But if it they get removed, what jurisdiction do you think it will get moved to?
    1
  177. Looks like Mr Steele has bonded out and will not have to attend the county jail has the jidge instructed. If one has blanket immunity, does that apply equally to purgury during compelled testimony? They definitely have an interesting interpretation of justice in fulton county.
    1
  178. @PMLT3400  That's a very nice use of logical fallacies there. Let me help you out. • An FBI investigation does not mean a crime has actually been committed, nor that charges will be brought. The FBI do thousands of investigations annually that lead nowhere • No one other than you has mentioned any timeline. • Personal attacks only weaken your argument • Amongst all your cope, you forgot to name a single jailable crime that you have evidence Henyard committed Henyards scheme is transparent. We know she's wrapped herself up in patsies for any crimes that could be committed, and given herself plausible deniability. Listen to her lawyer talk about Keith Freeman. "Woe is this new mayor, she did not know the rules or how to be a mayor. She relied completely on Freeman and he did things behind her back that were against the rules. Take pity on her because some identity politics stuff". In court it doesn't matter what you believe. It doesn't matter what you think you can see. It doesn't matter what ypur gut tells you. What matters, the ONLY thing that matters, is what you can PROVE with evidence. Got any?
    1
  179. @randywissler9923  Yeah, pointing out reality means that right? 🤣 Grow up and get some perspective.
    1
  180. @JimmyfromPhilly1-ub4hq  roflmao. What about pointing out the reality of the situation makes you make such a hideous comment? Or are you just being antisemitic, which is a crime...
    1
  181. @jerrygundrum1  I said crimes, those are not crimes. Those are iniustices sure, but they are not crimes. No one goes to jail for those things. Her charity never had her name registered to it, she used paties. She's used paties for everything. Name the CRIMES you have EVIDENCE she has committed.
    1
  182. @fish9905  What evidence of these crimes do you have? None of us have seen evidence of those crimes so please share the evidence so we all know.
    1
  183. @domone1201  Comments like that are so empty headed. That's a heavy dose of copium you're on.
    1
  184. @jerrygundrum1  That's this video Jerry. The mayor has the authority to make purchases. The dispute is an internal one over procedure. It isn't criminal in nature. The signs will eventually either be returned or paid. Either way the debtor is the village, not the individual. Try again
    1
  185. Can you name the "some of the best cities that are run by women"?
    1
  186. To be clear nothing in this hearing was of a criminal nature. Jail was never on the cards. It was only ever a matter of whether the DAs office in fulton county could try this case or had to pass it on to a different DA. Those were the only options.
    1
  187.  @gregn16  No it doesn't. From Cambridge dictionary Nepotism (n) the act of using your power or influence to get good jobs or unfair advantages for members of your own family
    1
  188.  @NightWhisper8462  Better? lol. The reason is a dictionary only describes how words are used. Most common words have varied their meaning over the last 200 years. What happened centuries ago isn't an argument for now. Yes, history informs the present but it does not dictate it. In modern times (and I use that loosely because the change happen more than a century ago) neoptism refers to just family.
    1
  189.  @NightWhisper8462  🤣🤣 Your condescending iamverysmart act isn't helping sell your ridiculous mental gymnastics. It's just making you look foolish. You have no actual argument. Logical fallacies and calls to what once was are not an argument. It appears you do not realise it, but I did actually answer your question. It's meaning changed because popular usage changed. You literally quoted that in your reply. The definition in 2024 does not include friends or associates, that is all that matters. It just means giving favours to family. Get over it, move on with your life. There's no discussion or debate to be had. Have a great life
    1
  190.  @TheDuravida  🤦‍♂️ No.
    1
  191.  @TheDuravida  🤣
    1
  192. 😂 "It's ok that we spent $50K on a sign, we used money and assets we stole from random people we robbed instead of taxes". - Chief Lacy 2024
    1
  193. Sunny is upset that if Colemans ideas gain traction she won't get free money and her children won't get special treatment. She wants a racially segregated world where people who look like her are on top.
    1
  194. There are only 3 star wars films, there will only ever be 3 star wars films. Everything else is just a poor knock off. I cancelled my disney+ subscription in November last year because they support genocide and I don't. I haven't seen any of Disney's remakes or live action films. They don't have anything in that catalogue worth watching. They have these films as existing properties that I enjoyed. Why would I want to watch how someone else would make the same movie I already liked? It's like getting someone to cover a tupac or beatles song, then wondering why it didn't get the same audience as the original. I was never into the MCU. Nothing against anyone who is, it just wasn't my thing. But from ny perspective what they did was try to milk that thing so long and at such an intensity, with no new properties in between that everyone got tired of it. That's what collapsed the MCU. Laziness and greed. If they had limited the MCU to one film every other year and worked on other properties in between they'd still be in good financial shape and people wouldn't have grown weary of the MCU. They're making the same mistake by making all their characters female or minority. Just pumping them out and making the mistake that the virtue signal is enough to make audiences turn up. This might be controversial to some, but Disney need to stop the remakes altogether. Hollywood in general has a problem with hack writers these days, stop hiring those people and seek out real writing talent. There's no shortage of it. Create new properties, with new characters. Good, solid characters that can be unifying instead of ideological or divisive. So one actually cares what gender they are or what colour skin they have.
    1
  195. Maybe when she gets out she cam be the mayor of Dolton? She seems to have the qualities they like to vote for...
    1
  196. Nate is so happy there's more to the Henyard story. FBI aren't going to arrest her. Not signing a liquor license isn't a federal crime. They'll investigate, because they have to. But just like all the other investigations, including other liquor licenses she hasn't issued, this will go nowhere. Golden goose isn't laying anymore.
    1
  197. @shabeki  Talking reality and not being part of a mindless, brain dead mob is not defending her. I'm stating a fact, I'm not providing approval.
    1
  198. @shabeki  In IL some types of kickbacks are in fact legal. It's the most corrupt state in the USA for a reason. Do you have concrete evidence of criminal kickbacks that Henyard personally participated in? The FBI don't. Laurie Lightfoot doesn't. The board of trustees don't. Please point us to the evidence that everyone else missed. There is a difference between being corrupt and being criminally corrupt. There is a difference between what you suspect or speculate on, and what can be demonstrated in a court of law. That I don't want to fall into your braindead mob mentality and delude myself into thinking something will happen that objectively won't does not make me a troll. Nor does the fact that reality hurts your feelings make me a troll. You can disagree with me and make a case for that, but you don't get to come here and call me names or act like a fool.
    1
  199. What material EVIDENCE of criminal fraud do you have? "I heard some things in the news/on youtube" is not evidence.
    1
  200.  @Salazarsbizzar  So, to a question asking about the EVIDENCE you have, that no one else has mind you, your response is "yeah right" ... way to tell me no one should take you seriously.
    1
  201. @frankenstone804 Nope, it's just reality. It's more telling of you that you'd resort to such a ridiculous logical fallacy. No one has actually accused Henyard of a crime, not the board of trustees, not the news, not nate, not the FBI. There's that one ex-administrator who claims Henyard caused a drive-by on her, but state police found there's no evidence to support that. In the real world being bad at your job isn't a crime. Dolton is stuck with Henyard until the next election, then they have the opportunity to vote her out and move on with their lives. Jason House says he's planning on running, so he'll likely become the next mayor and Henyard will just sink into obscurity once more.
    1
  202. @butterfinger1171  So, you have no actual evidence and are just now realising no one has actually accused Henyard of any crime? Even though the news has been explicit for the entire 2 years of this nonsense that she isn't accused of a crime? But you want to attack the messenger instead with dumb af assetions? lol. Grow up. The story isn't about her committing crimes. The story is about her being terrible at her job and trying to cover that up. The ways she tries to cover it up are child like, similar to your argument style, and that makes her look unhinged. It's non-criminal corruption in public office with an entertainment element, that's why it's a story.
    1
  203.  @nedflanders5463  What fraud? Do you have evidence of fraud?
    1
  204. Why is no one questioning how a person with "life long mental health issues" was capable of becoming a state social worker in the first place? This scheme can only occur if she's a social worker for the state. It doesn't work any other way. Why is the bar to employment by the state for people charged with looking after people with mental health problems and trauma not high enough to exclude those with their own significant problems? I don't believe this was a grooming operation. That doesn't make any sense. You don't need to go to these kinds of elaborate lengths to groom kids when you have an internet connection, and so do they. You certainly don't withdrawal from a school after a week if you're trying to groom kids. A week isn't long enough. What if it's this simple. You're a social worker. Day in and day out, you handle kids in terrible situations. You get to know the schools in the area and how they handle things. Some of the schools treat the kids terribly but you don't have the kind of evidence to affect real change. So you come up with a scheme to create that evidence by posing as a traumatised teenage girl and artificially tank their KPIs. You can't do it alone so you get your work friend on board pulling at their heart strings. That works, but you still need a mum and dad, so you pull the heart strings of your landlord and their spouse to pretend to be your parents. After all, all they have to do is make a phone call. What if it's that simple? Crazy? Yes, but she unquestionably has mental health problems. Plausible? Completely
    1
  205. Disagree completely on Choven. Those officers were a scapegoat. You can't asphyxiate someone by pushing on the back of their neck. There's your spine and so much muscle between you and the oesophagus. 3 men held Neely down. 3. Only the white one was prosecuted. BLM is a socialist, anti-white, racist organisation. The cofounder is a racist. When you're a racist, everything is about race. So she made it her pay cheque. She's putting on an act in this interview, we've all seen her being normal, she's straight ghetto.
    1
  206. From the Cambridge dictionary Bigoted (adj) having strong, unreasonable beliefs and disliking other people who have different beliefs or a different way of life: 99% of the time that I hear someone accuse someone else of being bigoted, they are both using the word incorrectly and ironically using it to shut down an argument demonstrating their own bigotry. Please, we need centrists to use the word bigot and bigoted more frequently in its correct usage to call out the far left for their actual genuine bigotry. The host on TYT Sport was in fact being bigoted when he continued to make unfounded claims about a 9 year old wearing attire which is both culturally appropriate and appropriate to the context in which he was wearing it. I see all these videos of people trying to "own" the far left. But they all make the cardinal mistake of buying into their erroneous double speak to begin with. The moment you buy into double speak you've lost. Stop falling for the double speak. Call it out, end their argument where it begins.
    1
  207. So if they were both drunk and she was the aggressor, was she charged with SA? Things will get better when that starts happening
    1
  208. Yeah, no. It was a race to send a converted ICBM as far as possible for military staging purposes, and yankville continually lost it. It's like getting one gold medal at the Olympics and deciding it was only about that event so everyone should ignore all the others. The space race came off the back of project paperclip. That is all the German scientists forcibly resettled to avoid Nuremberg. Every period of innovation, yankville experiences is down to a flood of immigration and not all of it legal. For the vast majority of the countries history, it's been as it is right now. Debating nonsense.
    1
  209. There are two mainstream solutions to the problem. 1. Athletes compete in the league as per their sx at birth 2. GID athletes compete in an open category where anyone of any sx, gender, or ability can compete. Most world sporting bodies are legislating the latter. But some leagues have decided on the former. Either or works.
    1
  210. This lawsuit doesn't make Henyard go anywhere. It just means the administration has to share the financial records they should have been sharing all along. Dolton is stuck with Henyard until the next election.
    1
  211. @65cj55  Wtf are you talking about? Charged with what? This was a civil lawsuit between the board of trustees (council) and the mayor over access to internal documents. There were no charges possible because nothing criminal occurred.
    1
  212. @65cj55  Busted? lol you mean she has some uncomfortable political questions to answer for voters. What crime do you think she committed by going to vegas? 🤣😂🤣
    1
  213.  @mc1993  🙄
    1
  214. Believe all women is a stupid concept. People lie. It isn't gender exclusive. Believe individuals based on the credibility and evidence on a case by case basis. For that reason I believe much of Amber Heards story, because Depp stood up on the stand and said many of the things she claimed did in fact happen.
    1
  215. "Misguided, miserable person" yep that describes Oprah alright.
    1
  216. Why do you only show the left and the right, when all sane people know the only good journalism takes place in the centre. Just like all good politics. Edit: Also, poll data always has a margin of error disclaimer. It's anywhere between 5% and 15% depending on the specific pollster. So that means any difference between candidates below the swing, is tied. That is, when you have Harris ahead by 3.6%, that's considered a tie because it's inside even the most conservative margin of error.
    1
  217. 10:07 No. No. I completely disagree with that. If you are a parent and you want your child to read that book. Pick up the phone. Call CPS. Tell them you are an unfit parent and would like to give up custody of your children. There are laws against this stuff.
    1
  218. To be clear, it isn't a "trans category" that's being created, it's an open category where anyone of any gender can compete. If a woman really wanted to compete against men she could in the open category. The reason Lia said no is because there will inevitably be other men in that category who couldn't win against the best men so they compete in open and he'll never win against them. Listen, we never hear about ftm trans athletes winning in sports against men, and there's a reason for that.
    1
  219. @cbeasy1995  It's because the women who call themselves boys and try to compete against men lose. It's that simple. No amount of hormone therapy is going to make a woman be able to compete against top athlete males. Inside Hook did a pro trans piece on a girl calling herself Ezra. She was the top athlete in the girls team when she accepted she's a girl. She became Ezra, joined the boys team and lost so badly that she decided to compete with the other girls and just call herself a boy. They try to spin that as being a trans athlete is about more than winning. But the reality is FtM trans athletes don't win in sport against men. That's why we only hear about MtF trans athletes, and that very reality is a demonstration of why we segregate genders in official competition sport. It's why every international sporting body either has an open category that's being deployed or they're in talks to develop one. And if we're really being factual and honest about the issue, para-sports already have a category for neurodiverse people, which, if you look at the stats, is where the bulk of trans athletes belong.
    1
  220. Ironically, the full Jerry Springer catalogue is officially available on YT on the Jerry Springer channel. Full episodes, all seasons.
    1