Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "State High Court Declines to Grant River Access on Private Property" video.

  1. There isn't anything vague about those terms. They are perfectly clear and defined in law.
    2
  2.  @simonmultiverse6349  You seem to be confused. We're talking about sections of water that are on private property. We aren't talking about sections of water on public land.
    2
  3.  @simonmultiverse6349  🤦
    2
  4.  @jeffreyhowll1392  roflmao. What an utterly ludicrous reply. Keep screaming at the sky mate.
    2
  5.  @jeffreyhowll1392  Still screaming at the sky I see.
    2
  6. Because he did not cause material harm and the fishermen was trespassing on his property... 🤦
    2
  7.  @jeffreyhowll1392  Unless you're going to waste your money getting yourself laughed out of court, you're just screaming angrily at the sky about how you wish things were rather than how they actually are.
    1
  8.  @ronpflugrath2712  🤣👍 nice one
    1
  9. So in essence the Colorado AG (Phil Weiser) submitted to the court that if anyone was going to bring the case to court it should be him and not some random fisherman. So the court said, sounds good and sided with the AG. You know a particular side of those powerful interests you're talking about have been calling up Mr Weiser to get that submission. At any rate, might I recommend that you don't take trolls seriously? There will always be people throwing tantrums in existential crisis because the world doesn't work the way they'd like it to. Who cares? Ignore them. That's what block buttons are for.
    1