Comments by "TJ Marx" (@tjmarx) on "Protests erupt in Paris after fatal police shooting of teenager" video.

"We're really upset about this police interaction we don't have all the detail for. Quick! Let's go destroy random people's vehicles who had nothing to do with it, and trash the place." Bunch of savages.
109
@constantinvaldor3742 There's a clip of a video from a distance. If you don't understand that it doesn't tell anything like the full story you might need to go back to school
10
@Toripusutashi What on earth are you talking about? Tell me about how my country is "stomping on my head" ...
3
@rudiegotbetter8730 Hi random person hiding behind a pseudonym. I just wanted to say that your conversation with Lewis was quite amusing. You appear to wilfully be denying reality, whilst illogically connecting disparate things in order to justify some kind of weird utopian fantasy you have where you get everything you ever wanted for no effort. You do so whilst ignoring or at times outright denying economics and reality. I found it most amusing when you claimed the IMF, the body whom literally decide the rules of the game and how economics will function globally are somehow wrong about their own game and you know more/better than every economist on the planet. The garbage about the 19th century and then the 1970s was also comedy gold. I just wanted to let you know I appreciated you making me laugh. I genuinely needed it, so thank you from the bottom of my heart.
2
@rudiegotbetter8730 I don't believe for a moment that you're an economist. You get fundamental principles wrong. The only ideology here is coming from you, but thanks again for the laughs.
2
@constantinvaldor3742 🤣🤣🤡 I'm not even going to entertain your clownish second comment. That you're even writing the other comment is yet again evidence of savagery. You have no genuine concept of justice nor logjc. It's sad.
1
@rudiegotbetter8730 🤣 Oh my. More fantasy from you. What you seem to have consistently misunderstood is that there is nothing in the least threatening about your ramblings. Indeed I was not entering any debate with you at all. I merely wished to thank you on a human level for the gift of laughter you bestowed. I was feeling down and you cheered me up a little. But your ego got in your way and now you're falling all over yourself desperately trying to save face. My dear pseudonym, you have as much intellectual control over the concepts of economics as a drunken clown does a prop cream pie. It's plain for all to see. But, if you wish to continue this farce, please do name some "academics" in the field of economics that support your speculations. Cite for us some mainstream economics journal published papers. Surely you have such things at the tip of your tongue and do not need to search online for hurriedly cherry picked offerings to appease such a request. After all you made a claim that your position has support of "academics" right? You must know who they are... P.S. it's spelt deluded*.
1