Comments by "marriage causes divorce" (@marriagecausesdivorce7540) on "The Risks Of Marrying A Modern Woman" video.

I'm going to keep this simple. DO NOT GET MARRIED. I lost 70% of my money, house, assets in divorce. The feminist divorce judge I got threw me under the bus. Marriage has zero benefits for men.
333
@johnnytate69 that is such a great analogy. Marriage is like a rental property investment owned solely by the wife. Divorce is her cashing out and selling the rental property. And even after divorce, alimony and child support is the monthly rental income/cash flow. Wow! Thank you for your insight.
11
@homeacres9454 yes, in the UK the judge's duty (especially the feminist judge's duty) is to ensure the wife and kids have more than enough money to maintain their standard of living. The husband just gets any remaining scraps. If the marital pot of money/assets is very small, in the UK 100% can and does get awarded to the wife, i.e. the poorer you are, the more screwed you are. I believe certain 'equitable' states in the USA also follow these exact same laws.
9
@josealexi5141 facts. I have been thinking about this a lot. And it literally makes zero sense for women to stay in marriage. Because the judge is going to award them with as much money as they need to maintain their standard of living. So why should women stay married? It is more sensible for women to divorce, and then let Chad move into the husband's old house. And the husband can pay the ex-wife monthly alimony, while Chad blows her back out.
8
@highstakes1235 pre-nups are not really a thing in the UK unless you are a multi-millionaire. In non-millionaire cases, they generally get thrown out if they are unfair to the women/kids, i.e. if the women/kids do not get 70%.
3
@AsurmenHandOfAsur facts bro. it's the only way to get the divorce laws changed to something fairer
2
@talmadgeholloway2734 men need to protect themselves at all times. marriage is not worth the risk of losing your money, house and kids.
2
Damn. She rob him of his money and sperm. Now she has thrown him to the side, now she got everything. He's a beta provider cuck. I wonder if the kids are even his?
1
She's obviously getting a lot of attention from Chad on IG. He doesn't want to get destroyed in divorce court so he is playing along. Nice guys finish last guys. Her and Chad are going to live in the husband's house and he's going to pay monthly spousal support for Chad to blow her back out.
1
@highstakes1235 hell no. unless you are a mulit-millionaire in the UK you have nothing to pre-nup in the first place. Pre-nups are more of a USA thing to protect yourself against ex-wife's legal fees, monthly alimony/spousal support, pre-nup any pre-marital assets, etc.
1
@MiniLittleBabyDoll thanks bro. just don't make the same mistakes I did.
1