Comments by "" (@craigkdillon) on "The History Guy: History Deserves to Be Remembered"
channel.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@TheHistoryGuyChannel I think much more was going on.
The book Slave Nation makes a very good argument that the Revolutionary War done to retain slavery.
1. Consider the Somerset Case and English Common Law. The precedent it set would eventually set the slaves in the colonies free, too. Therefore, the slave owners in the South, and the Slave Traders in Boston wanted to maintain the slave system. Which also explains the Boston/Virginia axis, and why New York was hardly involved. (didn't you ever find that strange? I did.)
2. The book Redcoats & Rebels talks about how King George begged for a compromise, but the Americans stood on principal. WTF??? Yankee traders travel the world making all kinds of shady deals, and they couldn't cut King George a deal???
Something else was going on, IMO. The Colonies had to be free.
3. The rabble rousing across the colonies seemed too well coordinated and funded to be truly spontaneous. Also, IMO.
Sam Adams, Patrick Henry, etc.. it seems very well calculated.
Don't forget the guy who really signed the Declaration of Independence with his flourishing signature was John Hancock, who is NEVER talked about in history books.
Who was he?? -- A smuggler, and one of the richest men. Could he have been financing Sam Adams, Patrick Henry, and other rabble rousers??
Just look at how Fox, Brietbart, and others today are financed by both domestic and foreign monies.
There is more to the Revolutionary War than the standard story, IMHO.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1