Comments by "" (@craigkdillon) on "Extra History"
channel.
-
342
-
56
-
49
-
29
-
28
-
26
-
25
-
19
-
14
-
12
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
WRONG...WRONG...WRONG....
IMHO, that boundary between Frankia & Germania was created by the Roman Empire. Even the disputed lands west of the Rhine were defined then. So, the future battlegrounds of The Netherlands, Alsace & Lorraine, Piedmont/Genoa/France borders, were all created during the Roman Empire.
So, the division of the Carolingian Empire just re-established what had been before Charlemagne's conquests. The Carolingian Empire was the aberration.
In fact, it even predates that. France was Celtic Gaul for centuries. Then came the Germans, who kicked the Celts out of Germany. The division is a language/cultural division, as well as geographic. Think about it...
French make good wine --- Germans make lousy wine.
French make lousy cars -- Germans make great cars
French make great clothes -- Who buys German clothes??? (Maybe that's why nudism is popular there)
French make great bread -- Germans, not so great
French make great cheeses --- Germans make lousy cheeses (Limburger anyone??)
Do French even make beer?? -- Germans make great beer
French are obnoxious tourists -- Germans are obnoxious tourists (OK, so they have one common point. It does not invalidate my thesis --- they are obnoxious in different ways.)
Then there is the Dutch, who drink Dutch beer, eat Dutch cheese, drive German cars, wear French fashions, speak both languages, and mock them both.
2
-
2
-
Taking my earlier example further...
A bank with $100,000 at 10% reserve rate, lends out $1,000,000 to 5 people who bought 5 houses at $250,000 each, creating $1,000,000 in newly "printed" money.
If the government wants to stimulate the economy, it can do that easily by lowering the reserve rate.
For instance, in this case, if the government lowers the reserve rate to 5%, this bank could now lend out $2,000,000 total, thus enabling 5 more people to buy 5 more similar houses, and creating $2,000,000 in additional dollars.
Now, there are limits to this
During the 2008-2009 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve was allowing some banks to have 0% reserve rate. Now, theoretically, that meant that they could lend out an infinite amount. The Financial Collapse that caused bank failures was probably our good fortune, because if those banks had been allowed to do that, then we would have had hyper-inflation and a collapse of the dollar. That would have taken 25 to 50 years to recover from. Look at 1920 Germany, Argentina, and other countries that had hyperinflation and currency destruction -- a banking collapse is preferred, IMO.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I reject Buddhism. It is totally inwardly motiviated.
Buddha's abandoning of hsi child and family is the start.
It says nothing about kindness, charity, or obligation.
Buddha, according to the stories, abandons his parents, wife, and child.
Disgusting person, IMO.
PLUS -- Karma teaches that when people suffer, it is because of their Karma.
Therefore, to be kind and to help a person interferes with their "karma" and should not be done.
Buddhism teaches fatalism, isiolation, and numbness.
To avoid all suffering it teaches avoiding all joy.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Why do you ignore Easter, herself??
Easter, as far as I know, was a Celtic Goddess of Fertility.
In fact, Christianity had a habit of incorporating traditions and rituals of absorbed people (I don't want to use the word "conquer").
For instance, "Christmas" absorbed the mistletoe and holly rituals and beliefs from the Druids of Gaul.
The Christmas Tree was either a Celtic or Germanic symbol for how life survives the death of winter. Holly, an evergreen, also represented the continuation of life to Pagans.
What I find interesting, is that the northern peoples of Europe kept the name "Easter" for the spring, along with the symbols of fertility - the bunny and the egg.
In places, Christianity is very thin. Scratch, and you will find Pagan beliefs, traditions, and origins hiding just beneath.
1
-
1
-
1
-
Well the states are definitely unstable. Egypt is stable, since its people have a clear identity as Egyptian.
But, Libya may fall apart. Syria may fall apart. Lebanon? who knows. Iraq may fall apart. Yet, Mesopotamia is an ancient region, with an ancient identity, so it might survive.
IMO, Islam has lost its power as a unifying force because of all the violence done in its name.
If you actually talk to Muslims, you will find that many have lost faith in it.
They don't accept the intolerant extreme and violent form being promoted by the Wahabbist Saudi Regime. The peaceful forms of Islam are marginalized. Hence, in the US and Europe, a high percentage of "Muslims" are now practicing Christians, Atheists, and Agnostics.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Similarly, I have talked to "Muslims" recently. After declaring themselves Muslim, I then ask them about their beliefs. What I found was astounding. Many used "Muslim" as an ethnic identification, not a religious one. Kind of like how many "Jews" are Atheists, Agnostics, or even Buddhist. Quite a few did not believe in Allah/God. Many did not believe the Quran to taken literally, or even was the word of God. Most did not accept the Islamic position on interest and loans. Most did not follow its teachings on liquor consumption. In fact, most "Muslims" were not Muslim in the theocratic or doctrinal sense.
In Muslim countries, Islam uses coercion and capital punishment to enforce its dominance. Without the ability to coerce and punish, Islam will decline among adherents in western countries. In fact, there are huge numbers converting to Christianity. I suspect even larger numbers just stop practicing, just as many "Christians" don't practice their faiths.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I agree with you. Battles and great men are important, yet, in the long run, social, technological, and philosophical forces are more important. BTW, I think the term "economic" is too narrow, and even misleading. For instance, the US Republic expanded rights to more groups, while the Roman Republic devolved towards Empire. Why?? I believe it has to do with the high level of literacy and communication that comes from the printing press. Literacy is not the issue, I think. I suspect most citizens of Rome could read. I think the printing press is the key differentiator between "modern" and "ancient" societies and peoples. I believe that without it, the modern nation-state would not have developed.
The printing press in Europe started a whole number of trends - The Age of Discovery, The Reformation, The Enlightenment, and The Nation-State. I don't fully understand how, but it seems that the printing press may have also been key to the rise of Nationalism, which really became powerful in the 1800's.
BTW.. "Nationalism" is a complex, interesting, and hugely important force. I think a series addressing it would be great. However, it might be beyond the capabilities of your format. Also, it is a murky, hard to define, hard to understand topic.
So, maybe your team is not up to it. (subtle challenge here).
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Aren't most wars "Resource Wars"???
Rome conquered Iberia for Silver, Britain for Tin, Gaul for slaves.
There were wars over the sugar colonies of the Caribbean, spice islands of the East Indies, Asian trade routes, colonization conquests, 100 Years War, Mongol conquests, Spanish American War, Viking conquests, raids of the Sea Peoples ~1200 BC. etc etc. There are some wars over succession, or just as an expression of ruler's testosterone levels, I guess. But, it seems to me the almost all can be traced down to wanting or protecting a resource.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Good info, but you left out a lot.... a whole lot...
1. Paper "money" is NOT money === It is currency. Money is broader, and includes deposits, IOU's, etc.
2. Modern currencies are NOT backed by bullion of any kind. So, what backs them??? YOU did NOT answer that question.
3. You needed to go further into FRACTIONAL LENDING, for that is both how money is CREATED and BACKED. The dollar is backed by ALL the outstanding loans denominated in dollars.
This is how it goes......
Say a bank has $100,000 in its vaults, and it must keep 10% reserve, so it could lend out $1,000,000
You are buying a house, for $250,000 with $50,000, and you need to borrow $200,000.
The bank lends you $200,000, AND puts the house on its books as the mortgagor.
Its assets are now $100,000 + one house valued at $250,000, while mortgagee has $200,000 -- new money that did NOT exist before the purchase and loan.
It could do this four more times, and create total of $1,000,000.
Its books would read $100,000 + 5 homes valued at $1,250,000 total, with outstanding loans of $1,000,000 to be collected. Meanwhile, 5 people would have $1,000,000 of spendable cash that did not exist before they bought and mortgaged the homes.
Now, all lending has the same affect, even unsecured loans. Although, since the only value in the transaction is the loan itself, these loans have much higher interest rates.
That is how money is both CREATED and BACKED in the US.
This is also why we can NEVER go back to bullion backed currency. If we did, money supply would crash, companies would fold, and people thrown out of work, and the government have no money to help people. Our whole economic system would stop. Millions would die.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Love it.
I suggest one on PRINTING. Printing is underestimated in its impact.
For instance, the Basque knew about the New World, and went there every year for cod fish for about 500 years before Columbus arrived. (See the book, "Cod", good read). HOWEVER, no one else learned about it because captains and merchants would never give away trade secrets. SO, any discoveries were kept hidden.
Then comes printing, now one could become rich writing and publishing. Take Amerigo Vespucci. He never traveled anywhere He published maps. And so, our continents are named after a couch potato, not an intrepid explorer like Columbus. Columbus's discoveries would have been kept secret if not for publishing.
Also, look at how Martin Luther caught fire (figuratively). That was also due to printing. The Renaissance and The Enlightenment could not have happened without printing and publishing.
I think this deserves a whole series.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
Ha! Do today's Christians have any idea what they supposedly believe?? Do they believe in the tenets of their professed faith??
In College, during one class, which mostly had Catholics, I asked them if they were Catholics -- they said "Yes". So, I went through the lines of the Apostle's Creed. FYI, to be Catholic, you have to believe in every one of them. Sometimes in the past, not accepting even one of them would deem you a heretic, and get you killed.
So, I asked -- Did they believe Christ was from a virgin birth??? Most said NO.
Was Jesus Christ God?? some sad "NO"
Did he rise from the Dead? Did he ascend into heaven?? Is there a Holy Spirit?? etc.
Well, most did not accept at least one, which told me that most "Catholics" were NOT Catholic.
In fact, many were Agnostic without knowing it, since they did not 100% believe in an anthropomorphic God.
I found it very enlightening.
1