Comments by "" (@craigkdillon) on "laowhy86" channel.

  1. 26
  2. 14
  3. 11
  4. 4
  5. 3
  6. 2
  7. 2
  8. 2
  9. Whoa -- not CSIS again. IMO, they are not competent. The CSIS "study" makes assertions, but does not back them up. What is more, the assertions are idiotic. For example, it asserts the US will lose several nuclear subs.' Oh yeah?? How? China cannot locate any of our subs underwater. How is China supposed to target and kill them?? Next, it claims US will lose several carriers. Again, HOW?? The US is NOT going to put our carrier groups within the first island chain -- for obvious reasons. China may have missiles capable of getting through our ECM systems, but I doubt that. China has NOT shown that any of its systems are able of defeating ours. HOWEVER - that is actually beside the point. WHY?? Simple -- why would Japan or US be involved at all?? A Chinese invasion of Taiwan will NOT survive the advanced anti-ship missiles Taiwan has. Taiwan makes the advanced chips, and has the techs that can put them into their HF missiles. The HF2 and HF3 can take out ANY Chinese ship. How will their ships survive the hundreds of missiles Taiwan has?? NEXT -- the HF-2e missile is long range and precise -- it can hit targets in EVERY Chinese port. What makes you even think all the Chinese ships will be able to put to sea to start the invasion??? Taiwan has the means to destroy China's navy with their missiles. Can China intercept and defeat Taiwan's missiles?? Maybe -- but not all of them. Only a few of China's ships might have sophisticated anti-missile tech. But, those systems can be defeated with multiple missiles. Now, the question becomes -- how many missiles does Taiwan have? AND, how effective are their ECCM systems?? Well, Taiwan has been making its missiles for over 20 years now. I expect them to have thousands, IMO. We know they have several hundred Harpoons. We also know that Taiwan has increased its defense spending a lot recently. The CSIS study seemed to me to be a scare tactic to induce increased defense spending by the US. BTW -- don't forget China has no answer to the F-35's of US & Japan.
    2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28. 1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1