Comments by "BlackFlagsNRoses" (@blackflagsnroses6013) on "" video.

  1. Federal must end plain and simple. The State and government have too much a monopoly on money
    5
  2. FakeBunny12 capitalism is nothing but the State ruling interest (capital) having government rule in its favor. The State is the apparatus of ruling classes to maintain their social orders and hierarchy.
    1
  3. FakeBunny12 well we libertarian socialists play the long game. First comes the revolution of the mind, then the social. Anarchism still lives so long as people are subjected to hierarchies and labor is exploited. Direct Action to create agro-industrial federation and free associations of autonomous industries and worker’s collectives or syndicates. Going outside the State and undermine those institutions to keep capital ruling. Socialists are the true free marketeers and voluntary communism can free the people/workers. To create libertarian societies we have to help people awaken, promote free thought, and reintroduce anarchist philosophies like anarcho-syndicalism, collectivism, communism, mutualism, free market anarchism. Again people must be inspired to take Direct Action and look towards libertarian solutions. The ideas aren’t new, they just haven’t had as much support so as to make the State bow to the will of a free people. Destroy the narrative that capitalism is freedom, and remind folks that socialism was the direct successor of classical liberalism. History has been distorted to promote capitalism instead of the next stage of liberation, the end of classes. “The economic principles of Modern Socialism are a logical deduction from the principle laid down by Adam Smith in the early chapters of his Wealth of Nations,—namely, that labor is the true measure of price. But Adam Smith, after stating this principle most clearly and concisely, immediately abandoned all further consideration of it to devote himself to showing what actually does measure price, and how, therefore, wealth is at present distributed. Since his day nearly all the political economists have followed his example by confining their function to the description of society as it is, in its industrial and commercial phases. Socialism, on the contrary, extends its function to the description of society as it should be, and the discovery of the means of making it what it should be. Half a century or more after Smith enunciated the principle above stated, Socialism picked it up where he had dropped it, and in following it to its logical conclusions, made it the basis of a new economic philosophy.” — Free Market Anarchist Benjamin Tucker
    1