Comments by "" (@bqanto) on "S. Korea to remove concrete localizer structures at airports after deadly Jeju Air crash" video.

@christopherrobinson7541 Are you aware that they made it out of reinforced concrete with the full knowledge that if a plane had hit it, it would have exploded and everyone would have died?
4
@thetravelerobserver Antennas must be mounted on a breakable wall, not a shatterproof wall.
3
@christopherrobinson7541 Lies, lies, lies. Muan airport was built in 2007. You are spreading lies in all your posts, you are really a paid person from the company that put up that wall. The structures for those antennas must be breakable, it is like that in all the airports where things do not work with bribes.
2
Another channel with an English name that praises the Korean government... A good move would have been if the walls were not built of reinforced concrete, a good move would have been not to accept bribes from the company that built the walls.
1
@ronc9413 Of course it was a problem also before. There must be nothing unbreakable on the runways, otherwise, guess what?, a plane in trouble could crash into them and explode. Did you notice that he didn't mention Incheon among the airports that will be redesigned? Because it's an intercontinental airport so it doesn't have that s*it, otherwise it wouldn't have had the necessary permits.
1
There is no need for any revolutionary discovery, just don't build illegal walls by accepting bribes.
1
Airports are not supposed to have anything breakable on the runways and that is a rule for all airports. There was no need to kill 179 people to find out, everyone who builds airports knows that. The reason why in South Korea they have those walls in the smaller airports is not because they don't know how to build an airport, but because they are corrupt and someone made money from building those walls. Have you asked yourself why the existence of a wall there wasn't reported on the airport map?
1
@christopherrobinson7541 But were you paid by the Korean ministry to spread this bul**hit? There are no border walls at the airport, at most there is a fence.
1
The emergency landing of the plane was perfect. There is no other term to indicate how the pilot landed with the plane in trouble: a perfect landing. If the wall had not been there, the plane would have continued to slide until it stopped. It is not true that it would not have been able to stop before the houses that were a few hundred meters away. Whoever built that wall is guilty of murder and massacre. In Korea, those guilty of serious crimes pay public relations agencies to manipulate public opinion, which almost has the final say in trials. This is why you see that there are here self-styled American aeronautical experts who talk nonsense at all blasts, they are people paid to divert the public's attention from who are the real guilties of the disaster.
1
The emergency landing of the plane was perfect. There is no other term to indicate how the pilot landed with the plane in trouble: a perfect landing. If the wall had not been there, the plane would have continued to slide until it stopped. It is not true that it would not have been able to stop before the houses that were a few hundred meters away. Whoever built that wall is guilty of murder and massacre. In Korea, those guilty of serious crimes pay public relations agencies to manipulate public opinion, which almost has the final say in trials. This is why you see that there are here self-styled American aeronautical experts who talk nonsense at all blasts, they are people paid to divert the public's attention from who are the real guilties of the disaster.
1
@thekenthouse6428 His name explains why.
1
@alfanika2934 No, he is a guy paid by the Koreans. He is writing nonsense everywhere to justify the presence of that illegal wall. He had the nerve to say that it was built in the 50s by the Americans.
1
@Zabzim Muan airport was built in 2007, don't believe those who are saying that the wall was left there in the 50s by the Americans, they are employees of agencies paid to spread disinformation and protect the guilty, a very common thing in the East.
1
There would have been no fire, because there would have been no impact. But perhaps you mean the engine fire.
1
@solandri69 The plane would have slowed down and stopped, don't talk bul**hit to pretend to understand something about aeronautics, and anyway I don't understand what sense there is in defending the existence of a WRONG wall. Are you seriously saying that that wall was put there to blow up the planes on the runway? The wall shouldn't have been there, the existence of that and other walls is just a huge basta*d s*it that should be blamed on the Ministry of Infrastructure, and none of those walls should have been there. Have you asked yourself why the existence of a wall there wasn't reported on the airport maps?
1
Antennas must be mounted on a breakable wall, not a shatterproof wall. The structures for those antennas must be breakable, it is like that in all the airports where things do not work with bribes. They made it out of reinforced concrete with the full knowledge that if a plane had hit it, it would have exploded and everyone would have died. Airports are not supposed to have anything breakable on the runways and that is a rule for all airports. There was no need to kill 179 people to find out, everyone who builds airports knows that. The reason why in South Korea they have those walls in the smaller airports is not because they don't know how to build an airport, but because they are corrupt and someone made money from building those walls. Have you asked yourself why the existence of a wall there wasn't reported on the airport map?
1