Comments by "The Esseboy" (@TheEsseboy) on "Scott Manley" channel.

  1.  @tysondog-original  Military projects are inherently more complex, and Starship is not even a unique vehicle, just a larger combination of already existing rocket technology. Two wrongs don't make one right. Whataboutism doesn't work as an argument.
    1
  2. probably a lot! Not to mention all the work to get the engines from not malfunctioning as they still do on the booster.
    1
  3. 2 engine failures, zero payload and still not reusable.
    1
  4. Not to mention they used all fuel reserves even without carrying any payload!
    1
  5. Ehm, he promised he would send them to Mars by 2020...
    1
  6.  @unownyoutuber9049  Nasa is funded by the government...they slashed their budget... ofc they cannot do it then...
    1
  7. It seemed like an uncontrolled leak, not dumping. So probably used up the RCS fuel trying to combat the spin induced by the leaking engines.
    1
  8. If nearly melting and engine failures is style, hmm.
    1