Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Inside the country backing Russia’s invasion of Ukraine - BBC Newsnight visits Serbia" video.

  1. 9
  2. 5
  3. 4
  4.  @josephinwood  : It’s always hard to know if your interlocutor is really who they claim to be, though your channel seems to be real enough? That is the tragedy of the age we live in; one of trolls, misinformation, propaganda and downright lies, all dressed up to look like something . . . other. Taking you at your word, which I read within hours of you replying but was hesitant to respond to (for the above stated reasons), I would first congratulate you on your excellent reporting and for drawing a wider audience’s attention to the fact that the war in Ukraine is not happening in a vacuum, but is having unlooked for consequences globally. I would question that editorial decision, however? It was the first question that leapt to the front of my mind and, though I cannot speak for everyone, I feel sure that there must have been many who thought the same things? Especially those in your audience who, like me, were adults at the time of the bombings and witnesses to the mounting international pressure for the west (Tony Blair in my country’s case) to respond. Surely it was THE pertinent question? The hypocrisy seems so stark? And I believe it is in the interests of the viewers to hear how these people who claim victimhood at alleged atrocities, holding up pictures of innocent children, etc, to hear the answer to the main question: HOW do these people reconcile the difference between what they were doing to an entire race with what happened to them? I can see many arguments for why the bombings were wrong. Mostly due to the fact that they wouldn’t have been necessary had the UN forces on the ground not been so reluctant to intervene earlier. Some arguments are more valid than others; and yet others, mere red herrings. I heard all of those at the time. But these were in the process of genocide. Do they even know WHY they were bombed? You say you put that to some of these people. I would dearly wish to know how they answered? What their level of honest awareness was (and is?) and whether they value some lives more than others? Were they ignorant of the genocide? I am curious as to how that editorial conversation went too? But, I understand why you may not be able to discuss that fully. But, surely this type of, “911,” style remembrance, transformed into abiding bitterness by propagandists, can only be occurring in a place where people have either been given false accounts of the reasons for the bombings, or they simply don’t know or care to know?
    3
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11. 1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15. 1