Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Fox News" channel.

  1. In answer to your question, "Why go to Russia?" To avoid imprisonment for the rest of his life as a consequence of doing the right thing. The interview ended at the point where we were coming onto the sloppy practices of the CIA in its use of private contractors. Wonder why?
    28
  2. What? Fox took someone’s words out of context, to the extent that they LIED about them? NOT FOX??? And WHY would they do that? Hmmm? Maybe because they would do ANYTHING for Trump??? Fox are a bunch of sellout whores, who may as well change their name to RT
    10
  3. I would have thought that BIG news, like this would be HIGH on the YouTube list? But, Fox put it it WAY DOWN on the list. Hmmm . . . Wonder WHY?
    10
  4. Mario : Yeah, that’s a thread you kids REALLY SHOULD pull on? Given that Trump has publicly admitted to FAR WORSE on SEVERAL OCCASIONS? How could HE keep his job, if Franken loses his? Hmmm . . . Keep it up, sheeple ;-)
    9
  5. STAUNCH NZ : Yeah, shouldn’t Bill O’Liely be doing THIS opinion piece???
    7
  6. Buuuhhhht . . . Fox backs Trump ALL THE WAY, when he attacks Muslims? When he attacks women? When he attacks people “of colour” (whatever the HELL THAT is?)? I just DON’T GET it? Fox peddles HATE, even of, “students,” almost EVERY day, and now THEY are “upset” when it happens to someone they like??? Perhaps THEY should set a BETTER example? From where I’m sitting, I’m seeing HYPOCRISY
    5
  7. STAUNCH NZ : THIS! Coming from the “Lock her up!” Channel???
    5
  8. So, defending slavery “back in the day” would be OK with you??? COME OOOHHHNNN!!!
    5
  9. Laura Ingram: Do you have NAY IDEA how despicable you sound. ALL the FLAT denials of ANY contacts with the Russians from Trump, and here we are! "We tried to get dirt on our opponents FROM THE RUSSIANS! But, hey, it's only TREASON! Treason ain't a crime?!?!?!?" And do you think it's going to end there? Now there there are FLAMES in all this "SMOKE"? Now that there is a "there" there? Sickening
    4
  10. ClusterVisionMach2 : This is Fake News
    4
  11. Juan Nadie : Eek! A racist! How revolting
    4
  12. The Angry Republican : So MANY news stories are MISSING on Fox? . . . How do you find out what’s going on, if the, “news,” won’t even TELL YOU? . . . 🤔
    4
  13. It's a trap. Wait and see
    3
  14. Good point. They can't have their cake and eat it, right?
    3
  15. Farkhod Gaziev Sure, and they may well have engineered things to get him there from Hon Kong. That doesn't make Snowden more or less culpable in anything
    3
  16. MrHighYeller : Well, now we KNOW. Dershowitz was SO WRONG. “No way are Flynn’s lawyers cooperating with Mueller!” Now the court has SHOWN US the EXACT OPPOSITE! IN WRITING!!! What. ELSE is Dershowitz WRONG about???
    3
  17. STAUNCH NZ : Good point. “Me thinks she doth protest too MUCH?” Is there a Hannity sex scandal coming? Is THAT why he’s doing this? Hmmm . . .
    3
  18. Richie Rich : The FU Crew Channel : So MANY news stories MISSING on Fox? . . . How do you find out what’s going on, if the, “news,” won’t even TELL YOU? . . . 🤔
    3
  19. Tony Leon : That comment, in isolation, does NOT tell the WHOLE story. This is just Fox, doing what it does, manipulating the FACTS. They CANNOT be trusted. I agree that Kelly did not “intend” to defend slavery, but he DID deny that this was the issue around which the war was fought, and he TRIED to make it about “loyalty to his State,” which, “meant MORE to him than loyalty to country.” That position is called TREASON ANYWAY, but it is ALSO WRONG, from a historical perspective and reveals Kelly’s ignorance AND prejudices. See the WHOLE interview, rather than allowing a biased media outlet cherry pick for you, the bits THEY want you to see, with THEIR “narrative” exposition telling you WHAT to think, instead of encouraging you to do your OWN thinking
    3
  20. So, colluding to do an investigation well, is “colluding” now? It was MUELLER who FIRED that guy? But, you guys are conspiring for Trump! The people won’t buy this
    3
  21. carlos gonzalez : But there are MILLIONS of Republicans who want Trump OUT of office. You didn’t KNOW this?
    3
  22. That screechy, moralising, interviewer is so dense. Good suggestion, prof
    2
  23. Everyone has an accent. I think what sounds so strange to you, is the truth
    2
  24. kappelmeister123: If it's fake news, you are saying that Junior lied
    2
  25. Rev Smith : Yeah, ‘coz your president only criticises people for being Muslims, but THAT’S OK, right? Dummy
    2
  26. 555 000 : The FU Crew Channel : So MANY news stories MISSING on Fox? . . . How do you find out what’s going on, if the, “news,” won’t even TELL YOU? . . . 🤔
    2
  27. Todd Kaplan : The FU Crew Channel : So MANY news stories MISSING on Fox? . . . How do you find out what’s going on, if the, “news,” won’t even TELL YOU? . . . 🤔
    2
  28. Patrick O'Neil : IF that is what ACTUALLY happened?
    2
  29. Patrick O'Neil : I haven’t seen the piece they are talking about, which is why I put it as a question. But, I was instantly suspicious of an organisation that gets all up in my face about respecting the “beliefs” of others, when they are FAMOUS for backing Trump, without criticism, for attacking women, Muslims, “people of colour” and so on? Sounds HYPOCRITICAL to me? I speak as a Christian, looking at the people who cast the first stones, as they complain about having one tossed back at them. THAT doesn’t even make SENSE, coming from Fox???
    2
  30. Hmmm . . . “Joan Collins”? That’s political analysis? Where is YOUR Loyalty? You LOVED Bush, when he was in office, but when he speaks TRUTH TO POWER, you turn on him, like a pack of angry dogs. Typical Foxian, Tiger Lilly Propaganda
    2
  31. George Schmid : The FU Crew Channel : So MANY news stories MISSING on Fox? . . . How do you find out what’s going on, if the, “news,” won’t even TELL YOU? . . . 🤔
    2
  32. sharon allport : And they WILL 😁
    2
  33. LadyBlaidd : WOW! You JUST, “found that out,” did you? Of COURSE Avenatti has his, “own beef,” with Trump! Like MOST Americans, he just WANTS THE TRUTH! If Trump is, “innocent,” WHY NOT get the TRUTH out there? Trump SAID, on MANY OCCASIONS, “Only MOBSTERS take the 5th.” You ALL KNOW that Trump is GUILTY but you DON’T CARE, because you’re in a CULT. So, when Russia and China becomes our BOSS, we will have CULTISTS like YOU to THANK FOR THAT. MAGA = Michael Avenatti Great American
    2
  34. If you know that the intelligence services leaked anything, why do you automatically blame them for leaking, Bill O'Liely? Oh, and when you talk of "the media goal", don't forget that YOU ARE the media, fool
    1
  35. I am scouring Fox for news on Mike Flynn and there is HARDLY ANYTHING? Why is that?
    1
  36. Trump screwed it up, O'Liely. Get off TV you sexual deviant and PROVEN liar
    1
  37. Look up Kennedy's inaugural address and compare. Or look up most other inaugural addresses and compare them with Trump's. Without exaggeration, I know 12 year olds who could do better. And if red confetti makes the poor little guy cry, he should maybe ask himself what people are so upset about? Clearly, no objectivity, if you take it so personally
    1
  38. This report is inaccurate. I saw the Maddow report. and it DID tell the viewer everything that the single piece of paper (two sides) had on it. Yet Fox opens by telling us that they are holding back on this? Also, they said what their source was. It was Johnston. He said he doesn't know HE doesn't know who dropped it in his mail box. MSNBC showed it to the White House, who confirmed it was real. Trump leaked it, for obvious reasons, and it is a non-story, given that this tiny EXCERPT from 2005 tells us nothing about where the money came from. As Fox says, no one is surprised at Trump making money. The question has always been, who does he make money from? This is like the wiretap story. Trump could clear up the issue in a heartbeat. Keep your word Mr Trump. Show us the tax returns and silence your critics?
    1
  39. NO-ORWELLIAN Dystopia : You probably know the "Dr" Gorka actually IS FAKE? His qualifications are not real. If Hannity was a journalist he would have discovered that. I still can't get over how DUMB Trumpanzees are
    1
  40. Answer to the title : Because they are not wrong. Hannity screwed up the interview from the outset
    1
  41. Even if it is a, "never Trump channel," so what? Don't you want a president to be presidential? America is an international punch line, because of Trump, and his "base" simply doesn't get it, judging by this comment stream. Elect a dick, you get dickery. And Trump HAS tried to shut down free speech, so that's a lie, Ms Slapp. And I defy you to find JUST ONE demonstrable inaccuracy in Joe or Mika's comments?
    1
  42. How embarrassing! A news anchor who didn't understand the topic and wasn't LISTENING! Several seconds of silence, while the idiot realizes that the interviewee had stopped talking, and then, "Phew! . . . That is, er . . . That was um, . . . " etc. What a DUMBASS
    1
  43. Rice may have blown her cred in the past, and she may even be responsible for unmasking. But don't you guys care about WHAT she unmasked? What people "expect in a Banana Republic" is a president who had to be told that it was inappropriate to have a Russia-style military parade at his inauguration; who makes up lies about the previous president; who flip-flops on Syria (they used gas attacks before) and BLAMES people in his own country (Obama ASKED congress for an attack on Syria and THEY - WITH A REPUBLICAN MAJORITY - did nothing), instead of seeking solidarity against the psychos who committed the atrocity; who blocks the Russia investigation at EVERY opportunity; who appoints friends and family to key positions REGARDLESS OF QUALIFICATIONS; and who makes speeches about his own achievements on the day that everyone else is staring with horror at the gas attacks in Syria, because he just doesn't give a damn. That's what "a Banana Republic" looks like! And Hannityski, "Where are the mainstream media?" YOU ARE THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA! Fox is the most popular news channel in the US. But, if you mean CNN and MSNBC? They are broadcasting interviews with Susan Rice AND her opponents. Why aren't you? "Fair and balanced?" by Kremlin standards, maybe
    1
  44. Jeez Fox, you guys are getting desparate
    1
  45. DjHotchickhugr : Me too. Trump is walking into a CLASSIC FBI-style trap. They'll have all eyes on her when she testifies about WHAT she found and everyone will forget about the unmasking issue, which she will have nailed down, legally, anyway. Trump is an idiot
    1
  46. ABLE2OVER : We'll see, but remember what I predicted, there. And by then, some of Trump's team will be under indictment, so she WON'T be the main attraction, no matter how hard the Russian Traitor in the White House tries to change the channel. He can put on a show, but P T Barnum will only get you so far
    1
  47. DjHotchickhugr : Hehhhhh . . . Shills are soOoo exhausting. If you CARE about criminality, why are you not shouting, "Lock Flynn up!"? Why do you not care about the MOUNTING evidence of corruption and Russian double dealing? Come ooohhn . . . no one's buying it
    1
  48. DjHotchickhugr : I "may be" dissapointed, but it's unlikely. The only way my prediction does not come true, is if things are much worse for Trump. I can PROMISE YOU this: The Rice affair will NOT save the POTUS. Disclaimer: I am a paid up Republican. I loathe Obama and Clinton, but for POLITICAL reasons, not because of the conflated, distorted and "Trumped" up claims of the Russian collaborators (Trump voters or, "Fans," as he likes to put it)
    1
  49. A Presidential inauguration is the ultimate political gesture, idiot. Why bleat about people "peacefully" "respecting the process" by declining to attend. As per usual, the angriest, loudest squawking comes from Mr O'Liely
    1
  50. This stuff is so ill informed. They stated in their judgement that they were not assessing the merits of the case! They were simply saying that there was a case to answer in court and, if they wanted to argue that, they must do so. They also pointed out that Trump had reversed the legal status of 1000000 people twice, without amending that order, which you cannot do. Otherwise, anyone can interpret the order how they like, when they like. They also told him that, if he took out the bits that break the constitution, he would have had less trouble in the first place. These were not politically biased rulings. It's the law, stupid
    1