Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Melanie Morgan: Al Franken harassed me after TV appearance" video.
-
9
-
4
-
Linda H : Interesting points. Maybe, these two are SO keen to defend Moore, for their . . . own . . . reasons? Even Hannity thinks Moore should stand down? Even Moore’s “friends” have said he should take the Lie Detector test? Even the GOP have rejected Moore? Even the Party has withdrawn sponsorship? Only Trump, sitting in a glass house, as he does, will not throw stones? So, their BLIND support of Moore, comes from the CULT of Trump, OR a “worse” place?
Their Kellyann CONway style, what-about-ism, regarding, “Al Franken,” saws at the branch they are sitting on, but they are parroting Trump, without consideration of the fact that, if Franken WERE to lose his job, Trump’s position would be unsustainable. So, let’s HOPE Franken is forced out, so that the Senate is FORCED to deal with Trump’s FAR WORSE, and CONFESSED, crimes against women? Let’s see how Trump’s harping on about Bill Clinton aides him, when he’s hoist by his own petard?
1
-
1
-
Colt FortyFive : You seem quite exercised over such a Nother Burger, but I know you will find you are WRONG about the application of standards, there. You see, calling it, “locker room” talk, does not speak to whether it was TRUE or FALSE. Trump will have to admit that he was bragging, to big himself up for Billy Bush, and lying, before the world, just to get passed the Access Hollywood tape. Then he’s still got 15 accusers to deal with. Franken has 1, who has forgiven him, for a prank; not EVEN sexual assault, mind you, a prank. Trump wouldn’t stand a CHANCE.
But THEN you have the same issue with Moore; and the Rep’s have ALREADY drawn the line with him and ARE likely to expel him, even if he DOES win, though it looks actually unlikely.
As to “parroting CNN”: what you are finding there, is intelligent people, reaching the same LOGICAL conclusions. Don’t take MY word for it, which is on record BEFORE CNN said it, but look up your Constitutional Law. It’s aaahhhll there, in black and white ;-)
1
-
1
-
1
-
Colt FortyFive : So, YOU mean, that Trump LYING, er, forgive me, “pea-cocking” for Billy Bush, because he felt that making up stories about sexually assaulting women was a GOOD thing to do? And that Trump will be FORCED to ADMIT to that? This is how YOU choose to define, “locker room talk”? You have NO WAY of KNOWING this, but you, like all Trump Cult followers, have decided upon the most favourable narrative and are sticking to it? Even though THAT is a HUMILIATING confession that Trump will be forced to make? And that it will be inconsistent with AHHHHLL the OTHER interviews, where he describes IN DETAIL how he abused other GIRLS, on the RADIO, ON RECORD?
You’re leaping through HOOPS to clean that up, and it won’t WASH. You’re a sick puppy and the EVIDENCE is stacking up against the DOTUS. Come to terms with it
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1