Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Half of Russia's Army Has Been Lost" video.

@drkzilla : I think David Wishengrad blah blah is a chat-bot. His comment appears to be meaningless, irrelevant ramblings, regardless. I shouldn’t waste time on it, unless it makes a relevant point, personally.
8
@anaignatowicz2779 : That’s because he’s smart. Do you love your country? If you do, then you’ll love Ukraine too, as they are repelling one of the two biggest threats to freedom and democracy on Earth right now. Show him or her that says they don’t love their own freedom and democracy, and I’ll show you a fool, a liar or a lying fool.
7
@drkzilla : To your other point; nukes are only capable of deterring other nukes. So long as Putin has no reason to believe he’s being invaded by western powers, he can expect massive military responses to his expansionism and imperial dreams wherever he attempts them from now on. But, as to whether Russia stands or falls as it is, that’s up to the Russians. He can’t nuke his own population if they revolt, once he’s lost more Ukrainian land than he started with, created more NATO countries than he started with, and simply gotten the opposite of every goal he set out to achieve. When his own people start to count the cost in Russian human bodies, and they cannot buy the coffins or even the flowers for their sons’ graves because of shortages, nukes will have no relevance to whatever they choose to do about that inside the Kremlin.
5
You are exactly right, Jake. The whole country of Ukraine would be turned into a giant concentration camp if Russia won their war.
1
I think Ukraine has found their Marlena Deitrich, or Vera Lynn, for the 21’st century in Witch. She could easily cast a spell on Hollywood after the war.
1
@aaronjohnston7908 : Wars are complicated affairs. There’s a lot to cover. It can never be just one sided. Forgive me, if I come off as paranoid, but . . . it would be typical of a Russian troll to request that a popular YouTuber covers more of what their stats tell them are the least popular topics under their rubric? Am I being paranoid?
1
@aaronjohnston7908 : They’re not daily updates, which surely you would know if you used to watch, “vigorously?” And, I wonder just what’s going on in your bank that makes it more interesting to you than the literal battle for the world’s freedom and democracy, currently being fought in Ukraine? Your name rings a bell for me, but I can’t place it. Perhaps you were one of those trolls who used to show up on CNN to hijack a story about pets and make it about trump? Or maybe you were someone I conversed with in a friendly way? I know your name, but . . . ?
1
@drkzilla : No one thinks Putin doesn’t have nukes. No one is suggesting that. Even if they are rusty and you can definitely half whatever number he claims to have, and then half that number again into those that still actually work. But he’s planning to move some to Belarus some time next year? By then, will Belarus still be a dictatorship? Will Putin still be in power?
1
@brianmaxwell1967 : They will have some that work well and, let’s face it? You don’t need many to ruin the planet. As to setting them up in Belarus next year? I think we should call his bluff. If we tell him we will give back all the nukes that the US persuaded Ukraine to give up in the 1990’s, should he go ahead, he’ll back down. Putin always flouts, “Red lines,” unless he knows we’re not bluffing. Every time he’s been seriously challenged, he backs down. And I mean, absolutely 100% of the time. ✌️
1