Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "farage's inconsistent story" video.
-
Example: Farage says, “I said was awful. What more do you want me to say? Of course it was an apology.”
Journalist COULD have responded: “You made a, ‘comment,’ NOT an apology. Since you ask, I want you to either apologise or explain WHY you refuse to apologise?”
Basic, syllogistic, chain of reasoning logic, that would have cornered Farage into showing us more of the truth of who he is.
Example: Farage asks, “Have you covered the Labour MP . . .” etc.
Journalist: “Your job is to answer the questions and mine is to ask them.” Or better still, “Isn’t it an insult to British intelligence that you think you can avoid answering tricky questions by trying to pose your own, when you happen to know that the people want you to answer this question?”
Example: Better even still, in response to Fargage’s, “awful,” dodge; “So, why do you refuse to apologise for such abhorrent racism in your party?” Being PREPARED to field the next move, “I already said it’s awful,” with the above, “That’s an observation and comment, NOT an apology.”
See? It’s all about whether the journalist cares and is prepared. Though I hasten to add, I do not judge this particular journalist, as I don’t know her, and don’t know what circumstances she was labouring under. But I would hope she would agree that she could have done a much better job?
2
-
2