Comments by "Ash Roskell" (@ashroskell) on "Fujitsu needs to close. It was directly profiting from the prosecutions" video.

  1. I said that Fujitsu was directly profiting from all of this. Any monies that could not be paid back by the victims will have been insured against criminal theft, so they will have put in claims for that. But now we learn they were charging to give evidence which they KNEW was unsafe! That is a criminal conspiracy! They need to be investigated by Scotland Yard and charged! Yes. These victims need 1) Full exoneration: Certainly honours are due to those who worked so tirelessly on behalf of their fellow victims. 2) Full Compensation: Including costs, inflation adjusted for any and ALL losses incurred, not just the enforced repayments of monies they never took, but damaged credit ratings, other losses of interest in their savings, or sold assets to make good the amounts, and any other related losses through legal fees, lost business opportunities, depreciation of assets, etc. 3) Damages: A high figure to each individual, so they never have to worry about money again. A figure representing emotional damages, psychological damages, losses to the grieving relatives of the suicide cases, and representative of the hard work victims were forced to put in to restore their good names (still pending from a legal point of view), etc. All aspects of their suffering and time lost should be represented in that figure. 4) Punitive Damages: Again, an eye-wateringly high figure, representing the damage Fujitsu has done to the Post Office’s and the government’s reputations, the harm to public trust in their institutions, the time that it has taken, the bad faith they showed in their submissions of evidence and their, “cooperation,” with the enquiry, which the judge has already left comments on the record about, the callousness of their disregard for hard evidence and their CONSPIRACY to cover up their mistakes at ANY cost, including that of human life, quite literally! The tax payers deserve to be made whole and to have their faith in the legal system upheld too. 5) A Criminal Investigation: Separate from this enquiry, but using the evidence referred to above, which shows beyond question that the spirit and letter of the law was recklessly disregarded in a conspiracy against these victims, the government (who are the shareholders and therefore owners of the Post Office) and against the tax paying public: the funders of the government. And it must be STIPULATED that ALL remedial measures to relieve the victims will be taken as a matter of urgency and ARE NOT to be held up by any further enquiries. Even if a special bill needs to be passed in the House in order for this to take place. 6) A Review of the Honours System: to include the King’s representatives alongside the government’s, with a view to stripping honours from all those who took part in this conspiracy and were in any way responsible, either criminally or through sheer stupidity, and ensuring that the credibility and respectability of of honours is not further diminished by such appalling miscarriages of justice, by root and branch review and reordering. I know I’m living out a fantasy here. Howling at the moon, even. But all of the above steps, carried out swiftly and with the same determination and urgency that Fujitsu and the PO showed in their commitment to conspiracy, framing people and getting false confessions out of them, would be the only way I could see for justice to be done. And if the Prime Minister was to lead the way on this, it might do his otherwise appalling fortunes some actual good in the polls?
    1