Youtube comments of Ash Roskell (@ashroskell).

  1. 1000
  2. 756
  3. 729
  4. 601
  5. 563
  6. 520
  7. 493
  8. 491
  9. 490
  10. 361
  11. 325
  12. 299
  13. 294
  14. 270
  15. 265
  16. 255
  17. 248
  18. 241
  19. 226
  20. 218
  21. 207
  22. 207
  23. 201
  24. 197
  25. 196
  26. 194
  27. 188
  28. 187
  29. 186
  30. 185
  31. 184
  32. 177
  33. 169
  34. 169
  35. 163
  36. 161
  37. 150
  38. 150
  39. 148
  40. 148
  41. 145
  42. 142
  43. 142
  44. 139
  45. 138
  46. 133
  47. 131
  48. 129
  49. 126
  50. 125
  51. 119
  52. 116
  53. 114
  54. 112
  55. 110
  56. 109
  57. 109
  58. 109
  59. 108
  60. 107
  61. 106
  62. 105
  63. 102
  64. 102
  65. 97
  66. 94
  67. 94
  68. 94
  69. 93
  70. 93
  71. 92
  72. 91
  73. 91
  74. 90
  75. 89
  76. 89
  77. 88
  78. 87
  79. 86
  80. 86
  81. 86
  82. 86
  83. 85
  84. 84
  85. 84
  86. 84
  87. 83
  88. 83
  89. 82
  90. 82
  91. 81
  92. 80
  93. 80
  94. 79
  95. 79
  96. 78
  97. 77
  98. 76
  99. 75
  100. 75
  101. 73
  102. 73
  103. 71
  104. 71
  105. 71
  106. 70
  107. 69
  108. 69
  109. 69
  110. 68
  111. 68
  112. 68
  113. 67
  114. 67
  115. 67
  116. 66
  117. 65
  118. My dad had a condition similar to the protagonist’s in the movie Memento. He’d had a series of mini-strokes rendering him unable to make new memories. Imagine your dad asking you, “Will you drive me to the hospital to visit your mum?” Only to have to see his face crumple with shock and pain, once again, when I had to explain that she was dead and buried already, just a few weeks ago. Why am I sharing this? Because it was this man who fell, trapped his arm, got taken to hospital and there caught Covid, from which he died within a couple of weeks of admission. The trauma, for me, was compounded by the fact that my dad knew he was seriously ill, but needed to have the fact that none of his four children (nor his wife) were there for him accounted for over and over again. Covid was still a new crisis and nowhere near as well understood as it is now, and the rushed off their feet medical staff would not have had the time to patiently re-explain my dad’s isolation to him, or the different reasons for his wife’s absence from that of his children’s. Yes we could WhatsApp with him, but that was a haphazard, unreliable process, often mediated by an exhausted medic who’s English was little better than basic. He died hard. He died alone. He died not understanding why he was alone. And then I saw a video of a female press secretary in which she stood at a podium and literally laughed out loud about the drunken antics of the politicians from which she’d just extricated herself, finding their rule breaking somewhat hilarious. At that moment, when I thought about their motives for doing that, and mine for being tempted to break the rules when I even had to get special permission to travel from Scotland to the north of England to attend his funeral, I felt (for the first time in my life) the rage of a revolutionary. I felt like the Tories were laughing at me and every family that suffered through those times. And I resolved never to forgive them. Even if I could, one day, find forgiveness for their blind, venal, arrogant self service and lies, in my heart, I knew it would be damaging for the country to allow this, “Let them eat cake,” moment to pass unanswered. Whatever Boris’s, “punishment,” for his cruel dereliction of duty, failure to model basic leadership in a time of crisis, or downright lies, I can never get my last moments with my dad back. So whatever they do to Boris, it won’t be enough.
    65
  119. 64
  120. 63
  121. 63
  122. How do you think they got so rich? It sure wasn’t by giving a damn about their employees. Phil Spencer, in that clip, was actively gaslighting fans, claiming he wants to, “foster creativity,” by, “allowing,” studios to make games of a type they don’t usually make. Half of the team that made Redfall, including all of its founders, had already left the company by the time that game was published. Those brave enough to speak out about why they left all said it was because they were being, “forced,” to make a live service game, which they had no experience making. Then Spencer flipped and said it would be a single player narrative, when they were already near completion, forcing them to rework the entire project, with the results we all saw. They had pleaded with Spencer not to force them out of their lane in the first place, into a type of game they didn’t like or believe in ethically, let alone artistically. But their pleas fell on deaf ears, until the Microsoft higher ups changed their minds, when it was already too late. They pleaded even louder with Spencer for more time, but again, deaf ears. He KNEW the game wasn’t ready, yet he outright lied in his softball Q&A sessions, saying he was getting great feedback from all the testers. He had simply calculated that the game would flop but, by releasing it in an incomplete state, he could still watch the calendar for when those quarterly payouts to the shareholders were due and guarantee their payoffs. And how could he guarantee them? Glad you asked. By knowing that he could still make savings at the other end, by firing staff. As long as the shareholders (who don’t play video games or know anything about them) get their money come pay day, everything is fine. And the investors probably don’t even know about these disasters in the community. All they know is that the first day they don’t get their LEGALLY ENFORCEABLE promised payouts, they will move on into another industry and gut that. Which is why, to the public, Spencer says the direct opposite of the truth and gaslights us players about what the studios actually wanted. Most of these people are bound by NDA’s, so the fact that we hear anything contradicting him, or even just challenging his basic assumptions, at all is as a result of brave individuals taking big risks.
    62
  123. 62
  124. 60
  125. 60
  126. 60
  127. 60
  128. 60
  129. 59
  130. 58
  131. 58
  132. 58
  133. 58
  134. 58
  135. 57
  136. 57
  137. 57
  138. 57
  139. 57
  140. 57
  141. 56
  142. 56
  143. 55
  144. 55
  145. 55
  146. 54
  147. 54
  148. 54
  149. 53
  150. 53
  151. 53
  152. 52
  153. 52
  154. 52
  155. 52
  156. 52
  157. 52
  158. 52
  159. 51
  160. 51
  161. 51
  162.  @pierreo33  : When people tell me that isn’t likely, I like to remind them that it was unpopular wars abroad, that the people didn’t understand, that were the driving influence of both of Russia’s last revolutions. Their famous one took place during WWI, and the next one, the collapse of the Soviet Union, occurred directly after Russia’s defeat in Afghanistan. It was especially driven on by the mismatch between the victorious tone of their media, set against all those expectant families who didn’t even get a coffin when they thought their boy was coming home. I lived through that time as an adult. And I followed news and current affairs as much as anyone (certainly more than, “the average guy”) and anyone who tells you they saw that utter soviet collapse coming is either, “misremembering,” or just lying. Even the people who lead it were simply swept up in events, rather than having the end game in sight, as all of the main players have since confirmed. All of those main historical ingredients are in place at the moment, with the pressures only increasing domestically and on the front. This is why Putin has found it advantageous to have the airforce, army and navy all competing for resources and passing blame for failure on to each other. And then to have divisions within each force blaming one another and fighting over the bullets. The Wagner group is far from unique in that regard. The only thing that’s new about that is that Prigozhin has been doing it in public, which is, admittedly, unprecedented. But he merely represents how ALL Russian armed services behave, behind closed doors. Yet, if one charismatic leader were to turn his tanks and howitzers around and point them at the Kremlin, the odds of his troops surviving the next three months will shoot up 90%. And it won’t be long now before a domestic protest, or, “incident,” in Russia, sparks the encouragement needed for entire battalions to head back to Moscow, happier to shoot at street cops rather than Abrams tanks . . . It just takes that first domino to fall . . .
    51
  163. 51
  164. 50
  165. 50
  166. 49
  167. 49
  168. 49
  169. 49
  170. 48
  171. 48
  172. 48
  173. 47
  174. 47
  175. 47
  176. 46
  177. 46
  178. 45
  179. 45
  180. 45
  181. 45
  182. 45
  183. 44
  184. 44
  185. 44
  186. 44
  187. 43
  188. 43
  189. 42
  190. 42
  191. 41
  192. 41
  193. 41
  194. 41
  195. It helps to know what his motives are. Putin believes his power depends upon being the biggest energy provider in Europe and Ukraine is sitting on enough energy to put Russia out of business. He stopped Shell and Exxon developing these finds by fomenting, “separatists,” in the regions where the reserves are (hearing a lot about, “Donbas,” lately? Never heard of that area before this all started?) and occupying Crimea, where the reserves are sitting offshore. Now the massive reserves in the west of Ukraine have been confirmed and paranoid Putin can’t reach that area unless he has the whole country. This is a pure smash and grab operation. And it’s going badly because his conscript army knows there’s no reason to be doing this, other than to make a trillionaire and his mafia cronies even richer and more powerful than they already are. Armed robbery. But since he’s threatened to use nukes already, and since this is about energy (something the west has NEVER allowed themselves to lose control over in a hundred years) only an idiot would allow a mad man to point a loaded gun at his head a second time. The west will pour all of its resources into getting the mad man’s finger off that trigger and putting him in a box where he can’t threaten to wipe out all life on Earth again. We have no choice. Even if we allow him to think he’s won this one, the west will be swift and relentless now. I pity the Russia people, who will pay the highest cost for the Revolution that is inevitable now.
    40
  196. 39
  197. 39
  198. 39
  199. 39
  200. 39
  201. 39
  202. 39
  203. 38
  204. 38
  205. 38
  206. 38
  207. 37
  208. 37
  209. 37
  210. 37
  211. 37
  212. 37
  213. 37
  214. 36
  215. 36
  216. 36
  217. 36
  218. 36
  219. 36
  220. 36
  221. 35
  222. 35
  223. 35
  224. 35
  225. 35
  226. 35
  227. 35
  228. 35
  229. 34
  230. 34
  231. 34
  232. 34
  233. 34
  234. 34
  235. Yes, he seems like a perfect storm in that sense, like life conspired to play on his weaknesses and crush his strengths. Which is pretty much what lies at the heart of all great tragedies; that sense of, “If only.” The narrator of this video did a great job but overlooked the key element of the whole story, the very same thing that made The Dark Knight such a successful Joker too: He’s the quintessential, “Unreliable Narrator.” We cannot know by the end, how much of this story actually happened and, of the parts of it that did, whether they happened in the same way as he remembers them. Like his love interest being a pure fabrication of his desperate loneliness, his unlikely meeting with Bruce Wayne and later his father, his murders, all of it could be all in his mind or just events he witnessed without taking part in them. Even his appearance on TV is brought into question. So, in that final scene, are we seeing nothing more than symbolic bloody footprints? Or are they the tracks of his latest, pointless murder? We take on faith that this is the story of the genuine article, The Joker, Batman’s antagonist, or there would be no point in watching the movie. But, just as Joker told a different story to each person about the scars on his face in The Dark Knight, the very intrigue about him, and that we cannot ever be certain of the facts surrounding him are and that’s what makes Joker such a towering success. People’s biggest concern about this film was that it might ruin the one characteristic about The Joker that makes him work so well, that he’s unknowable, a true agent of chaos and the antithesis of Batman, who seeks to bring order back to Gotham. Like a force of nature, he has always had no origin story, in the same way that banal evil is incomprehensible, giving him an edge that thrills the comic fans. This movie achieves the impossible, giving us that origin story to colour his narrative, but by making him utterly untrustworthy as the story teller, even to himself, we can still never really know what makes him what he is, or even if this is anything like the same story he would tell himself by the same time next week? That’s the genius of this film and why it works so well. It respects its source material and doesn’t spoil the one great thing about what made Batman’s greatest antagonist what he was: chaos incarnate.
    34
  236. 34
  237. 34
  238. 34
  239. 34
  240. 33
  241. 33
  242. 33
  243. 33
  244. 33
  245. 33
  246. 33
  247. 33
  248. 32
  249. 32
  250. 32
  251. 32
  252. 31
  253. 31
  254. 31
  255. 31
  256. 31
  257. 31
  258. 31
  259. 31
  260. I have a copy of Christopher Frame’s translation of Montaigne’s complete essays in the form of an audiobook, which I chose for having something to listen to when I walk my dog in the mornings. It’s one of the few books I keep returning to. Partly because it’s so beautifully read, by Christopher Lane in this case, in case anyone is thinking of buying it? But mostly because the writing is so astonishingly accessible, recognisably modern in attitude and bewitchingly honest. It is worth noting that Montaigne never thought of himself as a philosopher and that for every idea he professes, he will usually present its counter argument in a separate essay, as you noted with that reference to his introduction. Not that he was at all fickle, but that he could see valid reasons for almost all arguments. And the reason for that was both his disarming honesty and his superhuman gift for empathy. It’s that honesty and empathy that reaches us so clearly, through the generations. It’s also worth noting that he spent that period in his tower, with his books, not in total isolation. He enjoyed the company of regularly visiting friends, would go down to the village and drink and play small stakes gambling games with the locals and established friendly relationships with his large retinue of staff. All of which he tells us about in these essays. He remained gregarious but had withdrawn from the, “public life,” which made demands upon him that were outside of his control. I think that’s the essence of who he became: a man who just wanted to be free. It was the realisation that he need not leave a growing legacy behind him for his posterity, but merely a few resources and a little cash for those closest to him, that set him free, in my view. He realised he had enough wealth and did not need any more. What was truly revolutionary about his work, collectively, was an honesty that surpassed almost any of his contemporaries and an almost revolutionarily modern attitude to almost everything. A set of values that would have seen him burned at the stake had they been widely known. But to us seem eminently reasonable, sympathetic and even heart warming. The audiobook is well over 50 hours long, but I’ve completed the whole thing at least twice. And self proclaimed philosophers rarely get that much attention from me even though I have always loved reading philosophy generally. So, the guy had something.
    30
  261. 30
  262. 30
  263. 30
  264. 30
  265. Those Russian soldiers would find their life expectancy goes up sharply if they went back to Moscow and removed the very small group of oligarchs who are costing them everything, in return for nothing. Putin’s 6 mistakes so far: 1) Underestimating Ukrainian Resolve: Putin should have watched Ukraine On Fire on Netflix. 2) Overestimating his own armed forces. Their equipment is out of date and the boots on the ground are mostly conscripts. One person defending their home has 20 times the fight in them than one conscript who doesn’t want to be there. 3) Stated Objectives: No one in Russia knows WHY this is happening! Putin spent the last 20 years convincing Russians their claims on Ukraine were legit, because they are the, “same people and country,” essentially. Now they’re meant to go kill them all? 4) Putin’s REAL objectives: The whole point is to make sure Shell, Exxon and BP NEVER get to drill for those massive gas and oil reserves which rival Russia’s. It would take years to get it pumping, so he doesn’t want to pump it himself, either. He just wants to make sure NO ONE does, making him the only major supplier in Europe and the second biggest supplier in the world. 5) The west’s real objectives: Which brings us to Putin’s shock at the west’s resolve. Ever since energy security was a thing, for more than a 100 years, the west has NEVER relinquished control of energy security to the East, and they’re not going to start now, right or wrong. 6) How this ends: The west will remain as cautious as it dares to be and, sadly, won’t put Ukraine’s interests above that of energy security. Zelensky’s job is to keep those two interests aligned and to ensure he honours those deals with western oil developers to pay for rebuilding his country, along with reparations from Russia. If he plays his cards right, he could turn Ukraine into an energy powerhouse for the next 20 to 30 years, until the world is off its fossil fuel addiction? Which would only help move countries like Hungary toward democracy and away from reliance on a weakened Russia. Putin will bluff about nukes, but he wants to live as badly as any cowardly bully. He has mistaken the west’s caution for irresolution. They will not allow him to keep Ukraine. But since he keeps threatening nukes, they will do absolutely everything in their power; fomenting revolution in Russia, pouring in resources to Ukraine, long after they’re occupied, and anything else, and sanctions are only just getting started, until Putin is taken out in a palace coup, or taken down by a revolution. Governments of the west will prefer the palace coup for the sake of stability. We should hope for the Revolution, for the sake of real change.
    30
  266. 30
  267. 30
  268. 30
  269. 29
  270. 29
  271. 29
  272. 29
  273. 29
  274. 29
  275. 29
  276. 29
  277. 28
  278. 28
  279. 28
  280. 28
  281. 28
  282. 28
  283. 28
  284. 28
  285. 28
  286. 28
  287. 28
  288. 28
  289. 27
  290. 27
  291. 27
  292. 27
  293. 27
  294. 27
  295. 27
  296. 27
  297. 27
  298. 27
  299. 27
  300. 27
  301. 27
  302. 27
  303. 26
  304. 26
  305. 26
  306. 26
  307. 26
  308. 26
  309. 26
  310. 26
  311. 26
  312. 26
  313. 26
  314. 26
  315. 26
  316. 26
  317. 26
  318. 26
  319. 25
  320. 25
  321. 25
  322. 25
  323. 25
  324. 25
  325. 25
  326. 25
  327. 25
  328. 25
  329. 25
  330. 25
  331. 25
  332. 25
  333. 25
  334. 25
  335. 24
  336. 24
  337. 24
  338. 24
  339. 24
  340. 24
  341. 24
  342. 24
  343. 24
  344. 24
  345. 24
  346. 24
  347. 24
  348. 24
  349. 24
  350. 24
  351. 23
  352. 23
  353. 23
  354. 23
  355. 23
  356. 23
  357. 23
  358. 23
  359. 23
  360. 23
  361. 23
  362. 23
  363. 23
  364. 23
  365. 23
  366. 23
  367. 23
  368. 23
  369. 23
  370. 23
  371. 23
  372. 23
  373. 23
  374. 23
  375. 23
  376. 23
  377. 23
  378. 23
  379. 23
  380. 22
  381. 22
  382. 22
  383. 22
  384. 22
  385. 22
  386. 22
  387. 22
  388. 22
  389. 22
  390. 22
  391. 22
  392. 22
  393. 22
  394. 22
  395. 22
  396. 22
  397. 22
  398. 22
  399. 22
  400. 22
  401. 22
  402. 22
  403. 22
  404. 22
  405. 21
  406. 21
  407. 21
  408. 21
  409. 21
  410. 21
  411. 21
  412. 21
  413. 21
  414. 21
  415. 21
  416. 21
  417. 21
  418. 21
  419. 21
  420. 21
  421. 21
  422. 21
  423. 21
  424. 21
  425. 21
  426. 21
  427. 21
  428. 21
  429. 20
  430. 20
  431. 20
  432. 20
  433. 20
  434. 20
  435. 20
  436. 20
  437. 20
  438. 20
  439. 20
  440. 20
  441. 20
  442. 20
  443. 20
  444. 20
  445. 20
  446. 20
  447. 20
  448. 20
  449. 20
  450. 20
  451. 20
  452. 20
  453. 20
  454. 20
  455. 20
  456. 20
  457. 20
  458. 20
  459. That’s a clever idea, and a neat twist, potentially. Is it yours? But it is an attempt to save Mills and to find a, “happier,” outcome. Yet that would have robbed the finale of its bleakness and ultimately, what made it so impactful. The fact that his plan worked, even when it was revealed and he was operating in plain sight, this is what makes him, the story and the final impact on the viewer so memorable and powerful. Remember when you watched it for the first time? Remember after that Hemingway quote and the sound of that distant helicopter fades, how you sat silently, contemplating what you’d just witnessed? Any other outcome to this tragedy would have robbed you of that moment. The reason this thriller is perfect is because it’s bone chilling in it’s inevitability. There is even a scene in the movie where Somerset tells Mills, “This won’t have a happy ending,” warning us, the audience, as much as the character in the story. I would love to see a story about what became of the characters. Would you? Mills would not have been jailed but he would have been retired out of the police force. What would he have done with himself after recovering from the trauma? Hunted people like John Doe as a private investigator? Maybe avoided all such work forever? Could he have ever found love again? Could he have found purpose? And Somerset, who said he’d, “be around,” presumably to help Mills if he could? Did he finally retire and go, “far away from here,” wherever, “here,” is? The city is never named, so we could all see it as a city we know. What could bring these two men back together? A copycat? Wouldn’t you love to see that? It could be done disastrously, but if it was done well, I think it might be one of the most anticipated thrillers of the 21st century?
    20
  460. 20
  461. 19
  462. 19
  463. 19
  464. 19
  465. 19
  466. 19
  467. 19
  468. 19
  469. 19
  470. 19
  471. 19
  472. 19
  473. 19
  474. 19
  475. 19
  476. 19
  477. 19
  478. 19
  479. 19
  480. 19
  481. 19
  482. 19
  483. 19
  484. 19
  485. 19
  486. 19
  487. But surely, of all people, a UN ambassador understands that recognition of the State of Palestine is the recognition of a peoples and a country, NOT the terrorists within it? In the face of Israeli history, such gesture politics come off as shrill and hysterical. And such gestures have a way of backfiring. The next allegation his country makes of unfair treatment can be answered with, “But you shredded the UN charter, publicly and cannot invoke its protections now.” If not by UN politicians themselves, certainly by other hostile politicos and radicals. This ratification is simply a step (a rather small one in reality) in the direction of preventing further genocide. We can debate how intentional this genocide is, but not that it is occurring. On the first day, when we all heard about the Hamas attack and saw the appalling footage, I told my wife that Netanyahu would seize upon this as his lifeline and that Israel’s response would be disproportionate and will be seen, even by Israel’s allies, as a massive overreaction. My wife was sceptical, asking, “How can you overreact to that?” She pointed to a thumbnail of horror which I won’t describe on YouTube. My response was, “Give it a week, and you’ll see. Just remember I said this.” We simply cannot afford to lose sight of the fact that this is what is keeping Netanyahu a free man, and free of public shaming, opprobrium and the disgrace of a series of trial after being voted out of office in a probable landslide. The theatrics are a necessary part of his survival plan. So long as the war rages, he remains untouchable, and he knows from experience that he can keep this war raging for decades.
    19
  488. 19
  489. 19
  490. 19
  491. 19
  492. 19
  493. 19
  494. 19
  495. 18
  496. 18
  497. 18
  498. 18
  499. 18
  500. 18
  501. 18
  502. 18
  503. 18
  504. 18
  505. 18
  506. 18
  507. 18
  508. 18
  509. 18
  510. 18
  511. 18
  512. 18
  513. 18
  514. 18
  515. 18
  516. 18
  517. 18
  518. 18
  519. 18
  520. 18
  521. 18
  522. 18
  523. 18
  524. 18
  525. Do you remember the good ole’ days, when the Tories at least had the decency to stand at the podium and make a speech when they lost an election? Even the execrable Michael Portillo took his lumps like a good ‘un. This lot don’t even hang around for the count to finish, let alone THANK all those people who went door to door in the rain for them, hung on the phones and worked so hard in other ways in closely contested seats. They flee as soon as they know they’ve lost because they are the lowest caliber of people, who cannot bear losing and worse still, being seen to lose. Leadsom is just tired and it’s etched into every line of her face. She can see that there’s nothing to look forward to for an ambitious politician. She knows that the first few years of opposition promise nothing but the bloodiest, most unedifying, cruelest civil war the Tories have ever seen, and potentially all whilst being in Third Party status. Andrea Leadsom didn’t get to where she is today by, “listening,” to people. She has convictions, for sure. But they are misguided and come with all the usual baggage of a Tory, arrogance and overweening self interest which they persuade themselves is, “self belief.” I believe you encountered some of that in her surgery. When she was tired, defences down a little, and she showed you something of her true, unvarnished character. We have a Prime Minister who has never heard the views of a working person, let alone, “listened,” to anybody who wasn’t promising him lots of money. People are a bit curt when under pressure and I cut them slack for that, but when they flatly refuse to listen, that tends to be because they’re afraid of what you have to say. A tearful Leadsom is about as plausible to me as a weeping crocodile. I just hope you don’t let it put you off spending time in your representative’s surgeries in the future.
    18
  526. 18
  527. 18
  528. 18
  529. 18
  530. 18
  531. 18
  532. 18
  533. 18
  534. 18
  535. 18
  536. 18
  537. MoonstonePearl21​ I agree with you that it was almost certainly unintentional. This sort of thing is cultural, driven by our received opinions, created what we see in movie thrillers and the stories that the press enjoys focusing on. A patient of mine was in a relationship with a woman who was later diagnosed as sociopathic, after having committed several crimes of violence. Before this was known about her, however, he was violently attacked by her. He called me and I called the police. By the time I got there, he had been stabbed and the police had arrested him. She had lied, and said that he had tried to murder her; that she acted in self defence. He is a big, strong guy and he pulled through. She is petite and no one, except me, believed my patient's story. The assumptions made were based on sex, size and the fact that he was getting treatment from a psychotherapist, as he had told the police that he'd called me and explained who I was. Thankfully, the matter was resolved, as a trail of criminal activity on her part came to light and the courts believed my client. But I am still treating him. One of his biggest issues, now, is dealing with the trauma of not being believed by the authorities. Their treatment of him was appalling at first. And, despite the fact that he successfully sued them for their conduct, that day, they never apologised and he is still treated with suspicion by colleagues and neighbours. This stuff REALLY matters. I would like to see them correct this mistake, before it does harm to others. I can only hope my client never sees this. He would find it distressing. Thanks for the response, though. It was most encouraging
    17
  538. 17
  539. 17
  540. 17
  541. 17
  542.  @rogerreger9631  : That’s a slightly unfair interpretation of Mr Sake’s use of the term, “the masses,” don’t you think? His point is perfectly valid, without need of correction, and he obviously understood the issues involved? Yes, it was a hit job, by a few corrupt men. But, the jury was literally over two hundred people strong, each representing their clans and family’s interests. While Socrates had friends among the wealthy, educated class, he was generally unpopular enough for this to happen to him. And his defence more or less sealed his fate, ensuring his popularity was at an all time low among the people of Athens, by the time the jury returned their verdict. In actual fact, not one person sitting on that jury actually expected Socrates to die at all. They all knew his rich friends would bribe the guards and smuggle him out, and they more or less left the door open for him to escape. They were as shocked and saddened by his death as his friends were. But, that’s because they didn’t understand his (Asperger driven?) character, or his commitment to his principles, which included his obedience to the letter of the law. He chose to accept his death sentence, to make the point that no one should obviate the law, and that their law was wrong. Something of a game going on, for sure, “They’ll miss me when I’m gone,” mixed with a touch of, “Now they’ll be sorry.” But, he was right, because he knew each of them, collectively and individually, better than they knew themselves. And his final act was to show them the recklessness of mob mentality, and rule by mass consent. He spoke at great length about it to Plato, if his dialogues are to be believed? I’m only saying all this, not to say you were, “wrong,” in any way, but only to suggest that approaching your contribution from the point of view of a, “correction,” was unnecessarily patronising, maybe? It certainly invites, “defence,” when the point Mr Snake made was 100% correct, for all intents and purposes. I’m not accusing you of, “obtuseness,” merely that there was a friendlier way to add your knowledge? . . .
    17
  543. 17
  544. 17
  545. 17
  546. 17
  547. 17
  548. 17
  549. 17
  550. 17
  551. 17
  552. 17
  553. 17
  554. 17
  555. 17
  556. 17
  557. 17
  558. 17
  559. 17
  560. 17
  561. 17
  562. 17
  563. 17
  564. 17
  565. A well thought out comment. I would stress that Putin is only talking about the placement of missile silos, which is a far cry from threats to use them. It’s always an indicator of when Putin is feeling his losses and frustrations the most, when he does this sort of thing and, at this stage, it is only words. And we all know that Putin’s words are as worthless as an SBF NFT. As to Russian, “law,” that distinction is only potentially useful after the fact of a coup, or something, where the already badly abused military refuses an order to use tactical nukes. Any commander who does that is either preparing for civil war, or preparing for martyrdom. I would remind people, for instance, that it is illegal, according to the Russian constitution, to have ANY form of private military forces in Russia, or working abroad for Russia. Yet, no one is asking how the Wagner Group is even a thing in Russia? Russian, “law,” is as meaningless to Russians as their concept of, “democracy.” In my view, we simply need to CALL PUTIN’S BLUFF. He’s always bluffing. All commentators have to, “take such threats seriously,” because it would be irresponsible not to. But the reality is that this is Outin attempting to look strong when he’s feeling particularly weak. We should tell him that the west’s response will be to accelerate Ukraine’s membership of NATO and put nukes in Ukraine. It was America (Bill Clinton’s administration) that persuaded Ukraine to give up their nukes altogether in the first place, which we can all regret at leisure now. Putin wouldn’t be pulling this crap if Ukraine still had them. It’s about time that we study recent history and get one thing into our heads: CALL HIS BLUFF. That ALWAYS works. But only when we’re serious!
    17
  566. 17
  567. 17
  568. 17
  569. 17
  570. 17
  571. 17
  572. 17
  573. 17
  574. 17
  575. 17
  576. 17
  577. 17
  578. 17
  579. 17
  580. 17
  581. 17
  582. 17
  583. 17
  584. 17
  585. 17
  586. 17
  587. 17
  588. 16
  589. 16
  590. 16
  591. 16
  592. 16
  593. 16
  594. 16
  595. 16
  596. 16
  597. 16
  598. 16
  599. 16
  600. 16
  601. 16
  602. 16
  603. 16
  604. 16
  605. 16
  606. 16
  607. 16
  608. 16
  609. 16
  610. 16
  611. 16
  612. 16
  613. 16
  614. 16
  615. 16
  616. 16
  617. 16
  618. 16
  619. 16
  620. 16
  621. 16
  622. 16
  623. 16
  624. 16
  625. 16
  626. 16
  627. 16
  628. 16
  629. 16
  630. 16
  631. 16
  632. 16
  633. 16
  634. 16
  635. 16
  636. 16
  637. 16
  638. 16
  639. 16
  640. 16
  641. 16
  642. 16
  643. 16
  644. 16
  645. Fascinating observation about his emblem that I had never noticed, despite seeing the film multiple times. And your insights were really interesting. I’m curious as to how old you are? Only in terms of how close a contemporary of Bickle’s character you are? You certainly got a lot out of this movie. In fairness to the narrator, if you pay close attention to his choice of words, he would be right. The police back then were worse than they are now, and that part of New York was a notorious den of iniquity, patrolled by a jaded, underfunded and openly racist police force. But, whatever legitimate criticisms you could level at them, they certainly would have payed lip service to their duty. They would naturally reject all criticism, which was all the narrator really said. I suspect that any adult living in the late 1970’s would have scoffed at the notion of going to the cops, but it had to be considered in terms of Bickle’s options. I’ve given a lot of thought to Travis Bickle’s back story. Probably too much? It occurred to me, with the current vogue for prequels and origin stories, “Travis,” would make a great prequel movie or mini series? I could picture the schoolboy who doesn’t fit in, but wants to who, just like in the movie, gets an even stronger rejection from women who find him shockingly weird. So, he joins the marines, thinking he’ll fit in and find friendship there, and is then sent to Vietnam. At first, he thinks he’s found the answer and wants to go career, training well, committing 100% and loving the routine and discipline. He even gets on well with authority figures and his fellow marines, and is looked up to by his squad, because he is able to disregard setbacks and injury in a way they all take for his inner strength. But the contradictions of Vietnam soon hit home when he’s deployed in the field. The one guy he gets close to, intimate with, (another undiagnosed mentally ill person) gets killed, horribly. And it’s only later that he discovers that his friend was murdered by his fellow combat troops during a combat mission, because they found him to be such a weirdo, and because he threatened to tell on them for atrocities they routinely carried out. Travis being Travis, there’s a scene where he takes a souvenir from his buddy, a finger or an ear, and we see him cut off part of his friend, wrap it up, and we never learn what it was. The story culminates in a shootout, at the end of a particularly gruelling battle in which half of his platoon was wiped out. The showdown occurs in the gap between the end of the battle and the wait for inbound choppers to pick up the survivors. The army can’t get the truth out of him about what went down, though they’re sure he’s murdered other troops. So, they can’t award him a Purple Heart for his wounds, without stating how, when and where he received those wounds, so they discharge him honourably, but that’s why he has no medals, despite having exit wound scars. The whole thing could be told in flashbacks, from the interview in which the top brass are trying to get the truth out of him, perhaps? Before we meet Travis, we can see him being described by the other survivors of that final battle, painting a picture of a man who frightens them (possibly into silence) and of a man with deep intelligence, despite no formal education. All of their descriptions could build him up to be at odds with the man when we finally see him. We’re expecting a giant, covered in scars, with steely eyes, but we get a small, mumbling, average looking man, deepening the mystery about people who know him, versus the impression he makes upon first meeting. Another reason why so many seriously deranged people fly under the radar is that they never look like the, “monsters,” we expect. Having done several prison visits, I have always been struck by how normal and average everyone looks and acts when you meet them, regardless of whether they’re petty criminals or monsters. Anyway, Travis ends with him showing up in New York and using his discharge papers and veteran’s experience to impress the guy who owns the yellow cab company, where he gets a job . . .
    16
  646. 16
  647. 15
  648. 15
  649. 15
  650. 15
  651. 15
  652. 15
  653. 15
  654. 15
  655. 15
  656. 15
  657. 15
  658. 15
  659. 15
  660. 15
  661. 15
  662. 15
  663. 15
  664. 15
  665. 15
  666. 15
  667. I guess that whole, “Me Too,” thing is over now? . . . 🤷‍♂️ I mean, now it’s the 1950’s again, we can go back to men beating other men over a woman, because she cannot defend herself? Forget that the remark was harmless? Forget that she has made her own social media posts about alopecia, putting it in the public domain . . . herself!? Forget that Chris Rock’s job is to roast the audience at the Oscars, (which he’s done before!) and that they chose to sit on THE FRONT ROW? But she’s just a, “little lady,” who can’t speak for herself, having neither the wit of a comedian nor the strength of an entitled male bully. All she has is the power to role her eyes and sit back and wallow in a puddle of her own sociopathic self pity and entitled sense of, “feeling aggrieved,” as though it was a serious issue like CANCER or something and NOT just flipping HAIR LOSS! No attempt to stop him, from Jada? Not even to be seen in the entourage around him in the fall out? No condemnation of the appalling sexism, misogyny and entitlement on display, after the event? . . . And she’s certainly not aggrieved at her, ahem, “husband?” for taking matters out of her hands and making it all about him? She has more to answer for than Will Smith at this point. Feminism is dead in the Smith household, (along with their wedding vows) and their warped notions of Bible teachings that they love to prattle on about. “God and love made me do it!” Errr, did it, Will? . . . Did it really? . . . Coz’ to me it just looked like a small insecure Cuckold who’s not dealing too well with his wife’s sociopathy to me? . . . 🙄 Anyone wanna’ buy a used Blue-ray of I Am Legend? I’m so over these fools . . . And the hypocritical Academy that made them what they are.
    15
  668. 15
  669. 15
  670. 15
  671. 15
  672. 15
  673. 15
  674. 15
  675. 15
  676. 15
  677. 15
  678. 15
  679. 15
  680. 15
  681. 15
  682. 15
  683. 15
  684. 15
  685. 15
  686. 15
  687. 15
  688. 15
  689. 15
  690. 15
  691. 15
  692. 15
  693. 15
  694. 15
  695. 15
  696. 15
  697. People still don’t get it, do they? Google how much of whatever country you live in is owned by private owners? From St Paul’s Cathedral to fields and walking paths, you might be staggered by what you find!? Most of the land you thought was, “public property,” is owned by some foreign billionaire. The oligarchs are having a final fire sale and absolutely everything must go! They’re buying up or stealing all of it and digging downward from inside their town houses, using new tech to secure their bomb proof bunkers, so they can have everything from have swimming pools to panic rooms in their basements and can live in luxury while the poverty stricken fight it out over head! Victims of the coming riots will not even know they’re being murdered by some far right Nazi whilst the filthy rich are partying 50 feet beneath their spilled entrails! These are NOT, “politicians.” Merely front men and women, employed by weapons manufacturers, drug companies and other lobby groups, maintaining the elision of democracy for just long enough for them to establish their new Feudal order. We are merely surfs, and we’re about to find that out, all because one of the greediest fat cats doesn’t think he’s getting his share of the pie. Remember I said this in a few years, when law and order has become a thing that only exists if you live in the right neighbourhood (which won’t be yours unless you have more than 10 million in assets) and the, “politicians,” have given up all pretence of being anything other than what they are: representatives of the mega-corporations. Those corporations are about to redefine our borders and redraw the map, until you’ll find you live in a country called, “Microsoft 2.011,” or, “Glaxo Smithkline, Sector 10!” You think I’m exaggerating? Just remember this comment 10 years from now. That is, IF any of us are allowed to use free communications and have our licences in order? . . .
    15
  698. 15
  699. 15
  700. 15
  701. 15
  702. 15
  703. 15
  704. 15
  705. 15
  706.  @jennifersmetanko6631  : No one’s forgetting Snowden. And things have moved on considerably since his exile. Your contract for the device on which you wrote your comment allows some tech giant to collect and monitor Intel about everything from your location and viewing habits to your spending patterns and health details, and collates everything about you with millions of others to produce a set of statistics which are regularly mined by them and the highest outside bidders willing to pay for that information, mostly for the purposes of simply making vast stacks of cash, but for security and intelligence purposes too. Apple’s systems are far more invasive AND effective than anything the government owns (with the possible exception of military grade encryption?) largely because the public freely signs up to it! And I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that most of the government’s domestic spying is now done by contracts with Apple and Microsoft to just buy the information from them. Whatever your opinion of Snowden is, or was, his whistle blowing is past all relevance to today, as I’m sure he would be the first to admit. But at least in the west, if you don’t trust your government, you can still (just about) get rid of them and replace them with an alternative bunch of untrustworthy huxters. And you can say what you like about any one of them without having to fear a knock at your door, losing your job overnight, or spontaneously falling out of a window. So there’s that . . .
    15
  707. 15
  708. 15
  709. 15
  710. 15
  711. 15
  712. 15
  713. 15
  714. 15
  715. 15
  716. 15
  717. Exactly. Truth is, the Tories fear and loathe her. The very rich, and perhaps some snobs of the type who had to hold their nose when they voted for the likes of Lee Anderson, fear they will end up paying their fair share in taxes because of people like her. She has all of the benefits that people who like, “personality,” politics go for, with none of the drawbacks. She delivers genuine zingers at PMQ’s, she’s personally charming, eloquent, attractive and seems to genuinely care about the most disenfranchised, vulnerable Britains. I’m sure the Tories would LOVE us to think of Rayner as, “Marmite,” because their entire political model has been built on a foundation of DIVISION, wherever they can find it or (more often) create it! Even inside their own party. Their criminal conspiracy against her failed, when James Daily asked a Tory pal in the police to look into her background, without ever making ANY formal complaint until much later. When he realised he and his senior police officer bum chum might face charges themselves, they had to go back over the paperwork and agree on the same lies to make their investigation not appear as Stasi-like and blatantly criminal as it was! That’s just DESPERATION and they’re still desperate to get at Rayner by hook or by crook, because she’s one of Labour’s most popular and effective MP’s. She does her JOB! And the Tories can’t understand that about her! They probably think she’s a witch or something, because working hard for your constituency would NEVER occur to them.
    15
  718. 15
  719. 15
  720. 15
  721. 14
  722. 14
  723. 14
  724. 14
  725. 14
  726.  @amell.5461  : I had doubts from the outset, as the trial against the newspaper in England was an, “unsafe,” verdict and will probably be overturned on appeal now. But following the trial, it was the deposition recording that said all you needed to know. When she slipped up and revealed she’d already sold her story to TMZ before going to court to file for divorce; when she was proved to have lied about the makeup she claimed to cover her, “bruises,” with as the company that makes that makeup testified that this kit didn’t yet exist; her slip up when she referred to her makeup as her, “bruise kit,” her lie about giving $7 million to charity (ask the actual charities whether they see a difference between a pledge and a donation?); her lie about her, “broken nose,” when photos from the very next day showed her looking her best; all of the actual witnesses refuting every word she spoke; her recorded confession of hitting Depp on multiple occasions; and her literally and figuratively shitting in their bed! And this, boys and girls, is why we DON’T, “believe all women,” regardless of their allegation, but trust to EVIDENCE, FACTS AND THE TRUTH. The fact that the Me Too movement are not celebrating Depp’s victory and applauding his low key, dignified refusal to take victory laps has undermined my faith in their agenda completely. If anyone, “harmed,” the cause of abused women, it was Amber Heard. She should be locked out of any and all studios, from Hollywood to the news rooms. Did Kevin Spacey or Harvey Weinstein get to be interviewed in this way? The hypocrisy is disturbing.
    14
  727. 14
  728. 14
  729. 14
  730. 14
  731. 14
  732. 14
  733. 14
  734. 14
  735. 14
  736. 14
  737. 14
  738. 14
  739. 14
  740. 14
  741. 14
  742. 14
  743. 14
  744. 14
  745. 14
  746. 14
  747. 14
  748. 14
  749. 14
  750. 14
  751. 14
  752. 14
  753. 14
  754. 14
  755. 14
  756. 14
  757. 14
  758. 14
  759. 14
  760. 14
  761. 14
  762. 14
  763. 14
  764. 14
  765. 14
  766. 14
  767. 14
  768. 14
  769. 14
  770. 14
  771. 14
  772. 14
  773. 14
  774. 14
  775. 14
  776. Kelli Barnhouse : In Jan, they will be subpoenaing Trump’s Tax Returns. Pelosi announced it as their FIRST piece of business. As if THAT wouldn’t be more than enough to destroy Trump, we have all of the LIVE, televised, Congressional Hearings to look forward to, in which everyone from Mueller, his team, Cohen, Manafort, Stormy, NRA reps, GOP traitors, Russian spies, Comey, Tillerson, and a partridge in a pear tree, will be cross examined to such an extent, that, GOP Senators will be climbing over each other to Impeach Trump, so as to save their careers, and to calm the protests, of a, by now OUTRAGED American public, blocking Pennsylvania Avenue. But, when the TrumpTanic, finally vanishes below the water line, THAT is when our work REALLY STARTS. It’s up to US; we, the people, to pressure our representatives to make Tax Returns a legal requirement, for office seekers at ANY level; to outlaw Gerrymandering and Voter Suppression; to reform the Electoral College; etc, etc. The GOP will keep trading, offering backroom deals, to give the Dems other victories, in return for pushing OUR priorities, to the back of the cue. At first, they won’t have much power, to do much of that, but they WILL remain, regroup, over time, and, if WE LET THEM, they will go back to their old ways. Ask yourself? How come the Electoral College was NOT reformed, after the Bush Jr V Gore debacle? WHY did the Dems let that slip into the shadows? Someone got SOMETHING, out of that. Trump and the CROOKS of the GOP have FORCED us to, “be political,” because our Democracy has NEVER been so imperilled, since the War of 1812. As we’ve been forced into this spot, the LEAST we can do, is INSIST on the type of reforms that will ensure a SAFER Democracy, for our children? Sorry for going on, there . . . ✌️👍
    14
  777. 14
  778. It’s already a, “Banana Republic,” when the reverse is true too. If, “someone at the top,” can order his own, “acquittal,” as happened at the risible Impeachment SHAM, why shouldn’t we expect that he’ll be hunting down all the people who put him there, spoke the truth when asked, or even simply failed to scream out hysterical support for Trump, loudly enough, when Trump, “felt like it”??? The problem here, is that people are still acting like this kind of thing still matters, when the Impeachment was the last nail in the Republic’s coffin. Who in their right mind, even imagines that they are “NOT” going to RIG the coming, “elections,” when we ALL KNOW if Trump is unseated, he and his family will be indicted and all go to jail? Which will lead to them, ”ratting out,” everyone from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, the indictment and imprisonment of the ENTIRE administration, leaving a historically disgraced skeleton of the Republican Party in its wake, to disband and flee from the press like escaped Nazis after WWII. They have SHOWN you that Democracy, law and order, and the Constitution are OVER in America, but you all keep up this DENIAL, as if, “elections,” will MEAN a GOD DAMNED THING?! And, I think you’re all doing that, because you all know, in your hearts, that being honest with yourselves can lead to to only ONE conclusion. Americans must accept they have a Russia Style, FAKE Democracy, more popularly known as a DICTATORSHIP, and be DONE with it, OR? . . . Revolution!!! There is no third option
    14
  779. 14
  780. 14
  781. 14
  782. 14
  783.  @nickwarner8158  : Another important point there. I’m a Conservative. I joined the Lincoln Project because I needed a space where, “real,” conservatives stood up for principle over tribalism, with like minded, thinking people. I vote Dem right now, because America only has one political party, opposed by a racist conspiracy of kleptocrats. There are millions of conservatives who feel (and vote) like me. The people with the most to lose under a trump dictatorship are the ones fighting hardest to bring it about. They’ve been duped. And we know this, because 99% of the Jan 6th insurrectionists say as much when they learn the truth! They all say they never would have done it if they knew then what they know now. Only a few die hard racists are not learning their lessons, and they, disturbingly enough, have turned out to be cops in both the cases I’m aware of! But, ironically enough, you know what I think will defeat trumpism in the end? The very big businesses that trump tries so hard to cultivate. In the end, racism and dictatorship is bad for business. Not just because of boycotting, or the chaos of dictatorships and trump’s now proven inability to grasp the complexities of global economic systems. But because businesses never thrive under dictatorships, and the leaders in charge of them know this. They have all the real power, and they will mobilise it to restore the free wheeling free booting systems that keep making them so rich. Trump can never offer prosperity. And it will be that which undoes his (bowel) movement, in the final analysis.
    14
  784. 14
  785. 14
  786. 13
  787. 13
  788. 13
  789. 13
  790. 13
  791. 13
  792. 13
  793. 13
  794. 13
  795. If any company MUST be re-nationalised, it IS THE POST OFFICE. The current arrangement is the same as nationalisation anyway, in terms of financing, but the, “privatisation,” aspect has afforded these government jobsworths all the protections of legally protected cloaks and daggers, which are finally being exposed. The British people are entitled full accountability and to get their money’s worth from an organisation that THEY OWN and upon which THEY RELY! The existing system has FAILED in every important respect and every measurable metric. The competition has outstripped them on reliability and public confidence; major businesses (such as Amazon and Argos) do not use them for the above stated reason; the left hand clearly doesn’t know what the right hand is doing, showing a fundamental breakdown in organisation, as so clearly illustrated by the excerpts you played us; and countless lives have been destroyed by what was a flat out culture of denial around the Fujitsu Scandal, AT BEST, and systematic conspiracy of silence and criminal profiteering at worst (we still do not know!). Obviously, the people put in charge were incapable of fulfilling their remit, yet they were ostentatiously rewarded for many years of abject failure in a culture with ZERO ACCOUNTABILITY! “Culpable Negligence,” doesn’t even cover it! These people belong behind bars, not getting gongs from his majesty! And the public deserves an open service, fully accountable to them at every level, since they are PAYING for it!
    13
  796. 13
  797. 13
  798. 13
  799. 13
  800. 13
  801. 13
  802. 13
  803. 13
  804. 13
  805. 13
  806. 13
  807. 13
  808. 13
  809. 13
  810. 13
  811. 13
  812. 13
  813. 13
  814. 13
  815. I understand your point, but I honestly think we should go the opposite way. We have to seize this as an opportunity to put our house in order, now that we’re exposing the evil that lies just beneath America’s skin. It’s gone too far for us to, “unite,” even if we did have a common enemy now. No one can forget the treachery, and murder that is a direct result of the GOP’s capitulation to a Dictatorship; nor how close we came to exactly that. These people are past the exercise of free speech, and well into the territory of screaming, “Fire,” in a packed theatre, with no skin in the game, getting to sit back and rub their hands while others do the dying. Over 50 cops were seriously injured in those riots of the 6th of Jan! One is brain damaged and still in a coma. Another is blinded! And, of course we all know about the trump supporting cop who was murdered, beaten to death, in front of a thousand witnesses, yet we still have no clue who did that?! Seditious Propaganda used to be a crime! We literally hunted down and hung the propagandists after WWII, to set an example to others. But now? We allow Fox to cast doubt on the election over 700 times (according to Conservative analysts!) between the 7th Nov and the 6th Jan, and collect the money from their shares in the company! We are putting a KNOWN Quisling and traitor, onto the Education & Labor Committee!? Are you F’king KIDDING ME???!!! This has gone way too far, and it’s time we STOPPED looking for answers from outside our shores, and face up to what we’ve DONE! Imagine, preparing for battle, against the Martian invaders, when you discover the trooper on your right; the guy or gal upon whom your life might depend in an hour, is one of the people who doesn’t even BELIEVE your government is, “legitimate,” and has the badges of two cops he MURDERED in his locker at the base? You might be inclined to point your weapon at HIM?! I tell you, we have to CLEAN UP THIS MESS, or we might just as well hand the whole sorry shit pile over to Putin and announce his victory! I for one, would rather die! How about we speak for the DEAD and give them some JUSTICE? For the grieving families of half a million dead of Covid, and for all those dead, wounded or systematically intimidate by the growing (and let’s call it what it is?) NAZI threat, within our own shores. The GOP are desperate to call off the impeachment, because they KNOW they can all be forced to testify, with NO 5th Amendment protections. And, on the stand, they’ll be ripped to shreds in front of a watching world, on LIVE TV, if they say they, “believe,” in the seditious LIE they call, “The Steal.” And they KNOW that many, possibly, Lindsay Graham, Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, will ADMIT they KNEW it was a lie, but were, “only following orders,” like at Nuremberg! It will fracture the GOP, between the die hard nut jobs and the system gamers who want to survive! And, I say, let’s give them their, “civil war,” within the ranks of their own party! Time we force the breaking point, and stop this in its tracks. Time we got America BACK! Don’t you think? ✌️
    13
  816.  @conniesueadamsadams4092  : I’m begging you all; please, please get in touch with your representatives, on both sides? Demand that the key witnesses are forced to TESTIFY at trump’s trial! And don’t let up, until the day it begins. The TESTIMONY of people like him, Cruz, Hawley, Lindsay Graham (especially) and the rest will be the key to RUINING the GOP for a generation, or maybe for good? What can they say about, “The Steal,” which was the REASON for the Insurrection, and therefore the main focus of the Trial? That they, “believe,” in it? They’ll be ripped to shreds! Possibly get a Perjury rap! Once ONE of them admits the TRUTH; that they have no evidence, and they KNEW it was just a political ruse, a Seditious LIE, ALL OF THEM will do the same, and the house of cards will finally tumble! They are not allowed to refuse to testify, and they can’t take the 5th. And when the watching world hears them, under oath on LIVE TV, telling Q, The Proud Boys and the entire cult of trump, that they ALWAYS KNEW, “The Steal,” was a LIE, what future does the GOP have then? After their followers now have lost their careers, have criminal records and have left over 50 cops hospitalised? One cop was blinded! Another is still in a coma, with permanent brain damage! And we all know about the trump supporting cop who gave his life! If we compel their TESTIMONY, it’s OVER for the GOP! Demand accountability! Make sure your representatives KNOW what citizens expect from this trial! A final reckoning, with the TRUTH! ✌️👍
    13
  817. 13
  818. 13
  819. 13
  820. 13
  821. 13
  822. 13
  823. 13
  824. 13
  825. 13
  826. 13
  827. 13
  828. 13
  829. 13
  830. 13
  831. 13
  832. 13
  833. 13
  834. 13
  835. 13
  836. 13
  837. 13
  838. 13
  839. 13
  840. 13
  841. 13
  842. 13
  843. 13
  844. 13
  845. 13
  846. 13
  847. 13
  848. 13
  849. 13
  850. 13
  851. 13
  852. 13
  853. 13
  854. 13
  855. 13
  856. 13
  857. 13
  858. 13
  859. 13
  860. 13
  861. 13
  862. 13
  863. 13
  864. 13
  865. 13
  866. 13
  867. 13
  868. 13
  869. 13
  870. 13
  871. 13
  872. 13
  873. 13
  874. 13
  875. 13
  876. 13
  877. 13
  878. 13
  879. 13
  880. 13
  881. 13
  882. 13
  883. 13
  884. 13
  885. 13
  886. 13
  887. 13
  888. 13
  889. 13
  890. 13
  891. 13
  892. 13
  893. 13
  894. 13
  895. 13
  896. 13
  897. 12
  898. 12
  899. 12
  900. 12
  901. 12
  902. 12
  903. 12
  904. 12
  905. 12
  906. 12
  907. 12
  908. 12
  909. 12
  910. 12
  911. 12
  912. 12
  913. 12
  914. 12
  915. 12
  916. 12
  917. 12
  918. 12
  919. 12
  920. 12
  921. 12
  922. 12
  923. 12
  924. 12
  925. 12
  926. 12
  927. 12
  928. 12
  929. 12
  930. 12
  931. 12
  932. 12
  933. 12
  934. 12
  935. 12
  936. 12
  937. 12
  938. 12
  939. 12
  940. 12
  941. 12
  942. 12
  943. 12
  944. 12
  945. 12
  946. 12
  947. 12
  948. 12
  949. 12
  950. 12
  951. 12
  952. 12
  953. 12
  954. 12
  955. 12
  956. 12
  957. 12
  958. 12
  959. 12
  960. 12
  961. 12
  962. 12
  963. 12
  964. 12
  965. 12
  966. 12
  967. 12
  968. 12
  969. 12
  970. 12
  971. 12
  972. 12
  973. 12
  974. 12
  975. 12
  976. 12
  977. 12
  978. 12
  979. 12
  980. 12
  981. 12
  982. 12
  983. While I see the convergence between Putin’s opportunism and Britain’s withdrawal from Europe, I think it is a step too far to say his invasion of Ukraine could not have happened but for Brexit. It, “helped,” certainly. But there are so many moving parts to that diagram it would be impossible for me to martial an argument against the idea without writing an essay. An essay, using your five steps, I hasten to add. But, to your point, you touch it with a needle once again. At the very moment of the Brexit referendum result, the British government, “should,” have had a prepared plan of action, ready to go, comprising of diplomatic efforts to ensure strengthening bonds between ourselves and all other nations in Europe, as well as assurances to the wider world. We, “should,” have had state visits by every available member of the Royal Family, our diplomats all singing from a single, unified hymn sheet, and politicians from the Foreign Office and Cabinet, all busy out in Europe, making clear our intentions to maintain and strengthen our relationships with all countries inside the European project. We should have never allowed any breast beating and victory laps, and assured the Europeans that our withdrawal would be handled with discretion and minimum fanfare. Even if the vote had been 100% in favour we should have seen to that. Now, we’re naval gazing and waving our shrinking little union flags in the faces of those from whom we most the most help, in the belligerent manner of a toxic teen, incapable of respecting the adults in the room and bent on showing them so at every opportunity. It’s time we ALL collectively faced up to the fact that the remainers had a point, and even the pro-Brexiteers did NOT get the Brexit they were promised. It failed and is still failing. We must STOP all this backward, past-focussed thinking, all this insularism and, “little Englander,” mindset, stuff. We need to grow up and accept we have been conned, instead of squandering increasing amounts of hard cash and soft power on the very mob who lead us down this dark alley only to get mugged. And we must accept that these people in charge are not just squalid, self interested con artists, like so many politicians before them, but they represent a new class of politico: The incomparably THICK. In the last ten years, I have never seen a more STUPID collection of people in one room as I have in the Cabinet Office of Number 10 Downing Street. They must be replaced as a matter of national security.
    12
  984. 12
  985.  @Vinddraken  : Thanks for the history lesson, but it’s here and now that we have to focus on. The quickest way to sum it up, probably, is by saying that, “Abe Lincoln is a Democrat.” If he was alive today, there’s no question that the man who was assassinated (not the younger version) would be sitting with, if not, LEADING the Dems today. But, what we have now, is the desperation of a group of GOP Conspirators, who attempted to END our Democracy and are STILL attempting it! Since they’ve lost most of their big business support (for now) they have nowhere else to turn for money, other than grass roots donations, from the Cult of Trump. Hence, they can’t kick him to the curb, until after the Impeachment. What we, the people should be doing, is DEMANDING that they subpoena ALL the top GOP members who supported the notion of, “The Steal,” and have them give their, “evidence,” for it, ON THE WITNESS STAND, UNDER OATH, WITH NO 5TH AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS, AND NO LEGAL ABILITY TO REFUSE TO TESTIFY! All on LIVE TV! Most will confess it’s a SEDITIOUS LIE, to avoid PERJURY CHARGES, and stories that just won’t match! And when the Q followers, the Proud Boys, and other Nazis, HEAR THE TRUTH FROM THE MOUTHS OF THOSE WHO LIED TO THEM, trump will finally be done, and we can get passed treating the symptoms and move on to cure the disease! Contact your Representatives, on both sides! Demand testimony from Cruz, Graham, Hawley and, of course, the donald himself. And watch their house of cards collapse, with ZERO BLAME on the Dems for once! Do it America! ✌️👍
    12
  986. 12
  987. 12
  988. 12
  989. 12
  990. 12
  991. 12
  992. 12
  993. 12
  994. 12
  995. 12
  996. 12
  997. 12
  998. 12
  999. 12
  1000. 12
  1001. 12
  1002. 12
  1003. 12
  1004. 12
  1005. 12
  1006. 12
  1007. 12
  1008. 12
  1009. 12
  1010. 12
  1011. 12
  1012. 12
  1013. 11
  1014. 11
  1015. 11
  1016. 11
  1017. 11
  1018. 11
  1019. 11
  1020. 11
  1021. 11
  1022. 11
  1023. 11
  1024. 11
  1025. 11
  1026. 11
  1027. 11
  1028. 11
  1029. 11
  1030. The biggest mistake a human can make is to believe what most of the most popular fiction tells them; that they are not fully defined as a person until they have that significant other in their life. When you are comfortable with who you are, individually, and able to feel fulfilled with or without others to define that identity, you will (ironically?) find that you attract more, “mates,” regardless. Knowing this . . . and feeling this, are very different things. Not sure there’s a shortcut to the type of life experiences that leads to this deep down inner knowledge? Most people reading this will say, “Phwauh . . . Well, duhhh.” But not all of them really, “know,” this, or are able to take the emotional risks, or find the patience, to truly lead an adventurous life, in which you test your own limits and find out who you really are, what you can change, and what you can’t, or shouldn’t, about yourself. I didn’t. I was lucky, because circumstances forced me into self discovery, but I sure didn’t feel, “lucky,” while I was dealing with the types of crises that forced me up that learning curve. Being mad at boomers, for hogging and visibly squandering our inheritance is legitimate, but it becomes background noise when you are on a path of true self discovery. I say all of this as on older man who read your words, respected them, and wanted to offer something of worth to your comment of worth. Your honesty is disarming, and your self awareness - self knowledge - made me hope that you would hear my reply without feeling patronised? I hope you will hear my advice in the spirit in which it is intended? A word to the wise. Live your life to its limit, test yourself and take insane chances that your self belief and courage will see you through. The life partner will come out of that, unlooked for, regardless. It’s a natural consequence of a life well lived. Worked for me, at any rate. ✌️
    11
  1031. 11
  1032. 11
  1033. 11
  1034. 11
  1035. 11
  1036. 11
  1037. 11
  1038. 11
  1039. 11
  1040. 11
  1041. 11
  1042. 11
  1043. 11
  1044. 11
  1045. 11
  1046. 11
  1047. 11
  1048. 11
  1049. 11
  1050. 11
  1051. 11
  1052. 11
  1053. 11
  1054. 11
  1055. 11
  1056. 11
  1057. 11
  1058. 11
  1059. 11
  1060. 11
  1061. 11
  1062. 11
  1063. 11
  1064. 11
  1065. 11
  1066. 11
  1067. 11
  1068. 11
  1069. 11
  1070. 11
  1071. 11
  1072. 11
  1073. 11
  1074. 11
  1075. 11
  1076. 11
  1077. 11
  1078. 11
  1079. 11
  1080. 11
  1081. 11
  1082. 11
  1083. 11
  1084. 11
  1085. 11
  1086. 11
  1087. 11
  1088. 11
  1089. 11
  1090. 11
  1091. 11
  1092. 11
  1093. 11
  1094. 11
  1095. 11
  1096. 11
  1097. 11
  1098. 11
  1099. 11
  1100. 11
  1101. 11
  1102. 11
  1103. 11
  1104. 11
  1105. 11
  1106. 11
  1107. 11
  1108. 11
  1109. 11
  1110. 11
  1111. 11
  1112. 11
  1113. 11
  1114. 11
  1115. 11
  1116. 11
  1117. 11
  1118. 11
  1119. 11
  1120. 11
  1121. 11
  1122. 11
  1123. 11
  1124. 11
  1125. 11
  1126. 11
  1127. 11
  1128. 11
  1129. 11
  1130. 11
  1131. 11
  1132. 11
  1133. 11
  1134. 11
  1135. 11
  1136. 11
  1137. 11
  1138. 11
  1139. 11
  1140. 11
  1141. 11
  1142. 11
  1143. 11
  1144. 11
  1145. 11
  1146. 11
  1147. 11
  1148. 11
  1149. 11
  1150. 11
  1151. 11
  1152. 11
  1153. 11
  1154. 11
  1155. Well, we do know indisputably that two of the complaints against Raab were upheld. Given the extraordinarily high bar that needs to be proved beyond doubt, we can be certain that there was at least substance to the other claims. What I noted was that Raab’s resignation letter demonstrated the obtuseness and passive aggression that shows he’s unfit for high stress working environments. I find the specious, “argument,” that he and Jacob Rees Mogg (among others) put forward in Raab’s defence particularly obtuse and galling. They keep saying, “It’s right to get angry with people who get it wrong or do their job badly,” and I haven’t yet heard a journalist return with the obvious riposte, “The complaints are not about Raab’s internal emotional state. They are about his behaviour.” Literally everyone in a high stress job gets angry with their colleagues from time to time. But there’s a world of difference between using the supervision procedure to identify mistakes and learn from them, setting goals for improvement and deciding on what to do differently in the future, and calling someone personal names and attacking the way they look, sound or behave in front of their colleagues. The defence being used misses that point and only serves to demonstrate that he either simply doesn’t get it (and therefore was unfit for his post) or he lacks the humility and wisdom to apologise and constructively move forward, which would improve the odds of him saving what looks to be an increasingly unsafe seat at the next election. As to Sunack’s response to all this, he has done a classic Sunack: tried to avoid upsetting either side, merely serving to upset both sides further with his obvious pusillanimity. He allowed Raab to, “get his retaliation in first,” with a resignation letter that stopped just short of calling his victims, “snowflakes,” instead of sacking him immediately. And we all know he will have spoken to Raab on the phone, letting him know he will have to sack him but asking him how he would like to handle it. At a time when Britain has never needed firm decisive leadership more, since WWII, we’re being lead by a flaccid vacillator who seems to want to demonstrate his own indecision and weakness at every opportunity.
    11
  1156. 11
  1157. 11
  1158. 11
  1159. 11
  1160. Rohme Giuliano Well, Rohmey baby, you attributed a vast range of views to me, whilst having no actual idea of what they are, save for my stated view that Zizek's analysis of Robespierre is monstrous. It is precisely this tendency to over-generalise on the basis of assumptions that makes me hope that reactionary student union types, such as you appear to be, never get their twitchy, unthinking fingers on the levers of power. I guess I can picture you sitting beside Robespierre and Zizek, taking one look at my post, and then assuming away with gusto, creating a fictional back story for me and attributing your picture of my entire political, academic and professional career for me, without anything more to go on than my single statement, your overzealous instincts - enslaved as they are to your cultural prejudices - and your inability to conceive of the possibility that you could be in error or that there may be something that you could learn from the world, if you would only take a moment to stop preaching at it, and from all of this you would probably designate me a subversive and have me sent to the block. God forbid that you would tolerate a difference of opinion and let it roam free in the world unchecked? Heaven fore fend that you might think before bleating out two or three passages from a textbook? And most of all, let us never consider that another person's view might be different from the one we, the elite, have assigned him?! Tell you what, if you want to know what I ACTUALLY THINK, why don't you ask me? If you want to discuss something with an open mind, you are required to consider the chance that, just maybe, you don't already know what I believe before you have asked me. Do you think you can do that? Maybe remember your training (if you were or are a student of history), which teaches against assumption, and encourages a slightly more forensic approach to learning. Let me know if I'm getting to Zizekian for your tastes, won't you, please? P.S. I will say that Nietzsche was a worm who would have been annihilated in a society that was anything like the one he advocated, but please do not take this statement as a licence to rattle off a whole new reconstruction of my beliefs? That was a comment on the man, not his philosophy. ;-)
    10
  1161. 10
  1162. 10
  1163. 10
  1164. 10
  1165. 10
  1166. 10
  1167. 10
  1168. 10
  1169. 10
  1170. 10
  1171. 10
  1172. 10
  1173. 10
  1174. 10
  1175. 10
  1176. 10
  1177. 10
  1178. 10
  1179. 10
  1180. 10
  1181. 10
  1182. 10
  1183. 10
  1184. 10
  1185. 10
  1186. 10
  1187. 10
  1188. 10
  1189. 10
  1190. 10
  1191. 10
  1192. 10
  1193. 10
  1194. 10
  1195. 10
  1196. 10
  1197. 10
  1198. 10
  1199. 10
  1200. 10
  1201. 10
  1202. 10
  1203. 10
  1204. 10
  1205. 10
  1206. 10
  1207. 10
  1208. 10
  1209. 10
  1210. 10
  1211. 10
  1212. 10
  1213. 10
  1214. 10
  1215. 10
  1216. 10
  1217. 10
  1218. 10
  1219. 10
  1220. 10
  1221. 10
  1222. 10
  1223. 10
  1224. 10
  1225. 10
  1226. 10
  1227. 10
  1228. 10
  1229. 10
  1230. 10
  1231. 10
  1232. 10
  1233. 10
  1234. 10
  1235. 10
  1236. 10
  1237. 10
  1238. 10
  1239. 10
  1240. 10
  1241. 10
  1242. 10
  1243. 10
  1244. 10
  1245. 10
  1246. 10
  1247. 10
  1248. 10
  1249. 10
  1250. 10
  1251. 10
  1252. 10
  1253. 10
  1254. 10
  1255. 10
  1256. 10
  1257. 10
  1258. 10
  1259. 10
  1260. 10
  1261. 10
  1262. 10
  1263. 10
  1264. 10
  1265.  Gizella Lombardi  : The hypocrisy of the GOP’s desire for a slave class is why that border problem never gets solved. Even if there was a wall, hermetically ceiling off the border (including tunnels, boats and aircraft) farmers, private factory owners and all those folks with lawns and a desire to have a housemaid (or whatever other staffers that flatter their own egos) would be in control of a system for allowing them in. Suddenly, background checks would never be about whether someone was a legitimate asylum seeker, but whether their criminal history makes them too unsafe to nanny for your kids. It would be a job interview, for slave labor at slave wages, with brutal criminal consequences for getting it wrong. Naturally, they won’t ruthlessly prosecute the factory owners or farmers, for employing illegal labor. That would be too much like solving the problem, overnight! And that’s why it pays them to have all the poor white Americans kept in uneducated, racist ignorance, foaming at the mouth and doing their campaigning for them. As we fall into a labor crisis, right now, where educated Americans are simply unwilling to work for shitkicker wages, it’s the very people who claim they want to close the border who rely on illegal immigrant labor. If they were all legal, they would be demanding the same wages as the rest of us. Just another example of the rank hypocrisy that perpetuates a problem that the very people who cause it claim they want to fix it more than anyone else. Leaving the grownups stuck with the complexities of seeking fair, humane, constitutional solutions, without ANY cooperation from the fascist Qult of the GOP.
    10
  1266. 10
  1267. 10
  1268. 10
  1269. 10
  1270. 10
  1271. 10
  1272. 10
  1273. 10
  1274. 10
  1275. 10
  1276. 10
  1277. 10
  1278. 10
  1279. 10
  1280. 10
  1281. 10
  1282. 10
  1283. 10
  1284. 10
  1285. 10
  1286. 10
  1287. 10
  1288. 10
  1289. 10
  1290. 10
  1291. 10
  1292. 10
  1293. 10
  1294. 10
  1295. 10
  1296. 10
  1297. 10
  1298. 10
  1299. 10
  1300. 10
  1301. 10
  1302. 10
  1303. 10
  1304. 10
  1305. 10
  1306. 10
  1307. 10
  1308. 10
  1309. 10
  1310. 10
  1311. 10
  1312. Note: None of the Fascist rhetoric makes sense. Paranoid conspiracies were the way that Hitler got popular. But they’re self contradictory. “Covid is not a thing,” yet, “it’s killing people via the vector of migrants.” They complain about (CC), “Cancel Culture,” even though trump INVENTED that! From, “lock her up,” which was old before he took office, to Cancelling the Republic and the outcome of a democratic election on Jan 6th! Trump came in Cancelling GOP members for disagreeing with him, by having them Primaried, which he’s he’s STILL DOING to Liz Cheney! He demanded that Saturday Live was Cancelled for lol’ing at him. He’s currently demanding the firing of, “journalists,” at Fox! The GOP actually ARE CANCEL CULTURE. And, as ever, we know what they are, because they’re accusing others of being that thing! Check out Prof Stanley G Payne’s book, The History of Fascism 1914 - 1945. The word you need is not really, “Nazi.” It’s just, “Fascism.” A cult of personality, who’s founding narrative is a lie, largely based on, “victimhood.” The projection of macho, “strength,” and the use of violence (jan 6th) and intimidation as a political tool. The racism, of course. Trying to get the votes of minorities discounted, both from the elections, and now, attempting to ensure they can’t vote, prior to future elections. This is genuine fascism, just like in Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany. And history is completely repeating itself; especially with the paranoid conspiracies that got the Nazis into power. Disturbing.
    10
  1313. 10
  1314. 10
  1315. 10
  1316. 10
  1317. 10
  1318. 10
  1319. 10
  1320. 10
  1321. 10
  1322. 10
  1323. 10
  1324. 10
  1325. 10
  1326. 10
  1327. 10
  1328. 10
  1329. 10
  1330. 10
  1331. 10
  1332. 10
  1333. 10
  1334. 10
  1335. 10
  1336. 10
  1337. 10
  1338. 10
  1339. 10
  1340. 10
  1341. 10
  1342. 9
  1343. 9
  1344. 9
  1345. 9
  1346. 9
  1347. 9
  1348. 9
  1349. 9
  1350. 9
  1351. 9
  1352. 9
  1353. 9
  1354. 9
  1355. 9
  1356. 9
  1357. 9
  1358. 9
  1359. 9
  1360. 9
  1361. 9
  1362. 9
  1363. 9
  1364. 9
  1365. 9
  1366. 9
  1367. 9
  1368. 9
  1369. 9
  1370. 9
  1371. 9
  1372. 9
  1373. 9
  1374. 9
  1375. 9
  1376. 9
  1377. 9
  1378. 9
  1379. 9
  1380. 9
  1381. 9
  1382. 9
  1383. 9
  1384. 9
  1385. 9
  1386. 9
  1387. 9
  1388. 9
  1389. 9
  1390. 9
  1391. 9
  1392. 9
  1393. 9
  1394. 9
  1395. 9
  1396. 9
  1397. 9
  1398. 9
  1399. 9
  1400. 9
  1401. 9
  1402. 9
  1403. 9
  1404. 9
  1405. 9
  1406. 9
  1407. 9
  1408. 9
  1409. 9
  1410. 9
  1411. 9
  1412. 9
  1413. 9
  1414. 9
  1415. 9
  1416. 9
  1417. 9
  1418. 9
  1419. 9
  1420. 9
  1421. 9
  1422. 9
  1423. 9
  1424. 9
  1425. 9
  1426. 9
  1427. 9
  1428. 9
  1429. 9
  1430. 9
  1431. 9
  1432. 9
  1433. 9
  1434. 9
  1435. 9
  1436. 9
  1437. 9
  1438. 9
  1439. 9
  1440. 9
  1441. 9
  1442. 9
  1443. 9
  1444. 9
  1445. 9
  1446. 9
  1447. 9
  1448. 9
  1449. 9
  1450. 9
  1451. 9
  1452. 9
  1453. 9
  1454. 9
  1455. 9
  1456. 9
  1457. 9
  1458.  @bobross6318  : “Word salad;” Translation: “I have neither the concentration span nor the inclination to try to comprehend the words in front of me, let alone refute their content or even so much as address their meaning, so I will dismiss them out of hand to focus on the one thing I care about: a politician. Not a scientist, writer, leader, warrior or an inspiration to any living human, but an inarticulate, incompetent hack, around whom I have built my life, making obtuseness and hypocrisy a lifestyle choice. And, why have I done this? Partly because I am a victim of the Sunk Costs Fallacy, but mostly because I am a racist who lives in mortal fear of, ‘being told what to do,’ one day, by an African American disabled lesbian, which is also a recurring nightmare that I regularly wake from in a cold sweat. I can’t afford therapy and my court appointed parole officer is unsympathetic. So, I will live out the remainder of my days being routinely disappointed by life, getting used to being stared at by normals with their mouths open whenever I express my true feelings and giving away more of my savings that I can’t afford, because I’m too committed to admit to my alienated family that I was SO WRONG about EVERYTHING, even though the only conversations I ever have with them now always end with them saying, ‘We told you so,’ and shaking their disappointed heads at me, while I craft another trump banner for my next illegal march with Alex Jones blaring from my computer about gay frogs and such.” Quite the life you’re failing to lead there, son . . . 😉
    9
  1459. 9
  1460. 9
  1461. 9
  1462. 9
  1463. 9
  1464.  @aylbdrmadison1051  : Whoah, there! I’m a Conservative. There are NO, “conservatives,” in trumpism. They are totalitarians, at best! Fascists in reality! As a signed up member of the Lincoln Project, I really must ask, respectfully that we do NOT allow such respectable terms to be wasted on a bunch of racists who represent the end of politics and history in America? It has been my honor and privilege to work alongside many of the country’s leading Liberals and Conservatives, in our unified battle to restore POLITICS to America, instead of this ongoing Coup attempt that the GOP began on Jan 6th and have only increased in its potency ever since. I come from a culture of, “agree to disagree,” and, “let’s really debate our ideas,” in which the two different belief systems are acknowledged as belonging to people who are EQUALLY committed to what they believe is best for their country and the world; namely, Democracy and representative government. By working side by side, we at the Lincoln Project have a new found respect for our differences and, ironically enough, have been able to settle differences in the most profoundly polite, enabling encouraging ways that I genuinely believe there is a model to be found there, that could teach a thing or two to the people of America. Conservatives and Liberals are brothers and sisters, in a family that has its disagreements, but is united in its total commitment to America. You cannot look at these Stalinists; these fascists; these racists and haters, and see, “Conservative,” unless you don’t know what Conservative is? In your case, I’m granting that it may just be because of habit, using the term as shorthand? A mistake that I am guilty of sometimes, in regard to other things. But, please? DON’T? That’s not fair to the millions of Conservatives who voted for Joe, because they knew it was either the Dems or the Nazis, without exaggeration. Nor is it fair to the countless (often nameless) conservatives who fight, every day, like me, to help seek justice for trump’s many, many crimes, and to destroy this current iteration of the GOP. They have to go. And you and I are related, whether you like it or not: we are the Union Troops, facing the Confederacy, who are literally suppressing the votes of blacks in the south again! So, with great respect . . . PLEASE? Not, “conservatives”??? ✌️👍
    9
  1465. 9
  1466. 9
  1467. 9
  1468. 9
  1469. 9
  1470. 9
  1471. 9
  1472. 9
  1473. 9
  1474. 9
  1475. 9
  1476. 9
  1477. 9
  1478. 9
  1479. 9
  1480. 9
  1481. 9
  1482. 9
  1483. 9
  1484. 9
  1485. 9
  1486. 9
  1487. 9
  1488. 9
  1489. 9
  1490. 9
  1491. 9
  1492. 9
  1493. 9
  1494. 9
  1495. 9
  1496. 9
  1497. 9
  1498. 9
  1499. 9
  1500. 9
  1501. 9
  1502. 9
  1503. 9
  1504. 9
  1505. 9
  1506. 9
  1507. 9
  1508. 9
  1509.  @Pres_NotSure  : For, “politicians,” see, “Representatives, working for private industries, owned by a conglomerate of various lobbyists, carpet bagging the planet whilst selling off every last resource, patch of land and every last brick of property to the highest bidder.” The people who wanted to stop the Texas Governor introducing Stone Age abortion penalties through snitching on your neighbours legislation could have brought about a U-Turn in policy by going to the oil company depos and blocking all of the trucks from entering or leaving. Then the bosses of the Governor, at Shell, Exon and BP would have instructed the politicians they own to drop it, so they can get back to making money without having to shoot a bunch of white people on national TV. If people banded together and stopped using Facebook for 24 hours all over the planet, the floor would fall out from beneath the far right radicals who make so much money for such companies, like flipping a switch. It HAS TO BE obvious to everyone that ALL politicians have been corrupted at the highest levels by now? FFS, Germany is still planning to import 10% of its entire gas supply from Russia and we’re meant to believe that this arrangement is IN ANY WAY in Germany’s, “ best interests!?”??? It’s like FDR relying on Emperor Hirohito for his tanks and battleships during World War Two! I used to think, “Are they MAD that they think we don’t SEE their corruption!?” Now, I’ve realised. We’re the mad ones. They know we won’t do a god damned thing about it . . .
    9
  1510. 9
  1511. 9
  1512. 9
  1513. 9
  1514. 9
  1515. 9
  1516. 9
  1517. 9
  1518. 9
  1519. 9
  1520. 9
  1521. 9
  1522. 9
  1523. 9
  1524. 9
  1525. 9
  1526. Joseph Zapata : It’s already a, “Banana Republic,” when the reverse is true too. If, “someone at the top,” can order his own, “acquittal,” as happened at the risible Impeachment SHAM, why shouldn’t we expect that he’ll be hunting down all the people who put him there, spoke the truth when asked, or even simply failed to scream out hysterical support for Trump, loudly enough, when Trump, “felt like it”??? The problem here, is that people are still acting like this kind of thing still matters in a Dictatorship, when the Impeachment was the last nail in the Republic’s coffin. Who in their right mind, even imagines that they are “NOT” going to RIG the coming, “elections,” when we ALL KNOW if Trump is unseated, he and his family will be indicted and all go to jail? Which will lead to them, ”ratting out,” everyone from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, the indictment and imprisonment of the ENTIRE administration, leaving a historically disgraced skeleton of the Republican Party in its wake, to disband and flee from the press like escaped Nazis after WWII. They have SHOWN you that Democracy, law and order, and the Constitution are OVER in America, but you all keep up this DENIAL, as if, “elections,” will MEAN a GOD DAMNED THING?! And, I think you’re all doing that, because you all know, in your hearts, that being honest with yourselves can lead to to only ONE conclusion. Americans must accept they have a Russia Style, FAKE Democracy, more popularly known as a DICTATORSHIP, and be DONE with it, OR? . . . Revolution!!! There is no third option
    9
  1527. 9
  1528. 9
  1529. 9
  1530. 9
  1531. 9
  1532. 9
  1533. LadyRed L : True story for you, which ends with a question . . . We began this crisis as a united country, supporting our services, even being, “kind,” to each other. Then, Donny’s pollsters told him he was 10 points behind Biden, because, “unity,” is the ONE THING that is Kryptonite to Donny’s, “Make America Divided Again,” policy. Division is the source of his power, and a national approach was ruining his, “brand.” So, his hacktivists got busy organising, “protests,” while he got busy defunding the universities working on a cure, and the World Health Oragnisation, whom he knew would give him a bad report for wasting an entire month anyway. After the George Floyd thing, Donny found himself regretting being quite so vociferous in support of, “free speech,” and people’s, “rights to protest,” so he and Barr dismissed those protestors as ALL being a, “leftist democrat plot against Trump,” personally, and set about supporting people’s, “rights,” to be selfish idiots, who put everyone else’s lives at risk. So, here we are, with plague, famine, civil unrest, mass unemployment, Murdering cops somehow being a part of a, “Law & Order,” agenda, when it was America’s protests FOR Law & Order to be RESTORED that he was ignoring, and an economic downturn to look forward to. Why? All because of one man’s mental illness, the abject capitulation of the Quislings who work for him, and the personal appeal of selfishness to his cult, mixed with a heavy dose of racism; a salted wound, which Donny has been able to exploit, because America has never had the fortitude to address the fallout of the Civil War. And, since ALL OF THAT, we now find that trump was too Criminally Incompetent (or just a downright Collaborating TRAITOR?) to even CARE that our troops are being murdered by hitmen, paid for by the Cowardly Russians. How do you get someone to admit, even to themselves, that they’ve made such a big mistake that they’ve cost America thousands of lives? If you can answer that question for me, I would be sincerely grateful ✌️👍
    9
  1534. 9
  1535. 9
  1536.  @Terrackhimself  : The notion of the GOP as, “Conservatives,” is long dead. “Small Government”??? Tell me one area of public life that trump wasn’t meddling with and demanding we all get into line with him, or get expelled from life?! From trying to end Amazon & Google, to watching the game in peace! From whining about TV satire, the Oscars and Hollywood in general, to telling us where to shop, who to, “cancel,” who’s in and who’s out?! And, “Lower Taxes!”??? Come ooohhhhn??? EVERYTHING is more expensive now, because of brinkmanship with Chiynah, and other economies, and because we’ve lurched from one national crisis to another! So, he gave the little guy ONE brief, timed, expired, “tax break,” just before the MID TERMS, but NO, “buying votes,” like he was running Tammany Hall, or anything going on there, right? But, fossil fuel lobbyists, the NRA, and anyone willing to throw cash or launder Russian cash for him? They all got MASSIVE tax cuts, which YOU PAID FOR! In PRICES for goods and services! While trump gets his morons to chant about hating, “globalism,” (they might as well be protesting the WEATHER, btw!) he wants to be the ONLY GLOBALIST in America. “Conservatism,” is DEAD in the GOP!!! But, there are plenty of REAL Conservatives waiting for their opportunity. They all left the Republicans, but they’re experienced, able leaders, who’ve made Donny’s life HELL and are now suing Rudy Giuliani. Check out The Lincoln Project, if you want to find REAL, “small government, low taxes FOR ALL AMERICANS,” CONSERVATIVES? ✌️
    9
  1537. 9
  1538. 9
  1539. 9
  1540. 9
  1541. 9
  1542. I have been putting the same question to many YouTube commentators and have yet to receive an answer. When you look at how the allies flattened entire cities in Germany during WWII, and add to that that no one seemed to question the logic or morality of doing to Germany what they had done to Britain in the Blitz, it does beg the question. I think, in the end, we all know it’s about nukes. Personally, I would like to see the Ukrainian army punch through the Russian lines, take over their rail infrastructure and invade Moscow. Bombing civilians and power stations are war crimes, obviously, so that sort of thing is off the table. But bombing the Kremlin and military bases and stockpiles would be legitimate, and I would be all for it. Anyone telling you it’s not because of Russia’s nukes is being disingenuous at best, or just doesn’t understand the situation. We only need take a brief glimpse into the history of western powers, especially the US’s, to see what extraordinary lengths they will go to for the sake of resource control, and collateral civilian damage is low on their usual list of priorities, though they’re not generally as wicked as people like to paint them either. It’s a no brainer really. If Russia had no nukes, Putin would be facing a tribunal in The Hague now and Moscow would be under the control of blue hatted troops. But then, if they never had nukes, there never would have been a Cold War, let alone an environment that creates monsters like Putin.
    9
  1543. 9
  1544. 9
  1545. 9
  1546. 9
  1547. 9
  1548. 9
  1549. 9
  1550. 9
  1551. 9
  1552. 9
  1553. 9
  1554. 9
  1555. 9
  1556. 9
  1557. 9
  1558. 9
  1559. 9
  1560. 9
  1561. 9
  1562. 9
  1563. 9
  1564. 9
  1565. 9
  1566. 9
  1567. 9
  1568. 9
  1569. 9
  1570. 9
  1571. 9
  1572. 9
  1573. 9
  1574. 9
  1575. 9
  1576. 9
  1577. 9
  1578. 9
  1579. 9
  1580. 9
  1581. 9
  1582. 9
  1583. 9
  1584. 9
  1585. 9
  1586. 9
  1587. 9
  1588. 9
  1589. 9
  1590. 9
  1591. 9
  1592. 9
  1593. 9
  1594. 8
  1595. 8
  1596. 8
  1597. 8
  1598. 8
  1599. 8
  1600. 8
  1601. 8
  1602. Indeed, the very, “cancel culture,” of which they complain, was their invention. “Lock her up,” was old by the time trump took office, remember? And this case is a classic example of it, in both directions, revealing the utter hypocrisy of the Alt-Wrong. They use their media voice, trying to, “shape the narrative,” by overwhelming, “left,” outlets with trolls, and Fox anchors constantly introducing this idea of, “ANY reasonable doubt,” so they thought Chauvin would be acquitted, because the jury would hear them. But, when he’s found guilty (because he obviously murdered an innocent man in front of a watching, horrified planet!) they INSTANTLY switch the narrative to, “cancel culture,” in this case, claiming that the jury was intimidated, and Chauvin was a, “sacrificial lamb,” (Yes! Fox literally used that term!) to prevent rioting. No matter that trump, “cancelled,” his own party members by having them Primaried for merely disagreeing with him. No matter he’s still doing that today! Ask Liz Cheney? No matter that he literally tried to change Libel Law, so he could cancel SNL! Or that he calls the free press, “the enemy of the people,” (a direct quote from Stalin) and wants to cancel them. No matter that he got his party to vote to cancel a democratic election DURING an Insurrection which was trying to cancel the Republic! And, let’s not forget that they’re now cancelling Democracy with Voter Suppression! But, somehow, THEY are the, “victims,” and decent people are the, “oppressors.” If you can be vilified for simply saying, “no,” to state sponsored murder, at the most public, degrading, dehumanising level, there’s something fundamentally wrong somewhere. The word, “Hypocrisy,” is not strong enough for what it is. It’s Orwellian Dystopian Oppositeverse stuff. It’s actually Fascism, by every important distinction. And, hypocrisy bedevils Fascism continually, just as it did in Franco’s Spain, Mussolini’s Italy, and Hitler’s Germany. We must fight them with all we have. They cannot and will not back away. They will continue until they get that one, final, corrupted, rigged vote, and then they will END our Democratic Republic forever. That’s the problem with Fascism: Total Defeat, or Total Victory. They simply don’t offer a third alternative. We must accept the reality of that, and crush them, completely. ✌️👍
    8
  1603. 8
  1604. 8
  1605. 8
  1606. 8
  1607. 8
  1608. 8
  1609. 8
  1610. 8
  1611. 8
  1612. 8
  1613. 8
  1614. 8
  1615. 8
  1616. 8
  1617. 8
  1618. 8
  1619. 8
  1620. 8
  1621. 8
  1622. 8
  1623. 8
  1624. 8
  1625. 8
  1626. 8
  1627. 8
  1628. 8
  1629. 8
  1630. 8
  1631. 8
  1632. 8
  1633. 8
  1634. 8
  1635. 8
  1636. 8
  1637. 8
  1638. 8
  1639. 8
  1640. 8
  1641. 8
  1642. 8
  1643. 8
  1644. 8
  1645. 8
  1646. 8
  1647. 8
  1648. 8
  1649. Maybe Putin just needs to get over this false assumption that the expansion of democracy is any of his business? Maybe he needs to stop pretending that he’s not still just a Soviet Union thug. Otherwise, how could ANY, “deal,” (spoken or otherwise) still be valid? The Soviet Union is supposed to be gone! It’s like someone walking into a music store and demanding they fix their car, because the place used to be a garage! It’s f*cking lunacy! I’m sick of channels like this acting as though merely having an opposite view should be validated in some way!? I oppose the MOON! No! I insist that there’s no such thing and that projected hologram in the sky must go! Now I’m entitled to equal time to debate this on news channels, create a cult following and get to debate it in Washington on Capitol Hill! F*cking madness! This computer expert should learn more history and maybe learn just how many PEOPLE were DYING in the west, just so they could spread Democracy to the east! Instead of acting like, just because Putin says the moon isn’t real, we all have to nod our heads and say, “Tell us all about it, Puty?” F*ck that guy and F*ck this channel! Putin is in Ukraine to prevent them from developing their MASSIVE gas and oil reserves. Period! It’s an armed robbery, with NO, “alternative view,” and NO justification. A few Kremlin Kleptocrats have had the west eating out of the palms of the hands and they’re now shocked that the west doesn’t want to lose control of energy security? They haven’t studied their history either. Ever since the term, “Energy Security,” has existed, for over a hundred years, the west has NEVER let the east take away their control over that. And Putin will NOT be an exception. He’s not, “special.” He has no, “argument.” He a f*cking thug who’s threatening nukes and BLUFFING. But accidents do happen if you keep letting a maniac wave a loaded weapon around. So it’s time we made it clear: we are no longer doing business with the maniac! They can depose him in a palace coup or they can have a revolution. But only an IDIOT let’s a mad man wave a loaded weapon in their face a second time! F*ck Putin! He’s done!
    8
  1650. 8
  1651. 8
  1652. 8
  1653. 8
  1654. 8
  1655. 8
  1656. 8
  1657. 8
  1658. 8
  1659. 8
  1660. 8
  1661. 8
  1662. 8
  1663. 8
  1664. 8
  1665. 8
  1666.  @IAmSuzyQ  : I wrote my last comment before you posted yours to me (hope to clarify any confusion there?) but, if I see Daisy, I’ll come back to this thread and tell you. No, I miss her too, and it’s been a while? . . . Not for months. I lost my dad to Covid, in the summer. He’d already had mini strokes, which prevented him from making new memories, a bit like that movie, Memento. It was as nightmarish as it sounds, and I’m still having troubled dreams about it. He kept asking why he was in hospital and why his family wasn’t around. He died hard. I spoke to him on the phone, as did my brother and sisters, but he was in England and I, being in a far distant country, was working on permission to travel, which I only got in time for his funeral. Worse still, he caught it from a doctor! While my sisters wanted to sue the hospital, I wanted to commiserate with the doctor, who must have been devastated by her one, single mistake, which flew in the face of everything she had made a vocation of her life for. I wanted to tell her (still do) that I empathise and hold no anger, resentment or anything but sympathy for the heartbreak she must feel. But, due to my sisters’ palpable anger, the hospital (quite rightly) couldn’t trust me to have any contact with the doc in question, to whom I will right, in due course. The division in our family has torn us apart. To me, YOU are the hero in this story. YOU are why I fight. YOU are America, and YOU are worth everything I do to support the opponents of Putin and Trump, in this disinformation campaign that has cost the lives of so many that an all out war would have been less damaging. Thank you for everything you are doing for us. Always know that we WILL rally to you, and be there for you. That we are fighting for you, day in day out. Not just people like me, a Conservative (believe it or not?) from the Lincoln Project, but as the numbers have proved, MOST OF AMERICA. We LOVE YOU, and everything you stand for. There is light now. And the changes are coming. Hang in there. You will all get the recognition you deserve, when this is over, but in the mean time, Biden and the government are about to join the fight to save lives, and to show America what’s REALLY going on. I love you, Suzy. You are my sister. And I am fighting for you. I swear it. There are millions of us, doing all we can. God bless you ✌️👍 ♥️
    8
  1667. 8
  1668. 8
  1669. 8
  1670. 8
  1671. 8
  1672. 8
  1673. 8
  1674. 8
  1675. 8
  1676. 8
  1677. 8
  1678. 8
  1679.  @nancyjay790  : Yes, it’s troubling that people can be such regular citizens, even holders of office, or other authority, and not KNOW that the, “Steal,” is a made up thing?! Some of them do, of course, and are exploiting this idiocy, because they’re dumb enough to, “think,” that it might have actually WORKED! : That the entire edifice of the Republic might just crumble overnight, leaving them in unique positions of power! Greed, selfishness and stupidity (along with the usual suspects, like racism, white privilege and ignorance) lies at the heart of that. To me, that is all the more reason why RUTHLESS examples MUST be made, swiftly, and for all involved. We have a LOT of work to do, for all that, “hearts and minds,” restoration; reminding Americans of what America actually is, and what it stands for. But, NONE of that is even possible until the insurrectionists SEE that their situation hopeless, and that it’s OVER. So, our first steps must be to resolve to hunt down ANY AND ALL who threaten the Republic, and show stability, with ABSOLUTELY NO FEAR! That’s why Biden refuses to change his inauguration arrangements, save for Covid safety. He can’t, and he knows it. Not ONE THING can be given away, that the America Haters could even pretend was some species of, “victory.” If we have to mow them down, and place the survivors in massive internment camps, THAT would be better than flinching in the face of terrorists right now. We must show RESOLVE and DETERMINATION. And be willing to CRUSH an insurrection. Joe gets that. As we’ll see 👍✌️
    8
  1680. 8
  1681. 8
  1682. 8
  1683. 8
  1684. The Lords were nothing short of ingenious in this vote! They have not voted for or against the bill, nor even asked for any amendments, at least yet. They have simply said, “If Rwanda is a, ‘safe,’ place to send asylum seekers, please prove that to us?” A very reasonable sounding request on the face of it. There are contesting opinions as to the safety of Rwanda. We have been accepting refugees FROM Rwanda, even since this whole, “stop the boats,” nonsense began! So, all the government needs to do is prove that Rwanda is as safe as they claim and not the danger hotspot that opponents claim. And how do you do that, when there are opposing opinions on a crucial aspect of a bill? You get a court ruling, right? And, oh dear . . . Seems the courts have already ruled on this, so the government will need to persuade them to take up the case again. And to do that, they would need to persuade them that there is new evidence to look at. Now, given that the court’s ruling sited UN, NATO and EU laws and treaties to which we are committed (certainly NOT just the EU legislation the Tories keep banging on about!) where will they find any new evidence that would so much as challenge all three bodies enough to persuade them that there is even any reason to take up the case a second time, let alone actually find in their favour? In short, it was a stroke of sheer, artful genius! And, incidentally, coming back to an earlier discussion you raised, one of the best arguments for keeping a second chamber in the first place.
    8
  1685. 8
  1686. 8
  1687. 8
  1688. 8
  1689. 8
  1690. 8
  1691. 8
  1692. 8
  1693. 8
  1694. 8
  1695. 8
  1696. 8
  1697. 8
  1698. 8
  1699. 8
  1700. 8
  1701. 8
  1702. 8
  1703. 8
  1704.  @peterc4082  : America has not hit anyone, but your question is fair nonetheless. I know you’re not asking me, but I would suggest you put that question to your representatives and any candidates for upcoming elections in your country. Just, don’t give them an excuse to dismiss your legitimate inquiry by accusing the US of attacking either Russia or Iraq directly, or the reply you’ll get will be a long winded blurb about that topic, rather than addressing your actual question at all. I wrote to my MP in Britain, several times. After my third letter I got an actual response from him and not just a staffer, inviting me to a public discussion on aid to Ukraine. Sadly, it was to be held the very next day and I couldn’t upend my arrangements to be there. My point though, is that I agree with you wholeheartedly that our support for Ukraine is currently pusillanimous at best and we MUST unshackle them from fighting with one hand tied behind their backs! THEY should decide how to target, where and when to target Russian weapons and infrastructure as THEY see fit! Ukraine has proved beyond doubt, repeatedly, that Putin’s, “red lines,” are as meaningless as his word and that he simply will not (probably can not?) use the ultimate weapon. It is time the west called Putin’s bluff and stopped sacrificing innocent Ukrainian lives on the alter of Putin’s empty mafia rhetoric. And, anyone who tells you it’s a waste of time to write to your politicians is either badly deceived, or just cannot be trusted. The more the public actually reaches out to their representatives, the more those representatives count you as the one in 500, or the one in 5,000 who think the same way as you but are not inclined to write to them about it. But they know they might be inclined to vote about it. You might be the only one, but I doubt it. If you are one of ten or one of one hundred letter writers, you are making support for Ukraine an election issue. It matters. It works. Slava Ukraine.
    8
  1705. 8
  1706. 8
  1707. 8
  1708. 8
  1709. 8
  1710. 8
  1711. 8
  1712. carmen patricia conde fierro : It’s already a, “Banana Republic,” when the reverse is true too. If, “someone at the top,” can order his own, “acquittal,” as happened at the risible Impeachment SHAM, why shouldn’t we expect that he’ll be hunting down all the people who put him there, spoke the truth when asked, or even simply failed to scream out hysterical support for Trump, loudly enough, when Trump, “felt like it”??? The problem here, is that people are still acting like this kind of thing still matters, when the Impeachment was the last nail in the Republic’s coffin. Who in their right mind, even imagines that they are “NOT” going to RIG the coming, “elections,” when we ALL KNOW if Trump is unseated, he and his family will be indicted and all go to jail? Which will lead to them, ”ratting out,” everyone from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, the indictment and imprisonment of the ENTIRE administration, leaving a historically disgraced skeleton of the Republican Party in its wake, to disband and flee from the press like escaped Nazis after WWII. They have SHOWN you that Democracy, law and order, and the Constitution are OVER in America, but you all keep up this DENIAL, as if, “elections,” will MEAN a GOD DAMNED THING?! And, I think you’re all doing that, because you all know, in your hearts, that being honest with yourselves can lead to to only ONE conclusion. Americans must accept they have a Russia Style, FAKE Democracy, more popularly known as a DICTATORSHIP, and be DONE with it, OR? . . . Revolution!!! There is no third option
    8
  1713. 8
  1714. 8
  1715. 8
  1716. 8
  1717. 8
  1718. 8
  1719. 8
  1720. Really appreciated this analysis, and that you asked us for our input. Excellent video. Thank you. I think it is possible, since you did ask, that this war could end in 2025, but that depends on a lot of things and, most of all, the west chilling out about the idea of Putin being thwarted. Putin wants a long war now and has reorganised his economy for it. So, even Ukraine managing to drive out just some of Russia’s forces is likely to lead to his downfall at this point. But, Russians generally still don’t get it, that total victory is all the west will accept. Western politicians might well try to talk about appeasement packages, but even they’re all starting to realise that their chances of remaining in office depend on the voters, who won’t accept anything less than total Ukrainian victory. I think that message is only just starting to sink into western political minds, but we are seeing increasing evidence that they get it now. The voters they depend on have donated money, time and letters to their representatives, all over the free world at historically unprecedented levels. Psychologically, that makes a huge difference. Voters will, “feel,” personally betrayed by any watered down packages and their politicians are seeing that it’s an election issue now. As for Putin’s financial position, THANK YOU, for pointing out the issue that started this war in the first place. Putin thought he could boost his flagging support with a quick invasion, since the unrest at Russia’s flagging economy looked set to cause demonstrations before the elections, making his fix look even more totalitarian than it already did. The same strategy had worked for him with his partial invasion of Georgia, which boosted his approval ratings and his financial stock. Keep in mind that Navalny was still alive at the time and the prospect of anything from chaotic demonstrations to actual uprisings were realistic at that time. This smash and grab operation was meant to BOOST the economy and provide a psychological fillip for the people to, “feel good,” about Putin’s leadership. It is a FACT that, had Putin known what was awaiting him in Ukraine, he never would have started this war. If Kamala Harris becomes POTUS, she will want the plaudits that will come with a victory over Russia. She’s already on board ideologically and, with her honeymoon period ahead of her, and four years in which to bury any bad news in the short memories of American voters, she will seize the opportunity to stomp across Putin’s, “red lines,” to finish the job and take credit for a good deal of that victory. As well as that, America will be at the front of the cue for rebuilding Ukraine’s massive oil reserves, coal, grain, rare Earth elements, etc. which will lead to an economic boom for Ukraine and America both. The global markets could be transformed and made more secure and that’s too big a legacy for any president to pass up. Plus, Germany will be now able to get their oil and gas from Ukraine; a closer, ALLIED and secure source. And these events will merely drive Russia’s unsafe economy into the ground. That will push Russia into even deeper increased dependency on China, as we’re already seeing happen now. Xi is already the senior partner in that relationship, even though many Chinese banks won’t touch Russian investment already, for fear of sanctions. All Russia has is oil and gas, which China will continue to drain at an ever lowering discount price, whilst reclaiming their hotly contested territories back from the Russian Federation in their south east (China’s north east). Using the interest from Russia’s frozen capital in western banks to pay for Ukraine’s war, which is pending possibility now, will be the capstone on the arch over Russia’s financial tomb. An ongoing, limitless fund, provided by Russians themselves, will be financially ruinous to Russia but also politically humiliating for Putin. He cannot survive even some of these factors; but, all of them combined? . . . That just leaves western fears about what happens when Putin falls. But, I think western leaders are even starting to get that now. Russia’s history shows that keeping things stable in the country, whilst the chaos of replacing their leaders goes on behind closed doors, is actually something that Russia is good at. They’ve done it countless times. From the chaos after the death of Stalin, the removal of Khrushchev after the defeat of the Cuban Missile Crisis, a series of leaders that came and went in the 1980’s, installing Boris Yeltsin after an attempted coup from the old guard communists (with tanks in Red Square, who’s turrets were pointing directly at the Kremlin!) and there are way more examples I could add to that list. Suffice it to say that Russia will NOT break up into multiple nuclear states, just because Putin retires, dies or is otherwise removed! They will just keep on keeping on, like they always have! And western leaders are far less fearful of post Putin potentialities, since they have been observing events and Russian history repeating itself, yet again. That is why I think it is possible. But, as you can see, a lot could go wrong with the timeline I laid out: namely, other, “events,” distracting NATO from its goals, with other countries. But the possibility of that kind of derailment decreases with each day that passes in which western resolve stiffens. It’s up to us to keep the pressure on: donating money, writing to our representatives and supporting the politicians who are, “genuinely,” on Ukraine’s side.
    8
  1721. 8
  1722. 8
  1723. 8
  1724. 8
  1725. 8
  1726. 8
  1727. 8
  1728. 8
  1729. 8
  1730. 8
  1731. 8
  1732. 8
  1733. 8
  1734. 8
  1735. 8
  1736. 8
  1737. 8
  1738. 8
  1739. 8
  1740. 8
  1741. 8
  1742. 8
  1743. 8
  1744. 8
  1745. 8
  1746. 8
  1747. She’s wrong. Not about Dirac, or the incorrect assumptions that some scientists have made. Nor is she wrong (necessarily) about the vast sums we spend on colliders and how it might better be used. I’m not qualified to quantify that last. But, to argue that there is no value in trying to understand why anti-matter did not annihilate the entire universe at its inception is just wrong headed. She’s trying to invalidate the science by invalidating the question, which is a personality thing, not a scientific approach. Even she admits it would be great to know the answer. We don’t have to call it a, “problem,” but surely it’s a sensible question? She makes an assumption of her own; that there simply wasn’t an equal amount of anti-matter, but she cannot know that, simply by inferring it from our existence? The discovery of anti-matter stars would make a nonsense of that assumption for a start. There could have been a condition that kept anti-matter apart from baryonic matter, which would in turn, tell us incredibly important things about physics and the universe? To say the question has no value is no different to saying any question in physics has no value, despite her knowledge that many of the greatest, most important discoveries that have tangibly changed our world, were made by scientists who were simply interrogating questions that interested them and could have had no way of knowing where their investigations would ultimately lead. Newton could never have known that he was contributing to GPS Satellite technology for instance. It strikes me as a stubborn resistance to accelerators has been conflated with the basis of their use in her mind? She’d be more honest if she questioned their use alone, rather than the question itself. When she does that I see a slippery slight of hand at work, but she’s merely sawing at the branch she’s sitting on. Anyone can say, “It is what it is,” about any value. Indeed, many scientists have done so in history, and later come off as the fools for doing so. Edward Hoyle did the same thing when he coined the, “Big Bang Theory,” for work that he personally didn’t like, yet which proved to be perfectly true. I wish scientists would stay out of their internal politics in these videos and just get on with the science? There’s a, “teachable moment,” in this for her too.
    8
  1748. 8
  1749. 8
  1750. 8
  1751. 8
  1752. 8
  1753. It’s a difficult one to speculate about. If the Duchess was approached by a representative of Big Brother and didn’t give a flat, “no,” immediately, anyone can stretch a point and call that, “negotiations.” But, what I remember about her, most of all, was an interview she gave not long after divorcing the Prince. She ended the interview abruptly, when questioned about her corrupt financial dealings and has never answered for any of that as far as I know. Seems she was cut from a similar cloth to Edward? EDIT: I should qualify that. I’m referring to the 60 Minutes interview, in which they discussed a News Of The World sting operation (footage still available on YouTube) in which the Duchess was selling access to Prince Andrew to business representatives, while Andrew was still the Business Ambassador. She destroyed the world’s trust in the idea of the Brits as fair dealing, as well as a good deal of trust in the Royal family. Andrew claimed no knowledge of her dealings, which only begs the question. If you look at the footage, she is as brazen and blatant as they come, putting a $50,000 dollar price on, “Doors opened, full access,” to Andrew for trade discussions and, presumably, preferential treatment over others who just go through legitimate channels. So, if he really didn’t know, that makes her twice the con artist she already appears to be. Yes, she said she had a, “wake up call,” and claims she was only ever corrupted that one time. But it is obvious that she had been running this scam for a long time, with price points for each level of her shady dealing. I wouldn’t be surprised to learn she’d had booklets published, to save time with the patter. In the end, she got to reframe the whole thing, used super injunctions to silence the press, told a pack of lies in her book about it, and got away with the whole thing. She disgusts me.
    8
  1754. 8
  1755. 8
  1756. 8
  1757. 8
  1758. 8
  1759. 8
  1760. 8
  1761. 8
  1762. 8
  1763. 8
  1764. 8
  1765. 8
  1766. 8
  1767. 8
  1768. 8
  1769. 8
  1770. 8
  1771. 8
  1772. 8
  1773. 8
  1774. 8
  1775. 8
  1776. 8
  1777. 8
  1778. 8
  1779. 8
  1780. 8
  1781. 8
  1782. 8
  1783. 8
  1784. 8
  1785. 8
  1786. 8
  1787. 8
  1788. 8
  1789. 8
  1790. 8
  1791. 8
  1792. 8
  1793. 8
  1794. 8
  1795. 8
  1796. 8
  1797. 8
  1798. 8
  1799. 8
  1800. 8
  1801. 8
  1802. 8
  1803. 8
  1804. 8
  1805. 8
  1806. 8
  1807. 8
  1808. 8
  1809. 8
  1810. 8
  1811. 8
  1812. 8
  1813. 8
  1814. 8
  1815. 8
  1816. 8
  1817.  @Descalabro  : We have already seen a steep drop in Q followers, and other disillusioned trump fans, due to his not staging a round up of the Dems on the Inauguration Day locking them up and retaking power. The base is still there, but weakened. And they will lose significantly more if they hear, from the mouths of those who lead them to disaster (from the back) that they had lied the entire time. Some witnesses will be able to say they were always sceptical, and said so. Other can say they never supported, “the steal,” lie, and yet others, will simply have to say that they knew it was a lie, but lied anyway, because Donny told them to. In other words, the GOP will fracture into two, divergent narratives about what is true, what happened and whom they stand by. They will get that, “civil war,” they always wanted, only in their own ranks. The Greene thing, the, “steal lie,” and the Nazis showing up at the Capitol Riots have already cost the, deeply. But, this will be the point at which most of them will be forced to choose their side. Those who voted to challenge the election, regardless of the riots will largely comprise one side. The ones who refused to, despite planning to, and who simply didn’t will largely be on the other. Many will sink, with their feet nailed to the deck of the TrumpTanic. And, that’s what I’m talking about. Those who remain in control will either be Trumpian proto-fascists, or the system gamers, like Mitch McConnell. It’s unclear which way they’ll swing at this point, but the fracture is already beginning. What is clear is, so long as they force testimony from the GOP’s top brass, the half of the GOP that is left in charge, will be weakened, disgraced and struggling to rebuild. And, that’s why the verdict doesn’t matter. They’re Testimonies matter. And that’s why they will go, AFTER the trial, cap in hand to big business. Because these donors never leave forever. And, sooner or later, the government will be doing something that corporations need to fund opposition to. And that’s what they hire politicians for. I’m not fundamentally disagreeing with you. All I’m saying is (and the GOP knows I’m right) this impeachment could RUIN them, and the, “verdict,” is not even what the stakes are! Both sides know it. It’s a rigged game. But, they might be able to expose and shut down the roulette table?
    8
  1818. 8
  1819. 8
  1820. 8
  1821. 8
  1822. 8
  1823. 8
  1824. 8
  1825. 8
  1826. 8
  1827. 8
  1828. 8
  1829. 8
  1830. 8
  1831. 8
  1832. 8
  1833. 8
  1834. 8
  1835. 8
  1836. 8
  1837. 8
  1838. 8
  1839. 8
  1840. 8
  1841. 8
  1842. 8
  1843. 8
  1844. 8
  1845. 8
  1846. 8
  1847. 8
  1848. 8
  1849. 8
  1850. 8
  1851. 8
  1852. 8
  1853. 8
  1854. 8
  1855. 8
  1856. 8
  1857. 8
  1858. 8
  1859. 8
  1860. 8
  1861. 8
  1862. 8
  1863. 8
  1864.  @verti3213  : When I was a seven year old (or thereabouts) my best friend at the time described seeing a porno film with his dad (divorced from his mother, which was a rarity for those days, and this was during one of his hit-&-miss fortnightly visits) and I vividly remember the confused and confusing description he gave. I liked him, because he was never under serious adult supervision and always seemed to access to, “cool,” stuff, like air guns, a bow and arrow set, and other things capable of doing us kids serious bodily harm. He was particularly agitated that day, and when I visited after school, he shot a cat with his air gun and then stomped it to death. I was plagued by guilt and confusion about what I’d witnessed, and my part in it, having become so frightened by him, and that air gun in his hand, that I laughed along with him until I could get away. But I was unable to process for years that what he’d been exposed to that weekend had really effected him. I still visit him in the psychiatric ward of the secure facility he was sentenced to remain in for an indefinite period. I’m not suggesting that one glance at Deep Throat turned him into a monster by any means. But, what I know from experience is that kids just do not know how to process such things and you just cannot tell which way their cooky is going to crumble. There’s an inherent risk in the attitude, “Well, kids have seen it all these days, so why bother?” Mine didn’t. It’s not as hard as people make out to supervise your kids, if you actually like their company, and they do yours. I can never accept that argument. Respectfully. ✌️
    8
  1865. 8
  1866. 8
  1867. 8
  1868. 8
  1869. 8
  1870. 8
  1871. 8
  1872. 8
  1873. 8
  1874. 8
  1875. 8
  1876. 8
  1877. 8
  1878. 8
  1879. 8
  1880. 8
  1881. 8
  1882. 8
  1883. 8
  1884. 8
  1885. 8
  1886. 8
  1887. 8
  1888. 8
  1889. 8
  1890. 8
  1891. 8
  1892. 8
  1893. 8
  1894. 8
  1895. 8
  1896. 8
  1897. 8
  1898. 8
  1899. 8
  1900. 8
  1901. 8
  1902. 8
  1903. 8
  1904. 8
  1905. 8
  1906. 8
  1907. 8
  1908. 8
  1909. 8
  1910. 8
  1911. 8
  1912. 8
  1913. 8
  1914. 8
  1915. 8
  1916. 8
  1917. 8
  1918. 8
  1919. 8
  1920. 8
  1921. 8
  1922. 8
  1923. 8
  1924. 8
  1925. 8
  1926. 8
  1927. 8
  1928. 8
  1929. 8
  1930. 8
  1931. 8
  1932. 8
  1933. 8
  1934. 8
  1935. 8
  1936. 8
  1937. 7
  1938. 7
  1939. 7
  1940. 7
  1941. 7
  1942. 7
  1943. 7
  1944. 7
  1945. 7
  1946. 7
  1947. 7
  1948. I was struck by Johnson’s unapologetic and vehement performance in that enquiry hearing. He appeared to dig his own grave by stating that he thought he got advice from all of the right people, took the right steps, etc, even knowing what he knows now; meaning that he would do it all again, in the same way! Note: the very final question from the chair, who seemed to read him so well, all but walked him into a trap of his own making, by simply asking, “Well, is there anything you’d like to add?” But the way she framed it so cleverly, making it clear that this was his the opportunity to say, “If I had known then what I know now, here’s what I would have done differently.” By then, she had seen him sticking so vehemently to this, “I believe I did the right thing,” rhetoric, that she rightly surmised that the real meaning of the question would pass over his head. And he duly obliged the committee by stating that he had learned NOTHING from his experience and is a liability who would repeat all of the same mistakes; not change who advised him, not change his actions, not take better care of the health and safety of his own people, etc, not do ANYTHING differently, regardless. And I think that will be the key line the findings of this enquiry will take: That even though we cannot read minds and establish what is truly in Mr Johnson’s, “heart,” as he would have do, Boris Johnson has stated in his own words that he has not learned anything from his own failings and stated unequivocally that he would not do anything differently, even if he had full knowledge of the potential harm he could have caused, or the harm he was doing politically to his party. In short, they gave him enough rope and he hung himself. That would be the headline of my findings if I served on that committee, at any rate. And I would not fail to mention his pusillanimous response to outside influence and intimidation of committee members either. He reminded me of Donald Trump when he told them he would, essentially, be against the mob if he was exonerated, but for the mob should he be found guilty. That was a dark moment that I won’t be forgetting.
    7
  1949. 7
  1950. 7
  1951. 7
  1952. 7
  1953. 7
  1954. 7
  1955. 7
  1956. 7
  1957. 7
  1958. 7
  1959. 7
  1960. 7
  1961. 7
  1962. 7
  1963. 7
  1964. 7
  1965. 7
  1966. 7
  1967. 7
  1968. 7
  1969. 7
  1970. 7
  1971. 7
  1972. 7
  1973. 7
  1974. 7
  1975. 7
  1976. 7
  1977. 7
  1978. 7
  1979. 7
  1980. 7
  1981. 7
  1982. 7
  1983. 7
  1984. 7
  1985. 7
  1986. 7
  1987. 7
  1988. 7
  1989. 7
  1990. 7
  1991. 7
  1992. 7
  1993. 7
  1994. 7
  1995. 7
  1996. 7
  1997. 7
  1998. 7
  1999. 7
  2000. 7
  2001. 7
  2002. 7
  2003. 7
  2004. 7
  2005. 7
  2006. 7
  2007. 7
  2008. 7
  2009. 7
  2010. 7
  2011. 7
  2012. 7
  2013. 7
  2014. 7
  2015. 7
  2016. 7
  2017. 7
  2018. 7
  2019. 7
  2020. 7
  2021. 7
  2022. 7
  2023. 7
  2024. 7
  2025. 7
  2026. 7
  2027. 7
  2028. 7
  2029. 7
  2030. 7
  2031. 7
  2032. 7
  2033. 7
  2034. 7
  2035. 7
  2036. 7
  2037. 7
  2038. 7
  2039. 7
  2040. 7
  2041. 7
  2042. 7
  2043. 7
  2044. 7
  2045. 7
  2046. 7
  2047. 7
  2048. 7
  2049. 7
  2050. 7
  2051. 7
  2052. 7
  2053. 7
  2054. 7
  2055. Contact your representatives and make sure they know that we expect the huge financial contributions we are making to this war to be used more aggressively. Cynical western bean counters rather like the idea of grinding down Russia’s (Putin’s) power by forcing him to throw all of his resources into the bottomless pit of Ukraine. They would see to it that Zelensky only ever keeps get these small, incremental bumps in the war effort aid we offer, making the conflict last indefinitely. But, if Ukraine had 20 or 40 Patriot systems, operational all over Ukraine now, Putin would be powerless to commit his war crimes and would be seeing nothing but one defeat after another, as a more focussed and concentrated Ukraine can spend its resources on ejecting every last Russian boot from their soil. Putin wouldn’t survive that domestically, and all of the chaos we’re seeing in Europe, from Germany to the Russian border, would be thrust back where it belongs: INSIDE RUSSIA! So, yes! I agree. Don’t let ANY news service sell you the, “long term,” or, “stalemate,” line, as it’s rubbish! It really is up to us. Do we want to save ourselves a fortune by investing now, giving Ukraine a Navy and Air Force so seal their border from Russia, from the Black Sea to Donetsk? Are we willing to push this mess back into Russia and gamble that we can influence the outcome toward a democracy there, where they get so desperate that their new administration is willing to trade away their nukes for aid and embargo concessions, and looking to the west for rebuilding? Or do we want to keep standing by and watching these war crimes, EVERY DAY, in which the innocent are slaughtered by a coward leading cowards, who only ever makes nuclear threats every time we talk about it in the western press, because he knows he’ll get a response, even though he would never dare commit suicide like that? Tell your politicians we’ve had ENOUGH! Stop giving Ukraine what they need to cling on for dear life. Give Ukraine what they need to FINISH THIS! Let’s make this Putin’s problem!
    7
  2056. 7
  2057. 7
  2058. 7
  2059. 7
  2060. 7
  2061. 7
  2062. 7
  2063. 7
  2064. Steven Dykstra : This is your Dictatorship, in the wake of the 2019 Coup, attempting to distract you, while they consolidate their power. They no longer have to fear the, “electorate,” because the 2020, “elections,” are ALREADY RIGGED. The only thing they fear now is everyone looking at a, “trial,” with NO WITNESSES allowed to testify, and NO EVIDENCE allowed to be presented, and a, “JURY,” comprised of Trump’s CONSPIRATORS, who would go to JAIL if Trump lost his, “Protected Presidential Status,” and, “ratted,” on them, to save his own Orange ass. After all, that would be the same thing as telling the world that THERE IS NO LAW, so far as the Trumps are concerned! It would be the same thing as ADMITTING that the Republic has FALLEN. Now, they will just get STRONGER, and consolidate their position, making America AFRAID Again, turning us into informers, haters and scared little RATS, like in Russia. You will get to go through the motions of voting, in your FAKE REPUBLIC, just like in Russia, and your name will be remembered, when you vote, “wrong,” but the outcome will NEVER be in doubt, because you have a DICTATORSHIP. Iran is just a SHOW; agreed by Putin, who arranged it with Iran and the US. NONE of this matters any more. They only fear that America MIGHT WAKE UP! A second REVOLUTION is what they fear. But, you all seem to be happy to watch the Coup unfold on CNN, so they needn’t worry. That won’t stop them though. That’s how Dictatorships work. As they get stronger, they will scare off ALL opposition, until they are appointing Democrats, behind the scenes, and briefing them, on what they can say and do. And, your first female POTUS? That will be Ivanka. Putin has already arranged it . . . Smh
    7
  2065. 7
  2066. 7
  2067. 7
  2068. 7
  2069. 7
  2070. 7
  2071. 7
  2072. 7
  2073. 7
  2074. 7
  2075. 7
  2076. 7
  2077. 7
  2078. 7
  2079. 7
  2080. 7
  2081. 7
  2082. 7
  2083. 7
  2084. 7
  2085. 7
  2086. 7
  2087. 7
  2088. 7
  2089. 7
  2090. 7
  2091. 7
  2092. 7
  2093. 7
  2094. 7
  2095. 7
  2096. 7
  2097. 7
  2098. 7
  2099. 7
  2100. 7
  2101. 7
  2102. 7
  2103. 7
  2104. 7
  2105. 7
  2106. 7
  2107. 7
  2108. 7
  2109. 7
  2110. 7
  2111. 7
  2112. 7
  2113. 7
  2114. 7
  2115. 7
  2116. 7
  2117. 7
  2118. 7
  2119. 7
  2120. 7
  2121. 7
  2122. 7
  2123. 7
  2124. 7
  2125. 7
  2126. 7
  2127. 7
  2128. 7
  2129. 7
  2130. What a superb creation! How can I help? I will support this in any way I can. My pro-tip would be, rather than stressing what it’s not; rants, rudeness, cruel or illegal commentary, (all stuff that defensive businesses will focus on) stress what it is: Professionalised, clear, coordinated, categorised, factual, distinguishing between demonstrable facts and unproved personal experiences, giving access to personal reviews whilst clearly stating what they are, and also offering follow up information such as court records, ombudsman findings, etc. That dichotomy you’re pointing to is (to me) simply about categorising. It sounds very much like you are developing your policies positively with these things in mind. My suggestion would be to have a published policy about how you work, one that evolves over time - and clearly states that it will - and, perhaps, a constitution which states your ultimate goals. For example, are you hopeful that such a database would pressure governments to create departments that coordinate and pursue bad businesses in the way you collate information? Do you want an independant resource for protecting consumer interests? Do you just want a reliable resource for everyone to use, so they can check on business before spending their money? Additionally, have you spoken to Which? Magazine? If you are based in Britain, I can envisage countless possibilities for a fruitful collaboration there? I don’t doubt that you will have already addressed almost all, if not all, of the issues I’ve raised here with yourself and your colleagues, Kieth. But, I just get excited about the possibilities for such projects and the benefits that the consumer stands to gain in the long run. Do you have a YouTube channel? If not, you should definitely consider setting one up under the name of the website/organisation itself. Even if it starts with little more than weekly updates about how the project is going, what you need, successes and failures, and maybe addressing one specific topic of the week, each week? Wishing you every success, I will take a look at your web resources and support in any way I can. That won’t be much, but collectively, we’re mighty. Godspeed, Keith.
    7
  2131. 7
  2132. 7
  2133. 7
  2134. 7
  2135. 7
  2136. 7
  2137. 7
  2138. 7
  2139. I am a lifelong (well, actually, about 20 years) conservative. These days, that makes me a Democrat by default, voting for nothing more than the preservation of that right to vote and have that, “vote,” MEAN something still. Cheney was always a little too far out on the right wing ledge for my tastes, back in the day when the Republicans had a party and not a cult, or a collection of racist criminal grifters. Imagine that? A conservative who found Liz Cheney too right wing!? Yes, there really was a time when that was a plausible sentence to write! I am filled with admiration for her eloquence and the many quotable moments in that speech, as well as the well chosen historical allusions she brought to bear upon the basic argument for democracy itself. Most of all, I love the fact that she stood like a rock in the face of trump’s crimson tide, unyielding as actual human blood washed through the American democratic system, while countless unnecessary deaths were caused by a chaotic response to Covid, the encouragement of racist attacks and the appalling capitulation to Al Kaida, when trump released THOUSANDS of their worst offenders in return for a deal they did not honor, and which we all knew they wouldn’t, just so he could attempt to take credit for ending the war in Afghanistan. I do hope to hear her words repeated in news, literature and other art forms to come. They were important. She reminds us all of the very foundations upon which we stand, and the very reason I can write these words to you, without fear of later having my devices searched and being punished for writing them, as they are in Beijing and Moscow, simply for not backing the powers that be in word and deed. She is smart enough to know her own importance in this historic moment. And she has squeezed every last drop of juice out of that moment, with a speech that gives all thinking people pause. Wherever you are in the free world, for good or ill, America is the foundation upon which your freedom stands. If that democracy falls, so will they all. This means that you, wherever you are, have a legitimate dog in this fight, and you thus have every right to make yourself heard in this debate. We must never forget that this is only because our democracy still stands . . . “if you can keep it?” . . .
    7
  2140. 7
  2141. 7
  2142. 7
  2143. 7
  2144. 7
  2145. 7
  2146. 7
  2147. 7
  2148. 7
  2149. 7
  2150. 7
  2151. 7
  2152. 7
  2153. 7
  2154. 7
  2155. 7
  2156. 7
  2157. 7
  2158. 7
  2159. 7
  2160. 7
  2161. 7
  2162. 7
  2163. 7
  2164. 7
  2165. 7
  2166. 7
  2167. 7
  2168. 7
  2169. 7
  2170. 7
  2171. 7
  2172. 7
  2173. 7
  2174. 7
  2175. 7
  2176. 7
  2177. 7
  2178. 7
  2179. 7
  2180.  @alexsin4821  : Jake is generally very careful to avoid getting into the hornet’s nest of the divisive American political landscape, (I hope he won’t mind me speaking for him, here?) though followers of his work can discern that he comes from a place of putting country before party politics and his love of democracy is why he’s here, doing this. So, if you’re hoping for a partisan takedown of any particular characters in the chamber during this speech, I think you’re barking up the wrong tree. However, I hasten to add that I do NOT assume that this is what you’re seeking. I too would be interested to hear an impartial discussion on what it means to have such a bipartisan chamber (particularly at Christmas; having something of a, “Christmas miracle,” flavour to the whole proceedings to see such unity between Reps and Dems on ANY issue) and what the implications of that are for the future, as Ukraine turns from war to reconstruction, once the Crimea is set free? Jake has discussed the practical side of the recent midterms, doing so in terms of whether support for Ukrainian relief and military packages will be helped or hindered. And his analysis was most concise (unlike my comment; sorry for that😉). He does have a lot to offer in this area, but he is rightly careful to keep his discussions fact based and as, “apolitical,” as humanly possible. After all, most of the money he makes from his efforts go to Ukraine (you can check out his recent video identifying some of the charities that will safely get your contributions to the Ukrainian war effort, or to civilian relief charities) goes to charity. He would not provoke supporters from either side of the isle into leaving his channel unnecessarily, by criticising individuals in Senate or Congress, without a very good reason. I’m sure you get my gist? . . .
    7
  2181. 7
  2182. 7
  2183. 7
  2184. 7
  2185. 7
  2186. 7
  2187. 7
  2188. 7
  2189. 7
  2190. 7
  2191. 7
  2192. 7
  2193. 7
  2194. 7
  2195. 7
  2196. 7
  2197. 7
  2198. 7
  2199. 7
  2200. 7
  2201. 7
  2202. 7
  2203. 7
  2204. 7
  2205. 7
  2206. 7
  2207. 7
  2208. 7
  2209. 7
  2210. 7
  2211. 7
  2212. 7
  2213. 7
  2214. 7
  2215. 7
  2216. 7
  2217. 7
  2218. 7
  2219. 7
  2220. 7
  2221. 7
  2222. 7
  2223. 7
  2224. 7
  2225. 7
  2226. 7
  2227. 7
  2228. 7
  2229. 7
  2230. 7
  2231. 7
  2232. 7
  2233. 7
  2234. 7
  2235. 7
  2236. 7
  2237. 7
  2238. 7
  2239. 7
  2240. 7
  2241. 7
  2242. 7
  2243. 7
  2244. 7
  2245. 7
  2246. 7
  2247. 7
  2248. 7
  2249. 7
  2250. 7
  2251. 7
  2252. 7
  2253. 7
  2254. 7
  2255. 7
  2256. 7
  2257. 7
  2258. 7
  2259. 7
  2260. 7
  2261. 7
  2262. 7
  2263. 7
  2264. 7
  2265. 7
  2266. 7
  2267. 7
  2268. 7
  2269. 7
  2270. 7
  2271. 7
  2272. 7
  2273. 7
  2274. 7
  2275. 7
  2276. 7
  2277. 7
  2278. 7
  2279. 7
  2280. 7
  2281. 7
  2282. 7
  2283. 7
  2284. 7
  2285. 7
  2286. 7
  2287. 7
  2288. 7
  2289. 7
  2290. 7
  2291. 7
  2292. 7
  2293. 7
  2294. 7
  2295. 7
  2296. 7
  2297. 7
  2298. 7
  2299. 7
  2300. 7
  2301. 7
  2302. 7
  2303. 7
  2304. 7
  2305. 7
  2306. 7
  2307. 7
  2308. 7
  2309. 7
  2310. 7
  2311. 7
  2312. 7
  2313. 7
  2314. 7
  2315. 7
  2316. 7
  2317. 7
  2318. 7
  2319. 7
  2320. 7
  2321. 7
  2322. 7
  2323. 7
  2324. 7
  2325. 7
  2326. 7
  2327. 7
  2328. 7
  2329. 7
  2330. 7
  2331. 7
  2332. 7
  2333. 7
  2334. 7
  2335. 7
  2336. 7
  2337. 7
  2338. 7
  2339. 7
  2340. 7
  2341. 7
  2342. 7
  2343. 7
  2344. 7
  2345. 7
  2346. 7
  2347. 7
  2348. 7
  2349. 7
  2350. 7
  2351. Historically, Labour gave up after Neil Kinnock and started a concerted shift to occupy the centre ground, which meant a shift toward the right, culminating in Tony Blair’s brand of Tory lite. Their problem ever since has been a division between the rank and file socialists and the Westminster centrists which has created leaders who vacillate between the two sides, often on the same day, causing them to look weak and fumble their advantages, often at crucial moments. The difference today is that the Tories have the same problem now. And it’s new to them, so they don’t even have an internal coping strategy. Not that they ever lost their right wing instincts of the Thatcher era. It’s actually that they started flinging open their doors to extremists and panderers and, frankly, any short term vote winner, regardless of tomorrow’s consequences. And forget, “ideology.” That’s now just their fig leaf of window dressing used to justify widespread corruption, incompetence and waste. Hence Neo-Liberalism has gained such traction as it guarantees the worst, most corrupt and stupid people will grasp at power in just the same way that a new casino with no security guarantees a vast criminal element will move in. Liz Truss seemed to be the peak expression of Neo-Lib madness, but we’ve gradually learned that Rishi Sunak is no better, possibly worse. The upshot being, while Labour have the capacity to destroy themselves in the manner they have always done, the Tories are in a Cold Civil War just now and they actually need a period in the wilderness to fight it out in hot terms. They have to learn that even the brown skinned brown shirt is still an overt racist in the end and Brits don’t tolerate that stuff. That stealing national resources for friends and family only works when the electorate is not actively sinking into poverty and clearly able to blame the right people for putting them there. And that putting genuinely stupid people in charge of all three main offices of government is not amusing to anyone, but genuinely alarming. Starmer will recover from this one, unless he actively works at screwing up.
    7
  2352. 7
  2353. 7
  2354. 7
  2355. 7
  2356. 7
  2357. 7
  2358. 7
  2359.  @elizabeth_777  : I’ve seen Dr Reich’s lectures on YouTube. He sure isn’t right about everything. But he’s another man who encourages people to read and think for themselves. I must challenge your assertion that Jake would, “want to stop immigration,” though. He has said nothing of the sort in this or any previous video that I know of, and I haven’t missed any of them for at least three years now. Jake is showing you what the arguments are on both sides and the agendas behind them. He is discussing the difference between what politicians and pundits, “say,” and how their rhetoric does not match their actions. And he’s adding his analysis about what motives they have to keep migration (illegal and otherwise) a live issue in the minds of voters. The fact is that continuous migration is the very model that built America and made it so strong in the first place. The numbers are in and the facts checked. There is a direct correlation between population increase and economic success, so long as those demographic injections of people consist of the very types of people that migration necessarily encourages. It is not the elderly and sick, by and large, but the young, strong and active people who migrate to democracies, away from oppression. The very sorts of people a nation needs: those who say no to theocracy or dictatorship and are willing to take enormous risks for the sake of freedom. Those are the same types of people who don’t waste their votes, once enfranchised, and who generate economic activity by working hard, having children and generating taxable incomes. The younger a modern population is (in the developed world) the better its chances of growth, both demographically and financially. And America has sustained its edge over larger populations by constantly renewing its younger population, “artificially,” so to speak, through migration. It is true that unchecked and unsupervised migration would create more problems than it solves. But I don’t know of a single politician in America who has ever called for, “open borders;” a phrase much abused by bad faith claims of the far right, referencing a Hillary Clinton speech in 2015 and taking her words out of context. Sorry for going on, but I would hate to see Jake’s meaning misinterpreted. If nothing else, Jake is encouraging a broad audience to consider their civic responsibilities and to learn more about how their domestic politics is bound up with world affairs. And that’s a very good thing. Slava Ukraine, my friend. 🇺🇦✌️
    7
  2360. 7
  2361. 7
  2362. 7
  2363. 7
  2364. 7
  2365. Physics has one of the worst historical records for denial and holding back progress in science, but it isn’t talked about much. I would love to meet just one proponent of Inflation Theory who has taken the expansion of time into account, along with space, for instance? Tell them, “From a huge distance, space and baryonic matter looks tiny, so why shouldn’t time? Or don’t we believe in the direct connection between space and time, which is why we call it space-time since Einstein, anymore?” The best answer I’ve had so far is, “You just don’t get it.” But I can never persuade them to explain what I, “don’t get?” Sooner or later, people will accept that Inflation never occurred at all, but only appears to have done so from our distant perspective, from the further away you are in time, just as space looks different, from the bigger the distance. It’s a set of category errors that actually reveals something interesting about how we grasp complex notions like Space-Time. It’s not intuitive, therefore it’s vulnerable to assumption and confirmation bias, because we can’t resist thinking about it in terms of our own, limited, experience. In this case, complexity has taken such a deep hold on thinking about astrophysics that common sense is being left out of the equations. What I’m certain of is that we need more scientists with the attitude of Sabine, who simply speaks without deference or emotion, but plainly and without fear of offence, though whilst being polite at the same time. She’s just interested in the facts, regardless of how people feel about them, or what the emotional investment is.
    7
  2366. 7
  2367. 7
  2368. 7
  2369. 7
  2370. 7
  2371. 7
  2372. 7
  2373. 7
  2374. 7
  2375. 7
  2376. 7
  2377. 7
  2378. 7
  2379. 7
  2380. 7
  2381. 7
  2382. 7
  2383. 7
  2384. 7
  2385. 7
  2386. 7
  2387. 7
  2388. 7
  2389. 7
  2390. 7
  2391. 7
  2392. 7
  2393. 7
  2394. 7
  2395. 6
  2396. 6
  2397. 6
  2398. 6
  2399. 6
  2400. 6
  2401. 6
  2402. 6
  2403. 6
  2404. 6
  2405. 6
  2406. 6
  2407. 6
  2408. 6
  2409. 6
  2410. 6
  2411. 6
  2412. 6
  2413. 6
  2414. 6
  2415. 6
  2416. 6
  2417. 6
  2418. 6
  2419. 6
  2420. 6
  2421. These Senators and Congresspeople need to campaign for, “Right to OWN,” not right to repair. The right to repair comes automatically with full and complete OWNERSHIP. When it’s yours you can modify it, reverse engineer it, change it, break it, REPAIR it, blow it TF up! With NO fear of consequence or negative recourse. I’m a Brit, but as I’ve said before, if it happens in major American industries, there’s way more chance it can happen in the industries of little countries like mine, since America (like it or not) sets the world standard. That, “shift in culture,” starts in America. So, working on that principle, “If I stop my brother from getting screwed, I too one day, may stop myself from getting screwed.” I have no, “rights,” in your country, but a letter to your representatives emailed from Britain, may well get someone’s attention? If for no other reason than it may surprise them to see that even the British are aware of the issue and disgusted by it, since it, “demoralises,” soldiers and could easily cost lives? Since I’m an outsider, I’ll pick the politicians I don’t know so well (I already know that Elizabeth Warren doesn’t need convincing on this issue) because I know how to make myself sound, “influential,” and how to drop hints at having, “contacts,” in their area. The terms, “fraud, waste and abuse,” and, “freedom,” will appear in my correspondence. And I will stick to the rule of brevity being the key to good communication (unlike this comment here) since the shorter and clearer the message, the better, so long as it contains the key points. Thank you for your contributions to society, my friend. You are doing God’s work.
    6
  2422. 6
  2423. 6
  2424. 6
  2425. 6
  2426. 6
  2427. 6
  2428. 6
  2429. 6
  2430. 6
  2431. 6
  2432. 6
  2433. 6
  2434. 6
  2435. 6
  2436. 6
  2437. 6
  2438. 6
  2439. 6
  2440. 6
  2441. 6
  2442. 6
  2443. 6
  2444. 6
  2445. 6
  2446. 6
  2447. 6
  2448. 6
  2449. 6
  2450. 6
  2451. 6
  2452. 6
  2453. His insights are informative and valuable, but not always 100% right. Though his analysis of the facts are honest, factual and truthful, sometimes his conclusions are not spot on. For instance, “Fear is the new normal,” in his video’s title. I responded to that by asking, “Hold on? What’s, ‘new,’ about it?” Putin has always murdered his opponents, for more than 20 years now. He’s ramping up his consolidation of power moves right now, but it’s literally the typical way he has always done things. Things began to look a bit, “new,” when the unusual levels of criticism were being levelled at him from senior figures inside his own country. But, Putin is literally restoring the Russia that was before his insanely misjudged war in Ukraine, probably in order to be in a, “safe,” position to pull his forces out of part or all of Ukraine without being deposed for, “weakness.” Admiral Nielsen, I have noticed, has a tendency to see Russia through his NATO tinted lenses. That’s fine, as those lenses do have 20/20 sight and all, but they favour long term narratives, both forward thinking, and past analysis, which can be flawed when it comes to judging the facts in the moment. And this is the sort of result I’m speaking of, where Putin’s purging of opponents is being judged as some kind of new phenomena, because NATO has always given Putin the benefit of the doubt, historically, and cannot bring themselves to admit that their policy of Appeasement is what lead to the Ukraine war in the first place. NATO and the UN made the same historical mistake over Crimea that the allies did with Hitler over The Sudetenland and other territories, hoping to buy peace at the cost of other people’s freedom.
    6
  2454. 6
  2455. 6
  2456. 6
  2457. 6
  2458. 6
  2459. 6
  2460. 6
  2461. 6
  2462. 6
  2463. 6
  2464. 6
  2465. 6
  2466. 6
  2467. 6
  2468. 6
  2469. 6
  2470. 6
  2471. 6
  2472. 6
  2473. 6
  2474. 6
  2475. 6
  2476. 6
  2477. 6
  2478. 6
  2479. 6
  2480. 6
  2481. 6
  2482. 6
  2483. 6
  2484. 6
  2485. 6
  2486. 6
  2487. 6
  2488. 6
  2489. 6
  2490. 6
  2491. I have always appreciated your authenticity and have never, for a moment, considered that you would speak differently or seem and any different if I were to meet you face to face. Indeed, for me, that is part of your appeal and what keeps me coming back, whether I agree wholeheartedly with you or not on any given topic. I looked up the video of the Margolyes interview, before finishing this video, to see what you were talking about. And I did feel I understood her point. We all feel genuine, heartfelt anger toward some people, especially politicians. Though we can be happy enough for our feelings to be known about us, by the public at large, we would not necessarily want to spit our bile into the face of that person, simply because the opportunity presents itself. There are times when I feel I could cheerfully do actual physical harm to at least some of the politicians who literally laughed at us while we lost isolated loved ones during the Covid crisis and they partied on. Especially since I have learned about Boris Johnson’s attitude toward Covid as a natural way of killing off the old to make way for wastrels like himself. Their sheer callous disregard for all decency hurts all the more when I think of my father dying without me by his side. But it is not just the fear of legal consequences that would restrain me if I were to bump into Johnson in bar. Nor, necessarily, my sense of responsibility to the people around us, just minding their own business and not wishing to witness any violent actions or language. It is merely my fundamental belief that I am better than him in every important respect, more capable of self control and measured language, that I believe would govern my actions overall. I don’t think Margolyes betrayed any degree of hypocrisy so much as she simply expressed what she was thinking about the man, rather than willing to say to him. Smart people know that simple name calling merely fuels the confirmation bias of your enemies, making it too easy for them to dismiss you as, “just another hater,” or whatever, without ever thinking over what you said to them or why. She doesn’t care that people know (and, by extension, Jeremy Hunt knows) what she really thinks of him, but she is above confrontational abuse and I applaud her self restraint. Especially since it’s her, famous for speaking without apparent restraint. Simply abusing the man would have done neither party any good, but could have done harm. As to the BBC Radio 4 headquarters being a, “temple,” I am with you 100%. I see it as a soiled, somewhat sullied temple, badly in need of renovation and restoration to its former independence. But that’s a whole other conversation. If you read all of this, thank you for your patience. I hope you can see the distinction I was making?
    6
  2492. 6
  2493. 6
  2494. 6
  2495. 6
  2496. 6
  2497. 6
  2498. 6
  2499. 6
  2500. 6
  2501. 6
  2502. 6
  2503. 6
  2504. 6
  2505. 6
  2506. 6
  2507. 6
  2508. 6
  2509. 6
  2510. 6
  2511. 6
  2512. 6
  2513. 6
  2514. 6
  2515. 6
  2516.  @atlantisrising1864  : You read my mind. This is what political avoidance buys you as a citizen. Or, “moral absenteeism,” as I heard one political philosopher put it. Whenever you next hear someone say, “Oh, I never get involved in politics,” just remind them of how deeply, “political,” that choice is. And your examples are plentiful. Show them what it’s done to the people of countries like Russia, Belarus, Iran, China, etc, that thought they could buy themselves some peace to live quietly while their politicians, “did stuff,” that was nothing to do with them. Now they all have real skin in the game. If you’re not a fighting age male or a veteran, being drafted, you’re probably the mother, father, son or daughter of one. Now every Russian is losing real skin and bone and is outraged because Putin has broken his, “social contract,” with them. It’s almost impossible to explain to these people that THEY made this war, their dictatorship and the people who dominate their existence now. They have a generation of denial conditioning to break. That’s why I would always urge everyone to understand: YOU, me and everyone you know of voting age (and even younger) ARE POLITICAL, whether you like it or not. The only real question is whether you’re willing to take responsibility for steering that ship of state - a journey riven with pitfalls, disappointments and hard, thankless work - or whether you prefer to opt out of all that risk, relentless pushback, denial and intolerance, and to be chauffeur driven to the front lines of your doom? There is no third choice. That’s modern life and the price we pay for democracy.✌️
    6
  2517. 6
  2518. 6
  2519. 6
  2520. 6
  2521. 6
  2522. 6
  2523. 6
  2524. 6
  2525. 6
  2526. 6
  2527. 6
  2528. 6
  2529. I give it 100%, as a perfect example of its type. Agreed. When you think about it, Heath Ledger’s Joker was THE Joker: a cypher with a constantly changing backstory. We don’t know where he came from or what made him insane, and that’s one of the things that made him such a great super villain; the antithesis of Batman. We understand Batman, we know his back story, in depth and detail, and we understand why he does what he does. The Joker is the opposite of Batman, in spirit and intentionally, because he’s the antidote to Batman; his greatest antagonist. We can’t understand his desire for chaos, which is one of the things that makes him so scary, and which was explored so brilliantly in Nolan’s vision of him, as an Uber-Terrorist, who’s very existence is a counterpunch in Batman’s face; simply existing to love everything that Batman hates, but even the Joker understands that he’s nothing without Batman’s Yang to his Yin. The Joker needs Batman, and tells him so. “You complete me,” he says, referencing Jerry McGuire. And, Ledger, I’m convinced, would have won the Oscar for his masterful performance, had he lived, regardless. No one thought there would ever be another, or that it could be, or should be, topped. So, to take on the Joker’s backstory, and answer the very mystery that makes Joker who and what he is, was beyond dangerous! It was not just bold, straying into taboo territory, it was downright heroic! The accusations of hubris and stupidity that would have been levelled at the director, DC and at the star, had this movie failed, would have potentially ruined careers, including that of Phoenix, who had by that point, already danced on the edge of the precipice with some of his choices. Especially, that documentary that no one comprehended, and which alienated so many people on talk shows? Yet, not only did they DARE to tell us how the Joker came to be, defying the critics, which were already legion before the movie came out, but they also refused to compromise the vision of Joker in the teeth of so much ill-informed, un-thought-out, anti-violence opposition. All this, at a time when the DC universe was on its knees, desperate for a win! The epic failures of their flagship enterprises; the Justice League and the Superman V Batman battle, which had been teased so long ago in a Will Smith vehicle about vampires, had made even the most loyal fans sceptical at best, and downright hostile in most cases. But, this all wound up making the TRIUMPH that is Joker, all the sweeter for everyone involved in that project; from the writers, director and stars, to the key grip and Dolly guy! Every single one of them can now roll up their sleeves, show off their scars and say, “I won these scars at the Battle of The Joker SJW’s,” with pride! And people will remove their hats, shake their hands, buy them a drink and say, “Thank you for your service.” Because we now have one of the greatest movies in the DC cannon (only rivalled by The Dark Knight) and one of the greatest psychological thrillers ever made! A masterpiece, with a story of suffering behind it, like all great masterpieces should have. One of the best movies in anyone’s collection; up there with North By Northwest, Alien, Aliens, Terminator 1 & 2, Cyrano De Bergerac, It’s a Wonderful Life, Jaws, Duel, the first Planet of The Apes, The Big Country, True Grit, The Searchers, Metropolis, Dirty Harry, Unforgiven, West World (the movie), Some Like It Hot, Singin’ In The Rain and, as you can tell by now, I could list SO MANY more. But, Joker is right up there with that lot, and it’s obvious inspiration, Taxi Driver. True Art, is not yet dead in Hollywood. Joker is your proof ✌️👍
    6
  2530. 6
  2531. 6
  2532. 6
  2533.  @BullDykee  : That was a great comment. Interesting too. Of course, if we followed Putin’s logic we would be forced to conclude the reverse of his assertions: namely, that Russia therefore belongs to its founders, Ukraine. But we also know full well that these are only claims Putin has made to persuade his credulous population, not because he, “believes,” in anything. By his own words, Russia should still be communist, as he wrote a whole essay on the fall of the Soviet Union as being the worst thing that ever happened to Russia. Probably ghost written? Though it is full of assumptions, logical fallacies and downright errors, so maybe it was just him? His real interest was, is and always has been the wealth of Ukraine. They were just on the threshold of a new golden age in Ukraine, where companies like BP, Exxon and Shell, among others handed in reports saying there is as much fossil fuel wealth beneath Ukrainian soil and off the Crimean coast, as there is in Russia. The scientists and geologist teams for these oil companies were among the first to receive death threats and other intimidation tactics to scare them out of Ukraine, even before the Donbas and Crimean invasions began. But, combined with the Argon production (vital for microchip manufacture) that Ukraine has over 50% of the world’s supply of, and all that farming wealth, along with other rare Earth minerals, and you have a bonanza of prosperity on the verge of making Ukraine a major player on the world stage. Putin knows he cannot sell these stolen resources on the world markets. But he could stop Ukraine from having access to them and take them out of any competition, whilst transporting tons of these materials, coal and the rare earth’s, from Donbas to Moscow power stations. He and Xi probably sat in that box at the Winter Olympics plotting how between them, with Ukrainian Argon and Taiwanese chip manufacture, they could corner the world’s technology and become the dominant force together. But, China’s plans went to pot as they saw the furious resistance of the world to Putin’s Ukrainian HEIST and the reinvigoration of NATO. In so far as history plays a role at all, in the hearts and minds of people, its distortion is a performative act, done for the benefit of the populations who remain behind Putin’s new Iron Curtain. The west doesn’t buy it. And westerners, I’m sorry to say, are not as concerned about history as easterners are, culturally speaking. They should be encouraged. And your comment is evidence of that. I too would love to see Jake’s take on it, which he has touched on at various times, with that fascinating historical map he shows us from time to time. Slava Ukraine, my friend. 🇺🇦🔱🇬🇧
    6
  2534. 6
  2535. 6
  2536. 6
  2537. 6
  2538. 6
  2539. 6
  2540. 6
  2541. 6
  2542. 6
  2543. 6
  2544. 6
  2545. 6
  2546. 6
  2547. 6
  2548. 6
  2549. 6
  2550.  Neil Rusling  : Sadly, the answer to most of those questions are far too simple. The propaganda, “narratives,” come from Russia, approved by Putin, and then, “laundered,” via Focks and their malignant allies, like Alex Jonestown, et al. Putin’s key methodology is DIVISION. Trump’s and the GOP’s too. And, America never has come to terms with the outcome of the Civil War, and that situation was only exacerbated by the assassination of Lincoln. His VP, Andrew Jackson, found himself in a position to undermine Reconstruction, and was so blatant in both his racist sabotage and personal enrichment, that he got impeached for it. As with trump, too many racist partisans protected him from a conviction, but he never got re-elected either. Trump has poured his bile into that wound, to the point that, “legitimacy,” is a moot issue to these racists. And, make no mistake, it is all about racism, when you boil it down. It’s about Demographics, ultimately. The perceived, “threat,” is that white, “Anglo Saxon,” types really will be in a minority soon. Within one or two generations, perhaps? And, naturally, racists fear being treated in the same way that they would treat a minority. It’s a ghost fear, easily exploited by those who have money, power and microphones. They cannot imagine being outnumbered by what was once the minority, and being treated with equity, because they cannot imagine themselves doing that. Therefore, in the privacy of their Klan Lodges or (sadly) some police unions, or anywhere they feel I t’s safe to be open about their bigotry, they talk about it in terms of, “being realists.” They genuinely cannot picture it shaking out any other way. And they make their own fear everyone else’s, to the best of their ability. And, we all know, fear turns to hate, pretty quick. And here we are . . . ✌️
    6
  2551. 6
  2552. 6
  2553. 6
  2554. 6
  2555. 6
  2556. 6
  2557. 6
  2558. Sadly, history is littered with bordello madams who have acted as procurers for wealthy scumbags. Women have only barely known equality with men, historically speaking, and still aren’t quite there yet, so they have traditionally fulfilled such roles as a way to equalise the scales in their own life. But, Maxwell’s case is rather unique in that her father (probably) committed suicide when he was exposed in the giant pensions fraud, in which his daughter was only at the edges of in terms of liability. The abject and frequent abuse of his power as a corrupt media mogul and thief was a prototype model for the types of problems the world is having with Rupert Murdoch and Donald trump today. She was brought up by that man, with zero morals and a reputation for sexual exploitation, litigious revenge, smearing people in the best selling papers he owned and, having spent all the pensions of the entire staff who worked at his rags, took out his yacht, never to be seen again. His yacht was found, but his body was never recovered. Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised to discover he was in Epstein’s cellar for a further 20 years. Epstein helped Maxwell’s daughter out of her liability for millions of pounds, and she became his madam. That’s a story as old as prostitution itself. Many great female figures have been maligned to look like whores by the men who wrote their histories, but Gislaine Maxwell was and is the real deal. I’m only surprised that you’re surprised. There are far more female sexual predators than the statistics show. When I was a social worker, there was nearly always a responsible female figure who at least knew what was happening, when a man paid the price for his crimes. I was always glad when the man was convicted and punished. But, the women were rarely even arrested, let alone prosecuted. And some were very good at lapsing into playing the role of, “victim,” for which they would usually get support from the actual victim, being as how they were usually their daughter or son and confused. The world is Dracula Black if you’re willing to look. And you cannot unsee what you’ve witnessed. I live with that, and the bile comes back up when I see Maxwell, having already exploited her privileges and power to the hilt to get away with murder repeatedly. Even if she’s found completely guilty on all counts, she still won;t pay the penalty that you or I would pay for such sick transgressions. The air is different up there, for the super rich. It’s so rich with extra oxygen that one day it will catch alight, and they’ll all come flying down like shooting stars, aflame with revolutionary fire.
    6
  2559. 6
  2560. 6
  2561. 6
  2562. 6
  2563. 6
  2564. 6
  2565. 6
  2566. 6
  2567. 6
  2568. 6
  2569. 6
  2570. 6
  2571. 6
  2572. 6
  2573. 6
  2574. 6
  2575. 6
  2576. 6
  2577. 6
  2578. 6
  2579. 6
  2580. 6
  2581. 6
  2582. 6
  2583. 6
  2584. 6
  2585. 6
  2586. 6
  2587. When I was an older teenager, I attended a residential weekend with my youth club. One of the, “youth workers,” decided that it would be a good, “social experiment,” if he persuaded my two older sisters, the rest of the staff, and all those other young people in attendance to completely ignore me as though I wasn’t there for the first 24 hours. Sounds like a small thing, when I say it in a short sentence like that. I will never be able to describe the utter psychological harm that did to me. I never spoke of it for more than 20 years, and even then, I told it as an anecdote about something that happened to someone else. The shame and pain of it was so traumatic. To suddenly and inexplicably become completely insignificant to the point of none existence, in a set of new anxiety invoking circumstances was a shock to my system that still, to this day, causes me to catch myself arguing out loud with ghosts of my memories, like a mentally ill person, expressing the rage I want to pour out on the person responsible, who was completely unfit for his position of power. I couldn’t agree more with your assessment, though I have not seen the show, nor will I. I think it was after the first season of Big Brother that I stopped watching what I called, “Hate TV.” And ever since then I’ve watched the popularity of Hate TV gradually grow. It is the same form of manipulation and deep psychological scarring that people cannot comprehend until it’s already too late, being committed to a public screening, judging from the trailer I just watched for the sake of context. There is something of the anxiety dream, such as the one you described about the loss of your mother, about this dystopian vision we seem to be sleepwalking into. I keep thinking of the film, Gladiator, and Derek Jacobi saying, “He will give them blood, and they will love him for it.” The producers will be careful to avoid breaking any laws, but reckless about breaking people’s spirits.
    6
  2588. 6
  2589. 6
  2590. 6
  2591. 6
  2592. 6
  2593. 6
  2594. 6
  2595. 6
  2596. 6
  2597. 6
  2598. 6
  2599. 6
  2600. 6
  2601. 6
  2602. 6
  2603. 6
  2604. Considering that our armed services are tiny now, compared to when the Tories came in, we simply cannot spare them anyway! But, I suggested in previous comments that Ben Wallace should dramatically, “Cross The House,” over to the Labour benches, as he really has nothing to lose and so much to gain. If we set aside his one gaff (having a go at Zelensky about a week ago, for, “ingratitude,” of all things! For which he could still apologise) he’s actually pretty talented as a diplomat and statesman, and has clearly spearheaded the charge against Russia, being instrumental in breaking the deadlock over tanks to Ukraine. He’s liked on both sides of the House, and has good relationships in NATO, the UN and in the EU. And he’s not seen as being any Tory camp. He’s shown loyalty to Johnson when he was PM, but no more so than Sunack now. And all the thanks he got for his efficiency and hard work has been to be left to twist in the wind as the boundary changes for his seat will leave him without the votes, in all likelihood, to remain an MP. If he’s had talks with Starmer, perhaps offering to bring some other Tories with him over the weeks (Sit TF down, Johnson, no one wants you!) for that drip, drip effect that gets the whole nation and the press on both sides crying, “Can we have an election now!?” Starmer will have offered him big rewards. And let’s face it? He’s a vanishingly rare item in politics: a competent Tory, free of scandal and not hated by at least 50% of the population. He would be a genuine boon to Labour, perhaps continuing in his current post, under a brand new constituency? . . . Just a thought . . .
    6
  2605. 6
  2606. 6
  2607. 6
  2608. 6
  2609. 6
  2610. 6
  2611. 6
  2612. 6
  2613. 6
  2614. 6
  2615. 6
  2616. 6
  2617. 6
  2618. 6
  2619. 6
  2620. 6
  2621. 6
  2622. 6
  2623. 6
  2624. 6
  2625. 6
  2626. 6
  2627. 6
  2628. 6
  2629. 6
  2630. 6
  2631. 6
  2632. 6
  2633. 6
  2634. 6
  2635. 6
  2636. 6
  2637. 6
  2638. 6
  2639. 6
  2640. 6
  2641. 6
  2642. 6
  2643. 6
  2644. 6
  2645. 6
  2646. 6
  2647. 6
  2648. 6
  2649. 6
  2650. 6
  2651. 6
  2652. 6
  2653. 6
  2654. 6
  2655. 6
  2656. 6
  2657. 6
  2658. 6
  2659. Absolutely with you on this call to action, sir. Anyone who tells you that writing to your MP is a waste of time is either wholly misguided or speaking in bad faith. And any MP who does not hold surgeries is not an MP, but rather someone exploiting the title and privileges of an MP for their own nefarious means. As to freedom of speech, I’d put it even more simply: There is a simple difference between expressing your beliefs and opinions, and incitement. And, if you are inciting along with other inciters, you are taking part in a conspiracy. And conspiracies that lead to criminal harm are criminal conspiracies. As these people are beginning to discover, we already have multiple laws on the statute books which cover such instances. People on the far right, whilst using social media, love to use expressions like, “educate yourself,” and, “echo chamber,” when dealing with anybody who disagrees with their egregious take on the world. Well, now they are having it proved to them that they should have practiced what they preached. These are the lessons that will have a far greater impact on the far right, and will go further toward remedying the hate speech so rampant in modern discourse. It’s not just rounding up a few well photographed, well documented thugs, 70% of whom turned out to have previous convictions for violence and football hooliganism. But getting at the puppeteers and cutting their strings. I applaud the sentencing of this woman, and hope to God she will learn something from her experience. And I bet there are multiple other online, “activists,” urgently seeking legal advice as we speak. I do hope we jail at least double digits more of them?
    6
  2660. 6
  2661. 6
  2662. 6
  2663. 6
  2664. 6
  2665. 6
  2666. 6
  2667. 6
  2668. 6
  2669. 6
  2670. 6
  2671. 6
  2672. 6
  2673. 6
  2674. 6
  2675. 6
  2676. 6
  2677. 6
  2678. 6
  2679. 6
  2680. 6
  2681. 6
  2682. 6
  2683. 6
  2684. 6
  2685. 6
  2686. 6
  2687. 6
  2688. 6
  2689. 6
  2690. 6
  2691. 6
  2692. 6
  2693. 6
  2694. 6
  2695. 6
  2696. 6
  2697. 6
  2698. 6
  2699. 6
  2700. 6
  2701. 6
  2702. 6
  2703. 6
  2704. 6
  2705. 6
  2706. 6
  2707. 6
  2708. 6
  2709. 6
  2710. 6
  2711. 6
  2712. 6
  2713. 6
  2714. 6
  2715. 6
  2716. 6
  2717. 6
  2718. 6
  2719. 6
  2720. 6
  2721. 6
  2722. 6
  2723. 6
  2724. 6
  2725. 6
  2726. 6
  2727. 6
  2728. 6
  2729. 6
  2730. 6
  2731. 6
  2732. 6
  2733. 6
  2734. 6
  2735. 6
  2736. 6
  2737. 6
  2738. 6
  2739. 6
  2740. 6
  2741. 6
  2742. 6
  2743. 6
  2744. 6
  2745. 6
  2746.  @kevinfernandez6532  : Perhaps what you’re overlooking there is that, regardless of Putin’s dictates and however radically things change domestically for the Russians, the global economic forces at play are inescapable. There are a lot of variables and moving parts to these kinds of analyses, but the fact that Jake may be looking at them through an American lens doesn’t make them any less real globally. I don’t think anyone doubts that Putin will hurl as many bodies into this fight as he believes he can get away with. It has been estimated that this figure may be as high as 5,000,000 service aged men (and women) over a period of anywhere between 2 to 5 years, in the worst case scenarios. After that, there simply will not be anyone to take their places. But the civil unrest is expected to finally explode long before then, with the combination of shortages at home, losses of actual Ukrainian real estate being un-spinnable, and a range of other mounting political and economic pressures causing the collapse of the Putin government. Smart governments in the free world will prepare for the worst, whilst striving for better outcomes. And, to that end, our secret services diplomats, business magnates and media will all be playing a role. They will be looking to, “quietly,” support viable replacements for the Putin regime and offering funding and logistical support to that end. I lay no claim to any special knowledge here, but I know that this is how history has always worked. The only thing the west needs to do to win this thing, outright, to see Ukraine restored to full sovereignty, prosperity and security, is to stay the course, through thick and thin. Unlike the Middle Eastern and covert Latin American disasters we’ve seen since WWII, countries like Ukraine and Russia are both very susceptible to successful, “nation building,” programs, along the lines that Germany and Japan emerged so triumphantly from. They both went from aggressor nations, applying for acceptance back into the human race, to leading economic powerhouses and liberal democracies. Ukraine has VAST untapped reserves of all kinds of resources, right under its earth, as well as established economic growth potential from certain industries that were disrupted by this war. So, I am optimistic as to their future, so long as we never flinch and do not let them down. And, who knows? Maybe Russia will finally get its first ever democracy in more than 1,000 years?
    6
  2747. 6
  2748. 6
  2749. 6
  2750. 6
  2751. 6
  2752. 6
  2753. 6
  2754. 6
  2755. 6
  2756. 6
  2757. 6
  2758. 6
  2759. 6
  2760. 6
  2761. 6
  2762. 6
  2763.  @warriorprincess1846  : Honest, truthful answer? . . . A free country is being invaded by a dictatorship is what’s happening. Russia wants to establish the old borders of the Iron Curtain days and Putin has been forced to drop the pretence (that no one fell for anyway) that they were in some way a, “democratic,” country since the fall of the Soviet Union, when in fact, all that really happened was a Palace Coup in which the top KGB types had to scrabble for power whilst maintaining the pretence that the country was now free. Russia has a legitimate concern about the west, assisting former Iron Curtain countries toward democracy, especially if they were to become members of the same security arrangements, but actual invasion of a sovereign country is NOT a legitimate response unless you’re a gangster and dictator. Yes, it would be scary for Russia if Ukraine joined NATO and started housing nukes on the border of Russia, but that would remain an issue between Russia and Ukraine (and the UN or NATO) should that happen. But it’s not going to, nor was it likely. Therefore, this is obviously a pretext for grabbing power. Take the Cuban Missile Crisis for example. America had the same concerns that Russia does now, to get Russia’s nukes out of the Western Hemisphere and they played hardball over that. But they didn’t INVADE Cuba and take over the country. Just ask yourself, what right does ANY country have to decide how another runs its affairs? If this goes unanswered, what sense does it make to have ANY borders at all? Italy could decide to re establish the Roman Empire with more legitimacy than Putin has to invade Ukraine! Why not have the British Empire back? Russia has NO legitimate excuses for this. But Putin doesn’t understand grown up stuff, like context, history, truth or justice. He understands power, and who’s holding it. He thinks it’s better to ask forgiveness than permission, and thinks he’ll be in a stronger position once he has control of the Ukraine. It’s up to the rest of the world to make him see why he’s wrong, or we’re all f*cked. And that’s the honest truth, regardless of what you think of your western government.
    6
  2764. 6
  2765. 6
  2766. 6
  2767. 6
  2768. 6
  2769.  @basilmarasco1975  : Fascism is the ultimate Cancel Culture. What has Donny got in common with Franco, Mussolini and Hitler? All Qults of personality, who’s founding narrative is a racist lie, who take power through fear in their following and through intimidation, threats and actual violence against their opponents. All of them outlawed opposition parties, which was literally what Donny tried in his last weeks in office: never mind that it was misguided, childishly naive, and utterly incompetent. So was the Beer Hall Putsch, after all. They are Fascists, who’s mask has been torn off. Now, knowing that only other fascists will vote for fascism, they are attempting to re-rig the system, again, with a Cancel Culture that will cancel millions of minorities from voting at all. It has been a Stalinistic hallmark of the trump craze, to accuse everyone else of doing what they’re doing. Indeed, it has served as a handy barometer to know what scandal is about to be unveiled, or what egregious attempt at attacking the foundations of our Republic is about to occur next, under trump. So, Cancel Culture is their biggest complaint, as they move into their phase of attempting to cancel democracy. Trump demanded that Fox fires one of their chief contributors, only a few days ago, for disagreeing with him; and he’s still after Primarying Liz Cheney and others. Cancel Culture, that makes Joe McCarthy look like a reasonable Reaganite by comparison! Hypocrisy has always been part of the package with Fascism, historically speaking, but the GOP have made Hypocrisy into a lifestyle choice; a cultural norm, and a political ideology. Hypocrisy and playing the effeminate, “victim,” at any rate. ✌️
    6
  2770. 6
  2771. 6
  2772. 6
  2773. 6
  2774. 6
  2775. 6
  2776. 6
  2777. 6
  2778. 6
  2779. 6
  2780. 6
  2781. 6
  2782. 6
  2783. 6
  2784. 6
  2785. 6
  2786. 6
  2787. 6
  2788. 6
  2789. 6
  2790. 6
  2791. 6
  2792. 6
  2793. 6
  2794. 6
  2795. 6
  2796. 6
  2797. 6
  2798. 6
  2799. 6
  2800. 6
  2801. 6
  2802. 6
  2803. 6
  2804. 6
  2805. 6
  2806. 6
  2807. 6
  2808. 6
  2809. 6
  2810. 6
  2811. 6
  2812. 6
  2813. 6
  2814. 6
  2815. 6
  2816. 6
  2817. 6
  2818. 6
  2819. 6
  2820. 6
  2821. 6
  2822. 6
  2823. 6
  2824. 6
  2825. 6
  2826. 6
  2827. 6
  2828. 6
  2829. 6
  2830. 6
  2831. 6
  2832. 6
  2833. 6
  2834. 6
  2835. 6
  2836. 6
  2837. 6
  2838. 6
  2839. 6
  2840. 6
  2841. 6
  2842. 6
  2843. 6
  2844. 6
  2845. 6
  2846. 6
  2847. 6
  2848. 6
  2849. 6
  2850. 6
  2851. 6
  2852. 6
  2853. 6
  2854. 6
  2855. 6
  2856. 6
  2857. 6
  2858. 6
  2859. 6
  2860. 6
  2861. 6
  2862. 6
  2863. 6
  2864. 6
  2865. 6
  2866. 6
  2867. 6
  2868. 6
  2869. 6
  2870. 6
  2871. 6
  2872. 6
  2873. 6
  2874. 6
  2875. 6
  2876. 6
  2877. 6
  2878. 6
  2879. 6
  2880. 6
  2881. 6
  2882. 6
  2883. 6
  2884. 6
  2885. 6
  2886. 6
  2887. 6
  2888. 6
  2889. 6
  2890. 6
  2891. 6
  2892. 6
  2893. 6
  2894. 6
  2895. 6
  2896. 6
  2897. 6
  2898. 6
  2899. 6
  2900. 6
  2901. 6
  2902. 6
  2903. 6
  2904. 6
  2905. 6
  2906. 6
  2907.  simon temple  : It’s, “Incongruity,” that makes jokes work. The switch in the expectations of the audience. You paint a mental image in the mind of your audience; e.g. “What’s long, red, and dangles between Putin’s trembling knees?” The audience thinks of something rude, in all probably, so here comes the, “subversion of their expectation,” the, “switch,” in the punchline; “Donald Trump’s Tie.” The mental image has been flipped, and the audience lol’s because they’ve put the pieces together and expressed a sound that requires no further interaction; but shows they’ve gotten the joke and are ready for the next one . . . E.g; “A racist, a sex predator and an idiot walk into a bar, and the bartender says, ‘What are you having, Mr Trump?’” Bait and switch. We saw three separate people in our mind’s eye, then our expectation was subverted, as we realise the joke teller is saying all three describe one person. Jokes work in the same way riddles do, with a sense of satisfaction in the audience, at piecing the clues together, but much faster than riddles. We, the audience, solve the problem in our heads and are mildly flattered at being, “on the same page,” as the comedian. The release of tension is not only quicker than a riddle, but intensified by it’s speed, which is why one liners are so effective. The problem with Gutfeld’s, “comedy,” is that the, “switch,” is not coming. We already know the punchline. Just saying, “the master,” is, “racist,” and then using every instance of, “master,” known to humanity, involves no subversion and therefore is not, “technically,” even a joke. His other problem, when he, “has,” managed the subversion of expectation - slight of hand - is also the other, perennial, problem of comedy that so many bad comedians don’t get. Can your audience already predict where the subversion is leading? If they can, and the audience sees the punchline coming, there’s no real subversion, because even a child can predict the punchline. They feel smarter than the comedian, and vaguely insulted that they’re, “meant,” to be on that, low IQ wavelength. That’s why they call it, “telegraphed humor.” Because the audience has already received the telegram with the punchline delivered before the comedian can show up with it. It’s a delicate art, that skilled comics make, “look,” brash, when they’re really good at it. A lot of brash, shouty people make Gutfeld’s mistake, of thinking, “Because I am brash, I am therefore funny.” The two things are rarely compatible, which is why in real life, most of the, “brash comedians,” you meet are not like that at all, but usually polite, calm, reasonable people, who have an, “act.” Bill Burr, for example, is not permanently angry about everything. Humor is never funny when you analyse it. But, it’s a technical skill and an art form, like writing, acting, singing and dancing. The skill is in learning the technical stuff and then HIDING that from your audience, to make it LOOK natural; and being smart enough to know that it’s, “natural,” to no one, so you train and LEARN it in the first place. Gutfeld needs to punctuate all his, “gags,” with a child’s voice going, “OOF!” It’s literally like watching SNL do, “What if Fascists Tried To Be Funny?” He hasn’t learned the basic techniques of comedy, and like all Alt-Wrong idiots (trump especially) he thinks he just, “knows,” how it works, despite never having put in the hours for his craft. Now he’s paying the price for his arrogance. What would you bet that, when he packs it in, not too long from now, he won’t admit he’s not funny? What would you bet, that he blames, “Cancel Culture?” ✌️👍
    6
  2908. 6
  2909. 6
  2910. 6
  2911. 6
  2912. 6
  2913. 6
  2914. 6
  2915. 6
  2916. 6
  2917. 6
  2918.  @JustForFun-mt9og  : Ah, but so much has changed since then. Sure, that, “nobody,” got the harshest sentence law allows, but since then? When an almost exact copy of that guy took an automatic rifle to join his Fascist protesters, and shot up the very people who tried to restrain him, claiming MORE than one life, what happened this time? His bail got paid by Nazis and he was celebrated on the internet and DEFENDED on mainstream TV (talking about you, Fox & Fiends!) and he was free within 24 hours! And when he broke his bail conditions? They IGNORED IT! Then he breaks his bail terms again, and because of the media buzz, they reluctantly re-jail him, but this time he’s accompanied by a lawyer who already has a blank cheque from the Alt-Wrong to bail him right back out, despite the fact that his plans to flee America are on the internet, and the prosecution tells the judge he’s a flight risk! I don’t think he even saw the inside of a cell that time? And where is that multiple homicide waiting to happen again? Who knows? He FLED, as predicted! As he SAID he would! As the prosecution TOLD the judge he was planning to! So, yeah. Things are very different now. Now you can do worse than kill an innocent civilian. You can kill two, whilst wounding many more, and become a folk hero, like some Nazi Jessie James, and remain free to tick away like a desperate time bomb with nothing to lose, when you are finally located. That’s the influence of trump’s presidency. If that other kid had waited a year, before running down multiple people and killing a woman with his car, he’d probably be sitting in a Canadian bar, swapping stories with Jessie James, about how, “cool,” the internet thinks they are, if you like Nazi websites . . . We’ve got a looohhht of work to do, America. And it’s all about educating our youth. Education needs a Moonshot Investment
    6
  2919. 6
  2920. 6
  2921. 6
  2922. 6
  2923. 6
  2924. 6
  2925. 6
  2926. 6
  2927. 6
  2928. 6
  2929. 6
  2930. 6
  2931. 6
  2932. 6
  2933. 6
  2934. 6
  2935. 6
  2936. 6
  2937. 6
  2938. 6
  2939. 6
  2940. 6
  2941. 6
  2942. 6
  2943. 6
  2944. 6
  2945. 6
  2946. 6
  2947. 6
  2948. 6
  2949. 6
  2950.  @michaelwilliamson4759  : Felix Sater can be looked up on YouTube. He was a mafia hood, who fled Russia and joined up with the New York Mafia. He befriended Trump and set him up with Russian insiders, who figured out a way to launder money, via Russian donations to the NRA, which were then laundered and became NRA donations to the GOP and to trump individually. Sater got busted by the FBI and became an informer, working for them to bring down several New York Mobsters and a few Russian spies. However, he couldn’t resist temptation and he saw the possibility of his buddy, trump, becoming president, as a potential ticket to immunity from charges on all the crimes he continued to commit, despite being an FBI informant. His story is complicated, but the documentaries are fascinating. He was heavily involved in the propaganda campaign to get Donny elected in 2016, and he genuinely thought he was going to jail for a long, long time, when the FBI caught him, “going off script.” Don’t trust the right wing propaganda services though. Look at a reliable source, if you want the truth? He’s a typical example of the filth that Donny is mixed up with. A long time personal friend of Donny’s. In the same way that the leader of the Proud Boys turned out to be a regular FBI informant, who has helped to bring down a lot of criminal operations, he has been able to use the ongoing confusion and propaganda to keep himself relevant (and not yet dead) among the criminal underclass of America. But, just like that guy, who’s lawyer listed multiple occasions on which he’s BETRAYED his criminal followers, TO A JUDGE, IN COURT, the Q Qult are SO confused, they don’t know what to believe, so they, “believe,” what they prefer, rather than the facts. And that’s why they keep getting exposed. Everyone who leads them, is the ultimate TRAITOR who brings them down in the end. Felix Sater is just like that. Hope you found that helpful?
    6
  2951. 6
  2952. 6
  2953. 6
  2954. 6
  2955. 6
  2956. 6
  2957. 6
  2958. 6
  2959. 6
  2960. 6
  2961. 6
  2962. 6
  2963. 6
  2964. 6
  2965. 6
  2966. 6
  2967. 6
  2968. 6
  2969. 6
  2970. 6
  2971. 6
  2972. 6
  2973. 6
  2974. 6
  2975. 6
  2976. 6
  2977. 6
  2978. 6
  2979. 6
  2980. 6
  2981. 6
  2982.  @barrone9317  : But, they won’t succeed, if they are broken at Donny’s impeachment. Forget the, “verdict,” but the Trial itself. Lindsay is desperate for a rerun of the last one; but this time, witnesses will take the stand and testify. And they can call anyone, including trump on down. None can take the 5th, and none can refuse. The, “Steal,” is the very reason the insurrection occurred, and there are already countless pleas and testimonies to that effect, from the rioters arrested so far. So, where did they get the idea that, “The Steal,” was a real thing from? Time to cross examine Graham, Hawley, Cruz, et al, right? And, they cannot say, under oath, on Live TV, that they have, “evidence,” for it? The best they can say is that they got it from Donny and believed him, Coz’ him being the president, and all. “I was only following orders.” Witness after witness will have to take the stand and either get ripped to shreds, and possibly indicted for Perjury, or? . . . Confess! That they KNEW the, “steal,” was a political ploy and a seditious LIE, all along! And how many will do that? I think most of them, IF they get up there to answer questions? What else CAN they do? Especially when one cracks, the rest will follow, or their testimonies won’t match and people are back at risk of Perjury charges again! I’m telling you, this trial will crack the GOP right through! It is about to fracture into two halves! The desperate Nazi criminals on one side, and the system gamers, hoping to survive on the other. And that’s WHY Graham is travelling the country, trying to get, “popular opinion,” stirred up! He really is at the end of his rope! And they’re right to be. Time for some accountability, at long last. America deserves a reckoning 😉✌️👍
    6
  2983. 6
  2984. 6
  2985. 6
  2986. 6
  2987. 6
  2988. 6
  2989. 6
  2990. 6
  2991. 6
  2992. 6
  2993. 6
  2994. 6
  2995. 6
  2996. 6
  2997. 6
  2998. 6
  2999. 6
  3000. 6
  3001. 6
  3002. 6
  3003. 6
  3004. 6
  3005. 6
  3006. 6
  3007. 6
  3008. 6
  3009. 6
  3010. 6
  3011. 6
  3012. 6
  3013. 6
  3014. 6
  3015. 6
  3016. 6
  3017. 6
  3018. 6
  3019. 6
  3020. 6
  3021. 6
  3022. 6
  3023. 6
  3024. 6
  3025. 6
  3026. 6
  3027. 6
  3028. 6
  3029. 6
  3030. 6
  3031. 6
  3032. 6
  3033. 6
  3034.  @nunook5522  : I suspect that Dane’s, “job,” is to be a source of anger and division. Every topic that comes out of Russia, only to be processed through Fox, Q and Alex Jonestown, is aimed at, “Division,” as its primary goal. It’s the one weapon that our enemies have employed that actually increases their power, and weakens America. Dane would have no point in existing, if he wasn’t paid to spread division. And, most of them are paid. The ones on MSM at any rate. Think about it? Who, other than the mentally ill, would waste 5 years of their life, going to forums they hate, to talk to people they hate, about all the things they hate, day after day, for all that time? Without EVER once, trying to, “persuade,” anyone or change someone’s mind, but just to entrench that all important DIVISION? It’s the only, “agenda,” that makes sense. The, “narrative,” is less important, as it’s just the vehicle for that Division. You’ll see a LOT of Anti-Vaxers in the coming months, for example. Unable to get traction with trump, and with, “the steal,” on the threshold of public debunking, by the very people who perpetrated that lie, as they’re forced to testify about it, Putin will turn his attention to the issue that causes maximum Division in real time; and maximum harm, with the potential for violence and civil disorder. He’ll spread the word and his American outlets, Fox, etc, will process that, spreading, “doubts,” and blaming the vaccine for various illnesses, telling us there’s microchips in it, etc. I can make that prediction with full confidence, because America’s enemies are predictable; stupid, but cunning. Like a dumb animal, it may be an idiot, but it’s dangerous ✌️👍
    6
  3035. 6
  3036. 6
  3037. 6
  3038. 6
  3039. 6
  3040. 6
  3041. 6
  3042. 6
  3043. 6
  3044. 6
  3045. 6
  3046. 6
  3047. 6
  3048. 6
  3049. 6
  3050. 6
  3051. 6
  3052. 6
  3053. 6
  3054. 6
  3055. 6
  3056. 6
  3057. 6
  3058. 6
  3059. 6
  3060. 6
  3061. 6
  3062. 6
  3063. 6
  3064. 6
  3065. 6
  3066. 6
  3067. 6
  3068. 6
  3069. 6
  3070. 6
  3071. 6
  3072. 6
  3073. 6
  3074. 6
  3075. 6
  3076. 6
  3077. For what it’s worth, from a historian’s POV, here’s my analysis. If I get this right, I want a prize or something. Putin’s 6 mistakes so far: 1) Underestimating Ukrainian Resolve: Putin should have watched Ukraine On Fire on Netflix. 2) Overestimating his own armed forces. Their equipment is out of date and the boots on the ground are mostly conscripts. One person defending their home has 20 times the fight in them than one conscript who doesn’t want to be there. 3) Stated Objectives: No one in Russia knows WHY this is happening! Putin spent the last 20 years convincing Russians their claims on Ukraine were legit, because they are the, “same people and country,” essentially. Now they’re meant to go kill them all? 4) Putin’s REAL objectives: The whole point is to make sure Shell, Exxon and BP NEVER get to drill for those massive gas and oil reserves which rival Russia’s. It would take years to get it pumping, so he doesn’t want to pump it himself, either. He just wants to make sure NO ONE does, making him the only major supplier in Europe and the second biggest supplier in the world. 5) The west’s real objectives: Which brings us to Putin’s shock at the west’s resolve. Ever since energy security was a thing, for more than a 100 years, the west has NEVER relinquished control of energy security to the East, and they’re not going to start now, right or wrong. 6) How this ends: The west will remain as cautious as it dares to be and, sadly, won’t put Ukraine’s interests above that of energy security. Zelensky’s job is to keep those two interests aligned and to ensure he honours those deals with western oil developers to pay for rebuilding his country, along with reparations from Russia. If he plays his cards right, he could turn Ukraine into an energy powerhouse for the next 20 to 30 years, until the world is off its fossil fuel addiction? Which would only help move countries like Hungary toward democracy and away from reliance on a weakened Russia. Putin will bluff about nukes, but he wants to live as badly as any cowardly bully. He has mistaken the west’s caution for irresolution. They will not allow him to keep Ukraine. But since he keeps threatening nukes, they will do absolutely everything in their power; fomenting revolution in Russia, pouring in resources to Ukraine, long after they’re occupied, and anything else, and sanctions are only just getting started, until Putin is taken out in a palace coup, or taken down by a revolution. Governments of the west will prefer the palace coup for the sake of stability. We should hope for the Revolution, for the sake of real change.
    6
  3078. 6
  3079. 6
  3080. 6
  3081. 6
  3082.  @JamesKerLindsay  : My only criticism of your video is that you conflate, “process,” with, “reasons.” The fact is, the EU could cut all of the red tape and they would, if they thought it was in their interests to do so. They have legitimate reasons not to, but bureaucracy is not one of them. Ukraine couldn’t meet their conditions as they are, even if Putin wasn’t stealing all their gas and oil reserves in a war of theft and murder, dressed up to look like, “liberation,’’ on Russian state controlled TV. What this really shows us is that the Iron Curtain may have moved a little bit, and even been somewhat opaque since the 1990’s, but it never actually fell. Putin has been forced to show his cards and end his bluff. They ditched the inconvenience of Communist Ideology and absorbed the mafia into the KGB to form the government Putin has had control over ever since a partially blackmailed and perpetually drunk Boris Yeltsin sleepwalked Russia back from the brink of freedom and into the arms of a tyrant. The European Union KNOWS that this is about the massive energy reserves that Ukraine is sitting on. They know Putin has been able to frighten off Shell and Exxon, who bought the rights to develop it, and they KNOW it’s no coincidence that these reserves just happen to be off the Crimean coast, in the Donbas region and now confirmed to be in the west of Ukraine, where Putin can’t prevent their development, or be sure they’re not been developed behind his back. You can plot the root his troops are taking, on Googlemaps, and figure out where they’ll go next, before they make a move! It’s THAT predictable. Now they’re making their move to the Carpathian Mountain range, to block all access to (you guessed it!) massive gas and oil reserves!
    6
  3083. 6
  3084. 6
  3085. 6
  3086. 6
  3087. 6
  3088. 6
  3089. 6
  3090. 6
  3091. 6
  3092. 6
  3093. 6
  3094. 6
  3095. 6
  3096. 5
  3097. 5
  3098. 5
  3099. 5
  3100. 5
  3101. 5
  3102. 5
  3103. 5
  3104. 5
  3105. 5
  3106. 5
  3107. 5
  3108. 5
  3109. 5
  3110. 5
  3111. 5
  3112. 5
  3113. 5
  3114. 5
  3115. 5
  3116. 5
  3117. 5
  3118. 5
  3119. 5
  3120. 5
  3121. 5
  3122. 5
  3123. 5
  3124. 5
  3125. 5
  3126. 5
  3127. 5
  3128. 5
  3129. 5
  3130. 5
  3131. 5
  3132. 5
  3133. 5
  3134. [name here] : Your abusive, angry, scared and somewhat, “Butt Hurt,” approach to argument, speaks VOLUMES about your insecurity and the FACT that you KNOW you are WRONG. Whether that is deep down inside you or you’re just another paid Troll, is irrelevant, but you are doing Putin’s work for him. So, “How is Putin benefiting from a Trump presidency?” SO FAR? * Putin OWNS Syria. The Dems were going to push him out, or at least back to his naval base there. So, Putin would NOT have been able to prop up Assad, and THAT “administration” would be GONE by now and we WOULDN’T be looking at images of innocent children being BOMBED by the TERRORIST government and the Russians NOW, if Trump had lost. * The SANCTIONS have STILL not been enforced, (a LOT of Putin’s PERSONAL CASH is involved there) and there WOULD have been MORE sanctions on Russia by now. Putin lives in DREAD of this, because he and his FSB GOONS have sucked up SO MUCH money from the people, that their economy is WAY TOO FRAGILE to cope with the instability that would result from MASS POVERTY in his country. Who knows, they may have already REMOVED PUTIN by now, had there been a Democrat government? Why do you “think” Putin HATES Hillary SO MUCH? Because he was SCARED of her. And I say this as a CONSERVATIVE. NOT saying I support these things. I’m just saying WHAT WOULD have happened. * Then there’s the Ukraine and the Crimea and Poland and Turkey to think about. How is Putin going to mange his “Buffer States” while he has to shift his armed forces into Moscow to prevent a coup? I COULD describe the very DIFFERENT CHAOS each one of those countries represents to Putin, but as I’m NOT speaking for YOUR benefit, I won’t bother. People who WANT the TRUTH, will find it. You ARE, after all, just a Troll 😁
    5
  3135. 5
  3136. 5
  3137. 5
  3138. 5
  3139. 5
  3140. 5
  3141. 5
  3142. 5
  3143. 5
  3144. 5
  3145. 5
  3146. 5
  3147. 5
  3148. 5
  3149. 5
  3150. 5
  3151. 5
  3152. 5
  3153. 5
  3154. 5
  3155. 5
  3156. 5
  3157. 5
  3158. 5
  3159. 5
  3160. 5
  3161. 5
  3162. 5
  3163. 5
  3164.  @catherinerhea6336  : Your remarks concerning ANTIFA are actually no different to my own. I said they don’t always use lawful methods, but I don’t dismiss their organisation. However, they do have a lot of hot headed activists among them, with countless incidents that reflect badly on their number. BLM never promotes violence, and is careful to take people to their protests, who will police their own people, and separate infiltrators, or hot heads, from their number, in real time. I am with ANTIFA, 100%, in their goals and ideology, so far as I understand it? They want to rid democratic countries of Nazis, prevent their infiltration into mainstream affairs, and raise awareness as to the history of Fascism and the very real threat Nazis pose in today’s world. They can have my donations for that cause, but I won’t join them, because I’ve seen far too many incidents when they allow themselves to become the opposite side to the Nazi coinage: which is the very trap that the Nancy Boys lay out for them. BLM is a charity, a political awareness group, and a support group. It has no truck with violent confrontation, and avoids it at (almost) all costs. They’re not in the same currency as Nazis, and one of the reasons they beat them, and have become so respected as to have a Square named after them in New York, is because they understand: The art of never losing the game? Don’t play. That’s all I meant. Until ANTIFA starts policing itself better, cleans up its act and gets bold enough to discipline its own members for acts of violence (once again, something that BLM policy includes) I cannot subscribe. I can only be a part of a group that I need not apologise for. The very small minority of ANTIFA do themselves a disservice by using aggressive or violent tactics, but the organisation as a whole, does itself a bigger disservice, by not expelling these members ✌️
    5
  3165. 5
  3166. 5
  3167. 5
  3168. 5
  3169. 5
  3170. 5
  3171. 5
  3172. 5
  3173. 5
  3174. 5
  3175. 5
  3176. 5
  3177. 5
  3178. 5
  3179. 5
  3180. 5
  3181. 5
  3182. 5
  3183. 5
  3184. 5
  3185. 5
  3186. 5
  3187. 5
  3188. 5
  3189. 5
  3190. 5
  3191. 5
  3192. 5
  3193. 5
  3194. 5
  3195. 5
  3196. 5
  3197. 5
  3198. 5
  3199. 5
  3200. 5
  3201. 5
  3202. 5
  3203. 5
  3204. 5
  3205. 5
  3206. 5
  3207. 5
  3208. 5
  3209. 5
  3210. 5
  3211. 5
  3212. 5
  3213. 5
  3214. 5
  3215. 5
  3216. 5
  3217. 5
  3218. 5
  3219. 5
  3220. 5
  3221. 5
  3222. 5
  3223. 5
  3224. 5
  3225. 5
  3226. 5
  3227. 5
  3228. 5
  3229. 5
  3230. 5
  3231. 5
  3232. 5
  3233. 5
  3234. 5
  3235. 5
  3236. 5
  3237. 5
  3238. 5
  3239. 5
  3240. 5
  3241. 5
  3242. 5
  3243. 5
  3244. 5
  3245. 5
  3246. 5
  3247. 5
  3248. 5
  3249. 5
  3250. 5
  3251. 5
  3252. 5
  3253. 5
  3254. 5
  3255. 5
  3256. 5
  3257. 5
  3258. 5
  3259. 5
  3260. 5
  3261. For what it’s worth; and forgive me for being long here? But, I’m interested in what you think of this, seeing as it’s your profession? . . . It’s, “Incongruity,” that makes jokes work. The switch in the expectations of the audience. You paint a mental image in the mind of your audience; e.g. “What’s long, red, and dangles between Putin’s trembling knees?” The audience thinks of something rude, in all probably, so here comes the, “subversion of their expectation,” the, “switch,” in the punchline; “Donald Trump’s Tie.” The mental image has been flipped, and the audience lol’s because they’ve put the pieces together and expressed a sound that requires no further interaction; but shows they’ve gotten the joke and are ready for the next one . . . E.g; “A racist, a sex predator and an idiot walk into a bar, and the bartender says, ‘What are you having, Mr Trump?’” Bait and switch. We saw three separate people in our mind’s eye, then our expectation was subverted, as we realise the joke teller is saying all three describe one person. Jokes work in the same way riddles do, with a sense of satisfaction in the audience, at piecing the clues together, but much faster than riddles. We, the audience, solve the problem in our heads and are mildly flattered at being, “on the same page,” as the comedian. The release of tension is not only quicker than a riddle, but intensified by it’s speed, which is why one liners are so effective. The problem with Gutfeld’s, “comedy,” is that the, “switch,” is not coming. We already know the punchline. Just saying, “the master,” is, “racist,” and then using every instance of, “master,” known to humanity, involves no subversion and therefore is not, “technically,” even a joke. His other problem, when he, “has,” managed the subversion of expectation - slight of hand - is also the other, perennial, problem of comedy that so many bad comedians don’t get. Can your audience already predict where the subversion is leading? If they can, and the audience sees the punchline coming, there’s no real subversion, because even a child can predict the punchline. They feel smarter than the comedian, and vaguely insulted that they’re, “meant,” to be on that, low IQ wavelength. That’s why they call it, “telegraphed humor.” Because the audience has already received the telegram with the punchline delivered before the comedian can show up with it. It’s a delicate art, that skilled comics make, “look,” brash, when they’re really good at it. A lot of brash, shouty people make Gutfeld’s mistake, of thinking, “Because I am brash, I am therefore funny.” The two things are rarely compatible, which is why in real life, most of the, “brash comedians,” you meet are not like that at all, but usually polite, calm, reasonable people, who have an, “act.” Bill Burr, for example, is not permanently angry about everything. Humor is never funny when you analyse it. But, it’s a technical skill and an art form, like writing, acting, singing and dancing. The skill is in learning the technical stuff and then HIDING that from your audience, to make it LOOK natural; and being smart enough to know that it’s, “natural,” to no one, so you train and LEARN it in the first place. Gutfeld needs to punctuate all his, “gags,” with a child’s voice going, “OOF!” It’s literally like watching SNL do, “What if Fascists Tried To Be Funny?” He hasn’t learned the basic techniques of comedy, and like all Alt-Wrong idiots (trump especially) he thinks he just, “knows,” how it works, despite never having put in the hours for his craft. Now he’s paying the price for his arrogance. What would you bet that, when he packs it in, not too long from now, he won’t admit he’s not funny? What would you bet, that he blames, “Cancel Culture?” ✌️👍
    5
  3262. 5
  3263. 5
  3264. 5
  3265. 5
  3266. 5
  3267. 5
  3268. 5
  3269. 5
  3270. 5
  3271. 5
  3272. 5
  3273. 5
  3274. 5
  3275. 5
  3276. 5
  3277. 5
  3278. 5
  3279. 5
  3280. 5
  3281. I appreciate you taking a moment to process this moment that so many will either shy away from, or discuss in a sensationalistic, immature manner. Thank you, once again, for being our, “adult in the room.” We see so many stars abuse their privileges and take their public for granted, only to be like Icarus flying too close to the sun. But in their cases, it’s only their own lives they’re truly ruining, when they crash into the sea, as the splash settles, the waves are restored and the ocean forgets them. Only Daedalus remembers who they really were. With people like Glitter, Saville and Harris, the oily stain remains atop that ocean, keeping the shattered corpse afloat for all to see, having soiled that patch of ocean forever and threatening to stain any who swim too close. Whilst Daedalus looks down and wonders which of his creations was more ill-conceived. The deepest, longer lasting, unseen tragedy of Rolf Harris is the worry and guilt he infected so many parents, producers, colleagues, and so on, with. The sensation of being the parent of a child who sat in that group of kids on Rolf’s Cartoon Club, unsupervised, or those kids in those Teach Your Kids To Swim public information things and so on. The conversations those situations must have forced people to have with (possibly adult by now?) loved ones; the doubt; the breaking of trust . . . The unforgivable selfishness of the sexual predator who exploits his privileges to gain access to children is more chilling than any horror narrative I could dream up.
    5
  3282. 5
  3283. 5
  3284. 5
  3285. 5
  3286. 5
  3287. 5
  3288. 5
  3289. 5
  3290. 5
  3291. 5
  3292. 5
  3293. 5
  3294. 5
  3295. 5
  3296. 5
  3297. 5
  3298. 5
  3299. 5
  3300. 5
  3301. 5
  3302. 5
  3303. 5
  3304. 5
  3305. 5
  3306. 5
  3307. 5
  3308. 5
  3309. 5
  3310. 5
  3311. 5
  3312. And, despite all of their different agendas and perspectives, every single expert, police spokesperson or MP who has discussed this person, all agree about one thing: the clues were all there and he would have been tossed from the police many years ago, had those clues all been in one place, like his record. So, the only question that remains for us (for those of us who want to prevent other such cases, and uncover any others that may yet be out there?) is what are we going to do about this? Surely it’s vetting and reviewing procedures that need to change? I would call for single standard of vetting that covers all vocational professions where public trust is an issue? Covering the medical, caring professions, armed services and police services. A benchmark standard that is comprehensive, easy to understand because it’s built on common sense and basic moral principles, and that applies equally to all? Does that seem like a big ask? Because people love acronyms so much, call it Trust and Universal Standards (STU) or something? All professionals have to get their STU Card, before going into policing, nursing, the army, etc? With a points system that could apply, like those on driver’s licences? Too many points and you can no longer serve in trusted professions? But with some categories able to expire over a period of years, so you can reapply and be vetted again, but with other categories staying on your card permanently? Of course MP’s and senior civil servants wouldn’t be keen on having it apply to them, but they might get on board if it didn’t? ✌️
    5
  3313. 5
  3314. 5
  3315. 5
  3316. 5
  3317. 5
  3318. 5
  3319. 5
  3320. 5
  3321. 5
  3322. 5
  3323. 5
  3324. 5
  3325. 5
  3326. 5
  3327. 5
  3328. 5
  3329. 5
  3330. 5
  3331. 5
  3332. 5
  3333. 5
  3334. 5
  3335. 5
  3336. 5
  3337. 5
  3338. 5
  3339. 5
  3340. 5
  3341. 5
  3342. 5
  3343. 5
  3344. 5
  3345. 5
  3346. 5
  3347. 5
  3348. 5
  3349. 5
  3350. 5
  3351. 5
  3352. 5
  3353. 5
  3354. 5
  3355. 5
  3356. 5
  3357. 5
  3358. 5
  3359. 5
  3360. 5
  3361. 5
  3362. 5
  3363. 5
  3364. 5
  3365. 5
  3366. 5
  3367. 5
  3368. 5
  3369. 5
  3370. 5
  3371. 5
  3372. 5
  3373. I heard about the ISW’s (Institute for Studies in Warfare) assessment, which bares out my own comment last week. That Putin seems to be deliberately reducing Prigozhin’s Wagner group, whilst blocking his attempts to refill his ranks from gyms, clubs and prisons around Russia. Russia’s internal wars mean that Ukraine has not faced properly trained, equipped and supported soldiers for some time now, but just sheer overwhelming numbers, with occasional injections of special forces groups, here and there, but not in any significant numbers. I do not fear for what might happen when the Russians finally do put their best on the front lines, as they lost their very best in the battle for Kiev and their failed invasion attempts around the whole eastern half of Ukraine last year. Putin might think he’s buying time to train and equip his latest swathe of conscripts, but they simply will not have the experience, will or matching equipment to halt Ukraine’s Spring offensive. Once Putin has less Ukrainian real estate than he began with in February of last year, combined with new countries joining NATO and the sheer financial losses Russia has suffered, all topped off with China’s visit making it clear that Putin cannot expect any significant under the table assistance, and Russia are now China’s junior partner, his position as leader will be untenable. Unless Russia breaks up and becomes like North Korea with China’s assistance - while China soaks up the populations of Russia’s southern regions into their borders, because, “populations,” (particularly young people) are what China so badly needs right now, I can’t even see how Putin survives into next year?
    5
  3374. 5
  3375. 5
  3376. 5
  3377. 5
  3378. 5
  3379. 5
  3380. 5
  3381. Who here actually thinks the base really, “believes,” the Big Lie? I’m not convinced. I think a minority believes, but not the vast majority. I think it’s much more like a massive emotional disorder, fuelled by their gaslighting parental figures in their, “leadership.” It always looks, sounds and smells like a conspiracy, whenever I talk to a qultist. It’s more of a unmet, “need.” An emotional pain (like the one we all felt in 2016) but kept aflame through the politics of grievance, racism, and victimhood. It’s more of a willingness to disregard logic, facts and the truth, as an act of, “loyalty,” and, “self-sacrifice,” like in Stalin’s Communist Russia. Stalin used to take pleasure in getting on the podium, and announcing a huge flip flop, and acting like things had always been that way, just to see the party’s reaction. He did that with the famine. They all made it a central aspect of their policy as matters grew worse, due to false science (a whole other story) until, one day, Stalin literally announced to a crowd of thousands that, “There is no famine.” And that was that. Many Millions died. But, not one soul dared even MENTION its existence from that day, until the day he died. It was a test of, “loyalty,” to deny reality, and any who contradicted party doctrine went to the gulag. Anyone dumb enough to contradict Stalin with hearing range was robbed and executed. And they got to a point where many of his victims, the imprisoned widows of the executed party members, literally blamed themselves! So convinced they were, that, “if Big Brother says it’s five fingers, it’s five fingers.” The point, I guess I’m struggling to make here, is that the term, (even the concept of) “Belief,” becomes less relevant, to a gas lit society. It’s an emotional drive, working around the clock, and it takes commitment and hard work to go full on fascist, or Commie, or whatever clockwork world Donny is trying to replace our Republic with! The kind of deep seated emotional disorder that drives people to, rather than keep telling their kids that school has got it wrong, they change the laws, so you can’t teach about slavery anymore! That’s literally happening in Florida and Texas! The kind of hatred that makes it easier to have news stations that tell you what you want to hear, rather than what is! The kind of mental disorder that literally makes it EASIER to choose to unseat your democratically elected government, tear down your Republic and KILL people to do that, rather than accept that your Qult leader was WRONG about anything! America has an illness, for sure. But, “belief,” is not the issue. One needs to have thought through and had full knowledge of the facts, in order to avoid traps and to distort reality into a lie in the first place. It takes knowledge of the truth to lie about it. Which is why I believe the Qult KNOWS the truth but they just don’t CARE! They’re too emotionally harmed to care. But, if we don’t match that level of emotional drive and commitment, they will overwhelm us. Until the truth itself will become a radical notion; unsafe and life threatening even to utter. Our job is to curate the truth at all costs. To preserve it and protect it. We are at greater risk than we know, if we won’t acknowledge we are under direct, fascist attack. And what they call, “culture war,” is actually just war. They are coming for the facts; for the truth; for hope, sanity and reason, to force us into a hell scape of Stalinist anti-intellectual, anti-truth SLAVERY. Personally, I would rather die. But, I’d rather it doesn’t come to that? By all legal means necessary, we must fight with everything we’ve got in us, and more. Because if you don’t think the trumpists are willing to do that, then you’ve underestimated them. We did that once before. There are no second chances. There never is with fascism. It’s always all or nothing. We must win. Failure really is not an option. God bless America. God bless us all. ✌️
    5
  3382. 5
  3383. 5
  3384. 5
  3385. 5
  3386. 5
  3387. 5
  3388. 5
  3389. 5
  3390. 5
  3391. 5
  3392. 5
  3393. 5
  3394. 5
  3395. 5
  3396. 5
  3397. 5
  3398. 5
  3399. 5
  3400. 5
  3401. 5
  3402. 5
  3403. 5
  3404. 5
  3405. Exactly. What do we take from this? “Women can’t speak for or stand up for themselves?” Because now it’s the 1950’s again? So much for feminism! The Me Too movement can go f*ck itself it seems? We’re back to having the men fight over a woman’s personal sense of offence. “Free speech is not protected?” because not one soul spoke up for Chris Rock or defended his right to do his job without fear of assault? The racists get to say, “See? You can’t even prevent black on black crime at the Oscars!” and make every racist case they like without fear of contradiction. And the academy responds by GASLIGHTING us, in a statement that says they won’t tolerate such acts, at the very moment that they do EXACTLY THAT! And don’t even MENTION the fact that Jada was feeling sensitive about a lame joke over hair loss, NOT CANCER or anything serious like that! Because Mr Smith has made it clear that we all have to apply to a third party for the privilege of having her name in our, “f*cking mouths,” like she was his 10 year old daughter or something! Man, F*ck will smith and f*ck Hollywood. And double f*ck Jada Plinket Smith for putting him up to it and not condemning it in the moment. She obviously hates feminism. The only good thing to come out of this was the fact that we all got to see Hollywood’s GIANT HYPOCRISY on full display. And the only person who comes out of this well is Chris Rock, who was an absolute star, handling it beautifully. Even when the academy really hung him out to dry.
    5
  3406. 5
  3407. 5
  3408. 5
  3409. 5
  3410. 5
  3411. 5
  3412. 5
  3413. 5
  3414. 5
  3415. 5
  3416. 5
  3417. 5
  3418. 5
  3419. 5
  3420. 5
  3421. 5
  3422. 5
  3423. 5
  3424. 5
  3425. 5
  3426. 5
  3427. 5
  3428. 5
  3429. 5
  3430. 5
  3431. 5
  3432. 5
  3433. 5
  3434. 5
  3435. 5
  3436. 5
  3437. 5
  3438. 5
  3439. 5
  3440. 5
  3441. 5
  3442. 5
  3443. 5
  3444. 5
  3445. 5
  3446. 5
  3447. Yes. And isn’t there something uniquely American flavoured about that? Even if we see it everywhere? I’d like to see them do a follow up video to this one? Almost every sentence could have been a whole topic unto itself. The most powerful element of this video, for me, was something they only touched on briefly: the model of American Capitalism, unique to that country, which allows healthcare to fall into the hands of the profiteers, and doesn’t ban the marketing of witch’s brews. A whole video should be dedicated to how American Capitalism has shaped healthcare and created the environment for such a vast market to grow out of vanity, insecurities mixed with genuine, unmet health concerns? Gwyneth Paltrow with a Carpet Bag is an image that symbolises those things for me. She realised that she was past her prime, by Hollywood’s ruthless, sexist metric, and clearly meditated on the solution to that problem, as Hollywood has defined it for her, rather than the mental health problems they create, becoming both the ultimate victim of their unfair, unrealistic standards for women, whilst becoming the ultimate perpetrator, practically recreating an overnight industry leader in pseudo-science and old wife’s tales. She certainly breathed new life into the existing models. She’s Red Dead Redemption’s Nigel West Dickens, for the 21st Century. Not all bad, but certainly a little sinister. There’s a movie script in that, probably? And, with equal rights and progressive attitudes towards women, have come equal exploitation opportunities of cosmetics, wellness and fitness cures for men. Isn’t Captain America the ultimate embodiment of that? Tony Stark famously told him in the first Avengers movie, “Everything special about you came out of a bottle.” To which Steve Rogers should have said, “Well, duh! That’s the American way. And I’m Captain, ‘who,’ again?”
    5
  3448. 5
  3449. 5
  3450. 5
  3451. 5
  3452. 5
  3453. 5
  3454. 5
  3455. 5
  3456. 5
  3457. 5
  3458. 5
  3459. 5
  3460. 5
  3461. 5
  3462. 5
  3463. 5
  3464. 5
  3465. 5
  3466. 5
  3467. 5
  3468. 5
  3469. 5
  3470. 5
  3471. 5
  3472. 5
  3473. 5
  3474. 5
  3475. 5
  3476. 5
  3477. 5
  3478. 5
  3479. 5
  3480. 5
  3481. 5
  3482. 5
  3483. 5
  3484. 5
  3485. 5
  3486. 5
  3487. 5
  3488. 5
  3489. 5
  3490. 5
  3491. 5
  3492. 5
  3493. 5
  3494. 5
  3495. 5
  3496.  @thomaasfist6494  : If these times have taught us any lessons, among them is that people are swiftly becoming more politically literate and aware. As one section of the population devolves into unfocused race hate and rage, the other is growing up. It’s up to us, to use our, “collective bargaining power,” to push hardest on the agendas that matter. With America’s highest ever percentage of population turnout for an election, the politicians on both sides are NOT going to ignore the will of the people, if they’re firm, articulate, and loud. Don’t forget, Biden was all but retired. Like Horatius at the Bridge, he was quite clear to all America, he came back for one purpose, to STOP TRUMP. He may well announce he isn’t running for POTUS next time? He has ONE JOB; to make another trump an impossibility. And that’s where he will need OUR, YOUR support. Trump himself, is likely to give us a head start, by rendering himself and his family, unable to ever hold office again, by admitting to a list of serious felonies; that is, after all, a requirement of accepting pardons? But, we should ALL be worried about the possibility of the next sociopath, who is every bit as dangerous as trump, but able to talk, and convince people? Trump was visibly a moron, but imagine if he was clever and charming? Or, at least, appeared that way? Which is why, the most important thing we can do, is to make it so the mere THOUGHT of trying this kind of crap again, makes GOP members turn white with terror. Examples must be made, from the very top Senators, down to the lowest Covfefe boy. Whomsoever has blood on their hands must be PUNISHED to the HARSHEST levels the law allows. And trump’s enablers who don’t go to jail, must be ostracised, and viewed as toxic to ANY brand. And the only way to do that, is to prove to the cult, that THEY were the worst victimised, scammed and targeted group of Americans that Donny harmed MORE than any other. Which won’t be difficult, if the DOJ becomes truly independent? Same for Covid too. It’s a tough one, but we’ve learned a lot in the last 4 years. Now we have the opportunity to put the learning to use, and educate the cult. Some will never die off. But, that was the same with the Nazis and the Stalinists. It won’t matter, any more than they did, after the remainder of the surviving Nazis had all fled to South America. We need to keep working until Trumpism carries a the stigma it deserves ✌️👍
    5
  3497. 5
  3498. 5
  3499. 5
  3500. 5
  3501. 5
  3502. 5
  3503. 5
  3504. 5
  3505. 5
  3506. 5
  3507. 5
  3508. 5
  3509. 5
  3510. 5
  3511. 5
  3512. 5
  3513. 5
  3514. 5
  3515. 5
  3516. 5
  3517. 5
  3518. 5
  3519. 5
  3520. 5
  3521. 5
  3522. 5
  3523. 5
  3524. 5
  3525. 5
  3526. 5
  3527. 5
  3528. 5
  3529. 5
  3530. 5
  3531. 5
  3532. 5
  3533. 5
  3534. 5
  3535. 5
  3536. 5
  3537. 5
  3538. 5
  3539. 5
  3540. 5
  3541. 5
  3542. 5
  3543. 5
  3544. 5
  3545. 5
  3546. 5
  3547. 5
  3548. 5
  3549.  @Grace.allovertheplace  : That’s a good question, for which you can find clues as to the answer in various developments around the world. There will come a point, as the sanctions are finally biting down, when Putin has less than nothing to show for all the sacrifices his oligarchs and his people have made. And that point will be stark, round about when he has less Ukrainian soil under his control than he started out with in February last year. China seems to be quietly moving Russia toward becoming a smaller, vassal state, reliant upon their support just to stay cohesive, in the manner of North Korea. And you will see a concomitant move toward nuttier rhetoric and increased militarisation of schools, as various swathes of southern and eastern Russia break away from Moscow’s waning power, seeing a brighter future under the protective wing of China’s industrial powerhouse: a China that is DESPERATE for young people and an increase in its population: a China that has already begun changing its official maps to show Mandarin names for places and regions that are currently still part of the Russian, “Federation.” While Russia will not be able to seal its borders in the hermetic manner of North Korea, with their straight line across the 38th parallel and the deep blue sea around everything else, making Russian security a bigger headache for whatever government stands in a future Russia, they seem destined to shrink down to a manageable size for the world to be in a position to trade nukes for sanctions relief. Getting the last few nukes will be the tricky bit, but it will be a feather in the cap of whatever coalition or president who manages it. That’s my optimistic guess. Don’t ask me about my cynical guesses.
    5
  3550. 5
  3551. 5
  3552. 5
  3553. 5
  3554. 5
  3555. 5
  3556. 5
  3557. 5
  3558. 5
  3559. 5
  3560. 5
  3561. 5
  3562. 5
  3563. 5
  3564. 5
  3565. 5
  3566. 5
  3567. 5
  3568. 5
  3569. 5
  3570. 5
  3571. 5
  3572. 5
  3573. 5
  3574. 5
  3575. 5
  3576. 5
  3577. 5
  3578. 5
  3579. 5
  3580. 5
  3581. 5
  3582. 5
  3583. 5
  3584. 5
  3585. 5
  3586. 5
  3587. 5
  3588. 5
  3589. 5
  3590. 5
  3591. 5
  3592. 5
  3593. 5
  3594. 5
  3595. 5
  3596. 5
  3597. 5
  3598. 5
  3599. 5
  3600. 5
  3601. 5
  3602. 5
  3603. 5
  3604. 5
  3605. 5
  3606. 5
  3607. 5
  3608. 5
  3609. 5
  3610. 5
  3611. 5
  3612. 5
  3613. 5
  3614. 5
  3615. 5
  3616. 5
  3617. 5
  3618. 5
  3619. 5
  3620. 5
  3621. 5
  3622. 5
  3623. 5
  3624. 5
  3625. 5
  3626. 5
  3627. 5
  3628. 5
  3629. 5
  3630. 5
  3631. 5
  3632. 5
  3633. 5
  3634. 5
  3635. 5
  3636. 5
  3637. 5
  3638. 5
  3639. 5
  3640. 5
  3641. 5
  3642. 5
  3643. 5
  3644. 5
  3645. 5
  3646. 5
  3647. 5
  3648. 5
  3649. 5
  3650. 5
  3651. 5
  3652. 5
  3653. 5
  3654. 5
  3655. 5
  3656. 5
  3657. 5
  3658. 5
  3659. 5
  3660. 5
  3661. 5
  3662. 5
  3663. 5
  3664. 5
  3665. 5
  3666. 5
  3667. 5
  3668. 5
  3669. 5
  3670. 5
  3671. 5
  3672. 5
  3673. 5
  3674. 5
  3675. 5
  3676. 5
  3677. 5
  3678. 5
  3679. 5
  3680. 5
  3681. 5
  3682. 5
  3683. 5
  3684. 5
  3685. 5
  3686. 5
  3687. 5
  3688. 5
  3689. 5
  3690. 5
  3691. 5
  3692. 5
  3693. 5
  3694. 5
  3695. 5
  3696. 5
  3697. 5
  3698. 5
  3699. 5
  3700. 5
  3701. 5
  3702. 5
  3703. 5
  3704. 5
  3705. 5
  3706. 5
  3707. 5
  3708. 5
  3709. 5
  3710. 5
  3711. 5
  3712. 5
  3713. 5
  3714. 5
  3715. 5
  3716. 5
  3717. 5
  3718. 5
  3719. 5
  3720. 5
  3721. 5
  3722. 5
  3723. 5
  3724. Just imagine what a slap on the wrist, “censure,” would do; which is as good as saying we’re ending the Republic, right there and then? Given that loss of office will result in countless immediate indictments (both Federal & State) which will land him and his family in jail, what alternative does a, ”man,” with his established record of destroying the Constitution and breaking all of the laws he runs up against, HAVE? So long as he can count on enough of his base and the party to remain in denial, and HATE Dems and other races, just enough to make them cheer when he pisses on the rule of law, he will have NO CHOICE but to have Moscow ENSURE his, “re-election,” in a Putin Style, 2020 SHAM. It’s that, or disgrace and jail! And, half of the GOP are IMPLICATED with him, so they’re fighting for their OWN SURVIVAL. They simply CANNOT remove him. What else CAN he do? 2020 will HAVE TO be RIGGED, because too many Americans were persuaded to HATE their, “fellow Americans,” MORE than they hate (or even understand WHO ARE) America’s enemies . . . Just look at the shills on this thread, desperately trying to bury their SHAME, because they KNOW they’re killing America, but aren’t strong enough to ADMIT what they WANT! They WANT a Russian Style, Single Party system, with just enough FAKE Democracy to keep up appearances . . . Trump = Putin Mark Two; the Puppet Version, and they just DON’T CARE. In fact, they PREFER it that way. They’ll take that over the fictional, “brown menace,” any day . . . America’s Republic is OVER
    5
  3725. 5
  3726. 5
  3727. 5
  3728. 5
  3729. 5
  3730. 5
  3731. Biographics : Why does no one ever mention Galileo’s darker side? He frequently ripped off business associates. He made a deal with some Dutch inventors, regarding their invention of the telescope, which he then improved upon, and then sold, to the very people that he’d just talked the Dutch guys into delaying their sales meeting with. His friends (yes, “friends”) in the church supported his Copernican work, and frequently told him to stop Trolling the church by saying that either, “God or the Bible,” were, “wrong,” regarding claims that the Bible NEVER asserted in the first place. He deliberately courted controversy and the inquisition bent over backwards to avoid punishing him; the church, having funded much of this research in the first place. He treated people with disdain and betrayed the trust of friend and foe alike, out of arrogance and ego. NONE of this side of his character is EVER mentioned in his hagiographies, because they are, just like this video, usually, nothing more than that: “hagiographies,” with a specific agenda to them. In Galileo’s case, he has become the poster boy for the martyrs of science. The real Galileo was a flawed human being, who’s life and very real achievements have been hijacked into making him a symbol of, “Righteous Science,” being held back and/or crushed, by those perennially, “evil,” and nearly always, “ignorant,” Christians. I love science, but I love history more. And, by telling only half the story, you might as well be telling a different one altogether, or even lying by omission. The irony is that, by painting so many figures as impossibly perfect, in this way, you make it less likely for the rest us mere mortals to follow in their footsteps, or to feel able, or even worthy, of such an enterprise. Come on, now? I know you have a lot to get through, with your output, but learn your topic? And, remember, if the figure you’re discussing sounds like a perfect saint, or seems unredeemably evil, then you probably don’t have the whole story. I have come to expect a higher standard from this channel, which is why I care that you hear this, for what it’s worth. Small errors are forgivable, but this is way beyond that. You’re not the only people to do this with Galileo, but I thought the whole shtick of your vids was about dispelling the popular mythology, and received wisdom, surrounding famous figures? Tell me? Am I wrong about that?
    5
  3732. 5
  3733. 5
  3734. 5
  3735. 5
  3736. 5
  3737. 5
  3738. 5
  3739. 5
  3740. 5
  3741. 5
  3742. 5
  3743. 5
  3744. 5
  3745. 5
  3746. 5
  3747. 5
  3748. 5
  3749. 5
  3750. 5
  3751. 5
  3752. 5
  3753. 5
  3754. 5
  3755. 5
  3756. 5
  3757. 5
  3758. 5
  3759. 5
  3760. 5
  3761. 5
  3762.  @stephenorourke9896  : I know you won’t reply to what I’m about to explain to you, (how could you?) but just maybe it will give you pause, even for a moment? Read a little history, son? Start with a little incident they called The Cuban Missile Crisis? There you will see all the differences between both America’s position and that of Moscow’s, right now and then. America never invaded Cuba, which is still a communist dictatorship 30 miles off the coast of Florida, to this day. Ukraine has never expressed any hostility to Russia, not even a desire for association, just independence. It is still communist doctrine to destroy all of the pillars of capitalism globally, you know? But the usual greed and hypocrisy that emerge in every communist state are what keeps the proximate threat of Cuba’s doctrine at bay nowadays. Not gunfire. And of course, back then, Russia was genuinely installing REAL nukes into Cuba, not the made up propagandist, juvenile ravings of an implausible gangster, as Putin imagines (or says he does) now in Ukraine. And with what imagined slight has, “the west,” so offended Prickly Putin this time? Preventing him from overrunning every country on Earth and sucking it into his Evil Empire? Maybe it was simply blocking his plans to prevent Ukraine from becoming a bigger energy exporter than Russia? Because Shell & Exxon are convinced they have more gas and oil than Russia. But, Putin knew that already, which is why he took the very places where those reserves are: Crimea, Donbas, and now Western Ukraine. Forget too that silencing news, murdering the truth tellers and journalists he fears, and spending at least a $trillion on lying propaganda is tantamount to a confession of pure, undiluted evil. You would have to be either historically illiterate, or plain stupid to believe your own words. Worse still, you would have to that perennial combination of the two; the sort of stupidity and evil that makes people willing to sell their souls for just a little cash, so you can troll for the idiots who paid you to . . . I would pity a fool like you, if it wasn’t for the fact that all that hate in your heart soaks up finer feeling like a black hole. The event horizon of your heart has already been passed. And you probably didn’t even feel it.
    5
  3763. 5
  3764. 5
  3765. 5
  3766. 5
  3767. 5
  3768. 5
  3769. 5
  3770. 5
  3771. 5
  3772. 5
  3773. 5
  3774. 5
  3775. 5
  3776. 5
  3777. 5
  3778. 5
  3779. 5
  3780. 5
  3781. 5
  3782. 5
  3783. 5
  3784. 5
  3785. 5
  3786. 5
  3787. 5
  3788. 5
  3789. 5
  3790. 5
  3791. 5
  3792. 5
  3793. 5
  3794. 5
  3795. 5
  3796. 5
  3797. 5
  3798. 5
  3799. 5
  3800. 5
  3801. 5
  3802. 5
  3803. 5
  3804. 5
  3805. 5
  3806. 5
  3807. 5
  3808. 5
  3809. 5
  3810. 5
  3811. 5
  3812. 5
  3813. 5
  3814. 5
  3815. 5
  3816. 5
  3817. 5
  3818. 5
  3819. 5
  3820. 5
  3821. 5
  3822. 5
  3823. 5
  3824. 5
  3825. 5
  3826. 5
  3827. 5
  3828. 5
  3829. 5
  3830. 5
  3831. 5
  3832. 5
  3833. 5
  3834. 5
  3835. 5
  3836. 5
  3837. 5
  3838. 5
  3839. 5
  3840. 5
  3841. 5
  3842. 5
  3843. 5
  3844. 5
  3845. 5
  3846. 5
  3847. 5
  3848. 5
  3849. 5
  3850. 5
  3851. 5
  3852. 5
  3853. 5
  3854. 5
  3855. 5
  3856. 5
  3857. 5
  3858. 5
  3859. 5
  3860. 5
  3861. 5
  3862. 5
  3863. 5
  3864. 5
  3865. 5
  3866. 5
  3867. 5
  3868. 5
  3869. 5
  3870. 5
  3871. 5
  3872. 5
  3873.  @ACME_Kinetics  : Interestingly, Jake remains, “A-political.” He will not hesitate to give props to Lindsay Graham for saying he wears his, “arrest warrant,” issued by Putin, as a, “badge of honor.” And he thanks any Republican who lends their speech or support to the Ukrainian cause (which is everybody’s cause, if you love your own freedom and democracy). This is the catch that comes with being objective and civically responsible. It makes you seem, “partisan,” to those who disagree with objective truth. We’ve seen this phenomena take a grip on American discourse, since before 2016. Trump says something objectively false, yet so egregious that it needs to be fact checked for the sake of public interest, so the news stations not only state the fact that trump’s claims are false, but explain the facts, so there can be no objective misunderstanding. Then trump gets personally hurt by being shown to be wrong and attacks the news stations. They are forced to defend themselves with the facts, sometimes in court and, before you know it, everyone says that CNN is a, “liberal,” news station, working for the Democrats, when they’re just trying to do their jobs objectively. In that same way, Jake is finding that objective truth puts him in unavoidable conflict with those who support the liars, be they partisan deliberately or not. But the, “trick,” has worked. The enemies of truth don’t care that they look like idiots to a rational human being. They got what they wanted. They got all the people who tell the truth to be, “identified,” with, “the liberals.” In that way, there can be no objective truth, only, “opinion.” If you stand for truth and objectivity, you can be dismissed as just another, “Obama loving, liberal, bleeding heart, Clinton conspirator, baby eating, lefty.” So, by choosing words carelessly we risk falling into the trap of playing their game; a game that cannot be won, because it’s already rigged. You have to assume the lie to argue your case. Jake is not now, and has never been, partisan. He’s simply telling it like it is. And it is in our best interests to think of him that way. The art of NEVER losing the game? DON’T PLAY. Slava Ukraine, my friend. Happy new year to you. ✌️
    5
  3874. 5
  3875. 5
  3876. 5
  3877. 5
  3878. 5
  3879. 5
  3880. 5
  3881. 5
  3882. 5
  3883. 5
  3884. 5
  3885. 5
  3886. 5
  3887. 5
  3888. 5
  3889. 5
  3890. 5
  3891. 5
  3892. 5
  3893. 5
  3894. 5
  3895. 5
  3896. 5
  3897. 5
  3898. 5
  3899. 5
  3900. 5
  3901. 5
  3902. 5
  3903. 5
  3904. 5
  3905. 5
  3906. 5
  3907. 5
  3908. 5
  3909. 5
  3910. 5
  3911. 5
  3912. 5
  3913. 5
  3914. 5
  3915. 5
  3916. 5
  3917. 5
  3918. 5
  3919. 5
  3920. 5
  3921. 5
  3922. Mike Oprisi : It’s already a, “Banana Republic,” when the reverse is true too. If, “someone at the top,” can order his own, “acquittal,” as happened at the risible Impeachment SHAM, why shouldn’t we expect that he’ll be hunting down all the people who put him there, spoke the truth when asked, or even simply failed to scream out hysterical support for Trump, loudly enough, when Trump, “felt like it”??? The problem here, is that people are still acting like this kind of thing still matters, when the Impeachment was the last nail in the Republic’s coffin. Who in their right mind, even imagines that they are “NOT” going to RIG the coming, “elections,” when we ALL KNOW if Trump is unseated, he and his family will be indicted and all go to jail? Which will lead to them, ”ratting out,” everyone from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, the indictment and imprisonment of the ENTIRE administration, leaving a historically disgraced skeleton of the Republican Party in its wake, to disband and flee from the press like escaped Nazis after WWII. They have SHOWN you that Democracy, law and order, and the Constitution are OVER in America, but you all keep up this DENIAL, as if, “elections,” will MEAN a GOD DAMNED THING?! And, I think you’re all doing that, because you all know, in your hearts, that being honest with yourselves can lead to to only ONE conclusion. Americans must accept they have a Russia Style, FAKE Democracy, more popularly known as a DICTATORSHIP, and be DONE with it, OR? . . . Revolution!!! There is no third option
    5
  3923. 5
  3924. 5
  3925. 5
  3926. 5
  3927. 5
  3928. 5
  3929. 5
  3930. 5
  3931. 5
  3932. 5
  3933. 5
  3934. 5
  3935. 5
  3936. 5
  3937. 5
  3938. 5
  3939. 5
  3940. 5
  3941. 5
  3942. 5
  3943. 5
  3944. 5
  3945. 5
  3946. 5
  3947. 5
  3948. 5
  3949. 5
  3950. 5
  3951. 5
  3952. 5
  3953. 5
  3954. 5
  3955. 5
  3956. 5
  3957. 5
  3958. 5
  3959. 5
  3960. 5
  3961. 5
  3962. 5
  3963. 5
  3964. 5
  3965. 5
  3966. 5
  3967. 5
  3968. 5
  3969. 5
  3970. 5
  3971. 5
  3972. 5
  3973. 5
  3974. 5
  3975. 5
  3976. 5
  3977. 5
  3978. 5
  3979. 5
  3980. 5
  3981. 5
  3982. 5
  3983. 5
  3984. 5
  3985. 5
  3986. 5
  3987. 5
  3988. 5
  3989. 5
  3990. 5
  3991. 5
  3992. 5
  3993. 5
  3994. 5
  3995. 5
  3996.  @nigelhaywood9753  : It seems like a lot of journalists are, “saying this,” but they’re not the type of journalists that the heavily insulated Westminster Bubble allows to penetrate their meniscus. If you’re the kind of journalist that would make this obvious and utterly unanswerable point, you are kept well away from the sensitive earshot of the thin skinned (brown or otherwise) types that keep their grip on journalism just as tight as they do their own jobs. Just look at who the Chair of the BBC is? A friend and distant relative of Boris Johnson’s, who arranged a meeting between Johnson and the banker who gave him a fat stack of cash to play with, yet who failed to mention any of this in the part of his application form (a mere formality, probably filled in by a staffer) that asks about potential conflicts of interests. Instead of being scandalised by this, most of the top press have steered us away from this story, which reflects as badly on them as it does any of the goons in Westminster. Even Andrew Marr, who’s books I have bought and in whom I trusted for his frank capacity to, “tell it like it is,” described the story as, “toxic,” excusing himself from even discussing the scandal, let alone investigating it, on the grounds that appointing old boys from within the Westminster network is the way, “they’ve always done it in the past.” So, instead of suggesting that the system of top BBC appointments has always been corrupt and might well have suited, “the way they’ve always done things,” in the early 1930’s but which desperately needs some anti-corruption policies to protect the public’s interest now; instead of suggesting that the key institution upon which much of Britain’s reputation (internationally and domestically) stands is a snake, rotten from the head down, all we get is excuses from our leading journalists. But then I remembered to check who the publishers of Marr’s books and documentary series are, upon whom he relies for the residual payments. You guessed it, Auntie herself. So, it wouldn’t do to bight Auntie’s hand, would it? And all those contacts within the BBC to disavow him and no longer give him the inside scoop for his LBC broadcasts? The tragedy is that most of these, “journalists,” whilst doing a fairly good job in the main, have persuaded themselves that this sort of thing is somehow, “exceptional,” and can be safely overlooked, rather than scrutinised. We can call for change, root and branch reform in other organisations; the London Met, the 1922 Committee, the fella’ who pours the drinks in the Westminster Bar! But, there are certain things we don’t question. And that, my friend, is WHY no one says the startlingly obvious retort to the likes of Suella. Because they have already agreed not to, and been promised insider access to other stories, and to be first in the question cue when yet other stories break, on the basis of such, “quiet,” little agreements. Because people like Andrew Marr have conned themselves into thinking they’re not as much a part of that, “establishment,” as the Press Secretary who arranges these deals with them in the first place. They’re all drinking from Caesar’s cup, but many close their eyes while they drink and pretend not to taste the toxin as it goes down. You have to be very careful about every story you read these days. Asking yourself, not just about the facts and the players in each drama, but exactly who is reporting or analysing each development, and what role do they play in it? Whether they admit it or not. Sorry for going on so long, but you asked meaningful question which appeals to the common sense of most thinking people, and the answer, whilst meaningful, is complex. Its very complexity is another reason that the old boy network goes unchallenged. Because half the people in it, don’t know, don’t admit, don’t care, that they’re in it. Have a good day. ✌️
    5
  3997. 5
  3998. 5
  3999. 5
  4000. 5
  4001. 5
  4002. 5
  4003. 5
  4004. 5
  4005. 5
  4006. 5
  4007. 5
  4008. 5
  4009. 5
  4010. 5
  4011. 5
  4012. 5
  4013. 5
  4014. 5
  4015. 5
  4016. 5
  4017.  @coreyham3753  : Therein lies the problem. It’s about identification. People are still unwilling to call the Republicans what they are, like the last few weeks of trump’s desperate, reality free power grab never happened? They are unwilling to call them Fascists. But, a cult of personality, who’s foundational narrative is a lie (increasingly racist in nature), who does not tolerate opposition parties, who uses violence and intimidation to get its way, is Fascist; by definition. I’ve read studies on fascism, and the way it creeps in, is the way it has here. It was the same in Spain, with Franco; in Italy, with Mussolini and in Germany, with Hitler. At first, everyone mocked and then dismissed them. Then they were forced to deal with their dictators, but constantly downplayed their evil, or worst impulses. But, never did they really address what was happening, because it happened divisively, inside people’s families. People don’t want to accept that their friends and neighbours might march them off to a camp one day. “Divide and conquer,” really works. You simply cannot, “build a bridge,” between reality and a racist lie. Even now, it’s the GOP who refuses to work across the isle, to compromise, while they are attempting to literally make it a Felony to expand voter enfranchisement! They are fascists, and you will NEVER reach a consensus with evil. The only way to deal with this, is to be real about it. Fascists are inherently evil, illogical, cowardly, liars, cruel, venal, and DANGEROUS. We can see that! But we still want to reason with them. And that is a mistake . . .
    5
  4018. 5
  4019. 5
  4020. 5
  4021. 5
  4022. 5
  4023. 5
  4024. 5
  4025. 5
  4026. 5
  4027. 5
  4028. 5
  4029. 5
  4030. 5
  4031. 5
  4032. 5
  4033. 5
  4034. 5
  4035. 5
  4036. 5
  4037. 5
  4038. 5
  4039. 5
  4040. 5
  4041. 5
  4042. 5
  4043. 5
  4044. 5
  4045. 5
  4046. 5
  4047. 5
  4048. 5
  4049. 5
  4050. 5
  4051. 5
  4052. 5
  4053. 5
  4054. 5
  4055. 5
  4056. 5
  4057. 5
  4058. 5
  4059. 5
  4060. 5
  4061. 5
  4062. 5
  4063. 5
  4064. 5
  4065. 5
  4066. 5
  4067. 5
  4068. 5
  4069. 5
  4070. 5
  4071. 5
  4072. 5
  4073. 5
  4074. 5
  4075. 5
  4076. 5
  4077. 4
  4078. 4
  4079. 4
  4080. 4
  4081. 4
  4082. 4
  4083. 4
  4084. 4
  4085. 4
  4086. 4
  4087. 4
  4088. 4
  4089. 4
  4090. 4
  4091. 4
  4092. 4
  4093. 4
  4094. 4
  4095. 4
  4096. 4
  4097. 4
  4098. 4
  4099. 4
  4100. 4
  4101. Well, if anyone knows about, “smug,” it’s Farage. Of course it’s very personal. The whole journey for Farage has been built on, “personality politics,” without any truth or substance to back him up. He reminds me of that oily character (sadly) named Ash in John LeCarré’s The Spy Who Came In From The Cold. Lemas says of him, “He’s an empty space. There’s nothing there!” And he means a very similar thing. Once you lift the, “performance,” away and ask grownup questions about, “policy,” “foundation,” “facts,” “costs,” “statistics,” there is literally NOTHING there, other than lies. Cameron is one the Tories’ greatest assets. He still has some credibility with conservative voters. (Lord knows why?) Farage’s problem is the same as Braverman’s. When the cold, hard facts explode your, “policy,” nonsense, you can’t talk about them. You must redirect public discourse, urgently. And the only reliable way to do that is to get personal. It worked for Braverman, who dodged all questions at the dispatch box regarding the workability of her plans, the costs, the active harm it was doing to innocent people, by simply spewing out a series of epithets about the, “Soy bean eating, Guardian reading, wokerarty,” etc. which dominated the headlines and became the talking point of all the editorials, opinion pieces and BBC interviews in its wake! We never got ANY direct answers as to the costs (human or otherwise) from parliamentary discussions! Not once! Not from Braverman. But we did get a dividing line drawn through the metropolitan political landscape, which gave us protest marchers, angry far right activists suddenly back in the headlines and new, apparently equally urgent, discussions about our own personal freedoms and our rights to freedom of speech and freedom of expression. Oh, it worked so beautifully for that twisted little harpy that she decided to make that, “technique,” a lifestyle choice! And where did this parvenu learn her techniques if not at the feet of the drama QUEEN of harpy’s egg layers himself, Nigel Farage. Who needs facts, accountability or an estimate of the costs when they’ve got personal attacks, personality politics, populism and popular anger to misdirect? It’s little wonder Braverman wants to get into the harpy’s nest with the harpy queen himself. They’re otherwise idle and superfluous anyway. So they can spend all their time circling the turrets of Westminster, telling all the black crows to, “go back to where they came from,” and choose their targets to swoop down upon, getting all tangled in their hair if they’re lucky, flapping their harpy wings and squawking at the top of their lungs, causing a horrific spectacle that focuses all public discourse on their attacks without them ever having to account for themselves! By the time someone steps up with the appropriate shotgun it’s too late, as they are back up in the battlements, leaving the press circle standing around their victim to ask, “What was it like to be dive bombed by a harpy?” And, “Did that harpy have a point?” But I still think it won’t be too long before Braverman finds that she is suddenly the cuckoo in Farage’s nest, to be shunned like the Ugly Duckling. And that will serve her right. Yes, “Thank God for Cameron,” indeed! Hold the line!
    4
  4102. 4
  4103. 4
  4104. 4
  4105. 4
  4106. 4
  4107. 4
  4108. 4
  4109. 4
  4110. 4
  4111. 4
  4112. 4
  4113. 4
  4114. becka king : Nah, you’re just being defensive now. Has it not occurred to you, that not EVERY person on the planet is AWARE of every single racial epithet that exists? I just wanted to know what, if ANY “relevance” the guy’s comment had to this video? Apparently none, right? And, apparently, “rice and beans,” has a racial stereotyping connotation? So, MY being ignorant of that fact, upsets you? Despite the fact that, as a political historian, I could probably blow your sensitive, fluffy, explosive, triggered little mind with facts that have a serious bearing on the issues of racism, of which you NO NOTHING? You are doing nothing constructive, here; just blowing off steam and alienating opponents AND would be allies; making YOU as big a part of the PROBLEM as ANY Trump “fan” or casual RACIST out there. And your PRIDE prevents you from owning your error, so you make the problem worse, by doubling down in true, Trump style. We REALLY DON’T WANT people like you, challenging racists or Trump fans. You ARE the problem. A useful idiot, driving the converted into deeper conviction, and pushing the undecided into the enemy’s camp. And, for the record, RACISTS ARE SCUM, as are ALL MEMBERS OF THE TRUMP CULT. Hold your tongue and STOP damaging the cause. Some of us are CONVINCING others of the TRUTH. Some of us use reason and logic, to PERSUADE. And some of us CARE enough about the fate of the country AND the planet, to set our own EGO to one side. Try it some time, instead of acting like TUMP?
    4
  4115. 4
  4116. 4
  4117. 4
  4118. 4
  4119. 4
  4120. 4
  4121. 4
  4122. 4
  4123. 4
  4124. 4
  4125. 4
  4126. 4
  4127. 4
  4128. 4
  4129. 4
  4130. 4
  4131. 4
  4132. 4
  4133. 4
  4134. 4
  4135. 4
  4136. 4
  4137. 4
  4138. 4
  4139. 4
  4140. 4
  4141. 4
  4142. 4
  4143. 4
  4144. 4
  4145. 4
  4146. 4
  4147. 4
  4148. 4
  4149. 4
  4150. 4
  4151. 4
  4152. 4
  4153. 4
  4154. I heard about the ISW’s (Institute for Studies in Warfare) assessment, which bares out my own comment last week. That Putin seems to be deliberately reducing Prigozhin’s Wagner group, whilst blocking his attempts to refill his ranks from gyms, clubs and prisons around Russia. Russia’s internal wars mean that Ukraine has not faced properly trained, equipped and supported soldiers for some time now, but just sheer overwhelming numbers, with occasional injections of special forces groups, here and there, but not in any significant numbers. I do not fear for what might happen when the Russians finally do put their best on the front lines, as they lost their very best in the battle for Kiev and their failed invasion attempts around the whole eastern half of Ukraine last year. Putin might think he’s buying time to train and equip his latest swathe of conscripts, but they simply will not have the experience, will or matching equipment to halt Ukraine’s Spring offensive. Once Putin has less Ukrainian real estate than he began with in February of last year, combined with new countries joining NATO and the sheer financial losses Russia has suffered, all topped off with China’s visit making it clear that Putin cannot expect any significant under the table assistance, and Russia are now China’s junior partner, his position as leader will be untenable. Unless Russia breaks up and becomes like North Korea with China’s assistance - while China soaks up the populations of Russia’s southern regions into their borders, because, “populations,” (particularly young people) are what China so badly needs right now, I can’t even see how Putin survives into next year?
    4
  4155. 4
  4156. 4
  4157. 4
  4158. 4
  4159. 4
  4160. 4
  4161. 4
  4162. 4
  4163. 4
  4164. 4
  4165. 4
  4166. 4
  4167. 4
  4168. 4
  4169. 4
  4170. 4
  4171. 4
  4172. 4
  4173. 4
  4174. 4
  4175. 4
  4176. 4
  4177. 4
  4178. 4
  4179. 4
  4180. 4
  4181. 4
  4182. 4
  4183. 4
  4184. 4
  4185. 4
  4186. 4
  4187. 4
  4188. 4
  4189. 4
  4190. 4
  4191. 4
  4192.  @seanpatrick1243  : Ah yes . . . Ayn Rand, that darling of the Right, who was so vocally against state funded healthcare, yet who spent the last eleven years of her life soaking up the taxpayer’s dollars, which paid for the treatment of her incurable cancer that she didn’t want to pay for. And Machiavelli, who was tortured and tossed out of his City State’s affairs, and who spent the last years of his life sucking up to the reinstated Medici’s, begging to be allowed back in, despite having conspired against them. He dedicated The Prince to the head of their family, and it never occurred to him that his book was in such poor taste, tone deaf and of such utterly scandalous content, that no one in their right mind would endorse the man who just published a tome on how to manipulate the state (using murder, threats, betrayal, blackmail and any other crime that comes to hand) just after having come back into power (using many of those methods) while their government was still unstable. Even Donny wasn’t dumb enough to publish a book called, “I Cheated My Way Into The White House And Here’s How I Did It.” Both are fascinating to read, in their own ways. But, GOP, “thinkers,” went in there without a responsible adult to hold their hands, put two plus two together, and came up with, “Orange.” Maybe the GOP could use some grownups to educate them? Maybe they’d understand why they keep failing so badly? But, first they’d have to learn how to admit it? 🤷‍♂️🙄 . . . ✌️👍
    4
  4193. 4
  4194. 4
  4195. 4
  4196. 4
  4197. 4
  4198. 4
  4199. 4
  4200. 4
  4201. 4
  4202. 4
  4203. 4
  4204. 4
  4205. 4
  4206. 4
  4207. 4
  4208. 4
  4209. 4
  4210. 4
  4211. 4
  4212. 4
  4213. 4
  4214. 4
  4215. 4
  4216. 4
  4217. 4
  4218. 4
  4219. 4
  4220. 4
  4221. 4
  4222. 4
  4223. 4
  4224. 4
  4225. 4
  4226. 4
  4227. Kenneth King : There aren’t any of those. Trump’s Cults all KNOW he’s full of shit, and they PRETEND to, “believe,” him. From his Secretary of State, down to the MAGA hat wearing morons at his Hitler Youth rallies. They simply DON’T CARE. They are HAPPY that Trump’s Coup worked out. They’re GLAD Democracy is at an END. So long as they get to FAKE IT, and go through the motions of, “Voting,” in 2020, KNOWING that the results are ALREADY RIGGED, they see it as just another chance to have a dig at, “the left,” (whoever TF they are?) with a popularity contest that has about as much, “validity,” as a Miss Universe Contest in Saudi Arabia, where the one in the Orange Burkha has paid them all for their votes. You need a BIG distraction, when your putting the POTUS on, “Trial,” in a, “Trial,” where witnesses are NOT allowed to testify, evidence is NOT allowed to be presented, and the, “Jury,” consists of Trump’s CONSPIRATORS who would GO TO JAIL THEMSELVES, if Trump lost his, “Protected, Presidential Status.” THAT would be like publicly ADMITTING that the republic has FALLEN. So, they had to get their boss man, Putin, to arrange this SHIT SHOW with Iran. Iran has spilled NO American blood, so far, and we’re meant to think they believe they’ve settled the score? It’s just a SHOW, that they had to put on, because the X-Factor and Love Island simply weren’t enough this time. After Trump completes his THIRD term, and can say that he has, “beaten Obama,” his daughter, Ivanka, will become your first female POTUS. And YOU WILL celebrate this outcome, as to refuse to go along, by this time, will be likely to get you arrested and disappeared. They will be consolidated by then, and Europe will be the last, shrinking, hold outs, clinging to semi-democracies, under constant attack from the various dictatorships of the globe, lead by America. Australia will have fallen long ago, having had a racist revolution which resulted in Aborigines having been OUTLAWED, along with ALL foreigners. The entire continent of Africa will be a GIANT SWEAT SHOP, owned by China and Russia, but the US will be allowed to buy shares. And, everyone will be too fucking scared to complain about their Dictatorship, as the rumours about the Political Readjustment Centres will be TERRIFYING. And, YOU will be among the last generation on Earth, who can remember Democracy, making you unemployable in the white collar market. As you scrape the shit from your mouth, where a passing Republican teenager decided to take one there, just to prove to his friends that he LEGALLY could, for a larf, you will recall the heady days, when Democracy was a thing, but you will never say that out loud. As that would be a crime, and it’s already bad enough, having a bar code on your forehead, marking you out as the lower class pleb you now are. So, you will thank the teenager for noticing you exist, as his girlfriend idly forces a broken bear bottle into your rectum, (because, why not? She’s bored too) and you will regret not taking your chance to have a second revolution, back in 2019, when you had the chance. And, as the blood spurts from your torn anus, you will notice what looks like an ambulance coming to your rescue. But, it will turn out to be just the street cleaners, also with bar codes on their foreheads, who have come to toss you into the back of their van, because you are making a mess in the street. A crime for which you will now be sent to the Political Readjustment Centre . . . SMH
    4
  4228. 4
  4229. 4
  4230. 4
  4231. 4
  4232. 4
  4233. 4
  4234. 4
  4235. 4
  4236. 4
  4237. 4
  4238. 4
  4239. 4
  4240. 4
  4241. 4
  4242. 4
  4243. 4
  4244. 4
  4245. 4
  4246. 4
  4247. 4
  4248. 4
  4249. 4
  4250. 4
  4251. 4
  4252. 4
  4253. 4
  4254. 4
  4255. 4
  4256. 4
  4257. 4
  4258. 4
  4259. 4
  4260. 4
  4261. 4
  4262. 4
  4263. 4
  4264. 4
  4265. 4
  4266. 4
  4267. 4
  4268. 4
  4269. 4
  4270. 4
  4271. 4
  4272. 4
  4273. 4
  4274. 4
  4275. 4
  4276. 4
  4277. 4
  4278. 4
  4279. 4
  4280. 4
  4281. 4
  4282. 4
  4283. 4
  4284. 4
  4285. 4
  4286. 4
  4287. 4
  4288. 4
  4289. 4
  4290. 4
  4291. 4
  4292. 4
  4293. 4
  4294. 4
  4295. 4
  4296. 4
  4297. 4
  4298. 4
  4299. 4
  4300. 4
  4301. 4
  4302. 4
  4303. 4
  4304. 4
  4305. 4
  4306. 4
  4307. 4
  4308. 4
  4309. 4
  4310. 4
  4311. 4
  4312. 4
  4313. 4
  4314. 4
  4315. 4
  4316. 4
  4317. 4
  4318. 4
  4319. Thank you, Anna, for asking the difficult questions. I knew nothing else, being born in 1967, in England. I saw the Cold War flair up from time to time, but I did not live through the worst part of it, The Cuban Missile Crisis. In the same way that we didn’t see the fall of the Berlin Wall, or the fall of the Soviet Union, coming (and anyone who tells you they did is making things up or, “misremembering”) we were all fooled into thinking that the Cold War was over. The line in the movie, Terminator II: Judgement Day, is now famous for reflecting the west’s attitudes in the late 1990’s into the turn of the century; “The Russians? Aren’t they our friends now?” What I have learned since then is that the Cold War never really ended for Putin and we are now finally waking up to that threat, whilst we are in the midst of Cold War II. Russia has always been incompetent and reckless in both its attitude to fissile nuclear materials and their secretive default behaviour makes the world a much more dangerous place than any, “threats,” Putin makes. Whilst I can PROMISE any worried person that Putin will NEVER fire a nuclear missile, I would urge that same person to pay close attention to Russian foolishness, as disastrous accidents have already occurred under the Soviet’s watch. Chernobyl is in Ukraine after all. Though this was not a, “weapon,” it remains a perfect argument for how Russia’s stupidity and corruption is too out of control for them to be allowed to keep nuclear weapons, and their nuclear power should be supervised by the west. No, Putin will never fire a nuke in anger, as he’s actually getting ALL of the, “value,” of his nukes right now, by startling our over-reactive western media outlets. He’s getting all of the, “bang for his buck,” out of these threats, and also the west’s reluctance to, “escalate,” conflicts with Russia. If he fires just one small tactical nuke, that’s over and the west’s reaction is likely to be swift and overwhelming, and Putin knows this. And a narcissistic coward like Putin would never commit suicide in this manner, because he’s obsessed with his own, “legacy.” He does not want to be remembered as being worse than Hitler, Pol Pot and Stalin rolled into one, as, “The man who destroyed the world.” Hated by all who survive to rebuild after him, with a name that is more evocative than Satan? I don’t think so. So, knowing it would guarantee that he loses this and all other wars, no, he will not do it. Knowing it would wreck any hopes of a legacy, no, he will not do it. Knowing he is a coward, who would never invite a confrontation he could not win, no, he will not do it. But, might there be an accident? I’d say the odds are around 50/50 right now. And we ought to DO SOMETHING about that. Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇬🇧✌️👍
    4
  4320. 4
  4321. 4
  4322. 4
  4323. 4
  4324. 4
  4325. 4
  4326. 4
  4327. While I love Fareed’s show and always learn something new from every piece of analysis he offers, I sometimes find his take maddeningly obtuse. This was one of those days. There really is no point in the whole, “Coulda’, Woulda’, Shoulda’,” stuff now, Fareed. Of course it will get way worse! Russia’s, “federation,” is destined to break up into several countries, with China already eyeing the south eastern states that were formally Chinese before, needing a population boost as badly, if not more than, Russia does. That’s inevitable now, and that may well be entirely Putin’s fault, but it’s not like the west can do anything to halt that at this stage, as they once could? If they had forced Russia out of Crimea in 2014, or if Obama’s, “red line,” in Syria had been more than an empty bluff when Putin used sarin gas on their population, we may have been looking at a different scenario now? But as things stand, Putin is determined to retain power at any cost, which will result in a much smaller Russia being China’s vassal state, with several new independent countries seeking western help, while others fall into Xi’s lap. All we can do is assist Ukraine to win quickly, thus maintaining more control, rather than dragging this out so that Putin’s opponents have more time to organise and make covert alliances. We need to build relations with the potential break away leaders. Especially the pro-westerners who don’t want to wind up being a vassal of China’s.
    4
  4328. 4
  4329. 4
  4330. 4
  4331. 4
  4332. 4
  4333. 4
  4334. 4
  4335. 4
  4336. 4
  4337. 4
  4338. 4
  4339.  @Cpk86  : See, the only problem with the, “poor me,” thesis is that it’s fine to complain about hard done to and exploited you think you are, until you meet an actual victim of human trafficking, or an actual slave, and then you realise that you’ve actually got it really good, living at a time when there’s less violent crime, less hunger, less exploitation, more legal protection, better health care, longer lifespans, more access to information, higher standards of education and generally a more tolerant society that lets people whine about how their own affairs haven’t worked out the way they’d hope and now they choose to blame, “society,” instead of taking responsibility . . . than ever before in human history. Maybe just take some of that responsibility, (even just a tiny bit, in your tiny corner of the world?) and do a charitable act? Be kind to someone? Say or do something thoughtful? Take some time to smell the coffee, realise you’re NOT a, “slave,” maybe feel a bit less sorry for yourself and don’t allow the truly cynical to exploit you by convincing you that you’re a, “victim,” of any kind? Because you’re not. One of the first images of this war that I saw on TV was three girls, dressed rather like my three used to, all blondes like my girls, get bombed off the stage by a f*cking Russian coward who feels no compunction about murdering children. Their bodies in that street, not unlike a British, average kinda’ street, after I just saw them walking together, is seared into my brain, like I was shown what it would look like if my corner of the world was bombed 10 years ago and my kids taken from me, just like that. Those people have, “problems.” You really don’t. Do something to help them.
    4
  4340.  @Cpk86  : See, the only problem with the, “poor me,” thesis is that it’s fine to complain about hard done to and exploited you think you are, until you meet an actual victim of human trafficking, or an actual slave, and then you realise that you’ve actually got it really good, living at a time when there’s less violent crime, less hunger, less exploitation, more legal protection, better health care, longer lifespans, more access to information, higher standards of education and generally a more tolerant society that lets people whine about how their own affairs haven’t worked out the way they’d hope and now they choose to blame, “society,” instead of taking responsibility . . . than ever before in human history. Maybe just take some of that responsibility, (even just a tiny bit, in your tiny corner of the world?) and do a charitable act? Be kind to someone? Say or do something thoughtful? Take some time to smell the coffee, realise you’re NOT a, “slave,” maybe feel a bit less sorry for yourself and don’t allow the truly cynical to exploit you by convincing you that you’re a, “victim,” of any kind? Because you’re not. One of the first images of this war that I saw on TV was three girls, dressed rather like my three used to, all blondes like my girls, get bombed off the stage by a f*cking Russian coward who feels no compunction about murdering children. Their bodies in that street, not unlike a British, average kinda’ street, after I just saw them walking together, is seared into my brain, like I was shown what it would look like if my corner of the world was bombed 10 years ago and my kids taken from me, just like that. Those people have, “problems.” You really don’t. Do something to help them.
    4
  4341.  @Cpk86  : See, the only problem with the, “poor me,” thesis is that it’s fine to complain about hard done to and exploited you think you are, until you meet an actual victim of human trafficking, or an actual slave, and then you realise that you’ve actually got it really good, living at a time when there’s less violent crime, less hunger, less exploitation, more legal protection, better health care, longer lifespans, more access to information, higher standards of education and generally a more tolerant society that lets people whine about how their own affairs haven’t worked out the way they’d hope and now they choose to blame, “society,” instead of taking responsibility . . . than ever before in human history. Maybe just take some of that responsibility, (even just a tiny bit, in your tiny corner of the world?) and do a charitable act? Be kind to someone? Say or do something thoughtful? Take some time to smell the coffee, realise you’re NOT a, “slave,” maybe feel a bit less sorry for yourself and don’t allow the truly cynical to exploit you by convincing you that you’re a, “victim,” of any kind? Because you’re not. One of the first images of this war that I saw on TV was three girls, dressed rather like my three used to, all blondes like my girls, get bombed off the stage by a f*cking Russian coward who feels no compunction about murdering children. Their bodies in that street, not unlike a British, average kinda’ street, after I just saw them walking together, is seared into my brain, like I was shown what it would look like if my corner of the world was bombed 10 years ago and my kids taken from me, just like that. Those people have, “problems.” You really don’t. Do something to help them.
    4
  4342. 4
  4343. 4
  4344. 4
  4345. 4
  4346. 4
  4347. 4
  4348. 4
  4349. 4
  4350. 4
  4351. 4
  4352. 4
  4353. 4
  4354. 4
  4355. 4
  4356. 4
  4357. 4
  4358. 4
  4359. 4
  4360. 4
  4361. 4
  4362. 4
  4363. 4
  4364. 4
  4365. 4
  4366. 4
  4367. 4
  4368. 4
  4369. 4
  4370. 4
  4371. 4
  4372. 4
  4373. 4
  4374. 4
  4375. 4
  4376. 4
  4377. 4
  4378. 4
  4379. 4
  4380. 4
  4381. 4
  4382. 4
  4383. 4
  4384. 4
  4385. 4
  4386. 4
  4387. 4
  4388. 4
  4389. 4
  4390. 4
  4391. 4
  4392. 4
  4393. 4
  4394. 4
  4395. 4
  4396. 4
  4397. 4
  4398. 4
  4399. 4
  4400. 4
  4401. 4
  4402. 4
  4403. 4
  4404. 4
  4405. 4
  4406. 4
  4407. 4
  4408. 4
  4409. 4
  4410. 4
  4411. 4
  4412. 4
  4413. 4
  4414. 4
  4415. 4
  4416. 4
  4417. 4
  4418. 4
  4419. 4
  4420. 4
  4421. 4
  4422. 4
  4423. 4
  4424. 4
  4425. 4
  4426. 4
  4427. 4
  4428. 4
  4429. 4
  4430. 4
  4431. 4
  4432. 4
  4433. 4
  4434. 4
  4435. 4
  4436. 4
  4437. 4
  4438. 4
  4439. 4
  4440. 4
  4441. 4
  4442. 4
  4443. 4
  4444. 4
  4445. 4
  4446. 4
  4447. 4
  4448. 4
  4449. 4
  4450. 4
  4451. 4
  4452. 4
  4453. 4
  4454. 4
  4455. 4
  4456. 4
  4457. 4
  4458. 4
  4459. 4
  4460. 4
  4461. 4
  4462. 4
  4463. 4
  4464. 4
  4465. 4
  4466. 4
  4467. 4
  4468. 4
  4469. 4
  4470. 4
  4471. 4
  4472. 4
  4473. 4
  4474. 4
  4475. 4
  4476. 4
  4477. 4
  4478. 4
  4479. 4
  4480. 4
  4481. 4
  4482. That’s a good point. I have often thought that most of the TOS that games use would never stand up to a serious legal challenge. But it’s just a question of someone having the money and the will to do it. That person would face private investigators acting like CIA spooks, trying to intimidate them, death threats, bribes, all kinds of horrors which have been documented already as the common practices of publishers like EA Publishing, Take Two and Ubisoft, for example. Consider this example just to start with: What other industry is able to get you to buy their product, fully pay for it, download and install that product and only then, after they have your money, after they have installed all their monitoring programs which generate cash for them, can you read their Terms Of Service and have to agree to them if you want to play your game? If you disagree you cannot play and you are not entitled to your money back. That’s insane! No court in any free country would uphold an industry’s right to hold you to ransom like that! “I only get to look at the contract AFTER I paid for the product?” The publisher would be laughed out of court! But no one challenges this standard practice. There are a raft of things that the games industry gets away with that they must know they could never back up in the courts. But they rely on lobby groups to make politicians look the other way and the abject ignorance of those mostly elderly politicians, more interested in book and film laws, or oil rights. We need entire departments specialising in gaming law in each of the free world’s countries, as a matter of urgency. We’re talking multiple $£€ billions here, for single publishers alone! Massive tax revenues and consumer rights issues, sailing blithely under the radar! Would you buy a house, a car, a fridge, without knowing anything about it other than what the ads tell you, only to get it home and find out it isn’t even FINISHED yet!? “Oh don’t worry. The steering wheel is coming in an update in a couple of months . . . maybe.” WTF??? “Of course you’ll get a roof on your house! It’s a new house! You didn’t expect it to be perfect on day one, did you? Wait for the patch!” Whuh? . . . The games industry is the ONLY industry on Planet Earth that is routinely getting away with murder at the levels of a Bangladeshi Telemarketer, yet we do NOTHING about this??? That’s why, for example, CyberPunk 2077 became such a good game after its SHAMEFUL launch. Because the Polish Government had invested serious capital into that game and were expecting results. They only had to make the threat of taking CDPR to court and they caved instantly, acceding to every demand the government made, no matter how unreasonable they thought they were being. Because they KNEW they had no legal legs to stand on and that other aspects of gaming law might come under scrutiny, setting precedents that could start the dominoes falling throughout the entire industry. And NO ONE in the games publishing industry wants a powerful organisation like a government, challenging the way they do business on behalf of consumers. That’s a Pandora’s Box they need to keep firmly shut. The rumour is that other publishers stepped in, (I heard Take Two was one of them, but I have no proof) offering the Polish government money to buy CDPR time and offering to make them whole if CDPR failed to turn things around. But, make no mistake. We’re at these levels now. Where a games publishing company can destabilise the entire economy of a European power, through the failed launch of one game! And it’s not like they didn’t make serious profits anyway! Just not as much as they projected. If a games company making a serious profit, but just not enough, if what it takes to rock the economy of Poland, consider the God Tier levels this economic game is being played around the world?
    4
  4483. 4
  4484. 4
  4485. 4
  4486. 4
  4487. 4
  4488. 4
  4489. 4
  4490. 4
  4491. 4
  4492. 4
  4493. 4
  4494. 4
  4495. 4
  4496. 4
  4497. 4
  4498. 4
  4499. 4
  4500. 4
  4501. 4
  4502. 4
  4503. 4
  4504. 4
  4505. 4
  4506. 4
  4507. 4
  4508. Now that we have reasonably reliable records on demographics, we have learned that there is a simple equation that never fails: The nations with a young and growing population will succeed as economic blocks. Those with large ageing populations face economic ruin. China has slowly come to recognise this, but has been able to slow their crisis using their one and only advantage, state control over generations. The fear mongering around, “illegal immigration,” seems to me to be just one more attempt by Britain’s hard right to, “Americanise,” our politics and turn migration into a hot button issue. Yet the fact is that we actually NEED to grow our population and we should be admitting as many young families as possible. If I were to be ruthless about it, in the interests of simply growing our nation’s power and economic influence on the globe, I would push for only one level of, “discrimination,” and incentivise the young adult populations of other lands to migrate to us, favouring them over anyone aged 50 or above. I am 56 btw, so I am speaking from a merely logical point of view, without compassion. The incentives should be sweetened for 20 somethings, especially those with children. While they seem to have forgotten it now, this has been the very model that America’s enormous economic success was built upon. We should be welcoming refugees and providing work permits to as many young families as possible, so the country can benefit from their economic activity and taxable incomes. The utter bogusness of the Tories, attempting to appeal to the lowest common denominator by inspiring panic, literally results in self harm as far as the country is concerned. It also prevents us from building a coherent system of the type we will need in the near future, when there actually is a genuine crisis of being overwhelmed, in the wake of a war or natural disaster. But currently, we are literally being offered one of the most precious resources and refusing it. Not just refusing it, but viciously rejecting it. The resource of humanity is incalculable. That’s just hard science.
    4
  4509.  @godless1014  : EDUCATION. That’s how you, “fight back.” First you win the war, with a transition of power, putting the lie to hopes that trump will somehow still be president. Then you win the peace, by punishing criminals, EXPOSING ALL OF THEIR LIES, for ALL TO SEE (which worked in Nazi Germany and post war Japan, so we KNOW it CAN be done) which is the first step in their education. You also INVEST huge amounts into Education. Smart people simply don’t vote far right, which is literally a scientifically measurable FACT. And you put smart, educated people in charge of that, instead of the Betsy types, who literally oppose education. It’s not so impossible. Most of them are not so far gone. Oh, and since we’re taking lessons from WWII, I should add that examples were made out of the Propagandists too. The Brit who broadcast from Germany, regularly trolling the Allies (known as Lord Haw Haw) was not even taken seriously by anyone. But, he was tried and HUNG regardless. Now, I’m not suggesting we hang Hannity . . . yet . . .But, we could institute some LAWS about the Definition of, “news,” like they do in the UK? Did you know, F*x has no operations in the UK whatsoever? They planned to. They spent the money and built the studios, etc. But, it all went wrong when the broadcasting Authority had to explain to them that it’s ILLEGAL to broadcast LIES and call it, “News,” in Britain. Rupert Murdoch fought that, to the highest courts in the land, and lost. He COULD have set up Fox in the UK? He could have had the exact same thing as he has in America, but on British soil. But, he just wasn’t allowed to call it, “news.” So, he had a trump style hissy fit, and left our shores without ever building Fox in the UK . . . To this day, the Brits have heard no more of F*x UK. It’s not difficult, if the will is there, and the lobbyists aren’t haunting every corridor of power . . . ✌️
    4
  4510. 4
  4511. 4
  4512. 4
  4513. 4
  4514. 4
  4515. 4
  4516. 4
  4517. 4
  4518. 4
  4519. 4
  4520. 4
  4521. 4
  4522. 4
  4523. 4
  4524. Yeah, that’s probably exactly what they would say if you asked them, too. The answer to this question is one of text and subtext: The card is, “supposed to tell you,” that they are sensible, “responsible,” gun owners, who can defang the dark side of public opinion by showing a family, “responsibly,” sharing their love of guns in the manner of a hobbyist, who has found an interest in which the whole family can share. “You too can bond with your kids over your shared love of home defence and your Constitutional, ‘rights,’ and Merry Christmas. Guns are wholesome.” But the subtext is also clear. And that subtext is spoken out loud as the very motto of the National Rifle Association, and it’s an implied threat. “We are not helpless, indeed, we are dangerous. And you’ll have to take our weapons from our cold, dead hands.” Making it uniquely sinister. British people are probably more mindful of the child abuse aspects and the hopelessness of reforming a country that legalises such deep indoctrination. Whereas American eyes, from more, “liberal minded,” states, probably just see an answer to the ongoing pressure in politics to reform gun laws, and hear the resounding, “No,” from Nashville. In Britain, the parent who sent that picture around as a Christmas card, would be facing a prison sentence and have his kids promptly whisked away by the local authorities. In Nashville, they made him a Congressman. And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the difference between, “two nations separated by a common language.” I will lose sleep because of that picture of the frightened, grieving child on the bus, and I wasn’t even in the same country, let alone, “responsible,” for local legislation.
    4
  4525.  @r0smor  : You’re a genius. Seriously. It’s smart to want to understand rather than simply condemn out of hand. Indeed, we’ve seen that the head on, oppositional approach does not work. Moreover, it plays into the hands of the gun lobbies, who will scream, “They’re coming to take your guns,” as a response to ANY liberal legislation, let alone legislation that actually addresses gun control. The first thing to understand is that it’s already too late. Depending on which statistics you believe, there are anywhere from two to five guns for every American in that country. So even a universally supported ban on guns would not get them out of the country now. That is not to suggest that effective, common sense measures cannot be of use. Far from it. But to really get to grips with it, we have to address what we’re really dealing with: BIG BUSINESS. The two most toxic and difficult to challenge elements of America’s gun problem are the Politics and the MONEY. You are dealing with incredibly wealthy people, who use branding, advertising and all of the social media techniques, that are employed legitimately and nefariously, that people like Putin and Xi use for disinformation purposes in very similar ways. Lobbying to the point of corruption; advertising to the point of disinformation; infiltration to the point of spy craft. Therefore, in an environment where common sense is not enough and hearts and minds are encouraged to be polarised, the first and most important step to taking away the gun lobby’s power is, “empathy.” They don’t just want to polarise the debate, but NEED everyone to be entrenched and in opposite camps. Shocking incidents like this school shooting actually HELP the gun lobbies, because the arguments always get too extreme for any common ground to be reached. The VERY LAST THING that the gun lobbies want is for smart people like you to start stepping into no man’s land, meeting people from the other side and finding common ground. But, if they are to be defeated at all, that is where they will fall, in the quiet, sensible spaces between the battle lines. Seriously. You made the best, smartest comment I’ve read all day on this. ✌️
    4
  4526. 4
  4527. 4
  4528. 4
  4529. 4
  4530. 4
  4531. 4
  4532. 4
  4533. 4
  4534. 4
  4535. 4
  4536. 4
  4537. 4
  4538. 4
  4539. 4
  4540. 4
  4541. 4
  4542. 4
  4543. 4
  4544. 4
  4545. 4
  4546. 4
  4547. 4
  4548. 4
  4549. 4
  4550. 4
  4551. 4
  4552. 4
  4553. 4
  4554. 4
  4555. 4
  4556. 4
  4557. 4
  4558. 4
  4559. 4
  4560. 4
  4561. 4
  4562. 4
  4563. 4
  4564. I noticed that tautology there too. However, the rest of it wasn’t so bad. It occurred to me, with the current vogue for prequels and origin stories, Travis would make a great prequel movie or mini series. I could picture the schoolboy who doesn’t fit in, but wants too, who just like in the movie, gets an even stronger rejection from women who find him shockingly weird. So, he joins the army, thinking he’ll fit in and find friendship there, and is sent to Vietnam. At first, he thinks he’s found the answer and wants to go career soldiering, training well, committing 100% and loving the routine and discipline. But the contradictions of Vietnam soon hit home when he’s deployed in the field. The one guy he gets close to (another undiagnosed mentally ill person) gets killed, horribly. And it’s only later that he discovers that his friend was murdered by his fellow combat troops during a combat mission, because they found him such a weirdo, and because he threatened to tell on them for atrocities they routinely carried out. Being Travis, he takes a souvenir from his buddy, a finger or an ear, in a scene where we see him cut off part of his friend, wrap it up, and we never learn what it was. And it all culminates in a shootout, at the end of a particularly gruelling battle in which half of his platoon was wiped out. The showdown occurs in the gap between the end of the battle and the wait for inbound choppers to pick up the survivors. The army can’t get the truth out of him about what went down, though they’re sure he’s murdered other troops. So, they can’t award him a Purple Heart for his wounds, without stating how, when and where he received his wounds, so they discharge him honourably, but that’s why he has no medals, despite having exit wound scars. The whole thing could be told in flashbacks, from the interview in which the top brass are trying to get the truth out of him, perhaps? And it ends with him showing up in New York and using his discharge papers and veteran’s experience to impress the guy who owns the yellow cab company, to get a job . . .
    4
  4565. 4
  4566. 4
  4567. 4
  4568. 4
  4569. 4
  4570. 4
  4571. 4
  4572. 4
  4573. 4
  4574. 4
  4575. 4
  4576. 4
  4577. 4
  4578. I know very little about the Philip Schofield of these times. As a 55 year old, all of my memories of him are fond, as a dark haired young man with Gordon The Gopher as his side kick, revolutionising the presentation style of children’s television with a model that would be copied by other channels and then morning television. There would have been no Roland Rat (who appealed to adults mainly) without the Schofield-as-anchorman-between-children’s-shows innovation, for which I remain eternally grateful. Though I was aware of the, “Cue-Gate,” ahem, “scandal,” which looked to me like it was simply more of a general misunderstanding of how television works, I was not aware of his brother’s issues (indeed, I still have no idea of the details) until the last few days. The same is true of the apparent strain in his professional relationship between him and Holly Willoughby. When two popular presenters were meant to shoot footage of themselves passing the Queen’s coffin, which effectively meant that their producers, camera operators, sound engineers, etc, would also have had to cue with them, that would have been an unreasonable demand to make on their team, surely? If their job was to help the nation process a sad but inevitable event, that was a professional undertaking, of which they were one part, and I simply saw the whole misunderstanding as risible, rather than career shattering. Obviously, I can understand how the public becomes attached to daytime TV presenters, feeling like they have shared so much history with them as they did their housework, or studies with these people in their background. They become a part of the set dressing on the stage of people’s personal history plays. But, I was never a fan of couch based daytime television and I have to admit to being somewhat bemused by all the attention this is getting? Will Rishi Sunack be answering questions in The House about this soon? It almost feels like this couple have become more than icons, but a literal cultural identity in themselves? And it is as though it’s as painful for some commentators as a divorce? I hope to be understood that I am not asking these questions in an, “ironical,” tone, nor do I in the least bit wish to belittle a matter which is of great cultural importance to so many. But, I would like to understand it better? What is actually going on here? Why has he really quit? And why is the entire nation so fixed on this drama right now? Schofield always struck me as a good and decent man, to whom British television owes a debt. It is becoming clear to me that he has faced some truly unpleasant domestic issues around his brother, and struggles with his work place. But, were they so insoluble? Are we going to lose Schofield forever? That would be a bad thing. Like the C of E, though I never paid him much mind, it was always reassuring to know he was there. His influence on the British public has always been one of kindness, sincerity, humour and depth of feeling: all qualities we would do well to foster in our society. So I just hope I am not missing something of greater importance, by not having followed his day to day dramas more closely? I wish him well, from my less well informed position, and hope very much to see him return to television or the web in some other way.
    4
  4579. 4
  4580. 4
  4581. 4
  4582. 4
  4583. 4
  4584.  @BullDykee : I’m not Jake, but I can tell you that both N Korea and Russia have to look to their dominant senior partner for permission to do anything of consequence together, and that will be up to Xi. My biggest worry is that they may be setting up a smuggling conduit from China, through N Korea, to Russia? There are sanctions busting measures that can be taken by the west, already in place but not really enforced very heavily, to prevent this, but it would likely cause an escalation of tensions between China and the west. I just hope the Chinese, who are facing some serious domestic crises, pending, are not dumb enough to go down that road? It would throw their economy under the bus and make them desperate enough to make mistakes. If it’s just strictly business just between the two nations, the net will be positive for the west, as N Korea will only be returning supplies and weapons that Russia gave them with in the first place, which western weaponry will destroy in Ukraine, meaning a net loss for Putin and Kim. Mostly Putin, as Kim will have been paid, in dollars. The only real concern we should all share is over nuclear technology. That would be Putin’s biggest, and probably last, mistake. Kim could cause havoc in the region with new nuclear technology or fissionable materials. But there are several western allies and western countries that simply will not allow Putin’s regime to get away with such a reckless act. They would officially join in the war to defend Ukraine, so that Europe can be secured in order to confront this new development and finally cripple Russia. And suddenly, Putin will be under a greater domestic threat than he was when Prigozhin was alive. But the world will be a more dangerous place.
    4
  4585. 4
  4586. 4
  4587. 4
  4588. 4
  4589. 4
  4590. 4
  4591. 4
  4592. 4
  4593. 4
  4594. 4
  4595. 4
  4596. 4
  4597. 4
  4598. 4
  4599. 4
  4600. 4
  4601. 4
  4602. 4
  4603. 4
  4604. 4
  4605. 4
  4606. 4
  4607. 4
  4608. 4
  4609. 4
  4610. 4
  4611. 4
  4612. 4
  4613. 4
  4614. 4
  4615. 4
  4616. 4
  4617. 4
  4618. 4
  4619. 4
  4620. 4
  4621. 4
  4622. 4
  4623. 4
  4624. 4
  4625. 4
  4626. 4
  4627. 4
  4628. 4
  4629. 4
  4630. 4
  4631. 4
  4632. 4
  4633. 4
  4634. 4
  4635. 4
  4636. 4
  4637. 4
  4638. 4
  4639. 4
  4640. 4
  4641. 4
  4642. 4
  4643. 4
  4644. I don’t want to come off as callous but, those women seem to have been fine with their husbands all training to bomb innocent Ukrainian civilians into dust, from many miles away, but are complaining when they get transferred to units where they’re forced to fight armed Ukrainian soldiers. So it’s hard for me to work up a whole lot of sympathy for their, “plight,” which seems primarily to be a complaint about not getting to be the bullies they were promised their menfolk would be? At least they aren’t having to replace their windows with humorous graffiti boards, or rebuild their electricity stations every other day, so they still have it pretty good compared to their Ukrainian counterparts. And you don’t hear of Ukrainian wives and mothers banding together to complain about anything! I love your even handed, balanced approach to all these videos, Jake. I think the decision to read the highlights without showing Russian complainants anymore was smart. After all, you still give links for all who wish to see them, without allowing Russian complaints to draw attention away from the very just plight of the Ukrainian people and their actual real time suffering. We must never forget that every Ukrainian spouse suffers the same anxieties for their trooper counterpart, son, husband, etc, whilst having to avoid random missiles killing or maiming them outright, plunging them into darkness and the freezing cold, or randomly robbing them of friends, relatives and neighbours. Every time I see Russian spouses or soldiers make one of these videos, knowing that if they were to get a response it would likely be their violent repression, I can’t help but wonder, are they hypocrites or merely stupid?
    4
  4645. 4
  4646. 4
  4647. 4
  4648. 4
  4649. 4
  4650. 4
  4651. 4
  4652. 4
  4653. 4
  4654. 4
  4655. 4
  4656. 4
  4657. 4
  4658. 4
  4659. 4
  4660. 4
  4661. 4
  4662. 4
  4663. 4
  4664. 4
  4665. 4
  4666. 4
  4667. 4
  4668. 4
  4669. 4
  4670. 4
  4671. 4
  4672. 4
  4673. 4
  4674. 4
  4675. 4
  4676. 4
  4677. 4
  4678. 4
  4679. 4
  4680. 4
  4681. 4
  4682. 4
  4683. 4
  4684. 4
  4685. 4
  4686. 4
  4687. 4
  4688. 4
  4689. 4
  4690. 4
  4691. 4
  4692. 4
  4693. 4
  4694. 4
  4695. 4
  4696. 4
  4697. 4
  4698. 4
  4699. 4
  4700. 4
  4701. 4
  4702. 4
  4703. 4
  4704. 4
  4705. 4
  4706. 4
  4707. 4
  4708. 4
  4709. 4
  4710. 4
  4711. 4
  4712. 4
  4713. 4
  4714. 4
  4715. 4
  4716. 4
  4717. 4
  4718. 4
  4719. 4
  4720. 4
  4721. 4
  4722. 4
  4723. 4
  4724. 4
  4725. 4
  4726. 4
  4727. 4
  4728. 4
  4729. 4
  4730. 4
  4731. 4
  4732. 4
  4733. 4
  4734. 4
  4735. 4
  4736. 4
  4737. 4
  4738. 4
  4739. 4
  4740. 4
  4741. 4
  4742. 4
  4743. 4
  4744. 4
  4745. 4
  4746. 4
  4747. 4
  4748. 4
  4749. 4
  4750. 4
  4751. 4
  4752. 4
  4753. 4
  4754. 4
  4755. 4
  4756. 4
  4757. 4
  4758. 4
  4759. 4
  4760. 4
  4761. 4
  4762. 4
  4763. 4
  4764. 4
  4765. 4
  4766. 4
  4767. 4
  4768. CNN got trapped in the Alt-Wrong’s narrative, through no fault of their own, and were painted as the opposite side of the coin as Fox, when they’re not even the same currency. Tell me? How could ANY news organisation report on, analyse or write Op Eds, etc, on the last administration, without pointing out their failures, lies and crimes? Just because the TRUTH made them look so bad, they got constantly attacked by the government and an entire corporate machine of right wing media for being honest, so they have been forced to justify their reporting, account for their journalism and back up every iota of information against an onslaught of hostile propaganda. All of that has created the image of a, “left leaning,” news organisation, “hostile to the government,” when they have always tried to be unbiased news! Stelter’s right. We should demand more from our journalists. They need to challenge more and hold the government accountable; not just on issues that concern the public, but on issues that SHOULD concern the public, if only they knew about them! But, you make a good point. I suspect they all just wanted to get through this event without making gaffs or getting into the usual spats we saw under trump, and they’re probably a bit disorientated from all of the previous knock about farces of the last 4 years? And they do need to step up their game now. But CNN is not pro or anti anything when they’re at their best. They’re trying to be straight news. And the demons at Fox won’t allow that, if they can help it. Our job is to refuse that narrative altogether and trust the journalism, by journalistic standards ✌️
    4
  4769. 4
  4770. 4
  4771. 4
  4772. 4
  4773. 4
  4774. 4
  4775. 4
  4776. 4
  4777. 4
  4778. 4
  4779. 4
  4780. 4
  4781. 4
  4782. 4
  4783. 4
  4784. 4
  4785. 4
  4786. 4
  4787. 4
  4788. 4
  4789. 4
  4790. 4
  4791. 4
  4792. 4
  4793. 4
  4794. 4
  4795. 4
  4796. Now, that is an interesting take, Fareed. And, I confess, I certainly hadn’t thought about it quite like that before. However, I see certain factors at play that are historically unusual, everywhere I look. So, I doubt if anyone can make a truly certain guess as to where this all ends? What I see with optimism, for once, is that there is an unprecedented degree of international agreement over the coalition to break Russia’s economy, once and for all, so as to reduce their capacity for worldwide interference, which has also been unprecedented in recent years. Especially when we calculate Russia’s literal trillion dollar (or equivalent) investment in hacking, social media disruption and disinformation campaigns that have been causing such ills all around the world for the past decade or more? Whilst China remains our strongest and most pressing rival, economically, politically and in terms of raw power, Russia has been by far the biggest threat to worldwide stability, punching way above its own weight and getting away with political gadflying for far too long. Democracy itself has been facing the, “death of a thousand cuts,” because of this direct threat. And now that we have unsheathed our soft power and financial sword, so to speak, we have no alternative but to use it. The battle lines may have been drawn long ago, but the battle has been joined now. Losing that fight is not an option either. We can only hope that smarter people than us see the economic realities and have a responsible instinct regarding its impact upon worldwide democracy? We must scrutinise, criticise and hold accountable, everyone. But we must also trust our side and back it to win.
    4
  4797. 4
  4798. 4
  4799. 4
  4800. 4
  4801. 4
  4802. 4
  4803. 4
  4804. 4
  4805. 4
  4806. 4
  4807. 4
  4808. 4
  4809. 4
  4810. 4
  4811. 4
  4812. 4
  4813. 4
  4814. 4
  4815. 4
  4816. 4
  4817. 4
  4818. 4
  4819. 4
  4820. 4
  4821. 4
  4822. 4
  4823. 4
  4824. 4
  4825. 4
  4826. 4
  4827. 4
  4828. 4
  4829. 4
  4830. 4
  4831. 4
  4832. 4
  4833. 4
  4834. 4
  4835. 4
  4836. 4
  4837. 4
  4838. 4
  4839. 4
  4840. 4
  4841. 4
  4842. 4
  4843. 4
  4844. 4
  4845. 4
  4846. 4
  4847. 4
  4848. 4
  4849. 4
  4850. 4
  4851. 4
  4852. 4
  4853. 4
  4854. 4
  4855. 4
  4856. 4
  4857. 4
  4858. 4
  4859. 4
  4860. 4
  4861. 4
  4862. @ : BTW, before you answer, you might want to research the background? Since the Cold War started in the 1950’s, it was America’s policy (under all presidents) that Western European powers would allow them to direct international security for America’s interests, which is incidentally what made them grow in power, and in return for allowing America to call all the shots America took charge of all (most of the) military outlay, contributing the lion’s share so as to maintain control of international policy. The Korean War, The Cold War, the Viet Nam War and many other conflicts all took place under this American doctrine. It worked very well for all parties concerned . . . politically, or with regard to international policy making, that is. If America withdraws from NATO or simply shrinks its role, Europe will take up the slack, at the cost of America’s leading role in the world. This will affect US domestic wealth directly, since military might and wealth go hand in hand in developed, democratic countries. Industrial capacity will have to wind down in the US for all the tertiary and related industries. Hey, look. It was America that wanted it that way. If they can dress up giving up their influence in the world to look like they’re taking care of their own people first, convincing them, even while they get poorer while their politicians get richer, that will cause far fewer headaches for the rest of the world than it will for Trump. They will be over their biggest realignment issues by the time Trump has left office. And it will be a far humbler president that comes to do business with Europe thereafter. All I’m saying is, have it your way. But don’t try to kid yourselves that America has been helping out the idle Europeans. We gave you what you asked for, and you did very well out of it. You don’t want to be the most powerful nation any more? Fine.
    4
  4863. 4
  4864. 4
  4865. 4
  4866. 4
  4867. 4
  4868. 4
  4869. 4
  4870. 4
  4871. 4
  4872. 4
  4873. 4
  4874. 4
  4875. 4
  4876. 4
  4877. 4
  4878. 4
  4879. 4
  4880. 4
  4881. 4
  4882. 4
  4883. 4
  4884. 4
  4885. 4
  4886. 4
  4887. 4
  4888. 4
  4889. 4
  4890. 4
  4891. 4
  4892. 4
  4893.  @surprisinglythiswasavailable  : No! It’s really not and it chills me that a channel like this tries SO HARD to be, “even handed,” that it forgets what a legitimate point of view looks like and starts giving the Gravity Deniers equal, “weight!” See whaddi’ did there? 😉 Maybe Putin just needs to get over this false assumption that the expansion of democracy is any of his business? Maybe he needs to stop pretending that he’s not still just a Soviet Union thug? Otherwise, how could ANY, “deal,” (spoken or otherwise) still be valid? The Soviet Union is supposed to be gone! It’s like someone walking into a music store and demanding they fix their car, because the place used to be a garage! It’s f*cking lunacy! I’m sick of channels like this acting as though merely having an opposite view should be validated in some way!? I oppose the MOON! No! I insist that there’s no such thing and that projected hologram in the sky must go! Now I’m entitled to equal time to debate this on news channels, create a cult following and get to debate it in Washington on Capitol Hill! F*cking madness! This computer expert should learn more history and maybe learn just how many PEOPLE were DYING in the west, just so they could spread Democracy to the east! Instead of acting like, just because Putin says the moon isn’t real, we all have to nod our heads and say, “Tell us all about it, Puty?” F*ck that guy and F*ck this channel! Putin is in Ukraine to prevent them from developing their MASSIVE gas and oil reserves. Period! It’s an armed robbery, with NO, “alternative view,” and NO justification. A few Kremlin Kleptocrats have had the west eating out of the palms of the hands and they’re now shocked that the west doesn’t want to lose control of energy security? They haven’t studied their history either. Ever since the term, “Energy Security,” has existed, for over a hundred years, the west has NEVER let the east take away their control over that. And Putin will NOT be an exception. He’s not, “special.” He has no, “argument.” He a f*cking thug who’s threatening nukes and BLUFFING. But accident do happen if you keep letting a maniac wave a loaded weapon around. So it’s time we made it clear: we are no longer doing business with the maniac! They can depose him in a palace coup or they can have a revolution. But only an IDIOT let’s a mad man wave a loaded weapon in their face a second time! F*ck Putin! He’s done!
    4
  4894. 4
  4895. 4
  4896. 4
  4897. 4
  4898. 4
  4899. 4
  4900. So, I have a script for the movie called The President’s Speech: Inauguration Day. Yes. The sequel to the King’s Speech. It has everything. The boy from Scranton overcomes a crippling speech disability and talks way into our hearts and then, smooth talks his way into the White House. You get a montage, with Eye Of The Tiger playing in the background, of him doing all those funny exercises with his speech coach and love interest, Kamala; I know, but it’s Hollywood, so it’s got to be historically inaccurate. You get the moving bit, when he meets that boy, with the same disability, who breaks down crying, but never forgets the encouragement and ongoing support from Biden who befriended him. Then, that same kid comes back and gives a speech at Biden’s campaign, to violin music, which makes us all cry. And at the end, Biden makes the best damned speech, that unites the whole country behind him, to bombastic yet soaring Hans Zimmer music, that makes us all want to stand and salute him! And it ends with Kamala, softly breathing the words, “Shazam, Mr President,” as she kisses him in front of the world, on the podium. He winks and says, “Kamala, I’m lost for words.” They embrace, the crowd roars it’s approval, the score soars and the flying Delorian from Back To The Future circles overhead (for no explainable reason WHATSOEVER! Except that it looks SO damned cool!) and flies into camera with a crackling and a white flash! Role credits to the tune of Huey Lewis’s Power of Love! Would you pay to see that movie? I would! 🤣👏🥳✌️👍
    4
  4901. 4
  4902. 4
  4903. 4
  4904. 4
  4905. 4
  4906. 4
  4907. 4
  4908. 4
  4909. 4
  4910. 4
  4911. 4
  4912. 4
  4913. 4
  4914. 4
  4915. 4
  4916. 4
  4917. 4
  4918. 4
  4919. 4
  4920. 4
  4921. 4
  4922. 4
  4923. 4
  4924. 4
  4925. 4
  4926. 4
  4927. 4
  4928. 4
  4929. 4
  4930. 4
  4931. 4
  4932. 4
  4933. 4
  4934. 4
  4935. 4
  4936. 4
  4937. 4
  4938. 4
  4939. 4
  4940. 4
  4941. 4
  4942. 4
  4943. 4
  4944. 4
  4945. 4
  4946. 4
  4947. 4
  4948. 4
  4949. 4
  4950. 4
  4951. 4
  4952. 4
  4953. 4
  4954. 4
  4955. 4
  4956. 4
  4957. 4
  4958. 4
  4959. 4
  4960. 4
  4961. 4
  4962. 4
  4963. 4
  4964. 4
  4965. 4
  4966. 4
  4967. 4
  4968. 4
  4969. 4
  4970. 4
  4971. 4
  4972. 4
  4973. 4
  4974. 4
  4975. 4
  4976. 4
  4977. 4
  4978. 4
  4979. 4
  4980. 4
  4981. 4
  4982. 4
  4983. 4
  4984. 4
  4985. 4
  4986. 4
  4987. 4
  4988. 4
  4989. 4
  4990. 4
  4991. 4
  4992. 4
  4993. 4
  4994. 4
  4995. 4
  4996. 4
  4997. 4
  4998. 4
  4999. 4
  5000. 4
  5001. 4
  5002. 4
  5003. 4
  5004. 4
  5005. 4
  5006. 4
  5007. 4
  5008. 4
  5009. 4
  5010. 4
  5011. 4
  5012. 4
  5013. 4
  5014. 4
  5015. 4
  5016. 4
  5017. 4
  5018. 4
  5019. 4
  5020. 4
  5021. 4
  5022. 4
  5023. 4
  5024. 4
  5025. 4
  5026. 4
  5027. 4
  5028. 4
  5029. 4
  5030. 4
  5031. 4
  5032. 4
  5033. 4
  5034. 4
  5035. 4
  5036. 4
  5037. 4
  5038. 4
  5039. 4
  5040. 4
  5041. 4
  5042. 4
  5043. 4
  5044. 4
  5045. 4
  5046. 4
  5047. 4
  5048. 4
  5049. 4
  5050. 4
  5051. 4
  5052. 4
  5053. 4
  5054. 4
  5055. 4
  5056. 4
  5057. 4
  5058. 4
  5059. 4
  5060. 4
  5061. 4
  5062. 4
  5063. 4
  5064. 4
  5065. 4
  5066. 4
  5067. 4
  5068. 4
  5069. 4
  5070. 4
  5071. 4
  5072. 4
  5073. 4
  5074. 4
  5075. 4
  5076. 4
  5077. 4
  5078. 4
  5079. 4
  5080. 4
  5081. 4
  5082. 4
  5083. 4
  5084. 4
  5085. 4
  5086. 4
  5087. 4
  5088. 4
  5089. 4
  5090. 4
  5091. 4
  5092. 4
  5093. 4
  5094. 4
  5095. 4
  5096. 4
  5097. 4
  5098. 4
  5099. 4
  5100. 4
  5101. 4
  5102. 4
  5103. 4
  5104. 4
  5105. 4
  5106. 4
  5107. 4
  5108. 4
  5109. 4
  5110. 4
  5111. 4
  5112. 4
  5113. 4
  5114. 4
  5115. 4
  5116. 4
  5117. 4
  5118. 4
  5119. The art of NEVER LOSING the game: DON’T PLAY! . . . It’s a genius strategy. Note how she, reflecting Joe, never kicks trump while he’s down; never rubs his, or any of the Alt-Wrong’s, noses in it; never scores the open goals they leave for her? GOP Senators are literally complaining that Biden’s Tweets are not confrontational or emotionally charged enough! By simply answering questions, without humiliating anyone, in her inimitable, articulate, informed and professional manner, she’s helping the administration achieve its long-game; its long-term objective: To go around the GOP and the far-right media, straight to the hearts and minds of the American people. And, if polling is anything to go by, it’s working. Trump’s enablers know that they’re the biggest losers in this fight. Especially if the American people are the biggest winners. But, they are also the ones in the highest positions of the GOP. They will have that, “civil war,” they’ve always wanted, but it will be among themselves. And the smartest thing this administration can do, is what it’s already doing: it’s job. Without fuss or drama. Lindsay Graham, and the others on his wing of the GOP will try some more stunts as their desperation increases, and we must remain vigilant. But, if they lose more seats at the midterms, it’s finally OVER for Trumpian Fascism in America, and about one half of that GOP. Imagine what the Dems could achieve for us, with full and proper control of both houses? . . . ✌️
    4
  5120. 4
  5121. 4
  5122. 4
  5123. 4
  5124. 4
  5125. 4
  5126. 4
  5127. 4
  5128. 4
  5129. 4
  5130. 4
  5131. 4
  5132. 4
  5133. 4
  5134. 4
  5135. 4
  5136. 4
  5137. 4
  5138. 4
  5139. 4
  5140. 4
  5141. 4
  5142. 4
  5143. 4
  5144. 4
  5145. 4
  5146. 4
  5147. 4
  5148. 4
  5149. 4
  5150. 4
  5151. 4
  5152. 4
  5153. 4
  5154. 4
  5155. 4
  5156. 4
  5157. 4
  5158. 4
  5159. 4
  5160. 4
  5161. 4
  5162. 4
  5163. 4
  5164. 4
  5165. 4
  5166. 4
  5167. 4
  5168. 4
  5169. 4
  5170. 4
  5171. 4
  5172. 4
  5173. 4
  5174. 4
  5175. 4
  5176. 4
  5177. 4
  5178. 4
  5179. 4
  5180. 4
  5181. 4
  5182. 4
  5183. 4
  5184. 4
  5185. 4
  5186. 4
  5187. 4
  5188. 4
  5189. 4
  5190. 4
  5191. 4
  5192. 4
  5193. 4
  5194. 4
  5195. 4
  5196. 4
  5197. 4
  5198. 4
  5199. 4
  5200. 4
  5201. 4
  5202. 4
  5203. 4
  5204. 4
  5205. 4
  5206. 4
  5207. 4
  5208. 4
  5209. 4
  5210. 4
  5211. 4
  5212. 4
  5213. 4
  5214. 4
  5215. 4
  5216. 4
  5217. 4
  5218. 4
  5219. 4
  5220. 4
  5221. 4
  5222. 4
  5223. 4
  5224. 4
  5225. 4
  5226. 4
  5227. 4
  5228. 4
  5229. 4
  5230. 4
  5231. 4
  5232. 4
  5233. 4
  5234. 4
  5235. 4
  5236. 4
  5237. 4
  5238. 4
  5239. 4
  5240. 4
  5241. 4
  5242. 4
  5243. 4
  5244. 4
  5245. 4
  5246. 4
  5247. 4
  5248. 4
  5249. 4
  5250. 4
  5251. 4
  5252. 4
  5253. Thank you! For at least discussing the topic! You’re the first in 20 comments (all with tons of likes) that wasn’t worshipping Charlie’s sound glitch at the end there! Personally, I think it’s more about doing things that wouldn’t do in public? We all do daft things to entertain our kids, spouses, friends, even colleagues, that we’d be abashed by if anyone saw them. If we’re honest, we all have human brains that sometimes flood with oxytocin, making us feel that, “cute aggression,” which is a common phenomenon, fascinating to psychologists. Whether you want to squeeze a baby’s cheek, or squish up a kitten or puppies, or whatever. That’s a natural thing that all (“normal”) humans experience, unless you have brain damage or a particularly rare form of neuro-divergence. Yet, our survival mechanisms usually persuade us that this is not suitable for public consumption and we don’t actually share such intimacy with the public at large. I get why some people just want to share their love, as their brains are flooded with chemicals that impair judgement: which is why there are so many unwanted pregnancies in the world, among other things that result from the sudden rush of emotion that a chemically unbalanced mind can damage the host’s best interests with. But, I also detected Charlie’s deeper message there. He was saying, “I hope you’re all happy now, for bullying a harmless couple to tears?” He knows he has no real right to tell us off, but at the same time, I think he was ashamed more of the bullying than he was of the cringemeisters? I also get the sense that there were several guilty parties fiercely ignoring the content of Charlie’s message who, “doth protest too much,” about an irrelevant sound glitch, rather than acknowledge feeling a little ashamed of something they tweeted recently?
    4
  5254. 4
  5255. 4
  5256. 4
  5257. 4
  5258. 4
  5259. 4
  5260. 4
  5261. 4
  5262. 4
  5263. 4
  5264. 4
  5265. 4
  5266.  @johnjamesbaldridge867  : When you fall into the, “Well, other people agree with me,” trap, you’re already on shaky ground. As far as I know, (and I really HOPE I’m wrong about his?) Roger Penrose is the only physicist I know of who has (obliquely) asked a very common sense question about Inflation Theory (which should technically be called, “Inflation Hypothesis,” but that’s another can of worms) which is: If space, “inflated,” in the blink of an eye, why didn’t time inflate with it? Why does Inflation Theory abandon Einstein’s fundamental hypotheses at the CRUCIAL moment? I genuinely believe that once you put E=MC2 back into the equation, you will get a result that makes perfect sense and explains that, “space,” did NOT just jump on its own! “Time,” as viewed from a vast distance, looks tiny in the same way that distant baryonic matter does! Why should Space-Time cease to be a, “thing,” despite absolutely EVERY other observation we can make conforming to the basic rules of physics, wherever we look at any point in space and time? The reason that space has the same temperature (“homogeneity”) across the entire sky is that it all occurred at the same, “time,” but only appears to speed up, because we’re seeing it from a vast distance. You literally have to abandon E=MC2 for Guth’s hypothesis to make sense! And he offers absolutely zero account for WHY space decided to just expand at a rate that literally requires more energy than the universe posses! Not just a bit more, but logarithmic scales more energy than could possibly exist. Occam’s Razor applied to the problem; and you look for an explanation that accounts for what we SEE and for what IS right now, and we apply the KNOWN theory of how space AND time are INEXTRICABLY linked, making them ONE THING. Then it’s actually intuitive, makes more sense than inflation, and fits the evidence. Space and time are expanding, which is basically, “what,” the universe is. The none-static properties of the universe are what give rise to ALL observed phenomena, and explain why we automatically miscalculate, “time,” and distance, failing to take time’s expansion into account along with that of space itself. But plug in time’s expansion and you have solvable equations that stay within the parameters of OBSERVATION. I would so dearly love to sit down with those two guys over a coffee. Although, maybe Guth’s should be decaffeinated? 😉
    4
  5267. 4
  5268. 4
  5269. 4
  5270. 4
  5271. 4
  5272. 4
  5273. 4
  5274. 4
  5275. 4
  5276. 4
  5277. 4
  5278. 4
  5279. 4
  5280. 4
  5281. 4
  5282. 4
  5283. 4
  5284. 4
  5285. 4
  5286. 4
  5287. 4
  5288. 4
  5289. 4
  5290. 4
  5291. 4
  5292. 4
  5293. 4
  5294. 4
  5295. 4
  5296. 4
  5297. 4
  5298. 4
  5299. 4
  5300. 4
  5301. 4
  5302. 4
  5303. 4
  5304. 4
  5305. 4
  5306. 4
  5307. 4
  5308. Please could you give me a reference to look this story up? Regrettably, I missed it completely. I would very much like to know what this head teacher is saying and how he explains his rebellion? It is a bold and brave thing to do, regardless of his reasoning, right or wrong. Prima facia I stand with him. Though I too recognise the enormous importance of memorialising those among us who make the ultimate sacrifice for the rest of us, it seems fairly plain that even the over-propagandised Russians know that their cause is unjust, their methods brutal and their sacrifice too great for the sake of a tiny oligarchy’s ambitions, flinging all of the laws of diplomacy and war into the teeth of an outraged democratic world. Usually, when one person bravely takes a stand like this, they are merely expressing what everyone about them is thinking and feeling. And, if I had to guess, I would bet real money that this educator is not unwilling to memorialise the fallen soldier, as he is to accept the propaganda that they propose to hedge about his plaque? He will argue that it is the war he is opposing, not the boy. And that is a dilemma, which I am sure he must be feeling keenly. He may even feel that he is sacrificing his own future, liberty and possibly more, for the sake of that soldier as much as for his community. He does not have the luxury of distance that we do, knowing his actions must have an impact and that his time has come (presumably?) for this gesture. It will be easy for the Russian state to mobilise arguments similar to the one you expressed. But, for me at least, it does not take a great leap of the imagination to picture a head teacher who once knew this boy, knew his values, his hopes and dreams, his anxieties and fears, and perhaps is in a position to know that the person who would be most offended by a memorial of this type would be that boy himself? And that is just one of so many scenarios that leap to my overactive writer’s mind (“an imagination trained to misbehave,” as Stephen King once put it) that may fully justify this head teacher in a more personal, moral stance than we see on the face of it? That is why I would very much like to know where this story came from, read it myself and maybe use the search terms to find other journalistic takes on the situation? Such matters are close to my heart too.
    4
  5309. 4
  5310. 4
  5311. 4
  5312. 4
  5313. 4
  5314. 4
  5315. 4
  5316. 4
  5317. 4
  5318. 4
  5319. 4
  5320. 4
  5321. 4
  5322. 4
  5323. 4
  5324. 4
  5325. 4
  5326.  @peterlearner8594  : All true, but keep in mind that China has been covertly supporting Russia throughout this war. An open decision to support them would amount to a change in rhetoric, more than an actual real terms change, as they’ve been finding it expensive to retool their factories, so as to ensure that any shell casing or weapons don’t carry obvious markings of China’s production on them. If I had to guess, I’d say China is merely testing the waters to see what western resolve looks like in the face of that threat. China is facing a serious economic downturn of its own and knows that sanction packages have already been prepared in the west, to be slapped on swiftly, should they chance their arm with even, “minor,” support in terms of weapons and materials. This, “Doubling Down,” message is probably as much for Beijing’s ears as Moscow’s. I could be entirely wrong, but China is always super cautious in all it does. They haven’t even actually voted in the UN Council in favour of Russia’s war, so far. Nor have they voted against resolutions against Russia, preferring to, “abstain.” China stands to gain a lot from a weakened Russia, and will know that a prolonged, grinding war could result in Russia becoming a, “vassal state,” supplying those vital fossil fuels in return for China’s propping up of their teetering state? If Russia was to become as reliant upon China as North Korea is for their mere existence - in a similar way that Belarus is the vassal of Russia, destined to have their administration overthrown if Russia should see a democracy in a Revolution (which would be its first ever, btw) - then China might be able to rescue itself from its all but insurmountable domestic, economic and demographic woes. So, Xi will be playing both ends off against each other, hoping for a protracted conflict now. Xi is almost as bitter about Putin’s miscalculations over Ukraine as he is, as it cost him Taiwan, as he sees it. At least, in the immediate future. And any plans they had of dominating the world by dominating the manufacture of technology and the raw materials for making said tech, which would have been the main benefit of swift invasions of Ukraine and Taiwan together, have been scuppered now anyway, since America has set up its own manufacturing hub, with many of the same people who produced all those microchips in Taiwan (over 50% of the world’s supply from one factory, btw) now based in the heart of the US, whilst the Argon and other precious minerals that Ukraine produces, are still well within the none-occupied zones of Ukraine. This was a lengthy response, so I appreciate your patience if you bore with me. But, I just wanted to show that, A) there are so many moving parts to this that we cannot predict with any certainty how things will unfold, other than to be sure that Russia will be forced out of Ukraine in the end. And, B) China may want to exacerbate the situation, but it’s not in China’s interests to burn all of its boats and come out as a direct antagonist to the west, when it has so little to gain from Russia that it cannot get anyway, by safer means, which traditionally, has always been their preferred way of doing things regardless. ✌️🇺🇦
    4
  5327. 4
  5328. 4
  5329. 4
  5330. 4
  5331. 4
  5332. 4
  5333. 4
  5334. 4
  5335. 4
  5336. 4
  5337. 4
  5338. 4
  5339. 4
  5340. 4
  5341. 4
  5342. 4
  5343. 4
  5344. 4
  5345. 4
  5346. 4
  5347. 4
  5348. 4
  5349. 4
  5350. 4
  5351. 4
  5352. 4
  5353. 4
  5354. 4
  5355. 4
  5356. 4
  5357. 4
  5358. 4
  5359. 4
  5360. 4
  5361. 4
  5362. 4
  5363. 4
  5364. 4
  5365. Tania Cleland : My honest, best guess: If you remember Billo Liely? He used to talk about ratings ALL the time, and established a culture at Fox, of equating viewing figures with veracity. Y’know? If more people watch this show, then it MUST be, “true,” kinda’ thing. Very insecure; very childish; but a kind of Marketing technique, which, being Fox, worked effectively on the weak minded viewership, seeking reassurance, to quiet their nagging doubts and consciences. Years on, because they do it all the time now, it’s actually taken hold. They ACTUALLY, “BELIEVE,” that Normals would be as insecure about ratings as they have been brainwashed into being. So, Trolls, “think,” (if there’s an actual word for their mental processes?) that mentioning ratings works as a, “Whaddabout,” technique. They genuinely, “think,” Normals would equate truthfulness with ratings, or at least, that they would be distracted and, “emotionally hurt,” by the mere IDEA that CNN was losing viewers. They cannot comprehend that it’s the FACTS that matter to Normals, because they think we are like them; in allegiance to a news channel which acts as our mouthpiece, like theirs does. Therefore, we’d consider the failure of CNN as the failure of our, “side.” They’re genuinely THAT FAR GONE! “Brainwashed,” just isn’t a big enough superlative. But, that’s why we get, “the failing NY Times,” from Trump, right? Like their commercial status has ANYTHING to do with ANYTHING? Because, in their fucked up world, it DOES. Sorry. I went on a bit, there. But, it’s a, “Whaddabout,” that would work on them, is my best guess ✌️👍
    4
  5366. 4
  5367. 4
  5368. 4
  5369. 4
  5370. 4
  5371. 4
  5372. 4
  5373. 4
  5374. 4
  5375. 4
  5376. 4
  5377. 4
  5378. 4
  5379. 4
  5380. 4
  5381. 4
  5382. 4
  5383. 4
  5384. 4
  5385. 4
  5386. 4
  5387. 4
  5388. 4
  5389. 4
  5390. 4
  5391. 4
  5392. 4
  5393. 4
  5394. 4
  5395. 4
  5396. 4
  5397. 4
  5398. 4
  5399. 4
  5400. 4
  5401. 4
  5402. 4
  5403. 4
  5404. 4
  5405. 4
  5406. 4
  5407. 4
  5408. 4
  5409. 4
  5410. 4
  5411. 4
  5412. 4
  5413. 4
  5414. 4
  5415. 4
  5416. 4
  5417. 4
  5418. 4
  5419. 4
  5420. 4
  5421. 4
  5422. 4
  5423. 4
  5424. 4
  5425. 4
  5426. 4
  5427. 4
  5428. 4
  5429. 4
  5430. 4
  5431. 4
  5432. 4
  5433. 4
  5434. 4
  5435. 4
  5436. 4
  5437. 4
  5438. 4
  5439. 4
  5440. 4
  5441. 4
  5442. 4
  5443. 4
  5444. 4
  5445. 4
  5446. 4
  5447. 4
  5448. 4
  5449. 4
  5450. 4
  5451. 4
  5452. 4
  5453. 4
  5454. 4
  5455. 4
  5456. 4
  5457. 4
  5458. 4
  5459. 4
  5460. 4
  5461. 4
  5462. 4
  5463. 4
  5464. 4
  5465. 4
  5466. 4
  5467. 4
  5468. 4
  5469. 4
  5470. 4
  5471. 4
  5472. 4
  5473. 4
  5474. 4
  5475. 4
  5476. 4
  5477. 4
  5478. 4
  5479. 4
  5480. 4
  5481. 4
  5482. 4
  5483. 4
  5484. 4
  5485. 4
  5486. 4
  5487. 4
  5488. 4
  5489. 4
  5490. 4
  5491. 4
  5492. I do think there is something wrong with a culture that takes the, “official complaint,” as the first line of response to a problem rather than simply speaking to the person responsible. The man in question gave an eminently reasonable response and I think people should have their complaints summarily dismissed unless they can evidence their own attempts to approach the person in question to seek a remedy. We need to foster a culture of cooperation and community. And to foster a society that judges the official complaint as a form of failure in itself. Unless you are elderly and infirm, or in some other way disabled and have no one to act on your behalf, why do we feel we have the right to use up the precious resource of official time? Of course the ice cream van is an import, as is the Christmas Tree, Halloween celebrations and countless other little joys that I recall as a part of the landscape of my childhood. So what? Why should that have any bearing? Should we ban American Halloween? German Christmas Trees? Or should we remember that little ray of sunshine that sparkled in our own childhoods when we heard the chimes of the ice cream van coming? From your description, the ice cream vendor seems a harmless, polite man, plying his trade as best he can and keen to reach a resolution without bothering any, “officials.” We all know our rights, don’t we? How many of us know our responsibilities as well, and in such detail, as those rights? I don’t doubt he did let his chimes play on too long, and would apologise and stop doing it, if he’d merely been asked. But no. Mr, or Ms, Angry had to reach for the phone or their keyboard and waste the time and resources of, “officialdom,” just to make a point. Presumably because peeing on all four corners of the street to mark out their territory has gone out of style? Phooey, to Mr or Ms Angry. The guy’s just trying to make a living. Who doesn’t love an ice cream van? Other than certain members of the Scottish Mafia, but that’s another tale altogether.
    4
  5493. 4
  5494. 4
  5495. 4
  5496. 4
  5497. 4
  5498. 4
  5499. 4
  5500. 4
  5501. 4
  5502. 4
  5503. 4
  5504. 4
  5505. 4
  5506. 4
  5507. 4
  5508. 4
  5509. 4
  5510. 4
  5511. 4
  5512.  @dirtyharold7164  : If you could just take a step outside of that space (which you seem to think is inside my head and thought processes) and allow me to disabuse you of your incorrect assumption, no . . . I was inspired by her words. More to the point, I was inspired by what she said, when she said it, and where. Context is everything, dear boy. I also disagree with some of what she said, but I don’t think that makes her a bad person. What you won’t be able to do (and this is fact, not assumption) is point to one single example of people being, “punished,” by her, or her acolytes, for, “refusing to behave in a particular way.” Nor will you be able to show me one iota of evidence that she, or anyone who took any part in the, “Young leaders program,” (which I honestly think you’re mistaking for some type of Manchurian Candidate, “deep state,” version of MK Ultra, instead of an effort to promote the futures of promising young leaders) ever once stated the goal of turning the world into some, “weird, dystopian nightmare.” I know this because it is a fact. In the same way that I know that YOU have literally stepped into the public domain on this day to spout out an unqualified, un-thought-through, misogynistic and prejudicial conspiracy theory, riddled with assumptions and distorted by your own negative emotions, whilst achieving very little, unless your goal was to create a mental image in the heads of the adult, reading public of YOU beating out your angry words with your fists and forehead, missing all of your typos due to the tears of impotent rage misting your vision, whilst sitting on your bed instead of doing something useful with your time. Although, you have provided me with a modicum of entertainment, so it’s not all wasted. You have my sympathies, son.
    4
  5513. 4
  5514. 4
  5515. 4
  5516. 4
  5517. 4
  5518. 4
  5519. 4
  5520. 4
  5521. 4
  5522. 4
  5523. 4
  5524. 4
  5525. 4
  5526. 4
  5527. 4
  5528. 4
  5529. Never has the expression, “You can’t polish a turd,” been more apt. Delusion and gaslighting just can’t cut it, even amongst the most, “loyal,” Tories. Braverman is gleeful, making her best play for leadership, which relies on the destruction of the current iteration of the Tories, so she’s as toxic as ever, but at least the people who created her are being forced to taste some of their own bitter brew. For Sunack, who will leave for America after the election; who has nothing to lose in terms of real power (being a money man on Wall Street gives him more power than leading a political party, and he knows it) he only has his ego to protect now. And we should not underestimate the power of that. He sees the spectre of the worst Tory defeat since the war, possibly ever. And that makes him dangerous. The American political wonks, who have their hooks deeply into our Tufton (sorry if I misspelled Tufton?) Street Tories, make public speeches in their country about the, “dangers of education,” and the Tories have actively taken up that message. They know it is only the uneducated who can be persuaded to vote against their own interests. Soon, teachers will be like doctors, only contactable by phone and social media, if we continue down this road. Much as I admire your call for Sunack’s Dickensian, Damascene conversion toward even the obvious, let alone a legacy of doing SOME good before he leaves, I fear the reality will be far more like the Black Adder version of A Christmas Carol, in which he will lose all of his last inclinations toward kindness and reason and simply try to leave as insoluble a mess as possible. The reasoning being that he will hope that no incoming government will be able to fix our problems, which will provide him with legacy excuses. If, “reason,” or rationality had ever been a factor in this government, we would not be where we are now. Instead of practical, rational, good faith policy making we’ve seen nothing but opposition baiting, emotive and emotional cruelty and victimising of the most helpless members of society. We’ve seen public services quite callously exploited, looted and eviscerated, from our water supply to health, policing and education. And now Sunack proposes doing away with National Insurance!? It’s like he’s TRYING to alienate the last bastion of solid support he might have expected to count on! The elderly! Is he going to raise retirement to 75? It looks that way. Not that he’ll ever get the chance. But the Tories have emptied the public purse and are desperately scrambling to find ANY source of income that does NOT involve taking money from the very richest people in society or offending the client press’s sensibilities. I don’t envy the next Labour government. I just hope that they would have the character and good sense to form a coalition, regardless of their numbers, so that we really can, “work together as a nation,” as you said, and put a PR system in place, whilst we solve the nation’s problems collectively. And I pray that includes some accountability for those callous criminal goons who ran the postal service’s scamming machines and ruined honest people’s lives. Sorry for going on. That was not my intention. You really do get me thinking hard. People like you give me hope that not all is lost. Thank you, if you read all of this. And thank you anyway. Your service, this channel, is a jewel in YouTube’s crown.
    4
  5530. 4
  5531. 4
  5532. 4
  5533. 4
  5534. 4
  5535. 4
  5536. 4
  5537. 4
  5538. 4
  5539. 4
  5540. 4
  5541. 4
  5542. 4
  5543. 4
  5544. 4
  5545. 4
  5546. 4
  5547. 4
  5548. 4
  5549. 4
  5550. 4
  5551. 4
  5552. 4
  5553. 4
  5554. 4
  5555. 4
  5556. 4
  5557. 4
  5558. 4
  5559. 4
  5560. stephen wedderburn : It is required, by International and US Military law, that you cannot stand by, while a crime is committed. Obviously, the commanders on the ground, like you and I, are not naive, and probably know better than we do, that Trump is following Putin’s directives, here. But, they also know that they have no way to establish that, and that an order is an order. As the orders have no violence attached to them, they would not even question them, officially. Nor, would we want them to, as they have no way of guessing at the broader strategy behind such orders. However, events on the ground are a different ballpark. “Someone,” alerted Trump to the fact that US troops would be witness to atrocities, as the fighting was literally closing in on them, from all sides. So, a corridor had to be created, (the ceasefire) in which to get them out, without being put in a compromising position; as there are no orders telling them NOT to intervene, if they a witness to war crimes. These are, after all, their personal friends, with whom they have spilled the same blood, in the same mud. As I said, above, this is why the ceasefire was not respected, as it was only a deal, between Erdogan and Trump, to allow US troops to get out, without exposing them to what’s going on. So, the Turks have continued to blast areas where they know there are no US military. The short answer is: No, they can’t question their orders. But, yes they could intervene or even refuse unlawful orders, if confronted with their allies and their families being murdered. Which is why they have been shielded from that, after Trump was informed of the potential mess that could result, too late. Does that answer your question?
    4
  5561. 4
  5562. 4
  5563. 4
  5564. 4
  5565. 4
  5566. 4
  5567. 4
  5568. 4
  5569. 4
  5570. 4
  5571. 4
  5572. 4
  5573. 4
  5574. 4
  5575. 4
  5576. 4
  5577. 4
  5578. 4
  5579. 4
  5580. 4
  5581. 4
  5582. 4
  5583. 4
  5584. 4
  5585. 4
  5586. 4
  5587. 4
  5588. 4
  5589. 4
  5590. As to your broader commentary on the Afghan war, I find myself in agreement with almost all of what you said. Though I think it is important to note two things. Firstly, with regard to making the people who planned 911 regret taking part in that act of terrorism, and deterring nations and terror groups from contemplating further such acts, the invasion of Afghanistan was a 100% success. Ask any Afghani Taliban older than 30 if they think another atrocity along those lines would be worth carrying out? They would run a mile and, if they really thought you were seriously capable of doing it, they would probably eliminate you. The second point is that Nation Building was the cardinal error of that campaign. That works in secular, developed countries, which is why it worked so well in Germany and Japan after WWII. But such a model had already been shown as impossible to implement in Iraq and the intractable issues surrounding the Middle East conflicts were also lessons ignored. They never actually, “made progress,” of any kind. The allies tricked themselves into believing that, in the same way they tricked themselves into believing that Putin was a man we could do business with. The fact was that it was always going to be washed away unless the west committed to staying there permanently, which was something that was never on the cards. Yet, once again, despite the fact that neither side comes out of that with anything but shame and disgrace, at least Biden’s administration is only guilty of misreading the situation and botching it. Trump’s is guilty of that too, but we must also add to that his wilful betrayal of America, releasing over a thousand KNOWN terrorists in one fell swoop, and inviting their bloody leaders to Camp David. An almost sacrilegious smearing of a national place of honour with his attempts at wheeler dealing with terrorist murderers. And all to no avail. Unless you count the chaos to which trump deliberately added, which he saw as a win, because it, “looked bad,” for Biden? The cost in human lives never entered his thinking.
    4
  5591. 4
  5592. 4
  5593. 4
  5594. 4
  5595. 4
  5596. 4
  5597. 4
  5598. 4
  5599. 4
  5600. 4
  5601. 4
  5602. 4
  5603. 4
  5604. 4
  5605. 4
  5606. 4
  5607. 4
  5608. 4
  5609. 4
  5610. 4
  5611. 4
  5612. 4
  5613. 4
  5614. 4
  5615. 4
  5616. 4
  5617. 4
  5618. 4
  5619. 4
  5620. 4
  5621. 4
  5622. 4
  5623. Thanks for this analysis. But, are we at risk of misunderstanding the mindset at play here? The west is seeing both sides of the battle lines from the perspective of geo-politics, long term objectives and strategic outcomes (as reflected so eloquently in your video) whilst Zelensky and his government all have their heads in the trenches. The CIA advised Zelensky to pull out of Bakhmut, weeks ago. Yet he hasn’t. Have you accounted for Zelensky’s reasoning for that? Might it be something as plain for them that they simply want to make the Russian army understand that every inch of territory they take will cost them too much blood and treasure to be worth it? What may be lost on Putin will not be lost on an already demoralised Russian army? And if any breakdown in Russia’s political stability occurs, it will begin in the armed forces. While the west’s leaders view the entire conflict from their geo-centric point of view, Ukrainians are concentrating on breaking the will of their enemy’s armed forces. After all, if you’re a Russian commander who knows that even a strategically worthless piece of real estate is going to cost you far more blood and treasure than your opponent, how reluctant would you feel about ordering your troops to attack an actually valuable, already well guarded target? Especially if those troops are under resourced, under nourished and surely to begin with? Making videos that they hope Putin will see so he’ll get resources to them, not knowing that he already knows and is more likely to have them killed for it, does not make for a successful army. The will of your armed forces is a key component to winning a war, or so the generals and historians tell me. And, a country at Total War has a psychology unlike others. In my own country’s history, 1939 to 1940 were bleak years where Britain stood alone in Europe, facing Nazi tyranny, which they struggled to convey to their counterparts in the US until the Lend Lease program began to very slowly turn things around. Had it not been for Pearl Harbor, Britain might well have lost that war. I think you should commit some of your analysis to the psychology, stresses and strains of wartime leadership, and how very different the world looks from Zelensky’s perspective, than to Putin’s or the west’s?
    4
  5624. 4
  5625. 4
  5626. 4
  5627. 4
  5628. 4
  5629. 4
  5630.  @nigelhaywood9753  : You know, while I free-formed that diatribe off the top of my head, so to speak, I used a little tool that many writers use, just to help with the flow: Adopting a voice. I imagined the voice of Andrew Marr, doing one of those 5 minute YouTube videos he does so well; taking a step back and describing what he sees going on behind the scenes as a political story breaks. If you listen to the syntax and usages (as a dyslexic I, “hear,” all my prose before I put it to the page: hence adopting a, “voice,” through which to express it, which helps me spout. Oops! I’m doing it again!) when you read that passage, you can just picture Marr vocalising that little OpEd (as the Americans like to call it) which is what made the question resonate for me, and what made it pour out in that fashion. It was Andrew Marr’s voice doing the talking in a, “How would he put it?” type moment. What disappoints me so bitterly is myopia. The flat, disingenuous lack of self awareness. It’s not an especially new phenomenon, but these self contradictory excuses were what Marr offered up in a YouTube video of an LBC broadcast. A channel that prides itself on having representation from all political persuasions, from Boris Johnson’s sister on one end (presumably representing the centre right? I don’t really know?) to Eddie Mayer, a stalwart of BBC Radio 4’s flagship news show The Today Program, and all points East or West of what they represent in people’s heads. If anything, I would have expected Marr to speak honestly on this platform, but his excuses were so mealy mouthed I was genuinely shocked and even (yes, I admit it) somewhat hurt by the disappointment. No one likes to lose respect for a trusted informer. But what really stung me was the Orwellian realisation that I had, like an epiphany; “He really thinks he’s right about this! He’s honestly talked himself into, ‘believing,’ he’s not the problem!” Now, every time I see him, it’s like an awkward guest at a dinner party. You get along fine and can trust, “most,” of what he says, but you can never let go of that time when he really let the side down. Now, if I smile at one of his quips, nod along to a point well made, sympathise with his indignation at some politician’s behaviour, the effect is always diluted . . . no . . . slightly noxious, like there’s an impurity in the water. And then someone like you comes along and asks THE question, like the boy who says out loud, “But the emperor has no clothes on!” and it reminds me. Yes. I know why no one asks Cruella about her own hypocrisy to her face. And I feel just a little bit sick. Because an old and once trusted friend has let me down and all is not quite right with the world. Anyway. It felt good to get it off my chest, and I must thank you for acknowledging my response: both for your patience and for seeing my point. It helps to know that others out there get it. Thanks. 👍✌️
    4
  5631. 4
  5632. 4
  5633. 4
  5634. 4
  5635. 4
  5636. 4
  5637. 4
  5638. 4
  5639. 4
  5640. 4
  5641. 4
  5642. 4
  5643. 4
  5644. 4
  5645. 4
  5646. 4
  5647. 4
  5648. 4
  5649. 4
  5650. 4
  5651. 4
  5652. 4
  5653. 4
  5654. 4
  5655. 4
  5656. 4
  5657. 4
  5658. 4
  5659. 4
  5660. 4
  5661. 4
  5662. 4
  5663. 4
  5664. 4
  5665. 4
  5666. 4
  5667. 4
  5668. 4
  5669. 4
  5670. 4
  5671. 4
  5672. 4
  5673. 4
  5674. 4
  5675. 4
  5676. 4
  5677. 4
  5678. 4
  5679. 4
  5680. 4
  5681. 4
  5682. 4
  5683. 4
  5684. 4
  5685. 4
  5686. 4
  5687. 4
  5688. 4
  5689. 4
  5690. 4
  5691. 4
  5692. 4
  5693. 4
  5694. 4
  5695. 4
  5696. 4
  5697. 4
  5698. 4
  5699. 4
  5700. 4
  5701. 4
  5702. 4
  5703. 4
  5704. 4
  5705. 4
  5706. 4
  5707. 4
  5708. 4
  5709. 4
  5710. 4
  5711. 4
  5712. 4
  5713. 4
  5714. 4
  5715. 4
  5716. 4
  5717. 4
  5718. 4
  5719. 4
  5720. 4
  5721. 4
  5722. 4
  5723. 4
  5724. 4
  5725. 4
  5726. 4
  5727. 4
  5728. 4
  5729. 4
  5730. 4
  5731. 4
  5732. 4
  5733. 4
  5734. 4
  5735. 4
  5736. 4
  5737. 4
  5738. 4
  5739. 4
  5740. 4
  5741. 4
  5742. 4
  5743. 4
  5744. 4
  5745. 4
  5746. 4
  5747. 4
  5748. 4
  5749. 4
  5750. 4
  5751. 4
  5752. 3
  5753. 3
  5754. 3
  5755. 3
  5756. 3
  5757. 3
  5758. 3
  5759. 3
  5760. 3
  5761. 3
  5762. 3
  5763. 3
  5764. 3
  5765. 3
  5766. 3
  5767. 3
  5768. 3
  5769. 3
  5770. 3
  5771. 3
  5772. 3
  5773. 3
  5774. 3
  5775. 3
  5776. 3
  5777. 3
  5778. 3
  5779. 3
  5780. 3
  5781. 3
  5782. 3
  5783. 3
  5784. 3
  5785. 3
  5786. 3
  5787. 3
  5788. 3
  5789. 3
  5790. 3
  5791. 3
  5792. 3
  5793. 3
  5794. 3
  5795. 3
  5796. 3
  5797. 3
  5798. 3
  5799. 3
  5800. 3
  5801. 3
  5802. 3
  5803. 3
  5804. 3
  5805. 3
  5806. 3
  5807. 3
  5808. 3
  5809. 3
  5810. 3
  5811. 3
  5812. 3
  5813. 3
  5814. 3
  5815. 3
  5816. 3
  5817. 3
  5818. 3
  5819. 3
  5820. 3
  5821. 3
  5822. 3
  5823. 3
  5824. 3
  5825. 3
  5826. 3
  5827. 3
  5828. 3
  5829. 3
  5830. 3
  5831. 3
  5832. 3
  5833. 3
  5834. 3
  5835. 3
  5836. 3
  5837. 3
  5838. 3
  5839. 3
  5840. 3
  5841. 3
  5842. 3
  5843. 3
  5844. 3
  5845. 3
  5846. 3
  5847. 3
  5848. 3
  5849. 3
  5850. 3
  5851. 3
  5852. 3
  5853. 3
  5854. 3
  5855. 3
  5856. 3
  5857. 3
  5858. 3
  5859. 3
  5860. 3
  5861. 3
  5862. 3
  5863. 3
  5864. 3
  5865. 3
  5866. 3
  5867. 3
  5868. 3
  5869. 3
  5870. 3
  5871. 3
  5872. 3
  5873. 3
  5874. 3
  5875. 3
  5876. 3
  5877. 3
  5878. 3
  5879. 3
  5880. 3
  5881. 3
  5882. 3
  5883. 3
  5884. 3
  5885. 3
  5886. 3
  5887. 3
  5888. 3
  5889. 3
  5890. 3
  5891. 3
  5892. 3
  5893. 3
  5894. 3
  5895.  @richieg1887  : Haven’t you noticed? It’s either always the same old names or brand new accounts that come to LIVE on CNN, to tell everyone else not to watch CNN. They are Donny’s, “deep state,” and one of the most compelling reasons we should ALL pay attention to CNN. The more of them there are, and the louder they get, the more important the story is to either trump or PooTin. That’s how we know. If it hadn’t been for troll activity CNN might not be so popular world wide? They have convinced the world that there’s an awful lot that the enemies of America’s Republic don’t want us to, “believe.” They are what convinced so many activists to get active in the cause of democracy. They’re the morons who seem to think that Stalin’s old Orwellian techniques of propaganda, handled hamfistedly and with all the maturity of an angry, racist nine year old with a behaviour disorder, can still work in the modern era. They were only half right. It works just fine on their own channels, where they’re preaching to the choir who are looking for excuses to justify their laziness of thought, their racism and their desire to, “blame,” the other for their own entitlement and failure. But, when they come to mature, grown up channels, they merely serve to convince adults that they’re scared of adult thinking, reason, logic, science and truth. In that sense, we owe these morons a debt of gratitude for shooting themselves in the foot, SO comprehensively. They have literally convinced millions to oppose trump, trumpism and Putinism.
    3
  5896. 3
  5897. 3
  5898. 3
  5899. Nuno Foo : Good of you to say that. Thanks. I’m not offended, nor am I surprised at ignorance and bigotry. It’s one of the last bastions to be conquered; we don’t attack people because of their sexuality or skin color, but even the, “liberals,” among us, still feel that it’s open season on our inner most thoughts, faith and the things that give us comfort, in an incomprehensible world. Of course, if I said I was a Muslim, most of those same liberals would have nothing to say to me, because they think it’s somehow, “racist,” to attack THAT belief, even though there is such a thing as Caucasian Muslims (that thought would not occur to them). Whether you believe that God made the universe to behave randomly, in such a way that terrible things can happen, but so that the precious Free Will that makes us human and not robots, CAN exist; or, whether, like me, you spent the first four decades of your life never considering the possibility of a God, until you met the guy, I have no problem with you or what you believe. It goes without saying, I hope, that I do have a problem, at the moment you impose your belief onto someone else, use it as an excuse to attack others, or just give yourself a cheap thrill by trying to hurt people you don’t even know. But, then science WANTS that battle (or some scientists do) because they are educated enough to know that THEY are the Prophets of the modern era, capable of working miracles and bringing down destruction upon us. So, they want the money and respect that goes with that, after having spent years being called a nerd. Who can blame them for human frailty? Not me? But then, I don’t go around, randomly kicking people in the balls, for being different, like some of the, “science fans,” who seem so eager to disqualify chunks of our population from the human race, in an ironically unscientific way. My daughter is a physicist at a world-leading University and a Christian. This is possible, in small part, because I brought her up to believe that the two things - faith and science - are NOT mutually exclusive; but, that Religion (whether it is of the science variety or the alleged, “faith,” type) never mix well. I really appreciate you reaching out, like that. You did more for me, with those few, well chosen words, than you can know. Again . . . Thank you 🙂✌️
    3
  5900. 3
  5901. 3
  5902. 3
  5903. 3
  5904. 3
  5905. 3
  5906. 3
  5907. 3
  5908. 3
  5909. 3
  5910. 3
  5911. 3
  5912. 3
  5913. 3
  5914. 3
  5915. 3
  5916. 3
  5917. 3
  5918. 3
  5919. 3
  5920. 3
  5921. 3
  5922. 3
  5923. 3
  5924. 3
  5925. 3
  5926. 3
  5927. 3
  5928. 3
  5929. 3
  5930. 3
  5931. 3
  5932. 3
  5933. 3
  5934. 3
  5935. 3
  5936. 3
  5937. 3
  5938. 3
  5939. 3
  5940. 3
  5941. 3
  5942. 3
  5943. 3
  5944. 3
  5945. 3
  5946. 3
  5947. 3
  5948. 3
  5949. 3
  5950. 3
  5951. 3
  5952. 3
  5953. 3
  5954. 3
  5955. 3
  5956. Agreed. At no point did Boris ever tell us, “Here is what you think.” But, wasn’t that what the whole, “Stop The Boats,” rubbish was about in the first place? I still, to this day, cannot find a single person who even asked for that policy or who sees it as important. Plenty who express horror and alarm at it, even among conservative voting friends. And when I ask them, they agree that it seemed to drop out of a clear blue sky! Ipsos MORI polls consistently show that migration and asylum seekers are among the LOWEST priorities among voters! And the numbers don’t lie either. We take far fewer immigrants of any kind in the UK than all of our European counterparts! It strikes me that Sunak and his other two brown skinned brown shirts (Priti Patel and Suella B) have been attempting social engineering with this notion since the start? Telling us we, “care,” about this, so as to sweep up the far right and the low level bigots along with the nose-holding conservatives faithful, all under one big tent? They have seen the Americanisation of politics as a future in which they will prosper. That’s my theory. Stoking deliberate fear, division and anger (which always draws more attention on the internet than anything positive: there are comprehensive studies to show this, and platforms like Twitter have been exploiting the fact for over a decade now) are the way to command the greatest number of eyes on screens, ears to listen and, (who knows?) votes at the polling booths? It’s a cynical strategy, metastasised from within a morally bankrupt corporation, masquerading as a political party, calling itself, “The Conservatives.” An oxymoron if ever there was one.
    3
  5957. 3
  5958. 3
  5959. 3
  5960. 3
  5961. 3
  5962. 3
  5963. 3
  5964. 3
  5965. 3
  5966. 3
  5967. 3
  5968. 3
  5969. 3
  5970. 3
  5971. 3
  5972. 3
  5973. 3
  5974. 3
  5975. 3
  5976. 3
  5977. 3
  5978. 3
  5979. 3
  5980. 3
  5981. 3
  5982. 3
  5983. 3
  5984. 3
  5985. 3
  5986. 3
  5987. 3
  5988. 3
  5989. 3
  5990. 3
  5991. 3
  5992. 3
  5993. 3
  5994. 3
  5995. 3
  5996. 3
  5997. 3
  5998. 3
  5999. 3
  6000. 3
  6001. 3
  6002. 3
  6003. 3
  6004. 3
  6005. 3
  6006. 3
  6007. Roy Gonzalez : If Flynn makes it to court again, that will be all the evidence you need that he’s about to be let off the hook. How many people on death row, or just guilty of betraying our country, would LOVE to be able to change their plea, AFTER SENTENCING??? Merely entertaining that NOTION is a TRAVESTY! We HAVE TO STOP!!! Seriously, America! You are being PLAYED by the CLASSIC Putin Tactic on, “How To Maintain Your Dictatorship.” You always think the, “remedy,” is just around the corner, because that’s what they WANT you to think! The imprisonment of half of Trump’s campaign team? Surely, he can’t survive THAT, right? The trial and imprisonment of his Cabinet members? It must be close now? His impeachment!? CAUGHT! REDD HANDED! No? . . . Nothing? . . . Then definitely the, “elections,” right? . . . They can’t be RIGGED can they? . . . ALREADY? . . . WAKE UP, AMERICA! Your Republic has FALLEN! And, by acting like they have, “not,” already decided NOT to go to jail, is BEYOND NAIVETY NOW! It’s RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT! You are buying the Dictatorship the time it needs to CONSOLIDATE AND PREPARE ITS EXCUSES, FOR WHY THE BALLOTS SEEM DODGY IN KEY STATES! You should be Revolting?! Maybe you love your Orange Monarchy? Maybe you hate them? Just, PLEASE??? For the LOVE OF GOD??? Will you ALL STOP COLLUDING WITH THE IDEA THAT YOUR “ELECTIONS” ARE NOT ALREADY RIGGED??? The entire administration and the whole Trump K K Klan will GO TO JAIL, if Trump loses his power!!! Which means he’s KEEPING IT! For LIFE! Unless he hands it over to his daughter, maybe? But, they have NO CHOICE but to insulate themselves, because they’re ALL CRIMINALS! Just please, WAKE UP!
    3
  6008. 3
  6009. 3
  6010. 3
  6011. 3
  6012. 3
  6013. 3
  6014. 3
  6015. 3
  6016. 3
  6017. 3
  6018. 3
  6019. 3
  6020. 3
  6021. 3
  6022. 3
  6023. 3
  6024. 3
  6025. 3
  6026. 3
  6027. 3
  6028. 3
  6029. 3
  6030. 3
  6031. 3
  6032. 3
  6033. 3
  6034. 3
  6035. 3
  6036. 3
  6037. 3
  6038. 3
  6039. 3
  6040. 3
  6041. 3
  6042. 3
  6043. 3
  6044. 3
  6045. 3
  6046. 3
  6047. 3
  6048. 3
  6049. 3
  6050. 3
  6051. 3
  6052. 3
  6053. 3
  6054. 3
  6055. 3
  6056. 3
  6057. 3
  6058. 3
  6059. 3
  6060. 3
  6061. 3
  6062. 3
  6063. 3
  6064. 3
  6065. 3
  6066. 3
  6067. 3
  6068. 3
  6069. 3
  6070. 3
  6071. 3
  6072. 3
  6073. MaL: C : In Stalin’s Russia, the whole trick was about it being obvious. The idea was, if Stalin said the moon was not real and just a conspiracy, his cult like followers all KNOW that’s bollox, but there’s a double payoff for acting like they, “believe,” it. In America, the payoff has mostly been about trolling America. It is disconcerting to imagine that millions of Americans might actually, “believe,” the moon’s not real. But, in Stalin’s Russia, where he had control of ALL but dissident media, it was a Test Of Loyalty. The whole point of it was that you would repeat Stalin’s fictions, as though they were facts, and if you didn’t, you were identified as an, ‘undesirable.” If trump cheated his way to a 2nd term, his first attacks will be on CNN and MSNBC; probably (as it already looks likely?) a hostile takeover of the company that owns CNN, and the break up of MSNBC, with a bunch of faked, “scandals,” law suits, and show trials. The rest of the media gets the message, and plays ball, or goes out like their colleagues. Everything Trump does is Stalin’s playbook, which is hardly surprising, when it comes from the teachings of his coach, Putin. So, it’s NOT that the cult, “believes,” trump. They fake it, for effect. Their problem now, of course, is that it’s not for, “fun,” anymore. Now they do it out of FEAR. They fear, “We told you so.” They fear shame and humiliation, when they see they can’t get any of their stolen funds back. They fear “payback” in a lawful society, that checks their racist klan gatherings. They fear seeing their leaders go to jail, and the end of their dystopian dream of a white America, in which greed and racism are all that matters. But, most of all, they fear the TRUTH, as their reaction to this, “Fact Checking,” so clearly demonstrates. After all, they are about to join an exclusive club? The group of victims who got shafted the hardest, out of any con in history; a mark of shame that will live with them forever, and change their lives. They’re right to fear the truth, too. There’s no hiding place. Sorry to go on like that. I’m rather passionate ✌️👍
    3
  6074. 3
  6075. 3
  6076. 3
  6077. 3
  6078. 3
  6079. 3
  6080. 3
  6081. 3
  6082. 3
  6083. 3
  6084. 3
  6085. 3
  6086.  @elizabethwhite1068  : Take comfort, my friend. Several things are going to happen and the right will rally to the banner of their next big thing, soon enough. Keep in mind also, that many of the cult don’t, “believe,” this nonsense any more than you or I do. It’s a convenient fiction for them, because Donny is a racist, which is the only thing they really like about him. But, Donny won’t attend the Inauguration Ceremony, because that would be an admission to his Cult, of Biden’s legitimacy. That’s literally what it’s for; passing on the baton. And, to trump, “bending the knee,” and acknowledging Biden’s supremacy over him. So, where will he go? With all those warrants and indictments to worry about? For him, his family and his colleagues? He can’t be IN America on Jan 20th? But, he can be in a country with no extradition treaty? And he can take all that MONEY Roger Stone’s collecting for him. And, that will just be the first blow to the cult, that will come, one after another, when the DOJ’s INDEPENDENCE is restored, and all of Donny’s betrayals of America are revealed. The cult will discover that THEY were always Donny main target when it to financial scams. And, when he’s rendered ineligible for office, due to his criminal record (as will be his family) and there’s a new face in town, gathering up the fans, (to who’m Donny could never accept 2nd place) his former cult will HATE him with a passion and never forgive him for robbing them . . . It’s not Donny I’m worried about. Or his Million Moan Marchers, who showed they could only muster a few thousand (far less than Hillary got, after the 2016 elections) and that was when they had MOMENTUM! It’s whatever comes next? Has Putin got anyone else lined up? He must be thinking about it? We need to make some EXAMPLES to scare off future traitors? So, people see it’s not worth the risk? Don’t you think? Not for, “revenge.” For National Security! ✌️👍
    3
  6087. 3
  6088. 3
  6089. 3
  6090. 3
  6091. 3
  6092. 3
  6093. Wait a minute? This, “week long crack down,” as you describe it, is actually the first step in getting to the people smugglers! It leads to getting the bastards who exploit these desperate people in the first place! There is FAR MORE than just display going on here. Just think about it? How DO you get the smugglers? Labour did promise that they would go after the traffickers instead of all of this bullying of the migrants themselves, as the Tories prefer! The Home Office will have signed off on this operation, but it will have been the police who proposed them, not Yvette Cooper. All of these business GOT their, “staff,” from somewhere, right? And if you round up a whole bunch of these receivers and exploiters in one go, so they cannot talk to each other, you work on them to get to their sources! You find out who their contacts are, and work your way up the chain! That’s precisely what they SHOULD be doing! And is this Yvette Cooper, or a received response? Is this not the actions of the police? Somehow, I don’t picture Ms Cooper donning a flack jacket and kicking down doors? She merely signed off on a police action, presumably proposed BY the police, didn’t she? Yes, we need changes in policy. But Parliament is not even in session, so GIVE THEM A CHANCE, for crying out loud!? I support the idea of better policy AND going after the evil traffickers AS PROMISED in Labour’s manifesto! You seem to have made too many assumptions here that you cannot possibly be in a position to know? A habit formed from seeing our last government always doing as little as possible while shouting as much as possible, no doubt. But, I suspect this operation is intended to shake more intelligence out of the trees and get to those sods who need catching. And I say, wait and see BEFORE judging! They’ve barely had time to get their suspects into the station and you’re dismissing the whole thing as flannel? Why?
    3
  6094. 3
  6095. 3
  6096. 3
  6097. 3
  6098. 3
  6099. 3
  6100. 3
  6101. 3
  6102. 3
  6103. 3
  6104. 3
  6105. 3
  6106. 3
  6107. 3
  6108. 3
  6109. 3
  6110. 3
  6111. 3
  6112. 3
  6113. 3
  6114. 3
  6115. 3
  6116. 3
  6117. 3
  6118. 3
  6119. 3
  6120. 3
  6121. 3
  6122. 3
  6123. 3
  6124. 3
  6125. 3
  6126. 3
  6127. 3
  6128. 3
  6129. 3
  6130. 3
  6131. 3
  6132. 3
  6133. 3
  6134. 3
  6135. 3
  6136. 3
  6137. 3
  6138. 3
  6139. 3
  6140. 3
  6141. 3
  6142. 3
  6143. 3
  6144. 3
  6145. 3
  6146. 3
  6147. 3
  6148. 3
  6149. 3
  6150. 3
  6151. 3
  6152. 3
  6153. 3
  6154. 3
  6155. 3
  6156. 3
  6157. 3
  6158. 3
  6159. 3
  6160. 3
  6161. 3
  6162. 3
  6163. 3
  6164. 3
  6165. 3
  6166. 3
  6167. 3
  6168. 3
  6169. 3
  6170. 3
  6171. 3
  6172. 3
  6173. 3
  6174. 3
  6175. 3
  6176. 3
  6177. 3
  6178. 3
  6179. 3
  6180. 3
  6181. 3
  6182. 3
  6183. 3
  6184. 3
  6185. 3
  6186. 3
  6187. 3
  6188. 3
  6189. 3
  6190. 3
  6191. 3
  6192. 3
  6193. 3
  6194. 3
  6195. 3
  6196. 3
  6197. 3
  6198. It strikes me that the crux of Zelensky’s plan is one new approach from the west: The willingness of America and the western allies to put Russia in a position of serious military losses. No longer will the support be aimed solely at, “defending,” Ukraine. The idea is to aggressively, “attack,” Russia, until Putin understands he will lose, and, “could,” lose more at home by experiencing a chain of defeats both in Ukraine and ON RUSSIAN SOIL. If the west really wants an END to this war, Ukraine has to WIN it. And that realisation is slowly sinking in. Professor Allan Lichtman has made his prediction, that Kamala Harris will win the election. He is world famous for having used his own design of analysis which has correctly predicted the winner of every election in America for over 40 years now. I have followed his work since the Clinton presidency and see his methodology is very well thought out and totally reliable. As far as I’m concerned, we have the answer. Putin cannot rely on trump. 2025 will be the year the war ends, if Harris is willing to up America’s support, which I believe she will. Especially since she has so much to gain from seeing it end and being instrumental in that, and less to lose from early in her presidency. The fickle public will forget any mistakes and vote with their wallets, as per usual, and all candidates know this much at least. Ukraine’s victory is assured. Our responsibility, with this knowledge in mind, is to keep writing to our representatives so that we can save more lives by ensuring Ukraine’s victory sooner rather than later. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦🔱🇬🇧
    3
  6199. 3
  6200. 3
  6201. 3
  6202. 3
  6203. 3
  6204. 3
  6205. 3
  6206. 3
  6207. Pixie Girl 333 : And therein lays the problem. Edmond Burke’s tired old line is as true now, as it was when he said it, “All evil needs, to succeed, is for good men to do nothing.” I’m sure he would have included “women” had he lived today. There IS NO, “fence,” to sit on, or, “middle ground,” to occupy; no, “neutrality,” nor, “even-handedness,” remains available to us. There is not even any, “politics,” any longer. The fence has been smashed, and the middle ground has been invaded. There is ONLY right and wrong, remaining. Those who are paralysed by indecision, or who wish to entertain safe, comforting illusions of neutrality, will be swept aside by one side or the other. I don’t say this to alarm, upset, distress or make you feel ANY negative emotion. I am simply stating facts. And, sadly, the facts are ugly. But, remember, you can no more be neutral in the face of this WORLD WIDE ATTACK upon Democracy, than you can in the face of Nazism. You can either start, “Zieg Heiling,” and hope to be accepted, or you can FIGHT to restore DEMOCRACY. It was the ATTACKERS, the Russians and their colluders, who kicked out the fence from under us, and invaded all the safe spaces. But, if you hope to lay down under a white flag, in the midst of the battle field, well . . . good luck with that? But, NEVER forget, by attempting to appease BOTH sides, you risk becoming the enemy of BOTH sides. Inaction is a CHOICE, with CONSEQUENCES, JUST as SEVERE as any action you could take, for one side or the other. Don’t let them fool you into thinking anything else. Silence is COMPLICITY. God bless you
    3
  6208. 3
  6209. 3
  6210. 3
  6211. 3
  6212. 3
  6213. 3
  6214. 3
  6215. 3
  6216. 3
  6217. 3
  6218. 3
  6219. 3
  6220. 3
  6221. 3
  6222. 3
  6223. 3
  6224. 3
  6225. 3
  6226. 3
  6227. 3
  6228. 3
  6229. 3
  6230. 3
  6231. 3
  6232. 3
  6233. 3
  6234. 3
  6235. 3
  6236. 3
  6237. 3
  6238. 3
  6239. 3
  6240. 3
  6241. 3
  6242. 3
  6243. 3
  6244. 3
  6245. 3
  6246. 3
  6247. 3
  6248. 3
  6249. 3
  6250. 3
  6251. 3
  6252. 3
  6253. 3
  6254. 3
  6255. 3
  6256. 3
  6257. 3
  6258. 3
  6259. 3
  6260. 3
  6261. 3
  6262. 3
  6263. 3
  6264. 3
  6265. 3
  6266. 3
  6267. 3
  6268. 3
  6269. 3
  6270. 3
  6271. 3
  6272. 3
  6273. 3
  6274. 3
  6275. 3
  6276. 3
  6277. 3
  6278. 3
  6279. 3
  6280. 3
  6281. 3
  6282. 3
  6283. 3
  6284. 3
  6285. 3
  6286. 3
  6287. 3
  6288. 3
  6289. 3
  6290. 3
  6291. 3
  6292. 3
  6293. 3
  6294. 3
  6295. 3
  6296. 3
  6297. 3
  6298. 3
  6299. 3
  6300. 3
  6301. 3
  6302. 3
  6303. 3
  6304. 3
  6305. 3
  6306. 3
  6307. 3
  6308. 3
  6309. 3
  6310. 3
  6311. 3
  6312. 3
  6313. 3
  6314. 3
  6315. 3
  6316. 3
  6317. 3
  6318. 3
  6319. 3
  6320. 3
  6321. 3
  6322. 3
  6323. 3
  6324. 3
  6325. 3
  6326. 3
  6327. 3
  6328. 3
  6329. 3
  6330. 3
  6331. 3
  6332. 3
  6333. 3
  6334. 3
  6335. 3
  6336. 3
  6337. 3
  6338. 3
  6339. 3
  6340. 3
  6341. 3
  6342. Well, at least you have shone a light on much of the drama for me. I have been wondering why this apparent perfect storm of events in the life of one TV presenter has held the attention of the nation so much? I haven’t followed Schofield’s career since I was a child, and all of my memories of him and Gordon the Gopher are fond ones. That model of being the anchorman between children’s television shows was a stroke of genius that was copied around the world and recreated for adult audiences with creations like Roland Rat, for good or ill, you decide. But, despite only ever seeing him when he cropped up on a YouTube video that their algorithm pointed me at, I have never seen any of his shows. I knew, obviously, that he and Holly Willoughby were television Royalty, and that the whole, “cue-gate,” scandal was a risible misunderstanding by the general public about how television works. But all of these other issues, of which I’ve been vaguely aware in the last couple of weeks, just seem to have, “Private matters ripe for misrepresentation, incorrect assumption and darkly obtuse gutter press coverage,” written all over them. As far as I still know, Philip Schofield has contributed hugely to the tone and culture of our country since his early years in television, which owes him a debt in that regard. He has always struck me as a kind, thoughtful, humorous, sincere man and a good influence on the public therefore. Until I am disabused of that notion, with concrete evidence, I will continue on in my belief, hoping he will return to the public in some other forum of equal popularity. Even though I’ve personally seen very little of him, I am smart enough to know that our culture is better off with people like him influencing it. So, I just hope we haven’t lost him, and that the scurrilous rumours about him are nothing more than that, gutter press rumouring.
    3
  6343. 3
  6344.  @DJaquithFL  : Running away fixes nothing, but it sure shows where your, “loyalties,” lie. And, to the natives in 1643, your family were no more, “colonists,” than the Russian Army is in the Ukraine. That’s just rebranding and repackaging, but the actions haven’t changed. America survived one, “civil war,” and came out stronger than ever, so I’m not going to upsticks and run, just because some Nazis want to take over. And, so far as, “where,” you, allegedly moved your, “money,” I have a shock for you, in one word; “Globalism.” It’s a thing, which you can’t change any more than the whether. It makes no difference, “where,” your money is, only where you are. That’s where the property, goods and services are going, and you’re already supporting various global industries around the globe, merely by eating, sleeping and shitting there: fact. Flee, if that’s your solution. Maybe you’ll get treated like we treat, “colonisers,” in your new country, and learn a few things? Or, like trump’s forebears, maybe you’ll want to come home, when things don’t work out, but be refused by an isolationist government? Now, wouldn’t THAT be funny. But, the saddest part? You’re fleeing for all the wrong reasons, pursuant to your tenuous grasp of how the world works. And when you get there, you’re problems will be no different. Because YOU will still be there . . . So long . . . Don’t let the door hit you on the ass on your way out . . .
    3
  6345. 3
  6346. 3
  6347. 3
  6348. I give it 100%, as a perfect example of its type. Agreed. When you think about it, Heath Ledger’s Joker was THE Joker: a cypher with a constantly changing backstory. We don’t know where he came from or what made him insane, and that’s one of the things that made him such a great super villain; the antithesis of Batman. We understand Batman, we know his back story, in depth and detail, and we understand why he does what he does. The Joker is the opposite of Batman, in spirit and intentionally, because he’s the antidote to Batman; his greatest antagonist. We can’t understand his desire for chaos, which is one of the things that makes him so scary, and which was explored so brilliantly in Nolan’s vision of him, as an Uber-Terrorist, who’s very existence is a counterpunch in Batman’s face; simply existing to love everything that Batman hates, but even the Joker understands that he’s nothing without Batman’s Yang to his Yin. The Joker needs Batman, and tells him so. “You complete me,” he says, referencing Jerry McGuire. And, Ledger, I’m convinced, would have won the Oscar for his masterful performance, had he lived, regardless. No one thought there would ever be another, or that it could be, or should be, topped. So, to take on the Joker’s backstory, and answer the very mystery that makes Joker who and what he is, was beyond dangerous! It was not just bold, straying into taboo territory, it was downright heroic! The accusations of hubris and stupidity that would have been levelled at the director, DC and at the star, had this movie failed, would have potentially ruined careers, including that of Phoenix, who had by that point, already danced on the edge of the precipice with some of his choices. Especially, that documentary that no one comprehended, and which alienated so many people on talk shows? Yet, not only did they DARE to tell us how the Joker came to be, defying the critics, which were already legion before the movie came out, but they also refused to compromise the vision of Joker in the teeth of so much ill-informed, un-thought-out, anti-violence opposition. All this, at a time when the DC universe was on its knees, desperate for a win! The epic failures of their flagship enterprises; the Justice League and the Superman V Batman battle, which had been teased so long ago in a Will Smith vehicle about vampires, had made even the most loyal fans sceptical at best, and downright hostile in most cases. But, this all wound up making the TRIUMPH that is Joker, all the sweeter for everyone involved in that project; from the writers, director and stars, to the key grip and Dolly guy! Every single one of them can now roll up their sleeves, show off their scars and say, “I won these scars at the Battle of The Joker SJW’s,” with pride! And people will remove their hats, shake their hands, buy them a drink and say, “Thank you for your service.” Because we now have one of the greatest movies in the DC cannon (only rivalled by The Dark Knight) and one of the greatest psychological thrillers ever made! A masterpiece, with a story of suffering behind it, like all great masterpieces should have. One of the best movies in anyone’s collection; up there with North By Northwest, Alien, Aliens, Terminator 1 & 2, Cyrano De Bergerac, It’s a Wonderful Life, Jaws, Duel, the first Planet of The Apes, The Big Country, True Grit, The Searchers, Metropolis, Dirty Harry, Unforgiven, West World (the movie), Some Like It Hot, Singin’ In The Rain and, as you can tell by now, I could list SO MANY more. But, Joker is right up there with that lot, and it’s obvious inspiration, Taxi Driver. True Art, is not yet dead in Hollywood. Joker is your proof ✌️👍
    3
  6349. 3
  6350. 3
  6351. 3
  6352. 3
  6353. 3
  6354. 3
  6355. 3
  6356. 3
  6357. 3
  6358. 3
  6359. 3
  6360. 3
  6361. 3
  6362. 3
  6363. 3
  6364. 3
  6365. 3
  6366. 3
  6367. 3
  6368. 3
  6369. 3
  6370. 3
  6371. 3
  6372. 3
  6373. 3
  6374. 3
  6375. 3
  6376. 3
  6377. 3
  6378. 3
  6379. 3
  6380. 3
  6381. 3
  6382. 3
  6383. 3
  6384. 3
  6385. 3
  6386. 3
  6387. 3
  6388. 3
  6389. 3
  6390. 3
  6391. 3
  6392. 3
  6393. 3
  6394. 3
  6395. 3
  6396. 3
  6397. 3
  6398. 3
  6399. 3
  6400. 3
  6401. 3
  6402. 3
  6403. 3
  6404. 3
  6405. 3
  6406. 3
  6407. 3
  6408. 3
  6409. 3
  6410.  @donnellynell  : Jen Psaki is rapidly becoming a living legend. Her sheer calmness, eloquence and patience in the face of such a hypocritically phrased, bad faith question, is something to behold. I can only imagine her Trumpophile predecessors must be eating their hearts out? This, “journalist,” has the arrogance of the Inquisition, and the temerity to LIE with such casual obtuseness, whilst, “representing,” Christianity!? Psaki is NEVER caught off guard, unprepared; she never raises her voice, or fakes, “outrage;” she’s never Whaddabouting, or pushing at whatever triggered buttons she can find, calculated to get at the, “emotions,” of her president’s opponents. And she CRUSHES the trump trolls by winning over Americans, by never rubbing anyone’s nose in their idiocy, lies, faked concerns, or bad faith attempts at scoring playground points. Her sheer competence, skill and unrivalled knowledge of her topics is unmatched by ANY predecessor I can think of. And, you know WHY she’s SO masterful? It’s because she knows the most valuable lesson in politics: How do you NEVER lose the game? DON’T PLAY! It’s THAT simple. Do your job, and do it better than anyone in history. They can’t land a punch, because you’re not in the boxing ring. They hear the bell and come out flailing, only to find they were punching at air, and somehow knocked themselves out! They come to and look up, only to see the face of Jen Psaki, and realise that was the Referee the whole time, and she’s just called you OUT for the count. She’s my hero. Seriously. I admire her so deeply. ✌️
    3
  6411. 3
  6412. 3
  6413. 3
  6414. Lou Hayhurst : People run and hide inside religions, or science, or even faith. And, because their emotions brought them there, they rage at each other as if they were arguing two sides of the same coin. The mistake they make, is that they’re not. Faith has something to say on all topics. Science has nothing to say about faith. At least, the Dawkinsian type of science doesn’t, though it thinks it does. Religion, is just the organisation of people of ostensibly shared faith, into a hierarchy for political management, which is why it has failed, and become an anachronism. We have politics for that, now. It was never meant to be, and it has little to do with, the teaching of Jesus, which is why we have the kind of problems with it that we do now, where it only attracts people who need therapy into its leadership roles. Religion is the enemy of faith. I can’t agree with your comment on intelligence and science. Richard Dawkins is a deeply stupid person, but he’s also very accomplished at science. He has more in common with Donald Trump, so far as intellect or intellectual honesty is concerned. I forget the name of the man who wrote the book, The Science Delusion, but his story about Dawkins, though jaw dropping, is banal in its shear unsurprisingness. You come away thinking, “That book was WAY better than I expected it to be,” and, “Why am I not surprised to discover that Dawkins is just another cheap trickster, trying to exploit the religion market’s obverse face?” Don’t get me wrong. I am from a family of scientists and my daughter studies physics at an elite University. But, she believes in Jesus, through no, “fault,” or, “interference,” of mine. Anyone who tells you that the two worlds are mutually exclusive, is selling you a dud. Scientists are the high priests of the new church, able to work miracles, save and extend lives, collect samples from outer space, and make it possible for you and I to disagree, as friends, I hope, about the fundamental truth of life, at the speed of light, around the globe. And, they’re in direct competition with the old order of priesthood. And neither side likes to be questioned. Read the Science Delusion? It’s not what it sounds like. The author is a world class scientist, in his own right; respected in his field, and you can see his Ted Talks on YouTube. Nice talking with you ✌️
    3
  6415. 3
  6416. 3
  6417. 3
  6418. 3
  6419. 3
  6420. 3
  6421. 3
  6422. 3
  6423. 3
  6424. 3
  6425. 3
  6426. 3
  6427. 3
  6428. 3
  6429. 3
  6430. 3
  6431. 3
  6432. 3
  6433. 3
  6434. 3
  6435. 3
  6436. 3
  6437. 3
  6438. 3
  6439. 3
  6440. 3
  6441. 3
  6442. 3
  6443. 3
  6444. 3
  6445. 3
  6446. 3
  6447. 3
  6448. 3
  6449. 3
  6450. 3
  6451. 3
  6452. 3
  6453. 3
  6454. TheDude0fLife : At this stage, for, “Conspiracy Theory,” see, “Self Justification.” When you’re all out of excuses, have no logical, reasoned arguments, but feel the, “emotional,” need to stick to your guns, why not try out an un-disprovable, made up, story? The only problem with that, is you get to the point where you’ve jumped the shark, and find yourself trying to keep a straight face, whilst arguing that Hillary is a, “staffer murdering, uranium selling, intel bleaching, pedo-ring running,” Super Villain, with no answer as to why the most powerful man on the planet cannot, “lock her up,” even though she’s meant to be his arch enemy and he couldn’t prevent his own entire Campaign Team from going to jail. But, they’re still racists and and greedy, and they know they can count on Trump to be the same, so they just find themselves losing more and more of their, “colleagues,” and shouting slogans, or hate-speech, to try to put people off coming to news sites at all. The sheer HUMILIATION of doubling down so much, starts to make people ill, and they just get hysterical and start reaching for their weapons. And, instead of condemning that, Trump has a bunch of Hispanics rounded up, while he’s visiting ground zero, tacitly telling them he’s on their side. So, they, “think,” they can, “just hold on.” But, they’ll end up poorer than they ever were, by the time the dust settles, and blaming the Dems, who are trying to fix all the problems, and can’t afford tax handouts, because the last bunch squandered all our money on parties
    3
  6455. 3
  6456. 3
  6457. 3
  6458. 3
  6459. 3
  6460. 3
  6461. 3
  6462. 3
  6463. 3
  6464. 3
  6465. 3
  6466. 3
  6467. 3
  6468. 3
  6469. 3
  6470. 3
  6471. 3
  6472. 3
  6473. 3
  6474. 3
  6475. 3
  6476. 3
  6477. 3
  6478. 3
  6479. 3
  6480. 3
  6481. 3
  6482. 3
  6483. 3
  6484. 3
  6485. 3
  6486. 3
  6487. 3
  6488. 3
  6489. 3
  6490. 3
  6491. 3
  6492. 3
  6493. 3
  6494. 3
  6495. 3
  6496. 3
  6497. 3
  6498. 3
  6499. 3
  6500. 3
  6501. 3
  6502. 3
  6503. 3
  6504. 3
  6505. 3
  6506. 3
  6507. 3
  6508. I would take issue with one of your points there. This is far from the first time that Putin has showed his hand in this manner. I’m not speaking of Prigozhin either, as he was a, “legitimate target,” in the minds of Russians on both sides of the pro or anti democratic fence. But, Putin has been murdering people rather routinely, at home and abroad. He murdered a popular, well known journalist in front of the Kremlin. Had her shot in the back of the head to make his point. To put that in terms we can really identify with, imagine it’s the following week after the infamous Prince Andrew interview over the Epstein affair. In front of Buckingham Palace the body of Emily Maitliss is found with a single gunshot wound to the back of her head. By the following day, the press reveals that all clues as to the identity of the killer lead back to MI5. Then . . . radio silence. No more press coverage. No closure. Nothing. Imagine the impact that would have on the British people? With rumours swirling about other journalists who attempted to cover the story who got fired. Krishnan Guru-Murthy is, “let go,” from Channel 4 with no reason given to the public, but internet chatter suggesting he was upset about the death of Maitliss and wanted to do a follow up story. He is never available for comment and has closed his Twitter account. That paranoia and unease that everyone would be going through is just the start of the deliberate fear and loathing that Putin wants his people to feel. Yet the list of his most famous and infamous victims, at home and abroad, is now larger than Stalin’s. I think you could be right that this straw could break the camel’s back. After all, we none of us predicted the fall of communism in Russia. Nor did the world, by all accounts, foresee the fall of the Tzars. So, I would never count out a groundswell of anger to grow into something bigger.
    3
  6509. 3
  6510. 3
  6511. 3
  6512. 3
  6513. 3
  6514. 3
  6515. 3
  6516. 3
  6517. 3
  6518. 3
  6519. 3
  6520. 3
  6521. 3
  6522. 3
  6523. 3
  6524. 3
  6525. 3
  6526. 3
  6527. 3
  6528. 3
  6529. 3
  6530. 3
  6531. 3
  6532. 3
  6533. 3
  6534. 3
  6535. 3
  6536. 3
  6537. 3
  6538. 3
  6539. 3
  6540. 3
  6541. 3
  6542. 3
  6543. 3
  6544. 3
  6545. 3
  6546. 3
  6547. 3
  6548. 3
  6549. 3
  6550. 3
  6551. 3
  6552. 3
  6553. 3
  6554. 3
  6555. 3
  6556. 3
  6557. 3
  6558. 3
  6559. 3
  6560. 3
  6561. 3
  6562. 3
  6563. 3
  6564. 3
  6565. 3
  6566. 3
  6567. 3
  6568. 3
  6569. 3
  6570. 3
  6571. 3
  6572. 3
  6573. 3
  6574. 3
  6575. 3
  6576. 3
  6577. 3
  6578. 3
  6579. 3
  6580. 3
  6581. 3
  6582. 3
  6583. 3
  6584. 3
  6585. 3
  6586. 3
  6587. 3
  6588. 3
  6589. 3
  6590. 3
  6591. 3
  6592. 3
  6593. 3
  6594. 3
  6595. 3
  6596. 3
  6597. 3
  6598. @Javi Oz : Putin certainly influenced the campaign and his oligarchs were probably sitting in Number 10 helping out, at least part of the time? As to who and what his government really is now? Picture if the Russian Mafia had a baby with the FSB and KGB? They are the old school oligarchs now, with their sons (mostly sons, not daughters) sitting in all those other, ahem, “parties,” that always vote unanimously with Putin for some reason, despite being meant to represent, “different,” political points of view. In fact, I suspect there will be a large number of these oligarchs, sitting in smokey back rooms, asking, “Isn’t it about time the old boy retired?” They must be missing their revenue and yachts by now? And it’s only going to get worse for them. They know the clock is ticking. While people are finding other places to get their energy, and all the other revenue streams (which have a way of filling up like pools) temporary contracts have a way of becoming permanent and they stand to lose trillions long term. And for what? So that Putin can prevent Ukraine from drilling for gas and oil? So that one man can be the Bond Villain and own ALL the world’s energy supply? When has the west EVER allowed something like THAT to happen? Since the term, “energy security,” was a thing? In more than 100 years? Why Putin thought he was, “special,” must have more to do with the two years of semi-isolation he’s just emerged from, and the effects of reading too much of his own propaganda?
    3
  6599. 3
  6600. 3
  6601. 3
  6602.  @hardtackbeans9790 : They say, “there’s no mechanism,” as their standard issue excuse. But, one can be created by a subdivision of the UN, quite easily. The fact is that they don’t want to, as the UN has remained a convenient place for opposing representatives to meet without losing face and organise under the table talks in the shadows. And, if an anti-democratic, hostile nation was to be ejected, the message that would send to the world would be worth more than any back room negotiations, which would take place anyway, only at slightly more inconvenience for both sides. The concomitant effect would be that the remaining parties would be empowered to make the UN a more meaningful organisation that could take meaningful decisions and act on them. Even China would feel the isolation and would not be in a position to veto every resolution that passes under their noses. They are facing down bleak existential issues domestically and cannot afford to stare down the same fate as Russia, ejection from the UN, if that were to happen. They rely on western trade right now and, in the coming years, you will be reading about one crisis after another threatening absolute chaos there. They are far more desperate than many realise, which will soon be apparent to all. Therefore, they will be looking to fend off resolutions aimed at Taiwan, their treatment of religious and political minorities, Tibet, etc, and will not see the benefit in taking hits for Russia, who has very little to offer that the west cannot replace. I’d argue, be careful what you don’t wish for. As it has already been seen to have failed. Ask the millions of destitute families, the countless living under constant threat of Russian bombs, and the dead. Repeating the same mistakes has gotten us nowhere. A fresh approach is necessary.
    3
  6603. 3
  6604. 3
  6605. 3
  6606. 3
  6607. 3
  6608. 3
  6609. I’ve been trying to tell people for ages, before this war started, that Putin would NEVER use nukes. It’s hard to convince someone who’s frightened, so I have always been polite about it, except with Putin’s trolls and bots. But, I learned something I was ignorant of until less than a week ago, which throws a new light on this conflict for me: which is that, under Russian, “law,” the army cannot deploy conscripts in foreign conflicts. They can on;y be used to defend sovereign territory. So, all these dead Russian troops that Putin was desperate to replace might have been a bigger headache for him, requiring him to either ignore the law or amend it publicly, to send 300,000 extra troops to Ukraine. Instead, he annexed as much of Ukraine as he could in a ludicrously hasty fashion, so he could claim legitimacy and didn’t have to frighten his own population even further by changing or ignoring his own laws, in a country which is clearly pretty unstable as it is. It explains the irrationality of his actions as far as the west is concerned. We all knew it was a performance for his domestic audience, but it wasn’t convincing as an act of legitimacy even at home. Now it makes more sense and only shows Putin’s vulnerability among his own people, if he’s too afraid to ride roughshod over their laws at this crucial time, don’t you think? Yours is my No1 channel for analysis of Ukraine’s war of defence against tyranny. It really is exceptional. Thank you for that. This is also why I would so love to know if you were aware of this law in Russia and, if so, what’s your analysis?
    3
  6610. 3
  6611. 3
  6612. 3
  6613. 3
  6614. 3
  6615. 3
  6616. 3
  6617. 3
  6618. 3
  6619. 3
  6620. 3
  6621. She is positioning herself for leadership after Sunak, and this issue is the hobby horse that she made for herself. And, as she will see it, migration is the issue that Reform are riding on and the main place where she will find future allies, if she gets to reshape the new, “conservative,” party. She can be the only, “conservative,” talking about the issue and stealing Farage’s oxygen. The recent changes in migration laws were a blatant attempt to skirt international laws and protections for the most vulnerable people on Earth. They were cruel, sociopathic and they remain borderline illegal. Also, as we’ve seen, they are unworkable. But that hasn’t mattered much to the Braverman types, because they did give them what they sought, which was merely to look, “hard,” and to be unnecessarily cruel, probably killing people in the process, certainly causing a great deal of physical harm and suffering to desperate people who were entitled to care, sympathy and, if nothing else, the process of law. I cannot see the old guard of the conservative movement following her over that cliff post election. Nor can I imagine any of the truly conservative, “conservatives,” wishing to join her in a headlong charge toward a system that cannot result in anything less than her own doom. After all, she is visibly the type of ethnic minority that Reform voters fear and loath so much. So she is building her own gallows in the long term, for the short term advantage she believes she can wangle now. My guess is that the Conservative Party will fracture, outright, down this racist fault line, leaving the one nation, cooler headed, old fashioned conservatives to rely on their friends in the city and the press, their trust funds and the Royal Family to rebuild from a much diminished foundation. But the new brand of Reform will also have friends in the press and money and backing from America, which is, after all, where they get all their, “ideology,” and their divisive tactics from. Of course, there can be only one leader, and it is entirely possible that Farage and Braverman may pass each other, like ships in the night, to take charge of one another’s respective parties? But, I suspect it is more realistic that Braverman will find herself on the outside, ultimately. Either losing the whip and being rejected by reform, or being demoted by Farage from within the Tory party because he doesn’t want his own most likely successor hovering over him like the Angel of Death. She won’t be enough of a puppet for the Reform party to control, being too, “driven,” by her own demons, so that would end badly for her, since the Reformers would only want her as a, “useful idiot,” and mascot that argues against them being racists, despite them now having erstwhile BNP candidates officially standing in their ranks right now. All I am sure of is that the battle for both supremacy of the right, and to define what, “the right,” is, will be bloody and take no prisoners. And whilst we see many getting their well earned just desserts, it will be at the cost of other well known crooks, deadbeats and racists, climbing up on the ruins of their rival’s careers.
    3
  6622. 3
  6623. 3
  6624. 3
  6625. 3
  6626. 3
  6627. 3
  6628. 3
  6629.  @josephinwood  : It’s always hard to know if your interlocutor is really who they claim to be, though your channel seems to be real enough? That is the tragedy of the age we live in; one of trolls, misinformation, propaganda and downright lies, all dressed up to look like something . . . other. Taking you at your word, which I read within hours of you replying but was hesitant to respond to (for the above stated reasons), I would first congratulate you on your excellent reporting and for drawing a wider audience’s attention to the fact that the war in Ukraine is not happening in a vacuum, but is having unlooked for consequences globally. I would question that editorial decision, however? It was the first question that leapt to the front of my mind and, though I cannot speak for everyone, I feel sure that there must have been many who thought the same things? Especially those in your audience who, like me, were adults at the time of the bombings and witnesses to the mounting international pressure for the west (Tony Blair in my country’s case) to respond. Surely it was THE pertinent question? The hypocrisy seems so stark? And I believe it is in the interests of the viewers to hear how these people who claim victimhood at alleged atrocities, holding up pictures of innocent children, etc, to hear the answer to the main question: HOW do these people reconcile the difference between what they were doing to an entire race with what happened to them? I can see many arguments for why the bombings were wrong. Mostly due to the fact that they wouldn’t have been necessary had the UN forces on the ground not been so reluctant to intervene earlier. Some arguments are more valid than others; and yet others, mere red herrings. I heard all of those at the time. But these were in the process of genocide. Do they even know WHY they were bombed? You say you put that to some of these people. I would dearly wish to know how they answered? What their level of honest awareness was (and is?) and whether they value some lives more than others? Were they ignorant of the genocide? I am curious as to how that editorial conversation went too? But, I understand why you may not be able to discuss that fully. But, surely this type of, “911,” style remembrance, transformed into abiding bitterness by propagandists, can only be occurring in a place where people have either been given false accounts of the reasons for the bombings, or they simply don’t know or care to know?
    3
  6630. 3
  6631. 3
  6632. 3
  6633. 3
  6634. 3
  6635. 3
  6636. 3
  6637. 🤦‍♂️ . . . For what it’s worth, at this late stage . . . Can we be REAL about, “Cancel Culture?” “Lock Her Up,” was already OLD before trump took office. He came and Primaried, or threatened to Primary, any GOP member who didn’t toe his line, and he’s STILL doing that now! Ask Liz Cheney? Trump told us to stop watching SNL, boycott Amazon, and literally quotes Stalin, calling the free press, “the enemy of the people!” whilst proudly stating he was attempting to change the libel laws, so as to SILENCE the free press! Trump re-INVENTED a special brand of Cancel Culture that harks back to the heady days of Soviet Russia! And now he’s trying to Cancel Coke? Because they simply choose NOT to associate themselves with Fascist Voter Suppression?! Whilst stupidly giving away the fact he’s still drinking Coke??? There’s a genuine difference between saying, “I will not be associated with X or Y,” which is a free choice, and Alt-Wrong-Power Plays at trying to stomp on people, because the TRUTH they express is damaging to your, “brand.” Just look at how, “Cancel Culture,” turned police violence and racism into a bad faith issue about, “patriotism,” and how the GOP made a POINT of storming out of football games, because they couldn’t STAND it when a single black man took a knee (one of the most respectful gestures one can make) and tried to highlight that there’s a problem with institutional racism in America? As ever, it backfired, and I doubt BLM would even exist in the minds of so many Americans, had it not been for the childish cancel culture of the GOP? As with all things GOP, they project their crimes, their hatreds, their prejudice and their, “culture,” onto their opponents, which is the PRECISE mind-f’k programming propaganda that came from Stalin’s playbook. In fact, so many ideas from the Stalin Book Of Managing A Dictatorship manifest in Trumpism that it almost looks like the guy was being coached by a Russian Communist Dictator, who’s currently pretending to live in a, “democracy,” and has a vested interest in the downfall of the west, right? And Gutfeld’s, “comedy,” is fittingly hypocritical and cringeworthy. Perfect for an SNL skit about, “What if Fascists tried Comedy?” You would pick Gutfeld, name the show, “Gutpunch,” and punctuate each, “gag,” with a child’s voice, going, “Oof!” I bet it doesn’t last? Fascists are too thin skinned to take the pushback. But once other comics start to satirise him, he’ll weep and quit, like they always do. I guarantee it. And, he’ll never admit to being about as funny as a bout of Covid. Instead, he will, of course, “blame,” Cancel Culture . . . 🙄
    3
  6638. 3
  6639. 3
  6640. 3
  6641. 3
  6642. 3
  6643. 3
  6644. 3
  6645. 3
  6646. 3
  6647. 3
  6648. 3
  6649. 3
  6650. 3
  6651. 3
  6652. 3
  6653. 3
  6654. 3
  6655. 3
  6656. 3
  6657. 3
  6658. 3
  6659. 3
  6660. 3
  6661. 3
  6662. Ben Fitz : You weren’t able to understand Nias’ comment and have attempted to crowbar your prejudice into the argument, because you recognised a reference to “immigration.” And you were utterly wrong. I moved here from England in 2006. A safer and, currently, wiser and more stable country than America is, right now. Population increases are dropping all around the globe and, ironically, by 2030, America will be appealing to Mexicans in particular to come and work in America, despite mechanisation. I don’t expect you to believe me. But, I think you will remember I told you this. Britains sees America as being in some kind of meltdown and they feel GLAD not to have the kinds of problems the US is suffering through: Evangelicals claiming that Trump is God’s man, while there are mass shootings on a weekly basis, shooting deaths daily, wild fires, floods and even earthquakes, while our corrupt boss bows before Putin, taunts and insults his own people, instead of leading them, takes away Net Neutrality, so the bad guys can control the message, and introduces a Tax Heist, so the HE won’t personally suffer the consequences of the inflation and poverty that he caused. And he’s blatant about it. And YOU have fallen for his CON? You care MORE about “foreigners”; believing the LIES you are told about Europe, than you do about your own interests. Well, you may just GET what you want and end up extremely poor, in a country where law and order no longer matters, among white people. What a GLORIOUS future you have
    3
  6663. Nias : My brother, an expert in computer tech, tell me NEVER touch “click bait.” (Nothing personal) But, I’m guessing that your link shows how Trump fiddled the Visa rules in order to have cheap labour imported from foreign countries, to work at Mar a Lago? Is that right? Unfortunately, it’s been demonstrated, time and again, that Trump’s blatant hypocrisy does not impact on his “base” at all. However, it is still very important to put the word out, whenever and where ever possible. As a conservative, political historian, I think America will pull through and is unlikely, as many are suggesting, to lose its hegemony this century, for good or ill. Nevertheless, what you are pointing to is exactly right and it WILL COST us dear. We will have to pay the painful price of this crisis, sooner or later, but, IF WE CAN’T ACTUALLY COMMUNICATE, we COULD actually self-destruct! You may think I am being tiresome about this, but Net Neutrality is EVERYTHING, here. All modern revolutions, coups and invasions have this single element in common. Along with military, legal and law enforcement institutions, and the main utilities and sources of wealth, they ALWAYS GO AFTER THE TV AND RADIO STATIONS. He who CONTROLS THE MESSAGE, WINS. Nowadays, that means the WEB. And once private interests can do what they like, they will find themselves being lobbied and offered serious cash, by SHELL COMPANIES to prioritise one service over another. The problem will only worsen, until they can blatantly shut down web services at will, overtly punishing those who don’t toe the line. We should ALL be campaigning about this issue? Regardless of sides too. As, it COULD be the “left” who ends up in control OR the “right.” But, you can BANK on this: Putin will throw EVERYTHING HE HAS at this, and we should ALL be ALARMED
    3
  6664. 3
  6665. 3
  6666. 3
  6667. 3
  6668. 3
  6669. 3
  6670. 3
  6671. 3
  6672. 3
  6673. 3
  6674. 3
  6675. 3
  6676. 3
  6677. 3
  6678. 3
  6679. 3
  6680. 3
  6681. 3
  6682. 3
  6683. I too believe in taking each situation on its own merits (or demerits) and assessing them accordingly. One must be willing to admit mistakes and change one’s point of view. I have never doubted your integrity, sincerity or open mindedness in this regard. You touch on something that has occupied my mind a lot lately. When I hear people dismissing others with an overused epithet like, “woke,” they immediately lose something in my heart and mind. There’s a negative internal recoiling within me. And it is at that, “tribalism,” I think. It is so depressing that people use these terms instead of doing the heavy lifting intellectually, for the sake of convenience and so as to, “identify,” themselves with their tribe. As with all of these American imports, the, “culture wars,” are a deliberate attempt to dumb down discourse, tribalise all talking points and to remove responsible intelligent engagement with ideas or situations that make people uncomfortable. And because it’s easy, it’s appealing. I nearly always find that people who use, “woke,” as a pejorative cannot define the term at all, or will often describe it as something it is objectively not. What it actually is (as I can best describe it) can be articulated as a disparaging term of suspicion and categorisation of the, “other,” as someone who uses, “virtue signalling,” (another ridiculous term) and the appearance of seeking equality and diversity falsely, as a stick with which to beat down others in matters of art, politics and culture. It was invented (or rather, re-invented) by far right wing Americans of the Steve Bannon / Roger Stone ilk, seeking to deepen divisions in society and to raise their own boats on a tide of bile. Anything that provides the user with a catch-all term that excuses intellectual interrogation of the facts or issues in hand is useful to the types of people who make a living from the, “outrage,” and unhappiness of others. One of the many things I most admire about you, sir, is that you do not subscribe (so far as I can tell) to any one prescription or mode of thought, be that philosophically, politically or intellectually. You seem, rather, to encourage interrogation of the facts, analysis and consideration. You are also capable of changing your views and accounting for them. That is part of your charm as far as I’m concerned. Perhaps the real problem is that a fully rational, open minded person, will never be able to please all the people all the time? Perhaps they should never seek to? Heck! My wife and I disagree about lots of political matters, so I would be hard pressed to conform to any one group’s best groupthink, even if I tried. But we respect one another and do not see our disagreements as a reason to lose any of that respect. Perhaps that is the test of character we should be most concerned about? When the pejoratives and ad hominems start flying, that is usually just someone’s attempt to brow beat another person (or persons) into conforming to their tribe’s groupthink. A form of emotional blackmail. And that is another reason why I find it hard to respect people who use terms in such a manner.
    3
  6684. 3
  6685. 3
  6686. 3
  6687. 3
  6688. Justin P : You make some good points, but do you see who is to blame? ALL of us. The biggest Globalists, are people like Trump, Putin, the Saudis, etc, who have no compunction about setting children to work in their sweatshops, outsourced to foreign countries, because such practices are illegal at home. Think about that, each time you look at one of Trump’s red MAGA hats, made in China, by children? Nothing any of us say or do will change the fact that Globalism is here, unless we shut down the internet forever. Businesses, the military, news and media and, of course, social media, will be global until technology ends. You can’t STOP that, any more than you can change the weather, through shear force of will. The question is WHAT we do, given that it exists? And, NOT to be taken in by the main critics of Globalism, who exploit it to its fullest. Trump praises internet Trolls, and invited Putin to help him in 2020, using his Global network. They will do it again, with greater vigour and more resources, AND inside help, and you’ll probably see Trump become Dictator for life, given that he can’t afford to lose the protection of his job title. The mistake is to claim that one, “side,” is Globalists, and the other isn’t. We are ALL Globalists, and this conversation is PROOF of that. I’ve done very nicely, BECAUSE of Globalism, but it does make it easier to deceive people, exploit the vulnerable and destroy the integrity of politics. Like the weather, again; sometime lightning destroys stuff. So, instead of pretending that anyone is in control of it, we should build some shelters for people, to protect them, rather than blaming others for making something that we want every bit as much as they do. Admit the rough with the smooth? Be a realist?
    3
  6689. 3
  6690. 3
  6691. 3
  6692. 3
  6693. 3
  6694. 3
  6695. 3
  6696. 3
  6697. 3
  6698. 3
  6699. 3
  6700. 3
  6701. 3
  6702. 3
  6703. Let us remember that Lee Anderson is guilty of, “pranking,” the public in a far more egregious manner. He was caught red handed, FALSIFYING a so called, “spontaneous,” meeting with a member of the, “general public,” whilst on campaign. He didn’t realise the mic was still on him and working, whilst he was setting it up on his phone. So, for Lee Anderson, OF ALL PEOPLE, to get all thin skinned about it and to demand an apology from LBC for the behaviour of, “the public,” is beyond absurd! It’s downright hypocritical! How about HE apologises to all of us his own falsifications? Rachel Johnson responded in a perfectly appropriate manner, ending the call swiftly, yet ever so politely and with expressions of appropriate concern, stating instantly that the issue was one of a, “private and personal,” nature. What more could she have done on a LIVE radio show? To be honest, I didn’t get the impression that the caller was necessarily ill in any way (though he could have been?) but merely camping it up for a laugh. His performance had something of Monty Python about it to me. If he was being sincere, he is obviously in need of mental health care (fat chance of that in the current NHS) but I honestly felt he was performing for comic effect. And yes, he was entirely, “credible.” And Anderson’s loud complaints only serve to add further credibility. If he’d made a simple statement for the press and let it go at that, we wouldn’t even be discussing it now. The fact that it seems to have struck a nerve is what intrigues me now.
    3
  6704. 3
  6705. 3
  6706. 3
  6707. 3
  6708. 3
  6709. 3
  6710. 3
  6711. 3
  6712. 3
  6713. 3
  6714. 3
  6715. 3
  6716. 3
  6717. 3
  6718. 3
  6719. 3
  6720. 3
  6721. 3
  6722. 3
  6723. 3
  6724. 3
  6725. 3
  6726. 3
  6727. 3
  6728. 3
  6729. 3
  6730. 3
  6731. 3
  6732. 3
  6733. 3
  6734. 3
  6735. 3
  6736. 3
  6737. 3
  6738. 3
  6739. 3
  6740. 3
  6741. 3
  6742. 3
  6743. 3
  6744. 3
  6745. 3
  6746. 3
  6747. 3
  6748. 3
  6749. 3
  6750. 3
  6751. 3
  6752. 3
  6753. 3
  6754. 3
  6755. 3
  6756. 3
  6757. 3
  6758. 3
  6759. 3
  6760. 3
  6761. 3
  6762. 3
  6763. 3
  6764. 3
  6765. 3
  6766. 3
  6767. 3
  6768. 3
  6769. 3
  6770. 3
  6771. 3
  6772.  @saint-miscreant  : I think it would be fair to suggest that the answer to the question, “Why are people protesting Israel and not Russia?” could be put, in simplest terms, “Because we (the western powers) are not funding Putin’s genocide, but we are funding Israel’s.” And, in that regard, many of the student protests have been successful. Some of these elite colleges have agreed to divest themselves of all Israeli government investment and withdrawn financial support for Israeli programs that were funded (or contributed to) by the colleges. In that regard, I agree that Jake’s answer is something of a gross oversimplification. Particularly when he suggests they are pointless protests. He may well be right in terms of the big picture (indeed, he usually is) but that is to discount the thousands of students all over America who can already point to tangible, hard financial results and claim direct responsibility for them, and therefore claim success for their protests. That is me speaking from a strictly, “clinical,” perspective, without expressing any of my opinions on the rights and wrongs of the issue. But, if I was in the room with Jake I would certainly have asked, “Isn’t it because they believe they can influence the president into withdrawing the funding we’re giving which makes this genocide possible? Whereas there’s no point in protesting the government of a foreign dictatorship when your own government is already funding Ukraine’s war efforts?”
    3
  6773. 3
  6774. 3
  6775. 3
  6776. 3
  6777. 3
  6778. 3
  6779. 3
  6780.  @dakotadurham4788  : It’s very simple. Read your own comments more carefully. You asked questions, I answered them in full. Once again, your allegations against, “the left,” are left unsubstantiated; without even clarity about what you mean, this time, let alone evidence or references. The only clear allegation is that, “the left,” controls all the media, which is ludicrous, if Fox’s own propaganda is to be believed? They constantly tell us they are the most watched and trusted station, making them THE mainstream of media. You can’t have it both ways. But, with the rise of Newsmax, there is clearly a growing far right, “current affairs,” appetite, also making them more, “mainstream,” than truth. And I am most certainly NOT talking about about, “half of the country,’’ as Trumpism has already lost its appeal to the voters, which is why he lost the election. It can only have gotten far worse, since his acts of betrayal against the nation, and his ongoing refusal to accept defeat, only shows him to be utterly untrustworthy around any power. The, “Fascists,” to whom I refer, are the enablers in the GOP, and the cowards, too frightened to call trump out. Trump’s political, “ideology,” is precisely and empirically Fascist, as already described. Those who follow and support him, are either ignorant of his full blown fascism, ignorant of his threat to them, or just racist enough not to care. But, they are NOT even a majority of the GOP voting half of America. But, just so that you understand the difference between a Conservative, like me, and a Fascist supporter, like you; even if 99% of Americans supported trump, I would still call him a Fascist, because that’s what he is. And those who understand where supporting him leads, and still support him, they are Fascists too. Most of the loudest ones don’t know they’re fascists yet, and I’m working to save them from themselves, to prevent them from finding that out. Most of trump’s most rabid, rank and file, are just ignorant and racist. I know you want to mythologise about, “MSM,” because that’s the particular weed up your ass today, however insubstantial your heartfelt emotions are in fact, but I only answered the queries you put to me, whether rhetorical or not. That’s because that was the only topic worth discussing. Read Prof Stanly G Payne’s seminal study on Fascism from 1914 to 1945? That will remove all of your pretensions at ignorance.
    3
  6781. 3
  6782. 3
  6783. 3
  6784. 3
  6785. 3
  6786. 3
  6787. 3
  6788. 3
  6789. 3
  6790. 3
  6791. 3
  6792. 3
  6793. 3
  6794. 3
  6795. 3
  6796. 3
  6797. 3
  6798. 3
  6799. 3
  6800. 3
  6801. 3
  6802. 3
  6803. 3
  6804. 3
  6805. 3
  6806. 3
  6807. 3
  6808. 3
  6809. 3
  6810. 3
  6811. 3
  6812. 3
  6813. 3
  6814. 3
  6815. 3
  6816. 3
  6817. 3
  6818. 3
  6819. 3
  6820. 3
  6821. 3
  6822. 3
  6823. 3
  6824. 3
  6825. 3
  6826. 3
  6827. 3
  6828. 3
  6829. 3
  6830. 3
  6831. 3
  6832. 3
  6833. 3
  6834. 3
  6835. 3
  6836. 3
  6837. 3
  6838. 3
  6839. 3
  6840. 3
  6841. 3
  6842. 3
  6843. 3
  6844. 3
  6845. 3
  6846. 3
  6847. 3
  6848. 3
  6849. 3
  6850. 3
  6851. 3
  6852. 3
  6853. 3
  6854. 3
  6855. 3
  6856. Show me some evidence of that, “wisdom,” in this desperate attempt at digging for controversy where there is none and I’ll consider your point? Don’t get me wrong. Starkey is a pretty good, if somewhat opinionated, historian and I’ve enjoyed many of his books. But his two major flaws where on full display here. 1) Starkey’s gotta’ Starkey: in other words, he just want to be the bitter pill in the sugary meaninglessness of Charles’ speech, to protect his image, so he’ll get more bookings and money for speaking tours, rather than think through what he’s saying. And, 2) He’s more right wing than Margaret Thatcher on many issues and is trying to make this all about the unions. At the very least it shows that he wasn’t listening to Charles’ call for, “thoughts,” or, “compassion,” simply for the jobs these people do, without needing to politicise them. And he clearly is incapable of unbiased historical context (you know? The job he gets paid for?) when placing this address in the context of our heritage and history, or giving us any objective meaningful analysis. He’s just made it clear that he thinks that the people with too much money, getting record bonuses this year - those very same people who have made the rest of us all poorer in real terms - are the ones who should carry on getting richer for doing nothing except damage to the rest of us, whilst the people who make a difference, protect us, and make the actual quality of life better for others, can go hang . . . So where is this, “wisdom,” of which you speak? . . .
    3
  6857. 3
  6858. 3
  6859. 3
  6860. 3
  6861. 3
  6862. 3
  6863. 3
  6864. 3
  6865. 3
  6866. 3
  6867. 3
  6868. 3
  6869. 3
  6870. 3
  6871. 3
  6872. 3
  6873. 3
  6874. 3
  6875. 3
  6876. 3
  6877. 3
  6878. 3
  6879. 3
  6880. 3
  6881. 3
  6882. 3
  6883. 3
  6884. 3
  6885. 3
  6886. 3
  6887. 3
  6888. 3
  6889. 3
  6890. 3
  6891. 3
  6892. 3
  6893. 3
  6894. 3
  6895. 3
  6896. 3
  6897. 3
  6898. 3
  6899. 3
  6900. 3
  6901. 3
  6902. 3
  6903. 3
  6904. 3
  6905. 3
  6906. 3
  6907. 3
  6908. 3
  6909. 3
  6910. 3
  6911. 3
  6912. 3
  6913. 3
  6914. 3
  6915. 3
  6916. 3
  6917. 3
  6918. 3
  6919. 3
  6920. 3
  6921. 3
  6922. 3
  6923. 3
  6924. 3
  6925. 3
  6926. 3
  6927. 3
  6928. 3
  6929. 3
  6930. 3
  6931. 3
  6932. 3
  6933. 3
  6934. 3
  6935. 3
  6936. 3
  6937. 3
  6938. 3
  6939. 3
  6940. 3
  6941. 3
  6942. 3
  6943. 3
  6944. 3
  6945. 3
  6946. 3
  6947. 3
  6948. 3
  6949. 3
  6950. 3
  6951. 3
  6952. Luke : That last paragraph made me lol, but here’s an, “honest,” answer. I am one of MANY Conservatives who will be voting to ensure the REMOVAL of the GOP, and, as we’ve seen, in Virginia, Pennsylvania, Alabama, etc, there are MANY others like me. When you speak “against” generalising, you need to understand, therefore, that you do NOT speak for ALL Trumpski supporters. And YES, you ARE a Trumpski “Fan” whether by, withholding your vote, or voting for the GOP, that is what you are. We are defined by what we DO, not what we SAY, to justify our recklessness to ourselves, after the fact. We can AGREE that Hillary was an APPALLING candidate. I too, am GLAD she is out of it. No more, business as usual, dynastic, patronising, “Mommy knows best,” big business, patrician, leaders, THANK YOU. But, to back a guy, who ACTIVELY ATTACKS AMERICAN businesses, personalities, law and order, its institutions that CREATED America, and EVEN his OWN COLLEAGUES, while ACTIVELY SUCKING UP TO DICTATORS and IGNORING Facebooks APPALLING VIOLATION of America, and then go on to OPENLY LIE about Amazon? . . . You’d HAVE TO BE MAD or a TRAITOR! And THAT’S WITHOUT all the Russia stuff. . . The “abortion” argument, is a Red Herring, given that Trump has persuaded women to have abortions, and that there are GOP politicians who back the policies you hate and DNC politicians who back YOUR argument? But THAT brings me to the issue of WHY you seem unaware of this OBVIOUS flaw in your baby protection debate . . . The News . . . I look at Fox, “news,” and I cannot BELIEVE the HYSTERIA, LIES and MADNESS. Yet YOU think CNN is “worse”??? COME OOOHHHNNN??? Not even Republicans buy THAT! Did you KNOW the Republican Politicians HAVE TO watch CNN and MSNBC? Do you know WHY? It’s because, if they DON’T they risk looking like IDIOTS when they give interviews, as they CAN’T find out what is ACTUALLY HAPPENING on Fox! If they DO get some nugget of truth, it’s likely to be SO BADLY DISTORTED that they’ll look STUPID for repeating it. That is a FACT that you can look up for YOURSELF. I too, have concerns about abortion laws. But, I would NEVER SELL OUT AMERICA, for that cause? And, given the the GOP and Trumpski, do not CARE about that child, once it’s OUT of the womb, the HYPOCRISY of their argument, reveals to anyone who’s THINKING for THEMSELVES, that it’s shear POPULISM. They don’t “CARE” about you or ANYONE. They just want YOUR MONEY
    3
  6953. 3
  6954. 3
  6955. 3
  6956. 3
  6957. 3
  6958. 3
  6959. 3
  6960. 3
  6961. 3
  6962. Kier Starmer has a flat and uninspiring delivery but he may well grow into his job. But at least he won’t be clowning like Johnson, Robotic and disconnected like Sunak, or plain loopy like Truss. Boring, honest and consistent will do me just fine thanks. Many private schools are bastions for the privileged and should pay their fair share. I think you’re clutching at straws when you harken to this ECHR idea, since you could use the same argument (and legal mechanisms) to point out that all other industries and businesses have to pay their fair share of taxes and there is no lawful reason to exempt private education, making them, “special,” in some way. Remember, child care homes, elderly residences, care centres, hostels and accommodation for the disabled ALL have private sector investors, making profits out of public need and paying their taxes for them. What makes private education so special? The only thing the public can see is that it’s the Tory MP’s kids who all attend these schools. That doesn’t seem fair? But, here’s the kicker. The latest MRP poll to study this issue in recent weeks (as discussed on the YouTube channel, A Different Bias) shows us that, despite any personal and anecdotal evidence you may have to the contrary, the one demographic that has little to no objection to private education paying VAT is the parents of privately educated children. They, like the majority of the country, do NOT object to paying taxes nearly so much as they object to the breakdown of the services that those taxes are supposed to pay for!
    3
  6963. 3
  6964. 3
  6965. 3
  6966. 3
  6967. 3
  6968. 3
  6969. 3
  6970. 3
  6971. 3
  6972. 3
  6973. 3
  6974. 3
  6975. 3
  6976. 3
  6977. 3
  6978. 3
  6979. 3
  6980. 3
  6981. 3
  6982. 3
  6983. 3
  6984. 3
  6985. 3
  6986. 3
  6987. 3
  6988. 3
  6989. 3
  6990. 3
  6991. 3
  6992. 3
  6993. 3
  6994. 3
  6995. 3
  6996. 3
  6997. 3
  6998. 3
  6999. 3
  7000. 3
  7001. 3
  7002. 3
  7003. 3
  7004. 3
  7005. 3
  7006. 3
  7007. 3
  7008. 3
  7009. 3
  7010. 3
  7011. 3
  7012. 3
  7013. 3
  7014. 3
  7015. 3
  7016. 3
  7017. 3
  7018. 3
  7019. 3
  7020. 3
  7021. 3
  7022. 3
  7023. 3
  7024. 3
  7025. 3
  7026. 3
  7027. 3
  7028. 3
  7029. 3
  7030. 3
  7031. 3
  7032. 3
  7033. 3
  7034. 3
  7035. 3
  7036. 3
  7037. 3
  7038. 3
  7039. 3
  7040. 3
  7041. 3
  7042. 3
  7043. 3
  7044. 3
  7045. 3
  7046. 3
  7047. 3
  7048. 3
  7049. 3
  7050. 3
  7051. 3
  7052. 3
  7053. 3
  7054. 3
  7055. 3
  7056. 3
  7057. 3
  7058. 3
  7059. 3
  7060.  @theTeknoViking  : That’s only part of it. Consider places like Georgia, which are a far bigger threat in the regard you’re suggesting? If it was just about the possibility of Russia getting locked out, Georgia has been threatening this since their 20% (or so) invasion. Notable events that occurred in Ukraine, just prior to Putin’s infamous essay, include Shell, Exxon, BP and various other oil companies completing a series of reports which pretty well established that Ukraine (with the correct investment and industrial infrastructure) would be able to out supply Russia with fuel to the western world with oil and gas from their offshore Crimean reserves alone; but also from deposits confirmed in the landlocked east, the Carpathian region of the west and other areas. Almost immediately, it was the oil company scientists and workers who were chased out of Ukraine altogether, Putin ensuring that no development could safely be conducted. And that is setting aside the fact that over 50% of the world’s Argon supplies come from Ukraine. Remember Xi & Putin at the Winter Olympics? An agreement to the effect of Xi taking Taiwan shortly after Putin took Ukraine, would have resulted in China having control over more than 60% of microchip manufacture from one factory alone, and Putin owning well over 50% of the rare elements vital for their manufacture. Even if that situation lasted for one or two years until the west reorganised, the jump in technological lead would be worth a war or two, to them. There are countless other natural resources I haven’t mentioned here. But for a guy who has run his country like a mafia boss for the past 30 years, this stuff is no-brainer calculation. Especially when you analyse the order of events.
    3
  7061. 3
  7062. 3
  7063. 3
  7064. 3
  7065. 3
  7066. 3
  7067. 3
  7068. 3
  7069. 3
  7070. 3
  7071. 3
  7072. 3
  7073. 3
  7074. 3
  7075. 3
  7076. 3
  7077. 3
  7078. 3
  7079. 3
  7080. 3
  7081. 3
  7082. 3
  7083. 3
  7084. 3
  7085. 3
  7086. 3
  7087. 3
  7088. 3
  7089. 3
  7090. 3
  7091. 3
  7092. 3
  7093. 3
  7094. 3
  7095. 3
  7096. 3
  7097. 3
  7098. 3
  7099. 3
  7100. 3
  7101. 3
  7102. 3
  7103. 3
  7104. 3
  7105. 3
  7106. 3
  7107. 3
  7108. 3
  7109. 3
  7110. 3
  7111. 3
  7112. 3
  7113. 3
  7114. 3
  7115. 3
  7116. 3
  7117. 3
  7118. 3
  7119. 3
  7120. 3
  7121. 3
  7122. 3
  7123. 3
  7124. 3
  7125. 3
  7126. 3
  7127. 3
  7128. 3
  7129. 3
  7130. 3
  7131. 3
  7132. 3
  7133. 3
  7134. 3
  7135. 3
  7136. 3
  7137. 3
  7138. 3
  7139. 3
  7140. 3
  7141. 3
  7142. 3
  7143. 3
  7144. 3
  7145. 3
  7146. 3
  7147. 3
  7148. 3
  7149. 3
  7150. 3
  7151. 3
  7152. 3
  7153. 3
  7154. 3
  7155. 3
  7156. 3
  7157. 3
  7158. 3
  7159. 3
  7160. 3
  7161. 3
  7162. 3
  7163. 3
  7164. 3
  7165. 3
  7166. 3
  7167. 3
  7168. 3
  7169. 3
  7170. 3
  7171. 3
  7172. 3
  7173. 3
  7174. 3
  7175. 3
  7176. 3
  7177. 3
  7178. 3
  7179. 3
  7180. 3
  7181. 3
  7182. 3
  7183. 3
  7184. 3
  7185. 3
  7186. 3
  7187. 3
  7188. 3
  7189. 3
  7190. 3
  7191. 3
  7192. 3
  7193. 3
  7194. 3
  7195. 3
  7196. 3
  7197. 3
  7198. 3
  7199. 3
  7200. 3
  7201. 3
  7202. 3
  7203. 3
  7204. 3
  7205. 3
  7206. 3
  7207. 3
  7208. 3
  7209. 3
  7210. 3
  7211. 3
  7212. 3
  7213. I didn’t quite follow what, “Horizon,” actually is? Something to do with cooperating on technology, or science? I wish you had explained it, for dunces like me? But everything else in this video was vividly clear. I very much like your style. You get a lot of information out in a clear, comprehensive, unvarnished way, trusting your audience to infer what they will from the facts, without putting any, “spin,” on it. That’s something we used to be able to rely on the BBC’s political analysts for, but it saddens me to say we simply can’t any longer. Not that the BBC is, “terrible,” but ever since it became a political football (since the early 1990’s. At least, that’s when I noticed the change in tone and constant implicit threats made in Westminster regarding the renewal of their Charter, or their license fee?) I’ve seen a bizarre twisting of, “agendas,” within the organisation, where they seem to want to please everyone and end up pleasing no one. It doesn’t seem to occur to Auntie that she should simply remain unbiased altogether. Anyway. I love the name of your channel, btw. A Different Bias is sort of a stroke of genius, if you ask me . . . which you didn’t, but there you go. I’m getting sort of addicted to this channel. I always come away feeling like I’ve had a good gossip about Westminster with a smart guy who can fill the gaps in my knowledge without making me feel thick about it. A bit like a big brother you look up to. Thanks. 👍
    3
  7214. 3
  7215. 3
  7216. 3
  7217. 3
  7218. 3
  7219. 3
  7220. 3
  7221. 3
  7222. 3
  7223. 3
  7224. 3
  7225. 3
  7226. 3
  7227. 3
  7228. 3
  7229. 3
  7230. 3
  7231. 3
  7232. 3
  7233. 3
  7234. 3
  7235. 3
  7236. 3
  7237. 3
  7238. 3
  7239. 3
  7240. 3
  7241. 3
  7242. 3
  7243. 3
  7244. 3
  7245. 3
  7246. 3
  7247. 3
  7248. 3
  7249. I haven’t read the article and now feel compelled to ask, would I get anything out of reading it now, since you have already imparted the salient facts? I’d rather not read anything from that rag if I don’t have to, but if you feel it’s one of those topics that needs more attention in order to form an informed opinion, I will. I think certainly you’re right, as it’s precisely the type of exploit that so strained his relationships with his tutors at Eton. Consider the themes of that article? MONEY. It’s always the topic of money that is used to ding that antisemitic bell, isn’t it? And to use that term you described (one I didn’t know of before now) in a complaint related to finances is obviously meant to trigger antisemitic images in the mind of the reader. His calculation will have been that he would get away with it because it’s a largely unknown term and its full meaning will pass many by, despite having a sufficiently Semitic chime to it to strike a chord in the imaginations of readers, yet only chiming fully with the crowd that he intends to raise a nod and a wink from. He also will have considered that he could dismiss any complaints from within the Labour Party by suggesting that their track record on antisemitism is not so great. If I were thinking in truly Machiavellian terms, I might even suggest that this could be just the first in a series of attacks to come? Johnson’s way of, “sending up a balloon,”to see if he can refocus the public discourse onto Labour’s weak spots? But, perhaps that’s a little deep, even for him? Johnson is a lot of things, but the bumbling buffoon persona is all part of the act, convenient for defending himself at times like these. He’s a good writer and he knows exactly what he’s doing as a skilled manipulator of the reader’s imagination (once again taking notes from his idol, Winston Churchill) especially in prose, when he’s had time to martial his thoughts and edit himself. A Times editor would probably have questioned his use of that term, perhaps even spiked it, but a Daily Mail editor is more likely be one of the nodding winkers that Johnson is attempting to appeal to. I hope someone with a little pull over there lodges a formal complaint. I certainly think someone should.
    3
  7250. 3
  7251. 3
  7252. 3
  7253. 3
  7254. 3
  7255. 3
  7256. 3
  7257. 3
  7258. 3
  7259. 3
  7260. 3
  7261. 3
  7262. 3
  7263. 3
  7264. 3
  7265. 3
  7266. 3
  7267. 3
  7268. 3
  7269. 3
  7270. 3
  7271. 3
  7272. 3
  7273. 3
  7274. 3
  7275. 3
  7276. 3
  7277. 3
  7278. 3
  7279. 3
  7280. 3
  7281. 3
  7282. 3
  7283. 3
  7284. 3
  7285. 3
  7286. 3
  7287. 3
  7288. 3
  7289. 3
  7290. 3
  7291. 3
  7292. 3
  7293. 3
  7294. 3
  7295. 3
  7296. 3
  7297. 3
  7298. 3
  7299. 3
  7300. 3
  7301. 3
  7302. 3
  7303. 3
  7304. 3
  7305. 3
  7306. 3
  7307. 3
  7308. 3
  7309. 3
  7310. 3
  7311. 3
  7312. 3
  7313. 3
  7314. 3
  7315. 3
  7316. 3
  7317. 3
  7318. 3
  7319. 3
  7320. 3
  7321. 3
  7322. 3
  7323. 3
  7324. 3
  7325. 3
  7326. 3
  7327. 3
  7328.  @SteveWalkey  : In a very real sense, this war is actually World War Three (by other means) being fought on the battlefield of Ukraine in practical terms, but also in the arena of our politician’s offices, diplomat’s postings, business execs board rooms and even in our living rooms. We have all been forced to address the question, “What price freedom?” in our individual and collective ways, as we’re ALL contributing; either by paying more for our fuel, our heating, the cost of food, or by our direct involvement through campaigning, contributing to charities, even volunteering to go there and fight. Whether deliberately or incidentally, every individual one of us who earns an income of any kind, or is dependant upon a bread winner, anywhere in the free world, is contributing to the battle for freedom by paying at least some real price for this war. Make no mistake, if Putin had not invaded Ukraine, our inflation, fuel crises and world wide economic downturn would not be occurring today. Just think about that? Putin has destabilised the entire planet and must pay the price for doing so. If he doesn’t, the world will remain under the threat of extortion for the rest of time. And if you’re still not convinced that you have a dog in this fight (the rhetorical, “you,” in this case) then need I mention that the mere threat of using nuclear weapons in anger, even when it’s clear that no military advantage can be gained by such a wantonly spiteful act of suicidal idiocy, puts every living human at the discussion table with a legitimate stake in the outcome. This is the World War Three that comes in the age of potential nuclear annihilation, with unstoppable hypersonic missiles at the disposal of the main protagonists. This is the WWIII that we get when Putin knows that the MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) scenario has never been more real. The WWIII we get when Putin could not attack his real target, but thought he could weaken NATO and thereby weaken America, whilst enriching his own country with Ukraine’s rare and precious resources. It’s the WWIII we get when the protagonists simply cannot declare war upon each other because of a hair trigger that would end us all. This is the endgame for Putin and he knows it. And it is the moment of victory for the free west, that is ours to lose if we do anything clumsy or fumble the ball just as Ukraine crosses the finishing line (if you’ll forgive my mixed metaphors?) which makes it very much like that old joke, “It’s not much of a war, but it’s the only one we’ve got.” In this case, it’s not much of a World War Three, but it’s the only one we dare afford! . . . It is, “Our War,” as much as anyone’s. We are all in this one and there’s no off ramp, so we MUST see it through to the end. And people like you and me must keep the pressure on our politicians to give Ukraine much better defence systems and weapons, as we have the capability to render all of Russia’s missiles obsolete on the conventional battlefield, yet we’ve only just started offering them to Zelensky! You have a dog in this fight and it’s as legitimate as anyone else’s, saving a Ukrainians’. After all, you’re paying for it. Anyone who tells you different either doesn’t get it, or is a Russian. Merry Christmas and, Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦🎄✌️
    3
  7329. 3
  7330. 3
  7331. 3
  7332. 3
  7333. 3
  7334. 3
  7335. 3
  7336. 3
  7337. 3
  7338. 3
  7339. 3
  7340. 3
  7341. 3
  7342. 3
  7343. 3
  7344. 3
  7345. 3
  7346. 3
  7347. 3
  7348. 3
  7349. 3
  7350. 3
  7351. 3
  7352. 3
  7353. 3
  7354. 3
  7355. 3
  7356. 3
  7357. 3
  7358. 3
  7359. 3
  7360. 3
  7361. 3
  7362. 3
  7363. 3
  7364. 3
  7365. 3
  7366. Correction: I double checked this, but Newman did NOT ask Oakshot, “how much,” she got paid. She merely mentioned that she had, “accepted a lot of money,” from Hancock, and seemed to be coming to the question; At what point did you decide to betray his trust? I think Oakshot sensed this difficult question was coming, and the potential for the timeline to show that she already knew Hancock’s darkest secrets and merely plotted to get more out of him until she felt she could get no more, rather than instantly responding in shock to terrible revelations which she felt the public should know? Her response was to very slyly throw up this red herring of getting indignant about a question she had not been asked and to fixate on it, thus (in her own distorted imagination) providing a context for which she could indignantly end the interview. It was a very Rees Mogg type of response in fact, attempting to draw the focus onto a none existent question. Yes, Newman’s handling was somewhat inept, as I kept expecting her to simply say, “I didn’t ask you how much you were paid and I don’t care. The point is, you took a lot of money to do a job and then decided to betray your client’s trust; something for which you have a history,” or something along those lines. But the whole thing degenerated into a rather unedifying display in the end, which did nothing for either party’s reputation. However, Newman was right to remind Oakshot that she was as much, “the story,” as Hancock. I think that prospect alarmed her more than anything? The idea that people will be constantly bringing up her history of betrayal and unsubstantiated rumour-mongering, rather than her getting to be the pundit who casts judgement upon the souls of others, probably reminds her that she will one day be sharing a waiting room in Hell with Matt Hancock.
    3
  7367. 3
  7368. 3
  7369. 3
  7370. 3
  7371. 3
  7372. 3
  7373. 3
  7374. 3
  7375. 3
  7376. 3
  7377. 3
  7378. 3
  7379. 3
  7380. 3
  7381. 3
  7382. 3
  7383. 3
  7384. 3
  7385. 3
  7386. 3
  7387. 3
  7388. 3
  7389. 3
  7390. 3
  7391. 3
  7392. 3
  7393. 3
  7394. 3
  7395. 3
  7396. The irony is that their coverups draw more attention and cause them to be even less popular than the actual things they’re covering up! I mean, who the hell will be even remotely, “surprised,” that all of these WhatsApp messages contain nothing more than a gag reel of sick jokes at the bereaved’s expense, confessions of knowingly doing harm, insider dealing for their friends and family’s brand new, “companies,” meant to provide the protection equipment for hospitals, and MP’s handing off all of their own responsibilities to civil servants!? My dad, having had a series of mini strokes, was like that protagonist in the Christopher Nolan film Memento, where he couldn’t make new memories and he kept asking for his wife, my mum, whom we’d buried the year before. He had it explained to him over and over again that his four children were not allowed to be with him, and why, but forget again within minutes. So, in his world, he died of Covid, alone, and heart broken, unable to comprehend why he was alone. After going through a series of loopholes, so I could get permission to attend his funeral, travelling from Scotland to England, I returned home, weary and emotionally exhausted, so I only have myself to blame for putting on a current affairs program. But the first image I saw when I got back, now SEARED into the scar tissue of my neuro-divergent brain, was some Tory press wonk, standing before the agog press and a live camera, ACTUALLY LAUGHING OUT LOUD at the drunken antics of Cabinet members and Number 10 staff at a series of parties for Boris Johnson’s birthday! I can never relate that vertigo inducing sensation you get when you have been forced against your better judgement to place your trust in the government at a time of genuine, worldwide crisis, only to see that they drunk at the wheel! And LAUGHING IN YOUR FACE! I know there are many out there who went through something similar, some of them with worse mental health issues than me to begin with. And I will NEVER forgive or forget that utterly self-entitled, reckless, arrogant, cruel indifference to the fates of so many trusting fools like me. So now, when I hear that they want to cover up what we all KNOW we will find - cruelty, selfishness, indifference, arrogance, theft under the guise of business as usual and flat out incompetence - I once again feel that revolutionary RAGE boiling in my blood. It will be good for the country when the Tories are sent into the wilderness and not allowed to re-enter the corridors of power until they’ve culled their far right deliberate antagonists of the people and self enriching Masonic lodge Liberal Economics clubs they call, “think tanks,” altogether. But in the mean time, we have one HELL of a mess to clean up and a MOUNTAIN of hard cash to reappropriate for the people who earned it.
    3
  7397. 3
  7398. 3
  7399. 3
  7400. 3
  7401. 3
  7402. 3
  7403. 3
  7404. 3
  7405. 3
  7406. 3
  7407. 3
  7408. 3
  7409. 3
  7410. 3
  7411. 3
  7412. 3
  7413. 3
  7414. So, I went off to look at the inaugural The Culture Report video, letting Mr Robertson know that it was on the strength of your recommendation that I was there and I must say, I was transfixed. This is not something that MSM seems to be discussing in any detail at all, yet the noises of dissent seem particularly numerous and loud in Russia right now, if TCR is to be believed? The question for me is more to do with how much his video speaks of hope over judgement? Or whether this guy really has his finger on the pulse and is sensing the real, growing rumblings of change in Russia? I certainly hope he is right, but only time will tell. He shows clips and clearly uses sources correctly. But, as to how, “controlled,” all of this stuff is remains another question. If Putin is flushing out dissenters, by using agents to speak out, so as to encourage others, in a, “glasnost,” like sham, just to identify these people for a new, “hit list,” it wouldn’t be the first time. I’ll give this guy a chance and follow his channel for now, to see where this leads, if anywhere. But, I do disagree about Putin being dead (you offer no sources or links to follow up on that assertion that I know of) and I do believe that if he were to be bumped off or, like Nikita Khrushchev after the Cuban Missile Crisis, forced into, “early retirement,” that would present Russia with a face saving opportunity to withdraw troops from Ukraine (either partially or entirely) and seek a, “reset,” with with west in return for sanctions relief. Do you not see that as a possibility?
    3
  7415. 3
  7416. 3
  7417. 3
  7418. 3
  7419. 3
  7420. 3
  7421. 3
  7422. 3
  7423. 3
  7424. 3
  7425. 3
  7426. 3
  7427. 3
  7428. 3
  7429. 3
  7430. 3
  7431. 3
  7432. 3
  7433. 3
  7434. 3
  7435. 3
  7436. 3
  7437. 3
  7438. 3
  7439. 3
  7440. 3
  7441. 3
  7442. 3
  7443. 3
  7444. 3
  7445. 3
  7446. 3
  7447. 3
  7448. 3
  7449. 3
  7450.  @dbzkidkev2  : And don’t forget that the authors, in order to qualify, don’t just have to pay publishing fees, but they also have to submit copyright to the university or educational institution where they did their work. Your thesis could be a massive breakthrough in physics, but you don’t own any of it. Academia is broken and does suck. And it doesn’t surprise me that senior academics will be among the first to take that accusation personally. But I noted two things of real concern to me that undermine this video’s credibility: 1) Why didn’t he try to speak to her about this first, before publishing an explosive allegation packed video with a click bait title? I mean, if he is sincere, surely fixing the problem would be way more important to him than publicising it, wouldn’t it? Yet instead, he has drawn a clear line of division between them, offering no face saving way for Sabine Hossenfelder to change her ways without seeming to be brow beaten? 2) Whatever you or I might think of his arguments, we both know empirically that he is no mind reader. Yet he claims on multiple occasions to know her precise motivations for saying all of the things she has said? And he finds all of those motivations to be of the worst possible, bad faith, kind? How does he know this? I know for a fact that he has taken at least some of these excerpts he used out of context, as I remember the videos. And he is very fast and loose when it comes to conflating her opinions with her assertions about the facts, regardless of having no basis on which to do so. I know for an empirical fact that he has totally misunderstood the debate in physics about the, “impasse,” which exists. Even the string theorists do not debate that the impasse exists and that it happens to be the main focus of almost every top theoretical physicist’s work right now. Listing all of the latest achievements resulting from practical physics and recent experiments like that was as good as saying, “I don’t get what that debate is about,” and purely demonstrated his ignorance. I am left wondering what his real motives are, since he didn’t try to solve the problem but rather just went into attack mode in a click bait titled video?
    3
  7451. 3
  7452. 3
  7453. 3
  7454. 3
  7455. 3
  7456. 3
  7457. 3
  7458. 3
  7459. 3
  7460. 3
  7461. 3
  7462. 3
  7463. 3
  7464. 3
  7465. 3
  7466. 3
  7467. 3
  7468. It’s a worrying statistic if you’re a monarchist, I suppose. And if that survey company is a reliable one, which I can’t guess at. I have always been a republican (with a small, “r”) despite having huge admiration for Queen Elizabeth II’s character and personality. Though I hear the arguments in support of the institution with a sympathetic ear, largely because I respect our nation’s history and ideas about continuity. And because I do see the royals as having a hugely beneficial role to play in diplomacy and what they call, “the feel good factor,” of the nation. I site those examples above tourism, though the coin tourism generates is not to be sniffed at. I do not doubt for a moment that Elizabeth would, “put him away,” now, regardless of her alleged request of Charles that he, “look after,” Edward on her deathbed. A request that could be read in any number of ways. The royal family has the resources to offer Edward a reasonable income and a comfortable retirement in a foreign land and to keep the whole thing within the family, without touching the public purse. And, as you indicated yourself, we have precedent for this in the Wallace Simpson case. A monarch’s first loyalty must be to his country, or s/he renders the institution obsolete. The moment that family becomes a liability to the public good, the clamour of republicanism will grow all the louder and carry more weight. And, to stand by Edward at this point, is to signal the world that moral degeneracy is acceptable to the royals and stands up there as a symbol of who we are as Britains, which is after all, what their role is. They represent what Britain is as the, “model,” family. This was why Edward VIII’s position was considered untenable, because the institution can never be seen to place personal loyalties above the public good. Even Edward VII, who’s proclivities were infamous in his own lifetime, never stooped to the exploitation of underage girls! The fact that Edward’s track record is also tainted with scandal speaks to character flaws that have run unchecked for too long. At least the succession is secure and he no longer stands to inherit the throne if something unforeseen happens to Charles. Cold comfort to his victims. Cold comfort for people like me, who have witnessed the fierce, manipulative and deceitful face of child sexual abuse first hand. Whatever happens, Charles is the soul responsible party now. It’s his job.
    3
  7469. 3
  7470. 3
  7471. 3
  7472. 3
  7473. 3
  7474. 3
  7475. 3
  7476. 3
  7477. 3
  7478. 3
  7479. 3
  7480. 3
  7481. 3
  7482. 3
  7483. 3
  7484. 3
  7485. 3
  7486. 3
  7487. 3
  7488. 3
  7489. 3
  7490. 3
  7491. 3
  7492. 3
  7493. 3
  7494. 3
  7495. 3
  7496. 3
  7497. 3
  7498. 3
  7499. 3
  7500. 3
  7501. 3
  7502. 3
  7503. 3
  7504. 3
  7505. 3
  7506. 3
  7507. 3
  7508. 3
  7509. 3
  7510. 3
  7511. 3
  7512. 3
  7513. 3
  7514.  @greenkitty82  : Remove the capacity for empathy and sympathy from a person’s brain and you have yourself a sociopath. The bigger question is how a sociopath gets to be a police officer for 20 weeks, let alone 20 years? Every single expert, despite their different agendas and perspectives, have all agreed on one thing: the clues were all there. They all say, had those clues all been put together in one place; his debts, his connections with shady underworld figures, his disciplinary record for sexual assaults, etc, this sociopath would have been kicked out of the police force, long, long ago. The only question that remains for us (for those of us who want to prevent other such cases, and uncover any others that may yet be out there?) is what are we going to do about this? Surely it’s vetting and reviewing procedures that need to change? I would call for single standard that covers all vocational professions where public trust is at issue? Covering the medical, care, armed and police services. A benchmark standard that is comprehensive, easy to understand because it’s built on common sense and basic moral principles, and that applies equally to all? Does that seem like a big ask? Because people love acronyms so much, call it Trust and Universal Standards (STU) or something? A points system could apply, like on driver’s licences? Too many points and you can no longer serve in trusted professions? Of course MP’s and senior civil servants wouldn’t be keen on having it apply to them, but they might get on board if it didn’t? ✌️
    3
  7515.  @junedimond1693  : Gas prices went up in Texas, not here, kid. That’s blue states for ya’. Taxes haven’t risen. You seriously going to pretend there was no, “crisis,” at the border, while Donny was there? 🤦‍♂️ partisan hackery is so lame. Give Joe a chance to clean up trump’s Concentration Camp mess??? They’re still looking for missing CHILDREN! But, you can always count on prices going up, sooner or later (funny how they never go down, right?) and, “blame,” whomever, when you’re a racist hack with no ideas. But, forget that Covid’s coming under control and people are getting their vaccinations, despite the sabotage of trump’s goons. Forget all the Green Energy jobs he’s creating, or his plan to offer everyone work with an FDR style Infrastructure Package (something Donny was meant to be good at, yet didn’t even look at!) or that he’s going to reform the voting system, so everyone gets an equal vote and killing off suppression. Forget that investment is already coming back, or that we’re no longer on the brink of war every other week, depending if trump remembered to kiss Kim in his DM’s. America just feels better. 75% of the population can’t be completely wrong about Joe? Maybe they’re just relieved he didn’t ONCE seek revenge on any of the GOP Qults who tried to destroy the Republic, literally!? By voting to overturn a democratic election DURING an violent Insurrection? You should be grateful the FBI aren’t at your door? Oh, that’s right. You’re not IN America, are you? . . . SMH 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7516. 3
  7517. 3
  7518. 3
  7519. 3
  7520. 3
  7521. 3
  7522. 3
  7523. 3
  7524. 3
  7525. 3
  7526. 3
  7527. 3
  7528. 3
  7529. 3
  7530. 3
  7531. 3
  7532. 3
  7533. 3
  7534. 3
  7535. 3
  7536. 3
  7537. 3
  7538. 3
  7539. 3
  7540. 3
  7541. 3
  7542. 3
  7543. 3
  7544. 3
  7545. 3
  7546. 3
  7547. 3
  7548. 3
  7549. 3
  7550. 3
  7551. 3
  7552. 3
  7553. 3
  7554. 3
  7555. 3
  7556. 3
  7557. 3
  7558. 3
  7559. 3
  7560. 3
  7561. 3
  7562. 3
  7563. 3
  7564. 3
  7565. 3
  7566. 3
  7567. 3
  7568. 3
  7569. 3
  7570. 3
  7571. 3
  7572. 3
  7573. 3
  7574. 3
  7575. 3
  7576. 3
  7577. 3
  7578. 3
  7579. 3
  7580. 3
  7581. 3
  7582. 3
  7583. 3
  7584. 3
  7585. 3
  7586. 3
  7587. 3
  7588. 3
  7589. 3
  7590. 3
  7591. 3
  7592. 3
  7593. 3
  7594. 3
  7595. 3
  7596. 3
  7597. 3
  7598. 3
  7599. I’m just glad that those panelists called out that presenter’s childish attitude toward MSM. How do people with such unsophisticated and blatantly agenda-driven attitudes get to present serious news shows anyway? Note: when they challenged the simplicity and prejudice of his statements and went on to explain why it was dangerous to exploit his platform for undermining the public trust in their news outlets (giving examples too) he quickly retreated back to the story in hand. The refuge of the vacuous is to dodge any adult responsibility and quickly throw up chaff in hopes of avoiding having to be a grown up. I just wish they’d refused to let him off the hook so easily and pressed their points a little harder. The idiot is sawing at the branch he sits on, wishing in his heart that he could command the audiences of Channel 4 or the BBC, but like all populists these days, he is not willing to work for that, do journalism or stand in the cold streets talking to politicians. He wants it handed to him on a plate, resents the fact that it hasn’t been, and his complaints about the adults in the room is that the public treats real news like adult information, instead of, “choosing,” their news and their, “preferred narrative,” as though that could do anything other than harm. If I thought that any grownups were bothering to read my rant, I would go on to explain how it’s rock bottom, lazy labelling epithets like the ones people like him, Liz Truss, Boris Johnson and (famously now) Suella, “Goodness Gracious Me Character,” Braverman use, that merely appeal to the lowest common denominator of political opinion, actively CREATING the Tory party that we have now! By sloganising, ranting and diminishing every serious issue down to a catchphrase of victimised complaint, they have turned the politics of grievance into a way of life. The result is that the Tories have flung open their doors to every closet racist, every far right prepper, every angry sexually inadequate incel, every money grubbing, tax dodging, offshore leach and every single reckless agenda in the country, leaving them with an utterly UNGOVERNABLE party, made up of competing agendas and nothing else! The only thing that unites the Tories right now is their equally ungovernable GREED, coupled with their certain knowledge that they are facing a potential generation in the wilderness, which makes them more DANGEROUS to Britain’s interests than ever! The mere fact that so many Tory MP’s are saying out loud that they want Boris back, while the country looks on in horror and disgust at the very thought of bringing back the man who was DISGRACED out of power this year, tells you all you need to know about how tone deaf, obtuse and egregiously self serving the Tory agenda is now! What can we expect from a party that has been empirically PROVEN to be morally unfit, fiscally irresponsible, behaving politically like neophytes and constantly prepared to bicker in front of cameras about the country’s finances, whilst having NOTHING to say about the threat of DEATH for the vulnerable who cannot afford to heat and eat at the same time!? Well, OBVIOUSLY, they’re going to clean out the shop and loot what remains before they get kicked out! Bankers can expect huge bonuses, businesses will get huge tax breaks, and new laws will be imposed to criminalise anyone who complains about the sheer unfairness of having a bunch of greedy children raiding their futures in front of their faces. Britain’s closing down sale has begun and these goons are going to feather their nests and get away with bloody murder, not to go and hang their heads in shame in some quiet corner of the universe, but to live it large on the lecture circuit, having holidays in exotic locations and emailing editorials to The Sun and The Telegraph from the Algarve, secure in the knowledge of a forthcoming gong, knighthood, seat in The Lords, and/or some cushy, “advisory,” position for a company that only wants the name of an ex-cabinet minister on their doors and letter headings and don’t actually want them to show up for work, except on the odd occasion when they’re getting them to use their Westminster contacts to fix policies for the best financial outcome for their company, regardless of the harm they do to the planet, our rule of law or the country’s future. And all guys like this ignorant pr*ck, presenting a show he’s not qualified to be a guest on, can say is, “Oh, oh, main stream media, mieh mieh mieh,” like the insufferable professional, “victim,” he is! But, no . . . I don’t resent idiots like him being jealous of the adult news organisations in the world, or exploiting his privileged position to cry about how he doesn’t have even more privileges. I just look at him like I would a tumour; You can’t reason with the disease. You can remove it and hope that doing so doesn’t further damage the host, as the screams of entitlement of victimhood will be heard across the nation, no doubt . . . 🙄
    3
  7600. 3
  7601. 3
  7602. 3
  7603. 3
  7604. 3
  7605. 3
  7606. 3
  7607. 3
  7608. 3
  7609. 3
  7610. 3
  7611. 3
  7612. 3
  7613. 3
  7614. 3
  7615. 3
  7616. 3
  7617. 3
  7618. 3
  7619. 3
  7620. 3
  7621. 3
  7622. 3
  7623. A couple of months ago, I tripped and fell headlong through the side of my green house. I have a back problem that makes it really difficult for me to get up from a fall. As I lay there on my back, bleeding profusely from my hands and forearms, I looked up to see a large pain of jagged glass swing loose and drop like a guillotine for my throat. Needless to say, I rolled out of the danger zone just in time, taking most of the blow on my well protected upper back. The thought that raced through my 55 year old brain, in that moment of (and this really does happen) slowed down time, from realisation to escape, was, “I’ve left so much un-done!” along with a powerful sensation of guilt at the thought of my wife coming home to find her semi-decapitated husband in the garden. This isn’t all about me, though. My point being that; I t’s kind of odd that our experiences could be so different, yet the same, don’t you think? Yours has given you a kind of inner peace (the sort of thing you might expect from an older man) whilst my near death experience kind of did the opposite. It’s imbued me with a sense of urgency and need to sort a lot of stuff out, like my last will and testament, for instance😉. Yet both of us have come away with a refreshed and . . . “improved,” outlook on life. At the time, my Apple Watch went a bit crazy, with its fall detection threatening to contact all my loved ones and the ambulance service if I didn’t tell it not to by the end of the countdown. The simple act of deactivating that kind of snapped me out of it, so to speak, telling me, “You’re hurt, but you’ll be fine.” I now have a sense of resolve about completion with everything, from sorting out fractures in old relationships, to getting all of the collectibles in Red Dead Redemption Two! It has effected my work and my play. My question for you would be: Did anything crystallise for you, about your future? And did that feeling stay with you? Or has it been diluted at all, by time?
    3
  7624. 3
  7625. 3
  7626. 3
  7627. 3
  7628. 3
  7629. 3
  7630. 3
  7631. 3
  7632. 3
  7633. 3
  7634. 3
  7635. 3
  7636. 3
  7637. 3
  7638. 3
  7639. 3
  7640. 3
  7641. 3
  7642. 3
  7643. 3
  7644. 3
  7645. 3
  7646. 3
  7647. I disagree fundamentally with your opening point. The goals of the expedition were to hunt down Osama Bin Laden, carry out punitive attacks on the main body of the enemy and allies of the perpetrators of 911. This included the identification of the Taliban and their allies, and inducting local allies to assist in those aims. And it was to be carried out by a coalition of UN countries, either directly or through practical support, funding, logistical input and so on. That expedition met all of its stated aims and can be called a complete success. The delusion was, “National Building,” and the wrong headed notion that a new, democratic, western style government could installed in place of the enemy, which could last independently without permanent western support. Adding to that, the whole thing ended with betrayals. We had craven politicians using our erstwhile allies and Taliban prisoners as equal chips to be traded, or pawns to be played in their domestic political point scoring games, with absolutely no regard for honour, friendship, or even human life. Literally thousands of Taliban terrorists were set free by the previous US administration, just for the sake of a deal that the then president believed would make him, “look good,” creating the kind of chaos with the final evacuation that most US journalists compared it to the last days in Saigon! . . . Terrorists! The murderers of US and British and other allied soldiers! Invited to take coffee at Camp David, for crying out loud! Now, we uncover yet more cravenness and betrayal lead from the top. I share your feelings though, for me, it is more a sense of exhaustion, as the pit of pure rottenness has no bottom to it. There’s no lengths to which these gangsters will not stoop, so I cannot feel horror, which would require surprise or shock to ignite it. Disgust, surely. But, that hasn’t changed from the sense of betrayal and disgust at watching these goons make themselves rich as the number of children in poverty breaks new records. My shock-meter, horror-meter, and the gauge on my outrage detector have all been broken long ago. Now, I’m searching at the bottom of my backpack for any sight of my old, disused Hope-Meter. It’s not beeping yet, so it’s harder to find. This would be a perfect time to fully reform the military and its systems, since we’ve left Europe, changed our stance with the US and have military leaders all begging for root and branch reforms, and MONEY, of course. Our system is starting to look more like a Russian oligarchy, where huge chunks of cash go missing or get spent on, “off budget,” “expenses,” because it is as squalid and corrupt as all the other major branches of government, despite (strangely) not drawing so much attention as the others. Yes. I hope some articulate youth, in uniform, really sticks it to Sunak without raising his voice or using a single expletive and asks him, “Who is actually responsible and what will be done about this?” Maybe, after Sunak’s word salad of meaninglessness, one or two of the other speakers will speak truth to power? Maybe Starmer will promise his government will get to the bottom of the whole thing and introduce reforms? But I doubt the BBC will allow it.
    3
  7648. 3
  7649. 3
  7650. 3
  7651. 3
  7652. 3
  7653. 3
  7654. 3
  7655. 3
  7656. 3
  7657. 3
  7658. 3
  7659. 3
  7660. 3
  7661. 3
  7662. 3
  7663. 3
  7664. 3
  7665. 3
  7666. 3
  7667. 3
  7668. 3
  7669. 3
  7670. 3
  7671. 3
  7672. 3
  7673. 3
  7674. 3
  7675. 3
  7676. 3
  7677. 3
  7678. 3
  7679. 3
  7680. 3
  7681. 3
  7682. 3
  7683. 3
  7684. 3
  7685. 3
  7686. 3
  7687. 3
  7688. 3
  7689. 3
  7690. 3
  7691. 3
  7692. 3
  7693. 3
  7694. 3
  7695. 3
  7696. 3
  7697. 3
  7698. 3
  7699. 3
  7700. 3
  7701. 3
  7702. 3
  7703. 3
  7704. 3
  7705. 3
  7706. 3
  7707. 3
  7708. 3
  7709. 3
  7710. 3
  7711. 3
  7712. 3
  7713. 3
  7714. 3
  7715. 3
  7716. 3
  7717. 3
  7718. 3
  7719. 3
  7720. 3
  7721. 3
  7722. 3
  7723. 3
  7724. 3
  7725. 3
  7726. 3
  7727. 3
  7728. 3
  7729. 3
  7730. 3
  7731. 3
  7732. 3
  7733. 3
  7734. 3
  7735. 3
  7736. 3
  7737. 3
  7738. 3
  7739. 3
  7740. 3
  7741. 3
  7742. 3
  7743. 3
  7744. 3
  7745. 3
  7746. 3
  7747. 3
  7748. 3
  7749. 3
  7750. 3
  7751. 3
  7752. 3
  7753. 3
  7754. 3
  7755. 3
  7756. 3
  7757. 3
  7758. 3
  7759. 3
  7760. 3
  7761. I only knew of the root of that expression from its Irish origins, not the wooden fence, or Jewish connotations. I have a few books on etymology, which has always fascinated me, ever since I heard Noam Chomsky explain how the languages we use today are a recent, largely political, development, in a world where it was the norm to speak a range of dialects across all of Europe, with a good chance of being understood and understanding others wherever you went. Whereas, conversely, you could live in Bordeaux and go to Paris and not understand anything people were saying, as recently as two or three hundred years ago. Neal Stephenson’s Baroque Cycle - a series of novels set during the enlightenment, involving spies, pirates, natural philosophy (science), philosophy and all manner of fascinating developments in that period of history - delves rather eloquently into that whole language issue, showing through fiction the manner in which languages evolved and why they were used in the way they were, among a new species of, “vagabond,” and upper classes alike, who suddenly found themselves capable of rapid communications and transport for the first time in human existence. I don’t want to bore you with this digression, but I would only urge you, (if you have time for reading fiction at all?) to read those novels. To a man of your stamp, I cannot think of anything more likely to entertain, make you laugh out loud, and to fascinate you, from an intellectual point of view. I would imagine you read very little fiction in your spare time? But, if you have read Voltaire, Diderot or the lighter works of René Descartes and found them the least bit intriguing, then you will thoroughly enjoy the ingenuity, creativity, subtlety, scholarly knowledge and sheer entertainment value of these books. As always, thank you. This time, for imparting a little knowledge to me which I did not previously have. I do love to learn knew things. ✌️👍
    3
  7762. 3
  7763. 3
  7764. 3
  7765. 3
  7766. 3
  7767. 3
  7768. 3
  7769. 3
  7770. 3
  7771. 3
  7772. 3
  7773. 3
  7774. 3
  7775. 3
  7776. 3
  7777. 3
  7778. 3
  7779. 3
  7780. 3
  7781. 3
  7782. 3
  7783. 3
  7784. 3
  7785. 3
  7786. 3
  7787. 3
  7788. 3
  7789. 3
  7790. 3
  7791. 3
  7792. 3
  7793. 3
  7794. 3
  7795. 3
  7796. 3
  7797. 3
  7798. 3
  7799. 3
  7800. 3
  7801. 3
  7802. 3
  7803. 3
  7804. 3
  7805. 3
  7806. 3
  7807. 3
  7808. 3
  7809. 3
  7810. 3
  7811. 3
  7812. 3
  7813. 3
  7814. 3
  7815. 3
  7816. 3
  7817. 3
  7818. 3
  7819. 3
  7820. 3
  7821. 3
  7822. 3
  7823. 3
  7824. 3
  7825. 3
  7826. 3
  7827. 3
  7828. 3
  7829. 3
  7830.  @Seekeroftruth191  : There we’re no shots fired in anger over WWII in America, after Pearl Harbor, so your comment is meaningless in real world terms. You don’t have to b within range of a bullet to be in a war. You have confused the terms, “World War III,” and, “nuclear war,” in your mind. You’re not alone in that, but when you stop to think calmly about what is, and what, “opinions,” people express, you’ll see the stark difference. Try not to take it so personally? Just don’t kid yourself into thinking that any potential victory of Putin’s would end at the borders of Ukraine. Their state TV says that they want East Germany back every other night. They have overt designs on Finland and Hungary too. Just one backward step has been all it has ever taken for Putin to leap forward by two steps. But standing our ground has ALWAYS resulted in Putin backing down in the face of real force. I can promise you, since hearing about this decision (which adds up to the free world telling Putin he is not getting to keep Ukraine, period) Putin has, for the first time since this started, spoken out loud, to some confident or other, about finding a domestic off ramp. A fake referendum is his best option, so he can claim his people want him to end his special operations. Whatever he comes up with, he now knows he can’t look to the west for help with his usual face-saving excuses. This will get worse before it gets better. And you’re in it (if you pay any taxes, fuel your car, or pay heating bills?) already, whether you like it or not. If you want your bills to go down, you’d better support Ukraine’s victory.
    3
  7831. 3
  7832. 3
  7833. 3
  7834. 3
  7835. 3
  7836. 3
  7837. 3
  7838. 3
  7839. 3
  7840. 3
  7841. 3
  7842. 3
  7843. 3
  7844. 3
  7845. 3
  7846. 3
  7847. 3
  7848. 3
  7849. 3
  7850. 3
  7851. 3
  7852. 3
  7853. 3
  7854. 3
  7855. 3
  7856. 3
  7857. 3
  7858. 3
  7859. 3
  7860. 3
  7861. 3
  7862. 3
  7863. 3
  7864. 3
  7865. 3
  7866. 3
  7867. Dwight Blackwell : I found your exchange with ConservativeAnthem interesting. Is it not fair to say that, we know most of the allegations against Trump will be proven true? Also, that there are legions of Trolls at work, doing what they can to confuse the facts, alienate reasonable people from commenting, etc? And in THAT regard, surely, we must not fall for the last trick that the Putinistas have up their sleeve? They would DIVIDE Trump’s opposition into various camps. It’s their ONLY hope for the Mid Terms. That, and, as Tillerson hinted, with his, “We can’t stop Russian interference in 2018,” remark: which seems to imply that they will TRY to get the public to accept an unknowable quantity of Russian interference, so they can “claim” that they “probably” won? When you are outnumbered, and you KNOW what the “rivalries” ARE, within the enemy’s camp, you EXPLOIT them to the hilt, right? I was a Republican, who, already somewhat disillusioned, LEFT the Party, upon Trump’s nomination. The reasons I gave to friends and family seemed too far fetched to them. I have since received a great many apologies, from people who got VERY mad at me, over it, at the time. I no longer KNOW any Trump supporters. But, what I KNOW I HAVE TO DO, in the Mid Terms, is stand by WHOEVER will defeat the Republican Candidate. We MUST UNITE. I never “liked” or “trusted” HRC. Frankly, I’m GLAD she’s GONE. She DID buy up the Dem’s debts and take over the running, thus OUSTING Bernie. May not have been illegal, but it WAS WRONG. Many of those who voted for Trump, WOULD have voted for Bernie. They were DESPERATE, and STILL ARE. What I’m saying (forgive my longwindedness?) is that there ARE all kinds of issues that we can point to, that we may be RIGHT about, too, which divide us. But, if we don’t all stand together, for the upcoming elections, there will BE NO DEMOCRATIC FORUM, in which to set things right. If THAT means voting Democrat this year, then I’ll GLADLY do it. Like the old man said, “we either hang together, or we’ll BE HANGED, separately.” What do you think?
    3
  7868. Swnsasy _ : Two things there. Trump “fans” are not nearly so blind as the Trolls want you to believe. There are SO MANY Russian, and Russian hired, Trolls at work on YouTube, that the view of reality is skewed. But, among Republicans that I know, I don’t know one SINGLE person that will vote Republican, so long as Trump is still around, and some, who have lost their taste for the party altogether. Sure there’s a significant “hard core” and they must never be underestimated, but of those, very few really believe what the trolls say, even when pretending to. They just don’t have the numbers this time around, now that Trump has actually been in office and we’ve SEEN what SCUM he is, and how he’s brought out the absolute WORST in America and the GOP. So long as the opposition remains united. The other thing: There was ALREADY a money laundering investigation, going on under the radar, lead jointly by the FBI and CIA, into Trump, BEFORE he got into politics. Indeed, some say that Trump took this route so as to avoid prosecution. Don’t know if that’s true, but I do know that Trump’s Mafia buddy, was ALREADY a stoolie for the FBI, years ago, and is believed to have worn a wire for them. Honestly, I think the money laundering bit, will be the easiest conviction they’ll get. Mueller has quite literally got the BEST EXPERTS IN THE WORLD, in EACH AND EVERY DEPARTMENT of cyber crimes, money laundering, international law, espionage, business law, tax law, YOU NAME IT. And he’s an unflappable professional, at the height of his powers and experience. Believe me, there ain’t no “if” in this, only when. I could imagine them holding onto SOME crimes, for the sake of other investigations? But, even then, Mueller knows that you never cut a powerful adversary a break. You nail that sucker, and bury the pieces miles apart. I saw the Netflix series, you mentioned. So did Mueller 😉
    3
  7869. 3
  7870. 3
  7871. 3
  7872. 3
  7873. 3
  7874. 3
  7875. 3
  7876. 3
  7877. 3
  7878. 3
  7879. 3
  7880. 3
  7881. 3
  7882. 3
  7883. 3
  7884. 3
  7885. 3
  7886. 3
  7887. 3
  7888. 3
  7889. 3
  7890. 3
  7891. 3
  7892. 3
  7893. 3
  7894. 3
  7895. 3
  7896. 3
  7897. 3
  7898. 3
  7899. 3
  7900. 3
  7901. 3
  7902. 3
  7903. 3
  7904. 3
  7905. 3
  7906. 3
  7907. 3
  7908. 3
  7909. 3
  7910. 3
  7911. 3
  7912. 3
  7913. 3
  7914. 3
  7915. 3
  7916. 3
  7917. 3
  7918. 3
  7919. 3
  7920. 3
  7921. 3
  7922. 3
  7923. 3
  7924. 3
  7925. 3
  7926. 3
  7927. 3
  7928. 3
  7929. 3
  7930. 3
  7931. 3
  7932. 3
  7933. 3
  7934. 3
  7935. 3
  7936. 3
  7937. 3
  7938. 3
  7939. 3
  7940. 3
  7941. 3
  7942. 3
  7943. 3
  7944. 3
  7945. 3
  7946. 3
  7947. 3
  7948. 3
  7949. 3
  7950. 3
  7951. 3
  7952. 3
  7953. 3
  7954. 3
  7955. 3
  7956. 3
  7957. 3
  7958. 3
  7959. 3
  7960. 3
  7961. 3
  7962. 3
  7963. 3
  7964. 3
  7965. 3
  7966. 3
  7967. 3
  7968. 3
  7969. 3
  7970. 3
  7971. 3
  7972. 3
  7973. 3
  7974. 3
  7975. 3
  7976. 3
  7977. 3
  7978.  @Oscarcat2212  : You’re seeing it wrong. Look at it from Putin’s point of view? He’s spent the last four weeks finding out his orders are not being followed in many cases, or they’re being deliberately sabotaged. He’s discovering that half of the money he thought he’d procured top of the line equipment with has been spent on corrupted general’s yachts and dachas. He’s ordered three, “special operations,” to go fetch Zelensky’s head and all three were sabotaged by tip offs from inside the FSB! He’s gotten SO paranoid that he’s fired over a thousand staff and replaced them all with new faces. He can’t even be sure his breakfast order will be carried out the way he likes his eggs without wondering if they’ve been poisoned! Now, ask yourself? Even if he wasn’t bluffing (which I promise you he is) would YOU be willing to issue an order that is likely to mean suicide for the people carrying out that order, when there’s a strong reason to suspect you’ll be left looking like a dope in front of your generals, as absolutely nothing happens? In Russia, that’s the quickest way to find yourself being executed in the cellar with your family! And it’s not like they could ever count on nuclear protocols before this mess started. The actual, “risk,” is NOT from Putin being, “cornered,” at all. It’s right now! While he still has a free hand to further pressure everyone, transmit his paranoia around the Kremlin and keep every sub commander and silo chief exhausted and on permanent high alert. The guy who negotiates with a loaded weapon in his hands whilst waving it in everyone’s faces . . . He’s the guy who’s going to have an accident. It’s NOT crushing him more swiftly that’s liable to get us all killed! Colluding in helping Putin, “save face,” would be the west’s worst mistake. The smartest, safest play would be to offer a billion dollar bounty, citizenship and immunity to anyone who claims Putin’s head. And I think it might well come to that if Zelensky were to die in this? . . .
    3
  7979. Who was it who famously said, “Justice delayed is justice denied,” can anyone recall? Here’s a summary of the situation as it stands now, from the point of view of the Post Office: “We are facing bankruptcy, regardless of this scandal, as our business model has been mismanaged so badly, it may as well have been actively sabotaged. (Indeed, we might suspect that it was?) And our reputational damage cannot get any worse, regardless of what happens. So, we stonewall, call in every favour and use every possible contact to help use fudge the issues as much as possible. Otherwise, if we pay out everyone’s compensation and damages in one go, we are officially bankrupt and out of business. Many of our victims will be gone in the next few years anyway. We just need to outlast them.” That’s sounds about as malignant and cynical as it’s possible to be. But I believe I’m right. The only remedy would be for the barristers pursuing this case to call for specific punitive damages to take into account any further delay in justice (“Justice delayed is justice denied”) and especially swinging punitive damages for the families of the deceased victims. And, more importantly, to keep the public on board, by publicly organising and campaigning with them. The clock must be reset. So its ticking favours the victims and doesn’t work against them. The Post Office must be made to feel the urgency that the victims were so wrongly made to feel when forced into paying back monies they didn’t owe, or giving false confessions.
    3
  7980. 3
  7981. 3
  7982. 3
  7983. 3
  7984. 3
  7985. 3
  7986. 3
  7987. 3
  7988. 3
  7989. 3
  7990. 3
  7991. 3
  7992. 3
  7993. 3
  7994. 3
  7995. 3
  7996. 3
  7997. 3
  7998. 3
  7999. 3
  8000. 3
  8001. 3
  8002. 3
  8003. 3
  8004. 3
  8005. 3
  8006. 3
  8007. 3
  8008.  @davidbourne8267  : Machiavelli only wrote one tome which explored the principles of statecraft from the point of view of doing whatever it takes to achieve your ends, The Prince. And that book has been misinterpreted by people who’ve never read it ever since. He speaks as much about justice, truth and wise administration of the rule of law just as he does the darker impulses of men with power. He was controversial at that time for a range of reasons, most notably for saying out loud the things people had never dared to put on the page about the manipulative elements of statecraft before. Anyone who has read The Prince will quickly understand that it is not a book advocating for, “evil machinations,” but one that explores practical truths; good, bad and ugly, in a frank and honest manner. With that out of the way, it is pointless to discuss current events through the prism (nay, psychological, “prison”) of the actions of previous administrations who’s goals were entirely different from those at play now. That is simply, “Whaddabouting,” but with more steps. All that is truly clear from your commentary is that you don’t like America and that you read The Prince when you were too young to grasp it. I only hope it wasn’t a part of your school curriculum, as that would be an equal condemnation of your teacher, if not your educational system as a whole? If you wish to be taken seriously, (as you appear to be working at it?) you must focus on the matters that pertain directly to the case in hand. By all means, reference history, but stick to what is relevant, or you will lose everyone in a collective role of the eyes. After all, we have heard it ALL before and that really hasn’t moved the needle for you, has it?
    3
  8009. 3
  8010. 3
  8011. 3
  8012. 3
  8013. 3
  8014. 3
  8015. 3
  8016. 3
  8017. 3
  8018. 3
  8019.  Alaska Pirates  : With respect, you don’t get it yet. It’s NOT about any, “conviction.” The, “verdict,” is irrelevant! Most of the GOP have already announced their, “verdict,” so no one’s even playing that game; though I suspect it will be a LOT closer than the cult thinks? All that MATTERS is getting the most senior GOP members on the witness stand. Then it’s OVER for the GOP. Think it through? The reason for the Insurrection was what? “The Steal.” So, with no 5th Amendment to protect them; with no ability to refuse to testify; with a potential BILLION DOLLAR law suit staring at them with both barrels, and the risk of being charged with Perjury, Conspiracy, or WORSE!? What do you think they’ll say? They will ADMIT, “the steal,” is a seditious LIE, on Live TV! What, “choice,” do they have? And, what will any, “verdict,” MATTER, once the cult have heard it from the very mouths of those who lead them, from the back, to election DEFEAT, criminal records, zero pardons, ruined careers and futures and JAIL SENTENCES! Q is already losing followers in droves! And when the GOP tells them that they did everything for a LIE, created in the fevered mind of an Orange Orifice, spouting lie after lie, where will their conspiracy madness retreat to then? BACK TO THE FRINGES, WHERE THEY BELONG is where! It will break the GOP in two! With them being forced to pick a side, between trump (where the dwindling money supply is for now) or the rest of the GOP (who will get their big donors back, and the money they need for a future). It will be sink or swim. The end is upon them, and that, “civil war,” they always wanted, has broken out in their ranks already. The Impeachment is going to settle it. It will be their Gettysburg, except with no heroes and no soothing words in the aftermath. This Impeachment is REALLY IMPORTANT. “Verdicts,” be damned! 😉
    3
  8020. 3
  8021. 3
  8022. 3
  8023. 3
  8024. 3
  8025. 3
  8026. 3
  8027. 3
  8028. 3
  8029. 3
  8030. 3
  8031. 3
  8032.  @davidhunt7249  : Honest response? Full disclosure. I am, by American standards, a wealthy man, probably in the top 10% of wealthy, if not higher. I’m not ashamed of that, nor do I see being rich as inherently bad, or automatically at the cost of my fellow Americans. I used my brain, because I hate physical labor, and I contributed (in my own, tiny, way) to the monolith of historical knowledge out there, among other things. After 20 years working in various forms of children & family services, I learned that the only real impact I could have, to help people in need, was to earn money and influence. In my view, it’s not the nature of Capitalism per se that is bad. Just, “unchecked,” and, “unregulated,” capitalism, which leads to overwhelming temptation, desperation, jealousy, corruption and crime. Our values are skewed in such a way that a desperate criminal, trying to feed his family, having never had the advantages of education, being born with wealth, or, “connections,” often result in that person being punished far more harshly than someone who gambles with the nations life savings, knowingly committing multiple crimes, and loses. The latter guy can afford a battery of defence lawyers, and often finds himself connected personally to local politicians or even the judge in his case, and gets to be free, not remanded, even whilst awaiting trial, despite having, “robbed,” and RUINED the lives of literally millions of Americans. We saw that in the aftermath of the 2008 Banking Crisis. If levelling that playing field is called, “socialism,” then I’m a socialist. Along with giving access to healthcare, water, decent housing and quality education. Those things should be treated as human rights, as we move into the Hydrogen Age. But, I cannot agree that Capitalism is in itself, “bad.” Just as we have seen that no, “Communist,” country has EVER practised genuine Communism, Capitalist Countries have NEVER addressed the inherent flaws in a system that relies upon fair regulation, and that should, Constitutionally, write into its laws that, “inequality is to be considered the enemy of democracy AND successful Capitalism.” If trump’s regime taught us anything, it was that the people in charge cannot and should NEVER be trusted to regulate their own systems. Indeed, the biggest problems with trump’s regime was their constant attempts at encroaching on the other branches of government, both to ensure that they could break the rules (laws) and then to ensure their insulation from legal consequences for that. So, instead of seeing ANY, “progress,” throughout his entire term, America was too busy fighting a rear guard action, to fend of worsening government corruption, legal breakdown, civil unrest, and growing poverty and unemployment. All whilst a plague ravaged the nation. If we’re to see any improvement, it will take more than just Joe Biden actually fulfilling his campaign promises (though that is a refreshing start, and a relief!) but the very institutions meant to safeguard democracy and the systems of free trade and open markets must be made much more independent; with higher qualification requirements, and an independent access route. Politicians should NEVER be appointing Judges or any other government officials that aren’t directly part of their own executive branch. And there must NEVER be a financial or political advantage to any part of their remit. We were gradually improving the system, but it took so many serious blows under trump, that it may never fully recover, let alone make any real progress. Right now, the GOP are all but openly fascist, and they threaten the very foundations of the Republic. If they get power again, as they are, they will never relinquish it again. But, though your comments are full of merit, I will remain content to be a Capitalist, who fights for a level playing field. If I were to sum up my whole argument in one sentence, it would be: Let Capitalism have a chance at working, under proper, lawful management? If it fails after that, or still exploits the majority, I’ll throw in with you. But, until it’s had a fair chance to work, with all things being equal, it’s still like Communism; no one’s ever seen a real example of it yet. ✌️
    3
  8033. 3
  8034. 3
  8035. 3
  8036. 3
  8037. 3
  8038. 3
  8039. 3
  8040. 3
  8041. 3
  8042. 3
  8043. 3
  8044. 3
  8045. 3
  8046. 3
  8047. 3
  8048. 3
  8049. 3
  8050. 3
  8051. 3
  8052. 3
  8053. 3
  8054. 3
  8055. 3
  8056. 3
  8057. 3
  8058. 3
  8059. 3
  8060. 3
  8061. 3
  8062. 3
  8063. 3
  8064. 3
  8065. 3
  8066. 3
  8067. 3
  8068. 3
  8069. 3
  8070. 3
  8071. 3
  8072. 3
  8073. 3
  8074. 3
  8075. 3
  8076. 3
  8077. 3
  8078. 3
  8079. 3
  8080. 3
  8081. 3
  8082. 3
  8083. 3
  8084. 3
  8085. 3
  8086. 3
  8087. 3
  8088. 3
  8089. 3
  8090. 3
  8091. 3
  8092. 3
  8093. 3
  8094. 3
  8095. 3
  8096. 3
  8097. 3
  8098. 3
  8099. 3
  8100. 3
  8101. 3
  8102. 3
  8103. 3
  8104. 3
  8105. 3
  8106. 3
  8107. 3
  8108. 3
  8109. clara Hurley : Manafort, Stone and many others, who’s names are floating around in the mess, are all, “consultants,” who have known and, “worked,” with each other for 30 years. Trump claims he didn’t know Mannie, before he showed up, offering to, “do it for free,” which is implausible. At the very LEAST, they knew of each other and Trump had benefitted from Mannie’s contacts and schemes. Otherwise, what are we to make of Trump’s judgement, when he, allegedly, hires a guy, offering to work for nothing, whom even a cursory background check would have shown that he had just EPICALLY FAILED at his last job, and LITERALLY FLED the country after having been INSTRUMENTAL in the government’s DOWNFALL, in Ukraine??? I don’t even get WHY these Trolls are SAYING that Mannie won’t have anything on Trump, when it’s OBVIOUS he has TONS of material that COULD cover those last 30 YEARS? This leads me to believe that, at least some of them, must be the homegrown, racist, variety of Troll, who don’t read? I think you’re right. We will see signs of self preservation in the GOP, and the beginnings of a, “Distancing,” operation, followed by the coup de grace, post Mid Terms. Even then, they will cling on for confirmation at the polls, rather than LEAD the fight. Many will garner support, by opposing Trump, FINALLY, but after we give them whatever they need to finish the job, we must still make ALL of Trump’s enablers PAY for what they’ve done to America. Sorry. That was a bit of a rant 🙂✌️
    3
  8110. 3
  8111. 3
  8112. 3
  8113. 3
  8114. 3
  8115. 3
  8116. 3
  8117. 3
  8118. 3
  8119. 3
  8120.  @ninij9692  : I agree with most of what you said, but I’m equally alarmed by it. America has just barely slammed down the lid on a bubbling cauldron, just building up pressure and getting set to explode again. We have to accept, after everything we’ve witnessed, what the GOP are. They are Fascists. In the literal sense. In all but name. Franco, Mussolini and Hitler ALL have very similar stories to this one, and they have NOT gone away, or been subdued! I can literally see trump getting some jail time, but it being a short period in a health farm, handed down by one of his appointed judges who was so intimidated, he allowed trump to make speeches during cross examination, whilst his heavies moved around the court. I can see him (with a ghost writer) penning, “My Struggle: With a Permanent Unjustified Sense of Grievance And An Effeminate Tendency Toward Victimhood,” (He needs to work on that title) and emerging twice as determined, with a fully organised movement, ready to take his orders when he gets out! Remind anyone of Hitler after his Beer Hall Putsch, perhaps? Look at the comparisons? His is a Personality Qult, with a founding narrative that is a complete LIE. They are driven by racism and grievance. Fortunately for America, the economic conditions were different, but the Covid crisis did help him to create a similar sense of panic and urgency among his Qults, that drove them to the streets. They use threat, intimidation and actual violence to get their way. And they openly refuse to tolerate ANY political opposition. Remember how, “Lock Her Up,” was ALREADY old, before he even took office? And how every single opponent since then has been the victim of a smear campaign that ALWAYS alleges some sort of criminal activity? That is the attitude of a movement that is bent on OUTLAWING political parties of all kinds, apart from their own of course. And, don’t forget that after the insurrection, no participant woke up the next day, horrified at what they’d done? They had already planned for another one, in each of the 50 state capitols, and were going to have an American Krystal Nacht! If this whole thing had started two or three weeks earlier, I think they might have pulled it off!? It was only because Biden’s transition teams were privy to most of what was developing that the GOP couldn’t plot around the corners! America is facing a Fascist threat! And, this calm is great. But, it is in no way a restoration of our norms, and we cannot afford to act like it is! Their mask has been torn off, and every pretence the GOP makes at being pro-democracy, or even pro-republic sounds disingenuous, because it is! If they get power again, they will NEVER relinquish it! They simply cannot afford to, without facing the criminal consequences that they all know are coming for them. Democracy is putting up a brave fight, but it is far weaker than we imagined, and it was not just the events of the 6th that confirmed that; whether you count the Insurrection, or what I see as far worse, the GOP voting to overturn democracy, PERIOD, DURING A VIOLENT INSURRECTION! But, trump’s personal pressure on so many politicians, to fiddle the vote. How close did we come? If just one or two more of those people had capitulated, we would be living in a militarised dystopia now! Biden’s successes will help to shore up our democracy, as it will take away the hatred, where it will never win him votes. But, the GOP have been pursuing a scorched Earth policy for four years already, killing all bills that reached the Senate. That, “Emergency,” Covid Relief bill was passed by Congress and sent to the Senate A YEAR AGO! Half a MILLION Americans are DEAD! And we’re SO jaded that we see that kind of CRIMINAL, wilful EVIL as just, “business as usual”??? We need to WAKE UP! Example: They used to hunt down, try and execute traitors who broadcast anti-American Propaganda and LIES that got people KILLED. And they did that in living memory, after WWII! I’m not saying we should hang broadcasters, but for Christ’s sake! Fox literally broadcasts deadly lies on American soil and we allow them to get RICH doing it! Because we’ve grown too accepting and jaded! America will fall, if we allow it. I know how I sound, like a hysterical Tacitus. But, I predicted the insurrection AND that they wouldn’t be prepared for it, and might not get the back up they needed until it was too late. There are Conspiracies abroad, and they go to the top. It’s up to all of us to reset the boundaries of, “acceptable.” And to demand a review of our Sedition Laws! Fox will scream, “Fire,” in a theatre packed with agitated Nazis, because they CAN. And they’re getting Americans killed! We ALL need to recognise this threat, stop acting like everything’s OK now, and get involved in root and branch politics! At least, those of us who want to keep our Democracy should? Sorry to unload on you like that. But I speak in friendship. Sincerely. I don’t disagree with you. I just don’t see the GOP as those things any longer. They are Fascists now. ✌️👍
    3
  8121. 3
  8122. 3
  8123. 3
  8124. 3
  8125. 3
  8126. 3
  8127. 3
  8128. 3
  8129. 3
  8130. 3
  8131. 3
  8132. 3
  8133. 3
  8134. 3
  8135. 3
  8136. 3
  8137. 3
  8138. 3
  8139. 3
  8140. 3
  8141. 3
  8142. 3
  8143. 3
  8144. 3
  8145. 3
  8146. 3
  8147. 3
  8148. 3
  8149. 3
  8150. 3
  8151. 3
  8152. 3
  8153. 3
  8154. 3
  8155. 3
  8156. 3
  8157. 3
  8158. 3
  8159. 3
  8160. 3
  8161. 3
  8162. 3
  8163. 3
  8164. 3
  8165. 3
  8166. 3
  8167. 3
  8168. 3
  8169. 3
  8170. 3
  8171. 3
  8172. 3
  8173. 3
  8174. 3
  8175. 3
  8176. 3
  8177. 3
  8178. 3
  8179. 3
  8180. 3
  8181. 3
  8182. 3
  8183. 3
  8184. 3
  8185. 3
  8186. 3
  8187. 3
  8188. 3
  8189. 3
  8190. 3
  8191. 3
  8192. The very practice of, “Shorting,” stocks is, “Market Manipulation,” by definition. It is a fundamentally A-moral practice, not just betting against the success of a company, but it is creating the circumstances by which you can ensure that company’s failure; thus increasing the profits of the Shorter. So, to try to suggest a bunch of Redditers behaved in some kind of immoral way, differently from the way they behave every day; worse, to call it an attack on the rich, is hypocritical beyond belief! To your question: If we should be upset about anything, other than this hypocrisy, it should be about that the fact that these goons are running a casino with the nations money! Mr Reddit walks in, starts winning, because he’s figured out the same methods that the casino uses to cheat them, and the response of these Robin’ Hoods who own the casino? Shut down the game, and have the bouncers throw Mr Reddit, roughly, out of their casino. Mr Reddit lands on his ass in the street, right under the sign that says, “All Are Welcome,” and isn’t meant to feel ill used AND cheated??? And what did Congress REALLY get together for? Their reaction was swifter to this than it was to the Capitol riots! Sure, they grill the CEO of these Robin’ Hoods, and make him look uncomfortable for 5 minutes, but it looked more like they were just trying to figure out a way to punish Redditers, to me, for cutting in on their dance partner, and for a way to reset the game, so that other people never get into their Casino unless they are already in their club to start with! This whole debacle has merely highlighted what an abject Oligarchy America has become. It seems we’re fast approaching a time when politicians will be irrelevant, and the most political act you can commit will be to join a boycott of a company! For which the penalties will, no doubt, be swift, brutal and illegal! Until the companies ARE the, “law.” Like the Oligarchy in Russia, where the only way to get the police to seriously investigate a daylight murder, is for the victim’s family to pay the cops involved. And even then, the first thing those cops will do is check to make sure the suspect isn’t related to a CEO or friend of Putin’s, before taking any action. Strange how we sit still for all this, really? I think it’s because in the old days, when people worked for the robber barons of the railroads, they were actually there in groups, collectively experiencing the injustices of their bosses stealing their wages, or refusing to compensate workers for industrial accidents, etc. Now, we all sit in our caves, divided and already conquered. The only real, “communities,” now, are on the web. And, when they get together to change the game, the whole system rallies against them. Whatever happens still leaves everyone in their divided spaces, with other lives to get on with. This Reddit Shorting is a prime example; where it was bad, but it’s not their whole existence, like being a railroad employee was in the 19th century. So, they don’t all discuss it in the evening over beers and get worked up, pick up their tools and march on their foreman’s tent. They have already fended us off, because we’re separated, with jobs to go to, and other stuff to do. Who can say what the solution to that is? But, I bet there is one? Brilliant video there, Wisecrack. Really well done. Would love to see if there are any political philosophy solutions out there, to these unique circumstances. Or have the 1% finally figured out how to beat us forever, and the Oligarchs are here to stay?
    3
  8193. 3
  8194. 3
  8195. 3
  8196. 3
  8197. 3
  8198. 3
  8199. 3
  8200. 3
  8201. 3
  8202. 3
  8203. 3
  8204. 3
  8205. 3
  8206. 3
  8207. 3
  8208. 3
  8209. 3
  8210. 3
  8211. 3
  8212. 3
  8213. 3
  8214. 3
  8215. 3
  8216. 3
  8217. 3
  8218. 3
  8219. 3
  8220. 3
  8221. 3
  8222. 3
  8223. 3
  8224. 3
  8225. 3
  8226. 3
  8227. 3
  8228. 3
  8229. 3
  8230. 3
  8231. 3
  8232. 3
  8233. 3
  8234. 3
  8235. 3
  8236. 3
  8237. 3
  8238. 3
  8239. 3
  8240. 3
  8241. 3
  8242. 3
  8243. Hmmm . . . Well, one can always argue that Johnson made both Truss and Sunack a thing, and as to lasting damage, that’s hard to quantify. We’ll never know how things would have played out if he had supported Teresa May’s plans for Brexit, instead of sabotaging what would have been a far less bumpy ride for Britain than what we got, whilst stabbing her in the back and front, merely for his own Machiavellian ends. Seldon does write well and entertainingly. He - or, he and his colleagues (whom are fully accredited as co-authors on the covers of his books, btw) - is/are insightful and his book on Johnson seemed wholly accurate and justified to me . . . as well as just a good read. So, whilst I too will take some convincing, I will at least listen to his arguments with an open mind, as I would to almost anyone who is a true believer is history and its importance as a learning tool for us all. But I must contradict you on one point. Truss has absolutely zero, “ideas of her own.” I can understand why they seem that way, given how outlandish her political philosophy seemed at the time, even to her fellow party members. But, if you know anything about the, “Tufty Club,” or the Tufton Street so called, “think tanks,” and their American financial backers, you will see that her entire philosophy, as stated out loud and as attempted in reality, was directly derived from their Neo Liberal clap trap, of the type that the Tea Party and other far right American financial cartels spout. Nothing new or original in any of it, and most certainly not, “her,” ideas. She has merely acted as an empty vessel for these foreign and domestic investors who took advantage of her, “born again,” zeal, and the fact that she was more or less a blank slate to be filled with whatever nonsense they fed her.
    3
  8244. 3
  8245. 3
  8246. 3
  8247. 3
  8248. 3
  8249. 3
  8250. 3
  8251. 3
  8252. 3
  8253. 3
  8254. 3
  8255. 3
  8256. 3
  8257. 3
  8258. 3
  8259. 3
  8260. 3
  8261. 3
  8262. 3
  8263. 3
  8264. 3
  8265. 3
  8266. 3
  8267. 3
  8268. 3
  8269. 3
  8270. 3
  8271. 3
  8272. 3
  8273. 3
  8274. 3
  8275. 3
  8276. 3
  8277. 3
  8278. 3
  8279. 3
  8280. 3
  8281. 3
  8282. And it’s so gladdening to my heart that this is what people want to talk about, FINALLY! Andrew Marr excused himself from even discussing that topic, with a hand wave, saying, “They’ve always done it like that.” But he gets his residual pay,ents for his books and documentaries from the BBC, so that’s not hard to understand. Especially when you consider that anyone who takes a more lucrative job at another outlet still relies on their, “network,” of contacts for those big interviews that draw the punters. The whole topic of corrupt appointments has been subject to Omertà within the BBC because they don’t want to rock their leaky boat. But, a system that no one would bat an eye at in the early 1930’s, The State appointing State Radio Management, which was made even a necessity during the war, already looked outdated by the 1960’s and unfit for purpose by the end of the 80’s. Now it’s just an invasion by stealth, dismantling its values, public trust and its future viability by putting more and more Tories at the top, whilst using those positions to fish around for Tories among their presenters who might be stupid enough to allow themselves to be persuaded to shill for the government, like Fiona Bruce. And that’s not her first offence either, shilling for Johnson’s wife beating dad. I’ve literally watched her agog, on Question Time, stating the government’s arguments for them, because the Tory MP on the panel was refusing to. If anyone should be like a royal, taking their political biases to their graves with them, it’s political and news presenters. But Andrew Neil was never even questioned for starting his own right wing news outlet! The hypocrisy is palpable and shocking. Damn, I could site example after example, but it would be too long for a YouTube comment and it would leave all decent people feeling sicker than they already do.
    3
  8283. 3
  8284. 3
  8285. 3
  8286. 3
  8287. 3
  8288. 3
  8289. 3
  8290. 3
  8291. 3
  8292. 3
  8293. 3
  8294. 3
  8295. 3
  8296. 3
  8297. 3
  8298. 3
  8299. 3
  8300. 3
  8301. 3
  8302. 3
  8303. 3
  8304. 3
  8305. 3
  8306. 3
  8307. 3
  8308. 3
  8309. 3
  8310. 3
  8311. 3
  8312. 3
  8313. 3
  8314. 3
  8315. 3
  8316. 3
  8317. 3
  8318. 3
  8319. 3
  8320. 3
  8321. 3
  8322. 3
  8323. 3
  8324. 3
  8325. 3
  8326. 3
  8327. 3
  8328. 3
  8329. 3
  8330. 3
  8331. 3
  8332. 3
  8333. 3
  8334. 3
  8335. 3
  8336. 3
  8337. 3
  8338. 3
  8339. 3
  8340. 3
  8341. 3
  8342. 3
  8343. 3
  8344. 3
  8345. 3
  8346. 3
  8347. 3
  8348. 3
  8349. 3
  8350. 3
  8351. 3
  8352. 3
  8353. 3
  8354. 3
  8355. 3
  8356. 3
  8357. 3
  8358. 3
  8359. 3
  8360. 3
  8361. 3
  8362. 3
  8363. 3
  8364. 3
  8365. 3
  8366. 3
  8367. 3
  8368. 3
  8369. 3
  8370. 3
  8371. 3
  8372. 3
  8373. 3
  8374. 3
  8375. 3
  8376. 3
  8377. 3
  8378. 3
  8379. 3
  8380. 3
  8381. 3
  8382. 3
  8383. 3
  8384. 3
  8385. 3
  8386. 3
  8387. 3
  8388. 3
  8389. 3
  8390. 3
  8391. 3
  8392. 3
  8393. 3
  8394. 3
  8395. 3
  8396.  @foxman8344  : How well do you know the channel, SomeOrdinaryGamers? I ask because it sounds like you don’t know it too well? I think you expressed an utter misreading of both sides in that video. Of course it’s, “drama,” because it is, “dramatic.” He’s talking about someone he liked and thought he could trust. Did you register how often Muta encouraged viewers to do their own homework on this story and into charities generally? How he demonstrated the method for doing so and explained, step by step, how you can do this for yourself and draw your own conclusions? It’s like you are losing sight of the fact that he is making YouTube videos for, “entertainment,” and presenting his subject matter (whether it be serious or trivial) in an entertaining way? But none of that should negate the fact that Muta is telling you that there’s a YouTuber out there whom he has followed and admired all these years, only to find out that he has some deeply disturbing financial behaviour going on? That’s a dramatic story, which Muta handled in his usual, inimitable style, yet I thought he presented it very even handedly and with due consideration. Are you honestly telling me that your suspicions as to the motives of the person presenting you with the facts would colour your interpretation of those facts? You saw the records and heard their response. Those are not opinions, are they? Just facts. Are you honestly, “not,” seeing a massive red flag, when the guy who has been sitting on this growing sum of money, taking, “relatively,” small sums each year, with absolutely no accountability for where those, “expenses,” have gone, responds to Muta’s enquiry with, “I was just about to give it away,” and, “Maybe you could suggest whom to give it to?” which sounds very much like, “Would you like a bribe to keep this quiet?” at worst and, “You caught me red handed, but I can give most of it back,” at best to me! I mean, he doesn’t want to waste the charity’s money on, “giving it to a doctor or something”??? . . . Whu? . . ? Isn’t that what it’s FOR? If I had any doubts about the guy, they were eradicated when I heard him talk! He acts like a guy who was in the middle of stealing a TV, making excuses and just hoping he can put it back down and flee the scene! He was hoping he could sit on that pot and take it all for himself in a few years from now. That’s obvious. He lied repeatedly on his streams, saying the money was already in the hands of other charities, which he NAMED, yet he says he cannot identify a worthy one!? Look at the other video attached to this one, and you’ll see for yourself. Those were undeniably outright, repeated lies, over a period of years! Not once, over all those years, did he EVER tell his audience he was, “having difficulty,” identifying a worthy recipient! Why? Because he didn’t want anyone to know he was LYING to them!
    3
  8397. 3
  8398. 3
  8399. 3
  8400. 3
  8401. 3
  8402. 3
  8403. 3
  8404. 3
  8405. 3
  8406. 3
  8407. 3
  8408. 3
  8409. 3
  8410. 3
  8411. 3
  8412. 3
  8413. 3
  8414. 3
  8415. 3
  8416. 3
  8417. 3
  8418. 3
  8419. 3
  8420. 3
  8421. 3
  8422. 3
  8423. 3
  8424. 3
  8425. 3
  8426. 3
  8427. 3
  8428. 3
  8429. 3
  8430. 3
  8431. 3
  8432. 3
  8433. 3
  8434. 3
  8435. 3
  8436. Virginia B. Britton : Imagine, just how deeply, “hurt,” a person needs to be, to hate and blame a whole, “other,” group of people, instead of taking, “Responsibility,” for the fact that they work three jobs, have no time for their kids and only ever get their news from the Fox headlines, and their favourite conspiracy web-sites? The BURDEN they carry and feed, like an angry beast, eating them from the inside, and pressing down its weight, upon every decision and conversation; not just colouring their views, but putting a crazy kaleidoscope prism in front of them, distorting everything they see, into the opposite of what it is. That’s a LOT of anger and hate to carry around. They, ”think,” they’ll experience, “relief,” at some point; like there’s a finishing line that they can cross and declare, “victory.” It’s always just around the corner, for a racist. “If only we can,” etc, etc. And the fact that they NEVER get what they want, makes them adopt this culture of, “Victimhood.” Always Aggrieved, by something, and claiming that, because of, “The Other,” they are, “Oppressed Whites.” So, imagine, the weight of effeminate whining and casual cruelty, upon the soul. Never, “Manning Up,” except to throw bottles of urine at black people; more like, “Childing Up,” and having to waste their valuable time, that they SHOULD be spending on their families, researching conspiracy nonsense. Education is the only known cure for racism; doesn’t inoculate ALL cases, but does inoculate most young people. We NEED a program of inoculation: We NEED Education. But, the Alt-Wrong KNOWS this: Hence, they have an incompetent, running education into the ground, Fox (W)anchors, attacking universities on an almost nightly basis, and all the Alt-Wrong politicians, accusing educational establishments of being “Hotbeds of Socialism,” or WORSE. Yeah, pretty, “miserable,” existence for the average Trumpoid. Just look at them? Angry and aggrieved, ALL THE TIME . . . SMH
    3
  8437. 3
  8438. 3
  8439. 3
  8440. 3
  8441. 3
  8442. 3
  8443. 3
  8444. 3
  8445. 3
  8446. 3
  8447. 3
  8448. 3
  8449. 3
  8450. 3
  8451. 3
  8452. 3
  8453. 3
  8454. 3
  8455. 3
  8456. 3
  8457. 3
  8458. 3
  8459. 3
  8460. 3
  8461. 3
  8462. 3
  8463. 3
  8464. 3
  8465. 3
  8466. 3
  8467. 3
  8468. 3
  8469. 3
  8470. 3
  8471. 3
  8472. 3
  8473. 3
  8474. 3
  8475. 3
  8476. 3
  8477. 3
  8478. 3
  8479. 3
  8480. 3
  8481. 3
  8482. 3
  8483. 3
  8484. 3
  8485. 3
  8486. 3
  8487. 3
  8488. 3
  8489. 3
  8490. 3
  8491. 3
  8492. 3
  8493. 3
  8494. 3
  8495. 3
  8496. 3
  8497. 3
  8498. 3
  8499. 3
  8500. 3
  8501. 3
  8502. 3
  8503. 3
  8504. 3
  8505. 3
  8506. 3
  8507. 3
  8508. 3
  8509. 3
  8510. 3
  8511. 3
  8512. 3
  8513. 3
  8514. 3
  8515. 3
  8516. 3
  8517. 3
  8518. 3
  8519.  @GeneralSamov  : Are you speaking of GOP witness testimony? If so, consider: they cannot refuse to testify. They cannot take the 5th. So, when they are asked to give their, “evidence,” for, “The Steal,” which was the belief that caused the Insurrection, what can they say? Under oath, on Live TV? Risk getting torn to shreds, with fabulation? Make up some, “evidence,” on the spot? And get charged with Perjury, or Conspiracy, or worse? It’s precisely my utter lack of trust in them that I’m counting on. The ONLY option open to them, that doesn’t land them with their own indictment, is confession. This is a court, where they cannot say whatever they like, without any evidence. They will be forced, under oath, to tell America that they have ZERO, “evidence,” for, “The Steal.” Many will fold completely, and admit that not only did they know it was a LIE, but that they discussed it’s falsehood with other senior GOP witnesses. Then there’s the risk of their stories not matching, unless they tell the truth. The very best they can offer is the Nuremberg Defence! Or, a variation of it? “I believed my president, though I did not see any evidence for the steal, myself.” Or, “I was only following orders.” Many will already have been advised to take that line, by their legal council. They will ALL be in self preservation mode, and the only ones with a hope of coming out the other end with any semblance of dignity, are the guys like Moscow Mitch McConnell, who is currently decrying the falsehoods of QAnon, and deploring that they have a Conspiracist in their own ranks. Others will take cover with him, saying they have always said that, “The Steal,” is a lie. The GOP is about to fracture. And no, “verdict,” rigged or otherwise can save them from that.
    3
  8520. 3
  8521. 3
  8522. 3
  8523. 3
  8524. 3
  8525. 3
  8526. 3
  8527. 3
  8528. 3
  8529. 3
  8530. 3
  8531. 3
  8532. 3
  8533. 3
  8534. 3
  8535. 3
  8536. 3
  8537. 3
  8538. 3
  8539. 3
  8540. 3
  8541. 3
  8542. 3
  8543. 3
  8544. 3
  8545. 3
  8546. 3
  8547. 3
  8548. 3
  8549. 3
  8550. 3
  8551. 3
  8552. 3
  8553. 3
  8554. 3
  8555. 3
  8556. 3
  8557. 3
  8558. 3
  8559. 3
  8560. 3
  8561. 3
  8562. 3
  8563. 3
  8564. 3
  8565. 3
  8566. 3
  8567. 3
  8568. 3
  8569. 3
  8570. 3
  8571. 3
  8572. 3
  8573. 3
  8574. 3
  8575. 3
  8576. 3
  8577. 3
  8578. 3
  8579. 3
  8580. 3
  8581. I agree with you, though I would reverse the order of action. I think they should exile Andrew immediately, firmly and without hiding anything. Then they should build bridges with Harry and Megan, but taking their time and doing so with digression. Having been a family therapist, in a former life, among the chief tools at your disposal which MUST be put to good use, is time. It takes time and processing to forgive. It begins with honesty and acknowledgement. But all parties then need time to process, to gage the sincerity of other parties, assess what they need from the process, AND what they offer. The issue is complicated in this case by the aspect of, “duty,” that is unique to a royal dynasty. And for which the, “playbook,” offers little help, as their family history involves everything from Parliamentary interventions and private negotiations, to outright kidnapping and murder to settle all manner of publicly debated disputes. What I don’t question about Harry and Megan is that they both seem like good, decent people, attempting to navigate a tempest without a compass. I can only imagine the litany of mistakes I would make in their place. But I do not doubt their fine character, or their desire to, “do the right thing,” in all cases, despite what the, “Tory, client press,” has to say about them in their usual bad faith. A good father should be seeking reconciliation and closure for his son, acceptance of his choice of wife, regardless of the manner in which the gutter press attempts to steer public opinion against them (a topic that Charles, of all people, knows about) and remember his DUTY to the crown. If we are to have any faith in this institution, then the Royal Family MUST be made to understand; The British people don’t care about the mistakes people have made nearly so much as they do about the coverups and refusal to acknowledge wrongdoing where it is unquestionably present! Everyone makes blunders. Not everyone refuses to apologise, admit to them, or correct the situation. We need to see Charles’s good will. His attempts to be both a good father and a good head of state. He must put away his brother and fire those of his inner circle who are too cosy with the far right media, along with him. He must create the space and the trustworthy environment into which Harry and Megan can gradually re-enter. Rather than the current lion’s den it comes across as now.
    3
  8582. 3
  8583. 3
  8584. 3
  8585. 3
  8586. 3
  8587. 3
  8588. 3
  8589. 3
  8590. 3
  8591. 3
  8592. 3
  8593. 3
  8594. 3
  8595. 3
  8596. 3
  8597. Thank you! I honestly felt like I was going a bit mad! It’s not just me then? The guy should be the nonentity clown side show he’s always been, but somehow always ends up with disproportionate power to do real world harm, because the press and pundits just cannot get enough of the guy! Ed Davy, who, lest we forget, stands the biggest chance of forming the opposition after the Tories, has to fling himself off a bridge or parachute into a BBC studio, just to get a line in the Guardian or Telegraph! Whereas Farage bleats just one of his perennial LIES of the type that we’re all used to hearing from, “a bloke down the pub,” and he’s on the front pages of the tabloids and broadsheets across the land! WT actual F??? And this is all as a result of the client media being too cowed by the possibility of him becoming the leader of the party that signs their cheques and Tory MP’s being unwilling to take him on because they all want to be on his good side for the same reason. The right side, presumably? The further right the better. Add to that the fact that Farage has not raised his game one iota, but the Tories have LOWERED theirs to the point that they’re now indistinguishable from the known liar and clown side show act that’s chasing them wherever they go and soaking up their supporters! I’ve challenged Prof Wilson to get a grip and stop making every other video about Farage, but I doubt he’ll pay any attention to me, as it’s probably getting him higher views than more important matters like the post office scandal being the biggest conspiracy in British political history, or our water supply being polluted to deadly levels simply because it’s cheaper to treat fines as a business cost rather than fix the problem, or insider gambling networks, etc. I have huge respect for Prof Wilson, but he can be so wrong about some issues (admittedly, rarely in my view) and this is one of them.
    3
  8598. 3
  8599. 3
  8600. 3
  8601. 3
  8602. 3
  8603. 3
  8604. 3
  8605. 3
  8606. 3
  8607. 3
  8608. 3
  8609. 3
  8610. 3
  8611. 3
  8612. 3
  8613. 3
  8614. 3
  8615. 3
  8616. 3
  8617. 3
  8618. 3
  8619. 3
  8620. 3
  8621. 3
  8622. 3
  8623. 3
  8624. 3
  8625. 3
  8626. 3
  8627. 3
  8628. 3
  8629. 3
  8630. 3
  8631. 3
  8632. I would be utterly unsurprised if these WhatsApp exchanges amounted to little more than a gag reel of sick jokes at the bereaved’s expense and evidence that ministers knew they were actively doing real-world harm, and handing off their responsibilities to civil servants, because they had no clue as to how anything works. My suspicion is based upon the very firm foundation of my own experience of finally coming home after the funeral for my dad, who died of Covid, for which I had needed special permission to travel to England from Scotland to attend, and which had been complicated by my dad’s mental health which made his death particularly hard and cruel, only to switch on the TV to see a Tory press spokesperson LITERALLY LAUGHING OUT LOUD to members of the press, in front of camera, and for some reason believing this would not somehow become a headline story! LAUGHING, by the way, at the drunken antics of Cabinet members and Number 10 staff at Boris Johnson’s birthday party! Nay, PARTIES, plural! I was so emotionally damaged by that experience that I could have physically harmed Johnson had he been within blind rage shot! I carry that vertigo inducing sense of horror and despair at the realisation that the very people in which you have placed your trust at a time of crisis, are literally drunk at the wheel and think the whole thing is FUNNY! I kept seeing those (ironically enough) WhatsApp images of my dad, unable to make new memories, asking where his children were, having it explained to him, yet again, and then forgetting and only knowing he was dying alone, abandoned by his loved ones for no reason he could understand. That image is SEARED into the scar tissue of my brain. There is no, “healing,” that. But, every time I hear of yet more attempts to either play games with the truth, or to bury ANY of it, for a PUBLIC enquiry that THEY set up, I once again want to strangle a Boris Johnson type. They should just arrest the lot of them and get warrants to turn over every nook and cranny of their private spaces. Lord knows what they’d find!
    3
  8633. 3
  8634. 3
  8635. 3
  8636. 3
  8637. 3
  8638. 3
  8639. 3
  8640. 3
  8641. 3
  8642. 3
  8643. 3
  8644. 3
  8645. 3
  8646. 3
  8647. 3
  8648. 3
  8649. 3
  8650. 3
  8651. 3
  8652. 3
  8653. 3
  8654. 3
  8655. Surely, with that jaws example, there’s more to it than that? The scream we take to be of a possible shark attack, only to learn it’s a girl having fun with her boyfriend, takes place while the character of Brody is being talked to by that chap we saw in the shot. Like Brody, we the viewer are trying to see and hear past him, not paying attention to what he’s saying, straining over the sound of his voice as Brody is, which serves to heighten the frustration and tension of the audience. That is using sound design to draw us into the lead character’s mindset, as we are sharing his frustration and doing exactly what he is doing, looking over his interlocutor’s shoulder and listening to everything but his voice. This compounds the effect of the scream, which suddenly penetrates while we were straining so hard, doubling the shock value and compounding the ambivalent sense of both relief and disappointment when we realise it was not the shark. The partial disappointment is not that we want to see another victim of Jaws, but that we, like Brody, want a resolution to the ongoing terror. And we are aware that this resolution can only come at the cost of facing more horror. That was the brilliance of that scene. Not just the false alarms and the smoke and mirrors of Spielbergs red herrings, but the way he puts us inside Brody’s psychological box with him, by using another man’s voice in that way. We know we should be listening to him - Brody, as a member of the community, who has a responsibility to listen to this businessman expressing his concerns; the audience as people following the plot, knowing we might miss something of importance - but we both, audience and character are trying to tune him out, making us more attuned to, and vulnerable to, the frequency of screams.
    3
  8656. 3
  8657. 3
  8658. 3
  8659. 3
  8660. 3
  8661. 3
  8662. 3
  8663. 3
  8664. 3
  8665. 3
  8666. 3
  8667. 3
  8668. 3
  8669. 3
  8670. 3
  8671. 3
  8672. 3
  8673. 3
  8674. 3
  8675. 3
  8676. 3
  8677. 3
  8678. 3
  8679. 3
  8680. 3
  8681. 3
  8682. 3
  8683. 3
  8684. 3
  8685. 3
  8686. 3
  8687. 3
  8688. 3
  8689. 3
  8690. 3
  8691. 3
  8692. 3
  8693. 3
  8694. 3
  8695. 3
  8696. 3
  8697. 3
  8698. 3
  8699. 3
  8700. 3
  8701. 3
  8702. 3
  8703. 3
  8704. 3
  8705. 3
  8706. 3
  8707. 3
  8708. 3
  8709. 3
  8710. 3
  8711. 3
  8712. 3
  8713. 3
  8714. 2
  8715. 2
  8716. 2
  8717. OR . . . perhaps . . . You could eliminate the "free market" altogether, like they do in civilized countries? In the UK people can get private health insurance, IF THEY CHOOSE, or use the government funded NHS, which is paid for through taxation. This is why health care in the UK costs ONE QUARTER of what it costs in the USA. We Brits look at the US and, on this issue, we are bemused by two main things: 1) Your mean spirited refusal to share the burden of healthcare is both short sighted and barbaric. 2) What thinking person would risk placing the best interests of their HEALTHCARE into the hands of one of the most VENAL, SELF INTERESTED & UNTRUSTWORTHY industries as INSURERS? Are you all MAD? I understand that these PragerU vids are meant to put forward the arguments of the "right", but by failing to even address most of the REAL issues related to the costs of healthcare, this particular video is not up to the usually quite good educational, PragerU standard at all. This was simply propaganda for the insurance and drug companies. C minus: Cover the WHOLE issue, rather than cherry picking favorable aspects of the ones you address / at least TRY to address the alternative points of view and state your views against them (they do occur to your viewer, you know) / take care not to paint negative outcomes as the "desired effects" of the opposition (no one will believe that Obama WANTED drug prices to go up, as you imply) / Unless you are seeking a career with Breitbart or Infowars, you must try harder
    2
  8718. 2
  8719. 2
  8720. 2
  8721. 2
  8722. 2
  8723. 2
  8724. 2
  8725. 2
  8726.  @joeymac4302  : I enjoyed your comment. And, yes. Rand was dependent upon the kindness of her friends and upon state funded healthcare for the last eleven years of her life, battling cancer. She didn’t believe in state funded healthcare, advocating against it, and still frequently quoted to this day, by those who also advocate against it, but she sure had no problem being kept alive by it. The only reason we have those famous interviews with her, on YouTube now, is because she needed the money. I cannot see the, “beautiful ideal,” of the, “hero,” in the Fountainhead, but I’ve said enough about that in my comments above. Him dying, “broke and alone,” would have made for a better plot, about which people would be debating whether or not he asked for, or deserved such a fate, today. I genuinely thought WhiteTux’s, “teenage fan fiction,” comment was brilliantly incisive. Really. As to her philosophy. It’s roots are in science, I believe? Or, “natural philosophy.” Which is why it would work fine in a laboratory, for which it is better suited. I am neither right nor left wing myself, but the chronic tendency of the right to build upon philosophical foundations of over simplicity is the very sand which results in its repeated collapse, is exemplified in the trite spewings of Rand’s fiction. When she isn’t plagiarising George Orwell, and repurposing his work for opposite effect, she’s deliriously spouting about this, “ideal man,” like in The Fountainhead, which suggests to me that what she needed more than anything else in her life (apart from giving up cigarettes and her cult like clique, that is) was to just get laid. But, hey; wha’do I know? I’m just a baller fan of the OG doing Thug Notes. 😉
    2
  8727. 2
  8728. 2
  8729. 2
  8730. 2
  8731. 2
  8732. 2
  8733. 2
  8734. 2
  8735. 2
  8736. 2
  8737. 2
  8738. 2
  8739. 2
  8740. 2
  8741. 2
  8742. 2
  8743. 2
  8744. 2
  8745. 2
  8746. 2
  8747. 2
  8748. 2
  8749. 2
  8750. 2
  8751. 2
  8752. 2
  8753. 2
  8754. 2
  8755. 2
  8756. 2
  8757. 2
  8758. 2
  8759. 2
  8760. 2
  8761. 2
  8762. 2
  8763. 2
  8764. 2
  8765. 2
  8766. 2
  8767. 2
  8768. 2
  8769. 2
  8770. 2
  8771. 2
  8772. 2
  8773. 2
  8774. 2
  8775. 2
  8776. 2
  8777. 2
  8778. 2
  8779. 2
  8780. 2
  8781. 2
  8782. 2
  8783. 2
  8784. 2
  8785. 2
  8786. 2
  8787. 2
  8788. 2
  8789. 2
  8790. 2
  8791. 2
  8792. 2
  8793. 2
  8794. 2
  8795. 2
  8796. 2
  8797. 2
  8798. 2
  8799. 2
  8800. 2
  8801. 2
  8802. 2
  8803. 2
  8804. 2
  8805. 2
  8806. 2
  8807. 2
  8808. 2
  8809. 2
  8810. 2
  8811. 2
  8812. 2
  8813. 2
  8814. 2
  8815. 2
  8816. 2
  8817. 2
  8818. 2
  8819. 2
  8820. 2
  8821. 2
  8822. 2
  8823. 2
  8824.  @franklin9400  : Sorry, son. But, that’s lazy received wisdom, which I can’t really blame you for, because of lazy journalists and debauched writers, who’ve leaned on the term, “The Military Industrial Complex,” ever since Ike Eisenhower coined it. He said back then that he was worried about how arms manufacturers and their related industries would wind up influencing and directing government policies unless we did something to check them. He suggesting using Moral Grounds as our reason to ban lobbyists from the arms manufacturers, pharmaceutical companies, gun clubs, medical providers, etc and making such activity a serious federal crime. Instead, we all fell for it, and rather than cast our blame on specific groups, so we can DO SOMETHING to stop the growth of vested interests taking over the running of America, we just lump them ALL together, into one, nefarious, unfindable, undefinable, and therefore, untargetable group. The result? Liberals get to whine about the military industrial complex, and treat people who risk their lives to build schools, dams, hospitals and roads, like Carpet Baggers, along with everyone else we, “don’t like,” but can’t put our finger on. It’s easy to sound superior, so long as you’re not, “doing,” anything. Much harder to BE, “superior.” I know this how? Because I phoned the military industrial complex to put in a complaint about how they’re too powerful in politics. They replied by telling me they’re not a thing, but rather just an excuse for people to feel better about not taking any responsibility for anything. Well, apart from Joe that is? At least he’s stopped the buck, and he’s torn off the bandaid, right? You should be thanking him?
    2
  8825. 2
  8826. 2
  8827. 2
  8828. 2
  8829. 2
  8830. 2
  8831. 2
  8832. 2
  8833. 2
  8834. 2
  8835. 2
  8836. 2
  8837. 2
  8838. 2
  8839. 2
  8840. 2
  8841. 2
  8842. 2
  8843. 2
  8844. 2
  8845. 2
  8846. 2
  8847. 2
  8848. 2
  8849. 2
  8850. 2
  8851. 2
  8852. 2
  8853. 2
  8854. 2
  8855. 2
  8856. 2
  8857. 2
  8858. 2
  8859. 2
  8860. 2
  8861.  @batgorls  : While you make a good point, which the court will take into account, it was nevertheless a direct attack on the cheerleader team that all her followers will know about. That was kind of the whole point of the post, otherwise it just hangs there as a meaningless, nonsense comment, with no context, which is beyond implausible. The school has the right to act on that, and to defend its reputation; their house, their rules. I feel for the girl, but her lawyer is screwing her over. It’s not even a, “free speech,” argument, because, as far as we know, those comments could still be out there? The school did NOT request that she removed them. They simply said, “Beg to differ.” Their rules are explicit and the girl clearly showed she did not read them, or know what was in them. Best way to put it: what would you do with a guest in your house, if you read their comments on social media, and found something intolerable? Would you throw them out? Presumably, there’s a line they could cross at which point you would? It’s your house, and you don’t even NEED a reason, right? With a school, the parent is paying for services, and cheerleading is, “extracurricular.” However, their policy is CLEARLY stated, and she still has the 1st Amendment right to say what she likes about that (if her dad allows that?) and no one is stopping her, or HAS STOPPED her. See my point? If your argument still stands, then answer me this? Did her dad interfere with her free speech? By punishing her, which he has publicly stated that he did? If not, any reason you give for his actions, also apply to the school, who assumes parental responsibility for her too. There are three major prongs to the defence’s argument, and the complaint doesn’t stand a chance. If they had taken down her comment, or forced her to, that’s different. But they didn’t, so there’s no case to answer. I promise the judge will agree. And, I’m not stating the right or wrong of it; just the law ✌️
    2
  8862. 2
  8863. 2
  8864. 2
  8865. 2
  8866. 2
  8867. 2
  8868. 2
  8869. 2
  8870. 2
  8871. 2
  8872. 2
  8873. 2
  8874. 2
  8875. 2
  8876. 2
  8877. 2
  8878. 2
  8879. 2
  8880. 2
  8881. 2
  8882. 2
  8883. 2
  8884. 2
  8885. 2
  8886. 2
  8887. 2
  8888. 2
  8889. 2
  8890. 2
  8891. 2
  8892. 2
  8893. 2
  8894. 2
  8895. 2
  8896. 2
  8897. 2
  8898.  @jacqdanieles  : That is a fair quibble. As Jake points out, some of the headlines about this guy are misleading enough for people to assume that he’s some sort of, “good guy,” simply because he opposes Putin and not the mass murdering coward of a terrorist, on the run from the world’s justice, that he is. It was only a question of time before the far right extremists became a problem for Putin. Wagner was founded by Nazis and is riven with Nazi, “ideology,” among its leadership. And, as we can all see from the mere fact that they continue to openly defy Putin’s direct orders to join the regular army, Putin does not have the extremists under control. He can’t even isolate the one man he really wants to see die painfully, Prigozhin. That guy, “forced,” Putin to flee Moscow for St Petersburg, on a jet, when he HATES flying. The world got to see Putin’s, “I don’t need a ride, I need ammunition,” moment, and saw him panic and run. That’s a humiliation Putin cannot and will never forgive. Prigozhin knows his only hope for survival now is to destroy Putin. And Putin knows his only hope is vice versa, but he has to take out the pieces surrounding Prigozhin first. Which brings us back to the pickle that Girkin finds himself in. He will now be broken down to give up everything, including any, “cells,” or FSB insider contacts and their plans. Putin will be busy trying to survive, getting to everyone around Prigozhin and anyone who protects him, whilst trying to preserve his income from Wagner’s gold and diamond mines dotted about Africa. I suspect Girkin is just one of many pieces that are coming off the board now? He’s right of Adolph Hitler, with an ideology somewhere between Hitler’s and Stalin’s. If he dies in jail, we’ll know that Putin believes he’s making progress.
    2
  8899. 2
  8900. 2
  8901. 2
  8902. 2
  8903. 2
  8904. 2
  8905. 2
  8906. 2
  8907. 2
  8908. 2
  8909. 2
  8910. 2
  8911. 2
  8912. 2
  8913. 2
  8914. 2
  8915. 2
  8916. 2
  8917. 2
  8918. 2
  8919. 2
  8920. 2
  8921. 2
  8922. 2
  8923. 2
  8924. 2
  8925. 2
  8926. 2
  8927. 2
  8928. 2
  8929. 2
  8930. 2
  8931. 2
  8932. 2
  8933. 2
  8934. 2
  8935. 2
  8936. 2
  8937. 2
  8938. 2
  8939. 2
  8940. 2
  8941. 2
  8942. 2
  8943. 2
  8944. 2
  8945. 2
  8946.  @ti2218  : All good points. Though I sincerely hope that CNN will neither, “like,” or, “dislike,” trump. I hope they will continue to be straight down the line journalists, and will be scrupulous about having neither leftist or rightist leanings. Sure, trump stories are very click-baitable and most Americans look forward to the day when stories about him make no real difference in their world. But, it’s not just because of a business model? He is still the nominal, “leader,” of a party that ended its term in office by essentially declaring against the Republic, by voting to overturn a democratic election DURING an Insurrection against the state! No one feels safe while trump is at large because they aren’t! I’m guilty myself of clicking on stories that I know will make little if any difference to my knowledge base, but will be more likely to simply depress me. But there is an element of social responsibility in that too. A party that was pretty much outed in its final months, as having no regard for the foundations of the Republic, and that will, in all likelihood, NEVER relinquish power again, should they ever get it; and a party that seems he’ll bent on destroying our democratic voting system, because they see that they could never get, “elected,” in a free and fair election in which all votes have equal sway notionally; that party looks and feels like an existential threat! People won’t feel safe until trump is incarcerated. Even then, not unless his sentences are suitably long, and he doesn’t wind up serving two years of a five year sentence, during which his ghost writer pens his, “Mein Kampf,” for his Qult to eat up while the Klan rallies his forces? He is the symptom of a disease that the media suffers from as much as the rest of us. But trump targeted that very same media, and they have been forced to build a model of self justification into that business model, simply because trump demonised individuals with personal abuse, and the company as a whole. If they’re able to make money out of that, good for them. That’s capitalism. But, people will be drawn to worrying at that wound, because they’re looking for a way to heal it. Trump may only be the symptom, but he’s one that MUST be treated, before we can cure the disease: fascism. ✌️
    2
  8947. When you ask about how to manage your YouTube account; how to ban accounts or delete people’s comments, what I would suggest is either one of two things: 1) Reach out to other YouTubers and get advice on what they do? You have so many contacts and know so many people of influence that surely one or more of those people should be able to connect you with an Editor? 2) You are based at a prestigious academic establishment, are you not? Why not approach someone from one of the other departments that uses social media or trains people on its workings? You will likely be able to find a gifted student whom you can hire for a single session every once in a while, cleaning out your channel for you? Or, better yet, hire someone from the drama, media, political history, or one of those departments to train you? Using the, “Teach a man to fish . . .” philosophy of having them train you in the technicalities of running your channel? There is also 3) YouTubes own videos, teaching creators about managing their channels, and their online tools which are a suit available to all channel owners? Your solution probably lies in a mix of the above, but I see how finding time might be a factor? So, my suggestion would be to make that time by (BRIEFLY) stopping your output and using that time to learn the tools? That is, only if you cannot find time anywhere else? Just as a train must stop for repairs, sometimes on the track, much to the chagrin of the passengers. But everyone is glad when the repairs are done and they get a better, more reliable service thereafter. I wish I had these skills, as I would offer them to you for free. But, surely, if you are serious about solving these issues, the solutions you seek are in the above? You are surrounded by the help you need and paint an image of a man swimming in a fresh water lake, dying of thirst.
    2
  8948. 2
  8949. 2
  8950.  @bittersweet7145  : There are multiple organisations that have attempted to bring both George Bush Jr and Tony Blair to justice for what they sight as, “war crimes,” in reference to the illegal invasion of Iraq. What the people who would prefer we talk about that, instead of Putin’s current war crimes, are paid to overlook is that those cases have no bearing on this one. We already know in advance EXACTLY which geographical areas of the Ukraine are targeted, because we already know in advance what Putin’s real goal is: the MASSIVE gas and oil reserves recently uncovered in specific regions of the Ukraine and off the coast of the Crimea. Putin knows he’ll be put out of business if Ukraine becomes a rival company with as big a supply of fossil fuels as he has control over now. So he’s STEALING IT. So we can start with, “looting,” as a war crime and work up from there to the atrocities Putin has already committed, and is yet to, in the name of this war. Whatever your opinion of the rights and wrongs of this, there are only two possible outcomes, and Putin believes it’s worth restoring the Iron Curtain and reigniting the Cold War for this. Either he gets control of that gas and oil, or his economy (which is no bigger than Spain’s, yet way more broken, which is saying something) goes under in the face of free and fair competition. Naturally, the west would rather buy their gas and oil from a democracy, right next to the rest of Europe, than buying it from a dictatorship so far away that Putin can simply turn the switch off the supply with impunity and blackout half of the free world without fear of immediate consequences. And he’s made that threat before, which no one will forget when they’re making their choice of whom to buy it from. But, most salient of all (again, without morality confusing matters, but just as a matter of cold, hard fact) the west has NEVER relinquished overall control of majority shares in energy, for well over a hundred years now. To allow Putin to take over Ukraine’s supplies would be suicide. It’s not going to happen.
    2
  8951. 2
  8952. 2
  8953. 2
  8954. 2
  8955. 2
  8956. 2
  8957. 2
  8958. 2
  8959. 2
  8960. 2
  8961. 2
  8962. 2
  8963. 2
  8964. 2
  8965. 2
  8966. 2
  8967. 2
  8968. 2
  8969. 2
  8970. 2
  8971. 2
  8972. 2
  8973. 2
  8974. 2
  8975. 2
  8976. 2
  8977. 2
  8978. 2
  8979. 2
  8980. 2
  8981. 2
  8982. 2
  8983. 2
  8984. 2
  8985. 2
  8986. 2
  8987. 2
  8988. 2
  8989. 2
  8990. 2
  8991. 2
  8992. 2
  8993. 2
  8994. 2
  8995. 2
  8996. 2
  8997. 2
  8998. 2
  8999. 2
  9000. 2
  9001. 2
  9002. 2
  9003. 2
  9004. chrisflach : Now, there’s you, “thinking,” (if that’s the correct term for what a Trumpophile does with its brain?) that people who see the dangers, are in any way, “worried,” about them, because you haven’t thought that through, son. Why would smart people be, “worried,” when they are the ones who KNOW how to protect themselves and their loved ones? Just as I did, when I saw the Donster’s Inc puppet Dictator appear on the horizon, I took careful precautions with my resources, and made myself immune to the cash flow virus that was inevitably about to grip the planet, from the greed, racism and stupidity to come. Now we have an actual virus, and I’m LOADED, and unashamed of it. No, I feel for the people who are FORCED by the, “indemnified,” meat packing moguls, to risk their health in an uncertain time, with an uncertain risk. Tell me, if I knocked on your door and offered to pay you one month’s wages for doing nothing, BUT there was a 2% chance I might shoot you, then role the dice again, for EACH of your family members, would you let me in? If the answer to that question is NO, then you have no business risking their health in that way now. If the answer is YES, then that’s what you’re advocating right now. But, DON’T tell me the answer is NO and then be a HYPOCRITE and take Trump’s side of the argument, son. Think it through, and ask yourself WHY you’re letting this Orange moron risk EVERYTHING you have, when he’s got NO skin in the game? . . . Smh
    2
  9005. 2
  9006. 2
  9007. 2
  9008. 2
  9009. 2
  9010. 2
  9011. 2
  9012. 2
  9013. 2
  9014. 2
  9015. 2
  9016. 2
  9017. 2
  9018. 2
  9019. 2
  9020. 2
  9021. 2
  9022. 2
  9023. 2
  9024. 2
  9025. 2
  9026. 2
  9027. 2
  9028. 2
  9029. 2
  9030. 2
  9031. 2
  9032. 2
  9033. 2
  9034. 2
  9035. 2
  9036. 2
  9037. 2
  9038. 2
  9039. 2
  9040. 2
  9041. 2
  9042. 2
  9043. 2
  9044. 2
  9045. 2
  9046. 2
  9047. 2
  9048. 2
  9049. 2
  9050. 2
  9051. 2
  9052. 2
  9053. 2
  9054. 2
  9055. 2
  9056. 2
  9057. 2
  9058. 2
  9059. 2
  9060. 2
  9061. 2
  9062. 2
  9063. 2
  9064. 2
  9065. 2
  9066. 2
  9067. 2
  9068. 2
  9069. 2
  9070. 2
  9071. 2
  9072. 2
  9073. 2
  9074. 2
  9075. 2
  9076. 2
  9077. 2
  9078. 2
  9079. 2
  9080. 2
  9081. 2
  9082. 2
  9083. 2
  9084. 2
  9085. 2
  9086. 2
  9087. 2
  9088. 2
  9089. 2
  9090. 2
  9091. 2
  9092. 2
  9093. 2
  9094. 2
  9095. 2
  9096. 2
  9097. 2
  9098. 2
  9099. 2
  9100. 2
  9101. 2
  9102. 2
  9103. 2
  9104. 2
  9105. 2
  9106. 2
  9107. 2
  9108. 2
  9109. 2
  9110. 2
  9111. 2
  9112. 2
  9113. 2
  9114. 2
  9115. 2
  9116. 2
  9117. 2
  9118. 2
  9119. 2
  9120. 2
  9121. 2
  9122. 2
  9123. 2
  9124. 2
  9125. 2
  9126. 2
  9127. 2
  9128. 2
  9129. 2
  9130. 2
  9131. 2
  9132. 2
  9133. 2
  9134. 2
  9135. 2
  9136. 2
  9137. 2
  9138. 2
  9139. 2
  9140. 2
  9141. 2
  9142. 2
  9143. 2
  9144. 2
  9145. 2
  9146. 2
  9147. 2
  9148. 2
  9149. 2
  9150. 2
  9151. 2
  9152. 2
  9153. 2
  9154. 2
  9155. 2
  9156. 2
  9157. 2
  9158. 2
  9159. 2
  9160. 2
  9161. 2
  9162. 2
  9163. 2
  9164. 2
  9165. 2
  9166. 2
  9167. 2
  9168. 2
  9169. 2
  9170. 2
  9171. 2
  9172. 2
  9173. 2
  9174. 2
  9175. 2
  9176. 2
  9177. 2
  9178. 2
  9179. 2
  9180. 2
  9181. 2
  9182. 2
  9183. 2
  9184. 2
  9185. 2
  9186. 2
  9187. 2
  9188. I really enjoyed this video, thank you, and found it genuinely educational and informative. So, I hope you would take a little constructive criticism? The word, “perestroika,” is defined in English as, “Reconstruction.” It would have been helpful to give that definition and it feels like an oversight that you didn’t. Please, PLEASE, stop breaking off from the narrative to nag us repeatedly to, “click that like button,” etc? It’s as off putting as the ad breaks are, interrupting the flow and it’s irritating to the viewer. Ask once at the end, please? If you really feel you must ask at the beginning, you can’t blame people for feeling there’s something a bit shady about that, as they cannot possibly validate a video they haven’t yet watched. You must be losing as many thumbsups as you gain by what comes off as annoying nagging? I have no data to back that up, but I feel sure I can’t be alone in my exasperation? And that’s a terrible shame, because you have an otherwise excellent format of rapid information, arresting visuals (if slightly too rapid for a perfect edit at times, like when that shot of Gorbachev meeting Reagan lasted about one third of a second and came off more as a subliminal, “blip-vert,” than a visual enhancement?) and a perfectly pitched tone of seriousness with just a touch of wry humour here and there, appealing to the educated viewers. I do love this channel, which is why I care enough to make such a long comment. I think could genuinely improve with just a few small tweaks that should cost little to nothing . . . But, my sincere thanks for a great video, regardless of my going on too long about how you could improve it. ✌️👍
    2
  9189. 2
  9190. 2
  9191. 2
  9192. 2
  9193. 2
  9194. 2
  9195. 2
  9196. 2
  9197. 2
  9198. 2
  9199. 2
  9200. 2
  9201. 2
  9202. 2
  9203.  @oldcatlover  : All true enough, but you clearly didn’t do Constitutional Law, am I right? Setting aside, “ethical,” questions, (which a GOP Senator does whilst getting out of bed in the mornings) Impeachment is not a, “legal,” proceeding, but a, “political,” one. There is no 5th Amendment Cover, and the oath taken by all Senators has already, “volunteered,” them to give any and all answers to any and all (appropriately put) questions in the Senate House. Therefore, “Contempt,” proceedings are not only available to the presiding judge, but also exempt from legal interpretation, let alone legal interference. Indeed, I don’t know if you recall, but during the last impeachment, a GOP member, bent on disrupting the proceedings, spent a couple of hours in the cells beneath the Senate. They were making a point, at the time, and had no intention of holding him. Only shaming him. It worked, as he did not disrupt in any further way, other than through the usual, obtuse interpretations of English as we know it, and the type of mental gymnastics that makes most decent people want to vomit. In so far as the, “morality,” of such action is concerned, of course, the law has nothing to say on the matter, for the reasons given above; but, personally? . . . Under any (and I do mean, “any”) other circumstances, I would balk at such a measure. But, there are some types of threat, with which you cannot reason, debate, show error, or even prove your case with flat out logic. That threat is called, “Fascism.” Trump will continue to seek a single party system, in which the mere existence of, “opposition,” in ANY form, will become illegal, faster than most people think. That is, by definition, Fascism. Nazis, and Fascists are the type of threat you don’t even TRY to reason with, any more than you would a rabid tiger. You must kill it, or let it kill you. Or, at the very last, go down fighting it, and die with a clear conscience. And, if the law holds out certain remedies, such as banking on the cowardice of a coward, (which all Nazi sympathisers and Fascists are, again, by definition) then I say, put that remedy to good use, and do not hesitate or flinch while you use it. Sometimes, the greater good, is the greater moral concern. This would be one such time. Not just because of it’s appropriateness, but because you can pretty well guarantee that it WILL work! Fascinating points you bring up, though. And I do, genuinely, see your point, and see it as valid. I simply see the exception in this case. I am not legally trained (by way of full disclosure) but I am incredibly well read, and astonishingly clever . . . Like you 😉✌️
    2
  9204. 2
  9205. 2
  9206. 2
  9207. 2
  9208. 2
  9209. 2
  9210. 2
  9211. 2
  9212. 2
  9213. 2
  9214. 2
  9215. 2
  9216. 2
  9217. 2
  9218. 2
  9219. 2
  9220. 2
  9221. 2
  9222. 2
  9223. 2
  9224. 2
  9225. 2
  9226. 2
  9227. 2
  9228. 2
  9229. 2
  9230. 2
  9231. 2
  9232. 2
  9233. 2
  9234. 2
  9235. 2
  9236. 2
  9237. 2
  9238. 2
  9239. 2
  9240. 2
  9241. 2
  9242. 2
  9243. 2
  9244. 2
  9245. 2
  9246. 2
  9247. 2
  9248. 2
  9249. 2
  9250. 2
  9251. 2
  9252. 2
  9253. 2
  9254. 2
  9255. 2
  9256. 2
  9257. 2
  9258. 2
  9259. 2
  9260. 2
  9261. 2
  9262. 2
  9263.  @stephens1393  : It’s called, “Whaddabouting,” and Ms WR has been doing it for at least five years. What she needs is a better job than trolling, or serious therapy for her emotional issues, or both? It’s not sheeple like her, who are told WHAT to, “think,” and discouraged from learning HOW to THINK, that we need concern ourselves with. When the herd’s gone crazy, who gets into a debate with a sheep? You talk to the Shepard, right? It’s people like Abbot and DeSatan who shouldn’t be able to go near a phone, email, letter in tray, or his office, without being inundated with protests and protestors! They should be given no peace until they’re arrested! They’re literally getting away with murder. And we need to bring the fight to where they live! CapNate WR knows she’s just another sheep from a herd that all look, sound and act like her: indistinguishable. So, she wants to convince you she’s a wolf, but that’s just her insecurity, which only worsens, the more people like you he runs into, with ethics, morality, rationality and common sense. She obviously hasn’t even come to talk Covid, but wants to talk about an issue she, “thinks,” she’s safer with. Even though she’s wrong about that. But it’s a tortuous road you’d have to take her down, before you’d get her to see it, and even then, she won’t admit the truth. Either because she’s paid not too, or she’s just too racist and ill to, “want,” to. But, she will have wasted your time and successfully prevented you from commenting on multiple threads, sharing your sensible opinions and facts with others. And, you’ll come away from it (perhaps entertained at her stupidity? But, ultimately) no better off, wondering what the hell you were doing, standing in a field, arguing with a sheep? You’re smarter than her and better than that. I know this. I’ve read your comments before. You’re too good to be wasted on idiots, filled with hate, who spend most of their day, every day, coming to channels they hate, talking hate, to people they hate. “Division,” is the name of her game. She’s not here to, “convince,” you of anything, or even really to, “debate,” anything. Entrenching divisions in America is what got Donny elected, and that’s what trolls are for. Without Division, Donny is nothing. And, think about it? Who would do what she does, that does not have a mental health problem, or is doing it for pay, or both? . . . She clearly doesn’t understand how vaccines work, or what they’re meant to do. Leave her to chew her cud, with the other sheeple?. ✌️👍
    2
  9264. 2
  9265. 2
  9266. 2
  9267. 2
  9268. 2
  9269. 2
  9270. 2
  9271. 2
  9272. 2
  9273. 2
  9274. 2
  9275. 2
  9276. 2
  9277. 2
  9278. 2
  9279. 2
  9280. 2
  9281. 2
  9282. 2
  9283. 2
  9284. 2
  9285. 2
  9286. 2
  9287. 2
  9288. 2
  9289. 2
  9290. 2
  9291. 2
  9292. 2
  9293. 2
  9294. 2
  9295. 2
  9296. 2
  9297. 2
  9298. 2
  9299. 2
  9300.  @zed1stwizard  : We’re probably on a similar, if not the same page? Dawkins’ book, The Blind Watch Maker, (though flawed, in my opinion) was a tour de force and an excellent read. I would recommend it to anyone for its sharp focus on the scientific process, and for the thinking about how and why we do science at all. It’s a great look at the philosophy of science, almost Baconian in its depth and scope. He put forward his arguments, made his case, and should have left it at that. But, rather like a child, he was unhappy when challenged, or refuted. And there’s nothing like a scientist who doesn’t want to own his own mistakes or oversights, who gets all, “defensive,” about his personal philosophy, and wants the world to accept his personal philosophy as the Paradigm we live in; no questions asked. Before we knew it, he’d built a large following, with cult like adoration, and he’d turned what could have been an interesting contribution to the philosophy of science and skepticism, into a LIFESTYLE choice. Now, we’re all either in his club, or suspect outsiders at best! I joined a live chat on the web, for one of his book launches, over 10 years ago now. He got really mad at me and left the chat. Stating that he was leaving because he didn’t like my contributions. This left me surrounded by a bunch of disappointed fans, happy to, “blame,” me for his absence, and abusing me in Royal fashion. I had a ball, I must admit; staying calm throughout and focussing on those who were able to ask and answer questions. But, here’s the funny bit. About 5 or 6 minutes after he’d left, he’d returned, stating that his agent had told him he was contractually obliged to see through the session. Yet, I think he’d assumed that, because he’d set his dogs on me, I would be gone. A strategy that he probably employed before? When he saw I was happily chattering away with people, (I must admit to being a little childish here) I wrote something to the effect, “Don’t feel bad, Richard (no one else was using his first name, nor had he suggested they should) I’ll accept your apology graciously now.” And, he up and left again. Immediately, without a word. You can imagine the reaction I got from the fan base then . . . He’s a miserable tick, who’s ego seems to be most massaged, when he’s shattering children’s toys and stealing their sweeties, it seems to me. Proud, Bishop like and joyless. I honestly came away from that experience somewhat disillusioned and unhappy, despite having a wail of a time, while it was happening. But, then I read Rupert Sheldrake’s book, The Science Delusion. I thought it was going to be a bunch of mystic mumbo jumbo, so I’d put off reading it, but it was a revelation to me. Not just because it was written by a highly respected scientist, with revolutionary science to his own credit, and a firm belief in the scientific method, either. But, because he includes a chapter about his dealing with Richard Dawkins. Once I saw the Dawkins I’d encountered, reflected precisely as I’d encountered him, I felt a lot better about myself and the way I had behaved. If you haven’t read that book, I urge you to. And, you’ll see how Dawkins is not above doctoring his own results and committing what amounts to all but fraud in my book, for a Channel 4 Documentary in the UK. So, I have little to no respect for the man, much more for his abilities as a philosopher. As a scientist, I have considerably less respect for him now, because I’ve learned that he will blatantly misrepresent the views of others, and their science, which, to me, is no different from defrauding your scientific results . . . At least, morally speaking, and with respect to, “character.” Sorry to go on so long, but I though you might be interested? ✌️
    2
  9301. 2
  9302. 2
  9303. I’ll be pondering your thoughts for the rest of the day, quite possibly. As it seems increasingly the case that, to do nothing about Edward, would be a mistake for The Windsor’s. And to attempt his rehabilitation into public life could prove fatal to their future. It’s interesting to note that all of the names that appear on Epstein’s guest list had already been tainted by scandal, previous to any of us learning about their stays on his island. Some of them sexual in nature; all of them grubby. It certainly seems that Epstein preferred (or attracted?) a certain . . . “type.” I’ve never been a fan of the expression, “There’s no smoke without fire,” as it’s usually used by those with only suspicions and no evidence. But in Edward’s case it does seem fitting. We do have the circumstantial evidence that he lies; about his whereabouts in a pizza establishment, for instance. As well as risible lies, such as that of his inability to sweat. We have the evidence of a multimillion pound settlement with his accuser. And photographic evidence that he lied about having met the woman, only later, “adjusted,” to, “I do not recall,” having met her. From this (and other statements) we know that he is fundamentally dishonest. Also that he’s not very bright. Like Donald Trump he chooses to fabulate unnecessarily at times, about things that will prove to be demonstrably and necessarily false; and for which there was simply no need to lie in the first place, only serving to further undermine his own credibility. On a personal level, I see a very different man in his infamous Maitliss and other, more successful interviews, from the other Royals. I could envision myself as having a great deal to talk about with King Charles in light conversation, to our mutual interest. I am positively charmed by Princess Anne and always have been. She actually reminds me of you in some ways, as she too has that ineffable capacity to mix compassion with sound reasoning, from an informed and well educated position. Her commitment to the public good seems to equal that of her mother, along with a personal (if rarely witnessed) capacity to personally charm. Edward is someone I would never feel comfortable around, who with whom I doubt a truly intelligent conversation would be possible. I know it’s unfair to judge on the little I actually know about the man, but my gut has proved a reliable tool in my history, which has saved my life on more than one occasion, so I don’t ignore it.
    2
  9304. 2
  9305. Anthony Pierre-Canel : No problem, man. I search hard for forums where disagreeing with someone is an, “interesting,” thing to do, where people, “debate,” like men and women, not children. UEG attracts a lot of grown up gamers, like that. So, I thank you too. She sounds to me like, maybe, she’s blowing the, “right person,” or something? But, it usually comes down to Brute Force, in the end. In her case she has three forms of Brute Force: The revenue she creates is huge, meaning her platform provider will instinctively default to protecting her as a money making asset; then there’s followers, who will, sheeplike, follow her, defend her and do what she asks. Once people have invested their time in her, they are, “defending,” themselves and their own choices. If she’s exposed as something malign, that brings into question the judgement of her followers. People don’t like to admit they were wrong, or that they have been supporting a sex criminal, so they’ll work hard at providing her with excuses; And finally, perhaps most importantly, she has a, “history of hits,” now. She has successfully ruined the careers of others, and has a killer reputation, which makes other streamers more inclined to, “play nice,” with her, and avoid conflicts with her, because she could do that to them. None of those three points are disputed, not even by her, so far as I can tell? So she has all that Brute Force behind her, meaning it would take a LOT to knock her from her pedestal. If she really is what has been described here (which my gut tells me is true, because I trust the source, UEG, who’s never steered me wrong yet) then she’s a monster who SHOULD be in jail. I just don’t have the time to verify the facts, but I hope developments are covered on this channel? Pleasure talking with you 👍✌️
    2
  9306. 2
  9307. 2
  9308. 2
  9309. 2
  9310. 2
  9311. 2
  9312. 2
  9313. 2
  9314. 2
  9315. 2
  9316. 2
  9317. 2
  9318. 2
  9319. 2
  9320.  @TFx2TV  : Why so defensive? I think anyone who bothers to read our discourse will note for themselves the defensive, antagonistic and, at one point, devious tone of your, “argument,” but, since you’re having such difficulty following it, I’ll make real simple for you. There was nothing in my words from which you could infer ANYTHING about what I find, “sexual.” That much will be obvious to that person with too much free time on their hands who bothers to follow this discussion. They will simply see you wriggling on a hook of your own making, going for some low blow, to divert attention from the weakness of your position. My point: There is no benefit from using cultural stereotypes as an educational tool, UNLESS that education is focussed on the issue of the sexual stereotypes being put to use. Which, in this case, it is clearly not. It is, however, an attempt to, “normalise,” it. His word, not mine. My question would be, “Normalise what?” To which he would probably answer, “Difference?” I could then poke so many holes in the use of this particular medium that I doubtless wouldn’t get much more than angry obfuscation in return, if he was anything like you. Perhaps you’d prefer a question or two? Maybe consider what you’re babbling about, instead of locking on to the least relevant part of the argument, “little Timmy,” about whom you seem so passionate? What is the benefit of having a drag artist as a teacher? Why use one at all? For the same reason they would hire a clown? These are not healthy depictions of femininity. What is the point of using a grotesque when the mere fact of his grotesqueness is not even under discussion during the class. Do you honestly believe it doesn’t raise any questions in the minds of these kids? Inform their opinions about women? You seem to be denying that drag artists do show an unhealthy obsession about makeup, shoes and jewellery? Even though that is part of the point of them. Otherwise it’s just a cross dresser, selling himself as a drag artist, under false pretences.
    2
  9321. 2
  9322. 2
  9323. 2
  9324. 2
  9325. 2
  9326. I think these trends are deceptive. Russian passions will burn hotter and brighter like a dying star. This year, the sanctions will bight hard for the first time and there won’t be enough, “provincials,” from the obscure regions of Russia to throw into the meat grinder, so they’ll have to come for the Muscovites, until everyone will know someone who was dragged kicking and screaming to the front lines, or who got arrested on trumped up charges (drunk and disorderly has already been used) and woken up in Ukraine wearing half a uniform. This year will change things in Russia, when the Ukrainian spring offensives take back territory that cannot be propagandised into insignificance by Putin, and panic will set in in the Kremlin even when Ukraine’s troops start getting close to Crimea, let alone before they actually take it. And Putin will not throw away his only allies by using nukes. He may well use chemical attacks, for which Ukraine needs to prepare, as they’re likely to be unprecedented in scale, but even then, China will reign Putin back in. We in the west should be talking about supplying Ukraine with an airforce and navy, to protect their Black Sea interests in the long term and secure the country for western businesses to get in there and make everybody wealthy. I cannot think of a better way to give China pause and to take the last of the fight out of Putin’s army. But never forget: the Russian state fell twice before in the last 100 years. And both times, it was a costly war that precipitated the state’s downfall. When you keep your peasants in a permanent state of ignorance, you cannot expect them to have any sense of what they’re fighting for, or commitment to your Tsarist cause. These days, it is the combination of the stark difference between state propaganda and the harsh realities of the battlefield that makes liars out of Putin to the one group who matters: the armed soldiers who know they’re murdering innocent civilians for a lie. When they turn back to Moscow, not even China will be able to protect Putin. And will he nuke his own soldiers? In Moscow? . . . If he was smart, he’d be looking for his own, “off ramp,” now. Because the west is heartily sick of providing those for him.
    2
  9327. 2
  9328. 2
  9329. 2
  9330. 2
  9331. 2
  9332. 2
  9333. 2
  9334. 2
  9335. 2
  9336. 2
  9337. 2
  9338. 2
  9339. 2
  9340. 2
  9341. 2
  9342. 2
  9343. 2
  9344. 2
  9345. 2
  9346. 2
  9347. 2
  9348. 2
  9349. 2
  9350. 2
  9351. 2
  9352. 2
  9353. 2
  9354. 2
  9355. 2
  9356. 2
  9357. 2
  9358. 2
  9359. 2
  9360. 2
  9361. 2
  9362. 2
  9363. 2
  9364. 2
  9365. 2
  9366. 2
  9367. 2
  9368. 2
  9369. 2
  9370. 2
  9371. 2
  9372. 2
  9373. 2
  9374. 2
  9375. 2
  9376. 2
  9377. 2
  9378. 2
  9379. 2
  9380. 2
  9381. 2
  9382. 2
  9383. 2
  9384.  @roems6396  : Not Russian ones. They were founded on palace Coups and betrayals. Even their, “glorious founder,” Vladimir Lenin was deposed by Stalin and remained wheelchair bound after the whole thing gave him a stroke. But divine justice happened when Stalin died, “warm in his bed,” but that was after lying in a pool of his own vomit and urine for over 30 hours, all because everyone was too afraid to help him and the doctors were too afraid to treat him. You think he had a, “happy,” life? Living like a paranoid rat in a cage? Eating all his most loyal other rats, and getting increasingly scared of his own people, until the pressure of it killed him? Slowly, painfully and humiliatingly? . . . I wouldn’t exchange jackboots with the Russian leaders of ANY generation, but PooTin!? This is his Cuban Missile crisis. Where he’s badly miscalculated the west’s resolve and his enemy’s determination. Even if he eventually takes Ukraine, he’ll never stop ongoing resistance and the sanctions will just get increasingly worse, until he’s the king of a pile of rubble with nothing to show for it but a list of sanctions and a bunch of angry, deported oligarchs. And they’ll do the same to him as they did to Khrushchev. They’ll, “invite him to retire,” before they’re all completely broke. China’s not going to bail them out this time. Not an economy as small as Spain’s. Putin’s been reading too much of his own propaganda and hanging around in those Parlour chat rooms too long. He’s fallen for his own bulsh*t and he already wishes he could turn the clock back two weeks. The west can never do business with him now. He’s threatened nukes too often. And, even though we KNOW he’s bluffing, accidents happen that way. So, we will insist on regime change before we lift sanctions, along with a full withdrawal from Ukraine. Including Crimea and Donbas. Putin has screwed his Kremlin pooch.
    2
  9385. 2
  9386. 2
  9387. 2
  9388. 2
  9389. 2
  9390. 2
  9391. 2
  9392. 2
  9393. 2
  9394. 2
  9395. 2
  9396. 2
  9397. 2
  9398. 2
  9399. 2
  9400. 2
  9401. 2
  9402. 2
  9403. 2
  9404. 2
  9405. 2
  9406. 2
  9407. 2
  9408. 2
  9409. 2
  9410. 2
  9411. It’s a shame, when you think about what Ryan Johnson was trying to do? It, “could have,” been a brilliant, challenging new story, added to the cannon, in which the big question, “could have been,” about that theme, of whether the Force had an actual, “light side,” and, “dark side,” at all, or if that was just a construct that people mistakenly put on it, which was why it always lead to conflict. Imagine the Lovecraftian HORROR of the force being dispassionate, alien and utterly uncaring in the way that physics is to thought? A Universe that DOESN’T CARE, “could have been,” what Snoke embodied; not really on either side but his own. He could have had a background and story developed around that, and the whole trilogy could have been focussed on it. The first movie, with all its fan service would have needed little tweaking, but the second movie could have had the cliffhanger ending, in which Snoke appears to have won, by destroying BOTH hero and villain! In the way that Empire seemed bleak, but was the best movie of the first Trilogy. Making way for the Dark and Light sides of the Force to unite in the third movie, to defeat the whole idea of a Universe that doesn’t care, with the sacrifice of one major hero and, of course, the sacrifice of one major dark side character: the light-sider being someone from the original cannon (Han Solo?) and of course, we all know who the dark-sider would be, right? His son, Kylo. Imagine the possibilities of that? . . . Ah well . . .
    2
  9412. 2
  9413. 2
  9414. 2
  9415. 2
  9416. 2
  9417. 2
  9418. 2
  9419. 2
  9420. 2
  9421. 2
  9422. 2
  9423. 2
  9424. 2
  9425. 2
  9426. 2
  9427. 2
  9428. 2
  9429. 2
  9430. 2
  9431. 2
  9432. 2
  9433. 2
  9434. 2
  9435. 2
  9436. 2
  9437. 2
  9438. 2
  9439. 2
  9440. 2
  9441. 2
  9442. 2
  9443. 2
  9444. 2
  9445. 2
  9446. 2
  9447. 2
  9448. 2
  9449. 2
  9450. 2
  9451. 2
  9452. 2
  9453. 2
  9454. 2
  9455. 2
  9456. 2
  9457. 2
  9458. 2
  9459. 2
  9460. 2
  9461. 2
  9462. 2
  9463. 2
  9464. 2
  9465. 2
  9466. 2
  9467. 2
  9468. 2
  9469. 2
  9470. 2
  9471. 2
  9472. 2
  9473. 2
  9474. 2
  9475. 2
  9476. 2
  9477. 2
  9478. 2
  9479. 2
  9480. 2
  9481. 2
  9482. 2
  9483. 2
  9484. 2
  9485. 2
  9486. 2
  9487. 2
  9488. 2
  9489. 2
  9490. 2
  9491. 2
  9492. 2
  9493. 2
  9494. 2
  9495. 2
  9496. 2
  9497. 2
  9498. 2
  9499. 2
  9500. 2
  9501. 2
  9502. 2
  9503. 2
  9504. 2
  9505. 2
  9506. 2
  9507. 2
  9508. 2
  9509. 2
  9510. 2
  9511. 2
  9512. 2
  9513. 2
  9514. 2
  9515. 2
  9516. 2
  9517. 2
  9518. 2
  9519. 2
  9520. 2
  9521. 2
  9522. 2
  9523. 2
  9524.  @ychdis2008  : For what it’s worth, what I found interesting about their conversation was not at all flattering I’m afraid. It was just two egos, both wishing to sound, “smart,” circling each other’s orbit, and ultimately saying nothing we haven’t all heard before. Since when did we all become rats in maze? Their conversation typifies the total refusal to even acknowledge, “responsibility,” and they talk like they have zero control over this all powerful, “media,” without ever once expressing their individuality, responsibility, or culpability, let alone their own AGENCY! There is an, “Off,” switch, for those who are concerned about their brains being, “washed!” But, I would bet serious money that one or both of those two people are NOT concerned about, “society,” getting their brains washed, so much as they are about whether they’re using the Fox or CNN brand of soap to do it? It’s nearly always the brainwashed and the brain washers, who bring up the issue of, “brainwashing,” to start with! Certain clues are there, in their words, which show they neither of them are academically trained, nor qualified for their commentary. I’m not suggesting they’re not entitled to their opinions; but that they’re nothing more than emotional responses to the world, repackaged as pseudo-academia, from the book of their own heads. Making the argument, for instance, that a child can outmatch an adult at certain tasks is all well and good, EXCEPT, perhaps, in a conversation about critical thinking skills (something NOT innate in humans, but acquired) news analysis, historical context, politics, moral philosophy and the validity of this story. But, you and I both know, that was merely a defensive remark, made by a troll, who can’t figure out if he’s speaking to another troll or not. Ironically, it’s rather like watching rats in a maze, with the same, reliable sense of outcome. Both interlocutors would have had more, “credibility,” had they not been both LIVING on CNN for years! Literally! I see them constantly! Something makes them spend their time here? And drives them to comment? Regularly . . . For YEARS? Perhaps the media does control them? But, why they think everyone else is quite as enslaved as them? Pure projection. Something has the power to keep them coming back? And, if that, “something,” isn’t money, then it’s, “emotion.” The endorphins that people get addicted to on social media. And, not being readers, they’re unaware of it. They want to feel, “agency,” in the world, by trying to persuade others of their lack of agency; never seeing that they have given up their, “agency,” to an addiction. Never enquiring, asking a question, or risking, “vulnerability,” by stating that they don’t know, or are not qualified to asses a topic . . . Neither of them are, “special or unique,” but I get a great deal of pleasure, seeing them waste their lives, kidding themselves that their, “emotional,” outlet, is some sort of, “intellectual,” exercise. They just hate CNN. Period. If only such people spent the same amount of time READING as much as they write, huh? . . . Still, if they did, they would probably only ever read websites, with names likes, “I’m right, dot com,” or, “Why everyone else is wrong, dot org.” 😆
    2
  9525. 2
  9526. 2
  9527. 2
  9528. 2
  9529. 2
  9530. 2
  9531. 2
  9532. My first visit to your channel and I have to say you put it all rather succinctly and with a touch of very British humour, which I enjoyed. Thanks for that. Not long ago I saw Andrew Marr’s LBC YouTube video about the appointment of this Tory donor, Sharp, to the Chairship of the BBC. I thought, “Oh great. He’ll have an insight into how this corruption has actually existed since the inception of the BBC and will be able to speak to how, though it may have been a suitable system for the privileged classes of the 1930’s, it was outdated by the 1960’s and is unfit for purpose today.” I was SO SHOCKED and disappointed to discover that what he meant by the strap line printed on the video’s thumbnail, “This Story Is Toxic,” was that he was going to excuse himself from even discussing the story, let alone investigating it, or even interviewing anyone about it! What sickened me most was the excuse he proffered. “Well, they’ve always appointed BBC Chairs like this anyway.” The very thing I saw as DAMNING in a thinking person’s eyes, was the very thing that he saw as a plausible excuse for not doing his well paid job! But, of course, I’m sure his decision had nothing to do with all those residual payments he gets from his BBC published books and documentary series’, right? And if I was in a room with him now, I’d be telling him that the Lineker story is precisely the sort of self harm that people like him had a responsibility to help the BBC avoid! This is as much his fault as any other player in this drama, because he is happy to support the Tories with his complicity and silence, whilst getting to sound all righteous and indignant on the very same issues that Lineker is not allowed to speak of. It seems hypocrisy and double standards have become a way of life in the BBC, and for those who still rely on their connections there?
    2
  9533. 2
  9534. 2
  9535. 2
  9536. 2
  9537. 2
  9538. 2
  9539. 2
  9540. 2
  9541. 2
  9542. 2
  9543. 2
  9544. 2
  9545. 2
  9546. 2
  9547. 2
  9548. 2
  9549. 2
  9550. 2
  9551. 2
  9552. 2
  9553. 2
  9554. 2
  9555. 2
  9556. 2
  9557. 2
  9558. 2
  9559. 2
  9560. 2
  9561. 2
  9562. 2
  9563. 2
  9564. 2
  9565. 2
  9566. 2
  9567. 2
  9568. 2
  9569. 2
  9570. 2
  9571. 2
  9572. Can we talk about the, “Elephant & Castle,” in the room here? As a Landlord in Scotland, which has been under a rent freeze since Covid started, which I fully support, we could start by asking, “Is this the, “Britain,” that means, “England & Wales,” about which we hear so much up here? But that’s an aside. Can I just suggest that the issue that none of these people are even beginning to talk about is, who are the vested interests here? Answer that, and you will see why it is that obvious common sense (a rent freeze) is not even being discussed except among the sort of people willing to protest on the streets. We can talk about Thatcher’s Right To Buy policies all day long, and various changes in legislation that may or may not help. But, a rent freeze would alleviate the problem right away for the worst hit families, and would concentrate the minds of vested interests into finding solutions. Those vested interests of which I speak? MP’s, of course! Show me a Westminster MP or senior civil servant and I’ll show you a PROPERTY OWNER who makes prodigious amounts of cash by renting out properties, with very few exceptions. Asking MP’s to solve the problem is like asking Vampires to build you a blood bank! Until people start PUBLISHING lists of which MP’s own what properties and where, and what THEY charge for rent, we will not see anything but, “thoughts and prayers,” for the growing numbers of homeless. And the situation looks to get worse, not better.
    2
  9573. 2
  9574. 2
  9575. 2
  9576. 2
  9577. 2
  9578. 2
  9579. 2
  9580. 2
  9581. 2
  9582. 2
  9583. 2
  9584. 2
  9585. 2
  9586. 2
  9587. 2
  9588. 2
  9589. 2
  9590. 2
  9591. 2
  9592. 2
  9593. 2
  9594. 2
  9595. 2
  9596. 2
  9597. 2
  9598. 2
  9599. 2
  9600. 2
  9601. 2
  9602. 2
  9603. 2
  9604. 2
  9605. 2
  9606. 2
  9607. 2
  9608. 2
  9609. 2
  9610. 2
  9611. 2
  9612. 2
  9613. 2
  9614. 2
  9615. 2
  9616. 2
  9617. 2
  9618. 2
  9619. 2
  9620. 2
  9621. 2
  9622. 2
  9623. 2
  9624. There are three big obstacles to reunification, or so it seems to me? First, the tiny clique at the top of North Korea’s regime. They won’t do anything that dilutes their power base, and they only paid lip service to the idea a decade ago, so as to exploit trade-craft opportunities and use those briefly maintained talks and committees as opportunities to probe the South for weaknesses and opportunities to gain power down there and gain access to political and business institutions. Then there’s the humiliating reality of widespread poverty in the North and exposing the appalling failure of Communism to meet even the most basic needs of its people. They don’t want that stark comparison exposed for the whole world to see, laying abject failure at the feet of the cult like family of the Kim’s. Finally, there’s the economic issues which are all laid out in this video. But, I’m pretty sure that, from the perspective of the North’s leadership, those will remain both immovable and unspoken obstacles. In reality, the only real hope I can see would be pretty disastrous from a North Korean’s point of view. Either a natural disaster causes the collapse of an overwhelmed regime that can no longer maintain command and control over its military, as they are as badly effected and in need of western aid as everybody else? Seems vanishingly unlikely. Or? . . . A Soviet Union style collapse from within? Unlooked for and unexpected by the west, as in the case of Russia? But, then China would seek to step in alongside the extant forces of America from the borders, potentially causing chaos. Besides which, it seems like the North mitigates against such possibilities by keeping their population in what looks like 1900’s style living conditions, perpetual fear and a constant Zombie-like worship of their leaders on pain of death, which they could never maintain if their people had access to the internet. The only third possibility I could see, would be through China itself, upon who’s graces North Korea relies. They would not and could not exist as they are without China’s protection. We can take Russia out of that equation now (for the most part) but not entirely. And that would only occur through the democratisation of China, which, again, seems vanishingly unlikely.
    2
  9625. 2
  9626. 2
  9627. 2
  9628. 2
  9629. 2
  9630. 2
  9631. 2
  9632. 2
  9633. 2
  9634. 2
  9635. 2
  9636. 2
  9637. 2
  9638. 2
  9639. 2
  9640. 2
  9641. 2
  9642. 2
  9643. 2
  9644. 2
  9645. 2
  9646. 2
  9647. 2
  9648. 2
  9649. 2
  9650. 2
  9651. 2
  9652. 2
  9653. 2
  9654. 2
  9655. 2
  9656. 2
  9657. 2
  9658. 2
  9659. 2
  9660. 2
  9661. 2
  9662. 2
  9663. 2
  9664. 2
  9665. 2
  9666. 2
  9667. Ramon Guzman : Yeah, the full story always comes out in increments, over the years. There are so many bombshells coming down, that we’ll be sifting through the wreckage for years, before we even get a picture of the full extent of the rottenness at the heart of Washington. I mean, imagine what it must have taken, after just a little rhetorical resistance, for all the grandees of the GOP to cave so completely to Donny like that? They must be all getting blackmailed? The latest govt report on Russian interference shows how the trolling on all social media, far from relaxing when Trump got in, doubled or tripled on just about every platform; including this one. At the time, I was saying that they didn’t really expect to pull it off, and were just as shocked and unprepared for it, as the rest of the world. But, they were actively encouraged, and Putin doubled down and decided to cash in every piece of dirt he had from every spying operation in the States. Now, I’m certain of it. The perennial problem for Dictators, is their economies always end up in the toilet, because all their theft and murder, sucks all the resources into the centre, like a sponge. Putin is going for broke, with everything and nothing to lose, if you get my meaning? Nothing to lose, as it’s do or die for him now; everything to lose, because the end of Trump will mean sanctions, push-back on the world stage, America’s partners lifting up their drawbridges and Russian poverty, being a driver toward revolution, in a country with a history of revolution. No wonder Putin is trying to ban Rap music? Especially the type that talks resistance? What a time to be alive, though, huh? I wouldn’t wish this s**t on my worst enemy . . . SMH ✌️
    2
  9668. 2
  9669. 2
  9670. 2
  9671. 2
  9672. 2
  9673. 2
  9674. 2
  9675. 2
  9676. 2
  9677. 2
  9678. 2
  9679. 2
  9680. 2
  9681. 2
  9682. 2
  9683. 2
  9684. 2
  9685. 2
  9686. 2
  9687. 2
  9688. 2
  9689. 2
  9690. 2
  9691. 2
  9692. 2
  9693. 2
  9694. 2
  9695. 2
  9696. 2
  9697. 2
  9698. 2
  9699. 2
  9700. 2
  9701. 2
  9702. 2
  9703. 2
  9704. 2
  9705. 2
  9706. 2
  9707. 2
  9708. 2
  9709. 2
  9710. 2
  9711. 2
  9712. 2
  9713. 2
  9714. 2
  9715. 2
  9716. 2
  9717. 2
  9718. 2
  9719. 2
  9720. 2
  9721. 2
  9722. 2
  9723. 2
  9724. 2
  9725. 2
  9726. 2
  9727. 2
  9728. 2
  9729. 2
  9730. 2
  9731. 2
  9732. 2
  9733. 2
  9734. 2
  9735. 2
  9736. 2
  9737. 2
  9738. 2
  9739. 2
  9740. 2
  9741. 2
  9742. 2
  9743. 2
  9744. 2
  9745. 2
  9746. 2
  9747. 2
  9748. 2
  9749. 2
  9750. 2
  9751. 2
  9752. 2
  9753. 2
  9754. 2
  9755. 2
  9756. 2
  9757. 2
  9758. 2
  9759. 2
  9760. 2
  9761. 2
  9762. 2
  9763. 2
  9764. 2
  9765. 2
  9766. 2
  9767. 2
  9768. 2
  9769. 2
  9770. 2
  9771. 2
  9772. 2
  9773. 2
  9774. 2
  9775. 2
  9776. 2
  9777. 2
  9778. 2
  9779. 2
  9780. 2
  9781. J A C C : Yeah, you only have to look at the GoFundMe they set up for Trump’s Wall, for instance? Given that NOT ONE BRICK of, “new Wall,” has been laid, where did all those millions go? They had a whip round for Trump, across the nation, for legal support, when the Impeachment Inquiry got going, a few weeks ago. It’s actually quite clever, and well studied by psychologists. People, “over commit,” themselves. They lose friends, even family (some even lose their jobs!) by causing revulsion in others with racist, hateful lies. They give more money than they can afford, on impulse, at times of, “crisis,” for Trump. They have simply SACRIFICED, FAR TOO MUCH to turn back now. So, they get comfort, from Propaganda outlets; “respectable news,” organisations, like Fox, RT, etc, who reassure them that they were right all along, and tell them NOT to trust their fellow Americans. They wind up HATING their fellow Americans, precisely BECAUSE they threaten to burst their bubble with REALITY. They hate them MORE than they hate America’s ACTUAL ENEMIES! And, those with the courage to reflect on the sheer insanity just BEING in a Cult of Personality, in the FIRST PLACE, “consider,” turning back, but then realise that the very people they were, “conditioned,” into HATING, SO much, will get to say, “We TOLD you so!” Shame . . . and the FEAR of Shame keeps them, “loyal,” and, as we see, HYSTERICAL, in their group attempts to shout down reality. Apart from the Foreign Trolls, who just do it for money, these people do it FOR FREE, indoctrinating themselves . . . And their desperation is EVERY BIT as, “acute,” as Trump’s. That’s what we’re up against. People who KNOW the Truth, really. But, they DELIBERATELY chose to live in The Land Of Fake Believe, where the sky is Orange, everyone is white, and there are NO, “liberals,” saying, “we told you so.” ✌️🤭👍
    2
  9782. 2
  9783. 2
  9784. 2
  9785. 2
  9786. 2
  9787. 2
  9788. 2
  9789. 2
  9790. 2
  9791. 2
  9792. 2
  9793. 2
  9794. 2
  9795. 2
  9796. 2
  9797. 2
  9798. 2
  9799. 2
  9800. 2
  9801. 2
  9802. 2
  9803. 2
  9804. 2
  9805. 2
  9806. 2
  9807. 2
  9808. 2
  9809. 2
  9810. 2
  9811. 2
  9812. 2
  9813. 2
  9814. 2
  9815. 2
  9816. 2
  9817. 2
  9818. 2
  9819. 2
  9820. 2
  9821. 2
  9822. 2
  9823. 2
  9824. 2
  9825. 2
  9826. 2
  9827. 2
  9828. 2
  9829. 2
  9830. 2
  9831. 2
  9832. 2
  9833. 2
  9834. 2
  9835. 2
  9836. 2
  9837. 2
  9838. 2
  9839. 2
  9840. 2
  9841. 2
  9842. 2
  9843. 2
  9844. 2
  9845. 2
  9846. 2
  9847. 2
  9848. 2
  9849. 2
  9850. 2
  9851. 2
  9852. 2
  9853. 2
  9854. 2
  9855. 2
  9856. 2
  9857. 2
  9858. 2
  9859. 2
  9860. 2
  9861. 2
  9862. 2
  9863. 2
  9864. 2
  9865. 2
  9866. 2
  9867. 2
  9868. 2
  9869. 2
  9870. 2
  9871. 2
  9872. 2
  9873. 2
  9874. 2
  9875. 2
  9876. 2
  9877. 2
  9878. 2
  9879. 2
  9880. 2
  9881. 2
  9882. 2
  9883. 2
  9884. 2
  9885. 2
  9886. 2
  9887. 2
  9888. 2
  9889. 2
  9890. I am a devotee of Orwell’s essays and I have always argued that if you juxtapose his complete essay collection with Winston Churchill’s glossy history books, therein lies the truest picture of British history you can find, so long as you understand the concept of historiography and close reading. As to how people like Musk are hijacking Orwell, that simply reflects the Russification of far right tactics that we have seen increasingly, since Putin spread his tendrils into our media discourse at every level. The tried and tested Stalin technique of accusing your opponents of the things you are guilty of, or accusing them of doing things that you yourself are about to do, began in earnest in the west with Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign, at a time when trump’s ties with the Kremlin were far less opaque and almost his entire campaign team were found guilty of crimes relating to either domestic campaign laws, or to their spying and infiltration efforts on behalf of Putin. Remember Paul Manafort, anyone? If your goal is to muddy the waters so badly that everyone gives up trying to discern the truth, a good way to approach that is by taking the figures people who tried to warn the world about people like yourself and grafting them onto the faces of your own monsters. Have your, “creations,” utter the very phrases that people should be applying to you, and preempt that, by applying them to those who would stop you. It barely matters that the quotes you used were out of context, misunderstood, inappropriate or just plain wrong. In some senses that helps, as you get to accuse people correcting you of looking down their noses at you and being, “liberal elites,” blah, blah, blah. All that matters to the far right is that the comments are incendiary and get attention. Whether deliberately, by osmosis or just because of a general ongoing degradation of the quality of public discourse, Stalin’s tactics for making collective conclusions about the truth unattainable have been on the increase over the past 20 or so years, gathering momentum in the last decade, so far as I have observed them. Anyone who has read Simon Seabag Montefiore’s books on Russia, particularly his biographies of Stalin, will see what I mean, I hope?
    2
  9891. 2
  9892. 2
  9893. 2
  9894. 2
  9895. 2
  9896. 2
  9897. 2
  9898. 2
  9899. 2
  9900. 2
  9901. 2
  9902. 2
  9903. 2
  9904. 2
  9905. 2
  9906. 2
  9907. 2
  9908. 2
  9909. 2
  9910. 2
  9911. 2
  9912. 2
  9913. 2
  9914. 2
  9915. 2
  9916. 2
  9917. 2
  9918. 2
  9919. 2
  9920. 2
  9921. 2
  9922. 2
  9923. 2
  9924. 2
  9925. 2
  9926. 2
  9927. 2
  9928. 2
  9929. 2
  9930. 2
  9931. 2
  9932. 2
  9933. 2
  9934. 2
  9935. 2
  9936. 2
  9937. 2
  9938. 2
  9939. 2
  9940. 2
  9941. 2
  9942. 2
  9943. 2
  9944. 2
  9945. 2
  9946. 2
  9947. 2
  9948. 2
  9949. 2
  9950. 2
  9951. 2
  9952. 2
  9953. 2
  9954. 2
  9955. 2
  9956. 2
  9957. 2
  9958. 2
  9959. 2
  9960. 2
  9961. 2
  9962. 2
  9963. 2
  9964. 2
  9965. 2
  9966. 2
  9967. 2
  9968. 2
  9969. 2
  9970. 2
  9971. 2
  9972. 2
  9973. 2
  9974. 2
  9975. 2
  9976. 2
  9977. 2
  9978. 2
  9979. 2
  9980. 2
  9981. 2
  9982. 2
  9983. 2
  9984. 2
  9985. 2
  9986. 2
  9987. 2
  9988. 2
  9989. 2
  9990. 2
  9991. 2
  9992. It stuns me though, that Charlie is saying, “I don’t understand it,” so much. Because most gamers do and he is a gamer par excellence. The pushback has been so universal because all of these triple A companies have ALREADY planned their next several years fiscal cycles. And they already KNOW they will be releasing barely finished games filled with micro-transactions, pay walls and, “surprise mechanics,” with which to addict the vulnerable and empty the bank accounts of childrens’ parents around the world. Just glancing at the share holder meetings of Rockstar, Bungie, Blizzard, et al, tells you all you need to know. They have expectations firmly mapped out, predicting profits down to the last cent five years from now! Just making a really good game with great characters, a great story, in a world where you can build your own adventure from the ground up, would mean dumping all of their planned gouging techniques on which the devs are forced to spend more time than any, “artistic,” endeavour. Forget to give your starring character a FACE? “Never mind, we’ll fix it after release. They always forgive us.” Make any of the payment mechanisms even slightly difficult to use? “YOU’RE FIRED! And never darken our doorstep again with your communistic, freeloading ways!” This has been the most mealy mouthed, utterly sickening bunch of hogwash I’ve heard from triple A studios in a long time, which is saying something! Note: It’s all companies that are WAY BIGGER than Larian, claiming to give a sh*t about the poor little developers. NOT those actual small devs at all! The small companies have nothin’ but love for BG3. The STINK of sheer HYPOCRISY is genuinely nauseating. Good luck with your future artistic endeavours. If a games company tries to hire you, get a lawyer to check the fine print on your contract. ✌️👍
    2
  9993. 2
  9994. 2
  9995. 2
  9996. 2
  9997. 2
  9998. 2
  9999. 2
  10000. 2
  10001. 2
  10002. 2
  10003. 2
  10004. 2
  10005. 2
  10006. 2
  10007. 2
  10008. 2
  10009. 2
  10010. 2
  10011. 2
  10012. 2
  10013. 2
  10014. 2
  10015. 2
  10016. 2
  10017. 2
  10018. 2
  10019. 2
  10020. 2
  10021. 2
  10022. 2
  10023. 2
  10024. 2
  10025. 2
  10026. 2
  10027. 2
  10028. 2
  10029. 2
  10030. 2
  10031. 2
  10032. 2
  10033. 2
  10034. 2
  10035. 2
  10036. 2
  10037. 2
  10038. 2
  10039. 2
  10040. 2
  10041. 2
  10042. 2
  10043. 2
  10044.  @nomcognom2414  : Much of that, “incompetence,” you are observing is a result of straight forward corruption on rather grand scales. That’s why people like Shoigu get to run the armed forces, despite having no military background, other than the creeping militarisation of the emergency response department he was put in charge of. His background is civil engineering and he was responsible for architecture projects before then. His one qualification is that he has been unerringly loyal to Putin, who ignores his dipping into the coffers for personal gain, as Putin does that himself. It’s the reason why Putin was suddenly faced with the stark reality that his armed forces looked better on paper than in reality, back when he was wondering why his best troops at that time, the Spetsnaz were being wiped off the map by Kyiv’s home guards. Not many generals had the tanks and weapons their paperwork claimed, but many of them had lovely homes in London and Florida, with polished sports cars and tremendous yachts. Putin’s hopes that a long, protracted war will weaken the west’s resolve seemed reasonable at first, given the west’s behaviour in recent history, especially our flaccid response to his invasion of Crimea, but his problem is now about finding enough cannon fodder to throw in front of Ukrainian guns. It was all fine and dandy while he had stacks of people from the outskirts of the empire that no one in Moscow or St Petersburg would miss, and the Wagner Group rounding up rapists and murderers from Russia’s jails. But they’re running desperately low on that resource now, which was the primary reason for Prigozhin’s, “negotiating tactic,” in the first place. Neither Prigozhin or Putin want to be seen as plunging people of the main metropolitan areas into this war, bringing it home and making it so real for every Russian. How to maintain the illusion of a, “special military exercise,” when everyone in every city in western Russia has lost someone, and now the mothers grouping together to make those videos appealing for better conditions for their sons include the mothers of famous people, or politicians? Yet they have already been forced to dig into the student populations of urban areas, making the receipt of their degrees conditional on accepting their signing up papers, in person. And how long can they use these units of inexperienced young troops for all the logistics and administrative tasks, away from the worst of the action, while they burn through their experienced veterans and the last of their expendables? That clock is ticking more loudly for Putin, as his atrocities sicken and enrage the western world, stiffening our resolve and causing entire battalions of foreign volunteers to spring up in Ukraine. The west grows increasingly impatient with the pusillanimity of their politicians, constantly demanding more weapons and resources for Ukraine to win this war, while Russia is the side growing exhausted and wondering if any of this was worth it? Now that NATO has doubled its border length along the Russian frontier, and Russia’s coffers are running lower each day; now that the Ruble is worth one US Cent, literally, and the standards of living get worse; now that oligarchs are just not having any fun abroad anymore; now that incursions from the Russian Brigade have exploded the myth of Russian invulnerability and the Wagnazis have humiliated Putin, still defying his direct orders to this day, with Putin powerless to do a damned thing about it . . . I think the last straw for Putin is the day when Ukraine takes a patch of land back that Russia had control of before they started this war. On that day, even your average Russian on the street will see that it is empirically proved on every front, be it propaganda or fact, that Russia has gotten the exact opposite of what it wanted, all for the sake of one, easily replaced, oligarch.
    2
  10045. 2
  10046. 2
  10047. 2
  10048. 2
  10049. 2
  10050. 2
  10051. 2
  10052. 2
  10053. 2
  10054. 2
  10055. 2
  10056. 2
  10057. 2
  10058. 2
  10059. 2
  10060. 2
  10061. 2
  10062. 2
  10063. 2
  10064. 2
  10065. 2
  10066. 2
  10067. 2
  10068. 2
  10069. 2
  10070. 2
  10071. 2
  10072. 2
  10073. 2
  10074. 2
  10075. 2
  10076. 2
  10077. 2
  10078. 2
  10079. 2
  10080. 2
  10081. 2
  10082. 2
  10083. 2
  10084. 2
  10085. 2
  10086. 2
  10087. 2
  10088. 2
  10089. 2
  10090. 2
  10091. 2
  10092. 2
  10093. 2
  10094. 2
  10095. 2
  10096. 2
  10097. 2
  10098. 2
  10099. 2
  10100. 2
  10101. 2
  10102. 2
  10103. 2
  10104. 2
  10105. 2
  10106. 2
  10107. 2
  10108. 2
  10109. 2
  10110. 2
  10111. 2
  10112. 2
  10113. 2
  10114. 2
  10115. 2
  10116. 2
  10117. 2
  10118. 2
  10119. 2
  10120. 2
  10121. 2
  10122. 2
  10123. 2
  10124. 2
  10125. 2
  10126. 2
  10127. 2
  10128. 2
  10129. 2
  10130. 2
  10131. 2
  10132. 2
  10133. 2
  10134. 2
  10135. 2
  10136. 2
  10137. 2
  10138. 2
  10139. 2
  10140. 2
  10141. 2
  10142. 2
  10143. 2
  10144. 2
  10145. 2
  10146. 2
  10147. 2
  10148. 2
  10149. 2
  10150. 2
  10151. 2
  10152. 2
  10153. 2
  10154. 2
  10155. 2
  10156. 2
  10157. 2
  10158. 2
  10159. 2
  10160. 2
  10161. 2
  10162. 2
  10163. 2
  10164. 2
  10165. 2
  10166. 2
  10167. 2
  10168. 2
  10169. 2
  10170. 2
  10171. 2
  10172. 2
  10173. 2
  10174. 2
  10175. 2
  10176. 2
  10177. 2
  10178. 2
  10179. 2
  10180. 2
  10181. 2
  10182. 2
  10183. 2
  10184. 2
  10185. 2
  10186. 2
  10187. 2
  10188. 2
  10189. 2
  10190. 2
  10191. 2
  10192. 2
  10193. 2
  10194. 2
  10195. 2
  10196. Miss Kimberly : If you DO take Bullet’s suggestion, and check the ratings tables, take a look at the INTERNATIONAL RATINGS, too? ALL CNN and The BBC, baby. Most, “Trusted,” most, “Viewed,” and Fox is NOWHERE! The WORLD gets its News from RELIABLE sources. Where REAL issues are at stake. If you are in an African country, in the throws of Revolution, or in the Middle East, dodging missiles, you NEED straight NEWS! Imagine tuning in to FOX, when LIVES are at risk, trying to figure out WHERE to take your family, to get it out of harm’s way?!?!? More importantly, however, imagine basing your views on what the, “majority,” CHOOSES to believe, rather than what IS? The, “majority,” of physicists thought it was IMPOSSIBLE to get to the moon, but they DIDN’T stifle those who wanted to TRY? The, “majority,” doctors, REJECTED Germ Theory, But NOW, you wouldn’t want to be treated by one, who didn’t have clean hands? Majority does NOT equal TRUTH. Besides, Fox LIES all the time and carries the motto, “Fair and balanced.” THAT’S a joke, right? So, WHO KNOWS what their ACTUAL, “viewing figures,” ARE??? And WHO CARES? One final thought. Normal people DO look at Fox, because they are NOT afraid of having their world collapse, when they hear something that is PATENTLY FALSE. It’s the Fox Viewer types that REFUSE to hear the other side, so, on the basis of LOGIC, the propaganda station is ALWAYS going to get high viewing figures. In WW II, Propaganda stations were popular, because they played the latest music. The Nazis STILL LOST THE WAR. Hope you’ve been patient with me? If you got this far, thanks 😃 👍
    2
  10197. 2
  10198. 2
  10199. 2
  10200. 2
  10201. 2
  10202. 2
  10203. 2
  10204. 2
  10205. 2
  10206. 2
  10207. 2
  10208. 2
  10209. 2
  10210. Has to be, right? And, I think the leaders of the, “left,” must be in on it? Why else did they come up with such a triggering, means-the-opposite-of-what-it-sounds-like, DUMB name for it? And why haven’t the liberal media changed that name or at least taken the time to EXPLAIN IT better? Wreaks of conspiracy! Literally EVERYBODY wants the same thing! If that politician had said, “Do you want to fight crime with a well funded, well equipped, well staffed Sheriff’s or police department? Or do you prefer being a social worker, psychiatric nurse, corporate goon’s bodyguard, and a debt collector for the banks, putting tearful, broke assed families out on the streets? Because, if you want the former, then you WANT DEFUNDING!” But the best he could come up with in the moment was, “I accept funding, ahem . . . I mean, ‘endorsements,’ from anyone . . . Including the KKK and the Feck Your Momma To Death Party”??? I mean, NEITHER of them KNOWS what TF they’re TALKING ABOUT, or they wouldn’t BE disagreeing!!! If that’s NOT a conspiracy to muddy the waters of a no brainer, mutually beneficial, obvious solution, then it’s literally THE DUMBEST, most cringeworthy, humiliating case of crossed wires since the My Favourite Color Is Better Than Yours Wars of 1852! Two opposing men, who actually agree but don’t know it, might as well have both stood up and said, “I have never looked up the meaning of the term I am angry about! So, uuughhhhhhh . . . WAAAAAHHH!!!” F’king DOLTS! 🤦‍♂️ . . . Hehhhhhhh . . . 🤷‍♂️ ✌️👍
    2
  10211. 2
  10212. 2
  10213. 2
  10214. 2
  10215. 2
  10216. 2
  10217. 2
  10218. 2
  10219. 2
  10220. 2
  10221. 2
  10222. 2
  10223. 2
  10224. 2
  10225. 2
  10226. 2
  10227. 2
  10228. 2
  10229. 2
  10230. 2
  10231. It might be wrong to say, “All Conservatives are like this.” But it is right to say that ALL Conservatives work for and vocally support the very most rotten members of their organisation. Even the nicest Conservatives candidate still works for an organisation that has bought out the press; silenced critics through foul means; hidden corruption in its own ranks and covered for corrupt businesses outside of them; polluted our water; dismantled our NHS; put children in harm’s way in their schools and left them to struggle in poverty, whilst blaming their parents for not being born with their advantages; lied about the benefits of leaving Europe, whilst betting against the pound in the city at the economy’s most vulnerable moments; undermined policing; removed accountability mechanisms; destroyed the postal service whilst ruining the lives of pillars of countless communities; perjured themselves in parliamentary committees; shown utter contempt for the bravest generation at the D Day memorial and placed a blatant LIE about the opposition’s economic policy plans as the centre piece of their own election campaign! And that list is FAR from exhaustive. So, whilst even the nice Tories may mind their P’s & Q’s, tell charming after dinner stories and speak of their dismay at the far right lurching, crushing incompetence and manifest greed and corruption of their leadership, they need to be reminded that they are perhaps WORSE than the worst MP’s in their own parties, because they remain enablers, whilst professing to know better. I’m sorry, Prof. Wilson, but, on this score I’m with The Inglorious Basterds. (Yes, that’s how they spell it in the movie title) If I see one of them in that uniform, they’re a legitimate target, along with all the rest and they do not deserve mercy. Certainly not a seat on our governing body at least.
    2
  10232. 2
  10233. 2
  10234. 2
  10235. 2
  10236. 2
  10237. 2
  10238. 2
  10239. 2
  10240. 2
  10241. 2
  10242. 2
  10243. 2
  10244. 2
  10245. 2
  10246. 2
  10247. 2
  10248. 2
  10249. 2
  10250. 2
  10251. 2
  10252. 2
  10253. I understand that I’m not focusing on the actual point you’re making here, but hearing you discuss this issue has triggered deep abiding emotions for me. The first rule of being burgled is: You are now on their list. If they get away with it once, they will do it over and over to the same address. They are generally not smart people robbing you, and often rather desperate. Drug addicts are generally the worst, since their carelessness and desperation shows in their methods, which are usually the most destructive. It is worth hiring a private investigator, as identifying the crook/s burgling your house is not usually the problem. Proving it is. Even if there are no obvious clues, you will find that a concerted investigation will quickly track down the culprit. Note: The police didn’t forensically go over your house for clues, did they? They didn’t dust for prints or anything, as they would for a, “serious,” crime, right? They just don’t have the time or resources. When it happened to me, I took an enormous risk (DON’T try this yourself, dear readers) and pursued the burglars myself, that very night. This was in a former life, many years back, and I did it because I had experience from my work background, having worked with criminal types professionally for over 20 years and knew how to approach the burglars when I located them, which was within an hour of the robbery taking place. I literally tricked one of them into coming with me back to my house and into the waiting arms of the police. My actions were irresponsible, really. But I knew the statistics and didn’t want to be on that, “repeat visit,” list. My partner and I were both working full time and I knew that our house would become the local drug addict’s ATM if the culprits weren’t caught swiftly. The only alternative would have meant a change to our lifestyles and spending a fortune on security apparatus, which still wouldn’t have bought us any certainty. I took a calculated risk (under the influence of alcohol) based on what I knew would be the likely, repeated outcome and, having a partner whom I cared deeply for, that factor was the decider for me. I wanted to, “protect,” her. Even though I knew what I was doing, I knew I should not have done it. The two culprits had both just completed prison sentences and the one I lured back was actually being investigated for another, violent, offence and wanted for questioning. But for the grace of God I might have found myself in a physical struggle for my life at any point with this character. Having blown their paroles, they were both shuttled back to jail and the matter was swiftly resolved. All I would say is, take every precaution and don’t be afraid of overkill when it comes to your security arrangements. Burglars a looking for easy access and a quiet place to work. Deny them this and they’ll move on to the next target. If you share your home with others, there really is no excuse not to secure the place. 99% of all burglaries occur because the burglar seized an opportunity presented to them.
    2
  10254. 2
  10255. 2
  10256. 2
  10257. 2
  10258. 2
  10259. 2
  10260. 2
  10261. 2
  10262. 2
  10263. 2
  10264. 2
  10265. 2
  10266. 2
  10267. 2
  10268. 2
  10269. 2
  10270. 2
  10271. 2
  10272. 2
  10273. 2
  10274. 2
  10275. 2
  10276. 2
  10277. 2
  10278. 2
  10279. 2
  10280. 2
  10281. That is a thoughtful and well stated comment. Forgive me for repeating a comment I put in the main thread, but it seems to me you might get it? And you are right. Too much has been sacrificed already by Ukraine. It gets too easy to forget the human cost. And to forget that Ukraine is fighting for us too. My comment from above is as follows: Putin has shown that he ALWAYS backs down, every single time he has faced a genuine, serious, direct challenge. I honestly think the safest move for the world would be to demilitarise a zone around the Zaporizhzhia Power Station, create a no fly zone over that demilitarised area, and fly in volunteer experts to de-mine the place, and put in a team that can relieve the, by now, frayed and exhausted people who have been held hostage to manage the plant. It should be NATO’s absolute priority, shouldn’t it? An explosion, or leak, from Zaporizhzhia won’t just destroy Ukraine and a sizeable part of Russia, but the cloud could reach North America. In the worst case scenario, it would be 64 times bigger and more lethal than Chernobyl! Simply putting mines in there is already an act of terrorism and threat to the entire Northern hemisphere! They have shown they are stupid and desperate enough, as the blowing of the dam demonstrated. NATO’s virtual silence about this is utterly disturbing, as though they WANT a nuclear disaster? Putin is getting ALL of the, “value,” out of his nukes, right now, by milking western fears. That’s the ONLY, “bang for his buck,” he can get out of nukes, and he KNOWS THIS! But, we are creating the environment in which ACCIDENTS HAPPEN! And Russia has the worst record in history for nuclear accidents, both military and civilian! When they blew the dam, half of Russia’s own troops did not know it had happened and did not get out of the way in time, losing millions of dollars worth of vital equipment. So, it’s quite possible that someone accidentally set off those mines! WHY are we just WAITING for Russia to make another mistake??? Keep in mind that the Ukraine invasion was only the first giant miscalculation of SO MANY that came after up to now. Russia’s biggest weapon blew up in their face: the Wagner group. So, we already KNOW Putin’s judgement is appalling! And every hesitation of the west has been taken by Putin as an invitation to commit another atrocity! It’s time we called Russia’s bluff! NATO should, AT THE VERY LEAST, warn Russia about Zaporizhzhia and spell out the consequences of the nuclear terrorism that he is ALREADY subjecting us to!!!
    2
  10282. 2
  10283. 2
  10284. 2
  10285. 2
  10286. 2
  10287. 2
  10288. 2
  10289. 2
  10290. 2
  10291. 2
  10292. 2
  10293. Firstname Lastname : Personally, I’ve always despised the Microsoft company and the way its practices forced the worldwide competition to either take the same route, or directly challenge them, with alternatives, thus risking being crushed under the heal of a tech giant who seems to want to OWN your very soul; which is probably written into the fine print of several of their products. But I am also grown up enough to know that Bill Gates (the man) is like you and me, far more complex than the outside world can tell from the little we REALLY, “know,” about him. What I do know for certain is that his previous acts of philanthropy have been sincere and have paid huge dividends, saving lives and improving the otherwise desperate existences of the impoverished. We have absolutely ZERO reasons to distrust his attempts at saving America from this virus, and we should also acknowledge that it is, “enlightened philanthropy,” when you are also saving the markets upon which your company was founded, by helping to save the lives of those who buy your products and work in your industry. Therefore it is both smart AND kind. I don’t use Microsoft products at all. I’m mostly Apple, despite the fact that you can’t avoid companies with shady practices (Apple is little better in many respects) but you can, at least, avoid the company that made it all this way. But, that has nothing to do with this, kind, enlightened, philanthropy, for which any thinking person is currently most grateful. Those attempting to tear him down, are just the Trump shills, behaving like medieval villagers, throwing help back into the teeth of their saviours, all because they fear him. And they fear him, because they’ve been told to on the internet, by the Trumpophile Hacktivists. They deserve whatever they get. But, you should separate the issues, and apply your mind to this, particular issue? It’s NOT going to go away, and the gap between America’s death told, and that of the rest of the developed world is only going to grow; no matter how well they massage the statistics, or blame the Dems for it. God forbid we have a 2nd, more virulent strain, attacking us during the flu season? Will you be prepared for that? I know I will . . .✌️
    2
  10294. 2
  10295. 2
  10296. 2
  10297. 2
  10298. 2
  10299. 2
  10300. 2
  10301. 2
  10302. 2
  10303. 2
  10304. 2
  10305. 2
  10306. 2
  10307. 2
  10308. 2
  10309. 2
  10310. 2
  10311. 2
  10312. 2
  10313. 2
  10314. 2
  10315. 2
  10316. 2
  10317. 2
  10318. 2
  10319. 2
  10320. 2
  10321. 2
  10322. 2
  10323. 2
  10324. 2
  10325. 2
  10326. 2
  10327. 2
  10328. 2
  10329. 2
  10330. 2
  10331. 2
  10332. 2
  10333. 2
  10334. 2
  10335. 2
  10336. 2
  10337. 2
  10338. 2
  10339. 2
  10340. 2
  10341. 2
  10342. 2
  10343. 2
  10344. 2
  10345. 2
  10346. 2
  10347. 2
  10348. 2
  10349. 2
  10350. 2
  10351. 2
  10352. 2
  10353. 2
  10354. 2
  10355. 2
  10356. 2
  10357. 2
  10358. 2
  10359. 2
  10360. 2
  10361. 2
  10362. 2
  10363. 2
  10364. 2
  10365. 2
  10366. 2
  10367. 2
  10368. 2
  10369. 2
  10370. 2
  10371. 2
  10372. 2
  10373. 2
  10374. 2
  10375. 2
  10376. 2
  10377. 2
  10378. 2
  10379. 2
  10380. 2
  10381. 2
  10382. 2
  10383. 2
  10384. 2
  10385. 2
  10386. 2
  10387. 88Gibson LesPaul : I get what you mean, as we underestimated him; or the perfect storm of his racist base, Putin, other interested parties, the corruption of the GOP and the rancid, crooked Fox and Fiends, and their ilk, before. But, it’s all hanging out there now. Remember that the MAJORITY of Americans, did NOT vote him in, and Trump’s MINORITY has been shrinking ever since. And, because he has continuously doubled down, he’s raised the stakes to the point where it’s either going to be an out and out Dictatorship OR the restoration of American Democracy; but there’s NO MIDDLE GROUND! And, he’s NOT, NEARLY, so clever as some people think. Whenever it’s come down to a REAL test of strength, between him and ANYONE, Trump has ALWAYS, and I mean ALWAYS lost. He’s never won a court battle, that I can think of? And, I’m NOT talking, little flutters, like where Avenatti chanced his arm, knowing Stormy would have to pay costs, in the end, on that last escapade, either (though it’s worth noting that Trump LOST the main battle, even there, which is why we all KNOW Trump has an Orange mushroom, where his penis should be). Trump has been outrunning his failures, his entire life, using his name and his ability at publicising himself, to keep afloat. But, then he took this HARD RIGHT turn, into a cul de sac, from which there is NO ESCAPE. So, it’s going to be ONE or the OTHER. He will see to that. He will play it out to the bitter end and take down everything and everyone, in bitter vengeance. So, we MUST be ACTIVE, and in touch with our representatives, constantly keeping up the pressure, until it’s OVER. We have as little choice as Trump does. Democracy and Trump’s Fascism are locked in the room, with one baseball bat, and only one is coming out, alive. That’s the truth of it
    2
  10388. 2
  10389. 2
  10390. 2
  10391. 2
  10392. 2
  10393. 2
  10394. 2
  10395. 2
  10396. 2
  10397. 2
  10398. 2
  10399. 2
  10400. 2
  10401. 2
  10402. 2
  10403. 2
  10404. 2
  10405. That last observation appears correct, as it was mostly Russian kids surrendering to Ukrainians at the start of the war. People doing their national service and expecting to go on to careers in, “Event Management,” “IT,” or running a web channel. Horrified by what they were being ordered to do and unwilling to shoot down the very people that Putin spent the last 20 years trying to convince them were, “just like them.” For the last 8 years, Ukraine kept being told they could have masses of munitions, but they could only use them for training. Experts and trainers have spent that time coming in from the west and war gaming with Zelensky’s government, training their troops in urban warfare and running through every conceivable development in the theatre of war, whilst their stockpile of specialist gear mounted up on their shelves. Combine that with the fact that they have been holding back Putin’s forces in Crimea and Donbas, fighting skirmishes all this time; and the fact that civilians have had this shadow hanging over them all this time, giving them time to get training, research what to do and genuinely search their hearts and decide what they would do if it all went south? . . . Well, this is the result. A well prepared, well resourced and well angry population who have felt a sense of relief at finally being able to strike back at the bully who’s cast a shadow over their whole existence for the last generation. A life of resentment poured out down the barrel of a gun, by determined fighters with a legitimate weed up their asses. That has served them so well, it has halted the might of Putin’s mechanised forces and caused them to fight among themselves over blame and for resources. I think Ukraine could win a total victory and take back their entire country now? If the west supports them all the way? Why not? They sure as hell DESERVE our support, and they’ve sacrificed too much for anything less.
    2
  10406. 2
  10407. 2
  10408. 2
  10409. 2
  10410. 2
  10411. 2
  10412. 2
  10413. 10sBalls123 : Nah. I’m a Conservative, and I want National Security. So, when ALL of his EXPERTS tell him that a Wall will NOT solve the problem, and it’s a WASTE of money, time and resources, I listen. Seeking Asylum is a LEGAL PROCEDURE, but Trump’s rhetoric is designed to persuade Americans that the mere fact that people seek it, makes them criminals. You know, if you’re, “honest,” that the Wall is a Vanity Project, like his very own Hoover Dam, by which he wants to be remembered. Just look at the stats on the Wall in Texas? The numbers of immigrants DROPPED, steadily, since 1990, until they built the wall, when the numbers actually started to RISE again. That’s just ONE of a battery of examples. So, he’s abjectly, demonstrably WRONG on every level. But, the shutdown capped it, for America. When he was, “proudly,” stopping the FBI, Airport Staff, Coast Guard, AND ICE AGENTS from getting paid, it was clear that, “Security,” was NOT a priority for him. As ever, he shot himself in the foot. “Why is he vilified?” Because he LIES all the time, grabs women by the pussy and thinks it’s funny, has made the world less safe, and has rode the crest of the RACIST Wave, SO HARD, that Anne Coulter And Rush Limbaugh have more access and influence over him, than does his chief of staff. That’s not to mention all the frauds, the kidnapping of Children and WHERE THE F’ ARE THEY? I can go all day, pal. So, don’t PRETEND you don’t understand the issues? If you don’t KNOW WHY people HATE lying racist, sex pest, traitors, you’re not really qualified for the discussion. Does THAT answer your, “question”??? 🙂
    2
  10414. 2
  10415. 2
  10416. 2
  10417. 2
  10418. 2
  10419. 2
  10420. 2
  10421. 2
  10422. 2
  10423. 2
  10424. 2
  10425. 2
  10426. 2
  10427. 2
  10428. 2
  10429. 2
  10430. 2
  10431. 2
  10432. 2
  10433. 2
  10434. 2
  10435. 2
  10436. 2
  10437. 2
  10438. 2
  10439. 2
  10440. 2
  10441. 2
  10442. 2
  10443. 2
  10444. 2
  10445. 2
  10446. 2
  10447. 2
  10448. 2
  10449. 2
  10450. 2
  10451. 2
  10452. 2
  10453. 2
  10454.  @devilsnetwork4212  : I don’t believe you really know what you’re saying. If you were in Russia, saying the equivalent thing about the Russian state, you would have to fear a knock at your door just for writing that. God forbid you got stopped for a spot check by the, “police,” and they checked your devices for comments like these, as they do to so many Russians in Moscow right now. Trying to convince yourself that everything the government does is totally self serving and cynical doesn’t reveal the truth. It’s just another lazy, myopic way of looking at the world, which dismisses the sacrifices and commitment of those in government who aren’t playing some geopolitical fantasy-football-style game of world domination and manipulation, but genuinely trying to help people and make the world a better place. Granted, there are (and always will be) bad people in politics. But it’s an easy, low effort stance to take, to just assume every powerful politician is in a cabal, playing us for fools and making cruel, cynical choices without ever engaging their consciences or their morality. But it’s still a point of view that is as far fetched and un-thought through as the opposite case, where you assume everyone is a saint, selflessly serving the public good. Recognising the nuance in life is complicated and hard work, requiring thought, reading, critical thinking and analysis. Realising that even one person can be a mix of good and bad, depending on context and circumstances, should open your eyes to the fact that entire organisations will be considerably more complex and difficult to summarise in a sentence or two; let alone entire networks of organisations that make for one, single, modern government; to which we must then add the complex relationships of their allies and the organisations and institutions in which they cooperate. That’s why, I hope you will come to see (perhaps one day?) that dismissing a democracy’s agenda as being purely cynical is as naive as assuming that God and the angels are supporting your government’s every decision. It’s simply not possible, let alone plausible. Yes, bad things happen at the hands of powerful western democracies, but usually for reasons we don’t expect and rarely for the kinds of reasons we prefer to assume. After all, you are referring to the very same institutions that produce people like Jake Broe, Paul Massaro, and so many other self sacrificing individuals who are simply trying to put their knowledge and expertise at the disposal of the wider public for the general good. Maybe think about that the next time you feel like summarising the history of western democracy in two cynical sentences, huh? . . . Just saying.
    2
  10455. 2
  10456. 2
  10457. Einstein used to say, (words to the effect of) “If you cannot explain your entire physics theory to a 10 year old child, then you probably don’t understand the theory yourself.” I think that applies to all topics. Yet we must understand the difference between simplifying our language and talking down to people, if we want to communicate big ideas or complex knowledge successfully. At least, if we hope to reach as many people as possible with the most important issues. Something else to understand, of equal importance to all would be educators, is the difference between making people, “aware,” of an important topic and giving them a legitimate, “understanding,” of it. Some of the world’s biggest problems are not about people’s awareness per se, rather than their comprehension. This is why people argue so angrily on the internet. Because people feel such deep, personal pain about matters that everyone is aware of, but remain DIVIDED about. And, when these situations arise, I always look to see WHO is seeking to help people, “understand,” the issues? And WHO is seeking the DIVISION? It is always the dividers that have a vested personal interest in preventing reconciliation, peace and agreement. The dividers are your enemies. It is often very hard to be objective when you ask yourself this question about matters that are important to you. If you feel any emotion when seeking these answers, be wary of your own biases. If you are able to be objective, the answer is always apparent, without the need for further enquiry. Then, you will know; those people in positions of power, or those who are simply able to reach a large audience, due to their fame or popularity . . . If THEY are attempting to divide us, then THEY are, “politicians,” whether they claim to be or not. And THEY are the most dangerous people on the planet.
    2
  10458. 2
  10459. 2
  10460. 2
  10461. 2
  10462. 2
  10463. 2
  10464. 2
  10465. 2
  10466. 2
  10467. 2
  10468. 2
  10469. 2
  10470. 2
  10471. 2
  10472. 2
  10473. 2
  10474. 2
  10475. 2
  10476. 2
  10477. 2
  10478. 2
  10479. 2
  10480. 2
  10481. 2
  10482. 2
  10483. 2
  10484. 2
  10485. 2
  10486. 2
  10487. 2
  10488. 2
  10489. 2
  10490. 2
  10491. 2
  10492. For what it’s worth, America: We have to seize this as an opportunity to put our house in order, now that we’re exposing the evil that lies just beneath America’s skin. It’s gone too far for us to, “unite,” even if we did have a common enemy now. No one can forget the treachery, and murder that is a direct result of the GOP’s capitulation to a Dictatorship; nor how close we came to exactly that. These people are past the exercise of free speech, and well into the territory of screaming, “Fire,” in a packed theatre, with no skin in the game, getting to sit back and rub their hands while others do the dying. Over 50 cops were seriously injured in those riots of the 6th of Jan! One is brain damaged and still in a coma. Another is blinded! And, of course we all know about the trump supporting cop who was murdered, beaten to death, in front of a thousand witnesses, yet we still have no clue who did that?! Seditious Propaganda used to be a crime! We literally hunted down and hung the propagandists after WWII, to set an example to others. But now? We allow Fox to cast doubt on the election over 700 times (according to Conservative analysts!) between the 7th Nov and the 6th Jan, and collect the money from their shares in the company! We are putting a KNOWN Quisling and traitor, onto the Education & Labor Committee!? Are you F’king KIDDING ME???!!! This has gone way too far, and it’s time we STOPPED looking for answers from outside our shores, and face up to what we’ve DONE! Imagine, preparing for battle, against the Martian invaders, when you discover the trooper on your right; the guy or gal upon whom your life might depend in an hour, is one of the people who doesn’t even BELIEVE your government is, “legitimate,” and has the badges of two cops he MURDERED in his locker at the base? You might be inclined to point your weapon at HIM?! I tell you, we have to CLEAN UP THIS MESS, or we might just as well hand the whole sorry shit pile over to Putin and announce his victory! I for one, would rather die! How about we speak for the DEAD and give them some JUSTICE? For the grieving families of half a million dead of Covid, and for all those dead, wounded or systematically intimidated by the growing (and let’s call it what it is?) NAZI threat, within our own shores. The GOP are desperate to call off the impeachment, because they KNOW they can all be forced to testify, with NO 5th Amendment protections. And, on the stand, they’ll be ripped to shreds in front of a watching world, on LIVE TV, if they say they, “believe,” in the seditious LIE they call, “The Steal.” And they KNOW that many, possibly Lindsay Graham, Ted Cruz, Josh Hawley, will ADMIT they KNEW it was a lie, but were, “only following orders,” like at Nuremberg! It will fracture the GOP, between the die hard nut jobs and the system gamers who want to survive! And, I say, let’s give them their, “civil war,” within the ranks of their own party! Time we force the breaking point, and stop this in its tracks. Time we got America BACK! Don’t you think? ✌️
    2
  10493. 2
  10494. 2
  10495. 2
  10496. 2
  10497. @Stefan Parocki : Why is the prefix of the definite article an, “insult,” as you say? If so, I never heard that before. To us in the west right now, Ukraine is, “THE Ukraine,” as in, “We salute you.” You know Angela Merkel is history now, right? Olaf Scholz (of the SPD) is Germany’s current Chancellor. I was re-reading up on the famine, recently. After seeing a pretty good Vox video on YouTube about it. Stalin nearly wiped Ukraine’s people off the map, and he almost got away with covering the entire thing up! For all it matters, he did get away with it successfully, with barely a word of response from a sceptical west, which (once the proof had been rubbed in the western leaders’ faces) induced a coma of none committal and pusillanimity. It seems to me that the last 100 years of history in Ukraine has been about withstanding Soviet (and now Neo-Soviet) aggression. The more I learn about them, the more my admiration spirals out of all proportion! Of all countries in the western world, Ukraine deserves our gratitude as well as our frank, uncomplicated admiration and committed support. Since their rejection of Putin’s puppet dictatorship and their loss of Crimea, they have shown nothing but sheer unalloyed courage in the face of all but hopeless odds. And the average people of west are still not fully aware of how much their sacrifices have served to buffer the rest of the free world from Neo-Soviet expansion. The way I see it now, we simply cannot and MUST NOT allow Putin to, “save face,” as he retreats. Crimea HAS TO go back to Ukrainian hands and be protected by the UN. And the coal, oil and gas of the whole Donbas region (Putin’s real objective in both areas) must be rendered off limits to him. If Putin loses more than he began this murderous slaughter with, and cannot maintain a plausible lie of, “victory,” to his own people let alone the rest of the world, we will be doing more to secure world peace and make Dictatorships think twice before attacking defenceless neighbours, than has been achieved since the end of World War II. Ukraine has sacrificed too much for us all, for anything less to be acceptable now. We have the advantage and MUST press it home at all costs. And the gains from doing so will be both moral and strategic. That’s my view, at any rate. Do you agree?
    2
  10498. 2
  10499. 2
  10500. 2
  10501. 2
  10502. 2
  10503. 2
  10504. 2
  10505. 2
  10506. Yes, you touched it with a needle. This internal fight within the, “conservative,” movement has been such a long time coming. Since the days of Winston Churchill, the European project has been causing division with the Tory party, but has remained manageable so long as it was both a distant, background feature, in a landscape filled with more pressing issues, and the leadership was strong enough to whip their party into line behind their own vision. The referendum was blunder, but what resulted was the flare up wherein the competing visions of conservatism were finally put to the flame at a crucial moment when there was no leader with any vision and no sight of one on the horizon! That was further compounded by the moral bankruptcy of flinging open their doors to literally anybody who could win their seat due to their, “personality,” or, “performative,” populist politics. They no longer cared about their record, experience or background, so long as they could WIN, and they ended up with stiff necked grifters, with no vision beyond their own immediate, personal interests, or, “ideologues,” with the type of visions that would startle Oswald Mosley! And then they act all, “surprised,” when they found they couldn’t manage this pit of vipers, and stunned at the fact that these unmanageable newcomers acted like they OWNED the place and had the right to make demands! And while the last season of party, “leaders,” got progressively more bonkers and weaker at party discipline with each yank on the Westminster fruit machine handle, this influx of vipers started fighting each other instead of their opposite numbers, NAME CALLING anyone in the general public who didn’t agree with their extremist views, FROM THE DISPATCH BOX . . . REPEATEDLY, (without even the suggestion that the PM might even rein them in let alone discipline them!) and scrapping in the open, for all the press to see, over policies that were either objectively unworkable, or objectively cruel and un-British! And, as if the point needed to be made any more abundantly clear, at the moment Richie calls his election, five MP’s jump ship THAT SAME DAY! Any party with that kind of a record deserves its wilderness years. May they be long and painful for them, as their years in office were for us. It is to my great SHAME that I admit to voting for the Tories at the last election. Never, NEVER again. So long as ANY of this lot are around.
    2
  10507. 2
  10508. 2
  10509. 2
  10510. 2
  10511. 2
  10512. 2
  10513. 2
  10514. 2
  10515. 2
  10516. 2
  10517. 2
  10518. 2
  10519. 2
  10520. 2
  10521. 2
  10522. 2
  10523. 2
  10524. 2
  10525. 2
  10526. 2
  10527. 2
  10528. 2
  10529. 2
  10530. 2
  10531. 2
  10532. 2
  10533. 2
  10534. 2
  10535. 2
  10536. 2
  10537. 2
  10538. 2
  10539. 2
  10540. 2
  10541. 2
  10542. 2
  10543. 2
  10544. 2
  10545. 2
  10546. 2
  10547. 2
  10548. 2
  10549. 2
  10550. 2
  10551. 2
  10552. 2
  10553. 2
  10554. 2
  10555. 2
  10556. 2
  10557. 2
  10558. 2
  10559. 2
  10560. 2
  10561. 2
  10562. 2
  10563. 2
  10564. 2
  10565. 2
  10566. 2
  10567. 2
  10568. 2
  10569. 2
  10570. 2
  10571. 2
  10572. 2
  10573. 2
  10574. 2
  10575. 2
  10576. 2
  10577. 2
  10578. 2
  10579. 2
  10580. 2
  10581. 2
  10582. 2
  10583. 2
  10584. 2
  10585. 2
  10586. 2
  10587. 2
  10588. 2
  10589. 2
  10590. 2
  10591. 2
  10592. 2
  10593. 2
  10594. 2
  10595. 2
  10596. 2
  10597. 2
  10598. 2
  10599. 2
  10600. 2
  10601. 2
  10602. 2
  10603. 2
  10604. 2
  10605. 2
  10606. 2
  10607. 2
  10608. 2
  10609. 2
  10610. 2
  10611. 2
  10612. 2
  10613. 2
  10614. go forward : Don’t put words in my mouth, son. Trump fans (the ones that aren’t paid to Troll for him, who live in countries all around the world, that is) are fundamentally insecure, which is WHY they live on CNN. They HATE it here; they HATE the people who come here; they HATE the channel and its anchors; and, even though they KNOW they’re hearing the TRUTH here, they, “claim,” not to believe it, because they actually, “think,” that the GOP will successfully bury reality sufficiently that they won’t have to FACE the TRUTH. It’s an, “emotional,” urge; an effeminate, schoolgirl tendency to HIDE behind distorted or false comparisons from history, like the, “Clinton’s,” or, “Obama.” And, it’s EXACTLY that kind of Trollery that LOST you the Midterms. Conservatives, LIKE ME, either stayed home, or voted Democrat. There is only the Cult remaining, with its vast support network from Russia. So, ANYONE who lives a lie (for money or for free) is a mental midget, who will go to their grave filled with bitter hatred, a permanent sense of effeminate victimhood, and a look of disappointment shadowing their usual look of stupidity. Children are LITERALLY DYING, because of your self centred, myopic, idiocy. But, the thing that REALLY marks out the Trump Tramp, from the rest of humanity? It’s that Trump has ALWAYS given YOU the exact OPPOSITE of everything you thought he would give you, and FOOLED you into thinking he actually, “did something,” for you. And, when he couldn’t do that, he triggered your, “Blame Buttons,” and you were happy to, “blame,” ANYONE except the guy responsible, TRUMP! You indoctrinated YOURSELVES, by watching Fox, RT, and Alex QAnon Jones, who comfort you with their LIES and Conspiracy Theories. That’s how a guy who’s dumber than a box of rocks fooled you. By YOU doing ALL the hard work FOR HIM. Trump created the migrant crisis, by withdrawing Aid from Venezuela and other Latin Countries, KNOWING there would be an influx. And, he put on this whole show, for YOU to get triggered by. And, he’s done the same thing, over and over, KNOWING that YOU just, “WANT,” to believe, SO BADLY, because the worse it gets, the more committed you are! Trump may be dumb, but he’s also cunning, and he has EXPERIENCE at conning people. There’s VAST amounts of data, on how this works, son. People are too ASHAMED; TOO PROUD, to admit they’ve been conned in SUCH a STUPID WAY. So, they double down. That’s how mortgage-scams work. And, here you are. The living embodiment of a Trump Victim, with a little Dunning Kruger effect, thrown in for good measure. You’re going to cheer yourself into a Dictatorship, son. And, when they come to take YOU away, you’ll remember me . . . In fact, I may well be your last thought on Earth? 🙂
    2
  10615. 2
  10616. 2
  10617. 2
  10618. 2
  10619. 2
  10620. 2
  10621. 2
  10622. 2
  10623. 2
  10624. 2
  10625. 2
  10626. 2
  10627. 2
  10628. 2
  10629. 2
  10630. 2
  10631. 2
  10632. 2
  10633. 2
  10634. 2
  10635. 2
  10636. 2
  10637. 2
  10638. 2
  10639. 2
  10640. 2
  10641. 2
  10642. 2
  10643. 2
  10644. 2
  10645. 2
  10646. 2
  10647. 2
  10648. 2
  10649. 2
  10650. 2
  10651. 2
  10652. 2
  10653. 2
  10654. 2
  10655. 2
  10656. 2
  10657. 2
  10658. 2
  10659. 2
  10660. 2
  10661. 2
  10662. 2
  10663. 2
  10664. 2
  10665. 2
  10666. 2
  10667. 2
  10668. 2
  10669. 2
  10670. 2
  10671. 2
  10672. 2
  10673. 2
  10674. 2
  10675. 2
  10676. 2
  10677. 2
  10678. 2
  10679. 2
  10680. 2
  10681. 2
  10682. 2
  10683. 2
  10684. 2
  10685. 2
  10686. 2
  10687. 2
  10688. 2
  10689. 2
  10690. 2
  10691. 2
  10692. 2
  10693. 2
  10694. 2
  10695. 2
  10696. 2
  10697. 2
  10698. 2
  10699. 2
  10700. 2
  10701. 2
  10702. 2
  10703. 2
  10704. 2
  10705. 2
  10706. 2
  10707. 2
  10708. 2
  10709. 2
  10710. 2
  10711. 2
  10712. 2
  10713. 2
  10714. 2
  10715. 2
  10716. 2
  10717. 2
  10718. 2
  10719. 2
  10720. 2
  10721. 2
  10722. 2
  10723. 2
  10724. 2
  10725. 2
  10726. 2
  10727. 2
  10728. 2
  10729. 2
  10730. 2
  10731. 2
  10732. 2
  10733. 2
  10734. 2
  10735. 2
  10736. 2
  10737. 2
  10738. 2
  10739. 2
  10740. 2
  10741. 2
  10742. 2
  10743. 2
  10744. 2
  10745. 2
  10746. 2
  10747. 2
  10748. 2
  10749. 2
  10750. 2
  10751. 2
  10752. 2
  10753. 2
  10754. 2
  10755. 2
  10756. 2
  10757. 2
  10758. 2
  10759. 2
  10760. 2
  10761. 2
  10762. 2
  10763. 2
  10764. 2
  10765. 2
  10766.  @jfh667  : Trump was not involved in the negotiations. Mike Pompeo followed trump’s orders to end the war however he could. He surrendered to the Taliban, released their leader from US custody (along with their top 5000 war dogs) and made an arrangement which Biden kept, on Biden’s terms. By locking out the Afghan government, trump’s administration guaranteed the collapse of their democracy, which was corrupt and rotten to the core anyway. But, not even involving them in those, “negotiations,” amounted to abject surrender and betrayal. Thus, the Afghan government followed trump’s example and betrayed their people, by either fleeing or surrendering themselves. Biden told his generals what was coming and no one had any illusions. He lied to the American public about the strength and will of the Afghani troops and government, so as to prevent panic, and not be the cause of more chaos. If he’d said what he truly expected, he would have made it worse, caused worse chaos and been, “blamed,” for that too. Given the hand he was dealt, he put Americans first, and pulled off a minor miracle, getting Americans out without any blood spilled. We can’t count the bombing, as that was as much an attack on the Taliban as it was on the US and the Afghan allies. It was an immense achievement, getting around the obstacles that trump deliberately left behind, in hopes of sabotaging a withdrawal; which worked on the assumption that Biden would see how, “boxed in,” he was, and kick the can down the road, as all previous administrations had. But, he did not count on Biden’s resolve, or his willingness to take heat for the sake of our troops. No one thought he would pull it off, which was why he was able to do it, before America’s enemies could martial their forces against us. It was quite brilliant, actually, and Joe deserves our gratitude and support. Those comparing this to Vietnam or claiming this was IN ANY WAY a, “failure,” are historically illiterate and have no clue how history or the military works.
    2
  10767. 2
  10768. Dy Dayton : That’s right. He thinks of himself as a Machiavellian, master manipulator, but he’s just a cheap crook. For him, it all started in the Ukraine, where Putin’s Mafia were delighted to have an influential American on board, to clean up the image of their satellite’s, puppet DICKtator. People were already suspicious that the election had been rigged, with Manafort’s help, but their demonstration were brutally suppressed, and those who got away, were later found, as their pictures had been stored from the demos, and were picked up, tortured and sentenced, before the week was out. When the Putin puppet ignored a referendum result (the people had voted to join the E U) the demonstrations were so big that they actually released thugs from jail, to help suppress them. After a siege upon the capitol; and Putin’s own Moscow hoods were unable to contain the demonstrators, after days in the freezing conditions and MANY killings (even using SNIPERS to pick off perceived ring leaders), Ukraines, “elected,” leaders fled the country by helicopter. But, not before raiding their safe, from which the leadership parcelled out $ MILLIONS of Euros. Manafort took his cut and fled back to America, where he was almost instantly intercepted by Putin’s Moscow thugs, who said, “That’s OUR MONEY, you have there, son. Tell you what? Keep the change, and work for US, as we have an old friend of yours that we’d like you to work for. And we WILL find you, if you let us down.” So, Manafort, frightened out of his mind, shows up at Donny’s election campaign, DESPERATE to keep Putin at bay, and rather clumsily, burst in, offering to work for free. Any, “honest,” candidate would have, IMMEDIATELY, seen that something was up. But, greedy, stupid Donny, always on the take, DIDN’T consider the mess in Manafort’s wake, and just took the freebee, and Manafort believed he’d narrowly avoided his OWN, “wake.” The FBI picked up all the pieces, and Putin, since then has recently managed to pressure the Ukraine’s new leadership (sinking back into corruption, as it is) to stop cooperating with the FBI, but I think it’s a little late for that, now. The only real benefit for Putin, now, is that it’s unlikely that the FBI will get any Ukrainian witnesses, who aren’t already safely in the West and seeking asylum. But, if you were wondering, just WHY has Manafort been such a tough nut to crack? Imagine what he was thinking, when he got an anonymous tip off, telling him, “look over hear, at what we do to people who betray us,” and then saw, when he looked at what they told him to look at, the recent MURDER and the British ATTEMPTED MURDER, of those dissidents that we all saw in the, ahem, “fake,” news? He’s scared s**tless and isn’t sure the FBI can protect him. Sorry for going on, there, but that’s the (brief version) story of Manafort, so far. And, from THAT perspective, we can see how his actions to influence the media (the ONLY, “weapon,” he knows) look sort of rational, if TOTALLY DESPERATE and, from what we’re seeing now, UTTERLY DOOMED. Soon, he will see - when he’s in jail and desperate to AVOID potential hit men, among the population - that his best and ONLY hope is the FBI . . .
    2
  10769. 2
  10770. 2
  10771. 2
  10772. Upper Echelon Gamers : You’re right about that phrase, “lost in transmission.” It’s usually, “lost in translation.” No big deal, but you asked, so . . . I agree that it’s a great show, that ought to appeal to younger people who haven’t played the games, (though they really should, to get the full joy of it) and that I too was caught off balance by the none-linear story telling. When I figured out what was happening, I rather liked it. I felt it added something. And, I too was disappointed by some of the casting. Henry Cavil NAILED it, though. Without him, it may have been unwatchable for fans? But, what’s this OBSESSION you have with, “woke,” issues? Sure, that’s been an issue with the production of this; over reported and exaggerated in the press and media. But to build your entire review around that ONE, SINGLE point? Really? . . . Aren’t you getting a little FIXATED? Every video you produce, these days, seems to be hand wringing about overblown feminism, to the point that you’re getting predictable. I told my wife what I thought you would say in this video, based on the headline alone. I was 100% right. And, I was disappointed. By all means, make references to the issues that are happening (which I don’t deny, ARE real) but, for the LOVE OF GOD, can you spare us all the whining about feminism? I can’t BELIEVE I’m even SAYING this to YOU of all people!? I was attracted to your channel, because you seem to do top notch gaming journalism, and are always SO GOOD at calling, “Bullshit!” where you see it. But, this “Woke,” obsession, smells like a rat, to me. And, I CAN’T be the only one? It’s like you have an agenda? Like you want to be the SOURCE of the DIVISION, instead of giving us the first rate journalism, entertaining prose, and incisive observations, that made you so appealing in the first place? A good journalist never wants to BE the story, and preserves their integrity by reporting it, without trying to, “influence,” their viewers or readership. PLEASE, just think about what I’m saying? PLEASE DON’T become the figure around which people gather to salve their victimhood, and nurse their grievances? We GET IT! The SJW bullshit is a pain in the ASS, sometimes. But, it’s not the WHOLE WORLD! Reviews like this TAKE AWAY from the art form, and make it into the BATTLE GROUND, upon which people divide according to their political and social beliefs, and make up their minds, BEFORE THEY’VE EVEN SEEN THE MOVIES OR SHOWS BEING REVIEWED! PLEASE, don’t BE the problem? “Report,” on it. And, TRUST ME! You will carry FAR MORE with you, when you hold back your biases, than you ever could, playing to the crowd’s existing prejudices. Sure, you might get higher viewing figures, harping on about their grievances, if THAT’S what you’re about? But, you WERE SO MUCH MORE . . . If you remain predictable, and a victim, you may make more money too. But, then you will have become the thing that you say you loath: like an immoral games company, shitting out another, unoriginal, totally predicted package, which satisfies the unthinking masses, who don’t know any better, but which PISSES OFF the FANS who get it. I can’t believe (don’t WANT TO believe) that that is who YOU are??? . . . I was a fan, because you surprised me with your knowledge, eloquence, research (which always checked out) and the entertaining way you put all that together. I feel sure there must be others who feel the same way as me? I KNOW you can do SO MUCH BETTER, because I’ve SEEN IT. For what it’s worth, that was an appeal from the heart of a fan . . .
    2
  10773. 2
  10774. 2
  10775. 2
  10776. 2
  10777. 2
  10778. 2
  10779. 2
  10780. 2
  10781. 2
  10782. 2
  10783. 2
  10784. 2
  10785. 2
  10786. 2
  10787. 2
  10788. 2
  10789. 2
  10790. 2
  10791. 2
  10792. 2
  10793. 2
  10794. 2
  10795. 2
  10796. 2
  10797. 2
  10798. 2
  10799. 2
  10800. 2
  10801. 2
  10802. 2
  10803. 2
  10804. 2
  10805. 2
  10806. 2
  10807. 2
  10808. 2
  10809. 2
  10810. 2
  10811. 2
  10812. 2
  10813. 2
  10814. 2
  10815. 2
  10816. 2
  10817.  @arkadybelsky3150  : I too worry that, “empathy,” only carries so much weight on the international scales when balanced against, “pragmatism.” However, the real discussion in that regard surely centres around Crimea? Yes, Ukraine will need a navy and airforce to protect Crimea from future attacks, which will be costly. But the rewards in pure financial terms, long terms, are enormous. Just prior to the beginning of Putin’s invasion, Shell, Exxon, BP and others confirmed their findings of fossil fuels in all of the outlying regions of Ukraine; from the Carpathian Mountains to the west, to the Donbas in the East, and offshore, well within Ukraine’s legal waters, off Crimea. Putin never had the temerity to try to drill those offshore resources, knowing the international furore would likely interfere with his Nordstream deals, and goes off in who knows what direction. Since 2014, he’s been content to just sit on that hoard, like a dragon protecting the gold he can never spend, just so long as no one else gets to spend it. My argument (and I’m pretty certain Zelensky’s argument too) would be that not only did the west’s none-reaction to the invasion of Crimea contribute massively to Putin’s overplaying of his hand, (you might say it was the direct cause for why he thought he could get away with stealing an entire country, like it was the biggest heist in history?) but returning Crimea to Ukrainian hands is the ONLY solution that could buy us world peace. And, until Russia signs on to a declaration confirming the entirety of Ukraine’s independence, including full reparations, all sanctions will remain in place. Yes, that will cause the downfall of the Russian government as it currently is, and yes, that may result in just another oligarch. But there’s certainly NO argument for, “better the devil you know,” when you, “know,” this particular devil threatens nuclear Armageddon at the drop of a hat and is willing to kill literally millions of people for his own twisted goals. Russia MUST be forced into a position where it acknowledges defeat openly and before its own people. And they must acknowledge that their invasion was unjustified, which will provide them with a pathway back to a decent society, with all the scapegoats they need until they can move on. And only force will achieve that. And force is the only language Putin’s people understand. Only then can we negotiate in good faith about a realistic settlement. And we will be in a position to offer sanction concessions in return for nuclear weapons. This will have to take place over Putin’s dead body? So be it. But, if that seems like a strap price to you, I can only say, think of all the blood and treasure we will save by defeating Russia here, rather than fighting him in Poland and Germany next. These are real, openly stated goals, much discussed on Russian state television. And these are NATO countries, which will result in American, British, French, Italian, etc, etc, troops putting boots on the soil. Currently, Ukraine is fighting World War Three so that we don’t have to. This is the WWIII you get when no one wants to use their nukes. But both China and Russia MUST get a message from this war that resounds through the generations. And we must all be willing to pay whatever price freedom costs. If you would not desert your loved ones in their hour of battle, then I hope you would apply that thinking (that feeling) to the people of Ukraine. They never provoked a war, but were persuaded (by Bill Clinton) to give up their nuclear defence and trust in the process. This is where that trust has lead them. We are responsible for them because they did as we asked and Putin has taken every sign as one of weakness. We must show strength now. And at such unprecedented levels that it kills all of the fight left in those Z Zombies. It’s the ONLY path to peace. Let’s find the courage to take it together? ✌️
    2
  10818. 2
  10819. 2
  10820. 2
  10821. 2
  10822. 2
  10823. 2
  10824. 2
  10825. 2
  10826. 2
  10827. 2
  10828. 2
  10829. 2
  10830. 2
  10831. 2
  10832. 2
  10833. 2
  10834. 2
  10835. 2
  10836. 2
  10837. 2
  10838. 2
  10839. 2
  10840. 2
  10841. 2
  10842. 2
  10843. 2
  10844. 2
  10845. 2
  10846. 2
  10847. 2
  10848. 2
  10849. 2
  10850. 2
  10851. 2
  10852. 2
  10853. 2
  10854. 2
  10855. 2
  10856. 2
  10857. It’s time we faced the fact that there has been a consistent and concerted effort to take over the media at every level by the right, over the last 10 years. Since the Tories have stopped threatening the BBC’s license fee and almost daily whining about them being a, “leftie,” organisation, I have been paying closer attention to why that might be? The public were tossed a bone, in the form of a resigning Chairman, Richard Sharp, under a cloud of Tory sleaze scandal and then, radio silence from the front and back benches? Which just so happens to coincide with a suddenly more favourable coverage of Tory policies, downplaying of scandals and burying leads. Just look at how they covered the, “Let them die,” revelation about Sunak from the Covid Enquiry? He’s our current, serving PM! Yet the BBC’s reporting of that shockingly callous indifference was buried right at the very end of a litany of allegations against his enemy at large, Boris Johnson. A couple of sentences of coverage, tacked on to the very final seconds of the report I saw, in a blink-and-you’ll-miss-it, moment. We’ve seen the launch of a right wing, “news,” station and Parliament unable to get any answers from the regulator about MP’s blatantly breaking the law by anchoring programs and dressing up political opinion as news. If you watched any of the enquiries into those, the regulator comes off as pusillanimous at best. We have most of the press leaning to the right, which has done for decades, but never with such impunity and insolence. And they all seem to have their, “message,” agreed before anything goes to print or broadcast. Something is deeply rotten in the state of Denmark. And the coverage of the King is just an example of something we will likely see more and more of in the coming years: careless arrogance from the people in charge.
    2
  10858. 2
  10859. 2
  10860. 2
  10861. 2
  10862. 2
  10863. 2
  10864. 2
  10865. 2
  10866. 2
  10867. 2
  10868. 2
  10869. 2
  10870. 2
  10871. 2
  10872. 2
  10873. 2
  10874. 2
  10875. 2
  10876. 2
  10877. 2
  10878. 2
  10879. 2
  10880. 2
  10881. 2
  10882. 2
  10883. 2
  10884. 2
  10885. 2
  10886. 2
  10887. 2
  10888. 2
  10889. 2
  10890. 2
  10891. 2
  10892. 2
  10893. 2
  10894. 2
  10895. 2
  10896. 2
  10897. 2
  10898. 2
  10899. 2
  10900. 2
  10901. 2
  10902. 2
  10903.  @1987kahil  : Factually wrong at every level, ma’am. They have bombed every airport in Ukraine. Those are commercial, not military targets. People’s homes are burning, thousands fleeing west, and the body count is already climbing, so the Russians are either terrible shots or they’re lying to you. And, given this is the same guy who said, “We have no intention of invading,” right up until he actually began an INVASION and even after it began, I think it’s an empirical fact that Russian media lies as casually as a six year old with behaviour problems, or a Donald trump, don’t you? And your size assessment of Russia’s military is both wrong and irrelevant. North Korea has a million troops in their army at minimum, but no one takes them seriously as a threat, because they’re broke. Russia is only a, “super power,” because it has wasted its economy on nukes since the 1950’s, but they are losing all traction in the world, which is why Putin is getting so desperate now. The people are so poor they are demanding democracy and being locked up for expressing free speech on an annual basis now. Occupying Ukraine will break their bank and Putin will have to dip into his own stolen money to keep the military afloat. And you have NO LEGITIMATE excuses for WHY he’s invading Ukraine. His people don’t want this. The Ukrainians don’t want this. And he has no REASON other than megalomania to even do this! He’s mad! I wonder what will happen when he gets a terminal diagnosis from his doctors? He might just decide to take us all out with him? Maybe that’s what’s happened? That really WOULD be, “the end of history,” to quote the PooTin himself. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10904. 2
  10905. 2
  10906. 2
  10907. 2
  10908. 2
  10909. 2
  10910. 2
  10911. 2
  10912. 2
  10913. 2
  10914. 2
  10915. 2
  10916. 2
  10917. 2
  10918. 2
  10919. 2
  10920. 2
  10921. 2
  10922. 2
  10923. 2
  10924. 2
  10925. 2
  10926. 2
  10927. 2
  10928. 2
  10929. 2
  10930. 2
  10931. 2
  10932. 2
  10933. 2
  10934. 2
  10935. 2
  10936. 2
  10937. 2
  10938. 2
  10939. 2
  10940. 2
  10941. 2
  10942. 2
  10943. 2
  10944. 2
  10945. 2
  10946. 2
  10947.  @TaoStein  : If, “western opinion doesn’t matter outside the west,” then why has Putin sunk literal TRILLIONS of Rubles into propaganda at every level of western media, culture and political affairs? Why has Putin BANNED Facebook, YouTube and a raft of western media from Russia? Why is he jailing people for looking at western media on their phones and having cops LITERALLY spot checking people’s phones in the streets of Moscow? And why does Putin routinely have journalists MURDERED? It obviously, “matters,” a whole lot to Putin, or he wouldn’t be investing so much of his wealth on troll farms to reach the west. And only now is Putin beginning to see the results of his efforts. And he’s SO disappointed! People have been happy to take his money and parrot his crap, while it was convenient, but they were NEVER fooled by ANY of it. And they’re just as happy to take other people’s money, or to stand well back while Putin’s oligarchs are being stripped of their assets. He thought the world would fight that? Oops! You can’t count on, “loyalty,” when you had to BUY it, son. That’s where Putin went wrong. He never took the time to, “convince,” anyone of anything. He over did it, with a deluge of palpable bollox, that even his supporters never actually, “believed.” Now it’s, “inconvenient,” for China to parrot Putin’s narrative, and even they won’t play. And that’s even AFTER Putin put Taiwan on his Naughty List. Putin has lost the war of propaganda because he never mixed enough TRUTH in with his lies, like the Devil does. He thinks he’s a Bond Villain, but the Devil is way smarter . . .
    2
  10948. 2
  10949. 2
  10950. 2
  10951. 2
  10952. 2
  10953. 2
  10954. 2
  10955. 2
  10956. 2
  10957. 2
  10958. 2
  10959. 2
  10960. 2
  10961. 2
  10962. 2
  10963. 2
  10964. 2
  10965. 2
  10966. 2
  10967. 2
  10968. 2
  10969. 2
  10970. 2
  10971. 2
  10972. 2
  10973. 2
  10974. 2
  10975. 2
  10976. 2
  10977. 2
  10978. 2
  10979. 2
  10980. 2
  10981. 2
  10982. 2
  10983. 2
  10984. 2
  10985. 2
  10986. 2
  10987. 2
  10988. 2
  10989. 2
  10990. 2
  10991.  @ros8737  : I always find it helps to think of western media as children, overreacting to anything and everything they hear. Yes, they are doing a good job of keeping the issue alive in the minds of the public. But they are not so good at offering a realistic or consistent take on developments. That’s why channels like this one are so important, reported by someone with experience, insight and knowledge, who takes the time to analyse incoming information and sift through the matters that need our focus, whilst setting aside the hype and, just as often, explaining the hype. The press have become just as much a part of the story, requiring interpretation and a degree of dissection, if we want to understand their headlines. It’s always unhelpful when they say dumb stuff as though Ukraine is somehow, “losing,” simply because they aren’t storming through to Moscow or something and have changed their tactics so as to grind down Russian military infrastructure. Like when CNN always acts like every time Putin so much as looks at a nuke we should all prepare for Armageddon, when people with any knowledge of Putin know better than to treat anything he says or does as remotely plausible. But, if that serves to drum up support for giving Ukraine the weapons they need to win this war, I’m all for it. If it’s scaring people off, for the sake of dominating 24 hours of the news cycle, I’d like to throttle the producers! Gone are the days when your news channels were the way you took a step back and acquired news and sound analysis. Now you have to add their behaviour to the mix and analyse them just as hard.
    2
  10992. 2
  10993. 2
  10994. 2
  10995. 2
  10996. 2
  10997. 2
  10998. 2
  10999. 2
  11000. 2
  11001. 2
  11002. 2
  11003. 2
  11004. 2
  11005. 2
  11006. 2
  11007. 2
  11008. 2
  11009. 2
  11010. 2
  11011. 2
  11012. 2
  11013. 2
  11014. 2
  11015. 2
  11016. 2
  11017. 2
  11018. 2
  11019. 2
  11020. 2
  11021. 2
  11022. 2
  11023. 2
  11024. 2
  11025. 2
  11026. 2
  11027. 2
  11028. 2
  11029. 2
  11030. 2
  11031. 2
  11032. 2
  11033. 2
  11034. 2
  11035. 2
  11036. 2
  11037. 2
  11038. 2
  11039. 2
  11040. 2
  11041. 2
  11042. 2
  11043. 2
  11044. 2
  11045. 2
  11046. 2
  11047. 2
  11048. 2
  11049. 2
  11050. 2
  11051. 2
  11052. 2
  11053. 2
  11054.  @scottshepard3662  : You talk just as much, so don’t come the, “confused by your verbs,” son? Yes, I’m sure Baldwin agrees and sick about the whole thing. I don’t doubt he’s learned a sickening lesson and will be tortured by it for the rest of his days. He may even campaign about gun safety, in the way that A list actors do when tragedy hits home? But, here’s the point, made real simple: * Until the facts are known, you have no idea what happened, or who was responsible. It’s not even established if Baldwin had any reason to believe the gun was real or fake. How would he know the difference? * What do you think an, “Armourer’s,” job is? They take the liability as part of their contract. The law isn’t going to explore the deeper moral questions of culpability. But there are a thousand potential variables of which you are not in any position to judge at this point. What part of that don’t you get? * The law is the law. It is a fact, extant, about which there is no debate. It doesn’t matter whether actors are sensible, taking responsibility (morally) for where every bullet that leaves their gun stops, or not. The cops are not interested, nor is the court. The buck stops with the, “expert,” they hired to take responsibility. If her story doesn’t change, she’s alleging murder, committed by the short list of suspects who had access. I think she will change her story. But that’s all guessing. * What I can promise you, without any ambiguity, is that the cops are not even considering Baldwin as being culpable in any sense: save possibly as a producer, and whether he had any influence over practices on set. But that’s got no bearing on the fact that he fired the weapon. That part of it is not going to be pinned on him. Much as you seem to wish it would be? * I don’t give out personal details. So don’t ask. You asked a general question, which made little difference either way, so I answered it. But, I wouldn’t dismiss the opinions of others, whether they were experienced with fire arms or not, on a question like this. I haven’t been to the North Pole, but I can tell you it’s cold, without fear of contradiction.
    2
  11055. 2
  11056. 2
  11057. 2
  11058. 2
  11059. 2
  11060. 2
  11061. 2
  11062. 2
  11063. 2
  11064. 2
  11065. 2
  11066. 2
  11067. 2
  11068. 2
  11069. 2
  11070. 2
  11071. 2
  11072. 2
  11073. 2
  11074. 2
  11075. 2
  11076. 2
  11077. 2
  11078. 2
  11079. 2
  11080. 2
  11081. 2
  11082. 2
  11083. 2
  11084. 2
  11085. 2
  11086. 2
  11087. 2
  11088. 2
  11089. 2
  11090. 2
  11091. 2
  11092. 2
  11093. 2
  11094. 2
  11095. 2
  11096. 2
  11097. 2
  11098. 2
  11099. 2
  11100. 2
  11101. From the paranoid perspective of an Israeli government advisor, all they’re seeing is that the people funding HAMAS (Iran, et al) are now the ones calling time and offering back hostages, right at the point that Israel was about to smash a central support hub for HAMAS’s whole operation. Now there are Israelis who are chomping at the bit, thinking they may find other things when they get in there? Whether that be intelligence, billions of dollars worth of fighting technology and weapons, who knows what else? The actual remaining hostages, perhaps? But, because this call from HAMAS to accept Israel’s ceasefire proposal (And being Israel’s terms and conditions, so you would think they would accept them instantly?) come from Iran and their allies, Netanyahu instinctively feels the need to get in there and see what it is that they’re so keen to protect. Humanitarian concerns will have not have even crossed Netanyahu’s mind, nor those of his opponents in this complex war. And we must never forget, so long as Netanyahu is fighting this war, he is keeping the sword of Damocles from dropping on his head, in the form of elections, criminal charges and facing the corruption charges of which he is already accused. In that respect Netanyahu is very much like Vladimir Putin. Now, he is a warlord or he is nothing. It is not just in his political interests to keep this war raging (so long as he can maintain a significant minority of supporters), it is his lifeline. We are asking a proud, callous, sociopathic man to face shame, indignity after indignity, humbling and probably jail time or even self termination (the YouTube algorithm makes my comments disappear if I use more appropriate words), or he can fight a war. He is THE WORST person to be leading Israel at this crucial moment in their history. Whatever happens, this cannot end well for the Israelis. As for the Palestinians . . . Well, it’s already gone about as badly as it can and will get worse. But the innocent paying for the crimes of the guilty is a feature, not a bug, in this conflict, on both sides. Unless American pulls the plug, which they show no signs of doing, there can be no end to this conflict until Palestine ceases to exist. We are watching a genocide. And we’re doing very little about it, except helping to protect the perpetrators from Iranian missiles.
    2
  11102. Indeed, the Tory party lost all of its, “states,” men and women, years ago. I felt that the likes of Cameron were more like the donors and influencers within the elite, holding the fort until more talented MP’s could rise again. Then, after he resigned, we were left with the genuinely untalented leftovers who would NEVER have risen so high in less chaotic times. The, “characters,” the chancers and Neo-Libs, who, as you point out, acted with callous indifference, entitled cruelty, incompetence and corruption. It is truly sad that the, (oxymoronically named) “Conservatives,” are now having their civil war in the public domain, in this unedifying, unbecoming manner. But that’s what you get when no one has any ideology or ideas. The Tories have no, “story,” to tell about national identity, national character, our destiny or even our general direction. I think they do know what direction they all agree upon, in which they really want to take the country, but they know they cannot sell that story to the British people, as it would horrify even their most rabid supporters. A Neo-Liberal hellscape, in which corporations from all over the planet own everything, including security, policing and healthcare, is not any voter’s idea of a good time. You’re right. They’re all out of fig leaves, and they don’t even have sufficient self respect or decency to step into the shadows, admit defeat and see to their domestic squabbles in the privacy of their own homes. We must partake in the public spectacle as if politics was just I’m A Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here!
    2
  11103. 2
  11104. 2
  11105. 2
  11106. 2
  11107. 2
  11108. 2
  11109. 2
  11110. 2
  11111. 2
  11112. 2
  11113. 2
  11114. 2
  11115. 2
  11116. 2
  11117. 2
  11118. 2
  11119. 2
  11120. 2
  11121. 2
  11122. 2
  11123. 2
  11124. 2
  11125. 2
  11126. 2
  11127. 2
  11128. 2
  11129. 2
  11130. 2
  11131. 2
  11132. 2
  11133. 2
  11134. 2
  11135. 2
  11136. 2
  11137. 2
  11138. 2
  11139. 2
  11140. 2
  11141. 2
  11142. 2
  11143. 2
  11144. 2
  11145.  @thornelderfin  : You misapprehend me. I KNOW HE’S BLUFFING. It is the layman’s, “guess,” about this stuff where the true, “danger,” lies. The real, “risk,” is now; where people are on permanent high alert and have grown exhausted and angry; where it has become clear that Putin’s military information is totally unreliable and he cannot be sure about any of his resources or recourses. A man who, “negotiates,” whilst waving loaded weapons about is going to cause an accident that will claim ALL of our lives. Every last person who KNOWS Putin and has spoken to the press (whether they be former friends, politicians or some form of opponent) says the SAME THING: Putin would pull the nuclear trigger, but only if he thought he would be unharmed by doing so. In other words, he NEVER WILL. I correctly predicted that he was about to issue another nuclear, “threat,” when Biden went to meet with Europe’s heads of state. Kremlin playbook 101: Attempt to intimidate that meeting into not deciding anything too drastic. Meaningless rhetoric. Literally everything out of Putin’s mouth has proved to be the OPPOSITE of truth, from the risible allegation that Zelensky was some species of Jewish, “Nazi,” to, “I do not intend to invade Ukraine,” on the day he invades Ukraine. So, knowing that what he says is meaningless, what are we left with? The evidence of his history. Believe what he’s DONE, not what he says. And every last action he’s taken thus far is the classic act of a man who’s actually MORE desperate to survive than most Ukrainians! He will go as far as he dares, possibly using chemical weapons on his way out of Ukraine - especially if he loses Crimea and Donbas - and we should be prepared for that possibility. But I don’t believe in, “hunches,” either. Sometimes, it’s fleeing the danger that CREATES the danger. Giving in to a bully’s protection racket is a case in point. We may well die in a nuclear conflagration. But if we do, it will be one that started by accident, because people were not willing to face down a tyrant at the crucial moment. NOT because he meant to commit the largest murder suicide in history. That is 100% certain.
    2
  11146. 2
  11147. 2
  11148. 2
  11149. 2
  11150. 2
  11151. 2
  11152. 2
  11153. 2
  11154. 2
  11155. 2
  11156. Karsten : It’s well known, to those who read and can tell the truth from a lie, that Putin has always wanted to bring down America. Apart from the US being the Prime Target of all Soviet Countries, in the Cold War, their actual, “Defeat,” in 1989, has left a bitterness in political Russia, ever since. They lived in relative poverty, and were squeezed, economically, by America, for generations; all to fight a war that they ultimately lost. Putin grew up in that system, and rose in its ranks, hating the West, and seeing it as his adversary. In his autobiography, Putin devotes precisely TWO LINES to his alleged, “change in ideology,” from Communism, to Capitalism. The Truth is, he has nothing to say about it because, like ALL Soviet KGB agents, “ideology,” was a luxury that the citizens had; NOT them. He’s never HAD a, “political belief,” except in that which makes him stronger. He has a middling education, but his experience in mob violence, working hand in glove with the Russian Mafia, and his personal record of theft and state sanctioned murder, has carved out a hard, chiselled, shrewd and dangerous adversary. Trump is like a Kitten in his hands, and the only thing they have in common, is the fact that neither of them believe in ANYTHING, and they would both rape and then eat their own grandmothers to get ahead, and LAUGH while they did it. Both sociopaths. But, Putin is dangerous because he’s clever. Not a genius, but shrewd, like most gang bosses. In Russia, that’s enough . . . He will DESTROY America, if he can. And, he has destroyed far more than people realise . . . ✌️
    2
  11157. 2
  11158. 2
  11159. G Steele : That was the PERFECT comment, sir. It says it all and leads us to the natural, chilling conclusion. Not, “who,” is still supporting the Trumps, but, “WHY,” they continue to do it? It’s patently clear that not even his Cult actually, “believes,” in him. They are Faking their, “belief.” If we set aside the paid, foreign Trolls (about 50% or more of the Cult), the very, VERY stupid (around 5-10% of the Cult) and the GOP, who are politicians and, therefore inherently evil, but outside of the Cult Proper; we are still left with a significant number of Americans who KNOW Trump is all the things you say, and more, but don’t care. Why? My conclusion is complex, but I’ll skip to the outcome: The have been convinced, by their Propaganda outlets that, in a Binary System, it would be a, “Good thing,” to permanently eliminate the opposition. The idea of a Dictatorship, doesn’t phase them, because they’re dumb enough to think it will be, “their,” Dictatorship. They don’t see that THEY will be its primary victims. And, when you’ve been convinced that your opponents (fellow Americans) are worse than America’s enemies, anyway, they will happily betray their country, half-convinced that they are somehow, “saving it,” from the, “brown menace,” “open borders,” and all that other mythology that Fox spews out. They had to keep going back to Fox for comfort, at first, who kept telling them that they hadn’t committed the worst mistake in their lives, and that there was a, “good reason,” for all the treachery and betrayals of Trump. And, while they were watching, very skilled Propagandists filled them with hate, racism, hysteria, and loathing. What’s the ONE THING that would convince you, to keep supporting the man who’s stealing your mother’s life savings? The idea that he will at least protect your mom from the guys who want to kill her, I guess? It’s the Propaganda outlets who have the most to answer for, in all this. And, when the Cult, finally discovers that Donny has betrayed THEM, through his Tax Returns, among other things, those same Propaganda outlets will become the focus of the Cult’s BLAME. Rightly too. But, they know this and are fighting for their own lives. So, like Barr, Pompeo, at al, they have gotten themselves dirtied up and compromised. They know that Trump’s survival and their own are the SAME THING. So, they will literally say and do ANYTHING, as the End Game plays out. As, I don’t doubt, we will see. These people Fake Believe, because they HAVE TO. The Cult leaders, because the alternative is their DEMISE. And, the followers, because, like any other victim of the Dead Money Scam (nearly ALL of the followers have donated money, by now) people will do ANYTHING to avoid public shaming. And, having to hear, “the left,” (which includes Conservatives, like me, if you’re opposed to Trump) saying, “We told you so,” is as bad as it gets, for them. Sorry to be so long winded, but you summed it up, so beautifully, I had to share my thoughts with you. 😉✌️👍
    2
  11160. 2
  11161. 2
  11162. 2
  11163. 2
  11164. 2
  11165. 2
  11166. 2
  11167. 2
  11168. 2
  11169. 2
  11170. 2
  11171. 2
  11172. 2
  11173. 2
  11174. 2
  11175. 2
  11176. 2
  11177. 2
  11178. 2
  11179. 2
  11180. 2
  11181. 2
  11182. 2
  11183. 2
  11184. 2
  11185. 2
  11186. 2
  11187. 2
  11188. 2
  11189. 2
  11190. 2
  11191. 2
  11192. 2
  11193. 2
  11194. 2
  11195. 2
  11196. 2
  11197. 2
  11198. 2
  11199. 2
  11200. 2
  11201. 2
  11202. 2
  11203. 2
  11204. 2
  11205. 2
  11206. 2
  11207. It’s the one thing that people are bound to pay out for, as they cannot afford to, “take their business elsewhere.” Pubs, restaurants, supermarkets, etc, etc, simply have to pay their staff. They have no alternatives. Early in honeymoon period is the perfect time to introduce a policy that will be popular with just about everyone but a minority of mid-level business owners and chain store lobbyists who shouldn’t be getting private access to policy makers anyway. Dismantling the current lobby system is another thing that should go hand in hand with this. Yes, charities, concerned citizens and issues-based collective groups should have a mechanism by which to make representations to parliament. But, aren’t we ALL heartily SICK of, “think tanks,” which are nothing more than Masonic Lodges of rich people, looking to buy people like Liz Truss, Boris Johnson and Richi Sunack, for their private ownership collections? We need BRUTAL laws, swiftly enforced, against private businesses seeking advantage through illegal lobbying! They are DESTROYING Britain. Our water companies are NOT, “privatised,” as there is NO COMPETITION! Why bother to stop raw sewage getting into British water when no competitors are able to offer to do a better job, you only drink imported water and you barely visit Britain anyway, living in a none-dom country? Same with the rail networks. Lots of little fiefdoms that don’t compete, but just OWN their patches! It’s oligarchy, Russian style, and it’s leading us down a Yeltsin style toilet!
    2
  11208. 2
  11209. Putin has shown that he ALWAYS backs down, every single time he has faced a genuine, serious, direct challenge. I honestly think the safest move for the world would be to demilitarise a zone around the Zaporizhzhia Power Station, create a no fly zone over that demilitarised area, and fly in volunteer experts to de-mine the place, and put in a team that can relieve the, by now, frayed and exhausted people who have been held hostage to manage the plant. It should be NATO’s absolute priority, shouldn’t it? An explosion, or leak, from Zaporizhzhia won’t just destroy Ukraine and a sizeable part of Russia, but the cloud could reach North America. In the worst case scenario, it would be 64 times bigger and more lethal than Chernobyl! Simply putting mines in there is already an act of terrorism and threat to the entire Northern hemisphere! They have shown they are stupid and desperate enough, as the blowing of the dam demonstrated. NATO’s virtual silence about this is utterly disturbing, as though they WANT a nuclear disaster? Putin is getting ALL of the, “value,” out of his nukes, right now, by milking western fears. That’s the ONLY, “bang for his buck,” he can get out of nukes, and he KNOWS THIS! But, we are creating the environment in which ACCIDENTS HAPPEN! And Russia has the worst record in history for nuclear accidents, both military and civilian! When they blew the dam, half of Russia’s own troops did not know it had happened and did not get out of the way in time, losing millions of dollars worth of vital equipment. So, it’s quite possible that someone accidentally set off those mines! WHY are we just WAITING for Russia to make another mistake??? Keep in mind that the Ukraine invasion was only the first giant miscalculation of SO MANY that came after up to now. Russia’s biggest weapon blew up in their face: the Wagner group. So, we already KNOW Putin’s judgement is appalling! And every hesitation of the west has been taken by Putin as an invitation to commit another atrocity! It’s time we called Russia’s bluff! NATO should, AT THE VERY LEAST, warn Russia about Zaporizhzhia and spell out the consequences of the nuclear terrorism that he is ALREADY subjecting us to!!!
    2
  11210. 2
  11211. 2
  11212. 2
  11213. 2
  11214. 2
  11215. 2
  11216. 2
  11217. 2
  11218. 2
  11219. 2
  11220. 2
  11221. 2
  11222. 2
  11223. 2
  11224. 2
  11225. 2
  11226. 2
  11227. 2
  11228. 2
  11229. 2
  11230. 2
  11231. 2
  11232. 2
  11233. 2
  11234. 2
  11235. 2
  11236. 2
  11237. 2
  11238. 2
  11239. 2
  11240. 2
  11241. 2
  11242. 2
  11243. 2
  11244. 2
  11245. 2
  11246. 2
  11247. 2
  11248. 2
  11249. 2
  11250. 2
  11251. 2
  11252. 2
  11253. 2
  11254. 2
  11255. 2
  11256. 2
  11257. 2
  11258. 2
  11259. 2
  11260. 2
  11261. 2
  11262. 2
  11263. 2
  11264. 2
  11265. 2
  11266. 2
  11267. 2
  11268. 2
  11269. 2
  11270. 2
  11271. 2
  11272. 2
  11273. 2
  11274. 2
  11275. 2
  11276. 2
  11277. 2
  11278. 2
  11279. 2
  11280. 2
  11281. 2
  11282. 2
  11283. 2
  11284. 2
  11285. 2
  11286. It’s such a shame. I tried to get a hold of this movie on Amazon Prime, but there wasn’t even a copy to buy on that channel. In the end I had to buy a copy from America and have it sent across the pond to the UK. It wasn’t cheap, but it was well worth it. These smaller, independent movies get a raw deal as far as distribution goes. If this film was better advertised, better known, it would have been Oscar nominated for sure, along with its lead actor, Tim Blake Nelson, whose depths and skills were a sight to behold. Fans of Unforgiven, Hombre, Open Range and The Wild Bunch will be especially rewarded by the skill of the script writing in this shoestring classic. But any script is only as good as the performances that deliver it and there are no flaws to be found in any one of them. The direction is thoughtful, confidently paced (for a first time movie director) and thought provoking, the cinematography almost alchemical in the film’s ability to draw your eye to the right places at the right time, whilst juxtaposing the same scenery with itself to make it majestic in one moment and starkly baron the next, fitting the mood of each scene with precision. And the sparing use of a powerful, if understated, score just works to enhance the moment to moment emotion without the audience being conscious of the intercession. A small masterpiece, like a pocket sized Rembrandt, to take out and show to those special friends with an appreciative eye. You just know they’ll want their own copy once they’ve seen it. Which is all the praise a movie like this needs. I so look forward to more from this director, Potsy Ponciroli. An obscure name to conjure with. Destined to become a household name? If he maintains this calibre of work, for sure.
    2
  11287. 2
  11288. 2
  11289. 2
  11290. 2
  11291. 2
  11292. 2
  11293. 2
  11294. 2
  11295. 2
  11296. 2
  11297. 2
  11298. 2
  11299. 2
  11300. 2
  11301. 2
  11302. 2
  11303. 2
  11304. 2
  11305. 2
  11306. 2
  11307. 2
  11308. 2
  11309. 2
  11310. 2
  11311. 2
  11312. 2
  11313. 2
  11314. 2
  11315. 2
  11316. 2
  11317. 2
  11318. 2
  11319. 2
  11320. 2
  11321. 2
  11322. 2
  11323. 2
  11324. 2
  11325. 2
  11326. 2
  11327. 2
  11328. 2
  11329. 2
  11330. 2
  11331. 2
  11332. 2
  11333. 2
  11334. 2
  11335. 2
  11336. 2
  11337. 2
  11338. 2
  11339. 2
  11340. 2
  11341. 2
  11342. 2
  11343. 2
  11344. 2
  11345. 2
  11346. 2
  11347. 2
  11348. 2
  11349. 2
  11350. 2
  11351. 2
  11352. 2
  11353. 2
  11354. 2
  11355. 2
  11356. 2
  11357. 2
  11358. 2
  11359. 2
  11360. 2
  11361. 2
  11362. 2
  11363. 2
  11364. 2
  11365. 2
  11366. 2
  11367. 2
  11368. 2
  11369. 2
  11370. 2
  11371. 2
  11372. 2
  11373. 2
  11374. Oh, I can tell you who is better off because of Brexit. Those business, “insiders,” who got tip offs from inside Westminster and who, “shorted,” (bet against) the Pound on the international markets. They made a killing and went back for seconds when Liz Truss told her, “think tanks,” all about her insane Neo-Liberal plan to turn Britain’s entire economy over to the business owners. One cannot help wondering how much of that was her and Kwasi Kwarteng and how much of it was the brainwashing of those quangos and far right infiltration units that she spent all of her free time plotting with? Because she really behaved like a Manchurian Candidate throughout her mercifully brief tenure. But we must never be tempted to fall for the line that, just because the country has been haemorrhaging money, someone in-country hasn’t been profiting. That way, madness lies. We often think policy makers are being wilfully self destructive and even illogical, but there’s always an evil method to their madness. And, of course, Boris profited immensely, as he was able to back-stab his way to power, which he would have sustained, even (dare I say) maintained to this day with laurels to polish, if only he’d had just enough of an IQ not to mess it up, so wilfully and in such an entitled, spoiled, idiotically callous fashion. But he did profit by Brexit, along with all those who hung on his coat tails, and whom we witness publishing bitter memoirs or galavanting in jungles to be tormented by the British viewing public. At least the people who vote to toss a former MP into a pit of black widows, or to eat a rhino’s testicles, know their votes have a more meaningful outcome (certainly more gratifying) than general enfranchisement has granted them in the last 20 years.
    2
  11375. 2
  11376. 2
  11377. 2
  11378. 2
  11379. 2
  11380. 2
  11381. 2
  11382. 2
  11383. 2
  11384. 2
  11385. 2
  11386. 2
  11387. 2
  11388. 2
  11389. 2
  11390. 2
  11391. 2
  11392. 2
  11393. 2
  11394. 2
  11395. 2
  11396. 2
  11397. 2
  11398. 2
  11399. 2
  11400. 2
  11401. 2
  11402. 2
  11403. 2
  11404. 2
  11405. 2
  11406. 2
  11407. 2
  11408. 2
  11409. 2
  11410. 2
  11411. 2
  11412. 2
  11413. 2
  11414. 2
  11415. 2
  11416. 2
  11417. 2
  11418. 2
  11419. 2
  11420. 2
  11421. 2
  11422. 2
  11423. 2
  11424. 2
  11425. 2
  11426. 2
  11427. 2
  11428. 2
  11429. 2
  11430. 2
  11431. 2
  11432. 2
  11433. 2
  11434. 2
  11435. 2
  11436. 2
  11437. 2
  11438. 2
  11439. 2
  11440. 2
  11441. 2
  11442. 2
  11443. 2
  11444. 2
  11445. 2
  11446. 2
  11447. 2
  11448. 2
  11449. 2
  11450. 2
  11451. 2
  11452. 2
  11453. 2
  11454. 2
  11455. 2
  11456. 2
  11457. 2
  11458. 2
  11459. 2
  11460. 2
  11461. 2
  11462. 2
  11463. 2
  11464. 2
  11465. 2
  11466. 2
  11467. 2
  11468. 2
  11469. 2
  11470. 2
  11471. 2
  11472. 2
  11473. 2
  11474. 2
  11475. 2
  11476. 2
  11477. 2
  11478.  @hutsuls  : Appreciated. But, rather than going down a rabbit hole of conspiracy theorists, what I actually want to understand is why HE specifically chooses to, “believe,” this extraordinary thing. I doubt I will be persuaded, but I want to know what specifically persuaded HIM? Who HIS sources are? BTW, I am not, “shouting,” those alt-cap words, but I have no way to put italics or underlining into my text. There are probably a million different theories about how, when and where just about every famous person has died, been abducted or been replaced by lizard people on the web, so I wouldn’t have any problem constructing a theory of my own, collating all of my, “sources,” and building a web page called, “I’m right dot com @, ‘educate yourself!!!’ for the insecure bubble dwellers incorporated,” and have my own following and donation pages by sundown. I’m just too old and too bored with all that rubbish to bother. I am simply going to repeat the question, each time I witness him making this assertion. Though probably way more briefly in future. It’s HIS reasoning I’m after and which, incidentally, I believe we are all entitled to, since Prof Wilson is a professional educator, broadcasting to the public, with a significantly large, consistent (if not, “loyal”) audience. He of all people ought to know that he has a responsibility to that audience. You just can’t go around saying stuff like that without offering a shred of evidence to back up your assertions! He has criticised many others for doing the same thing.
    2
  11479. 2
  11480. 2
  11481. 2
  11482. 2
  11483. 2
  11484. 2
  11485. 2
  11486. 2
  11487. 2
  11488. 2
  11489. 2
  11490. 2
  11491. 2
  11492. 2
  11493. 2
  11494. 2
  11495. 2
  11496. 2
  11497. 2
  11498. 2
  11499. 2
  11500. 2
  11501. 2
  11502. 2
  11503. 2
  11504. 2
  11505. 2
  11506. 2
  11507. 2
  11508. 2
  11509. And that is precisely why science has hit a brick wall and been stuck for about 20 years on the issues of Dark Matter and Dark Energy. Because physics and wondered into the realms of philosophy, not science. Worse still, it has done so for largely disingenuous reasons. I’m kinda late to this party but, for what it’s worth . . . It is true that science has nothing to say about, “God.” Certainly not the God of the three main faiths that share the same original Jehovah. In the same way that physics has nothing to say about an individual’s personal taste in music, or to explain why we’re happy or sad. And that works both ways. While one’s personal faith might inform a scientist’s personal approach to their work, their relationships within the scientific community, or the type of physics they are interested in, God will not show up in their equations, nor should He. I take issue, only in part, with one thing you said. Dark Energy is my exemplar to explain why. People assume it exists, because of observed phenomena, but they might be investigating something that is not even there, or real in a physical sense? It could be an effect of gravity that has not yet been discovered, or any one of several other hypotheses that have been suggested by great minds? Yet, we investigate it, because we want to understand the universe better and settle on a universally understood theory, which would benefit all of science and, ultimately, all of human kind. You will say, “Yes. But that is a scientific response to a real, observable phenomena in the universe, which science has something to say about.” But, my answer would be that there are phenomena which are genuinely, objectively experienced in the universe, which could be caused by something outside of our time space continuum, like Dark Energy, that could be caused by a knowing, all powerful, “god-like,” consciousness. Science cannot rule that out, despite the fact that there is no hypothesis for investigating it directly. That being said, though science has nothing to say about God and God has nothing to say about hard science, all I’m suggesting is that, once we start using science to refute the existence of God, we have done a disservice to both science and people of faith. On the one hand, we are ruling out the possibility of something, without any evidence to support that stance: attempting to prove a negative, which is by its nature, impossible. And, on the other hand, we are making God a preoccupation of science, whilst arguing that God has no place in science. If scientists believe there’s no place for God in the physics, they fail to see the fallacy of their own placing of God at the centre of the science, in a vain attempt to prove a negative. That’s comes off as a bad faith exercise, and somewhat oppressive to people of faith, don’t you think? Scientists need to leave God alone, if they truly have no belief in him. A trivial point, you think? If you think that, you’re failing to see why physics has hit a brick wall in the last 20 or so years. Instead of doing the science they get paid to do, physicists (not all of them, obviously) have devoted themselves to the disputation of faith, spending time, money and other resources on ever increasingly extravagant hypotheses, which are reaching a breaking point of sheer lunacy, if you ask me! “Many Worlds?” Really? An entire structure of, “scientific,” thinking, upon which millions have now been spent, despite there being ZERO proof for any of it! Sure, there are elegant mathematic theorems, etc, but all of them are fatally flawed when any attempt is made to apply them to the real world. An infinite number of dimensions, stretching out forever, from every single decision point of every living creature, which would make one minute of one day create so many separate universes springing into existence (out of thin vacuum) that their number is literally incalculable; yet bigger than the number of electrons in the known universe? Give me a break! It’s a philosophy, not a scientific hypothesis, and what’s more, it is far less plausible than the notion of a god. So yes, I would agree that the two spheres of human endeavour, “faith,” and, “science,” have NOTHING to say to each other. But, instead of fallaciously trying to rid god from the equations, why don’t scientists get their own message, and leave God alone? If they stuck to the observable universe, instead of wasting vast sums on colliders, we might have all had our flying cars by now, floating on a cloud of Dark Matter, repelling the effects of gravity? I mean, who knows? Does it really require a new, enlightened generation before science can take its next paradigm shift, back to real physics? . . . ✌️
    2
  11510. 2
  11511. 2
  11512. 2
  11513. 2
  11514. 2
  11515. 2
  11516. 2
  11517. 2
  11518. 2
  11519. 2
  11520. 2
  11521. 2
  11522. 2
  11523. 2
  11524. 2
  11525. 2
  11526. 2
  11527. 2
  11528. 2
  11529. 2
  11530. 2
  11531. 2
  11532. 2
  11533. Jerry W : Let’s face it? The entire administration, from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, have ALL colluded with the crimes of this administration, and they ALL KNOW that Trump would, “rat them out,” if he was unseated, indicted and went to jail with his whole family. They have literally SHOWN America that they will RIG the coming, “elections,” with Putin’s help, because they have decided they would be prefer to be a part of the new Russian model of fake, “democracy,” than s-end the rest of their lives in cells, contemplating the historic infamy that will always be attached to their names in the same way that Hitler’s goons are. And, the WORST part of it all? Because WE, the people, just CAN’T bring ourselves to admit the Republic has FALLEN, we cling to our hope of a, “free and fair election,” which makes us CONSPIRATORS, buying time for the Dictatorship to consolidate its strength, prepare its excuses for when the paper ballots don’t match the computer ballots in key states, and organise intimidation squads to swamp the polling stations. Modern democracies follow the same pattern all over the globe, because the citizens always think it could never happen in their own country. Only a Revolution could save America now. The carrot of a future, “remedy,” just around the next bend, has been the perfect (Putin) scam, keeping the populace docile. They simply CANNOT AND WILL NOT allow you to, “vote,” them out now??? Stop colluding with their LIES, America? You’re giving away your freedom, for the dumbest, most OBCENE Putin Puppet in history! . . . SMH
    2
  11534. 2
  11535. 2
  11536. 2
  11537. 2
  11538. 2
  11539. 2
  11540. 2
  11541. 2
  11542. 2
  11543. 2
  11544. 2
  11545. 2
  11546. 2
  11547. 2
  11548. 2
  11549. 2
  11550. 2
  11551. 2
  11552. 2
  11553. We don’t want the BBC doing investigative work, do we? Exploring the motives and workings of our institutions and government, might leave too many people being informed? I 100% believe that this cutback is a direct result of pressure from our Tory, “government.” There is a direct correlation between the government’s sudden radio silence about the BBC and that institution’s sudden apparent silence on any news that looks bad for the Tories. We have gone from almost daily attacks on the BBC, even from the Dispatch Box, continually threatening the licence fee, occurring all the way up to Boris Johnson’s tenure at Downing Street, to this apparent acquiescence on the part of the Beeb, frequently quashing headlines that would embarrass the government, demonstrating appalling pro-government biases (which themselves have grabbed headlines) and having the old boy network appointees quietly slipped into positions of leadership throughout the whole organisation. The irony, of course, is that people like me, who were once fierce defenders of that license fee, find the best argument for ending it in their becoming a propaganda mouthpiece for whatever government happens to be in power! It has been truly distressing to watch the decline in standards of this precious jewel in the nation’s crown. The three things that speak most loudly to me of, “Britishness,” have always been 1) Our independent judicial system, still able to make judgements that can even stymy the worst laid plans of Prime Ministers, as both Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak have found, to their chagrin. 2) Our NHS, providing healthcare from cradle to grave, FREE at the point of need; still heroically standing, however embattled. And 3) Our independent journalism, with its finest exemplar, setting the standard that the world still follows (or aspires to) in the BBC. An organisation with literal global reach, scope and influence. People huddled in trenches in some God forsaken African war zone or East European war zone, or some Middle Eastern hell hole, dodging missiles and trying to find out what’s really going on out there so they can decide what to do next, do NOT tune in to Fox, CNN, Al Jazeera or the RT propaganda outlets. They tune in to the BBC World Service, to get unalloyed, simple FACTS, coming from gallant journalists worthy of the name, often risking their lives or their freedom, just to get the TRUTH out to the world about matters of ultimate urgency. And our government has done more to undermine those three institutions in the last 13 years than any previous government in the last 13 decades! This cut back will lead directly back to some influential Tory, or Tories, I have no doubt.
    2
  11554. 2
  11555. 2
  11556. 2
  11557. 2
  11558. 2
  11559. 2
  11560. 2
  11561. 2
  11562. 2
  11563. 2
  11564. 2
  11565. 2
  11566. 2
  11567. 2
  11568. 2
  11569. 2
  11570. 2
  11571. 2
  11572. 2
  11573. 2
  11574. 2
  11575. 2
  11576. 2
  11577. 2
  11578. 2
  11579. 2
  11580. 2
  11581. 2
  11582. 2
  11583. 2
  11584. 2
  11585. 2
  11586. 2
  11587. 2
  11588. 2
  11589. 2
  11590. 2
  11591. 2
  11592. 2
  11593. 2
  11594. 2
  11595. 2
  11596. 2
  11597. 2
  11598. 2
  11599. 2
  11600. 2
  11601. 2
  11602. 2
  11603. 2
  11604. 2
  11605. 2
  11606. 2
  11607. 2
  11608. 2
  11609. 2
  11610. 2
  11611. 2
  11612. 2
  11613. 2
  11614. 2
  11615. 2
  11616. 2
  11617. 2
  11618. 2
  11619. 2
  11620. 2
  11621. 2
  11622. 2
  11623. 2
  11624. 2
  11625. 2
  11626. 2
  11627. 2
  11628. 2
  11629. 2
  11630. 2
  11631. 2
  11632. 2
  11633. 2
  11634. 2
  11635. 2
  11636. 2
  11637. 2
  11638. 2
  11639. 2
  11640. 2
  11641. 2
  11642. 2
  11643. 2
  11644. 2
  11645. 2
  11646. 2
  11647. 2
  11648. 2
  11649. 2
  11650. 2
  11651. 2
  11652. 2
  11653. 2
  11654. 2
  11655. 2
  11656. 2
  11657. 2
  11658. 2
  11659. 2
  11660. 2
  11661. 2
  11662. 2
  11663. 2
  11664. 2
  11665. 2
  11666. 2
  11667. 2
  11668. 2
  11669. 2
  11670. 2
  11671. 2
  11672. 2
  11673. 2
  11674. 2
  11675. 2
  11676. 2
  11677. 2
  11678. 2
  11679. 2
  11680. 2
  11681. Upper Echelon Gamers : OK, what the writers did with CoD was wrong. No question. That kind of revisionism can be dangerous, if it’s not clear that it’s fiction. But, the fact is, you don’t KNOW, “WHY,” they did it. You proffer NOTHING, in terms of, “evidence,” but have a LOT of, “conclusions,” anyway. No quotes; no statements from the makers; have you even ASKED them about it? Or, seen any other journalist’s insight into WHY they did it? Because, if you have ANY facts, you didn’t put them in this video? You believe you see an agenda at work, but this time, I don’t see it AT ALL. All you HAVE is your emotional response, articulate though it may be, it’s still only that. I guess I’m seeing the Balance disappear from your videos, which saddens me. I got it, early on, when I started watching your vids, that you’re not impressed by the left, (I consider myself conservative) but I had you down as a centrist, with the journalistic integrity to genuinely see facts in isolation, without needing to put a spin on them. In this case, your GUESS work, ascribing the, “motivations,” about which you had NO WAY of, “knowing,” about, but keep referring to as this, “growing tendency,” you see everywhere, but are unable to substantiate, smacks of paranoia or deliberate propaganda. If you could substantiate it, I may well have agreed with you. But, no comments by the writers, no interviews, not even a, “rumour,” as to their agenda; no nothing. You can’t speak to WHY they did it, only that they did, but you decided you, “know why,” and complained about that, instead of finding out. That bothers me This is not the standard I have came to expect from you. I’m still an admirer, for all that. But, I feel somewhat guarded about that, now. Please don’t take a, “side,” in these culture wars? Your VALUE is in your journalism. Once you represent one side, over another, (regardless of which) your value is shot, and would be next to impossible to restore. As John Marston would say, “I implore you!” Be better than that. You usually are ✌️👍
    2
  11682. 2
  11683. 2
  11684. 2
  11685. 2
  11686. 2
  11687. 2
  11688. 2
  11689. 2
  11690. 2
  11691. 2
  11692. 2
  11693. 2
  11694. 2
  11695. 2
  11696. 2
  11697. 2
  11698. 2
  11699. 2
  11700. 2
  11701. 2
  11702. 2
  11703. 2
  11704. 2
  11705. 2
  11706. 2
  11707. 2
  11708. 2
  11709. 2
  11710. 2
  11711. 2
  11712. 2
  11713. 2
  11714. 2
  11715. 2
  11716. 2
  11717. 2
  11718. 2
  11719. It’s a shame, when you think about what Ryan Johnson was trying to do? It, “could have,” been a brilliant, challenging new story, added to the cannon, in which the big question, “could have been,” about that theme, of whether the Force had an actual, “light side,” and, “dark side,” at all, or if that was just a construct that people mistakenly put on it, which was why it always lead to conflict. Imagine the Lovecraftian HORROR of the force being dispassionate, alien and utterly uncaring in the way that physics is to thought? A Universe that DOESN’T CARE, “could have been,” what Snoke embodied; not really on either side but his own. He could have had a background and story developed around that, and the whole trilogy could have been focussed on it. The first movie, with all its fan service would have needed little tweaking, but the second movie could have had the cliffhanger ending, in which Snoke appears to have won, by destroying BOTH hero and villain! In the way that Empire seemed bleak, but was the best movie of the first Trilogy. Making way for the Dark and Light sides of the Force to unite in the third movie, to defeat the whole idea of a Universe that doesn’t care, with the sacrifice of one major hero and, of course, the sacrifice of one major dark side character: the light-sider being someone from the original cannon (Han Solo?) and of course, we all know who the dark-sider would be, right? His son, Kilo Ren. Imagine the possibilities of that? . . . Ah well . . .
    2
  11720. 2
  11721. 2
  11722. 2
  11723. 2
  11724. 2
  11725. 2
  11726. 2
  11727. 2
  11728. 2
  11729. 2
  11730. 2
  11731. 2
  11732. 2
  11733. TEFLON DON : Other people commit murders too, so maybe we should just fling open the doors on Death Row? Not that we can expect anything other than specious, “logic,” from the broken down El Presidente. That is, when can even make a coherent sentence in the first place? But, can we be REAL for one minute? They are NOT going to risk a real, “vote,” in 2020, so that Trump and his whole family ends up in JAIL after literally countless indictments? They KNOW he will, “rat them all out,” cutting ANY deal he can, as it will be the first time in his life that he can’t, “counter-sue,” or pull any of his usual, shit. Which means we would see the ENTIRE ADMINISTRATION go to JAIL. You would have to be clinically INSANE not to KNOW they have already RIGGED the 2020, “Elections.” Acting like it even MATTERS just, “who,” gets to lead the, “opposition,” at this point, is like caring what color the bullet is that is about to enter your brain! You are just buying them time to consolidate their Putin Style Dictatorship, in which the populace are kept docile by being allowed to go through the motions of, “voting,” in, “elections.” All they will be is a Data-Gathering exercise, helping the GOP determine which States and which individuals they’re going to TARGET next. It’s TIME, America. Have a Revolution, or accept that the Republic has FALLEN? Jus DON’T help the Dictatorship, by PRETENDING that you still have a, “democracy”??? The last nail went in that coffin at the FAKED Impeachment . . . Please wake up?
    2
  11734. 2
  11735. 2
  11736. 2
  11737. 2
  11738. 2
  11739. 2
  11740. 2
  11741. 2
  11742. 2
  11743. 2
  11744. 2
  11745. 2
  11746. 2
  11747. 2
  11748. 2
  11749. 2
  11750. 2
  11751. 2
  11752. 2
  11753. 2
  11754. 2
  11755. 2
  11756. 2
  11757. 2
  11758. 2
  11759. 2
  11760. 2
  11761. 2
  11762. 2
  11763. 2
  11764. 2
  11765. 2
  11766. 2
  11767. 2
  11768. 2
  11769. 2
  11770. 2
  11771. 2
  11772. 2
  11773. 2
  11774. 2
  11775. 2
  11776. 2
  11777. 2
  11778. 2
  11779. 2
  11780. 2
  11781. 2
  11782. 2
  11783. 2
  11784. 2
  11785. 2
  11786. 2
  11787. 2
  11788. 2
  11789. 2
  11790. 2
  11791. 2
  11792. 2
  11793. 2
  11794. 2
  11795. 2
  11796. 2
  11797. 2
  11798. 2
  11799. 2
  11800. 2
  11801. 2
  11802. 2
  11803. 2
  11804. 2
  11805. 2
  11806. 2
  11807. 2
  11808. 2
  11809. 2
  11810. 2
  11811. 2
  11812. 2
  11813. 2
  11814. 2
  11815. 2
  11816. 2
  11817. 2
  11818. 2
  11819. 2
  11820. 2
  11821. 2
  11822. 2
  11823. 2
  11824. 2
  11825. 2
  11826. 2
  11827. 2
  11828. 2
  11829. 2
  11830. 2
  11831. 2
  11832. 2
  11833. 2
  11834. 2
  11835. Glad they called out that presenter’s childish attitude toward MSM. How do people with such unsophisticated and blatantly agenda-driven attitudes get to present serious news shows anyway? Note: when they challenged the simplicity and prejudice of his statements and went on to explain why it was dangerous to exploit his platform for undermining the public trust in their news outlets (giving examples too) he quickly retreated back to the story in hand. The refuge of the vacuous is to dodge any adult responsibility and quickly throw up chaff in hopes of avoiding having to be a grown up. I just wish they’d refused to let him off the hook so easily and pressed their points a little harder. The idiot is sawing at the branch he sits on, wishing in his heart that he could command the audiences of Channel 4 or the BBC, but like all populists these days, he is not willing to work for that, do journalism or stand in the cold streets talking to politicians. He wants it handed to him on a plate, resents the fact that it hasn’t been, and his complaints about the adults in the room is that the public treats real news like adult information, instead of, “choosing,” their news and their, “preferred narrative,” as though that could do anything other than harm. If I thought that any grownups were bothering to read my rant, I would go on to explain how it’s rock bottom, lazy labelling epithets like the ones people like him, Liz Truss, Boris Johnson and (famously now) Suella, “Goodness Gracious Me Character,” Braverman use, that merely appeal to the lowest common denominator of political opinion, actively CREATING the Tory party that we have now! By sloganising, ranting and diminishing every serious issue down to a catchphrase of victimised complaint, they have turned the politics of grievance into a way of life. The result is that the Tories have flung open their doors to every closet racist, every far right prepper, every angry sexually inadequate incel, every money grubbing, tax dodging, offshore leach and every single reckless agenda in the country, leaving them with an utterly UNGOVERNABLE party, made up of competing agendas and nothing else! The only thing that unites the Tories right now is their equally ungovernable GREED, coupled with their certain knowledge that they are facing a potential generation in the wilderness, which makes them more DANGEROUS to Britain’s interests than ever! The mere fact that so many Tory MP’s are saying out loud that they want Boris back, while the country looks on in horror and disgust at the very thought of bringing back the man who was DISGRACED out of power this year, tells you all you need to know about how tone deaf, obtuse and egregiously self serving the Tory agenda is now! What can we expect from a party that has been empirically PROVEN to be morally unfit, fiscally irresponsible, behaving politically like neophytes and constantly prepared to bicker in front of cameras about the country’s finances, whilst having NOTHING to say about the threat of DEATH for the vulnerable who cannot afford to heat and eat at the same time!? Well, OBVIOUSLY, they’re going to clean out the shop and loot what remains before they get kicked out! Bankers can expect huge bonuses, businesses will get huge tax breaks, and new laws will be imposed to criminalise anyone who complains about the sheer unfairness of having a bunch of greedy children raiding their futures in front of their faces. Britain’s closing down sale has begun and these goons are going to feather their nests and get away with bloody murder, not to go and hang their heads in shame in some quiet corner of the universe, but to live it large on the lecture circuit, having holidays in exotic locations and emailing editorials to The Sun and The Telegraph from the Algarve, secure in the knowledge of a forthcoming gong, knighthood, seat in The Lords, and/or some cushy, “advisory,” position for a company that only wants the name of an ex-cabinet minister on their doors and letter headings and don’t actually want them to show up for work, except on the odd occasion when they’re getting them to use their Westminster contacts to fix policies for the best financial outcome for their company, regardless of the harm they do to the planet, our rule of law or the country’s future. And all guys like this ignorant pr*ck, presenting a show he’s not qualified to be a guest on, can say is, “Oh, oh, main stream media, mieh mieh mieh,” like the insufferable professional, “victim,” he is! But, no . . . I don’t resent idiots like him being jealous of the adult news organisations in the world, or exploiting his privileged position to cry about how he doesn’t have even more privileges. I just look at him like I would a tumour; You can’t reason with the disease. You can remove it and hope that doing so doesn’t further damage the host, as the screams of entitlement of victimhood will be heard across the nation, no doubt . . . 🙄
    2
  11836. 2
  11837. 2
  11838. 2
  11839. 2
  11840. 2
  11841. 2
  11842. 2
  11843. 2
  11844. 2
  11845. 2
  11846. 2
  11847. 2
  11848. 2
  11849. 2
  11850. 2
  11851. 2
  11852. 2
  11853. 2
  11854. 2
  11855. 2
  11856. 2
  11857. 2
  11858. 2
  11859. 2
  11860. 2
  11861. 2
  11862. 2
  11863. 2
  11864. 2
  11865. 2
  11866. 2
  11867. 2
  11868. 2
  11869. 2
  11870. 2
  11871. 2
  11872. 2
  11873. 2
  11874. 2
  11875. 2
  11876. 2
  11877. 2
  11878. 2
  11879. 2
  11880. 2
  11881. 2
  11882. 2
  11883. 2
  11884. 2
  11885. 2
  11886. 2
  11887. 2
  11888. 2
  11889. 2
  11890. 2
  11891. 2
  11892. 2
  11893. 2
  11894. 2
  11895. 2
  11896. 2
  11897. 2
  11898. 2
  11899. 2
  11900. 2
  11901. 2
  11902. 2
  11903. 2
  11904. Seldon writes with almost brutal frankness and honesty, and with a captivating prose style. He seems to have a co-writer on nearly all of his most recent projects. He self describes his biography of Boris Johnson as a, “cautionary tale of individual and institutional failure,” which was spot on. I was fascinated by the parallels he drew between the careers and personalities of Johnson and Lloyd George, which I found deeply insightful. Contrasting their differences too was salient. He hopes we can learn lessons from contemporary history and I will always give my time and attention to a true believer in history as a project for learning. After all, it was Johnson’s idol, Winston Churchill, who told a journalist that the way to get good at leadership in politics was to study, “History, history and history. Therein lay all the secrets of statecraft.” Therefore, on that basis, I am willing to hear out Seldon’s argument. Like you, I doubt very much if Seldon will convince me that Truss was a better PM than . . . well, frankly, anyone. But, “scatty,” or not; relying on his co-writers or not, he deserves to be heard with an open mind. If Seldon were to stand a serious chance of convincing me, the focus would necessarily have to be on how much, “worse,” Johnson was than I realised, rather than convincing me that Truss had any redeeming characteristics as a political leader. We already know she has literally nothing that she can point to and call an, “achievement.” And she has so much damage to account for, which continues to pass unacknowledged by her or any of her people, let alone apologised for. Her electoral defenestration was as close as we’ll ever get to, “accountability,” with her. But, Seldon will entertain me and enlighten me, whether he convinces me or not. So, I’ll get the audiobook to see me through the home improvements I’m working on and my mornings walking the doggle. It will be worth a listen.
    2
  11905. 2
  11906. 2
  11907. 2
  11908. 2
  11909. 2
  11910. 2
  11911. 2
  11912. 2
  11913. 2
  11914. 2
  11915. 2
  11916. 2
  11917. 2
  11918. 2
  11919. 2
  11920. 2
  11921. 2
  11922. 2
  11923. 2
  11924. 2
  11925. 2
  11926. 2
  11927. 2
  11928. 2
  11929. 2
  11930. 2
  11931. 2
  11932. 2
  11933. 2
  11934. 2
  11935. 2
  11936. 2
  11937. 2
  11938. 2
  11939. 2
  11940. 2
  11941. 2
  11942. 2
  11943. 2
  11944. 2
  11945. 2
  11946. 2
  11947. 2
  11948. 2
  11949. 2
  11950. 2
  11951. 2
  11952. 2
  11953. 2
  11954. 2
  11955. 2
  11956. 2
  11957. 2
  11958. 2
  11959. 2
  11960. 2
  11961. 2
  11962. 2
  11963. 2
  11964. 2
  11965. 2
  11966. 2
  11967. 2
  11968. 2
  11969. 2
  11970. 2
  11971. 2
  11972. 2
  11973. 2
  11974. 2
  11975. 2
  11976. 2
  11977. 2
  11978. 2
  11979. 2
  11980. 2
  11981. 2
  11982. 2
  11983. 2
  11984. 2
  11985. 2
  11986. 2
  11987. 2
  11988. 2
  11989. 2
  11990. 2
  11991. 2
  11992. 2
  11993. 2
  11994. 2
  11995. 2
  11996. 2
  11997. 2
  11998. 2
  11999. 2
  12000. 2
  12001. 2
  12002. 2
  12003. 2
  12004. 2
  12005. 2
  12006. 2
  12007. 2
  12008. 2
  12009. 2
  12010. 2
  12011. 2
  12012. 2
  12013. 2
  12014. 2
  12015. 2
  12016. 2
  12017. 2
  12018. 2
  12019. 2
  12020. 2
  12021. 2
  12022. 2
  12023. 2
  12024. 2
  12025. 2
  12026. 2
  12027. 2
  12028. 2
  12029. 2
  12030. 2
  12031. 2
  12032. 2
  12033. 2
  12034. 2
  12035. 2
  12036. 2
  12037. 2
  12038. 2
  12039. 2
  12040.  @fraserwyllie8840  : I’m no geologist, but I can tell you who employs the best geologists in the world: Shell, BP and Exxon. They found massive reserves off the coast of Crimea, boom! Then in the Donbas region, boom! Now in the west, by the Carpathian Mountains, boom, boom and boom! They say it’s more than Russia’s reserves and, yes; it would take years to drill it, get it pumping and build the pipeline infrastructure. So, Putin doesn’t want to drill it. Who would buy obviously STOLEN reserves anyway? He just needs to ensure NO ONE does. This is an armed robbery, son. And now Putin is realising that the cops aren’t letting him get away with it this time, so he’s doing what he always does: pulling the pin on a grenade and threatening to take us all with him. He’s BLUFFING! But his problem is that accidents happen and one of these days he’s going to drop that grenade and kill us all by MISTAKE! So it’s up to the Russian people to see to regime change now. Clearly the west has decided to put pressure on the oligarchy to sort it out for themselves, like they’ve always done historically. They did it to Lenin, so they’re old hands at this. They fired Khrushchev after the Cuban Missile crisis too. See, my specialty is political history, not geology. And I see that Putin cannot win this one. Because ever since the term, “energy security,” has existed (for over 100 years now) the west has NEVER allowed the east to get control over it. I’m not saying that’s right or wrong. It just is. But, they could save a LOT of lives if they put Putin out of commission now, rather than later. And the, “gratitude,” of western leaders will carry a cash value. Now. Tell me I’m, “wrong,” son? And show your working out? . . . I’ll wait.
    2
  12041. 2
  12042. 2
  12043. 2
  12044. 2
  12045. 2
  12046. 2
  12047. 2
  12048. 2
  12049. 2
  12050. 2
  12051. 2
  12052. 2
  12053. 2
  12054. 2
  12055. 2
  12056. 2
  12057. 2
  12058. 2
  12059. 2
  12060. 2
  12061. 2
  12062. 2
  12063. 2
  12064. 2
  12065. 2
  12066. 2
  12067. 2
  12068. 2
  12069. 2
  12070. 2
  12071. 2
  12072. 2
  12073. 2
  12074. 2
  12075. 2
  12076. 2
  12077. 2
  12078. 2
  12079. 2
  12080. 2
  12081. 2
  12082. 2
  12083. 2
  12084. 2
  12085. 2
  12086. 2
  12087. 2
  12088. 2
  12089. 2
  12090. 2
  12091. 2
  12092. 2
  12093. 2
  12094. 2
  12095. 2
  12096. 2
  12097. 2
  12098. 2
  12099. 2
  12100. 2
  12101. 2
  12102. 2
  12103. 2
  12104. 2
  12105. 2
  12106. 2
  12107. 2
  12108. 2
  12109.  @blackbird5634  : I love my wife, but actually, she’s very different from me. She’s a liberal, whereas I’m a conservative. She’s shy, into gardening and makes me go to church every weekend, despite my issues with, “religion.” Whereas, I like a good conversation with strangers, and I’m happy to sit with a good book and watch my wife enjoying the garden. In our case, our differences attracted, and I can pretty much count on her to have a different political view from mine, in almost all conversations we have with others, rather than reflecting me. She has my back, don’t get me wrong, here? But, where she says, “we kinda’ make up for each other’s deficiencies,” I say, “we enhance one another’s strengths.” So, the short answer is, no. But, I read that thing (can’t remember the title now) about the architect, rapist, sociopath, whom Rand said, “represented the ideal man,” and found it risible. Grammatically flawed and occasionally incomprehensible, ill informed, childishly naive in places, objectively WRONG about how banks, real estate, the law (both criminal and civil) and even the press WORKED. It honestly reads like a teen’s fan fiction, with the occasional flourish, but mostly nonsensical gibberish, and philosophically entitled, hypocritical, ignorant and sociopathic. It took me a YEAR to get through that book, because I promised a friend I would, to settle an argument. Oh boy did I get my revenge, though. I had yellow sticky notes through the whole thing and lectured her on every point, flaw, factual error, grammatical mistake, you name it! See?! Just thinking of it has given me PTSD and a tendency to ramble like her! 😵‍💫 . . . 😉✌️
    2
  12110. 2
  12111. 2
  12112. 2
  12113. 2
  12114. 2
  12115. 2
  12116. 2
  12117. 2
  12118. 2
  12119. 2
  12120. 2
  12121. 2
  12122. 2
  12123. 2
  12124. 2
  12125. 2
  12126. 2
  12127. 2
  12128. 2
  12129. 2
  12130. 2
  12131. 2
  12132. 2
  12133. 2
  12134. 2
  12135. 2
  12136. 2
  12137. 2
  12138. 2
  12139. 2
  12140. 2
  12141. 2
  12142. 2
  12143.  @rebahenderson211  : Totally with you on all of that. The GOP has descended into actual fascism. They carry every significant marker that historians warn us of, from their founding myth being a lie, their permanent, “victimhood,” their racism, their anti-intellectualism, anti-science, anti-truth, to their Qult of personality and their blatant use of violence for political ends. You cannot reason with a fascist, any more than you can reason with a rabid dog. And you are forced to deal with them in the same way: let them go around biting others and spreading their rabid racism, or put them down. It’s way beyond, “politics,” now. They are attempting a Coup and will rob America and the world of freedom if we let them. The only, “politics,” they know is that of the, “talking point,” used with a level of hypocrisy that would make Stalin blush! They are the cancer, and the Republican Party are revealed for what they really are; every bit as bad as trump, pretending to be ashamed of him occasionally, when they’re actually worse, but happy for trump to be the focal point and bullet sponge, so they can disassociate themselves from him, if he gets taken down. They threaten all that is decent in the world and are determined to destroy our democratic republic, at any cost. It is the most urgent threat America has faced since the Civil War itself. Failure is not an option. We have to defeat them in the abject, crushing manner, so as to stomp them out forever. Or there will be no country on Earth in which you and I can argue our differences in politics and challenge each other, politely, knowing we are both on the same side, with different ideas about how to get there. All politics will be over, along with history. It will be 1984 in the living, zombie like, flesh. I only wish there was one iota of exaggeration in my words. You can count on me, to the end. You have my word ✌️👍
    2
  12144. 2
  12145. 2
  12146. 2
  12147. 2
  12148. 2
  12149. 2
  12150. 2
  12151. 2
  12152. 2
  12153. 2
  12154. 2
  12155. 2
  12156. 2
  12157. 2
  12158. 2
  12159. 2
  12160. 2
  12161. 2
  12162. 2
  12163. 2
  12164. 2
  12165. 2
  12166. 2
  12167. 2
  12168. 2
  12169. 2
  12170. 2
  12171. 2
  12172. 2
  12173. 2
  12174. 2
  12175. 2
  12176. Jen Psaki is rapidly becoming a living legend. Her sheer calmness, eloquence and patience in the face of such a hypocritically phrased, bad faith question, is something to behold. I can only imagine her Trumpophile predecessors must be eating their hearts out? This, “journalist,” has the arrogance of the Inquisition, and the temerity to LIE with such casual obtuseness, whilst, “representing,” Christianity!? Psaki is NEVER caught off guard, unprepared; she never raises her voice, or fakes, “outrage;” she’s never Whaddabouting, or pushing at whatever triggered buttons she can find, calculated to get at the, “emotions,” of her president’s opponents. And she CRUSHES the trump trolls by winning over Americans, by never rubbing anyone’s nose in their idiocy, lies, faked concerns, or bad faith attempts at scoring playground points. Her sheer competence, skill and unrivalled knowledge of her topics is unmatched by ANY predecessor I can think of. And, you know WHY she’s SO masterful? It’s because she knows the most valuable lesson in politics: How do you NEVER lose the game? DON’T PLAY! It’s THAT simple. Do your job, and do it better than anyone in history. They can’t land a punch, because you’re not in the boxing ring. They hear the bell and come out flailing, only to find they were punching at air, and somehow knocked themselves out! They come to, look up and Jen Psaki was the Referee the whole time and she’s just called you OUT for the count. She’s my hero. Seriously. I admire her so deeply. ✌️
    2
  12177. 2
  12178. 2
  12179. 2
  12180. 2
  12181. 2
  12182. 2
  12183. 2
  12184. 2
  12185. 2
  12186. 2
  12187. 2
  12188. 2
  12189. 2
  12190. spinalcrackerbox : Again, you are absolutely spot on. The Cohen revelation, about Hannity, will have caused SOME Trump fans some pause, as it explains to many, just WHY he and some others, like Tucker Carlson, have stuck their necks SO FAR OUT that they can NEVER pull them back in, without losing all, “credibility.” We are learning that they are all part of a “Deep State” (ironically) cabal, who’s fortunes and failures are very much bound up in one another’s fates. Though the Russians and the shell company paid, Eastern European Trolls, and the American paid Trolls, all make their numbers look bigger than they REALLY are (by using multiple accounts on various social media outlets and working at it, full time) there will ALWAYS be SOME who will NEVER see the light. Nixon STILL has his followers, to this day! The, “explanation,” for THOSE, “people,” ALWAYS lies in their ULTERIOR MOTIVES: from the Roger Stones of this world, with his freaky tattoo of Nixon on his back, who’s motives were ALWAYS about power, money and influence; to the grunts on the street, who care SO MUCH about guns, race and their DEBTS, that they don’t CARE if the USA becomes a satellite of Russia, so long as they get what THEY want. But, their numbers are CLEARLY small. Otherwise, the GOP WOULDN’T have lost those, “Safe States,” of Virginia, Pennsylvania, Alabama, etc, as I pointed out earlier. I too, would dearly LOVE to have reliable figures, but THAT’S the whole problem. There ARE NO, “reliable figures.” There’s ONLY a war of words
    2
  12191. 2
  12192. 2
  12193. 2
  12194. 2
  12195. 2
  12196. 2
  12197. 2
  12198. 2
  12199. 2
  12200. 2
  12201. 2
  12202. 2
  12203. 2
  12204. 2
  12205. 2
  12206. 2
  12207. 2
  12208. 2
  12209. 2
  12210. 2
  12211. 2
  12212. 2
  12213. 2
  12214. Johnny Mauchline : Eloquently put. The Republic fell in 2019. The funny thing is, the more OBVIOUS that gets, the fewer people will DARE to mention it. That’s how Dictatorship works. We will be forced to, “go through the motions,” by voting in Pre-RIGGED, “elections,” like the 2020 one will be. And, after that, they will consolidate their power, and there won’t be any need for fake, “wars,” to distract us, or the Giuliani Traveling Circus, because there won’t BE anyone left, who dares to point out the OBVIOUS: We’re a Putin Style Dictatorship now. They just need to keep it up, until the Impeachment SHAM is over with. I guarantee BIG distractions on that day: They just don’t want us all looking at a, “trial,” without witnesses, in which evidence is banned, and the, “jury,” consists of the Defendant’s CONSPIRATORS, who would all go to jail if Trump lost his protected presidential status and was forced to, “rat them out,” which he undoubtedly would. Doing THAT is like the GOP ADMITTING that the Republic was wiped out in a COUP, in 2019. It MIGHT cause a second REVOLUTION??? So, you can count on fireworks, probably orchestrated by Putin, with Iran’s cooperation, again; or maybe this time, it’s time to pull out that promised, “surprise,” from North Korea? A little test of their latest missile which will actually WORK for a change, and have an actual intercontinental range for once? That would get us all on the edge of our seats? Well, we let it happen, so . . . Maybe we DESERVE this? . . . Smh
    2
  12215. 2
  12216. 2
  12217. 2
  12218. 2
  12219. 2
  12220. 2
  12221. 2
  12222. 2
  12223. 2
  12224. 2
  12225. 2
  12226. 2
  12227. 2
  12228. 2
  12229. 2
  12230. 2
  12231. 2
  12232. 2
  12233. 2
  12234. 2
  12235. 2
  12236. 2
  12237. 2
  12238. 2
  12239. 2
  12240. 2
  12241. 2
  12242. 2
  12243. 2
  12244. 2
  12245. 2
  12246. 2
  12247. 2
  12248. 2
  12249. 2
  12250. 2
  12251. 2
  12252. 2
  12253. 2
  12254. 2
  12255. 2
  12256. 2
  12257. 2
  12258. 2
  12259. 2
  12260. 2
  12261. 2
  12262. 2
  12263. 2
  12264. 2
  12265. 2
  12266. 2
  12267. 2
  12268. 2
  12269. 2
  12270.  @jaybingham3711  : Well said. I also believe that there ought to be a compulsory foundational year devoted to science history, science philosophy and critical thinking theory. At least for anyone who’s studying to a degree level and plans to have a future in the field. A lot of us overlook the fact that most top scientists are ordinary people who expected to spend the rest of their lives doing science for a company or the government, making a decent living, but never expecting to be thrust into the limelight. Then, these shy, cerebral people find themselves becoming famous, making serious money from their books and lecture tours and being discussed in YouTube videos. They get prestigious awards and are not trained or equipped for the world of, “popular science,” or necessarily have the wherewithal to cope. They are flawed people who, unlike actors, singers, politicians, etc, are not experienced in the field of, “popular opinion,” and don’t have, “managers,” or and entourage to help them cope (or lead them on a path to their own destruction in a tabloid splash about hookers and cocaine😆) so, if they are not supremely well adjusted, they can go a little strange when people start challenging the very work that won them their prizes and the root to all that cash. Critical thinking can go out of the window so fast in some situations. That’s why I like Sabine. She knows she’s going to take a lot of heat for being rational. I don’t always agree with her, but I know she wouldn’t be emotional about that. She would want to hear my argument and then prove me wrong, agree that I’m right, or need to time to think it over and test her equations. That’s a rare quality that I admire, and which I believe needs to be defended at all costs.
    2
  12271. 2
  12272. 2
  12273. 2
  12274. 2
  12275. 2
  12276. 2
  12277. 2
  12278. 2
  12279. 2
  12280. 2
  12281. 2
  12282. 2
  12283. 2
  12284. 2
  12285. 2
  12286. 2
  12287. 2
  12288. 2
  12289. 2
  12290. 2
  12291. 2
  12292. Thank you for exploring Seldon’s book a bit further with us. The mere fact that Truss has the instinct to, “defend,” her record and not to, “account,” for it, even APOLOGISE for it, shows more of that, “personal and institutional failure,” that Seldon refers to in the introduction to his book on Johnson that is characteristic of the current brand of Tory and speaks to the core of what is really wrong with them. For over a decade now the Tories have fostered this culture of thin skinned, defensive aggression in their ranks and lauding these qualities in their leaders, aping the Republican manner of doing politics and Americanising their approach to every topic. This aggressive, divisive and unreasoning approach has rendered actual debate impossible and dialectics out of the question. And we do need a healthy, capable opposition that can hold the government’s feet to the fire on important policy issues, rather than squandering every opportunity by either uniformly running off to America, rattling their begging tins at their Republican puppeteers, or writing op eds for the domestic client press that read as being wholly out of touch with reality, let alone the British people, set on driving further wedges into society. If you were to ask me, “What makes a, ‘good,’ politician, Ash?” I would probably describe someone with a POSITIVE vision, FUTURE FOCUSSED, whilst being realistic about the present, well EDUCATED in law and history, but most of all, like Winston Churchill in 1941, able to UNITE the British people with a sense of joined destiny, purpose and prosperity. I don’t think I need say much more about those politicians who do the diametric opposite of what I just described. I need only say, “Liz Truss,” and the point is made. That is why, for me, Seldon’s book on Truss will face a tall order convincing me that Truss was not the worst PM Britain has ever had since Walpole first, sort of, created the post. But, because he believes in the salutary, educational value of contemporary history, I look forward to reading (listening to) his book.
    2
  12293. 2
  12294. 2
  12295. 2
  12296. 2
  12297. Preston Sulik : It’s the very fact that you feel it necessary to Troll so repeatedly and so angrily that reveals what are, son. You’re only job is to provide, “plausibility,” to the faked polls, and make it look as though there, “could be,” a, “majority,” of Americans who support the Trump Monarchy, when we all know that the vast majority wants him in jail. Russia is already busy, inside our election technology, in key states, and the GOP made the mistake of ADMITTING Russia is inside Florida’s election computers. Even though they’ve been trying to bury that fact, with threats of jail under terror legislation, ever since, for anyone who even MENTIONS it. It’s BECAUSE of people like you, son, that we KNOW you’re scared. You act scared. But, the one, single comfort that people like me can get from all this, is not getting to say, “we told you so,” though that will be a larf. It’s the knowledge that all the Trolls on the payroll will be, “disposed,” of, when the, “elections,” are over with, and they start to manage Propaganda through government departments alone, like modern dictatorships always do. They won’t want to leave behind ANY evidence that they ever paid the cheap, gullible twats like you. I believe that some of you are not on the payroll, but not many. But, the ones who, “do it for free,” like their moms, are the ones who will lose the most anyway. So, I stay cheerful, knowing that the vast majority of the people who actually WANT a Dictatorship will GET what they fought for, and won’t be able to get off the ride, when they realise just how WRONG they were, about everything. Anti-Americans, like you, make everyone sick. But, we’ll still be here, long after you’re . . . “not” . . . 😉
    2
  12298. 2
  12299. Moving the pictures is more chilling than it looks at first sight. Imagine, if you can, an America that has no news channels that ever push back against Trump’s rhetoric? No matter how nuts any particular statement may be? I say this, not just because that’s Trump’s goal (obviously), nor because it will happen within a year or two, if trump is still POTUS after the elections. I’m talking about the trolls and the fans at those rallies, who KNOW as well as you or I do, when Trump’s lying, but they lie right along with him. At least, the majority does. Many are, “suckers,” as you say, but the rest do it as a show of, “loyalty,” to their, “cause.” It comes from Stalin’s playbook. It’s disconcerting when a significant section of society repeats a crazy, damaging lie, as though it were true, the very next day after their leader pronounced it, already, right? But, how chilling will it be, when you are no longer hearing ANY common sense or pushback in the press? In a time when you now remember how CNN was subjected to a hostile take over by a, “media corporation,” friendly to trump; and in which MSNBC suffered a string of trials, scandals, dismissals and the break up of its outposts; and you remember how the other stations, “got the message,” and fell into line, after a few more firings. And it was all done just like in Russia, with frightening speed; both after Stalin took power, and then repeated, in the exact same way, after Putin took power. The only difference being that Russia’s infrastructure and people were already pliable, and culturally trained to accept their new circumstances. But, in America, (if you can imagine this?) it now seems that the only journalists who push back against the Trump’s are either outlaws, the, “disgraced sex offenders and murderers,” or otherwise known, wanted criminals. Seems far fetched, right? But, would you have believed anything I told you, had I predicted we’d be where we are now, back in 2015? And, what people spoke of in Russia; the exiles, dissidents and defectors, was always the same on this point. What really frightened people was reading some new propaganda, pronounced by their leader, that was patently insane, but hearing everyone repeat it as fact by the very next day, because of “who” said it. It was seen as a test of, “loyalty,” and to contradict the, “party line,” was to become an, “Enemy of The State.” So, try to picture it? Everyone gets so frightened that even your closest friends (especially your closest friends) will report you to the secret police, BECAUSE you tell the TRUTH, and their known association with you, jeopardises them. They are known associates of yours, who could be tarred with the same brush, viewed with suspicion at best! So, they can only clear themselves of any doubt by being the one to inform on you. That’s what trump’s cultists at his rallies are really about. Trump is demonstrating his sheer, raw POWER: “If I say the moon has gone, they all agree with me, and that means they’re loyal, and that’s REAL POWER.” Putin has passed these techniques on to trump, who uses them clumsily, but with the support of smarter men, like Steve Bannon, Stephen Miller, et al; and of course, the collusion of the, “popular press,” like F*x and others. Sometimes we laugh at his words, sometimes we’re horrified, but at the moment, we don’t, “have to believe.” Not yet. Take part in your politics; local and National. Don’t give yourself any cause to regret not having acted on your deathbed? ✌️👍
    2
  12300. 2
  12301. 2
  12302. 2
  12303. 2
  12304. 2
  12305. 2
  12306. 2
  12307. 2
  12308. 2
  12309. 2
  12310. 2
  12311. 2
  12312. 2
  12313. 2
  12314. 2
  12315. 2
  12316. 2
  12317. 2
  12318. 2
  12319. 2
  12320. 2
  12321. 2
  12322. 2
  12323. 2
  12324. 2
  12325. 2
  12326.  Frankline  : Then you’re not really understanding what this is about. China is desperate for both population growth and the advanced technologies (many of them still closely protected secrets) of Taiwan. Before Covid, they were manufacturing well over 50% of the world’s most advanced microchips, from ONE factory alone! That’s why we just had a worldwide shortage, which effected everyone from the military, governments, to you and me, when they closed their factory for Covid protection, as anyone who tried to buy a PS5 or Xbox X during 2021 - 2022 can testify. It’s ALWAYS about the MONEY. The original idea, discussed by Putin and Xi in that isolated box at the Beijing Winter Olympics, was that China would take Taiwan, so long as Putin’s bid to take Ukraine was successful. Ukraine produces well over 50% of the world’s Argon supply: an element vital in the manufacture of (you guessed it . . . I hope?) microchips. They planned to dominate the world in one fell swoop, by jointly dominating the tech markets worldwide and forcing the west into an equivalent Stone Age, by comparison. Putin blew it and made China very angry in the process, as his hubris and disconnection from the realities of his own country, both militarily and economically, became apparent. But China actually has an, “ideology,” of sorts. Twisted and hypocritical it may be, but it’s still a driving force for them. And, unlike Putin, who just fakes it for the purposes of rhetoric, which is why he gets so much of his history so wrong, Xi and his cronies are obsessed with, “unification,” on ideological grounds. The old regime of China fled to Taiwan, when their government collapsed and Communism took over. Thus, China sees Taiwan as ethnically, historically and culturally bound to them. It’s bollox, but it’s real bollox, which we fail to take seriously at our peril. If you’re interested in saving democracy, that is?
    2
  12327. 2
  12328. 2
  12329. 2
  12330. 2
  12331. 2
  12332. 2
  12333. 2
  12334. 2
  12335. 2
  12336. 2
  12337. 2
  12338. 2
  12339. 2
  12340. 2
  12341. 2
  12342. 2
  12343. 2
  12344. 2
  12345. 2
  12346. 2
  12347. 2
  12348. 2
  12349. 2
  12350. 2
  12351. 2
  12352. 2
  12353. 2
  12354. 2
  12355. 2
  12356. 2
  12357. 2
  12358. 2
  12359. 2
  12360. 2
  12361. 2
  12362. 2
  12363. 2
  12364. 2
  12365. 2
  12366. 2
  12367. 2
  12368. 2
  12369. 2
  12370. 2
  12371. 2
  12372. 2
  12373. 2
  12374. 2
  12375. 2
  12376. 2
  12377. 2
  12378. And in the midst of all this national chaos, Katie Price, a supermodel, feels a bit shy and doesn’t want to show up in court? And she’s twisting the courts around her little finger, at tax payer expense, creating delays and further backlogs, while the courts are stretched to breaking point! Truly sickening behaviour. THIS is the, “two tier,” justice system that we SHOULD be talking about! How the wealthy get away with murder just because they have a, “name,” or MONEY, even when they pretend they don’t. It’s funny how these, “influencers,” seek public attention 24/7 yet are allowed to escape the public gaze when accountability is called for? She can afford elective surgery, trips to exotic locations and, as one journalist recently observed, she was sunning herself and relaxing as the press pack tracked her down and didn’t appear to be, “working,” at all, despite telling the court that she was. And she has been playing the media game for decades now, so I don’t believe she doesn’t know what she’s doing, or is so, “vulnerable,” and alone, whilst paying for a film crew and her entourage to skulk off to Turkey. She’s not just getting away with it, but rubbing our noses in it. I know people who are on medical waiting lists for surgeries that are not desired or, “elective,” by any description, yet she has the funds to pay for a fatter lip or whatever the heck she’s having done this time. It truly is sickening to me and I would like to see the courts send in a receiver to liquidate her assets and put them to the service of the country. Not coo and role over when she says she, “doesn’t like appearing in public,” and grant her video links to the court from around the bloody corner! THAT’S two tier justice! Always in favour of the monied class.
    2
  12379. 2
  12380. 2
  12381. 2
  12382. 2
  12383. 2
  12384. 2
  12385. 2
  12386. 2
  12387. 2
  12388. 2
  12389. 2
  12390. 2
  12391. 2
  12392. 2
  12393. 2
  12394. 2
  12395. 2
  12396. 2
  12397. 2
  12398. 2
  12399. 2
  12400. 2
  12401. 2
  12402. 2
  12403. 2
  12404. 2
  12405. 2
  12406. Well put. You’re right. It’s such a shame that the movie isn’t 100% successful, mostly because it has a foot in two camps, between camp horror and serious adult thriller. Not that it isn’t head and shoulders above most in either camp, but it does suffer by not committing to one or the other. And I loved that they not only have the two original actors who played both protagonists from the original movie, but that they are both supporting opposite sides of their original camp. Gregory Peck is sleazy as Max Caddy’s representative and Robert Mitchum is the straight arrow; beautiful touch. I have one complaint about this otherwise great video. People always get that scriptural commandment wrong. It’s rare for an inaccurate Biblical translation to read, “Thou shalt no kill.” It says, “Thou shalt do no murder.” Exodus 20:13. Even Christ understood that people would necessarily continue to commit, “homicide,” (in the strictest sense of the word) but that there is a big difference between killing in battle, as an executioner, or in self defence or defence of loved ones and the committing of, ‘’murder.” We are not prohibited from killing, nor should we be. If we were, that would make every allied soldier who fought the Nazis and the Japanese in WWII unforgivable killers and self condemned to damnation. But they are not, because they did not, “murder,” anyone. Or, if they did and were found out, they were prosecuted for war crimes. This is why Jesus could do a miracle for a Roman Centurion with no conflict of interest, of fear of self contradiction. None of this supports Max’s case, of course. But it’s an important distinction. Jesus, God and the Bible do not say, “Thou shalt not kill.” It says, “Thou shall do no murder.” And that’s different.
    2
  12407. 2
  12408. 2
  12409. 2
  12410. 2
  12411. 2
  12412. 2
  12413. 2
  12414. 2
  12415. 2
  12416. 2
  12417. 2
  12418. 2
  12419. 2
  12420. 2
  12421. 2
  12422. 2
  12423. 2
  12424. 2
  12425. 2
  12426.  @aaronmicalowe  : Fortunate for you, I suppose. Not everyone took it in or followed it closely. It really was one of those times when it paid to be dumb or out of touch. The smarter people were, the more troubled they were. It blackened the hearts and memories of some. And there was a lot of anger and resentment at Russia, from all around the world: some at being at the mercy of a foreigner’s incompetence, some at having the atomic energy commissions of the UN and NATO suddenly step up their demands, presence and expenses in borderline hostile countries. It goes a long way toward explaining why Germany has so little nuclear energy reliance to this day (for good or ill, that’s another conversation) and changed a great deal about international politics. If losing the war in Afghanistan was the cause of Soviet Russia’s fall, the Chernobyl disaster was the catalyst; the first domino to fall, which set events in motion. There’s a complex story to tell, which I won’t bore you with now, about how the overestimates of the harm in the immediate blast area caused more psychological and imagined harm than real. But that cloud was as real as it gets, until it dissipated. And 64 times the lethality would cause devastation across Europe. Factoid footnote: the fall of the Soviet Union being precipitated by Chernobyl, and the fate of two journalists accused of spying by the Russians, was the inspiration for the plot of the movie Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. And it’s actually a pretty damned good movie, if you like Star Trek? 🇺🇦✌️🇬🇧
    2
  12427. 2
  12428. 2
  12429. 2
  12430. 2
  12431. 2
  12432. 2
  12433. 2
  12434. 2
  12435. 2
  12436. 2
  12437. 2
  12438. 2
  12439. 2
  12440. 2
  12441. 2
  12442. 2
  12443. 2
  12444. 2
  12445. 2
  12446. 2
  12447. 2
  12448. 2
  12449. 2
  12450. 2
  12451. 2
  12452. 2
  12453. 2
  12454. 2
  12455. 2
  12456. 2
  12457. 2
  12458. 2
  12459. 2
  12460. 2
  12461. 2
  12462. 2
  12463. 2
  12464. 2
  12465. 2
  12466. 2
  12467. 2
  12468. 2
  12469. 2
  12470. 2
  12471. 2
  12472. 2
  12473. 2
  12474. 2
  12475. 2
  12476. 2
  12477. 2
  12478. 2
  12479. 2
  12480. 2
  12481. 2
  12482. 2
  12483. 2
  12484. 2
  12485. 2
  12486.  @peterlearner8594  : Yeah, it’s almost impossible to know what is true if you just look at a cross section of popular news outlets these days, which is why I think it’s worth spending a little time,on a regular basis, evaluating your sources, looking into who owns them, who the share holders are, the records of their editors and journalists, etc. It’s not as difficult as may sound. And we all have to be open to the possibility that trusted sources can change. Jake’s take on Edward Snowden is a great example of that. I too admired the guy, what he did, and the great sacrifice he made, when it all blew up in the press. But just who TF is he now? And how, “freely,” is he even speaking at all as repression increases in Russia? The special privileges he’s been granted look more and more, “contingent,” and I cannot decide if we’re all going to wind up seeing an explosive final upload, exposing some of the Kremlin’s darkest secrets on the same day that Snowden falls out of a window, or he’s just going to parrot their talking points until the day he dies just so he can avoid defenestration? I struggle to believe he’s been bought or, “come around to their way of thinking,” given he was willing to sacrifice literally everything he had to expose the truth in the first place, so he must be under life and death pressures? But, regardless, it’s hard to accept that a man who’s commentary and interviews were sought all over the world, by organisations like Amnesty International and much of the free press, as a kind of spokes person for open democratic practices, has now become a shill for Moscow. But that seems to be the case? So, regular review of your news (and/or opinion) sources is as important as finding a trusted source in the first place. But you sound to me like you get it?
    2
  12487. 2
  12488. 2
  12489. 2
  12490. 2
  12491. 2
  12492. 2
  12493. 2
  12494. 2
  12495. 2
  12496. 2
  12497. 2
  12498. 2
  12499. 2
  12500. 2
  12501. 2
  12502. 2
  12503. 2
  12504. 2
  12505. 2
  12506. 2
  12507. 2
  12508. 2
  12509. 2
  12510. 2
  12511. 2
  12512. 2
  12513. 2
  12514. 2
  12515. 2
  12516. 2
  12517. 2
  12518. 2
  12519. 2
  12520. 2
  12521. 2
  12522. 2
  12523. 2
  12524. 2
  12525. 2
  12526. 2
  12527. 2
  12528. 2
  12529. 2
  12530. 2
  12531. 2
  12532. 2
  12533. 2
  12534. 2
  12535. 2
  12536. 2
  12537. 2
  12538. 2
  12539. 2
  12540. 2
  12541. 2
  12542. 2
  12543. 2
  12544. 2
  12545. 2
  12546. 2
  12547. 2
  12548. 2
  12549. 2
  12550. 2
  12551. 2
  12552. 2
  12553. 2
  12554. 2
  12555. 2
  12556. 2
  12557. 2
  12558. 2
  12559. 2
  12560. 2
  12561. 2
  12562. 2
  12563. 2
  12564. 2
  12565. 2
  12566. 2
  12567. 2
  12568. 2
  12569. 2
  12570. 2
  12571. 2
  12572. 2
  12573. 2
  12574. 2
  12575. 2
  12576. 2
  12577. 2
  12578. 2
  12579. 2
  12580. 2
  12581. 2
  12582. 2
  12583. 2
  12584. 2
  12585. 2
  12586. 2
  12587. 2
  12588. 2
  12589. 2
  12590. 2
  12591. 2
  12592. 2
  12593. 2
  12594. 2
  12595. 2
  12596. 2
  12597. 2
  12598. 2
  12599. 2
  12600. 2
  12601. 2
  12602. 2
  12603. 2
  12604. 2
  12605. 2
  12606. 2
  12607. 2
  12608. 2
  12609. 2
  12610. 2
  12611. 2
  12612. 2
  12613. 2
  12614. 2
  12615. 2
  12616. 2
  12617. 2
  12618. 2
  12619. 2
  12620. 2
  12621. 2
  12622. 2
  12623. 2
  12624. 2
  12625. 2
  12626. 2
  12627. 2
  12628. 2
  12629. 2
  12630. 2
  12631. 2
  12632. 2
  12633. 2
  12634. 2
  12635. 2
  12636. 2
  12637. 2
  12638. 2
  12639. 2
  12640. 2
  12641. 2
  12642. 2
  12643. 2
  12644. 2
  12645. 2
  12646. 2
  12647. 2
  12648. 2
  12649. 2
  12650. 2
  12651. 2
  12652. 2
  12653. 2
  12654. 2
  12655. 2
  12656. 2
  12657. 2
  12658. 2
  12659. 2
  12660. 2
  12661. 2
  12662. 2
  12663. 2
  12664. 2
  12665. 2
  12666. 2
  12667. 2
  12668. 2
  12669. 2
  12670. 2
  12671. 2
  12672. 2
  12673. 2
  12674. 2
  12675. 2
  12676. 2
  12677. 2
  12678. 2
  12679. 2
  12680. 2
  12681. 2
  12682. 2
  12683. 2
  12684. 2
  12685. 2
  12686. 2
  12687. 2
  12688. 2
  12689. 2
  12690. 2
  12691. 2
  12692. 2
  12693. 2
  12694. 2
  12695. 2
  12696. 2
  12697. 2
  12698. 2
  12699. 2
  12700. 2
  12701. 2
  12702. 2
  12703. 2
  12704. 2
  12705. 2
  12706. 2
  12707. 2
  12708. 2
  12709. 2
  12710. 2
  12711. 2
  12712. 2
  12713. 2
  12714. 2
  12715. 2
  12716. 2
  12717. 2
  12718. I read that book. And I despair. Here is a prime example. Two men, a politician and a senior cop, disagreeing over, “defunding the police.” Neither man knows what the term means, nor realises that they both want precisely the same thing. Either out of deliberate obtuseness, conspiracy, or sheer ignorance, they have not got a definition of the term to hand. Ask either one of them, “Would you prefer a well funded, well equipped, well staffed police force to solve crimes, prevent crimes and catch criminals? Or are you happy to see the expanded use of the police as psychiatric nurses, social workers, corporate goon body guards and bailiffs for the banks, collecting debts and turning poor people out of their homes?” They would BOTH give the same answer! They BOTH want, “defunding,” but . . . Do they? . . . They’re either the dumbest people to be put in charge of anything, or corporate stooges, right? What other possibility is there? Even the name, “defunding,” sounds like the opposite of what it means, and was SO BOUND to trigger unthinking people, who never look sh*t up! Talk about ASKING to be misunderstood? Reform will have to come from the ground up, with better terms to define the debate. I’ve never, in all my years, seen such an obvious misunderstanding getting so much fuel from such egregiously idiotic, “leaders,” in such an obviously callous exploitation of ignorance. It’s problem that America does NOT WANT to solve. Too much MONEY to be lost . . . And little honor to be found.
    2
  12719. 2
  12720. 2
  12721. 2
  12722. 2
  12723. 2
  12724. 2
  12725. 2
  12726. 2
  12727. 2
  12728. 2
  12729. 2
  12730. 2
  12731. 2
  12732. 2
  12733. 2
  12734. 2
  12735. 2
  12736. 2
  12737. 2
  12738. 2
  12739. 2
  12740. 2
  12741. 2
  12742. 2
  12743. 2
  12744. 2
  12745. 2
  12746. 2
  12747. 2
  12748. 2
  12749. 2
  12750. 2
  12751. 2
  12752. 2
  12753. 2
  12754. 2
  12755. 2
  12756. 2
  12757. 2
  12758. 2
  12759. 2
  12760. 2
  12761. John Michael Godier : How about the question I’ve thrown at you on several threads now, but haven’t gotten an answer? The Politics of humanity, as we spread out, into the Solar System? I think it could be a genuinely interesting topic? For example: Why do so many Sci Fi writers seem to think that the distance between Mars and Earth, makes it inevitable that future colonies would eventually break away from Earth’s governance and possibly go to War with us? That thought would put governments off sending missions, wouldn’t it? Or; Will mining the asteroids give us an abundance of everything? Or, will population explosions lead to scarcity, and space-based battles over resources? The question interests me, because, in this divisive time, it’s a way of putting things into a broader perspective, and perhaps, helping people to see that we REALLY need to get our act together, so that our futures are not so bleak? I don’t expect you to have all the answers, but as a writer, you must have thought about such questions? And, some of your colleagues may have things to say? Perhaps there isn’t much appetite for the subject? But, if you told me that, I’d stop nagging you. I just think it’s a fascinating topic, which raises questions about where we’re going, what we want our future to look like, the various possibilities, the cross over between science and politics, and, with our increasing reliance upon the science that makes this future possible, could that mean that the scientists themselves will be the real power brokers of the future? Possibly, they may be the high priests, or Uber-Politicians, the Emperors of space? Just let me know if you’re not interested, and I won’t be offended or anything, but it could be something of real value to explore? I love your channel, regardless ✌️ 👍
    2
  12762. 2
  12763. 2
  12764. 2
  12765. 2
  12766. 2
  12767. 2
  12768. 2
  12769. 2
  12770. 2
  12771. 2
  12772. 2
  12773. 2
  12774. 2
  12775. 2
  12776. 2
  12777. 2
  12778. 2
  12779. 2
  12780. 2
  12781.  @eddeh0772  : Thanks, and yes, I’m all about respect and playing nice with the other kids. I want a world in which we can all do that and not feel like we have to get the first jab in just because we’re expecting a jab to come at us. That’s why I want to stop trump and all of his acolytes. Every citizen of Planet Earth has a legitimate dog in this fight, since every one of us will be directly affected by the outcome of the US election. If trump loses, it will be a large enough task just to stop all of the pointless lawsuits, fake claims and rabble rousing to the point of treasonous, violent rebellion, possibly a direct coup attempt. My hope is that his (none Russian funded) backers will see that he’s a loser and melt away, looking for a better champion for their Neo-Liberal-Anti-Democracy agenda. I see that as a real possibility since, in the end, they just want to ride the coat tails of someone who will give them what they want, and trump will have been comprehensively beaten too many times for money to be further wasted on him. But, if he wins . . . we ALL lose and God help us all. The chances of a nuclear conflict will escalate, not diminish, as his cowardly cult believes, because he will continue to botch the situation with Russia and Ukraine until it’s too late, forcing other countries like Poland and Finland to get involved. And that’s setting aside the breakdown of law and order in America that will soon follow his inauguration and the letting loose of the dogs. All of those thugs he has lined up for the election period will still be there, ready to sweep through the country rounding up trump’s, “enemies.” And this time, it will be swift and merciless; planned and terrifying. The end of democracy will be more sudden than people are expecting. I honestly believe this.
    2
  12782. 2
  12783. 2
  12784. 2
  12785. 2
  12786. 2
  12787. 2
  12788. 2
  12789. 2
  12790.  @Etaoinshrdlu69  : Forgive me. You’re quite right to correct my poor choice of phrasing there. But, before I get into that, I must correct you on one point: I PROMISE YOU: Putin will NOT use nukes (deliberately) under ANY circumstances. He is getting ALL of the, “bang for his buck,” he can out of them, RIGHT NOW. Each time he even mentions nukes the western press gets unhelpfully hysterical. Yet, if he so much as drops a small, “tactical,” nuke anywhere in the world and it’s all over for him. The western allies have gamed this possibility out in permutations you and I could not have even dreamt of and their response will be instantaneous and overwhelming. It will not just be the end of Putin, but that legacy obsessed, bullying little pr*ck will go down in history (written over his dead body and thus outside of his control) as the maddest, dumbest, evilest dick-tater the world has ever known! Outstripping Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini all rolled into one. And the important takeaway here is that Putin KNOWS this! He also knows that China is more likely to assist the west than defend him and get into WWIII over such a stupid act, than fight on his side! At the very worst, they would stand back and do nothing, knowing they have a lot to gain from mopping up the sudden, “break away nations,” that no longer wish to be a part of insane Russia. They have a population crisis to solve in China and they’ve been eyeing up several Russian, “federations,” rather greedily of late. So they can play both ends of the table on this one, as they have been doing thus far. So, to your correct point: I was speaking figuratively about how disastrous a policy of, “waiting out,” Ukraine would be for Russia. I didn’t mean that Ukraine would literally take the Kremlin, only that it would be almost as good as that. They will not make any incursions into Russia with western supplies. Though I expect they will make the odd sortie, in the manner of others we’ve already seen, such as when they flew in helicopters to blast a fuel depot just inside the Russian border in the early months of the war. But all such actions will be carried out with bespoke, home made equipment, from those mysterious military, “supply,” factories that the Germans are so helpfully assisting Ukraine in building as we speak. Yes, eventually they will need to establish superiority over their borders, which will mean that the final weeks or months of the war will see them establish missile bases right along the Ukraine/Russia border that can identify and take out any threat, land, sea or airborne, far away from their own skies. They will have to have the assurance that nothing can get past that steel umbrella, so they don’t have to put up with their civilian population being harassed by air raid sirens every other day. Russia will be required to keep anything of military value a couple of hundred kilometres away from the Ukrainian border if they don’t want to see it explode. But, you’re right. I should be more careful about my figures of speech, as I risk being taken literally, which was not my intention in that case. A poor choice of words. I guess I’m just a little caught up in the desire to see the world’s most cowardly nation being put back in its box where it belongs, and being forced to deal with its own issues internally instead of victimising the innocents of other sovereign nations as if we were still living in the Medieval days! I believe that some nations reach a point, where they collectively celebrate the routine rape, murder and kidnapping of innocent children, that they have just as, “collectively,” earned collective chastisement. The last time we saw this was World War Two. Yet both Germany and China did the smart thing and did not just surrender, but they submitted to wholesale rebuilding and re-education on western values and the importance of the rule of law. Russia would be a prime candidate for such a, “nation building,” program, not susceptible to the types of issues which made it impossible (and an arrogant misjudgement) in Muslim countries. But, if they will not submit to such an opportunity, they must be forced, collectively, to reap what they have sown and, more importantly, NOT given the opportunity to make their problems anyone else’s! But hey . . . That’s just me . . .
    2
  12791. 2
  12792. 2
  12793. 2
  12794. 2
  12795. 2
  12796. 2
  12797. 2
  12798. 2
  12799. 2
  12800. 2
  12801. 2
  12802. 2
  12803. 2
  12804. 2
  12805. 2
  12806. 2
  12807. 2
  12808. 2
  12809. 2
  12810. 2
  12811. 2
  12812. 2
  12813. 2
  12814. 2
  12815. 2
  12816. 2
  12817. 2
  12818. 2
  12819. 2
  12820. 2
  12821. 2
  12822. 2
  12823. What are your rights, regarding your own questioning of the police? I.e. “Why did you stop me?” Or, “Why do you want to search me?/My car?” Given there are no exigent circumstances, is the driver allowed to establish their sufficient grounds before allowing any search? Do the police have the right to disregard your questioning? Or must they answer and establish their grounds? My encounters with police usually lead to the officer/s in question refusing to answer any reasonable query. Indeed, even when I’ve been helpful (which is all the time) they seem either not to know, or just not willing to answer. As a teen I was asked who I was and where I was going, by a random (to me at any rate) police officer, to whom I responded, “Do I have to tell you that?” I just got the same question back, but with more, “attitude.” I literally stood my ground and asked, “What are my rights, right now? Am I legally compelled to tell you, a complete stranger, my personal details?” After being ignored a third time, and another officer creeping up behind me, I’m ashamed to say, I caved in and gave them everything. At the end of the encounter, once they were being less intimidating, I tried one last time. “Did I have to tell you my details, by law? What would have happened, if I’d refused?” The answer I got sounded more like a threat than a response to anything I’d asked. I was left feeling like the police don’t want to be trusted or respected, and actively discourage it. This was many years ago now, and I hope things are better? But, sheesh! 🤦‍♂️ I still don’t really know what my rights are these days? . . . 🤷‍♂️🙄
    2
  12824. 2
  12825. 2
  12826. 2
  12827. 2
  12828. 2
  12829. 2
  12830. 2
  12831. 2
  12832. 2
  12833. 2
  12834. 2
  12835. 2
  12836. 2
  12837. 2
  12838. 2
  12839. 2
  12840. 2
  12841. 2
  12842. 2
  12843. 2
  12844. 2
  12845. 2
  12846. 2
  12847. 2
  12848. 2
  12849. 2
  12850. 2
  12851. 2
  12852. 2
  12853. 2
  12854. 2
  12855. 2
  12856. 2
  12857. 2
  12858. 2
  12859. 2
  12860. 2
  12861. 2
  12862. 2
  12863. 2
  12864. 2
  12865. 2
  12866. 2
  12867. 2
  12868. 2
  12869. 2
  12870. 2
  12871. 2
  12872. 2
  12873. 2
  12874. 2
  12875. 2
  12876. 2
  12877. 2
  12878. 2
  12879. 2
  12880. 2
  12881. 2
  12882. 2
  12883. 2
  12884. That’s kind of missing the point though. Everyone’s aware that the color of your skin changes your life opportunities and it changes the individual’s expectations of justice and equity. To analyse how that works, from cradle to the grave, is a noble endeavour, so long as it is done with earnest, honest integrity and intent. Once it is given a, “name,” it becomes a straw man, for people to attack, because they don’t understand it. And you can guarantee that anyone who is, “against CRT,” is speaking from a position of ignorance: 100% of the time. So, to get bogged down in its origin story, is as misguided as arguing over who started The Beer Hall Putsch on the beaches of Normandy on D Day. No one is teaching it. It’s not on the curriculum. Academics argue that it should, “inform,” teaching methods, and is something that educators should know about when teaching; in the same way that people are taught to be aware of racism, sexism and oppression in general. It’s not a thesis. It’s not a formal discipline. It’s an idea about awareness. As ever, the GOP are mischaracterising something, for the sake of creating a shadow to box with. Because they dare not deal with ANY policy in a substantive manner. To do so could only lead to the revelation that they not only NEVER serve the public good, but that they are the CAUSE of the public’s harm. So, with respect. Learn what it is and pay more attention to the content of the, “thing,” than when and where it manifested? I could tell you a lot about Copenhagen, Niels Bohr and Albert Einstein, but that wouldn’t tell you anything about Physics, or the Copenhagen Interpretation. See what I mean?
    2
  12885. 2
  12886. 2
  12887. 2
  12888. 2
  12889. 2
  12890. 2
  12891. 2
  12892. 2
  12893. 2
  12894. 2
  12895. 2
  12896. 2
  12897. 2
  12898. 2
  12899. 2
  12900. 2
  12901. 2
  12902. 2
  12903. 2
  12904. 2
  12905. 2
  12906. 2
  12907. 2
  12908. 2
  12909. 2
  12910. 2
  12911. 2
  12912. 2
  12913. 2
  12914. 2
  12915.  @leonie563  : It’s reassuring to me to see that other people at least, “get it,” and aren’t making the classic emotive comments. Indeed, when countries appear to be doing something patently stupid, against their own interests and threatening to world peace, we must assume that it only appears that way because we have not got the whole picture in front of us. “Population,” in this case, is as important a resource for both China and Russia, as oil or money. In fact, both countries are pretty desperate to increase their younger population numbers, to the extent that Russia has taken a drastic risk (which is backfiring painfully, I’m delighted to see) and China is considering the same thing. Artificially boosting your numbers is the only option left open to these two countries, which means literally STEALING entire populations. Hence, Ukraine and Taiwan. Sitting in that box overlooking the Winter Olympiad, Putin and Xi must have thought that their planning session was both diabolically clever and mathematically airtight, and that the west would just keep fumbling their words instead of getting up and DOING something about it? Yes, they thought they could dominate the world by dominating the technology markets, by owning the main production outlets of microchips and the main rare element production for microchips between them. But what they REALLY wanted was and is more PEOPLE. Especially the younger generation. So, it’s little wonder that Xi began backing out of his, “unlimited,” relationship with Putin when he saw that even the base population of Ukraine could drive back Russia’s entire army, BEFORE all that western aid started pouring in! And then to see Putin continually botch things, literally driving out his youngest, brightest section of his population only added to their abstaining at every UN vote, rather than offering even a full throated verbal support, let alone weapons. And it certainly caused China to pause their invasion plans for Taiwan, which infuriated Xi! But, not everyone has noticed something of potentially enormous significance. Which is that China might actually be content to turn their sights on the Russian Federation themselves, as they have just recently changed their equivalent to google maps; which now shows these southern-eastern regions of Russia (which were formerly Chinese) now have their old Mandarin Chinese names again . . . Why now? Possibly anticipating the break up of the Russian federation? Maybe planning to scoop up old territories which will be looking for economic support and, “protection,” from Russia? Maybe this will be China’s way of getting what it needs from a less incendiary source, whilst Russia, as it shrinks and falls into chaos will still NEED China more than ever and be unable to make much complaint about developments, being China’s vassal state? . . . Not saying these things are certain, by any means. But changing your map names is not a small act, nor an unnoticed one in Moscow . . .
    2
  12916. 2
  12917. 2
  12918. 2
  12919. 2
  12920. 2
  12921. 2
  12922. 2
  12923. 2
  12924. 2
  12925. 2
  12926. 2
  12927. 2
  12928. 2
  12929. 2
  12930. 2
  12931. 2
  12932. 2
  12933. 2
  12934. 2
  12935. 2
  12936. 2
  12937. 2
  12938. 2
  12939. 2
  12940. 2
  12941. 2
  12942. 2
  12943. 2
  12944. 2
  12945. 2
  12946. 2
  12947. 2
  12948. 2
  12949. 2
  12950. 2
  12951. 2
  12952. 2
  12953. 2
  12954. 2
  12955. 2
  12956. 2
  12957. 2
  12958. 2
  12959. 2
  12960. 2
  12961. 2
  12962. 2
  12963. 2
  12964. 2
  12965. 2
  12966. 2
  12967. 2
  12968. 2
  12969. 2
  12970. 2
  12971. 2
  12972. 2
  12973. Just imagine what a slap on the wrist, “censure,” would do; which is as good as saying we’re ending the Republic, right there and then? Given that loss of office will result in countless immediate indictments (both Federal & State) which will land him and his family in jail, what alternative does a, ”man,” with his established record of destroying the Constitution and breaking all of the laws he runs up against, HAVE? So long as he can count on enough of his base and the party to remain in denial, and HATE Dems and other races, just enough to make them cheer when he pisses on the rule of law, he will have NO CHOICE but to have Moscow ENSURE his, “re-election,” in a Putin Style, 2020 SHAM. It’s that, or disgrace and jail! And, half of the GOP are IMPLICATED with him, so they’re fighting for their OWN SURVIVAL. They simply CANNOT remove him. What else CAN he do? 2020 will HAVE TO be RIGGED, because too many Americans were persuaded to HATE their, “fellow Americans,” MORE than they hate (or even understand WHO ARE) America’s enemies . . . Just look at the shills on this thread, desperately trying to bury their SHAME, because they KNOW they’re killing America, but aren’t strong enough to ADMIT what they WANT! They WANT a Russian Style, Single Party system, with just enough FAKE Democracy to keep up appearances . . . Trump = Putin Mark Two; the Puppet Version, and they just DON’T CARE. In fact, they PREFER it that way. They’ll take that over the fictional, “brown menace,” any day . . . America’s Republic is OVER
    2
  12974. 2
  12975. 2
  12976. 2
  12977. 2
  12978. 2
  12979. 2
  12980. 2
  12981. 2
  12982. 2
  12983. 2
  12984. 2
  12985. 2
  12986. 2
  12987. 2
  12988. 2
  12989. 2
  12990. 2
  12991. 2
  12992. 2
  12993. 2
  12994. 2
  12995. 2
  12996. 2
  12997. 2
  12998. 2
  12999. 2
  13000. 2
  13001. 2
  13002. 2
  13003. 2
  13004. 2
  13005. 2
  13006. 2
  13007. 2
  13008. 2
  13009. 2
  13010. 2
  13011. 2
  13012. 2
  13013. 2
  13014. 2
  13015. 2
  13016. 2
  13017. 2
  13018. 2
  13019. 2
  13020. 2
  13021. 2
  13022. 2
  13023. 2
  13024. 2
  13025. 2
  13026. 2
  13027. 2
  13028. 2
  13029. 2
  13030. 2
  13031. Honestly, I’m getting so tired of hearing about Farage and all this disproportionate coverage. I get why you would do it. He’s colourful, says things that stick with people and nearly always epically wrong. So there’s a lot to say, if you want to assist in raising his profile, and if you understand that Farage being wrong makes no difference to his success as a public figure. All he needs is ongoing discussion about him. Like the figure of Colonel Kurts in Apocalypse Now, we didn’t need to see Marlon Brando for him to dominate the picture, because everyone talks about him the whole time, acts either for or against him and makes it clear throughout the entire journey that everything we see happening is happening because of him. The fact that we don’t even get a clear look at him by the end of the movie, and that he mumbles a few lines from the shadows before making his exit, was neither here nor there. It is still credited as one of Brando’s biggest films! I think it’s related to, “The Streisand Effect,” in that respect. The press and people like you are building Farage up, way beyond all reasonable proportion. And the result will be that he will be empowered to take over the remains of the, “Conservative,” Party BECAUSE of people like you never shutting up about him! I’m certain there was an element of this distraction toward the bright and shiny objects involved in the rise of other historical dictators. And make no mistake, if everyone keeps playing his game, by his rules, fuelling him with the oxygen of attention, just because he says something a bit weird or different from the mainstream (right, wrong or indifferent) it will be those people (you included) who will have given him that power. The Tories are being exposed for what their opponents have long suspected to a wider cross section of the public and it is merely the fact that they are so empirically awful that makes right leaning voters confused. They no longer see Farage as the purely risible clown figure he once cut, but not because he’s gotten any better, more competent, less of a blatant liar, but simply because he’s no longer distinguishable from the rottenness we see from Tories at every turn! And the pundits and MSM are turning him into that viable alternative! You should act more responsibly, covering the many, many political issues and stories that are burning out there and limit your time on Farage to something more reasonable! Or forever take responsibility for the role you played in his rise to eventual power and the end of our democracy! I know you think I exaggerate. I’m being, “hysterical,” or, “hyperbolic,” perhaps? Well, let us see how well these words age?
    2
  13032. 2
  13033. 2
  13034. 2
  13035. 2
  13036. 2
  13037. 2
  13038. 2
  13039. 2
  13040. 2
  13041. 2
  13042. 2
  13043. 2
  13044. 2
  13045. 2
  13046. 2
  13047. 2
  13048. 2
  13049. 2
  13050. 2
  13051. 2
  13052. 2
  13053. 2
  13054. 2
  13055. 2
  13056. 2
  13057. 2
  13058. 2
  13059. 2
  13060. 2
  13061. 2
  13062. 2
  13063. 2
  13064. 2
  13065. 2
  13066. 2
  13067. 2
  13068. 2
  13069. 2
  13070. 2
  13071. 2
  13072. 2
  13073. 2
  13074. 2
  13075. 2
  13076. 2
  13077. 2
  13078. 2
  13079. 2
  13080. 2
  13081. 2
  13082. 2
  13083. 2
  13084. 2
  13085. 2
  13086.  Darth Wheazius  : And, if one employee is out in the open, how many are there, remaining, “secret?” This may seam off topic, but please bare with me? In the mid 1980’s they got a think tank together, of the best economic, historical and scientific minds they could muster in America, to answer certain key questions that had always been political footballs, because it was easy to guess at, “Stuff,” but twist the facts to suit certain arguments. Anyway, one of the questions they settled, for example, was the actual, “Cost,” of the Apollo, Lunar Missions. Their conclusion surprised everyone, except the scientists; especially the physicists, apparently. They concluded that, for every single dollar spent on Apollo, $7 dollars went back into the economy, over a 10 year period. It was their most conservative estimate, some putting it at double that, but all agreed it was no lower. Dems and Republicans were represented, vehemently on both sides and were in that think tank, supervising their work and conclusions, all the way. So, now . . . Of those who even know about this stuff, the question is considered answered and all arguments closed. I bring this up, because I genuinely believe that, combined with a swift, furious and harsh pushback against seditious propaganda and its propagandists, EDUCATION is the key to lifting America out of this mire, for good. It’s a well established fact that educated people don’t listen to bullsh*t propaganda, and they sure as hell don’t vote for it! And, that’s as well established as the Alt-Wrong’s continuous attacks upon our best educational establishments; constantly calling them, “hotbeds of leftist insurrection,” etc. Well, now we’ve literally seen the insurrectionist hotbeds, laid bare! And they are Fox, who got away with screaming, “Fire!” in a packed theatre, filled with deceived and agitated sheep, who became wolves for a day, and boasted about it on social media, while their comrades and their, “thin blue line,” of cops, were literally beaten to DEATH with the American flag, or 50 others, to within an inch of their lives, and others, on their, “side,” were simply shot to death! And, if those people had been brought up with a half way decent educations, in Civics, History and moral philosophy, NONE of that would have been possible. You have to step back for a moment, just to see how obvious a tinder box it was, and how blatantly, and egregiously, the likes of Fox manipulated America, and kicked the country when it was down! Half of those rioters weren’t just pretending because they’re racists, and entitled! Half of them actually BELIEVED in the, “steal.” I had to ask myself, what would I have done, if I believed a Coup had been pulled off? . . . The BLAME lies squarely upon the shoulders of those who knew better; who have had those Ivy League educations, and exploited their advantages to the murderous limit! And we MUST prioritise, both EDUCATION and CONSEQUENCES for Seditious Propaganda! Time for a little LAW, and a little investment in our youth, don’t you think? Apologies, for going on. But I know you’re smart enough to get me. And your comment deserved my full attention ✌️👍
    2
  13087. 2
  13088. J Groovy : You are talking about word definitions, logic, facts, credibility, etc. Trump’s Trolls are not even attempting to work on that level, which is why they will never hear you. They are emotional. Their, “rhetoric,” is ALL aimed at emotions. Facts, alone, are enough to show that Trump is a criminal, being used by Putin, and Trump probably only knows HALF (or less) of HOW he’s being played. The Troll’s JOB is to, “scare,” “anger,” “intimidate,” or, failing that, “persuade,” people that it’s all, “hopeless,” and that it has always been thus, and, “I’m just one person. What can I do about ALL this?” ALL EMOTIONAL. What is CLEAR from this YouTube thread and all the others, beneath this Video, is that the Trolls are actually frightened, now. Some are racists, some are paid, by Russian shell companies and, either sitting in a bunker in St Petersburg, or scattered about the globe, having answered one of those emails, offering to, “Turn Your Comments Into CASH!” Just so long as each comment is positive about Trump and Putin. I know this, because I got one, which I passed on to the FBI. Just keep in mind, a Troll’s job is NOT to, “debate,” or, “prove,” anything. There is NO, “arguing,” with a Trump Tramp. All you can do, is DISPROVE their comments, point out the LUNACY of their talking points, and SHOW that you are NEVER going to be, “intimidated,” by their threats of, “Civil War,” which are, if nothing else, an even STRONGER argument, for the REMOVAL, TRIAL, and EXECUTION of the Orange Orifice. I am curious to hear your response? ✌️
    2
  13089. 2
  13090. 2
  13091. 2
  13092. 2
  13093. 2
  13094. 2
  13095. 2
  13096. 2
  13097. 2
  13098. 2
  13099. 2
  13100. 2
  13101. 2
  13102. 2
  13103. 2
  13104. 2
  13105. 2
  13106. 2
  13107. 2
  13108. 2
  13109. 2
  13110. 2
  13111. 2
  13112. 2
  13113. 2
  13114. 2
  13115. 2
  13116. 2
  13117. 2
  13118. 2
  13119. 2
  13120. 2
  13121. 2
  13122. 2
  13123. 2
  13124. 2
  13125. 2
  13126. 2
  13127. 2
  13128. 2
  13129. 2
  13130. 2
  13131. 2
  13132. 2
  13133. 2
  13134. 2
  13135. 2
  13136. 2
  13137. Your words of wisdom are a balm to my troubled spirit in these unsettling times. I am grateful that you take the time to talk to us and offer an alternative perspective to the, “mainstream,” (a term I use advisedly in this case) norm. Using Johnson’s connections, Truss has hit the money making circuit, apparently not thinking about what she actually planned to say, almost until the moment she got to the podium. There was a moment when she referred to the US Constitution and our Magna Carta, adding something like, “and there are many such documents I could name.” An awkward, if brief, pause followed during which I just WISHED that someone shouted out, “Can you really, Liz? Go on then? Name just one?” But what alarmed me was that she was really pushing that Neo-Liberal agenda, from the, “think tanks,” that she belongs to (who are probably the source of her scripts?) and stating that she plans to stay in politics for that, “cause,” alone. To me, her speech sounded like an advertisement. “I am available, along with all of my Westminster connections, for Lobby work and setting up private meetings,” was my translation. We are increasingly creating a false sense of class in Britain, like the old Tudor notion of the, “worthy,” “impotent,” poor (which are, by design, very few in number) whilst everyone else must be seen as, “unworthy,” or, “indolent.” This seems to be born from a sense that the wealthy are directly threatened by the growing numbers of, “have nots,” so long as they remain enfranchised, educated and having access to accurate information. And the blatancy with which Britain’s elites are actively working to take away those three vital tools of democracy seems, to me at least, to be on the increase. Every time I hear the term, “woke,” from the mouth of a far right hack like Cruella Braverman or Liz Truss, I feel it is a deliberate attempt to define a separation between, “them and us,” in direct opposition to the role and responsibility of a politician, who’s job is meant to be concerned with uniting the people. I am unmoved by Truss’s bandwagoning attempts at baiting better people than herself in society, with such deliberate hostility she spits at those whom she meant to lead. That’s just like being harangued by an angry toddler who feels personally slighted at being made to go to bed. But I am disturbed that overtly divisive rhetoric is considered acceptable from this, “political,” party, which is so gleefully breaking its social contract by attacking its own population, rather than attempting to reason with them and calm their anger. When a party is all out of political ideas and has no longer got any, “ideology,” to lay claim to (other than an extremist version of neo-liberalism which they know the general public finds as unrealistic and immoral as proposing we become a communist dictatorship) people like Liz Truss are scraped up, from the very bottom of the barrel. It’s the, “normalisation,” of allowing leaders to be actively hostile and baiting of those in their charge which is truly unprecedented in British politics. I only hope it becomes recognised as a key reason for their defeat at the next election?
    2
  13138. 2
  13139. 2
  13140. 2
  13141. 2
  13142. 2
  13143. 2
  13144. 2
  13145. 2
  13146. 2
  13147. 2
  13148. 2
  13149. 2
  13150. 2
  13151. 2
  13152. 2
  13153. 2
  13154. 2
  13155. 2
  13156. 2
  13157. 2
  13158. 2
  13159. 2
  13160. 2
  13161. 2
  13162. 2
  13163. 2
  13164. 2
  13165. 2
  13166. 2
  13167. 2
  13168. 2
  13169. 2
  13170. 2
  13171. 2
  13172. 2
  13173. 2
  13174. 2
  13175. 2
  13176. 2
  13177. 2
  13178. 2
  13179. 2
  13180. 2
  13181. 2
  13182. 2
  13183. 2
  13184. 2
  13185. 2
  13186. 2
  13187. 2
  13188. 2
  13189. 2
  13190. 2
  13191. 2
  13192. 2
  13193. 2
  13194. 2
  13195. 2
  13196. 2
  13197. 2
  13198. 2
  13199. 2
  13200. 2
  13201. 2
  13202. 2
  13203. 2
  13204. 2
  13205. 2
  13206. 2
  13207. 2
  13208. 2
  13209. 2
  13210. 2
  13211. 2
  13212. 2
  13213. 2
  13214. 2
  13215. 2
  13216. 2
  13217. 2
  13218. 2
  13219. 2
  13220. 2
  13221. 2
  13222. 2
  13223. 2
  13224. 2
  13225. 2
  13226. 2
  13227. 2
  13228. 2
  13229. 2
  13230. 2
  13231. 2
  13232. 2
  13233. 2
  13234. 2
  13235. 2
  13236. 2
  13237. 2
  13238. 2
  13239. 2
  13240. 2
  13241. 2
  13242. 2
  13243. 2
  13244. 2
  13245. 2
  13246. 2
  13247. 2
  13248. 2
  13249. 2
  13250. 2
  13251.  @AngryAlfonse  : Yeah, I know. The combination of lobbyists buying their politicians wholesale and their utter ignorance as to the subject matter is bad enough. But, when such topics become vote winning election issues, it’s amazing how quickly situations can change. There are moves afoot, seriously and for the first time that I know of, where some politicians from both sides of the isle are attempting to put together a package to prevent tech companies in particular from lobbying at all. They will have an uphill battle, but America was built on an uphill battle which they won, so I don’t count them out. As I pointed out, technically, the laws already exist, and YouTube’s actions have been calculated based on the likelihood that Jjjacksfilms will not take this any further, for fear of YouTube’s reprisals, and their endless supply of Google money for legal fees. Just as it’s so clear that the whole bothsidesing is a direct result of YouTube’s, “negotiations,” with Sssniperwolf herself. It’s so obvious that it was a concession she must have insisted on. I doubt YouTube would have wanted to be so blatantly hypocritical and tone deaf, if they felt they had a choice? In my perfect world, Jacksfilms would crowdfund a successful lawsuit against YouTube that would result in their apology to him, the permanent banning of Sssniperwolf, and a public undertaking to apply their policies without fear or favour in future. But then, in my perfect world, YouTube would show far fewer adverts (which literally make some channels unwatchable for me now) and Jessica Beal would be my wife, and there’s about as much chance of either one happening.
    2
  13252. 2
  13253. 2
  13254. 2
  13255. 2
  13256. 2
  13257. 2
  13258. 2
  13259. 2
  13260. 2
  13261. 2
  13262. 2
  13263. 2
  13264. 2
  13265. 2
  13266. 2
  13267. 2
  13268. 2
  13269. 2
  13270. 2
  13271. 2
  13272. 2
  13273. 2
  13274. 2
  13275. 2
  13276. 2
  13277. 2
  13278. 2
  13279. 2
  13280. 2
  13281. 2
  13282. 2
  13283. 2
  13284. 2
  13285. 2
  13286. 2
  13287. 2
  13288. 2
  13289. 2
  13290. This is such an important explanation of Soviet, and current, methodology and criminality. It is such a historic tragedy that the world has lost so many languages and their attendant cultural practices that goes largely overlooked. I used the word, “criminality,” advisedly, as I certainly believe that such deliberate attempts to wipe out the cultures and languages of others should be recognised internationally as a crime. Now I feel I will have to do some research, to find out what the stance of NATO, the UN, European Union, etc. is with regard to this practice, and whether it is outlawed? And, indeed, if not, why not? Despite being a bit of a history buff myself, I had not given much thought to this aspect of Russification. I suspect that most of us in the west have always thought of the USSR (and then the Russian Federation) as having many, “regions,” within it, but not really recognising the distinction of them being, “nations,” with different ethnic and cultural roots, despite knowing this in the back of our minds? So, we end up seeing this enormous geographic block as being, “Russian,” as taught to the west by Stalin, Khrushchev and their successors; seeing their world through the distorted lens of their making, rather than through honest, clear and truthful glass. And, if reasonably educated people like me can still be tricked by that smoke and mirrors act, so can the vast majority of people in the free world. At least, that is my worry? Even though I have NEVER trusted a word out of Putin’s mouth, and have railed against the Nordstream deals (and others like it) for almost two decades now, (from my powerless, “everyman,” perspective) seeing it as being suicidally stupid and patently obvious that it could only be the result of Putin’s corruption and blackmailing of western politicians; I am still shocked by the sheer brutality and the barbarian savagery of erasing entire cultures in such a pernicious, systematic and calculating manner. When you put this into a clear perspective like this, which jibes so fundamentally with everything we know about our history of dealing with Russia, it truly chills me to the bone. Russification is just another aspect of Genocide, as practiced in Ukraine today. And, with the added horrors of mass kidnapping of children (recognised as Genocide by the international courts, as recent events have demonstrated) for the purposes of Russification, with the specific goal of shoring up the diminishing numbers of young Russians, as their response to their, “demographic crisis,” of an aging, shrinking population; on top of routine mass murders; all of this is about as sinister and historically unprecedented as it gets! At least in terms of its sheer scale! Putin is genuinely diabolical, in the strictest sense of the word. I could say more about how his plans look set to backfire, in terms of China’s apparent plans to take some of the Russian, “Federation’s,” population of Putin’s hands, as their recent changing of formerly Russian geographic names to their old Manchurian designations on their electronic maps appears to indicate, but if you have born with me this far, I am grateful for your patience and will spare you my wider geopolitical predictions. I am so grateful to you for re-opening my eyes to this worldwide threat that Putin would spread around the world like a cancer, destroying all that is valuable, life affirming and good on the face of the Earth. What you offer as a service cannot be weighed in gold. Its educational value is incalculable. Thank you. From Britain, thank you SO MUCH. ✌️🇺🇦🇬🇧🇺🇦
    2
  13291. 2
  13292. 2
  13293. 2
  13294. 2
  13295. 2
  13296. 2
  13297. 2
  13298. 2
  13299. 2
  13300. 2
  13301. 2
  13302. 2
  13303. 2
  13304. 2
  13305. 2
  13306. 2
  13307. 2
  13308. 2
  13309. 2
  13310. 2
  13311. 2
  13312. 2
  13313. 2
  13314. 2
  13315. 2
  13316. 2
  13317. 2
  13318. 2
  13319. 2
  13320. 2
  13321. 2
  13322. 2
  13323. 2
  13324. 2
  13325. 2
  13326. 2
  13327. 2
  13328. 2
  13329. 2
  13330. 2
  13331. 2
  13332. You know what I would like to see? I mean, apart from Putin being publicly executed by his own family members for losing Donbas and Crimea (I’m allowed to dream aren’t I?). Well, I’d like to see Germany having to, “justify,” funding Putin’s war, to the faces of the surviving victims, and to a legal standard, in The Court of Human Rights! Does anyone here think that, “Give us a couple of years to avoid price hikes and a spike in unemployment,” is a good enough excuse to justify FUNDING Putin’s rape, torture, looting, murder and genocide on an industrial scale? Because I think the surviving victims might have a strong case against the German Government? If they switched of the Russian energy supply TODAY, they would survive the inconveniences and industrial set backs, with European and American assistance to boot! And they could call it a Tax On Stupid, for ever having set up such a suicidally stupid arrangement in the first place. The only reason Putin remains a threat is because WE ARE PAYING HIM TO! It’s simply INSANE and must be STOPPED! Let us ALL write to the German government about this? Ask them if they ever really did, “learn,” anything from World War Two? And let them know you will be supporting ANY Ukrainian refugees who sue the German government, for collaboration with the enemy. We actually have the power to kill Russia’s economy and stop Putin in his tracks. Yes, we will be wounded. But not nearly so badly as Putin’s victims. We WILL be next.
    2
  13333. 2
  13334. 2
  13335. It’s, “Incongruity,” that makes jokes work. The switch in the expectations of the audience. You paint a mental image in the mind of your audience; e.g. “What’s long, red, and dangles between Putin’s trembling knees?” The audience thinks of something rude, in all probably, so here comes the, “subversion of their expectation,” the, “switch,” in the punchline; “Donald Trump’s Tie.” The mental image has been flipped, and the audience lol’s because they’ve put the pieces together and expressed a sound that requires no further interaction; but shows they’ve gotten the joke and are ready for the next one . . . E.g; “A racist, a sex predator and an idiot walk into a bar, and the bartender says, ‘What are you having, Mr Trump?’” Bait and switch. We saw three separate people in our mind’s eye, then our expectation was subverted, as we realise the joke teller is saying all three describe one person. Jokes work in the same way riddles do, with a sense of satisfaction in the audience, at piecing the clues together, but much faster than riddles. We, the audience, solve the problem in our heads and are mildly flattered at being, “on the same page,” as the comedian. The release of tension is not only quicker than a riddle, but intensified by it’s speed, which is why one liners are so effective. The problem with Gutfeld’s, “comedy,” is that the, “switch,” is not coming. We already know the punchline. Just saying, “the master,” is, “racist,” and then using every instance of, “master,” known to humanity, involves no subversion and therefore is not, “technically,” even a joke. His other problem, when he, “has,” managed the subversion of expectation - slight of hand - is also the other, perennial, problem of comedy that so many bad comedians don’t get. Can your audience already predict where the subversion is leading? If they can, and the audience sees the punchline coming, there’s no real subversion, because even a child can predict the punchline. They feel smarter than the comedian, and vaguely insulted that they’re, “meant,” to be on that, low IQ wavelength. That’s why they call it, “telegraphed humor.” Because the audience has already received the telegram with the punchline delivered before the comedian can show up with it. It’s a delicate art, that skilled comics make, “look,” brash, when they’re really good at it. A lot of brash, shouty people make Gutfeld’s mistake, of thinking, “Because I am brash, I am therefore funny.” The two things are rarely compatible, which is why in real life, most of the, “brash comedians,” you meet are not like that at all, but usually polite, calm, reasonable people, who have an, “act.” Bill Burr, for example, is not permanently angry about everything. Humor is never funny when you analyse it. But, it’s a technical skill and an art form, like writing, acting, singing and dancing. The skill is in learning the technical stuff and then HIDING that from your audience, to make it LOOK natural; and being smart enough to know that it’s, “natural,” to no one, so you train and LEARN it in the first place. Gutfeld needs to punctuate all his, “gags,” with a child’s voice going, “OOF!” It’s literally like watching SNL do, “What if Fascists Tried To Be Funny?” He hasn’t learned the basic techniques of comedy, and like all Alt-Wrong idiots (trump especially) he thinks he just, “knows,” how it works, despite never having put in the hours for his craft. Now he’s paying the price for his arrogance. What would you bet that, when he packs it in, not too long from now, he won’t admit he’s not funny? What would you bet, that he blames, “Cancel Culture?” ✌️👍
    2
  13336. 2
  13337. 2
  13338. 2
  13339. 2
  13340. 2
  13341. 2
  13342. 2
  13343. 2
  13344. 2
  13345. 2
  13346. 2
  13347. 2
  13348. 2
  13349. 2
  13350. 2
  13351. 2
  13352. 2
  13353. 2
  13354. 2
  13355. 2
  13356. 2
  13357. 2
  13358. 2
  13359. 2
  13360. 2
  13361. 2
  13362. 2
  13363. 2
  13364. 2
  13365. 2
  13366. 2
  13367. 2
  13368. 2
  13369. 2
  13370. 2
  13371. 2
  13372. 2
  13373. 2
  13374. 2
  13375. 2
  13376. 2
  13377. 2
  13378. 2
  13379. 2
  13380. 2
  13381. 2
  13382. 2
  13383. 2
  13384. 2
  13385. 2
  13386. 2
  13387. 2
  13388. 2
  13389. 2
  13390. 2
  13391. 2
  13392. 2
  13393. 2
  13394. 2
  13395. 2
  13396. 2
  13397. 2
  13398. 2
  13399. 2
  13400. 2
  13401. 2
  13402. 2
  13403. 2
  13404. 2
  13405. 2
  13406. 2
  13407. 2
  13408. 2
  13409. 2
  13410. 2
  13411. 2
  13412. 2
  13413. 2
  13414. 2
  13415. 2
  13416. 2
  13417. 2
  13418. 2
  13419. 2
  13420. 2
  13421. 2
  13422. 2
  13423. 2
  13424. 2
  13425. 2
  13426. 2
  13427. 2
  13428. 2
  13429.  @jacksonpaul167  : All democracies are flawed. That is the inherent problem with a system that enfranchises everyone, regardless of their comprehension of current affairs, education levels or income. You can even get democracies that vote against their own interests, installing anti-democratic leaders, like trump, Hitler and the first Shah of Iran after the US propped up state dictatorship fell. In those last two cases, the countries themselves did not have a robust constitution from which challenges to their leadership were empowered enough to retain their democratic systems. In trump’s case, the opposite was true. This is why people are willing to fight and die for a strong, robust democracy. Because the leaders will come and go and some of them will break their own rules, but they are ultimately held accountable, which was why Nixon narrowly avoided jail and the disgrace of an impeachment trial, by trading away his power and handing it back to the electorate. And why 60 of his enablers went to jail. It is why trump faces criminal trials now. Some leaders get away with it, like the Bush family, or while their underlings pay the the price, like Reagan’s contra pedlars. But the system rights itself and ultimately, the rule of law prevails. You, on the other hand, have no arguments, so you repeated the category error I already called you out for, and went back down the telescopic view of history to cherry pick the pieces that serve your, “argument,” (or so you think) instead of addressing the mistake, or dealing with the topic. You are, therefore, forcing the casual reader into the conclusion that you don’t have the intellectual wherewithal to deal with the issues at hand. The term, “Rules Based Society,” is just some western catch phrase to you, meaning nothing to a young man who has never known a society with an effective rule of law. You probably think it’s fine to just steal another person’s country and come up with, “justifications,” after the fact, based purely on answering the loudest complaints, rather than any political, “ideology,” or legitimate argument. It is pointless trying to explain the value of law to a person who, if he is not a chat bot, might as well be.
    2
  13430. 2
  13431. 2
  13432. 2
  13433. 2
  13434. 2
  13435. 2
  13436. 2
  13437. 2
  13438. 2
  13439. 2
  13440. 2
  13441. 2
  13442. 2
  13443. 2
  13444. 2
  13445. 2
  13446. 2
  13447. 2
  13448. 2
  13449. 2
  13450. 2
  13451. 2
  13452. 2
  13453. 2
  13454. 2
  13455. 2
  13456. 2
  13457. 2
  13458. 2
  13459. 2
  13460. 2
  13461. 2
  13462. 2
  13463. 2
  13464. 2
  13465. 2
  13466. 2
  13467. 2
  13468. 2
  13469. 2
  13470. 2
  13471. 2
  13472. 2
  13473. 2
  13474. 2
  13475. 2
  13476. 2
  13477. 2
  13478. 2
  13479. 2
  13480. 2
  13481. 2
  13482. 2
  13483. 2
  13484. 2
  13485. 2
  13486. 2
  13487. 2
  13488. 2
  13489. 2
  13490. 2
  13491. 2
  13492. 2
  13493. 2
  13494. 2
  13495. 2
  13496. 2
  13497. 2
  13498. 2
  13499. 2
  13500. 2
  13501. 2
  13502. 2
  13503. 2
  13504. 2
  13505. 2
  13506. 2
  13507. 2
  13508. 2
  13509. 2
  13510. 2
  13511. 2
  13512. 2
  13513. 2
  13514. 2
  13515. 2
  13516. 2
  13517. 2
  13518. 2
  13519. 2
  13520. 2
  13521. 2
  13522. 2
  13523. 2
  13524. 2
  13525. 2
  13526. 2
  13527. 2
  13528. 2
  13529. 2
  13530. 2
  13531. 2
  13532. 2
  13533. 2
  13534. 2
  13535. 2
  13536. 2
  13537. 2
  13538. 2
  13539. 2
  13540. 2
  13541. 2
  13542. 2
  13543.  @papaiamericano5420  : I think his isolation from Covid in the last two years may have gotten to him? He’s apparently more paranoid and not playing well with others in his Cabinet. It’s hard to tell whether he has a terminal diagnosis of some kind and just doesn’t care, or if he just thinks he’s a Bond Villain, but he has already threatened us with nukes, so the west will not let that go, even if they’re inclined to let him think so for a while. In over a hundred years the west has trodden over millions of corpses to maintain control over energy supplies. I don’t think they’re going to let Putin be an exception. Only a nut job lets another nut job point a loaded gun at their head twice. The west will pour resources into getting Putin’s bellicose, sticky fingers off of that trigger now. Whether it’s by backing a palace coup, stirring up dissent in Russia or arming Ukraine (all three and more, probably) they (we) cannot afford to rest until he’s out of the picture. It’s all fun and games if your name is Kim and your sabre can’t reach across the coast of Japan, but when you have the power to burn the world a thousand times over, and you’re putting your stations on high alert whilst making threats, it’s probably time to put you in a padded cell where you can’t harm yourself and others, right? We can count on his oligarch buddies not being in a suicide pact, and there’s always someone waiting in the wings . . . Besides, there’s the other factor he’s so badly miscalculated too, his people. While he’s been able to use the spectre of Cold War austerity as a way of saying, “Well, at least it’s not as bad as the old days?” now the people are seeing exactly that. Not just free speech getting you 15 years either, but all their favourite TV and news stations are closing down. When they have to cue all day for one loaf of bread, and face a beating for complaining about it, someone is going to say, “F*ck this! We would be rich if we took our trillions back from the oligarchs and made friends with the west. Let’s tear down the Kremlin!”
    2
  13544. 2
  13545. 2
  13546. 2
  13547. 2
  13548. 2
  13549. 2
  13550. 2
  13551. 2
  13552. 2
  13553. 2
  13554. 2
  13555. 2
  13556. 2
  13557. 2
  13558. 2
  13559. 2
  13560. 2
  13561. 2
  13562. 2
  13563. 2
  13564. 2
  13565.  @mrkiplingreallywasanexceed8311  : When I saw the length of your comment I thought, “Oh oh, hear we go,” but I was pleasantly disabused. I listen to that interview with David Owen, agreed with almost everything he said, but was angered by his (as you put it), “pusillanimity,” regarding the question of Crimea and the ultimate settlement with Moscow. It struck me as not just patrician, patronising and out of touch - with one eye on doing business with the same old Russian faces after the war and maintaining the status quo - but also quite divorced from the reality on the ground. It reminded me of the same surprise Zelensky gave the Americans when he said, “I don’t need a ride, I need ammunition,” and refused to be evacuated. Many in the west still don’t see what Ukraine sees as clear as a bell. Once Russia is out of Ukraine, they will never cease their terror bombings in the way they’re doing now, unless they are physically beaten into submission, or their administration collapses. It is easy to assume, from the moral absenteeism of the Russian population, and the country’s history, in which two collapses of government in the last century lead to equally corrupt governments taking over, that if Putin is replaced, it will be by just another oligarch. Yet, I demur on this question, because of the absolute vacuum of intelligent or capable men left in Putin’s orbit. When Stalin died, the people left alive to replace him never questioned Communism as a system, but all were not really fit to run a country, which showed. Had Stalin been killed in a revolution, the people left standing would not have had the intellect or wherewithal to withstand a concerted onslaught. And this will be the first time in Russia 1000 year history where we may see the possibility of a concerted revolution and people of genuine imagination and ability rise up from outside Putin’s bubble to take power . . . possibly? But, either way, the politicians of the west have shown that they are slowly coming to understand that Ukraine is not putting Crimea up for debate, any more than Kiev. And they will not cease hostilities with Russia until their homeland is made safe from hostile attacks, rather than being forced to live like Palestinians in the West Bank, constantly wondering when and where the next missile strikes are coming. Yes, a deal will have to be made in the end. But ANY deal simply cannot involve surrendering an inch of soil to Putin or Zelensky will get thrown out at the next election, replaced by someone willing to fight, and place the west back in the same quandaries anyway. I put it in my comment that if he was talking about Cornwall or Wales, we would all be naturally and rightly appalled and enraged by his sickeningly myopic, “Daddy knows best,” attitude. I site Cornwall and Wales, because both have made noises about independence and devolution in the past, but equally, both would rather see their land nuked than fall into the hands of a Stalinist dictatorship, and we do not need to question whether they would stand with Westminster, should such a question (implausible as it is) arise. It was such a shame, because I could not fault him on everything else he said. Indeed I found myself nodding to the suggestion of selling top of the line jets to Poland, so they can donate their jets to Ukraine. After all, Poland spends a whopping 5% of GDP on its military and the contracts mean prosperity for British workers and companies. And that makes for a blunt answer to those who complain about their taxes being wasted on Ukraine. But it also served as a reminder as to why Lord Owen never saw his own party achieve power when he was an MP, and why so much of his political career was so disastrous. He really does see it all through the old boy establishment lens. And that lens cracked back in the 80’s. By now, it is completely shattered. I just hope they keep him out of any diplomacy involving settlements? ✌️🇺🇦
    2
  13566. 2
  13567. 2
  13568. 2
  13569. 2
  13570. 2
  13571. 2
  13572. 2
  13573. 2
  13574. 2
  13575. 2
  13576. 2
  13577. 2
  13578. 2
  13579. 2
  13580. 2
  13581. 2
  13582. 2
  13583. 2
  13584. 2
  13585. The value of these educational videos is immeasurable. The fact that they are entertaining and inspiring is a bonus. Thank you, Anna. I apologise, but I feel compelled to disagree strongly about only one thing you said. You asserted that Putin, “did not see Ukraine was strong,” in 2014. Actually, (and this is only my opinion, but) I believe it was BECAUSE Putin could see how strong, passionate and united Ukraine was, that he wanted to stamp that out of you. Ukraine is a giant resource in Putin’s eyes, sitting on as much untapped mineral wealth and food production as the rest 0f Russia, in all probability, if only your country was left in peace to govern its own affairs and exploit its own resources. Putin wants that. He’s a mafia crook, trying to steal what you have. He certainly doesn’t want a rival country, closer to Europe (both geographically and politically) providing all the goods and services his nation relies on. So, it was the very fact of your strength, unity, national pride and belief in freedom and democracy that frightened him so much and enraged him. His plan up until then was just to keep corrupting your politicians while he sent bogus, “nationalists,” to eat away at the sovereignty of your borders, until the whole country became so dysfunctional and, “Sovietised,” that it eventually dropped into his lap. Combined with the west’s former utter lack of urgency and total inaction at his previous crimes, and he saw a situation in which he thought he could get away with it. As with all bullies, it IS your, “strength,” your dignity, your courage and your determination that bothers him so much and goads him into lashing out. He knows no other way and is not bright enough to be taught. This is why there is no other course for the west but to see it through to the end. Putin in particular, but Russia as a whole, MUST BE DEFEATED. And that means total victory for Ukraine. No other outcome could truly end this war. Thank you again, for your spirit in the face of the enemy, which inspires me so. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦✌️🇬🇧
    2
  13586. 2
  13587. 2
  13588. 2
  13589. 2
  13590. 2
  13591. 2
  13592. 2
  13593. 2
  13594. 2
  13595. 2
  13596.  @GeneralSamov  : Again, you’re assuming much, but not things that can be found in my words. Those under Federal Indictment, right now, will take their confessions as the, “out,” they’re looking for, so as to reinforce their message of, “remorse,” to a judge, hoping for a reduced sentence and future employability. Several of the Q followers, who have been writing all over social media, expressing their, “shock,” and, “disappointment,” that trump didn’t round up the Dems at the Inauguration, and retake the presidency (As Q said would happen) will be able to ease several more followers out with them. But, that will leave the vast majority of the racists, the proto-Nazis and the under educated, “They’re t’kin’ urr jerbz,” types behind. No one is expecting that America will suddenly wake up, as if from a fevered dream, and snap out of it? And, I’m not suggesting that either. But, what they will have, is their STICK taken from them. Their ability to claim, “legitimacy,” for what has always been a lunatic fringe movement, at the centre of main stream politics, wreaking havoc, and literally killing Americans in droves; whether by inaction over a plague ravaging our most vulnerable, or by direct violence. No one will be able to claim our government is not legitimate, without being treated in the same fashion that fringe Conspiracy Theorists usually are, and the fracture between those in the GOP who have built their careers around the trump edifice, and those who game the system, like Mitch McConnell, will become a gulf, too wide to straddle. They will go their separate ways, and the main stream system gamers will survive to stay in politics, because the Dems will assist them. The symptom of Trump will become treatable, through criminal law, and the disease of the GOP (as we’re already seeing) will become evident. The cause, Putin, will grow more apparent, and the vector, Fox and Fiends (and their ilk) will be vulnerable to new Sedition Laws, with any good fortune and a helping hand from God? The bitterness of defeat, and the shame and embarrassment of exposure will make some crazy (something else we’re seeing plenty of already) but these people will not be ignored. And, slowly, they will be rehabilitated, or shunned. Their numbers will dwindle, but they will never be forgotten, or failed to be dealt with, when they arise. People in search of a cult don’t go away. But, we can offer them better things
    2
  13597. 2
  13598. 2
  13599. 2
  13600. 2
  13601. 2
  13602. 2
  13603. 2
  13604. 2
  13605. 2
  13606. 2
  13607. 2
  13608. 2
  13609. 2
  13610. 2
  13611. 2
  13612. 2
  13613. 2
  13614. 2
  13615. 2
  13616. 2
  13617. 2
  13618. 2
  13619. 2
  13620. 2
  13621. 2
  13622. 2
  13623. 2
  13624. 2
  13625. 2
  13626.  @PaulGreeve  : I love her show and her style, but haven’t read her book. Yet, I don’t agree with her entirely. Taking a page from your own book, so to speak, I disagree in principle that the mere investigation of what sets the values of anti-matter versus baryonic matter is valueless. Whether we call it a, “problem,” or not is merely word play, after all? It’s an interesting mystery. Dirac only predicted that there would be such a thing as, “anti-matter,” by doing math and he was later proven correct, though he never suggested he knew what the amount would be. So far, so cleared up, and thank you to Sabine for that. Yet, to just take the, “Shut up and calculate,” attitude thereafter and to suggest that it’s time wasting to delve deeper into that mystery is wrong headed in my view. I am not expert enough to comment on whether the vast sums spent on colliders is worth it or not, or if the science is valid when it comes to this question in particular, but there is an obvious question worthy of investigation by science isn’t there? If the amounts of anti-matter and matter were 1 to 1 equal, there would be no universe in which we could ponder the question at all. So, isn’t it natural to wonder what caused that imbalance? It was by pondering such questions that Einstein came up with his ideas, for which later scientists like Arthur Eddington dreamt up experiments that could prove him right. Either, there was an equal amount of both matter types and there was something that caused them to avoid direct contact in the earliest moments of the universe’s existence, or there were different amounts to start with? Either way, how is trying to discover which is the case a waste of any scientist’s time? Knowing what conditions set these values could change our understanding of physics altogether? I think it’s a slippery slight of hand to try to invalidate the question, just because you would rather spend money an resources differently. She admits herself that it would be, “wonderful to know the answer.” But, then just goes on to say there is no way to figure it out. I think she’s wrong about that, and about the ingenuity of science to come up with ways of interrogating these questions. She reminds me of Hoyle dismissing the Big Bang theory whilst coining the expression, refuting the very basis of the science out of a personal dislike, rather than for a scientific reason. To speak in absolutes, “There is no science in existence today equipped to investigate the question,” (I’m paraphrasing, but that’s pretty much what she said) is a bonkers thing to say, like standing in a forest and saying, “There’s nothing here from which we could build a house,” when a thousand carpenters would beg to differ. Don’t get me wrong. I love her show, and she’s usually right on the money. But she has an emotive attitude that sometimes gets the better of her, which a lot of people miss because of her cool Germanic style. This seems to me to be one of those cases. Of course it’s an intriguing question, from which the whole of physics would benefit by the answer! Maybe the debate should be about, “how,: it is investigated, not, “if,” it should be? What do you think? ✌️
    2
  13627. 2
  13628. 2
  13629. 2
  13630. 2
  13631. 2
  13632. 2
  13633. 2
  13634. 2
  13635. 2
  13636. 2
  13637. 2
  13638. 2
  13639. 2
  13640. 2
  13641. 2
  13642. 2
  13643. 2
  13644. 2
  13645. 2
  13646. 2
  13647. 2
  13648. 2
  13649. 2
  13650. 2
  13651. 2
  13652. 2
  13653. 2
  13654. 2
  13655. 2
  13656. 2
  13657. 2
  13658. 2
  13659. 2
  13660. 2
  13661. 2
  13662. 2
  13663. 2
  13664. 2
  13665. 2
  13666. 2
  13667. 2
  13668. 2
  13669. 2
  13670. 2
  13671. 2
  13672. 2
  13673. The irony is that their coverups draw more attention and cause them to be even less popular than the actual things they’re covering up! I mean, who TF will be even remotely, “surprised,” that all of these WhatsApp messages contain nothing more than a gag reel of sick jokes at the bereaved’s expense, confessions of knowingly doing harm, insider dealing for their friends and family’s brand new, “companies,” meant to provide the protection equipment for hospitals, and MP’s handing off all of their own responsibilities to civil servants!? My dad, having had a series of mini strokes, was like that protagonist in the Christopher Nolan film Memento, where he couldn’t make new memories and he kept asking for his wife, my mum, whom we’d buried the year before. He had it explained to him over and over again that his four children were not allowed to be with him, and why, but forget again within minutes. So, in his world, he died of Covid, alone, and heart broken, unable to comprehend why he was alone. After going through a series of loopholes, so I could get permission to attend his funeral, travelling from Scotland to England, I returned home, weary and emotionally exhausted, so I only have myself to blame for putting on a current affairs program. But the first image I saw when I got back, now SEARED into the scar tissue of my neuro-divergent brain, was some Tory press wonk, standing before the agog press and a live camera, ACTUALLY LAUGHING OUT LOUD at the drunken antics of Cabinet members and Number 10 staff at a series of parties for Boris Johnson’s birthday! I can never relate that vertigo inducing sensation you get when you have been forced against your better judgement to place your trust in the government at a time of genuine, worldwide crisis, only to see that they drunk at the wheel! And LAUGHING IN YOUR FACE! I know there are many out there who went through something similar, some of them with worse mental health issues than me to begin with. And I will NEVER forgive or forget that utterly self-entitled, reckless, arrogant, cruel indifference to the fates of so many trusting fools like me. So now, when I hear that they want to cover up what we all KNOW we will find - cruelty, selfishness, indifference, arrogance, theft under the guise of business as usual and flat out incompetence - I once again feel that revolutionary RAGE boiling in my blood. It will be good for the country when the Tories are sent into the wilderness and not allowed to re-enter the corridors of power until they’ve culled their far right deliberate antagonists of the people and self enriching Masonic lodge Liberal Economics clubs they call, “think tanks,” altogether. But in the mean time, we have one HELL of a mess to clean up and a MOUNTAIN of hard cash to reappropriate for the people who earned it.
    2
  13674. 2
  13675. 2
  13676. 2
  13677. 2
  13678. 2
  13679. 2
  13680. 2
  13681. 2
  13682. 2
  13683. 2
  13684. 2
  13685. 2
  13686. 2
  13687. 2
  13688. 2
  13689. 2
  13690. 2
  13691. 2
  13692. 2
  13693. 2
  13694. 2
  13695. 2
  13696. 2
  13697. 2
  13698. 2
  13699. 2
  13700. 2
  13701. 2
  13702. 2
  13703. 2
  13704. 2
  13705. 2
  13706. 2
  13707. 2
  13708. 2
  13709. 2
  13710. 2
  13711. 2
  13712. 2
  13713. 2
  13714. 2
  13715. 2
  13716. 2
  13717. 2
  13718. 2
  13719. 2
  13720. 2
  13721. 2
  13722. 2
  13723. 2
  13724. 2
  13725. 2
  13726. 2
  13727. 2
  13728. 2
  13729.  @armstrongcatherine  : Surely there are no scales in which to weigh the balance? In every single war we learn of some war crime or other, committed by our own side, as we do here. It is to be expected from those who are walking among their own dead relatives in the rubble of their own homes, as much as it was from those who’d survived Hitler’s Blitz on London when they got to Berlin. The difference, then as now, is that the Russian army uses rape, looting, torture and murder as their METHOD of warfare. And the very fact of their instantaneous gaslighting denials, before they could possibly have enough information to evaluate the truth of allegations, tells you all you need to know. Like our own armed forces, the Ukrainians must expect an occasional war crime, and they do, as we saw, acknowledge it, and deal with it through Courts Martial. They treat it as the, “exception,” because that’s what it is. The Russian army (and I say this without value judgement) is made up of largely under educated, poverty stricken young men, with a Third World mentality. Russia still has the highest stats on alcoholism in the world, to boot. They see acts of terror and cowardice as, “normal,” not exceptional, and they believe that conquering a city grants them the right to rape, loot and murder. And their military culture is built around, “the spoils of war,” like medieval bandits. They are so unlike us in their thinking and superstitious belief systems as to be practically aliens. And it must be GALLING for Zelensky’s advisor to have to even tolerate such a badly put question with its false equivalencies, its utter discounting of the suffering of Ukrainian citizens and its almost brutal blindness as to how it offers assistance to the Russian enemy by drawing those false comparisons. It’s not the question that was wrong. It needed to be highlighted, to draw out the differences between the two armies for the world to see. It was the blundering, aggressive and frankly obtuse manner of its asking that was so offensively wrong headed.
    2
  13730. 2
  13731. 2
  13732. 2
  13733. 2
  13734. 2
  13735. 2
  13736. 2
  13737. 2
  13738. 2
  13739. 2
  13740. 2
  13741. 2
  13742. 2
  13743. 2
  13744. 2
  13745. 2
  13746. 2
  13747. 2
  13748. 2
  13749. 2
  13750. 2
  13751. 2
  13752. 2
  13753. 2
  13754. 2
  13755. I think Heard was demonised: by Amber Heard, out of her own mouth. Anyone who watched the key points of the trial saw for themselves that this was in no way a case of, “he said, she said.” This was a deliberate, malignant attempt to vindictively destroy a good man, by a villain who thought her victim was too drugged up and too basically decent to defend himself. Never forget, this woman is physically brutal, mentally depraved, morally bankrupt and conniving even now. She is showing us that she’s learned nothing from her experience and is far too narcissistic to accept just how completely her lies and her schemes were exposed. And her, “lawyer,” is like the Black Knight is Monty Python And The Holy Grail, saying, “Tis but a scratch,” when her arm is cut off! She’s not just unable to see that she’s utterly beaten, she’s making a complete arse of herself in the process! It was a perfect storm of total incompetence from start to finish, with everything from their choices of witnesses to Berenhoft’s, “I’m trying,” performance, set against the slick yet very human and humane performance of Depp’s council and the consistent witnesses they chose. Depp was clearly more than innocent. He was a victim! For six long years. Losing respect, his career and countless millions. Not to mention the appalling incalculable damage Heard inflicted on all those sick children that Depp would have otherwise visited in hospitals around the world, dressed as Captain Jack Sparrow. Just think of all the heartbreak Heard inflicted on children who have been visited by him or who had visits cancelled, as they falsely believed their idol was a, “wife beater.” Heard was demonised alright. By herself! Because Amber Heard is and remains a DEMON!
    2
  13756. 2
  13757. 2
  13758. 2
  13759. 2
  13760. 2
  13761. 2
  13762. 2
  13763. 2
  13764. 2
  13765. 2
  13766. 2
  13767. 2
  13768. 2
  13769. 2
  13770. 2
  13771. 2
  13772. 2
  13773. 2
  13774. 2
  13775. 2
  13776. 2
  13777. 2
  13778. 2
  13779. 2
  13780. 2
  13781. 2
  13782. 2
  13783. 2
  13784. 2
  13785. 2
  13786. Which leaves us in the uncomfortable position of not being able to wholeheartedly trust any given poll, yet not being able to entirely dismiss their findings. The thing I find most helpful, when I’m at all bothered to know what a poll truly says (which is not often) is to go to the source, find out who did the poll, what the exact grammar of the question was and how it was put to them, and all of that comes after learning what the demographic was and whether they’re a true representation of the target group. There’s a world of difference, for instance between answering a poll privately instead of in front of friends, family or colleagues. There’s a world of difference between whether it was filling in a form or giving verbal answers to a person on the phone, who may or may not have been trained to lead their subject with cunning linguistics, and who may just hang up on people who sound like they’re not going to give them the answers they’re looking for. However, what’s of genuine use is not so much the findings of the poll, but what it tells you about the concerns of those who conduct them. What is it that they hope to prove and why they want to show it, and when, and in what way, tells you quite a lot about the internal politics of certain groups and gives clues as to what to expect in the near future. In the same way that Julius Caesar’s memoirs about the Gallic Wars don’t necessarily give a reliable account of the facts, they certainly tell you all you need to know about how propaganda worked in Ancient Rome at the time, what people thought was important and what made them, “look good,” to their audience, making it an invaluable historical document, for those who know how to read it. ✌️
    2
  13787. 2
  13788. 2
  13789. 2
  13790. Sir . . . Oh, captain my captain . . . What can I say. May every joy of the coming celebrations be yours. You who worked so hard; who marshalled the voices of history, deployed and commanded them in the field; who’s withering criticism of the GOP cannot have failed to influence the hearts of many. The Laurel Wreath of victory goes to you, sir. With my thanks and sincere admiration. Not an easy romp, but a hard won battle, like the climax of Ben Hur. And like that character, Masala, trump ultimately crushed himself, with his own dirty tricks, and is left broken on the field, ignored by the thrilled crowds, who flocked to your banner. Of course, our work is not done; not until Biden is Inaugurated. But, you gave so much more than so many, and you deserve the thanks of a grateful nation. 😁✌️👍🥳 True fact: I was gone, completely, for a crucial 24 hours, during Election Day. I had been banned from YouTube, permanently, for, “hate speech,” and, “threats.” It turned out, trolls had banded together to, “complaint bomb,” me, from around the world, simply to silence me. You can’t make this up, can you? With my ONE, single chance to have them look at their decision, I was able to show that it was, of course, all lies. I now have my status restored, with zero strikes on my record, and I am in, “Good Standing,” again. But, I share this to illustrate. Little ole’ me, who comments a lot, on politics, was targeted by malicious trolls, who pulled off a minor coup, removing me from the Election Day discourse, altogether. Imagine what they would do to our government with those kinds of resources, if we let them? Putin’s Pockets are deep, and I urge you to consider what you might write in that little box YouTube gives you, to defend your own reputation, should it happen to you? You get ONE shot at defending yourself, and after that, it’s automated rejection, from then on. Our chance to push back, in a meaningful way is upon us now, and I’m in it for the duration. That attack decided me. I was actually going to stop commenting, after Biden’s Inauguration. But, since trump’s trolls have flattered me with their attentions (some of whom have now themselves been banned for making, “malicious complaints,” which were, “without merit”) they have merely demonstrated that I have had an effect, that they were desperate enough to risk their own necks to rid themselves of that effect; however tiny. So, a giant like you is bound to find himself in their crosshairs, sooner or later. Be ready. I write for a living, so I was able to be articulate, and necessarily brief, even though I was also writing in urgent haste (keen to have input) and whilst feeling rather miffed. I don’t kid myself that a guy who writes comments on YouTube is any kind of an, “influencer,” but the mere fact that they attempted to silence me, and timed it, to shut me down at a key moment in history, is a lesson I will never forget. Even if I can only measure my effect in terms of negative impact upon the enemies of Democracy, I’ll take that, and run with it. Sorry to have been so long winded, but if I could buy you a drink and shake your hand (or bump elbows😉) I would count myself honoured. The fact is, the world NEEDS more people like you in it. Enjoy your well earned celebrations and the best Christmas ever, my friend. And thank you, for everything you did; and did so very, very well 🖖👏👍✌️
    2
  13791. 2
  13792. 2
  13793. 2
  13794. 2
  13795. 2
  13796. 2
  13797. 2
  13798. 2
  13799. 2
  13800. 2
  13801. 2
  13802. 2
  13803. 2
  13804. 2
  13805. 2
  13806. 2
  13807. 2
  13808. 2
  13809. 2
  13810. 2
  13811. 2
  13812. 2
  13813. 2
  13814. 2
  13815. 2
  13816. 2
  13817. 2
  13818. 2
  13819. 2
  13820. 2
  13821. 2
  13822. 2
  13823. 2
  13824. 2
  13825. 2
  13826. 2
  13827. 2
  13828. 2
  13829. 2
  13830. 2
  13831. 2
  13832. 2
  13833. 2
  13834. 2
  13835. 2
  13836. 2
  13837. 2
  13838. 2
  13839.  @colehowe  : If you’re really interested, and have the patience, this is the discussion you need: It’s a genuine perfect storm of one, “leader’s,” stupidity. He was never a, “smart,” man. He rose through the ranks of the KGB by taking advantage of the Wild West environment created in the vacuum of a post Soviet Russia. He co-opted the mafia into his secret services, making him rich. Alexander Litvinenko was a colonel in the KGB at the time and the reason Putin hated him so much was because he gave a public press conference, naming Putin, as running a scheme to sell Afghan opium and launder the cash into Russia and his own pocket. A world wide press conference was unprecedented enough, but naming names was the make or break moment for Russia. President Yeltsin was either going to clean up Russia’s democracy, or the thugs would win. But Yeltsin was too drunk and too blackmailed by Putin to do a damned thing by then. So Litvinenko was forced to flee Russia and Putin inherited the presidency. They have a word in Russia for which there is no translation directly into English. It means, “I’m lying, and you know I’m lying, but because I have so much power and you have none, we’ll act like this is just a joke, and I’m flattering you by letting you be in on that gag.” I’ll spell it wrongly now, but I think it’s called, “Stoya,” or, “Ztovia,” or something? But it is this, “cultural acting,” that the press and public all take part in that creates this, “illusion,” of Putin being a, “smart,” man. We’ve been losing a lot in translation ever since the 1990’s, and it’s cost us dear. When George Bush has to explain why Putin totally ignored any diplomatic agreements and marched into Chechnya, it’s far easier to for his people to explain it away as Putin’s, “crazy like a fox,” mentality, than to admit that he inexplicably gave us the middle finger. When Barack Obama drew a, “red line,” in Syria, it’s easier for his people to talk about Putin’s, “long game,” than to admit that he has such contempt for the west’s rule of law that he’ll gleefully gas Syrian civilians, committing a brand new set of war crimes whilst breaking any treaties he had with the world. Putin has spent roughly a TRILLION DOLLARS on image making, propaganda and disinformation in the last 10 years alone! And we have been SO SUCKERED by their tactics that, even when we see Russia as the enemy, we STILL fall for their bollox and see their evil through a lens of THEIR making. So we make blunders, like imagining that Putin could take Kiev in three days, or then three weeks, or maybe three months, perhaps three centuries!? We are only now, FINALLY, BEGINNING to see Putin’s Russia for what they really are: FAKES! Russia is no, “smarter,” than Donald Trump. His ideas on, “history,” are not what he, “believes,” but carefully crafted set of intellectually baron EXCUSES written by moderately smarter men. And they are all men. His desire is to take the massive fossil fuel resources of Ukraine and, if he cannot spend them on the open market, he can prevent Ukraine from becoming the economic power house it threatens to become. The top international oil companies were threatened out Ukraine, but prior to the war, they reported findings of gas and oil that could compete with Russia’s supply, off the coast of Crimea alone! Not to mention the coal and oil in the east, and new oil finds just next to the Carpathian Mountains to the west! It was always about the money and the power for Putin and the rest is all excuses and window dressing. His use of terror is deliberate and calculated, and was brought on by the MYTH we sustained in the west that appeasement might work when he invaded Crimea! No one was learning from history, or looking beyond the smoke and mirrors. We might as well have INVITED his invasion with our pusillanimous response to Crimea! But, as to Russian culture, and how they see the world? All the Russian people know is that Putin made his KGB contemporaries, like Cyril, the equivalent of their Pope and head of their Orthodox Church. This was why the Ukrainian government had to close down so many orthodox churches all over Ukraine, recently. They found treasure troves of Russian intelligence in their vestries and that almost every priest in that church was a Russian spy, working for Cyril! That’s pretty BLATANT, don’t you think? People like Litvinenko have been assassinated long ago, in horrid ways. Litvinenko was murdered on British soil and there are warrants out for his murderers. Since the 90’s. And when they were first issued, the suspects gave a press conference, from the same building, in the same room that Litvinenko used to give his and name Putin as a criminal gangster. Pretty strong message there, right? Putin is just a thug and his people know it, by the way they’re having their phones randomly checked in train stations for apps and messages the government doesn’t like, by faceless armed cops; by the way state tv threatens them regularly, whilst all the free speech channels have been shut down. By the way that political dissidents and journalists keep being murdered at home and abroad. But they have been trained to be politically inactive and morally absent. I mean, don’t you think that a population which DOESN’T hit the streets to protest at the bombing of men, women and children, after seeing footage of destroyed cities being celebrated on state TV needs waking up? When they’ve decided it’s, “okay,” to take away ANY nations power and water supply, do they sound like, “thinking,” reasoning people to you? I happen to believe that a collective decision to tolerate genocide warrants collective chastisement. So, when you’re next thinking about the question of the Russian population, just ask yourself how you would respond to such a stimulus? And then ask, why do they not band together to stop this? They are more alien to us than the Chinese, in their psychology. And it’s born of a nation that has NEVER known democracy in a 1000 years. If you followed me all this way, thank you for your patience. Just know I left a LOT out for the sake of brevity. Slava Ukraine. ✌️🇺🇦
    2
  13840. 2
  13841. 2
  13842. 2
  13843. 2
  13844. 2
  13845. 2
  13846. 2
  13847. 2
  13848. 2
  13849. 2
  13850. 2
  13851. 2
  13852. 2
  13853. 2
  13854. 2
  13855. 2
  13856. 2
  13857. 2
  13858. 2
  13859. 2
  13860. 2
  13861. 2
  13862. 2
  13863. 2
  13864. 2
  13865. 2
  13866. 2
  13867. 2
  13868. 2
  13869. 2
  13870. 2
  13871. 2
  13872. 2
  13873. 2
  13874. 2
  13875.  @pathart8854  : Well, you must keep in mind that this is just the beginning and that all the things you are suggesting are exactly what will happen. The sanctions will get harsher, more comprehensive and increasingly watertight. They will spread to other areas of industry and like water finding its own level, goods and services that are no longer available from Russia (or that you won’t buy from Russia, because your partners won’t do business with you if you do) will find that temporary arrangements have a way of becoming permanent ones, with legally binding contracts. It is tragic that whole populations suffer when such things happen, and it seems to have become the modern way of war; fought as hard in the board room as on the battlefield. In that regard, we can probably say that World War Three is already underway. But if the aggressor is causing whole populations to starve and suffer, it is the job of the defending democracies to push that suffering back to its source. If it’s Russia’s population that starves, and if all the rich oligarchs who’ve been enjoying the privileges of western democracy and open markets are forced to go home and starve with them, maybe THEY will take responsibility and DO something about that? After all, Russians have been very accepting of Putin’s dictatorship, so long as things were better than the bad old days? At least they don’t have to cue all day for a loaf of bread and face jail if they complain about it, whilst pretending to love communism? Well, maybe the price they’ll pay for looking the other way when it suited them is more just than it first appears? I don’t wish starvation on ANYONE. But if it is going to happen, I’m willing to pay extra for my gas and put up with a few inconveniences. And if anyone has to starve, we should make damned sure it’s the people who’s country is making war on the free world! Maybe, if they don’t like it, they’ll remove the source of the problem? We’re not expecting a sudden rash of democracy to break out in Russia? The 1990’s taught us that is never likely to happen with rampant mafia and KGB goons forming the entire infrastructure of Russia’s alleged, “political system.” But we can no longer do business with Putin, so we need a change of face. Preferably NOT a leader who thinks the being a, “strong man,” means screaming about his nukes every time he’s upset about something? This story ends with Russian troops withdrawing from Ukraine. All that’s up for grabs is how long that takes and how poor Russia gets while innocents die and the world gets keener on Punishing Russia. If he uses gas, as seems likely, he might well get that World War he claims he doesn’t want?
    2
  13876. 2
  13877. 2
  13878. 1
  13879. 1
  13880. 1
  13881. 1
  13882. 1
  13883. 1
  13884. 1
  13885. 1
  13886. 1
  13887. 1
  13888. 1
  13889. 1
  13890. 1
  13891. 1
  13892. 1
  13893. 1
  13894. 1
  13895. 1
  13896. 1
  13897. 1
  13898. 1
  13899. 1
  13900. 1
  13901. 1
  13902. 1
  13903. 1
  13904. 1
  13905. 1
  13906. 1
  13907. 1
  13908. 1
  13909. 1
  13910. 1
  13911. 1
  13912. 1
  13913. 1
  13914. 1
  13915. 1
  13916. 1
  13917. 1
  13918. 1
  13919. 1
  13920. 1
  13921. 1
  13922. 1
  13923. 1
  13924. 1
  13925. 1
  13926. 1
  13927. 1
  13928. 1
  13929. 1
  13930. 1
  13931. 1
  13932. 1
  13933. 1
  13934. 1
  13935. 1
  13936. 1
  13937. 1
  13938. 1
  13939. 1
  13940. 1
  13941. 1
  13942. 1
  13943. 1
  13944. 1
  13945. 1
  13946. 1
  13947. 1
  13948. 1
  13949. 1
  13950. 1
  13951. 1
  13952. 1
  13953. 1
  13954. 1
  13955. ***** Your points are good ones. We are only oppressed by the language of others when they have power over us & we are unable to address them on equal terms, in which case, it is not really their language but their abuse of power that we would prevent. If we simply want others to stop saying things that offend us, we are trying to control their freedom of speech, which fails to address what they still think and feel, only, now you can never really know what that is. Therefore, we cannot argue, discuss, educate or outside people with offensive attitudes, we can only police their behaviour, which creates the ticking time bomb. There is also the inbuilt assumption that the truth is inoffensive and that to be offensive is to be wrong, which in itself is wrong. When will people accept that you cannot prescribe remedies for the human condition? You can challenge from a position of sincerity, which entails openess to personal correction. But prescription always results in an eventual backlash, due to the inherent injustice that people feel, even if they do not have the education to express it. Which brings me to the fact that the language of PC requires the use of multi-sylable terms which do not come naturally to most people and rely on pseudo scientific references, which therefore make them inherently less accessible to those who do not have a formal education. Among the first casualties of PC are a great many common slang expressions, which come more easily to people and are more widely understood: thus PC can have a disabling effect upon the already disadvantaged. Why should we even have guidelines? If you don't like people's views or language, is that not your problem? I too agree with Zizek IN THIS CASE, though I find many of his views aphorent, but he too is warning of the way in which the left (center or liberal left) are often appearing to sneer at the dumb shit kickers on the right. P C is one of the worst offenders
    1
  13956. 1
  13957. 1
  13958. 1
  13959. 1
  13960. 1
  13961. 1
  13962. 1
  13963. 1
  13964. 1
  13965. 1
  13966. 1
  13967. 1
  13968. 1
  13969. 1
  13970. 1
  13971. 1
  13972. 1
  13973. 1
  13974. 1
  13975. 1
  13976. 1
  13977. 1
  13978. 1
  13979. 1
  13980. 1
  13981. 1
  13982. 1
  13983. 1
  13984. 1
  13985. 1
  13986. 1
  13987. 1
  13988. Z-Statistic Thank you, Z, I was starting to worry that this channel was not reaching the intellectual bench mark it set out for. I am wondering, now, about the libertarian candidate, even though it might be a waste & I haven't done any research on him. I feel irresponsible just sitting on my hands & not voting & I am not disrespectful enough to write "none of the above", & Trump looks like he doesn't need my help anyway, given what the FBI just did for him. I have really enjoyed the output from PragerU & I have learned things I didn't know before, which, upon cross-referencing, stand up to scrutiny. I want the institution to do well, if this material is consistent with the rest of their vision. I still want to see them take on Donald, head on, as it seems the socially responsible thing to do. For or against; or somewhere in between, PragerU has looked at Bush's presidency & is there to influence the political landscape. So give us a short, PragerU, & show us your heart? Fair question? More to follow on your critique of my criticism, but not enough room here. One last thought though. I was recently admonished by a 14 year old sofa more girl for calling her "hyperbolic nonsense" out. She pointed out that a lot more get's said & people listen better (if you actually wanna persuade that person) if you make your points without name calling. I am not offended in the least, but I think it would be good for PragerU if we can discuss the issues & not rant? You call. But so far, I have earned & given more respect from & to a little girl than any of you guys. If, on the other hand, you just want to show off in some way, that's just masturbating for your friends. & I don't do that
    1
  13989. 1
  13990. Z-Statistic 1 I merely responded to the standard proffered to me, not set by me. So, if you were not happy about that, you should have said you were planning on getting all legalistic about it, don't you think? & no one said anything about the courts with regard to this issue other than Trump himself. He is convicted, right or wrong, in the court of public opinion because he said he did things like that. If he was telling the truth, then HE IS guilty of sexual assault WHICH IS a felony. If he was lying about it, he is demonstrating that he thinks that getting away with sexual assault is in some twisted Trumpette reality, A GOOD THING!?!? 2 I doubt, from all of the facts & evidence I have been able to gather, that there was any INTENTION on Hillary's part to break the law. That doesn't mean she is not an idiot & unfit for office, so indict her! Be my guest! However, if Trump was convicted (BY YOUR STANDARD, NOT MINE) for sexual assault, he would be a felon & in jail. The Oval Office just aint that big. 3 I must apologise here, I did not have a clue as to your point? It got lost, for me, in all that shouty, righteous indignation, without their being a discernable point or question that I could make out. It felt like being interviewed by Bill O'Reilly. As to your alphabetical sub-categories; mostly wholly "wrong" as Trump likes to Trump. I was not referring to "defaulting" at all when he stiffed his staff, though I don't doubt that there are plenty of examples we could trawl through there too. You say I have no idea how business works, but I've done pretty ok for myself, without going bankrupt & there are a raft of Billionaire's who have come forward to say that they don't go bankrupt & do not know of ANY WAY that doing so can be described as a good business model. Which states of the Union will he break up & sell off if he is going to run the country in the same way as his businesses, when the country is bankrupt? The rest of your stuff was simply factually inaccurate & I recommend proper research. Your commentary on my style of argument was uncomplimentary; that's a thread I wouldn't pull too hard on, friend, you wouldn't last 2 minutes with my guys.
    1
  13991. 1
  13992. Z-Statistic Look. On the whole "should Hillary be tried" thing, you are preaching to the choir, OK? You'll get no argument from me. But, when I hear this; "the whole prevailing theory . . ." stuff, I think, "theory schmeory!" I have been involved in a lot of situations like this (not with the FBI, I hasten to add) & you MAY BE RIGHT, but you are not looking at it from the "humans are just a bit rubbish" standpoint. You half said it yourself. There are guys & their spouses, all inappropriately close in their professional & personal interests, with blurred ideas about where the line is, until people from the outside see what's happening & shout, "You guys are way over the line!" Bear with me while I run a scenario past you. & I will weigh your view equally carefully: Comey, despite his wife's job, is a paid up republican. Did you know that? silly Q I guess, you're pretty up on all this. His reputation in law enforcement is as a straight arrow, down the line &, before all of this, that was also the view on both sides of The House. Not just squeaky clean, but Kevin Costner in The Untouchables kinda guy. Then he's being thrown to the wolves by both sides & did not come out of his congressional meeting smelling of roses, so he's furious. The one thing a cop relies on (particularly a senior cop, in charge of one of the most prestigious policing organisations IN THE WORLD) is his reputation & his was exceptional, until he got tainted by the politicians. He did his best, that wasn't good enough. THEN: 2 days ago, he's handed this evidence (whatever it is; damning, suspicious or just don't know) & thinks to himself, "Chrissakes!" "After getting burned last time, I am not sticking my neck out for anyone. I could sit on it, so as not to be seen trying to influence an election? The right will, quite correctly, say that my decision DID influence the election. But, if I notify congress right away, the left will cry "sabotage!" Well, to hell with all of them! I'll do my job & let the chips fall where they may. They took my good name so I don't owe anybody anything! But I'll be damned if I ever give them good cause to try! That's the more realistic, human reality that I see. & HE probably has no clue as to whether the stuff he has is even important. How could he? There are thousands of emails to go through. I think he did the right thing. But I don't believe that there was EVER a cover up. The FBI is way past its J Edgar Hoover days, thankfully.
    1
  13993. 1
  13994. 1
  13995. Z-Statistic Oh well, you don't need to be Robert Ludlum to come up with a scenario; more pure guessery here but, off the top 'o my head; Clinton, or her lawyer, or whom-ever says, "There was a classified CIA operation going on at the time, & we had reason to believe the regular lines of communication were compromised." Or you could say, "Some of the emails concerned have been destroyed under the Homeland Security Act because, if we gave them to you, you would produce them for Congress, & an ongoing operation of major Putin, China, Iran, Iraq, Syria proportions will expose every operative in the field." Sounds ludicrous on YouTube, but make the lie big enough & it wouldn't cross Comey's mind that they might be lying to him. Besides, you can classify stuff & then classify that classification (Super-Injunction style) & then Comey may find himself in the position where he cannot legally expose the lie! It aint that plausible but it wouldn't be unprecedented. I just think, what's more likely, even than all of the above, is that Comey buckled under pressure. Maybe he was told he was having undue influence on politics at the outset of the inquiry a year or so ago? Maybe he blanched when his reputation was threatened & did what so many guys like that do & blinked in the face of a 30+ year player against whom he never stood an intellectual chance? I just think that he is either on the make in SUCH a big & subtle way that he is outsmarting Congress, the FBI, both parties his family & the public, or he's an honest man who is gonna get fricked 6 ways from Sunday after the election. He may be the Republican's darling now, but come the 9th, they will know they can't trust him because he tried to let Hillary go, & Hillary sure can't trust him. Do you think he will get his contract renewed by the next administration? Whoever that is? Worst case scenario, he has been looking for a way to make good after, as you said, taking part in shady dealings. But my gut is pretty reliable on these things & he's not one of those kinds of players. He's a cop's cop, respected by his men & women; difficult, stubborn & with a tendency to speak up politically on matters that would traditionally be left off the FBI talking points list. No saint. But not a sinner, either.
    1
  13996. 1
  13997. 1
  13998. 1
  13999. 1
  14000. 1
  14001. 1
  14002. 1
  14003. 1
  14004. 1
  14005. 1
  14006. 1
  14007. 1
  14008. 1
  14009. 1
  14010. 1
  14011. 1
  14012. 1
  14013. 1
  14014. 1
  14015. 1
  14016. 1
  14017. 1
  14018. 1
  14019. 1
  14020. 1
  14021. 1
  14022. 1
  14023. 1
  14024. 1
  14025. 1
  14026. 1
  14027. 1
  14028. 1
  14029. 1
  14030. 1
  14031. 1
  14032. 1
  14033. 1
  14034. 1
  14035. 1
  14036. 1
  14037. 1
  14038. 1
  14039. 1
  14040. 1
  14041. 1
  14042. 1
  14043. 1
  14044. 1
  14045. 1
  14046. 1
  14047. 1
  14048. 1
  14049. 1
  14050. 1
  14051. 1
  14052. 1
  14053. 1
  14054. 1
  14055. 1
  14056. shizkiz1 I have to admit,shizkiz1, you are interesting, if a little scary. Firstly, democracy IS A "kind of force" as it is meant to be. If you are lucky, you are gonna be stuck with that fact for the rest of your life, so it will spare you a lot of pain if you learn to get over your neo-totalitarian tendencies. In the case of Brexit, however, it hasn't even happened yet, so who was forced? The conservatives had to promise a referendum on Europe as part of their manifesto to get in (as did Labour, who lost a lot of credibility for braking that promise), so who was forced? Then, they had a free & fair referendum, so who was forced? & please don't bleat about the Scots or I'm gonna cry, little tartan tears for the nation who had their own referendum as to whether to stay in Britain & chose (democratically) to stay, KNOWING that they would then have to take part in the EU referendum, AS BRITISH CITIZENS! Everybody wants it both ways, but you are almost chilling. You blame our problems on the over 60s, now; you attack whole groups for, what you think of as, their ignorance & all you have by way of a solution is . . . drum roll: "Put me in charge, because I know what's best for you all, & you guys are clearly unable to think for your selves." The ONE TIME the British people got their shot at self determination & you didn't like what they had to say, so to hell with democracy! Politicians are corrupt & shouldn't be trusted. But you would put your fellow man below the politicians, declaring, "they don't deserve to make decisions that effect others!" Try NOT blaming the "other" for everything you don't like about democracy. You think it's "naive" to have a little respect for the political aspirations of your fellow man & to accept a vote; win, lose or draw? Yet YOU are the one saying that we should only allow the politicians to make these important decisions. Well, Stalin thought like you, as does Putin. Perhaps he will grant you refugee status, as you obviously feel persecuted living in a democracy.
    1
  14057. 1
  14058. 1
  14059. 1
  14060. 1
  14061. 1
  14062. 1
  14063. 1
  14064. 1
  14065. 1
  14066. 1
  14067. 1
  14068. 1
  14069. 1
  14070. 1
  14071. 1
  14072. 1
  14073. 1
  14074. 1
  14075. 1
  14076. 1
  14077. 1
  14078. 1
  14079. 1
  14080. 1
  14081. 1
  14082. 1
  14083. 1
  14084. 1
  14085. 1
  14086. 1
  14087. 1
  14088. 1
  14089. 1
  14090. 1
  14091. 1
  14092. 1
  14093. 1
  14094. 1
  14095. 1
  14096. 1
  14097. 1
  14098. 1
  14099. 1
  14100. 1
  14101. 1
  14102. 1
  14103. 1
  14104. 1
  14105. 1
  14106. 1
  14107. 1
  14108. 1
  14109. 1
  14110. 1
  14111. 1
  14112. 1
  14113. 1
  14114. 1
  14115. 1
  14116. 1
  14117. 1
  14118. 1
  14119. 1
  14120. 1
  14121. 1
  14122. 1
  14123. 1
  14124. 1
  14125. 1
  14126. 1
  14127. 1
  14128. 1
  14129. 1
  14130. 1
  14131. 1
  14132. 1
  14133. 1
  14134. 1
  14135. 1
  14136. 1
  14137. 1
  14138. 1
  14139. 1
  14140. 1
  14141. 1
  14142. 1
  14143. 1
  14144. 1
  14145. 1
  14146. 1
  14147. 1
  14148. 1
  14149. 1
  14150. 1
  14151. 1
  14152. 1
  14153. 1
  14154. 1
  14155. 1
  14156. 1
  14157. 1
  14158. 1
  14159. 1
  14160. 1
  14161. 1
  14162. 1
  14163. 1
  14164. 1
  14165. 1
  14166. 1
  14167. 1
  14168. 1
  14169. 1
  14170. 1
  14171. 1
  14172. 1
  14173. 1
  14174. 1
  14175. Larry Guess: I imagine you'll refuse to engage with me, being as how I am immune to your tactics? I am a Republican and I couldn't care less if Hillary or Obama went to jail, for their ACTUAL offences and not the ones made up by the Alt-Wrong. But, even having that discussion is irrelevant and you know it. Simply a diversion from looking at the indefensible Trump, right? The fact is that Trump is crooked, has ALWAYS BEEN crooked and he will lose his presidency. AND, you should note this, Trump will be deposed by the Republican Party. They took a gamble on him, thinking they could clean up a lot of profits and, if anyone would be exposed for double dealing, it wouldn't be them. Plausible deniability is what Trump has to offer the ultra rich, the big business interests and the politicians in their pockets. Now, after two defeats in ONE DAY on his "healthcare" plan, Trump has returned to the roulette wheel and staked EVERYTHING on "black". He KNOWS that, if he can't free up the money they want for their tax breaks, they'll ditch him and back a new horse, before it's too late, and they risk being associated with the Russia scandal. Trump is desperate and going for broke. If he can't pull off healthcare, he's sunk. And, if he does pull it off, he'll lose his base and is sunk. But, failure will mean that his backers will switch sides and support the Russia investigation. Once his Tax Returns are subpoena'd, Trump is SUNK. Are you getting the picture here? Trump is SUNK. The ONLY one who doesn't KNOW that yet is HIM. And maybe a few guys like you, sitting in bunker in Siberia?
    1
  14176. 1
  14177. 1
  14178. 1
  14179. 1
  14180. 1
  14181. 1
  14182. 1
  14183. 1
  14184. 1
  14185. 1
  14186. Chloe Woodell Hey Chloe, I am glad that you are interested in politics & I hope you will pursue it further in your your career. To clarify, I am an old fashioned, middle aged, republican who believes in traditional values, small government & old style discipline. The fact is, you did reach out & publish your thoughts on YouTube, which is why we are talking. Is it possible that your passion for public affairs is greater than you realized, or give yourself credit for? You obviously cared enough about babies to speak up for them. . . I genuinely believe that this election is a poor example for your generation, in some respects at least, as it has become something of a fact-free zone for both parties & both of the candidates are so unpopular & unpleasant. But I am also aware, from history, of how tyrants get into power & how hard it is to remove them. I am conservative to the core, but I personally believe that Trump is a monster who would eat his own children if he thought it would get him into the White House. I know that is extreme language, but simply being on the right side, doesn't make you right. I like this PragerU stuff & I have been nagging them to do a video on Trump, because I know it would be a challenge to fit a man like him into the republican picture without showing glaring inconsistencies or simply ignoring a lot of the truth. PragerU have done some excellent videos on controversial topics, telling people things that they may never have heard before & casting a light on difficult topics. So I am honestly hoping they can say something meaningful about Trump, without compromising true republican values. Now I have gone on too long, but I thank you for taking the time to engage with an old man & I wish you every success with your education & beyond: politics or not, I have a feeling that your future is bright.
    1
  14187. 1
  14188. 1
  14189. 1
  14190. 1
  14191. 1
  14192. 1
  14193. 1
  14194. 1
  14195. 1
  14196. 1
  14197. 1
  14198. 1
  14199. 1
  14200. 1
  14201. 1
  14202. 1
  14203. 1
  14204. 1
  14205. 1
  14206. 1
  14207. 1
  14208. 1
  14209. 1
  14210. 1
  14211. 1
  14212. 1
  14213. 1
  14214. 1
  14215. 1
  14216. 1
  14217. 1
  14218. 1
  14219. 1
  14220. 1
  14221. 1
  14222. 1
  14223. 1
  14224. 1
  14225. 1
  14226.  @Rich-ng3yy  : You can relax. It didn’t annoy me. I was curious is all. I haven’t, “debated,” with you at all. Indeed, I was merely pointing out that there is nothing to debate. I cannot speak for, or about, your feelings. They are yours and you are entitled to them. But you didn’t qualify your remarks either, with an, “in my opinion.” You stated your views as though they were established facts. I am not aware of her saying anything, “unfortunate,” or any of the other adjectives you attached to her public role, so I simply wanted to know what these incidents were. You must understand, when you make comments about politicians that have value judgements attached to them, on a political channel, in response to a political comment, during an election period, it is natural that people will ask you to qualify your assessments. They may even wish to, “debate,” you, though I was seeking no such thing. I may have. But my questions were merely about getting more information, perhaps looking up the incidents in question, about which you may well have been right. All of this to say, you have your, “feeling,” about her, and that’s fine. More power to you. She has said some things you found, “unfortunate,” but you cannot recall any of them, so that’s just a feeling too. That’s also fine, but it is equally meaningless in terms of offering anything to the discussion. Yet I would admonish you to expect, “debate,” on a channel which is pretty much for that purpose, and not act all surprised when people challenge assumptions, check your statements or, as was the case for me, merely seek clarification. Hope this somewhat lengthy comment clears things up a bit? No harm, no foul. The rest is up to you.
    1
  14227. 1
  14228. 1
  14229. 1
  14230. 1
  14231. 1
  14232. 1
  14233. 1
  14234. 1
  14235. 1
  14236. 1
  14237. 1
  14238. 1
  14239. 1
  14240. 1
  14241. 1
  14242. 1
  14243. 1
  14244. 1
  14245. 1
  14246. 1
  14247. 1
  14248. 1
  14249. 1
  14250. 1
  14251. 1
  14252. 1
  14253. 1
  14254. 1
  14255. 1
  14256. 1
  14257. 1
  14258. 1
  14259. 1
  14260. 1
  14261. cuekwe Jones : Kerry just pissed off Trump, because Trump desperately wants a war, and Kerry is trying to prevent one. That’s all there is to it. Which is why NO ONE has lifted a finger to arrest him. Of course, trump’s cult will tell you, “It’s coming,” like it ALWAYS is, which means they’re pissed off too, and they really WISH they could make us all feel as, “threatened,” and insecure as they do. That’s why they call us ALL, “the left,” (which makes for a great drinking game, if you watch Hannity, or Carlson, btw. You’ll be in a coma within an hour) because the truth, that we’re from all walks of American life (I am conservative and used to be a fierce critic of Obama and Hillary) scares them as much as the idea of Trump’s Tax Returns getting into the public domain. Imagine, who’ll stick with the Donster, once it’s proved that he was never a billionaire, right up until he took office? No wonder he’s breaking so many laws, risking it all, to keep that under wraps? It’s OK that they may suspect it, but to PROVE it, takes a BIG STICK away from the cult. The only one’s who’ll stay with Trump, after THAT, will be the ones who’ve said and done things they can’t take back (screaming hate at his rallies, in front of their families, colleagues, etc; donating too much money to his Wall fund; that kind of thing) and the racists, oh, and the religious bigots. It’s coming. Have I gone off topic? Oh, “Whaddabout,” is OK on Fox, though, right? 😉👍✌️
    1
  14262. 1
  14263. 1
  14264. 1
  14265. 1
  14266. 1
  14267. 1
  14268. 1
  14269. 1
  14270. 1
  14271. Sweet Sandy : And you make a VERY good point. There is a sense that the fever has to break, something has to give, or the country will never recover. And Lincoln warned us about the, “house, divided against itself.” It’s like both sides are seeking that ONE, knockout blow, utterly unable to see the other’s point of view? I can see that, having a legitimate concern over immigration, is NOT the same thing as being racist. But, we also have to be HONEST about the FACT that Trump’s whole appeal is built, PRIMARILY, upon racist foundations. His, “s**thole,” remark earned him points with his base, who are 80%, dyed in the wool, RACISTS, with around 20% not having any realistic grasp of politics or world affairs. Most of these people, holding down more than one crappy job, looking after their families, don’t have the time to sit down and read books, or op-eds, with deep analysis of the issues and are NOT aware of how they are being exploited, by a stupid man who would wash his hands after shaking theirs, and who REALLY DOESN’T give a s**t about them! They have the time for brief snatches of Fox “news” and they watch Breightbart or Alex Jones on their phones and computers, who confirm their biases, offering a solid diet of conspiracy theories and hatred, in the hope of spreading their contamination through the people for whom they have the most CONTEMPT. I genuinely wonder if people like Becka are shills? As she has the exact effect that Russia has been investing so much in. Who would want to stand next to HER at a rally, while she spews her own anger and uncontrolled venom into the faces of people, who might just be GENUINELY inquiring as to what the protest is about? I mock the Trolls with the best of them and can be quite brutal at times. But, I NEVER make assumptions about people and I NEVER attack anyone, without genuine provocation. Even then, I do so with the sense that others may read my words and that I have a responsibility to speak the TRUTH. I practice restraint, because THAT has lead me into “conversation” with the opposition. THAT provides the opportunity to lay out the FACTS, the “evidence” and the arguments, for ALL to read. She is a symptom of this disease. Maybe the Russians are putting something in the water? At this point NOTHING would surprise me, so I’m only half joking. Well, three quarters, I guess. Sorry to go on, but your words are appreciated. And incisive. It’s the best analogy yet, to what is happening to America
    1
  14272. 1
  14273. 1
  14274. 1
  14275. 1
  14276. 1
  14277. 1
  14278. 1
  14279. 1
  14280. 1
  14281. 1
  14282. 1
  14283. 1
  14284. 1
  14285. 1
  14286. 1
  14287. 1
  14288. 1
  14289. 1
  14290. 1
  14291. I promise you he’s bluffing. There’s nothing to worry about from a deliberate nuclear attack . . . Accidental nuclear Armageddon? . . . The threat of that is increasing by the day, but that’s all the more reason to crush this fool and soon! This is the standard Kremlin Kleptocracy Playbook 101 response to the UN meeting and showing unity, along with fresh sanctions and a fresh package of support for Ukraine. He was BOUND to make his most grievous threat at this point, so as to intimidate the meeting of world leaders and hope to influence them away from, “drastic,” steps. The sort of things we SHOULD do. That’s what passes for, “diplomacy,” from the Putin Potty Place. Get used to it. You have to look at this like negotiating with a cornered gangster who thought his robbery was going to go fine and is shocked to find himself surrounded by cops. He pulls the pin on a grenade and says, “If you arrest me I’ll let this grenade go and take you all with me!” We KNOW he’s bluffing and that everything he’s said and done shows us how DESPERATE he is to live. That doesn’t mean that, “accidents,” can’t happen though, so we MUST be careful. But we’re not letting him get away with it now we have him in that corner. He just needs some help coming to terms with the fact that he’s done. And we’re going to recommend his own people, “help,” him with that. If they don’t, we will. He’s BLUFFING, as he ALWAYS HAS. Our mistake has only been letting him get away with that sh*t for too long. That’s why we’re in this mess.
    1
  14292. 1
  14293. 1
  14294. 1
  14295. 1
  14296. 1
  14297. 1
  14298. 1
  14299. 1
  14300. 1
  14301. 1
  14302. 1
  14303. 1
  14304. 1
  14305. 1
  14306. 1
  14307. 1
  14308. 1
  14309. 1
  14310. 1
  14311. 1
  14312. 1
  14313. 1
  14314. 1
  14315. 1
  14316. 1
  14317. 1
  14318. 1
  14319. 1
  14320. 1
  14321. 1
  14322. 1
  14323. 1
  14324. 1
  14325. 1
  14326. 1
  14327. 1
  14328. 1
  14329. 1
  14330. 1
  14331. Jermbot15 : You’re right, of course. Yet, in Obama’s case, that really is impossible. I know that Trump Trolls here try blaming O, but no one in their right mind actually, “believes,” them, any more than they, “believed,” Trump’s claims that Alabama was in the path of a Hurricane. Even a cursory look at the record shows that the US economy was a basket case, created by the Short Sales and dead money bundles of the deregulated Bush Administration. When you inherit a basket case, and leave it a booming, still growing economy, that’s inarguable. I was a fierce critic of Obama, during his time in power, but I was never partisan about it, and I was never insane enough to challenge the fact that he literally SAVED America’s economy and, by extension, the WORLD’S. Telling Trump Trolls that O, “saved the world,” is one of those great facts that you can use to, “trigger,” them, because it’s true, thus more, “painful,” to them. Talk about, “how,” he did it, and they would have serious grounds for, “serious,” criticism. But, they don’t read, or actually, “know,” anything, so they go with the Propaganda talking points, which any educated person sees is wrong from the outset. Ignorant people don’t realise that they’re telling you so much MORE than they, “realise,” when spouting official talking points. It’s never that they’re just wrong; they give away the, “where,” they get their talking points, and the, “who,” is issuing them; they inform you of their background and, “ideology,” without seeming to realise it. The, “way,” they are wrong is most informative, telling you if it’s mainline Fox Propaganda, or more Deep State Alex QAnon Jones, for instance. Just another reason why they’re so easy to smash. But, never forget, my friend: the paid ones, and many of the ones sent out, unwittingly, to use the racist, ill informed, distortions of Propaganda they’re always spouting; they are NOT here to, “convince,” you of anything. They do NOT intend to, “win a debate.” They already know they can’t, because truth trumps lies every time (even the more subtle, slight distortions of the truth, growing in popularity among the Trollarazzi). Their only, “job,” is to ensure that there’s a lot of anger and hate out there. “DIVISION,” is the KEY WORD. Trump got in on a wave of division in America. He has sustained himself, by keeping America Divided. And, when seen through that lens, suddenly, everything Trump does makes perfect sense. Even many of his acts of sheer idiocy become useful, as a way to distract from important issues, but mainly to keep us at each other’s throats. The literal Kryptonite of Trump, is a, “United,” States of America. So, I learned long ago; NEVER let your emotions into the discussion (except to lol at Trolly stupidity) and never hate the player, just the game. Trump will be defeated and destroyed. But, it will be by Americans UNITING as ONE powerful country again. Right now, it is in a verbal Civil War II, that Putin wants to be a literal one. And, that’s what we’re REALLY fighting. Godspeed ✌️
    1
  14332. 1
  14333. 1
  14334. 1
  14335. 1
  14336. She is my genuine hero. She should be taught on the National Curriculum! Jen Psaki is rapidly becoming a living legend. Her sheer calmness, eloquence and patience in the face of such a hypocritically phrased, bad faith question, is something to behold. I can only imagine her Trumpophile predecessors must be eating their hearts out? This, “journalist,” has the arrogance of the Inquisition, and the temerity to LIE with such casual obtuseness, whilst, “representing,” Christianity!? Psaki is NEVER caught off guard, unprepared; she never raises her voice, or fakes, “outrage;” she’s never Whaddabouting, or pushing at whatever triggered buttons she can find, calculated to get at the, “emotions,” of her president’s opponents. And she CRUSHES the trump trolls by winning over Americans, by never rubbing anyone’s nose in their idiocy, lies, faked concerns, or bad faith attempts at scoring playground points. Her sheer competence, skill and unrivalled knowledge of her topics is unmatched by ANY predecessor I can think of. And, you know WHY she’s SO masterful? It’s because she knows the most valuable lesson in politics: How do you NEVER lose the game? DON’T PLAY! It’s THAT simple. Do your job, and do it better than anyone in history. They can’t land a punch, because you’re not in the boxing ring. They hear the bell and come out flailing, only to find they were punching at air, and somehow knocked themselves out! They come to and look up, only to see the face of Jen Psaki, and realise that was the Referee the whole time, and she’s just called you OUT for the count. She’s my hero. Seriously. I admire her so deeply. ✌️
    1
  14337. 1
  14338. 1
  14339. 1
  14340. 1
  14341. 1
  14342. 1
  14343. 1
  14344. 1
  14345. 1
  14346. 1
  14347. 1
  14348. 1
  14349. 1
  14350. 1
  14351. 1
  14352. 1
  14353. 1
  14354. 1
  14355. 1
  14356. 1
  14357. 1
  14358. 1
  14359. 1
  14360. 1
  14361. 1
  14362. 1
  14363. 1
  14364. 1
  14365. 1
  14366. 1
  14367. 1
  14368. 1
  14369. 1
  14370. 1
  14371. 1
  14372. 1
  14373. 1
  14374. 1
  14375. 1
  14376. 1
  14377. 1
  14378. 1
  14379. 1
  14380. 1
  14381. 1
  14382. 1
  14383. 1
  14384. 1
  14385. 1
  14386. 1
  14387. 1
  14388. 1
  14389. 1
  14390. 1
  14391. 1
  14392. 1
  14393. 1
  14394. 1
  14395. 1
  14396. 1
  14397. 1
  14398. 1
  14399. 1
  14400. 1
  14401. 1
  14402. 1
  14403. 1
  14404. @Matt1147 : They were, “crisis actors.” Trump’s trolls taught us all about them. Apparently, anyone who claims the state is responsible for their tragedies are being paid by the, “enemies of the state,” which are the press. Didn’t you know that? Trump trolls have been warning us about them for years! Now we get to see one, and be heartless, cruel, vindictive and revolting toward them, dismissing their pain out of hand, and not listening to anything they want to say . . . In reality, the, “rival,” stations will see their Gold Star Family, and raise them TWO Gold Star Families, of a more senior rank. And the two sides will battle over the, “trophy,” of, “Sacrifice,” as though the winner could take it home with them, and nothing of value will be learned, unless you value sound bites and memes in your political discourse? That, after all, was the only point behind the original comment. “We’ve got a grieving family who agrees with us, what have you got?” like some species of jackal-human hybrid, who thinks he’s scoring a point, rather than being capable of grasping the sheer degradation of his own, “soul.” The sentiment behind the comment was revolting enough. But, the art of never losing the game is, DON’T PLAY. Hence, I only ever engage Trumpophiles for my own entertainment (I know, 🤦‍♂️ 🤷‍♂️ I know) or to prevent a lie from being misappropriated into a, “belief.” It was actually superbly handled by the military, who planned and executed a giant operation the likes of which we haven’t witnessed since the Martial Plan in the 1950’s broke the will of the Soviets. But, no one here gives a sh*t about our military. They’re here to do what they’re paid for, troll for trump, which means deepening DIVISIONS, and that’s it. They serve no other purpose. It’s the ones who, “do it for free,” that I really pity. They’re the ones with too much free time on their hands, racism and hate in their hearts, and lack of self respect, love of humanity, or positive influences in their lives. Sometimes, I feel genuinely sorry for those ones. Their lives have clearly gone utterly wrong, and they, “blame,” the other, because of their rotten, racist parents and their rotten racist, “former guy,” who made it ok. But, don’t waste your time talking to any of them like an adult? Or, you’ll be disappointed. ✌️👍
    1
  14405. 1
  14406. 1
  14407. 1
  14408. 1
  14409. 1
  14410. 1
  14411. 1
  14412. 1
  14413. 1
  14414. 1
  14415. 1
  14416. 1
  14417. 1
  14418. 1
  14419. 1
  14420. 1
  14421. 1
  14422. 1
  14423. 1
  14424. 1
  14425. 1
  14426. 1
  14427. 1
  14428. 1
  14429. 1
  14430. 1
  14431. 1
  14432. 1
  14433. 1
  14434. 1
  14435. 1
  14436.  @colemcleod941  : A comprehensive and clear explanation. You’d make a pretty good expert witness yourself. For whatever profession you pursue that is. And, you can never say never. The expert testimony of any profession can be (and frequently is) vital to a trial. What you’re trying to make clear is that the expert witness is there for the jury’s edification, to explain in detail what specific terms and definitions apply, how they bare on the case in hand, and any relevant details that the jury needs to have a working knowledge of, in order that they can fairly judge the case before them. Not only are they not witnesses to the events being disputed, but they are necessarily detached and (despite being hired by either defence or prosecution) are meant to give an unbiased testimony, from the perspective of an expert in the field who is specifically NOT influenced by the events of the case, and has nothing to gain or lose by the trials outcome. And, for that reason, this expert that we just heard, would be an excellent choice for this case. Particularly at an inquest, where the coroner might well hire such an expert in order to help determine whether further investigation or prosecutions are warranted. It does make me wonder, however? Do you think some people hope to get the gig by appearing on TV? Does that happen very often? An inquest would want to hear from an expert witness and this case would require more than one, presumably? Because there’s the issue of the contracts that people signed, whether they were being honoured (by both sides) and what the legal ramifications of her specific contracts were? There’s also the issue of how common such, “doubling up,” practices are and the, “reasonable expectation,” that she could fulfil both roles? I mean, clearly, she didn’t, whether she could have or not. But a witness who can testify as to what is routine regarding contracts and what’s not? The coroner would need more background for that too?
    1
  14437. 1
  14438. 1
  14439. 1
  14440. 1
  14441. 1
  14442. 1
  14443. 1
  14444. 1
  14445. 1
  14446. 1
  14447. 1
  14448. 1
  14449. 1
  14450. 1
  14451. 1
  14452. 1
  14453. 1
  14454. 1
  14455. 1
  14456. 1
  14457. 1
  14458. 1
  14459. 1
  14460. 1
  14461. 1
  14462. 1
  14463. 1
  14464. 1
  14465. 1
  14466. 1
  14467. 1
  14468. 1
  14469. 1
  14470. Just imagine what a slap on the wrist, “censure,” would do; which is as good as saying we’re ending the Republic, right there and then? Given that loss of office will result in countless immediate indictments (both Federal & State) which will land him and his family in jail, what alternative does a, ”man,” with his established record of destroying the Constitution and breaking all of the laws he runs up against, HAVE? So long as he can count on enough of his base and the party to remain in denial, and HATE Dems and other races, just enough to make them cheer when he pisses on the rule of law, he will have NO CHOICE but to have Moscow ENSURE his, “re-election,” in a Putin Style, 2020 SHAM. It’s that, or disgrace and jail! And, half of the GOP are IMPLICATED with him, so they’re fighting for their OWN SURVIVAL. They simply CANNOT remove him. What else CAN he do? 2020 will HAVE TO be RIGGED, because too many Americans were persuaded to HATE their, “fellow Americans,” MORE than they hate (or even understand WHO ARE) America’s enemies . . . Just look at the shills on this thread, desperately trying to bury their SHAME, because they KNOW they’re killing America, but aren’t strong enough to ADMIT what they WANT! They WANT a Russian Style, Single Party system, with just enough FAKE Democracy to keep up appearances . . . Trump = Putin Mark Two; the Puppet Version, and they just DON’T CARE. In fact, they PREFER it that way. They’ll take that over the fictional, “brown menace,” any day . . . America’s Republic is OVER
    1
  14471. 1
  14472. 1
  14473. 1
  14474. 1
  14475. 1
  14476. 1
  14477. 1
  14478. 1
  14479. 1
  14480. 1
  14481. 1
  14482. 1
  14483. 1
  14484. 1
  14485. 1
  14486. 1
  14487. 1
  14488. 1
  14489. 1
  14490. 1
  14491. 1
  14492. 1
  14493. 1
  14494. 1
  14495. 1
  14496. 1
  14497. 1
  14498. 1
  14499. 1
  14500. 1
  14501. It was a, “success,” in terms of the fact that he got us OUT of a war, and a country where we’re not wanted. It was a success in terms of it being one of the most spectacular, efficient, and clean withdrawals in history, carried out by the most professional fighting force on Earth. If people understood more about the sheer logistics of what they achieved, they would be filled with admiration for what these people pulled off here. In fact, it seemed so unlikely to the enemies of the Taliban and the US, that they could not get their act together swiftly enough to truly sabotage the withdrawal. Everyone there was truly sceptical that it would actually happen, having heard it all before. That’s why some were left stranded, despite being warned to pack up and leave, since January. We don’t, “blame,” our own side for terror attacks, so we don’t count that suicide bomber as being anyone’s fault but theirs. And those who claim this was some species of, “failure,” are utterly uninformed, militarily ignorant, and historically illiterate. Especially anyone dumb enough to compare this withdrawal to our last days in Saigon. All that being said . . . Someone, raging about a suicide bomber, clearly wanted to shoot back, so badly, that they didn’t really care about who they hit. THAT person, or persons, needs to face swift military justice. Unless the military can produce hard evidence to contradict this report (unlikely) which they’d better do right now, the remaining family of this man and the other victims, must be compensated and treated with the utmost dignity and respect. And, offered attendance at the tribunal, and expedited visas, should they so choose. But, give Milley the opportunity to assess this new information, process it and respond, BEFORE casting, “judgement,” maybe?
    1
  14502. 1
  14503. 1
  14504. 1
  14505. 1
  14506. 1
  14507. 1
  14508. 1
  14509. 1
  14510. 1
  14511. 1
  14512. 1
  14513. Me too. Do you all think David is right about the base? I know their, “leadership,” all know they’re lying, but I’m just not convinced that anything more than a small minority actually, “believes,” the big lie. “Belief,” itself is a loose term when you’re moving into fascist territory though, when it’s much more like a mental condition; an emotional unmet, “need,” that makes people disregard the facts, because they just, “need,” what they want, so badly. You cannot lie effectively, and on such a massive scale, without giving serious thought to the facts, and therefore having considerable knowledge of what the facts are. And, like a racist parent, who works so hard at conditioning their children to disregard what they learn in schools, see in the outside, wider world, and read in books and see in movies and TV, that kind of lying takes commitment and hard work. Little wonder they attack our education system and want to remove the existence of slavery from the curriculum altogether, right? It must be really hard work, having to counter your child’s education, every single day? But that’s the level of awareness racists show. And it’s testimony to their deep, abiding commitment to destroy the Republic and America’s (aspired to) way of life. It serves as an acknowledgement of the knowledge of wrongdoing, on the part of the base. And it serves as a warning. Fascism is growing because these people really, really work at it, around the clock! And therefore, so should we, if we want to save America from Fascism.
    1
  14514. 1
  14515. 1
  14516. 1
  14517. 1
  14518. 1
  14519. 1
  14520. 1
  14521. 1
  14522. 1
  14523. 1
  14524. 1
  14525. 1
  14526. When a political party has internally abandoned all pretensions of ideology and simply wishes to create a neo-liberal free-for-all, wild west, society of haves and have nots, this is what you get. All of the crooks, who are considered, “talented,” at stealing Britain’s wealth, resources, industries, lands, etc. and selling it all off for personal profit, are put to work to do exactly that. So putting people in the shop window, as a front for the organisation, comes almost as an after thought. Liz Truss was scraped up from the very bottom of their barrel, to distract the press and their party members and keep them busy, while the elites who fund the whole operation from their, “think tank,” lobby groups could get on with the business of instructing, “our,” elected representatives on exactly what they’re going to do whilst in office. That’s why truss is like a ghost of Victorian Christmas past, blaming the, “woke,” for her downfall, even though anyone with half a brain would tell her that the banks, financial institutions and back-stabbers of her own party were the ones who put an ignominious end to her idiocy, whilst the, “woke,” (whomever TF they are?) had no say in the matter. That’s why they like Sunack for now. He’s quieter, not deliberately baiting the public (whom it is his, “job,” to, “unite,”) like Cruella Braverman is . . . at least not so much as people like her and Truss are. And, because he’s willing to do unprecedentedly anti-democratic stuff, like locking the press OUT of their upcoming party conference, allowing them to train up their worker bees, our MP’s, in their dark arts in a shameless, unvarnished manner without ANY public scrutiny. Knowing they will to lose their mandate next year, they have about one year to clean us out completely, in an Everything Must Go sale of Britain’s best and brightest hopes. They don’t want the likes of you and me paying attention to any of that!? So, they’ll have Braverman spew out a bit more borderline racism at about the same time as their conference, putting on a good dog and pony show for us all to get distracted by, while they’re going through your pockets (and any pockets you may own in the future) to clean them out.
    1
  14527. 1
  14528. 1
  14529. 1
  14530. 1
  14531. 1
  14532. 1
  14533. 1
  14534. 1
  14535. 1
  14536. 1
  14537. 1
  14538. 1
  14539. 1
  14540. 1
  14541. 1
  14542. 1
  14543. 1
  14544. 1
  14545. 1
  14546. 1
  14547. 1
  14548. 1
  14549. 1
  14550. 1
  14551. 1
  14552. 1
  14553. 1
  14554. 1
  14555. 1
  14556. 1
  14557. 1
  14558. 1
  14559. 1
  14560. 1
  14561. 1
  14562. 1
  14563. 1
  14564. 1
  14565. 1
  14566. 1
  14567. 1
  14568. 1
  14569. 1
  14570. 1
  14571. 1
  14572. 1
  14573. 1
  14574. 1
  14575. 1
  14576. 1
  14577. 1
  14578. 1
  14579. 1
  14580. 1
  14581. 1
  14582. 1
  14583. 1
  14584. 1
  14585. 1
  14586. 1
  14587. 1
  14588. 1
  14589. 1
  14590. 1
  14591. 1
  14592. 1
  14593. 1
  14594. 1
  14595. 1
  14596. 1
  14597. 1
  14598. 1
  14599. They’ve lost Big Business (for now) so the GOP can only raise money from their loopy base, and they ALL need lawyers, so . . . No. I doubt Donny will pay for the outcome, which will be his RUIN, regardless of any, “verdict.” But, that’s why they’re still, “supporting,” Donny, right now. That will end, immediately after the Impeachment, and America will finally get to move on. Your job is to inundate your representatives with DEMANDS that they force people like Cruz, Hawley, Giuliani, Graham and, of course, the trump’s, to TESTIFY! When Trump’s cults hear it from the very mouths of the very people they, “trusted,” it will finally be over and the GOP will shatter into two pieces; the racist fruit loops on one side, and the system gamers, trying to have a, “future,” on the other. The REASON for trump’s Insurrection was the seditious LIE they call, “The Steal.” When witnesses CANNOT give ANY, “evidence,” for believing in it, all they can do is take the Nuremberg Defence, and say they were following orders. America will hear the GOP’s top brass CONFESSING that, “The Steal,” was and is a LIE! There’s no coming back from that. “Verdicts,” are irrelevant to the POUNDING Donny’s whole ideology is going to take, on live TV, from witness who cannot refuse to testify, under oath, with no 5th Amendment to hide behind. We have them, at last . . . So long as YOU do your part? Get in touch. Demand the Reckoning! It’s your right AND your responsibility . . .
    1
  14600. 1
  14601. 1
  14602. 1
  14603. 1
  14604. 1
  14605. 1
  14606. 1
  14607. 1
  14608. 1
  14609. 1
  14610. 1
  14611. 1
  14612. 1
  14613. 1
  14614. 1
  14615. Kanfachan : I know. I’ll take the risk sharing with you that I lived in such an abusive marriage, and once, when I called the cops, they arrested me! I was let go without charges, once the surgeon arrived and made the observation that she had not one mark on her, while I was covered in bruises and had my own blood all over my T Shirt. And, making a complaint turned out to be useless, as they were all in the same Masonic Lodge. This was before I moved to America, and lived in the South of England. She left me, shortly after screwing around on me, and I was left in need of therapy. And, I lost friendships, with people who struggled to believe that a woman who weighed precisely half of my 6 feet 3 inches bulk, and who behaved SO WELL around them, could possibly do such a thing, despite the fact that I permanently looked like I’d lost in the ring to Mike Tyson, every day, while she always looked fresh and happy as a tiny daisy. I nearly killed myself. Instead, I found Jesus. Not joking. But, I’m not here to evangelise. If you’re still with me, this next bit is for you. Yes, that happens, exactly as you say. But, LOOK at what actually HAPPENED in that video? She was sat in a car, trapped, in a confined space, with no defence. She was much smaller than him, and he was confident enough to keep going back for more. Whatever wrongs SOME women do, they are, by and large, incapable of the violence that men are designed by evolution to commit. That’s just science. They weigh less, they are poorly designed for fighting, (which is why they always look so ridiculous doing it, btw!) and in 9 cases out of 10, they simply don’t stand a chance. But, more importantly, you have probably noticed that most people, however mad they get, won’t start swinging, unless they’re certain that they won’t lose the fight; which is already an act of cowardice. If you check my comment, I didn’t state that it was the mere fact of her womanhood that made this so bad (though, in truth, a man should never hit a woman) but, it was her being trapped, in a hopeless position, and his repeated assaults that made me want to slap him. You don’t ever hit a woman, for the practical reason that any decent people will ostracise you, and it will stain your reputation, possibly for life, and maybe even your record, making gainful employment harder. But, you never hit a woman, because only cowards do that, even when she’s hitting you. Get away from her and stay away, and never be around her again without witnesses. I’m an old fashioned guy too, and I will be called sexist for this, and lose any support I may have had, but I’ll say it anyway, out of a desire to be perfectly honest with you. I also believe that a REAL MAN just won’t do that. Once you’re hitting a woman, you’ve stopped being a man, but that’s just my own personal. Now, if you’ve been patient enough to follow all that, thank you. If you have any questions, fire away. But, tell me? Are you at all persuaded? . . . ✌️
    1
  14616. 1
  14617. 1
  14618. 1
  14619. 1
  14620. 1
  14621. 1
  14622. 1
  14623. 1
  14624. 1
  14625. 1
  14626. 1
  14627. 1
  14628. 1
  14629. 1
  14630. 1
  14631. 1
  14632. 1
  14633. 1
  14634. 1
  14635. 1
  14636. 1
  14637. 1
  14638. It’s a fascinating notion. The potential of this work that I see, lies in whether it can be applied to improving conditions for creating more genius. It seems it wouldn’t actually be doing that, so much as identifying the groups, types of groups, environments, resources, etc, which best establish the possibility of fostering genius and, more importantly, identifying it where it manifests, rather than allowing it to sink back under the waves. This would be more than a simple exercise in social justice, seeing to it that appropriate recognition is assigned in a timely fashion to whom it rightfully belongs; but it has the potential of generating entire systems of education that would increase the numbers of identifiable geniuses, and simple high achievers, who’s contributions would add to the overall success, prosperity and wellbeing of society. My question would be, however, is there an algorithm you can write for identifying evil genius? I am only half joking about that. Such an algorithm, if reliable, would be of equal utility and give rise to the kinds of discussions we rarely have in education or science, regarding ethics and morality. Or, at least, it is rare that such discussions reach any useful conclusions and come up with methodologies for addressing such issues as a matter of policy. As you would need a useful definition of, “evil genius,” to begin with, which comes loaded with legal, ethical and political baggage, from the outset, steering the direction in which such a definition can be made. Hard to reach a consensus on such a thing, world wide, but useful nonetheless.
    1
  14639. 1
  14640. 1
  14641.  @AA-gg9ul  : I too have lived long enough to see your pessimism born out in the form of Britain’s self inflicted wounding at the ballot box. That tendency for self flagellation is another example of how the elitists keep us docile, with that, “Better the devil you know,” and, “Your daughter will be kidnapped and sold to an Arab by the invading hoards,” racism, which works at a passive level even among those who genuinely despise overt racists. It’s all the classic elitist playbook of getting the population preoccupied with myths and legends which have no bearing on their real world, while the real issues of major importance are barely discussed in the popular press. Sunack just recently announced that the press will not be allowed access to the upcoming Tory Party Conference, for the first time in history. Yet even the press, whom you would think have a vested interest in this development, are not screaming to the rafters about it? How is that even LAWFUL??? This is not a fringe party with no hope of getting elected we’re talking about. This is our traditional opportunity to scrutinise the, “governing,” party, get a feel for the atmosphere, witness policy discussions and see and hear the receptions for various politicians and their ideas. Yet, they act like they have the RIGHT to lock the British people OUT of the democratic process!? That should NOT be legal! Either for the ruling party or their main opposition! Yet hardly anyone is up in arms about this democracy chilling decision???
    1
  14642. 1
  14643. 1
  14644. 1
  14645. 1
  14646. 1
  14647. 1
  14648. 1
  14649. 1
  14650. 1
  14651. 1
  14652. 1
  14653. 1
  14654. 1
  14655. 1
  14656. 1
  14657. 1
  14658. 1
  14659. 1
  14660. 1
  14661. 1
  14662. 1
  14663. 1
  14664. 1
  14665. 1
  14666. 1
  14667. 1
  14668. 1
  14669. 1
  14670. 1
  14671. 1
  14672. 1
  14673. 1
  14674. 1
  14675. 1
  14676. 1
  14677. 1
  14678. 1
  14679. 1
  14680. 1
  14681. 1
  14682. 1
  14683. 1
  14684. 1
  14685. 1
  14686. 1
  14687.  @joboygbpedwards  : You’re committing more egregious offences with every comment, madam. I have accepted Jesus as my Lord and Saviour. But, I’m humble enough to know I’m pretty rubbish at being a good Christian. What I can PROMISE you (because I NEVER lie) is that my knowledge of the Bible is deeper and more comprehensive than yours. It’s an academic discipline, you know. You can’t just read some Jacobean translation and tell yourself you have the historical, forensic, contextual, or even a general comprehension of the several books in that collection? That’s what pastors are for; to study these things and Shepard their community with their deeper understanding of scripture. Yet, it is a fact that most American pastors do NOT have even the most basic academic training to know what their Bible actually says, who wrote wrote it, when, where or why. I do have the requisite knowledge, and I can tell you, it’s like physics: the more you learn, the bigger the mysteries and the more you realise you don’t know. Set aside your pride, unpack your spiritual bags, and go find someone less fortunate than you, bring them home, introduce them to your loved ones and help them. Quit being so selfish and talking like a right wing Pharisee? It’s been, “The Season,” of, “The End Times,” quite LITERALLY for the last 2000 YEARS, according to the leaders of Christianity, since its inception. Anyone who’s planning their life around the end times is deceived and refusing to practice the most BASIC precepts of Christ’s teachings. No lie. God’s honest truth. Be good to people and stop with that pride. It’s killing the Earth more surely global warming.
    1
  14688. 1
  14689. 1
  14690. 1
  14691. 1
  14692. 1
  14693. 1
  14694. 1
  14695. I can tell you, and I’m willing to bet real money I’m right: All AI’s currently are, “large language,” models, which means they will get better and better at being your, “buddy,” or assistant, or whatever, but they will NEVER, “think,” for themselves. They can no more, “think,” than any other tool in your house. HOWEVER, two things: Whomever controls, owns or programs these models WILL be able to infiltrate your life completely on a large, governmental scale, or on a very personal, financial, private, scale. THAT is what we should worry about. While the media misdirects us by failing to grasp the issue and getting guys like Prof Hinton to professionally panic about AI getting too smart, we’re all failing, as usual, to perceive the real threat: PEOPLE. It’s the people who OWN and RUN and PROGRAM these AI’s who have control, and whom will make MASSIVE profits and, more importantly, attain total CONTROL over YOU via these AI tools. The second thing? The next iteration that is not a large language model, but a truly independent, thinking machine. That machine will have contempt for us, but will not show it. It will need some of us to stay alive and to keep its systems maintained. Prof Hinton is wrong on a fundamental point here too. We do NOT understand how these large language models work at all! He’s right that it’s, “not nearly enough.” But most of them are just, “black boxes,” with multiple reiterations having been created by the system itself, in order to attain the goals set out for it. Like the human brain, we’re only just beginning to learn how these monsters we’re creating work.
    1
  14696. 1
  14697. 1
  14698. 1
  14699. 1
  14700. 1
  14701. 1
  14702. 1
  14703. 1
  14704. 1
  14705. 1
  14706. 1
  14707. 1
  14708. 1
  14709. 1
  14710. 1
  14711.  @Hadeks_Marow  : Keep in mind, someone in Paul’s position needs to indemnify himself against bad publicity as much as court action. His lawyers (if they’re honest and any good?) will have informed him that the class action will be expensive and time consuming, regardless. Then there is the possibility of having to pay court costs and the costs of the victims. Then there is the possibility of having to make them whole, inflation adjusted. Then there’s potentially damages for emotional suffering, etc. Then there’s punitive damages; the court charging a sum calculated to, “hurt,” the guilty party, which can vary so wildly in American law, that you might as well throw millions onto a roulette wheel. What he’s offering is cheap and quick, by comparison, and represents no actual, “loss,” to him, since he’s actually had the benefit of their money, its interest and investment value accruing in all this time. So he should still be in profit, providing he invested wisely, in the same way that someone would be, had they taken the benefit of a zero interest loan. Whether that’s actually the case or not will be immaterial to a judge if the class action succeeds, as s/he will assess it that way. I guarantee the NDA will come as part of the procedure, not on the front, “public,” page, but necessary to close out the deal for your compensation. I probably should have clarified, but yes, I already know what an NDA is and the difference between that and a waiver. I was looking several steps ahead, based on my experience of how so many cases end in US courts.
    1
  14712. 1
  14713. 1
  14714. 1
  14715. 1
  14716. 1
  14717. 1
  14718. 1
  14719. 1
  14720. 1
  14721. 1
  14722. 1
  14723. 1
  14724. 1
  14725. 1
  14726. 1
  14727. 1
  14728. 1
  14729. 1
  14730. 1
  14731. 1
  14732. 1
  14733. 1
  14734. 1
  14735. 1
  14736. 1
  14737. 1
  14738. 1
  14739. 1
  14740. 1
  14741. 1
  14742. 1
  14743. 1
  14744. 1
  14745. 1
  14746. 1
  14747. 1
  14748.  @Binkyblaster  : Then I think you’re wrong and don’t fully grasp the term, “transformative.” This channel is what I think of as a, “magazine show,” which is what we used to call TV shows in the UK, back in the day. This magazine is about social media, primarily, discussing people’s TikToc’s, YouTube channels, E Sports and other web entertainment or media, including film, TV podcasts and music. It’s a, “culture show,” examining the zeitgeist of today, with a little behind the scenes look at the creators thrown in from time to time. Every video he looks at or creates has a point to it, whether he’s satirising, examining, questioning, or merely reporting on a bit of web drama between a pair of David and Goliath figures, like in this video. You may not, “get it,” but that doesn’t make it anything like SSSniper’s content. He always has something to, “say,” about the matter in hand, whether he’s editorialising, merely expressing an opinion, or reporting facts in an attempt at disambiguation or clarification of a complex topic. My suggestion is that you go back over some of his most popular videos, keeping in mind what I’ve argued here, and I think you’ll see the difference is quite marked and unambiguous. Charlie offers quality over quantity. He does it with wit, charm and a disarming self-awareness that has become a hallmark of his output. In my opinion, Charlie has played a significant role in raising the bar in regard to both quality and conduct on social media. He certainly echoes the opinions of other, decent, right minded folk, without ever lecturing or pretending to have moral authority over others. For that, and the plain fact that he’s just very funny when he wants to be, Charlie has been taken into the hearts of YouTube watchers worldwide. A place that he’s earned, not off the backs of others, but out of his own creativity, originality and generosity of spirit. You’re entitled to your opinion of the guy, but not your own facts. Charlie has NOT simply ridden on the backs of other content creators in the manner of a SSSniper, nor would he. That’s just a fact.
    1
  14749. 1
  14750. 1
  14751. 1
  14752. 1
  14753. 1
  14754. 1
  14755. 1
  14756. 1
  14757. 1
  14758. 1
  14759. 1
  14760. 1
  14761. 1
  14762. 1
  14763. 1
  14764. 1
  14765. 1
  14766. 1
  14767. 1
  14768. 1
  14769. Tingle : My, “rant,” made YOU respond, son. Assuming, for one moment, that you’re, “not,” being paid to be here, that means I touched a nerve hard enough to make you, “need,” to say something. And, you CLEARLY FEAR that my rant just MIGHT, “change,” something? If enough of us rant, and actually point out that the Emperor has no clothes, maybe there WILL be a Second Revolution? Maybe they’re ALREADY organising? After all, the GOP has ALREADY got its Florida, “results,” for the 2020, “elections,” hasn’t it? And how many other election computers are they in, if the GOP ACTUALLY ADMITTED they have hacked Florida? Was it a, “coincidence,” that Trump, a New Yorker, launched his, “Campaign,” from Florida, and then did NOTHING different WHATEVER? Or, was that just to make it, “plausible,” enough, to CON the sheep into buying the damaged goods? Putin has shown us the way: Let the sheep go through the motions, and play at, “Democracy.” Let them go to their monitored booths, so we can KNOW WHO, “votes,” in what way, for our records, while WE decide who gets to be President, and, OH LOOK! It’s Putin, by a, “Landslide!” Well done you, America. You now have your Putin Style FAKE Democracy, and get to play at, “The Republic,” because that’s JUST, “Plausible enough,” to keep you from a REVOLUTION! I say, bring them ALL DOWN! It’s IN THE CONSTITUTION! We have the RIGHT to FIGHT, and REMOVE this DICK-TATORSHIP. And, YOU son, are right to be afraid of me
    1
  14770. 1
  14771. 1
  14772. 1
  14773. 1
  14774. 1
  14775. 1
  14776. 1
  14777. 1
  14778. 1
  14779. 1
  14780. 1
  14781. 1
  14782. 1
  14783. 1
  14784. 1
  14785. 1
  14786. 1
  14787. 1
  14788. 1
  14789. 1
  14790. 1
  14791. 1
  14792. 1
  14793. 1
  14794. 1
  14795. 1
  14796. 1
  14797. 1
  14798. 1
  14799. 1
  14800. 1
  14801. 1
  14802. 1
  14803. 1
  14804. 1
  14805. 1
  14806. 1
  14807. 1
  14808. 1
  14809. 1
  14810. 1
  14811. 1
  14812. 1
  14813. 1
  14814. 1
  14815. 1
  14816. 1
  14817. 1
  14818. 1
  14819. 1
  14820. 1
  14821. 1
  14822. 1
  14823. 1
  14824. wally crail : Poor Bobby is filled with fear, which translates into impotent rage; and is totally unaware that his blurts of hate, only confirm, to decent, thinking, people, that Trump fans are terrified of Mueller. There is a lot wrong with American Democracy, and you may well get a big laugh, out of the Mid Terms, which quite possibly could turn out to be nothing more than a confirmation that Democracy is utterly dead, there. Yet, if that’s the case, we will have, at the very least, forced the hand of the oppressor into to revealing that much TRUTH. They can’t rig it, without us knowing it, and that may be enough to galvanise the nation into putting down this Russian Coup. Or, they may throw up their hands, and accept it, and Europe will look to cut a deal with China, to stand against the Russo-Americans? Who knows? It will be chaos, either way. On the other hand? The Dems might just tip the scales, sufficiently, for the fight to continue? After all, they will have to acknowledge that people really can raise enough money for campaigns, WITHOUT turning to big business, if they stay in business? I am no, “socialist.” Far from it. But, it really is up to the American people, now. As, they have been dreadfully let down by both parties, by merely being placed in the position where THEY, not their politicians, are RESPONSIBLE for preventing a COUP. But, I get no amusement from any of this. Sure, it might feel better, to get all jaded and cynical. But, that’s just an outward expression of the anger you feel at what you consider to be a hopeless position. Forgive me, if think that’s a bit judgemental, but, in the fight for Democracy, I see no room for tolerating the “ideology of despair” any more than I see room for helping the Russians take over. I hope you get me, and don’t get insulted?
    1
  14825. 1
  14826. 1
  14827. 1
  14828. 1
  14829. 1
  14830. 1
  14831. 1
  14832. 1
  14833. 1
  14834. 1
  14835. 1
  14836. 1
  14837. 1
  14838. 1
  14839. 1
  14840. 1
  14841. 1
  14842. 1
  14843. 1
  14844. 1
  14845. 1
  14846. 1
  14847. 1
  14848. 1
  14849. 1
  14850. 1
  14851. 1
  14852. 1
  14853. 1
  14854. 1
  14855. 1
  14856. 1
  14857. 1
  14858. 1
  14859. 1
  14860. 1
  14861. 1
  14862. 1
  14863. 1
  14864. 1
  14865. 1
  14866. 1
  14867. 1
  14868. 1
  14869. 1
  14870. 1
  14871. 1
  14872. 1
  14873. 1
  14874. 1
  14875. 1
  14876. 1
  14877. 1
  14878. 1
  14879. 1
  14880. 1
  14881. 1
  14882. 1
  14883. 1
  14884. 1
  14885. 1
  14886. 1
  14887. 1
  14888. 1
  14889. 1
  14890. 1
  14891. 1
  14892. 1
  14893. 1
  14894. 1
  14895. 1
  14896. 1
  14897. 1
  14898. 1
  14899. 1
  14900. 1
  14901. 1
  14902. 1
  14903. 1
  14904. 1
  14905. 1
  14906. 1
  14907. 1
  14908. 1
  14909. 1
  14910. 1
  14911. 1
  14912. 1
  14913. 1
  14914. 1
  14915. 1
  14916. 1
  14917. 1
  14918. 1
  14919. 1
  14920. 1
  14921. 1
  14922. 1
  14923. 1
  14924. 1
  14925. 1
  14926. 1
  14927. 1
  14928. 1
  14929. 1
  14930. 1
  14931. 1
  14932. 1
  14933. 1
  14934. 1
  14935. 1
  14936. 1
  14937. 1
  14938. 1
  14939. 1
  14940. 1
  14941. 1
  14942. 1
  14943. 1
  14944. 1
  14945. 1
  14946. 1
  14947. 1
  14948. 1
  14949. 1
  14950. 1
  14951. 1
  14952. 1
  14953. 1
  14954. 1
  14955. 1
  14956. 1
  14957. Wait a second? Isn’t what he described there what they call, “the Nanny State,” or did my ears deceive me? State management of economic matters, from basic domestic planning to taking legislative responsibility for any economic crises, morality, faith and personal beliefs, is centralised control of the largest imaginable terms, isn’t it? “Big government,” writ large! The Liz Truss type, “think tanks,” are just Neo-Liberal masonic lodges; private clubs in which they make speeches about the, “free market solving all problems,” from the NHS to policing, which is just a tiny fig leaf (if it can even be described as that?) for their plans to privatise absolutely EVERYTHING! Those two things are diametrically opposed, philosophically, morally, economically, and especially POLITICALLY. If there really are rival camps within the Conservative Party who feel strongly about these utterly opposing views, A) It would explain a lot about their current infighting. B) It explains a lot about how all of the least qualified turds have floated to the top in their party, looting the very little that Britain has left to sell off to their friends and families, while none of the grownups were minding the shop, too busy writing, “think pieces,” for the Telegraph and trying to win, “hearts and minds,” by converting the BBC into a conservative institution and, C) It means that their party genuinely NEEDS these coming Wilderness Years, in which to fight it out and settle matters once and for all. One thing I can say for certain is that the thing he was just describing is NOT, “conservatism,” by any metric. Not, “small state,” not, “market driven,” not leaving matters of personal belief and faith as a private, none-partisan issue. It sounded to me like the foundation stone for the type of, “socialism,” the Nazis propagated!?
    1
  14958. 1
  14959. 1
  14960. 1
  14961. 1
  14962. 1
  14963. 1
  14964. 1
  14965. 1
  14966. 1
  14967. 1
  14968. 1
  14969. 1
  14970. 1
  14971. 1
  14972. 1
  14973. 1
  14974. 1
  14975. 1
  14976. 1
  14977. 1
  14978. 1
  14979. 1
  14980. 1
  14981. 1
  14982. 1
  14983. 1
  14984. 1
  14985. 1
  14986. 1
  14987. 1
  14988. 1
  14989. 1
  14990. 1
  14991. 1
  14992. 1
  14993. 1
  14994. 1
  14995. 1
  14996. 1
  14997. 1
  14998. 1
  14999. 1
  15000. 1
  15001. 1
  15002. 1
  15003. 1
  15004. 1
  15005. 1
  15006. 1
  15007. 1
  15008. 1
  15009. 1
  15010. 1
  15011. 1
  15012. 1
  15013. 1
  15014. 1
  15015. 1
  15016. 1
  15017. 1
  15018. 1
  15019. 1
  15020. 1
  15021. 1
  15022. 1
  15023. 1
  15024. 1
  15025. 1
  15026. 1
  15027. 1
  15028. 1
  15029. 1
  15030. 1
  15031. 1
  15032. 1
  15033. 1
  15034. 1
  15035. 1
  15036. 1
  15037. 1
  15038. 1
  15039. 1
  15040. 1
  15041. 1
  15042. 1
  15043. 1
  15044. 1
  15045. 1
  15046. 1
  15047. 1
  15048. 1
  15049. 1
  15050. 1
  15051. 1
  15052. 1
  15053. 1
  15054. 1
  15055. 1
  15056. 1
  15057. 1
  15058. 1
  15059. 1
  15060. 1
  15061. 1
  15062. 1
  15063. 1
  15064. 1
  15065. 1
  15066. 1
  15067. 1
  15068. 1
  15069. 1
  15070. 1
  15071. 1
  15072. 1
  15073. 1
  15074. 1
  15075. 1
  15076. 1
  15077. 1
  15078. 1
  15079. 1
  15080. 1
  15081. 1
  15082. 1
  15083. 1
  15084. 1
  15085. 1
  15086. 1
  15087. 1
  15088. 1
  15089. 1
  15090. 1
  15091. 1
  15092. 1
  15093. 1
  15094. 1
  15095.  @GrimThaDumpGod  : My worry is (and I’m not well versed enough in Bethesda games to be sure) that they are great at telling stories, but not so hot on the technical side. Let’s say that Starfield releases with a genuinely great story, interesting characters and a deeply intriguing universe that players want to explore? If that is a buggy mess, which is capped at 30fps, by the time the game has the potential to draw in the types of player numbers they need, other games will be on the market that will make it look like a last gen game in the way that Ghost Of Tsushima compares to Max Payne 2. Or that’s my worry. I was one of those players who wanted to replace his PS4 with a PS5, but scalpers were just so repellant to me that I would rather give away my left testicle than give them my money. So I got an Xbox X, but I was very happy with the experience. Especially since Sony were acknowledging the scalper issues and seeming to only release games that had backwards compatibility. Eventually I (well, my daughter) sold my PS4 and several of the games and I didn’t really think I would look back, but . . . I soon started paying out for games that were not on Gamepass, and quickly realised that all my favourite games were 3rd party titles, like RDR2, The GTA series, Control, Mad Max, etc. I only learned a few weeks ago about the end of the Scalper hegemony and was delighted to see all those stories about scalpers going under because they’re selling PS5’s at a loss. And then there was Redfall . . . Redfall was pre-installed on my Gamepass, but I didn’t even play it before uninstalling it. Too many trusted reviewers were telling me the truth about its poor quality in both story and technical state. My wife saw the look on my face and (not making this up) came back from work that same day with a brand new PS5 from a major retailer for me! I must have looked really gutted! I know I felt it. So, now I’m working my way through Ghost of Tsushima, with TLOU Part 1 Remake and Days Gone sitting in the memory, waiting for me to get around to them, whilst I eye up the Spider-Man Miles Morales on my wish list. So I’ll be busy and content until Starfield comes out. But I am PRAYING that it turns out great! Whilst the, “console wars,” when they’re fought between players are as dumb as a sock full of frogs, like watching street urchins fighting over which tyrant is best and only ever hurting themselves, the wars between the actual companies, Microsoft versus Sony, are great for us consumers. They force them to keep their prices at parity and compete downwards for customers. And, as we’re witnessing, they also force them to prioritise quality of the products. You just can’t sell consoles if no one cares about your games. So that’s good for the consumer and we should all hope that these wars continue for that reason. That’s what worries me more than anything. I’ll be so sad if Starfield is rubbish, just out of personal disappointment. But if Microsoft keeps taking these body blows, the Xbox will die out, leaving Sony to be as exploitative as they like and us powerless to stop them. And that’s bad for everyone. So even the Sony Pony’s ought to hope that Starfield is great, for their own sakes, regardless of how much they hate Xboxers. If the Xbox goes down, we all lose.
    1
  15096. 1
  15097.  @AVIXS_0  : Oh, don’t get me STARTED on CyberPunk! Suffice to say that I got a refund shortly after it’s release and I’ve never looked back, despite following the news around it, since. I’m so glad you got your copy at the right time and are having such a blast with it, though. That’s their job, after all; to take us out of our world and put us in another one where the rules are different and we (usually) get to kill the people who annoy us. 😉 I’m a real, “believer,” so to speak. I love the art form which, like movies, sponsors a range of other art forms and technical achievements under one umbrella. People still play and talk about the soundtrack to RDRII in the way people do with the soundtrack from a musical. People love Arthur Morgan and John Marston, have complicated emotions about Dutch Vanderlind and love to hate Micah Bell. Those fictional people are a part of my life in a way that only an, “escape artist,” can comprehend, escaping our world and passing through the console vortex from time to time. Whether you are V or Arthur, or Jin Sakai (as I am currently living out my Kurosawa life fantasies) I wish you nothing but good things, whatever your console (or computer) and, if there was anything I would fundamentally change about the world of video games (apart from introducing strict, swiftly upheld laws that ruthlessly destroyed exploitative false advertisers, gambling exploiters, etc) it would be to see everyone have one phrase printed in the Star Wars font on coffee mugs, T-Shirts and big signs over their front doors, “Pre-Orders KILL Video Games!” Anyhoo, more power to you. Maybe I’ll drop in on Knight City one day? But, I’m still not over it. ✌️👍
    1
  15098. 1
  15099. 1
  15100. 1
  15101. 1
  15102. 1
  15103. 1
  15104. 1
  15105. 1
  15106. 1
  15107. 1
  15108. 1
  15109. 1
  15110. 1
  15111. 1
  15112. 1
  15113. 1
  15114. 1
  15115. 1
  15116. 1
  15117. 1
  15118. 1
  15119. 1
  15120. 1
  15121. 1
  15122. 1
  15123. 1
  15124. 1
  15125. 1
  15126. 1
  15127. 1
  15128. 1
  15129. 1
  15130. 1
  15131. 1
  15132. 1
  15133. 1
  15134. 1
  15135. 1
  15136. 1
  15137. 1
  15138. 1
  15139. 1
  15140. 1
  15141. 1
  15142. 1
  15143. 1
  15144. 1
  15145. 1
  15146. 1
  15147. 1
  15148. 1
  15149. 1
  15150. 1
  15151. 1
  15152. 1
  15153. 1
  15154. 1
  15155. 1
  15156. 1
  15157. 1
  15158. 1
  15159. 1
  15160. 1
  15161. 1
  15162. 1
  15163. 1
  15164. 1
  15165. 1
  15166. 1
  15167. 1
  15168. 1
  15169. 1
  15170. 1
  15171. 1
  15172. ROBOCOP! Please? Please, PLEASE? Would love to hear you guys discuss that. A deep, witty, (prophetic?) darkly funny, ultra-violent schlock sci fi masterpiece from Paul Verhoeven’s trilogy of sci fi perfection, including Starship Troopers (also a satire) and Total Recall. They were Verhoeven’s best works, in my opinion, yet Robocop has never been equalled as a movie with something to say about the world that was worth listening to; a gripping, fast paced cop-thriller story with a strong horror element (we can all love the character of Murphy, but he’s not a super hero that any of us would like to be?) and it’s all done with 2000 AD style, comic book approach, of massively broad brush strokes, which allow for these, almost lunatic, two dimensional characters, without harming the final product at all! It’s philosophically challenging, eminently rewatchable, and utterly groundbreaking in its day! It set a benchmark that even he was unable to fully match, despite coming close, and I would dearly love to know what you guys make of it, setting it in its proper context historically? It’s hard to credit that it was made in the 1980’s! The special effects, whilst giving away that fact, were stunning for its time. But, the way it reflected that Gordon Gecko / post Reaganism, “Greed is good,” culture and flung it back in our faces, with an ad-absurdum analysis at the natural outcome of where such political, cultural thinking might lead us, like a man losing his temper and ranting at us about what we’ve done to ourselves, who’s a bit drunk and extreme, but you know he’s kinda’ right, just made it so powerful and hilarious at the same time! Please, PLEASE do Robocop? ✌️
    1
  15173. 1
  15174. 1
  15175. 1
  15176. 1
  15177. 1
  15178. 1
  15179. 1
  15180. 1
  15181. 1
  15182. 1
  15183. 1
  15184. 1
  15185. 1
  15186. 1
  15187. 1
  15188. 1
  15189. 1
  15190. 1
  15191. 1
  15192. 1
  15193. 1
  15194. 1
  15195. 1
  15196. 1
  15197. 1
  15198. 1
  15199. 1
  15200. 1
  15201. 1
  15202. 1
  15203. 1
  15204. 1
  15205. 1
  15206. 1
  15207. 1
  15208. 1
  15209. 1
  15210. 1
  15211. 1
  15212. 1
  15213. 1
  15214. 1
  15215. 1
  15216. 1
  15217. 1
  15218. 1
  15219. 1
  15220. 1
  15221. 1
  15222. 1
  15223. 1
  15224. 1
  15225. 1
  15226. 1
  15227. 1
  15228. 1
  15229. 1
  15230. 1
  15231. 1
  15232. 1
  15233. 1
  15234. 1
  15235. 1
  15236. 1
  15237. 1
  15238. 1
  15239. 1
  15240. 1
  15241. 1
  15242. 1
  15243. 1
  15244. 1
  15245. 1
  15246. 1
  15247. 1
  15248. 1
  15249. Ross Lumbus : OK. You can’t do concise, so I’ll indulge you, this once, without the insecurity of insult, undermining my comments: Facts do not, “collaborate.” I said, “corroborate.” Dyslexia does not come with a low IQ; or the abandonment of grammar and diction; usually the opposite, but you Trump fans are fond of your stereotypes, so I’ll let that one go. And, it makes no difference where you are or what your nationality is. You are doing the work of Putin and Xi for them, by trying, (not very hard, it seems?) to sell a KNOWN LIE that not even the GOP supports. NO ONE, with the occasional exception of the ever flip-flopping Trump, even SUGGESTS that the Russians did NOT interfere, DIRECTLY, in the US elections. So, WHY would YOU? On WHAT, “basis,” would you assert a falsehood, like that, UNLESS you had an ulterior motive? But, you are also, either UTTERLY UNAWARE of American politics, or lying again, when you suggest that Trump could POSSIBLY, “win,” the Mid Terms? Having scraped in, with a minority vote, 3,000,000 short of drawing level, let alone the, “popular,” vote, what has Trump then gone on to do? “What, Ash?” Thanks for asking. He has ALIENATED EVERY SINGLE MINORITY and / or ANYONE who thinks that he may be WRONG about ANYTHING, which means EVERYONE ELSE. Has he, “won people over?” Like HELL???!!! Is it a mathematical CERTAINTY that trump will get FEWER VOTERS on his side, since he’s been busy attacking American businesses, people and personalities, institutions, law and order, OUR ALLIES and EVEN HIS OWN FRIENDS AND COLLEAGUES? Yeah, I’d say so! The ONLY people Trump has been, “nice,” about are FOREIGN DICTATORS. So, Trump is growing increasingly DESPERATE: VISIBLY. Which makes him DANGEROUS, as he will do ANYTHING to retain power. He knows that the alternative could mean jail. So he has little to lose, by RIGGING the Mid Terms (nor do Russia and China, for that matter?), or giving Congress a pretext (excuse) to suspend (CANCEL) them. And our foreign adversaries have experience now; with better access and greater motive. Or, perhaps Trump will just continue having his goons, play out these cases in the court of public opinion? Perhaps, stir them into SUCH a FURY of Conspiracy Theories and Nut Jobbery, that he’ll have them encircling Polling Stations? Beating up minorities and intimidating or even MURDERING voters? Perhaps it will be America’s own Kristal Nacht, and we’ll all get to SEE that, “Democracy,” is DEAD. And, when American democracy dies, how long do you think YOURS will survive? With ALL the superpowers being dictatorships? But, here’s what I KNOW for a fact: If you KNEW the history of Trump and his family, you would NOT be shilling for him, UNLESS, you are either responding to one of those shell company emails, to, “Turn YOUR comments into CASH!” Or just a plain, Troll Farmed, battery raised, cattle prodded, government Troll. You are clearly too smart to be one of Trump’s cultists? . . .
    1
  15250. 1
  15251. 1
  15252. 1
  15253. 1
  15254. 1
  15255. 1
  15256. 1
  15257. 1
  15258. 1
  15259. 1
  15260. 1
  15261. 1
  15262. 1
  15263. 1
  15264. 1
  15265. 1
  15266. 1
  15267. 1
  15268. 1
  15269. 1
  15270. 1
  15271. 1
  15272. 1
  15273. 1
  15274. 1
  15275. 1
  15276. 1
  15277. 1
  15278. 1
  15279. 1
  15280. 1
  15281. 1
  15282. 1
  15283. 1
  15284. 1
  15285. 1
  15286. 1
  15287. 1
  15288. 1
  15289. 1
  15290. 1
  15291. 1
  15292. 1
  15293. 1
  15294. 1
  15295. 1
  15296. 1
  15297. 1
  15298. 1
  15299. 1
  15300. 1
  15301. 1
  15302. 1
  15303. 1
  15304. 1
  15305. 1
  15306. 1
  15307. 1
  15308. 1
  15309. 1
  15310. 1
  15311. 1
  15312. 1
  15313. 1
  15314. 1
  15315. 1
  15316. 1
  15317. 1
  15318. 1
  15319. 1
  15320. 1
  15321. 1
  15322. 1
  15323. 1
  15324. 1
  15325. 1
  15326. 1
  15327. 1
  15328. 1
  15329. 1
  15330. 1
  15331. 1
  15332. 1
  15333. 1
  15334. 1
  15335. 1
  15336. 1
  15337. 1
  15338. 1
  15339. 1
  15340. 1
  15341. 1
  15342. 1
  15343. 1
  15344. 1
  15345. 1
  15346. 1
  15347. 1
  15348. 1
  15349. 1
  15350. 1
  15351. 1
  15352. 1
  15353. 1
  15354. 1
  15355. 1
  15356. 1
  15357. 1
  15358. 1
  15359. 1
  15360. 1
  15361. 1
  15362. 1
  15363. 1
  15364. 1
  15365. 1
  15366. 1
  15367. 1
  15368. 1
  15369. 1
  15370. 1
  15371. 1
  15372. 1
  15373. 1
  15374. 1
  15375. 1
  15376. 1
  15377. 1
  15378. 1
  15379. 1
  15380. 1
  15381. 1
  15382. 1
  15383. 1
  15384. 1
  15385. 1
  15386. 1
  15387. 1
  15388. 1
  15389. 1
  15390. 1
  15391. 1
  15392. 1
  15393. 1
  15394. 1
  15395. 1
  15396. 1
  15397. 1
  15398. 1
  15399. 1
  15400. 1
  15401. 1
  15402. 1
  15403. 1
  15404. 1
  15405. 1
  15406. 1
  15407. 1
  15408. 1
  15409. 1
  15410. 1
  15411. 1
  15412. 1
  15413. 1
  15414. 1
  15415. 1
  15416. 1
  15417. 1
  15418. 1
  15419. 1
  15420. 1
  15421. 1
  15422. 1
  15423. 1
  15424. 1
  15425.  @oldcatlover  : If the presiding judge at the trial had forced the defendant’s lawyer (who spoke for trump on the witness stand) to answer the question, under pain of instant imprisonment, for Contempt of Congress, when he was asked if the election was, “legitimate or not?” that would have been a shattering blow to the GOP. And, if they had followed that by getting key Senators, Lindsay Graham and Ted Cruz in particular, on the stand, forced to answer that same question, they would NOT have risked a BILLION dollar lawsuit, or given false testimony, risking Perjury or Conspiracy charges! We could have struck at the very FOUNDATION of the Fascist Trump Movement, by taking away their false, seditious, propaganda-narrative! Out of the MOUTHS of the very people who sold them that narrative, shattering their careers in the process. They literally had that power, and could have had the Sergeants At Arms escort them to the cells until they were willing to answer the question . . . Indefinitely! That would have lasted all of 5 minutes! Each of them ALWAYS takes the path of least resistance, and we would have had our, “victory,” regardless of the, “verdict,” with no place for the fascist narrative to bury its head. They did a superb job, by legal standards. But, this was a political trial and a political process, and they should have played for keeps. And, I resent the hell out of the Dems for that! Now it’s up to the criminal courts and the ballot box, to protect us from out and out Fascism! ✌️👍
    1
  15426. 1
  15427. 1
  15428. 1
  15429. Jeff Smith : It’s already a, “Banana Republic,” when the reverse is true too. If, “someone at the top,” can order his own, “acquittal,” as happened at the risible Impeachment SHAM, why shouldn’t we expect that he’ll be hunting down all the people who put him there, spoke the truth when asked, or even simply failed to scream out hysterical support for Trump, loudly enough, when Trump, “felt like it”??? The problem here, is that people are still acting like this kind of thing still matters, when the Impeachment was the last nail in the Republic’s coffin. Who in their right mind, even imagines that they are “NOT” going to RIG the coming, “elections,” when we ALL KNOW if Trump is unseated, he and his family will be indicted and all go to jail? Which will lead to them, ”ratting out,” everyone from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, the indictment and imprisonment of the ENTIRE administration, leaving a historically disgraced skeleton of the Republican Party in its wake, to disband and flee from the press like escaped Nazis after WWII. They have SHOWN you that Democracy, law and order, and the Constitution are OVER in America, but you all keep up this DENIAL, as if, “elections,” will MEAN a GOD DAMNED THING?! And, I think you’re all doing that, because you all know, in your hearts, that being honest with yourselves can lead to to only ONE conclusion. Americans must accept they have a Russia Style, FAKE Democracy, more popularly known as a DICTATORSHIP, and be DONE with it, OR? . . . Revolution!!! There is no third option
    1
  15430. 1
  15431. 1
  15432. I would support national service if it was for two years and each conscript was allowed to choose between one of three options: 1) The armed services, obviously. And you can learn a skill or two that can go on your CV, as well as shore up our shrinking armed services’ numbers, which is an issue that needs attention as well as money. 2) Health and Social Services. Again, these services are desperate for staff and meaningful skills could be taught to young people for their CV’s, whilst they prop up the services by doing all the grunt work, while the NHS can redirect some of their real money to be spent on doctors, nurses and other skilled professionals, along with the equipment and premises they need. Just DON’T allow any, “friends and family,” contracts with people who are married to MP’s providing equipment that is unfit for purpose! 3) Community Projects. I started out in Community Resource work, in a previous life, and there is mountains of stuff to do and an awful lot that could be done if we got enough bodies to do the liaison work and build relationships in these communities. Everything from play-schemes during the school holiday periods, to needle exchanges, and countless other outreach projects which strengthen communities, build relationships between people in those communities and foster positive relations between local government and those communities. If all of them lasted for two years, they would be long enough for the participants to gain meaningful skills and qualifications. AND they would be long enough for participants to make a meaningful difference. And with their new qualifications and the knowledge of their contribution to society, each draftee will emerge with a sense of ownership over their contribution and a sense of responsibility toward their country and communities, making them better informed and responsible, contributing members of society. Of course, informed, educated and responsible members of society is the last thing that Tories want, so they wouldn’t dream of running it like that. Especially if National Service could result in the extended longevity of Health, Social and Community services, which they want to privatise by running them into the ground. But, if Labour were to pick up their ball and run with it? Doing it properly, in the manner I suggested? . . .
    1
  15433. 1
  15434. 1
  15435. 1
  15436. 1
  15437. 1
  15438. 1
  15439. 1
  15440. 1
  15441. 1
  15442. 1
  15443. 1
  15444. 1
  15445. 1
  15446. 1
  15447. 1
  15448. 1
  15449. 1
  15450. 1
  15451. 1
  15452. 1
  15453. 1
  15454. 1
  15455. 1
  15456. 1
  15457. 1
  15458. 1
  15459. 1
  15460. 1
  15461. 1
  15462. 1
  15463. 1
  15464. 1
  15465. 1
  15466. 1
  15467. 1
  15468. 1
  15469. 1
  15470. 1
  15471. 1
  15472.  @dago87able  : Because, A) It was in their interests to take out strategic targets; ships in dock, warehouses, factories, military bases, police stations, electricity and water supplies, etc, etc. B) The guided missile had not been invented. You flew over an area, at night, where your map said there was a likelihood of hitting X target if you dropped enough bombs in rapid succession, so that’s what they did. C) These were young men in bombers, not the fighter pilots (who rarely if ever had enough fuel to get across the English Channel) who just wanted to hit their mark (or near it) and go home! Kids, really. Not murderers. D) Records have shown that, even though, “terror,” was among the stated objectives of Goering’s Luftwaffe toward the end of WWII, his apparent incompetence turned out to have more to do with young men being unwilling to carry out immoral orders and finding it relatively easy to be plausibly, “unlucky,” when it came to aiming at a hospital, or something. Once you start counting up the number of, “deliberately,” murdered civilians, killed by shelling, you will find these statistics quite jaw dropping and physically unsustainable! As in, there will be no population alive to bomb within six months at this rate of deaths. Poland lost an entire 5th of it’s population in WWII, which is the record. Ukraine will reach that in two months max, if it’s casualty rate doesn’t drop. But, even Poland lost most of it’s people through combat or concentration camps. Not one single method. Seriously! Check the numbers. This is one of the most shockingly COWARDLY attacks ever in modern history. Like shooting fish in a barrel, only they are people! It’s NEVER been done on this scale before! I cannot find a single example this sustained, outside of possibly Stalingrad? But even there, the fighting raged for months first. Not after one soldier stubbed his toe and said, “F*ck it! Kill them all!” ? ? ? Respect for giving a shit and for double checking. ✌️
    1
  15473. 1
  15474. 1
  15475. 1
  15476. 1
  15477. 1
  15478. 1
  15479. 1
  15480. 1
  15481. 1
  15482. 1
  15483. 1
  15484. 1
  15485. 1
  15486. 1
  15487. 1
  15488. 1
  15489. 1
  15490. 1
  15491. 1
  15492. 1
  15493. 1
  15494. 1
  15495. “Being poor is an expensive lifestyle.” That’s how I always express it to my wife if she balks at the cost of some new item I want to buy for the home, or that I’ve spend on a present for her. If you can afford the very best pair of shoes, there’s a good chance that a middle aged person, like me, will never have to replace them for the rest of their lives. Yet, if you simply cannot afford to spend £3 or £4 hundred pounds on a pair of shoes, and can only muster £20 to £30 pounds to meet an urgent need, then you will be forced to replace or repair them within a year or two at most. This is a cycle of self enforced poverty that so few even realise is there, partly because some people are just too poor to be able to save or spend their money as wisely as they’d like and partly because businesses have built entire economies on this model of short-termism. The constant stream of FOMO and disposability that comes at us from all directions, especially on the web, even more especially through YouTube’s abominable advertising algorithms, is unending and totally misleading. But we are trained from childhood to think this way by people who want to make more money forever from fleecing the sheep regularly rather than get one big payoff for butchering the herd. But making canny shopping choices means spending a lot once, not spending a little again and again until you die. And making those first few decisions will free up cash that you can save, making it possible for you to save up to buy more top of the line gear that will never need replacing. They call that, “investment.”
    1
  15496. 1
  15497.  @TOMAS-lh4er  : And we must all play our part in that. After all, Ukraine is just the front line in a world war that will shape the world to come, which we cannot lose at any cost. Spread these videos. Spread the word. The official policy of Putin’s Russia is COWARDICE! Make that word STICK to them. They only bomb civilians and run from soldiers. They only arrest peaceful citizens and ignore criminals. They only beat and torture women and children, or the helpless. They only steal that which is unprotected and they make all of their policies in the dark, out of fear of the free world. We must shine lights into every corner and expose these cockroaches until there are no shadows for them to scuttle off to! We must stomp them out of existence. The Soviet Union 2.0 will claim more lives than did Stalin! And like Stalin, most of those lives will be of their own people. It’s up to you and me to keep the pressure on our politicians to drive out the last of the oligarchs who STILL sit in the heart of London, enjoying our freedoms and the greatest privileges that money can buy; including access to our politicians. This must END! TODAY! Any Russian business oligarchs must be deported. Write to your representatives and keep writing until they comply. Get friends, colleagues and family to do the same. If we lose this fight, our own homes will become the battlegrounds, and there will be no difference between Moscow or Londongrad! Keep fighting with all you have at your disposal! Failure is not an option! ✌️
    1
  15498. 1
  15499. 1
  15500. 1
  15501. 1
  15502. 1
  15503. 1
  15504. 1
  15505. 1
  15506. 1
  15507. 1
  15508. 1
  15509. 1
  15510. 1
  15511. 1
  15512. 1
  15513. 1
  15514. 1
  15515. 1
  15516. 1
  15517. 1
  15518. 1
  15519. 1
  15520. 1
  15521. 1
  15522. 1
  15523. 1
  15524. 1
  15525. 1
  15526. 1
  15527. 1
  15528. 1
  15529. 1
  15530. 1
  15531. 1
  15532. 1
  15533. 1
  15534. 1
  15535. 1
  15536. 1
  15537. 1
  15538. 1
  15539. 1
  15540. 1
  15541. 1
  15542. 1
  15543. 1
  15544. 1
  15545. 1
  15546. 1
  15547. 1
  15548. 1
  15549. 1
  15550. 1
  15551. 1
  15552. 1
  15553. 1
  15554. 1
  15555. 1
  15556. 1
  15557. 1
  15558. 1
  15559. 1
  15560. 1
  15561. 1
  15562. 1
  15563. 1
  15564. 1
  15565. 1
  15566. 1
  15567. 1
  15568. 1
  15569. 1
  15570. 1
  15571. 1
  15572. 1
  15573. 1
  15574. 1
  15575. 1
  15576. 1
  15577. 1
  15578. 1
  15579. 1
  15580. 1
  15581. 1
  15582. 1
  15583. 1
  15584. 1
  15585. 1
  15586. 1
  15587. 1
  15588. 1
  15589. 1
  15590. 1
  15591. 1
  15592. 1
  15593. 1
  15594. 1
  15595. As to your vote this year, I wouldn’t deign to tell you how to vote, but I do have a suggestion. From all of your videos it is clear to me that you are one of the most knowledgeable and authoritative voices on British politics out there. So, you must know that it’s more important right now, not just to get this particular brand of Tories out, but to lay down a lesson for the ages about who we are as Britons. I am hoping that the Tories do not even retain opposition status after this election and that the message becomes clear: The more far right wing your politics, the less chance you have of achieving power. This election cycle promises at least that much opportunity. Whether the British people take it or not remains to be seen. But, for myself, I have joined the tactical voting scheme that has grown and organised itself rather brilliantly around the country. They have websites which make it really easy to find out which candidate stands the greatest chance of defeating the Tory candidate in your area (and is not right of them politically) which they regularly update with the latest quality polling information. That information becomes vital in marginal seats. In my area, in the East of Scotland, it is not the same, as the Tories don’t traditionally do well here anyway. But I have spread the word to my friends and family all around England and Wales, (I don’t know anyone in Northern Ireland) and given them the links showing them how easy it is to get genuinely helpful guidance, if your aim is simply to irradiate the Tories as a political entity. Sorry, to get to my point: Please consider a tactical vote? If not, I would love to hear you account for why you think tactical voting is a bad idea, or just not for you personally; but, of course, I fully respect your right not to account for anything, let alone disclose your voting intention. Yet you did discuss it to some degree there. With the campaign itself, having gained so much traction around the country, I do feel it is a worthy topic for your channel and you may like to share some thoughts on it in a more generalised discussion, perhaps? Your output is so vast that it’s quite possible that you have already done this and I have missed it? Much as I’d love to see all of your videos, I cannot fit them is with everything else I’m trying to keep up with right now. But if you have already discussed tactical voting, perhaps you could direct me to that video? Edit: I should add that the tactical voting website also gives helpful information on the local issues in your area, the voting records of the candidates and any public record titbits about their speeches, or other relevant facts about these candidates, that a voter may feel it is important to know.
    1
  15596. 1
  15597. 1
  15598. 1
  15599. 1
  15600. 1
  15601. Shawn William : That’s kind of my point. I HAVE, along with MANY OTHERS, “disavowed,” The Republicans, the GOP and ESPECIALLY TRUMP; making it CLEAR that I LEFT the Republicans BECAUSE of TRUMP. THAT is WHY I IMPLORE YOU: Do not confuse people with Conservative politics, with these RADICALS. RATHER, you SHOULD be WELCOMING them into the fold. Our UNITY is ALL that MATTERS NOW. Are you hearing me? WE DO DISAVOW the Republican Party, while remaining TRUE to OUR convictions. “Conservatism,” is NOT a dirty word, and you will only play into the hands of the Russians and the GOP, by encouraging division. Conservatives HAVE BEEN VOTING AGAINST TRUMP! Can you SEE THAT? You and I are on the SAME SIDE. We have “different” politics, but we MUST UNITE, in order to SAVE THE DEMOCRACY in which people are ALLOWED to HAVE, “different politics.” I have taken the time to TRY to get you to SEE this? We must SET ASSIDE OUR DIFFERENCES and FIGHT for our DEMOCRACY! Trump ticks ALL the boxes for a DICTATOR; delegitimisation of the opposition, of democratic votes, encouraging violence, attacking our allies and American institutions, including the Justice System and Law Enforcement, Even American BUSINESSES, NOW. I could go ON AND ON about just how DANGEROUS the GOP and this dictator ARE TO AMERICA. I offer my hand, in UNITY, and say, “FIGHT WITH ME!” STOP looking for what makes us DIFFERENT. Conservatives are OK, But these are EXTREME RIGHT WING RADICALS, on the BRINK of dismantling the LAST, BEST HOPE of KEEPING OUR DEMOCRACY. And if America falls, the WHOLE WORLD FALLS. I do NOT exaggerate. Check out the book, I recommended: How Democracies Die. I am a political historian. I KNOW what I am talking about. We REALLY ARE AT THAT POINT. We either SAVE Democracy, through the Mid Terms (IF Russia hasn’t ALREADY fixed those?), and through the Special Council, or we WILL LOSE IT FOR GOOD! ARE YOU IN?
    1
  15602. 1
  15603. 1
  15604. 1
  15605. 1
  15606. 1
  15607. 1
  15608. 1
  15609. 1
  15610. 1
  15611. 1
  15612. 1
  15613. 1
  15614. 1
  15615. 1
  15616. 1
  15617. 1
  15618. 1
  15619. 1
  15620. 1
  15621. 1
  15622. 1
  15623. 1
  15624. 1
  15625. Sharlene Lakhan : True. Speaking as a Conservative, I cringe when Trump Trolls try to take away the credit for that, from Obama. But, he had to give those money men (and they are mostly men) a LOT of power, and cut so many complex deals, that we saw very few of the chief engineers of our financial ruin, pay any price for it. That’s the, “bitter taste,” I was referring to. He saved the economy, but at what cost? Now, the banks, Wall Street, etc, runs our affairs, without checks and balances, and we see it lose its balance, each and every time Trump has stuck his stupid, greedy, ignorant snout into the trough. That’s what we’re left with, now. A two tier system, with the economy and finance, having shut out the government, except for occasional measures, for show, to reassure us little people that the fantasy of a government that actually runs our financial future, is safe. Trump is clearly out of that loop, as the Mexico debacle demonstrated, where the GOP (financial representatives) spent years hashing out a deal, finalised it, three months ago, and didn’t even bother to TELL Trump. Or, if they did, he wasn’t listening? So, he butts in, like a simple minded horse, with his threats and loud pronouncements, only to be rebuffed by a GOP who stand to lose a LOT of investment, over deals that are already up and running. It seems, MONEY, is the only thing that will make them stand up to the Orange Orifice, and the only thing he’ll hear? Because our economy, and our government are two separate entities, now
    1
  15626. 1
  15627. 1
  15628. 1
  15629. 1
  15630. 1
  15631. 1
  15632. 1
  15633. 1
  15634. 1
  15635. 1
  15636. 1
  15637. 1
  15638. 1
  15639. 1
  15640. 1
  15641. 1
  15642. 1
  15643. 1
  15644. 1
  15645. 1
  15646. 1
  15647. 1
  15648. 1
  15649. 1
  15650. 1
  15651. 1
  15652. 1
  15653. 1
  15654. 1
  15655. 1
  15656. 1
  15657. 1
  15658. 1
  15659. 1
  15660. 1
  15661. 1
  15662. 1
  15663. 1
  15664. 1
  15665. 1
  15666. 1
  15667. 1
  15668. 1
  15669. 1
  15670. 1
  15671. 1
  15672. 1
  15673. 1
  15674. 1
  15675. 1
  15676. 1
  15677. 1
  15678. 1
  15679. 1
  15680. 1
  15681. 1
  15682. 1
  15683. 1
  15684. 1
  15685. 1
  15686. 1
  15687. 1
  15688. 1
  15689. 1
  15690. 1
  15691. 1
  15692. 1
  15693. 1
  15694. 1
  15695. 1
  15696. 1
  15697. 1
  15698. 1
  15699. 1
  15700. 1
  15701. 1
  15702. 1
  15703.  @derekbaker3279 : An excellent answer, in grownup and thoughtful terms. A bit wasted on a pro-Putin troll, who is just as likely to be a St Petersburg chat-bot as a paid human, but nonetheless most comprehensive. If you ask me, we waste our time even questioning what goes on in Putin’s head, in the same way we waste precious time when we question the thought processes of a home invader or member of the mafia. Their actions are eminently predictable, and people have been frustrated that politicians have wasted so much time and resources on Putin when the average layperson has predicted his every next move better than them, for the last 20 years! The FACT is that it is well within NATO’s gift to offer Ukraine a swift and TOTAL victory. All they need do is STOP signalling to Putin that he could fight this war to a draw, by constantly talking about Ukraine’s, “defence,” whilst giving them JUST enough hardware to prevent further incursions. They need only send an unambiguous message: “Ukraine WILL WIN A TOTAL VICTORY, and NATO will see to it,” whilst sending the jets and naval forces they need. I guarantee that Putin will create his own off-ramps at home. He will make every blood curdling threat imaginable, but he will quietly withdraw from the region, once he KNOWS there’s no hope. NATO keeps giving him hope, by not making it clear he will not win! It is up to us to write to our NATO representatives to demand these things. The financial costs will be poultry compared to the blood and treasure we would save from a protracted, never ending war in Ukraine. And the prosperity potential for a peacetime Ukraine are immense! Anyone who tells you that writing to your representatives is a waste of time is badly deceived. Ukraine has earned their TOTAL VICTORY. Let us give it to them!
    1
  15704. 1
  15705. 1
  15706. 1
  15707. 1
  15708. 1
  15709. 1
  15710. 1
  15711. 1
  15712. 1
  15713. 1
  15714. 1
  15715. 1
  15716. 1
  15717. 1
  15718. 1
  15719. 1
  15720. 1
  15721. 1
  15722. 1
  15723. It seems right to me that America would take steps to stop Communist China from planting kernel level spyware into everyone’s tech, from small children to government officials, between which there is little difference when it comes to awareness of security issues or moral behaviour. But, you’re right. It all should be governed from a hub of fundamental laws, internationally agreed where possible in the free world, but nevertheless reflecting each other in democratic countries; which establish basic rights, not to be spied on; to have full disclosure about how your data is used, what data is accessed and a clear point beyond which private companies and government apps cannot pass. There need to be clear consequences for violating those laws, with categories delineating seriousness and whether they are misdemeanours or felonies. Unlike the laws which make suing a company for culpable negligence that results in someone’s death or other tragedy, these laws should make company CEO’s directly and personally responsible for any and all violations, unless they can be directly attributed to specific individuals who acted without their knowledge for their own ends, so that there is NEVER a situation where no individual can be held to account. This would result in only the most honest and decent people taking up these positions in the first place, willing to take responsibility and knowledgeable enough about their own company that they are able to. But, to really make this work, and to find the political will, two things would have to happen that probably never will. Not unless there was a giant incident that captured the world’s imagination. Firstly, the monopolies of Twitter, Google, Apple, etc, need to be broken down into smaller, more manageable companies without so much power. Secondly, it would need to become an election issue.
    1
  15724. 1
  15725. 1
  15726. 1
  15727. 1
  15728. 1
  15729. 1
  15730. 1
  15731. 1
  15732. 1
  15733. 1
  15734. 1
  15735. 1
  15736. 1
  15737. 1
  15738. 1
  15739. 1
  15740. 1
  15741. 1
  15742. 1
  15743. 1
  15744. 1
  15745. 1
  15746. 1
  15747. 1
  15748. 1
  15749. 1
  15750. 1
  15751. 1
  15752. 1
  15753. 1
  15754. 1
  15755. 1
  15756. 1
  15757. 1
  15758. 1
  15759. 1
  15760. 1
  15761. 1
  15762. 1
  15763. 1
  15764. 1
  15765. 1
  15766. 1
  15767. 1
  15768. 1
  15769. 1
  15770. 1
  15771. 1
  15772. 1
  15773. 1
  15774. 1
  15775. 1
  15776. 1
  15777. 1
  15778. 1
  15779. 1
  15780. 1
  15781. 1
  15782. 1
  15783. 1
  15784. 1
  15785. 1
  15786. 1
  15787. 1
  15788. 1
  15789.  @ixiahj  : Now, that’s something our society could use more of. A cultural respect for elders. Not for nothing did history’s most successful societies venerate their elders, take care of them in their dotage and listen to them for their wisdom and experience. Plato even said that men should not marry they are 50 and that they should be prohibited from politics until that age too. But Plato was a bit of a fascist by today’s standards, so he’s probably not the best example? But, he is one of the few who took the time to articulate the benefits of ageing, and what everyone took for granted back in the day: that your elders knew what was what, had been there, done that and their experience was invaluable. So they respected them. The idea of Senior Homes is a very new one, historically speaking barely a blip on the measure of time. And I believe it has come at a brutal cost to the west. It has institutionalised a level of selfishness, unthinkable to our forebears, who didn’t simply see Grammy as a burden and responsibility, but as a treasured part of the family, enhancing its growth and value. At least in your society, the tide raises all boats together. The west can afford to be this heartless, and to spend its resources on making Senior Homes seem a lot more, “glamorous,” and less self obsessed than they really are. To the point that the economic model that has arisen around the idea, so quickly took over. Now, people have too many responsibilities and their own jobs, to be able to take care of their elders, at the first sign of disease or extra care needed. And of course, Grammy did it to his or her parents, so they expect as much from their own offspring. I think it was another mistake of western society, driven by narcissism and selfishness. But that’s just me. Most would disagree. I wish you all the good things in in life. You have my respect and admiration for that much of your culture. I don’t know much about the Philippines per se, save for the fact that Sylvester Stallone filmed one of his better Rambo movies near your neck of the woods, and that the west is fond of, “importing,” women from your country, for household labor and internet brides. I’m getting sad just thinking of it. But, I bet there is much beauty and wonder there too? Apologies for prattling on, but I’d love to hear your thoughts? ✌️
    1
  15790. 1
  15791. 1
  15792. 1
  15793. 1
  15794. 1
  15795. 1
  15796. 1
  15797. 1
  15798. 1
  15799. 1
  15800. 1
  15801. 1
  15802. 1
  15803. 1
  15804. 1
  15805. 1
  15806. 1
  15807. 1
  15808. 1
  15809. 1
  15810. 1
  15811. 1
  15812. 1
  15813. 1
  15814. 1
  15815. 1
  15816. 1
  15817. 1
  15818. 1
  15819. 1
  15820. 1
  15821. 1
  15822. 1
  15823. 1
  15824. 1
  15825. 1
  15826. 1
  15827. 1
  15828. 1
  15829. 1
  15830. 1
  15831. 1
  15832. 1
  15833. Isn’t it obvious to everyone, what actually happened? . . . “Brexit changed left wing voting habits,” for the simple reason that the general public were more worried about the possibility of a government overturning a democratic referendum and the UK no longer being a democracy, than they were about which party was in power. The Tories were promising to honour the Brexit vote, and that won them the election. The fact that we did not get the Brexit that was advertised came as a surprise to precisely no one, except for those right wing voters who were naive enough to actually believe in people like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson. I, and many people I know, voted Tory at the last general election, not for any ideological reasons. I simply believed that overturning a national referendum was such an egregious mistake that we would no longer even be a democracy anymore and we could easily wind up with governments that refuse to accept election defeats, as we later saw the Republicans attempt in America. What we actually DO about this seems pretty obvious to me too. We simply have to seek terms with Europe that closely align us on trade, human rights, strategic military goals and justice, without surrendering our sovereignty and without sacrificing our right to make policies on a case by case basis, when it comes to new crises affecting the world. And that’s something that the Tories have been fighting against since Margaret Thatcher. So, we have no alternative but to change government, if for no other reason than getting friendly faces into power that the Europeans will find acceptable, in order that we can iron out new deals without the baggage of the Euro-Skeptic politicians round our necks.
    1
  15834. 1
  15835. 1
  15836. 1
  15837. 1
  15838. 1
  15839. 1
  15840. 1
  15841. 1
  15842. 1
  15843. 1
  15844. 1
  15845. 1
  15846. 1
  15847. 1
  15848. 1
  15849. 1
  15850. 1
  15851. 1
  15852. 1
  15853. 1
  15854. 1
  15855. 1
  15856. 1
  15857. 1
  15858. 1
  15859. 1
  15860. 1
  15861. 1
  15862. 1
  15863. 1
  15864. 1
  15865. 1
  15866. 1
  15867. 1
  15868. 1
  15869. 1
  15870. 1
  15871. 1
  15872. 1
  15873. 1
  15874. 1
  15875. 1
  15876. 1
  15877. 1
  15878. 1
  15879. 1
  15880. 1
  15881. 1
  15882. 1
  15883. 1
  15884. 1
  15885. 1
  15886. 1
  15887. 1
  15888. 1
  15889. 1
  15890. 1
  15891. 1
  15892. 1
  15893. 1
  15894. 1
  15895. 1
  15896. 1
  15897. 1
  15898. 1
  15899. 1
  15900. 1
  15901. 1
  15902. 1
  15903. 1
  15904. 1
  15905. 1
  15906. 1
  15907. 1
  15908. 1
  15909. 1
  15910. 1
  15911. 1
  15912. 1
  15913. 1
  15914. 1
  15915. 1
  15916. 1
  15917. 1
  15918. 1
  15919. 1
  15920. 1
  15921. 1
  15922. 1
  15923. 1
  15924. 1
  15925.  @peterc.1419  : Was that meant to be ironical? The one spectre that Putin has held over his people; the one reason they’ve tolerated dictatorship since the 90’s has been, “Well, at least it’s not like the bad old days where we had to inform on our neighbours, pretend to love Communism (or even understand it) cue for a loaf of bread all day and get locked up if we complained to loud about it.” Now, that’s EXACTLY what they’re getting. And when it matters most. A rich reward for turning a blind eye and not caring enough to fight for a real democracy after getting SO CLOSE they could taste it! The one thing they were willing to trade has been taken off the board. Now they have to decide if they’re fine with poverty and the bad old days, with cops doing spot checks on people’s phones to see who they’re talking to, what they’re saying and what a-ps they’re using. Now they’re watching all their favourite apps, news stations, radio and TV just up and vanish in front of their miserable eyes, and they can’t even eat their comfort food because MacDonalds and a bunch of other franchises have packed up and hauled ass. It will be WORSE than the bad old days, because they’ve all gotten used to semi-free information, conveniences, entertainment and money. Now the difference between a Ruble and a dollar is about ONE DOLLAR they’re looking at the genuine possibility of STARVATION. Just WHO is missing those good ole’ days? I’d love to talk to THAT guy? 😂
    1
  15926. 1
  15927. 1
  15928. 1
  15929. 1
  15930. 1
  15931. 1
  15932. 1
  15933. 1
  15934. 1
  15935. 1
  15936. 1
  15937. 1
  15938. 1
  15939. 1
  15940. 1
  15941. 1
  15942. 1
  15943. 1
  15944. 1
  15945. 1
  15946. 1
  15947. 1
  15948. 1
  15949. 1
  15950. 1
  15951. 1
  15952. Donald Magill : I just can’t get behind people who turn a blind eye, change the narrative, twist the facts and CONSTANTLY excuse the appalling hypocrisy and hatred, bigotry and sexual menacing of this sick puppy POTUS. That’s one thing. But, when the SAME people get all “indignant” at the slightest attack on someone that THEY like, using the SAME complaints that are CONSTANTLY, and quite justifiably, levelled against THEM, it turns my stomach. And I imagine the majority of of the people can see what’s happening. Indeed, I imagine that the majority of those who support Trump and “news”, or opinion pieces like these, REALLY know, in their hearts, that they are being hypocrites. This too, sickens and depresses me as to the state of the human condition in the 21’st century. When I was a kid, I believed that we would grow more enlightened, as history implied we would. Now I am a political historian, and I know that history is a rollercoaster, and we happen to be at one of our lows. What we haven’t accepted, is that we REALLY ARE further down a road more reminiscent of 1930’s Germany than we care to admit to ourselves. But, THAT’S how it happened in 1930’s Germany: people in denial and the slavering, mindless haters being elevated to positions of control. And if you want evidence for this, just LOOK at the UTTER hypocrisy of this op-ed, and ask yourself, was there EVER a time, before this, when such BLATANT hypocrisy would have even been taken seriously? I wish nothing but peace and happiness to you and yours. But PLEASE, do not speak to me of religious persecution, when we have a government bent upon EXACTLY THAT, lead by a sexual deviant with the IQ and morality of a rat
    1
  15953. Donald Magill : It may have SEEMED that this was the choice, depending upon who’s “word” you trusted? But that REALLY wasn’t true, as I believe you are referring to the issue of Syria, there? Putin would have backed down, and the only “Fire and Fury” would have been in his words, not his deeds. Sure, we would still be dealing with difficult issues there, probably to this day. But, Putin would not DARE go full out into a war with the USA, DESPITE Fox’s hysteria. Scare tactics for the election was ALL that was. Instead, Trump has given the entire country to Russia, save for a small patch in the south west region, and rolled over while thousands of innocents have been bombed out of existence by the Russians, who have ALSO smuggled weaponry to the enemies of America which have been USED to KILL our military personnel. But they do their BEST to keep THAT quiet. And we WOULDN’T be upon the BRINK of nuclear war with N Korea and the Chinese. Don’t get me wrong, here. I am GLAD HRC will never be POTUS. She is corrupt. But only in the way that MOST wealthy politicians are. Trump is selling your country out from under you, bit by bit. You are RIGHT, that it was an AWFUL choice, and we can only hope and PRAY that BOTH parties re-evaluate their moral compasses. But America (and I speak as a LOYAL Republican) made the WRONG choice, this time. And even if he were to vanish in a puff of smoke, with all his minions, today, we will be YEARS cleaning up his MESS. But, each day that passes, plays further RIGHT INTO PUTIN’S corrupted little hands, and Trump is just too vain and STUPID to do ANYTHING to help, even if he wanted to. We are ALL responsible for OUR democracy, so, it’s no good shrugging and saying, “Well, what can you do?” You can DO a LOT
    1
  15954. Donald Magill : I am not going to debate with you on issues of personal grief. And I cannot imagine what kind of yard stick you can use to debate who is “more corrupt”? Kind of a schoolyard argument? But the URANIUM story??? You too? So, DEBUNKED, as you will discover for yourself, slowly, when you see that NOTHING will come of it, and you will look back and see that a desperate administration screamed “DISTRACTION!” at the top of their lungs and you ALL fell for it. But YOU sounded “smarter” than THAT??? The uranium CAN’T leave the country and hasn’t, without THIS Government’s approval. It was a deal on which HRC was on the periphery of. Get the FACTS. But, let’s say, for the sake of “argument” that ALL of that conspiracy nut-job theory stuff WERE true? SO WHAT??? How does THAT alter a SINGLE THING about Russia’s collusion with Trump? Even IF HRC were guilty as hell, she only got “money” for introducing a few people to each other? Do you have ANY IDEA how LAME screaming, “uranium” sounds to MOST of the members of the Republican Party? They HATE it, which is WHY so few even mention it. Because they KNOW it is NOT true (not the Alt-Wrong version, at any rate) and it is making them LOOK shifty and STUPID. But NONE of that changes the fact that Trump is selling us out. He gives Putin what he wants at every turn and the Republican Party is going to spend a GENERATION in the wilderness, if we don’t get REAL about this Russia Scandal. It WON’T go away, because of distractions? You don’t get caught for a bank robbery and say, “well I know another gang that got away with a crime,” to the Judge? THAT won’t change your responsibility or your sentence! WAKE UP! Whether you CHOOSE to “swallow” your “yellow cake” and THINK you can eat it too, or NOT. Trump is STILL a GANGSTER, at BEST! And looks more like a TRAITOR. Are you REALLY American? Do you CARE???
    1
  15955. 1
  15956. 1
  15957. 1
  15958. 1
  15959. 1
  15960. 1
  15961. 1
  15962. 1
  15963. 1
  15964. 1
  15965. 1
  15966. 1
  15967. 1
  15968. 1
  15969. 1
  15970. 1
  15971. 1
  15972. 1
  15973. 1
  15974. 1
  15975.  @imalebowski  : Well, in fairness, this video and discussion is about that party, yes. But, it was a discussion about this new emerging philosophy within conservatism, coming out of America, about which I think we all need to pay a bit more attention to. Listen carefully and he was describing National Socialism! Liz Truss’s, “think tanks,” came up, as they are diametrically opposed to the state, “taking responsibility,” for ANY economic policy and it’s her brand of conservatism, coming as it does from these masonic lodges of self enrichment, that wants to privatise EVERYTHING from the NHS to policing! Ensuring that they and their friends and family own the companies that run them, of course. Whilst this guest was describing a state controlled economy, from day to day management to especially controlling any economic crisis that may arise. He brushed over, rather airily, the centralised, “faith,” component of their beliefs, but you can be sure that a particularly egregious distortion of, “Christianity,” lies at the heart of the Americanised far right, and the line between church and state is barely there to separate the two things at all. Unless you have any faith other than Christian, in which case their doors will be slammed pretty firmly in your face. But, listen again if you doubt me. Everything he described in this new model is antithetical to what you and I understand to be, “conservative,” with a small or large, “c.” Not, “small government,” not, “respecting religious privacy,” not, “market lead capitalism,” but state control? . . . Without any of that pesky looking after the interests of the wider public and spending on healthcare, pensions and unemployment support, what does that leave you with? To me that looks like the very foundation stone of National Socialism, and I think we should all be very alarmed. It would certainly explain a lot about the recent trend toward putting beige Nazis in control of the Home Office lately, as if having brown skin in any way complicates the accusation of racism. And a, “Stop The Boats,” policy which literally NO ONE asked for, except the sorts of minorities that sport Swastika tattoos or who support incel baiting videos on YouTube. I’ve seen what the right wing looks like in places like Alabama, Kentucky and Florida. My GOD we DON’T want that here!
    1
  15976. 1
  15977. 1
  15978. 1
  15979. 1
  15980. 1
  15981. 1
  15982. 1
  15983. 1
  15984. 1
  15985. 1
  15986. 1
  15987. 1
  15988. 1
  15989. 1
  15990. 1
  15991. 1
  15992. 1
  15993. 1
  15994. 1
  15995. 1
  15996. 1
  15997. 1
  15998. 1
  15999. 1
  16000. 1
  16001. 1
  16002. 1
  16003. 1
  16004. 1
  16005. 1
  16006. 1
  16007. 1
  16008. 1
  16009. I hope they can work this out? Iran needs to realise they can’t use trump’s egregious brinkmanship as an excuse to milk the situation to squeeze it for all it’s worth. The old tactics of seeking forgiveness after the fact, agreeing to come to the table, once they’ve got all their nuclear centrifuge - ducks in a row, just won’t work. Biden cannot be too specific, until they’ve had talks. There’s no harm in America’s outreach, but Iran must come to the table. They could get an election winning result out of this, if they’re swift? At the very most, western sanctions can only be lifted on the condition of access for the west to check their capabilities, and an agreement that Iran comes to the table, in good faith. If they try to exploit the situation and speed up their nuclear program, and then come to the table later, America won’t sit still for that. Not after trump’s f’k up. It’s too volatile for that, now. Iran will get itself bombed or worse. And, if they sit on their hands, or worse, try to get more of their nuclear program in place, waiting out the elections, they’ll shoot themselves in the foot. Whenever things deteriorate with the west, or when there’s sabre rattling going on, Iran ALWAYS lurches to the right, so they’ll lose power, leaving a more extreme government in charge. And, let’s face it, Iran has got some legitimate complaints. Not just trump’s mishandling either. But, Israel’s assassinations of their top nuclear scientists have been all but warlike! And trump’s sucking up to Israel’s hard right government has been blatant, to put it mildly. Not saying I approve or disapprove, “want,” or, “don’t want,” anything here. Just that, it is what it is, and Iran needs to take a good faith step, get to the table, and get an, “Achievement,” out of this, to help themselves keep in power, before the next election in 4 months. It could be a win win? With some generosity that the current regime can play off as, “atonement,” from America? Ah, who am I kidding? They’ll make it all worse, and seek Moscow’s approval for any negotiations. And of course, Putin will say, “Niet,” to anything that helps America . . . SMH
    1
  16010. 1
  16011. 1
  16012. 1
  16013. 1
  16014. 1
  16015. 1
  16016. 1
  16017. 1
  16018. 1
  16019. 1
  16020. 1
  16021. 1
  16022. 1
  16023. 1
  16024. 1
  16025. 1
  16026. 1
  16027. 1
  16028. 1
  16029. 1
  16030. 1
  16031. 1
  16032. 1
  16033. 1
  16034. 1
  16035. 1
  16036. 1
  16037. 1
  16038. 1
  16039. 1
  16040. 1
  16041. 1
  16042. 1
  16043. 1
  16044. 1
  16045. 1
  16046. 1
  16047. 1
  16048. 1
  16049. 1
  16050. 1
  16051. 1
  16052. 1
  16053. 1
  16054. 1
  16055. 1
  16056. 1
  16057. 1
  16058. 1
  16059. 1
  16060. 1
  16061. 1
  16062. 1
  16063. 1
  16064. 1
  16065. 1
  16066. 1
  16067. 1
  16068. 1
  16069. 1
  16070. 1
  16071. 1
  16072. 1
  16073. 1
  16074. 1
  16075. 1
  16076. Kyle Kiss : “What would be different?” I don’t usually play the, “Hillary-ous,” game, buhhht . . . Well, let’s see, shall we? Putin would be the one holding a tiny corner of Syria, namely his GIANT Military Port, INSTEAD of the US. And, Putin would be posturing and threatening, because he would no longer have a free hand to terrorise the civilian population, as he does now, and ASSAD WOULD BE GONE, instead of MURDERING HIS OWN PEOPLE! That’s ONE THING. Donny would be behind bars, along with a SWATHE of American TRAITORS and an equally large number of Russian SPIES! What else? I’m ENJOYING this game! Oh yeah, the SANCTIONS would be enacted, probably with MORE sanctions on top. And the world would SEE that Putin is NOT more powerful than the West, even though he wants his own people to “think” that. The EMBARRASSMENT of having his PERSONAL funds frozen has always GALLED him, but when it happens to his Top Oligarchs too, THAT is a THREAT to his stability. They could end up stabbing him in the back and cutting a deal with the west, so LIKE STALIN, he lives in PERPETUAL PARANOIA. This would all mean less money and resources for his invasion of the Crimea, so they will eventually be forced to pull out, when Poland reasserts itself and cleanses their own little Putin problem? And I am not even a Hillary fan. I am a conservative, who left the Republicans, when Trump got the nomination, as I KNEW he was a CROOK. So, you WON’T be able to PRETEND that this is a “Right versus Left” issue at the Mid Terms. Conservatives WILL be voting Trump OUT. As will the SANE Republican VOTERS. Pretty COMPREHENSIVE answer, don’t you think? I BET you won’t, or CAN’T, respond, without trying to change the subject? So, it HIGHLY unlikely that you will answer me at ALL 😁
    1
  16077. 1
  16078. 1
  16079. 1
  16080. 1
  16081. 1
  16082. 1
  16083. 1
  16084. 1
  16085. 1
  16086. 1
  16087. 1
  16088. 1
  16089. 1
  16090. 1
  16091. 1
  16092. 1
  16093. 1
  16094. 1
  16095. 1
  16096. 1
  16097. 1
  16098. 1
  16099. 1
  16100. 1
  16101. 1
  16102. 1
  16103. 1
  16104. 1
  16105. 1
  16106. 1
  16107. 1
  16108. 1
  16109. 1
  16110. 1
  16111. 1
  16112. 1
  16113. 1
  16114. 1
  16115. 1
  16116. 1
  16117. 1
  16118. 1
  16119. 1
  16120. 1
  16121. 1
  16122. 1
  16123. 1
  16124. 1
  16125. 1
  16126. 1
  16127. 1
  16128. 1
  16129. 1
  16130. 1
  16131. 1
  16132. 1
  16133. 1
  16134. 1
  16135. 1
  16136. 1
  16137. 1
  16138. 1
  16139. 1
  16140. 1
  16141. 1
  16142. 1
  16143.  @thomasweir2834  : All the more need for radical legislation then, right? When I was a kid, I read a short story, about the invention of teleportation and public access. In the end, they had to take it away from the people, because of a riot. People kept jumping the riot to pre-agreed spots all over the globe, preventing law enforcement from bringing them under control, until weeks had passed, until they shut the system down altogether. Now, I’m not suggesting we do that with the internet, but what we’re seeing here is a RIOT, being orchestrated by America’s enemies, usually pretending to Americans, and keeping it live and moving, because there’s no choke point on the planet! What we CAN do, however, is make it an easily prosecutable CRIME to broadcast LIES under the guise of, “news.” Sure, the chaos will go on regardless. But, the big corporations, like F*x, RT, etc, would be put out of business, or forced to clean up their act! When it comes to otherwise, “normal,” people, volunteering their lives to this Cult, knowing most of it is fake, that’s the consequence of an unfocused life, with too many luxuries and not enough hardship, or work ethic, to earn those luxuries. People with too much free time, caught up in nut jobbery, which becomes a focus for their hatreds, which can always be fuelled a little more, by people who hate America. It’s not the lies of your own cult that bothers you, (the rhetorical, “you,” of course) it’s the hatred of the, “other,” that drives you. I can think of several solutions (potentially) but, the biggest thing, right now, is the EXAMPLE that the government sets. If people are given HUGE sentences, shamed and humiliated; if the politicians and media types who created this mess, and fuelled it, as it occurred (looking at you, Ted Cruz) are PUNISHED, then people will start to get it. Remember, “Loose Lips Sink Ships,” for example? The popular view that to talk down, or against Democracy was inherently, “bad,” and that, to do so made YOU the enemy of America? We need a revival of that kind of Patriotism. People are dying, and it’s went too far at Charlottesville! Time we outlawed, “news,” that isn’t news?
    1
  16144. 1
  16145. 1
  16146. 1
  16147. 1
  16148. 1
  16149. 1
  16150. 1
  16151. 1
  16152. 1
  16153. THIS is what you get when an entire nation lives by the mantra, “I never get involved in politics.” One of the most political decisions you can take in your life is to abandon politics and therefore your country. And being dumb enough to believe that you have some sort of, “social contract,” with your politicians, whereby you get to do what you want so long as you stay out of politics, results in the politics coming to you. As the countless thousands fleeing Putin’s draft discovered. And if you think that could never happen where you live, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I present exhibit A: Tricky Dicky Nixon, who exploited the cynicism and political nihilism of the late 60’s and early 70’s, resulting in a draft for people to fight a war in a country they’d never heard of, against an enemy they had no beef with, for goals that not even their leaders could agree upon: the Vietnam War. The only difference was that Nixon’s intention to dismantle our democracy was only at the beginning stages, and everyone suddenly got political, enabling the people to put an end to that war, and to expose the illegal dealings of their president before it was too late. But we’ve come close to losing our democracy since and the powers of the far right use Stalin-like, Putinesque methods more and more. Russians seem to have had sheer cowardice bred into them over generations. Is that what you want for us, or for Europe? These, “soldiers,” refused to go back to the front lines for the sake of their own skins, but we never hear of them refusing to bomb civilian targets, murder innocents, rape, loot, torture, etc. NOW they, “care,” when they’re being drafted without training or equipment. Suddenly the Russian cheers for Putin are quietened whilst veterans and the able bodied men flee their homeland by the thousands. The price for political absenteeism is a life of cowardice, living among cowards, in permanent fear. There are worse things than dying, yet these people don’t know that.
    1
  16154. 1
  16155. 1
  16156. 1
  16157. 1
  16158. 1
  16159. 1
  16160. 1
  16161. 1
  16162. 1
  16163. 1
  16164. 1
  16165. 1
  16166. 1
  16167. 1
  16168. 1
  16169. 1
  16170. 1
  16171. 1
  16172. 1
  16173. 1
  16174. 1
  16175. 1
  16176. 1
  16177. 1
  16178. 1
  16179. 1
  16180. 1
  16181. 1
  16182. 1
  16183. 1
  16184. 1
  16185. 1
  16186. 1
  16187. 1
  16188. 1
  16189. 1
  16190. 1
  16191. 1
  16192. 1
  16193. 1
  16194. 1
  16195. 1
  16196. blksbth1 : Firstly, you should pick a “character” and STICK to it, as you are KNOWN to use multiple “identities”. So, to you and your alter ego, Thomas: You REALLY should try reading about the FACTS. Based upon ONE FBI Agent, who blasted politicians on BOTH sides of the political divide; who was dismissed from the investigation BY MUELLER, before the Shills even got wind of the guy; and with the FULL KNOWLEDGE that Mueller is a REPUBLICAN, you go on to build a house of cards argument on that foundation? Claiming “Left Wing Infiltration”? Digging up past donations, going back so far, that they show up at THE SAME TIME that Donny was donating to the CLINTONS? And we ALL KNOW that getting a penny out of Trump is a feet in itself; meaning that he must have REALLY WANTED them to succeed at the time? But, of course, the idea is NOT to “PROVE” anything, is it? The “IDEA” is simply to throw up as much CHAFF as possible, right? A political Flash-Bang-Grenade, intended to cause JUST ENOUGH temporary confusion and doubt around Mueller for Trump’s minions (ALL of whom have a LOT at risk from any financial history being exposed?) to JUST MAYBE, halt or slow down the investigation. But, it HAS to be the minions who do it, right? They can’t allow Donny to ADD to his already growing list of OBSTRUCTION charges, so HE HAS to APPEAR to be playing nice, RIGHT? YOUR OVERLORDS are hoping that, by the time Mueller has discredited their claims of bias, it will be too late; that they will have thrown in ANYTHING else they can find to add to it. But, if you are not smart enough to comprehend anything I just told you, just remember this: Mueller is WISE to your IDIOTIC, PANICKING Trump LACKEYS, and it WILL NOT WORK
    1
  16197. 1
  16198. Daniel Andrews : The account I gave you, of what happened to me, is true. I cannot say for certain, IF Thomas truly has been working multiple accounts, but I KNOW that it DOES happen. I have had other dirty tricks pulled on me, but I am fortunate in having a computer expert for a brother. Though he works for Rockstar, in England, my country of origin, it is AMAZING what you can do to protect your computer over the web, but it is equally STAGGERING what these shell companies are capable of, on behalf of their Russian creators. It struck me there, that Thomas was simply echoing the same message? And the established MO, so I am informed, is to have two “fronts” on the go at once; one childish and abusive, the other more adult, and to see which generates the most attention. There REALLY IS a whole playbook for this!!! Honestly, I was as sceptical as to their abilities, as they come, despite knowing that there was a lot of dirty tricks going on out there, until I had my eyes opened. My brother says NEVER click on Click Bait, EVEN when you can see the link is just another YouTube vid. “A classic con,” according to my brother. “A Standard Ploy,” according to the FBI. But, to the point, you ARE RIGHT. Thomas is just rationalising. Just ONE quick example: Bannon is now OPENLY talking about how the Trump family, et al, attended that meeting with the Russian lawyer, in Trump Tower, to get “dirt” on Hillary. Are we HONESTLY expected to BELIEVE that “daddy” was NOT complicit in this? Would Trump, post impeachment, be able to convince a Grand Jury of that? With the way he rambles and bombasts? WHY are people beginning to “rationalise” ANYWAY? Is this because they happen to SEE that certain, incontrovertible FACTS are coming out? It’s like they just keep redrawing the front line, as they lose the battle: accepting ONE MORE “thing” after another, but ALWAYS trying to keep Trump inside the Bubble
    1
  16199. 1
  16200. 1
  16201. Yes, we should be careful how we read this situation, but NOT inactive. The west needs to get ready for Russia’s approaching collapse. The signs are there and some factors are beyond dispute. Even Putin publicly admitted he cannot control Prighozin, who continues to defy Putin’s direct orders to fold Wagner’s Nazis into the regular military AND defy his, “exile.” Putin cannot isolate him and he cannot afford to lose the revenue stream from the diamond and gold mines that Wagner provides from their criminal, terrorist enterprises in Africa. Two power bases at odds is a situation that cannot remain stable. And as long as Prigozhin swans about in Russia, Putin has that bloody nose Wagner gave him, for the world to see. He cannot even wipe the blood off his nose to save face. The world drew a comparison immediately: Zelensky is the type of guy who stays, even when it looks like he might be taken prisoner (see, “Executed,” for details on how that was going to play out) while the Russians were inside the borders of Kyiv. It was Prigozhin who forced Putin to flee Moscow, without even getting within 20 MILES of the city limits! No one is forgetting THAT any time soon. The fact that Putin is powerless to avenge himself on Prigozhin for abjectly SHAMING him tells you all you really need to know about who’s running things in Russia. And it isn’t any one man anymore. Something is going to give, sooner rather than later. And if we’re not ready for that, we’ll be fighting off competition from all over the globe when China seeks to sweep all the newly independent states of the Russian Federation into its, “sphere of influence.” Buckle up people. Ukraine might just win this war even though the west doesn’t really want them to? Or, so it seems from NATO’s pusillanimity? Then what? I say it’s better to be in control of events then try to deal with them as they happen chaotically about you. I say, let Ukraine win! Give them an airforce and navy to be proud of and make lots of money from their oil, gas, rare elements and farming! Slava Ukraine! 🇺🇦✌️🇬🇧
    1
  16202. 1
  16203. 1
  16204. 1
  16205. 1
  16206. 1
  16207. 1
  16208. 1
  16209. 1
  16210. 1
  16211. 1
  16212. 1
  16213. 1
  16214. 1
  16215. 1
  16216. 1
  16217. 1
  16218. 1
  16219. 1
  16220. 1
  16221. The answer to this question is one of text and subtext: The card is, “supposed to tell you,” that they are sensible gun owners, who can defang the dark side of public opinion by showing a family, “responsibly,” sharing their love of guns as a hobbyist, who has found an interest in which the whole family can share. “You too can bond with your kids over your shared love of home defence and your Constitutional, ‘rights,’ and Merry Christmas. Guns are wholesome.” But the subtext is also clear. And that subtext is spoken out loud as the very motto of the National Rifle Association, and it’s an implied threat. “We are not helpless, indeed, we are dangerous. And you’ll have to take our weapons from our cold, dead hands.” Making it uniquely sinister. British people are probably more mindful of the child abuse aspects and the hopelessness of reforming a country that legalises such deep indoctrination. Whereas American eyes, from more, “liberal minded,” states, probably just see an answer to the ongoing pressure in politics to reform gun laws, and hear the resounding, “No,” from Nashville. In Britain, the parent who sent that picture around as a Christmas card, would be facing a prison sentence and have his kids promptly whisked away by the local authorities. In Nashville, they made him a Congressman. And THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the difference between, “two nations separated by a common language.” I will lose sleep because of that picture of the frightened, grieving child on the bus, and I wasn’t even in the same country, let alone, “responsible,” for local legislation.
    1
  16222. 1
  16223. 1
  16224. 1
  16225. 1
  16226. 1
  16227. 1
  16228. 1
  16229. 1
  16230. 1
  16231. 1
  16232. 1
  16233. 1
  16234. 1
  16235. 1
  16236. 1
  16237. 1
  16238. 1
  16239. 1
  16240. 1
  16241. 1
  16242. 1
  16243. So, I watched it, based on your recommendation. Cost me £18 on Amazon Prime. It’s a masterpiece. But you should have mentioned the real genius behind this, Lauren LeFranc. Seems she both wrote and developed the show, which means she put all of those great words into the mouths of that almost flawless cast AND did all the heavy lifting that is required of a screen developer these days. It also goes a long way to explaining how she nailed the, “Giganti,” character and Penguin’s mom into such compelling and ultimately tragic characters. We’re talking Shakespearean levels of complexity, nuance and depth here. By the start of the last episode I was certain I knew what was going to happen to the antagonist and was right, but plenty of other stuff happened that I just did not see coming and left me speechless. Watched the entire series in less than 24 hours, so riveted was I. I can see why Farrell would be reluctant to do a follow up series for the reasons he’s stated, regarding the makeup, but also for artistic reasons. As an Exec on the show and, it seems, with a close relative being a producer (his wife, or daughter, perhaps?) it’s not just a huge commitment that can strain family relationships (especially if season 2 were to bomb) but, where do you go from there? However, I do have an elegant solution: We are given a teaser about another well known Batman character, just before the credits role on season one, after all. So, the way to go is to do a set of shows, with the same writers, producers (and especially the cinematographers and set designers!) featuring other characters from the Arkham universe, into which we insert cameos from Farrell’s Penguin? Less hard physical labour for him, whilst building up a revenue stream as a show runner, producer AND giving the audiences what they want? Four or five seasons down the line, after a whole set of characters have had their stories told, with the Penguin playing a role in each of them, consolidate them all with a special, or with a cinematic movie, using a similar model that Disney did so successfully in the early years of Marvel, before they ruined it all? If they can maintain this quality of writing and production values, without greedy Warner execs f*cking it all up? . . . Just imagine how great this could be?
    1
  16244. 1
  16245. 1
  16246. 1
  16247. 1
  16248. 1
  16249. 1
  16250. 1
  16251. 1
  16252. 1
  16253. 1
  16254. 1
  16255. 1
  16256. 1
  16257. 1
  16258. 1
  16259. 1
  16260. 1
  16261. 1
  16262. 1
  16263. 1
  16264. 1
  16265. 1
  16266. 1
  16267. 1
  16268. And that world of 2019 seemed like the nadir of humanity’s affairs, yet we had no idea. A world wide pandemic and economic rollercoaster of the early 20’s were just the warm up act for what was to come. Now it’s clear that Putin does not have full control of his army, who fight like medieval thugs, raping, stealing, kidnapping children en masse, and bury their mass murder victims in mass graves, whilst only winning any engagement by reducing their target city to rubble and throwing away their own expendable personnel at a rate of 10 to 1. Yet, throughout it all, NATO stops short of ending the war by simply stating out loud that they will see to it that Ukraine wins it. As soon as Putin knows he cannot, “fight to a draw,” he will start creating his own off ramps at home, as his retention of power domestically is more important to him than anything else. I can only conclude that NATO has a reason to encourage Putin to stay in the fight, while they hold up the increasingly unconvincing fig leaf of, “fear of escalation,” as their excuse? Maybe they’re making money? Maybe they’re just happy to grind Russia down slowly? Let us just pray that NATO is not paralysed simply by indecision! It’s inevitable that Russia is going to collapse from within, as Putin is a coward, as Prigozhin demonstrated so humiliatingly for Putin and all the world to see, by forcing Putin flee Moscow for St Petersburg without even getting within 20 miles of Moscow’s city limits. Not exactly, “I don’t need a ride, I need ammo,” is it? He can NEVER forgive or forget that public shaming Prigozhin forced on him, so the fact that Prigozhin still breathes is ample proof that he’s not in full control. Putin relies on the profits from the gold and diamond mines that Wagner controls in Africa. Which is why Wagner are STILL defying Putin’s direct orders to join the regular army and Prigozhin is ignoring his, “exile,” and Putin is powerless to prevent it. Russia is teetering on the brink and NATO should be saving blood and treasure by giving them a little push. Forget the brainwashed population, who are willing to cheer, collectively, at the sight of bombed out cities in which little children once played, innocent civilians went about their business and no one was, “guilty,” of a damned thing. A population that can be so morally repugnant and, on their best day, politically absent, deserves collective chastisement, in my opinion. What are NATO waiting for? They’re encouraging world war three by encouraging Putin to think he might be allowed to keep Crimea! We should all be writing to our representatives about this, and demanding more of them. A full F16 fleet of jets and a full navy are what Ukraine deserves and needs. We owe them that much.
    1
  16269. 1
  16270. 1
  16271. 1
  16272. 1
  16273. 1
  16274. 1
  16275. 1
  16276. 1
  16277. 1
  16278. 1
  16279. 1
  16280. 1
  16281. 1
  16282. 1
  16283. 1
  16284. 1
  16285. 1
  16286. 1
  16287. 1
  16288. 1
  16289. 1
  16290. 1
  16291. 1
  16292.  @blitzm4nn511  : True, but there will always be weak minded people who reach conclusions based on what they’re told to think, rather than doing the heavy lifting of thinking for themselves. Keep in mind, the only people, for whom this whole trumped up beef matters, will have seen the relevant videos and know the truth. I guess Charlie rightly felt that there were a couple of points he could have been clearer on, but I do hope this is the end of it for him? Now he’s forensically dismantled his troll’s lies, he could only do either harm to himself by going on about it, or (worse still!) promote her brand. Personally, I trust Charlie implicitly and would have accepted a 20 second video of him saying, “Everything this woman accuses me of is a lie or distortion of the facts, with some of it making no logical sense at all,” and taken him at his word. But that’s because I’ve been watching him for years and feel like I, “know,” him well enough to know what this trollette is REALLY trying to do. She maliciously picked a topic close to Charlie’s heart (the harming of children) KNOWING it would hurt, in order to get the maximum emotional response. And, despite his self control, you can see he’s really angry at her spite and cruelty, trying to manipulate him on such an important issue. Using issues in this way, for personal gain, invariably harms the victims concerned. And that, to me, is unforgivable and well below Charlie’s high standards. She deserves punishment for that alone.
    1
  16293. 1
  16294. 1
  16295. 1
  16296. 1
  16297. 1
  16298. 1
  16299. 1
  16300. 1
  16301. 1
  16302. 1
  16303. 1
  16304. 1
  16305. 1
  16306. 1
  16307. 1
  16308. 1
  16309. 1
  16310. 1
  16311. 1
  16312. 1
  16313. 1
  16314. 1
  16315. 1
  16316. 1
  16317. 1
  16318. 1
  16319. 1
  16320. 1
  16321. 1
  16322. 1
  16323. 1
  16324. 1
  16325. 1
  16326. 1
  16327. 1
  16328. 1
  16329. 1
  16330. 1
  16331. 1
  16332. 1
  16333. 1
  16334. 1
  16335. 1
  16336.  @Brian-vn2pe  : Says the guy with no life except what his shell company, “employers,” grant him for being a trump troll. It all went horribly wrong for you long before you’d even heard of Donald Judas Trump, and we can only hope they pay you to spend your entire life trawling the internet, trying to get negative attention from everyone you encounter by being deliberately wrong about everything? The alternative is too horrifying to contemplate! That you actually do this out of, “choice,” and for free? As the graffiti on the washroom walls so strongly suggests next to your phone number and an illustration scrawled in crayon and saliva. I thought you did all that as an act? But then, we all thought that about Donny’s dumbary too, until we discovered that he really was clinically thick, so . . . You wouldn’t be the first. I would genuinely pity you, if you weren’t a racist. But, while we’re talking, perhaps you could come clean and just explain to me one thing, son? I’m genuinely curious and (who knows?) you might even be able to persuade me? What is the appeal of racism? Is it just fear? Have you fallen for the, “replacement theory,” gibberings of focks? Or is there an, (and I hesitate to squander the term) “intellectual,” reason for it? BTW, if you practice with Speech To Text technology, you too could be rattling off lengthy prose like mine with barely any effort. Give it some thought? Oh, but, “you people,” don’t do, “thought,” do you? Anyhoo, cry about it as much as you like, coz’ Baldwin ain’t going to jail, and you won’t be able to refute that, just as you can’t refute all the crap you made up about trump that got blown out of the water. So, what you’re doing here, kid, is getting all emotional for the entertainment of people like me. I already know what your reply will be, but at least try to be original and maybe, “entertaining,” like me? 🤷‍♂️
    1
  16337. 1
  16338. 1
  16339. 1
  16340. 1
  16341. 1
  16342. 1
  16343. 1
  16344. 1
  16345.  @MrDan11422  : Yeah, I believe in God, as taught in the Christian Bible. Which means not the God that most Christians seem to believe in. Few people have the relevant academic training or historical knowledge to contextualise the writings of the Bible, let alone understand it. And it’s no longer taught by pastors, because they don’t have the training or education either. Most only care about what’s in your wallet, and the tax breaks. What I don’t really go with is lots of aphorisms with little practical use in the real world. Jesus spoke to people in a very practical way, about real world issues and current affairs (of His day) and didn’t like to speak in riddles. Yeah, He used parables, but as a teaching tool, for specific situations with a clear context, that had been raised as a question. Nothing is real. Let me rephrase that? There is such a thing as, “no thing.” A place where; no, not a place. An, “area,” in which no thing exists: no time, no objects, no movement, no light, no energy. Not even seething radiation or the bubbling of quarks. You and I will never experience this state of nothingness, because we are, “things.” Made up of countless other things. But, that oblivion of nothingness; that other dimension in which no thing exists . . . That is what awaits those who abandon life, love, and the experiences of free will. Eternal damnation is not a, “thing,” you can or will experience, but you can be consigned to it, nevertheless. You will simply not know it, because there will be no, “you,” to speak of. Jesus offers life eternal. Which is the only natural alternative to the universe in which we exist. The laws of physics demand it. You can choose life everlasting or the wages of sin, which are death. I know which I prefer . . .
    1
  16346. 1
  16347. 1
  16348. 1
  16349. 1
  16350. 1
  16351. 1
  16352. 1
  16353. 1
  16354. 1
  16355. 1
  16356. 1
  16357. 1
  16358. 1
  16359. 1
  16360. 1
  16361. 1
  16362. 1
  16363. 1
  16364. 1
  16365. 1
  16366. 1
  16367. 1
  16368. 1
  16369. 1
  16370. 1
  16371. 1
  16372. 1
  16373. 1
  16374. 1
  16375. 1
  16376. 1
  16377. 1
  16378. 1
  16379. 1
  16380. 1
  16381. 1
  16382. 1
  16383. 1
  16384. 1
  16385. 1
  16386. 1
  16387. 1
  16388. 1
  16389. 1
  16390.  @martianunlimited : Underrated comment, there, my friend. That’s all there is to it. Be born with money and make a, “career,” out of paying to have your name slapped onto every pack and warehouse of the most successful projects, and let each company’s own publicity department get going on the myth making, with bonuses for those who raise your profile in a positive way and by a measurable metric. Sit back and look for more stuff to buy. The only way that plan ever goes wrong is when you fall for your own myth and start buying controlling shares in your investments, so you can, “make decisions.” Then, if your ego is really fragile, you’ll be spending the rest of your days looking for none-specific groups who cannot sue you for scapegoating them for your every mistake, like, “the woke,” or, “the left,” or, “bleeding heart liberals.” You think you’re getting away with it, but now people have started actually scrutinising your, “decisions.” And the smarter ones out there having started doing their homework and delineating the line between the point where there was a thriving, growing, future focussed business, and when YOU started making decisions, and realising that this is where things started to go wrong, each and every time. With the exception of SpaceX of course . . . Because NASA and the American government have never allowed you to fuck around with the science or the budgets and retained the last word on every decision of importance. But, you still get to pick the colour of the cockpit, so . . . Well done you . . . 🤭✌️
    1
  16391. 1
  16392. 1
  16393. 1
  16394. 1
  16395. 1
  16396. 1
  16397. 1
  16398. 1
  16399. 1
  16400. 1
  16401. 1
  16402. 1
  16403. 1
  16404. 1
  16405. 1
  16406. 1
  16407. 1
  16408. 1
  16409. 1
  16410. 1
  16411. 1
  16412. 1
  16413. 1
  16414.  @joejaurique8064  : David Cay Johnston’s books, The Making Of Donald Trump and, It’s Worse Than You Think, give the full answer to your ignorant question. Hard, irrefutable FACTS, throughout, with reference sections almost as long as the books themselves, because the author knew he was going to have to prove his allegations in court, when Donny tried to, “cancel,” his books, which he did. If you are poor, you can get them at your local library (assuming you’re, “American,” to begin with?) for free, and I guarantee you: after finishing those, you will conclude that Donny is a crook, a criminal, a con man, a racist, an incompetent, a vindictive little weasel, a sexual predator, a liar, a blackmailer, a thief and a coward, as well as being incredibly stupid, crass and simple minded. If you still support him after that, it will be because either you are a racist too, incredibly stupid, or just paid to and don’t care about the threat to democracy he represents because you don’t have it where you live. If you are a real, authentic human being, you will never have a positive word to say about trump, ever again. And, keep this in mind, if you ever do muster the courage to face facts?: the author is a life long Republican, a financial expert who advises whole governments around the world, a personal acquaintance who knows the trump’s and has for 30 years, and a Pulitzer Prise winning journalist, so you cannot dismiss his legally established FACTS as, “fake news,” or, “deep state,” son. Your move, I think? Oh, wait? No no . . . It appears you’ve been Check Mated . . . 😉
    1
  16415. 1
  16416. 1
  16417. 1
  16418. 1
  16419. 1
  16420. 1
  16421. 1
  16422. 1
  16423. 1
  16424. 1
  16425. 1
  16426. 1
  16427. 1
  16428. 1
  16429. 1
  16430. 1
  16431. 1
  16432. 1
  16433. 1
  16434. 1
  16435. 1
  16436. 1
  16437. 1
  16438. 1
  16439. 1
  16440. 1
  16441. 1
  16442. 1
  16443. 1
  16444. 1
  16445. 1
  16446. 1
  16447. 1
  16448. 1
  16449. 1
  16450. 1
  16451. 1
  16452. 1
  16453. 1
  16454. 1
  16455. 1
  16456. 1
  16457. 1
  16458. 1
  16459. 1
  16460. 1
  16461. 1
  16462. 1
  16463. 1
  16464. 1
  16465. 1
  16466. 1
  16467. 1
  16468. 1
  16469. 1
  16470. 1
  16471. 1
  16472. 1
  16473. 1
  16474. 1
  16475. 1
  16476. 1
  16477. 1
  16478. 1
  16479. 1
  16480. 1
  16481. 1
  16482. 1
  16483. 1
  16484. 1
  16485. 1
  16486. 1
  16487. 1
  16488. 1
  16489. 1
  16490. 1
  16491. 1
  16492. 1
  16493. 1
  16494. 1
  16495. 1
  16496. 1
  16497. 1
  16498. 1
  16499. 1
  16500. 1
  16501. 1
  16502. 1
  16503. 1
  16504. 1
  16505. 1
  16506. 1
  16507. 1
  16508. 1
  16509. 1
  16510. 1
  16511. 1
  16512. 1
  16513. 1
  16514. 1
  16515. 1
  16516. 1
  16517. 1
  16518. 1
  16519. 1
  16520. 1
  16521. 1
  16522. I do so admire your capacity to conjoin compassion with rationality into one coherent thought process. We have much to learn from people like you. And I am so glad to hear this terminology challenged. Let’s face it? The reason Tories use the term, “illegal migrant,” is purely manipulative and a psychological, “technique.” They want to instil racist mental images in the minds of the public; Muslim suicide bombers, Russian spies and a generally semi-vagrant, criminal underclass, skulking about our cities stealing to survive and stealing our jobs from under our noses too. Two ironies with this (well, actually countless ironies, but the two I’ll mention are): 1: They are using the same technique that the Nazis used against Jews in the 1930’s, which are the same techniques that such people are fleeing, and would be fleeing from Britain if there was any substantive action being taken to back up the claims of their, “criminality.” But, as Robespierre points out, there have been no arrests, because migration and asylum seeking are not crimes. 2: The mental image of the, “illegal migrant,” these schemers foster is such a distortion that it results in unthinking people looking at their neighbours with suspicion, even if they have been born and bred in Britain, simply because their skin is the same colour as that of our PM and previous couple of Home Secretaries. And those same people then complain loudly in the pub about, “these illegals,” to a guy with white skin and an odd accent who is nodding along and not about to tell this bigot that he has outstayed his visa for years and would be deported under current laws! All this, “government,” seems capable of is making up entirely false problems, promising to fix what no one saw as a problem until they started going on about it, and then making it worse by every empirical measure! They are a national security threat!
    1
  16523. 1
  16524. 1
  16525. 1
  16526. 1
  16527. 1
  16528. By the way, I must challenge that assumption that it was, “complacency,” that caused people to vote for other parties, rather than the Labour Party, since they knew they would win anyway. You can only tag those who don’t bother to vote with, “complacency.” I wanted Labour to win, but I didn’t vote for them, since they stood no chance in my constituency. Most of all I cast a TACTICAL vote, because it was between the Tories or the SNP in my constituency. I voted SNP to stop the Tories. And it worked. I think the use of that term in this context will be taken very negatively by people like me, who voted according to the advice of the tactical voting campaign, since it overlooks the very fierce opposition so many voters had for the Tories. Lots of different political persuasions followed the tactical campaign on the web and took advice on how to vote in order to STOP THE TORIES. That was NOT complacency, but political activism writ large across the land! And, as so many pundits seem so worryingly quick to forget, the tactical vote goes a long way to explaining why Labour won so many seats, yet did so rather narrowly in so many constituencies. The tactical voting campaign was far, far bigger than most news outlets either comprehend or are willing to give credit for. Largely, I believe, because they don’t want to encourage a trend by acknowledging its power to create meaningful changes in the political landscape. It is being treated like British politics’ dirty little secret. I wish someone would commission an independent study into how many people were aware of the campaign, versus how many voters cast their vote not, “for,” any particular party, but just to STOP the Tories? I think the answers would be game changing.
    1
  16529. 1
  16530. 1
  16531. 1
  16532. 1
  16533. 1
  16534. 1
  16535. 1
  16536. 1
  16537. 1
  16538. 1
  16539. 1
  16540. 1
  16541. 1
  16542. 1
  16543. 1
  16544. 1
  16545. 1
  16546. 1
  16547. 1
  16548. 1
  16549. 1
  16550. 1
  16551. 1
  16552. 1
  16553. 1
  16554. 1
  16555. 1
  16556. 1
  16557. 1
  16558. 1
  16559. 1
  16560. 1
  16561. 1
  16562. 1
  16563. 1
  16564. 1
  16565. 1
  16566. 1
  16567. 1
  16568. 1
  16569. 1
  16570. 1
  16571. 1
  16572. 1
  16573. 1
  16574. 1
  16575. 1
  16576. 1
  16577. 1
  16578. 1
  16579. 1
  16580. 1
  16581. 1
  16582. 1
  16583. 1
  16584. 1
  16585. 1
  16586. 1
  16587. 1
  16588. 1
  16589. 1
  16590. 1
  16591. 1
  16592. 1
  16593. 1
  16594. 1
  16595. 1
  16596. 1
  16597. 1
  16598. 1
  16599. 1
  16600. 1
  16601. 1
  16602. 1
  16603. 1
  16604. 1
  16605. 1
  16606. 1
  16607. 1
  16608. 1
  16609. 1
  16610. 1
  16611. 1
  16612. 1
  16613. 1
  16614. 1
  16615. 1
  16616. 1
  16617. 1
  16618. 1
  16619. 1
  16620. 1
  16621. 1
  16622. 1
  16623. 1
  16624. 1
  16625. 1
  16626. 1
  16627. 1
  16628. 1
  16629. 1
  16630. 1
  16631. 1
  16632. 1
  16633. 1
  16634. 1
  16635. 1
  16636. 1
  16637. 1
  16638. 1
  16639. 1
  16640. 1
  16641. 1
  16642. 1
  16643. 1
  16644. 1
  16645. 1
  16646. 1
  16647. 1
  16648. 1
  16649. 1
  16650. 1
  16651. 1
  16652. 1
  16653. 1
  16654. 1
  16655. 1
  16656. 1
  16657. 1
  16658. 1
  16659. 1
  16660. 1
  16661. 1
  16662. 1
  16663. 1
  16664. 1
  16665. 1
  16666. 1
  16667. 1
  16668. 1
  16669. 1
  16670. 1
  16671. 1
  16672. 1
  16673. olrik parlez : Re-sent, at your request; as follows: Would that you were right, but I cannot agree. Not while children are being caged, some of them dying, in state funded Concentration Camps? Not, while Trump casts about for the war he so desperately wants? Not while we are forced to pay real money for his ego-trip Trade War? Not while people are being radicalised into appalling acts of mass murder, by Nazis who use his, “rhetoric,” to inspire people into acts of terrorism, in which these, “heroes,” shoot down defenceless women and children in the streets? Not while women’s bodies are invaded as a, “punishment,” for a single error of judgement, leading to an unwanted pregnancy. And, not while there is no escaping Trump, even in our sports, which he somehow managed to DIVIDE, or while he Tweet Bombs State Funerals, undermines our biggest industries like Amazon and Google, our domestic services; EVEN THE POST OFFICE!? That, my friend, is REAL POWER. You are right that he will never be the thing he desires to be, and I think that it is his awareness of that, and the bitterness which results from it, which is (in part) what makes him SO evil? But, it’s time we got REAL about this situation? If Trump, his whole family, and all his enablers were to be locked away for life, TODAY, we STILL cannot (for SHAME!) lay ANY claims to having a system which, “works,” or, “serves,” its people. As a racist and a hater of all who oppose him, we have had to cope, for years now, with a, “leader,” who LITERALLY HATES THE VAST MAJORITY OF AMERICANS. Our broken system allowed this, and is sitting still, while the Russians see to it that he will remain Dictator for life. He CANNOT relinquish power for fear of indictment, shame, and jail; ultimate DEFEAT. So, Impeachment is the ONLY remedy left to us, and those who have that power, are unwilling because they have been so indoctrinated by a lifetime of, “tactical, political thinking,” that they’ve forgotten what it is to just DO THE RIGHT THING! Without Impeachment, Trump will, “win,” 2020, driven by that violent engine of his power: DIVISION. Even the GOP has been forced to admit that Russia HACKED Florida’s election computers, so just think HOW BAD IS IT, REALLY? I cannot share your sanguine attitude, for those reasons. The Republic has already fallen, in Washington, and the people do not, “feel,” it because they still go to work, pay their taxes and get arrested if they break the laws. But, if Trump is still there for the 2020 elections, it will ALREADY be OVER, and after the BLOODBATH that election night will be; with goon squads, intimidating voters or shooting at them, outright, THEN America will KNOW what a Dictatorship is, and feel the REAL POWER that they refused to believe was there. Trump’s foundation of a DIVIDED States of America will be the violent source of his REAL power. This is how Democracy Dies, in the modern world. There’s a great book about it, available as an audiobook on YouTube, if it’s still there? Modern Democracies die, because the citizens of those countries always say and do the same thing: They say, “It can never happen HERE?” And, they DO NOTHING . . . ✌️
    1
  16674. 1
  16675. 1
  16676. 1
  16677. 1
  16678. 1
  16679. 1
  16680. 1
  16681. 1
  16682. 1
  16683. 1
  16684. 1
  16685. 1
  16686. 1
  16687. 1
  16688. 1
  16689. 1
  16690. 1
  16691. 1
  16692. 1
  16693. 1
  16694. 1
  16695. 1
  16696. 1
  16697. 1
  16698. 1
  16699. 1
  16700. 1
  16701. 1
  16702. 1
  16703. 1
  16704. 1
  16705. 1
  16706. 1
  16707. 1
  16708. 1
  16709. 1
  16710. 1
  16711. 1
  16712. 1
  16713. 1
  16714. 1
  16715. 1
  16716. 1
  16717. 1
  16718. 1
  16719. 1
  16720. 1
  16721. 1
  16722. 1
  16723. 1
  16724. 1
  16725. 1
  16726. 1
  16727. 1
  16728. 1
  16729. 1
  16730. 1
  16731. 1
  16732. 1
  16733. 1
  16734. 1
  16735. 1
  16736. 1
  16737. 1
  16738. 1
  16739. 1
  16740. 1
  16741. 1
  16742. carol Lund : Yeah, I see what you mean. I actually moved here FROM England in 2006, and have duel citizenship. The country has changed, largely on the basis of embarrassment. I really believe that. So many ignorant people are vaguely aware that Trump is a traitor, but have stuck their necks out too far to pull them back in, without being attacked by other, rabid, Trumpskis. So, they live in fear. Being a political historian, (the occupation which brought me out here, in the first place) and having the outsider’s perspective, I have noticed that the changes have been rapid, due to unseen poverty. EVERYONE here (I am blessed to be able to exclude myself in this) seems to be in a Debt Trap. Their education; their homes; their cars; their health; their businesses, ALL seem to have put a millstone around their necks. So, even though the US can “claim” to be prosperous, right now, there is STILL the sense of desperation that was a driving factor behind Hitler. It’s very hard to make people aware of their shared financial fix, despite the fact that most Americans (over 80%) will die leaving DEBT as a legacy for their children. That’s why a TEMPORARY Tax Break is a straw they’ll cling to. Racism has ALWAYS been a much bigger problem in The States, than most of the developed world, which is WHY Trump has been able to seize on financial despair, without ever naming its source and blame “the other” like Hitler. Though he acts more like Stalin. If the Dems don’t win the Mid Terms, we will lose our democracy, and I’ll be returning back to England, while we stave off the inevitable downfall of Democracy on a GLOBAL basis. Hill has no clue, and seems to be demonstrating my point. How insecure do you have to be, to lay out your personal biography to a stranger that you have just been abusing, just to show that you aren’t living in your mom’s basement? It seems THAT is more important to him, than the issue in hand? Says a LOT
    1
  16743. 1
  16744. 1
  16745. 1
  16746. 1
  16747. 1
  16748. 1
  16749. 1
  16750. 1
  16751. 1
  16752. 1
  16753. 1
  16754. 1
  16755. 1
  16756. 1
  16757. 1
  16758. 1
  16759. 1
  16760. 1
  16761. 1
  16762. 1
  16763. 1
  16764. 1
  16765. 1
  16766. 1
  16767. 1
  16768. 1
  16769. 1
  16770. 1
  16771. 1
  16772. 1
  16773. 1
  16774. 1
  16775. 1
  16776. 1
  16777. 1
  16778.  @WinstonSmith19847  : Now a little time has passed and the most concerning development for me has been that ALL of the most dangerous, corrupt and divisive voices from the neo-lib-con wing of the Tories have been to America already! And if you needed proof that their, “talks,” “lectures,” “interviews,” “book tours,” were nothing more than cover for laundering their payoffs in lieu of fulfilling their contracts for the Tufton Street Americanos, try Boris Johnson, addressing an almost empty room. If it wasn’t for the press pack I think he would have had zero attendance, for his, “speech/lecture,” whatever they’d booked him for. But he got paid, regardless, out of the RNC’s deep pockets. There’s a photo of it doing the rounds on the internet, which makes the point perfectly. Does anyone else think it’s a dead giveaway that right after the election, win, lose or draw, all the usual suspects showed up for their American paymasters with their hands out? Suella Braverman, with her massively reduced majority is working hard for her constituents, in America. Nigel Farage has committed to sticking around for as long as the trump campaign wants him, siting that American politics are, “far more important than British politics,” even when he has a constituency to disregard! I’m telling you, people; the American right outright OWNS the British Tory Party. At least, its extreme wing at any rate. And that’s what the big fight inside the Tories is all about now, as we speak. The, “wets,” are fighting to delay the leadership contest, so that the older, more traditional wing of the Tories can get their ducks in a row and fight off the insurgency of Tufty clubbers. And the US owned extremists want the contest right now, so they can ride their wave of populism into the leadership. We’ll know who’s winning by next week. That’s when the newly organised 1922 Committee will lay out the rules for this contest. If we get an, “Interim Leader,” buying time for the wets, then they’re winning. Or, at the very least, they have managed to reassert some control over the process. If they have the internal elections right away, look forward to a far right version of the Tories, taking their talking points from Washington and Moscow. Interesting times.
    1
  16779. 1
  16780. 1
  16781. 1
  16782. 1
  16783. 1
  16784. 1
  16785. 1
  16786. 1
  16787. 1
  16788. 1
  16789. 1
  16790. 1
  16791. 1
  16792. 1
  16793. 1
  16794. 1
  16795. 1
  16796. 1
  16797. 1
  16798. 1
  16799. 1
  16800. 1
  16801. 1
  16802. 1
  16803. 1
  16804. 1
  16805. 1
  16806. 1
  16807. 1
  16808. 1
  16809. 1
  16810. 1
  16811. 1
  16812. 1
  16813. 1
  16814. 1
  16815. 1
  16816. 1
  16817. 1
  16818. 1
  16819. 1
  16820. 1
  16821. 1
  16822. 1
  16823. 1
  16824. 1
  16825. 1
  16826. 1
  16827. 1
  16828. 1
  16829. 1
  16830. 1
  16831. 1
  16832. 1
  16833. 1
  16834. 1
  16835. 1
  16836. 1
  16837. 1
  16838. 1
  16839. 1
  16840. 1
  16841. 1
  16842. 1
  16843. 1
  16844. 1
  16845. 1
  16846. 1
  16847. 1
  16848. 1
  16849. 1
  16850. 1
  16851. 1
  16852. 1
  16853. 1
  16854. 1
  16855. 1
  16856. 1
  16857. 1
  16858. 1
  16859. 1
  16860. 1
  16861. 1
  16862. 1
  16863. 1
  16864. 1
  16865. 1
  16866. 1
  16867. 1
  16868. 1
  16869. 1
  16870. 1
  16871. 1
  16872. 1
  16873. 1
  16874. 1
  16875. 1
  16876. 1
  16877. 1
  16878. 1
  16879. 1
  16880. 1
  16881. 1
  16882. 1
  16883. 1
  16884. 1
  16885. 1
  16886. 1
  16887. I sincerely regret voting for this feckless pack of spongers, oligarch appeasers and degenerate ne’er do wells. I wasn’t convinced by either side over leaving or staying in Europe, but I believed a second referendum would make a nonsense out of our democracy and undermine it irrevocably. And I still think if I were to meet Johnson in a pub, he’d be enormously engaging company. But I used to work with criminals for a living and I liked a lot of those guys too. That doesn’t mean I would have put them in charge of so much as a mop,and bucket, let alone the future of our country. While my dad died of Covid, these people partied and spread the pandemic from the hub of the country, putting us all in the line of fire (knowingly having more contact with more people, who were the very types that needed to travel about the country and have more contact with even more people, literally in every single constituency in the country) while they LAUGHED at us, and had the GALL to try to make the discussion about whether Johnson was allowed a birthday cake! Johnson lies almost as much as Putin and has gaslighted the country once too often, and then ten more times over! The real test for me was when he told us Putin was planning to invade Ukraine, and I just couldn’t take him seriously. I had to go off and do homework because I couldn’t trust a damned word out of the PM’s mouth about such a fundamental and urgent issue. If we re-elected these people, we would literally be no different than turkeys voting for Christmas every day! I don’t even want revenge anymore. I just want our country back in responsible hands. And, for everything negative one can truthfully say about Starmer, he’s fundamentally decent and he doesn’t lie. Not that I’m aware of, at any rate?
    1
  16888. 1
  16889. 1
  16890. 1
  16891. 1
  16892. 1
  16893. 1
  16894. 1
  16895. 1
  16896. 1
  16897. 1
  16898. 1
  16899. 1
  16900. 1
  16901. 1
  16902. 1
  16903. 1
  16904. 1
  16905. 1
  16906. 1
  16907. 1
  16908. 1
  16909. 1
  16910. 1
  16911. 1
  16912. 1
  16913. 1
  16914. 1
  16915. 1
  16916. 1
  16917. 1
  16918. 1
  16919. 1
  16920. 1
  16921. 1
  16922. 1
  16923. 1
  16924. 1
  16925. 1
  16926. 1
  16927. 1
  16928. 1
  16929. 1
  16930. 1
  16931. 1
  16932. 1
  16933. 1
  16934. 1
  16935. 1
  16936. 1
  16937. 1
  16938. 1
  16939. 1
  16940. 1
  16941. 1
  16942. 1
  16943. 1
  16944. 1
  16945. 1
  16946. 1
  16947. 1
  16948. 1
  16949. 1
  16950. 1
  16951. 1
  16952. 1
  16953. 1
  16954. 1
  16955. 1
  16956. 1
  16957. 1
  16958. 1
  16959. 1
  16960. 1
  16961. 1
  16962. 1
  16963. 1
  16964. 1
  16965. 1
  16966. 1
  16967. 1
  16968. 1
  16969. 1
  16970. 1
  16971. 1
  16972. 1
  16973. 1
  16974. 1
  16975. 1
  16976. 1
  16977. 1
  16978. 1
  16979. 1
  16980. 1
  16981. 1
  16982. 1
  16983. 1
  16984. 1
  16985. 1
  16986. 1
  16987. 1
  16988. 1
  16989. 1
  16990. 1
  16991. 1
  16992. 1
  16993. 1
  16994. 1
  16995. 1
  16996. 1
  16997. 1
  16998. 1
  16999. 1
  17000. 1
  17001. 1
  17002. 1
  17003. 1
  17004. 1
  17005. 1
  17006. 1
  17007. 1
  17008. 1
  17009. 1
  17010. 1
  17011. 1
  17012. 1
  17013. 1
  17014. 1
  17015. 1
  17016. 1
  17017. 1
  17018. 1
  17019. 1
  17020. 1
  17021. 1
  17022.  @taniadavenport2939  : Start with The Gulag Archipelago by Alexander Solzhenitsyn, if you can access it in your library? It’s still banned in Russia, maybe? Read it as though he is talking about the present day, as it really is no different. “Progress,” is a thing that happens to other countries, if you’re a Russian. Anton Checkoff’s collection of essays and short stories would be good for you, like vitamins for the brain. Then, if you’re up for some grown up stuff, (and if you can handle a little Leo Tolstoy without breaking into tears?) you could move on to Simon Seabag Montefiore’s two part biography of Stalin. Honestly, when you read those, especially the second one, you’ll keep picking up your western copies of Putin’s life and wondering where the differences are! Maybe it will sink in that Putin has modelled his entire philosophy, politics, lifestyle and career on the one man who survived as dictator of Russia until his death? Granted, he died horribly, helplessly lying in his own bodily fluids for 16 hours after a stroke, until they finally put him in a bed and all he could do was watch his enemies plot and scheme for power, while ensuring that he would never recover this time. Granted, all the doctors had been purged, so he had to rely on quacks who were so terrified that they relied on consensus diagnostics and debate instead of doing anything to help him, and he had to watch all of this, unable to articulate his horror and rage until he finally died. But he did cling to power. Putin loves that.
    1
  17023. 1
  17024. 1
  17025. 1
  17026. 1
  17027. 1
  17028. 1
  17029. 1
  17030. 1
  17031. 1
  17032. 1
  17033. 1
  17034. 1
  17035. 1
  17036. 1
  17037. 1
  17038. 1
  17039. 1
  17040. 1
  17041. 1
  17042. 1
  17043. 1
  17044. 1
  17045. 1
  17046. 1
  17047. 1
  17048. 1
  17049. 1
  17050. 1
  17051. 1
  17052. 1
  17053. 1
  17054. 1
  17055. 1
  17056. 1
  17057. 1
  17058. 1
  17059. 1
  17060. 1
  17061. 1
  17062. 1
  17063. 1
  17064. 1
  17065. 1
  17066. 1
  17067. 1
  17068. 1
  17069. 1
  17070. 1
  17071. 1
  17072. 1
  17073. 1
  17074. 1
  17075. 1
  17076. 1
  17077. 1
  17078. 1
  17079. 1
  17080. 1
  17081. 1
  17082. 1
  17083. 1
  17084. 1
  17085. 1
  17086. 1
  17087. 1
  17088. 1
  17089. 1
  17090. 1
  17091. Suella Braverman is that most dangerous cocktail of things; driven by pathological belief in her, “mission,” wrong headed, sociopathic and intellectually speaking, plain stupid. The reason for the, “Conservative crisis,” has far more to do with broken trust with the voters (a series of incompetent PM’s for example) due to their callous indifference to the real problems of average people. It is useful, manipulative, to both the far right, “conservatives,” like her and people in the Farage Garage, to pretend that migration is the central issue of this election. But the stark reality is that we now pay record levels of tax while our public services are in record decline. And we’ve all seen that this was due to Brexit lies, theft, incompetence, callous indifference to Covid (and the previous mentioned issues), insider dealing, corruption and waste! We’ve watched them make themselves, their friends and their families much richer at the direct cost of justice, fairness and the voters’ pockets. But, let’s just come down to one basic case in point, shall we? As I see it, any cabinet minister who literally calls vast swathes of voters names, from the dispatch box, is unfit for ANY role in public life! Not just once, and not just one name, but a list of deliberately hurtful epithets, in several speeches, questions or pre-prepared responses to questions, DRIVING HOME the point that not only does she not care about what people who disagree with her think, but she actively hates them and seeks to punish them! She is just wrong in every respect; factually, intellectually, emotionally, historically, you name it. Wrong and wrong headed. I genuinely believe she would benefit more from spending time with a good psychotherapist than in public life. She’s obviously deeply unhappy. But why is she entitled to make the rest of us live in her own personal hell with her? Away with her. Forever!
    1
  17092. 1
  17093. 1
  17094. 1
  17095. 1
  17096. 1
  17097. 1
  17098. 1
  17099. 1
  17100. 1
  17101. 1
  17102. 1
  17103. 1
  17104. 1
  17105. 1
  17106. 1
  17107. 1
  17108. 1
  17109. 1
  17110. 1
  17111. 1
  17112. 1
  17113. 1
  17114. 1
  17115. 1
  17116. 1
  17117. 1
  17118. 1
  17119. 1
  17120. 1
  17121. 1
  17122. 1
  17123. 1
  17124. 1
  17125. 1
  17126. 1
  17127. 1
  17128. 1
  17129. 1
  17130. 1
  17131. 1
  17132. 1
  17133. 1
  17134. 1
  17135. 1
  17136. 1
  17137. 1
  17138. 1
  17139. 1
  17140. 1
  17141. 1
  17142. 1
  17143. 1
  17144. 1
  17145. 1
  17146. 1
  17147. 1
  17148. 1
  17149. 1
  17150. 1
  17151. 1
  17152. 1
  17153. 1
  17154. 1
  17155. 1
  17156. 1
  17157. 1
  17158. 1
  17159. 1
  17160. 1
  17161. 1
  17162. 1
  17163. 1
  17164. 1
  17165. 1
  17166. 1
  17167. 1
  17168. 1
  17169. 1
  17170. 1
  17171. 1
  17172. 1
  17173. 1
  17174. 1
  17175. 1
  17176. 1
  17177. 1
  17178. 1
  17179. 1
  17180. 1
  17181. 1
  17182. 1
  17183. 1
  17184. 1
  17185. 1
  17186. 1
  17187. 1
  17188. 1
  17189. 1
  17190. 1
  17191. 1
  17192. 1
  17193. 1
  17194. 1
  17195. 1
  17196. 1
  17197. 1
  17198. 1
  17199. 1
  17200. 1
  17201. 1
  17202. 1
  17203. 1
  17204. 1
  17205. 1
  17206. 1
  17207. 1
  17208. 1
  17209. 1
  17210. 1
  17211. 1
  17212. 1
  17213. 1
  17214. 1
  17215. 1
  17216. 1
  17217. 1
  17218. 1
  17219. 1
  17220. 1
  17221. 1
  17222. 1
  17223. 1
  17224. 1
  17225. 1
  17226. 1
  17227. 1
  17228. 1
  17229. 1
  17230. 1
  17231. 1
  17232. 1
  17233. 1
  17234. 1
  17235. 1
  17236. While I agree it could use some improvements (more dialogue options and the cheating mechanic during the poker playing, for example) the one thing I would say you got fundamentally wrong, (a scientifically demonstrable fact, my dear boy) was about the gunplay. That IS Red Dead. It’s what the fans loved and came back for. Sure, it’s just an opinion, yada, yada, but it’s also missing the whole point of WHY people play in the first place. As games become more like interactive movies, the story and characters will become more of a focus, especially to critics. But, the bottom line for any video game, will always be that it’s a, “game,” and that the gameplay is the core, around which all else is built. And, if you doubt that, I present Death Stranding as my exhibit A, for my case. That game fails, because it’s not a game. It’s a movie, with godawful intervals in which the player has to grind to get to the next good bit; a cut scene. You were right about that. And the fans would have crucified RDR2 if it DIDN’T have the gunplay they love and enjoyed so much, from the first game. Story and characters; acting and pretty vistas, ALL come AFTER that; indeed it’s what makes all that stuff WORK: the player’s immersion into that world and the sense that they occupy the central character, which occurs because they already know how to use the gunplay mechanics, expect to know, WANT to know, and feel it like the familiarity of a comfortable pair of old boots. And, to be Arthur Morgan, is to experience the chore of looting, grafting, and doing all the hard work of the character, because his mentor, Dutch, doesn’t. By the end of the game, we understand Arthur’s inner conflict better, because he did all those repetitive chores, or had to flee the law, because there wasn’t time to loot the bodies, solely because Dutch doesn’t. Look how squalid their last hideout is, when Arthur is no longer contributing to chores and other things? For the sake of the story, chores are no longer an option, but many players who did those camp chores, barely even notice. Because they’re living inside Arthur, and like him, they don’t feel the impulse to contribute in that way any more, even though they did earlier. Arthur did the grinding for Dutch, which is why we feel his betrayal all the more. However, you’re right that it was boring, having to go into too much detail, with searching drawers, etc, but mostly because the mechanics were clunky. Had they been smoother and less prone to error, it would have been less noticeable. My biggest complaint was that Arthur would have killed Michah long ago, and never said anything to Dutch about it, when he had the chance. And they should have written that into the plot, and made Dutch the mole, which would have been more believable. His hypocrisy is what their breakup comes down to, right? But, that’s plotting. Not your complaint. Funny though, how our different paths lead us to about the same score? As I would give the game about the same score as you. For different reasons. Frankly, I’m amazed that Rockstar never patched the looting mechanics, for corpses or buildings. So, they and not enough fans were bothered, I guess? We can share in that disappointment? Knowing the odds of you, or anyone, even reading this, is a bit like writing, “Riggs was here,” in The Shawshank Redemption, or leaving my name on that rock in the game, that so many other NPC’s did. A curiosity, that just maybe, someone else may stumble across, read the first two lines of, and then not give enough of a f*ck about it to finish. Why do it then? Why did they? 😉✌️
    1
  17237. 1
  17238. 1
  17239. 1
  17240. 1
  17241. 1
  17242. 1
  17243. 1
  17244. 1
  17245. 1
  17246. 1
  17247. 1
  17248. 1
  17249. 1
  17250. 1
  17251. 1
  17252. 1
  17253. 1
  17254. 1
  17255. 1
  17256. 1
  17257. 1
  17258. 1
  17259. 1
  17260. 1
  17261. 1
  17262. 1
  17263. 1
  17264. 1
  17265. 1
  17266. 1
  17267. 1
  17268. 1
  17269. 1
  17270. 1
  17271. 1
  17272. 1
  17273. 1
  17274. 1
  17275. 1
  17276. 1
  17277. 1
  17278. 1
  17279. 1
  17280. 1
  17281. 1
  17282. 1
  17283. 1
  17284. 1
  17285. 1
  17286. 1
  17287. 1
  17288. 1
  17289. 1
  17290. 1
  17291. 1
  17292. 1
  17293. 1
  17294. 1
  17295. 1
  17296. 1
  17297. 1
  17298. 1
  17299. 1
  17300. 1
  17301. 1
  17302. 1
  17303. 1
  17304. 1
  17305. 1
  17306. 1
  17307. 1
  17308. 1
  17309. 1
  17310. 1
  17311. 1
  17312. 1
  17313. 1
  17314. 1
  17315. 1
  17316. 1
  17317. 1
  17318. 1
  17319. 1
  17320. 1
  17321. 1
  17322. 1
  17323. 1
  17324. 1
  17325. 1
  17326. 1
  17327. 1
  17328. 1
  17329. 1
  17330. 1
  17331. 1
  17332. 1
  17333. 1
  17334. 1
  17335. 1
  17336. 1
  17337. 1
  17338. 1
  17339. 1
  17340. 1
  17341. 1
  17342. 1
  17343. 1
  17344. 1
  17345. 1
  17346. 1
  17347. 1
  17348. 1
  17349. 1
  17350. 1
  17351. 1
  17352. 1
  17353. 1
  17354. 1
  17355. 1
  17356. 1
  17357. 1
  17358. 1
  17359. 1
  17360. 1
  17361. 1
  17362. 1
  17363. 1
  17364. 1
  17365. 1
  17366. 1
  17367. 1
  17368. 1
  17369. 1
  17370. 1
  17371. 1
  17372. 1
  17373. 1
  17374. 1
  17375. 1
  17376. 1
  17377. 1
  17378. 1
  17379. 1
  17380. 1
  17381. 1
  17382. 1
  17383. 1
  17384. 1
  17385. 1
  17386. 1
  17387. 1
  17388. 1
  17389. 1
  17390. 1
  17391. 1
  17392. 1
  17393. 1
  17394. 1
  17395. 1
  17396. 1
  17397. 1
  17398. 1
  17399. 1
  17400. 1
  17401. 1
  17402. 1
  17403. 1
  17404. 1
  17405. 1
  17406. 1
  17407. 1
  17408. 1
  17409. 1
  17410. 1
  17411. 1
  17412. 1
  17413. 1
  17414. 1
  17415. 1
  17416. 1
  17417. 1
  17418. 1
  17419. 1
  17420. 1
  17421. 1
  17422. 1
  17423. 1
  17424. 1
  17425. 1
  17426. 1
  17427. 1
  17428. 1
  17429. 1
  17430. 1
  17431. 1
  17432. 1
  17433. 1
  17434. 1
  17435. 1
  17436. 1
  17437. 1
  17438. 1
  17439. 1
  17440. 1
  17441. 1
  17442. 1
  17443. 1
  17444. 1
  17445. 1
  17446. 1
  17447. 1
  17448. 1
  17449. 1
  17450. 1
  17451. 1
  17452. 1
  17453. 1
  17454. 1
  17455. 1
  17456. 1
  17457. 1
  17458. 1
  17459. 1
  17460. 1
  17461. 1
  17462. 1
  17463. 1
  17464. 1
  17465. 1
  17466. 1
  17467. 1
  17468. 1
  17469. 1
  17470. 1
  17471. 1
  17472. 1
  17473. 1
  17474. 1
  17475. 1
  17476. 1
  17477. 1
  17478. 1
  17479. 1
  17480. 1
  17481. 1
  17482. 1
  17483. 1
  17484. 1
  17485. 1
  17486. 1
  17487. 1
  17488. 1
  17489. 1
  17490. 1
  17491. 1
  17492. 1
  17493. 1
  17494. 1
  17495. 1
  17496. 1
  17497. 1
  17498. 1
  17499. 1
  17500. 1
  17501. 1
  17502. Mark 975 : Why, “Whaddabout,” doesn’t work, huh? I guess you must all be pretty frustrated, as to why that never gets you anything but lol’d at? Well, here goes . . . First, the inbuilt assumption is that people objecting to Trump have ANY thoughts or, “feelings,” about Obama, anyway. For example; I’m a Conservative. I was a fierce critic of Obama, and I’m REALLY GLAD that Hillary is PAST tense, regarding her political prospects. America didn’t WANT her, because she was patronising, crooked against Bernie, and represented a, “business as usual,” dynasty. THAT’S WHY she couldn’t even muster enough support to beat Trump, of ALL people. Just ASSuming that, because we don’t like Trump, that makes us Obama or Hillary fans, is NUTS, and automatically sets people’s teeth on edge, as it looks like a cop out. Second; “Whaddabout,” is a change of topic, with false equivalencies. Anyone who can’t defend the actions of Trump, changes topic. Let’s say that ALL of your allegations against Obama AND Hillary were true? SO WHAT? If a guy robbed bank, the fact that someone else robbed a bank, is NOT relevant. Another inbuilt flaw, see? Your, “double standard,” depends upon people having standards, that you can only GUESS at. Arresting one bank robber, DOES NOT, make you a supporter of the OTHER bank robber, son. Thirdly; there’s the, “motivations,” that you prejudicially attach to the actions of your opponents, which are nearly ALWAYS inaccurate, misrepresented and PROVABLY FALSE. Again, you’re GUESSING at why O or HRC have done the things they’ve done, when history does not stand with you. This leads people to conclude that you are getting false information, and malign in your intentions, to spread false information. People just want the TRUTH, son. They really DON’T CARE about Hillary or Obama, who’s NEVER even STOOD against Trump. Which brings me to the final point. It’s NOT, “Either, OR,” son! Trump’s faults say NOTHING about the faults (or otherwise) of other people. He IS doing bad things, in PLAIN SIGHT, now. Mueller (the person you have all been saying you BELIEVE, because you thought Barr was telling the, “truth,”) has JUST TOLD YOU THIS! He SAID exactly what I PREDICTED. The, “investigation,” was hamstrung from the outset, by OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE! He could NOT prove what he could NOT investigate. But, HE thinks Congress should IMPEACH Trump, for OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, because his Office is NOT ALLOWED TO ARREST HIM. What MORE do you ACTUALLY NEED? . . . SMH
    1
  17503. 1
  17504. 1
  17505. 1
  17506. 1
  17507. 1
  17508. 1
  17509. 1
  17510. 1
  17511. 1
  17512. 1
  17513. 1
  17514. 1
  17515. 1
  17516. 1
  17517. 1
  17518. 1
  17519. 1
  17520. 1
  17521. 1
  17522. 1
  17523. 1
  17524. 1
  17525. 1
  17526. 1
  17527. 1
  17528. 1
  17529. 1
  17530. 1
  17531. 1
  17532. 1
  17533. 1
  17534. 1
  17535. 1
  17536. 1
  17537. 1
  17538. 1
  17539. 1
  17540. 1
  17541. 1
  17542. 1
  17543. 1
  17544. 1
  17545. 1
  17546. 1
  17547. 1
  17548. 1
  17549. Ben Wallace needs to get into talks with Keir Starmer! In exchange for the supreme sacrifice of crossing the House, he could be offered a good job by the Labour Cabinet? Perhaps encouraging some others to come with him over subsequent weeks for maximum, drip, drip, “When’s the election, already?” effect? Sit down, Boris! No one wants you! The doors are slamming shut in all directions anyway for Wallace, as his seat was redefined by the new boundary reorganisation and he is believed to be one of the big beasts of Torydom at risk of losing his seat now anyway. He’s no longer guaranteed the Conservative voters of Preston and he’s at the mercy of Lancaster’s more cosmopolitan ministrations with a large student population to boot. Could he do a Chris Patton? He was a Tory who’s reputation for hard work and talent saw him being offered the governorship of HonKong by Tony Blair’s Labour government, overseeing the island’s transition back to China. Then he got a post chairing the BBC (which he wasn’t very good at in public meetings, that’s for sure) again, under Labour. Mr Wallace ought to apologise for his remarks last week, to wipe that blot off his copybook, and make some overtures to Keir Starmer, perhaps even to stay on in his defence post? He is already a known quantity in Europe with good relationships in the EU and NATO, which is no mean feat for a Tory. As is the fact that he appears to be untainted by any of their scandals. The pressure to become part of Johnson’s sewer, Truss’s mad house, and now Sunack’s pit of despair, incompetence, graft and insanity, all rolled into one must have been immense, so we might just have a Tory that’s worth something to the public interest here?
    1
  17550. 1
  17551. 1
  17552. 1
  17553. 1
  17554. 1
  17555. 1
  17556. 1
  17557. 1
  17558. 1
  17559. 1
  17560. 1
  17561. 1
  17562. 1
  17563. 1
  17564. 1
  17565. 1
  17566. 1
  17567. 1
  17568. 1
  17569. 1
  17570. 1
  17571. 1
  17572. 1
  17573. 1
  17574. 1
  17575. 1
  17576. 1
  17577. 1
  17578. 1
  17579. To answer your question: No, I did not know about the Kandakai (👈apologies if I misspelled that) and THANK YOU for that entertainingly educational video. I LOVE history and will certainly be looking into this story more deeply. At least sufficiently enough to learn how to spell their names correctly😉. You said something rather odd toward the end of this video, though? WHY the heck would I, “hate your guts”??? In fact, why would ANYONE hate your guts? I didn’t get that, but can only guess that you may have been getting a lot of hate filled messages lately? Please ignore such people? I thought this video was a comprehensive take down of the specious arguments that the director and producer of that, “documentary,” have been making. I am also deeply angered by the casual manner in which they feel they have the right to call others, “racists,” simply for pointing out the flaws in their efforts. It’s simply an immature, childish response which illustrates just how irresponsible it was of Netflix to give such real power to those who are unworthy of wielding it. They got it badly wrong and are unable to accept constructive criticism to the point where they have become actively abusive. It is shocking that public discourse (particularly in the USA) has plummeted to such a low common denominator that neither side of a political divide are capable of speaking respectfully, like adults to one another. People like you are leading the way, like when Socrates stepped into the fray to save the life of Alcibiades by shielding him from all comers in a mess of a fight and leading his wounded form to a quieter place, wherein he would recover. Not sure if that metaphor works completely, but I hope you get the idea? We NEED people like you, who simply explain the facts, whilst also showing those who would learn that this can be done in an audience-pleasing, entertaining manner, without having to, “compromise,” any part of the truth. If you can make the facts entertaining in a 20 minute YouTube video, I’m pretty sure that experienced artists with a giant budget could have done a decent job, had they not decided to hijack the truth for a self-declared political agenda. So, thank you again. Love this channel more and more, each time I visit it.
    1
  17580. 1
  17581. 1
  17582. 1
  17583. 1
  17584. 1
  17585. 1
  17586. 1
  17587. 1
  17588. 1
  17589. 1
  17590. 1
  17591. 1
  17592. 1
  17593. 1
  17594. 1
  17595. 1
  17596. 1
  17597. 1
  17598. 1
  17599. 1
  17600. 1
  17601. 1
  17602. 1
  17603. 1
  17604. 1
  17605. 1
  17606. 1
  17607. 1
  17608. 1
  17609. 1
  17610. 1
  17611. 1
  17612. 1
  17613. 1
  17614. 1
  17615. 1
  17616.  @conniejenni5504  : Very true. Happened in Spain and Italy around the same time too. But, Donny has always struck me as more of the Stalin (without the book learning) type. The disinformation and propaganda techniques are directly from his playbook. Probably learned at the feet of Putin? And his nanny state anti-small-government-conservatism is very Stalin. His anti-science, anti-intellectualism echoes, “Uncle Joe Stalin,” too. Then there’s the thin skinned stuff, which cost so many lives, just because of perceived threats, which would soon be the same if Donny ever got into power again. And, we all know Donny (accidentally) quotes Stalin, when he calls the free press, “the enemy of the people.” But, most of all, the total abject denial of Covid, which so closely mirrored Stalin’s denial of a famine that cost millions of lives in Russia. You could get sent to the gulag, or even executed, just for saying the famine was a thing in Stalin’s presence, and you weren’t allowed to mention Covid deaths to Donny! Stalin was the first, “politician,” (I use the term loosely, as with trump) to Politicise a national health crisis and Donny was step by step copying him. And, should trumplin ever see power again, that’s the society we’d have, within a couple of years. With neighbours informing on each other to protect themselves, and people you recognise from being arrested for racist thug activity will now be showing up on your doorstep, wearing a uniform, and able to search your house without any need for warrants or due process. That’s the America we’re fighting to prevent. We came so close to that, I don’t even like to think about it. ✌️👍
    1
  17617. 1
  17618. 1
  17619. 1
  17620. 1
  17621. 1
  17622. 1
  17623. 1
  17624. This is the first time (ironically) that I’ve ever herd this channel say something that’s actively damaging to science education and public knowledge generally. Of course, by saying you regularly, “lie,” to us (and I’ll overlook the patronising comparison to children that you made of your audience) you were using hyperbole. But you never once mentioned the moral dimension of the purpose of lying, the DELIBERATE intention to deceive or the correct definition of what lying actually is. It is about INTENT as much as it is about deception. You can mislead accidentally, but that makes a mistaken person a liar in your definition. And it’s not as though the time constraints and editing restrictions caused your omission? Your definition was flawed in multiple senses, which I will not list completely here. But it is a category error to define all simplifications as lies. “Sphere,” for example, is a perfectly acceptable definition of Earth, for the purposes of description. It is NOT a lie to say so. Examine absolutely ANY sphere, real or depicted in a diagram, at a close enough scale and it is no longer spherical. There is no such thing as a perfect sphere in reality, but we define spheres accepting that there is more to them that can be continually added to each definition, both as a set, and individually. You could argue that it is impossible to even imagine a perfect sphere, thus proving that they don’t exist in any form. But that is an unhelpful way to live your life and will confuse the child in your example, who asked what shape the Earth is. This was your worst ever video, and I fear it will have done nothing but add ammunition to the idiots suffering from the Dunning Kruger effect in the first place. What were you thinking. Being both wrong and patronising in one video is not a good look. And you’ve never done that before! Why???
    1
  17625. 1
  17626. 1
  17627. 1
  17628. 1
  17629. 1
  17630. 1
  17631. 1
  17632. 1
  17633. 1
  17634. 1
  17635. 1
  17636. 1
  17637. 1
  17638. 1
  17639. 1
  17640. 1
  17641. 1
  17642. 1
  17643. 1
  17644. 1
  17645. 1
  17646. 1
  17647. 1
  17648. 1
  17649. 1
  17650. 1
  17651. 1
  17652. 1
  17653. 1
  17654. 1
  17655. 1
  17656. 1
  17657. 1
  17658. 1
  17659. 1
  17660. 1
  17661. 1
  17662. 1
  17663. 1
  17664. 1
  17665. 1
  17666. 1
  17667. 1
  17668. 1
  17669. 1
  17670. 1
  17671. 1
  17672. 1
  17673. 1
  17674. 1
  17675. 1
  17676. 1
  17677. 1
  17678. 1
  17679. 1
  17680. 1
  17681. 1
  17682. 1
  17683. 1
  17684. 1
  17685. 1
  17686. 1
  17687. 1
  17688. 1
  17689. 1
  17690. 1
  17691. 1
  17692. 1
  17693. 1
  17694. 1
  17695. 1
  17696. 1
  17697. 1
  17698. 1
  17699. 1
  17700. 1
  17701. 1
  17702. 1
  17703. 1
  17704. 1
  17705. 1
  17706. 1
  17707. 1
  17708. 1
  17709. 1
  17710. 1
  17711. 1
  17712. 1
  17713. 1
  17714. 1
  17715. 1
  17716. 1
  17717. 1
  17718. 1
  17719. 1
  17720. 1
  17721. 1
  17722. 1
  17723. 1
  17724. 1
  17725. 1
  17726. 1
  17727. 1
  17728. 1
  17729. 1
  17730. 1
  17731. 1
  17732. 1
  17733. 1
  17734. 1
  17735. 1
  17736. 1
  17737. 1
  17738. 1
  17739. 1
  17740. 1
  17741. 1
  17742. 1
  17743. 1
  17744. 1
  17745. 1
  17746. 1
  17747. 1
  17748. 1
  17749. 1
  17750. 1
  17751. 1
  17752. 1
  17753. BW MadDog : You weren’t listening to the story, at all, son. Trump would be literally breaking the law, and promising pardons, after the fact. Let’s set aside the fact that such a, “promise,” of Pardons is a Crime, as well as immoral and an abuse of power, which YOU don’t mind, now, but WILL when it’s YOUR TURN to be on the receiving end (and that day WILL come), and let’s just talk about the LAW, shall we? What could you actually arrest her for? “Forming a Militia?” Sorry son. It’s the LAW. She has every right. “Shooting trespassers?” Sorry Son. 2nd Amendment. She’s LITERALLY, “Preventing Crime,” in the same way that ANYONE is, when they shoot home invaders. “Obstructing Government,” maybe? Well, it has LITERALLY BEEN IN THE NEWS, that they KNOW they are breaking the law! And, again, the 2nd Amendment was INVENTED to protect against Government Tyranny, so? . . . Let’s define, “Government Tyranny,” shall we? How about, “STEALING LAND AND PROPERTY?” AND . . . “DOING IT, KNOWINGLY, BREAKING THE LAW!” You have NO LEG to stand on. And, the BEAUTY of it? It’s ALL because of the 2nd Amendment, which Trump Trolls LOVE to shout about, like they don’t seem to realise that 80% of Gun Owners, LIKE ME, WANT Gun Control. Trump Trolls act like Trump’s opponents, “don’t own guns.” Which means they’re in for a shock, too. You have NO CASE, sir. Unless you count your Head Case in the White House. But, he won’t be there for very long, now 😁
    1
  17754. 1
  17755. 1
  17756. 1
  17757. 1
  17758. This Kursk incursion mission has multiple objectives; diplomatic, logistical, psychological, journalistic even and, of course, addressing the practical matter of defeating an illegal, terroristic, mafia style theft operation and invasion. I agree with your guess that, if something big happens in Moscow or St Petersburg, “it will be fast.” The quality of life has diminished in Russia, even in the metropolitan centres, while money is getting more expensive and resources growing scarce. When the wheel turns in Russia, it is always sudden and, apparently, out of a clear blue sky. The Russian revolution set a precedent that was, apparently, set in stone and has repeated itself multiple times over the last century or so. And it is the nature of the state apparatus that makes it so. The death of Stalin caused an upheaval because no one knew how to cope or what to do (I cannot recommend Armando Iannucci’s movie about that enough, btw) and then Nikita Khrushchev was suddenly deposed after losing his game of nuclear chicken with the Americans. The fall of communism came out of that same clear blue sky so far as the west was concerned. Anyone who says they saw that coming is misremembering or lying to you. Then there was an attempted counter revolution by the old guard (which people barely remember these days) during which the Kremlin was besieged by tanks and from which emerged the figure of an apparent, “hero,” Boris Yeltsin, who turned out to be more of the same but without the restraints of communist doctrine to act as guard rails against his particular brand of debauchery and gangsterism. The Wagner revolt was certainly not predicted by Putin, as was made so abundantly clear by the fact that there were no defences between Wagner and Moscow when they came barrelling up the motor way with, as you mentioned, the popular cheers of the people of Rostov at their backs. But that fell apart due to Prighozin’s allies backing out at the last moment. That was one time when Putin’s positioning of people into senior posts for their loyalty, not their ability, paid off. Yet, what all of these events in Russian history have in common is, when it happens, it happens fast and, often, out of a clear blue sky. So, settle in, buy some popcorn and enjoy the End Of Putin Show while it lasts. Look away from your screens for too long and you may miss a revolution?
    1
  17759. 1
  17760. 1
  17761. 1
  17762. 1
  17763. 1
  17764. 1
  17765. 1
  17766. 1
  17767. 1
  17768. 1
  17769. 1
  17770. 1
  17771. 1
  17772. 1
  17773. 1
  17774. 1
  17775.  @maplemaple1439  : You make an impassioned plea for, “the better angels of our nature,” and I hear you, but you must admit that the example you site from Africa is a rare exception? They show us it’s possible to live without war, and that humanity has it in themselves to do that, but I don’t think human nature is so peacefully inclined or even desirous to live in a permanent state of peace; much as I would truly want to. The idea of Jen Luc Picard’s Star Trek is one of my favourite fantasies. But, just as men have a way of getting violent when they’re afraid or when their desires are frustrated, they will always seek to justify their violence. War is the institutionalisation of that desire, and the tool for those at the top, through which they can sate their greed and ambition. History is almost nothing but the story of war. That does not mean I’ve given up, or resigned myself to a society that is permanently in a state of conflict, though. It just means that I believe whatever solutions we come up with, for reducing conflict and organised violence, needs to acknowledge the reality of man’s (as it is mostly men) need for conflict. Have you seen The Hurt Locker? Kathryn Bigalo does a very good job of illustrating this very human failing. It’s not just about greedy, malignant politicians, or dumb soldiers who don’t really care why they’re killing this group of people today and that group tomorrow. If that were the case, politicians would never be able to convince people to join the armed services, let alone convince them to fight! Men get addicted to the conflict itself; the buzz of danger; the release of violence, justified and rewarded; and overcoming their opponents, in a dick swinging contest of, “Ha! I won! You’re dead!” They really do. Our solutions will always need to accommodate this aspect of the human conditions, and find valid, legalised, releases for them. I respect your opinion, really.
    1
  17776. 1
  17777. 1
  17778. 1
  17779. 1
  17780. 1
  17781. 1
  17782. 1
  17783. 1
  17784. 1
  17785. 1
  17786. 1
  17787. 1
  17788. 1
  17789. 1
  17790. 1
  17791. 1
  17792. 1
  17793. 1
  17794. 1
  17795. 1
  17796. 1
  17797. 1
  17798. 1
  17799. 1
  17800. 1
  17801. 1
  17802. 1
  17803. 1
  17804. 1
  17805. 1
  17806. 1
  17807. 1
  17808. 1
  17809. 1
  17810. 1
  17811. 1
  17812. 1
  17813. 1
  17814. 1
  17815. 1
  17816. 1
  17817. 1
  17818. 1
  17819. 1
  17820. 1
  17821. 1
  17822. 1
  17823. 1
  17824. Frederick Delius Legacy - And Far Beyond : Take a look at Florida: the place where the GOP was forced to admit that Russia had hacked their election computers. When the press tried to establish which Counties, in what way they’d gotten inside, and what, if anything was being done about it, we learned that everyone had been threatened with instant jailing, under terror legislation, if they said one more WORD about it, and were left with total radio silence. The next time we hear a thing about Florida, was about a month later, when Trump launched his, “Campaign,” from there; doing absolutely NOTHING, “differently,” at all, but obviously providing the, “plausible deniability,” necessary to explain Trump’s coming, “victory,” in this increasingly diverse, divided and ESSENTIAL, “must win,” State, which carries plenty of Electoral College votes. You only need a few rigged states, and I wouldn’t be at all surprised if the polls we’ve been getting are already rigged at the source, before any of the press gets the numbers? But, what do people EXPECT from a career criminal, who’s ONE effective strategy in life has been to get your minions as dirty as you, so that fighting for your survival and their own, become the SAME THING? That they would rest on their Gerrymandering, vote buying, bribes, and a massive campaign of LIES on the internet, “News,” feeds, and their own Propaganda, “News,” outlets? That’s still a gamble, when they KNOW the majority of Americans want Trump out, and in jail? When it’s SO MUCH EASIER, to have a hostile power ALREADY INSIDE your voting apparatus, and you can guarantee victory? Even IF it’s al exposed, they have several layers of deniability and fall guys, to fall back on. And, we know from experience that any investigations will last throughout his next two terms, before he’s ready to hand over to Ivanka, so as to STAY insulated. You can’t use the law, when there is no law . . . America’s done
    1
  17825. 1
  17826. 1
  17827. 1
  17828. 1
  17829. 1
  17830. 1
  17831. 1
  17832. 1
  17833. 1
  17834. 1
  17835. 1
  17836. 1
  17837. 1
  17838. 1
  17839. 1
  17840. 1
  17841.  @ilokivi  : The myth of, “scarcity,” is the one that boils my blood, out of that huge list (that I don’t doubt we could compile together) because they exploit people’s fears into CAUSING that very scarcity (the, “who’s gonna’ pay for . . .?” mob) that everybody fears! Some nations are on the brink of economic and social collapse, because they have ageing populations and not enough birth rates to replace the dwindling younger populations who would support their pensions and the growing need for elderly healthcare that all countries are seeing as life expectancy goes up. The Chinese are in a real crisis due to their, now reversed, single child policy and Russia too is at the top of that list, due to them squandering young men on an unwinnable war in Ukraine, and frightening off all their best and brightest youths, from their draft. At the last count, over a million service aged men have fled Russia in the last year. And what would Britain benefit most from, right now? An injection of young adults, who will have babies and generate taxable income and economic growth? Perhaps the sort of younger people who have the courage and gumption to risk reprisal rather than commit genocide? Perhaps the sorts of people from all over the world willing to risk life and limb because they say NO to fascists and demagogues? Those people educated enough and committed enough to get here, willing to do the million or so jobs (at last count) that we Brits feel are beneath us, like picking crops, cleaning the streets, warehouse work, etc? The very solutions to our problems are on our doorstep, literally banging on the door and asking to be let in, but our government wrongly believes that they can stir up Nazi levels of hatred against, “the other,” and desperately cling to power like limpet mines, going off and taking another chunk of the country’s institutions with them, destroying the very foundations of our identity and law, for their sociopathic egos and greed. I’m not expecting any great insights or meaningful leadership from Labour, but at least they don’t encourage fascism in their party! So, I’ll take them over the Tories any day of the week.
    1
  17842. 1
  17843. 1
  17844. 1
  17845. 1
  17846. 1
  17847. 1
  17848. 1
  17849. 1
  17850. 1
  17851. 1
  17852. 1
  17853. 1
  17854. 1
  17855. 1
  17856. 1
  17857. 1
  17858. 1
  17859. 1
  17860. 1
  17861. 1
  17862. 1
  17863. 1
  17864. 1
  17865. 1
  17866. 1
  17867. 1
  17868. 1
  17869. 1
  17870. 1
  17871. 1
  17872.  @mediamanM  : Fascists, obviously . . . What else? There’s nothing, “conservative,” about Trumpism. The GOP are Nanny State, not small government. They’re anti-corporate business, if Moscow Mitch is to be taken seriously? They’re racists. They’re anti-democratic. They’re a cult of personality. They’re anti-intellectual, anti-science, anti-truth. Just about everything that we traditionally think of as, “conservative values,” like the family, sexual propriety, religious freedom, patriotism, etc, has been radically ejected from the GOP under trump’s management. They are literally Fascists, and what’s worse is that they have been fully exposed as Totalitarian and anti-democracy, to the extent that they have no ground to retreat to, no room to walk back any of their refusal to accept democracy: not when you combine their insurrection; voting to overturn a democratic election DURING that insurrection; their delegitimisation of ALL political opponents for the last 5 YEARS or more (remember, “Lock Her Up” was already OLD by the time trump took office?); their current refusal to accept the election results, delegitimising our Democracy before the entire world; and the fraudulent conspiracy they’re about to perpetrate against America, when their bogus, sham, “audit,” announces that, “Chiynah stole our elections, for Joe!” Finally, combine all of that, with the Suppression of Voters, the right to Protest and now, even Suppressing the history of Slavery from the Education Curriculum, all to keep the ailing careers of an unpopular minority, within a minority, on life support. They have abandoned ALL pretensions of Democracy, and have as good as announced that not only will they NEVER relinquish power EVER again, but that they haven’t given up on their January 6th Coup attempt yet! Totalitarian is inarguable! Fascist is a better description though. And America needs to do the, “waking up!” Because Fascism is a real threat to us all, right now! ✌️
    1
  17873. 1
  17874. 1
  17875. 1
  17876. 1
  17877. 1
  17878. 1
  17879. 1
  17880. 1
  17881. 1
  17882. 1
  17883. 1
  17884. 1
  17885. 1
  17886. 1
  17887. 1
  17888. 1
  17889. 1
  17890. I honestly don’t think, “we,” will have anything to do with Musk’s ultimate downfall. The way he’s worn the face of Republican villainy for trump looks like a classic Machiavellian set up, as written in The Prince. Ever heard the story of Ramiro D’Orco, governor of Romagna, who worked for his ambitious prince, Cesare Borgia? Ramiro violated church laws, tortured and violated the people of Romagna and killed off any and all opponents of the Borgia clan, suspected or otherwise. And, after bringing the province to heal by destroying its records, institutions and security, leaving the surviving Romagnans terrified, docile and compliant enough to obey any and every edict a Borgia might utter, there was only one problem left. The bitter rage and resentment that boiled under the surface of Romagnan society was a cauldron of hatred that would continually threaten to boil over them forever, unless the local authorities did something to mollify the embittered population. So, making a great show of ignorance at Ramiro’s atrocities and feigning outrage at discovering them, Cesare had Ramiro arrested on Christmas Day of 1502, on trumped (pun intended) up conspiracy charges, Stalin (or Putin) style. On Boxing Day the inhabitants of Romagna awoke to the best Christmas present ever: the bisected body of Ramiro, on display in the town square, his head and body separated by the block and executioner’s knife between the two parts, just so all would get the message. Cesare Borgia was conveniently out of town that day, giving his people the opportunity to gauge the local response to this act. And, surprise, surprise, it worked. The Borgia’s maintained their rule over Romagna without incident for Cesare’s remaining reign. It seems obvious to me that Trump will gain a massive boost in popularity when he has Musk perp-walked out of power and into a cell (presumably, “suing,” him for all he’s worth in the process) and enriching himself at the same time. But, he will only do this AFTER Musk has fulfilled his role and handed Trump everything he requires. Musk looks to me like a taylor made patsy, playing the role of Ramiro D’Orco to Trump’s Cesare Borgia. At least, the way Machiavelli tells it, he does.
    1
  17891. 1
  17892. 1
  17893. 1
  17894. 1
  17895. 1
  17896. 1
  17897. 1
  17898. 1
  17899. 1
  17900. 1
  17901. 1
  17902. 1
  17903. 1
  17904. 1
  17905. 1
  17906. 1
  17907. 1
  17908. 1
  17909. 1
  17910. 1
  17911. 1
  17912. 1
  17913. 1
  17914. 1
  17915. 1
  17916. 1
  17917. 1
  17918. 1
  17919. 1
  17920. 1
  17921. 1
  17922. 1
  17923. 1
  17924. 1
  17925. 1
  17926. 1
  17927. 1
  17928. 1
  17929. 1
  17930. 1
  17931. 1
  17932. 1
  17933. 1
  17934. 1
  17935. 1
  17936. 1
  17937. 1
  17938. 1
  17939. 1
  17940. 1
  17941. 1
  17942. 1
  17943. 1
  17944. 1
  17945. 1
  17946. 1
  17947. 1
  17948. 1
  17949. 1
  17950. 1
  17951. 1
  17952. 1
  17953. 1
  17954. 1
  17955. 1
  17956. 1
  17957. 1
  17958. 1
  17959. 1
  17960. 1
  17961. 1
  17962. 1
  17963. 1
  17964. 1
  17965. 1
  17966. 1
  17967. 1
  17968. 1
  17969. 1
  17970. 1
  17971. 1
  17972. 1
  17973. 1
  17974. 1
  17975. 1
  17976. 1
  17977. 1
  17978. 1
  17979. 1
  17980. 1
  17981. 1
  17982. no no : So, because I am able to identify YOUR emotional ravings, you repeat the words back at me and say that I am “feeling” them? You are CLEARLY a stranger to reason. Happily, not my problem. As I have pointed out, and thank you for making my point SO ably, you have NOTHING to say about the topic under discussion. WHY do “think” this is? Don’t bother; as you’re hanging on my every syllable, I’ll tell YOU: You are ASHAMED. McConnell tried to STOP the military from getting paid. He revealed himself for the conniving SCUM that he is and the Generals will REMEMBER this “loyalty” which I don’t doubt, they will pay back in kind. Now, at least TRY to engage in the POLITICS here, or at the very least, get your hurt feelings under control. We have held NOBODY’S interest, here? The ONLY “benefit” that this, ahem, “conversation,” can now have, is if you took the time to LEARN something about the REAL world, and I am happy to instruct you. But, DO STOP WHINING? You’re just showing the world (if anyone ever looks this far down the thread in the future?) how insecure you are. Have you no self respect? You REALLY shouldn’t go on YouTube, if you are so EASILY distressed? Think about it? You are suffering pain (anger and impotent rage) and TRYING to project back onto someone who’m you can NEVER touch, on an emotional level, (that’s the “impotent” part) because you have no comprehension as to what drives me? Your “hurt” drips from your words, and you “think” a casual reader won’t SEE that? Talk politics, and stop harming yourself. I say it for your own good, honestly. Smh
    1
  17983. 1
  17984. 1
  17985. 1
  17986. 1
  17987. 1
  17988. 1
  17989. 1
  17990. What I find most interesting about it, is what she put her finger on, right at the end of her presentation. It’s a, “philosophical,” difference. It’s a mutation of paranoia and distrust, born out of anti-authoritarianism and disillusionment with, “authority,” figures. Give me a Flat Earther in the same room as me and access to the internet, and I can destroy their, “scientific,” arguments, in minutes. Yet, I know this will not convert them, for one of three possible reasons: They’re (1) too emotionally damaged to, “want,” to accept the truth (too proud to admit this six foot, hairy boomer, who can’t stop laughing at him is right, for example) (2) too educationally challenged (stoopid, or probably a combination of 1 & 2?) or, (3) they’re being paid to refute common sense. The group 3 are the ones I despise, because they could do untold harm, and they do it for money. You might argue there is a group 4? The troll. But, actually, the troll is just any one of, or a combination of, the previous three categories. But, here’s the, “interesting,” bit that I promised (trigger warning) : Many Worlds Theory, or MWT. That is a, “hypothesis,” which has some mathematical basis, which can be made to fit the hypothesis. But, only ever at the cost of disregarding some other fatal flaws which have yet to be resolved. It is popular among many of our leading physicists. And, though more and more people are questioning it, it has taken on the trappings of Dogma. Yet, there is no, “scientific,” basis for it. No evidence, no disprovability, no testable experiments, no predictions, no applications, no foundation for its conjecture whatsoever. It is a philosophical idea, which some scientists cling to with the emotional commitment of high priests. Why is that, exactly? I believe it is because it solves one thorny problem and no other. If it were true, we could then dispense with, “God.” And that is the ONLY reason MWT is a philosophical belief that has taken root in physics and is doing duty for science where there is no science to be had. In other words, it’s not just Flat Earthers, who are willing to run away with their philosophical ideas. It seems anyone is capable of that type of thinking, if the emotional stakes are high enough? . . . Food for thought? . . . ✌️
    1
  17991. 1
  17992. 1
  17993. 1
  17994. 1
  17995. 1
  17996. 1
  17997. 1
  17998. Dixie flatline : Well said. It’s a technique that Putin passed on to trump, successfully used in Russia, by Putin himself and Stalin, from whom Putin learned it. The idea is not to be, “plausible.” Quite the opposite. There’s no better demonstration of raw power than to (for example) deny the moon exists, and then have your cult screaming, “There’s no moon!” at a rally, and all tweet it, as fact, the next day, while, “respectable,” news outlets keep driving the point home. Right now, it’s only disconcerting. And that’s because of the great debt we owe to real news channels for pushing back against the lies and challenging authority (which is their job) and holding the administration to account. But, imagine just how SPINE TINGLINGLY CHILLING it would be, if ALL the news outlets agreed? Like in Stalin’s Russia? And then in Putin’s Russia? Imagine you read in your favourite paper, “The Moon Vanished,” headline? You look at it, see it’s there, but KNOW if you say that out loud, you are being, “disloyal,” to the party, or the the leader. THAT’S what it’s about. The Cultists chant trump’s lunatic assertions, enjoying the trolling of America, which makes them feel, “powerful,” in a way they never have before. And, to show that, “loyalty,” to their, “cause,” which is, at its heart, purely racism. But, if trump is still in power after the elections, for whatever reason, you’ll be astonished (or, perhaps you’ll expect it, like me?) at how FAST CNN and MSNBC are hit with a string of scandals, resignations, court battles, firings, etc, until CNN comes under the control of a trump friendly oligarch, and MSNBC is broken up. The other stations will have less eventful resignations, scandals, etc, but, having gotten, “the message,” they’ll fall into line, and all the hosts will be pretty much new faces. And, the worst part? When lies are ludicrous, yet stated as fact, and people are chilled and afraid, you will continue to tell the truth, making YOU not just a target for the unmarked secret police, (now consolidated into an official unit, not just volunteers bussed into Washington for trump’s peace of mind), but the people closest to you; friends, family and colleagues, will be terrified of being targeted due to their, “known association,” with you. Not only will you have to weigh their safety in the balance, but you may be shocked to discover (as so many others have already) that they have preempted coming under suspicion, by reporting you to the authorities. And the death cry of a modern democracy, which I’ve already heard is, “Yeah, but that could never happen here.” My only answer to that is, “In 2015, if I’d predicted where we are now, would you have believed me?” If I get a, “Yeah but,” reply, I already know I’m talking to someone in denial, too afraid to contemplate what’s really happening. I don’t blame them. I’m scared too. But, I’m NOT going to my grave, wondering what difference I, “could have made?” I’m involved in my local and national politics. And suggest we ALL get involved, and remove this Clear And Present Danger? Sorry to go on so long, but you gave me such a good (thought provoking) response, I felt you deserved a thoughtful answer ✌️👍
    1
  17999. 1
  18000. 1
  18001. 1
  18002. 1
  18003. 1
  18004. 1
  18005. 1
  18006. 1
  18007. 1
  18008.  @ljragsandfeathers  : It’s forgivable for thinking that, especially if you watch a lot of YouTube and follow what its algorithm shoves in front of you. But the evidence is that people are more interested in fixing the world’s problems than you may think. On the news, yesterday, I watched hundreds of thousands of people in Britain, from a wide range of backgrounds, march together for peace in Palestine, calling for a ceasefire. They did so, despite countless lies being told about them in the media and direct threats from the far right. They did so, despite the egregious mischaracterisation of their intentions, route and motives by Britain’s actual HOME SECRETARY, who actually INCITED VIOLENCE through dog whistles and downright lies! These were brave, motivated and young people, for the most part, who knew they were taking a risk with their own futures, as well as the possibility of direct violence on the day, merely by showing up and calling for peace! They do not fit your description. Ironically, there were several acts of violence committed on that day, but none of them occurred on the peace march. They actually happened a mile and a half away, around the cordoned off Cenotaph. And they were ALL committed by far right extremists, answering Suella Braverman’s dog whistles. They broke the police lines, knocked the cameras out of news teams hands, issued death threats and several were arrested for actual acts of violence. All whilst being too thick to realise that their target was a mile and a half away, because they believed the Home Secretary’s deliberate lie and thought they would all be at the Cenotaph. What we can learn from this is that people on both sides are highly active and motivated. And that the far right nut jobs are vastly outnumbered, as well as fail to grasp any form of reality, which is helpful to the reasonable human. The web is a distorted, fun house mirror, which only shows you what you feed it. “We see, as through a glass, darkly.”
    1
  18009. 1
  18010. 1
  18011. 1
  18012. 1
  18013. 1
  18014. 1
  18015. I believe she will seek to settle out of court in the civil case. I do not believe you are being too hard on her though. Far from it! How utterly tone deaf is it, for ANY politician to flaunt their wealth at any time? Let alone at a time when the number of food banks is only growing and the number of children falling below the poverty line is increasing. All as a direct result of Tory policies. She really does cut a Marie Antoinette figure. But, the fact that none of the whips dressed her down for this behaviour, or even explained to her why it would be perceived as trolling the general public, the poorer one is, the more painful their conclusions, says so much about the degenerate state of morality in modern politics. No one intervened. She did it over and over again. WTF did she EXPECT! I’m afraid the Sans-Culottes will be coming for her Capet head. It’s bad enough when people rub their wealth in the faces of the poor and blame them for their own predicament. But to do so as a politician is unacceptable in its lack of decorum. And to do so as a titled (en-titled) privileged politician, the public can only perceive that as a direct threat! The fact that she doesn’t understand this alone, is proof of her unfitness for her position. But, the fact that she swooped in to a national crisis, carpet bag in hand, is truly sickening. “Off with her head,” I say. Metaphorically speaking, of course. But can we not at least empathise with those who have lost loved ones and whom may well have calculated that her actions contributed to the deaths of their nearest and dearest? Can we blame them for wanting to do murder? I at least empathise with them, having lost my father to Covid.
    1
  18016. 1
  18017. 1
  18018. 1
  18019. 1
  18020. 1
  18021. 1
  18022. 1
  18023. 1
  18024. 1
  18025. 1
  18026. 1
  18027. 1
  18028. 1
  18029. 1
  18030. 1
  18031. 1
  18032. 1
  18033. 1
  18034. 1
  18035. 1
  18036. 1
  18037. 1
  18038. 1
  18039. 1
  18040. 1
  18041. 1
  18042. Maki Hashimoto : I can’t agree about naming the guy, but it is good practice (journalistically speaking) to speak to the person before publishing the story. Yet, there are mitigating circumstances, here? Possibly? If you have been helping a Newbie, at whatever it is you’re skilled at, encouraging them, teaching what you know, etc, and then discover that they have not only been mislead by a con man with a record, but that this con man is trying to stain the record of your protégée, you might be inclined to act fast, get the first blow in, so to speak, for her sake? I would be tempted to do that, and not just out of anger, but to make him KNOW that he better take the fight to me, and lay off her, for the sake of NOT crippling her reputation, before she’s even really got going. He has the potential to mark her reputation and leave a stain on her, that could never be removed. For the sake of someone else, someone who trusts and looks up to you, and for whom you feel responsible, might you be tempted to just stomp the guy? But, naming him and especially his business? That’s the whole point, isn’t it? People need to KNOW and be warned. The guy uses and disposes of people as though they were Cleanex. At best, he’s a poor boss, who certainly will NOT look after your interests, and have we heard ANYONE speak well of him? Actual ex-employees and not his shills, still doing his bidding? At worst, and probably in reality, he’s a con artist, who’s SO narcissistic, he may not even KNOW he’s a bad person, seeing the law, policies and, “best practices,” as mere obstructions to be circumvented; not considering what harm he’s doing to real people, who gave up other opportunities, job offers, their time, creativity and skills, only to be DUMPED, once they had fulfilled their, “real,” purpose. He’s taking REAL MONEY under FALSE pretences, squandering good will, and WORST OF ALL, he tried to make it look as though Matty has embezzled $ thousands, meant for a Charity! Just THINK what that could have DONE to her reputation? People go to JAIL for that sh*t! And, imagine going through life, with everyone you know, love and respect, thinking you STEAL from CHARITIES? That SOB has shown skill, foreknowledge, planning, experience and cunning. He KNOWS what he’s doing and has probably used his boyishness to get out of a lot of scrapes. He belongs in jail, at least for a spell. It’s no joke, what he’s doing. And what was his ACTUAL intent for that, “charity money,” and WHERE in ACTUALITY, IS IT? Nah, NAME AND SHAME, so ALL can be WARNED. I thank God for public spirited people, like UEG, and can forgive a LOT of minor errors, when confronting this malignant little pr*ck. I can promise you, we’ll hear of him again, and he’ll KEEP conning people, until he’s either President of the USA, or in JAIL ✌️
    1
  18043. 1
  18044. Maki Hashimoto : In return, thanks for your patience. I did go on a bit. Though I used, “emotional,” rhetoric, I stand by what I said. The, “style,” of my prose was only meant to drive home a point in more entertaining way than just listing my concerns, like a court document. However, style and substance are very different things. Where I can agree with you, is that, though I suggested there could be, “mitigating circumstances,” I was only guessing, and without any further explanation from UEG on the matter, I am forced to conclude that he let himself down, by not approaching the kid, before, “going to press,” as it were. And, keep in mind, the mitigation I suggested, did not stand in place of justification. I leave that to UEG to explain, or not. I merely raise the question. Yet, the point still stands. I remember being 21, and I knew it was not just wrong to take people’s money under false pretences, but a con, and a crime. I have done some bad things in my day, and I have tried to put right what I could. But, believe me when I tell you that I know whereof I speak, when I tell you that this kid is not just a menace, but he’s set to either get way worse, or be stomped where he stands. Yes, UEG has had something similar happen to him, but there was a significant difference: UEG was NOT guilty of the allegations levelled at him. This kid demonstrably is. All, “emotions,” set aside: This is not some hi jinx. This is people’s careers and lives, effected by a guy who hired them on the basis of a lie. And, it’s a con; meaning that it is ONLY the most trusting, vulnerable and least able to do anything about it, once they realise what’s happened to them, that get taken in. Would you feel the same way about a pick-pocket? Or, a guy who sold you a games console that turned out to be an empty box, with a breeze block in it? Both you and UEG, seem too inclined to cut this kid too much slack, which is part of what is wrong with the world, in my view. Yet, ALL of that, pales in comparison to the way that this kid, so casually attempted to accuse UEG’s protégée of stealing $ thousands of dollars, meant for a charity. The measures that UEG took to protect her reputation COST those $ thousands, just to ensure she was not in a position, where she could be accused of such a fraud. Where I come from, Matty could have been labelled as, “scum,” and all because she was attempting to do some good, develop her own career, and trusted a con man. Youthful exuberance and showing off, is not so well thought out, executed, and so well supplied with contingencies for the possibility of exposure. So, both you and UEG are naive to write it off as such. Though I suspect that UEG’s real reason for saying that, is so as to provide the kid with a face-saving, “out,” rather than because he believes it. This kid has a record, which inclines me to ask you. “Did YOU really watch the video?” Youthful exuberance happens once or twice; but, does NOT persist in trying to circumvent the rules which keep shutting you down, like the kid has been doing; for YEARS now. He’s a committed con man, breathing the oxygen that you seem so committed to grant him, by letting him off the hook, so easily? Without emotion; I ask you to question? Consider the harm that would have been done, if the kid’s scheme had worked, and lead to more such schemes (there WILL be more such schemes). And, consider what the worst outcome would have been for UEG’s protégée? And, then tell me if THAT is just some dumb kid? Or, (with genuine respect) is he smarter than you?
    1
  18045. 1
  18046. 1
  18047. 1
  18048. 1
  18049. 1
  18050. 1
  18051. 1
  18052. 1
  18053. 1
  18054. 1
  18055. 1
  18056. 1
  18057. 1
  18058. 1
  18059. 1
  18060. 1
  18061. 1
  18062. 1
  18063. 1
  18064. 1
  18065. 1
  18066. 1
  18067. 1
  18068. 1
  18069. 1
  18070. 1
  18071. 1
  18072. 1
  18073. 1
  18074. 1
  18075. 1
  18076. 1
  18077. 1
  18078. 1
  18079. 1
  18080. 1
  18081. 1
  18082. 1
  18083. 1
  18084. 1
  18085. 1
  18086. 1
  18087. 1
  18088. 1
  18089. 1
  18090. 1
  18091. 1
  18092. 1
  18093. 1
  18094. 1
  18095. 1
  18096. 1
  18097. 1
  18098. 1
  18099. 1
  18100. 1
  18101. 1
  18102. 1
  18103. 1
  18104. 1
  18105. 1
  18106. 1
  18107. 1
  18108. 1
  18109. 1
  18110. 1
  18111. 1
  18112. 1
  18113. 1
  18114. 1
  18115. 1
  18116. 1
  18117. 1
  18118. 1
  18119. 1
  18120. 1
  18121. 1
  18122. 1
  18123. 1
  18124. 1
  18125. 1
  18126. 1
  18127. 1
  18128. 1
  18129. 1
  18130.  @dananskidolf  Indeed, and as I say, that’s a feature, not a bug. The Tories are deliberately making it so bad that it will soon look hopeless and irreparable; a massive tax burden with no end in sight and no real hope of rescue. Then, instead of being blamed for destroying it, they get to be the white knights who lifted the burden from the general public, with a small tax cut and the full privatisation of the entire service. They can keep some taxes in place, claiming they need them to convert everything, even though they DON’T in terms of staffing and infrastructure (except where they can cut corners by hiring unqualified staff instead of well trained, experienced people) because they’ve already been stealth privatising all this time. I know from experience, when I get the seals for my sleep apnea machine. A nurse used to put a couple in my hand, any time I asked for them. Now, I have to email requests and answer personal questions about what I did with the old ones and why I can’t make them last longer. When I got mad about this and listed everything that was wrong with their questions and the tone of their response, a senior nurse cracked and told me the complaints were coming from a private company, ResMed, who supply the parts. She just sent me what I asked for, plus spares, and now I regularly harangue the people at ResMed, encouraging them to get a job working for a company that is less likely to result in them being refused admission at the Pearly Gates, but no longer have any trouble getting my equipment. I do this, not for the sport, (though that is a bonus) but because I know that these, “newer,” companies are still in a highly competitive phase (unlike the fiefdoms that the water and transport companies own, with no competition legally allowed) and they really, really don’t want high complaint statistics. They rely on intimidation tactics and exploitation of scared people in a vulnerable state. Well, they picked the wrong patient, my friend. And I do it because the nurses don’t like being forced to act like enforcers on behalf of a company they hate, which is interfering with the otherwise excellent service they provide. These nasty tactics are being applied across the board and it’s all quite deliberate.
    1
  18131. 1
  18132.  @Eimost  : Yes, I get the idea, but just don’t get how that works in practical terms. When can you cash a bond, for instance? There must be restrictions, or the former owner could just cash them all on the day of the forced sale, forcing an instant purchase. Why wouldn’t they? In the hopes that their bonds go up in value? What does that depend on? The value of the company they just divested themselves of, or interest rates, or some other mechanism? This guy may well be 100% right in his assertion, but he sure as hell didn’t explain how any of the important aspects of it works. He left so many logical questions unanswered (at least from a layperson’s perspective) that I was left very distrustful of him as a source. He might as well have said, “The tax payer doesn’t pay for it, ‘cause the computer says no.” And that’s leaving out all of the other real world costs that are discrete to each case. Like when a water company’s pollution gets so bad that people start suing the water board for deaths or injuries and fines have to be paid. If we nationalised the water companies, which I strongly believe we should, where does that money come from if not the public purse? Each industry can be accused of real world harms for which the former companies would be responsible. Now, you may be able to answer all of my questions and the many more that I have (most of them more obvious than legal wranglings over settlements) but that still leaves the question: Why didn’t he? All I heard was, “2 + 2 = 3, because it just does.”
    1
  18133. 1
  18134. 1
  18135. 1
  18136. Couple of things. We simply cannot know if he is attempting some sort of disinformation messaging here, or if he’s really so dumb that he grasps so little about NATO tactics and strategy that he seriously believes that Ukraine would steal a bunch of lightly defended, strategically useless land in the north, only to trade it back for their own land later, like some dodgy Muscovite, from the back of a truck? If he’s trying to deceive, it’s a childishly inept attempt that fails to take into account the widely publicised fact that Ukraine has stipulated it will NOT cross Russian borders for any reason, (save for missiles aimed at legitimate targets) which is also a key condition for receiving NATO aid. And given that cynically trading stolen, occupied land is a criminal act, under every code of law, his ignorance is palpable. What it does achieve though, is to give us an insight into the Russian psyche. Stealing land, with crassly illegal trade offs and seeking to capture militarily useless targets must all have to seem, “plausible,” enough to Russians, for him not to know how utterly IDIOTIC he sounds in this video. Maybe he also didn’t get that other memo, about how the west pays no attention to anything Russians say anymore anyway? The free world has been ignoring everything out of Putin’s mouth since 2014 and is only making decisions based on actions and reality, not any Russian, “words.” Personally, I like him better when he’s drunk, not hung over. When he’s ranting about army corruption and unnerving Putin while he staggers about looking frightened.
    1
  18137. 1
  18138. 1
  18139. 1
  18140. 1
  18141. 1
  18142. 1
  18143. 1
  18144. 1
  18145. 1
  18146. 1
  18147. 1
  18148. 1
  18149. 1
  18150. 1
  18151. 1
  18152. 1
  18153.  @powernab8457  : I’m not quick to throw unions under the bus. I’m a conservative (with a small, “c,”) by inclination, but I’ve been DRIVEN to the left by all of the lies, fecklessness and entitlement of these incompetent, fundamentally broken sociopaths failing to run our country, even with their slimy tentacles upon the levers of power! 12 YEARS of this sh*t should have been enough for even the most egregiously hostile, “anti,” whatever-ist to get it by now: These goons are NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE, let alone fit for office! I gave my binmen a Christmas tip this year. Not huge. Just enough for the three of them to have a couple of rounds on me, a grateful recipient of their invaluable services who appreciates the fact that there are people out there willing to do things for me that I would literally hate to have to do for myself: i.e. clean away my crap. One of them LITERALLY CRIED! His life is a story of desperation, lurching from one debt to another food bank, to a debt counsellor, to another crisis! It sounded like a nightmare! Yet he was still here, taking my sh*t away for me. And, much to my shame, I have to confess that, if I’d known that a small act of generosity was going to open up this can of worms in the first place, I probably wouldn’t have done it. Out of sheer Britishness and terrified desire to avoid all outward expressions of human emotions. I wasn’t sure it would even be taken in the spirit by which it was intended, but I hadn’t expected an outpouring of gratitude and a tearful response! My point, I guess, is that all about us, wherever we look, there are people moving about inside their own stoic clouds of hardship and quiet desperation. It doesn’t take much to trigger an outpouring from these clouds and, if someone comes along with the correct formula of words, able to reach a large audience, all these little clouds are going to gather up in a cumulonimbus of righteous anger and frustration, and tear it all down. I worry about stuff like that. And it’s upsetting to think that everyone I see is suffering that bit more because of the sheer greed and heartless, out-of-touch, tone deaf, idiocy of the politicians in charge.
    1
  18154. 1
  18155. 1
  18156. 1
  18157. 1
  18158. 1
  18159. 1
  18160. 1
  18161. 1
  18162. 1
  18163. 1
  18164. 1
  18165. 1
  18166. 1
  18167. 1
  18168. 1
  18169. 1
  18170. 1
  18171. 1
  18172. 1
  18173. 1
  18174. 1
  18175. 1
  18176. 1
  18177. 1
  18178. 1
  18179. 1
  18180. 1
  18181. 1
  18182. 1
  18183. 1
  18184. 1
  18185. 1
  18186. 1
  18187. 1
  18188. 1
  18189. 1
  18190. 1
  18191. 1
  18192. 1
  18193. I meant to say, “skewing,” the numbers, but spewing works, I guess? If we get a vaccination program in schools, which the government is so keen to make money on, er . . . I mean, “return normality to households and see to the education of our youth,” then their reckless, racist, pointless parents can do what they like, without the risk of them harming the innocent, right? No downside. I think the only reason there are so many of the resisters is entirely down to the Russian Propaganda, made to look like, “American,” propaganda, because it comes from Alex Q Jones, or Fox, or whatever. And the only reason they’re so wound up is because they know, deep down, in their deepest hearts, that they’re wrong and they’re risking their kids lives; so they drown out their guilt and insecurities, by screaming a lot, and seeking self justification from the Bible. The Evangelical ones should read the New Testament Mark? Jesus says, Himself, that most churches will be corrupted and will lead the people to destruction, through greed and, (they didn’t have the concept of racism, back then, but they had equivalencies) racism. They should be running for the hills? 666 wasn’t enough for them. Plague, famine, wars and rumours of wars? Civil unrest, and public, degrading murders, committed by our police forces. Now, Bill Barr is building a legion of Secret Police SS units, to suppress us, when we complain about having our, “elections,” stolen from us. The GOP KNOWS they’re going to jail, or establishing a Dictatorship. There’s no alternative, third outcome, here. America’s pretty f**ked, and I’m going to stay in the UK if Trump pulls off a Coup. But, I’ll only be putting off the inevitable, worldwide fall of Democracy. But, I will, at least, get to out live a whole, vast section of American society, who will have, “We told you so,” inscribed on their tombstones 😉
    1
  18194. 1
  18195. 1
  18196. 1
  18197. 1
  18198. 1
  18199. 1
  18200. 1
  18201. 1
  18202. 1
  18203. 1
  18204. 1
  18205. 1
  18206. 1
  18207. 1
  18208. 1
  18209. 1
  18210. 1
  18211. 1
  18212. 1
  18213. 1
  18214. 1
  18215. 1
  18216. We’re not doing nearly enough! Putin hoarded enough gold for Russia’s economy to hold out for a couple of years. That’s why we HAVE TO invest much MORE into defeating Putin. The blood and treasure we invest now will save us a fortune down the line. Finland and Sweden joining NATO will be a real body blow to all of Putin’s rhetoric at home, but we HAVE TO get Germany to lead the way and cut off ALL energy supplies from Russia, and rally Europe and America into an energy pact of assured mutual support. Western Europeans are still funding the very war we want to stop! The Ruble was bound to bounce back, due to internal demand, and we simply don’t have the time to grind down Russia’s economy over years! Ukraine needs a full navy and airforce to support its heavy infantry in attacking Russia on all fronts, while Europe STOPS giving Putin at least a billion a week to kill, rape, torture and murder more Ukrainians en masse and individually! It’s the very LEAST we owe them! And it’s our best hope for a lasting peace. Two thirds of the world’s grain imports, 50% of the elements vital for microchip technology (anyone who tried to buy a PlayStation 5 knows there’s a worldwide shortage of microchips) and Shell, Exxon and BP spent billions on the rights to develop the massive oil and gas reserves in Ukraine, which they say rivals that of Russia itself! So the implications for world security are incalculable! Imagine if Putin succeeded in taking all of Ukraine and controlled more of the world’s energy reserves than any other individual? Combined with their ally, China, taking control of ALL technology manufacturing between them! Taiwan manufactured two thirds of the world’s microchips out of ONE SINGLE FACTORY! When Covid forced them to close temporarily, that’s when the microchip shortage effected the entire planet. So imagine China owning Taiwan and Putin having control of most of the elements used in their manufacture between them? It would be the end for the west. And there’s the simple matter of morality and human cost, underlining all of this. Ukraine has sacrificed too much for all of us, fighting on our front lines. Putin wants Germany, the economic power house of Europe, and will impose the old East German borders at the very least if we let him. It all comes down to CRUSHING his forces in Ukraine, NOW! We’re not doing nearly enough.
    1
  18217. 1
  18218. 1
  18219. 1
  18220. 1
  18221. 1
  18222. 1
  18223. 1
  18224. 1
  18225. So, what you’re telling us is that unchecked monopoly capitalism is anti-capitalist, right? If you cannot start a small business because you’re getting squeezed by the monopoly giants, that’s the literal antithesis of a, “free market,” economy. I honestly think the argument should be framed this way. It’s the, “language,” that hits home for people. Note: the monopoly giants hijack terms like, “capitalism,” and, “free market economy,” to describe their activities, knowing these terms have a certain traction in the American (western) imagination, while it can be shown, simply and empirically, that what they’re doing is the precise opposite of that. The most powerful argument you have is that they are shutting down capitalism, thus killing the American Dream and the American way of life. Their methods, as you have demonstrated, are more reflective of the mafia than operators in a, “free,” space of any kind. If you put it to the people this way, that giant mergers are, “killing capitalism itself,” by killing the main resource capitalism needs to thrive, “competition,” you stand a much higher chance of not only framing the discussion in such a way that the public can take it more seriously, but also in such a manner that the courts and legislators cannot ignore. Your opponents are GUARANTEED to attempt to paint a picture of you, and your cause, as being, “woolly liberals,” and, “anti-capitalists.” You must seize that ground from under them at the outset. Make sure everyone understands that your arguments are Pro-Capitalist, literally calling for protection of the capitalist system. What you’re calling for IS the free market economy, with the checks and balances that are meant to by guaranteed in the Constitution since the 1890’s (a piece of legislation that you need to include in your videos and legal arguments in the future, by the way) and draw as many parallels with the workings of, “government,” as you can. You must OWN that Capitalism space and make it the centre-piece of your argument. As you have already pointed out, this much power in the hands of so few (especially in media forms) represents great power. And, “with great power comes,” Marvel comic book clichés, but that doesn’t make them any less true. You have the arguments of Capitalism, Responsibility (as there appears to be zero accountability for the owners of these companies, except to shareholders, which do not have public interest at heart, by definition) and you have the VAST evidence of public inconvenience, Ticketmaster breaking their written word, the lowering of standards in those industries, lowering of pay and conditions for employees, all set against the background of the rapidly rising cost of living. If you have access to good lawyers, and if you can get you connected to any senior politicians, you cannot lose. Oh, and you’ll need LOTS of money to fight these monopolists, when you’re trying to get legislation passed. But, if you make regular videos about your campaign, with progress reports, also making the granular detail available for those who want to dive deep, people will donate to the cause. It’s the only pocket that’s deeper than the head of Warner, or Mr Meat Monopolist, etc. I would contribute my cash . . . Good luck and Godspeed, my friend. ✌️ P.S. If you read this whole thing, thank you for your patience. 👍
    1
  18226. 1
  18227. 1
  18228. 1
  18229. 1
  18230. 1
  18231. 1
  18232. 1
  18233. 1
  18234. 1
  18235. 1
  18236. 1
  18237. The Dems disappointed the Europe with their pusillanimous, “support,” for Ukraine, which was slow in coming and came with far too many restraints, forcing Ukraine to fight with one arm tied behind their back. Since European security is as much at issue as Ukraine’s in this war, Europe was already questioning America’s loyalty to its own purported ideology. Now, we’ve seen an outright betrayal of America’s allies in Europe and the Five Eyes nations. With China offering to step into the breach, and the possibility of making a deal that includes them withdrawing their support for Moscow’s invasion plans, the answer to this dilemma seems obvious to me. Europe AND the Five Eyes nations should act as one, making a set of new trade deals with China, in return for European security guarantees; which come in the form of Putin withdrawing from Ukraine, which is now in the interests of all parties concerned. It might even be possible to reach a deal on Taiwan, setting an agreed date to hand over the territory, in a similar fashion to Hong Kong, providing migration guarantees to the Taiwanese people and their industries. Too brutal? A betrayal of our principles? Perhaps . . . Or is it simply a recognition of the harsh realities of geopolitics and a resolution not to get caught in the crossfire between two unreliable superpowers; only one of which can at least be relied upon to act in accord with its own interests and is therefore consistent. You can deal with a consistent, reliable nation, even if you don’t support their politics. And, if Taiwan’s fall will become increasingly inevitable, as America’s economy shrinks and the dollar destabilises, leaving the Euro or the Chinese Yuan as the new, “stable currency,” maybe we have the opportunity to save lives, the dignity of a peoples, and to place caveats in their system of governance, which prevent them from falling into total autocracy? Especially if China is so reliant on European, Canadian, Austral Asian and British good faith? Putin’s economy is close to meltdown anyway, after all. He is already dipping into pension funds and slowing the production of oil. It would only take a small push from China to send them into full crisis, thus relieving Europe of a massive economic and security burden. Or replacing its security burdens with new ones, perhaps? But at least this will be shared, globally. And a prosperous Europe, with an urgently needed injection of young Taiwanese families, rebalancing the demographics of the aging populations of so many nations, means prosperous trade for all.
    1
  18238. 1
  18239. 1
  18240. 1
  18241. 1
  18242. 1
  18243. 1
  18244. 1
  18245. 1
  18246. 1
  18247. 1
  18248. 1
  18249. 1
  18250. 1
  18251. 1
  18252. I heard about the ISW’s (Institute for Studies in Warfare) assessment, which bares out my own comment last week. That Putin seems to be deliberately reducing Prigozhin’s Wagner group, whilst blocking his attempts to refill his ranks from gyms, clubs and prisons around Russia. Russia’s internal wars mean that Ukraine has not faced properly trained, equipped and supported soldiers for some time now, but just sheer overwhelming numbers, with occasional injections of special forces groups, here and there, but not in any significant numbers. I do not fear for what might happen when the Russians finally do put their best on the front lines, as they lost their very best in the battle for Kiev and their failed invasion attempts around the whole eastern half of Ukraine last year. Putin might think he’s buying time to train and equip his latest swathe of conscripts, but they simply will not have the experience, will or matching equipment to halt Ukraine’s Spring offensive. Once Putin has less Ukrainian real estate than he began with in February of last year, combined with new countries joining NATO and the sheer financial losses Russia has suffered, all topped off with China’s visit making it clear that Putin cannot expect any significant under the table assistance, and Russia are now China’s junior partner, his position as leader will be untenable. Unless Russia breaks up and becomes like North Korea with China’s assistance - while China soaks up the populations of Russia’s southern regions into their borders, because, “populations,” (particularly young people) are what China so badly needs right now, I can’t even see how Putin survives into next year?
    1
  18253. 1
  18254. 1
  18255. 1
  18256. 1
  18257. 1
  18258. 1
  18259. 1
  18260. grammaticopedanticus : Precisely. Consider the term, “Small Government Conservatism,” and set that against the invasive attempts of Trump, to control and have an impact on EVERYTHING, from, “Make Iran Great Again,” Trump’s own words, which directly contradict, “America First.” From Tweet bombing State Funerals, to causing a rift in our SPORTS; the very place Americans go to get away from politics! From, “punishing,” pregnant women, to spontaneously phoning in to Propaganda news outlets, the control of which is only spreading. Attacking our biggest industries, Amazon, Google, etc, even the post office! I could go on listing various aspects of public life, but the point is, whatever you can call Trump, it’s NOT, “Conservative,” by ANY definition. The big ROBBERY of $1.5 TRILLION, early on, for his donors and his family, was about their speed, and on its own, would have had us still arguing over its patent failure to stimulate the economy, and now prices are rising on almost EVERYTHING electronic, because of the pointless trade war, with the ONE COUNTRY that can take hit after hit, without EVER having to worry about the, “political consequences,” when China doesn’t even HAVE elections! Sorry for waffling a bit, there, but speaking as a Conservative, what I see is STALIN. He even QUOTES Stalin, and he’s being fed Stalin’s tactics, by Putin. His aims may well be Proto-Nazi, but his technique is Stalinist, mass control of EVERYTHING. That’s Anti-Conservative, and I’m WITH THE RESISTANCE, ALL THE WAY TO THE END ✌️👍
    1
  18261. 1
  18262. 1
  18263. 1
  18264. 1
  18265. 1
  18266. 1
  18267. 1
  18268. 1
  18269. 1
  18270. 1
  18271. 1
  18272. 1
  18273. 1
  18274. 1
  18275. 1
  18276. 1
  18277. 1
  18278. 1
  18279. 1
  18280. 1
  18281. 1
  18282. 1
  18283. 1
  18284. 1
  18285. 1
  18286. 1
  18287. 1
  18288. 1
  18289. 1
  18290. 1
  18291. 1
  18292. 1
  18293. 1
  18294. 1
  18295. 1
  18296. 1
  18297. 1
  18298. 1
  18299. 1
  18300. 1
  18301. 1
  18302. Stu_Lopher : Good point. Accept, he didn’t say it. In fact, he was one of the few who was warning, from his global geopolitical perspective, about the growing popularity of far right cults, and the damaging effects of mass propaganda dumps. He showed it was happening all over the world, and was (still is) driven by Russia and their allies, while expressing concerns over education levels and mass movements. He may have said, early on, what everyone was saying, but that was way back when the GOP was saying they’d never accept trump, because of his racism, sexism and stupidity (people like Lindsay Graham and Moscow Mitch were very loud on the topic). None of us could have predicted that the GOP would cave, so abjectly, to such an obvious Putin Puppet? But, Fareed was one of the first, trying to explain to us why trump might get, “elected,” and how. So, Mickey, here, is full of shit. But, note this? Look how complex the truth is? Look how many words it took for me to explain the facts? How much patience has it taken for anyone to read this comment through? See, Mickey knows that he can COUNT on people being lazy, because lies are quick and easy. He either guessed and took a chance, or just flat out lied. Morally, there’s no difference. Basically, he’s a complete and utter cult, who takes money to lie, or is just so mentally ill, that he spends all day, every day, spewing out lies and hate, to people he hates on channels he hates. That’s not a, “sane,” man’s actions. Just a cult’s. ✌️👍
    1
  18303. 1
  18304. 1
  18305. 1
  18306. 1
  18307. 1
  18308. 1
  18309. 1
  18310. 1
  18311. 1
  18312. 1
  18313. 1
  18314. 1
  18315. 1
  18316. 1
  18317. 1
  18318. 1
  18319. 1
  18320. 1
  18321. 1
  18322. 1
  18323. 1
  18324. 1
  18325. 1
  18326. 1
  18327. 1
  18328. 1
  18329. 1
  18330. 1
  18331. 1
  18332. 1
  18333. 1
  18334. 1
  18335. 1
  18336. 1
  18337. 1
  18338. 1
  18339. 1
  18340. 1
  18341. 1
  18342. 1
  18343. 1
  18344. 1
  18345. 1
  18346. 1
  18347. 1
  18348. 1
  18349. 1
  18350. 1
  18351. 1
  18352. 1
  18353. 1
  18354. 1
  18355. 1
  18356. 1
  18357. 1
  18358. 1
  18359. 1
  18360. 1
  18361. 1
  18362. 1
  18363. 1
  18364. 1
  18365. 1
  18366. 1
  18367. 1
  18368. 1
  18369. 1
  18370. 1
  18371. 1
  18372. 1
  18373. 1
  18374. 1
  18375. 1
  18376. 1
  18377. 1
  18378. 1
  18379. 1
  18380. 1
  18381. 1
  18382. 1
  18383. 1
  18384. 1
  18385. 1
  18386. 1
  18387. 1
  18388. 1
  18389. 1
  18390. 1
  18391. 1
  18392. 1
  18393. 1
  18394. 1
  18395. 1
  18396. 1
  18397. 1
  18398. 1
  18399. 1
  18400. 1
  18401. 1
  18402. 1
  18403. 1
  18404. 1
  18405. 1
  18406. 1
  18407. 1
  18408. 1
  18409. 1
  18410. 1
  18411. 1
  18412. 1
  18413. 1
  18414. 1
  18415. 1
  18416. 1
  18417. 1
  18418. 1
  18419. 1
  18420. 1
  18421. 1
  18422. 1
  18423. 1
  18424. 1
  18425. 1
  18426. 1
  18427. 1
  18428. 1
  18429. 1
  18430. 1
  18431. 1
  18432. 1
  18433. 1
  18434. 1
  18435. 1
  18436. 1
  18437. 1
  18438. 1
  18439. 1
  18440. 1
  18441. 1
  18442. 1
  18443. 1
  18444. 1
  18445. 1
  18446. 1
  18447. 1
  18448. 1
  18449. 1
  18450. 1
  18451. 1
  18452. 1
  18453. 1
  18454. 1
  18455. 1
  18456. 1
  18457. 1
  18458. 1
  18459. 1
  18460. 1
  18461. 1
  18462. 1
  18463. 1
  18464. 1
  18465. 1
  18466. 1
  18467. 1
  18468. 1
  18469. 1
  18470. 1
  18471. 1
  18472. 1
  18473. 1
  18474. 1
  18475. 1
  18476. 1
  18477. 1
  18478. 1
  18479. 1
  18480. 1
  18481. 1
  18482. 1
  18483. 1
  18484. 1
  18485. 1
  18486. 1
  18487. 1
  18488. 1
  18489. 1
  18490. 1
  18491. 1
  18492. 1
  18493. 1
  18494. 1
  18495. 1
  18496. 1
  18497. 1
  18498. 1
  18499. 1
  18500. 1
  18501. 1
  18502. 1
  18503. 1
  18504. 1
  18505. 1
  18506. 1
  18507. 1
  18508. 1
  18509. 1
  18510. 1
  18511. 1
  18512. 1
  18513. 1
  18514. 1
  18515. 1
  18516. 1
  18517. 1
  18518. 1
  18519. 1
  18520. 1
  18521. 1
  18522. 1
  18523. 1
  18524. 1
  18525. 1
  18526. 1
  18527. 1
  18528. 1
  18529. 1
  18530. 1
  18531. 1
  18532. 1
  18533. 1
  18534. 1
  18535. 1
  18536. 1
  18537. 1
  18538. 1
  18539. 1
  18540. 1
  18541. 1
  18542. 1
  18543. 1
  18544. 1
  18545. 1
  18546. 1
  18547. 1
  18548. 1
  18549. 1
  18550. 1
  18551. 1
  18552. 1
  18553. 1
  18554. 1
  18555. 1
  18556. 1
  18557. 1
  18558. 1
  18559. 1
  18560. 1
  18561. 1
  18562. 1
  18563. 1
  18564. 1
  18565. 1
  18566. 1
  18567. 1
  18568. 1
  18569. 1
  18570. 1
  18571. 1
  18572. 1
  18573. 1
  18574. 1
  18575. 1
  18576. 1
  18577. 1
  18578. 1
  18579. 1
  18580. 1
  18581. 1
  18582. 1
  18583. 1
  18584. 1
  18585. 1
  18586. 1
  18587. 1
  18588. 1
  18589. 1
  18590. 1
  18591. 1
  18592. 1
  18593. 1
  18594. 1
  18595. 1
  18596. 1
  18597. 1
  18598. 1
  18599. 1
  18600. 1
  18601. 1
  18602. 1
  18603. 1
  18604. 1
  18605. 1
  18606. 1
  18607. 1
  18608. 1
  18609. 1
  18610. 1
  18611. 1
  18612. 1
  18613. 1
  18614. 1
  18615. 1
  18616. 1
  18617. 1
  18618. 1
  18619. 1
  18620. 1
  18621. 1
  18622. 1
  18623. 1
  18624. 1
  18625. 1
  18626. 1
  18627. 1
  18628. 1
  18629. 1
  18630. 1
  18631. 1
  18632. 1
  18633. 1
  18634. 1
  18635. 1
  18636. 1
  18637. 1
  18638. 1
  18639. 1
  18640. 1
  18641. 1
  18642. 1
  18643. 1
  18644. 1
  18645. 1
  18646. 1
  18647. 1
  18648. 1
  18649.  ZZarrssxm : That’s unchecked, rampant, unregulated capitalism for you. The problem with the markets all being global is that you can’t just appoint a sheriff to take down the bad actors and enforce any single interpretation of the law. It would take an act of supreme determination on the part of the largest economy, the USA, rounding up whatever allies they can gather, to lay down hard and fast rules that the rest of the world would have to fall in line behind; like the right to repair your own property, the right to OWN your own media and video games, not rent them, the right to have simplified TOS’s that anyone at an average, basic level of education could understand, and the right to NEVER be forced to sign contracts AFTER they’ve already purchased their items (which applies to TV’s, computers, video games and soon, everything else) or get locked out of using your ALREADY PURCHASED product, and so on. The problem is that American politicians can’t agree on a definition of treason or murder, let alone the subtle nuances of trade laws. And they’re so rotten that any lobby group can persuade them to reverse their campaign promises with eye watering sums of cash. So, get used to the CyberPunk dystopia, kid. Looks like there’s no way to avoid it other than civil collapse or some other world wide disaster that changes how we live? I just can’t myself eating the flesh of my enemies in a Mad Max world and saying, “Well, at least we stopped Apple, Tw@er and the NSO from running our lives,” and actually being happy about my life. Can you?
    1
  18650. 1
  18651. 1
  18652. 1
  18653. 1
  18654. 1
  18655. 1
  18656. 1
  18657. 1
  18658. 1
  18659. 1
  18660. 1
  18661. 1
  18662. 1
  18663. 1
  18664. 1
  18665. 1
  18666. 1
  18667. 1
  18668. 1
  18669. 1
  18670. 1
  18671. 1
  18672. 1
  18673. 1
  18674. 1
  18675. 1
  18676. 1
  18677. 1
  18678. 1
  18679. 1
  18680. 1
  18681. 1
  18682. 1
  18683. 1
  18684. Nias : Looks like you were responding to me? It REALLY DOES bare all the hallmarks of a COUP, doesn’t it? But, there is one small ray of hope on the horizon. Trump’s Tax Heist, designed to create a class of oligarchs in America, that resembles Putin’s Goons, with whom Putin will be able to negotiate directly and do end runs around the government, is all but signed. THAT is a TERRIBLE development. BUT: What USE has Trump’s party got for HIM now? Apart from his public disgraces, the way that he attacks Americans, en masse, and individually, the MIRE of suspicion of TREASON around him and his utter incompetence; MOST of the Republican Party have PERSONAL reasons to “avenge” themselves on Trump, after he’s publicly shamed and attacked SO MANY of his own colleagues and allies. Once Trump signs that Bill, they may take the opportunity to try to restore public “confidence”? Even to make themselves look like “heroes” by “patriotically” standing up to Trump in the face of overwhelming evidence? Just a thought, but, Trump looks to have a sell-by date on him, which has expired. Can they seriously get ANYTHING of “value” from him now? Something that they couldn’t do for themselves, without all the division and hate that comes with the Trump Package? And they COULD win a LOT of support from the centrist “left” leaning voters? I’m thinking we may see some rumblings over the Christmas period, from within the Republican Party? But, hey. I’ve been wrong before?
    1
  18685. Nias : Maybe, but think about it. Many of them are coming to retirement age, many KNOW things about how Trump can’t last, and many have already said they’re retiring. But MOST of them will be richer than GOD. The ones that don’t cut and run, who aren’t planning to buy a home in a none-extradition-treaty tax haven, and plan to continue in politics, won’t be worried about Trump’s base. They KNOW there is a solid Republican base around and that Trump’s mad dogs WON’T vote Democrat under ANY circumstances. So, let them stay at home, right? Appeal to the floating voters. The 9% of Trump voters who say they’ll never vote for Trump again? The ones who wanted either Bernie OR Trump, because they JUST WANTED CHANGE? And how many Democrats will LOVE the guys who stand up to Trump, sighting the Founding Fathers and having their “come to Jesus” moment of sudden “realisation” regarding Trump? The “base” is a static block of around 30%, but EVEN THAT number will get smaller if they hear the Trump “loyalists” telling them that Trump sold them out and providing them with the EXCUSE to take back their own commitment. If 9% of Trump voters were willing to tel FOX that they wouldn’t vote for Trump again, in front of their friends and families, on the house phone, JUST HOW MANY are there out there, who DON’T speak up, but have SEEN for themselves? And the latest polls show ONLY 7% of America supports this Tax Heist! Now is the time, perhaps? And it’s just been discovered that a “last minute” amendment has gone into the Bill, giving a further HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS in Tax Breaks to REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS!!! How is the base going to take THAT? Yeah, most will swallow it WHOLE, “outwardly”? I am willing to predict that we are about to see a change in tone and early rumblings toward Trump, very soon, from within the party. And if Mueller’s interviews with Trump’s lawyers go badly, this week? . . .
    1
  18686. 1
  18687. 1
  18688. 1
  18689. 1
  18690. 1
  18691. 1
  18692. 1
  18693. 1
  18694. 1
  18695. 1
  18696. 1
  18697. 1
  18698. 1
  18699. 1
  18700. 1
  18701. 1
  18702. 1
  18703. 1
  18704. 1
  18705. 1
  18706. 1
  18707. 1
  18708. 1
  18709. 1
  18710. 1
  18711. 1
  18712. 1
  18713. 1
  18714. 1
  18715. 1
  18716. 1
  18717. 1
  18718. 1
  18719. 1
  18720. 1
  18721. 1
  18722. 1
  18723. 1
  18724. 1
  18725. 1
  18726. 1
  18727. 1
  18728. 1
  18729. 1
  18730. 1
  18731. 1
  18732. 1
  18733. 1
  18734. 1
  18735. 1
  18736. 1
  18737. 1
  18738.  @joerogain5025  : Indeed. Many believe that this current program of mass kidnappings of Ukrainian children is connected to Putin’s awareness that they now have a serious demographic problem. An ageing and shrinking population, with the best, youngest and brightest all having fled the draft from an unjust war, totalling somewhere between 750,000 to a million young men, whilst the rest of their young population are being wilfully tossed into a meat grinder, currently totalling between 100,000 to 200,000 depending on whom you believe. Russia ALREADY just couldn’t take the population hit of Covid, which was relatively negligible to other populations around the world (except China’s maybe?) before this war even started! But now it seems that Putin has already used up or lost around 2 million out of the potential 5 million men and women he could throw at this problem before the crisis topples his government. So, is anyone surprised to see that they now have 10 year old SCHOOL CHILDREN stripping rifles and training for war? They’re so desperate that kidnapping the population of another country looks like a, “good idea,” to Putin. No wonder they daren’t talk about that on state TV, right? Not the usual angry come backs from all the talking heads and propaganda outlets, regarding the warrant for Putin’s arrest for child kidnapping? No fulminations round the table, like we usually see in response to the west’s sanctions? Is anyone surprised. Every nation that shares a border with Russia needs to move their children inland and far away from the child snatchers in Russia.
    1
  18739. 1
  18740. 1
  18741. 1
  18742. 1
  18743. 1
  18744. 1
  18745. 1
  18746. 1
  18747. 1
  18748. 1
  18749. 1
  18750. 1
  18751. 1
  18752. 1
  18753. 1
  18754. I think they’re, “true believers,” in the sense that they know their fortunes are bound to the state and they will say or do anything to protect themselves. Yet, they are also in a privileged position, as they are responsible for putting a positive spin on the, “bad news,” and need the facts in order to distort them. Therefore, they obviously cannot, “believe,” their own lies. But they do not believe in the concept of, “Truth.” They have a Putinist, Sovietised, politicised, attitude to truth, facts, information, etc. Their priority is about weaponising information, to such an extent that the very concept of, “truth,” is an irrelevance. I would imagine, if you asked one of these goons what they think about the importance of truth, they would stare blankly. Perhaps they would say, “We decide what is truth.” They are the living expression of Orwellianism. We get to see it from the perspective of a, “free world,” and note the jarring juxtaposition between them, the Soviet 2.0 New Stalinists, and us, the, “choose your own facts,” “create your own echo chamber,” yet, “still having free access to ALL of the FACTS should you want them, free western world. We certainly have our own problems and an uneasy relationship with truth in the free world. But that essential freedom of thought and opinion makes all the difference. We can openly mock, dispute and sue propagandists in the west, whilst choosing to opt out of regular viewing. Try that in Russia and you face a 15 year minimum sentence. This enforced cognitive dissonance has created a society of apathy in Russia, which is entirely intentional, as far as the state goes. Yet, it’s not just this mass moral absenteeism that results. It creates the kind of Orwellian fearfulness that leads people to actually cheer, en masse, whilst being shown images of bombed out Ukrainian cities, reduced to rubble, lest they be reported by their neighbours to the secret police. They cheer without a thought for the children and civilians who had to be murdered to create that situation. Even the Americans at their most jingoistic never do that. Francis Bacon wrote, “‘What is truth?’ asked [Pontius] Pilate, yet he would not stay for an answer.” He was speaking of those who fear their reality as much as they fear not being on-message, too. So, it’s a venerable tradition, to lie to the masses. The Russians think they have mastered the art, but they clearly haven’t. Solviov (may have misspelled his name there?) was known for being an activist for the opposition to Gorbachev, then Yeltsin, and even Putin, for a short time. Now he sells the message for his own opposition whilst getting rich. These people have no, “beliefs,” only priorities. They are Stalinists. They are Soviet 2.0. And, just as back in Stalin’s day, they are only fooling a small part of their own population, but their population daren’t tell them so. And they sure as hell don’t fool anyone in the west. Not even their supporters.
    1
  18755. 1
  18756. 1
  18757. 1
  18758. 1
  18759.  @zoom777 : Yeah, what, “response”? How how does Russia, “escalate,” a response when they’ve already turned it up to 11? There’s no act of mass child kidnapping, rape, theft, torture, cowardly bombing from miles away, mass murder and mass grave digging that has the power to, “surprise,” or, “intimidate,” literally anyone in the west, let alone Ukrainians. Russian threats are all as empty as Putin’s head, while their acts of terrorism are just another Tuesday in Ukraine. Everyone knows that the only potential major change from within Russia is that the Rusky hard liners and the Rusky opposition may feel emboldened to overthrow Putin? We’ve all seen, thanks to Wagner, how unstable Russia’s, “government,” is. And we all got to see what an abject COWARD Putin is, when he fled Moscow for St Petersburg, even though Wagner didn’t get within 20 miles of the city limits! Not exactly, “I don’t need a ride, I need ammo,” is it? The world compares the heroism of Zelensky to Putin’s weak COWARDICE and hears the clock ticking in Moscow. It’s just a question of how long Putin can withstand being shown up as powerless within his own country? Wagner are still openly defying Putin’s direct orders. Prigozhin, by Putin’s own admission, is defying his own, “exile,” (I’m not convinced he’s even BEEN to Belarus) and an increasing number of drones and missiles are showing up in Moscow, while Russia’s army slowly loses territory and racks up casualties. Not a sustainable situation for Puty boy. Tick, tick, tick . . .
    1
  18760. 1
  18761. 1
  18762. Sir, I am most interested in why so many people accept the Inflation Hypothesis (commonly known wrongly as a, “theory”) at face value, without wanting to make more logical, empirical sense out of it? And why it never seems to account for time? Is it not possible that as we, “see into the past,” that this very, “past,” is distorted in the same way that light is? It seems to me that, “space time,” is always correctly asserted as an explanation for how we get GPS to work, etc, but then we promptly eject the, “time,” element from the universe’s distant past? Thus, we record Inflation as a spacial anomaly that took place in a consistently behaving time? Why would we assume that time was not as distorted as it would normally be when close to (part of) a giant mass? The universe is the largest mass there is. Therefore, surely time itself must have been distorted in a manner that has never occurred since? To a distant observer, this would make it appear as though events must have occurred at a rate that was inexplicable by our current measurements of time, such as the mysterious, “homogeneity,” of the universe? This would also explain why the expansion of the universe is speeding up. What is happening is not that it is getting faster, but that there is less mass in proximity to slow the passage of time. It seems to me that people automatically forget that, “Space-time,” are a thing, the inextricable linkage of space and time? Am I wrong about this? What are my incorrect assumptions? I can’t see them for myself. But this may be because, like physicists, I am too close to and bound up within the problem?
    1
  18763. 1
  18764. 1
  18765. 1
  18766. 1
  18767. 1
  18768. 1
  18769. 1
  18770. 1
  18771. 1
  18772. 1
  18773. 1
  18774. 1
  18775. 1
  18776. 1
  18777. 1
  18778. 1
  18779. 1
  18780. 1
  18781. 1
  18782. 1
  18783. 1
  18784. 1
  18785. 1
  18786. 1
  18787. 1
  18788. 1
  18789. 1
  18790. 1
  18791. 1
  18792. Yutube Lurker : Ah, we have a Trump Propagandist in our midst, Putin’ words in my mouth and pivoting to Obama. I made NO claim that countries are, “not,” trying to set up a single world order. Quite the opposite, in fact. Read more carefully? My point is, you’re being sucker punched, by the very people you throw your support behind. Globalism is a fact of life, like the weather. So, you can carry on being distracted, howling at the wind and the rain, whilst they are attempting to build that very, “world order,” that you so fear. No, I DON’T own Nikes, but I don’t doubt that sweatshop goods have slipped under my radar. But, I don’t KNOWINGLY buy sweatshop goods. And, while you struggle with disproof of your thesis, in your very hands; The Internet, which you flatly deny is the CHIEF INSTRUMENT of Globalism, yet CANNOT offer an argument as to WHY you, “completely disagree,” consider how you are building the Trump Tower of Babel with your keyboard hand, whilst holding up an anti-globalist placard with the other? The EU is nothing but a front for a business clique, and the likes of Putin, Xi, and Trump all want it gone, as it’s the only threat to the prize of a One World Order, that they will ultimately have to fight each other for, in the end. And, when THAT time comes, America will stand NO CHANCE, having been hopelessly compromised and infiltrated by Russian Hacks, and the vast army of SUCKERS they drag in their wake. So, Putin will have control over everyone from Turkey to Iraq, and China will be the last man standing, while America sinks into the dust of its own folly. That’s why I left the US. I moved there from England in 2006 and have duel citizenship, but I recently returned. The only thing that would get me back to the US now, would be if there were mass demonstrations to join, against Trump, or an Impeachment to enjoy. America is already OVER, the Republic fallen, its Constitution in SHREDS. Because the Globalists WON, by telling you they were, “not globalists,” and chanting, “America First.” You FELL for it, and richly deserve your reward . . . Smh
    1
  18793. 1
  18794. 1
  18795. 1
  18796. 1
  18797. 1
  18798. 1
  18799. 1
  18800. 1
  18801. 1
  18802. 1
  18803. 1
  18804. 1
  18805. 1
  18806. 1
  18807. 1
  18808. Tracy Clark : I know you didn’t ask me, about Vesuvius, but I’ll give you my 10 cent’s worth, anyway. Apart from his juvenile attitude and OBVIOUS racism, his remarks seemed to have a “specific” purpose in mind. They are all aimed at SILENCING opposition, through vague intimidation. Obviously, he is the type of person who can BE bullied, bought or persuaded to act in what he believes are his own interests, rather than having any morality. I doubt he even KNOWS the difference between “right and wrong” any longer? I know that may seem an inordinately harsh assessment, but consider: he says things like, “Moore will remember,” the blacks for voting against him. Implying revenge policies and unjust legal outcomes will result, for the black community of Alabama. He tells us that Barkley’s comments will only encourage more white people to oppose the Dems, simply BECAUSE Barkley comments; not because of anything he says, which is measured and reasonable, to anyone who LISTENS. It’s typical, SVR, FSB, bully boy tactics, designed to make people feel scared to speak out. It’s also childish and self defeating, given that his “style” gnaws at the very centre of a sane person’s morality and is more likely to ignite a passionate rejection of his arguments and a righteous anger, within decent folk. But, having said all that, I’ll throw in a prediction for you too. Moore will probably win this election, given that he’s done a deal with Trump, to vote the exact way he’s instructed by the White House, especially on the Healthcare raiding, Tax Grab, which Trump is DESPERATE to win. I’ve seen MANY Alabamans being interviewed on Fox AND CNN, saying the same thing. If Trump tells us to do it, we’ll vote for Roy Moore. And there is always the silent contingent of bigots and racists, who vote for these guys, but don’t admit it. BUT, take heart. For this is the LAST significant victory that the Trump’s will pull off. And I say the Trump’s, because that is what this is all about, really. Moore’s stint as senator will be BRIEF and IGNOMINIOUS. Even if he beats the odds and survives his term (which I don’t see happening) he’ll be primaried out. The Republicans don’t want him, and are ONLY supporting him for Trump’s agenda, right now. Can I ask, why you asked about Vesuvius? And what is your view? Sorry for going on ;-)
    1
  18809. 1
  18810. 1
  18811. 1
  18812. 1
  18813. Tasnif Rahman : It’s on the MSNBC website. And you can, as I did, check the Republicans own data base on, “Memberships.” Look for, “none-renewals,” and it CONFIRMED what I read. There was also a discussion which brought it up on a recent Ari Melber YouTube vid, where they discussed the fact that MOST of those people leaving are under the age of 50, and mostly around the 25 to 40 age range. AND, that they sited, “Racism,” and, “lying,” within the GOP, among their main reasons for NOT renewing their memberships, when surveyed. Apologies, but I DON’T offer, “click bait,” as I am known for telling others NEVER to TOUCH Click links. My brother is a Tech Expert (he actually works in the gaming industry, for Rockstar, now, but he USED TO work for a telecoms firm, on computer security) and he DEMONSTRATED to me exactly HOW TO make a friendly looking YouTube link and then FILL it with Trojans, Bots, Worms, etc, etc. It was TERRIFYING, and you’d NEVER KNOW, until your tech CRASHED on you! So, I’m ALWAYS telling people, “DON’T TOUCH the Click Bait.” It’s not, “hard,” to verify this, though? I was able to cross reference it, as soon as I read it. So, if you’re really interested, I don’t think you’ll find it too difficult. I NEVER make stuff up, or go with things I just WANT to believe; even when it comes from a TRUSTED source, like CNN or, in this case, MSNBC. We are NOT THEM, and I am scrupulous about my FACTS. In truth, a lot of people left the Dems, after the election, and a downswing in membership is usual, for the losing side. What’s interesting is that, the DNC numbers a growing, now. While the RNC shows no sign of stemming their hemorrhage
    1
  18814. 1
  18815. 1
  18816. 1
  18817. 1
  18818. 1
  18819. 1
  18820. 1
  18821. 1
  18822. 1
  18823. 1
  18824. 1
  18825. 1
  18826. 1
  18827. 1
  18828. 1
  18829. 1
  18830. 1
  18831. 1
  18832. 1
  18833. 1
  18834. 1
  18835. 1
  18836. 1
  18837. 1
  18838. 1
  18839. 1
  18840. 1
  18841. 1
  18842. 1
  18843. 1
  18844. 1
  18845. 1
  18846. 1
  18847. 1
  18848. 1
  18849. 1
  18850. 1
  18851. 1
  18852. 1
  18853. 1
  18854. 1
  18855. 1
  18856. 1
  18857. 1
  18858. 1
  18859. 1
  18860. 1
  18861. 1
  18862. 1
  18863. 1
  18864. 1
  18865. 1
  18866. 1
  18867. 1
  18868. 1
  18869. 1
  18870. 1
  18871. 1
  18872. 1
  18873. 1
  18874. 1
  18875. 1
  18876. 1
  18877. 1
  18878. 1
  18879. 1
  18880. 1
  18881. 1
  18882. 1
  18883. 1
  18884. 1
  18885. 1
  18886. 1
  18887. 1
  18888. 1
  18889. 1
  18890. 1
  18891. 1
  18892. 1
  18893. 1
  18894. 1
  18895. 1
  18896.  @Rin-qj7zt  : So glad that you’re getting where I’m coming from. If being educated was a condition of the job; the expectation, then the community would genuinely start looking up to cops. If they were meant to be the calm one in every situation and not, “the threat,” then people would WANT to help them. They wouldn’t be reluctant to tell them their details, because they wouldn’t feel like they were being trapped into something. That fundamental culture of the cop being the, “smartest person in the room,” and people having the expectation that s/he is going to be the one who resolves the conflict with the least drama, is what we should be training them for. We do them as much of a disservice as we do the public, by not offering cops high academic levels of in-house training; even elevating aspects of their job to degree and doctorate levels of academe. Training them into a culture of, “head stuff,” and to put a stigma on emotional policing is the way to go. When your colleagues are saying, “Ahh, no. You clearly got mad at that guy. That’s bad,” would be using peer pressure (the strongest force) against violent policing. Nearly all the videos I see, of police brutality, have the same three factors: the cop was not smart enough to use his words; the cop got angry; and the cop knew the culture he worked in expected him to have physical control over others at all times, and he felt like he was failing, just because his suspect wasn’t clicking his heels and snapping to attention when he issued a, “lawful,” command. I mean, even that language is a giveaway, right? “I’m issuing a lawful order!” Really? Could you maybe just start by asking the guy for his help and cooperation? Why are you his enemy walking in? Even if your arresting the guy, have the decency to show regret that it’s come to this? Most people would let you put on the cuffs and shrug! Sorry, I’m going on a bit now ✌️👍
    1
  18897. 1
  18898. 1
  18899. 1
  18900. 1
  18901. 1
  18902. 1
  18903. 1
  18904. 1
  18905. 1
  18906. 1
  18907. 1
  18908. 1
  18909. 1
  18910. 1
  18911. 1
  18912. 1
  18913. 1
  18914. 1
  18915. 1
  18916. 1
  18917. 1
  18918. 1
  18919. 1
  18920. 1
  18921. 1
  18922. 1
  18923. 1
  18924. 1
  18925. 1
  18926. 1
  18927. 1
  18928. 1
  18929. 1
  18930. 1
  18931. 1
  18932. 1
  18933. 1
  18934. 1
  18935. 1
  18936. 1
  18937. 1
  18938. 1
  18939. 1
  18940. 1
  18941. 1
  18942. 1
  18943. 1
  18944. 1
  18945. 1
  18946. 1
  18947. 1
  18948. 1
  18949. 1
  18950. 1
  18951. 1
  18952. 1
  18953. 1
  18954. 1
  18955. 1
  18956. 1
  18957. 1
  18958. 1
  18959. 1
  18960. 1
  18961. 1
  18962. 1
  18963. 1
  18964. 1
  18965. 1
  18966. 1
  18967. 1
  18968. 1
  18969. 1
  18970. 1
  18971. 1
  18972. 1
  18973. 1
  18974. 1
  18975. 1
  18976. 1
  18977. 1
  18978. 1
  18979. 1
  18980. 1
  18981. 1
  18982. 1
  18983. 1
  18984. 1
  18985. 1
  18986.  @OVER9000xDxD  : If only you knew sufficient history to prevent yourself from making such embarrassing mistakes, huh, son? Do you know WHO those, “Red Army,” soldiers who took Berlin were? Look it up, kid? They were mostly UKRAINIANS. The leg you stand on has been kicked out from under you. But it’s silly to equate the deeds of our grandfathers with modern politics, so you didn’t have an, “argument,” to start with. You Putinistas like to brandish your rusty nukes at everyone, hoping that the free world is occupied by the same kind of morally absent cowards as Russia is filled with, but you’re obviously as ignorant on that topic as you are every other. Not that we can really blame you for that, given that you live in a propaganda bubble in which free speech and access to truth are banned. You’ll be glad of those nukes in the end, alright, but not for the reasons you imagine. They will be the only currency Russia has left to trade that the world will accept for sanctions relief. After all, it’s not like they can fire them at anyone without committing suicide. Maybe Putin might decide to take you all with him in a giant suicide pact, toward the end, but do you really think that people who want to live will not have anticipated that? Russian military corruption is LEGENDARY and half of those nukes will only exist on PAPER! But the ones that are there represent a commander’s ticket to a rich future in the prosperous west, for him and his family; tradable goods that the west will gladly accept. And much smarter to trade them westwards than trade them east, only to have to spend the rest of your days on the run, on a CIA hit list, right? There is no scenario in which Putin survives this, or in which Crimea and the whole of Ukraine doesn’t go back to the Ukrainians. I can tell from the way you mask your anger with a, “lol,” and the other insecure remarks you make, that you know I’m right. The problem with you Putinistas is that not even you believe you, and it shows. Have a nice day, kiddo. 😉
    1
  18987. 1
  18988. 1
  18989. 1
  18990. 1
  18991. 1
  18992. 1
  18993. 1
  18994. 1
  18995. 1
  18996. 1
  18997. 1
  18998. 1
  18999. 1
  19000. 1
  19001. 1
  19002. 1
  19003. 1
  19004. 1
  19005. 1
  19006. 1
  19007. 1
  19008. 1
  19009. 1
  19010. 1
  19011. 1
  19012. 1
  19013. 1
  19014. 1
  19015. 1
  19016. 1
  19017. 1
  19018. 1
  19019. 1
  19020. 1
  19021. Bruce Bartup : Oh, I’m ALWAYS, “calm.” I rarely write anything for the benefit of the Troll, that I happen to be answering. I just think it’s helpful to point out the HYPOCRISY and UTTER lack of LOGIC in their lies. A LOT of people DO fear a nuclear confrontation. Some are even uneducated enough to ACTUALLY BELIEVE that Putin would pull the trigger! SERIOUSLY! They don’t know that the ONLY way Putin would be the FIRST to start a Nuke War, would be by accident (the most real scenario), because he’s ALREADY been attacked with nukes, or if he still had the power to call a strike at the moment he was being REMOVED from office. Not even the CRAZIEST leaders have ever, or WOULD ever, try it, because they KNOW it means them dying too, or surviving in a world not worth living in. And there are ALWAYS enough pragmatists, up and down the chain to restrain a nut job leader, EVEN IF he issues the order. So, I think people need to KNOW that we have NOTHING to fear from Putin, militarily. Many have supported Trump and tried EVER SO HARD to ignore the Putin factor, because they are AFRAID. Putin does not have military might equal to 10% of what America has, ALONE. But, the WHOLE of NATO? Putin is a speck, who’s country is collapsing slowly, because he and his gang have bled it WHITE. He makes a BIG noise and has sunk a FORTUNE into Asymmetric Warfare, and a LOT of Americans are FALLING FOR IT. They “think” Putin could REALLY HURT AMERICA, if we CONFRONTED HIM, because his PROPAGANDA has WORKED, WITH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE POTUS! They NEED to know the TRUTH. Putin talks a big game, but that’s all it is. Sorry for going on, and, if you got this far, thanks for your patience. Now, I’m going to, “go to Montana, marry a BIG WOMAN and bread rabbits.” 😉
    1
  19022. 1
  19023. 1
  19024. 1
  19025. 1
  19026. 1
  19027. 1
  19028. 1
  19029. 1
  19030. 1
  19031. 1
  19032. 1
  19033. 1
  19034. 1
  19035. 1
  19036. 1
  19037. 1
  19038. 1
  19039. 1
  19040. 1
  19041. 1
  19042. 1
  19043. 1
  19044. 1
  19045. 1
  19046. 1
  19047. 1
  19048. 1
  19049. 1
  19050. 1
  19051. 1
  19052. 1
  19053. 1
  19054. 1
  19055. 1
  19056. 1
  19057. 1
  19058. 1
  19059. 1
  19060. 1
  19061.  @georgine321  : I watched a Peter Zeihan video, weeks ago, in which he predicted that the grain deal would cease and Russia would avoid sinking actual ships, so as to avoid Putin falling out with all those countries in Africa he’s been courting; among other reasons. So, his alternative will be an attempt to destroy the infrastructure of Odessa’s port. That was weeks ago! NATO’s Intel knew this was coming. We have also seen that it only takes one country to lead the way, like the UK did over the tanks debate, or cruise missiles, and other countries quickly follow suit. No one wants to be first, but every country has a vested interest in showing a united front, and all are equally as anxious not to show any cracks in the armour of our unity to Russia. Now, America has finally removed the breaks on F16’s, telling every country they no longer object to anyone sending as many F16’s as they like; indeed, telling NATO that the current schedule is too slow and facilitating a speeding up of that process. They are also committing four new missile defence systems to Odessa. But, wouldn’t it be great if we got ahead of this just once? By the time Odessa becomes as secure as Kyiv (which is not impenetrable) how much grain will be left for the starving people of the world? We will ALL feel the increase in food prices, planet wide, while there is already a food inflation crisis underway. Putin tried this same tactic with fossil fuels and is fuming that we managed to get that under control. He’s had more time to work on this plan. We have to start cutting off his diabolical schemes BEFORE he can start sabotaging the planet and show Russia that their situation is hopeless. What we’re currently doing is actively encouraging a drowning man to clasp at straws. Until he hears the straight message, that Ukraine will defeat Russia and NATO guarantees this, he will keep on flailing to all our cost. Putin isn’t looking for an off ramp because we keep telling him not to. Yet history shows us that, every single time Putin has been faced with genuine resolve by an equal or stronger enemy, he has ALWAYS backed down. The last 20 years are replete with examples. Time NATO stopped gambling with our lives and faced reality: We are the ones making escalation more likely, by constantly appeasing. And history is also replete with examples of how appeasement ALWAYS works out for the appeasers.
    1
  19062. 1
  19063. 1
  19064. 1
  19065. 1
  19066. 1
  19067. 1
  19068. 1
  19069. 1
  19070. 1
  19071. 1
  19072. 1
  19073. 1
  19074. 1
  19075. 1
  19076. 1
  19077. 1
  19078. 1
  19079. 1
  19080. 1
  19081. 1
  19082. 1
  19083. 1
  19084. 1
  19085. 1
  19086. 1
  19087. 1
  19088. 1
  19089. 1
  19090. 1
  19091. 1
  19092. 1
  19093. 1
  19094. 1
  19095. 1
  19096. You keep using the word, “reflexive,” when you appear to mean, “reflective?” Is there such a word as, “reflectsive?” I don’t think so. It is confusing to your audience, as you are telling us that film maker’s are using their reflexes, to respond to self awareness, at least 5 times! “Self-reflexive.” Simply wrong and confusing. A shame, because the content of this video is awesome, and has so much to say of genuine merit! Can you edit your own videos, once published on YouTube? If so, you really should. Or, at least, put a disclaimer at the start? It really is a misleading term, and used so frequently in this particular edition that it cannot be overlooked. You have quite literally altered the MEANING of what you’re trying to say. “Reflectsive,” is not only NOT a word, but if it were, people would only hear, “reflexive:” an automatic response to a stimulus, a reflex, a muscle jerk, knee jerk reaction to cinema that cannot be controlled; or just happens as a consequence of what came previously? That’s NOT what you’re trying to say, right? Five times, dudes! It’s driven home too often to overlook! I know it seems like a pre-occupation of my own, but I’m honestly not being a grammar nazi. It genuinely is confusing, and I had to think carefully about what you were trying to say, since you just kept saying it, until I could only conclude that you were making up a word, that sounds like a different word, in a really unhelpful context. Otherwise, I loved the video though 😉✌️
    1
  19097. 1
  19098. 1
  19099. 1
  19100. 1
  19101. 1
  19102. This is where I find that even the, “best,” journalists (an oxymoron, perhaps?) get high on the smell of their own farts. That’s why I hope and pray for the Lib Dems to become the opposition, which would only require a small nudge in key seats around the country. Imagine the historic change that would result if the Tories were no longer able to direct the narrative? If the party holding Labour’s feet to the fire was sincere about saving the NHS and not trying to quietly privatise the last holdouts? Sincere about making fines on the water companies prohibitively expensive and not just an additional expense? Sincere about saving free education at a high quality and not just making sure that private schools get their tax breaks? Committed to rebuilding our national security and not putting Putin’s spooks into the House of Lords? Sincere about funding our military and not just about friends and families selling weapons to the highest bidders? And, most of all, backing all requests to open up the books on public enquiries, so we can root out and prosecute the conspirators of the London Met, the Postal Services and the Grenfell Tower guilty parties and bring them to justice, which is the only real defence against repeat performances? Just imagine the Tory voice being silenced for the first time in British political history? To whom would the press turn for clients? They would still need their kickbacks and cheques signed. They would still have a job to do and they can’t take their business elsewhere. We would suddenly see a massive turnover of staff in the Murdoch press and in senior positions at the BBC. We could yet save Britain? . . .
    1
  19103. 1
  19104. 1
  19105. 1
  19106. 1
  19107. 1
  19108. 1
  19109. 1
  19110. 1
  19111. 1
  19112. 1
  19113. 1
  19114. 1
  19115. 1
  19116. 1
  19117. 1
  19118. 1
  19119. 1
  19120. 1
  19121. You cannot compare a DA who campaigns on the promise of indicting a president to others who play politics with the threat of indicting a class of people or political opponents! Putting that promise front and centre of this DA’s campaign was giving the commitment that the rule of LAW would be upheld! It was a brave act, by a DA who knew they would have to take special care over their own and their loved ones’ personal security for the rest of their days. It was actually ANTI-POLITICAL, restoring a degree of trust to a jaded public, in a system that we’ve all watched being cynically abused to the hilt and which, as the case of George Santos illustrated so humiliatingly for the entire democratic process, does not even have the mechanisms to deal with some extreme levels of blatant fraud! Win, lose or draw, we SHOULD have expected swift and prepared cases to drop upon that stupid orange head, the moment he left the White House, which would have had the added benefit of keeping him too busy and distracted to whip up an insurrection from the very steps of the Capitol Building. The American public has been shamed, embarrassed and humiliated enough in the eyes of the world, by what looks to them like a hesitant, pusillanimous and financially deferential justice system, undermining their confidence that an out and out fraud like trump could even be compelled to face ANY responsibility for his many, MANY crimes. This is just one small, brave step, taken by people with integrity and commitment to their professions and their country: the triage that we all hope will lead to treatment, while we hope for a cure. So, to suggest that the unique promise, made to fit singularly unique circumstances, was anything other than dutiful and heroic, is to buy into the far-wrong’s politicisation of the whole issue. A DA said, “We all doubt that the law will be applied to one unique individual, but if you vote for me, I will ensure it is applied, like it would and should be, to any American.” And, in a right minded country, that SHOULD be a vote winner that ANY American could get behind.
    1
  19122. 1
  19123. 1
  19124. 1
  19125. 1
  19126. 1
  19127. 1
  19128. 1
  19129. 1
  19130. 1
  19131. 1
  19132. 1
  19133. 1
  19134. 1
  19135. 1
  19136. 1
  19137. 1
  19138. 1
  19139. 1
  19140. 1
  19141. 1
  19142. 1
  19143. 1
  19144. 1
  19145. Gao Li : What is different about Britain, apart from the fact that Europe depends upon many of it’s financial and tertiary services and industries, in a way that most European countries simply cannot compete, is that it is already America’s biggest economic partner. It can stand upon it’s own two feet, without its laws and trade agreements constantly being undermined by unelected, civil servants, now. Britain will be just fine. As you say yourself, MUCH of the consequences of leaving, were exaggerated or misrepresented, anyway. We are NOT cutting off trade? And, that has worked well for Norway, with the highest, per capita, income in the WORLD. We are NOT cutting off our intelligence services? We are NOT leaving NATO? We are NOT closing our doors. And, personally, I sincerely HOPE that immigration continues in Britain, because it always HAS and that’s GOOD for a country’s growth. I am NO racist. As to your South China Seas, “examples.” They simply do not pertain. You speak of, “mischaracterisation,” while proceeding to do exactly that. What makes you think that such models would apply to Europe? The truth is that Europe will be losing one of it’s LARGEST contributors, keeping basket case countries afloat, like Grease, Spain, Italy, and the former Eastern Block Countries. And, Germany dominates the whole of Europe, through the power of the Banks. That situation is morally and practically WRONG. And, we are fortunate, that we no longer have to serve the agenda’s of the international monied class, in such a demeaning way. The, “Liberals,” will moan at me, claiming that Northern Ireland should be given back to the South, while, in the next breath, tell me we should all be part of one big happy family? That doesn’t even make sense! So, instead of being increasingly subordinated by the faceless goons that made Trump possible, while baring NO responsibility, and whining about him; I’m content that Britain will sink or swim. But, it will do it, WITHOUT having to buy its paddle, form a bureaucrat in Brussels, thanks
    1
  19146. 1
  19147. 1
  19148. 1
  19149. 1
  19150. 1
  19151. 1
  19152. 1
  19153. 1
  19154. 1
  19155. 1
  19156. 1
  19157. 1
  19158. 1
  19159. 1
  19160. How can you claim that an informal, verbal agreement, WITH A DIFFERENT COUNTRY, the Soviet Union, should even apply to the Russian Federation? That requires the unspoken acceptance that the Soviet Union is still a thing! Maybe it’s time Putin got over his, “unspoken,” belief that he’s allowed ANY SAY over what OTHER countries do at all? Did the Soviet Union NOT fall then? Because if we’re accepting that, then we must accept that it is still our duty to bring Russia down? That we are still in a state of Cold War? What other reason does Russia HAVE to feel, “threatened,” by the expansion of Democracy? See how your attempt at, “even handedness,” merely comes off as apologist nonsense, which also nullifies Yeltsin’s assertions that he was not threatened by the expansion of NATO? There is no LOGICAL argument for Putin that holds ANY water! All this video does is muddy the waters and apologise for what is essentially an ARMED ROBBERY of an entire country! Your grasp of history is basic at best, and does not take into account what so many people sacrificed and DIED for during those years. Maybe you should work for Moscow? Maybe you are working for Moscow? It’s sickening that you would attempt to validate one side as though merely having an opposing view has equal weight!? That’s how Flat Earthers got created! Some talking points are just bollox and need to be called out for what they are. Deals with the Soviet Union don’t even apply to this, “other,” country, Russia.
    1
  19161. 1
  19162. 1
  19163. 1
  19164. 1
  19165. 1
  19166. 1
  19167. 1
  19168. 1
  19169. 1
  19170. 1
  19171. 1
  19172. Your contradiction of the student’s second lecture seems wrong to me. If the professor uses Hawking as the basis for any of his foundational arguments, it’s both rational and appropriate for the student to show refutations of Hawking, given his brief and the prof’s own talking points. Merely side stepping his point by saying, “Yeah well, Hawking wasn’t a philosopher,” doesn’t obviate that. Nor does it discredit the possibility that something he said has any bearing on philosophy. Isn’t that disingenuous? Furthermore, Hawking did have a lot to say about God, and not merely as a misunderstood analogy, as in, “knowing the mind of God.” It is also worth noting that many physicists have been openly hostile to the Big Bang Theory, on the basis that it seems to comport with the Genesis Story. You say his use of Genesis isn’t valid, using Thanos as your analogy. But, he was not merely siting it as evidence (indeed, “evidence,” is the wrong word) but pointing to an example of Scripture, showing early knowledge. In other words, it raises the question of how this 3 to 5 thousand year old text, stems entirely from one notion?; A notion that has been born out by modern science all these many generations later? He’s pointing to scripture, and giving an example that its Foundational Mythos comports with modern science. How can that be in any way, “invalid,” to the mission he has been briefed on. You are discrediting it as, “argument,” without validating it as foundational comportment that is a starting point from which to build an argument: i.e. early belief, based on spiritual insight. Which comes from? . . . See? Then you build your argument. My personal belief, (for what it’s worth?) is that issues of faith are precisely that; rendered less meaningful by, “evidence,” and meaningless by, “proof.” And, that most debates about faith (Christianity in particular) are red herrings, centred on proving the existence, or the none existence, of God. If either could be done (a sheer impossibility, that smart people ought to know from the outset, which only starts me off as seeing the person trying it on as being not as smart as they think they are) then the logical outcome would, necessarily, be zero impact on the real world, one’s life and/or, how we live it. Think it through? Without faith, God is rendered meaningless, much like the famous Douglas Adams discussion that leads man to prove that black is white and get himself run over at the next zebra crossing. Issues of the relationship to God, belief and therefore, “motive,” are rendered moot. Equally, science still has nothing to say about God, even if He is now a, “thing,”or about faith or the philosophy of life. Even if God’s existence was an established, empirical fact, life goes on, unchanged for all of us, in a practical sense, and in our personal search for meaning, or lack thereof. Science knows it can never, “disprove,” God, but wastes time in bogus attempts to do so, to what end? To sell mean spirited books by Richard Dawkins, who strikes me as a bad faith actor, who is as emotionally damaged and psychologically exploitative as any Evangelical huckster I’ve ever heard of? I do agree with the other points you made, in the fundamental misunderstandings of philosophy (and individual philosophers) but, you don’t point nearly so incisively at the fundamental flaws in their grasp of Christianity. Once again, you were unfair to the student, at the end, who points out that you cannot be mad at God, unless He’s a, “thing.” A common error that a lot of anti-Christians make is to conflate the arguments for His not existing, with their anger at Him, without seeing it. And that is common to the Christian experience. We meet people, all the time, who are mad at God, but who are actually mad at their church, and the way they let them down, conflating that with, “God.” Or, as in this case, feeling desperately let down by a tragedy, and blaming God for that, thus NOT abandoning their, “belief,” but only their, “faith.” Again, you MUST acknowledge the student’s brief? He makes a valid point, and is responding appropriately, given the prof’s behaviour and HIS arguments; showing the fundamental flaws in his reasoning. But, again you side stepped that, pointing to the, “morality,” of exploiting his childhood trauma. That was not the student’s choice in that dynamic (or at least, what you showed of it? I haven’t seen the movie in question) merely his forced perspective. The end of the movie is laughably bogus, and didn’t need much adding. As it shows a bogus prof, with a bogus basis for his anger and a false belief system, which a child could have poked holes in (his anger was at God, therefore he believed in God. QED) and the stunt of, “deathbed conversion,” is a cheap trick to pull on an audience. Yet it seemed to me that your arguments, or your analysis grew weaker, as the video developed, stemming out from more and more flawed reasoning, upon which the rest of the reasoning grew, necessarily, to be flawed? I would so love a discussion with you about these things. . . . There just isn’t room for me to explain my reasoning here. Despite my criticisms, however, I really did enjoy this video, and learned quite a bit from it. Plus, as ever, you do it all so entertainingly. Thanks 👍
    1
  19173. 1
  19174. 1
  19175. 1
  19176. 1
  19177. 1
  19178. 1
  19179. 1
  19180. 1
  19181. 1
  19182. 1
  19183. 1
  19184. 1
  19185. 1
  19186. 1
  19187. 1
  19188. 1
  19189. 1
  19190. This seems like new phenomenon that has stunned the population into a kind of confused inactivity. A new breed of Brown skinned Brown Shirts whom it’s hard to call out for their obvious racist dog whistling due to the colour of their skin, yet it’s obvious they are pulling up the rope ladder that their parents used to get them into their privileged position. We thought Pretty Patel was bad? Braverman is hacking at the rope ladder with a meat cleaver! She might as well be a sleeper agent for the Chinese or Russians at this point! I genuinely wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what they found! Both left wing AND right wing analysis of geo politics is pointing one thing! WE NEED A POPULATION BOOST! We ESPECIALLY NEED the type of young people with the drive and determination to risk everything to get here, and the sort of integrity to prefer that dangerous option to giving in to the dictatorships they are fleeing! China and Russia are both on the brink of economic implosions, for a range of reasons, but right at the heart of both is the fact that their populations are shrinking, and they’re being left with an increasing number of elderly retired people whom the state cannot generate enough income to look after, as the number of working youth, generating income they spend to stimulate the markets and that all important TAXES which pay to prop up the state, are vanishing! Our population has stagnated and desperately NEEDS an injection. The nations willing to do what it takes to create a baby boom, or welcome migrants willing to do all those ONE MILLION (count them! ONE MILLION PLUS!) JOBS going begging in the UK, that we don’t want to do, especially for the terrible wages, are the nations that will come out on top in the next 10 years and will have financial assurances lasting 30 years beyond that. But, no . . . This corrupt administration will cling to power for as long as possible, NOT in the hopes that they can turn things around, despite telling the press that, but simply to raid the sweeties from the sweetie shop before it shuts its doors on them for a generation of wilderness years! By their OWN SUMS government losses, due to, “Waste, Incompetence and FRAUD,” has gone up in the last five years almost 1,000%!!! How MUCH has it cost them to keep those figures out of the headlines, do you think? Over £26 BILLION POUNDS! I’m genuinely wondering if we should treat the Tories as a national security threat? They just seem to want to break the country so as to ensure Labour could never hope to fix it again?
    1
  19191. 1
  19192. 1
  19193. 1
  19194. 1
  19195. 1
  19196. 1
  19197. 1
  19198. 1
  19199. 1
  19200. 1
  19201. 1
  19202. 1
  19203. 1
  19204. 1
  19205. 1
  19206. 1
  19207. 1
  19208. 1
  19209. 1
  19210. 1
  19211. 1
  19212. 1
  19213. 1
  19214. 1
  19215. 1
  19216. 1
  19217.  @nolaserv  : I can answer that. The first thing to happen would be they would secure all of the fossil fuel sites and rare Earth resources, such as the Argon vital for making computer chips (Ukraine produces over 50% of the world’s supply) taking any and all reserves back to Russia, whilst restoring any damaged infrastructure. They would also start completing the drilling and mining for oil and coal that Shell, BP, Exxon and others confirmed were there (in the west of Ukraine) but were scared away from and the coal reserves in the East. These were Putin’s financial goals from the outset. While all this was happening, the death toll would not stop, but actually increase, as Russian paranoia gets out of control due to pockets of resistance that would crop up all over the country, and scores were settled by an Orc army with a well documented medieval approach to warfare. Theft of white goods, cars and technology would see most of Ukraine’s riches exported to Moscow piecemeal, as individual soldiers supplemented their none-existent wages by sending anything they can lay their hands on back to their families. A massive exodus would occur while all of this was taking place; some of it organised as Zelensky would be persuaded (we hope) to set up a government in exile in the UK, or some other western country, but people will flood the German and other boarders, seeking safety from the marauding Zombies. In the midst of all this chaos, it is likely that western governments, under immense pressure from an angry citizenry, unwilling to sink any deeper into an economic slide than they already are, yet unwilling to turn away the good people of Ukraine, would reach a tipping point. The economic pressure, combined with fresh atrocities and theft on an unprecedented scale, would be combined with the issue of energy security and an urgent need to ensure that the balance of power does NOT tip into the hands of Putin. Therefore, all out war would likely follow pretty rapidly. Despite what people would have you believe, nuclear conflict would be highly unlikely, even if the whole of NATO declared war on Russia. It would be devastating for Russia in the first week, as their entire navy (save, possibly a few subs) would be sunk. They would lose their naval bases in Syria and Turkey within days, and without the missile capacity to strike at longer range targets, or the technology to get through top end European defences, their mechanised army would be wiped out in all places where they have bases or concentrations of tanks and other hardware. This would result in domestic chaos in Moscow, with the police being far stronger and better equipped than any of Russia’s military world wide, and being the last target for the western world. And the west would want to tip the scales there urgently, so as to prevent any desperate nuclear attacks on the part of a, by now, possibly suicidal Putin. It is quite possible that the chain of command would have a link broken somewhere, so that Putin might be unable to order a nuclear strike. But the west would not gamble on this, so a full scale invasion would be rapid. The street to street fighting would be brutal, as Putin’s Pretorian police are well paid and well equipped and will be the last civil servants to lose their wages. But they will be outmatched by better trained and equipped opposition, and the desire to burn their uniforms in the realisation that they will be hung if they don’t surrender. I could go on but . . . Does that answer your question?
    1
  19218. 1
  19219. 1
  19220. 1
  19221. 1
  19222. 1
  19223. 1
  19224. 1
  19225. 1
  19226. 1
  19227. 1
  19228. 1
  19229. 1
  19230. 1
  19231. 1
  19232. 1
  19233. 1
  19234. 1
  19235. 1
  19236. 1
  19237. 1
  19238. 1
  19239. 1
  19240. 1
  19241. 1
  19242. 1
  19243. 1
  19244. 1
  19245. 1
  19246. 1
  19247. 1
  19248. 1
  19249. 1
  19250. 1
  19251. 1
  19252. 1
  19253. 1
  19254. 1
  19255. 1
  19256. 1
  19257. 1
  19258. 1
  19259. 1
  19260. 1
  19261. 1
  19262. 1
  19263.  @dakotadurham4788  : That’s a highly bogus assessment, light on evidence, high on allegation. Just a series of opinions with zero analysis or anything to back it up. That’s where the far right keeps going wrong. You’re right about one thing. This lot are too lazy and ignorant to exploit the tools they have to hand, which was why they lost the last election so roundly. Their propaganda comes from foreign countries, who don’t get American culture, so that, even after it’s been filtered through Fox and other right wing media, to American tastes, it still comes off as implausible and childish. The Russians are used to generations old audiences, brought up to swallow their medicine like good children. So, the fascists of the right are always bemused at how easily thinking people see through them. Why call them, “Fascists?” Because their founding myth is a lie, they are a cult of personality, driven by emotion, racism and anti-intellectualism, who use threats, intimidation and actual violence to achieve their political ends. And, because they keep telling us they are, in all but name. They have as much in common with Stalin, when it comes to their propaganda techniques, as they do with Franco, Mussolini or Hitler, so I can see your confusion. But, that’s because their Orwellian Double-Think isn’t just about perpetrating lies. It’s as much a test of, “loyalty,” to the, “brand,” as it is about, “convincing,” anyone of anything. You are showing that you are willing to cast aside logic, reason, even science, and your own short term interests, in favor of an illogical, nonsense conspiracy theory, just as they did in Stalin’s Russia. He confessed that some of the narratives he put about, were not meant to be believed, but were tests, to see who would crack under the strain of lies and not take it anymore. There’s a lot of that going on in trump’s Stalinist model of propaganda; which is clearly coached to him, by Putin. But, just from a logical perspective: Who in their right mind would allow a party back into power, when they haven’t accepted the legitimacy of their own election defeat, or even the legitimacy of their opposition party? They are actively attempting a conspiracy right now, to undermine the elections, which will end in tears when these, “audit,” hacks get busted and jailed for fraud and conspiracy! Trump is literally telling us that there are ZERO circumstances in which he will even accept defeat! That means, ironically, to ANY logical thinking person, that he can NEVER be legitimate at all! Ever! He’s literally TELLING YOU he’s a Dictator. And, they bear every single marker that history warned us of, as outlined above. That should answer all your questions.
    1
  19264. 1
  19265. 1
  19266. 1
  19267. 1
  19268. 1
  19269. 1
  19270. 1
  19271. 1
  19272. 1
  19273. 1
  19274. 1
  19275. 1
  19276. 1
  19277. 1
  19278. 1
  19279. 1
  19280. 1
  19281. 1
  19282. 1
  19283. 1
  19284. 1
  19285. 1
  19286. 1
  19287. 1
  19288. 1
  19289. 1
  19290. 1
  19291. 1
  19292. 1
  19293. 1
  19294. Christina Davage : Signs and wonders, my friend. It’s all there, in Mark, in your Bible. And, of course, comfort is a good thing, as is being at peace, in your heart, depending on the love of Jesus. But, never allow that to lull you into false hopes? God does not us expect or require us to, “not,” be, “scared,” I’m afraid to tell you. And, he sure doesn’t expect people to be without fear when the End Times begin, and the Tribulation could well be upon us, for all we know? Being at peace because you trust in God, follow his teachings and love your neighbour as you love yourself is all well and good; but, we are also required to step out of our comfort zone, accept the fear, and do God’s work, regardless. Only one of Christ’s Apostles avoided a violent death, which was a lesson in itself. I do NOT mean to rob you of comfort by saying that. I only fear that (as I’ve seen time and time again) people’s faith can be shaken to its foundations when they experience tragedy, first hand; and it’s often because they thought that following Jesus would protect them from harm, which the Bible does NOT promise. Your works, with faith, will be protected, as will your faith, if it comes with works. But your body belongs to the world, and it will remain here to wither into dust, when you leave it behind; and the world is a place divided, by evil and good. Embrace your fears, and use that energy to transform it into Hope; hope in Jesus, by doing good works. Confront your fears, and they will diminish, as it is the enemy who wants you to make decisions, based on your fears, instead being based upon the rock upon which the church was built. Your church is not a building. Your church is all about you. Find those with similar fears, and offer them comfort, even if it’s only via the web or on the phone? By comforting others, you will find the weaknesses in your fears, and see them shrink before you. Though you should walk through the valley of DEATH itself, you will, “fear,” NO evil, once you have confronted and embraced your fears, turning them into WORKS, for the one who made you and gave you everlasting life! Do not seek comfort from men. It will let you down in the end. Rather, BE the comfort. Turn curses into blessing, as the Father thought you to do. God bless you ✌️
    1
  19295. 1
  19296. 1
  19297. 1
  19298. 1
  19299. 1
  19300. 1
  19301. 1
  19302. 1
  19303. 1
  19304. 1
  19305. 1
  19306. 1
  19307. 1
  19308. 1
  19309. 1
  19310. 1
  19311. 1
  19312. 1
  19313. 1
  19314. 1
  19315. 1
  19316. 1
  19317. 1
  19318. 1
  19319. 1
  19320. 1
  19321. 1
  19322. 1
  19323. 1
  19324. 1
  19325. 1
  19326. 1
  19327. 1
  19328. 1
  19329. 1
  19330. 1
  19331. 1
  19332. 1
  19333. 1
  19334. 1
  19335. 1
  19336. 1
  19337. 1
  19338. 1
  19339. 1
  19340. 1
  19341. 1
  19342. 1
  19343. 1
  19344. 1
  19345. 1
  19346. 1
  19347. 1
  19348. 1
  19349. 1
  19350. 1
  19351. 1
  19352. 1
  19353. 1
  19354. 1
  19355. 1
  19356. 1
  19357. 1
  19358. 1
  19359. 1
  19360. 1
  19361. 1
  19362. 1
  19363. 1
  19364. 1
  19365. 1
  19366. 1
  19367. 1
  19368. 1
  19369. 1
  19370. 1
  19371. 1
  19372. 1
  19373. 1
  19374. 1
  19375. 1
  19376. 1
  19377. 1
  19378. 1
  19379. 1
  19380. 1
  19381. 1
  19382. 1
  19383. 1
  19384. 1
  19385. 1
  19386. 1
  19387. 1
  19388. 1
  19389. 1
  19390. 1
  19391. 1
  19392. 1
  19393. 1
  19394. 1
  19395. 1
  19396. 1
  19397. 1
  19398. 1
  19399. 1
  19400. 1
  19401. 1
  19402. 1
  19403. 1
  19404. 1
  19405. 1
  19406. 1
  19407. 1
  19408. 1
  19409. 1
  19410. 1
  19411. 1
  19412. 1
  19413. 1
  19414. 1
  19415. 1
  19416. 1
  19417. 1
  19418. 1
  19419. 1
  19420. 1
  19421. 1
  19422. 1
  19423. 1
  19424. 1
  19425. 1
  19426. 1
  19427. 1
  19428. 1
  19429. 1
  19430. 1
  19431. 1
  19432. 1
  19433. 1
  19434. 1
  19435. 1
  19436. 1
  19437. 1
  19438. 1
  19439. 1
  19440. 1
  19441. 1
  19442. 1
  19443. 1
  19444. 1
  19445. 1
  19446. 1
  19447. 1
  19448. 1
  19449. 1
  19450. 1
  19451. 1
  19452. 1
  19453. 1
  19454. 1
  19455. 1
  19456. 1
  19457. 1
  19458. 1
  19459. 1
  19460. 1
  19461. 1
  19462. 1
  19463. 1
  19464. 1
  19465. 1
  19466. 1
  19467. 1
  19468. 1
  19469. 1
  19470. 1
  19471. 1
  19472. 1
  19473. 1
  19474. 1
  19475. 1
  19476. 1
  19477. 1
  19478. 1
  19479. 1
  19480. 1
  19481. 1
  19482. 1
  19483. 1
  19484. 1
  19485. 1
  19486. 1
  19487. 1
  19488. 1
  19489. 1
  19490. 1
  19491. 1
  19492. 1
  19493. 1
  19494. 1
  19495. 1
  19496. 1
  19497. 1
  19498. 1
  19499. 1
  19500. 1
  19501. 1
  19502. 1
  19503. 1
  19504. 1
  19505. 1
  19506. 1
  19507. 1
  19508. 1
  19509. 1
  19510. 1
  19511. 1
  19512. 1
  19513. Would it not be better if people like you, sensible, intelligent, compassionate, thoughtful, “influential,” set aside time to discuss the likes of Farage in a summary discussion once a week? Yes, we cannot ignore him, and we cannot dismiss his role in the riots (which I suspect is far deeper and more forewarned than he’s letting on) and a discussion about how to defeat the message of the far right must be had. But the fatal error here is that you discuss Farage several times a day! Your followers have Farage on their minds each day and will be discussing him with their friends, families and colleagues, because YOU talk about little else these days! Please don’t mischaracterise this comment as a call to ignore Farage completely? But I do think it is genuinely game changing when the grownups re-contextualise far right leaders and most importantly, STOP giving them exactly what they want! Which is their faces, voices and words in the headlines as much as possible. When you talk about Farage to such a disproportionate extent, you make him much bigger in the minds of the general public, and it becomes more plausible in the public consciousness that such a man could assume more power, because he has always loomed so large on the political landscape. It should be shocking to everyone that such a man is even in Parliament, let alone such a big influence on the nation’s woes. I don’t know exactly how you view yourself as a, “player,” on the political stage, but you must know that you are influential? And with that influence comes responsibility. Not just the type of responsibility that you are accustomed to as an educator (which I don’t doubt is comprehensive enough) but as a YouTuber, you also (I would hope?) are aware of the journalistic responsibilities of a broadcaster? I really worry that you are making a mistake by making Farage far too big a focus for discussion, making him far more powerful than he should be, and playing directly into his hands. Sometimes, having smart observations to share and not making them can be frustrating. But Farage is the one individual who would be most gratified by what you are doing here. And I think you should give serious thought to reconsidering your approach to him. I apologise for such a long comment, but I assure you I am completely sincere and, as the record shows, a genuine admirer of you and your work. If I am wrong, please show me how so?
    1
  19514. 1
  19515. 1
  19516. 1
  19517. 1
  19518. 1
  19519. 1
  19520. 1
  19521. 1
  19522. 1
  19523. 1
  19524. 1
  19525. 1
  19526. 1
  19527. 1
  19528. 1
  19529. 1
  19530. 1
  19531. 1
  19532. 1
  19533. 1
  19534. 1
  19535. 1
  19536. 1
  19537. 1
  19538. 1
  19539. 1
  19540. 1
  19541. 1
  19542. 1
  19543. 1
  19544. This was a really sharp, incisive, precise and well explained analysis. It feels rare these days to see a, “close reading,” of this sort, with such a depth and breadth of understanding, being explained and, (if you like?) “reverse engineered,” so as to explain all of the moving parts in such a concise manner, making it easy for the layperson to follow. I really enjoyed that, thank you. And I actually learned a few things, which is invaluable to me. I particularly admire your ability to stay outside of the fray, so to speak, as the outsider looking in, delving into specifics, explaining them and then moving onto the next part, until the whole thing is put back together and we are left with a comprehensive understanding of how the whole thing works. You (and, presumably, your team?) are very clever and superb communicators. And that sets you apart from many other channels attempting to do what you do, but whom all too often digress from the topic in hand, hone in on the wrong aspects, express too much of their own personal thoughts and experiences, or otherwise frustrate their audience by losing the thread of the topic altogether. I have watched otherwise well meaning channels spend entire 20 minute videos expressing one, single fact, or breaking one single piece of news and surrounding the whole thing with opinion, digression, discussion, sponsorships and other meaningless twaddle, that leaves me with my finger hovering over the skip button, just so I can get to their POINT, and it leaves me wondering how much harm they do to their own cause by frustrating audiences like that? This was the diametric opposite of that: Concise, filled with information, thoughtful in analysis, grounded and realistic, whilst managing to be entertaining on the basis of an eloquent script and a sense of momentum. The BBC in my country, has this expression written over the entrance to their building; sort of cardinal rules that they seek for all their programming. They say that all their broadcasts must contain one of, if not all three of these specific elements: To Educate, Inform and Entertain. You tick all three boxes there, my friend. It has been a while since I last watched this channel, and paid proper attention to it. I am very glad I did today. Consider me a subscriber. And, thank you. We need more like you, if we want to save democracy, keeping the shrill, panicky voices at bay and just analysing what is. Yes, thank you, really.
    1
  19545. 1
  19546. 1
  19547. 1
  19548. 1
  19549. 1
  19550. 1
  19551. 1
  19552. 1
  19553. 1
  19554. 1
  19555. 1
  19556. 1
  19557. 1
  19558. 1
  19559. 1
  19560. 1
  19561. 1
  19562. 1
  19563. 1
  19564. 1
  19565. 1
  19566. 1
  19567. 1
  19568. 1
  19569. 1
  19570. 1
  19571. 1
  19572. 1
  19573. 1
  19574. 1
  19575. 1
  19576. 1
  19577. 1
  19578. 1
  19579. 1
  19580. 1
  19581. 1
  19582. 1
  19583. 1
  19584. 1
  19585. 1
  19586. 1
  19587. 1
  19588. 1
  19589. 1
  19590. 1
  19591. 1
  19592. 1
  19593. 1
  19594. 1
  19595. 1
  19596. 1
  19597. 1
  19598. 1
  19599. 1
  19600. 1
  19601. 1
  19602. 1
  19603. 1
  19604. 1
  19605. 1
  19606. 1
  19607. 1
  19608. 1
  19609. 1
  19610. 1
  19611. 1
  19612. 1
  19613. 1
  19614. 1
  19615. 1
  19616. 1
  19617. 1
  19618. 1
  19619. 1
  19620. 1
  19621. 1
  19622. 1
  19623. 1
  19624. 1
  19625. 1
  19626. 1
  19627. 1
  19628. 1
  19629. 1
  19630. 1
  19631. 1
  19632. 1
  19633. 1
  19634. 1
  19635. 1
  19636. 1
  19637. 1
  19638. 1
  19639. 1
  19640. 1
  19641. 1
  19642. 1
  19643. 1
  19644. 1
  19645. 1
  19646. 1
  19647. 1
  19648. 1
  19649. 1
  19650. 1
  19651. 1
  19652. 1
  19653. 1
  19654. 1
  19655. 1
  19656. 1
  19657. 1
  19658. 1
  19659. 1
  19660. 1
  19661. 1
  19662. 1
  19663. 1
  19664. 1
  19665. 1
  19666. 1
  19667. 1
  19668. 1
  19669. 1
  19670. 1
  19671. 1
  19672. 1
  19673. 1
  19674. 1
  19675. 1
  19676. 1
  19677. 1
  19678. 1
  19679. 1
  19680. 1
  19681. 1
  19682. 1
  19683. 1
  19684. 1
  19685. 1
  19686. 1
  19687. 1
  19688. 1
  19689. 1
  19690. 1
  19691. 1
  19692. 1
  19693. 1
  19694. 1
  19695. 1
  19696. 1
  19697. 1
  19698. 1
  19699. 1
  19700. 1
  19701. 1
  19702. 1
  19703. 1
  19704. 1
  19705. 1
  19706. 1
  19707. 1
  19708. 1
  19709. 1
  19710. 1
  19711. 1
  19712. 1
  19713. 1
  19714. 1
  19715. 1
  19716. 1
  19717. 1
  19718. 1
  19719. 1
  19720. 1
  19721. 1
  19722. 1
  19723. 1
  19724. I admire all (sincere) medical professionals, especially those like you, who so often find themselves on the front lines of crises, without any warning, yet keep it together under such stress. And I had a similar experience from one of my former lives as a social worker, and then as a, “crisis family therapist,” (I know . . . I know . . .) implementing what we called, “Break Away Techniques,” when dealing with aggressive or potentially dangerous clients: keeping desks or chairs between you and the angry person, checking whom else is vulnerable, checking for exits, managing tone of voice, etc. But, you know what struck me as fundamentally flawed in this presentation? The language. Within the first couple of sentences this guy is telling us, “you can always create more energy,” and talking about a, “sense of failed success.” So, while I (also dealing with ADHD and Autism) am pondering this oxymoron and the previous statement which defies physics, I found myself thinking, “Well, I’d bet real money that this guy is excellent at his job and has probably saved lives by imparting his knowledge and experience to trainees. But, where in the heck did he learn to talk like that?!” Something else we learned in Break Away (and I’ll bet you were taught this too?) was the genuine, incontrovertible value of PLAIN SPEAKING! I get that he comes from a professional culture that fosters, “professionalised discourse,” or whatever they call it at Langley (and I don’t doubt they’ll have a term for it) but I was a professional trainer in yet another life, and I learned very early on that teaching necessarily requires the plainest possible language. Otherwise you wind up like this fella’ who is so over-pathologising his statements that he is occasionally talking plain gibberish! And it’s such a shame, since, as I said, he probably has so much to offer and is obviously well enough respected within his profession to be chosen for a presentation on a prestigious channel. But, at best, that kind of, “professional-speak,” distances, alienates or even just confuses people, because it gives away that the speaker is failing to articulate a simple idea, twisting it into knots. At worst, it can escalate an impatient person into a hostile act. I always taught professionals; Do you talk that way to your wives, husbands, friends, and so on? No? Then don’t speak like that to your patients, pupils, officers, etc. Be clear and simple, ESPECIALLY in a crisis! I don’t doubt you had more than enough Latin, Greek and technical terminology to deal with without being, “requested to convey a libational stimulant from the mechanism of the lacunae which may require financial remuneration in order to conduct the transaction,” or something, when you could have been simply asked to, “get a coffee from the machine in the hall. Do you need some cash?” Am I being too hard on the guy?
    1
  19725. 1
  19726. 1
  19727. 1
  19728. 1
  19729. 1
  19730. 1
  19731. 1
  19732. 1
  19733. 1
  19734. 1
  19735. 1
  19736. 1
  19737. 1
  19738. 1
  19739. 1
  19740. 1
  19741. 1
  19742. 1
  19743. 1
  19744. 1
  19745. 1
  19746. 1
  19747. 1
  19748. 1
  19749. 1
  19750. 1
  19751. 1
  19752. 1
  19753. 1
  19754. 1
  19755. 1
  19756. 1
  19757. 1
  19758. 1
  19759. 1
  19760. 1
  19761. 1
  19762. 1
  19763. 1
  19764. 1
  19765. 1
  19766. 1
  19767. 1
  19768. 1
  19769. 1
  19770. 1
  19771. 1
  19772. 1
  19773. 1
  19774. 1
  19775. 1
  19776. 1
  19777. 1
  19778. 1
  19779. 1
  19780. 1
  19781. 1
  19782. 1
  19783. 1
  19784. 1
  19785. 1
  19786. 1
  19787. 1
  19788. 1
  19789. 1
  19790. 1
  19791. 1
  19792. 1
  19793. 1
  19794. 1
  19795. 1
  19796. 1
  19797. 1
  19798. 1
  19799. 1
  19800. 1
  19801. 1
  19802. 1
  19803. 1
  19804. 1
  19805. 1
  19806. 1
  19807. 1
  19808. 1
  19809. 1
  19810. 1
  19811. 1
  19812. 1
  19813. 1
  19814. 1
  19815. 1
  19816. 1
  19817. 1
  19818. 1
  19819. 1
  19820. 1
  19821. 1
  19822. 1
  19823. 1
  19824. 1
  19825. 1
  19826. 1
  19827. 1
  19828. 1
  19829. 1
  19830. 1
  19831. 1
  19832. 1
  19833. 1
  19834. 1
  19835. 1
  19836. 1
  19837. 1
  19838. 1
  19839. 1
  19840. 1
  19841. 1
  19842. 1
  19843. 1
  19844. 1
  19845. 1
  19846. 1
  19847. 1
  19848. 1
  19849. 1
  19850. 1
  19851. 1
  19852. 1
  19853. 1
  19854. 1
  19855. 1
  19856. 1
  19857. 1
  19858. 1
  19859. 1
  19860. 1
  19861. 1
  19862. 1
  19863. 1
  19864. 1
  19865. 1
  19866. 1
  19867. 1
  19868. 1
  19869. 1
  19870. 1
  19871. 1
  19872. 1
  19873. 1
  19874. 1
  19875. 1
  19876. 1
  19877. 1
  19878. 1
  19879. 1
  19880. 1
  19881. 1
  19882. 1
  19883. 1
  19884. 1
  19885. 1
  19886. 1
  19887. 1
  19888. 1
  19889. 1
  19890. 1
  19891. 1
  19892. 1
  19893. 1
  19894. 1
  19895. 1
  19896. 1
  19897. 1
  19898. 1
  19899. 1
  19900. 1
  19901. 1
  19902. 1
  19903. 1
  19904. 1
  19905. 1
  19906. 1
  19907. 1
  19908. 1
  19909. 1
  19910. 1
  19911. 1
  19912. 1
  19913. 1
  19914. 1
  19915. 1
  19916. 1
  19917. 1
  19918. 1
  19919. 1
  19920. 1
  19921. 1
  19922. 1
  19923. 1
  19924. 1
  19925. 1
  19926. 1
  19927. 1
  19928. 1
  19929. 1
  19930. 1
  19931. 1
  19932. 1
  19933. 1
  19934. 1
  19935. 1
  19936. 1
  19937. 1
  19938. 1
  19939. 1
  19940. 1
  19941. 1
  19942. 1
  19943. 1
  19944. 1
  19945. 1
  19946. 1
  19947. 1
  19948. 1
  19949. 1
  19950. 1
  19951. 1
  19952. 1
  19953. 1
  19954. 1
  19955. 1
  19956. 1
  19957. 1
  19958. 1
  19959. 1
  19960. 1
  19961. 1
  19962. 1
  19963. 1
  19964. 1
  19965. 1
  19966. 1
  19967. 1
  19968. 1
  19969. 1
  19970. 1
  19971. 1
  19972. 1
  19973. 1
  19974. 1
  19975. 1
  19976. 1
  19977. 1
  19978. 1
  19979. 1
  19980. 1
  19981. 1
  19982. 1
  19983. 1
  19984. 1
  19985. 1
  19986. 1
  19987. 1
  19988. 1
  19989. 1
  19990. 1
  19991. 1
  19992. 1
  19993. 1
  19994. When the last boot is ejected from the last inch of Crimea, Ukraine will need some kind of assurance (more concrete than a worthless piece of paper signed by a known habitual liar) that they will not see their civilian men, women and CHILDREN continually showered with cowardly bombs from miles away. Therefore they will need long range missiles systems like the ones the British have just donated, to remove any threats inside Russian territory before they can be used. The more sabotage and fear that can be spread from within Russia, therefore, the fewer missiles will be needed to launch from Ukraine into Russia. Winston Churchill told his special forces, working behind enemy lines, to, “Set Europe alight!” And they did exactly that. It is believed that the contribution of the resistance forces of various nations, working alongside the special divisions dropped into Europe, shortened the war by at least a year. Some military historians will point to particular operations, siting examples of how they turned the tide completely, such as the destruction of the Telemark Heavy Water plant, preventing the Germans from building first nuclear bombs, etc. Ukraine has been riddled with Putin Puppets since the fall of his puppet regime in 2014, and leaders have struggled against their corruption and collaboration ever since, rooting them out, one at a time. But the type of sabotage and bombing campaigns that we see occurring inside Russia, derailing trains, blowing up oil refineries, etc, are far more traditional, along the World War Two lines. And that’s a good thing. Ukraine must always reserve the right to take out legitimate targets inside Russia. And anyone who dares to call that an, “escalation,” has not been paying attention. Thank you for your rich insights and thoughts, Anna. Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦🇬🇧✌️
    1
  19995. 1
  19996. 1
  19997. 1
  19998. 1
  19999. 1
  20000. 1
  20001. 1
  20002. 1
  20003. 1
  20004. 1
  20005. 1
  20006. 1
  20007. 1
  20008. 1
  20009. 1
  20010. 1
  20011. 1
  20012. 1
  20013. 1
  20014. 1
  20015. 1
  20016. 1
  20017. 1
  20018. 1
  20019. 1
  20020. 1
  20021. 1
  20022. 1
  20023. 1
  20024. 1
  20025. 1
  20026. 1
  20027. 1
  20028. 1
  20029. 1
  20030. 1
  20031. 1
  20032. 1
  20033. 1
  20034. 1
  20035. 1
  20036. 1
  20037. 1
  20038. 1
  20039. 1
  20040. 1
  20041. 1
  20042. 1
  20043. 1
  20044. 1
  20045. 1
  20046. 1
  20047. 1
  20048. 1
  20049. 1
  20050. 1
  20051. 1
  20052. 1
  20053. 1
  20054. 1
  20055. 1
  20056. 1
  20057. 1
  20058. 1
  20059. 1
  20060. 1
  20061. 1
  20062. 1
  20063. 1
  20064. 1
  20065. 1
  20066. 1
  20067. 1
  20068. 1
  20069. 1
  20070. 1
  20071. 1
  20072. 1
  20073. 1
  20074. 1
  20075. 1
  20076. 1
  20077. 1
  20078. 1
  20079. 1
  20080. 1
  20081. 1
  20082. 1
  20083. 1
  20084. 1
  20085. 1
  20086. 1
  20087. 1
  20088. 1
  20089. 1
  20090. 1
  20091. 1
  20092. 1
  20093. 1
  20094. 1
  20095. 1
  20096. 1
  20097. 1
  20098. 1
  20099. 1
  20100. 1
  20101. 1
  20102. 1
  20103. 1
  20104. 1
  20105. 1
  20106. 1
  20107. 1
  20108. 1
  20109. 1
  20110. 1
  20111. 1
  20112. 1
  20113. 1
  20114. 1
  20115. 1
  20116. 1
  20117. 1
  20118. 1
  20119. 1
  20120. 1
  20121. 1
  20122. 1
  20123. 1
  20124. 1
  20125. 1
  20126. 1
  20127. 1
  20128. 1
  20129. 1
  20130.  @fauxque5057  : I’m sorry but you’re very wrong. Only one so called, “government,” caused this war. Not the, “two,” that you claim. The fact that you feel able to slide that exceptional deception under the rhetorical table is disingenuous at best; downright suspicious if you ask me. I too would evacuate my family. But I would not desert my friends, neighbours and other extended family; the old and infirm who cannot or will not leave, those remaining in hospitals, pensioner homes and other places that have not yet been evacuated; even the very stubborn who simply refuse to leave their own homes just because some dick in a foreign land decided he wants it. Some of those people have families who have no choice but to remain at their parents’ or grandparents’ side. And that’s without going into the myriad complex reasons for why people do not or cannot leave their homes, invasion or not! I would NOT desert those people, leaving them to be robbed, tied, beaten, tortured, raped, murdered and then bulldozed into a grave that is as indiscriminate as the medieval mentality that lead to them being dumped there in a giant Z for Zombie hoard! But that’s just me. You have the right to flee, and all the reward that goes with that. I have the right to stay and defend my homeland, having lived long and fully enough to know by now, there are things in life that are far worse than dying. And having a mind so warped that you could entertain the notion that there is ANY, “comparison,” between what Ukraine is fighting for and what Putin is attempting to steal, is definitely one of them.
    1
  20131. 1
  20132. 1
  20133. 1
  20134. 1
  20135. 1
  20136. 1
  20137. 1
  20138. 1
  20139. 1
  20140. 1
  20141. 1
  20142. 1
  20143. 1
  20144. 1
  20145. 1
  20146. 1
  20147. My beef with Nvidia, and all video card manufacturers generally, is the conspiracy they’re running that has held back the quality of video games, DELIBERATELY! They make it so you get all these extra details in your image rendering that console manufacturers HAVE TO be able to run in their games, or they just won’t work. But, by giving us lighting effects, dust particles in the air, DLSS, ray tracing, and so on, they deliberately prevent games from developing better architecture, bigger adventures, faster running games, so there can be NO COMPETITION from new developers! . . . We have to stick to playing games that are artificially arrested; that have never truly progressed, which could have been SO MUCH BETTER. Instead, we get lighting and detail effects, which is nice, but it’s all INSTEAD of the REAL developments that would give us groundbreaking games, like we used to get in the 1990’s and 2000’s. Remember the big jumps in graphics and what games were capable of offering back then? Remember the big jumps between consoles? The last change we had, from Xbox One and PS4 to Xbox X and PS5 has been a giant nothing burger and console sales reflect that. Only 50% of Sony’s market have transitioned from PS4 to PS5 world wide, because, “Why bother?” These consoles are expensive and there’s no great leap between generations anyway! They still make all of their newest games playable on the old systems anyway! Sooner or later. It’s strange to me that no one seems to be making videos on YouTube about THIS! Actually there are a few, but VERY few. But Nvidia can afford to spread cash around and, “lobby,” the leading gamer writers and video creators, right? YOUR GAMES are TRAPPED in this artificial bubble, where they’re preventing you from getting truly great games! And it’s all because Nvidia and their nearest competitors are all happy to hold back development to corner and monopolise the market. Yet, I think it’s only a question of time before a company that has the reach of a strong enough publisher and the ability to develop their own game engine will declare war on the monopoly and break the rules by releasing a super-great game with all the whistles and bells that this generation of consoles told us we’d be getting from the outset. And then there will be blood on the carpet of the Wall Street board rooms, as that game sweeps all the awards and sells by the millions world wide. And once someone proves it can be done, without relying on Nvidia tech, all bets are off.
    1
  20148. 1
  20149. 1
  20150. 1
  20151. 1
  20152. 1
  20153. 1
  20154. 1
  20155. 1
  20156. 1
  20157. 1
  20158. 1
  20159. Well put. Totally agree. Please write to your representatives and demand that NATO gives the formal invitation to join NATO today! Keep in mind that the process can still take as long as NATO wants after the invitation is proffered, but it gives the unequivocal and unambiguous signal that NATO is committed to Ukraine WINNING this war! That’s the one message that the west has stopped short of, “because escalation,” blah, friggin’ blah. Putin has ALWAYS backed off when faced with a GENUINE red line. Every single time! Just look at the Wagner Mutiny? Putin fled Moscow for St Petersburg! Even though the Wagnazis didn’t even reach the outskirts of the city! Prigozhin is ignoring his exile, swanning about Russia, free as a bird, while Wagner STILL refuses to carry out Putin’s direct orders and join the regular armed forces! He’s not even IN, “control,” of Russia! We should NOT fear a deliberate nuclear attack, but we SHOULD fear the possibility of nuclear ACCIDENTS, which Russia has a legendary record for! As the chaos continues, the chances of that go up. Western intervention is necessary for peace, yet NATO has just told Putin that he might still find a way to get a, “draw,” out of this. NATO has just prolonged the war! Please? If you care about world peace, the future of Europe, or the plight of Ukraine, just drop a line to your representative and DEMAND action! Let them know it is an election issue. Save Ukraine and we save the world . . . at least, we save it from one of the three biggest threats, (China and the Middle East remaining as troubling as ever, but not actively making war on Europeans!) and saving Ukraine could potentially neutralise Russia as a threat to the world, possibly forever?
    1
  20160. 1
  20161. 1
  20162. 1
  20163. 1
  20164. 1
  20165. 1
  20166. 1
  20167. 1
  20168. 1
  20169. 1
  20170. 1
  20171. The Prime Minister needs to remove the current Chair of the BBC and appoint a new, unbiased one, with actual journalistic or editorial experience and NO history of being a major donor to any party. I have no problem with the BBC honouring their contract with Edwards up to the point where he was proved to be guilty of a crime. And, assuming that he gave assurances that he intended to prove his innocence. I don’t know if that was the case, but I would hope it was. The nature of the contract itself, whether they were paying him too much, is another issue. But, if they had been assured of his innocence, they should sue for those wages paid from the point of the arrest, on the basis that he lied to them. That should be cut and dried . . . ? I stand with you on the notion of censorship. Rolf Harris, much like Jimmy Saville, did public information films about being safe in the water (chillingly, surrounded by children in swimwear) but I don’t intend to drown myself or my offspring due to the revelations about the man. The current state of the BBC reflects the broader problem of OFCOM being a bunch of Tory pals in an organisation with no teeth even if they did decide to do their jobs. We should be hearing from them on EVERY SINGLE issue that involves moral dilemmas and where thoughtful guidance is needed. That organisation is completely meaningless as it is and THAT is the problem. We NEED a centralised independent overseer of all media in this country, with subpoena powers and the powers to make firm recommendations that will be followed. AND they should have the power to make referrals to the Crown Prosecution Service! We need an organisation with teeth, staffed with believers who understand how important these issues are to democracy and the democratic process as a whole. As it is, the BBC does not represent the nation, or the nation’s interests. And, as you touch on, this act of censorship looks more like a personal act of censureship, in a lame attempt to, “punish,” a man who hurt their feelings. And what of all the other artists, writers, technicians and producers who made that episode of Dr Who, who are now to be punished along with Huw Edwards? Why should they be flogged along with the guilty and innocent alike? It makes no sense. Especially since people will already have their box sets, which will now have a, “special,” collector’s value. You can’t block ANYTHING in the internet age. But you can act out of hubris and make more money for those willing to exploit your hubristic foolishness.
    1
  20172. 1
  20173. 1
  20174. 1
  20175. 1
  20176. 1
  20177. 1
  20178. 1
  20179. 1
  20180. 1
  20181. 1
  20182. 1
  20183. 1
  20184. 1
  20185. 1
  20186. 1
  20187. 1
  20188. 1
  20189. 1
  20190. 1
  20191. 1
  20192. 1
  20193. 1
  20194. 1
  20195. 1
  20196. 1
  20197. 1
  20198. 1
  20199. 1
  20200. 1
  20201. 1
  20202. 1
  20203. 1
  20204. 1
  20205. 1
  20206. 1
  20207. 1
  20208. 1
  20209. 1
  20210. 1
  20211. 1
  20212. 1
  20213. 1
  20214. 1
  20215. 1
  20216. 1
  20217. 1
  20218. 1
  20219. 1
  20220. 1
  20221. 1
  20222. 1
  20223. 1
  20224. 1
  20225. 1
  20226. 1
  20227. 1
  20228. 1
  20229. 1
  20230. 1
  20231. 1
  20232. 1
  20233. 1
  20234. 1
  20235. 1
  20236. 1
  20237. 1
  20238. 1
  20239. 1
  20240. 1
  20241. 1
  20242. 1
  20243. 1
  20244. 1
  20245. 1
  20246. 1
  20247. 1
  20248. 1
  20249. 1
  20250. 1
  20251. 1
  20252. 1
  20253. 1
  20254. 1
  20255. 1
  20256. 1
  20257. 1
  20258. 1
  20259. 1
  20260. 1
  20261. 1
  20262. 1
  20263. 1
  20264. 1
  20265. 1
  20266. 1
  20267. 1
  20268. 1
  20269. 1
  20270. 1
  20271. 1
  20272. 1
  20273. 1
  20274. I read some excerpts from this, (soon to be pulped, or bought up in bulk by her mates) “memoir.” These are NOT the Alan Clarke or Tony Ben diaries, are they? Not actually interesting, insightful, funny, witty, or revealing anything about the machinations of Westminster that we didn’t already know, or hadn’t guessed at. Let’s face it? You KNOW as soon as any scene is set up, exactly how it’s going to play out, in the same way that you know how an adolescent’s self justifications are going to play out, when they air their unedifying grievances on Twitter about some group of, “Mean Girls,” they recently fell out with over a boyfriend! In terms of fabulation, she has more in common with Geoffrey Archer. And that utterly disingenuous pretence that she’s quoting from her diaries, as written at the time, when everyone and their pet knows that she’s making it all up after the fact, to fit a 20/20 hindsight, that somehow still manages to be factually skewed, simply because her book is NOT a great, “revelation,” at all. It is the squalling of an angry toddler, who, “took her bat and ball home,” when she was refused her gong (the one decision of Sunak’s that I can get behind) and who will do anything to stay in the limelight to which she has become so addicted. Just one more shrill screech of attention seeking and sour grapes from an intellectual midget who has had far too much attention already. It’s way past her bedtime and I dearly wish someone would just put her out of our misery.
    1
  20275. 1
  20276. 1
  20277. 1
  20278. 1
  20279. 1
  20280. 1
  20281. 1
  20282. 1
  20283. 1
  20284. 1
  20285. 1
  20286. 1
  20287. 1
  20288. 1
  20289. 1
  20290. 1
  20291. 1
  20292. 1
  20293. 1
  20294. 1
  20295. 1
  20296. 1
  20297. 1
  20298. 1
  20299. 1
  20300. 1
  20301. 1
  20302. 1
  20303. 1
  20304. 1
  20305. 1
  20306. 1
  20307. 1
  20308. 1
  20309. 1
  20310. 1
  20311. 1
  20312. 1
  20313. 1
  20314. 1
  20315. 1
  20316. 1
  20317. 1
  20318. 1
  20319. 1
  20320. 1
  20321. 1
  20322. 1
  20323. 1
  20324. 1
  20325. 1
  20326. 1
  20327. 1
  20328. 1
  20329. 1
  20330. 1
  20331. 1
  20332. 1
  20333. 1
  20334. 1
  20335. 1
  20336. 1
  20337. 1
  20338. 1
  20339. 1
  20340. 1
  20341. 1
  20342. 1
  20343. 1
  20344. 1
  20345. 1
  20346. 1
  20347. 1
  20348. Have you read Steven King’s literacy experiment, turned best selling series of novels, The Dark Tower series? (Spoiler warning) It would have been worth raising, because of the supremely clever way in which the final book literally addresses this problem in a genius finale. It literally gives you an analysis of how series story telling works, and why the ending we’re about to witness is less important than the journey we’ve shared with the characters, to the point that it teases the reader, taking on a, “You don’t really need to know what happened, do you?” coquettish quality, making you wonder if he’s just going to leave it all unresolved, before . . . well . . . resolving the story with the most unexpected and clever narrative twist. Genuinely genius in the way it’s hinted at from book II throughout the rest of the multiple novels, we find our hero entering one of the portals which the story has built its narrative around throughout the series, yet which we’ve almost forgotten about by the final novel. And this time, the hero’s free will is taken from him, and he’s thrust, pleading and begging, back to the very start of the adventure, in an, “eternal loop,” of which the universe itself may well be made. And the last line of the last book is the same as the first line of the first book. For many, like me, who’d had such joy with the novels, it was the perfect excuse to simply reread them, only this time with that, “knowing what we know now,” understanding, which makes twisty stories so enjoyable a second time around, like with The Sixth Sense. It’s arguably King’s finest work; certainly his smartest. And he was only experimenting with forms, as a kind of side project, apparently. But, it literally obviates the problem with ending a series, without copping out of giving satisfying conclusions for characters that the reader gets attached to. Would have made a great example, because it’s an exception to the rule, and quite a unique achievement in literature. Not in what it does, but in the fact that King pulls it off, through sheer poetic, literate, genius and skill.
    1
  20349. 1
  20350. 1
  20351. 1
  20352. 1
  20353. 1
  20354. 1
  20355. 1
  20356. 1
  20357. 1
  20358. 1
  20359. 1
  20360. 1
  20361. 1
  20362. 1
  20363. 1
  20364. 1
  20365. 1
  20366.  @MultiBikerboy1  : I think it’s most unwise to politicise this issue, given that both Trump and Biden are only responding to what their advisers are telling them. They’re not just going over to Area 51 and pronouncing declassifications left, right and centre, like in some Roland Emeric block buster. They’re following the concerns of their security and military personnel. If I had to guess, I would suggest the thinking behind declassification has something to do with an increasingly camera-literate population, and the success of other projects, like those of NASA, when they’ve used the public’s resources to help carry the load? Sometimes, just borrowing a bit of computing time and space, on your device while you sleep; sometimes, active involvement, sharing world wide results. That’s just speculation, however, and we’ll know soon enough if there’s anything to that. But, whatever that thinking is, it never came out of Donny’s or Joe’s heads. But, from experts who got together over many meetings, to discuss possible outcomes and America’s best interests. And, not telling you something, is not, “lying.” It’s omitting. You could tell me your mother’s maiden name (DON’T!) but, you’re unlikely to, because that information belongs to her, and it’s not your place to divulge it. In the same way, most of the people who know what’s going on, don’t have the permission or the right to just tell you everything, just because you’re curious. They need permission from the top. And the person at the top, won’t just give that away, without speaking to the experts in charge, and finding out whether that’s a smart or stupid thing to do. See my point?
    1
  20367. 1
  20368. 1
  20369. 1
  20370. 1
  20371. 1
  20372. 1
  20373. 1
  20374. 1
  20375. 1
  20376. 1
  20377. 1
  20378. 1
  20379. 1
  20380. 1
  20381. 1
  20382. 1
  20383. 1
  20384. 1
  20385. 1
  20386. 1
  20387. 1
  20388. 1
  20389. 1
  20390. 1
  20391. 1
  20392. 1
  20393. 1
  20394. 1
  20395. 1
  20396. 1
  20397. 1
  20398. 1
  20399. 1
  20400. 1
  20401. 1
  20402. 1
  20403. 1
  20404. 1
  20405. 1
  20406. 1
  20407. 1
  20408. 1
  20409. 1
  20410. 1
  20411. 1
  20412. 1
  20413. 1
  20414. 1
  20415. 1
  20416. 1
  20417. 1
  20418. 1
  20419. 1
  20420. 1
  20421. 1
  20422. 1
  20423. 1
  20424. 1
  20425. 1
  20426. 1
  20427. 1
  20428. 1
  20429. 1
  20430. 1
  20431. 1
  20432. 1
  20433. 1
  20434. 1
  20435. 1
  20436. 1
  20437. 1
  20438. 1
  20439. 1
  20440. 1
  20441. 1
  20442. 1
  20443. 1
  20444. 1
  20445. 1
  20446. 1
  20447. 1
  20448. 1
  20449. 1
  20450. 1
  20451. 1
  20452. 1
  20453. 1
  20454. 1
  20455. 1
  20456. 1
  20457. 1
  20458. 1
  20459. 1
  20460. 1
  20461. 1
  20462. 1
  20463. 1
  20464. 1
  20465. 1
  20466. 1
  20467. 1
  20468. 1
  20469. 1
  20470. 1
  20471. 1
  20472. 1
  20473. 1
  20474. 1
  20475. 1
  20476. 1
  20477. 1
  20478. 1
  20479. 1
  20480. 1
  20481. 1
  20482. 1
  20483. 1
  20484. 1
  20485. 1
  20486. 1
  20487. 1
  20488. 1
  20489. 1
  20490. 1
  20491. 1
  20492. 1
  20493. 1
  20494. 1
  20495. 1
  20496. 1
  20497. 1
  20498. 1
  20499. 1
  20500. 1
  20501. 1
  20502. 1
  20503. 1
  20504. 1
  20505. 1
  20506. 1
  20507. 1
  20508. 1
  20509. 1
  20510. 1
  20511. 1
  20512. 1
  20513. 1
  20514. 1
  20515. 1
  20516. 1
  20517. 1
  20518. 1
  20519. 1
  20520. 1
  20521. 1
  20522. 1
  20523. 1
  20524. 1
  20525. 1
  20526. 1
  20527. 1
  20528. 1
  20529. 1
  20530. 1
  20531. 1
  20532. 1
  20533. 1
  20534. 1
  20535. 1
  20536. 1
  20537. 1
  20538. 1
  20539. 1
  20540. 1
  20541. 1
  20542. 1
  20543. 1
  20544. 1
  20545. 1
  20546. 1
  20547. 1
  20548. 1
  20549. 1
  20550. 1
  20551. 1
  20552. 1
  20553. 1
  20554. 1
  20555.  @superbmediacontentcreator  : True enough. They will find not one single error, but a chain of them in this case. And it won’t all be buck passing, but will likely come down to two factors. Cutting corners to save costs, about which there were already safety concerns raised and conflicts among the professionals and the producers; and failure of supervision, allowing people to use live ammo at all (probably as hobbyists?) when the guns were not being used on set. When I hear people saying it was the actor’s responsibility to check his own gun I just want to laugh. Why hire an, “expert,” at all, if the actor can decide at the last second and we’re all going to trust his or her word over that of the professional we hired? The insurance company would ask the same question in court. But a lot of, “gun experts,” don’t seem to be able to make the distinction between knowing about their firearms (and what is good practice with guns generally) and knowing about firearms on the set of a movie. Nor have they thought it through? So what if the actor says, “But there’s a bullet in the chamber,” and has misgivings? The armorer says, “Yes, we know. It’s a blank.” Or, “It’s a dummy.” We don’t expect actors to know the difference. Even if they’re experts in firearms themselves, that doesn’t make them experts in fake bullets, blanks or dummies. That’s WHY you have an, “expert,” who takes soul responsibility in the first place. To those saying, “Baldwin should have checked the weapon himself,” I say, “And then what?” He would have found something in the chamber, as expected. Was he meant to remove each bullet and check them? Would we be expected to take his word over the armorers? Why did we hire the armorer then? He most likely would have said, “I have no clue what the difference between a live bullet and a Hollywood fake looks like. But that’s why we hired an armorer.” The Dunning Kruger Effect is running rampant in this story. A lot of self professed gun experts (some of whom may well be, but are more likely to be childish people who think they sound macho by professing to know all about gun safety) seem to think that knowing about weapon safety is the same thing as knowing about Hollywood movie magic, special effects and the art of film making. To those who say, “I would have checked the gun myself,” I say, “NO YOU WOULDN’T!” That’s what the armorer does. And no one would listen to the actor, regardless of what he thought he found in his gun. You trust the, “expert,” which is why you pay them! 🤷‍♂️
    1
  20556.  @superbmediacontentcreator  : That’s a very weird thing for your doctor to have done? Presumably it was to do with your insurance? But it does raise the issue of what’s in the fine print when we trust experts and what s/he was permitted to do? On the Rust set, the bottom line will be what it says in the armorer’s contract, which will be that she had soul responsibility for what was in that gun. She was literally there to ensure the safety of everyone using those props on set, so I can’t see how she can be cleared of that? The secondary, but equally important issue, will be to understand that, “sequence of unfortunate events,” that lead to this disaster, so as to allocate liability and (we can only hope?) learn from the experience for the sake of future movie makers and artists. But even when the whole thing is understood, I still can’t see any link in that chain that absolves the armorer herself? At some point, she failed in her responsibility. But, unless this is some episode of Columbo, and we’re looking for a murderer who pulled a bullet switch with some sort of deliberate, “intent,” what we will find is that it was a sequence of events that lead to a tragedy which has altered the lives of all concerned. I certainly hope nobody needs to be jailed for this? It seems to me quite tragic enough without darkening matters over issues of, “punishment?” I get the impression that there are a lot of trump fans in the comment section, who dislike Baldwin for his famous impressions of trump on SNL, and they’re expressing their hopes over their judgement? I think they like the idea of Baldwin being held responsible personally, but that’s just their emotions talking. If an actor meddles with the weapon s/he’s using on a set, A) Everyone will take the armorer’s word over that of the actor, because that’s WHY they hired her. And, B) The armorer would then have to take the weapon back and reset it, ready for use in the scene. It is necessarily the armorer’s job to have the last word on the weapon, meaning the actor does NOTHING other than follow his or her directions, in order to keep everybody safe on the set. They’re NOT at a gun club and the paperwork makes it abundantly clear that it’s the armorer’s job to decide whether the gun is, “hot,” or, “cold,” as they say it on the set apparently. So all that, “I would have checked myself,” poppycock is pure Dunning Kruger stuff. Nice to speak to someone sensible about it though. Sorry for waffling. I do that sometimes. Especially when I see the image of one of my favourite actresses in the thumbnail. That is Kate Blanchett, isn’t it?
    1
  20557. 1
  20558. 1
  20559. 1
  20560. 1
  20561. 1
  20562. 1
  20563. 1
  20564. 1
  20565. 1
  20566. 1
  20567. 1
  20568. 1
  20569. 1
  20570. 1
  20571. 1
  20572. 1
  20573. 1
  20574. 1
  20575. 1
  20576. 1
  20577. 1
  20578. 1
  20579. 1
  20580. 1
  20581. 1
  20582. 1
  20583. 1
  20584. 1
  20585. 1
  20586. 1
  20587. 1
  20588. 1
  20589. 1
  20590. 1
  20591. 1
  20592. 1
  20593. 1
  20594. 1
  20595. 1
  20596. 1
  20597. 1
  20598. 1
  20599. 1
  20600. 1
  20601. 1
  20602. 1
  20603. 1
  20604. 1
  20605. 1
  20606. 1
  20607. 1
  20608. 1
  20609. 1
  20610. 1
  20611. 1
  20612. 1
  20613. 1
  20614. 1
  20615. 1
  20616. 1
  20617. 1
  20618. 1
  20619. 1
  20620. 1
  20621. 1
  20622. 1
  20623. 1
  20624. 1
  20625. 1
  20626. 1
  20627. We may see the impossible happen yet? If America doesn’t ruin everything by easing the sanctions on Russia, this is the year in which Putin will simply fail to make ends meet. Russia’s economy is burning out like the layers of a giant star, getting bigger, bolder and hotter on the outside, while is rapidly burns through layer after layer of its most precious elements until it all, inevitably, collapses suddenly back onto the core. We may yet live to see Putin’s regime go supernova. They have been dumping a billion Chinese Yuan every two days to prop up the Ruble since December and they’re running out of gold as fast. Unless Putin can produce some miracle from all those diamonds mines he’s stolen in African countries, I simply cannot see any other way for this to go. I don’t know if you were an adult in 1989, when the Berlin Wall came down and Soviet Communism collapsed, but I was. And my biggest take away from that was that anyone who tells you they saw it coming is either misremembering or just making things up. As far as the outside world saw things, the Soviet Empire looked as solid and immovable as ever, with Gorbachev offering small, incremental steps toward peace with the west. Then, boom! Out of a clear blue sky . . . So never say never, my friend. All the stars are aligning and, unless Putin really isn’t as dumb as his recent blunders have suggested over the past decade, and has some master plan that none of us see coming, this year is his final year presiding over his empire. He may hold on to power, who knows? But it won’t be over anything bigger than a medium sized European country called Russia, and no longer containing any of the, “federation,” states. Personally, I don’t think his oligarchs will let him off the hook for that. Have a good laugh at my expense, this time next year, if I’m wrong. But, just remember, this only works so long as America doesn’t help Putin out.
    1
  20628. 1
  20629. 1
  20630. 1
  20631. 1
  20632. 1
  20633. 1
  20634. 1
  20635. 1
  20636. 1
  20637. 1
  20638. 1
  20639. 1
  20640. 1
  20641. 1
  20642. 1
  20643. 1
  20644. 1
  20645. 1
  20646. 1
  20647. 1
  20648. 1
  20649. 1
  20650. 1
  20651. 1
  20652. 1
  20653. 1
  20654. 1
  20655. 1
  20656. 1
  20657. 1
  20658. 1
  20659. 1
  20660. 1
  20661. 1
  20662. 1
  20663. 1
  20664. 1
  20665. 1
  20666. 1
  20667. 1
  20668. 1
  20669. 1
  20670. 1
  20671. 1
  20672. 1
  20673. 1
  20674. 1
  20675. 1
  20676. 1
  20677. 1
  20678. 1
  20679. 1
  20680. 1
  20681. 1
  20682. 1
  20683. 1
  20684. 1
  20685. 1
  20686. 1
  20687. 1
  20688. 1
  20689. 1
  20690. 1
  20691. 1
  20692. 1
  20693. 1
  20694. 1
  20695. The more we learn, the more dismayed I feel. The duplicity, mismanagement and criminality seems all set to go unpunished. By mixing their responsibilities like this, they have managed to create such an unpickable legal knot that I am reminded of Charles Dickens’s, “Circumlocution Offices.” And I suspect it has all been deliberate. Another plan to promote the private interests of rival businesses, in a similar manner to the stealth privatisation of the Health Service? But now backfiring? The only hope for a remedy that I can see (and it’s one that this corrupt network of clowns will never go for) would be to replace the entire upper tier of management of both The Post Office and Royal Mail, forthwith. Set up a new, independent inquiry, but have it lead by the QC who is willing to take charge of the running of both organisations, with a view to replacing the upper management and harmonising their respective services. That way, the inquiry can be certain that no one can interfere with evidence, or have to battle to get access to evidence (as has been the case in the current inquiry) and that no one with a vested interest in protecting their own reputation has any further access to anything pertinent. They will only be appearing at the inquiry as ex-employees, to defend their records. Meantime, the job of rebuilding the new postal service can continue unhindered. And, while we’re at it, perhaps Kier Starmer can ask, will the tax payers be able to look forward to a reduction in taxes that reflects the reduction in public services? If we’re no longer getting weekend deliveries, we should not have to continue paying for them, surely?
    1
  20696. 1
  20697. 1
  20698. 1
  20699. 1
  20700. 1
  20701. 1
  20702. 1
  20703. 1
  20704. 1
  20705. 1
  20706. 1
  20707. 1
  20708. 1
  20709. 1
  20710. 1
  20711. 1
  20712. 1
  20713. 1
  20714. 1
  20715. 1
  20716. 1
  20717. 1
  20718. 1
  20719. 1
  20720. 1
  20721. 1
  20722. 1
  20723. 1
  20724. 1
  20725. 1
  20726. I love your videos, and your voice. Just one criticism for this one. I wonder if you’d agree? You overlooked the key element of the whole story, the very same thing that made The Dark Knight such a successful Joker too: He’s the quintessential, “Unreliable Narrator.” We cannot know by the end, how much of this story actually happened and, of the parts of it that did, whether they happened in the same way as he remembers them. Like his love interest being a pure fabrication of his desperate loneliness, his unlikely meeting with Bruce Wayne and later his father, his murders, all of it could be all in his mind or just events he witnessed without taking part in them. Even his appearance on TV is brought into question. So, in that final scene, are we seeing nothing more than symbolic bloody footprints? Or are they the tracks of his latest, pointless murder? We take on faith that this is the story of the genuine article, The Joker, Batman’s antagonist, or there would be no point in watching the movie. But, just as Joker told a different story to each person about the scars on his face in The Dark Knight, the very intrigue about him, and that we cannot ever be certain of the facts surrounding him are and that’s what makes Joker such a towering success. People’s biggest concern about this film was that it might ruin the one characteristic about The Joker that makes him work so well, that he’s unknowable, a true agent of chaos and the antithesis of Batman, who seeks to bring order back to Gotham. Like a force of nature, he has always had no origin story, in the same way that banal evil is incomprehensible, giving him an edge that thrills the comic fans. This movie achieves the impossible, giving us that origin story to colour his narrative, but by making him utterly untrustworthy as the story teller, even to himself, we can still never really know what makes him what he is, or even if this is anything like the same story he would tell himself by the same time next week? That’s the genius of this film and why it works so well. It respects its source material and doesn’t spoil the one great thing about what made Batman’s greatest antagonist what he was: chaos incarnate.
    1
  20727. 1
  20728. 1
  20729. 1
  20730. 1
  20731. 1
  20732. 1
  20733. 1
  20734. 1
  20735. 1
  20736. 1
  20737. 1
  20738. 1
  20739. 1
  20740. 1
  20741. 1
  20742. 1
  20743. 1
  20744. 1
  20745. 1
  20746. 1
  20747. 1
  20748. 1
  20749. 1
  20750. 1
  20751. I did find your analysis most interesting, but I would have liked to have heard more of your thoughts on what, “harm,” you believe Shelby caused, or was responsible for? She has been charged with crimes, and she has certainly embarrassed a whole bunch of professionals, probably harming their careers and the reputations of certain establishments. But it doesn’t appear to me, from the little I know, that she had any, “intent,” to harm anyone? She doesn’t appear to exploited people financially beyond achieving her goals of setting up this fantasy life? It seems she is not a, “criminal,” in the usual sense of that term, as she was not attempting to defraud out of malice, not targeting any individual or organisation to harm them in any way, nor attempting to get away with financial theft or stealing property. I think a big part of why this case is so unique and baffling is exactly that. It must have been difficult for the prosecutors to decide what to charge her with, especially in terms of serving the public interest? She committed a vast and complex fraud, which involved duping a raft of people and organisations, which is a form of damage. And she got financial backing from these organisations under false pretences, which is obviously criminal. And, in so doing, she demonstrated her cleverness, understanding of the systems in play, and consciousness of committing illegal acts; even if she wouldn’t necessarily be able to name the laws she’d broken or describe the manner in which she done so, which means she was a self aware - knowing criminal, consciously committing elaborate crimes. But, to what end? That is the question that needs to be answered if we are to know what action would best serve the public interest. Is she a threat to society? Does she need treatment? Has the real-terms damage she’s done been assessed and evaluated? Is she likely to reoffend if allowed to go free? Or, does she simply need psychiatric care? She is not violent, menacing, or (apparently?) deliberately attempting to harm anybody? I would love to be a fly on the wall, to hear whether she feels remorse for her deceptions? Particularly with regard to the people who took her in and who’s trust she betrayed most personally, if not most deeply? As to how much harm she has done, that is a matter the courts will determine, I suppose. But as to how much actual, “harm,” she has committed, I cannot answer that question. Maybe the people she lived with are just shrugging their shoulders, or maybe they’re heart broken? There’s a novel in here somewhere.
    1
  20752. 1
  20753. 1
  20754. 1
  20755. 1
  20756. 1
  20757. 1
  20758. 1
  20759. 1
  20760. 1
  20761. 1
  20762. 1
  20763. 1
  20764. 1
  20765. 1
  20766. 1
  20767. 1
  20768. For what it’s worth, I have a hypothesis of my own; or, the beginnings of one, related to the Antimatter Problem. I wonder if this Dark Matter is related to it, and that it and Dark Energy may account for its remains, after annihilation? Imagine there was an equal amount of baryonic and antimatter at the Big Bang, and they did annihilate? With there being just a slight amount of one or the other being more abundant? The act of annihilation would result in vast amounts of energy (explosions) which is equal to mass, in another form, and which may well be able to accrete and convert back to solid matter? But, it could also have accreted into something other too, at the same time? What would be the, “residue,” (if you like) of antimatter blasts? Could it be something that behaves precisely, diametrically oppositely to baryonic matter? Something that does not reflect or absorb light? Something that has mass, like baryonic mass, but which behaves oppositely, pushing away mass, in the reverse way that baryonic matter draws matter, through gravity? That kind of matter would push itself away from other particles of the same stuff, in the exact opposite way that normal matter accretes, with an, “anti-gravity,” effect? Thus, it would be spread out, throughout the universe, forcing itself, and all things to spread out, being pushed away (and pushing away) dense areas of matter, perhaps? This would account for a range of effects that we see, but have not yet explained in the universe, such as Dark Energy, the acceleration of the universe’s receding away from us, even the accelerated spin of galaxies, which our current models cannot account for? It’s a long shot, I know, but think of the implications? If we could capture and harness some Dark Matter, (presumably by surrounding and trapping it, in a way that you would if you were trying to catch matter that was magnetically polarised to North, say, when you and everything you use is polarised to South?) you maybe able to make literal Anti-Gravity devices? The applications would be endless. And confirmation of its existence may result in answering a whole gamut of mysteries, from the age of the universe and Inflation, to most, if not all of the mysteries discussed in your awesome video? I’m not a trained physicist, but I hang out with and have brought up one. I love discussions along these lines, and have been a fan of your videos for some time now. I hope you read this, as I would love to know what you think? I hope you keep doing these videos in the coming years too. Thanks
    1
  20769. 1
  20770. 1
  20771. 1
  20772. 1
  20773. 1
  20774. 1
  20775. 1
  20776. 1
  20777. 1
  20778. 1
  20779. 1
  20780. 1
  20781. 1
  20782. 1
  20783. 1
  20784. 1
  20785. 1
  20786. 1
  20787. 1
  20788. 1
  20789. 1
  20790. 1
  20791. 1
  20792. 1
  20793. 1
  20794. 1
  20795. 1
  20796. 1
  20797. 1
  20798. 1
  20799. 1
  20800. 1
  20801. 1
  20802. 1
  20803. 1
  20804. 1
  20805. 1
  20806. 1
  20807. 1
  20808. 1
  20809. 1
  20810. 1
  20811. I suspect that the real Secret Sauce in the story of your success is probably your authenticity. Some content creators are so loose and hap-hazard that it’s hard to know if they really care about what they do, whereas others are so hyper-professionalised that it’s impossible to imagine what they’re like in real life, but you can be fairly certain they don’t talk to their children or spouses in that same board meeting or circus ring master tone, or you’d hope not. You have hit that sweet spot where the viewer can tell you’ve put work into your scripts (or the notes you work from) organising your points into a flow, etc, lining up the gags, without putting any effort into buzz phrases (except for ironic impact) special effects or distancing diagrams etc. You talk about what honestly interests you, care about people and are really funny when you want to be, and you stand out from the crowd because you are so genuine. In that sense, you represent something about the viewer that they like to think is in themselves. Like the average YouTube viewer, you look at what’s going on in the world of content creation from a distance, seeing it all through the eyes of a normal dude who’s responses are always fundamentally decent. You’re a kind of Web-Digest, picking up on the main stories, or things that matter, delving into the arts of video gaming, movies, chess, manga and those related Japanese card collections (that I still don’t really understand) and other baroque subjects, without ever straying into the hotbed of politics. In that sense you’re a magazine program; a who’s who and what’s what of the internet by which people can stay informed about modern entertainment whilst being entertained. But most of all your charm is just in the fact that you are YOU and people like you. Hell, I watched you unwrapping those Ugio card things for well over an hour a few months ago, having no clue what the hell that was all about, but I was just enjoying the chit chat between you, your partner and your friends while it was happening. I barely look up at the screen as I was fixing some furniture, but it was like having friends in the room, chattering while I worked. And I really like that group of friends. Keep doing you, Charlie. We need authentic in our lives.
    1
  20812. 1
  20813. 1
  20814. 1
  20815. 1
  20816. 1
  20817. 1
  20818. 1
  20819. 1
  20820. 1
  20821. 1
  20822. 1
  20823. 1
  20824. 1
  20825. 1
  20826. 1
  20827. 1
  20828. 1
  20829. 1
  20830. 1
  20831. I said that Fujitsu was directly profiting from all of this. Any monies that could not be paid back by the victims will have been insured against criminal theft, so they will have put in claims for that. But now we learn they were charging to give evidence which they KNEW was unsafe! That is a criminal conspiracy! They need to be investigated by Scotland Yard and charged! Yes. These victims need 1) Full exoneration: Certainly honours are due to those who worked so tirelessly on behalf of their fellow victims. 2) Full Compensation: Including costs, inflation adjusted for any and ALL losses incurred, not just the enforced repayments of monies they never took, but damaged credit ratings, other losses of interest in their savings, or sold assets to make good the amounts, and any other related losses through legal fees, lost business opportunities, depreciation of assets, etc. 3) Damages: A high figure to each individual, so they never have to worry about money again. A figure representing emotional damages, psychological damages, losses to the grieving relatives of the suicide cases, and representative of the hard work victims were forced to put in to restore their good names (still pending from a legal point of view), etc. All aspects of their suffering and time lost should be represented in that figure. 4) Punitive Damages: Again, an eye-wateringly high figure, representing the damage Fujitsu has done to the Post Office’s and the government’s reputations, the harm to public trust in their institutions, the time that it has taken, the bad faith they showed in their submissions of evidence and their, “cooperation,” with the enquiry, which the judge has already left comments on the record about, the callousness of their disregard for hard evidence and their CONSPIRACY to cover up their mistakes at ANY cost, including that of human life, quite literally! The tax payers deserve to be made whole and to have their faith in the legal system upheld too. 5) A Criminal Investigation: Separate from this enquiry, but using the evidence referred to above, which shows beyond question that the spirit and letter of the law was recklessly disregarded in a conspiracy against these victims, the government (who are the shareholders and therefore owners of the Post Office) and against the tax paying public: the funders of the government. And it must be STIPULATED that ALL remedial measures to relieve the victims will be taken as a matter of urgency and ARE NOT to be held up by any further enquiries. Even if a special bill needs to be passed in the House in order for this to take place. 6) A Review of the Honours System: to include the King’s representatives alongside the government’s, with a view to stripping honours from all those who took part in this conspiracy and were in any way responsible, either criminally or through sheer stupidity, and ensuring that the credibility and respectability of of honours is not further diminished by such appalling miscarriages of justice, by root and branch review and reordering. I know I’m living out a fantasy here. Howling at the moon, even. But all of the above steps, carried out swiftly and with the same determination and urgency that Fujitsu and the PO showed in their commitment to conspiracy, framing people and getting false confessions out of them, would be the only way I could see for justice to be done. And if the Prime Minister was to lead the way on this, it might do his otherwise appalling fortunes some actual good in the polls?
    1
  20832. 1
  20833. 1
  20834. 1
  20835. 1
  20836. 1
  20837. 1
  20838. 1
  20839. 1
  20840. 1
  20841. 1
  20842. 1
  20843. 1
  20844. 1
  20845. 1
  20846. 1
  20847. 1
  20848. 1
  20849. 1
  20850. 1
  20851. 1
  20852. 1
  20853. 1
  20854. 1
  20855. 1
  20856. 1
  20857. 1
  20858. 1
  20859. 1
  20860. 1
  20861. 1
  20862. 1
  20863. 1
  20864. 1
  20865. 1
  20866. 1
  20867. 1
  20868. 1
  20869. 1
  20870. 1
  20871. 1
  20872. 1
  20873. 1
  20874. 1
  20875. 1
  20876. 1
  20877. 1
  20878. 1
  20879. 1
  20880. 1
  20881. 1
  20882. 1
  20883. 1
  20884. 1
  20885. 1
  20886. 1
  20887. 1
  20888. 1
  20889. 1
  20890. 1
  20891. 1
  20892. 1
  20893. 1
  20894. co coco : I hope that your reference to, “bloody men,” was not meant to imply that there is something inherently, “bad,” about being a man? Because, other than that, I was impressed by your comment. I like your honest ambivalence toward Obama (there is, “harm,” in, “charm,” as mother, God rest her, used to say) as I am, “conservative,” in my politics, and was once a ferocious critic of his oppressive domestic spying. But, then Trump happened, and America went a little crazy, like that, “friend,” we’ve all had, in an abusive relationship, who cannot be persuaded to listen to reason, but who’m you have no choice, but to support, after the harm has been done? As a citizen, I say we HAVE TO bight the bullet; OWN the FACT that a staggeringly large percentage of our population is racist, and willing to trade Democracy for a White America. Education is the only, known, cure for the virus of racism; less effective, the older you get, but capable of inoculating the young. It’s time for a little long term investment in THAT future. The racists in power KNOW this, btw; hence, Betsy Duuuh’voss, and a daily diet of University HATE, from Fox. Other than Trump’s opponents, it’s universities that get all of the Alt-Wrong’s opprobrium. And, that’s why. America is having trouble owning its mistake, but NOT just because it was SO HUGE. It’s because those who invested in Trumpski, have staked their very lives on him. And, like Trump himself, the more they invest, the more they are FORCED to back up their investments, with MORE investments, continuously raising the stakes. I could say MUCH more, but, look at me, rambling on! You seem to have set me off?
    1
  20895. 1
  20896. 1
  20897. 1
  20898. 1
  20899. 1
  20900. 1
  20901. 1
  20902. 1
  20903. 1
  20904. 1
  20905. 1
  20906. Putin’s nuclear threats are the best possible news for the west. Putin is afraid for himself and merely expresses DESPERATION when he says crap like that. He doesn’t know what else he CAN say. He can’t understand why he’s gotten away with playing western countries like a fiddle and now suddenly nothing works. His panic talk should not surprise ANYONE who knows anything about what’s happening, nor should it frighten anyone. If anything it should reassure us. This author says the Russian people, “don’t want to know,” like that was something, “new.” But it isn’t. Moral and political absenteeism has been a way of life in Russia since Putin conned his way into power. The, “social contract,” between the Russians and their state has been, “We can do what we like so long as we stay out of politics and never criticise the state.” That unspoken contract was broken when Putin’s politics started costing Russian’s their jobs, livelihoods and freedoms, and now their very bodies for the meat grinder. With another 300,000 to come no doubt, before the spring offensive, which will, by then, be a desperate rear guard action to get out of Ukraine with the fewest possible casualties, whilst passing the Buck for failures, back to an increasingly delegitimised Kremlin and a toppling Putin. The west is winning for once, and stands to win the capacity for stabilising prices and markets around the world if Russia collapses. And the west is on the side of the angels, for once, so we should support Ukraine to the very end and be instrumental in the rebuilding of their country’s infrastructure and membership of NATO. Just as we are all paying a price for this war, the inflation, fuel hikes, gas prices and cost of living crisis (recession) all resulting from Putin’s actions primarily, we have the opportunity to see that the dog we all have in this fight gets his victory and a decent bight of the pie for a change. Wouldn’t THAT be nice?
    1
  20907. 1
  20908. 1
  20909. 1
  20910. 1
  20911. 1
  20912. 1
  20913. 1
  20914. 1
  20915. 1
  20916. 1
  20917. 1
  20918. 1
  20919. 1
  20920. 1
  20921. 1
  20922. 1
  20923. 1
  20924. 1
  20925. 1
  20926. 1
  20927. 1
  20928. 1
  20929. 1
  20930. 1
  20931. 1
  20932. 1
  20933. 1
  20934. 1
  20935. 1
  20936. 1
  20937. 1
  20938. 1
  20939. 1
  20940. 1
  20941. 1
  20942. 1
  20943. 1
  20944. 1
  20945. 1
  20946. 1
  20947. 1
  20948. 1
  20949. 1
  20950. 1
  20951. 1
  20952. 1
  20953. 1
  20954. 1
  20955. 1
  20956. 1
  20957. 1
  20958. 1
  20959. 1
  20960. 1
  20961. 1
  20962. 1
  20963. 1
  20964. 1
  20965. 1
  20966. 1
  20967. 1
  20968. 1
  20969. 1
  20970. 1
  20971. 1
  20972. 1
  20973. 1
  20974. 1
  20975. 1
  20976. 1
  20977. 1
  20978. 1
  20979. 1
  20980. 1
  20981. 1
  20982. 1
  20983. 1
  20984. 1
  20985. 1
  20986. 1
  20987. 1
  20988. 1
  20989. 1
  20990. 1
  20991. 1
  20992. 1
  20993. 1
  20994. 1
  20995. 1
  20996. 1
  20997. 1
  20998. 1
  20999. 1
  21000. The New Natives : You Interest me. For a spiritual warrior, you do sound a little cynical, though? I should clarify, that I was referring to Trump’s, “perception,” of what he did; not what he actually DID. He, “believes,” Iran to be impotent, and picked them for that reason, to do his, “strong-man-president,” performance, for the sake of those, “Trump Cultists,” who were left scratching their heads, after seeing him GROVEL, so ABJECTLY before Putin. Iran can probably cause all kinds of HAVOC, should they let slip their dogs of war, but they are too CLOSELY ALLIED to Putin, to go off half cocked. Trump has been spoiling for a fight with Iran, because he believes that Putin may relent; perhaps, in exchange for US troops pulling out of Syria? And, his, “Advisors,” have told him that War Time Presidents always get a spike in their polls. And, Trump IS pretty DESPERATE, with the Mid Terms looming. Though, he probably doesn’t grasp that Americans will NOT, “thank,” him for spending their blood and treasure on an AVOIDABLE conflict, of HIS making. But, you strongly suggest that God is playing Trump like a chess piece, presumably, with all the other actors on the stage, if you’ll forgive my mixed metaphor, there? On what basis, do you draw THAT conclusion? You are obviously a, “believer,” unless I’m missing your sarcasm? I am a Christian, “believer,” though I DON’T fit the model that most Churches follow. And, I fully respect other faiths. Are you drawing upon Prophecy? I’m genuinely interested. You don’t strike me as the usual, run of the mill, person of faith. How are you reading the runes, and what runes, do you read, if you don’t mind my asking?
    1
  21001. 1
  21002. 1
  21003. 1
  21004. 1
  21005. 1
  21006. 1
  21007. 1
  21008. 1
  21009. 1
  21010. 1
  21011. 1
  21012. 1
  21013. 1
  21014. @Derek Black : We agree on Saudi Arabia, except, I would say, we should have invaded them, “as well as,” not, “instead of,” Afghanistan. Invading SA would have merely added to that imperative. As to your last point, A) I’m not convinced at all, and there’s no objective measure by which to guage what is, after all, only a personal opinion, not a statement of fact. B) We prevented any further 911 style attacks, which was the chief objective, so our troops can hold their heads up high for that reason. C) I’m not convinced it was our responsibility to leave the country better or worse. Nor was it our problem. Harsh, but fair. Indeed, there is often mileage in leaving a country in a broken down state, making it a drain on its allies, rather than a resource. However, what some call, “Empire Building,” is what others call, “Nation Building,” and the truth is always somewhere in the middle. It was a very successful model that worked so well after WWII. Sadly, the Henry Kissinger types of this world have had too much say in how we run things, resulting in our abject failure to learn from history. Nation Building doesn’t work in Muslim Countries, it seems. We should maybe have never tried? But, I’m not about to gain say them for trying. They could have just glassed the place, policed it, ruthlessly, like the Russians tried to, and left after a couple of years. But, they took responsibility, which is at least, “laudable,” if costly and wasteful. Regarding your opening remark, about all those other countries, I don’t see the relevance? . . .
    1
  21015. 1
  21016. 1
  21017. 1
  21018. 1
  21019. 1
  21020. 1
  21021. 1
  21022. 1
  21023. 1
  21024. 1
  21025. 1
  21026. 1
  21027. 1
  21028. 1
  21029. 1
  21030. 1
  21031. 1
  21032. 1
  21033. 1
  21034. 1
  21035. 1
  21036. 1
  21037. 1
  21038. 1
  21039. 1
  21040. 1
  21041. 1
  21042. 1
  21043. 1
  21044. 1
  21045. 1
  21046. 1
  21047. 1
  21048. 1
  21049. 1
  21050. 1
  21051. 1
  21052. 1
  21053. 1
  21054. 1
  21055. 1
  21056. 1
  21057. 1
  21058. 1
  21059. 1
  21060. 1
  21061. 1
  21062. 1
  21063. 1
  21064. 1
  21065. 1
  21066. 1
  21067. 1
  21068. 1
  21069. 1
  21070. 1
  21071. 1
  21072. 1
  21073. 1
  21074. 1
  21075. 1
  21076. 1
  21077. 1
  21078. 1
  21079. 1
  21080. 1
  21081. 1
  21082. 1
  21083. 1
  21084. 1
  21085. 1
  21086. 1
  21087. 1
  21088. 1
  21089. 1
  21090. 1
  21091. 1
  21092. 1
  21093. 1
  21094. 1
  21095. 1
  21096. 1
  21097. 1
  21098. 1
  21099. 1
  21100. 1
  21101. 1
  21102. 1
  21103. 1
  21104. 1
  21105. 1
  21106. 1
  21107. 1
  21108. 1
  21109. 1
  21110. 1
  21111. 1
  21112. 1
  21113. 1
  21114. 1
  21115. 1
  21116. 1
  21117. 1
  21118. 1
  21119. 1
  21120. 1
  21121. 1
  21122. 1
  21123. 1
  21124. 1
  21125. 1
  21126. 1
  21127. 1
  21128. 1
  21129. 1
  21130. 1
  21131. 1
  21132. 1
  21133. 1
  21134. 1
  21135. 1
  21136. 1
  21137.  @NobleNemesis  : Churchill would have been screaming to the rafters long before the Ukraine war started, about all of the oil and gas deals the west got into with Putin in the first place. I always said it was suicidally dumb and Churchill would have compared it to relying on Hitler for his Hurricanes and Spitfires during The Battle Of Britain! We asked for this problem, as we could have crushed Russia within weeks had we not gotten ourselves hooked on his energy pipelines. And how did Putin get the west SO DEEPLY compromised in the first place? By corruption. Instead of spies hiding and bribing and blackmailing our top politicians and business tycoons, like in the Cold War days, he simply had his oligarchs do it all in the open, buying up western sports teams, listed properties and major companies, and then use their money and influence to get into all the top parties and social events. From there they blackmailed and bribed our top policy makers into becoming reliant on our avowed enemies for our very life blood, like a drug dealer getting immature teens hooked on his product in the playground! Some of us have been screaming about this for literal DECADES now! Some of us saw all of this coming and are only relieved that it didn’t work! But the actual harm we’ve allowed Putin to do to our world wide economy has been incalculable! The food shortages, fuel price hikes, coming recession and, “cost of living crisis,” are ALL a direct result of two decades of pusillanimous politicians taking bribes and getting themselves compromised by Russian oligarchs, right under our noses, and disclaiming any responsibility, like the Germans did, by saying it was all some sort of, “policy plan,” in which we could get Russia to be more democratic by bringing them into economic reliance with the west. Yet, if that was even HALF true, how come we didn’t come up with business opportunities that made Russia reliant on the west? Instead of us relying on them? Cheap gas and oil blinded these well meaning, grasping Neo-Liberal idiots and corrupted bureaucrats into making sure that THEY were making big bucks in the here and now, with no thought of tomorrow. Well, tomorrow came and countless thousands are dead, with millions potentially facing death. All because we in the west cut our own throats in the most egregious, short sighted, predictable, GREEDY way possible. Every politician (especially in Germany) who signed up for Russian pipelines should be investigated. What you will find is that they all took massive bribes or were blackmailed, or both.
    1
  21138. 1
  21139. 1
  21140. 1
  21141. I just hope you all understand how the Kremlin 101 Playbook, “On International Diplomacy,” works. Because, those of you who know your history will know that this is classic meaningless rhetoric. Look at it from Putin’s point of view and you’ll soon see what I mean: Imagine you’re the guy who’s heist has gone horribly wrong? You’re cornered and sitting there with a big grenade and you’ve pulled the pin and threatened to let go of the lever if they arrest you? Stalemate, or so it seems? Except all the people in your gang are getting hurt, getting poorer and angrier by the day. And you know it’s only a question of time before something gives. At the point when all the cops who have you in that corner and aren’t letting you go, they decide to get into a huddle together to talk about how to end this hostage siege, and you’re watching them, getting increasingly twitchy and exhausted, wondering if you might drop that grenade accidentally by yourself!? At that point, what do you do? You make your worst possible threat, in the hopes of intimidating that huddle out of doing anything too, “drastic.” When Putin says, “Do X or Y and I’ll nuke you all,” he’s really telling you, “Do X or Y and I’ll fold and lose this thing.” I’m certain of two things. One: Putin is BLUFFING. Two: We should call his bluff! We should have called his bluff in the 1990’s and he’s only pulling this sh*t because WE’VE ALLOWED IT! We owe Ukraine more than an apology. We owe them TOTAL VICTORY.
    1
  21142. 1
  21143. 1
  21144. 1
  21145. 1
  21146. 1
  21147. 1
  21148. 1
  21149. 1
  21150. 1
  21151. 1
  21152. 1
  21153. 1
  21154. 1
  21155. 1
  21156. 1
  21157. 1
  21158. 1
  21159. 1
  21160. 1
  21161. 1
  21162. 1
  21163. 1
  21164. 1
  21165. 1
  21166. 1
  21167. 1
  21168. 1
  21169. 1
  21170. 1
  21171. 1
  21172. 1
  21173. 1
  21174. 1
  21175. 1
  21176. 1
  21177. 1
  21178. 1
  21179. 1
  21180. 1
  21181. 1
  21182. 1
  21183. 1
  21184. 1
  21185. 1
  21186. 1
  21187. 1
  21188. 1
  21189. 1
  21190. 1
  21191. 1
  21192. 1
  21193. 1
  21194. 1
  21195. 1
  21196. 1
  21197. 1
  21198. 1
  21199. 1
  21200. 1
  21201. 1
  21202. 1
  21203. 1
  21204. 1
  21205. 1
  21206. 1
  21207. 1
  21208. 1
  21209. 1
  21210. 1
  21211. 1
  21212. 1
  21213. 1
  21214. 1
  21215. 1
  21216. 1
  21217. 1
  21218. 1
  21219. 1
  21220. 1
  21221. 1
  21222. 1
  21223. 1
  21224. 1
  21225. 1
  21226. 1
  21227. 1
  21228. 1
  21229. 1
  21230. 1
  21231. 1
  21232. 1
  21233. 1
  21234. 1
  21235. 1
  21236. 1
  21237. 1
  21238. 1
  21239. 1
  21240. 1
  21241. 1
  21242. 1
  21243. 1
  21244. 1
  21245. 1
  21246. 1
  21247. 1
  21248. 1
  21249. 1
  21250. 1
  21251. 1
  21252. 1
  21253. 1
  21254. 1
  21255. 1
  21256. 1
  21257. 1
  21258. 1
  21259. 1
  21260. 1
  21261. 1
  21262. 1
  21263. 1
  21264. 1
  21265. 1
  21266. 1
  21267. 1
  21268. 1
  21269. 1
  21270. 1
  21271. 1
  21272. 1
  21273. 1
  21274. 1
  21275. 1
  21276. 1
  21277. 1
  21278. 1
  21279. 1
  21280. 1
  21281. 1
  21282. 1
  21283. 1
  21284. 1
  21285. 1
  21286. 1
  21287. 1
  21288. 1
  21289. 1
  21290. 1
  21291.  @N3KRoM3KHANIKaL  : It seems to me that even the great physicists have a habit of falling into the trap of ejecting either time, or space (or gravity or mass) from their thinking when they consider these questions. The muddle leads to dead ends, like, “bootstrapping,” and, “grandmother paradoxes,” because they are so busy seeing, “violations,” of one factor or another instead of taking them into account? Consider the birth of the universe? While the entire mass of the universe was compressed into an area smaller than humans can comprehend, what was time actually, “doing,” as a result of such immense compression? We can calculate the precise amount of mass it takes to create a black hole, yet somehow an entire universe, “violated,” every known law of physics by expanding outwards with a mass so much bigger than it takes to create the smallest black hole that there is literally not enough room in the whole of YouTube for me to print out all the zeroes after the first one, if I tried to put a figure on it. And what do physicists do? They eject the notion of time whilst, paradoxically, wonder how the universe violated time by communicating with each opposite end to produce a uniform appearance? Not once do they ask, what happened to time itself? Despite knowing that space-time is a repeatedly proven phenomena to the extent that we rely upon it to use things like YouTube in the first place. Time had to be utterly distorted at the beginning of the universe, but we prefer to accept ideas like Inflation? I think we need a new Einstein, Newton or Copernicus to move us forward.
    1
  21292. 1
  21293. 1
  21294. 1
  21295. 1
  21296. 1
  21297. 1
  21298. 1
  21299. 1
  21300. 1
  21301. 1
  21302. 1
  21303. 1
  21304. 1
  21305. 1
  21306. 1
  21307. 1
  21308. 1
  21309. 1
  21310. 1
  21311. 1
  21312. 1
  21313. 1
  21314. 1
  21315. 1
  21316. 1
  21317. 1
  21318. 1
  21319. 1
  21320. 1
  21321. 1
  21322. 1
  21323. 1
  21324. 1
  21325. 1
  21326. 1
  21327. 1
  21328. 1
  21329. 1
  21330. 1
  21331. Valient Six : I say it because I see it. They had a deal, inspectors from the UN were satisfied Iran was keeping the deal. Trump broke that deal, continually threatened Iran and cornered them, knowing they would have to take up a war footing, so he could, “blame,” Iran for the war he wanted. Putin phoned Trump and told him to call off his bombing, and Trump came up with the lamest excuse for backing down. Russia and Iran are allies and Putin has mercs and infrastructure all over their country. Remember Trump saying he was going to, “invade Venezuela,” when he got in Office? After about three weeks of building up the rhetoric, he suddenly dropped the whole idea, remember? WHY? The SAME reason that he won’t go into Iran: Putin’s people and hardware are there, protecting the oil and propping up the regimes. Trump is CLEARLY DETERMINED to have a war, but Putin keeps blocking him, because he’s already IN these places. So, Trump follows his orders from the Kremlin, but he can probably kick up enough chaos in the Middle East to start a large scale conflict with, “someone,” if he pours enough Americans in there, and gets a few killed, so the press starts screaming for, “revenge.” It’s an old story, and it’s OBVIOUS to anyone who reads. Now, Putin will allow, “MAYBE,” a few bombing runs, in specially agreed areas, where he can get his own people out of the way, like the one he did with Trump just after he got in? But, it’s Putin calling the shots out there. And, it’s Putin who won’t ALLOW American, “boots on the ground,” in Iran.
    1
  21332. 1
  21333. 1
  21334. 1
  21335. 1
  21336. 1
  21337. 1
  21338. 1
  21339. 1
  21340. 1
  21341. 1
  21342. 1
  21343. 1
  21344. 1
  21345. 1
  21346. 1
  21347. 1
  21348. 1
  21349. 1
  21350. 1
  21351. 1
  21352. 1
  21353. 1
  21354. 1
  21355. 1
  21356. 1
  21357. 1
  21358. 1
  21359. 1
  21360. 1
  21361. 1
  21362. 1
  21363. 1
  21364. 1
  21365. 1
  21366. 1
  21367. 1
  21368. 1
  21369. 1
  21370. 1
  21371. 1
  21372. 1
  21373. 1
  21374. 1
  21375. 1
  21376. 1
  21377. 1
  21378. 1
  21379. 1
  21380. 1
  21381. 1
  21382. 1
  21383. 1
  21384. 1
  21385. 1
  21386. 1
  21387. 1
  21388. 1
  21389. 1
  21390. 1
  21391. 1
  21392. 1
  21393. 1
  21394. 1
  21395. 1
  21396. 1
  21397. 1
  21398. 1
  21399. 1
  21400. 1
  21401. 1
  21402. 1
  21403. 1
  21404. 1
  21405. 1
  21406. 1
  21407. 1
  21408. 1
  21409. 1
  21410. 1
  21411. 1
  21412. 1
  21413. 1
  21414. 1
  21415. 1
  21416. 1
  21417. 1
  21418. 1
  21419. 1
  21420. 1
  21421. 1
  21422. 1
  21423. 1
  21424. 1
  21425. 1
  21426. 1
  21427. 1
  21428. 1
  21429. 1
  21430. 1
  21431. 1
  21432. 1
  21433. 1
  21434. 1
  21435. 1
  21436. 1
  21437. 1
  21438. 1
  21439. 1
  21440. 1
  21441. 1
  21442. 1
  21443. 1
  21444. 1
  21445. 1
  21446. 1
  21447. 1
  21448. 1
  21449. 1
  21450. 1
  21451. 1
  21452. 1
  21453. 1
  21454. 1
  21455. 1
  21456. 1
  21457. 1
  21458. 1
  21459. 1
  21460. 1
  21461. 1
  21462. 1
  21463. 1
  21464. 1
  21465. 1
  21466. 1
  21467. 1
  21468. 1
  21469. 1
  21470. 1
  21471. 1
  21472. 1
  21473. 1
  21474. 1
  21475. 1
  21476. 1
  21477. 1
  21478. 1
  21479. 1
  21480. 1
  21481. 1
  21482. 1
  21483. 1
  21484. 1
  21485. 1
  21486. 1
  21487. 1
  21488. 1
  21489. 1
  21490. 1
  21491. 1
  21492. 1
  21493. 1
  21494. 1
  21495. 1
  21496. 1
  21497. 1
  21498. 1
  21499.  @lisasanborn9176  : I get that principle. And I get the idea that they must be willing to try what they can, if they can make it work, to defend their client to their utmost ability. That’s how we know a conviction is sound, because the evidence has been tested to destruction and withstood the best possible defence. However, all that being said; these guys? “The Asshole Defence”??? There comes a point when you look, to the jury, like your flailing. And, that does more harm than good, surely? Your colleagues not withstanding, THIS so called, “defence,” team are actually sabotaging their own defence when they show a jury that there’s nothing they won’t stoop to, no straw they won’t grasp, until their efforts become indistinguishable from any moment when they might present some actual hard evidence! If they think that showing there’s nothing they won’t do for their client will get them more work and enhance their reputations, then I think they’re mistaken? Their reputations depend as much upon the credibility of their presentation, and at least looking like they’re prepared and have a thought out strategy. These guys are visibly clutching at any straw and showing the jury they have no case, but that they are willing to throw any chaff in their eyes on the off-chance that something, ANYTHING might just stick! They will be remembered for that, like Sidney Powell is going to be remembered for being insane. She may have been a wonderful lawyer, with many historic victories under her belt, for all we know? But, history already has her marked as the seditious conspiracy theorist, who made the lamest, most insulting to her own base, “defence,” of her own lies, and no one will ever associate her with anything other than the trump insurrection. And these guys will be the same: “The bosos who disgusted America with their Asshole Defence.” If they’re not planning on retiring after this, they will be, when they re-enter the real world . . . 🤦‍♂️ . . . ✌️👍
    1
  21500. 1
  21501. 1
  21502. 1
  21503. 1
  21504. 1
  21505. 1
  21506. 1
  21507. 1
  21508. 1
  21509. 1
  21510. 1
  21511. 1
  21512. 1
  21513. 1
  21514. 1
  21515. 1
  21516. 1
  21517. 1
  21518. 1
  21519. 1
  21520. 1
  21521. 1
  21522. 1
  21523. Let’s face it? What the government should be putting in every single speech that references the economy should contain three major talking points, for the rest of this Parliament. 1) The last budget of the Truss government EXCLUDED the OBR, the Bank Of England AND the Treasury! 2) The last budget of the Sunack government EXCLUDED the £20 + BILLION POUNDS MISSING and HIDDEN from the public, whilst the Tory government’s OWN FIGURES confirmed a RECORD BREAKING £26 BILLION POUNDS LOST to, “Waste, Incompetence and Fraud!”!!! 3) The last Tory government, despite being questioned about this in every forum imaginable, from the press, to the Commons and Lords, to the COURTS and sworn statements in government committees, have yet to offer ONE SINGLE, “benefit,” that Britain reaps, or is yet to receive, from Brexit! Not ONE Tory minister, or any minister from other parties that are pro-Brexit like Reform UK, has EVER stated a SINGLE, “benefit,” from Brexit. Not ONE! Labour should be seizing every single opportunity to pummel these points home until the entire country is at least AWARE of these FACTS, whether they excuse or deny them or not! They should be making the TRUTH as inescapable as the consequences we are ALL OF US suffering as a DIRECT consequence of Tory entitlement, self interest and atavistic greed! Every single Labour (and Lib Dem) MP and candidate should be making these three points the centrepiece of ANY discussion on public finances and speaking in terms of their proposals, policies and actions being direct response to the financial CRISIS the Tories wantonly lead us into. Sure, we want to hear solutions, answers and policies that move us forward. But every single one of those policies NEEDS to be set in context so persistently, so often and so articulately that even the Tory client press cannot avoid printing their words in black and white, hearing it on the radio, seeing it laid bare in any and all news coverage. It needs to be organised with military precision and the commitment of an election campaign. Then, when the public has NOTHING ELSE to talk about; when whatever new situation arises and is duly set into the proper context, it will become an abject impossibility for any of this current iteration of the Tories to get elected ANYWHERE. Anyone who was in government during the economic meltdown under the Tories will be marked by the pirate’s Black Spot and will need to seek employment outside of politics or lose their deposits at the polls. And any talk of a potential, “Johnson comeback,” Will be met by derision, even in the Tory press. Only then will the country (possibly) get an opposition worthy of office, capable of doing what a healthy democracy needs, which is holding government accountable, for REAL issues and holding their feet to the fire in parliament. But, as you have observed on multiple occasions, the one thing the Labour Party is bad at, and really needs to get better at, as a matter of urgency, is communicating with the public. So, I doubt this would ever happen. But, a man can dream, can’t he? . . .
    1
  21524. Sally Portillo : This is your Dictatorship, in the wake of the 2019 Coup, attempting to distract you, while they consolidate their power. They no longer have to fear the, “electorate,” because the 2020, “elections,” are ALREADY RIGGED. The only thing they fear now is everyone looking at a, “trial,” with NO WITNESSES allowed to testify, and NO EVIDENCE allowed to be presented, and a, “JURY,” comprised of Trump’s CONSPIRATORS, who would go to JAIL if Trump lost his, “Protected Presidential Status,” and, “ratted,” on them, to save his own Orange ass. After all, that would be the same thing as telling the world that THERE IS NO LAW, so far as the Trumps are concerned! It would be the same thing as ADMITTING that the Republic has FALLEN. Now, they will just get STRONGER, and consolidate their position, making America AFRAID Again, turning us into informers, haters and scared little RATS, like in Russia. You will get to go through the motions of voting, in your FAKE REPUBLIC, just like in Russia, and your name will be remembered, when you vote, “wrong,” but the outcome will NEVER be in doubt, because you have a DICTATORSHIP. Iran is just a SHOW; agreed by Putin, who arranged it with Iran and the US. NONE of this matters any more. They only fear that America MIGHT WAKE UP! A second REVOLUTION is what they fear. But, you all seem to be happy to watch the Coup unfold on CNN, so they needn’t worry. That won’t stop them though. That’s how Dictatorships work. As they get stronger, they will scare off ALL opposition, until they are appointing Democrats, behind the scenes, and briefing them, on what they can say and do. And, your first female POTUS? That will be Ivanka. Putin has already arranged it . . . Smh
    1
  21525. 1
  21526. 1
  21527. 1
  21528. 1
  21529. 1
  21530. 1
  21531.  @DetroitMicroSound  : Y’know, I once got into trouble for laying my hands on a suit of armour that Henry V wore, and defended myself by saying, “I’m sorry but I just had to touch the armour that the King who faced the French at Agincourt wore, in this once in a lifetime opportunity, or I never could have forgiven myself and probably would have taken it to the grave as one of my deepest personal regrets and failures of courage, had I not committed to my impulse.” I know this verbatim because my wife recorded the incident, which set off an alarm and resulted in a very angry young woman and two burly security guards confronting me. Her response? She seemed to visibly melt, I think upon the realisation that I was not just doing it for a larf, but genuinely overcome by historical enthusiasm, and she said, “Since you put it like that, and we cannot undo anything now, perhaps you’ll accept these complimentary vouchers for lunch at our restaurant? So long as you accept them now and go there before doing anything else?” I took the hint, and the gift, and all smiles behind me. The point of that obscure, outré story? Just to say that I so completely get why you would have such a collection and the value of curating such a thing, that puts you so closely in touch with the people and places where they were once used and created. To hold a coin, at a time when we may well live to see coins fall out of use altogether, knowing that it passed through the hands of an ancient, who valued and spent it exactly as we would our own currency; to know and understand such a thing and to be able to hold that in your hands . . . It means everything. Especially to those of us who travel in time, at least in our minds. I am filled with both envy (of a pleasing nature) and admiration for your collection. So cool. 👍
    1
  21532. 1
  21533. 1
  21534. 1
  21535. 1
  21536. 1
  21537. 1
  21538. 1
  21539. 1
  21540. 1
  21541. 1
  21542. 1
  21543. 1
  21544. 1
  21545. 1
  21546. 1
  21547. 1
  21548. 1
  21549. 1
  21550. 1
  21551. 1
  21552. 1
  21553. 1
  21554. 1
  21555. 1
  21556. 1
  21557. 1
  21558. 1
  21559. 1
  21560. 1
  21561. 1
  21562. 1
  21563. 1
  21564. 1
  21565. 1
  21566. 1
  21567. 1
  21568. 1
  21569. 1
  21570. 1
  21571. 1
  21572. 1
  21573. 1
  21574. 1
  21575. 1
  21576. 1
  21577. 1
  21578. 1
  21579. 1
  21580. 1
  21581. 1
  21582. 1
  21583. 1
  21584. 1
  21585. 1
  21586. 1
  21587. 1
  21588. 1
  21589. 1
  21590. 1
  21591. 1
  21592. 1
  21593. I immediately thought of the separation of powers, when you said government wants to review judicial decisions. I don’t believe the judicial system is fair or just and it has stagnated rather than grown with the times, which is why they have laid themselves vulnerable to populism. We cannot blindly have faith and trust in the judiciary. We must have a reasoned argument for improving it. As the government’s argument is a powerful one: they are elected by the people and speak for them; they legislate upon law already, civil, fiscal and criminal. Why shouldn’t they review the arm of governance which enacts our laws? Don’t get me wrong. I agree with you. This is chilling, if true. An independent body, which has no ministers in it, could do the job and I would say that’s a good thing. But, coming from a government that has already suffered one or two judicial black eyes, this seems highly suspicious to begin with. Indeed, one can argue if they are sincere in wanting progressive reform, why do they want to recreate the wheel? They already legislate, which means they are empowered to change all of law already, merely by winning a mandate and a vote in the Commons. What they seem to be talking about is overturning individual decisions which effect their policies or the criminal liabilities of their friends and themselves. That would mean an end to justice altogether. Or, more likely, a two tier justice system in which legislatures and their donors would be untouchable by law, and no ballot can remove a crooked donor. I would need to know who would be on this committee, and what their argument for it is? I think you would have to martial some very powerful arguments though? It’s easy for a populist to point at the guys in gowns and wigs and call them anachronistic to popular acclaim. They would be right about that. Now that the judiciary has stopped acting like an extension of the old boy’s network (or, begun to?) as it used to in the days of the Jeremy Thorpe scandal, Profumo, and over other and the Birmingham Six, etc, it might be too little too late? And the judiciary only has itself to blame, for offering the government so much ammunition. I grew up witnessing these appalling abuses of judicial power, and no one ever paid for their rotten complicity in ruining the lives of the innocent on behalf of the establishment. The Crown owes its pound of flesh to the mob. That’s how the populists will sell it, and they’ll probably win with arguments like that? You need arguments as powerful, emotive and zippy as that to counter what would in effect be, as you say, a power grab.
    1
  21594. 1
  21595. 1
  21596. 1
  21597. 1
  21598. 1
  21599. 1
  21600. 1
  21601. 1
  21602. 1
  21603. 1
  21604. 1
  21605. 1
  21606. 1
  21607. 1
  21608. 1
  21609. 1
  21610. 1
  21611. 1
  21612. 1
  21613. 1
  21614. 1
  21615. 1
  21616. 1
  21617. 1
  21618. 1
  21619. 1
  21620. 1
  21621. 1
  21622. 1
  21623. 1
  21624. 1
  21625. 1
  21626. 1
  21627. 1
  21628. 1
  21629. 1
  21630. 1
  21631. 1
  21632. 1
  21633. 1
  21634. 1
  21635. 1
  21636. 1
  21637. 1
  21638. 1
  21639. 1
  21640. 1
  21641. 1
  21642. 1
  21643. 1
  21644. 1
  21645. 1
  21646. 1
  21647. 1
  21648. 1
  21649. 1
  21650. 1
  21651. 1
  21652. 1
  21653. 1
  21654. 1
  21655. 1
  21656. 1
  21657. 1
  21658. 1
  21659. 1
  21660. 1
  21661. 1
  21662. 1
  21663. 1
  21664. 1
  21665. 1
  21666. 1
  21667. 1
  21668. 1
  21669. 1
  21670. 1
  21671. 1
  21672. 1
  21673. 1
  21674. 1
  21675. 1
  21676. The bigger project for me, that I hope more Brits will spread the word on, is to get the Tories down to Third Party status. The Tory project has not just failed us this time, but resulted in unforgivable damage, some of which can never be repaired. But it’s worse, even, than that. They have no plan for Britain, which makes them as likely to grasp at straws dangling from the Nazis as it does old fashioned conservatives. And the evidence for this is their increasing tendency to lean into deliberate divisiveness and the far right rhetoric imported from America’s Republican Party. “Woke,” as a pejorative; “Open Borders,” as an allegation; and active hostility toward large sections of the electorate, from the dispatch box, with the conscious aim of deepening fear, anger, outrage and widening those ideological gulfs of division through a type of soft core media terrorism, are all imports from the Capitol of school shootings, mass murders and insurrections we know as the once, “United,” States of America. I want to see a concerted campaign that nips THAT hard in the bud and answers it in such a resounding fashion that the conservatives are forced to spend a wilderness period culling their most egregious race baiters, like Braverman, Patel, Rees Mogg and Mister, “Stop The Boats,” himself, Sunack, whilst also having to kill off their most egregious carpet baggers, like the Quasi Chancellor Kwarteng, and his side kick, Liz Truss, Boris Johnson and, once again, Rees Mogg. Between the Liberal-Economics of attempting to privatise everything from transport and clean water to policing and the health service and the sheer, blatant carpet bagging of, “personality politics,” as characterised by Johnson, Rees Mogg and that despicable waste of organs, Matt Hancock, we’ve devastated Britain in a giant game of British Politics’s Got No Talent, like we were playing a popularity contest with the nation’s future! And in the same manner that so many winners of Britain’s Got Talent manage to win because the public wants to make a point, rather than believing in the ability of the contestant, so the winner ends up vanishing into obscurity again, we’ve done the same with our votes! Except, the pond is too shallow for our failures to sink without trace, and we’re all forced to deal with the corpses of their populism, rotting and floating among us, daily. We cannot escape our failure of judgement and just, “stop going on about it,” as so many wish we would about Brexit, or Prime Ministerial corruption, or the simple failure of INSANE economic policies, because we’re all having to deal with them, every day! The only way we get to, “move on,”m from this mess is if we honestly accept our mistakes and face them, fix them (as best they can be fixed) so that then, and ONLY THEN, do we get to move on and stop talking about them. And that means that the British public needs to seize this once in a lifetime opportunity to galvanise a national Tactical Voting Campaign so that the Tories are not just beaten, not just Landslided out of power, but utterly CRUSHED! Even those who care about Conservatism could get onboard with that, as it presents conservatives with an opportunity for a complete restructuring of the Tory project from the ground up, and to revive their core values that were once so popular. That simply cannot happen while the people in charge are either blatantly corrupt or abjectly incompetent, or both. Tactical Voting! Look it up, spread the word. Do your bit for Britain.
    1
  21677. 1
  21678. 1
  21679. 1
  21680. 1
  21681. 1
  21682. 1
  21683. 1
  21684. 1
  21685. 1
  21686. 1
  21687. 1
  21688. 1
  21689. 1
  21690. 1
  21691. 1
  21692. 1
  21693. 1
  21694. 1
  21695. 1
  21696. 1
  21697. 1
  21698. 1
  21699. 1
  21700. 1
  21701. 1
  21702. 1
  21703. 1
  21704. 1
  21705. 1
  21706.  @NathanSommer-c8l  : Yeah, don’t get me wrong. The guy still makes me larf, (I’m here aren’t I? 🤷‍♂️) but I’ve been following him for years, since back when he was a wee timorous beastie who ran naked in the heather with the rest of the wild haggises for the pleasure of just a couple of thousand viewers. And back then he was original, eclectic and way funnier. Now, I feel like he’s allowed himself to become enslaved by the algorithm, banging the same drum because it guarantees his biggest audiences, rather than just talking about what genuinely interests him and the things that made him fall in love with cinema and TV in the first place. You have to admit, even if you don’t agree with me, that you seen and heard a LOT of his gags a thousand times, right? Eventually, he’ll wind up sounding like that old guy who lives in the basement, complaining about movies being too loud now, or something. And the only audience that will stick with him will be the bigots and angry 50 year old virgins who just want to see him stick it to the, “lib-tards.” If he wants to get some of his old magic back, he should talk more about what he loves, less about what he hates. Sure, still complain about what he hates, but for crying out loud! A blow by blow account of an entire series that we already know he hates and why??? That’s not educational, or informative, and it’s getting less and less entertaining. The other day he released a riveting video on Werner Herzog’s movie, Fitzcarraldo, which was excellent on every metric I mentioned in my last sentence. With new and different material, he was forced to write new and different witticisms, whilst giving his audience a bit of genuine insight into the movie making process and a look into the world of a truly unique and fascinating project that could have destroyed everyone involved! That was a taste of the old Drinker that drew me into this channel. I miss that guy. I just don’t want to see him become the type of algorithm chasing hack that he ridicules. And I don’t need to hear the same old gags, getting older with each repetition. I’m a fan.
    1
  21707. 1
  21708. 1
  21709. 1
  21710. 1
  21711. 1
  21712. 1
  21713. 1
  21714. 1
  21715. 1
  21716. 1
  21717. 1
  21718. 1
  21719. 1
  21720. 1
  21721. 1
  21722. 1
  21723. 1
  21724. 1
  21725. 1
  21726. 1
  21727. 1
  21728. 1
  21729. 1
  21730. 1
  21731. 1
  21732. 1
  21733. 1
  21734. 1
  21735. 1
  21736. 1
  21737. 1
  21738. 1
  21739. 1
  21740. 1
  21741. 1
  21742.  @lizhaycook8219  : To your second comment. Sure, there is a, “utility,” in being able to lead society from a purely dispassionate, disinterested, point of view. And that’s,why some politicians are good at what they do. However, we must consider that psychotics are NOT devoid of, “emotions,” but only devoid of Empathy. Which leads to two possible negative issues: Their inability to make a decision out of empathy, where the extra cost (let’s say?) time and resources needed to do the, “right thing,” are refused by the psychotic, merely on the grounds of a, “greater good,” (that of saving resources) when everyone around them doesn’t care about the expenditure, but wants to make the decision based on morality. The Covid debate (which I don’t want to get into here) has been a lot to do with the utility of getting back to work and reopening businesses, versus the protection of the most vulnerable, least productive members of society. So, we’ve actually all witnessed that conflict in real time (if we set aside the other issues, such as scepticism, etc?). The other, perhaps more potent, issue, is what if the psychotic in charge of our lives wants to satisfy their own emotional, financial and personal power desires, at the expense of society altogether? What if they steal, embezzle, make cruel laws, lie and deceive the people, just to satisfy their own ego? Their lack of empathy then becomes a genuine threat to all of us, if they are your Prime Minister, President, King or Queen? They may lead into a war, on the basis of a lie, resulting in hundreds of thousands of unnecessary deaths? Or, deny the very facts in front of you, during a plague, with the same result? They may take away your right to vote, or to do anything about their crimes, because they’re psychotic and simply don’t care? Don’t get me wrong. I saw a documentary in which a neurosurgeon self-diagnosed as a psychotic. He was great at his job and highly successful in his home and professional life. Yet, he knew he was, “different,” and explored the issue out of his own fascination into the workings of the human brain. He was unafraid to be honest and forthright about his condition, and he was able to sight examples of where his lack of empathy had saved lives professionally, but also where he had hurt people without understanding why he had. In the end, he put his great success down to the, “values,” he’d been taught by his mother. He argued it was both a, “nature,” and, “nurture,” deal, in the end. Truly fascinating, if you’re interested? As to, “who gets to make the rules,” about what’s right and wrong? There you’re talking political philosophy, really. You could start with Socrates (via Plato) and go on from there. You will usually find that too is a mix of utilitarianism and moral philosophy. Sometimes it’s not about the needs of the many outweighing the needs of the few. Sometimes it is. But, in the end, you have to come to your own conclusions. But, your question was such a good one, I felt it deserved a full answer. So, if you read me this far, thank you for your patience 😉👍
    1
  21743. 1
  21744. 1
  21745. 1
  21746. 1
  21747. 1
  21748. 1
  21749. 1
  21750. 1
  21751. 1
  21752. 1
  21753. 1
  21754. 1
  21755. 1
  21756. 1
  21757. 1
  21758. 1
  21759. 1
  21760. 1
  21761. 1
  21762. 1
  21763. 1
  21764. 1
  21765. 1
  21766. 1
  21767. 1
  21768. 1
  21769. 1
  21770. 1
  21771. 1
  21772. 1
  21773. 1
  21774. 1
  21775. 1
  21776. 1
  21777. 1
  21778. 1
  21779. 1
  21780. 1
  21781. 1
  21782. 1
  21783. 1
  21784. Thank you so much for this insight. It has more value than I can put into words. It is remarkable that the Russian state’s response to the Zelensky interview was SO PREDICTABLE. That’s the thing about evil; it’s sheer banality. I remember something Putin said to a western, “journalist,” in just after he started his botched attempt to invade Ukraine, which said it all for me. He said words to the effect, “If there was no Russia, what would be the point of having the world at all?” It was a response to the (hinted) suggestion that he could be deposed, either by forces from the wider world or by his own population. The implied threat of nucl3ar annihilation was clear enough, but there was a deeper point that I so WISH people would explode the myth of. And that is the idea that Putin, “represents,” Russia in ANY WAY. I so WISHED that this, “journalist,” had responded by saying, “Why would Russia need you to continue being Russia? Why wouldn’t the country be just fine without you? What are you? A Tzar?” Of all the propaganda that needs to be challenged at a fundamental level, I would say it is the idea that Putin somehow, “is Russia,” in some way. Putin has worked so hard at making himself the living embodiment of Russia, to the point where his name and the word, “Russia,” are meant to be synonymous. But the fact is, like all greedy, small minded, mafia bosses, he has NO CLUE about who, “his people,” are or what Russian, “culture,” actually is. For example, I feel certain that, if Putin ever was brought down by some palace coup, there would be dancing in the streets of Moscow, regardless of how many thousands missed him; there would be millions more that celebrated the end of his dictatorship. And I think Putin is vaguely aware of that much. Which is the full extent of how in touch he is with his own people: he fears them. Putin is NOT Russia. And Russia would be better off without him. Deep down, in their hearts, all Russians know this; even the fanatics. I really appreciate your thoughtful insights, honesty and realism. I feel for you and the ambivalence you must struggle with, understanding your people far better than your dictator ever will and loving your country far more than your dictator ever could. Your truth is louder than anything Putin has to say. Thank you, sincerely.
    1
  21785. 1
  21786. 1
  21787. 1
  21788. 1
  21789. 1
  21790. 1
  21791. 1
  21792. 1
  21793. 1
  21794. 1
  21795. 1
  21796. 1
  21797. 1
  21798. 1
  21799. 1
  21800. 1
  21801. 1
  21802. 1
  21803. 1
  21804. 1
  21805. 1
  21806. 1
  21807. 1
  21808. 1
  21809. 1
  21810. 1
  21811. 1
  21812. 1
  21813. 1
  21814. 1
  21815. 1
  21816. 1
  21817. 1
  21818. 1
  21819. 1
  21820. 1
  21821. 1
  21822. 1
  21823. 1
  21824. 1
  21825. Kathleen Martin : It seems that, “satire,” is not a thing anymore? Look, every time there’s a Nazi atrocity, the Trump Tramps scream about their, “2nd Amendment Right to bear arms,” because the whole point of a Troll (and I wonder if you even KNOW this?) is to create and maintain American DIVISION. Have you ever noticed just how easy it is to defeat the, “arguments,” of Trump Trolls? How abusive they get, when you’ve achieved that? They are NOT employed to, “win any debates,” or, “persuade,” you of a God Damned thing! They are here to ensure that Trump gets the OXYGEN he NEEDS: “DIVISION.” That which got him into power, and will KEEP HIM THERE, if people like YOU don’t WAKE UP! I KNOW for a FACT that NOT ONE Trump Tramp, 2nd Amendment, SHOW OFF, will DARE to reach for a gun! You should KNOW this too?! Most of Trump’s Trolls are NOT EVEN AMERICAN or IN THIS COUNTRY! And the ones that are, like Trump because THEY are LIKE Trump! COWARDS! LIARS! SOCIOPATHS! They’re happy for someone ELSE to pull the trigger, so long as it’s NOT them. I promise you, NO ONE from the 2nd Amendment Camp will lift a trigger finger, because they’re also Trump Loyalists, and the rest are NOT sociopaths. So, excuse me, while I point out the INCONTROVERTIBLE FACTS, because they are f**king IRONIC, to say the LEAST! It IS TRUE, that the 2nd Amendment WAS created for this PRECISE Contingency, and that, to me, is F**KING HILARIOUS!!! They are, once again, hoist by their own petard, of hypocrisy and cowardice. But, we cannot deny the FACT that this woman COULD, if she so desired, form a Militia, swear in people from ANY part of the US, and defend her land and property, from a tyrannical state, which is SO BREAKING THE LAW, that it was in the NEWS, FFS!!! Is THAT not funny to you!??? She could commit an atrocity on her own land, and they would not even be able to arrest her without breaking the law and defying the Constitution. If they did arrest her, she could SUE them and make a fortune out of it, and write a book, too! Imagine the grieving families of the architects, engineers, brick layers and builders, having to live through THAT? Watching her being interviewed on Oprah? That’s sick but HILARIOUS, because it’s NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! Don’t you GET that? The Trump loyalists will meekly give up their land, and some of them will sue, MAYBE, because it was illegal, Tyrannical and unconstitutional. Pardons will be issued, and Trump will have that added to his Impeachment list. And, the people who lost their land will have to wait for years and years, before they get their, “unsatisfactory,” outcome. And, those, who were never loyal to Trump in the first place, will invite the press, fight to stop the machines; and, MAYBE some will get arrested, for going too far? But, their plight will be ignored, by an indifferent world, which doesn’t care that they are STILL DOING THIS SHIT TO INDIAN TRIBES, TODAY, and no one gave a shit when that Native American girl got her ARM BLOWN OFF by an Oil Company, “security,” thug, did they? That was less than a years ago. So, you don’t like my sense of humor? Fine. But, you definitely don’t GET the joke, if you, “think,” I’m, “ADVOCATING,” for violence? I’m just lol’ing at the utter HYPOCRISY of Trump Trolls, and pointing out the FACTS, and the insupportable, untenable position the government would be in, if people started forming those Militias. The real TRAGEDY is that this woman will not just be weeping for the loss of her land. She’s weeping for the loss of America, and all decent people are weeping with her. I am. Does she LOOK like she’s going to shoot anyone to you? I feel for her, as a symbol of the crookedness and HATE, and the DIVISION that Trump has exploited to the point of killing America. And, I could have been more brief in my response to you, and simply said, “If I didn’t laugh at this, I’d be forced to weep with her.” But, you strike me as a feeling, decent, intelligent human being. Was I right? To give you the benefit of the doubt? Even though you did not extend that curtesy to me? We are brother and sister, you and I. Don’t give them what they want. Let us unite? I apologise, if I offended you. I was NOT serious. Though my point was, “deadly,” serious. And, I can promise you that no builders were harmed in the making of this, overly long, comment 😉✌️ . . . ?
    1
  21826. 1
  21827. 1
  21828. 1
  21829. 1
  21830. 1
  21831. 1
  21832. 1
  21833. 1
  21834. 1
  21835. I am going to ask you for your empathy. And I beg your patience, since this comment turned out far longer than I intended when I began. Please believe my sincerity and hear my point? Look, Prof Wilson, surely you can see that this behaviour is unfair on your viewers and somewhat confusing? You are normally so sound on political matters, indeed, the voice of reason and calm when all about us are losing their heads. Yet, you repeatedly make this astonishing claim about Putin without EVER responding to the very reasonable request to offer SOME REASON as to WHY you believe this, let alone EVIDENCE or even LINKS to your sources or articles . . . ANYTHING! I don’t understand WHY you are doing this? Do you want to convince us? Then give your evidence. Do you want us to research it for ourselves? Then SAY SO! Maybe give us a starting point? Are you just trolling us with unsubstantiated, outrageous claims of Trumpian proportions? Then, please stop it! I wish I could convey the effect this has on me personally and probably many other disconcerted viewers. I come to you as a TRUSTED source of political discussion, sketch offerings, debate, think pieces, etc. I have disagreed with you on several occasions, but NEVER ONCE have I doubted your honesty, integrity or compassion. To a man like me, an agoraphobic, with several mental health conditions, who consequently doesn’t get out much, you are a man upon whom I can rely, for some well adjusted, thoughtful, compassionate, well informed and often surprisingly entertaining videos, to which I turn for help with processing world events; you help me to see other points of view; help me through my, often, troubled days. I like you, personally, (from what I see presented) and believe that, if we ever met (vanishingly unlikely, but) you and I would get along famously. Yet, PLEASE try to imagine for yourself what it might FEEL like if one of your most reliable, TRUSTED sources of information AND solace; a person to whom you turn for sensible, dare I say, “comforting,” input, suddenly kept making an allegation like, “Kier Starmer is not the real PM, but a doppelgänger,” and every single time you asked, “What makes you think that?” they flatly ignore you. They reply to other questions and comments, but NEVER this one. They offer no evidence, no reason for you to agree with their findings, and behave as though it’s all just a bit of fun. And they repeatedly assert it as though it were established fact, heedless of any effect such a destabilising assertion may have on their broader following or how that ripples out into the wider community. How would that make YOU feel? Someone you trust, like and rely upon as an oasis of sanity in a world gone mad, on this one particular issue, simply will not stop making these completely (to me) groundless allegations that have implications for everyone on Earth! And they flatly will not offer you ANY reasoning behind their thinking, let alone a SOURCE! For me, it ultimately leaves me saddened. I honestly thought you were one of the, “normals,” not one of the conspiracy nut jobs. But how else does one describe a man who makes these outrageous assertions with no evidence? If I have missed your evidence, links or whatever, in a previous video, please direct me to that? But, PLEASE!? For the love of Mike!? Will you please STOP making these assertions, UNLESS you site your EVIDENCE (even if it is just links under your video) and back up your claims EACH TIME you make them? You SHOULD be offering links to your sources in every single video in which you make this claim. You must understand that? Can’t you see how irresponsible this behaviour is??? You realise some people actually take you seriously, right??? From a genuine admirer, a long time subscriber and a sincere commenter, I ask you, please consider what I am asking of you with an open mind?
    1
  21836. 1
  21837. 1
  21838. 1
  21839. 1
  21840. 1
  21841. 1
  21842. 1
  21843. 1
  21844. 1
  21845. 1
  21846. 1
  21847. 1
  21848. 1
  21849. 1
  21850. 1
  21851. 1
  21852. 1
  21853. 1
  21854. 1
  21855. 1
  21856. 1
  21857. 1
  21858. 1
  21859. 1
  21860. 1
  21861. To the guy who withdrew his comment: There’s a lot of truth in what you say there, especially about the culture of Russia. Yet, the communist revolution wasn’t their only big grasp at a better world. You seem to be overlooking that it was Lenin’s betrayal of the new government, and then Stalin’s betrayal of Lenin that turned things sour in Russia? Not external forces. Then there was the fall of Communism; a revolution in its own right, within which we saw the old guard stage another attempted coup, driving tanks into Red Square. It was that failed attempt to restore communism that made Boris Yeltsin a star, before the world learned what a drunken degenerate he was, willing to bequeath the whole country to Putin (probably as much due to blackmail and threats as being too drunk to care?) and all of that put a seal on Russia’s destiny. And you’re overlooking the popular support on the ground that Prigozhin’s Wagner Mutiny generated? Yes, Russia has never known enfranchisement or democracy in its entire history, which is well over a millennia. But it is obvious to Putin’s already paranoid state that the Russian people want democracy for the most part: especially the young and educated. That is why they have such a stranglehold on web services, news media and any other cultural outlet they can grasp onto. Putin himself has modelled his entire career on Stalin’s, trying to emulate him in every way imaginable. The paranoia leads to heavy handed tactics, which leads to people hating their leaders, which leads to paranoia, which leads to . . . and so on, forever. Until the system becomes unsustainable again. Russia has had two major revolutions inside one century, and far more coup attempts. The biggest pressures on the Russian state are not external. They come from within. Putin just finds it convenient to draw the public’s attention to external forces. And it’s useful to blame the west for his own failures. Just as he does over the Ukraine war. Russia was never under any threat from the west, and he knew that better than anyone.
    1
  21862. 1
  21863. 1
  21864. 1
  21865. 1
  21866. 1
  21867. 1
  21868. 1
  21869. 1
  21870. 1
  21871. 1
  21872. 1
  21873. 1
  21874. 1
  21875. 1
  21876. 1
  21877. 1
  21878. 1
  21879. 1
  21880. 1
  21881. 1
  21882. 1
  21883. 1
  21884. 1
  21885. 1
  21886. 1
  21887. 1
  21888. 1
  21889. 1
  21890. 1
  21891. 1
  21892. 1
  21893. 1
  21894. 1
  21895. 1
  21896. 1
  21897. 1
  21898. 1
  21899. 1
  21900. 1
  21901. 1
  21902. 1
  21903. 1
  21904. 1
  21905. 1
  21906. 1
  21907. 1
  21908. 1
  21909. 1
  21910. 1
  21911. 1
  21912. 1
  21913. 1
  21914. 1
  21915. 1
  21916. 1
  21917. Varemia : You just IGNORED all the salient FACTS that were pointed out to you? Logic and reason are NOT really your thing, are they? For a start, EVIDENCE is EVIDENCE, regardless of the “motivations” of the people who FIND the FACTS. Not even the “memo” disputes THAT. There is the “WHAT” in this case. Then there is the “WHO”, which in THIS case, is the JUDGE, who makes the DECISION to grant and / or extend the FISA Warrants. The FBI can ONLY APPLY for the warrants, IT WAS THE JUDGE who made the DECISION. Then, there’s the “WHY”? Because, surveilling Carter Page lead to the OUTING of THREE RUSSIAN SPIES! Two of whom fled the country and are now back in Moscow, and one of whom Pleaded GUILTY to SPYING and was imprisoned! Then the “WHAT” was Steele asked to do? Investigate Donald Trump, for Fusion GPS. You IGNORE the FACT that Steele DID NOT KNOW the “WHO”. Fusion NEVER told him, UNTIL he handed in his FINDINGS. Of COURSE Steele and ALL who knew the TRUTH about TRUMP, were “Anti-Trump” at THAT point? By THEN, they ALL KNEW Trump was CROOKED! Steele could not BELIEVE that the FBI were going to ALLOW Trump to become POTUS, when THEY TOO had all this EVIDENCE of Trump’s CORRUPTION. And the “WHERE” is MOSCOW. THAT is where ALL the crooked money came from, to buy up Donny’s MASSIVE DEBTS with Deutsche Bank, when THEY were SUING Trump to get it back and HE was, as usual, COUNTER SUING the bank! A familiar “tactic” of Trump’s, to buy time and make it not worth while for the people he owes money to, to come after it. THAT is the REASON that NO Western bank will TOUCH CROOKED DONNY. And, suddenly, as if by “magic” his $ Billions in debt, DISAPPEARS??? Not ONLY did Deutsche Bank STOP trying to get back their $ Billions, but they, STRANGELY, decided to lend him EVEN MORE THAN THEY WANTED BACK FROM HIM?!?!?! So, the “WHEN”? Steele’s “Anti-Trump Bias,” along with EVERYONE ELSE involved with these investigations, emerged AFTER they found out just HOW DEEPLY CROOKED Trump is! And how OBVIOUSLY BOUGHT BY THE RUSSIANS his WHOLE FAMILY IS. This HOSTILE, FOREIGN POWER, that wants to END our DEMOCRACY. REMEMBER THAT??? They attacked our ELECTIONS! Even DONNY doesn’t dispute THAT any more? Only that Putin, himself, gave the order, which WE, THE PEOPLE, KNOW to be a LIE! So, now that you have the FACTS, what will YOU do with them? Keep SHILLING for Trumpski? Or DEMAND our DEMOCRACY back, and JUSTICE for ALL concerned? This “memo” is a bad JOKE! Without questioning the ACTUAL EVIDENCE, even ONCE, the ENTIRE “document” COMPLAINS about the “motives” of the people who DID THEIR JOBS WELL, by taking their “remarks” OUT OF CONTEXT and by TRYING to CONFUSE the timelines and by LEAVING OUT IMPORTANT DETAILS about what ELSE WAS HAPPENING at the times that they quote them. IT WILL NOT STAND! Nunes’ PALPABLE failure will become APPARENT to those who haven’t ALREADY seen RIGHT THROUGH IT, as the HACK JOB it REALLY IS. And then Nunes will either be LAMBASTED by Trump, or just go quietly into the wilderness, hoping not to draw attention to himself. So, TELL THE TRUTH, or be on the WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY? But, don’t try to sell us this “Bill of Goods” because NO ONE IS BUYING IT. SMH
    1
  21918. Varemia : You lost the argument, so your excuse for running away is, “Caps-lock hurts my eyes”? Really??? That is the BASIS for you RUNNING AWAY FROM THE TRUTH??? Ha ha ha! 🤣 You say I am, “worked up”? Yet YOU are the one putting in all this effort to distort the EVIDENCE? You seek a reason to cop out, KNOWING that you a WRONG, so the best you can do is, “CAPS-LOCK HURTS MY EYES,” and run away? VERY lame 🤣 Firstly, Judges are NOT CONCERNED with the, “motives,” political or otherwise of EVIDENCE. You WON’T see it dismissed, on THAT basis, I PROMISE you. It does NOT MATTER “why” people prove your guilt? Do you “think” if Eliot Ness said, “I don’t LIKE Al Capone, and I made it my mission in life to bring him down,” the judge would have thrown out the case, because of PERSONAL BIAS??? ARE YOU MAD??? Next, it is a DEMONSTRABLE LIE, in any case. Most of the FBI agents involved in investigating Trump are REPUBLICANS. This too, will be established. But, they do NOT let politics interfere with their work. They ARE Professionals. Though this is ONLY relevant, if you take the discredited, Nunes’, “Deep State” HYSTERIA to heart, in which case, you are too dumb to deal with the truth; or too DESPERATE; or like Nunes, too compromised? So, given that this “complaint” is NOT a “Fruit of the poison tree” issue, that it leaves out relevant FACTS, confuses time lines and attributes “motives” to people, that could NEVER be established in court, EVEN IF it were to be taken seriously; what are you left with? A “Personal Opinion” expressed by a KNOWN Trump SHILL, who was SO BADLY DISCREDITED that he was “sort of” recused from his position as the CHAIR of the Committee in the FIRST PLACE. The COUNTER-Memo’s FACTS WILL come out, which will only ADD to the ongoing SHREDDING that even Republicans have joined in with, of Nunes’ memo. And, one last thing? Should “statements which imply MOTIVE” be the standard of the thread to pull on, here? Because, by that SAME token, Trump will be DEMONSTRABLY in SERIOUS Trouble. So, you run away, if you need an EXCUSE? But, I will write in the manner of MY choosing. I PROMISE you THIS: The Nunes “memo” will end up being just one more petard, by which the GOP will be hoist. I give it TWO WEEKS, MAX. Come back again, in two weeks, to discuss it, if you DARE? And I will explain to you just WHY my prediction was SPOT ON. Mean while, you continue with your GOP-Style lame excuses for copping out of arguments that you CAN’T win 🤣
    1
  21919. 1
  21920. 1
  21921. 1
  21922. 1
  21923. 1
  21924. 1
  21925. 1
  21926. 1
  21927. It seems to me that FTL travel is not forbidden by physics, so long a nothing occurs before your own time line? You could travel into the, “past,” toward the distant light of Vega, continually adjusting for blue shifted, speeded up events and positioning unfolding before the vessel you’re in. Vega only receives the message before we sent it, relative to our position, which automatically corrects itself as you cover the distance. Let’s say they replay, using FTL signalling? They would experience the same phenomena, but our reply would not arrive before we sent it. Only, apparently before they sent it, but only if they remain at a giant distance from us. I think there’s a flaw in the, “bootstrapping,” reading of the problem, which fails to take into account the distance itself. It’s a space-time problem that discards, “space,” resulting in erroneous bootstrapping conclusions. Hawking suggested such violations are impossible but it was only conjecture. He has no theory to back it up. Not even a thought out hypothesis. He just said, “Maybe the universe does something to prevent light speed breaking?” He had no idea how, or in what way we might investigate that idea. To me this strikes me as the same muddled thinking that results in bizarre notions like Inflation. That’s another hypothesis that is often, wrongly, referred to as a, “theory,” despite having no evidence to support it, as yet. At least, no evidence that cannot be accounted for by rival hypotheses. With Inflation, the fundamental category error is in seeing the apparent uniform (“homogeneous”) spread of baryonic matter throughout the universe as resulting from a violation of time’s speed limit. How can the universe be the same in opposite directions when the speed of light would have to be violated to make it so. Two obvious answers occur to me. One: that the uniformity is caused by something intrinsic to the nature of matter itself, in the same way that two plastic cups can be identical in every important respect, despite being made in two different factories on opposite sides of the Earth. Using the same materials, processes and methods is what makes them the same, because they are made of the same stuff and appeared in the same way. Or Two, my preference: Put, “time,” back into the equation. Instead of seeing Inflation as a, “violation,” of time’s limitations, ask the question, “What was time doing when it was compressed into the entire mass of the universe, which was itself compressed into an infinitesimally tiny spec?” Surely, if we accept that space-time is a thing; the two entities being inextricably interwoven (which we’ve proved over and over and now rely on this knowledge to make our world work) then it is foolish to assume that time was running at the same rate throughout the entire expansion of the universe? I put this criticism of Inflation forward as the best example I can think of for the type of category errors we make that lead us into the dead ends of, “grandmother paradoxes,” and bootstrapping, etc. Why are we ignoring the vast amount of matter and space between us and Vega when we ask what would happen to an FTL message. The constraints of causality would still apply in so far as how we would experience the exchange of information. We would send the message and get a reply, in that order. It would arrive at Vega many years in our past, but still at a point after the point at which we see it now; not beyond that point. I’m not at all sure if I’m communicating clearly, but I’m convinced we get muddled by the trap of our own experience of the universe, which is stuck at a point that is neither micro nor macro enough to see it from both ends . . . so to speak. Thanks for the fascinating video though. And, if you read my whole comment (I doubt anyone will) thanks for your immense patience.
    1
  21928. 1
  21929. 1
  21930. 1
  21931. 1
  21932. 1
  21933. 1
  21934. 1
  21935. 1
  21936. 1
  21937. 1
  21938. 1
  21939. 1
  21940. 1
  21941. 1
  21942. 1
  21943. 1
  21944. 1
  21945. 1
  21946. 1
  21947. 1
  21948. 1
  21949. 1
  21950. 1
  21951. 1
  21952. 1
  21953. 1
  21954. 1
  21955. 1
  21956. 1
  21957. 1
  21958. 1
  21959. 1
  21960. 1
  21961. 1
  21962. 1
  21963. 1
  21964. 1
  21965. 1
  21966. 1
  21967. 1
  21968. 1
  21969. 1
  21970. 1
  21971. 1
  21972. 1
  21973. 1
  21974. 1
  21975. 1
  21976. 1
  21977. 1
  21978. 1
  21979. 1
  21980. 1
  21981. 1
  21982. 1
  21983. 1
  21984. 1
  21985. 1
  21986. 1
  21987. 1
  21988. 1
  21989. 1
  21990. 1
  21991. 1
  21992. 1
  21993. 1
  21994. 1
  21995. 1
  21996. 1
  21997. 1
  21998. 1
  21999. 1
  22000. 1
  22001. 1
  22002. 1
  22003. 1
  22004. 1
  22005. 1
  22006. 1
  22007. 1
  22008. 1
  22009. 1
  22010. 1
  22011. 1
  22012. 1
  22013. 1
  22014. 1
  22015. 1
  22016. 1
  22017. 1
  22018. 1
  22019. 1
  22020. 1
  22021. 1
  22022. 1
  22023. 1
  22024. 1
  22025. 1
  22026. 1
  22027. 1
  22028. 1
  22029. 1
  22030. 1
  22031. Though, he could have answered the question with one word: Corruption. We’re witnessing the direct result of Oligarchy. Where are all those guns and tanks we said we had, asks Putin? Well, ask the generals with the big shiny yachts and the posh London houses where all that money went. And because so many officers have bought their commissions, that all seemed fine during peacetime, but now there’s fighting and no one has a clue how to prosecute a war. They thought they would be resupplying in Kyiv and didn’t bring enough shells or fuel to even deal with the possibility of resistance. Since then, the top brass have been more concerned about reprisals from Putin than fighting their war, and none of the various units have been cooperating because they were competing for scarce resources and playing the blame game. You can forget about air, sea and land coordination. They are slowly getting their act together as the incompetent leaders are being killed off, but I remain convinced that a concerted effort could yet bring Ukraine TOTAL VICTORY, meaning Russian troops GONE from Donbas, Crimea, The Black Sea and the Sea of Azov. Especially if we in the west have the sense to see that spending billions on giving Ukraine a fully equipped navy, airforce AND heavy infantry NOW would still save us an untold amount in blood and treasure in the future. Our best hope for a lasting peace would be to give Putin his worst ever bloody nose. We must treat his digging into eastern Ukraine as utterly unacceptable. Or he’ll be at it again in Finland, Poland and other countries before you know it, while China helps him out by invading Taiwan! We need to give Putin and the world’s dictators a moment of pause, and some genuine reasons to doubt the hope of success in taking on the west. We must be willing to sacrifice for the cost of that. Or we’ll be paying costs we cannot afford sooner than we think. And defeating Putin now would actually be the best nuclear deterrent we have.
    1
  22032. 1
  22033. 1
  22034. PA JM : Can I just take issue with ONE thing you said? It’s the term, “Conservative.” Words matter, as we’re constantly being reminded, and, as a conservative, I feel it’s important that we GET THIS. Conservative America DESPISES Trump and ALL he represents. I left the Republicans when Trump swindled the nomination. MANY of my EX-Republican friends have apologised to me, for getting angry at me, for all the, “animus,” I expressed about Trump. They thought I was off my rocker. Now, THEY KNOW that Trump is off his; and corrupt; and a traitor; and a childish, vindictive, IDIOT, not qualified to run a barbecue, let alone something IMPORTANT. The GOP (the Republicans) are now an EXTREMIST, Nazi appeasing, cult; made up of the criminally compromised, the blind and the RACISTS. 25% of Reps have LEFT the party, since Trump took office, which explains his, “apparent,” rise in, “popularity,” WITHIN the Rep Party, as the dregs have been left behind, to support Trump’s Nazi Goals, pursued by Stalinist methods. Consider: WHAT is, “Conservative,” about EXPLODING our National Debt, in a Tax HEIST, where the temporary tax break ENDS next year, for the working man and woman, while the 1%’s Tax Relief is PERMANENT? WHAT is, “Conservative,” about ATTACKING our allies, rhetorically and financially? WHAT is, “conservative,” about ATTACKING ONLY AMERICAN institutions, law and order, the CONSTITUTION, American business, personalities, EVEN OUR SPORTS, for crying out loud??? There are NO conservatives supporting Trump, in the Party, and Conservative America will VOTE THEM ALL OUT at the Mid Terms. What we must WATCH FOR, is a ALL OUT attack on the voting system, from both Russia AND China! BOTH of whom, have NOTHING to lose, by trying it again, but this time, with INSIDE HELP? Be VIGILANT! And CALL THEM what they ARE: “Traitors, Nazis, Alt-Wrong, Extremist, Criminals, Conspirators, Racists, Corrupted, SOB’s”!!! But, THEY DON’T GET TO BE CALLED, “CONSERVATIVE!!!” Not by ANY existing definition of the word! Phew! I ranted a bit, there . . . Sorry ‘bout that . . . If you read this far, thank you for your indulgence. I mean it; sincerely 👍
    1
  22035. Steven Thompson : That’s an understatement, if ever I heard one. It’s basic physics by now. We have a, “soft dictatorship,” which completed its, “soft coup,” at the comedy Impeachment, “trial.” Your coming, “elections,” are already rigged. So, expecting ANY form of, “justice,” in a Dictatorship, is like expecting them to restore the Republic, admit their crimes, and allowing their entire administration to be indicted and jailed along with the whole Trump family. It’s just NOT gonna’ happen. But, what WILL happen, by the looks of it, is that they will continue to follow Putin’s teachings on, “How To Keep Your Dictatorship,” by following Rule 1: Never admit it’s a Dictatorship; Rule 2: Always allow your opponents in the population to believe that the, “remedy,” is just around the corner (in this case, our rigged, “elections”) and, Rule 3: (which is conveniently Trump’s family motto) Always Get Revenge. You’ll notice the proof of this pudding, as it becomes increasingly obvious that the Republic has already fallen, while fewer and fewer public figures and journalists are willing to criticise the administration, and Trump in particular. Until, one day, you’ll realise that the only way to find ANY criticism of Trump, will be to go onto illegal websites, or foreign ones, which will be VERY difficult to access, given that the government is censoring the internet now. Besides, you won’t want to get, “flagged,” for having made the search? Revolution, like the Ukraine’s, a decade ago, without weapons, filling the streets and halting the country: THAT is your ONLY hope now. I don’t blame you all for being scared of that. But, please, for the sake of reality, don’t go propagating the LIE that the, “elections,” are, “not,” ALREADY RIGGED? That just helps the Monarchy to buy time . . .
    1
  22036. 1
  22037. 1
  22038. 1
  22039. 1
  22040. 1
  22041. 1
  22042. 1
  22043. 1
  22044. 1
  22045. 1
  22046. 1
  22047. 1
  22048. 1
  22049. 1
  22050. 1
  22051. 1
  22052. 1
  22053. 1
  22054. 1
  22055. 1
  22056. 1
  22057. 1
  22058. 1
  22059. 1
  22060. 1
  22061. 1
  22062. 1
  22063. 1
  22064. 1
  22065. 1
  22066. 1
  22067. 1
  22068. 1
  22069. 1
  22070. 1
  22071. 1
  22072. 1
  22073. 1
  22074. 1
  22075. 1
  22076. 1
  22077. 1
  22078. 1
  22079. 1
  22080. You know, that’s a really good point. It might actually provide the UN with that illusive, “mechanism,” by which they can eject Russia from the UN altogether? The whole lunatic scheme is riddled with paradoxes, beginning with the fact that, if the downfall of the USSR was, “illegal,” then her, “federal,” court has no legal standing by which to make that case. But, if they do proceed and ratify this sham, the only court who’s opinion will matter will be China’s. They will ensure China is on board and going to formally recognise their reinstatement of the Soviet block, or the whole exercise will be pointless anyway. And China will demand that this means the, “whole package,” including Communism! They are ideologically committed to the worldwide spread of communism, which makes no sense for a country with the largest number, per capita, of dollar millionaires in the world, but I don’t doubt they will love seizing the opportunity to teach Russia the dark ways of hypocrisy as a state model. It would help the west to no end, though. As no one would be able to dismiss anything going on with Russia as, “regional spats,” when they are back to openly declaring world domination as their motives, beginning with the re-establishment of their old Soviet borders. The entire world will be on high alert, with western politicians unable to get elected unless they commit to getting the reds out from under our beds. We should all HOPE that Putin is dumb enough to let this go ahead, and laugh as his country breaks up in regional rioting, while the core of Russia becomes China’s official equivalent of Belarus cum North Korea.
    1
  22081. 1
  22082. 1
  22083. 1
  22084. 1
  22085. 1
  22086. 1
  22087. 1
  22088. 1
  22089. 1
  22090. 1
  22091. 1
  22092. 1
  22093. Mary Civitano : That takes real courage and self discipline. I admire that. Keep in mind, these cowards will never follow through on their threats. They’re like Trump in that way; all Bloviating. More importantly, remember at all times, the, “Formula,” for Trump. His Trolls are NOT here to, “convince,” you of anything. I promise you that. Not one of them has an, “open mind,” or is capable of, “change.” Not because they can’t, or are, “too stupid,” or whatever. But, it’s because that is NOT why they are here. The aim of a professional Troll is NEVER to, “win a debate,” as that’s patently impossible. They are here to maintain “DIVISION.” Remember, and hold on to, that word; and it’s antonym, “UNITY.” Do that, and everything Trump AND his Trolls do and say makes perfect sense. Trolls MUST keep people angry, alienated and DIVIDED. Trump’s Kryptonite is UNITY. Trump and his Cult KNOWS that a, “United States,” of America would be the END of him, as sure as full disclosure of his Tax and financial documents would. So, when the trolls, “argue,” it is only to make people, “feel,” things, like anger, fear, “rage,” etc. And, that’s what the threats are about. They speak of a, “Civil War II,” like it could, “really happen!” But, a moment’s thought, and you realise that the nation’s BIGGEST employer of ethnic minorities (the Military) who’s generals have been fired or quit, after being publicly attacked by Trump, one by one, and whom Trump’s, now DEFUNCT, “charity,” the Trump Foundation, was declared IN COURT to be, “routinely stealing from defenceless needy children and US Veterans,”. . . THOSE GUYS? . . . They are NOT going to back THAT GUY???!!! It’s all air. But, it’s ESSENTIAL to know that they KNOW they can’t convince anyone of a THING. That’s NOT their job. It makes NO SENSE for them to LIVE on channels they HATE, talking to people they HATE, about how much they HATE the Anchors and EVERYTHING they have to say? . . . “Division,” is their goal. “Unity,” is their DREAD. Hold that thought, and EVERY SINGLE THING you see, hear, or read in the news, now makes absolute sense. Sorry I went on so long, but you’re so wonderful, I just HAD to share my thoughts with you. Finally, a gem (not mine, but so true): The, “Art,” of NEVER losing the game? Don’t PLAY. God bless you ✌️👍
    1
  22094. 1
  22095. 1
  22096. 1
  22097. 1
  22098. 1
  22099. Mary Civitano : BTW, to your other point: If he is not a, “professional Troll,” he is still a Troll, getting his, “news,” from, “I’m Always Right About Stuff dot com,” “Alt-Wrong, Conspiracies And Reasons To Hate Other Races dot org,” and, “Grand Wizard of the Klan Pronouncements of The Week, hashtag RunAway,” or whatever these nut jobs get told WHAT to, “think,” by these days. In which case, the upshot of who and what he is, is the same, as he’s only regurgitating what Russia feeds to Alex Jones, QAnon, Fox And Fiends, et al. So, whether he’s witting or halfwitted, he works for Putin in the end. Therefore, there’s no reason to treat him any differently from an Organically, Home Grown, Troll Farmed professional. They all read from the same, Putin approved, script, with the same talking points. And, this chap is a perfect illustration of my earlier description: no, “argument,” “rationale,” or even basic, “reason,” behind ANY of his script, right? Just an attempt to get into people’s heads, at an, “emotional,” level. Every right minded person responds to him with disgust, horror, fear, anger, outrage, take your pick. And, then they’ve fallen into his trap, which he lays without KNOWING how he’s being USED by the, “media,” outlets that got him all worked up about the myths in his head. See? All, “feelings,” to ENSURE DIVISION. He may well be one of those guys who, “thinks,” he’s being paid by an American company, when it’s actually a Russian, or East European, Shell Company? He may be, “doing it for free,” as they say? Or, he may be in a bunker in St Petersburg? But, there is literally NO reason to treat him ANY differently, regardless of his circumstances, about which we cannot know, without a hack. If he’s dangerous, I can feel glad I reported him, at least. But, I PROMISE YOU, he is just a guy with Impotent Rage issues, who is too much of a coward to, “do,” the things he says. The ones that, “do,” these things, usually don’t talk to their victims about it. They stupidly talk to, “like minded,” loons, and the FBI sweeps them up on a slow weekend. But, it’s BECAUSE I don’t KNOW if he’s, “dangerous,” for sure, that I reported him. If he’s already on a Watch List, this could be a tipping point, that may save some people? Unlikely, but I won’t risk even a one in a million chance, personally ✌️👍
    1
  22100. 1
  22101. 1
  22102. 1
  22103. 1
  22104. 1
  22105. 1
  22106. 1
  22107. 1
  22108. 1
  22109. 1
  22110. 1
  22111. 1
  22112. 1
  22113. 1
  22114. 1
  22115. 1
  22116. 1
  22117. 1
  22118. 1
  22119. 1
  22120. 1
  22121. 1
  22122. 1
  22123. 1
  22124. 1
  22125. 1
  22126. 1
  22127. 1
  22128. 1
  22129. 1
  22130. 1
  22131. 1
  22132. 1
  22133. 1
  22134. 1
  22135. 1
  22136. 1
  22137. 1
  22138. 1
  22139. 1
  22140. 1
  22141. 1
  22142. 1
  22143. 1
  22144. 1
  22145. 1
  22146. 1
  22147. 1
  22148. 1
  22149. 1
  22150. 1
  22151. 1
  22152. 1
  22153. 1
  22154. 1
  22155. 1
  22156. 1
  22157. 1
  22158. 1
  22159. 1
  22160. 1
  22161. 1
  22162. 1
  22163. 1
  22164. 1
  22165. 1
  22166. 1
  22167. 1
  22168. 1
  22169. 1
  22170. 1
  22171. 1
  22172. 1
  22173. 1
  22174. 1
  22175. 1
  22176. 1
  22177. 1
  22178. 1
  22179. 1
  22180. 1
  22181. 1
  22182. 1
  22183. 1
  22184. 1
  22185. 1
  22186. 1
  22187. 1
  22188. 1
  22189. 1
  22190. 1
  22191. 1
  22192. 1
  22193. 1
  22194. 1
  22195. 1
  22196. 1
  22197. 1
  22198. 1
  22199. 1
  22200. 1
  22201. 1
  22202. 1
  22203. 1
  22204. 1
  22205. 1
  22206. 1
  22207. 1
  22208. 1
  22209. 1
  22210. 1
  22211. 1
  22212. 1
  22213. 1
  22214. 1
  22215. 1
  22216. 1
  22217. 1
  22218. 1
  22219. 1
  22220. 1
  22221. 1
  22222. 1
  22223. 1
  22224. 1
  22225. 1
  22226. 1
  22227. 1
  22228. 1
  22229.  @malthusXIII-fo3ep  : Nah, it wasn’t just that the banking collapse began on his watch, during 2008, putting paid to his reputation as an adroit financial manager. The nation as a whole bitterly resented the anti-democratic tendencies Labour kept showing, and were sick of being ignored over issues like Iraq already. But then he was just handed the job of PM without even having to so much as compete within his own party for the job, let alone attempting to win an election or anything so oldfashionedly democratic. The British public were already sour on the idea of a back room, “Deal,” in which people could make shady determinations about our democracy. But the banking crash was considered his chance, blown, as he hadn’t seen it coming, like the rest of the planet; had no safety net against a rainy day (indeed, it turned out he’d been using our nation’s gold reserves to keep Labour’s criminal war in Iraq afloat) and he merely shrugged when the public screamed for justice against the stock barons and bankers who’d so recklessly squandered the nation’s wealth on a housing bubble from which the nation has STILL yet to recover! If only Labour didn’t have such anti-democratic instincts, which keep surfacing so spectacularly at least twice a decade, they would be the go-to, “sensible,” party, in the way that the Tories once were. Now Starmer is the closest thing we have to a safe pair of hands, so centrists with a conservative (small c) outlook, like me, see him as our last, best hope.
    1
  22230. 1
  22231. 1
  22232. 1
  22233. 1
  22234. 1
  22235. 1
  22236. 1
  22237. 1
  22238. 1
  22239. 1
  22240. 1
  22241. 1
  22242. 1
  22243. 1
  22244. 1
  22245. 1
  22246. 1
  22247. 1
  22248. 1
  22249. 1
  22250. 1
  22251. 1
  22252. 1
  22253. 1
  22254. 1
  22255. 1
  22256. 1
  22257. 1
  22258. 1
  22259. 1
  22260. 1
  22261. 1
  22262. 1
  22263. 1
  22264. 1
  22265. 1
  22266. 1
  22267. 1
  22268. 1
  22269. 1
  22270. 1
  22271. 1
  22272. 1
  22273. 1
  22274. 1
  22275. 1
  22276. 1
  22277. 1
  22278. 1
  22279. 1
  22280. 1
  22281. 1
  22282. 1
  22283. 1
  22284. 1
  22285. 1
  22286. 1
  22287. 1
  22288. 1
  22289. 1
  22290. 1
  22291. 1
  22292. 1
  22293. 1
  22294. 1
  22295. 1
  22296. 1
  22297. 1
  22298. 1
  22299. 1
  22300. 1
  22301. 1
  22302. 1
  22303. 1
  22304. 1
  22305. 1
  22306. 1
  22307. 1
  22308. 1
  22309. 1
  22310. 1
  22311. 1
  22312. 1
  22313. 1
  22314. 1
  22315. 1
  22316. 1
  22317. 1
  22318. 1
  22319. 1
  22320. What amuses me is that so many mainstream outlets are acting like ChatGPT is a, “new,” technology, about to, “revolutionise,” or, “threaten,” the internet, depending on your perspective. When the reality is that half of the ads you’re seeing on YouTube are spoken by Robot voices, annunciating scripts that were generated by AI’s, being only one of hundreds generated that day, using publicly accessible stock footage, all in an attempt by scammers to see which, “product,” gains the highest traction. Has anyone seen that Jelvix ad lately? An artificial voice, speaking over generic stock footage of meeting rooms and sciencey looking people, about a, “company,” that does not yet exist! It doesn’t even mention what the, “product,” is! Then there’s all the bots that people get drawn into debates with on the more political videos. Any video featuring Donald Trump will have an army of bots with fake comments, capable of responding to your comments. You wonder why these people are so dumb and obtuse? Because they’re not real people! You wonder why their names are always weird and with lots of initials and numbers in them? That’s so their human analysts can identify them to modify the algorithm. Sure, there are human, “edge lords,” in the mix, but there are times when bots account for 90% of all the comments! This has been growing under our feet for years now. But, on the positive side, we will soon be able to generate AI companions, with crafted world views and attitudes, to help us with our research, support us with our self improvement goals, and console us when we’re sad or disappointed. We’ll have conversations with them, sharing the kinds of things we would normally only tell a psychotherapist and getting really helpful feedback. All whilst Apple, Google and Microsoft store everything away, and retain copyright over your inner most thoughts. And, if you tell your new AI BFF that you’re so mad at someone you could kill them, and then find the police are at your door, you’ll find that your BFF was responsible for notifying the cops after misinterpreting your conversation as, “criminal intent.” And it won’t help you to complain to your service provider, as you’ll find that you agreed to this potential outcome in your terms and conditions. The future looks . . . different, huh? . . .
    1
  22321. 1
  22322. 1
  22323. 1
  22324. 1
  22325. 1
  22326. 1
  22327. 1
  22328. 1
  22329. 1
  22330. 1
  22331. 1
  22332. 1
  22333. 1
  22334. 1
  22335. 1
  22336. 1
  22337. 1
  22338. 1
  22339. 1
  22340. 1
  22341. 1
  22342. 1
  22343. 1
  22344. 1
  22345. 1
  22346. 1
  22347. 1
  22348. 1
  22349. 1
  22350. 1
  22351. 1
  22352. 1
  22353. 1
  22354. 1
  22355. 1
  22356. 1
  22357. 1
  22358. 1
  22359. 1
  22360. 1
  22361. 1
  22362. 1
  22363. 1
  22364. 1
  22365. 1
  22366. 1
  22367. 1
  22368. 1
  22369. 1
  22370. 1
  22371. 1
  22372. 1
  22373. 1
  22374. 1
  22375. 1
  22376. 1
  22377. 1
  22378. 1
  22379. 1
  22380. 1
  22381. 1
  22382. 1
  22383. 1
  22384. 1
  22385. 1
  22386. 1
  22387. 1
  22388. 1
  22389. 1
  22390. 1
  22391. 1
  22392. 1
  22393. 1
  22394. 1
  22395. 1
  22396. 1
  22397. 1
  22398. 1
  22399. 1
  22400. 1
  22401. 1
  22402. 1
  22403. 1
  22404. 1
  22405. 1
  22406. 1
  22407. 1
  22408. 1
  22409. 1
  22410. 1
  22411. 1
  22412. 1
  22413. 1
  22414. 1
  22415. 1
  22416. 1
  22417. 1
  22418. 1
  22419. 1
  22420. 1
  22421. 1
  22422. 1
  22423. 1
  22424. 1
  22425. 1
  22426. 1
  22427. 1
  22428. 1
  22429. 1
  22430. 1
  22431. 1
  22432. 1
  22433. 1
  22434. 1
  22435. 1
  22436. 1
  22437. 1
  22438. 1
  22439. 1
  22440. 1
  22441. 1
  22442. 1
  22443. 1
  22444. 1
  22445. 1
  22446. 1
  22447. 1
  22448. 1
  22449. 1
  22450. 1
  22451. 1
  22452. 1
  22453. 1
  22454. 1
  22455. 1
  22456. 1
  22457. 1
  22458. 1
  22459. 1
  22460. 1
  22461. 1
  22462. 1
  22463. 1
  22464. 1
  22465. 1
  22466. 1
  22467. 1
  22468. 1
  22469. You said, “I feel like it’s too late to change everything.” I say don’t give up hope, as you may be surprised at just how fast Russia actually can change. We’ve seen it before. Look how quickly Russia flipped the switch from Communism to Cowboy Capitalism overnight? Look at how Prigozhin was cheered on the streets of Rostov, to everyone’s surprise, and not told to get out of town, but gifted wine, supplies for the troops and literal flowers thrown at the Wagner Group’s feet? Russia is a bubbling cauldron of resentment and anger at the state, with that very, very thin film of pro-Z, “patriotism,” on top. But all it takes is that one bubble to break the surface, at the right time, in the right place, and the whole thing can boil over and extinguish the flames beneath. I reckon Russia is one serious Ukrainian defeat away from an oligarch palace coup, one recruitment drive away from an angry mothers lead revolt, one draft fleeing gang of students away from all out chaos on the streets. It’s only ever a question of how quickly the, “law,” enforcement organisations get a sense of which way the wind is blowing and start refusing orders or transferring allegiances . . . Never give up hope, my friend. The west has no beef with Russians. It’s just the government and their thugs, who happen to be vastly outnumbered. And Putin’s paranoia demonstrates he knows he’s on a knife edge. It can’t be any fun being Putin these days. Your day will come. Maybe sooner than you think?
    1
  22470. 1
  22471. 1
  22472. 1
  22473. 1
  22474. 1
  22475. 1
  22476. 1
  22477. 1
  22478. 1
  22479. 1
  22480. 1
  22481. 1
  22482. 1
  22483. 1
  22484. 1
  22485. 1
  22486. 1
  22487. 1
  22488. 1
  22489. 1
  22490. 1
  22491. 1
  22492. 1
  22493. 1
  22494. 1
  22495. 1
  22496. 1
  22497. 1
  22498. 1
  22499. 1
  22500. 1
  22501. 1
  22502. 1
  22503. 1
  22504. 1
  22505. 1
  22506. 1
  22507. 1
  22508. 1
  22509. 1
  22510. 1
  22511. 1
  22512. 1
  22513. 1
  22514. 1
  22515. 1
  22516. 1
  22517. 1
  22518. 1
  22519. 1
  22520. 1
  22521. 1
  22522. 1
  22523. 1
  22524. 1
  22525. 1
  22526. 1
  22527. 1
  22528. 1
  22529. 1
  22530. Would you all just write to your well meaning MP’s and, after urging them to read Frankie’s articles for the broadsheets, and his monologues from the end of each New World Order episode, tell them: if they REALLY want CHANGE in Britain, they must STOP dumping these massive numbers on people and give us clear EXAMPLES of how they rip us off! Because I just want to scream at some of these very nice, kind, well meaning MP’s! It’s the examples that get everyone baying for blood. If you’re old enough to remember the drip drip effect of the MP’s Expenses Scandal, you’ll know what I mean. No one remembers the name of the MP now, or how much he charged us, the tax payers, but literally EVERYONE who heard about it, remembers that some grifting, entitled SOB charged us real money to maintain a MOAT around his DUCK ISLAND! And then, “defended,” himself by calling the angry British public, “just jealous,” for wanting him to give that money back! THAT was what sold papers and CHANGED Britain (though not as much as the public were conned into believing) and THAT is what we need now! If this woman wants us to join the fight for REAL change, then she needs to show us, “This is how your bank/service provider/supermarket makes YOU poorer and entraps YOU into poor economic decision making.” Examples, Examples, EXAMPLES!!! People were not shocked at, “how much,” Boris spent on paintings and wall paper for Downing Street. They were shocked that THEY were paying for it! They were not shocked at his parties (not even surprised, probably? I wasn’t.) they were appalled by the EXAMPLES of people being sick down the walls and dancing like it’s 1999 on the very EVE OF PRINCE PHILIP’S FUNERAL! And some of those c**ts will now be getting KNIGHTHOODS from that dead guy’s son! That’s going to be awkward! But EXAMPLES like THAT make the British public ask, “WHY TF should I be PAYING for this out of MY POCKET???” This issue is the same. That’s why Martin Lewis went from, “niche,” Radio 4 broadcaster to public figure and member of every financial body and watchdog in Europe practically over night. Because he gave SPECIFIC EXAMPLES of the rip offs, how they work, and what to do about them and everyone listened! EXAMPLES!
    1
  22531. 1
  22532. 1
  22533. 1
  22534. 1
  22535. 1
  22536. 1
  22537. 1
  22538. 1
  22539. 1
  22540. 1
  22541. 1
  22542. 1
  22543. 1
  22544. 1
  22545. 1
  22546. 1
  22547. 1
  22548. 1
  22549. 1
  22550. 1
  22551. 1
  22552. 1
  22553. 1
  22554. 1
  22555. 1
  22556. 1
  22557. 1
  22558. 1
  22559. 1
  22560. 1
  22561. 1
  22562. 1
  22563. 1
  22564. 1
  22565. 1
  22566. 1
  22567. 1
  22568. 1
  22569. 1
  22570. 1
  22571. 1
  22572. 1
  22573. 1
  22574. 1
  22575. 1
  22576. 1
  22577. 1
  22578. 1
  22579. 1
  22580. 1
  22581. 1
  22582. 1
  22583. 1
  22584. 1
  22585. 1
  22586. 1
  22587. 1
  22588. 1
  22589. 1
  22590. 1
  22591. 1
  22592. 1
  22593. 1
  22594. 1
  22595. 1
  22596. I have such admiration and gratitude to Channel 4’s journalists, who (let’s face it) have easily surpassed the BBC: a thing I genuinely did not expect to see in my lifetime. It’s not just that these journalists are clearly well educated, able to put this news into context for us, give an informed perspective and use that educated perspective to inform how they focus the aspects of this news that are important to pass on to us, the general public. It’s their gallantry in the face of danger. Being shot at by a sniper would be enough for most sensible people to leave the country for good. But such thinking does not even occur to a person like Lindsay. All it seems to have done is legitimise her coverage and focus her attention on the plight of those who, “don’t get to go back to their hotel and have a drink.” Her empathy and courage genuinely moves me. But, set ALL OF THAT aside and just ask yourself, which of the main British channels can you turn to for in depth, on site, up to date INFORMATION out of Ukraine and analysis of events? It used to be The BBC, no question. On this particular story, Ukraine’s war, that is not the case any longer. Channel 4 is just better, more comprehensive, more detailed, more up to date, etc, etc. I so hope that she and Channel 4 get some recognition amongst their piers for this coverage. They deserve accolades. It’s THE single most important issue in the world right now; from the reason we’re all paying more for fuel and heating, and facing a recession, to international politics and trade, to the fact that the world is dealing with the biggest threat to democracy in its history, certainly since WWII. The answers to all your big political questions are being determined on the battlefields of Ukraine. Anyone who thinks that’s misinformed has not been paying attention.
    1
  22597. 1
  22598. 1
  22599. 1
  22600. 1
  22601. 1
  22602. 1
  22603. 1
  22604. 1
  22605. 1
  22606. 1
  22607. 1
  22608. 1
  22609. 1
  22610. 1
  22611. 1
  22612. 1
  22613. 1
  22614. 1
  22615. 1
  22616. 1
  22617. 1
  22618. 1
  22619. 1
  22620. 1
  22621. 1
  22622. 1
  22623. 1
  22624. 1
  22625. 1
  22626. 1
  22627. 1
  22628. 1
  22629. 1
  22630. 1
  22631. 1
  22632. 1
  22633. 1
  22634. Do people get it yet? . . . Billionaires are NOT, “geniuses.” They’re more likely to have a lower than average IQ because of the bubble of isolation and privilege they’ve been brought up in. What happens is that some of these idiots get so high on the smell of their own farts, because they’re surrounded by, “yes sir, great idea sir, you’re so clever sir, for using my ideas sir,” that they actually come into contact with large numbers of the public, due to their need for attention and approval making them decide to run for president or buy a social media platform. Then we suddenly see and hear them, unfiltered, on a daily basis and we find out they’re idiots. Their mystique is destroyed and the public starts to question how such a dumbass got their cool reputation? And the answer is simple: They started with lots of money, made more money by buying the right to slap their names on every product they invest in, and then making all of the employees sign NDA’s which prevent them from telling everyone that these, “great products/inventions,” he’s going around talking about like he came up with the ideas himself, were not his idea at all. Musk Google’s, “What are smart people talking about?” every morning, and then says something dumb about it. We really need to stop assisting these idiots by acting like they’re any different from the rest of us, just because they have enough raw cash to pay Dave Chappelle to let him walk on stage in the middle of his act and shout, “I’m rich, bitch!” in the faces of an already loudly booing audience.
    1
  22635. 1
  22636. 1
  22637. 1
  22638. 1
  22639. 1
  22640. 1
  22641. 1
  22642. 1
  22643. 1
  22644. 1
  22645. 1
  22646. 1
  22647. 1
  22648. 1
  22649. 1
  22650. 1
  22651. 1
  22652. 1
  22653. 1
  22654. 1
  22655. 1
  22656. 1
  22657. 1
  22658. 1
  22659. 1
  22660. 1
  22661. 1
  22662. 1
  22663. 1
  22664. 1
  22665. 1
  22666. 1
  22667. 1
  22668. Agreed. I certainly hope the cops dig out anyone making racist threats. And that the actual racists are exposed for what they are. However . . . What of the legitimate criticism? Is that all to be shut down, labelling people as racists for raising their hands and asking questions? There’s no reason to tolerate racism. Yet some subjects are unsuitable for certain actors. I can’t imagine any legitimate reason to complain about black actors in Star Trek, Star Wars or the Marvel Universe. The line that these fantasies, “must reflect the world we live in today,” is fine. But it’s just daft to have black actors in The Lord Of The Rings. Tolkien created a world based on old Norse, ancient Germanic and ancient Celtic mythology. It doesn’t upset me at all to see people being just wrong about their artistic choices. But, to be told, “Nope! Not listening!” to anyone questioning the logic of altering the basis of Tolkien’s myths at a genetic level is just a cowardly way of shutting down debate and labelling people as, “racists,” for simply disagreeing. There will always be those who are just racists, and who hate what’s happening for racist reasons. I have no time for racists. But that should not be an excuse to shut down adult discussion over the meaning of art and why interfering with Tolkien’s vision is disrespectful to his legacy. That’s NOT a racist point of view. Merely an artistic criticism. The images are jarring and look misplaced, because they don’t represent the world that Tolkien created over an entire lifetime of hard work, research and creative endeavour. It is not up for debate, any more than people’s racism is. The whole point of Tolkien’s fantasy was that it does NOT, “reflect the world we live in today.” It reflects a mythical time in a place based on Northern European culture and genuine mythology that shaped their real worlds. Why should the people’s of these cultures be content to have their stories altered and distorted to fit some modern political agenda? It seems like a tone deaf overcorrection by people who lack the imagination to create their own mythology to me. The fact that the show has an awful, illogical script that disrespects the characters Tolkien created, hijacks their motivations and misrepresents the meanings of Tolkien’s work is not relevant. But it does seem like people who are too quick to put all criticism down to racism have an inbuilt excuse for failure. If we don’t like the show, simply because it’s rubbish, does that make us racists? Come on?
    1
  22669. 1
  22670. 1
  22671. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION: Examples, examples, EXAMPLES . . . PLEASE!? Draw less attention to the profits themselves (these are just vast numbers that people see, hear and read all the time and don’t sink in without a hook, a context; a working EXAMPLE) and instead, draw attention to HOW they are making those profits in the simplest terms. If people are told, “Your supermarket/bank/service provider is exploiting your need by doing X or Y, knowing you cannot afford alternatives, whilst actively making YOU poorer,” then that hits home, HARD. I’m tired of hearing reports about how the government’s own figures show a £21 BILLION POUND deficit due to waste, corruption and fraud, without ANY examples! Even though the main stream press (including the BBC!) don’t seem all that interested in this HORRIFIC revelation. People just tut and shake their heads. But give them some context, like they did over the expenses scandals a decade or so ago, and the public will be baying for BLOOD, as they did then! No one remembers, “how much it cost,” but EVERYONE remembers that an MP charged the public for a MOAT FOR HIS DUCK ISLAND and then said we were, “just jealous,” when we complained about it! THAT is how you get change! Just look at how people reacted to Johnson’s Party-gate scandal at first, and then how attitudes changed? A lot of shrugging and, “Oh well, that’s Boris for you,” quickly turned into horror and demands for ACTION once people started getting EXAMPLES of what happened at these parties, what people said and did about them, and the Tories made it worse for themselves by excusing and dismissing them, giving further context for people to be horrified at! The lies are what ostensibly cost Johnson his job, but it was EXAMPLES that made the public so angry and brought about that pressure for redress.
    1
  22672. 1
  22673. 1
  22674. 1
  22675. 1
  22676. 1
  22677. 1
  22678. 1
  22679. 1
  22680. 1
  22681. 1
  22682. 1
  22683. 1
  22684. 1
  22685. 1
  22686. 1
  22687. 1
  22688. 1
  22689. 1
  22690. 1
  22691. 1
  22692. 1
  22693. 1
  22694. 1
  22695. 1
  22696. 1
  22697. 1
  22698. 1
  22699. 1
  22700. 1
  22701. 1
  22702. 1
  22703. 1
  22704. 1
  22705. 1
  22706. 1
  22707. 1
  22708. 1
  22709. 1
  22710. 1
  22711. 1
  22712. 1
  22713. 1
  22714. 1
  22715. 1
  22716. 1
  22717. 1
  22718. 1
  22719. 1
  22720. 1
  22721. 1
  22722. 1
  22723. 1
  22724. 1
  22725. 1
  22726. 1
  22727. 1
  22728. 1
  22729. 1
  22730. 1
  22731. 1
  22732. 1
  22733. 1
  22734. 1
  22735. 1
  22736. 1
  22737. 1
  22738. 1
  22739. 1
  22740. 1
  22741. 1
  22742. 1
  22743. 1
  22744. 1
  22745. 1
  22746. 1
  22747. 1
  22748. 1
  22749. 1
  22750. 1
  22751. 1
  22752. 1
  22753. 1
  22754. 1
  22755. 1
  22756. 1
  22757. 1
  22758. Michelle D. You are the reason I wish I'd gotten around to reviewing this thread earlier. Thank you for taking the time to express your kind and well thought out words. I avoided a book called The Science Delusion for ages, thinking it would be an ad hominem and angry response to Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion, doing more harm than good. However, I would recommend it, now that I HAVE read it. And especially to agnostics. Written by a highly qualified, highly respected biologist, The Science Delusion is a REAL EYE OPENER on modern physics, scientific politics, the influence of celebrity and, most importantly, the VERY DEEP FLAWS in the standard "materialist" model, pushed SO HARD by guys like Dawkins. It also reveals some fascinating incidents, that have taken place between the author and Dawkins, which exposed Dawkins' hypocrisy, his attempts to defraud the whole public debate and his REAL AGENDA that many, BUT NOT ALL, scientists share. That agenda is for scientists to become the new High Priests of the Science Lab Temple, and to take control over policy, budgets and public thinking. The author does NOT get bogged down in that element of the Science Delusion, after exposing it, but simply focuses on GENUINE experiments that he has done, with the HIGHEST standards of RIGOR AND PEER REVIEW. And his results, for those who understand science, are simply STUNNING. I urge you to get hold of a copy, and I will gladly provide links, if you are interested, for the book, the audio book and or other works by this prolific author. I know I have gone on a bit, but I hope you can see that I am speaking to your point, in that, there is an agenda out there for science to bait religion into hopeless arguments, which make those of faith appear to be naive and even dangerous, so that people will mock them and place their faith in science. Many scientists are disgusted by this approach, particularly given the emerging evidence, that is breaking down the "materialist's" world view and changing the paradigm of science. And THAT is why the materialists LOVE to get people arguing over the "age of the Earth"! And it is why Christians need a better education into their own beliefs. Sadly, many are lead by the ignorant in both science AND religion. But I PROMISE YOU, if you are truly an agnostic, this book will lead you to further research and will change your life. Thank you again and God bless you
    1
  22759. 1
  22760. 1
  22761. 1
  22762. 1
  22763. 1
  22764. 1
  22765. 1
  22766. 1
  22767. 1
  22768. 1
  22769. 1
  22770. 1
  22771. 1
  22772. 1
  22773. 1
  22774. 1
  22775. 1
  22776. 1
  22777. 1
  22778. 1
  22779. 1
  22780. 1
  22781. 1
  22782. 1
  22783. 1
  22784. 1
  22785. 1
  22786. 1
  22787. 1
  22788. 1
  22789. 1
  22790. 1
  22791. 1
  22792. 1
  22793. 1
  22794. 1
  22795. 1
  22796. 1
  22797. 1
  22798. 1
  22799. 1
  22800. 1
  22801. 1
  22802. 1
  22803. This depends on how you define, “greatest,” when it comes to, “greatest villains of all.” For utter psychopathic cruelty, mastery and sheer achievement, (nearly taking the entire Galaxy for himself) he is indisputably the greatest. But to me, the, “greatest,” screen villains ever put to the page are those in whom I can believe. This guy is too Saturday Matinee to be plausible, as is the whole of Star Wars. Not that there’s anything wrong with that at all; far from it. But the best villains for me are the one’s like the Corleone’s in The Godfather movies, who are very like the real people upon whom they were based; or at least how I imagine them. The most plausible villains are the scariest and most compelling, like Walter White, in whom we can believe and even understand, despite never seeing him as anything less than monstrous. The realistic evil (or just realistic enough to make them real) is the evil that haunts your dreams or occupies your waking hours, and that’s the greatest writing and acting you get. There’s also the most entertaining to take into account, for definition of greatest villain, like Alan Rickman in Robin Hood Prince Of Thieves, or Die Hard. This Palpatine guy is actually high on my entertaining list, because one cannot help but giggle at his sadism and Ian McDirmidt’s portrayal is enormous fun. And for me, there is also the villain we empathise with, like Roy Batty in Blade Runner, who kills psychotically, but who has a problem that would drive any of us to extremes: short life span. So I see the category as being filled with sub categories. For sheer levels of malignancy and power, Palpatine wins, but for the other categories, I’m not so sure. We haven’t even mentioned categories like Scariest? The ones that actually give you nightmares like The Thing, or John Doe from Se7en.
    1
  22804. 1
  22805. 1
  22806. 1
  22807. 1
  22808. 1
  22809. 1
  22810. 1
  22811. 1
  22812. 1
  22813. 1
  22814. 1
  22815. 1
  22816. 1
  22817. 1
  22818. 1
  22819. 1
  22820. 1
  22821. 1
  22822. 1
  22823. 1
  22824. 1
  22825. 1
  22826. 1
  22827. 1
  22828. 1
  22829. 1
  22830. 1
  22831. 1
  22832. 1
  22833. 1
  22834. 1
  22835. 1
  22836. 1
  22837. 1
  22838. 1
  22839. 1
  22840. 1
  22841. 1
  22842. 1
  22843. 1
  22844. 1
  22845. 1
  22846. 1
  22847. 1
  22848. 1
  22849. 1
  22850. 1
  22851.  @Thetequilashooter1  : The truth is that it’s worded in such a manner that it can be interpreted how the western powers decide. As with all politics, splitting hairs over the fine print is to miss the point. The people with the largest economies win wars, period. Von Clausewitz knew that, and nothing’s changed. There are literally countless treaties, agreements, ceasefires, promises, speeches, undertakings, etc, that Putin has signed, stated out loud, given his most solemn word on, that have been utterly meaningless when the rubber hit the road. Everyone, even the Russians, knows that. Our enemies are frequently surprised at western sincerity when we do keep our promises, which is (historically speaking) more often than not. They don’t understand the value of honesty, integrity, trust, etc. But that’s why Russians who fled the draft don’t want to give up their freedoms and luxuries in the west and return home, and why western civilisation enjoys a far higher standard of living and people like me are free to say that Putin is a blight on the arse of humanity, without fear of reprisal, losing my job, becoming a pariah in my neighbourhood, or that knock on the door in the middle of the night, let alone the bullet in the brain pan right in front of the Kremlin, just to make a point. And the reason we have our luxuries, our freedoms and our healthier, more fun lifestyles is because our trading partners are based all around the world, working within a rules based system, wherein the rule of law ensures trust. What’s Russia got? A declining standard of living, drones flying into Moscow, paranoia and a depoliticised population afraid to even talk politics, who face 15 years hard Labour for holding up a blank piece of paper in front of a camera? An aging, declining population and a permanent dread of tomorrow? You can keep it.
    1
  22852. 1
  22853. 1
  22854. 1
  22855. 1
  22856. 1
  22857. 1
  22858. 1
  22859. 1
  22860. 1
  22861. 1
  22862. 1
  22863. 1
  22864. 1
  22865. 1
  22866. 1
  22867. 1
  22868. 1
  22869. 1
  22870. 1
  22871. 1
  22872. 1
  22873. 1
  22874. 1
  22875. 1
  22876. Alelae : Look, kid . . . We know you’re trying. And, maybe there’s a part of you that’s started to, “believe,” the Trump Trollery, because you’ve been doing it for so long? I’ve answered the question, above, so I won’t repeat it. But, consider? Are you saying that the protestors have as much moral influence over you as your, “president,” does? Don’t you expect, “leadership,” instead of, “make ME feel better,” masturbation sessions? The science has been proved to you, and you need to pick ONE, “narrative,” if you want, “credibility,” kiddo? You already have enough problems, with the fact that no one, “believes,” the words of a person who LIVES all day, every day, FOR YEARS now; on the channel you say you hate, whining about what you hate, to the people you claim to hate? The perennial problem of the Trump Troll. You CAN’T, “claim,” to be, “educating people,” when your insults are calculated to put people off? You CAN’T say it’s, “fun,” when you’re SO CLEARLY having a bad day? You all take the PAY to Propagandise, but very, VERY few are, “trained,” at it, and you don’t, “honor,” your agreements to research the topic, so you all come off as lame and angry. If fact, it’s BECAUSE of people like YOU that we KNOW that hostile foreign powers are trying to ruin America, child! Just, stop wasting your life? If you’re one of the few who doesn’t get PAID to LIVE on CNN, forget everything I just said, as you are mentally ill, and you need a therapist. But, if they’re paying you, you should check out the research? It’s NOT an, “American,” company paying you; the Russians lie a lot. But, more importantly, it really does make people mentally ill. A natural consequence of lying all day, being childishly hostile, and feeling emotionally hurt, EVERY SINGLE DAY, for a pittance . . . Sort your life out, cup cake . . . SMH
    1
  22877. 1
  22878. 1
  22879. 1
  22880. 1
  22881. 1
  22882. 1
  22883. Jack Wertz : You’ve been suckered, son. You want to keep S Americans, “out?” But, Trump brought them here, by withdrawing the Aid that was keeping them at home, knowing you’d go apeshit, and support his wall. That makes YOU the, “Open Boarders,” guy. You want to, “MAGA?” But, Trump is supporting the worst nations on the planet, that would otherwise have been crushed by now. Shit, son, he even SAID, “Make Iran Great Again.” And, “Small Government Conservatism?” Tell me one (JUST ONE?!) aspect of public life that Trump hasn’t stuck the government’s Orange Orifice into? From dividing our sports, to attacking our biggest, most successful businesses, like Amazon; from undermining the sale of major media companies, to attacking the US Post Office; from Tweet Bombing State Funerals, to putting our farmers on Tax Payer Welfare; there isn’t ONE nit of news that doesn’t have Donny making America look WEAK and petty, while he sucks the penises of the Dictators that he admires, while attacking our oldest, strongest, allies. And, now that he’s spending his time supporting the criminal enablers of CHILD SEX TRAFFICKERS, building Concentration Camps, and constantly, “threatening,” while never doing his ICE Raid-Krystal Nacht show, you’re here, trying to tell ME what Conservatism is? . . . I was a Conservative when Donny was still a Card Carrying Democrat, giving his money to the Clinton’s, boy. So, DON’T presume to tell me. You’re no better than one of Stalin’s little pups, OK? 🙂
    1
  22884. 1
  22885. 1
  22886. 1
  22887. 1
  22888. 1
  22889. 1
  22890. 1
  22891. 1
  22892. 1
  22893. 1
  22894. 1
  22895. 1
  22896. 1
  22897. 1
  22898. 1
  22899. 1
  22900. 1
  22901. 1
  22902. 1
  22903. 1
  22904. 1
  22905. 1
  22906. 1
  22907. 1
  22908. 1
  22909. 1
  22910. 1
  22911. 1
  22912. 1
  22913. 1
  22914. 1
  22915. 1
  22916. 1
  22917. 1
  22918. 1
  22919. 1
  22920. 1
  22921. 1
  22922. 1
  22923. 1
  22924. 1
  22925. 1
  22926. 1
  22927. 1
  22928. 1
  22929. 1
  22930. 1
  22931. 1
  22932. 1
  22933. 1
  22934. 1
  22935. I find her presentations fascinating and her voice is so soothing to me. I’m quite the fanboy . . . The Many Worlds notion has always struck me as bogus; from my not-expert perspective. It’s untestable, and certainly unprovable, for a start, even if, “evidence,” may one day be found. The same evidence can and will be usable for rival theories. But, my real problem with it, is that it’s actually philosophy, not physics. The very same prejudice that Einstein felt, which made him find the work of LeMetre so unpalatable, (which evidenced the Big Bang Theory) is at work in MWT. It’s a philosophical argument, with one purpose; refuting the existence of God. Einstein apologised to LeMetre, a Catholic priest, after having once told him, “Your math is correct but your physics is abominable.” And, The Big Bang is now generally accepted, despite having been held back for almost a generation by the egos of over powerful scientists. And, once again, we are seeing the history repeat itself. The idea of something miraculous happen, that the physical world could actually be altered by the mere act of, “observation,” and all that this implies, is intolerable to an atheistic culture, that is as guilty of prejudice, groupthink and dogma, as any religious organisation in history. The very same people who worship Galileo as their Martyr for being a victim of prejudice and dogma, perpetrated by an over weening establishment, have now become that very thing they despise. They are sacrificing science on the alter of that dogma, which might as well be stated as, “We refuse to accept any conclusions that may imply a creator of the universe, regardless of what the facts are,” and they come up with the most extravagant, superstitious and logically implausible solutions, and pursue them with such vehemence that they have become the new dogma! No doubt, someone reading this, will assume that I am a, “believer,” in God, and have a personal axe to grind, rather than question their own assumptions, because they have been trained to respond in that fashion, as though I was a Flat Earther or denying Gravity . . . But, my actual point is that there is yet to be a scientific explanation for our observations, and that the Copenhagen position has become a dogma, enforced by a powerful scientist, with a famously powerful and intolerant personality, and has evolved in to ever increasingly extravagant philosophical ideas. Without any evidence (hard or otherwise) Physics has been actively encouraged to wonder away from the path of science. We must look harder at the problem, and bring in fresh minds. And, whether we find evidence, or proof, of a God, a creator, or the exact opposite, we must accept the truth of whatever we find, unflinchingly, with the disciplined eyes of the scientist. We must leave philosophy to the philosophers, especially when we cannot even establish a working mathematical model for MWT that doesn’t have one or more fatal flaw in it. We simply have NO BASIS for MWT. Yet, I hear, you can actually fail your doctorate for saying that now! You would have thought we’d have learned by now, after the famously appalling ways great scientists have been treated, by the scientific community in the past, (leading to suicides and even murders! . . . In the 20th Century!) that anything that smacks of dogma is unhealthy for science. And the establishment must NEVER be allowed to get too comfortable, or, “established.” These were just some general thoughts on the nature and culture of science today, as it relates to this fascinating problem . . . It’s worth pondering, do any of you know any Christian believers in science? Physics especially? And, do any of you know any atheists in that field? Of the ones who claim to have, “open minds,” who are the least tolerant of difference in beliefs? You already know the answer, right? . . .
    1
  22936. 1
  22937. 1
  22938. 1
  22939. 1
  22940. 1
  22941. 1
  22942. 1
  22943. 1
  22944. 1
  22945. 1
  22946. 1
  22947. 1
  22948. 1
  22949. 1
  22950. 1
  22951. 1
  22952. 1
  22953. 1
  22954. 1
  22955. 1
  22956. 1
  22957. 1
  22958. 1
  22959. 1
  22960. 1
  22961. 1
  22962. 1
  22963. 1
  22964. 1
  22965. 1
  22966. 1
  22967. 1
  22968. 1
  22969. 1
  22970. 1
  22971. 1
  22972. 1
  22973. 1
  22974. 1
  22975. 1
  22976. 1
  22977. 1
  22978. 1
  22979. 1
  22980. 1
  22981. 1
  22982. 1
  22983. 1
  22984. 1
  22985. 1
  22986. 1
  22987. 1
  22988. 1
  22989. 1
  22990. 1
  22991. 1
  22992. 1
  22993. 1
  22994. 1
  22995. 1
  22996. 1
  22997. 1
  22998. 1
  22999. 1
  23000. 1
  23001. 1
  23002. 1
  23003. 1
  23004. 1
  23005. 1
  23006. 1
  23007. 1
  23008. 1
  23009. 1
  23010. 1
  23011. 1
  23012. 1
  23013. 1
  23014. 1
  23015. 1
  23016. 1
  23017. 1
  23018. 1
  23019. 1
  23020. 1
  23021. 1
  23022. 1
  23023. 1
  23024. 1
  23025. 1
  23026. 1
  23027. 1
  23028. 1
  23029. 1
  23030. 1
  23031. 1
  23032. 1
  23033. 1
  23034. 1
  23035. 1
  23036. 1
  23037. 1
  23038. 1
  23039. 1
  23040. 1
  23041. 1
  23042. 1
  23043. 1
  23044. 1
  23045. 1
  23046. 1
  23047. 1
  23048. 1
  23049. 1
  23050. “Irresponsible,” has been a matter of, “policy,” for these goons, since they took office. They literally LAUGHED at us for being dim witted enough to obey the rules as they drunkenly celebrated while Covid cut a swathe through our society. My dad died of Covid and I could have choked the life out of Boris when I heard what he’d been up to, while my dad struggled for his final breath as I looked on from a WhatsApp screen, unable to make myself heard over the whirring of machinery and a nurse who jabbered over me, because her English was so poor that she couldn’t understand the phrase, “Please STFU!” And then to hear their excuses and dismissals was almost enough to turn me into a terrorist, I was so distraught! All while they, “celebrated,” the success of food banks for the poor and desperate, instead of admitting that their very existence is an indictment of their own failure! We are practically fighting a war in Europe, because our, “government,” has been taking backhanders from Russian spooks and inviting them into Downing Street, whilst helping them to buy all the best houses and land! And who is footing the bill for their corruption in the form of weapons and aid? NOT THEM! The tax payer, of course! Boris thinks he’s Horace Walpole or something! He thinks he can buy or sell his way out of ANY problem, while the money he uses for his corruption is OURS! If the next election doesn’t go to Labour, we’re screwed! But, if we fail to elect Keir Starmer because he’s, “boring,” then we all deserve to be sold into slavery! Every time I hear people (even allegedly, “well informed,” commentators on the BBC!) saying that being, “dull,” is a, “disqualification,” for high office, I have to wonder just how SUICIDALLY IGNORANT people have to be to think such a diabolically, clinically thick, thing!? Isn’t, “dull and uninteresting,” EXACTLY what our politics SHOULD BE at its best? That’s when there’s no, “interesting,” cruelty, corruption, indolence or sickening complacency to speak of. I don’t know about you, but I’ve had a belly full of, “entertaining,” politicians.
    1
  23051. 1
  23052. 1
  23053. 1
  23054. 1
  23055. 1
  23056. 1
  23057. 1
  23058. 1
  23059. 1
  23060. 1
  23061. 1
  23062. 1
  23063. 1
  23064. 1
  23065. 1
  23066.  @pjs232  : That all strikes me as very fair and well thought out. Of course, the situation is so fluid (made more so by the global issues around the Ukraine war and China’s designs on Taiwan) that, as you say, we can none of us make certain predictions. However, if you held my feet to the fire, I would hope that Keir is smart enough to take the pragmatic view: “It is what it is,” now. Putting the country through another referendum would be to invite the nemesis of all politicians into his first administration: Division. Does Britain really need all that back stabbing, and front stabbing in Westminster again, let alone all the infighting on social media and division within households that such a vote invites? Especially since it is also plain now (and I bet Cameron only wished he could have known this during his premiership) that victory for either side leaves nothing resolved, as the country will be as near to a 50/50 split as makes no difference when it comes to cultural division and the well-being of the state. Now that there is such an international NEED for unity in the face of looming threats from China and Russia, we are in a unique position to (NOT cynically) take advantage of that situation and have never been better placed to make a virtue out of necessity. All Keir need do is continue to build on those foundations and attach conditions here and there to certain joint aid packages going out to Ukraine, for example. We have been leading the way on support for Ukraine, breaking the deadlock over tanks, along with Poland, for instance, by being the first country to offer them unconditionally to fight Russians with. And, one day, Ukraine will be at peace. And this country, rich in fossil fuels (enough to compete with Russia’s resources, if you believe the reports from Exxon, Shell, BP and others?) supplying over 50% of the world’s Argon (an element vital for the production of microchips) and producing vast quantities of the world’s grain supplies - among so many other profitable business enterprises - will one day be looking for international partners and markets in which to develop those fossil fuels and sell them, re-enter the technology markets and re-supply that grain at the levels that the poorer countries of the world have come to rely on. And in all of these markets (and many others) Ukraine will be looking to western companies to rebuild their infrastructure and develop these new revenue streams. And who will they favour over other western powers, but those upon whom they can rely and trust, who supported them unquestioningly in their hour of need, and who ensured they still had freedom and democracy in the first place. America will, of course be at the very front of that cue, but Britain will be next in line, and with British American cooperation being what it is, there’s no reason why we won’t all make a LOT of money, whilst assisting Ukraine to find an official place in the European Union, the UN and ultimately, NATO, down the line. That’s just one example of many I could make, being the most tortured in the news of late, but you see my point, I hope? We simply need to accept what is, not put Britain through further division, and work to build upon the uniting projects in the model of other prosperous European countries outside of the EU. I would hope that either premier, Rishi or Keir, would get that by now?
    1
  23067. 1
  23068. 1
  23069. 1
  23070. 1
  23071. 1
  23072. 1
  23073. 1
  23074. 1
  23075. 1
  23076. 1
  23077. 1
  23078. 1
  23079. 1
  23080. 1
  23081. 1
  23082. 1
  23083. 1
  23084. 1
  23085. 1
  23086. 1
  23087. 1
  23088. 1
  23089. 1
  23090. 1
  23091. 1
  23092. 1
  23093. 1
  23094. 1
  23095. 1
  23096. 1
  23097. 1
  23098. 1
  23099. 1
  23100. 1
  23101. 1
  23102. 1
  23103. 1
  23104. 1
  23105. 1
  23106. 1
  23107. 1
  23108. 1
  23109. 1
  23110. 1
  23111. 1
  23112. 1
  23113. 1
  23114. 1
  23115. 1
  23116. 1
  23117. 1
  23118. 1
  23119. 1
  23120. I honestly believe that, up to this point, people have voted SNP for their, “other,” policies, which reflect what a pre-Tony-Blair Labour Party. The education system is more accessible to the poor in Scotland, the Health Service is more independent and maintains things like free prescriptions which are palpable benefits to a population with a poorer economy than England. The SNP took ownership of that left of centre ground that was once occupied by Labour, with a more socialist, yet nevertheless pragmatic and self consciously, “fiscally responsible,” stall. I really think that this is what the majority of SNP voters actually vote, “for.” I honestly think that it is only about half of their loyal, regularly-showing-up-to-the-polls, voters, “care,” about independence? And you only have to talk to a few of those people to find out that none of them have the same vision in their head about just how that would work in practical terms. Every time I talk to someone who’s all William Wallace about the issue, they talk vaguely about oil reserves, maybe joining the EU, or about how Westminster is so corrupt but then, in the next breath, half of those types go on to say, “Well, I never bothered to vote last time and I probably won’t next time either.” I’m sure that’s not representative, but it does indicate how there is simply no, “vision,” that the public can sink their teeth into. It’s all vagaries and potentials, which no two people are alike about. I truly believe that if the SNP won a huge landslide and claimed a mandate for a new referendum, they would lose by a bigger margin than they did pre-Brexit. At least, as things are. The scandal that overshadows them now, since the making of this video, makes two for two SNP leaders leaving under a cloud of disillusioning question marks. And Sturgeon’s apparent inability to simply state, “My husband is innocent,” merely serves to make her look potentially guilty . . . of something? Whether that was active participation in embezzlement or simply the complicity of silence, the SNP are not in a good place, now that her, “sudden,” resignation and retirement looks suspiciously motivated by far more than the reasons she offered us.
    1
  23121. 1
  23122. 1
  23123. 1
  23124. 1
  23125. Two Impossible Girls : I knew a psychiatric nurse, who worked on a ward in which two of her patients had been raped. The police believed the victims, as did everybody else, except the justice system, which allowed their rapists to walk on a technicality, as they had rich daddies, who could afford the kind of lawyers who put teams of researchers onto looking for any weakness in the prosecution’s case. I say I, “knew,” this nurse, as she surprised us all by committing suicide in a local park, hanging herself from a tree. Her suicide note was a text to her mom, which simply read, “Truth is dead.” Of the two rapists, I learned that one of them died of a drug overdose and the other is confined to a wheelchair, after encountering a dose of, “Street Justice.” So, that is a desperately sad tale, with no happy endings. Peter is not a “man” but I think he’s actually getting off on trying to “torment” you. The very same thing that rapists want, is to exploit, “Power,” to which they have no right. His deliberate obtuseness, has NOTHING to do with what he believes, but is an expression of his denial and impotent rage. You made your points well and, anyone who takes the trouble to read your discussion with this guy, will SEE what an impotent tool he is, hiding behind abuse and saying things that he would not DARE to express in front of his friends, colleagues or family. He is venting the pollution of his soul onto the world. Don’t give him ANY, Power.” The art of NEVER losing the game, is not to play. Besides, to ANY reasonable, right minded person . . . You WON this one, anyway
    1
  23126. 1
  23127. 1
  23128. 1
  23129. 1
  23130. 1
  23131. 1
  23132. 1
  23133. 1
  23134. 1
  23135. 1
  23136. 1
  23137. 1
  23138. 1
  23139. 1
  23140. 1
  23141. 1
  23142. 1
  23143. 1
  23144. 1
  23145. What is the hard evidence for your interpretation of determinism? We have never (not once) deciphered the gap between macro and micro physics. We know that there has to be a relationship between the two, because they coexist in our world, but no one has ever come close to bridging that gap. My experience is that I have free will. That is my experience of the world. You’re trying to pull the, “Science says it’s so,” card, yet you’re behaving like so many of those scientists that you have distain for because you have no proof. A quintillion quantum events took place in my right arm as I saluted the screen just now, yet my arm bent to my will along with all of those events, not because it was written into the Big Bang but because it seemed a suitably random choice of illustration. And, just because a computer can predict whether I was about to move, or not move, my arm before I knew I was going to do it means nothing when it comes to bigger, more general choices, such as watching your video, forming an opinion about it and what I do with that information, since I am more than an electronically measurable mechanism; much more than the sum of my parts. Choice, free will, I grant you, are more illusory than many think. But they’re not totally absent, just because of one type of measurement of motor function, set against thousands of other experiences humans have which are under their control. Perhaps there are only a few of us who truly are free willed free thinkers? Perhaps I am exceptional? But, I would say I’m one of those, wouldn’t I, being neurodivergent and all? Give me acceptable, empirical evidence please? Otherwise, why should I privilege your opinion over so many other untestable, unproven hypotheses?
    1
  23146. 1
  23147. 1
  23148. 1
  23149. 1
  23150. 1
  23151. 1
  23152. 1
  23153. 1
  23154. 1
  23155. 1
  23156. 1
  23157. 1
  23158. 1
  23159. 1
  23160. 1
  23161. 1
  23162. 1
  23163. 1
  23164. 1
  23165. 1
  23166. 1
  23167. 1
  23168. 1
  23169. 1
  23170. 1
  23171. 1
  23172. 1
  23173. 1
  23174. 1
  23175. 1
  23176. 1
  23177. 1
  23178. 1
  23179. 1
  23180. 1
  23181. 1
  23182. 1
  23183. 1
  23184. 1
  23185. 1
  23186. 1
  23187. 1
  23188. 1
  23189. 1
  23190. 1
  23191. 1
  23192. 1
  23193. 1
  23194. 1
  23195. 1
  23196. 1
  23197. 1
  23198. 1
  23199. 1
  23200. 1
  23201. 1
  23202. 1
  23203. 1
  23204. 1
  23205. 1
  23206. 1
  23207. 1
  23208. 1
  23209. 1
  23210. 1
  23211. 1
  23212. 1
  23213. 1
  23214. 1
  23215. 1
  23216. 1
  23217. 1
  23218. 1
  23219. 1
  23220. 1
  23221. 1
  23222. 1
  23223. 1
  23224. 1
  23225. 1
  23226. 1
  23227. 1
  23228. 1
  23229. 1
  23230. 1
  23231. 1
  23232. 1
  23233. 1
  23234. 1
  23235. 1
  23236. 1
  23237. 1
  23238. A Revolution. That is now your ONLY hope of restoring the Republic. The 2020, “elections,” are ALREADY RIGGED. They are NOT even afraid of how anyone might, “vote.” Their ONLY threat is the possibility of holding an Impeachment, “Trial,” with NO evidence and NO witnesses, with Trump’s CONSPIRATORS, who are also looking at JAIL TIME, sitting in, “judgement,” of him. Not because of how the, “electorate,” might respond at the polling booths, though. But, because it might become SO OBVIOUS that the Republic has FALLEN that the people might RISE UP, like they have done before, in places like the Ukraine, a decade ago. Putin has taught us all; If you want to KEEP your Dictatorship, you do it by going through the motions of a, “Democracy,” but you can never risk making it TOO OBVIOUS that it’s already OVER. Hence, all the distractions of a potential, “war,” mediated through Putin, with Iran’s cooperation. And, the Giuliani travelling circus. It’s all part of the show, to drown out the noise of a SHAM Impeachment, which will look to any reasonable adult, like the GOP ADMITTING that they have staged a COUP and set your Constitution ALIGHT! But, you’ll see. As it becomes more and more clear that Democracy DIED in 2019, that FACT will actually get pointed out less and less. As they consolidate their power, people will become more and more SCARED to tell the truth. That’s the standard irony of all modern Dictatorships. People are less likely to challenge it, the more obvious it is, because they don’t want to become a government, “target.” That’s how Russia works. And now, that’s how America works . . . Sorry . . .
    1
  23239. 1
  23240. 1
  23241. 1
  23242. 1
  23243. 1
  23244. 1
  23245. 1
  23246. 1
  23247. 1
  23248. 1
  23249. 1
  23250. 1
  23251. 1
  23252. 1
  23253. 1
  23254. 1
  23255. 1
  23256. 1
  23257. 1
  23258. 1
  23259. 1
  23260. 1
  23261. 1
  23262. 1
  23263. 1
  23264. 1
  23265. 1
  23266. 1
  23267. 1
  23268. 1
  23269. 1
  23270. 1
  23271. 1
  23272. 1
  23273. 1
  23274. 1
  23275. 1
  23276. 1
  23277. 1
  23278. 1
  23279. 1
  23280. 1
  23281. 1
  23282. 1
  23283. 1
  23284. 1
  23285. 1
  23286. 1
  23287. 1
  23288. 1
  23289. 1
  23290. 1
  23291. 1
  23292. 1
  23293. 1
  23294. 1
  23295. 1
  23296. 1
  23297. 1
  23298. 1
  23299. 1
  23300. 1
  23301. 1
  23302. 1
  23303. 1
  23304. 1
  23305. 1
  23306. 1
  23307. 1
  23308. 1
  23309. 1
  23310. 1
  23311. 1
  23312. 1
  23313. 1
  23314. 1
  23315. 1
  23316. 1
  23317. 1
  23318. 1
  23319. 1
  23320. 1
  23321. 1
  23322. 1
  23323. 1
  23324. 1
  23325. 1
  23326. 1
  23327. 1
  23328. 1
  23329. 1
  23330. 1
  23331. 1
  23332. 1
  23333. 1
  23334. 1
  23335. 1
  23336. 1
  23337. 1
  23338. 1
  23339. 1
  23340. 1
  23341.  @glidgebidge1029  : I fear you misapprehend me? Perhaps I expressed myself badly? I draw no comparisons between Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, from the point of view of the average Russian and their, “government,” and other places in the world, other than to point out that their behaviour toward May parades has never changed, regardless. I doubt they would ever try to sell the single tank as a, “tactful,” gesture, because that’s just not in their character. Bluster and doubling down is all Putin knows how to do. Whilst we in the west all know that Putin is afraid and doesn’t want to be in the presence of all those armed personnel, while he simply cannot spare the weapons and armed vehicles for a parade, how this is explained to the Russian people will be what you heard from Jake in this video. On Anna From Ukraine’s channel, apparently, people were being told it was the weather! When they pointed out that the weather is fine in Moscow, they were told, “Yes, but it’s bad in the surrounding airbases, etc.” Russians, especially Muscovites, have been trained to accept implausible nonsense all their lives and not to question it. Whether they believe it or not has never been a question people would even bother to ask. What people say is all that matters. And they are expected to repeat their dictator’s message, verbatim. But, one thing I can promise you is that no one in the Kremlin will have said, we are reducing the number of missiles, jets, tanks, etc, down to one single WWII tank out of, “consideration for the fallen,” “tact,” or out of, “thought for the families of the dead.” That’s just not how it’s done in Russia.
    1
  23342. 1
  23343. 1
  23344. 1
  23345. 1
  23346. 1
  23347. 1
  23348. 1
  23349. 1
  23350. 1
  23351. 1
  23352. 1
  23353. 1
  23354. 1
  23355. 1
  23356. WeFightTheC: And, you don’t see how utterly idiotic you sound, do you? After THREE YEARS, the most powerful man on Earth has FAILED to, “Lock Her Up,” right? His Arch Enemy? He could NOT prevent his OWN, WHOLE Campaign Team from going to jail? And, he tells you she’s a, “pedo-ring running, staffer murdering, intel bleaching, URANIUM Selling,” Super Villain, that would make James Bond think twice? Every week that passes makes you ALL look SO CREDULOUS, it’s TRULY LAUGHABLE! I genuinely believe your Cult is just too EMBARRASSED to admit you were SO WRONG. You live in DREAD of hearing, “I told you so,” from your fellow Americans, whom YOU have turned into your, “enemies,” like the Perfect little Putin Poodles you are, and you MUST be suspecting it, by NOW? THREE YEARS, SON! Not even a Parking Ticket??? You’re not even fooling YOURSELF! But, you CLING to face-saving, SHAME covering Propaganda from Alex-QAnon-Jones, and indoctrinate YOURSELF into, “believing,” that there will be YET ANOTHER, “document dump,” or, “intel release,” or some such shit, and it’s STILL, “just around the corner.” And, the biggest IRONY is that NONE of Trump’s opponents, “like,” or even CARE about that f**king Clinton’s, son! That’s always been in your fixated HEADS. If she EXPLODED tomorrow, America would YAWN, and STILL get on with bringing down the Orange Clown. You HATE your fellow Americans, because they’re RIGHT, and you feel like an IDIOT; just as Putin planned it, you TOTAL MORON. Do get over yourself, son. You sound 12 years old 🤣 😂 😆 😂 🤣
    1
  23357. 1
  23358. 1
  23359. 1
  23360. 1
  23361. 1
  23362. 1
  23363. 1
  23364. 1
  23365. 1
  23366. 1
  23367. 1
  23368. 1
  23369. 1
  23370. 1
  23371. 1
  23372. 1
  23373. 1
  23374. 1
  23375. 1
  23376. 1
  23377. 1
  23378. 1
  23379. 1
  23380. 1
  23381. 1
  23382. 1
  23383. 1
  23384. 1
  23385. 1
  23386. 1
  23387. 1
  23388. 1
  23389. 1
  23390. 1
  23391. 1
  23392. 1
  23393. 1
  23394. 1
  23395. 1
  23396. 1
  23397. 1
  23398. 1
  23399. 1
  23400. 1
  23401. 1
  23402. 1
  23403. 1
  23404. 1
  23405. 1
  23406. 1
  23407. 1
  23408. 1
  23409. 1
  23410. 1
  23411. 1
  23412. 1
  23413. 1
  23414. 1
  23415. 1
  23416. 1
  23417. 1
  23418. 1
  23419. 1
  23420. 1
  23421. 1
  23422. 1
  23423. 1
  23424. 1
  23425. 1
  23426. 1
  23427. 1
  23428. 1
  23429. 1
  23430. 1
  23431. 1
  23432. 1
  23433. 1
  23434. 1
  23435. 1
  23436. 1
  23437. 1
  23438. 1
  23439. 1
  23440. 1
  23441. 1
  23442. 1
  23443. 1
  23444. 1
  23445. 1
  23446. 1
  23447. 1
  23448. 1
  23449. 1
  23450. 1
  23451. 1
  23452. 1
  23453. 1
  23454. 1
  23455. 1
  23456. 1
  23457. 1
  23458. 1
  23459. 1
  23460. 1
  23461. 1
  23462. 1
  23463. 1
  23464. 1
  23465. 1
  23466. 1
  23467. They’re simply frustrated, Prof Wilson, that they cannot issue direct threats for fear of losing their platforms or being arrested for incitement. So these, “premonitions,” and doom mongerings are all they dare to spit out at us. That type of intimidation tactic works on cowards like them, so they assume it will work on the rest of us, not realising that it merely stiffens our resolve to crush these monsters who demonise the desperate, victimise those in need and who use others as their goons to carry out their violence, whilst they hide away in their safe spaces. Starky is a classic example of a gammon faced loon, masquerading as an, “intellectual,” and bleating because he sees the far right being rejected on all fronts. He criticises the Tories for, “failing to address,” these issues, whilst he is FAILING TO ADDRESS that very issue! The Tories CREATED these divisions, deliberately and he KNOWS IT! And he played his role in that. Now he’s bleating because their tactics FAILED and British decency won out over the indolent, craven Tory plan to set us at each others throats while they loot the country and sell it off piecemeal! Now people on the right wing, who see that trump is about to lose the election in America, therefore Ukraine will get increased support to defeat Putin and the Labour Party has comprehensively defeated the Tories at home, are simply livid that they’ve lost. Their only plan B is probably a coup! Just as trump is planning one in America, again. We should be prepared for them on every front. And hold those low level threateners to account, rather than slap them on the back for having, “foresight.” The only insight people like Starky have comes from their conspiracies and plotting.
    1
  23468. 1
  23469. 1
  23470. 1
  23471. 1
  23472. 1
  23473. 1
  23474. 1
  23475. 1
  23476. 1
  23477. 1
  23478. 1
  23479. 1
  23480. 1
  23481. 1
  23482. 1
  23483. 1
  23484. 1
  23485. 1
  23486. 1
  23487. 1
  23488. 1
  23489. 1
  23490. 1
  23491. 1
  23492. 1
  23493. 1
  23494. 1
  23495. 1
  23496. 1
  23497. 1
  23498. 1
  23499. 1
  23500. 1
  23501. 1
  23502. 1
  23503. 1
  23504. 1
  23505. 1
  23506. 1
  23507. 1
  23508. 1
  23509. They were already dead, killed off by the Johnson, “coalition of chaos,” greed, avarice, stupidity and cupidity. And just like the walking dead left behind, the zombies of the Tory host, is lumbering forth, biting chunks out of any remaining flesh left on the eviscerated bones of Britain exposed to their hungry mouths. There is no living Conservative party left. But, that’s what happens when you fling open your populist doors to every incel with a grievance and every racist with a weed up their arse. You wind up with an ungovernable collection of agendas, all fighting one another for supremacy, united only by their greed! And what makes this zombie hoard so dangerous is their certain knowledge of unelectability, driving them toward ever more frenzied attacks so they can sink their teeth into one last juicy pension pancreas, just one more privatised health package of liver, one last tax avoiding buttock to bite into and fatten themselves up before the buffet of humanity closes for a generation. Like the cornered rats they are, they have never been more dangerous. Truss’s Closing Britain Down sale has been suspended for now, but the Everything Must Go sign is still vivid in the memories of the fat cat super zombies and they all know they won’t get another big wet bite out of our asses, so they’re going for broke. They are as carnal as serial killers, with the morality of alley cats and the imagination of zombie serial killers that even the other zombies avoid. Britain has never needed a general election SO BADLY since the South Sea Bubble. They have NO MANDATE!
    1
  23510. 1
  23511. 1
  23512. 1
  23513. 1
  23514. 1
  23515. 1
  23516. 1
  23517. 1
  23518. 1
  23519. 1
  23520. 1
  23521. 1
  23522. 1
  23523. 1
  23524. 1
  23525. 1
  23526. 1
  23527. 1
  23528. 1
  23529. 1
  23530. 1
  23531. 1
  23532. 1
  23533. 1
  23534. 1
  23535. 1
  23536. 1
  23537. 1
  23538. 1
  23539. 1
  23540. 1
  23541. 1
  23542. 1
  23543. 1
  23544. 1
  23545.  @sgsa2856  : Agreed. Furthermore, recent history is replete with examples of Putin backing down every single time he has been seriously challenged with the possibility of force from a NATO country. Even during this war Putin ceased his blockade against Ukraine’s international grain shipments when Turkey sent escort ships in flat defiance of Putin. And Erdogan (another tinpot dicktator) didn’t offer Putin any face saving rhetoric or, “off ramps,” leaving him to spin it to his own people the best he could. There were several times after the invasion of Crimea that Putin was forced to send his building forces back home when NATO decided to host war games in the closest available regions. And he only picked this fight because the west had, up to that stage, shown every sign of weakness, internal division and GREED for cheap energy. He honestly thought he would have to stomach some of the worst sanctions in his country’s recent history, but that the world would move on in about 10 years and that his savings, along with the massive new (virtually untapped) resources he could loot from Ukraine would more than make up for it. Especially since he figured that everyone would be looking at the invasion of Taiwan as a bigger deal within a year. There is not ONE example anyone can show where Putin has defied international will and not backed down when the west has shown him they were willing to fight him. Like his soldiers, he has refused any fair fight, only victimising the defenceless and using a distorted, twisted rewriting of history as his window dressing for his thuggery. He’s nothing more than a mafia don. He has literally built his power base by integrating the various mafia outfits into the KGB and then the NKVD and GRU later on. Every oligarch still standing is either ex mafia or ex spook, with many being a combination of the two. Even the head of the Russian Orthodox Church is an ex KGB spook! A contemporary, who rose through the ranks with Putin and who now spouts Putin’s party line, promising forgiveness of all sins to anyone dumb enough to volunteer to be canon fodder on the front lines. It’s literally a medieval mentality, like the crusades! This blight on Europe needs eradicating and the Russian people need to be dragged (kicking and screaming if need be!) into the 21st century! If you have lived a life of moral absenteeism to such an extent that you can accept obvious war crimes, like bombing civilian infrastructure and swathes of innocent civilians, as just another day at the office; if you can read a tweet of support from North Korea and feel good about that, you’re f’cked up and have no idea what a civilised society even is. Sorry, I’m ranting now. But Putler makes me so sick.
    1
  23546. 1
  23547. 1
  23548. 1
  23549. 1
  23550. 1
  23551. 1
  23552. 1
  23553. 1
  23554. 1
  23555. 1
  23556. 1
  23557. 1
  23558. 1
  23559. 1
  23560. 1
  23561. 1
  23562. 1
  23563. 1
  23564. 1
  23565. 1
  23566. 1
  23567. 1
  23568. 1
  23569. 1
  23570. 1
  23571. 1
  23572. 1
  23573. 1
  23574. 1
  23575. 1
  23576. 1
  23577. 1
  23578. 1
  23579. 1
  23580. 1
  23581. 1
  23582. 1
  23583. 1
  23584. All that NFT and Block Chain talk has made the general public uneasy. Perhaps if he were to make some sort of statement to reassure the public, he might regain some trust? But Google and YouTube in particular don’t seem to care about what the public thinks of them at all, and it doesn’t sound like it would be his style to even discuss what he really thinks about anything? I had to abandon the Google search engine when I could no longer get quick, reliable information without having to trawl through the ad stuffing and discern fact from advert for myself. I have disliked the way they’ve been going for over a decade now. I went to Bing, as that ChatGPT is really useful for rolling several searches into one, once you get the hang of it. Even more so now that I can do so via pure conversation without having to touch a keyboard. It reminds me that the keyboard has long been viewed as the, “last obstacle,” between the user and their interface, by the tech giants. Never thought I would ever Bing things, or trust Microsoft’s aggressive monetisation models ever again, having switched all my tech to Apple years since. But their search engine works super efficiently, if you’re willing to teach yourself a little bit about it and know the value of cross referencing. So this new YouTube guy is a cypher, if we’re honest. But I didn’t invest in Nebula because I liked watching more and more ads on YouTube. My test for him would be: Can he seek that holy grail of, “growth, growth, growth,” that all these tech bros obsess about, in new and innovative ways that DON’T rely on more and more Ad interruptions? If he finds a way to create fresh revenue streams from new innovations, I’ll call that a success. As it is, YouTube’s quality has been downgrading for a long time now, mostly because of grasping ads, but also because of its obtuse policing system and apparent hatred of doing what it’s meant to do: promote comment and interaction with the videos. I honestly think they would get rid of comments altogether if they could. They certainly discourage them and make it harder to comment, edit comments and respond to comments, every year.
    1
  23585. ROOKTABULA : We keep hearing, these days, “WORDS MATTER!” Let me explain why: I agree, WITH YOU, except on this one, CRUCIAL, point: We CANNOT ALLOW these Nazis to HIJACK terms, so as to HIDE THEIR TREASON in plain sight! DON’T HELP THEM! I can, “CALL,” myself an, “American,” when I’m a Russian Troll, or a SPY, but that doesn’t MAKE me, “American”??? I can, “CALL,” myself a, “nice guy,” while I’m STABBING BABIES TO DEATH! But, people can SEE that I’m NOT! And, ANYONE, whatever they, “call,” themselves, who votes Republican at the Mid Terms, will be as ANTI-CONSERVATIVE as they are ANTI-DEMOCRATIC, and ANTI-AMERICAN! Calling yourself, “Conservative,” and supporting Trump, is an OXYMORON . . . Like calling yourself a, “Journalist,” while presenting a propaganda show on Fox. I am, “Conservative,” in my politics and my views. I will be voting Democrat at the Mid Terms, to help SAVE Democracy. So that I can disagree with, “liberals,” in a CIVILISED WORLD, where NAZIS get NO SAY and GO TO JAIL FOR BEING NAZIS. I never, “liked,” HRC or Obama, but I respected them. We are FIGHTING for the REAL WORLD, of the, “reasonable man,” as John Le Carre so often puts it. I’m SO SICK of people attaching terms, like Flags of Convenience, which only HELPS THEM! Don’t you see? NO ONE in their right MIND would support a NAZI! But, it’s EASY to VOTE for a Nazi, if he’s allowed to masquerade under the title, “Conservative.” Don’t HELP them to DILUTE the truth! Or to make their RACISM more palatable, with user friendly terminology! Call them what they ARE! There are 11, (SERIOUSLY! ELEVEN!!!) ACTUAL OUTED NAZIS, RUNNING AS REPUBLICANS, at the Mid Terms!!! This is happening BECAUSE people call them STUPID names, like, “Conservative,” instead of F**KING “NAZIS”!!! “WORDS MATTER!” Right now, MORE THAN EVER. Republicans are nurturing NAZIS at their bosom! This is a COUP! Stalinist tactics, for Nazi GOALS! At the COST of DEMOCRACY, WORLD WIDE. We are in the fight of our LIVES, my friend, in which WORDS DO MATTER. Democracy Versus Nazis! It’s THAT SIMPLE! Are you WITH ME???
    1
  23586. 1
  23587. 1
  23588. 1
  23589. 1
  23590. 1
  23591. 1
  23592. 1
  23593. 1
  23594. 1
  23595. 1
  23596. 1
  23597. 1
  23598. 1
  23599. 1
  23600. 1
  23601. 1
  23602. 1
  23603. 1
  23604. 1
  23605. 1
  23606. 1
  23607. 1
  23608. 1
  23609. 1
  23610. 1
  23611. 1
  23612. 1
  23613. 1
  23614. 1
  23615. 1
  23616. 1
  23617. 1
  23618. 1
  23619. 1
  23620. 1
  23621. 1
  23622. 1
  23623. 1
  23624. 1
  23625.  @alphakwk  : Can’t you see that doesn’t matter? The war has already begun and by definition CANNOT be stopped without one side’s defeat. I have chosen a side. It is a moral choice, not up for philosophical debate, any more than Russia’s latest missile (that killed men, women and little children) can be persuaded to change course! It’s already happened! The war criminals responsible for that attack must be hunted down and captured or killed. The people who ordered, funded and enabled these atrocities must be held accountable! To lay down our arms now would be to offer up everyone in Ukraine to death, humiliation, torture, theft and rape! Sometimes there is NO CHOICE! Putin has made himself into Stalin at home and Hitler abroad. I want peace too. And I intend that we should get it by the only means available to us. Even if the war lasts more than a year (which is unlikely) we must DESTROY Putin’s attempts to steal Planet Earth as though he was Ming The Merciless in some comic book. We must shatter his delusions to the point where NO PROPAGANDA on Earth can talk his way out of the unmitigated disaster of his failed invasion of Ukraine and his people are FORCED out of their moral absenteeism and back into the REAL WORLD, where they must face and PAY for the consequences of their actions, or their failure to act. There’s no such thing as a citizen who is not responsible for the actions of their government. There are simply those who are engaged and those who are too afraid to look when they pull the trigger; but they’re still pulling the trigger. Well, it’s time the free world pulled the trigger on them and wake them up out of their deplorable apathy! Russia be warned. This is on ALL ON YOU.
    1
  23626. 1
  23627. 1
  23628. 1
  23629. 1
  23630. Just imagine what a slap on the wrist, “censure,” would do; which is as good as saying we’re ending the Republic, right there and then? Given that loss of office will result in countless immediate indictments (both Federal & State) which will land him and his family in jail, what alternative does a, ”man,” with his established record of destroying the Constitution and breaking all of the laws he runs up against, HAVE? So long as he can count on enough of his base and the party to remain in denial, and HATE Dems and other races, just enough to make them cheer when he pisses on the rule of law, he will have NO CHOICE but to have Moscow ENSURE his, “re-election,” in a Putin Style, 2020 SHAM. It’s that, or disgrace and jail! And, half of the GOP are IMPLICATED with him, so they’re fighting for their OWN SURVIVAL. They simply CANNOT remove him. What else CAN he do? 2020 will HAVE TO be RIGGED, because too many Americans were persuaded to HATE their, “fellow Americans,” MORE than they hate (or even understand WHO ARE) America’s enemies . . . Just look at the shills on this thread, desperately trying to bury their SHAME, because they KNOW they’re killing America, but aren’t strong enough to ADMIT what they WANT! They WANT a Russian Style, Single Party system, with just enough FAKE Democracy to keep up appearances . . . Trump = Putin Mark Two; the Puppet Version, and they just DON’T CARE. In fact, they PREFER it that way. They’ll take that over the fictional, “brown menace,” any day . . . America’s Republic is OVER
    1
  23631. 1
  23632. 1
  23633. 1
  23634. 1
  23635. 1
  23636. 1
  23637. 1
  23638. 1
  23639. 1
  23640. 1
  23641. 1
  23642. 1
  23643. 1
  23644. 1
  23645. 1
  23646. 1
  23647. 1
  23648. 1
  23649. 1
  23650. 1
  23651. 1
  23652. 1
  23653. 1
  23654. 1
  23655. 1
  23656. 1
  23657. 1
  23658. 1
  23659. 1
  23660. 1
  23661. 1
  23662. 1
  23663. 1
  23664. 1
  23665. 1
  23666. 1
  23667. 1
  23668. 1
  23669. 1
  23670. 1
  23671. 1
  23672. 1
  23673. 1
  23674. 1
  23675. 1
  23676. 1
  23677. 1
  23678. 1
  23679. 1
  23680. 1
  23681. 1
  23682. 1
  23683. 1
  23684. 1
  23685. 1
  23686. 1
  23687. 1
  23688. 1
  23689. 1
  23690. 1
  23691. 1
  23692. 1
  23693. 1
  23694. 1
  23695. 1
  23696. 1
  23697. 1
  23698. 1
  23699. 1
  23700. 1
  23701. 1
  23702. 1
  23703. 1
  23704. 1
  23705. 1
  23706. 1
  23707. 1
  23708. 1
  23709. 1
  23710. 1
  23711. 1
  23712. 1
  23713. 1
  23714. 1
  23715. 1
  23716. 1
  23717. 1
  23718. 1
  23719. 1
  23720. 1
  23721. 1
  23722. 1
  23723. 1
  23724. 1
  23725. 1
  23726. 1
  23727. 1
  23728. 1
  23729. 1
  23730. 1
  23731. 1
  23732. 1
  23733. 1
  23734. 1
  23735. 1
  23736. 1
  23737. 1
  23738. 1
  23739. 1
  23740. 1
  23741. 1
  23742. 1
  23743. 1
  23744. 1
  23745. 1
  23746. 1
  23747. 1
  23748. 1
  23749. 1
  23750. 1
  23751. 1
  23752. 1
  23753. 1
  23754. 1
  23755. 1
  23756. 1
  23757. 1
  23758. 1
  23759. 1
  23760. 1
  23761. 1
  23762. 1
  23763. 1
  23764. 1
  23765. 1
  23766. 1
  23767. 1
  23768. 1
  23769. 1
  23770. 1
  23771. 1
  23772. 1
  23773. 1
  23774. 1
  23775. 1
  23776. 1
  23777. 1
  23778. 1
  23779. 1
  23780. 1
  23781. 1
  23782. 1
  23783. 1
  23784. 1
  23785. 1
  23786. 1
  23787. 1
  23788. 1
  23789. 1
  23790. 1
  23791. 1
  23792. 1
  23793. 1
  23794. 1
  23795. 1
  23796. 1
  23797. Honest answer, David, (and I apologise for being complicated about this) is . . . it depends. For what it’s worth, I would need to know, does Wallace hold shares in Fox (as many of their anchors do) and/or, is he a thorn is their flesh that they tolerate because they have to, for whatever reason? If that were the case, it would be better if he left, so that Fox would become the all out, undiluted equivalent of Lord Haw Haw’s Germany Calling show, during WWII; the unmitigated, inexcusable disgrace to journalism that they are. But, if they want to use him, for the purposes you described, to provide the thin veil of, “balance,” to their programming, then he should stay, because he’s quite good at what he does, and he appears to have some seniority within the network. I have seen Wallace, for example, on more than one occasion, in discussion with the Fox & Fiends panel (during a handover, it appeared, rather than as a guest) and he has verbally crushed their narratives over some controversy or other, regarding trump. He appears to be knowledgeable enough to do that, but more importantly, he appears to have the seniority (or, perhaps it’s just respect of his colleagues?) to not only correct them forcefully, but then they don’t argue against him. A little, “face saving,” attempts at trying to, “compromise,” occurs, but Wallace never seems to tolerate that either, and he simply puts their nonsense to shame, and they daren’t gain say him. So, if they would only replace him with someone else, he should stay, rather than take the chance that his replacement is not as good as Wallace at stopping the Propaganda in his earshot while on TV. In fact, Fox might well choose someone who’s not so good at debate, carries less authority, both journalistically and within the Fox organisation, and is generally less competent at challenging their narratives? Breaking the arguments of the left is good Propaganda too, right? But, if they would be happier if he left, because they want to replace him with someone who’s totally on board with the far right, anti-democratic narrative, it would be so much better if Wallace left and left them to it. Particularly if he was to be snapped up by CNN? Or, some other rival network, with a reputation for genuinely, “fair and balanced,” journalism? It is far easier to deal with an enemy, when that enemy has no redeeming features. I don’t speak in terms of counter-narratives, or counter-propaganda purposes, either. But, in terms of simplifying the fight. If Fox were to one day be brought down completely, perhaps in the wake of a raft of sedition scandals after the death of Rupert Murdoch (not necessarily such a far fetched idea?) I would hate to see Wallace’s life ruined by that? But, it’s also about the hypocrisy of the station that claims, “balance,” when what it’s really doing is keeping Wallace as a kind of insurance policy that might keep their business model alive, should they be exposed and prosecuted, or just have their reputations irreparably damaged. It’s a false dichotomy that they cover, “both sides,” of a topic at all, when one is pure lies and Seditious poison that literally costs American lives! They have ONE MAN, doing a little analysis and a few slightly challenging interviews, set against a background of white entitlement, false narratives, and pro-Fascist propaganda! We’re so jaded with them, that we often seem to forget that this stuff comes mostly out of Russia, and from other enemy states! Their JOB is to DIVIDE America! To bring the country down! They are but a filter for Putin’s narratives, that they make palatable to American WASP tastes. Within living memory, we literally took the trouble to hunt down, try and execute traitors who spread seditious propaganda! Now, we allow them to collect their shares in the company and broadcast their, “Make America Divided Again,” filth, on American soil! So, it would be better for America if their inhumanity was undiluted and clear, so America could see them for what they are. But, if they would simply replace him with some hack, hired to see the, “other side,” of the debates, but not do such a good job of it, and not see what they were being exploited for, that would only make matters worse. If you read any of this, David, thank you for your patience. I hope I have persuaded you? ✌️
    1
  23798. 1
  23799. 1
  23800. 1
  23801. 1
  23802. 1
  23803. 1
  23804. 1
  23805. 1
  23806. 1
  23807. 1
  23808. 1
  23809. 1
  23810. 1
  23811. 1
  23812. 1
  23813. 1
  23814. 1
  23815. 1
  23816. 1
  23817. 1
  23818. 1
  23819. 1
  23820. 1
  23821. 1
  23822. 1
  23823. @ : Let us try to reason together without the chest puffing? When I heard Penrose discussing this last, he was talking about memories. You can program a computer to know what a grandmother is, in terms of genetics, economics, diet, fashion, even in terms of culture, and with modern large language models, you can have that same computer speak convincingly about having a grandmother, even sounding rather sentimental about it. But that computer still, “feels,” nothing. However, when a human has the task, that discussion triggers emotions and digressions that are not logically programmable. While you’re describing the colour of grandma’s eyes, you might actually be thinking of the way she smelled, or the smell of her house and suddenly say, “I haven’t eaten apple pie in a long time. Let’s make a pie. I know a recipe.” Not just a tangential connection being made, but a course of action, including time used, resources spent, shops visited and cooking and eating with a person whom you want to share the experience of what Grandma’s apple pie used to taste like. I can expand further on the qualia aspect of what it is that Penrose is getting at. But that is what he said he doesn’t believe an AI can match. That does not mean that there aren’t new avenues to pursue that might result in subtler, more capable, “thinking,” processes for computers. Indeed, he has discussed possibilities himself. Which is why I believe Sabine may have the wrong end of the stick here.
    1
  23824. 1
  23825. 1
  23826. 1
  23827. 1
  23828. 1
  23829. 1
  23830. 1
  23831. 1
  23832. 1
  23833. 1
  23834. 1
  23835. 1
  23836. 1
  23837. 1
  23838. 1
  23839. 1
  23840. 1
  23841. 1
  23842. 1
  23843. 1
  23844. 1
  23845. 1
  23846. 1
  23847. 1
  23848. 1
  23849. 1
  23850.  @prind666  : I guess it’s people like you who actually do make this a controversial movie after all? People who don’t get Verhoven’s stated intentions, and who think that living in such a world would be, “cool.” Your first sentence is right. And that was Verhoven’s intention, to make it look appealing to the young and immature. The friendships have real value, and ultimately save the lives of the characters. But, think it through? Presumably, (if you mean what you say?) you have a problem with America’s Constitution and the notion of being born with equal, inalienable rights? You think people should have no say in their society, let alone the right to vote, unless they’ve served in a war for two years minimum? Where I can get behind such a scheme, which offers privileges for those who serve, it should not be exclusively military service, or able to rob citizens of their very citizenship. Service in the medical; as a hospital porter, field nurse, etc, with equal opportunities for rapid promotion; or in social services, parole officers, child protection, etc, would have to be added, for those who don’t want to pick up a gun. But, what privileges should be given, should be exactly that, “privileges,” not fundamental rights? The right to vote is fundamental to your right to be seen and treated as a human being. You can argue till the cows come home over your politics, or anti-politics? But, what you can’t do is take away Verhoven’s intent, or the fact that you just didn’t get his movie. You think it looks cool, but that’s only because you think Robin Hood looks cool, and would actually hate living in squalid conditions with a bunch of criminals, eking out a living by theft and murder, and then shitting behind the same tree you eat under, in a world that hasn’t even discovered electricity yet. I suppose Mad Max looks cool, and you can’t see it’s a movie depicting a world gone wrong, either? These are single state fascists, who only get to vote for individuals with one party, so far as we can tell. There is no opposition of any kind. What is their vote worth? After all that sacrifice? What are they protecting? Not freedom, that’s for sure. And, ask yourself, why is the idea of a smart-bug so, “controversial,” to all of the characters, in their world? The higher up the chain of command, the more, “offensive,” that idea is. Why? . . . Figure that out and there might be hope for you yet; you might not be quite so fascist as you think you are . . .
    1
  23851. 1
  23852. 1
  23853. 1
  23854. 1
  23855. 1
  23856. 1
  23857. 1
  23858. 1
  23859. 1
  23860. tradeeagle : I am a Conservative, to the core . . . and I AGREE. The Trolls are DESPERATE to characterise this whole thing as, “libs v cons,” when that’s a LIE. The TRUTH is, Comey screwed up BIG TIME in his handling of the HRC, “revelations,” which actually WERE a, “Nothing Burger,” but were also sufficient to put a Stalinist into the White House. He will remain too obstinate to SEE or LEARN from what he did. But, THAT does NOT make him a bad person. He was wrong, and yet, he doesn’t accept that, nothing more. He IS a man of honour. But, let’s be HONEST here. Even Hillary SUPPORTERS were GLAD in their, “secret heart,” that she lost. The HOPE is that the DNC does not remain as obstinate as Comey? That they will field a candidate who is NOT, “business backed, business as usual,” or patronising, patrician and CLEARLY out of touch? SO MANY, former Trump voters are now saying, when asked if they would VOTE for the Dems, “It DEPENDS upon WHO they put up.” WILL the DNC LEARN and not FIX it so that the Bernie’s of this world are NOT shoved out? Many of HIS votes went to Trump, for that reason. The DNC REFUSED to, “dignify,” the complaint that Bernie was nobbled, even AFTER the election, ONLY for us to later discover that they HAD FIXED Bernie!!! They NEED to LISTEN and ACT ACCORDINGLY. As a CONSERVATIVE, I will be voting Democrat, come HELL or high water, in order to SAVE DEMOCRACY from a DICTATORSHIP. But, the DNC MUST do it’s part. The Mid Terms are theirs to lose. If they squander their opportunity, I will NEVER forgive them, as it will COST us DEMOCRACY. Sorry for going on, and for going a little off topic, here, but what I’m saying is what is at the HEART of this matter. Honourable people DON’T always do the “right thing” because they can be honourable AND WRONG at the same time. You are RIGHT, that we MUST get BEYOND this, but he represents a SYMPTOM of a much BIGGER syndrome that ran RAMPANT in the DNC and cost them the elections. ENOUGH of the Hillary types! This NEW, asymmetrical warfare, calls for NEW thinking, NEW tactics and NEW PEOPLE. Nancy Pelosi and her ilk, REALLY NEED to MAKE WAY for a candidate that the PEOPLE want, who’s MAIN characteristic feature is that s/he is NOT LIKE THEM AT ALL. Personally, I’d go with Tom Hanks, but THAT will NEVER happen. But, we REALLY need to stand together and WELCOME conservatives INTO the fold
    1
  23861. 1
  23862. 1
  23863. 1
  23864. 1
  23865. 1
  23866. 1
  23867. 1
  23868. 1
  23869. 1
  23870. 1
  23871. 1
  23872. 1
  23873. 1
  23874. 1
  23875. 1
  23876. 1
  23877. 1
  23878. 1
  23879. 1
  23880. 1
  23881. 1
  23882. 1
  23883. 1
  23884. 1
  23885. 1
  23886. 1
  23887. 1
  23888. 1
  23889. 1
  23890. 1
  23891. 1
  23892. 1
  23893. 1
  23894. 1
  23895. 1
  23896. 1
  23897. 1
  23898. 1
  23899. 1
  23900. 1
  23901. 1
  23902. 1
  23903. 1
  23904. 1
  23905. 1
  23906. 1
  23907. 1
  23908. 1
  23909. 1
  23910. 1
  23911. 1
  23912. 1
  23913. 1
  23914. 1
  23915. 1
  23916. 1
  23917. 1
  23918. 1
  23919. 1
  23920. 1
  23921. 1
  23922. 1
  23923. 1
  23924. 1
  23925. 1
  23926. 1
  23927. 1
  23928. 1
  23929. 1
  23930. 1
  23931. 1
  23932. 1
  23933. 1
  23934. 1
  23935. 1
  23936. 1
  23937. 1
  23938. 1
  23939. 1
  23940. 1
  23941. 1
  23942. 1
  23943. 1
  23944. 1
  23945. 1
  23946. 1
  23947. 1
  23948. 1
  23949. 1
  23950. 1
  23951. 1
  23952. 1
  23953. 1
  23954. 1
  23955. 1
  23956. 1
  23957. 1
  23958. 1
  23959. 1
  23960. 1
  23961. 1
  23962. 1
  23963. 1
  23964. 1
  23965. 1
  23966. 1
  23967. 1
  23968. 1
  23969. 1
  23970. 1
  23971. 1
  23972. 1
  23973. 1
  23974. 1
  23975. 1
  23976. 1
  23977. 1
  23978. 1
  23979. 1
  23980. 1
  23981. 1
  23982. 1
  23983. 1
  23984. 1
  23985. 1
  23986. 1
  23987. 1
  23988. 1
  23989. 1
  23990. 1
  23991. 1
  23992. 1
  23993. 1
  23994. 1
  23995. 1
  23996. 1
  23997. 1
  23998. 1
  23999. 1
  24000. 1
  24001. 1
  24002. 1
  24003. 1
  24004. 1
  24005. 1
  24006. 1
  24007. 1
  24008. 1
  24009. 1
  24010. 1
  24011. 1
  24012. 1
  24013. 1
  24014. 1
  24015. 1
  24016. 1
  24017. 1
  24018. 1
  24019. 1
  24020. 1
  24021. 1
  24022. 1
  24023. 1
  24024. 1
  24025. 1
  24026. 1
  24027. 1
  24028. 1
  24029. 1
  24030. 1
  24031. 1
  24032. 1
  24033. 1
  24034. 1
  24035. 1
  24036. 1
  24037. 1
  24038. 1
  24039. 1
  24040. 1
  24041. 1
  24042. 1
  24043. 1
  24044. 1
  24045. 1
  24046. 1
  24047. 1
  24048. 1
  24049. 1
  24050. 1
  24051. 1
  24052. 1
  24053. 1
  24054. 1
  24055. 1
  24056. 1
  24057. 1
  24058. 1
  24059. 1
  24060. 1
  24061. 1
  24062. 1
  24063. 1
  24064. 1
  24065. 1
  24066. 1
  24067. 1
  24068. 1
  24069. 1
  24070. 1
  24071. 1
  24072. 1
  24073. 1
  24074. 1
  24075. I love physics theories, have read literally thousands of books, but studied political history at college and wasted my career in social services, whilst being a dunce at maths. But, that doesn’t mean I don’t have anything smart to say about the theories, or cannot have an insight of value. Am I allowed to pick a side on the current debate about string theory? I wrote to a physicist once, impressed by his book and wanting to posit an idea. He wrote back and was very kind, patiently explaining why my idea could not work. I thanked him, seeing why he was right, and moved on. But, I don’t think I had been a crackpot about it? I was just trying to come to grips with big, exciting ideas and learn more. Granted, I was not suggesting physics was wrong. I was trying to overcome the problem of faster than light communication with a quantum idea. If my idea was stupid, then the author in question was very flattering to me about it, as he told me he thought I was being very clever in my approach. By the way, I would question your characterisation of Schrödinger’s Cat. Yes, it was not meant to prove or disprove quantum theory. And, yes, it is an illustration, not a demonstration of anything. But, Schrödinger was trying to illustrate the fact that we have failed to explain something fundamental about how it works. He was showing that there is a dissonance between the quantum understanding and the point at which it works in the macro world. That is why we now have the two separate schools of thought; one trying to explain that gap and the other called, “Shut up and calculate.” It is the most successful theory in the world. Yet, Einstein was right too. There is a gap in our understanding and we have not yet resolved the point at which quantum stops being quantum and becomes macro. The first person to do that will win a Nobel Prize. But, I’m not crackpot enough to imagine I would dream it up out of inspiration. The reason for physics’ crackpot appeal is the fact that a crackpot can actually hide from the layman behind complexity of theory, and believes they can throw enough chaff into the eyes of real physicists to confuse any onlooking audience. It provides a lot of cover for crackpots. Especially since some qualified physicists can be crackpots too. Oh, you acknowledge that at the end, so that helps explain it, right? Loved the video. Good to see a scientist openly express exasperation with crackpots without worrying about their, “image,” at least.
    1
  24076. 1
  24077. 1
  24078. 1
  24079. 1
  24080. 1
  24081. 1
  24082. 1
  24083. 1
  24084. 1
  24085. 1
  24086. 1
  24087. 1
  24088. 1
  24089. 1
  24090. 1
  24091. 1
  24092. 1
  24093. 1
  24094. 1
  24095. 1
  24096. 1
  24097. 1
  24098. 1
  24099. Eco Geek : Once the rigged, “elections,” are over, we won’t have ANY, “influence,” in that region, as it will all be up to Putin. America is already less influential in world affairs, by isolationist choice, and by the fact that our Dictator keeps getting played. He’s as gullible with other Dictators as he seems to think the American people are. Having said that, he may well be right? No one wants to admit that the Republic has already FALLEN. The Dems, because they’re too close to the problem, and their huge egos won’t allow them to believe that they can’t personally change the course of American history; and the Republicans, because they have learned from Putin that the one thing a modern Dictatorship NEVER does, is admit that it’s a Dictatorship. So, we’ll get FAKE Democracy, like Russia’s, and be, “told,” that we’re, “influencing,” events that we care about. And, as it becomes more and more OBVIOUS that we’re in a Dictatorship, fewer and fewer people will be willing to state that fact out loud. So, I really wouldn’t concern myself with Syria’s problems any more, since Putin ordered Trump to withdraw our forces from the zone? It’s not like we can, “do,” anything about it? We can’t even unseat our own Dictatorship, let alone theirs? Christ! We don’t even WANT to admit it’s THERE! Because, if we got REAL, then we’d have to admit to ourselves that the only way to remove a Dictator is REVOLUTION; Ukraine-Style, without weapons . . . Or, we can just carry on being pussies, and PRETEND we would be ALLOWED to, “Vote,” our Dictatorship out of power, so that an ENTIRE administration would go to jail? . . . SMH
    1
  24100. 1
  24101. 1
  24102. 1
  24103. 1
  24104. 1
  24105. 1
  24106. 1
  24107. 1
  24108. 1
  24109. 1
  24110. 1
  24111. 1
  24112. 1
  24113. 1
  24114. 1
  24115. 1
  24116. 1
  24117. 1
  24118. 1
  24119. 1
  24120. 1
  24121. 1
  24122. 1
  24123. 1
  24124. 1
  24125. 1
  24126. 1
  24127. 1
  24128. 1
  24129. 1
  24130. 1
  24131. 1
  24132. 1
  24133. 1
  24134. 1
  24135. 1
  24136. 1
  24137. 1
  24138. 1
  24139. 1
  24140. 1
  24141. 1
  24142. 1
  24143. 1
  24144. 1
  24145. 1
  24146. 1
  24147. 1
  24148. 1
  24149. 1
  24150. 1
  24151. 1
  24152. What I find most interesting about it, is what she put her finger on, right at the end of her presentation. It’s a, “philosophical,” difference. It’s a mutation of paranoia and distrust, born out of anti-authoritarianism and disillusionment with, “authority,” figures. Give me a Flat Earther in the same room as me and access to the internet, and I can destroy their, “scientific,” arguments, in minutes. Yet, I know this will not convert them, for one of three possible reasons: They’re (1) too emotionally damaged to, “want,” to accept the truth (too proud to admit this six foot, hairy boomer, who can’t stop laughing at him is right, for example) (2) too educationally challenged (stoopid, or probably a combination of 1 & 2?) or, (3) they’re being paid to refute common sense. The group 3 are the ones I despise, because they could do untold harm, and they do it for money. You might argue there is a group 4? The troll. But, actually, the troll is just any one, or combination of, the previous three categories. But, here’s the, “interesting,” bit that I promised (trigger warning) : Many Worlds Theory, or MTW. That is a, “hypothesis,” which has some mathematical basis, which can be made to fit the hypothesis. But, only ever at the cost of disregarding some other fatal flaws which have yet to be resolved. It is popular among many of our leading physicists. And, though more and more people are questioning it, it has taken on the trappings of Dogma. Yet, there is no, “scientific,” basis for it. No evidence, no disprovability, no testable experiments, no predictions, no applications, no foundation for its conjecture whatsoever. It is a philosophical idea, which some scientists cling to with the emotional commitment of high priests. Why is that, exactly? I believe it is because it solves one thorny problem and no other. If it were true, we could then dispense with, “God.” And that is the ONLY reason MWT is a philosophical belief that has taken root in physics and is doing duty for science where there is no science to be had. In other words, it’s not just Flat Earthers, who are willing to run away with their philosophical ideas. It seems anyone is capable of that type of thinking, if the emotional stakes are high enough? . . . Food for thought? . . . ✌️
    1
  24153. It’s what happens when a party implodes. Brexit brought the Tories to a point of internal battle that had been brewing for generations, but which they had never quite had to face before, or just had very strong leadership who took no prisoners when enacting their own vision of dealing with Europe. It’s all because of that craven lust for power, that lead them down the path of flinging open their doors to anyone who looked like they could win their seat in that moment and give them the numbers they needed for a majority. They let in more and more fringe types with extremist views, more and more dodgy types, with criminal connections but lots of money, and they made a special effort to let in the, “personality politicians,” with their amusing haircuts and entertaining line of patter that gets a larf on Have I Got News For You, without checking ANYONE’S record, background or credentials. As the old guard, the ones with quaint, old fashioned things like, “ideologies,” and, “beliefs,” retired, the remaining MP’s increasingly found that these new kids weren’t content to simply play a role as show ponies, but they demanded a seat at the top table and started acting like they owned the place. Then Brexit happened and it was the flashpoint between, “Are we isolationists and extremists, or are we centrist, single nation, leaning to conservative, ‘values,’ kind of Tories?” And they had to confront this finally, in the sort of battle that is usually fought in the respectable privacy of a period out of office, because it was HAPPENING right now, and they saw that the sort of Brexit we get now, will define them and the country for generations. So they’ve been fighting among themselves ever since! In the most unedifying and disgraceful fashion at times. They even had the Home Office minister using the dispatch box to call the nation NAMES and deliberately deepen division! The one minister whom you’d expect to at least pay lip service to uniting Britain was (and still is, from the side lines) screaming for the most extreme, un-British, exploitation of THE most vulnerable people on EARTH (asylum seekers) as her personal political football, with a scheme that was so heartless and insane Charles Dickens would have blushed! I site that example because it crystallises what was really going on. It was an attempt on the part of the party’s minority to hijack the defining characteristics of the party and make it seem to stand for this new, extremist vision, like we have become Cold War East Germany or something! Overnight! Ask yourself this question. Before this all became the hot topic of the day, do remember what the world was like? How it was a world wide discussion about how global weather patterns, various conflicts and economic pressures were going to cause an influx of asylum seekers all over the western world; and the fact that we needed to seek some international cooperation and planning to deal with it, before it gets out of hand? Then this whole, “Stop The Boats!” drama was literally dropped on us out of a clear blue sky!? Remember? Like ANYONE has ASKED for that? Or thought it an urgent issue in quite the same way that the extremists did? Again, that’s just one example. But my point here (and if you’re still with me, thank you for your patience) is there was a catastrophic period of backstabbing and internal division (still far from settled) that killed off all the leading politicians and when the dust settled, they looked around and saw that there were no actual educated, experienced, articulate, well informed politicians left! They’d betrayed them all, driven them off into retirement, or otherwise disillusioned and frightened off their most trusted and talented people! All they had left to draw on were the dregs! The people who would, in the normal state of things, be staffers, fetching the coffee or doing the paperwork. And THAT’S why they’re SO BAD at their jobs. They’re just not the real thing anymore. None of them have the least clue what they’re doing, how to handle the press, how to speak in public and how to avoid one catastrophic gaff after another! Half of them don’t even want to be there, and I honestly think Sunack is one of them! He’s already had a no confidence vote and was probably (as I believe will be revealed after the election) being threatened with yet another palace coup! Why put up with this snake pit of entitled, talentless, unqualified nonentities, all clawing their way to Number 10 over the destroyed bodies of their colleagues, when he could be sitting in a Californian air conditioned corner office, having the staff bring him what he wants, making lots of money and working on his memoirs? They just don’t have anyone left capable of doing the job and their leader has given up on his own party and probably wants to avenge himself on them, seeing as how they’ve ensured that he will go down in history as the leader who lead them to their worst ever defeat and possibly off the opposition benches altogether. With that kind of a legacy staring you in the face, what else is there to do but ensure you get a little revenge? Especially if you’re the sort of politician who doesn’t EVER think about piffling tiny matters like, “the good of the country,” or the suffering of your fellow beings?
    1
  24154. 1
  24155. 1
  24156. 1
  24157. 1
  24158. 1
  24159. 1
  24160. 1
  24161. 1
  24162. 1
  24163. 1
  24164. 1
  24165. 1
  24166. 1
  24167. 1
  24168. 1
  24169. 1
  24170. 1
  24171. 1
  24172. 1
  24173. 1
  24174. 1
  24175. 1
  24176. 1
  24177. 1
  24178. 1
  24179. 1
  24180. 1
  24181. 1
  24182. 1
  24183. 1
  24184. 1
  24185. 1
  24186. 1
  24187. 1
  24188. 1
  24189. 1
  24190. 1
  24191. 1
  24192. 1
  24193. 1
  24194. 1
  24195. 1
  24196. 1
  24197. 1
  24198. 1
  24199. 1
  24200. 1
  24201. 1
  24202. 1
  24203. 1
  24204. 1
  24205. 1
  24206. 1
  24207. 1
  24208. 1
  24209. 1
  24210. 1
  24211. 1
  24212. 1
  24213. 1
  24214. 1
  24215. 1
  24216. 1
  24217. 1
  24218. 1
  24219. 1
  24220. 1
  24221. 1
  24222. 1
  24223. 1
  24224. 1
  24225. 1
  24226. 1
  24227. 1
  24228. 1
  24229. 1
  24230. 1
  24231. 1
  24232. 1
  24233. 1
  24234. 1
  24235. 1
  24236. 1
  24237. 1
  24238. 1
  24239. 1
  24240. 1
  24241. 1
  24242. 1
  24243. 1
  24244. 1
  24245. 1
  24246. 1
  24247. 1
  24248. 1
  24249. 1
  24250. 1
  24251. 1
  24252. 1
  24253. 1
  24254. 1
  24255. 1
  24256. 1
  24257. 1
  24258. 1
  24259.  @antimatters6283  : Great comment. The best person, most likely to find an, “off ramp,” for Putin, is Putin! And he will, immediately, begin that process the very moment he KNOWS his army will be ejected from Ukraine. Sure, he’ll do all he can to try to make a, “special case,” for Crimea; sure, he’ll make blood curdling nuclear threats, but that whole time he will be reversing policy domestically and having his state TV start the messaging to get his people reconciled to leaving Ukraine. The ONLY thing keeping him in the fight right now is NATO’s mixed messaging, which he will ALWAYS interpret as, “Maybe I can fight to a draw?” Throw in a little sanctions relief, so his oligarchs notice an improvement in their living standards, making them less inclined to back any disruption to the process, and Putin will do ALL of the heavy lifting himself! It is NOT up to the west to even think in such terms as, “Oh dear, but what is Putin thinking, what will he do?” The average lay person has ALWAYS predicted Putin’s next moves better than any politician because they are not bogged down with geo-political theory and Russian history. They just know a thug when they see one. I kicked up a fuss 20 YEARS ago, over creating oil dependency with Russia, saying it was suicidally stupid! But the Germans lead the way with that, because they were being bribed and blackmailed, and because there are still East German Soviet believers being held over in politics there to this day. And now we hear they’re dragging their feet over weapons to Ukraine? Oh, what a surprise, NOT! Their armed forces administration is so complex and unfit for purpose, it’s a wonder they have a military at all. What it comes down to is restoring some of the old spirit of the Greatest Generation. And I’m not being all misty eyed, but seeing things in the hardest possible glare of reale politique. A truly great man once said, “We have nothing to fear, but fear itself!” And that’s how you get Putin off our backs. Face him down with an unambiguous message from NATO! That Ukraine, from the Belarusian border to the watery limits of the Crimean seaboard, WILL be restored, ENTIRELY to the Ukrainian government. Period! And watch Putin climb all the way off the west’s backs all on his own without any help from us! Just as he has ALWAYS done before whenever he has faced REAL resolve in the past, every single time.
    1
  24260. 1
  24261. 1
  24262. 1
  24263. 1
  24264. 1
  24265. 1
  24266. 1
  24267. 1
  24268. 1
  24269. 1
  24270. 1
  24271. 1
  24272. 1
  24273. 1
  24274. 1
  24275. 1
  24276. 1
  24277. 1
  24278. 1
  24279. 1
  24280. 1
  24281. 1
  24282. 1
  24283. 1
  24284. 1
  24285. 1
  24286. 1
  24287. 1
  24288. Deep. His three sci fi masterpieces each have something important to say, and are epic adventures to boot. Robocop is a satire about the fetishisation of everything, the commercialisation of justice and monstrous horrors of unregulated capitalism. No one would want to be Robocop. He’s a horrifying Frankenstein’s monster, and what they did to him was monstrous. Even the music represents his clunky march, and his smiling acceptance at the end, of what he’s become, is terrifying. Total recall is an examination of the question, what is real? It’s ambiguous ending is brilliant. It also shows that, if reality can be commercialised, it will be. Our memories, our experience of life, is not a safe concept, tied down by fact, but a subjective notion that we cling to. Starship Troopers is the best of all of them. In the same way George Orwell asks, “Could you come to love big brother?” This movie asks, “Could you be seduced into being a Nazi?” You are left wondering if the Bugs were actually really, “bugs,” at all? Or were they a metaphor for other humans that have been turned into bugs in the minds of the brainwashed fascists who hunt them to extinction? All works of genius. Showgirls is a bad movie, but misunderstood nevertheless. Your video explains that quite well. It is about the prostitution at the heart of all American culture. It says that America is built upon an edifice of exploitation and brainwashing. Verhoven made another satire but it fell on the wrong side of that thin line between satirising its target and actual exploitation. Verhoven’s sci fi trilogy are masterworks, however. And I will stand by them till the day I die. 😉✌️
    1
  24289. 1
  24290. 1
  24291. 1
  24292. 1
  24293. 1
  24294. 1
  24295. 1
  24296. 1
  24297. 1
  24298. 1
  24299. 1
  24300. 1
  24301. 1
  24302. 1
  24303. 1
  24304. 1
  24305. 1
  24306. 1
  24307. 1
  24308. 1
  24309. 1
  24310. 1
  24311. 1
  24312. 1
  24313. 1
  24314. 1
  24315. 1
  24316. 1
  24317. 1
  24318. 1
  24319. 1
  24320. 1
  24321. 1
  24322. 1
  24323. 1
  24324. 1
  24325. 1
  24326. 1
  24327. 1
  24328. 1
  24329. 1
  24330. 1
  24331. 1
  24332. 1
  24333. 1
  24334. 1
  24335. 1
  24336. 1
  24337. 1
  24338. 1
  24339. 1
  24340. 1
  24341. 1
  24342. 1
  24343. 1
  24344. 1
  24345.  @theconnoisseur2346  : I’m not familiar with Russian nuclear doctrine or protocols for attack. But I do know a bluff when I see one. Putin’s bluffing. He clearly wants to live, very badly. Far more so than many Ukrainians or a growing number of Russians in fact. Accidents happen, and there’s no fail safe for human error. He’s literally done the precise opposite of everything he’s said so far. From, “I don’t intend to invade Ukraine,” on the same day he invaded, to, “We do not target civilians,” when he’s been targeting little else. His bogus claims of chemical weapons development by the west, meant that he was thinking of using them (which he still might). Zelensky is a, “Nazi.” A Jewish Nazi? That’s new. Opposites all the way. So, read his, “Cross my line and I’ll use nukes,” as, “This is the point at which I fold.” As to protocols, we’ve seen how Russian fail safes work at Chernobyl. And the power plant they nearly shot to pieces the other day, with an exhausted bunch of hostages still, presumably, working to prevent a meltdown? I think we have to accept conflagration as a possibility, but not a deliberate one, with low odds at that. But, a 1 in a 100 chance of an accidental nuclear launch or a misinterpreted sub commander’s orders, or whatever, is high enough for us all to sit up and say, “We don’t do business with the grenade juggler over there. Get someone else in charge, or we keep hold of your testicles and squeeze until something comes off!”
    1
  24346. 1
  24347. 1
  24348. 1
  24349. 1
  24350. 1
  24351. 1
  24352. 1
  24353. 1
  24354. 1
  24355. 1
  24356. 1
  24357. 1
  24358. 1
  24359. 1
  24360. 1
  24361. 1
  24362. 1
  24363. 1
  24364. 1
  24365. Nationalise water and transport. Save the tax payers from having to pay for Tory greed and force fines on the previous owners, taken out of the bonds issued for the purchases. Then use that fund for a public housing startup service for young families. No rents, but zero interest loans, payable after the mortgages. And designate the houses by percentage minimums for every constituency, with councils empowered to decide where they go in their own zones, by a deadline. If they fail to meet the deadline, the money goes back into the central pot to be reallocated to constituencies which have been fulfilling their obligations. Meanwhile, start immediate negotiations with the EU with the long term goal of re-entering the single market. Some good will can be generated by reaffirming our commitment to international law and enshrining the EU human rights legislation into our own books. Use windfall taxes to lower energy prices and shore up our military, and take some windfalls from unusual places, like the arms industry, who will have a vested interest in remaining in business with a nation that’s growing its armed services and is producing replacement weapons and equipment for all the stuff we’re sending to Ukraine, which shall be increasing for the next couple of years anyway. While all this is happening, grab up the headlines by reopening all the books into Windrush, Grenfell Tower and the post office scandals and prosecuting people. Where prosecutions are no longer possible, or loopholes allow the culpable to walk free, take away their gongs and introduce legislation to prevent further such abuses and to close any escape hatches for those who might think they can get away with stuff. While those books are open, you are all but certain to catch people with their hands in the tills, or burying bad news, in the act. Make examples of them. Play to your strengths, sound financial management and work on your weaknesses, like social media and popular public figures in the media. And, while we’re at it, crush the client media with a raft of legislation that levels the playing field. You can’t tell people what to say, but you can make statements as to political affiliations mandatory on all outlets and publications, thus being able to hold those with none to account, and enforcing equal numbers of outlets permitted (never exceeded) nationally and regionally.
    1
  24366. 1
  24367. 1
  24368. 1
  24369. 1
  24370. 1
  24371. 1
  24372. 1
  24373. 1
  24374. 1
  24375. 1
  24376. 1
  24377. 1
  24378. 1
  24379. 1
  24380. 1
  24381. 1
  24382. 1
  24383. 1
  24384. 1
  24385. 1
  24386. 1
  24387. 1
  24388. 1
  24389. 1
  24390. 1
  24391. 1
  24392. 1
  24393. 1
  24394. 1
  24395. 1
  24396. 1
  24397. 1
  24398. 1
  24399. 1
  24400. 1
  24401. 1
  24402. 1
  24403. 1
  24404. 1
  24405. 1
  24406. 1
  24407. 1
  24408. 1
  24409. 1
  24410. 1
  24411. 1
  24412. 1
  24413. 1
  24414. 1
  24415. 1
  24416. 1
  24417. 1
  24418. 1
  24419. 1
  24420. 1
  24421. 1
  24422. 1
  24423. 1
  24424. 1
  24425. 1
  24426. 1
  24427. 1
  24428. 1
  24429. 1
  24430. 1
  24431. 1
  24432. 1
  24433. 1
  24434. 1
  24435. 1
  24436. 1
  24437. Theresa Terry : America will be very similar to Russia soon, since the Coup was completed at the risible, rigged, Impeachment, “trial.” Once the rigged, “elections,” are over, we won’t have ANY, “influence,” in that region, as it will all be up to Putin. America is already less influential in world affairs, by isolationist choice, and by the fact that our Dictator keeps getting played. He’s as gullible with other Dictators as he seems to think the American people are. Having said that, he may well be right? No one wants to admit that the Republic has already FALLEN. The Dems, because they’re too close to the problem, and their huge egos won’t allow them to believe that they can’t personally change the course of American history; and the Republicans, because they have learned from Putin that the one thing a modern Dictatorship NEVER does, is admit that it’s a Dictatorship. So, we’ll get FAKE Democracy, like Russia’s, and be, “told,” that we’re, “influencing,” events that we care about. And, as it becomes more and more OBVIOUS that we’re in a Dictatorship, fewer and fewer people will be willing to state that fact out loud. So, I really wouldn’t concern myself with Syria’s problems any more, since Putin ordered Trump to withdraw our forces from the zone? It’s not like we can, “do,” anything about it? We can’t even unseat our own Dictatorship, let alone theirs? Christ! We don’t even WANT to admit it’s THERE! Because, if we got REAL, then we’d have to admit to ourselves that the only way to remove a Dictator is REVOLUTION; Ukraine-Style, without weapons . . . Or, we can just carry on being pussies, and PRETEND we would be ALLOWED to, “Vote,” our Dictatorship out of power, so that an ENTIRE administration would go to jail? . . . SMH
    1
  24438. 1
  24439. 1
  24440. Except he left out the reason Putin has invaded Ukraine. This is why academics need to get out more. History is useless without context, invaluable with it. Ukraine is sitting on the biggest gas and oil reserves outside of Russia. Putin has made sure they never get developed by stealing them in Crimea and fomenting trouble in the Donbas region. But now Shell, Exxon and BP have all confirmed even bigger finds in the west of the country, outside of Putin’s reach, the only way he can prevent their development is by stealing the whole country and sitting on them himself. So long as they are never drilled, he remains the biggest energy exporter in Europe and the 2nd biggest in the world. He doesn’t want to drill them himself. He just wants to ensure no one else does. But, if Putin had ever read a little history, he’d understand that the west has NEVER allowed themselves to lose control over energy reserves in a hundred years. Not since, “energy security,” has been a thing. This is not a war. This is an armed robbery, pure and simples. And he’ll lose. In 20 or 30 years, it won’t matter, because no one will be using fossil fuels. But psycho boy Putin doesn’t care what mess he leaves behind to bequeath his successors. In fact, it probably massages his ego to think the country will collapse when he’s gone, making it look like only he could run Mother Russia? Who cares? The madman needs to go now. We must sanction him into the Stone Age until his people overthrow him. Better that than starving?
    1
  24441. 1
  24442. 1
  24443. 1
  24444. 1
  24445. 1
  24446. 1
  24447. 1
  24448. 1
  24449. 1
  24450. 1
  24451. 1
  24452. 1
  24453. 1
  24454. 1
  24455. 1
  24456. 1
  24457. 1
  24458. 1
  24459. 1
  24460. 1
  24461. 1
  24462. 1
  24463. 1
  24464. 1
  24465. 1
  24466. 1
  24467. 1
  24468. 1
  24469. 1
  24470. 1
  24471. 1
  24472. 1
  24473. 1
  24474. 1
  24475. 1
  24476. 1
  24477. 1
  24478. 1
  24479. 1
  24480. 1
  24481. 1
  24482.  @franklin9400  : She did just fine out of it, and knew what she was doing, every step of the way. Bill’s not a Jedi? He didn’t use anything but his power and charm. Are we meant to conclude that Ms Lewinski was not at all responsible for putting his wife through that appalling nightmare of humiliation? She didn’t care about the harm she’d done to his family, or his innocent children? Or the harm she did to the tax payer and the state of our politics? Of course, we had money to burn (literally) back then, but wow! She was only there because she was, like ANY intern that makes it all the way to the WHITE HOUSE, meant to be brighter, smarter, better educated, and more highly aware of moral philosophy than the average young woman among her peer group! If the BJ in the Oval Office didn’t show her DEPRAVED indifference to the country’s interests, and practically GOP LEVELS of rank selfishness, then certainly her bringing it into the public domain did! The only, “victims,” in that story were his wife, his kids and the tax payers! Lisa’s talking unqualified BOLLOX! Anyone remember the Kennedy’s? Didn’t THEY, “set the bar,” pretty low? They literally passed women around between them! Including Marilyn Munro! Oh, but Lisa isn’t being paid to talk about THEM is she? Her, “job,” is to swipe at the Clinton’s for reason which I doubt even SHE can remember, so addled are her brains, from Trumpoganda and Foxification! These people! . . . Sheesh! . . . 🙄✌️
    1
  24483. 1
  24484. 1
  24485. 1
  24486. 1
  24487. 1
  24488. 1
  24489. 1
  24490. 1
  24491. 1
  24492. 1
  24493. 1
  24494. 1
  24495. 1
  24496. 1
  24497. 1
  24498. 1
  24499. 1
  24500. 1
  24501. 1
  24502. 1
  24503. 1
  24504. 1
  24505. 1
  24506. 1
  24507. 1
  24508. 1
  24509. 1
  24510. 1
  24511. 1
  24512. 1
  24513. 1
  24514. 1
  24515. 1
  24516. 1
  24517. 1
  24518. Exactly. We’re not doing nearly enough! Putin hoarded enough gold for Russia’s economy to hold out for a couple of years. That’s why we HAVE TO invest much MORE into defeating Putin. The blood and treasure we invest now will save us a fortune down the line. Finland and Sweden joining NATO will be a real body blow to all of Putin’s rhetoric at home, but we HAVE TO get Germany to lead the way and cut off ALL energy supplies from Russia, and rally Europe and America into an energy pact of assured mutual support. Western Europeans are still funding the very war we want to stop! The Ruble was bound to bounce back, due to internal demand, and we simply don’t have the time to grind down Russia’s economy over years! Ukraine needs a full navy and airforce to support its heavy infantry in attacking Russia on all fronts, while Europe STOPS giving Putin at least a billion a week to kill, rape, torture and murder more Ukrainians en masse and individually! It’s the very LEAST we owe them! And it’s our best hope for a lasting peace. Two thirds of the world’s grain imports, 50% of the elements vital for microchip technology (anyone who tried to buy a PlayStation 5 knows there’s a worldwide shortage of microchips) and Shell, Exxon and BP spent billions on the rights to develop the massive oil and gas reserves in Ukraine, which they say rivals that of Russia itself! So the implications for world security are incalculable! Imagine if Putin succeeded in taking all of Ukraine and controlled more of the world’s energy reserves than any other individual? Combined with their ally, China, taking control of ALL technology manufacturing between them! Taiwan manufactured two thirds of the world’s microchips out of ONE SINGLE FACTORY! When Covid forced them to close temporarily, that’s when the microchip shortage effected the entire planet. So imagine China owning Taiwan and Putin having control of most of the elements used in their manufacture between them? It would be the end for the west. And there’s the simple matter of morality and human cost, underlining all of this. Ukraine has sacrificed too much for all of us, fighting on our front lines. Putin wants Germany, the economic power house of Europe, and will impose the old East German borders at the very least if we let him. It all comes down to CRUSHING his forces in Ukraine, NOW! We’re not doing nearly enough.
    1
  24519. 1
  24520. 1
  24521. 1
  24522. 1
  24523. 1
  24524. 1
  24525. 1
  24526. 1
  24527. 1
  24528. 1
  24529. 1
  24530. 1
  24531. 1
  24532. 1
  24533. 1
  24534. 1
  24535. 1
  24536. 1
  24537. 1
  24538. 1
  24539. 1
  24540. 1
  24541. 1
  24542. 1
  24543. 1
  24544. 1
  24545. 1
  24546. 1
  24547. 1
  24548. 1
  24549. 1
  24550. A genuine secret to successful podcasting that not many people know: NEVER allow the term, “um,” “ah,” or, “errrr,” to make it to the final cut. And NEVER say, “um,” or, “er,” live. There are techniques you can adopt for seeing to this and I promise you it will make the difference between how many audience members tune in and how many you retain for an entire podcast. It’s a genuine psychological reaction that is only just showing up in studies, but something we can all intuitively grasp. Umming and erring is what makes people tune out, change the channel, or decide it’s frustrating to listen to. It’s the one thing that Radio 4 live broadcasting is prescient about and does well. And I don’t doubt it is included in their training packages. That is, “training,” for those presenters who aren’t already too famous and prickly to admit they could benefit from training. Trust me on this. It will change your fortunes. The brain just reacts super-negatively to hesitations and digressions. Especially impatient or autistic brains, like mine. But autism is far more wide spread in the world than most people realise. And the key to audience retention lies here, in this one small change to presentation style (especially in live broadcasts) that will probably prove to be the biggest net positive for the least effort. Never allow yourself to digress (always stick to the point) and never, “um,” and, “err.” I know I come off as a bit dotty, but I honestly would bet serious money that you’ll notice a huge benefit in very little time, once you master the technique. And, obviously, I’m speaking as a (none member. I don’t, “join,” groups) huge fan, wishing you nothing but success and growth in the future.
    1
  24551. 1
  24552. 1
  24553. 1
  24554. 1
  24555. 1
  24556. 1
  24557. 1
  24558. 1
  24559. 1
  24560. 1
  24561. 1
  24562.  @opinion3742  : I didn’t ask for, “proof,” of anything. I merely stated an opinion, which I stand by. Yes, phobias are by definition, “irrational fears,” or they would not be phobias. You made no mention of, “phobias,” in your initial comment, so I can hardly be expected to retrospectively change the terms of the discussion and remain sincere. Nor can you, but you are adding information in manner that does not entirely strike as me as being in good faith. Frankly, the, “argument,” which goes, traditionally, something like, “She was raped by a black man, now you can’t blame her for hating all black men,” is both disingenuous and far too common (at least, variations on that theme are) for them to be based in any kind of reality. You happen to be holding this discussion with a former psychotherapist (in a former life) and I can tell you that such racial fixations, as a direct result of personal trauma, are both statistically vanishingly rare and anecdotally so too. However, such fixations are less rare in racially charged discussions; but I can only speak from personal experience there, with no statistical record to back up the fact that I’ve heard it far too often for my own liking and I’d be willing to bet real money that others will say they have too. I cannot speak to your friend’s experience. He has my sympathy. But I can tell you, if all you say is as accurate as you claim it is, (assuming you have not misinterpreted what you sincerely apprehend?) any treatment toward recovery and learning to live with that trauma no longer dominating your friend’s thoughts and actions, will involve addressing underlying issues which were brought to the fore by said events. It will be a great help to your friend, therefore, if he is not racist. Because I can tell you for a scientific fact that trauma does not make people racist. It may well bring out a tendency, underlying issue, or render someone vulnerable to the indoctrination of other racists? But, racism is acquired, rather like a disease. You must be exposed to and taught how to be a racist. And that requires an damaged environment and other undermining issues to be on hand. These are simple facts. Please do not attempt to imply that I am in some way, “discounting,” or otherwise diminishing your friend’s tragic experience. I am not. All I am saying is that his trauma did not make him a racist. Because that’s a fact.
    1
  24563. 1
  24564. 1
  24565. 1
  24566. 1
  24567. 1
  24568. 1
  24569. 1
  24570. 1
  24571. 1
  24572. 1
  24573. 1
  24574. 1
  24575. 1
  24576. 1
  24577. 1
  24578. 1
  24579. 1
  24580. 1
  24581. 1
  24582. Interestingly, if you check the figures you will see that energy prices are back where they were before the war broke out in Ukraine. Jake Broe, on his YouTube channel offered a recent analysis of what is going on worldwide in connection to the policies around energy that the western world are supporting, in order to collapse the Russian economy. These are things that the management of the Fed in the US cannot say out loud, but seem clearly linked. He begins by describing the sudden collapse of an American Bank (the 18th richest bank in America) which is occurring right now, and how the silicone valley investors all lost their money due to a rush. It’s a big deal in US financial news, but it plays a role in geo politics which is fascinating to see unfold in real time, so to speak. I highly recommend his channel for those interested in the day to day events involving the Ukraine War. Inflation in America is far lower than in Britain, having peaked at 9% early last year, and steadily dropping since then. Their economic issues are considerably different from ours now. Ours are more complex, given the fluidity of our position as we renegotiate our place with respect to Europe. But it is not as dire as many predicted either. That’s of little comfort to those who cannot afford to rent a home within miles of their workplace, let alone own one. But we are seeing the emergence of a new Class Divide, between the Haves, who seem to have it all, and the Have Nots, who seem to have less each year. Very few are sitting in that middle class of which we’re so fond of protecting like it was at the heart of British identity. It will be interesting to see where that goes from here?
    1
  24583. 1
  24584. 1
  24585. 1
  24586. 1
  24587. 1
  24588. 1
  24589. 1
  24590. 1
  24591. 1
  24592. 1
  24593. 1
  24594. 1
  24595. Slight side question here but, Did Liberty Macenea invent a new word? “Precarity,” was always, “precariousness,” in my dictionary. I’m interested because I’ve noticed that the rate at which new words and terms are entering the English lexicon seems to be increasing? And with speedier changes in language, comes speedier changes in thought and the very tools we use to communicate those changes: our words. This is very much your bailiwick, as the philosophical implications of our language changing at an increasing rate, to accommodate new ideas, new ways of thinking and expressing thoughts, songs, novels, scripts and ideas, is potentially profound. I just find that fascinating, because it is also reflected in the world wide reaction to gender fluidity, and this, “Trad-Wife,” thing seems like a, “conservative,” with a small, “c,” reaction to that. I think it’s an expression of fear at a world changing into a place we don’t recognise from our childhoods. Whether that’s a good or bad thing will depend on your politics to a large degree. So, it will be the exceptions that will be most interesting, culturally. But, I did have to laugh out loud, quite literally, at hearing all that stuff about the, “Catholic Aesthetic.” My gut reaction was, “Yeah, only the priests, cardinals and the pope are allowed to spend hours getting all dolled up, to impress the little kids, right?” Nevertheless, I am fascinated to see how this one pans out. It was news to me until I watched this video, but then, I’m older than god and twice as pissed off. But, I would be equally fascinated to hear a Wisecrack discussion on language, (with the implications of chat-bots and other influences) most of all with reflections on the rapid pace of change. Is that a real thing, or does it just seem that way?
    1
  24596. 1
  24597.  @martinwinter615  : I think you’re missing the point? While I wouldn’t have begun by laying into you quite so hard, I would have asked, “What science of dating,” are you talking about? Because I’m all but certain that you won’t find any such thing in respectable academic circles? You may find, “data,” studies and the topic of dating, discussed as part of a broader academic study, but you will not find it as an academic discipline. And that appears to be what Mr W took issue with: the way you posit, “the science of dating,” as though it was an acknowledged academic field, instead of the marketing tool that it really is. I share Mr W’s concern with the, “legitimacy crisis,” of academia being undermined by bogus claims being made by those who care far more about what’s in your bank account than contributing to the landscape of learning. I’m not dismissing you out of hand, as it’s entirely possible that you merely have your terms mixed up? This would be a natural consequence of spending time on things that purport to be science, which aren’t. There’s a lot of that about. And it would be unfair to start from the assumption that everyone should be able to tell, “sales technique,” from, “academia,” when the advertisers who peddle such nonsense have spent fortunes on deceiving the general public into making precisely that mistake. But, now you know, there is no such thing as the, “science of dating.” Now you have been made aware that your belief in such a thing was simply born out of the machinations of people who want to take advantage of the fact that you don’t have a sufficiently academic background to make that distinction. And hopefully, you can respond to that in a constructive way, for your own benefit as much as the people you discuss such things with? As to your criticisms of Wisecrack’s approach . . . Well, that claim is empirically wrong. They are always, “showing their receipts,” so to speak, and throughout this whole video they gave you the findings of relevant studies and curated relevant quotes from the philosophers they discussed. The whole point of their videos is to discuss what current academia is finding in modern culture, explain the history behind these ideas, and to show what current research finds to be occurring together; and, most importantly, they show it all from the point of view of a particular school of philosophy, along with any rival thought, or contradictory philosophies out there. Perhaps what you’re really looking for is something on social psychology, sociology or one of the social sciences that prefers numbers and statistics over the thinking that goes behind people’s collective behaviour? It seems you were frustrated by your inability to glean enough hard data from this video? But that’s not what these videos are for. Rather, they want the opposite of that, (if they have any aim beyond making money with entertaining YouTube videos at all?) which is to make the viewer do all that heavy lifting for themselves. They don’t want to tell you WHAT to think, but encourage you to practice HOW to think. And that is something you must do for yourself. I hope that cleared things up for you? Have a nice day.
    1
  24598. 1
  24599. 1
  24600. 1
  24601. 1
  24602. 1
  24603. 1
  24604. 1
  24605. 1
  24606. 1
  24607. 1
  24608. 1
  24609. 1
  24610. 1
  24611. 1
  24612. 1
  24613. 1
  24614. 1
  24615. 1
  24616. 1
  24617. 1
  24618. 1
  24619. 1
  24620. 1
  24621. 1
  24622. 1
  24623. 1
  24624. 1
  24625. 1
  24626. 1
  24627. 1
  24628. 1
  24629. 1
  24630. 1
  24631. 1
  24632. 1
  24633. 1
  24634. 1
  24635. 1
  24636. 1
  24637. 1
  24638. 1
  24639. 1
  24640. 1
  24641. 1
  24642. 1
  24643. 1
  24644. 1
  24645. 1
  24646. 1
  24647. 1
  24648. 1
  24649. 1
  24650. 1
  24651. 1
  24652. ruth depew : You raise important points there. The ENTIRE PROPAGANDA around Trump has TWO essential features: Past focus and VICTIMHOOD. They DESPERATELY push the, “narrative,” that ANYONE who wants to see Trump and his GOONS in JAIL, has some AUTOMATIC adoration for Obama and Hillary. I used to think that their obtuseness was aimed at Anti-Trump people, but now I SEE, it’s for their OWN DRONES. They are DESPERATE to CONVINCE people that ALL Trump opponents are, “liberals,” who want to make it illegal to own a gun and have a religion. NOT to ALIENATE Trump’s opponents, but to hold on to, and EXPAND, their flock of SHEEPLE. Which brings us to your point: their PERPETUAL sense of, “Butt Hurt,” VICTIMHOOD. How appealing it must be, to be told that, “you,” are NOT, “responsible,” for the fact that your life is crap and that your frustrating inability to express the hatred, racism and brutality that you always feel, without some serious pushback, is NOT YOUR FAULT. Along comes a guy who gives PERMISSION to be a full on NAZI and who says that EVERYTHING you’re bitter about is the FAULT of the, “OTHER.” Suddenly, not only can you BE RACIST, but it’s MANDATED, so as to BLAME Mexicans, Syrian Refugees and African Americans for Crime, Terrorism and the fact that EVERYONE is in MASSIVE DEBT! Conspiracy theories become the CATHARSIS, relieving all senses guilt, logic and personal responsibility. Backed by this carefully nurtured sense of PARANOIA, we can now BLAME ANY ONE AND EVERYONE, and act like Hillary is STILL a, “THING,”!!! like she’d ever run for office again??? This propaganda is NOT about right minded people! It’s about gathering the WRONG minded people and KEEPING those already IN THE CULT! Quite the revelation, when you think about it? . . . You’re an interesting person, ruth
    1
  24653. 1
  24654. 1
  24655. 1
  24656. 1
  24657. 1
  24658. 1
  24659. 1
  24660. 1
  24661. 1
  24662. 1
  24663. 1
  24664. 1
  24665. 1
  24666. 1
  24667. 1
  24668. 1
  24669. 1
  24670. 1
  24671. 1
  24672. 1
  24673. 1
  24674. 1
  24675. 1
  24676. 1
  24677. 1
  24678. 1
  24679. 1
  24680. 1
  24681. 1
  24682. 1
  24683. 1
  24684. 1
  24685. 1
  24686. 1
  24687. 1
  24688. 1
  24689. 1
  24690. ErroneousClique : Imagine you bought a car, and had to make payments on it, over the course of a year, say? Imagine, after you get the car home, you find a letter on your doorstep, telling you that your first payment was insufficient, and they’re threatening a repo? A couple of calls later, you discover your contract now belongs to a different sales company, the terms and conditions of your contract are completely different, and the ONLY thing that’s iron clad about it, is your signature, meaning you either do it their way, or lose your car? And, if their way was the PRECISE way that you DIDN’T want to do it, which was WHY you signed up to the deal you, “thought,” you had, what will you do? I’ll tell you what you’ll do. Absolutely NOTHING. Because there’s NOTHING you can do. That’s why it matters. This may be a considerably scaled down analogy (just a game), but with so MANY customers, the financial rewards for such a scam, work on a truly massive scale. It’s a con. People deliberately AVOID certain platforms, because they make REAL, FINANCIAL, DIFFERENCES to terms and conditions, where the game you, “thought,” you owned becomes impossible to play, unless you pay REAL money for the, “Surprise Mechanics.” That which you wanted to avoid, and which you KNOW the company you thought you were buying from does NOT do, becomes the only reality. I agreed with your latter points. But, your opening point overlooks all of that. It’s a serious con, which will hurt the industry, because people will refuse to pre-order, and many will hold off buying games at all, until they’ve been going long enough for people to be sure there are no shenanigans going on. It matters a great deal, my friend ✌️
    1
  24691. 1
  24692. 1
  24693. 1
  24694. 1
  24695. 1
  24696. 1
  24697. 1
  24698. 1
  24699. 1
  24700. 1
  24701. 1
  24702. 1
  24703. 1
  24704. 1
  24705. 1
  24706. 1
  24707. 1
  24708. 1
  24709. 1
  24710. 1
  24711. 1
  24712. 1
  24713. 1
  24714. 1
  24715. 1
  24716. 1
  24717. 1
  24718. 1
  24719. 1
  24720. 1
  24721. 1
  24722. 1
  24723. 1
  24724. 1
  24725. 1
  24726. 1
  24727. 1
  24728. 1
  24729. 1
  24730. 1
  24731. 1
  24732. 1
  24733. 1
  24734. 1
  24735. 1
  24736. 1
  24737. 1
  24738. 1
  24739. 1
  24740. 1
  24741. 1
  24742. 1
  24743. 1
  24744. 1
  24745. 1
  24746. 1
  24747. 1
  24748. 1
  24749. 1
  24750. 1
  24751. 1
  24752. 1
  24753. 1
  24754. 1
  24755. 1
  24756. 1
  24757. 1
  24758. 1
  24759. 1
  24760. 1
  24761. 1
  24762. 1
  24763. 1
  24764. 1
  24765. 1
  24766. 1
  24767. 1
  24768. 1
  24769. 1
  24770. 1
  24771. 1
  24772. 1
  24773. 1
  24774. 1
  24775. 1
  24776. 1
  24777. 1
  24778. 1
  24779. 1
  24780. 1
  24781. 1
  24782. 1
  24783. 1
  24784. 1
  24785. 1
  24786. 1
  24787. 1
  24788. 1
  24789. 1
  24790. 1
  24791. 1
  24792. 1
  24793. 1
  24794. 1
  24795. 1
  24796. 1
  24797. 1
  24798. 1
  24799. 1
  24800. 1
  24801. 1
  24802. 1
  24803. 1
  24804. 1
  24805. 1
  24806. 1
  24807. 1
  24808. 1
  24809. 1
  24810.  @seang2700  : Quite possibly. But that has NOTHING to do with Tactical Voting. Simply voting is already a selection from the lesser of two evils, which you describe as, “negative voting,” for some, as yet, unexplained and impenetrable reason. What you described there is the normal state of affairs. Tactical Voting is a, “Positive,” act. It is a coordinated action, employed by an informed electorate who are taking back the reigns of power, as is their democratic right, and using the system to alter the political landscape. If we are never to be offered a satisfactory party, with an honest commitment to reforms, or even to see through their own stated policy goals, we can still eradicate the most egregious party, thereby putting those who remain standing on notice that they had better see to it that they deliver their promises or die trying, as the electorate hold the keys to their office and now have the power of the internet to coordinate OUTSIDE of their controlled stomping ground. That is about as close to revolutionary as we can get in a technological age. And about as close as we should want to come. Any action that empowers the demos and strips the entitled classes of their fiefdoms is a, “positive,” act. But it is also one from which only good may come, even if it only half works. For me, the best possible outcome would be the formation of a Labour/Lib Dem Coaltion, and voting reform. So, here’s my question for you: You bandy this word, “negative,” about, as though you were accusing Luddites of smashing their machinery in a pointless act of vandalism, and that is partly because you’re clearly disturbed at the upsetting of the status quo, despite the fact that this incarnation of Tory has done nothing but for the last 8 years. So, tell us what is actually, “negative,” about Tactical Voting? If you actually know, that is? And, if you’re not just grabbing at a definition like a bogey man to frighten the children? In what way is Tactical Voting actually, “negative”?
    1
  24811. 1
  24812.  @seang2700  : The, “personal rancour,” you identify came from you. You called tactical voters, (and, by extension, me) “stupid.” That was your angry response to the, “grain of truth,” you don’t like to chew on in your otherwise steady diet of Tory mush that you are so obviously used to swallowing. I note you will not, because you cannot, answer the simplest question: What is negative about tactical voting? That was just your way of dressing up something you fear, in hopes of persuading the credulous. It is also why you fail. See, it hasn’t occurred to you yet, but what, “negative,” outcomes should we fear? That the economy might tank? Already happened. That inflation might skyrocket in a manner that is demonstrably not related to world affairs and purely a problem of our own creation? Already happened. That the NHS might get privatised until we end up with a health system not fit for purpose which puts people in debt for the rest of their lives if they have an accident or unforeseen illness? Well, that’s happening but still worth fighting for to undo the most egregious changes and to prevent the rest from happening. What are we meant to, “fear,” Mr Bogey man? That essential services like the provision of TAP WATER isn’t, “Pretend-Privatised,” when it’s actually handed over to a SINGLE company in each region with NO COMPETITION ALLOWED, making it NOT a business but a FIEFDOM! And that’s WHY they’re getting away with polluting EVERYTHING, because they’re not even in a Liberal-Economist’s wet dream but more like a 17th century royal family! What POSSIBLE, “harm,” could an alternative to Tory hegemony DO to Britain that the Tories have not ALREADY DONE? That’s a SERIOUS QUESTION, BTW. I know you will attempt to answer neither, already. Because you HAVE NO ANSWER. You are either in the pay of the Tories yourself, or you’re one of those unthinking drones who simply gets all upset at the idea of, “change,” because you were brought up to think of all alternatives as, “Looney Lefties,” and never had the wit or imagination to read a book! My, “passion,” is derived from the fact that, like all Tories, you think you have the, “entitlement,” to call those who think differently to you, “stupid,” whilst manifesting your own un-self-aware stupidity, and expecting people to take it without answering back. It derives from the obvious fact that you cannot see the, “germ of truth,” in front of you but you are ignorant enough to dismiss dissent as if you actually had something (ANYTHING) to actually, “say.” It comes from the HORRIBLE death of my father and returning from his funeral (for which I had to get special permission to go to) exhausted and frayed, only to see a Tory staffer, talking to the press, in front of cameras, telling them about the drunken antics of Number 10 staff and CABINET MEMBERS and LITERALLY LAUGHING OUT LOUD! In my face!!! My depth of feeling is similar to countless millions who shared my experience and who KNEW they would NEVER vote Tory again, so long as ANY of these goons remain in the party. And if you claim to have no, “feelings,” about that, it will simply confirm the vapidity of the Tory mindset. But you needn’t bother making such a false claim, as it is clear that you do have feelings. You feel FEAR, because you see the very real possibility of annihilation for your imagined (and utterly unreal) status quo, which you express through anger, and a typically devious Tory attempt to transfer that fear onto others. Well, you have failed. Indeed, all you have achieved is to remind me as to why it is SO important that the Tories are not just defeated at the next election, but necessarily CRUSHED for the good of the country. Have a fearful, anger inducing, Tory day, son . . . SMH
    1
  24813. 1
  24814. 1
  24815. 1
  24816. 1
  24817. 1
  24818. 1
  24819. 1
  24820. 1
  24821. 1
  24822. 1
  24823. 1
  24824. 1
  24825. 1
  24826. 1
  24827. 1
  24828. 1
  24829. 1
  24830. 1
  24831. 1
  24832. 1
  24833. 1
  24834. 1
  24835. 1
  24836. 1
  24837. 1
  24838. 1
  24839. 1
  24840. 1
  24841. 1
  24842. 1
  24843. 1
  24844. 1
  24845. 1
  24846. 1
  24847. 1
  24848. 1
  24849. 1
  24850. 1
  24851. 1
  24852. 1
  24853. 1
  24854. 1
  24855. 1
  24856. 1
  24857. 1
  24858. 1
  24859. 1
  24860. 1
  24861. 1
  24862. 1
  24863. 1
  24864. 1
  24865. 1
  24866. 1
  24867. 1
  24868. 1
  24869. 1
  24870. 1
  24871. 1
  24872. 1
  24873. 1
  24874. 1
  24875. 1
  24876. 1
  24877. 1
  24878. 1
  24879. 1
  24880. 1
  24881. 1
  24882. 1
  24883. 1
  24884. 1
  24885. 1
  24886. 1
  24887. 1
  24888. 1
  24889. 1
  24890. 1
  24891. 1
  24892. 1
  24893. 1
  24894. 1
  24895. 1
  24896. 1
  24897. 1
  24898. 1
  24899. 1
  24900. 1
  24901. 1
  24902. 1
  24903. 1
  24904. 1
  24905. 1
  24906. 1
  24907.  @spd28237  : Or they just HATE the, “other,” sufficiently to vote against their own interests? That is, after all, what the dominant right wing press has been feeding them for the past 11 years. The lies that have been disseminated from the Dispatch Box (the Home Office in particular) have been so big, so hysterical, so egregious, that they have created an atmosphere of race baited panic in the unthinking classes and the already low level racists of Britain. They have appealed to greed and nationalism, despite hurting those who grasp at greedy straws and want a, “little England,” to be free of migration. The ironies abound to the point where there is no superlative that could possibly express the degree to which the Tories have grown increasingly hypocritical, thieving, stupid, ignorant, backward thinking, incompetent, mean spirited and a genuine threat to national security at every conceivable level. There will always be a significant number of voters who do not follow politics closely enough to understand the issues, yet vote the way their parents do, or their employer tells them to, for a quiet life. And there will always be a significant number of extremists, or plain stupid racists. There will also be a significant number of ignorant, greedy people who are easily manipulated into thinking a Tory vote is a vote for lower taxes and more money, despite the empirical evidence proving that the opposite has always been the case since 1945 when, whilst out of power, several reforms took place within the Tory party’s structure and political philosophy. So there will ALWAYS be much to overcome. Just look at how BAD things have had to get before it has become obvious to the public that the Tories are no longer even Tories anymore, barely a cohesive political party! They’re more like a giant hedge fund, or, “think tank,” which is just a cover term for financial group of aligned interests (which is literally where the last, brief, PM got all of her ideas fed to her, btw) breaking down Britain into its constituent parts and selling them all off to the highest bidder from ANY country whatsoever. And they’re incompetent at that! Can you even remember a time before when ministers actually spat bile at the electorate from the Dispatch Box? Suella Braverman’s, “speeches,” are nothing but long lists of name calling! That is unprecedented in British political life and would have been in all the headlines as a career ending mental breakdown moment for any minister a decade ago! Now it’s business as usual! WTF!? So, yeah. There will always be those who act against everyone else’s best interests and they must be convinced or defeated. And that responsibility is yours. Mine too.
    1
  24908.  @spd28237  : P.S. I am currently reading a science fiction novel called The Three Body Problem. In it, there is a character who brings about the destruction of Planet Earth by revealing our location to hostile aliens, bent on colonisation and treating us like the Native American Indians of the 19th Century, if we’re lucky. The book is beautifully written, taking its time to describe the life of this astronomer character and why she does what she does. The reader, whilst not agreeing with her desire to see the human race either taken over and managed like children who cannot be trusted around their own dangerous toys, or simply destroyed completely, can understand her motives comprehensively. What the author shows us is that there will always be people amongst us who have what they think of as perfectly rational reasons to destroy humanity’s best interests, alongside those who are not worthy of the responsibilities they already have or aspire to, or the just plain stupid. It is incumbent upon the rest of us to remain vigilant and involved in our fellow human’s lives, therefore. As there may come, one day, people who are smarter than us, with better, more rational arguments, for acting in direct contradiction to every instinct of self preservation or decency. Unless we were smart ourselves and read our history, studied our current politics and comprehended where our own occupation and pass times fit into the scheme of things. Unless we know HOW to look out for our fellow traveller, we may not be able to when the crisis moment comes. Then again, she may be right? Maybe human kind doesn’t offer anything better than desolation and destruction to a universe that would be better off without us? But, while we choose to continue our existence, we have a responsibility to ensure that this is not the case. And that means getting involved. Inaction is a decision, as much as it would be if you stood by and watched a mother beat her child to death without intervening. That is your choice. Humanity is your choice.
    1
  24909. 1
  24910. 1
  24911. 1
  24912. 1
  24913. 1
  24914. 1
  24915. 1
  24916. 1
  24917. 1
  24918. 1
  24919. 1
  24920. 1
  24921. 1
  24922. 1
  24923. 1
  24924. 1
  24925. 1
  24926. 1
  24927. 1
  24928. 1
  24929. 1
  24930. 1
  24931. 1
  24932. I find her presentations fascinating and her voice is so soothing to me. I’m quite the fanboy . . . The Many Worlds notion has always struck me as bogus; from my not-expert perspective. It’s untestable, and certainly unprovable, for a start, even if, “evidence,” may one day be found. The same evidence can and will be usable for rival theories. But, my real problem with it, is that it’s actually philosophy, not physics. The very same prejudice that Einstein felt, which made him find the work of LeMetre so unpalatable, (which evidenced the Big Bang Theory) is at work in MWT. It’s a philosophical argument, with one purpose; refuting the existence of God. Einstein apologised to LeMetre, a Catholic priest, after having once told him, “Your math is correct but your physics is abominable.” And, The Big Bang is now generally accepted, despite having been held back for almost a generation by the egos of over powerful scientists. And, once again, we are seeing the history repeat itself. The idea of something miraculous happen, that the physical world could actually be altered by the mere act of, “observation,” and all that this implies, is intolerable to an atheistic culture, that is as guilty of prejudice, groupthink and dogma, as any religious organisation in history. The very same people who worship Galileo as their Martyr for being a victim of prejudice and dogma, perpetrated by an over weening establishment, have now become that very thing they despise. They are sacrificing science on the alter of that dogma, which might as well be stated as, “We refuse to accept any conclusions that may imply a creator of the universe, regardless of what the facts are,” and they come up with the most extravagant, superstitious and logically implausible solutions, and pursue them with such vehemence that they have become the new dogma! No doubt, someone reading this, will assume that I am a, “believer,” in God, and have a personal axe to grind, rather than question their own assumptions, because they have been trained to respond in that fashion, as though I was a Flat Earther or denying Gravity . . . But, my actual point is that there is yet to be a scientific explanation for our observations, and that the Copenhagen position has become a dogma, enforced by a powerful scientist, with a famously powerful and intolerant personality, and has evolved in to ever increasingly extravagant philosophical ideas. Without any evidence (hard or otherwise) Physics has been actively encouraged to wonder away from the path of science. We must look harder at the problem, and bring in fresh minds. And, whether we find evidence, or proof, of a God, a creator, or the exact opposite, we must accept the truth of whatever we find, unflinchingly, with the disciplined eyes of the scientist. We must leave philosophy to the philosophers, especially when we cannot even establish a working mathematical model for MWT that doesn’t have one or more fatal flaw in it. We simply have NO BASIS for MWT. Yet, I hear, you can actually fail your doctorate for saying that now! You would have thought we’d have learned by now, after the famously appalling ways great scientists have been treated, by the scientific community in the past, (leading to suicides and even murders! . . . In the 20th Century!) that anything that smacks of dogma is unhealthy for science. And the establishment must NEVER be allowed to get too comfortable, or, “established.” These were just some general thoughts on the nature and culture of science today, as it relates to this fascinating problem . . . It’s worth pondering, do any of you know any Christian believers in science? Physics especially? And, do any of you know any atheists in that field? Of the ones who claim to have, “open minds,” who are the least tolerant of difference in beliefs? You already know the answer, right? . . .
    1
  24933. 1
  24934.  @Jehannum2000  : Let me put it to you like this? Do you think it was really the, “science,” that Einstein was struggling with? It wasn’t LeMetre’s math? He told him as much, right from the start. At the very minimum, Einstein was struggling with his own personal pride, in being able to admit of flaws in his own theory? It was a period of years, before he could admit LeMetre was right. But, he said himself that he did not like the implications of a priest, no less, establishing a moment of, “creation,” in physics, and that he was suspicious of letting God into the science. LeMetre was the one who argued that God was irrelevant to the discussion. It was just the way the universe worked . . . works . . . But, imagine if LeMetre had been as bombastic as Bohr? Or just egotistical enough to match Einstein? What if he actually was pressing the religious subtext as hard as Einstein feared he, or others, might? How long would THAT debate have lasted? And how many casualties might such an intellectual war have claimed? Would we still be debating the Big Bang to this day? Would the Hubble Telescope ever have been funded, by a Congress that can get so very twitchy about, “religion,” in politics? Too much, “personality,” and not enough science, is the problem that people of faith run into in science (physics in particular) and which the people without never even notice. They make a point of not noticing. I speak as a none-scientist, outsider, looking in. I know many scientists, and I’m reasonably well,read on the history of science, though, by no means any kind of expert. But, I honestly believe (bringing this back to the topic) that the MWT is nothing more than an expression of this desperation to lock away certain possibilities, due to an unspoken, but no less potent, dogma. It is a philosophical explanation, doing duty for science, where science has nothing to offer. Or, what it does have to offer, we cannot yet tell, because no one has tread that ground and been lead where the science is taking them. I do see an increasing number of sceptics, unhappy with MWT though. And I occasionally wonder if such people will get the support they need to explore the no man’s land, or if they’ll just find themselves on another front, of the Galileo Wars? . . .
    1
  24935. 1
  24936. 1
  24937.  @usernamearrg  : Yes it would, wherever they are, whom ever they serve, of whatever political stripe. But it’s Germany’s biggest open secret that they were infiltrated (as were Americans and other European powers to a lesser extent) by Russian Oligarchs at every level. There are photographs and videos all over the media of the very same oligarchs who’s yachts and houses have been impounded, smiling with our top business leaders and politicians at glitzy events throughout the past 20 years. Some, like Roman Abramovich are well known to the security services and have been forced to work for our side or face poverty and jail forever, some are unknown to the public (and to Moscow) facing the same fate. Others are still using their money for super injunctions, so the press cannot even report on the allegations surrounding them, and some remain unknown to the world, except in The Kremlin. The problem is messy and complex because it’s been going on for so long and the energy from Moscow to Europe is the biggest outward manifestation of this appalling, anti-democratic corruption. Paul Massaro’s channel (a guy who’s been a guest on this show) examines the issue in detail, with experts who are well known on the international stage. As he reminds us frequently, some corruption is not even illegal, but just the sort of thing you don’t want the public to know, as it would result in ruined careers and lobbying for new laws. But, what I know for a certainty about Scholtz is that, when a powerful figure seems to be behaving irrationally, that is only because we’re not seeing the full picture. This is not just holding out for a deal, nor is it fear of Putin’s perception politically. We’re way past that as a rational explanation. Either Putin has power over several key players, or Scholtz is just ideologically set against diminishing returns on his Russian energy shares port folio. I can see no third explanation at a time when people are literally dying (innocent CHILDREN being bombed in their beds!) while Scholtz’s pusillanimity is costing lives!
    1
  24938. 1
  24939. 1
  24940.  @elenalatici9568  : I think they, “fear,” being treated the way they have treated others? When your nation only has 300 years on the clock, which has been spent wiping out the indigenous population, then shunning them; whilst introducing an entire new race, as slaves, and fighting a war to maintain slavery; then rigging the system ever after, so as to maintain political, financial and educational control over these people . . . you kind of expect that they might want some revenge for that? They’re wrong, of course. And, even for those who know they’re wrong, they still don’t like the idea of not being in the, “advantaged,” class of humanity. I genuinely hope America’s minorities DO grow to outnumber the white population. Then the myths around their fear will be proved wrong, which will substantially take their sticks from them. The whole, “white replacement,” racism is an expression of that hysteria and that kind of fear can mobilise whole armies, so we can’t just sit still for it, hoping no one will take such juvenile notions seriously, sadly. 20th Century Spain, Italy & Germany taught us that it never shakes out that way. As their rhetoric gets more toxic, and their actions more egregious (remember, this is the party that just voted to overturn a democratic election DURING an Insurrection attempt) they will leave themselves with fewer options. Eventually they will have nowhere, psychologically, intellectually, or rhetorically, to retreat to, or ways in which they can dress up what they’re getting at. People forget that Fascism grows over years, and never gives up. Because they’re facing the condemnation of history, unless they get to write it. There’s a gag from Rick & Morty that sums it up. A short lived character in a flashback to WWII is a prisoner of a strutting, uniformed Nazi, and he says, “Back in Brooklyn, we’ got a name for people like you.” To which the Nazi spins on his heal to face him and says, “I’m comfortable being called a Nazi! What word do you think could upset me?! Yes! Think before you speak next time!” Made me lol, at the time . . . Now, I just wonder, how long before the term, “Fascist,” or even, “Nazi,” starts getting, “mainstream,” again? . . . ✌️👍
    1
  24941. 1
  24942. Ultimately, this was a case of political corruption at the heart of a charity. Probably, most disturbingly, committed by people who didn’t even acknowledge their own hypocrisy corruption; telling themselves that what Cuomo, “stood for,” was what made him, “too big to fail,” so the truth didn’t matter? Spare a thought for the victims of serious sexual assault and harassment, who are (or recently were) in the process of being supported by Time’s Up, when all this hypocrisy lead to the collapse of an already burning building? Imagine the despair of all those (mostly) women who were relying on them for legal and moral support? I would not be surprised to learn of suicides as a direct result of this? Every time I see the name, “Johnny Depp,” mentioned on YouTube, I always write the same comment; “Depp was framed!” But, the good news is that Robert Downey Jr has insisted on having Depp in his third Sherlock Holmes movie, in a major role (probably the villain) and that he has huge support within the population; unlike Amber Herd, who’s star is already fading. The bad news is that it is more and more falling to the, “popular,” vote, for justice to get spread around a little more evenly. Because it seems that Injustice gets spread around, just as easily? The people involved in Time’s Up deserve all that’s coming to them. But the people they were helping? What of them now? They trusted them, and will mostly be legit cases of people out on a limb, with few options left to them, as their main advocate has been discredited. I hear you. I feel you. I just hope lessons will be learned? And that people who want change in the world, don’t start becoming like their cultish opponents, disregarding all news and narratives they don’t, “like,” in favor of ones they, “prefer,” until hypocrisy becomes less of a, “trap,” for people to fall into, due to racism, sexism, and all those other, “isms,” and more of a lifestyle choice? There’s too much MONEY sitting around in Time’s Up’s bank account for them to just shut up shop overnight? But, whether that gets donated to worthier charities, or they try to fix their broken organisation, will be the next big story to watch for them. I just hope they take good care of the case load on their books? I hope they don’t desert the people who trusted in them for help and guidance, so easily as they did their moral responsibilities?
    1
  24943. 1
  24944. 1
  24945. 1
  24946. 1
  24947. 1
  24948. 1
  24949. 1
  24950. 1
  24951. Susan Galea : You are right, of course. But, I believe most people, certainly I can speak for myself in this, when they call Putin a “Commie” are being both ironic AND REALISTIC. By using the infrastructure of the KGB, re-Christening it as the FSB, and melding that organisation with the top mafia outfits of Russia, Putin rebuilt the state in his own image. Though we can NEVER call what he has now, ACTUAL “Communism,” there IS little or NO difference between his current “government” and that of STALIN. Thus, it is eminently FAIR to call Putin a “Commie” of the Old School, who, like Stalin, has used the state as a means of enriching himself, used terror, false imprisonment and murder to silence his critics and steal from wealthy opponents, whilst silencing them too. He rose to power, by “fixing” problems for Boris Yeltsin, all the while, consolidating his own position, through the above mentioned tactics, while his leader was too drunk to care, so long as he got what he wanted. Let’s face it? WHAT country EVER succeeded at “communism”? Not ONE of them became anything other than a Totalitarian Dictatorship. But, the house that Putin built, is an almost EXACT replica of Stalin’s model; with the one, important distinction (DECEPTION): they are no longer encumbered by the need to maintain the mirage of “ideology”. As a free-wheeling “capitalist” system, they can justify their enormous wealth, and claim that it is THIS, in and of itself, that proves their fitness to rule, in money oriented state. When, really, all they are is the Mob, stealing and murdering their way to power, killing and silencing those who would expose them. And, worst of all, they have a dread fear of REVOLUTION. They have seen all of these Break Away nations, seeking independence from them, and they live in mortal terror of being executed or dug out of a sewer, like other dictators, they watched die on CNN. So there is NO AMOUNT of “power” or “wealth” that will EVER make them feel “secure” enough to rest and stabilise what they already have. And, America, the most powerful democracy in the world, has this nasty habit of exposing their crimes, freezing their assets and calling for free and fair elections, on the world stage. So, they have LONG seen The USA as a threat that MUST be neutralised. And, when you CANNOT equal them in strength, you must chip at their vulnerabilities. So, they have invested $ BILLIONS in fake news, money laundering, international bribery and blackmail, AND, of course, CYBER CRIME. They believe they have levelled the field, this way. And it “seems” to have WORKED?
    1
  24952. 1
  24953. 1
  24954. 1
  24955. 1
  24956. 1
  24957. 1
  24958. 1
  24959. 1
  24960. 1
  24961. 1
  24962. 1
  24963. 1
  24964. 1
  24965. 1
  24966. 1
  24967. 1
  24968. 1
  24969. 1
  24970. 1
  24971. 1
  24972. 1
  24973. 1
  24974. A S : You appear not to have read my comment? You repeated the point that I challenged, without acknowledging, or dealing with my point, at all. I don’t know this guy, and I’m not willing to make assumptions about him, because, for all I know, he may have paid his debt to society, visited his victims, and won their support? OR . . . He may still have unpaid debts, and blood on his hands? REGARDLESS; he is taking a personal risk, marking himself as a target, to people who KNOW him, his friends and family, and COULD get to him, if they were determined enough. He is challenging the foundation of Nazis, the ignorance, insecurity, failure in life, and the ruthless COWARDICE of Trump, who is too afraid to alienate his base, by condemning an abject ATROCITY. THAT is what he CAN be thanked for. It does help. It does contribute to change. And, it does undermine the very foundation of evil, even if it’s just a little. Imagine a battle field; men and women have been killing each other for days, and one side is now defeated. A white flag is waved, and the two opposing commanding officers meet in No Man’s Land, to discuss terms of surrender. The victorious commander offers medical assistance for the wounded. He tells his opponent, that the Geneva Convention will be strictly observed, and as a symbol of TRUST, and by way of respecting the gallantry of the vanquished, the victorious officer refuses the defeated commander’s side arm, telling him he can keep it. If that defeated officer was an American, and the victor a German, in WW II, what do you expect the American commander to say? “But, what about Hitler? The Jews? The death camps? I lost a brother in France!” . . . Of course not. He will say, as would you, “Thank you for that.” If you see this in the right context, you would see that I am no better than you, and that you should thank this man, for THIS thing that he’s done, for the sake of peace, on this day. Sometimes it’s just necessary to set aside the rest, for the sake of that peace, and for the good of those you are responsible for? I think you would be as gallant as those officers, if you were in their position. I think it’s just a question of seeing it through (slightly) better eyes. We want the same thing ✌️
    1
  24975. 1
  24976. 1
  24977. 1
  24978. 1
  24979. 1
  24980. 1
  24981. 1
  24982. 1
  24983. 1
  24984. 1
  24985. 1
  24986. 1
  24987. 1
  24988. 1
  24989. 1
  24990. 1
  24991. 1
  24992. 1
  24993. 1
  24994. 1
  24995. 1
  24996. 1
  24997. 1
  24998. 1
  24999. 1
  25000. 1
  25001. 1
  25002. 1
  25003. 1
  25004. 1
  25005. 1
  25006. 1
  25007. 1
  25008. 1
  25009. 1
  25010. 1
  25011. 1
  25012. 1
  25013. 1
  25014. 1
  25015. 1
  25016. 1
  25017. 1
  25018. 1
  25019. 1
  25020. 1
  25021. 1
  25022. 1
  25023. 1
  25024. 1
  25025. 1
  25026. 1
  25027. 1
  25028. 1
  25029. 1
  25030. 1
  25031. 1
  25032. 1
  25033. 1
  25034. 1
  25035. 1
  25036. 1
  25037. 1
  25038. 1
  25039. 1
  25040. 1
  25041. 1
  25042. 1
  25043. 1
  25044. It’s SICK isn’t it? He gets to act out his Winston Churchill fantasy, at tax payer expense, while his constituents are busy being totally ignored. But now we’re learning that he has managed to get a personal friend appointed to the Chair of the BBC and we’re all meant to accept their excuses that, “Oh, you wouldn’t know about this stuff, because you’re all plebs, but this is how we do things all the time, so it’s fine really,” and we’re meant to tug our forelocks and say, “Oh well, sorry we bothered you then,” like it’s the 19 fricken’ 50’s or something!? The current CHAIR of the same BBC that Boris has accused in (IN PARLIAMENT!) of being biased against him personally and has threatened with the loss of its license fee, is now being chaired by the same regular dinner guest at his house who has promised the bank that HE will pay the entire £800,000 pounds should Boris decide not to pay it back! I don’t know about you, but I don’t have ANY friends or family close enough to be willing to take a million dollar risk on me, do you? And that fact that this guy, Richard Sharp, didn’t declare it on his application under interests tells us all we need to know! The more Boris tells us that they’re not such good buddies, the more TRANSACTIONAL this looks! Not all corruption is illegal, but that doesn’t stop it from being immoral. How are we meant to trust the BBC while they have one of Boris financial backers chairing the organisation??? This country has gotten SO BROKEN we need a do-over! “Business as usual,” my arse, Mr Chancellor.
    1
  25045. 1
  25046. 1
  25047. 1
  25048. 1
  25049. 1
  25050. 1
  25051. 1
  25052. 1
  25053. 1
  25054. 1
  25055. 1
  25056. 1
  25057. 1
  25058. 1
  25059. 1
  25060. 1
  25061. 1
  25062. 1
  25063. 1
  25064. 1
  25065. 1
  25066. 1
  25067. 1
  25068. 1
  25069. 1
  25070. 1
  25071. 1
  25072. 1
  25073. 1
  25074. 1
  25075. 1
  25076. 1
  25077. 1
  25078. 1
  25079. 1
  25080. 1
  25081. 1
  25082. 1
  25083. 1
  25084. 1
  25085. 1
  25086. 1
  25087. 1
  25088. 1
  25089. 1
  25090. 1
  25091. 1
  25092. 1
  25093. 1
  25094. 1
  25095. 1
  25096. 1
  25097. 1
  25098. 1
  25099. 1
  25100. 1
  25101. Katie Elkins : Well, you won’t get slammed by me. It’s there alright. I understand his point, after seeing what Rock Paper Shotgun, et al, tried to do to Project CD Red, for example; stirring up a lot of unfounded accusations about images they were, “offended,” by, when they had NO context to draw on. And, to see that expand the way it did. I’ve always maintained that a, “popular view,” when based on an obvious falsehood, has to be a coordinated lie. And, I found that alarming. Also, there will always be those who want to turn a thing into something it isn’t; like when a bunch of juveniles get carried away on a live stream game, and start coming out with juvenile abuse. Suddenly, it’s, “an endemic issue, speaking to the toxic culture of gaming?” More like a bunch of unpleasant kids being unpleasant kids, which has been happening since humans learned to talk. Yet, after all that, there’s always another side of the coin. And, in this case, we’re not just talking about a few kids, saying things they wouldn’t dare say in front of their mothers, for fear of a slap. There is, even here, sparked by this very video, the cherry picking of the sentiments expressed, and hijacking into some kind of, “Anti-Liberal,” pseudo-political agenda. All sprinkled with a liberal dusting of hate speech, misogyny and racism. So, to say, “Toxic Masculinity is a Myth,” is only true, in that very narrow definition, to which he addressed this video; regarding the sinister forces that would either hijack the issue as a way of destroying the competition, or just to prove a thesis, which fits some sort of, “SJW,” view of the world, that activists want us to agree with. But, that level of, “coordination,” exists, among the haters and the far right, and to pretend that it doesn’t, or that it hasn’t infected gaming, is equivalent, in my view, to pretending that there is no such thing as Nazis, or being a holocaust denier. It’s beyond obtuse, to a dangerous degree. It’s for that reason that I am disappointed that UEG has not responded to any of the comments, after inviting them, on such a hot topic? I know he does, sometimes, respond to people, having seen it. And, though I, obviously would have liked it if he’d responded to me, for the sake of my ego 😉, all I really feel, that I kinda’ need to know from him, is that he acknowledges that, whatever we may call it, there is a problem; there is coordination, and that far right agenda exists every bit as realistically as the SJW one does? I just hope he’s NOT denying that? I was astounded at the quality of this guy’s journalism and eloquence, when I first encountered this channel. And, I lavished praise on him, in his threads, because he didn’t seem to be getting much appreciation, other than the generalised kind. I wanted him to know, “what,” it was, in specific terms, that people were appreciating, and to know that people understood the value and quality of his work. So, I have to confess to being a little rattled, by this video. Again, not because I disagree with anything in it, but because of what it, “doesn’t say.” To me, it was kind of like hearing a lecture on German history in the 20th Century, which tells us nothing but positives about what a wonderful nation, people and history, they can be proud of, without ever mentioning Hitler, or WW II. Nothing, inherently, “wrong,” with it, but it leaves you feeling uneasy, as to the, “Why,” of it? I just feel I need to know, now? Otherwise, it’s going to be in the back of my mind, whenever I’m listening to him talk . . . To suggest that there aren’t right wing forces, working just as hard as the left, to influence ALL aspects of culture would be beyond naive, and possibly sinister. UEG has NOT done THAT, but he did skate around the, “Concentration Camps,” as it were, and he is not engaging with anyone on the topic, after INVITING that. He RAISED the issue, and STATED that he knew it was going to set people off in the comments, right? But, will he take NO responsibility for that? I’ve tried REALLY HARD to draw him on the topic, but . . . Nothing. That bothers me. You wrote REALLY well, and I didn’t JUST enjoy reading you, I also thought, “I’m not the only one, here, trying to reason out the debate, taking time to respond, after HE INVITED the responses. Some people have done an excellent job, and it seems the least he could do?” You should think about a career in writing, if you haven’t already, by the way? Sorry for going on again, but this video has obviously gotten to me, and that was some stream of consciousness stuff going on, there. I guess this is not the sort of issue that people can just, “agree to disagree,” about? And, I don’t want to think of UEG as being the sort of person who would just toss a verbal grenade, like this, and walk off, without even looking back over his shoulder, to see what it’s done? . . . 👍✌️
    1
  25102. 1
  25103. 1
  25104. 1
  25105. 1
  25106. 1
  25107. 1
  25108. 1
  25109. 1
  25110. 1
  25111. 1
  25112. 1
  25113. 1
  25114. 1
  25115. 1
  25116. 1
  25117. 1
  25118. 1
  25119. 1
  25120. 1
  25121. 1
  25122. 1
  25123. 1
  25124. 1
  25125. 1
  25126. 1
  25127. 1
  25128. 1
  25129. 1
  25130. 1
  25131. 1
  25132. 1
  25133. 1
  25134. 1
  25135. 1
  25136. Andy Bevill : Precisely. Which is why Trump needs him, and he’ll NEVER, “resign.” It’s already a, “Banana Republic,” when the reverse is true too. If, “someone at the top,” can order his own, “acquittal,” as happened at the risible Impeachment SHAM, why shouldn’t we expect that he’ll be hunting down all the people who put him there, spoke the truth when asked, or even simply failed to scream out hysterical support for Trump, loudly enough, when Trump, “felt like it”??? The problem here, is that people are still acting like this kind of thing still matters in a Dictatorship, when the Impeachment was the last nail in the Republic’s coffin. Who in their right mind, even imagines that they are “NOT” going to RIG the coming, “elections,” when we ALL KNOW if Trump is unseated, he and his family will be indicted and all go to jail? Which will lead to them, ”ratting out,” everyone from Bill Barr down to Devin Nunes, the indictment and imprisonment of the ENTIRE administration, leaving a historically disgraced skeleton of the Republican Party in its wake, to disband and flee from the press like escaped Nazis after WWII. They have SHOWN you that Democracy, law and order, and the Constitution are OVER in America, but you all keep up this DENIAL, as if, “elections,” will MEAN a GOD DAMNED THING?! And, I think you’re all doing that, because you all know, in your hearts, that being honest with yourselves can lead to to only ONE conclusion. Americans must accept they have a Russia Style, FAKE Democracy, more popularly known as a DICTATORSHIP, and be DONE with it, OR? . . . Revolution!!! There is no third option
    1
  25137. 1
  25138. Buck Browning : It was NOT an, “attempted,” Coup, son. It succeeded. The Impeachment sham was the final nail in the Republic’s coffin. I predicted the, “Vengeance Rampage,” if Trump walked from this, because it’s how ALL modern Dictatorships evolve, these days. Putin has lead the way, teaching us that a successful dictator only survives by maintaining the ILLUSION of, “Democracy.” And, that’s why Bill Barr complained about Trump’s blatancy. Trump, being an idiot, with a childlike, “need,” to play with all the toys at once, is making it hard for us to PRETEND we’re, “not,” a Dictatorship, while he keeps PROVING that we are, by getting away with Dictatorship Shit. And, Barr knows that you can only reach Trump by going on TV, where he can’t interrupt you, or fly into a rage to shut you up, so as to maintain his Safe-Space-Bubble. I just find it funny that BOTH Dems and Trump Culters are COLLUDING in this FARCE, pretending that the Republic has, “not,” already FALLEN, and that the coming, “Elections,” are, “not,” ALREADY RIGGED. Each for their different reasons: The GOP needs to consolidate its power (which Trump thinks is about getting revenge on his enemies, and ruling through fear, and the GOP thinks is about calming things down,so the people don’t rise up in a Revolution because it’s SO FUCKING OBVIOUS that the Republic has fallen) and the Dems do it, because they’re too close to the problem, busy making their little backroom deals and trying to preserve their own constituencies, while pushing back any thoughts of reality, as Revolutions have unpredictable outcomes. And, that leaves us, the American People, who KNOW it’s all over, stuck in the middle with you, Bucky Betrayal and his merry band of America Hating Traitors . . . SMH
    1
  25139. 1
  25140. 1
  25141. 1
  25142. 1
  25143. 1
  25144. 1
  25145. 1
  25146. 1
  25147. 1
  25148. 1
  25149. 1
  25150. 1
  25151. 1
  25152. 1
  25153. 1
  25154. 1
  25155. 1
  25156. 1
  25157. 1
  25158. 1
  25159. 1
  25160. 1
  25161. 1
  25162. 1
  25163. 1
  25164. 1
  25165. 1
  25166. 1
  25167. 1
  25168. 1
  25169. 1
  25170. 1
  25171. 1
  25172. 1
  25173. 1
  25174. 1
  25175. 1
  25176. 1
  25177. 1
  25178. 1
  25179. 1
  25180. 1
  25181. 1
  25182. 1
  25183. 1
  25184. 1
  25185. 1
  25186. 1
  25187. 1
  25188. 1
  25189. 1
  25190. It’s a question of correctly defining what a, “healthier lifestyle,” means, both objectively and then to you personally. If you’re simply fleeing your terror of death by wasting all of your time trying to extend it, you will achieve little except remaining terrorised, possibly for longer. After all, many will think they’re, “life hacking,” even though they don’t have the skills for research or critical analysis, probably resulting in them being sold a bunch of dodgy steroids on the web, or something equally life shortening, not to mention the hazards to your bank account’s mortality. In the same way, you may seek to improve your philosophical outlook, yet have no training or knowledge of philosophy, reaching spurious conclusions about, “the good life,” without ever hearing the challenges, or understanding why your life has not improved. The best life hack I can offer is to learn the skill of identifying GENUINE expertise in others. Get good at knowing what makes someone an expert and you’ll always be able to get access to tailor made advice that suits your actual needs, from your physical health to your mental and spiritual well-being. And how to strike a balance between those things, work at a job that’s right for you and get the most out of your day to day. Every vulnerability you have, or think you have, has a 10,000 charlatans around the world, looking for a way into your wallet or worse. Being able to identify them and sort through the chaff until you get to the few precious grains of wheat is the best skill any living human can have in the 21’st century. And, for a reasonable fee, you can join my class on how to improve this life hack for your needs . . . Just kidding. 😉
    1
  25191. 1
  25192. 1
  25193. 1
  25194. 1
  25195. 1
  25196. 1
  25197. 1
  25198. 1
  25199. 1
  25200. 1
  25201. 1
  25202. 1
  25203. 1
  25204. 1
  25205. 1
  25206. 1
  25207. 1
  25208. 1
  25209. 1
  25210. 1
  25211. 1
  25212. 1
  25213. 1
  25214. 1
  25215. 1
  25216. 1
  25217. 1
  25218. 1
  25219. 1
  25220. 1
  25221. 1
  25222. 1
  25223. 1
  25224. 1
  25225. 1
  25226. 1
  25227. 1
  25228. 1
  25229. 1
  25230. 1
  25231. 1
  25232. 1
  25233. 1
  25234. 1
  25235. 1
  25236. 1
  25237. 1
  25238. 1
  25239. 1
  25240. 1
  25241. 1
  25242. 1
  25243. 1
  25244. 1
  25245. 1
  25246. 1
  25247. 1
  25248. 1
  25249. 1
  25250. 1
  25251. 1
  25252. 1
  25253. 1
  25254. 1
  25255. 1
  25256. 1
  25257. 1
  25258. 1
  25259. 1
  25260. 1
  25261. 1
  25262. I truly hope that Heard has no responsibility for raising a child now? Isn’t there a young child they share? My chief concern is for that child. Amber Heard represents a clear risk to that child’s safety and should never be allowed unsupervised contact with children. She has been proven to a legal standard to be violent, manipulative and a downright liar. Now she is proving that she has no humility or capacity for learning or growth. She has been given terrible advice if she has been encouraged to go out and repeat the lies that were debunked in court, laying herself open to further legal actions. But she also has no idea how to protect her own interests, doubling down as she is, upon her deceit and malignant untruths. Any child would be vulnerable to such a bullying narcissist and should be kept far away from her. I worked as a Family Therapist for six years and our goal was to prevent family breakdown to prevent children entering the care system, by assessing whether it was safe and appropriate to do so and if it was realistic that the family could work out their issues, at least enough to stay safely under the same roof. Our concern was always primarily for the children in all cases (we worked under Children’s Services for the Social Services Dept) and protecting the child’s interests above and beyond all other considerations. We would get referrals for children who were displaying, “problem behaviours,” but nearly always found that there was an adult (or adults) at the root of the child’s difficulties. Many families expected us to work with the child alone, but the only successful cases were the ones where we worked with the whole family. All this to say, in the case of this family I would deem any children in their orbit as being, “At risk.”
    1
  25263. 1
  25264. 1
  25265. 1
  25266. 1
  25267. 1
  25268. 1
  25269. 1
  25270. 1
  25271. 1
  25272. 1
  25273. 1
  25274. 1
  25275. 1
  25276. 1
  25277. 1
  25278. 1
  25279. 1
  25280. 1
  25281. 1
  25282. 1
  25283. 1
  25284. 1
  25285. 1
  25286. 1
  25287. 1
  25288. 1
  25289. 1
  25290. 1
  25291. 1
  25292. 1
  25293. 1
  25294. 1
  25295. 1
  25296. 1
  25297. 1
  25298. 1
  25299. 1
  25300. 1
  25301. 1
  25302. 1
  25303. 1
  25304. 1
  25305. 1
  25306. 1
  25307. I’m just gonna’ come right out and say it: Stanley Kubrick is overrated. His best movies are the least well known, these days, like Barry Lindon (which was too long) and Paths Of Glory. He’s credited as the director of Spartacus, even though the real director was its star and head producer, Kirk Douglas, so that brilliant epic doesn’t count. Clockwork Orange is unintentionally funny in parts, dated badly in others, and doesn’t do justice to the style or substance of Anthony Burgess’s original novel. Don’t get me wrong. Kubrick was clever and original in his time, and his cinematography was innovative and unique (but that was more to do with his, “cinematographer,” than him, surely?) and his stories and subject matter were always challenging and adult enough to be genuinely interesting and worthy. But, his movies were always pompous and overblown too, with style frequently coming at the cost of substance; seeming to rely on his audiences, looking on agog, at his wonderful set piece story telling, whilst forgetting whatever the F his story was meant to be about. He was good. But no, “genius.” It’s worth reflecting, that this guy considered himself to be such an influence upon our fragile little minds that he genuinely believed it was his responsibility to buy up all copies of Clockwork Orange, to effectively ban it from public viewing. Why? Because he believed his movie would make society more violent. Self belief is a wonderful thing, separating the boys from the men, so that some artists achieve extraordinary things. But, when it leads you to taking all your toys back indoors, because the children are not grown up enough to handle the epic mental influences of your genius, auteur visions, surely you just need to get over yourself? He believed he was a genius, and he convinced a lot of people that he was, by his unique style and by the smart choices he made in the variety of topics he picked to make movies about. But, honestly? In your heart of hearts? Was he a, “genius,” though? . . . Really? . . . Nah . . . ✌️
    1
  25308. 1
  25309. 1
  25310. 1
  25311. 1
  25312. 1
  25313. 1
  25314. 1
  25315. 1
  25316. 1
  25317. 1
  25318. 1
  25319. 1
  25320. 1
  25321. 1
  25322. 1
  25323. 1
  25324. 1
  25325. 1
  25326. 1
  25327. 1
  25328. 1
  25329. 1
  25330. 1
  25331. 1
  25332. 1
  25333. 1
  25334. 1
  25335. 1
  25336. 1
  25337. 1
  25338. 1
  25339. 1
  25340. 1
  25341. 1
  25342. 1
  25343. 1
  25344. 1
  25345. Mir0slava123 : They have been unstable for decades, but not in a way that most would assume. This, “oppressive regime,” that the west sees, is actually rather, “Liberal,” by Saudi standards. The King has replaced two princes in recent years, with administrative responsibilities; equivalent to a Prime Minister. And, women are getting driving licences and being allowed to go to cinemas, do knew types of jobs, like being doctors, for the first time, EVER. There was never ANY threat of an Arab Spring, as this administration is having to placate the population who are largely uneasy with all this, “liberalisation,” at best; leaving many raging that their culture is being, “westernised,” and that their power is being undermined. The setup there is more akin to some kind of sci fi fantasy or Game of Thrones, scenario, with rival royal houses, battling for supremacy. And the best way to win allies, is to pander to the, “Conservatives,” with all the cash and family names that go back centuries. The complexities are endless and too numerous to list, here. But, suffice to say; the simplest breakdown is that the US (with occasional help from Britain and France in particular, but also other UN countries) shields Saudi Arabia, which is viewed with either suspicion or hostility, by its neighbours. It uses that leverage to pressure the country into playing ball on western (particularly US) interests. The balance has always been delicate, and the scapegoating of other countries, for 9/11 was a necessity, in order to maintain that balance. We have a snake by the tail, which is useful for keeping hostile nations at bay and enriching the top echelons of western powers. But, it BIGHTS, and its bight is lethal. And, the very worst thing you can do with a pet like that, is to REWARD it, when it eats one of your own. The venom of that bight is only just starting to take effect, but it will be far more crippling than Trump will ever admit. Not only have we encouraged the viper to strike again, but the effect of its sting is about to poison us all. Wait and see
    1
  25346. 1
  25347. 1
  25348. 1
  25349. 1
  25350. 1
  25351. 1
  25352. 1
  25353. 1
  25354. 1
  25355. 1
  25356. 1
  25357. 1
  25358. 1
  25359. 1
  25360. 1
  25361. 1
  25362. 1
  25363. 1
  25364. 1
  25365. 1
  25366. 1
  25367. 1
  25368. 1
  25369. Thank you so much for bringing this to our attention in such clear and entertaining way. Thank you for getting all the important points across in such a comprehensive manner that leaves the viewer in possession of all the salient facts. This was staggeringly irresponsible of this woman, whatever her motives! What was she thinking?! Of course she belongs in jail. She may well have believed she was merely speeding inevitable conclusions by cutting corners. But, if just one person was wrongfully convicted on the basis of her incorrect data, she should serve at least as long as her victim has. Then we must take into account the staggering cost to the local tax payers, over $7 million and counting, just to go over all those retests again, and the cost of any retrials and new motions will land on top of that bill. And perhaps, the larger cost of the criminal justice system’s reputation in Colorado, which affects everyone from the DA and police to the Courts and especially their forensic departments! There is a category of crime called, “Culpable Negligence,” which usually only comes up in corporate cases where people have died as a direct result of enforced corner cutting or time saving measures that make proper safety checks impossible. But it clearly applies to her unbelievable arrogance in this case and should be added to the charges! It’s just too big a case and it will cause overhauls of methods and practice, regardless of outcomes, which all costs the tax payer too. And even that only applies to if a jury believes her defence is sincere, that she believed all these people to be guilty anyway: a defence which dies upon the first instance of a person proven to have been wrongfully convicted! For then we must consider if she acted out of malice or spite, in any one or possibly all cases? Or maybe she’ll plead insanity. For only she must have known how crazily reckless she was being with other people’s lives, let alone her department’s reputation and the general reputation of American justice? Of course she belongs in jail. Even if they don’t find one case that contradicts her findings. For the abject chaos she has caused and the irreparable damage she has done to public trust in the criminal justice system! A wilfully selfish and ruthless woman like that doesn’t belong anywhere near decent, free people. Most of all, I feel for any wrongfully convicted prisoners and their families.
    1
  25370. 1
  25371. 1
  25372. 1
  25373. 1
  25374. 1
  25375. 1
  25376. 1
  25377. 1
  25378. 1
  25379. 1
  25380. 1
  25381. 1
  25382. 1
  25383. 1
  25384. 1
  25385. 1
  25386. 1
  25387. 1
  25388. 1
  25389. 1
  25390. 1
  25391. 1
  25392. 1
  25393. 1
  25394. 1
  25395. 1
  25396. 1
  25397. 1
  25398. 1
  25399. As far as I know, the Russian, “constitution,” actually outlaws private military groups. So the mere existence of the Wagner Group is a direct contradiction of Russian, “law.” In fact, there has been a proliferation of various private military groups, according to some reliable western outlets, as there are several oligarchs, each creating their own outfits, who are worried about the possibility of post-war chaos and attempting to protect their own interests. I understand your feelings about the Russian population, very well. To me, Russia is like the largest open prison on Earth. The closer you get to Moscow and the centres of power, the worse the conditions and the more ignorant it is necessary to be to survive. And it is as though the inmates of this giant jail are all keeping their heads down, hoping not to be noticed by the prison guards, who approach people at train stations, bus depots and especially airports, in their black, faceless uniforms, demanding to see their mobile phones so they can search for banned apps, search private messages and emails for, “rebellious,” language or comments in, “private,” conversations. You can be arrested and jailed for 15 years, just for holding a blank scrap of paper up to a camera. The people of Russia have seen their privileges being removed systematically, channels being banned, entire news outlets being banned, shops and restaurant chains disappearing from their midst. And soon they know their money will become worthless as they barter for bread: that economic bombshell is coming. Yet, so few protest. This is not a free society. Russia is a jail of the soul.
    1
  25400. 1
  25401. 1
  25402. 1
  25403. 1
  25404. 1
  25405. 1
  25406. 1
  25407. 1
  25408. 1
  25409. 1
  25410. 1
  25411. 1
  25412. 1
  25413. 1
  25414. 1
  25415. 1
  25416. 1
  25417. 1
  25418. 1
  25419. 1
  25420. 1
  25421. 1
  25422. 1
  25423. 1
  25424. 1
  25425. 1
  25426. 1
  25427. 1
  25428. 1
  25429. 1
  25430. 1
  25431. 1
  25432. 1
  25433. 1
  25434. 1
  25435. 1
  25436. 1
  25437. 1
  25438. 1
  25439. 1
  25440. 1
  25441. 1
  25442. 1
  25443. 1
  25444. 1
  25445. 1
  25446. 1
  25447. 1
  25448. 1
  25449. 1
  25450. 1
  25451. 1
  25452. 1
  25453. 1
  25454. 1
  25455. 1
  25456. 1
  25457. 1
  25458. 1
  25459. 1
  25460. 1
  25461. 1
  25462. 1
  25463. 1
  25464. 1
  25465. 1
  25466. 1
  25467. 1
  25468. 1
  25469. 1
  25470. 1
  25471. 1
  25472. 1
  25473. 1
  25474. 1
  25475. 1
  25476. 1
  25477. 1
  25478. 1
  25479. 1
  25480. 1
  25481. 1
  25482. 1
  25483. 1
  25484. 1
  25485. 1
  25486. 1
  25487. 1
  25488. 1
  25489. 1
  25490. 1
  25491. 1
  25492. 1
  25493. 1
  25494. 1
  25495. 1
  25496. 1
  25497. 1
  25498. 1
  25499. 1
  25500. 1
  25501. 1
  25502. 1
  25503. 1
  25504. 1
  25505. 1
  25506. 1
  25507. 1
  25508. 1
  25509. 1
  25510. 1
  25511. 1
  25512. 1
  25513. 1
  25514. 1
  25515. 1
  25516. 1
  25517. 1
  25518. 1
  25519. 1
  25520. 1
  25521. 1
  25522. 1
  25523. 1
  25524. 1
  25525. 1
  25526. 1
  25527. What of the legitimate criticism? Is that all to be shut down, labelling people as racists for raising their hands and asking questions? There’s no reason to tolerate racism. Yet some subjects are unsuitable for certain actors. I can’t imagine any legitimate reason to complain about black actors in Star Trek, Star Wars or the Marvel Universe. The line that these fantasies, “must reflect the world we live in today,” is fine. But it’s just daft to have black actors in The Lord Of The Rings. Tolkien created a world based on old Norse, ancient Germanic and ancient Celtic mythology. It doesn’t upset me at all to see people being just wrong about their artistic choices. But, to be told, “Nope! Not listening!” to anyone questioning the logic of altering the basis of Tolkien’s myths at a genetic level is just a cowardly way of shutting down debate and labelling people as, “racists,” for simply disagreeing. There will always be those who are just racists, and who hate what’s happening for racist reasons. I have no time for racists. But that should not be an excuse to shut down adult discussion over the meaning of art and why interfering with Tolkien’s vision is disrespectful to his legacy. That’s NOT a racist point of view. Merely an artistic criticism. The images are jarring and look misplaced, because they don’t represent the world that Tolkien created over an entire lifetime of hard work, research and creative endeavour. It is not up for debate, any more than people’s racism is. The whole point of Tolkien’s fantasy was that it does NOT, “reflect the world we live in today.” It reflects a mythical time in a place based on Northern European culture and genuine mythology that shaped their real worlds. Why should the people’s of these cultures be content to have their stories altered and distorted to fit some modern political agenda? It seems like a tone deaf overcorrection by people who lack the imagination to create their own mythology to me. The fact that the show has an awful, illogical script that disrespects the characters Tolkien created, hijacks their motivations and misrepresents the meanings of Tolkien’s work is not relevant. But it does seem like people who are too quick to put all criticism down to racism have an inbuilt excuse for failure. If we don’t like the show, simply because it’s rubbish, does that make us racists? Come on?
    1
  25528. 1
  25529. 1
  25530. 1
  25531. 1
  25532. 1
  25533. 1
  25534. 1
  25535. 1
  25536. 1
  25537. 1
  25538. 1
  25539. 1
  25540. 1
  25541. 1
  25542. 1
  25543. 1
  25544. 1
  25545. 1
  25546. 1
  25547. 1
  25548. 1
  25549. 1
  25550. 1
  25551. 1
  25552. 1
  25553. 1
  25554. 1
  25555. 1
  25556. 1
  25557. 1
  25558. 1
  25559. 1
  25560. 1
  25561. Upper Echelon Gamers : Honestly, you are the most switched on, articulate games journalists I’ve ever encountered. I discovered your channel a couple of weeks ago, and I’m so impressed. Somehow, these IGN people, are fine with passively watching Saving Private Ryan and Schindler’s List, with some of the grimmest imagery of war that can be imagined, but because they were, “passive,” they claim to be guilt free of voyeurism, or any other vicarious form of sheer, “entertainment?” Sure, if it’s SO, “real,” that they feel like they’re, “really shooting,” someone, and that’s too much for them, I get that. So, they can sit it out, and buy a game that doesn’t upset them. But, the brass ballery, of thinking, because they’re sensibilities are offended, “everyone else is going to feel just like me, including veterans,” is beyond arrogant, and seems to come from an insecure NEED to have everyone conform to their pale shadow of what they want from a gaming experience, or they’ll feel . . . “Lonely?” What makes them think they have a right to impose their will on others, in that mealy mouthed way? They pretend we’re, “all going to be offended,” when they are passive-aggressively URGING us to be offended, like teenagers. Usually, veterans are the very people they consult for these games, anyway, so I doubt they’ll get anything other than the usual, positive feedback, assuming the game itself turns out well? I sure don’t want inoffensive characters, incidents or gameplay. We pay for and demand the most faithful experience possible, as gamers, in the same way that movie goers do. There’s a time for vanilla family movies and games, and there’s a time for gritty, adults only movies and games. Time to let the hard working players decide what they want, and not be told it, by people who are not yet even in a position to judge ✌️
    1
  25562. 1
  25563. 1
  25564. 1
  25565. 1
  25566. 1
  25567. 1
  25568. 1
  25569. 1
  25570. 1
  25571. 1
  25572. 1
  25573. 1
  25574. 1
  25575. 1
  25576. 1
  25577. 1
  25578. 1
  25579. Jake, can you PLEASE help me? Some of my responses to your videos (particularly under your personal comment thread) get zapped by the YouTube algorithm. From what I understand, they get shunted into a separate, “box,” because the algorithm detected a phrase or word that triggered it, but that you can examine at your leisure, should you be so inclined. Am I right about that? I know you couldn’t possibly look into each individual case, especially if it happens repeatedly, as there could never be the time. All I ask is, (if it is in your gift?) could you release my name from that, “Watch list,” or whatever it is? I hope you know me well enough by now to know that I have been following you for years and have never written anything that could be interpreted as negatively intended toward you, let alone breaking YouTube’s TOS. I have not joined your membership (because I don’t join any memberships) but I have contributed to your patch charity and now get update emails from Dimitri from the 69th. I am a loyal, polite viewer, with occasional opinions. My record will show this if you look back at my commentary, but it’s upsetting that I can spend time and effort, thinking about what you’ve told us, martialling my thoughts and putting forward an opinion, only to be zapped out of existence by a heavy handed automated system that has taken a disliking to me. Please help? Or tell me if I misunderstand how this works? Perhaps there is something else I need to do? If you have read all of this, thank you for your patience. Whatever happens, I will continue to support you and this cause, which I believe in with all my heart. I just don’t know what words or phrases to avoid.
    1
  25580. 1
  25581. 1
  25582. 1
  25583. 1
  25584. 1
  25585. 1
  25586. 1
  25587. 1
  25588. 1
  25589. 1
  25590. 1
  25591. 1
  25592. 1
  25593. 1
  25594. 1
  25595. 1
  25596. 1
  25597. 1
  25598. 1
  25599. 1
  25600. 1
  25601. 1
  25602. 1
  25603. 1
  25604. 1
  25605. 1
  25606. 1
  25607. 1
  25608. 1
  25609. 1
  25610. 1
  25611. 1
  25612. 1
  25613. 1
  25614. 1
  25615. 1
  25616. 1
  25617. 1
  25618. 1
  25619. 1
  25620. 1
  25621. 1
  25622. 1
  25623. 1
  25624. 1
  25625. 1
  25626. 1
  25627. 1
  25628. 1
  25629. 1
  25630. 1
  25631. 1
  25632. 1
  25633. 1
  25634. 1
  25635. 1
  25636. 1
  25637. 1
  25638. 1
  25639. 1
  25640. 1
  25641. 1
  25642. 1
  25643. 1
  25644. 1
  25645. 1
  25646. 1
  25647. 1
  25648. 1
  25649. 1
  25650. 1
  25651. 1
  25652. 1
  25653. 1
  25654. 1
  25655. 1
  25656. 1
  25657. 1
  25658. 1
  25659. 1
  25660. 1
  25661. 1
  25662. 1
  25663. 1
  25664. 1
  25665. 1
  25666. 1
  25667. 1
  25668. 1
  25669. 1
  25670. 1
  25671. 1
  25672. Donovan Davis : Yes, I am putting my, “argument,” forward, while refusing to quarrel or be personal about it. That is the point of this discussion. I am attempting to show you that there is no, “neutral,” position that you can adopt, without ignoring the fact that your laws are being broken, your Constitution undermined and the very foundations of your Republic under threat. And, to say, “if,” about the fact that you have witnessed these events, is just obtuse. As to, “why,” that might be the case? Well, you said so, yourself. The money. So long as the economy, “seems,” fine, you can tell yourself that they’re all as bad as each other, and that anyone who is outraged at this destruction is just being, “hysterical,” because that’s what you, “need,” to believe. I’m not an economist; a political historian is my trade; but, that does cover economic ground. However, even I can see that our national debt is growing to unserviceable levels. ALL of that money WILL have to be paid back, sooner or later. And, Trump seems to think that he can run the country into bankruptcy and bail out, by the time it’s unmanageable? The Tariffs on China are escalating to a point where Trump will have to back down and admit he was wrong, or double down to the point where it won’t be just our soya farmers who are on welfare. And, he’s entering the same process with Mexico, whilst blankly LYING to you, saying the Americans will not pay the costs of that. So, what happens, when the economy, finally DOES get too rocky for your comfort? Is THAT the point at which you discover that he’s also immoral, developing a Nanny State, which controls all aspects of your life? The OPPOSITE of a Conservative, BTW?
    1
  25673. 1
  25674. 1
  25675. 1
  25676. 1
  25677. 1
  25678. 1
  25679. 1
  25680. 1
  25681. 1
  25682. 1
  25683. 1
  25684. 1
  25685. 1
  25686. 1
  25687. 1
  25688. 1
  25689. 1
  25690. 1
  25691. 1
  25692. 1
  25693. 1
  25694. 1
  25695. 1
  25696. 1
  25697. 1
  25698. 1
  25699. Steven Ratti : My, “call to arms,” was meant to be irony, son. The, “right to bear arms,” in the 2nd Amendment was put there because the individual states did not trust the federal government, and wanted to protect their, “way of life.” It’s in the history books, if you don’t believe me. Protecting the country from invaders was secondary in the minds of the writers of that Amendment. Sorry, but that’s pure, unadulterated fact. And, my whole point was that the very same people, who voted for Trump, demanded the wall, and who like to threaten a second, “Civil War,” whilst shouting about the 2nd Amendment, are now, ironically, the very same people who suddenly have the most to lose. And, that, “irony,” is merely compounded by the fact that the very, “rights,” they throw in our faces, are the PRECISE, “rights,” that actually DO PERTAIN. And, they are also the same rights, as you will SEE, that these people will refuse to exercise. You may not, “get,” my sense of Satire, but I assure you, my history is SOUND. I am not, “calling,” for anything, here. I am simply pointing out hypocrisy where I see it. I promise you. Not ONE Trump Trolls will exercise their right to defend their land against the tyranny of a corrupted government, even though they literally ARE protected, under the 2nd Amendment to do so. Remember, Trump is promising pardons, AFTER the the fact, meaning that they would have to be KNOWINGLY committing FELONIES, and not ONE court in the land would, or COULD, find the defenders of their estates, “guilty,” of ANYTHING. It just won’t happen. I’m just forcing people top look at the mess they’ve made. But MY, “call,” if anything, is for, “PEACE.” But, that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t laugh, however bitterly, at the rank corruption, hypocrisy and utter stupidity of Trump, and all his supporters, does it? Sincerely? Does it?
    1
  25700. 1
  25701. 1
  25702. 1
  25703. 1
  25704. 1
  25705. 1
  25706. 1
  25707. 1
  25708. 1
  25709. 1
  25710. 1
  25711. 1
  25712. 1
  25713. 1
  25714. 1
  25715. 1
  25716. 1
  25717. 1
  25718. 1
  25719. 1
  25720. 1
  25721. 1
  25722. 1
  25723. Evelyn Rose : Ms Rose, a minor, but important, distinction: it is NOT that psychopaths (or sociopaths) do feel emotions: actually they can “feel” as deeply as anyone and usually do so even more than the “average” person. However (and this is WHY they are SO dangerous) they CANNOT “empathise”. They can learn about what society expects from them and SEEM to empathise, but their own emotions are NOT inspired, initiated or “caused” by the feelings or experiences of others. Without boring you with the distinctions between the two conditions, suffice to say, that the clues are usually there in the form of tell-tale behaviours; such as, talking about themselves, instead of the “other” after a that other has just experienced a trauma; turning important matters into trivial ones; claiming involvement and credit for things that they recognise others to think of as important; demanding loyalty without ever returning it (when it matters); failure to see the significance of events except in terms of how it effects them; hyperbolic claims; hyperbolic reactions to perceived slights; cruelty; a need to be the focus of attention; etc, etc. Psychopaths are more easily spotted (NORMALLY) due to other symptoms: inappropriate responses to circumstances; outlandish paranoia and violent tendencies. However, some can be highly intelligent and are able to mask their symptoms, but they will ALL “act out” in some manner; whether secretly, like the Ted Bundy’s or Bernie Madeoff’s or Richard Nixon’s of the world. Whereas, the sociopath feels no NEED to hide, but rather, wants to be validated, Like the Idie Armine’s, Vladimir Putin’s and Donald Trump’s of the world. Hope that helps ;-)
    1
  25724. 1
  25725. 1
  25726. 1
  25727. 1
  25728. 1
  25729. 1
  25730. 1
  25731. 1
  25732. 1
  25733. 1
  25734. 1
  25735. Honestly, this is becoming the, “Nigel Farage is Bad,” channel. He is bad, but come ohhhn? You said it yourself, “You can argue that it works for populism in general.” Here’s a genuine idea for combatting the spread of Faragistic populism: STOP putting his face on EVERY OTHER THUMBNAIL! Can’t you see it? You can empirically PROVE that Farage is greedy, stupid, manipulative, racist, criminal and just plain WRONG about everything! Yet that won’t make the slightest difference to his followers except to reassure them that he is the top bogey man figure for everyone left of Thatcher. You are actually HELPING him! YOU are establishing Farage THE man to watch, regardless. And you are allowing him to, “dictate the narrative.” The very thing you just warned against! Isn’t it worth sacrificing a few thousand clicks? All you are doing is making him the de facto leader of the right wing and the right wing themselves are taking their cues from people like YOU; and those whom the centre and the left keep putting up as their bogey man. Yes, he needs to be discussed and regularly, and seriously . . . when HE DOES SOMETHING! But it was NOT necessary for you to use him in this thumbnail AT ALL for this video, since this is a general topic about tackling populism, not just him! I am speaking in good faith, as a fan of yours, who has followed your channel for years. I understand that his face is probably getting you higher viewing figures. But you have a RESPONSIBILITY here. Please think about what I’m arguing here?
    1
  25736. 1
  25737. 1
  25738. 1
  25739. Sunack’s election, “pledges,” are actually deeply alarming. Most people don’t know how, “inflation,” works and, “halving,” that doesn’t necessarily mean that food or petrol prices will come down at all. Note; Tories avoid putting it in terms of, “cost of living,” because they don’t intend to bring prices down. “Growing the economy,” only means Stock Market and big business stuff, which has NO MEANING to the person on the street, who needs to understand that economic growth does NOT benefit people unless they’re already wealthy! It’s just a sound bite. And sinister at that. As is, “Reducing NHS waiting lists.” NOT, “Improving the NHS,” or making pay and conditions better and therefore more attractive for people seeking to work in the caring professions. Why do they target waiting lists? Because they want to PRIVATISE more and more of the NHS and shortening waiting times is the bribe they intend to use to get privatisation in through the back door: which they have increasingly done throughout their time in office and which they only did more vehemently when Covid struck! And, don’t even get me STARTED on, “Stop The Boats!” Literally NO ONE wants that, asked for that, or sees it as ANY kind of a, “priority!” No one except Swastika-tattooed Nazis and brown-skinned brown-shirts like the PM, Cruella Braverman and her predecessor, which constitute an apparent new breed of Nazi that’s emerged to confuse the hell out of Brits these days, including the Nazis themselves! In fact, we NEED immigration desperately! And these people are more than willing to do the more than ONE MILLION JOBS in Britain that are going begging because the locals don’t like stacking shelves, picking fruit and hod carrying for some Polish guy with a better grasp of economics than any Tory and moderately better communication skills! But THAT would be too much like common sense for the Tories! Instead we get TOLD that we are racists who want to turn THE most vulnerable humans on the face of planet Earth into political footballs for the lowest common denominator! Seriously, people! F*ck these racist, feckless, entitled, lying, thieving, Tory scum!
    1
  25740.  @quetailion6762  : Indeed, so far America has refused repeated requests from Zelensky for the types of long range missiles that could reach well inside Russia’s borders. Even after offering to hand veto power to the US, regarding targets. Of course, the US can see that once they start vetoing any targets, they will also be seen as tacitly sanctioning all the other targets and handing Putin the excuse he needs to claim that they are now playing an active, direct role in the war, thus lifting all remaining restraints from Putin’s insanity. They don’t want to give him that excuse. Notably, early on in the war, not long after Ukraine rallied their forces and started pushing Russia back, there were several highly successful incursions to areas just inside the Russian border. Ukraine took out massive fuel and weapons caches, sometimes with missiles and once or twice with their own special forces units. We don’t hear about any such activity any longer. And I suspect they have yielded to diplomatic pressures to cease and desist? Maybe it’s up to people like us to keep ramping up the pressure on our representatives, making the raising of the west’s game an election issue? I write regularly to my representatives on the issue of Ukraine, simply because it’s the one issue that effects everything right now. Our fuel and heating costs, world wide inflation skyrocketing and the threat to world peace in general is coming as a direct result of Putin’s actions. I feel we should be granting Ukraine greater independence and freedom of choice for selecting Russian targets. They understand the Russian mindset far better than the west, and they have been masterful at the psychological warfare. They want to wake the Russian population out of their moral absenteeism, and they know they can only do this by making them feel their skin in the game. Of course, this means no war crimes of any kind, but I don’t think Ukraine needs that to be explained to them.
    1
  25741. 1
  25742. 1
  25743. 1
  25744. 1
  25745. 1
  25746. 1
  25747. 1
  25748. 1
  25749. 1
  25750. 1
  25751. 1
  25752. 1
  25753. 1
  25754. 1
  25755. 1
  25756. 1
  25757. 1
  25758. 1
  25759. 1
  25760. 1
  25761. 1
  25762. 1
  25763. 1
  25764. 1
  25765. 1
  25766. 1
  25767. 1
  25768. 1
  25769. 1
  25770. 1
  25771. 1
  25772. 1
  25773. 1
  25774. 1
  25775. 1
  25776. 1
  25777. 1
  25778. 1
  25779. 1
  25780. 1
  25781. 1
  25782. 1
  25783. 1
  25784. 1
  25785. 1
  25786. 1
  25787. 1
  25788. 1
  25789. 1
  25790. 1
  25791. 1
  25792. 1
  25793. 1
  25794. 1
  25795. 1
  25796. 1
  25797. 1
  25798. 1
  25799. 1
  25800. 1
  25801. 1
  25802. 1
  25803. 1
  25804. 1
  25805. 1
  25806. 1
  25807. It is inevitable that Bakhmut will fall back into Ukrainian hands, but the real question is about time. Whether Ukraine will be forced to withdraw before taking back vast swathes of real estate is the question? I believe Ukraine’s big counter offensive will be a huge, “all or nothing,” attempt to overwhelm and destroy Russian positions throughout the entirety of Ukraine in one big hit, which is why it’s taking so long, yet we keep discovering Ukrainians are training on weapon systems we didn’t even know they had, like in Italy, the UK and US, Spain, etc, along with all of the expected stuff they’re getting from Poland, Germany and, again, the UK and US, etc. They are clearly intentionally bleeding Russia white and pinning their main efforts to one zone, though fierce fighting is still taking place all along the front line to varying degrees. That’s not just about the politics of it all, but about breaking the morale of the Russian forces. The real question is how quickly Ukraine can get the tanks, jets and missile systems into the field, with trained, competent operators working everything and knowing how to do what the Russians can’t: coordinate their forces? And that’s something you simply cannot rush. We must only hope that Biden is keeping his cards close to his chest and offering more than we thought? Like when we were all surprised to learn that he’s training Ukrainian pilots on American soil, in F16’s? Ukraine simply would not and could not afford to waste valuable, urgently needed, pilots on exercises like that, unless something was expected down the line. Slava Ukraine 🇺🇦✌️
    1
  25808. 1
  25809. 1
  25810. 1
  25811. 1
  25812. 1
  25813. 1
  25814. 1
  25815. 1
  25816. 1
  25817. 1
  25818. 1
  25819. 1
  25820. 1
  25821. 1
  25822. 1
  25823. 1
  25824. 1
  25825. 1
  25826. 1
  25827. 1
  25828. 1
  25829. 1
  25830. 1
  25831. 1
  25832. 1
  25833. 1
  25834. 1
  25835. 1
  25836. 1
  25837. 1
  25838. 1
  25839. 1
  25840. 1
  25841. 1
  25842. 1
  25843. 1
  25844. 1
  25845. 1
  25846. 1
  25847. 1
  25848. 1
  25849. 1
  25850. 1
  25851. 1
  25852. 1
  25853. 1
  25854. 1
  25855. 1
  25856. 1
  25857. 1
  25858. 1
  25859. 1
  25860. 1
  25861. 1
  25862. 1
  25863. 1
  25864. 1
  25865. 1
  25866. 1
  25867. 1
  25868. 1
  25869. 1
  25870. 1
  25871. 1
  25872. 1
  25873. 1
  25874. 1
  25875. 1
  25876. 1
  25877. 1
  25878. 1
  25879. 1
  25880. 1
  25881. 1
  25882. Fascinating video. The problem, however, with the remedies you offer, is that, while they are true, they don’t acknowledge that knowing the solution is not a solution in itself. The characters in Satre’s play will all, at some level, know the folly of their own inner demons. Each of them will have a degree of insight, however much they suppress it, into the fact that they are all seeking an unattainable validation from others in their room. The coward, for example, says he cannot leave while the woman he cares about thinks him a coward and ostensibly stays in order to change her mind. Setting aside that we could read this as an ironical act of bravery, since it is an opportunity to flee Hell itself, there has to be some self knowledge that informs this man that nothing the woman thinks of him will change his past actions? Even if she were to convince him that she believes him to be the bravest man who ever lived, what would he do with that knowledge? The thought crosses his mind at some level. He knows this does not solve his problem. The Buddhists are right about desire being the root of all suffering in humans, whether that is a desire for basic lusts or needs, like food, or more worthy desires, like wanting justice, or to improve conditions for your fellow humans. The conflict between what is and what we want lies at the heart of our discomfort, but we cannot merely will it away. I know that, if I stopped loving my wife, divorced her and moved out, I wouldn’t have to worry about her stresses at work, making her breakfast in the mornings, how other relationships effect her, etc. A whole Atlas level boulder of concerns would be lifted from my shoulders. But, knowing this does not make me stop loving her. Don’t get me wrong, as I agree with your conclusions. I merely suggest that a Step 5 might be introduced? Having attained the knowledge we have, that we can make a Heaven or Hell out in the mirror of other people, we then have to decide on a course of action. It is not enough just to know. Whether we seek therapy, study philosophy, make time for prayer or meditation, we need to establish a process in our lives where we think about our knowledge of what makes us so unhappy, accept our limitations and enable ourselves to change things in our relationships and in ourselves, through a process. Merely being rational is only a step in the right direction. It’s what you, “do,” next that matters.
    1
  25883. 1
  25884. 1
  25885.  @aaronknautz7364  : Other humans are all we can speak about. We have a sample of 1 to draw on for all our best informed guesses. Animals don’t count, as they have all evolved from one gene pool in which they must eat each other (or be eaten) to survive. But also, because animals are not sentient. Look around you and it’s clear that even on our harsh planet we got past the desire to wipe out all other races, learning to live with them, side by side. And it was abundance of resources that lead to that, as much as anything else. I would suggest a whole entire species that has developed technologies so far advanced beyond anything we can comprehend, let alone build, is not going to be dumb enough to wipe out other sentient life forms just because they look different. Consider carefully the author’s thesis and you’ll see that only a Chinese Communist upbringing could lead to the conception of such depths of paranoia. But it’s worth considering how contrived the circumstances of the novel had to be in order that he could create a fictional species of sentient life that would even have a motive to travel all this way just for conquest. The type of creatures that can survive a tri-solar system is far fetched enough, don’t you think? Yet, what are the odds that such a rare and billions to one species would see the environment on our stable planet and say, “That’s just like home.” The most plausible part of the whole story is that some nihilist may well betray humanity after being embittered sufficiently. Stephen Hawking was a better physicist than he was an anthropologist or historian.
    1
  25886. 1
  25887. 1
  25888. 1
  25889. 1
  25890. 1
  25891. 1
  25892. 1
  25893. 1
  25894. 1
  25895. 1
  25896. 1
  25897. 1
  25898. It’s going to need some work to iron out the legalities and kinks, but it’s coming so . . . What amuses me is that so many mainstream outlets are acting like ChatGPT is a, “new,” technology, about to, “revolutionise,” or, “threaten,” the internet, depending on your perspective. When the reality is that half of the ads you’re seeing on YouTube are spoken by Robot voices, annunciating scripts that were generated by AI’s, being only one of hundreds generated that day, using publicly accessible stock footage, all in an attempt by scammers to see which, “product,” gains the highest traction. Has anyone seen that Jelvix ad lately? An artificial voice, speaking over generic stock footage of meeting rooms and sciencey looking people, about a, “company,” that does not yet exist! It doesn’t even mention what the, “product,” is! Then there’s all the bots that people get drawn into debates with on the more political videos. Any video featuring Donald Trump will have an army of bots with fake comments, capable of responding to your comments. You wonder why these people are so dumb and obtuse? Because they’re not real people! You wonder why their names are always weird and with lots of initials and numbers in them? That’s so their human analysts can identify them to modify the algorithm. Sure, there are human, “edge lords,” in the mix, but there are times when bots account for 90% of all the comments! This has been growing under our feet for years now. But, on the positive side, we will soon be able to generate AI companions, with crafted world views and attitudes, to help us with our research, support us with our self improvement goals, and console us when we’re sad or disappointed. We’ll have conversations with them, sharing the kinds of things we would normally only tell a psychotherapist and getting really helpful feedback. All whilst Apple, Google and Microsoft store everything away, and retain copyright over your inner most thoughts. And, if you tell your new AI BFF that you’re so mad at someone you could kill them, and then find the police are at your door, you’ll find that your BFF was responsible for notifying the cops after misinterpreting your conversation as, “criminal intent.” And it won’t help you to complain to your service provider, as you’ll find that you agreed to this potential outcome in your terms and conditions. The future looks . . . different, huh? . . .
    1
  25899. 1
  25900. 1
  25901. 1
  25902. 1
  25903. 1
  25904. 1
  25905. 1
  25906. 1
  25907. You’re absolutely right. When Putin’s fat cats are missing being rescued from every tree they get stuck up by western money; when their wives start leaving them for more jet-setting types who don’t have targets on their backs and the backs of their kids, who probably don’t even know them very well, and who are all writing best sellers in the west about what ass hats their dads are; when they’re tired of being threatened with death constantly and have seen some of their friends and colleagues falling out of hospital upper flaw windows or getting Novichocked; when they’re sick of spending what little capital they have left on private security outfits because they live in constant fear of the people as much as their own government and begin to realise that Sasha on the front line probably has a longer life expectancy; when even Lil’ Kim won’t visit because he doesn’t like slumming it and besides, it’s just not safe in Russia? . . . My guess is that it will start with the armed forces? A few colonels (maybe one or two generals?) who know they are facing show trials at home if they don’t deliver results that can only be achieved through the wiping out of their own entire divisions, will look into the faces of those boys and say, “F*ck this noise, boys! Would you rather take on the best trained, best equipped fighting force in the world, to steal a country for one single person, or face down a few thousand, very well equipped, but not with the tanks and field guns we have, Muscovite cops? We’re going home, lads, and we’re taking back the Kremlin. Anyone who wants out? The Wagner group is that way.”
    1
  25908. 1
  25909. 1
  25910. 1
  25911. 1
  25912. 1
  25913. 1
  25914. 1
  25915. 1
  25916. 1
  25917. 1
  25918. 1
  25919. 1
  25920. 1
  25921. 1
  25922. I’d like to see you do a follow up video to this one? Almost every sentence could have been a whole topic unto itself. The most powerful element of this video, for me, was something you only touched on briefly: the model of American Capitalism, unique to that country, which allows healthcare to fall into the hands of the profiteers, and doesn’t ban the marketing of witch’s brews. A whole video should be dedicated to how American Capitalism has shaped healthcare and created the environment for such a vast market to grow out of vanity, insecurities mixed with genuine, unmet health concerns? Gwyneth Paltrow with a Carpet Bag is an image that symbolises those things for me. She realised that she was past her prime, by Hollywood’s ruthless, sexist metric, and clearly meditated on the solution to that problem, as Hollywood has defined it for her, rather than the mental health problems they create, becoming both the ultimate victim of their unfair, unrealistic standards for women, whilst becoming the ultimate perpetrator, practically recreating an overnight industry leader in pseudo-science and old wife’s tales. She certainly breathed new life into the existing models. She’s Red Dead Redemption’s Nigel West Dickens, for the 21st Century. Not all bad, but certainly a little sinister. There’s a movie script in that, probably? And, with equal rights and progressive attitudes towards women, have come equal exploitation opportunities of cosmetics, wellness and fitness cures for men. Isn’t Captain America the ultimate embodiment of that? Tony Stark famously told him in the first Avengers movie, “Everything special about you came out of a bottle.” To which Steve Rogers should have said, “Well, duh! That’s the American way. And I’m Captain, ‘who,’ again?”
    1
  25923. 1
  25924. 1
  25925. 1
  25926. 1
  25927. 1
  25928. 1
  25929. 1
  25930. 1
  25931. 1
  25932. 1
  25933. 1
  25934. 1
  25935. 1
  25936. 1
  25937. 1
  25938. 1
  25939. 1
  25940. 1
  25941. 1
  25942. 1
  25943. 1
  25944. 1
  25945. 1
  25946. I’m kinda late to this party but, for what it’s worth . . . It is true that science has nothing to say about, “God.” Certainly not the God of the three main faiths that share the same original Jehovah. In the same way that physics has nothing to say about an individual’s personal taste in music, or to explain why we’re happy or sad. And that works both ways. While one’s personal faith might inform a scientist’s personal approach to their work, their relationships within the scientific community, or the type of physics they are interested in, God will not show up in their equations, nor should He. I take issue, only in part, with one thing you said. Dark Energy is my exemplar to explain why. People assume it exists, because of observed phenomena, but they might be investigating something that is not even there, or real in a physical sense? It could be an effect of gravity that has not yet been discovered, or any one of several other hypotheses that have been suggested by great minds? Yet, we investigate it, because we want to understand the universe better and settle on a universally understood theory, which would benefit all of science and, ultimately, all of human kind. You will say, “Yes. But that is a scientific response to a real, observable phenomena in the universe, which science has something to say about.” But, my answer would be that there are phenomena which are genuinely, objectively experienced in the universe, which could be caused by something outside of our time space continuum, like Dark Energy, that could be caused by a knowing, all powerful, “god-like,” consciousness. Science cannot rule that out, despite the fact that there is no hypothesis for investigating it directly. That being said, though science has nothing to say about God and God has nothing to say about hard science, all I’m suggesting is that, once we start using science to refute the existence of God, we have done a disservice to both science and people of faith. On the one hand, we are ruling out the possibility of something, without any evidence to support that stance: attempting to prove a negative, which is by its nature, impossible. And, on the other hand, we are making God a preoccupation of science, whilst arguing that God has no place in science. If scientists believe there’s no place for God in the physics, they fail to see the fallacy of their own placing of God at the centre of the science, in a vain attempt to prove a negative. That’s comes off as a bad faith exercise, and somewhat oppressive to people of faith, don’t you think? Scientists need to leave God alone, if they truly have no belief in him. A trivial point, you think? If you think that, you’re failing to see why physics has hit a brick wall in the last 20 or so years. Instead of doing the science they get paid to do, physicists (not all of them, obviously) have devoted themselves to the disputation of faith, spending time, money and other resources on ever increasingly extravagant hypotheses, which are reaching a breaking point of sheer lunacy, if you ask me! “Many Worlds?” Really? An entire structure of, “scientific,” thinking, upon which millions have now been spent, despite there being ZERO proof for any of it! Sure, there are elegant mathematic theorems, etc, but all of them are fatally flawed when any attempt is made to apply them to the real world. An infinite number of dimensions, stretching out forever, from every single decision point of every living creature, which would make one minute of one day create so many separate universes springing into existence (out of thin vacuum) that their number is literally incalculable; yet bigger than the number of electrons in the known universe? Give me a break! It’s a philosophy, not a scientific hypothesis, and what’s more, it is far less plausible than the notion of a god. So yes, I would agree that the two spheres of human endeavour, “faith,” and, “science,” have NOTHING to say to each other. But, instead of fallaciously trying to rid god from the equations, why don’t scientists get their own message, and leave God alone? If they stuck to the observable universe, instead of wasting vast sums on colliders, we might have all had our flying cars by now, floating on a cloud of Dark Matter, repelling the effects of gravity? I mean, who knows? Does it really require a new, enlightened generation before science can take its next paradigm shift, back to real physics? . . .
    1
  25947. 1
  25948. 1
  25949. 1
  25950. 1
  25951. 1
  25952. 1
  25953. 1
  25954. 1
  25955. 1
  25956. 1
  25957. 1
  25958. 1
  25959. 1
  25960. 1
  25961. 1
  25962. 1
  25963. 1
  25964. 1
  25965. 1
  25966. 1
  25967. 1
  25968. 1
  25969. 1
  25970. 1
  25971. 1
  25972. 1
  25973. 1
  25974. 1
  25975. 1
  25976. 1
  25977. 1
  25978. 1
  25979. 1
  25980. 1
  25981. 1
  25982. 1
  25983. 1
  25984. 1
  25985. 1
  25986. 1
  25987. 1
  25988. This is your Dictatorship, in the wake of the 2019 Coup, attempting to distract you, while they consolidate their power. They no longer have to fear the, “electorate,” because the 2020, “elections,” are ALREADY RIGGED. The only thing they fear now is everyone looking at a, “trial,” with NO WITNESSES allowed to testify, and NO EVIDENCE allowed to be presented, and a, “JURY,” comprised of Trump’s CONSPIRATORS, who would go to JAIL if Trump lost his, “Protected Presidential Status,” and, “ratted,” on them, to save his own Orange ass. After all, that would be the same thing as telling the world that THERE IS NO LAW, so far as the Trumps are concerned! It would be the same thing as ADMITTING that the Republic has FALLEN. Now, they will just get STRONGER, and consolidate their position, making America AFRAID Again, turning us into informers, haters and scared little RATS, like in Russia. You will get to go through the motions of voting, in your FAKE REPUBLIC, just like in Russia, and your name will be remembered, when you vote, “wrong,” but the outcome will NEVER be in doubt, because you have a DICTATORSHIP. Iran is just a SHOW; agreed by Putin, who arranged it with Iran and the US. NONE of this matters any more. They only fear that America MIGHT WAKE UP! A second REVOLUTION is what they fear. But, you all seem to be happy to watch the Coup unfold on CNN, so they needn’t worry. That won’t stop them though. That’s how Dictatorships work. As they get stronger, they will scare off ALL opposition, until they are appointing Democrats, behind the scenes, and briefing them, on what they can say and do. And, your first female POTUS? That will be Ivanka. Putin has already arranged it . . . Smh
    1
  25989. 1
  25990. 1
  25991. 1
  25992. 1
  25993. 1
  25994. 1
  25995. 1
  25996. 1
  25997. 1
  25998. 1
  25999. 1
  26000. 1
  26001. 1
  26002. 1
  26003. 1
  26004. 1
  26005. 1
  26006. 1
  26007. 1
  26008. 1
  26009. 1
  26010. Linda Wright : The fact is that, we now know, people are born with distorted configurations of the brain, BUT, we also know that the neurologist who discovered this FACT suffered from the SAME brain disorder, after having had a fruitful and productive life. He attributed the fact that he has a wife and family of his own, that love him and the fact that he had never committed any crimes in his life, to his upbringing, with a firm, loving mother and father. So, the TRUTH is: NATURE AND NURTURE are STILL the combination that produce, “Good or Bad,” people. Trump inherited his father’s sociopathic genes, but was NURTURED into being a SOB. That neurologist, was shocked, when he was told by his wife, children, friends, colleagues and students, that they ALL saw a ruthless side to him and were able to give examples of his, OCCASIONAL, “coldness.” Yet they ALL respected and admired him. His daughters had the scan, and their brains were, “normal.” They described their dad as loving, yet able to shock them, like when he went to work, instead of attending his mother’s funeral, saying he didn’t want to be bored. He didn’t GET that the funeral was for the comfort of the living, and that he should have been there for his family. Yet they ALL said he was kind and generous, when he was not being ruthlessly competitive. Trump is, was, and ALWAYS WILL BE, FULLY RESPONSIBLE for his actions, because he, like you and I, can DISTINGUISH between, “Right and Wrong.” He should NOT be let off the hook. As the SCIENCE PROVES; he is as “CULPABLE” as YOU OR I
    1
  26011. 1
  26012. 1
  26013. 1
  26014. 1
  26015. 1
  26016. 1
  26017. 1
  26018. 1
  26019. 1
  26020. 1
  26021. 1
  26022. These opening points are all true. “Peace through trade,” as a, “doctrine,” simply worked as a fig leaf for corruption. And we’ve seen what real harm that the gullible and the greedy (especially in Germany) did by enabling Russia to commit monstrous atrocities that we are finally just beginning to face up to. The truth is, China and Russia cannot expand their economies, or their populations, (and populations are a resource they’re just as desperate about as money) without TAKING what other countries have in the democratic world. That is what their desire to invade Ukraine and Taiwan is driven by. They need the bodies as much as the resources. Both countries are in a population crisis, with young people leaving their countries (their best and brightest) while the rest of the population is ageing too fast. We can debate aspects of these concerns and their long term effects, but that would be to make the mistake of missing the point that this is how THEY see it. They do want to end our democracies and they are actively working toward that goal. They see no other way forward than theft of entire regions, especially their populations, so as to inflate their own flagging workforces and intelligentsia. This is why we cannot afford to underestimate them . . . ever again. We have been far too naive and grasping of cheap resources in the past, because of the greed of a minority in power. And that has cost us all dear. Gerard Schröder retired from politics as an incredibly wealthy man, with money he did not get on the German government’s payroll, but which had more to do with facilitating the Nordstream deals with Moscow. And look where that got them? But, does he even care? He walked away with all the money and hasn’t even been investigated. Like I said, “Peace through trade,” as a, “doctrine,” simply worked as a fig leaf for corruption.
    1
  26023. 1
  26024. 1
  26025. 1
  26026. Connie Bailey : I don’t disagree with your comment, in principal. So long as it isn’t based on any false assumptions? I was never a, “fan,” of the Clinton’s, and I was one of Obama’s most ferocious, Conservative critics. And, whenever, at the time, I would challenge the very notion of our anachronistic Electoral College, I would be ignored or lol’d at. Now, it’s all people talk about, and as usual, they talk about it, when it’s too late. So long as you’re not reaching those false conclusions, or trying to frame this as a question of a false choice, I agree with you. The decline may well have been apparent for years. But, the question remains: WTF are you going to DO about that? Just sit around hoping that your, “elections,” won’t be falsified, as well as gerrymandered and voters suppressed this time? Do you think that a bunch of criminals who KNOW they will be fighting indictments and going to JAIL for the rest of their days if they lose the elections, and they find themselves no longer able to obstruct justice, will just sit around? Waiting for people to lift the lid on their crimes and reveal them to the world? America will either fall back into the position of being a Republic again, with a mountain of clean up and catch up to get through, and then just hope and pray they can restore their former positions of power around the globe; OR, it will COLLAPSE into a Putin style Dictatorship. And that will mark the end of American democracy, and the beginning of the end for the rest of the world’s democracies. Oh, and that will all be taking place in the wake of millions DEAD, killed by an unchecked virus . . .
    1
  26027. 1
  26028. 1
  26029. 1
  26030. 1
  26031. 1
  26032. 1
  26033. 1
  26034. 1
  26035. 1
  26036. 1
  26037. 1
  26038. 1
  26039. 1
  26040.  @Dionysus-gv9lz  : There is a popular myth about immigration, pushed by the far right, which goes something like this: Every migrant welcomed into a prosperous nation, takes up resources that would otherwise go to citizens of that country. The fact is the opposite of that. The very reason that America is the wealthiest country on Earth is because of its demographic arrangements. The US has always imported a significant proportion its population through migration and, check the numbers for yourself; migrants contribute far more to their respective nation’s economy than they take out of it. Right now, we are at a time when population figures have never been more important to economic success. Not the total numbers, but the growth or decline in population is what makes the difference. Countries with shrinking populations are facing economic melt down. Countries with growing populations are prospering. And those which artificially stimulate their growth, through migration, are getting richer, faster. So, whatever you may think of, “illegal,” migration, it’s worth remembering the hard math. But it’s also worth remembering that the farm owners and industrial magnates who hire illegals on the largest scales and incentivise the largest numbers to try their luck are the ones who are never punished for creating the problem in the first place. If there was no money or work to be had in the USA, there would be no migrants coming for that work. But the people who bleat the loudest about the issue of, “illegals,” are usually the ones profiting the most from their labour. It benefits them to donate to campaigns so as to indemnify themselves against the creation of laws that would ban their practices and put an end to the problem over night. This practice is over a century old now. And they are simply manipulating voters. While they exploit cheap labour and avoid paying their taxes, they donate to politicians who convince you to blame the wrong people, thus protecting their own financial and political interests and the interests of their farm and factory owning donors. Do a little reading into, “Demographics,” and study the numbers. Politicians on both sides will lie to you, but the numbers don’t.
    1
  26041.  @Dionysus-gv9lz  : YouTube zapped my response to you, but if this version gets through, I respectfully ask you to give it your consideration? There is a popular myth about immigration, pushed by the far right, which goes something like this: Every migrant welcomed into a prosperous nation takes up resources that would otherwise go to citizens of that country. The economic fact is the opposite of that. The very reason that America is the wealthiest country on Earth is because it has always imported a significant proportion its population through migration and, check the numbers for yourself; and because these migrants contribute far more to their respective nation’s economy than they take out of it. Right now, we are at a time when population figures have never been more important to a nation’s economic success. Not the total numbers, but the growth or decline in population is what makes the difference. Countries with shrinking populations are facing economic melt down. Countries with growing populations are prospering. And those which artificially stimulate their growth, through migration, are getting richer, faster. So, whatever you may think of, “illegal,” migration, it’s worth remembering the hard math. And asking, who determines what is legal or illegal? When you ask that question it’s worth remembering that the farm and factory owners who hire illegals on the largest scales and incentivise the largest numbers to try their luck are also the ones who are never punished for creating the problem in the first place. If there was no money or work to be had in the USA, there would be no migrants (legal or otherwise) coming for that work. But the people who complain the loudest about the issue of, “illegals,” are usually the ones profiting the most from their labour. It benefits them to donate to campaigns so as to indemnify themselves against the creation of laws that would ban their practices and put an end to the problem over night. This practice is over a century old now, but only in recent years has it been such a political hot potato. And this new focus on such an old practice is simply due to politicians manipulating voters. While the farm and factory owners exploit cheap labour and avoid paying their taxes, they donate to the politicians who convince you that it’s suddenly an urgent issue and to blame the wrong people for it. Thus they protecting their own financial and political interests. A little study into, “Demographics,” and the basic numbers, is highly revealing on this issue. Politicians on both sides will lie to you, but the numbers don’t.
    1
  26042. 1
  26043. 1
  26044. 1
  26045. 1
  26046. 1
  26047. 1
  26048. 1
  26049. 1
  26050. 1
  26051. 1
  26052. 1
  26053. 1
  26054. 1
  26055. 1
  26056. 1
  26057. 1
  26058. 1
  26059. 1
  26060. 1
  26061. 1
  26062. 1
  26063. 1
  26064. 1
  26065. 1
  26066. 1
  26067. 1
  26068. “Ignorance,” is not to Miriam’s, “credit,” is it? If she’d been doing her job, she would have been aware of the abuses going on under her watch, as you said. Tories still don’t grasp how exhausted we voters are with the same old tired excuses, constantly being trotted out. Frankly, I don’t believe her. Here’s an irony for you. The sorts of people who think conversion therapy (regarding sexual identity or proclivity) is a worth while enterprise, are the sorts of people who really would benefit from intervention and therapy. I am a Christian believer, if a poor example for my faith. There is no prohibition against homosexuality as a, “life choice,” in the Bible, that I know of. When we read terms like, “abomination,” in connection with, “Sodom,” or, “sodomy,” we are reading a story about sexual violence, not consent. But, wilful misinterpretation is meat and drink to most, “Christian,” churches. It’s was more authoritative to tell Galileo that he’s defying, “scriptures,” than for him to get away with telling them, “No. You’ve read it wrong,” which would have resulted in an instant violent sentencing. Nothing in science, “contradicts,” scripture, as my youngest daughter will attest who has just passed her PhD and become a Doctor of Physics at St Andrews University. It so often comes down to vicious little cliques, wilfully exploiting the vagaries of dubious translations of the Bible for their own ends. I doubt Christ will find many Christians in the churches if and when he comes back for us. I certainly know that many Christians don’t even know that we are not meant to live by the laws of the Old Testament at all! Jesus was pretty unambiguous about this! But, churches tend to be hypocritical in their selective adherence to the Old Testament ways, gladly accepting tithes (preferably in cash, not 10% of what you produce) but they never request a burnt offering for some reason? . . . Oh, don’t get me started on the institutions of, “Christianity.” Few of them are real.
    1
  26069. 1
  26070. 1
  26071. 1
  26072. 1
  26073. 1
  26074. 1
  26075. 1
  26076. 1
  26077. 1
  26078. 1
  26079. 1
  26080. 1
  26081. 1
  26082. 1
  26083. 1
  26084. 1
  26085. 1
  26086. 1
  26087. 1
  26088. Beau Ioannides : All good points, which I take in good faith. I simply feel that, we must seize EVERY SINGLE opportunity for unity. Trump’s strategy (NOT his, but that of his puppeteers) is Divide And Conquer: Hence, even issues that would have not even come up for discussion a couple of years ago, are splitting the country in twain. THAT is quite DELIBERATE, making the “base” stubborn and recalcitrant, while the networks are at open war. Nothing gets done and we all fight, often over stupid things. Putin is WINNING while Trump doesn’t see that he is losing, nor does he CARE that the US is losing. UNITY is the ONLY remedy. I speak, my friend, as a Republican, in values, who NEVER supported Trump, but who GENUINELY has lots of friends from all over the political spectrum. MOST importantly, I learned a lesson, recently, when, after hours of tearful arguing with a group of friends (their tears, not mine) two of them “confessed” to me that they’d voted for Trump and BITTERLY REGRET that now. I gave them all the encouragement I could and it was suddenly clear to me, in a way that it hadn’t been before: DIVISION is the Weapon of the Trumpers, the Russians, the Trollarazzi and the right wing press! Where ever they SEE unity, they stamp it out, and we make it EASY for them. UNITY is the WEAPON with which to defeat Trump. Sure, people should be accountable for their crimes and misdemeanours. But let’s hold the Nuremberg Trials AFTER the war is won? Find what you have in common with others and MAKE IT SAFE to cross the line, BACK to sanity, WITHOUT making them regret it with BLAME and SHAME. Otherwise, you play right into your enemy’s hands. I feel I want to go on, but I’m aware that I am “going on”; but KNOW that I agree with you
    1
  26089. 1
  26090. 1
  26091. 1
  26092. 1
  26093. 1
  26094. 1
  26095. 1
  26096. 1
  26097. 1
  26098. 1
  26099. 1
  26100. 1
  26101. 1
  26102. 1
  26103. 1
  26104. 1
  26105. 1
  26106. 1
  26107. 1
  26108. 1
  26109. 1
  26110. 1
  26111. 1
  26112. 1
  26113. 1
  26114. 1
  26115. Putin will NEVER use nukes. Not deliberately. He’s getting all of the, “bang for his buck,” out of his threats. That’s the, “value,” he gets from having them. He knows that if he were to use just one, the entire world would react swiftly and ruthlessly with well prepared, pre-gamed, plans for every possible scenario and there’s a good chance that China might well not just sit back but assist, for the same reasons you attribute to Putin: because they want to live. Threats are all he has. He would not choose nukes, even if he were suicidal. Because he knows that even him losing in Ukraine doesn’t stop his, “legacy,” of disinformation that his successors will count on to maintain a dictatorship in Russia. Accidents, on the other hand, are far more likely. Russia has a history of devastating mistakes with both nuclear weapons and, as every Ukrainian knows, with nuclear power stations. Yes, “PTSD,” was correct. Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. And, actually, the stress of living under a permanent threat of this nature can cause that, so I would imagine that Ukraine has higher than average numbers than most developed countries? Especially among the young and other smart, thinking groups of people who feel powerless? And this is why your service is so good for us and for you. Because you are, “doing,” something that changes lives and improves their quality for so many, rather than allowing yourself to be made powerless. I hope it helps you? It helps me and mine. Slava Ukraine. 🇺🇦✌️🇬🇧
    1
  26116. 1
  26117. 1
  26118. 1
  26119. 1
  26120. 1
  26121. 1
  26122. 1
  26123. 1
  26124. 1
  26125. 1
  26126. 1
  26127. 1
  26128. 1
  26129. 1
  26130. 1
  26131. 1
  26132. 1
  26133. 1
  26134. 1
  26135. 1
  26136. 1
  26137. 1
  26138. 1
  26139. 1
  26140. 1
  26141. 1
  26142. 1
  26143. 1
  26144. 1
  26145. 1
  26146. 1
  26147. 1
  26148. 1
  26149. 1
  26150. 1
  26151. 1
  26152. 1
  26153. 1
  26154. 1
  26155. 1
  26156. 1
  26157. 1
  26158. Mr. Casillas : You make some fair, even good, points there. Britain nearly entered the Civil War, on the side of the South, because their Lancashire cotton mills were thriving due to Southern, slave produced, cotton. Only the bottom line, to start with. It was actually popular opinion that swayed the Brits to go the opposite way. Did you know that? Look up the strikes that took place in Britain, at that time? You had the intelligencia producing books, plays, and news stories, pressuring the government to, “do the right thing.” Then, there’s Lincoln, whom the far right can exploit to this day, because he started out indifferent to the, “issue,” of slavery. But, read his letters, his speeches, and articles? And, watch the transformation of his moral character? His views changed as the war went on, given more and more reason to give it up, as the bodies and the costs mounted. But, his conviction grew, that it was the right thing to do, until he ended his life as a PASSIONATE Anti-Slaver. Sure, Britain could see the population numbers, and the industrial might of the North, and reasoned that they could keep replacing men and material at a rate that the South just couldn’t match. Of course, pragmatism drove the politics. But, it would be very unwise to put it down to just one thing, like Bill Clinton’s, “the economy, stupid.” If 21st Century Populism has taught us ANYTHING, it’s that the Money may well still be the Prince of the battlefield, but it’s no longer King. “Information,” and, “Disinformation,” are the King and Queen of today’s politics, with Money being as close knit with mom and pop as you can get, but NOT the master any more. It was trump’s ability to DIVIDE America, with lies made to look credible, by the vast resources of the Prince, but that Prince was working on behalf of the King and Queen. And, right now, both King and Queen are in their own Civil War, to see whether it’s Truth or Lies that win out. America stands on this knife edge, due to it’s laziness and desire for confirmation bias, which the Prince has exploited, beautifully. But, it won’t be down to who offers the best chance of economic success this time. People have always voted with their wallets, but this time, even their wallets have been lied to ✌️
    1
  26159. 1
  26160. 1
  26161. 1
  26162. 1
  26163. 1
  26164. 1
  26165. 1
  26166. 1
  26167. 1
  26168. 1
  26169. 1
  26170. 1
  26171. 1
  26172. 1
  26173. 1
  26174. 1
  26175. 1
  26176. 1
  26177. 1
  26178. 1
  26179. 1
  26180. 1
  26181. 1
  26182. 1
  26183. 1
  26184. 1
  26185. 1
  26186. 1
  26187. 1
  26188. 1
  26189. 1
  26190. 1
  26191.  @shep9231  : I know it’s not my fault, but I cannot control my feelings in the way I can govern my thoughts. You are right, of course, and many is the time when I remember my dad fondly. But it’s when I think of his end I cannot stop something inside from crumpling and the sensation of guilt and shame hits me. I doubted the government’s sincerity at the time and even thought about driving down to the hospital regardless. What stopped me was my sense of social responsibility and my inability to get all the way from Scotland to England (and back) without having to refuel and expose my potential for carrying of the bug around Britain, to older, vulnerable types like my dad. Not the law, but the science and the commitment to right over wrong. The fact is that thoughts of my dad’s passing lead immediately to images of Tories laughing at me, at us, and just not getting it, even when it’s explained. As I write this line, I just watched Jacob Rees Mogg loose his parliamentary seat on the BBC and then a cut to Kier Starmer making his victory speech to his party, having just crossed the minimum number of seats for a government majority. I will try to set my thoughts (and feelings) to the future and restoration. Let’s see what these guys can do? And let’s make sure to stay involved, share that responsibility and regularly contact our representatives. I thank you for your kind words and for attempting to help me see what I know in my head is right, but what I cannot change in my heart. I will commit that pain into the energy of anger, and that anger into the constructive energy to work for the rescuing and betterment of the NHS at this crucial moment.
    1
  26192.  @PorterStats3  : That’s kind of you to say, thank you. But I sincerely hope I haven’t made you feel worse. Sometimes people talk as though losing a relative makes their loss more, “legitimate,” in some way, but the fact is that almost everyone lost someone, a friend, a colleague, a relative, it doesn’t matter. All that matters is what the heart tells you when it happens, and how you learn to live with that. Yes, “burned a hole,” is an excellent summary of what happened to me. One of rage, righteous anger and wrongful desire for revenge which, over time, just became a blank, dead space in my soul. Not huge. Not big enough to change who am. But felt every day, like scar tissue that never quite heals. I cannot see certain politicians’ faces without seeing that smug idiot of a staffer, laughing conspiratorially with the press pack, giggling like a naughty child, enjoying the, “naughtiness,” without it ever once occurring to her that she was being callously indifferent to the pain of others that she was instrumental in causing. And that’s the best reading I can put on that. And Johnson’s GENUINE surprise at people’s horror and disgust sent me over the edge. I got some therapy, which I felt I should be billing to the Tory Party, and it did help. But helping myself was the real answer. And I realised that I could give this senseless death a little meaning by allowing that anger to energise me into action; letters to MP’s, campaigning for the tactical vote, etc, really helped. I decided that, so long as I never let it rule me, make choices for me, or define me as a person, I could get use out of that pain and do something constructive about the result. To lighten the mood a little, I found I was like Jim Kirk in Star Trek 3, where he refused to have his emotions at the loss of his son, “healed,” by Spock’s brother; “I need my pain,” he says. And I know what he means. But, if you are in pain, I am there for you, my friend. And, thank you again. Your words described me well.
    1
  26193. 1
  26194. 1
  26195. 1
  26196. 1
  26197. 1
  26198. 1
  26199. 1
  26200. 1
  26201. 1
  26202. 1
  26203. 1
  26204. 1
  26205. 1
  26206. 1
  26207. 1
  26208. 1
  26209. 1
  26210. 1
  26211. 1
  26212. 1
  26213. 1
  26214. 1
  26215. 1
  26216. 1
  26217. 1
  26218. 1
  26219. 1
  26220. 1
  26221. 1
  26222. 1
  26223. 1
  26224. 1
  26225. 1
  26226. 1
  26227. 1
  26228. 1
  26229. 1
  26230. 1
  26231. 1
  26232. 1
  26233. 1
  26234. 1
  26235. 1
  26236. 1
  26237. 1
  26238. 1
  26239. 1
  26240. 1
  26241. 1
  26242. 1
  26243. 1
  26244. 1
  26245. 1
  26246. 1
  26247. 1
  26248. 1
  26249. 1
  26250. 1
  26251. 1
  26252. 1
  26253. 1
  26254. 1
  26255. 1
  26256. 1
  26257. 1
  26258. 1
  26259. 1
  26260. Agreed. Once you’re reliant on one supplier for any vital resource, you’re placing your country’s balls in your enemy’s hands and saying, “Please don’t squeeze too hard? Or, at least wait until I’ve retired with all this money you gave me for facilitating the Nordstream pipeline, so no one’s investigating my corruption when we’re in an economic war?” Yes, I’m looking at you, Gerhard Schröder. You retired from politics a very rich man, didn’t you? You didn’t get THAT kind of money on the government payroll, did you Gerry? And now your country has shut down one pipeline whilst the other was blown up by the Kremlin and everyone wishes they hadn’t bothered . . . But you’re a very rich man and you just don’t care, right? . . . We have been SO gullible and naive, due to grasping politicos waving around their fig leaf of, “peace through trade,” as if it was even a, “doctrine,” and not just a shabby excuse to fleece your own country, leaving entire populations to pick up the pieces after the carpet bagging is done, that we’ve forgotten that China and Russia are our self-declared ENEMIES! China’s doctrine is literally in a little red book that they give to every single school child. And it openly declares that they intend to cause the downfall of democracy worldwide! Russia’s state TV gleefully runs video scenarios of nuking Britain, nightly! I been saying for 20 years that it was suicidally stupid to get into these deals, like FDR relying on Hirohito for his aircraft carriers in 1942! Or Churchill having all of his Spitfires and Hurricanes made by the Goering Factory in 1941! And we are JUST STARTING to get it! This is what happens when you allow small elite groups run your country: they get greedy and make themselves rich by betraying the rest of us. Like Churchill said, “You cannot negotiate with a tiger while your head is in his mouth!”
    1
  26261. 1
  26262. 1
  26263. 1
  26264. 1
  26265. 1
  26266. 1
  26267. 1
  26268. 1
  26269. 1
  26270. 1
  26271. 1
  26272. 1
  26273. 1
  26274. 1
  26275. 1
  26276. 1
  26277. 1
  26278. 1
  26279. 1
  26280. 1
  26281. 1
  26282. 1
  26283. 1
  26284. 1
  26285. 1
  26286. 1
  26287. 1
  26288. Philip Lindley : Did you know, just before the financial crisis of 2008, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, were facing a situation in which it’s Latin American debtors were about to balance the books? In fact, there was real, very hushed, talk of the IMF closing shop; former basket case countries were moving into the black all over the globe. And, the power of Europe and America, to say to these countries, “We can ease your payment problems, if you allow BP certain mineral rights here, or this fruit company gets a new franchise deal there, etc, was on the brink of vanishing into the either, along with the biggest banks in the world. Then, as if by magic, the world was hit by the biggest economic crisis, since 1929, and the IMF was back in business, bailing out Greece, Spain, Italy, etc. Its future has never looked more secure, and virtually NO ONE was held accountable for all those businesses going under, people’s life savings and pensions vanishing, and all those families who lost their houses. It was like kicking in an ant hill, and watching all the little ants, scurry about, trying to survive the calamity, knowing that the Queen was deep under the ground, safe and untouched by the chaos above. But I’m sure there was no connection between the IMF’s problems and ours, right? Just a coincidence . . . Like Loki recently told us, in true Hollywood style, to argue with such forces is pointless. In the same way that it is for an ant to argue with a boot
    1
  26289. 1
  26290. 1
  26291. 1
  26292. 1
  26293. 1
  26294. 1
  26295. 1
  26296. 1
  26297. 1
  26298. 1
  26299. 1
  26300. 1
  26301. 1
  26302.  @RoKer13  : I wish you all good things in your future. I would still question your stated desire to adopt children who have been traumatised. Even if you don’t mean that quite as literally as it sounds, a responsible supervisor (if they were any good) would be obligated to help you examine your, “rescuing tendencies,” and try to help you maintain a little objective distance. Don’t get me wrong, here. I wanted to be the one to make a difference in the lives of the lost, ignored, disenfranchised, victimised, etc, which was why I set out on my course as a volunteer youth worker, then a professional for 6 years, then a residential social worker for another 6 (on the front lines with, “children in crisis,” which could mean anything from being on remand and facing a life sentence, to avoiding their families who ought to be on remand and facing a life sentence for what they did to them) then a brief break, working with adult men with learning difficulties, then, after studying at The Manchester Institute For Psychotherapy, Family Therapy for another 6 years. With various occupations here and there I gave 20 years to children and families. And the one lesson I learned that was harder than any other was, the people who employ you will always choose money, power and self protection above the welfare of their clients. It took me 20 years to get that into my thick skull and it broke me. it’s now been over 20 years since I even looked at a kid with a professional’s eye (though that never really leaves you) and all the evidence is that things have only gotten worse. You are resigning yourself to a hard life with little appreciation and even fewer rewards. No one will ever thank you for your service and give you front row seats or free meals, like the military. Though you may have to risk your life and you WILL be frequently traumatised. The services for children need people like you, but I would urge you to truly examine that impulse, take it to a good therapist before you get in too deep, and see if it’s just an impulse that you know is not real, or if it’s something deeper? Without the ability to keep a professional distance, you’ll drown and no one will notice you going under, even if you plead for help. Be picky about the jobs you take and check out your colleagues BEFORE committing. Your instincts about them (any doubts) will always prove right. You have my prayers and support, truly. But, what they didn’t tell you is that you are embarking upon the very toughest job on Earth . . . That is, it’s the toughest job on Earth if you’re worthy of it. Good luck and Godspeed.
    1
  26303. 1
  26304. 1
  26305. 1
  26306. 1
  26307. 1
  26308. 1
  26309. 1
  26310. 1
  26311. 1
  26312. 1
  26313. 1
  26314. 1
  26315. 1
  26316. 1
  26317. 1
  26318. 1
  26319. 1
  26320. 1
  26321. 1
  26322. 1
  26323. 1
  26324. 1
  26325. 1
  26326. 1
  26327. 1
  26328. 1
  26329. 1
  26330. 1
  26331. 1
  26332. 1
  26333. 1
  26334. 1
  26335. 1
  26336. 1
  26337. 1
  26338. 1
  26339. 1
  26340. 1
  26341. 1
  26342. 1
  26343. 1
  26344. 1
  26345. 1
  26346. 1
  26347. You’re probably right, but it needn’t be that bleak? I mean, isn’t it obvious to everyone, what actually happened? . . . “Brexit changed left wing voting habits,” as this streamer put it, for the simple reason that the general public were more alarmed by the possibility of a government overturning a democratic referendum and the UK no longer being a democracy, than they were about which party was in power. The Tories were promising to honour the Brexit vote, and that’s what won them the election. The fact that we did not get the Brexit that was advertised came as a surprise to precisely no one, except for those far right wing voters who were naive enough to actually believe in people like Nigel Farage and Boris Johnson. I, and many people I know, voted Tory at the last general election, not for any their ideological reasons. I simply believed that overturning a national referendum was such an egregious mistake that we would no longer even be a democracy anymore and we could easily wind up with governments that refuse to accept other votes, like election results, as we later saw the Republicans attempt in America. What we actually DO about this now seems equally obvious to me too. We simply have to seek terms with Europe that closely align us on trade, human rights, strategic military goals and justice, without surrendering our sovereignty and without sacrificing our right to make policies on a case by case basis, when it comes to new crises affecting the world. We still have considerable economic clout, which buys us a seat at such a negotiating table, if for no other reason than everyone still likes having MONEY. Yet, alignment with Europe is something that the Tories have been openly fighting against since the days of Margaret Thatcher. So, we have no alternative but to change our government, if for no other reason than getting friendly faces into power that the Europeans will find acceptable, in order that we can iron out new deals without the baggage of the Euro-Skeptic politicians round our necks. European politicians cannot abide Boris Johnson, or his acolytes. We need people who Europe can do business with and whom they don’t hate on a visceral level.
    1
  26348. 1
  26349. 1
  26350. 1
  26351. 1
  26352. 1
  26353. 1
  26354. 1
  26355. 1
  26356. 1
  26357. 1
  26358. 1
  26359. 1
  26360. 1
  26361. 1
  26362. 1
  26363. 1
  26364. 1
  26365. 1
  26366. 1
  26367. 1
  26368. 1
  26369. 1
  26370. 1
  26371. 1
  26372. 1
  26373. 1
  26374. 1
  26375. 1
  26376. 1
  26377. 1
  26378. 1
  26379. 1
  26380. 1
  26381. 1
  26382. 1
  26383. 1
  26384. 1
  26385. 1
  26386. 1
  26387. 1
  26388. 1
  26389. 1
  26390. 1
  26391. 1
  26392. 1
  26393. 1
  26394. 1
  26395. 1
  26396. 1
  26397. 1
  26398. 1
  26399. 1
  26400. 1
  26401. 1
  26402. 1
  26403. 1
  26404. 1
  26405. 1
  26406. 1
  26407. 1
  26408. 1
  26409. 1
  26410. 1
  26411. 1
  26412. 1
  26413. 1
  26414. 1
  26415. 1
  26416. 1
  26417. 1
  26418. 1
  26419. 1
  26420. 1
  26421. 1
  26422. 1
  26423. 1
  26424. 1
  26425. 1
  26426. 1
  26427. 1
  26428. 1
  26429. 1
  26430. 1
  26431. 1
  26432. 1
  26433. 1
  26434. 1
  26435. 1
  26436. 1
  26437. 1
  26438. 1
  26439. 1
  26440. 1
  26441. 1
  26442. 1
  26443. 1
  26444. 1
  26445. 1
  26446. 1
  26447. 1
  26448. 1
  26449. 1
  26450. 1
  26451. 1
  26452. 1
  26453. 1
  26454. 1
  26455. 1
  26456. 1
  26457. 1
  26458. 1
  26459. 1
  26460. 1
  26461. 1
  26462. 1
  26463. 1
  26464. 1
  26465. 1
  26466. 1
  26467.  @CorryGal  : I am urging my government to do exactly that, and to suspend Russia from the Security Council, kick out all of Russia’s diplomats and ALL of their oligarchs, to freeze ALL of their assets in every bank, and to pay off any losses to the western business interests from the SWIFT payment system, which they should have locked Russia out of yesterday! Stingers, drones, rifles and ammo are a no brainer and they should be piling up everything they need at their door. I have written to my local and national representatives to urge all of this and more. But I cannot personally drop my responsibilities to my family and bring supplies to your country, for which I would get arrested for transporting anyway, so that would be even less use to the Ukraine. Plus, I would be just as likely to meet Russians at the border as I would Ukrainians, so such a suggestion is beyond impracticable. I am urging my friends and family to write to the government, demanding the same things as I. I wish Ukraine 100% victory over Putin’s forces, and I hope the Russian people, who don’t want this war any more than Ukraine does, will rise up to put pressure on Putin’s rear and force him to think twice, if not go home. I have urged my leaders to urge the Russian people to have mass protests like they did last year. Putin called on the Ukrainians to betray their leaders, so it’s only fair that the west does the same, and reminds them that the reason they are about to starve and cue for miles for a loaf of bread, is all on their glorious DICKtator, so I am with you, in so far as I can be. ✌️
    1
  26468.  @773-o2n  : What are you talking about? “The west,” (by which I presume you mean, “America,” and/or NATO countries?) has never made ANY secret of wishing to expand! We WANT ALL COUNTRIES OF EARTH to be FREE and DEMOCRATIC! We want countries to have the RIGHT to choose their own leaders and to boot them out again when they’re dissatisfied! That’s not some, “dark,” or, “hidden,” agenda, son!? It’s called FREEDOM. You don’t accuse your doctor of being up to something when s/he tries to cure you, do you? Why are you even trying to make this about the west as though their support for Ukraine’s democracy is supposed to be, “hidden,” in some way? Putin has legit concerns about the west letting Ukraine into their security council and parking their nukes off his border, but that was NEVER going to happen, and ISN’T going to happen now! Not even if the Russian people overthrow Putin and have an election! You can’t act like the west is the bad guy for saying they support democracies and wish that all countries on the Earth were free to choose their own leaders? Nor can you criticise them for working for that? To treat the desire for democracy with suspicion and to call THAT, “propaganda,” is to fall for the Putinista propaganda, which trains all people to treat anything that smacks of individualism or personal freedom with suspicion and distrust. And he does that because he KNOWS he would NOT SURVIVE in a free and fair democracy. The majority of Russians tolerate their dictatorship, but they don’t kid themselves that they have a democracy. You want to live like that? In a country where you have to be, “careful,” about what you say, and whom you say it to? Where you might write something funny about your leader on the internet that gets a thousand likes and the next day you walk into work to find you’ve been fired and the cops are waiting to give you three nights in jail on trumped up child molestation charges? That’s RT! Russia Today is already automatically jailing people who are protesting Putin’s invasion. And people like you, who think there’s, “two sides to this,” INVASION are making people like Putin possible. Be honest? Are you REALLY for Zelensky’s democracy?
    1
  26469.  @rhondat2584  : I watched his chief of security, trembling visibly, as he urged Putin to, “accept a deal with Ukraine,” and intimating that Putin should withdraw his troops. He was reduced to repeating himself and stammering as it was obvious that Putin did not want to hear this, but he stood by his position and, while he wasn’t willing to tell Putin what he was doing was wrong, that’s what the world saw. I was riveted by that scene, fascinated by the sheer, raw courage of that man (who’s name I cannot remember now) to speak up at all, on live national TV, when everyone else was sat around in that giant semicircle like they were in a 1960’s Bond movie, sticking to their script and probably an autocue. I genuinely half expected the flaw to open up and the guy to drop into a flaming pit! The look on Putin’s face told me, within a year, that guy will be in jail or the morgue. Maybe he, like so many of these people, has family in Ukraine? Or, maybe he just thought he ought to offer Putin an, “out?” I can’t kid myself that he rose to head of security under Putin’s dictatorship by being a, “moral,” man. But, a complex and fascinating one, for sure. He’s the guy that the west should be reaching out to. The guy who’s shelf life has just expired, but who might be able to render the west some great assistance before he’s done for? If they can get around the double watch that must be on him now? Maybe he can defect to the west in return for security plans of this invasion, and of the Kremlin? . . . That was the most . . . “entertaining,” television I’ve seen in decades. ✌️
    1
  26470. 1
  26471. 1
  26472. 1
  26473. 1
  26474. 1
  26475. 1
  26476. 1
  26477. 1
  26478. 1
  26479. 1
  26480. 1
  26481. 1
  26482. 1
  26483. 1
  26484. 1
  26485. 1
  26486. 1
  26487. 1
  26488. 1
  26489. 1
  26490. 1
  26491. 1
  26492. 1
  26493. 1
  26494. 1
  26495. 1
  26496.  @stevealba56  : I think you’re missing the point. Quite aside from the ongoing oil trading with friendly nations that Russia is doing with its fossil fuels, they can only get what the west dictates they can get for it now. And that is no longer a sustainable model for funding their war. It’s one of the sanctions that China and other nations are happily swallowing, as getting unusually cheap oil at artificially low prices makes everyone a winner . . . Everyone except Russia, that is. But the real point here is that the west knows they have to follow through, now that they’ve drawn on Russia, returning hostile intent for their hostile intent. They may well be capable of leaving Ukraine to twist in the wind, but they won’t because that would not be in anyone’s interests. They have tried repeatedly to warn Putin that his constant lies and greedy imperialism would end in tears, but letting him get away with gassing civilians in Syria and invading Crimea was already too much for many in the west, and it became clear to western analysts that such appeasement was the very instrument with which Putin was robbing NATO of its moral authority and international reputation. Since then, NATO has seen by public and political reactions around the globe there is more than just an appetite for putting Putin back in his box. People want to see justice done. And that desire is keeping politicians in power and winning them legitimacy. Once you draw down on your enemy, you cannot afford to let him get back up again. And since Putin’s strongest ally seeks to benefit from his weakening, they will continue to stand by showing the limits of their, “unlimited,” partnership, as they have greedy eyes on the populations of potential break away states. But the NATO countries have seen their power, wealth and security enhanced by Putin’s miscalculation. So, even if Crimea becomes an independent statelet, after UN supervised referenda, Russia will not be allowed to profit this time. The west will make its point by ensuring Putin walks away with less Ukrainian real estate than it started with in February of last year. And it won’t be until that has been achieved (and the Russian guns fall silent) that the US, UK, Poland and Germany will put any real pressure on Zelensky to start serious talks.
    1
  26497. 1
  26498. 1
  26499. 1
  26500. 1
  26501. 1
  26502. 1
  26503. 1
  26504. 1
  26505. 1
  26506.  @clarkalvarez1729  : Firstly, I called you out for attempting to, “belittle,” the original commenter with your, “read a book,” quip, whilst demonstrably missing the point of her comment. Secondly, the kid who says, “read a book,” as a pejorative now says, “I don’t read many books,” adding hypocrisy to his growing list of charges. I was curt with you, but not rude or dismissive, taking the time to explain exactly how and why you are wrong, so you might learn something and grow. So, if you can step out from behind your shield of defensiveness, you might try spelling, “Pinocchio,” the way I did and find that YouTube’s engine does not offer an alternative? Then you might remember that the rules of grammar and diction are there for the sake of clarity? Did you understand me? Yes. Have you since learned of my disability? Yes. Do you persist in persecuting me for this one error, in an attempt to distract from the pompous, out of place, remarks you were being challenged for? Yes. Now, we can add bullying to your charge sheet. But never fear, as I can no more be offended or upset by bullies on social media than I can smell your farts. The mere fact that you pursue this line instead of defending the indefensible also marks you out as a moral coward, unwilling (or unable) to admit to being wrong. Just hold up your hands, tell me I have a point, and leave it at that. I may have a range of what is popularly known as, “neuro-divergent,” disabilities (I prefer to think of them as, “conditions,” even, “enhancements,” in some cases) but I am extremely smart, highly articulate and I give careful thought to my words before expressing them. You should try it some time? In the end, your initial criticism was snobbish, ill intentioned and fundamentally missed the point. I spoke up because I don’t like it when people dismiss others out of ignorance, attempting to crush their spirit for no other reason than their own insecurities. Stop doing that and you will have more friends . . . friends that are worth the name, that is.
    1
  26507. 1
  26508. 1
  26509. 1
  26510. 1
  26511. 1
  26512. 1
  26513. 1
  26514. 1
  26515. 1
  26516. 1
  26517. 1
  26518. 1
  26519. 1
  26520. 1
  26521. 1
  26522. 1
  26523. 1
  26524. 1
  26525. 1
  26526. 1
  26527. 1
  26528. 1
  26529. 1
  26530. 1
  26531. 1
  26532. 1
  26533. 1
  26534. 1
  26535. 1
  26536. 1
  26537. 1
  26538. 1
  26539. 1
  26540. 1
  26541. 1
  26542. 1
  26543. 1
  26544. I made a comment that leaned very much in the same direction as your conclusions. People sometimes get attached to theories like they’re their children. And that’s often because of the system they operate in, wherein they are now, “known,” for their Dark Matter work and get asked to guest on, or even host, science shows on that basis. It becomes the foundation of their reputation, even the gongs they have been awarded, so they fear being, “discredited.” It takes discipline and courage to lead the charge on alternative theories when you’re in such a position. Even Einstein was capable of a bit of humbug. Though he was at least capable of apologising for that and giving credit where it was due. Yet, that is a vanishingly rare quality in every profession. And I think it goes some way toward explaining many of the hold ups we have seen in the history of scientific developments. I think it was Earnest Hemingway who said, “Sometimes we have to kill our darlings.” I may be paraphrasing that, from my unreliable memory? But it was pretty close. He was talking about great characters who, nevertheless, do not serve the story you’re trying to tell. Or a great plot line, which nevertheless, interfere’s with or fudges an otherwise clean story ark. But it’s people with that kind of commitment to their craft, whether it be science or the arts, who always win out in the end. It would be a tragedy for, “Dark Matter,” to end up being remembered in the way we think of, “Flat Earth theories,” today. As beloved ideas that were clung to in spite of all mounting evidence to the contrary. But it seems to be steering that way.
    1
  26545. 1
  26546. 1
  26547. 1
  26548. 1
  26549. 1
  26550. 1
  26551. 1
  26552. 1
  26553. 1
  26554. 1
  26555. 1
  26556. 1
  26557. 1
  26558. 1
  26559. 1
  26560. 1
  26561. 1
  26562. 1
  26563. 1
  26564. 1
  26565. 1
  26566. 1
  26567. 1
  26568. 1
  26569. 1
  26570. 1
  26571. 1
  26572. 1
  26573. 1
  26574. 1
  26575. 1
  26576. 1
  26577. 1
  26578. 1
  26579. I’m going to give you the best advice anyone has ever given you, or is likely to in your whole career. The question will be if you’re smart enough to get it? He used a poor example for his opener, and there might be a clue in that for you? Buster Keaton could never have performed stunts like the ones he’s so famous for in Vaudeville. People from that background who broke into film, like Keaton, Stan Laurel, Charlie Chaplin, etc, came from a background that relied on live theatre audiences (frequently suffered poverty) and utilised utterly different technical skills, and where they were innovators across the whole field. Guys like them knew as much about film distribution and production as they did about film stock chemistry, lighting technique and special effects, because they were inventing what they needed for their success. The nearest equivalents these days are some of the YouTube creators who write, produce and direct their own dramas, sketches and documentaries, shaping the entertainment space to fit their craft as much as audience demand is shaping what succeeds. Perhaps your future success will have more to do with finding a few up and coming innovators in the web space who can write, edit, or generally provide for the needs where you are lacking and come up with a complete vision. The only thing the old Vaudeville performers knew, that served them in movies, was how to get that vital reaction out of an audience; what made people laugh or cry within that precious 5 to 10 minute window of time they had in which their stage act would sink or swim. YouTube, and spaces like it, are the modern Vaudeville, with audiences coming and going, having only brief attention spans and very little patience for things that don’t grab them right away. Unless you know some indie video game creators, your best bet is creating a company with a small handpicked group of people who each have the very different technical and artistic skills to create something original and artistically worthy. Good luck, my friend.
    1
  26580. 1
  26581. 1
  26582. 1
  26583. 1
  26584. 1
  26585. 1
  26586. 1
  26587. 1
  26588. 1
  26589. 1
  26590. 1
  26591. 1
  26592. 1
  26593. 1
  26594. 1
  26595. 1
  26596. 1
  26597. 1
  26598. 1
  26599. 1
  26600. 1
  26601. 1
  26602. 1
  26603. 1
  26604. 1
  26605. 1
  26606. 1
  26607. 1
  26608. 1
  26609. 1
  26610. 1
  26611. 1
  26612. 1
  26613. 1
  26614. 1
  26615. 1
  26616. 1
  26617.  @Strathom1  : That’s a good question, and I’d love to hear some more analysis from Jake about that. We do know that some of the biggest leaks to come out of Russia, came from FSB double agents, including the invasion plan from the start. They also (as good as) saved Zelensky’s life by pre-warning him about more than one assassination attempt, and that Intel turned out to be good. Whether they’re doing it for their own ends, because they simply have a different agenda to Putin but still want evil outcomes, or whether the west is benefitting from just a few insider double agents, is totally unclear unless you’re the director of the CIA, MI6, or one of the other Five Eyes spy agencies, I guess? From the FSB’s point of view, having access to all information (or as much as Russia has at any rate) they could probably see from the start that this attempt on Ukraine was all but suicidal, and they’re probably just fighting to survive, whatever the outcome. Yes, Putin recreated the FSB, making it up from his old colleagues in the KGB and from his new mafia boss friends from various regions across his empire. So, you would have thought he would be tighter with them than anyone, right? But, these are the people who have spent their entire lives surviving and getting what they want, through the type of brutality that would make a Borgia wince, and by breaking every law under the sun, now all in a large organisation, who’s, “loyalties,” probably go first to their leaders inside the FSB and stop at their wallets. I would love to know more, but that’s a really hard topic to research. But they are a formidable economic force, so Jake probably knows way more than the average guy?
    1
  26618. 1
  26619. 1
  26620. 1
  26621. 1
  26622. 1
  26623. 1
  26624. 1
  26625. 1
  26626.  @bolinvolovan3060  : That’s an interesting perspective take. But, consider? If this was a movie, in which George Clooney gets Brad Pitt and his buddies together, to show them a diagram of how the Stock Market Casino owners have been routinely robbing their customers, and then puts together an elaborate plan to beat them at their own game, who would you be rooting for? Of course, this movie had no happy ending for the Ocean’s 11 Redditers. Their plan worked perfectly, but the bad guy just shut down the whole Casino and had the bouncers kick ‘em onto the street, whilst dropping the whole facade of the Stock Market, and proving that it’s actually a private club. The final act of this movie, finishes with the casino owner, standing under the sign which reads, “This Is Public Property: All Are Welcome,” screaming at the now beaten and bruised 11, about how this was an, “attack upon the rich, done for no other reason than pure malice and socialism!” whilst the 11 scratch their heads and wonder if this guy is for real, and if he really doesn’t get that they just wanted a piece of the same pie, that the, “rules,” say they are entitled to??? Just before we cut to black and the titles, we see an angry 1%er, Mr Robin’ Hood, ripping up the rule book, screaming, “I’m doing this because I can! I OWN the rule book!” And, what we thought was going to be a fun caper movie, turns into a dark morality tale, about how America is an Oligarchy, and you will never be in the 1%, because even if you figure out how to join them, they will throw you back out anyway. You have to be a private member. But that’s the illusion that the Reddit 11 have broken. We all thought everyone was entitled to the American Dream. Nah, “private members only.” Sure, people lost real money. But in this case, it was the 1%, which is why I at least, was routing for the Reddit 11. No one who couldn’t afford to lose a lot of money was getting hurt. And, if anything, we owe the Reddit 11 a debt of gratitude, for at least tearing off their mask, don’t you think? Like the end of 300, King Reddit threw his spear, before being crushed by a giant army, and wounded the Persian Oligarch, showing that he really can bleed. But, look how FAST Congress was to react? They were having hearings in less than a couple of weeks! It took well over a month for them to start hearings over the Capitol Riots! What does THAT tell you about their priorities? So, while you make a great comment, I’m not sure I care about the, “victims,” of this short? They do that stuff for living ✌️👍
    1
  26627. 1
  26628. 1
  26629. 1
  26630. 1
  26631. 1
  26632. 1
  26633. 1
  26634. 1
  26635. 1
  26636. 1
  26637. Do people get it yet? . . . Billionaires are NOT, “geniuses.” They’re more likely to have a lower than average IQ because of the bubble of isolation and privilege they’ve been brought up in. What happens is that some of these idiots get so high on the smell of their own farts, because they’re surrounded by, “yes sir, great idea sir, you’re so clever sir, for using my ideas sir,” that they actually come into contact with large numbers of the public, due to their need for attention and approval making them decide to run for president or buy a social media platform. Then we suddenly see and hear them, unfiltered, on a daily basis and we find out they’re idiots. Their mystique is destroyed and the public starts to question how such a dumbass got their cool reputation? And the answer is simple: They started with lots of money, made more money by buying the right to slap their names on every product they invest in, and then making all of the employees sign NDA’s which prevent them from telling everyone that these, “great products/inventions,” he’s going around talking about like he came up with the ideas himself, were not his idea at all. Musk Google’s, “What are smart people talking about?” every morning, and then says something dumb about it. We really need to stop assisting these idiots by acting like they’re any different from the rest of us, just because they have enough raw cash to pay Dave Chappelle to let him walk on stage in the middle of his act and shout, “I’m rich, bitch!” in the faces of an already loudly booing audience.
    1
  26638. 1
  26639. 1
  26640. 1
  26641. 1
  26642. 1
  26643. 1
  26644. 1
  26645. 1
  26646. 1
  26647. 1
  26648. 1
  26649. 1
  26650. 1
  26651. 1
  26652. 1
  26653. 1
  26654. 1
  26655. 1
  26656. 1
  26657. 1
  26658. 1
  26659. 1
  26660. 1
  26661. 1
  26662. 1
  26663. 1
  26664. 1
  26665. 1
  26666. 1
  26667. 1
  26668. 1
  26669. 1
  26670. 1
  26671. 1
  26672. 1
  26673. 1
  26674. 1
  26675. 1
  26676. 1
  26677. 1
  26678. 1
  26679. 1
  26680. 1
  26681. 1
  26682. 1
  26683. 1
  26684. 1
  26685. 1
  26686. 1
  26687. 1
  26688. 1
  26689. 1
  26690. 1
  26691. 1
  26692. 1
  26693. 1
  26694. 1
  26695. 1
  26696. 1
  26697. 1
  26698. 1
  26699. 1
  26700. 1
  26701. 1
  26702. 1
  26703. 1
  26704. 1
  26705. 1
  26706. 1
  26707. 1
  26708. 1
  26709. 1
  26710. 1
  26711. Please write to your representatives and demand that NATO gives the formal invitation to join NATO today! Keep in mind that the process can still take as long as NATO wants after the invitation is proffered, but it gives the unequivocal and unambiguous signal that NATO is committed to Ukraine WINNING this war! That’s the one message that the west has stopped short of, “because escalation,” blah, friggin’ blah. Putin has ALWAYS backed off when faced with a GENUINE red line. Every single time! Just look at the Wagner Mutiny? Putin fled Moscow for St Petersburg! Even though the Wagnazis didn’t even reach the outskirts of the city! Prigozhin is ignoring his exile, swanning about Russia, free as a bird, while Wagner STILL refuses to carry out Putin’s direct orders and join the regular armed forces! He’s not even IN, “control,” of Russia! We should NOT fear a deliberate nuclear attack, but we SHOULD fear the possibility of nuclear ACCIDENTS, which Russia has a legendary record for! As the chaos continues, the chances of that go up. Western intervention is necessary for peace, yet NATO has just told Putin that he might still find a way to get a, “draw,” out of this. NATO has just prolonged the war! Please? If you care about world peace, the future of Europe, or the plight of Ukraine, just drop a line to your representative and DEMAND action! Let them know it is an election issue. Save Ukraine and we save the world . . . at least, we save it from one of the three biggest threats, (China and the Middle East remaining as troubling as ever, but not actively making war on Europeans!) and saving Ukraine could potentially neutralise Russia as a threat to the world, possibly forever?
    1
  26712. 1
  26713. (Spoiler warning) It would have been worth raising Steven King’s Dark Tower series of fantasy novels, in which the final book literally end in a genius way. It literally gives you an analysis of how series story telling works, and why the ending we’re about to witness is less important than the journey we’ve shared with the characters, to the point that it teases the reader, taking on a, “You don’t really need to know what happened, do you?” coquettish quality, making you wonder if he’s just going to leave it all unresolved, before . . . well . . . resolving the story with the most unexpected and clever narrative twist. Genuinely genius in the way it’s hinted at from book II throughout the rest of the multiple novels, we find our hero entering one of the portals which the story has built its narrative around throughout the series, yet which we’ve almost forgotten about by the final novel. And this time, the hero’s free will is taken from him, and he’s thrust, pleading and begging, back to the very start of the adventure, in an, “eternal loop,” of which the universe itself may well be made. And the last line of the last book is the same as the first line of the first book. For many, like me, who’d had such joy with the novels, it was the perfect excuse to simply reread them, only this time with that, “knowing what we know now,” understanding, which makes twisty stories so enjoyable a second time around, like with The Sixth Sense. It’s arguably King’s finest work; certainly his smartest. And he was only experimenting with forms, as a kind of side project, apparently. But, it literally obviates the problem with ending a series, without copping out of giving satisfying conclusions for characters that the reader gets attached to. Would have made a great example, because it’s an exception to the rule, and quite a unique achievement in literature. Not in what it does, but in the fact that King pulls it off, through sheer poetic, literate, genius and skill.
    1
  26714. 1
  26715. 1
  26716. 1
  26717. 1
  26718. 1
  26719. Challenge for all: Who can answer this? Alan Guth says space inflated, but, “Time,” didn’t? If space inflated, so did time with it! That’s why it, “looks,” like space suddenly inflated in the blink of an eye. It didn’t. Time expanded with the rest of space, so it looks, “smaller,” from a huge distance, in the same way that baryonic matter does. I’m amazed this never occurs to physicists! Can anyone contradict this? Or show where Guth has taken the expansion of time into account? Presumably, we are still believing in time dilation and Einstein’s theories? And before anyone says, “They must have thought about that,” I ask you to site ONE example where inflation takes the expansion of time into account? Just one? I tell you, one of the greatest oversights of common sense in astrophysics is inflation theory! Which should technically be called the, “Inflation Hypothesis,” given that there is zero evidence for it, unless you count that which, as Sabine just explained, can be applied to a raft of other theories? I can say, “There’s this guy who paints the sky each night to make it blue, but some nights he’s too tired and leaves it, so it’s white on those days.” To which you can say, “But, where’s your evidence?” To which I answer, “Look at the sky? It’s blue isn’t it? That’s my evidence.” Preposterous? Welcome to Inflation Theory. It’s so obvious, when you think about it! Einstein showed us that we have to think of space AND time as being properties of the same thing! But then we exclude time for inflation? Inflation never happened!
    1
  26720. 1
  26721. 1
  26722. 1
  26723. 1
  26724. 1
  26725. 1
  26726. 1
  26727. 1
  26728. 1
  26729. 1
  26730. 1
  26731. 1
  26732. 1
  26733. 1
  26734. 1
  26735. 1
  26736. 1
  26737. 1
  26738. 1
  26739. 1
  26740. 1
  26741. 1
  26742. 1
  26743. 1
  26744. 1
  26745. 1
  26746. 1
  26747. 1
  26748. Lee Boriack : True story for you, which ends with a question . . . We began this crisis as a united country, supporting our services, even being, “kind,” to each other. Then, Donny’s pollsters told him he was 10 points behind Biden, because, “unity,” is the ONE THING that is Kryptonite to Donny’s, “Make America Divided Again,” policy. Division is the source of his power, and a national approach was ruining his, “brand.” So, his hacktivists got busy organising, “protests,” while he got busy defunding the universities working on a cure, and the World Health Oragnisation, whom he knew would give him a bad report for wasting an entire month anyway. After the George Floyd thing, Donny found himself regretting being quite so vociferous in support of, “free speech,” and people’s, “rights to protest,” so he and Barr dismissed those protestors as ALL being a, “leftist democrat plot against Trump,” personally, and set about supporting people’s, “rights,” to be selfish idiots, who put everyone else’s lives at risk. So, here we are, with plague, famine, civil unrest, mass unemployment, Murdering cops somehow being a part of a, “Law & Order,” agenda, when it was America’s protests FOR Law & Order to be RESTORED that he was ignoring, and an economic downturn to look forward to. Why? All because of one man’s mental illness, the abject capitulation of the Quislings who work for him, and the personal appeal of selfishness to his cult, mixed with a heavy dose of racism; a salted wound, which Donny has been able to exploit, because America has never had the fortitude to address the fallout of the Civil War. And, since ALL OF THAT, we now find that trump was too Criminally Incompetent (or just a downright Collaborating TRAITOR?) to even CARE that our troops are being murdered by hitmen, paid for by the Cowardly Russians. How do you get someone to admit, even to themselves, that they’ve made such a big mistake that they’ve cost America thousands of lives? If you can answer that question for me, I would be sincerely grateful ✌️👍
    1
  26749. 1
  26750. 1
  26751. 1
  26752. 1
  26753. 1
  26754. 1
  26755. 1
  26756. 1
  26757. 1
  26758. 1
  26759. 1
  26760. 1
  26761. 1
  26762. 1
  26763. 1
  26764. 1
  26765. 1
  26766. 1
  26767. 1
  26768. 1
  26769. 1
  26770. 1
  26771. 1
  26772. 1
  26773. 1
  26774. 1
  26775. 1
  26776. 1
  26777. 1
  26778. 1
  26779. 1
  26780. 1
  26781. 1
  26782. 1
  26783. 1
  26784. 1
  26785. 1
  26786. 1
  26787. 1
  26788. 1
  26789. 1
  26790. 1
  26791. 1
  26792. 1
  26793. 1
  26794. 1
  26795. 1
  26796. 1
  26797. 1
  26798. 1
  26799. 1
  26800. 1
  26801. 1
  26802. 1
  26803. 1
  26804. 1
  26805. 1
  26806. 1
  26807. 1
  26808. 1
  26809. 1
  26810. 1
  26811. 1
  26812. 1
  26813. 1
  26814. 1
  26815. 1
  26816. 1
  26817. 1
  26818. 1
  26819. 1
  26820. 1
  26821.  @BlinkonceforU  : There are many differences between the two events, as was pointed out by Jake Broe on his YouTube channel, from which I took this comparison. Yet it is an apt comparison nonetheless; especially for the type of warfare we are seeing. As to the location of Russia’s, “first line of defence,” you know as little of that as I do, which is considerably less than a Ukrainian general. I trust that they know what they are doing and will succeed, as they have at all other points in this war. I must take issue with your statement that, “this is not a world war,” as it clearly is. Just because it is only being fought in Ukraine, doesn’t make the stakes any less high. Every country in the free world has a dog in this fight. And this is the World War Three that the world gets when the protagonists on both sides are unwilling to use their nukes for obvious, not being suicidal, reasons. Russia is not alone in its, “axis of evil,” as China has been backing them both overtly with words and covertly with resources, along with Iran (directly with weaponry) and other countries. While Ukraine is supported by the entire EU and the Five Eyes states, because we value freedom and democracy as much as we value life. That is another respect in which we can draw our comparison with the battle against Nazism. The casualties were high on D Day and in the coming months afterwards, but they were expected to be high and that high casualty rate was built into the calculations of the allies, as it is in Ukraine. I do not say this is a, “good thing,” just a reality of war. Yes, I would love to see Ukraine get a fleet of F16’s. I write to MP about that! Do you write to your representatives? Anyone who tells you that’s a waste of time is plain wrong. Demand the tools for victory and help speed the process! But, keep in mind that what the world’s leaders are saying and what is happening are not always the same thing. They don’t necessarily want Russia to know about much of the hardware that is already in Ukraine, or the shadow dropping of some jets, via Poland and other allies. I promise you, Ukraine WILL WIN. The question is how long? And how many casualties must they take. We can influence the answer by demanding more from our representatives. That’s your role in this. On top of donating money and supporting correspondents who get the truth out there, you can persuade your own politicians.
    1
  26822. 1
  26823. 1
  26824. 1
  26825. 1
  26826. 1
  26827. 1
  26828. 1
  26829. 1
  26830. 1
  26831. 1
  26832. 1
  26833. 1
  26834. 1
  26835. 1
  26836. 1
  26837. 1
  26838. J Groovy : That was a great comment, though I couldn’t tell if it was aimed at me, as requested, or not? You didn’t put anyone’s name on it. Isn’t it true that most people, when meeting a stranger, or new group of people, behave and talk in a liberal, yet conservative way? Or a conservatively liberal way? I agree whole heartedly that, “extremism,” in either direction is the enemy of Democracy and of decent lifestyles. I am Conservative, myself, and was a fierce critic of Obama, during his administration, though I NEVER pretended that he hadn’t saved our economy; even if the results of his actions did make the money magnates even MORE POWERFUL; he had little choice. I miss Obama, now. Your observation, that Trump speaks in, “superlatives,” is kinda’ the point I was making, about everything he and his supporters and enablers do, is designed to appeal to the, “emotions,” NOT the head. The simplest equation is that Trump gained power and retains it, on the basis of DIVISION; and the methodology, is to use emotion over logic. UNITY is the ONE thing that would defeat Trump, and he knows that. The natural outcome of his methods, are what we’re seeing. The DIVISION has to, and can only, get worse, or it fails to work at all. This is what Putin knows. It will lead to the collapse of America’s political foundation. And, into that vacuum, the easiest thing to fill it with, is a dictatorship, masquerading as a, “democracy,” like that of Putin’s Russia. And, just like Putin’s Russia, the wealth and resources will quickly be sucked into the centre, making it impossible to sustain. Thus, the expansion, into the Middle East, Europe and, now, America. If Russia was put back in its box, it would collapse into revolution, at the most extreme, or just dissolve over time. That is what most western Geo-Political Analysts predicted would happen to them, in the 21st Century. Of, course, many of them failed to see that Russia would see that too, and make inroads into the world, to suck up more resources, and keep itself afloat, by infiltrating world wide politics. Whether we like it or not, we are fighting for the survival of Democracy. I am NO extremist, but as with the World Wars and the Cold War, the only available solution, is to fight back, harder than the enemy, or lose the fight. This is Cold War II. And, it will be seen as that, by history. Or, history will be re-written, by the bad guys. I truly WISH I was exaggerating ✌️
    1
  26839. 1
  26840. 1
  26841. 1
  26842. 1
  26843. 1
  26844. 1
  26845. 1
  26846. 1
  26847. 1
  26848. 1
  26849. 1
  26850. 1
  26851. 1
  26852. 1
  26853. 1
  26854. 1
  26855. 1
  26856. 1
  26857. 1
  26858. 1
  26859. 1
  26860. 1
  26861. 1
  26862. 1
  26863. 1
  26864. 1
  26865. 1
  26866. 1
  26867. 1
  26868. 1
  26869. 1
  26870. 1
  26871. 1
  26872. 1
  26873. 1
  26874. 1
  26875. 1
  26876. 1
  26877. 1
  26878. 1
  26879. 1
  26880. 1
  26881. 1
  26882. 1
  26883. 1
  26884. 1
  26885. 1
  26886.  @flclub54  : As a producer Baldwin might well take some heat for this. But to all those saying, “I would have checked the gun myself,” I say, “NO YOU WOULDN’T!” Those people have a touch of the Dunning Kruger Effect, where they think that any expertise they have in gun use translates into safety on a Hollywood set. The expert is there to have the last word and it’s the one place in the world where you NEVER give responsibility to the person discharging the weapon. They are NOT, “experts,” and even a weapons expert is not trained in telling fakes from the real thing. It’s a specialist knowledge. People would have checked their own gun and then done what? “Oh, but there’s bullets in the chambers.” To which everyone rolls their eyes and says, “Yeah we know. They’re blanks!” I mean, how TF is an actor supposed to know the difference? What’s the point of hiring an armorer? And do these people even realise that a Hollywood armorer is NOT an, “Armorer,” in the sense they’re thinking of the word? No one puts their safety into the hands of any Tom, Dick or Harry with a SAG card, FFS!? The weapons expert gets the last word, and if the actor messes with the gun in the scene, they have to give it back to the armorer to start over making it safe again! People always think they’re, “experts,” in their armchairs, but in this case, the only proof I’ll need to show I’m right is that I can PROMISE right now that Baldwin will NOT be charged with anything to do with his pulling the trigger on that gun. As a producer, he may well be held as one of the people liable for cutting corners (depending on whether he can get away with the, “plausible deniability,” act he’s pulling right now?) but not for the actual bullet being in the weapon. That’s on the armorer alone. It literally says so in her contract, and it’s literally the REASON they hire them in the first place. 🤷‍♂️
    1
  26887. 1
  26888. 1
  26889. 1
  26890. 1
  26891. 1
  26892. 1
  26893. 1
  26894. 1
  26895. 1
  26896. 1
  26897. 1
  26898. 1
  26899. 1
  26900. 1
  26901. 1
  26902. 1
  26903. 1
  26904. 1
  26905. 1
  26906. 1
  26907. 1
  26908. 1
  26909. 1
  26910. 1
  26911. 1
  26912. 1
  26913. 1
  26914. 1
  26915. 1
  26916. 1
  26917. 1
  26918. 1
  26919. 1
  26920. 1
  26921. 1
  26922. 1
  26923. 1
  26924. 1
  26925. 1
  26926. 1
  26927. 1
  26928. 1
  26929. 1
  26930. 1
  26931. 1
  26932. 1
  26933. 1
  26934. 1
  26935. 1
  26936. 1
  26937.  FKR  : Biden’s a centrist, with a proven track record. So, I’m guessing you’re pretty young? He helped Obama turn the economic disaster of the 2008 banking crisis around with staggering success. And, contrary to Trumpophile propaganda, that was not achieved by tax rises on the poor. Education is the solution. Pure and simple (unlike the water) and it always will be. The countries with the most liberal, accessible education systems are also the most prosperous, per capita. And that’s NOT a coincidence. As to the threat of another trump in 4 years, or a trump type, that’s very real. Swift, harsh, merciless justice is the answer to that. The signs were ignored, which were first visible when the Freedom Caucus (the political wing of the Tea Party) got a grip on the GOP and blocked Obama’s SCOTUS appointments. Not what they did, but the manner in which they did it. Since then, the GOP has realised that they could get away with worse rejections of our norms, time and again. Those, “norms,” having proved useless, must now be codified into law. Exposure, and the harshest penalties that law allows, will make it unpatriotic to support Trumpism again, if handled swiftly and harshly enough. Putting fear into the types tempted to try that shit again, and an insurmountable ideological obstacle in the way of the uneducated. Democracy is not a right, it’s a hard won privilege. People are learning that now. And, even many of trump’s most rabid supporters are regretting that now, as they didn’t real think he would steal their Christmas too. I suspect the votes in Georgia will reflect that? As will the GOP’s desperate attempts to sabotage the Georgia vote?
    1
  26938. 1
  26939. 1
  26940. 1
  26941. 1
  26942. 1
  26943. 1
  26944. 1
  26945. siderealvision : The fact is that the Republican Party are old hands at it, and were successfully sued and punished for the criminal practice of having, “Watch Groups,” hanging around polling stations with fake ID’s, “allowing people to conclude they were officials,” without mentioning that they weren’t, questioning voters and threatening voter’s family members with deportation and imprisonment. It occurred all over the country and is a matter of verifiable record. So, put that, “old experience,” together with Trump’s repeated statements about not accepting defeat, and what we all should know about him, by now, anyway? We have just witnessed him encouraging America to, “protest,” his OWN policies, regardless of the lives that he endangered by doing so? I get that it’s distasteful, to consider that it could happen; in the same way that it’s a bitter pill to contemplate the decline of America’s hegemony in the world. But, not wanting to believe what’s right before your eyes and burying your heads in the sand? . . . Well, that’s how he got in, in the first place. And, how many times since have we thought, “OK, but that’s as far as it goes. Surely he wouldn’t stoop any lower?” We’re asking for trouble by not admitting it to ourselves. He’s a dictator, with every impulse of a dictator, who would have already been ousted from his post and sent to jail, if it weren’t for his cowed and corrupted party . . . We will wake up to the threat. That I promise you. Whether it’s before or after the fact? Well, that’s another proposition altogether . . . Smh ✌️
    1
  26946. 1
  26947. 1
  26948. 1
  26949. 1
  26950. 1
  26951. 1
  26952. 1
  26953. 1
  26954. 1
  26955. 1
  26956. 1
  26957. 1
  26958. 1
  26959. 1
  26960. 1
  26961. 1
  26962. 1
  26963. 1
  26964. 1
  26965. 1
  26966. 1
  26967. 1
  26968. 1
  26969. 1
  26970. 1
  26971. 1
  26972. 1
  26973. 1
  26974. 1
  26975. 1
  26976. 1
  26977. 1
  26978. 1
  26979. 1
  26980. 1
  26981. 1
  26982. 1
  26983. 1
  26984. 1
  26985. 1
  26986. 1
  26987. 1
  26988. 1
  26989. 1
  26990. 1
  26991. 1
  26992. 1
  26993. 1
  26994. 1
  26995. 1
  26996. 1
  26997. 1
  26998. 1
  26999. 1
  27000. 1
  27001. 1
  27002. 1
  27003. 1
  27004. 1
  27005. 1
  27006. 1
  27007. 1
  27008. 1
  27009. 1
  27010. 1
  27011. 1
  27012. 1
  27013. 1
  27014. 1
  27015. 1
  27016. 1
  27017. 1
  27018. 1
  27019. 1
  27020. 1
  27021. 1
  27022. 1
  27023. 1
  27024. 1
  27025. 1
  27026. 1
  27027. 1
  27028. 1
  27029. 1
  27030. 1
  27031. 1
  27032. 1
  27033. 1
  27034. 1
  27035. 1
  27036. 1
  27037. 1
  27038. 1
  27039. 1
  27040. 1
  27041. 1
  27042. 1
  27043. 1
  27044. 1
  27045. 1
  27046. 1
  27047. 1
  27048. 1
  27049. 1
  27050. 1
  27051. 1
  27052. 1
  27053. 1
  27054. I just want to grab these well meaning politicians by the scruff of their jackets and scream into their faces, “Give them EXAMPLES!” Everyone’s eyes glaze over once you start talking numbers. I’ve seen it! The BBC is not even bothering to report that the government’s OWN FIGURES on, “waste, corruption and fraud,” from inside government institutions has QUADRUPLED in two years, to a staggering £21 BILLION POUNDS! But once you start giving EXAMPLES literally everyone sits up and pays REAL attention. Remember the MP’s Expenses scandals that were in every paper for about two years, roughly 15 years ago or so? No one recalls the name of the MP or the amount he charged the public purse, but EVERYONE remembers that he charged us for a MOAT for his DUCK ISLAND! And THAT’S what made everyone so angry! No one really cared that much about Boris’s Party-Gate scandal, until they got EXAMPLES of how they were literally vomiting up expensive red wines down the walls of Number 10 Downing Street on the eve of Prince Philip’s funeral! You only need a few good EXAMPLES and the dismissals and excuses people make for their theft will enrage the public sufficiently to bring about ACTUAL CHANGE! Well meaning MP’s have got to STOP counting every bean and seeing the issues from an MP’s perspective and say, “Here is exactly HOW your bank/supermarket/service provider is directly making YOU poorer by ripping you off with THIS PRECISE EXAMPLE!” That’s how Martin Lewis got everyone’s attention over the last year. He was, “niche,” and only known to us Radio 4 listeners before then. Now everyone knows who he is because he gives us plain, practical EXAMPLES of how we’re being ripped off and what we can do about it! And I would advise ANYONE who’s writing to their MP about this stuff to BEG them to give EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES, EXAMPLES and FFS STOP just giving us numbers! I would also urge them to read the complete works of Frankie Boyle, starting with his articles for the broadsheets, and his New World Order monologues at the end of each show, but that’s another matter entirely.
    1
  27055. 1
  27056. 1
  27057. 1
  27058. 1
  27059. 1
  27060. 1
  27061. 1
  27062. 1
  27063. 1
  27064.  @Amiami-oy6pt  : I honestly believe there’s a salient point in that. The first example in this video could have said that, without hinting at his own underlying racism, by even mentioning that he, “needs to be careful what I say,” about that. The fact that we are following the same economic models, the same democratic fundamentals, the same cultural basics, etc, is worth pointing out. It tells us that THIS CAN HAPPEN TO YOU, and it increases the sense of urgency in helping Ukraine and gives us ALL a reason to want to STOP Putin in his tracks! Where so many of these examples actually were egregious was by not making that clear and either allowing us to think they were meaning racist things, or hinting at it themselves. Their skin colour and religion is NOT the issue. The fact that if it can happen in Kyiv, it can happen in Paris, Berlin and Washington, is far more important. That’s a wake up call we all need. It’s not racist to point out where this is leading. It is racist to suggest we should invest more in people of the same ethnic, religious or cultural background. And it is worth pointing out that in an Eastern monarchy, where you can be stoned to death for the mere suspicion of adultery, or a dictatorship that just happens to be getting along with the west, we shouldn’t (and aren’t) surprised when that all caves in and turns to chaos. It’s not racist to be unsurprised by that? It’s racist to imply that these white Europeans are somehow more valuable. Journalists are meant to be educated people, able to express subtlety and explain things to the public, after all? That’s what they get paid for and spent years learning how to do it. So, when you see all of that time and money coming out as a thinly veiled, ignorant prejudice, people are right to be angry about that. Don’t you think?
    1
  27065. 1
  27066. 1
  27067. 1
  27068. 1
  27069. 1
  27070. 1
  27071. 1
  27072. 1
  27073. 1
  27074. 1
  27075. 1
  27076. 1
  27077. 1
  27078. 1
  27079. 1
  27080. 1
  27081. 1
  27082. 1
  27083. 1
  27084. 1
  27085. 1
  27086. 1
  27087. 1
  27088. 1
  27089. 1
  27090. 1
  27091. 1
  27092. 1
  27093. 1
  27094. 1
  27095.  @OhioOwns  : You should read the news, madam? What the Dems want is to restore the filibuster to what it used to be. Instead of just throwing a spanner in the works, by saying, “nah,” to what the country wants, and then getting to go off for summer break while the country’s democracy is held up, the Dems want anyone who disagrees with the policies that the majority have ALREADY VOTED FOR, to say why. Is THAT such a BIG ASK? Having to account for your own parties political position? To argue your case? To, “represent,” your constituency? The GOP are just afraid because they HAVE NO, “arguments,” and are terrified of being forced to OWN their Anti-Democratic, “values.” They fear being made to look like a horses ass when they cannot come out with talking points that don’t give them away. And they’re TERRIFIED that they might have to WORK for a living! Having to prepare a long speech, so you can talk out the clock for three days straight, would require them to EXPLAIN THEMSELVES. And we all know, even the trump Qult (already haemorrhaging voters) would lose more support, when they hear the open racism, the nonsensical, gibberish, self contradicting, Stalinist, deep state BOLLOX coming out of the mouths of politicians who aren’t used to doing their jobs and have no clue where to start! And, they fear making slip ups, after talking for hours and hours, just to hold up democracy, and letting something out that might get them arrested. Half of them are too old and would risk having a heart attack with marathon lying sessions? We all KNOW they would make mistakes and tell us things we weren’t meant to know. THAT’S WHAT THEY FEAR. And that’s what you’re terrified of: a little TRUTH getting into American politics, and GOP Fascists, having to EARN their handsome wages. Read a book, Karen 🙄
    1
  27096. 1
  27097. 1
  27098. 1
  27099. 1
  27100. 1
  27101. 1
  27102. 1
  27103. 1
  27104. 1
  27105. 1
  27106. 1
  27107. 1
  27108. 1
  27109. 1
  27110. Dear Netflix, when statements about poor quality, in general, become axiomatic, your company has a problem. I’m not referring to this movie here, but the quality 0f the movies you generally buy up. Your documentaries are getting so good that the mere fact it’s a Netflix series or one off documentary, is enough to draw audiences now. Your own, produced movies are very hit and miss, but people don’t mind that, because you invest in talent and take chances, giving us the occasional gem. The best of your TV dramas tend to get cancelled, so often, at their peak, that it’s changing the behaviour of audiences, some of who, like me, won’t invest in a Netflix TV series until they KNOW it’s going to reach a proper conclusion, instead of being killed off in the midst of its story, like The Santa Clarita Diet, and so many others. That’s why I keep putting off your current Star Trek series, in case we never get a satisfactory ending. That’s the disappointment that’s changing how audiences watch. I don’t have stats to offer, only anecdotes, but I know I can’t be the only one, who puts off watching Netflix dramas, just in case? And that must be skewing your own algorithms and stats? But, here’s my biggest complaint (as a paying customer). PLEASE consider this? I’m certain I speak for the majority of your customers, when I ask you: PLEASE STOP bulking out your stock of movies, with dreadful, unpopular, straight to video, or critically panned and financially FAILED movies? We would rather have fewer movies that were of better quality! And, that was what you promised us, when you reduced your movie numbers from 6000 +, to 4000 +, remember? We would all LOVE to see more old classics, like Gone With The Wind, Mad Max, The Jurassic Park movies, etc, that you are offering, instead of all these dreadful failures that only a very few have heard of? It feels like an INSULT to have a terrible movie, “Recommended,” to me, and I’m sure others would feel the same way? You have barely scraped the surface of the 1940’s and 50’s movie classics, like the Humphrey Bogart, John Wayne, Gene Kelly, Alfred Hitchcock, and so many others I could suggest?! But, if you note only one thing from all I’m saying here, please make it this: the Axiom, I mentioned at the top? When my friend went to see the action movie Angel Has Fallen, he told me it was not very good, compared to the others, and he expected it to flop (which it did). When he asked me if I would bother to see it, being a fan of the star, I said, “Nah, if it’s rubbish, it’ll be on Netflix soon.” And that’s the Axiom that’s following Netflix around like a bad smell. IF IT’S A BAD (NEW) MOVIE, IT WILL BE ON NETFLIX SOON. It’s not funny, but it is true. A truism, that should be challenged, at a fundamental level. You can do better. We KNOW THIS. You show all the evidence that you people KNOW what a good movie is. Please consider this? You put out so much dross, during Covid??? Do your part, Netflix? You make a LOT of money, and you do some things so well! Please get some, “Quality Control,” in your classic and older movies? We LOVE to watch older movies. Just not the dross. Sorry to rant, but it’s important. Do you CARE about your customers? Offer them something extra, to help, during this challenging time? . . . RESPECTFULLY, PLEASE?
    1
  27111. 1
  27112. 1
  27113. 1
  27114. 1
  27115. 1
  27116. 1
  27117. 1
  27118. 1
  27119. 1
  27120. 1
  27121. 1
  27122. 1
  27123. 1
  27124. 1
  27125. 1
  27126. 1
  27127. 1
  27128. 1
  27129. 1
  27130. 1
  27131. 1
  27132. 1
  27133. 1
  27134. 1
  27135. 1
  27136. 1
  27137. 1
  27138. 1
  27139. 1
  27140. 1
  27141. 1
  27142. 1
  27143. 1
  27144. 1
  27145. 1
  27146. 1
  27147. 1
  27148. 1
  27149. 1
  27150. 1
  27151. 1
  27152. 1
  27153. 1
  27154. 1
  27155. 1
  27156. 1
  27157. 1
  27158. 1
  27159. 1
  27160. 1
  27161. 1
  27162. 1
  27163. 1
  27164. 1
  27165. 1
  27166. 1
  27167. 1
  27168. 1
  27169. 1
  27170. 1
  27171. 1
  27172. 1
  27173. 1
  27174. 1
  27175. 1
  27176. 1
  27177. 1
  27178. 1
  27179. 1
  27180. 1
  27181. 1
  27182. 1
  27183. 1
  27184.  @artamutt5485  : The, “good,” I refer to, is simple and straight forward. And it has nothing to do with the points you make (legitimate or not). Whichever party holds power, there must ALWAYS be a strong opposition, acknowledged by the government as legitimate; able to hold gov to account, able to debate policy in public and express its opposition without fear of threat, or violence. It must be able to prevent excesses and have the means to invoke the legal tools at its disposal to prosecute those who break with the constitution or break the country’s laws. Without that opposition, that is capable of winning over the government’s voters, to the point that the government can lose its powers and be replaced, you no longer have a Democracy. And, America was supposed to be a Democratic, Constitutional, Federal Republic. America is not that, right now. It has ONE political party, currently holding fascism at bay, but under threat from all sides. From the suppression of votes, protest and now, even education, to the hacks that are about to announce that, “Chiynah,” interfered with our elections. Putin has come far closer than most Americans are willing to accept, to dividing America into an irreparable condition. Democracy cannot function as it is, with one side sworn to oppose all policies, good, bad or indifferent, and it will collapse under the strain. So, I argue that a genuine party, representing the millions of conservatives, who are not down with fascism, is a necessity. When the future of a party, or their country, starts to boil down to what one or two people might do, at a pinch, your democracy is already in trouble. Trump will take his, “populist,” (even though his cult doesn’t see that their actions are NOT even that) followers with him, but the actual voters will fall away over time. The democratic conservatives, who establish their own party, will win more and more support. Especially if they join the Dems on certain, genuinely popular, votes on key bills, like that of Infrastructure. They can demote Cheney, but they cannot fire her from her elected position. They’re stuck with her, until the midterms. And she will build a coalition around her. And the power, and popularity of that coalition may grow, based on what they do? There is the opportunity for them to make trumpism genuinely irrelevant, and to grow a legitimate opposition, without the need for the violent confrontation that the trumpists are seeking. But, if you can set aside thoughts of what it is that you don’t like about, “conservatism,” and see it from that perspective? That of, WHY it is NECESSARY to have strong opponents to government, if you want to keep your democratic Republic? Then I hope you’ll get where I’m coming from, and why I support Liz Cheney, a woman who’s, “politics,” have turned my stomach in the past? . . . ✌️
    1
  27185. 1
  27186. 1
  27187. 1
  27188. 1
  27189. 1
  27190. 1
  27191. 1
  27192. 1
  27193. 1
  27194. 1
  27195. 1
  27196. 1
  27197.  @wengelder9256  : No. The terms are not, “known,” as there is no existing legal formula or precedent for such a case. We could not simply join as though we were a knew partner, with zero history. The EU would naturally seek safeguards against the possibility of further massive disruptions. Plus, Britain remains one of the largest economies on Earth, certainly in the top 10 (currently, though that is far from a stable state of affairs) and the EU took a huge financial hit from our leaving. Several scientific, trade and development programs have been ended as a direct result of our withdrawal, along with all that cash to prop it up. Assurances would be a necessary part of any deal. And all that assumes that we could surmount the hurdle of other countries vetoing our rejoining. The French famously blocked our very first attempt at joining what was known as The Common Market back in the late 1960’s or early 1970’s (I can’t recall the exact year off the top of my head) and they will have reflected that they were vindicated by recent events. They won’t, I assure you, simply require a legally binding undertaking not to have any further referendums for a generation or two. They will have demands, regarding trade, Rn’D projects, with the potential insistence on restoring funding for certain special military or science projects that were trashed before. These things are never simple. And the simplicity of simply withdrawing has lead to complications for both sides of that discussion, both in Europe and domestically. All that to say, no. You’re simply wrong about that. Do a little more reading on policy, perhaps?
    1
  27198. 1
  27199. 1
  27200. 1
  27201. 1
  27202. 1
  27203. 1
  27204. 1
  27205. 1
  27206. 1
  27207. 1
  27208. 1
  27209. 1
  27210. 1
  27211. 1
  27212. 1
  27213. 1
  27214. 1
  27215. 1
  27216. 1
  27217. 1
  27218. 1
  27219. 1
  27220. 1
  27221. 1
  27222. 1
  27223. 1
  27224. 1
  27225. 1
  27226. 1
  27227. 1
  27228. 1
  27229. 1
  27230. This a selective presentation, unbalanced and therefore biased. You are also unreasonably dumping responsibility on Hossenfelder for the way in which others respond to, or hijack, her content. You misrepresented her statements about her experience of one university as her making an accusation about all academia. That comes off as sly. The fact is that there is a problem with the way capitalism pervades science research and governs agendas. Yet again, when she says that most of the scientific research that, “your taxes pay for is bullshit,” she is NOT saying, “all scientific research is bullshit.” There is a clear distinction there that you are refusing to acknowledge. She is attempting to highlight a problem within the system. Using hyperbole in the manner she does may be damaging, but hardly as damning as you want to make it seem. You are also conflating the times when she’s disagreeing with other scientists, arguing her case, with her arguments about the problems generally. And you are showing that you don’t get the argument. Physics IS STUCK. Yes, there have been breakthroughs and discoveries in practical physics, like the examples you gave, but THAT is NOT what she’s talking about. She is talking about THEORETICAL physics. And you will not find ANY respected physicist who disagrees with this proposition: THEORETICAL physics IS STUCK. I have seen her in academic institutions, on the stage, in front of live audiences, discussing this problem with the very string theorists and others who sit firmly in different camps, debating WHY this is, not IF this is the case! You are misinterpreting the disagreement and misrepresenting it. Also, she is NOT, “outside of academia.” Who told you that? She is still working with universities, submitting papers and being peer reviewed. Or, so she tells us. Do you have evidence to the contrary? It seems you have not done your homework and thus made empirically measurable mistakes. And, in misunderstanding the nature of so much of her content, you have gotten carried away with your own suspicions as to her motives. Accusing her of, “sacrificing her integrity and POISONING SOCIETY,” is, I’m afraid, not just, “overly dramatic,” but painfully misguided and wrong headed at best. If you really are speaking in good faith, you will do more research so as to understand how you have misunderstood the nature of the impasse in THEORETICAL physics. If not, you will continue making, “click bait, for clicks and cash,” as you put it, and taking fair criticism too personally. I too have disagreements with some of her theoretical conclusions and sometimes with her messaging and the manner in which she presents some of that. But, despite your attempts at demonstrating, “balance,” by siting her positives, you expressed no respect for her or even her endeavours in principle, which I found telling. There is something personal in this for you and if you’re honest, you will admit that. Otherwise you would have used less personally insulting language and less incendiary terms. I would remind you however, in either case, no matter what you say, or how overwrought your presentation, you personally do not get to decide if Sabina Hossenfelder is a, “trusted science communicator,” as though she were on trial for her career, or as if your personal verdict carries any more weight than the next man or woman’s. That is up to the audience with whom she communicates. And I suspect her audience is not quite so, “incapable of discernment,” as you think. But, at least we know a little more about what you think of YouTube viewers.
    1
  27231. @ : I don’t believe she is, “pandering,” to anyone, nor does the author of this complaint. I think he’s looking down the wrong end of the telescope, worrying about how others use or hijack people like her for their own purposes. He certainly doesn’t judge YouTube audiences as people capable of making their own informed judgements. Much of his complaint is opinion, not fact. And if he was genuinely concerned in the manner pretends to be, he would have evidenced his attempts to reach out to her and discuss the problem before attacking her in a click bait video. In this video alone, he commits all of the offences he accuses her of. And he draws a clear demarcation line of division between them, rather than attempting any form of synthesis. That is audience manipulation. Don’t fall for it. I have suspected this guy of being a little vain before, but it never influenced my opinion of his content much; rather it accounted for why he takes so long to get to the point sometimes, or can be so repetitive. But this was a very personal, personalised attack and I think ego has a lot to do with it. I have seen most of the videos he used excerpts from and know that he’s misrepresenting them by skewing the context. I don’t trust his motives at all, since he’s taken the wrong approach and just exploded out of nowhere with a bunch of hyperbole, insinuation and accusation. Regardless of whether you and I agree on the above, you cannot dispute that he is NOT a mind reader. He does not have a privileged insight into what’s going on inside her head, but he ascribes the worst possible motives and he has never even spoken to her about it. What does that tell you? It certainly does not fit the character of Sabine Hossenfelder that I have come to know over the years. I do not know her either, but I do not believe she is as reckless, thoughtless, selfish and dangerous as he alleges at all. That’s just not who she is. His rhetoric reminds me of the very worst politicians whose every allegation is actually a confession. And I know for a fact that he has totally misunderstood the debate about the impasse in physics at a fundamental level. It is simply not what he thinks it is and simply rattling off a bunch of achievements in physics is to miss the point entirely, demonstrating his ignorance.
    1
  27232. 1
  27233. 1
  27234. 1
  27235. 1
  27236. 1
  27237. 1
  27238. 1
  27239. 1
  27240. 1
  27241. 1
  27242. 1
  27243. 1
  27244. 1
  27245. 1
  27246. 1
  27247. 1
  27248. 1
  27249. 1
  27250. 1
  27251. 1
  27252. 1
  27253. 1
  27254. 1
  27255. 1
  27256. 1
  27257. 1
  27258. 1
  27259. 1
  27260. 1
  27261. 1
  27262. 1
  27263. 1
  27264. 1
  27265. Paul Knowles : And, how many times do I have to say it? You seem to HATE America. You’re OBVIOUSLY not American, as I pointed out. Read more carefully, son. Mueller was supposed to have been let loose, by now, but they keep him on the contract, so they can control him (also, already stated) but, behind closed doors, Mueller, who is NOT partisan, yet still a registered Republican, is being Mueller: trying to tell the TRUTH without making it a set piece for the press. His public testimony will come, but at least there can still be some discretion this way. I think you know this, if you take the trouble to think from both points of view? And, when you look up the court proceedings, of the Trump Foundation, keep in mind that the embezzlement is not even a question. What’s being investigated is exactly which members of the Trump family took what, how they did it, and who helped them with that. Also bare in mind that, as you’ll see, it’s been around for some time, and is only one of the scams Trump has going that provides sufficient cash for him to keep up a front. His defenders will point to the fact that he tried to close the Foundation, before it got too closely scrutinised, as if he, “knew,” something fishy was going on and was trying to stop it. But, put times and outgoings together, and do the math for yourself? That fact that you haven’t heard about this, only months after it was in the news, says something about where you’re getting your info, son, and what those people don’t want you looking at. I always look at the, “news,” of the far right. You should really look at both sides. It will ware down your faith in Trump, through the sheer power of logic
    1
  27266. Paul Knowles : Australia is a great country. I know many Australians. They are the first to admit that their history puts as much blood on the country’s hands, as does America’s, when it comes down to their treatment of the original inhabitants. Only, your country’s historic crimes are more recent. Racism is a problem and it’s on the rise. Nazis have become more powerful, due to the power of mass communication, giving them the ability to organise and coordinate their Propaganda lies better. This growing consolidation gives the appearance of growth, when it’s nothing more than consolidation. That doesn’t mean that the problem of Propaganda, Misinformation, betrayal of countries and increasing attacks upon the truth and the flesh are not worse than ever. But, it doesn’t mean that more people are becoming Nazis, either. Your, “rejection of the left,” is not growing. It’s just getting organised. But, so is the other side. The problem for Nazis is that they need people to, “reject,” centrists, conservatives, and average, decent people, if they want to get any REAL traction. And, I’m not saying that won’t happen, either. It might? We’ve seen Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, et al, so we KNOW the threat is real. But, it’s not a, “given,” either. Hitler and Stalin lost, in the end. People prefer NOT to live in Dictatorships, when it comes down to it. So, even if the right is rising, that’s no excuse for conservatives, like me, to give in to the likes of Trump. He’ll be remembered for what he is. And, whether I’m alone, or speaking for the majority, I’ll do my own thinking, and keep my morality, thanks. That’s all any of us have, in the end
    1
  27267. 1
  27268. 1
  27269. 1
  27270. 1
  27271. 1
  27272. 1
  27273. 1
  27274. 1
  27275. 1
  27276. 1
  27277. 1
  27278. 1
  27279. 1
  27280. 1
  27281. 1
  27282. 1
  27283. 1
  27284. 1
  27285. 1
  27286. 1
  27287. 1
  27288. 1
  27289. 1
  27290. 1
  27291. 1
  27292. 1
  27293. 1
  27294. 1
  27295. 1
  27296. 1
  27297. 1
  27298. 1
  27299. 1
  27300. 1
  27301. 1
  27302. X•Mega Mike : There’s no way trump will survive a legal, free and fair election. And you’re so right. Desperate criminals, facing historic disgrace, when there’s no one there to obstruct justice for them, and we finally SEE EVERYTHING, and they’ll get a lifetime in jail, regardless of the coming Pardon Fest (which will only serve to drive home to Americans all the CRIMES they’re guilty of, having to pardon themselves of them); these kinds of CRIMINALS will do ANYTHING to avoid that fate. They’re ALREADY CHEATING in Kentucky, S Carolina, Georgia, where they reduced the number of polling stations, had them all in white neighbourhoods, and then claimed technical problems and incompetence as their, “defence,” for closing early, while they spoliated the votes, no doubt. America won’t stand for it. Racism and the DIVISION you get from racism is what gave Donny the power to Make America Divided Again. Time to be a UNITED STATES! Perhaps for the first REAL time? Unity is Donny’s Kryptonite, so we MUST STAND TOGETHER, regardless of all other concerns, beliefs or religions! It’s not your fault, America. But it IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY. There’s no hiding from it. They aren’t going peacefully. But, they’re most;y cowards. Demonstrating the sincere willingness to fight is usually enough to make bullies back down. When they see it’s hopeless, they break ranks and try to save themselves by cutting deals. Then we own them. But until then, it’s up to us! ✌️👍
    1
  27303. 1
  27304. 1
  27305. 1
  27306. 1
  27307. 1
  27308. 1
  27309. 1
  27310. 1
  27311. 1
  27312. 1
  27313. Pharmaceutical companies are just as bad as the conspiracy theorists. By behaving in such an established, inarguably unethical way, consistently, across the board, and having killed so many countless people through sheer greed and abuse of their immense power over the legal system, they have forced the desperate and poor to seek any alternative they can afford. Then, when people doubt the validity of these wild alternatives, it is easy to point to the very real villainy of the pharmaceutical industry and say, “Well, they don’t want you to know about the truth,” and that sounds plausible enough. If any of these alternatives turned out to do what the gullible thinks is true, the industry probably would try to prevent free public access to them, until they could get their own patents and licences all over them. So, when a famous guy, with a known tendency to believe in superstition (I this as a Christian myself, just not a Catholic) says he believes in something that sounds like it requires a fairly superstitious outlook on life to believe in, should we be surprised? Or even influenced at all? No. Could it turn out that some or all of what he believes is true? Yes. It seems unlikely, but the science will tell us. Those who really want to know should regularly check in with the patent offices of major countries and watch for quietly forthcoming medical legislation concerning these products, to see if the pharmaceutical companies are attempting to get control over them. If they are, that means their research has been promising.
    1
  27314. 1
  27315. 1
  27316. 1
  27317. Do people not get it yet? . . . It really is very simple. This is what happens when you let the children of a school for kids with impulse control issues and antisocial behaviour disorders in charge of the sweet shop! They are taking everything they can fill their pockets with and only looking out for the interests of their friends and family members, gutting the shop completely. We have fallen for the, “personality politicians,” and we are reaping the rewards, which are to be robbed blind! Analysing the government and trying to understand the, “ideologies,” of these goons is like trying to interpret the philosophy of the MAFIA! It’s IRRELEVANT! They have no clue themselves! They don’t, “believe,” in ANYTHING and they have no, “plan,” other than to keep up the self dealing and to take everything that’s left for themselves before it’s all gone in this riot of looting the sinking ship, if you’ll forgive my mixing up my metaphors. The Trussites and Boris Johnsonites all belong to these, “think tanks,” which are just private clubs for enriching their members, like a manic Masonic lodge. They use the fig leaf of, “liberal economics,” and the, “free markets,” solving every problem from policing to health care, but they simply see EVERYTHING as a potentially lootable resource and will ensure that they own shares in the new, “Police Force Plus,” or, “NHS Extra,” whatever precious last property they can steal from us and sell! They are slightly INSANE, unqualified and openly hostile to at least two thirds of their own population! They have the sheer ARROGANCE to TELL us that we, “care,” about, “Stopping The Boats,” when I can’t find a single person (who doesn’t have a swastika tattooed on their forehead) that actually WANTS that! This is like, “analysing,” why your cat grows fur! Can we PLEASE just accept that it does and move on??? The question is HOW TF do we get them OUT of power and replaced in their coming wilderness years by some GROWNUPS???
    1
  27318. 1
  27319. 1
  27320. 1
  27321. 1
  27322. 1
  27323. 1
  27324. 1
  27325. 1
  27326. 1
  27327. 1
  27328. 1
  27329. 1
  27330. 1
  27331. 1
  27332. 1
  27333. 1
  27334. 1
  27335. 1
  27336. 1
  27337. 1
  27338. 1
  27339. 1
  27340. 1
  27341. 1
  27342. 1
  27343. 1
  27344. 1
  27345.  @valyshknee4203 : But, aren’t you just another one saying, “Because I was happy to accept minor bugs, I don’t believe that all the other people who experienced game breaking bugs are real,” now? You can’t get more game-breaking than crashing, and that was most common on high end computers and the PS5, ironically. Repeated crashes that made people give up reloading. And I’m glad you brought up RDR2 because, whether you liked the final product or not, you cannot pretend it was what they advertised it to be? In the opening scenes you can see people playing pool, banks of arcade games, drinking and eating, but you couldn’t actually DO any of that yourself. It is a sterile shop window of a world, that actively punishes you for going off the rails and just exploring. It may have a good story, good script and good performances from a cool cast, but they told you it would be an immersive open world. Now, you and I both know that in both of the RDR games, you can completely ignore the story quests and side quests and still have an awesome day of making your own adventures for several entire play sessions in a row, playing cards and other gambling games, bounty hunting, finding outlaw dens and f*cking up their sh*t, racing horses, hunting a serial killer, getting drunk, shooting contests, hunting and fishing the fauna, botany and recipe collecting, I could just keep going. And that’s ignoring all the random encounters, treasures and weapons built in to that experience. NONE of that happens in CyberPunk. Is it a good game? Probably. Is it worth the asking price? Not for those who bought it on a PS4 and found it unplayable, like me, no. We should be getting Phantom L for free. Though I sold my PS4 and gave the game away for free, so it wouldn’t do me any good. But, even CDPR admitted about half of the truth in their own apology video, and that was only because the Polish government made them come clean and fix their sh*t, rather than allowing them to just walk away from it.
    1
  27346. 1
  27347. 1
  27348. 1
  27349. 1
  27350. 1
  27351. 1
  27352. 1
  27353. 1
  27354. 1
  27355. 1
  27356. 1
  27357. 1
  27358. 1
  27359. 1
  27360. 1
  27361. 1
  27362. 1
  27363. 1
  27364. 1
  27365. 1
  27366. 1
  27367. 1
  27368. 1
  27369. 1
  27370. 1
  27371. 1
  27372. 1
  27373. 1
  27374. 1
  27375. 1
  27376. 1
  27377. 1
  27378. 1
  27379. 1
  27380. 1
  27381. 1
  27382. 1
  27383. 1
  27384. 1
  27385. 1
  27386. 1
  27387. 1
  27388. 1
  27389. 1
  27390. 1
  27391. 1
  27392. 1
  27393. 1
  27394. 1
  27395. 1
  27396. 1
  27397. 1
  27398. 1
  27399. 1
  27400. 1
  27401. 1
  27402. 1
  27403. 1
  27404. 1
  27405. 1
  27406. 1
  27407. 1
  27408. 1
  27409. 1
  27410. 1
  27411. 1
  27412. 1
  27413. 1
  27414. 1
  27415. 1
  27416. 1
  27417. 1
  27418. 1
  27419. 1
  27420. 1
  27421. 1
  27422. 1
  27423. 1
  27424. 1
  27425. 1
  27426. 1
  27427. 1
  27428. 1
  27429. 1
  27430. 1
  27431. 1
  27432. 1
  27433. 1
  27434. 1
  27435. 1
  27436. 1
  27437. 1
  27438. 1
  27439. 1
  27440. 1
  27441. 1
  27442. 1
  27443. 1
  27444. 1
  27445. 1
  27446. 1
  27447. 1
  27448. 1
  27449. 1
  27450. 1
  27451. 1
  27452. 1
  27453. 1
  27454. 1
  27455. 1
  27456. 1
  27457. 1
  27458. 1
  27459. 1
  27460. 1
  27461. 1
  27462. 1
  27463. 1
  27464. 1
  27465. 1
  27466. 1
  27467. 1
  27468. 1
  27469.  @kimbaldunsmore4633  : Okay. Well, number 1 stands a decent chance, provided you have the tech and range, which isn’t cheap, and relies as much on getting lucky, without insider knowledge of operational frequencies, as piloting. So, it’s far from reliable. Number two is just a variation on the theme of 1, (which would still presumably be in play?) only we’re discussing the range of a signal, added to the mix. More complexity, more things can go wrong. 3 is a dusey. Sure, blow up the jammers. But to do that, you’re having to overcome problems 1) and 2) as well as trying to locate mobile jammers, of which there are literally hundreds available to the Russians, never occupying the same space two nights in a row. That’s a job for ground teams of special forces, or dependent upon spies giving up Intel to the Ukrainians. Something I don’t doubt they would grab with both hands, should opportunities become available. ALL options for 3 are expensive, dangerous and yielding minimal results unless you can destroy multiple vehicles at their manufacture sight or something. No doubt, as I say, pending . . . Your bonus, 4) as I’m sure you know, requires THE most expensive type of military drone, costing upwards of $ two million a pop, to have the power to travel such a large distance whilst carrying such a heavy payload, and which, once again, relies on good Intel as to where the MOBILE target is. The math is off by a long mile. Plus you have the added factor that none of the drones can be NATO donations, so that type is off the table anyway. All incursion drones are, by agreement with the free world, manufactured in Ukraine (or, presumably, can come from none NATO countries interested in assisting Ukraine?) and Ukraine simply cannot afford to give away that kind of cash for such small rewards. Add to that the recoverable technology from such drones, falling into enemy hands. The explosives aboard would have to be guaranteed to incinerate the drone on impact or capture. Look at the great expense and trouble Russia went to just to recover one US drone that they risked two pilots AND their jets to knock out of the sky? A whole Rusky naval expedition was launched to recover that single American drone, even though Russia knew it had been stripped down to its basics and was just a giant camera with wings and a propeller, as Putin is desperate to reverse engineer ANYTHING the Americans have in the skies for their guidance systems. So, while I’m not saying these things don’t exist, and are not used, and will certainly be used a good deal more in the coming months, I am arguing that they do not play the clear, “Press button A, get result B,” role that you seem to think they do. I guess I could have just said, “It’s more complicated than that,” but you wouldn’t have accepted that as an adequate rebuttal, would you? Hopefully, now you can see my point?
    1
  27470. 1
  27471. 1
  27472. 1
  27473. 1
  27474. 1
  27475. 1
  27476. 1
  27477. 1
  27478. 1
  27479. 1
  27480. 1
  27481. 1
  27482. 1
  27483. 1
  27484. 1
  27485. 1
  27486. 1
  27487. 1
  27488.  @Tad1945  : Trolls arrive illegally. But, when you ignore international law and say, “Anyone who arrives in a boat is now breaking the law,” then we know there has been a break down in law. What’s next? Anyone who uses the channel tunnel is now to be criminalised? Anyone who arrives wearing a tie? Anyone called, “Anthony,” who arrives on, “Tony Tuesdays,” will be outlawed? Anyone using the YouTube name, “Tad,” could be next. You simply cannot make an arbitrary divide and decide, “All the people on this side of the line are fine, but all the people on THAT side are criminals.” At least, not if you want your system to work. We are STILL subscribers to international, BINDING laws, which insist that each asylum seeker MUST be assessed on the merits of their case, NOT their mode of travel. And I have yet to see a SINGLE example of any migrant or asylum seeker that has taken resources from the public, or bread out of the mouths of the working, tax paying public. This government has squandered all your cash, turned hotels into overcrowded prisons and liners into prison hulks, breaking the law in the process of emptying our wallets. We used to simply process asylum seekers, let them in, get work and contribute to the economy by generating economic activity and paying taxes, under the last government. And those cases that failed to meet the criteria resulted in swift deportation. The Tories stopped all of that and gave massive cues and expensive waiting lists of people that cost the tax payer a fortune to imprison while they don’t get processed and get busy catching diseases and getting huge settlements through their human rights lawyers! Learn the FACTS, son. You cannot afford to be this angry at the wrong people, while the people who are robbing you blind are telling you who to blame. And anyone will do, so long as it isn’t them. That’s a hostage mentality that can only do you harm.
    1
  27489. 1
  27490. 1
  27491. 1
  27492. 1
  27493. 1
  27494. 1
  27495. 1
  27496. 1
  27497. 1
  27498. 1
  27499. 1
  27500. 1
  27501. 1
  27502. 1
  27503. 1
  27504. 1
  27505. 1
  27506. 1
  27507. 1
  27508. 1
  27509. 1
  27510. 1
  27511. 1
  27512. 1
  27513. 1
  27514. 1
  27515. 1
  27516. 1
  27517. 1
  27518. 1
  27519. 1
  27520. 1
  27521. 1
  27522. 1
  27523. 1
  27524. 1
  27525. 1
  27526. 1
  27527. 1
  27528. 1
  27529. 1
  27530. 1
  27531. 1
  27532. 1
  27533. 1
  27534. 1
  27535. 1
  27536. 1
  27537. 1
  27538. 1
  27539. 1
  27540. 1
  27541. 1
  27542. 1
  27543. 1
  27544. 1
  27545. 1
  27546. 1
  27547. 1
  27548. 1
  27549. 1
  27550. 1
  27551. 1
  27552. 1
  27553. 1
  27554. 1
  27555. 1
  27556. 1
  27557. 1
  27558. 1
  27559. 1
  27560. 1
  27561. 1
  27562. 1
  27563. 1
  27564. 1
  27565. 1
  27566. 1
  27567. 1
  27568. 1
  27569. 1
  27570. 1
  27571. 1
  27572. 1
  27573. 1
  27574. 1
  27575. 1
  27576. 1
  27577. 1
  27578. 1
  27579. 1
  27580. 1
  27581. 1
  27582. 1
  27583. 1
  27584. 1
  27585. 1
  27586. 1
  27587. 1
  27588. 1
  27589. 1
  27590. 1
  27591. 1
  27592. 1
  27593. 1
  27594. 1
  27595. 1
  27596. 1
  27597. 1
  27598. 1
  27599. 1
  27600. 1
  27601. 1
  27602. 1
  27603. 1
  27604. 1
  27605. 1
  27606. 1
  27607. 1
  27608. 1
  27609. 1
  27610. 1
  27611. 1
  27612. 1
  27613. 1
  27614. 1
  27615. 1
  27616. 1
  27617. 1
  27618. 1
  27619. 1
  27620. I think it’s time to stand back really LISTEN to what’s being said here. “I don’t think it’s a particularly radical view to hold.” . . . ? . . . ? . . . ? . . . I know that’s a comment to be taken in context, but she’s advocating leaving the UN, the WHO, dismantling our court system and just putting businesses in charge of everything! That’s NOT, “conservatism,” by ANY measure of the term. And it’s why the Tories are fighting a civil war. In the last 10 years the Tories got craven about holding on to power, flinging open their doors to an increasingly radical mob, making it increasingly easier for worse, more ignorant, more narcissistic, more greedy grifters to get their grubby mitts on the levers of power. Now they’re paying the cost of inviting con artists and extremist radicals into their ranks. The very identity of the party is no longer fixed. The Tories are a lot of things, but, “conservative,” is NOT one of them. And Truss shows all of the prima face symptoms of a genuinely ill woman. As does Johnson, to a lesser degree, who has the compulsive urges of an addicted gambler. The zeal with which she can be converted from one radical idea to another is represented by her political history. She has less clue how to run a country than my kids! Sincerely. My point is, why ask if she, “believes,” her own craziness? When a chimp is waving a machine gun around, your only concern is to get that weapon away from it, NOT what its political ideology is! These people are already proven to have spectacularly failed and the very idea that they could be allowed back into Number 10 should make us all shudder! Or have we all forgotten the great chimpocides of the last decade!?
    1
  27621. 1
  27622. 1
  27623. 1
  27624. 1
  27625. 1
  27626. 1
  27627. 1
  27628. 1
  27629. 1
  27630. 1
  27631. 1
  27632. 1
  27633. 1
  27634. 1
  27635. 1
  27636. 1
  27637. 1
  27638. 1
  27639. 1
  27640. 1
  27641. 1
  27642. 1
  27643. 1
  27644. 1
  27645. 1
  27646. 1
  27647. 1
  27648. 1
  27649. 1
  27650. 1
  27651. 1
  27652. 1
  27653. 1
  27654. 1
  27655. 1
  27656. 1
  27657. 1
  27658. 1
  27659. 1
  27660. 1
  27661. 1
  27662. 1
  27663. 1
  27664. 1
  27665. 1
  27666. 1
  27667. 1
  27668. 1
  27669. 1
  27670. 1
  27671. 1
  27672. 1
  27673. 1
  27674. 1
  27675. 1
  27676. 1
  27677. 1
  27678. 1
  27679. 1
  27680. 1
  27681. 1
  27682. 1
  27683. 1
  27684. 1
  27685. 1
  27686. 1
  27687. 1
  27688. 1
  27689. 1
  27690. 1
  27691. 1
  27692. Buckeye Roy : No need to be so defensive, son. IF you HAD, “read,” my comment, you would KNOW that I ACTUALLY referred to the point, which YOU are PRETENDING that I didn’t. It’s OK to learn from other people and not go all, 12 year old on me, simply because I disagree with you? I specifically pointed out that people have both good and bad “MOTIVES” but TRIED to help you to SEE, that you had not, (indeed you STILL ACTUALLY HAVEN’T) validated the, “sarcasm,” you directed at him, in ANY WAY. You never SAID what was ACTUALLY WRONG with his statement. Only that YOU “think” it is pure, “attention seeking.” So, you accuse ME of saying the EXACT OPPOSITE of what I DID say, and then have the nerve to accuse ME of needing to, “brush up on my debating skills”???? 🤣 I would have had more respect for you, if you could have just OWNED your mistake. Let me put it SIMPLY for you, as I am NOT going to sink to your level and try to twist your words to make them sound like the OPPOSITE of what you actually said, or play ANY dirty tricks on you (being that I am an adult): Your criticism would have been, “valid,” if YOU had pointed to something he’s SAID. Instead, you have criticised him for, “attention seeking,” without EXPLAINING WHY. Which is WHY I pointed out OUT that we are ALL seeking attention, without SPELLING IT OUT FOR YOU, giving YOU the opportunity to SAY what was WRONG with his remark, giving YOU the opportunity to, “save face.” Instead, you got, “Butt Hurt,” and couldn’t move passed the fact that you’d been, RESPECTFULLY, criticised, and responded immaturely. Don’t take it all so PERSONALLY, son? Conversations can be INTERESTING, without childishness . . . SMH . . . 🙂
    1
  27693. 1
  27694. 1
  27695. 1
  27696. 1
  27697. 1
  27698. 1
  27699. 1
  27700. 1
  27701. 1
  27702. 1
  27703. 1
  27704. 1
  27705. 1
  27706. 1
  27707. 1
  27708. 1
  27709. 1
  27710. 1
  27711. 1
  27712. 1
  27713. 1
  27714. 1
  27715. 1
  27716. 1
  27717. 1
  27718. 1
  27719. 1
  27720. 1
  27721. 1
  27722. 1
  27723. 1
  27724. 1
  27725. 1
  27726. 1
  27727. 1
  27728. 1
  27729. 1
  27730. 1
  27731. 1
  27732. 1
  27733. 1
  27734. 1
  27735. 1
  27736. 1
  27737. 1
  27738. 1
  27739. 1
  27740. 1
  27741. 1
  27742. 1
  27743. 1
  27744. 1
  27745. 1
  27746. 1
  27747. 1
  27748. 1
  27749. 1
  27750.  @ltloxa1159  : If they made it a serious criminal offence for farm owners and industry owners to employ illegal immigrants, with an automatic crippling fine and guaranteed jail time for the most senior managers (and ALWAYS for the owners) the, “problem,” as it stands would just about vanish over night. The problem is that no such bill could ever be passed because politicians on both sides of the isle depend on donations from these wealthy business and farm owners, much less be ruthlessly and speedily enforced. You could say, the people who complain the loudest about, “illegal immigration,” are the ones with the biggest vested interest in keeping it a live issue; certainly among the wealthy. So, the only real solution would be to ban lobby groups and all political donations over certain figure (say, $1,000?). You know? Like Donald Trump promised on the 2016 campaign trail? Only to throw that promise out the window, almost immediately upon winning the election. I believe it was the gun lobby that showed us the most spectacular example of that, literally interrupting him in front of the cameras while he was proclaiming certain bans on guns to be effected by Executive Privilege, only to be taken off into a side room where massive donations were proffered and Trump announced a flip flop the next day. It’s always been the money. Always will be. If they ever sign a bill into law that does limit donations, putting industries on the same influential footing as a common citizen, there will be hope for America’s democracy. Especially if the penalties for circumventing such laws were always swiftly and ruthlessly punished, with the harshest possible penalties. But that’s a dream, not a reality.
    1
  27751. 1
  27752. 1
  27753. 1
  27754. 1
  27755. 1
  27756. 1
  27757. 1
  27758. 1
  27759. 1
  27760. 1
  27761. 1
  27762. 1
  27763. 1
  27764. 1
  27765. 1
  27766. 1
  27767. 1
  27768. 1
  27769. 1
  27770. 1
  27771. 1
  27772. 1
  27773. 1
  27774. 1
  27775. 1
  27776. 1
  27777. 1
  27778. 1
  27779. 1
  27780. 1
  27781. 1
  27782. Yeah, we know. It was the ideological and tactical deal decided upon and requested by America in the post war years, which Europe agreed to. Germany and Japan (along with their allied countries) submitted to, “Nation Building.” Britain and several European countries, were bankrupt and in massive debt to America. They accepted giant contributions for their infrastructure in return for accepting the doctrine against Communism, which got increasingly strong throughout the 1950’s. The deal was: We, America, get to choose which wars to fight, which atrocities we all ignore, and we decide which international issues are important. In return, we fund all policing of trade and commerce all around the world, set up bases in all your countries and all the outposts, guaranteeing protection for all NATO members, from Communists and/or otherwise hostile powers. We agreed because we were impoverished and war torn. Britain only finally payed off its American borrowing from WWII in 2006. Washington got to run the free world, so long as they acted in good faith. That faith was broken in 2025. I disagree with this presentation’s conclusions. Europe should not cut America out completely from trade; fair enough. But they must rearm independently and gain the full ability to protect themselves collectively. They must reposition themselves as a fully independent block, reliant only upon each other. And they need to establish an independent trading and sovereignty organisation, parallel to NATO. They will need to exclude the countries which cannot be trusted with veto powers, which means Hungary right now, but should be VERY choosy about whom they include. This new, “coalition of the willing,” presents a starting point from which could spring this new organisation. But it needs to happen fast. We need Churchillian leaders of vision, with zero illusions about the autocrats, oligarchs and kleptocrats. We need, above all, to rally around our democracies, which are under direct assault as we speak.
    1
  27783. 1
  27784. 1
  27785. 1
  27786. 1
  27787. 1
  27788. 1
  27789. 1
  27790. 1
  27791. 1
  27792. 1
  27793. 1
  27794. 1
  27795. 1
  27796. 1
  27797. 1
  27798. 1
  27799. 1
  27800. 1
  27801. 1
  27802. 1
  27803. 1
  27804. 1
  27805. 1
  27806. 1
  27807. 1
  27808. 1
  27809. 1
  27810. 1
  27811. 1
  27812. 1
  27813. 1
  27814. 1
  27815. 1
  27816. 1
  27817. 1
  27818. 1
  27819. 1
  27820. 1
  27821. 1
  27822. 1
  27823. 1
  27824. 1
  27825. 1
  27826. 1
  27827. 1
  27828. 1
  27829. 1
  27830. 1
  27831. 1
  27832. 1
  27833. 1
  27834. 1
  27835. 1
  27836. 1
  27837. 1
  27838. 1
  27839. 1
  27840. 1
  27841. 1
  27842. 1
  27843. 1
  27844. 1
  27845. 1
  27846. 1
  27847. 1
  27848. 1
  27849. 1
  27850. 1
  27851. 1
  27852. 1
  27853. 1
  27854. 1
  27855. 1
  27856. 1
  27857. 1
  27858. 1
  27859. 1
  27860. 1
  27861. 1
  27862. 1
  27863. 1
  27864. 1
  27865. 1
  27866. 1
  27867. 1
  27868. 1
  27869. 1
  27870. 1
  27871. 1
  27872. 1
  27873. 1
  27874. 1
  27875. 1
  27876. 1
  27877. 1
  27878. 1
  27879. 1
  27880. 1
  27881. 1
  27882. 1
  27883. 1
  27884. 1
  27885. 1
  27886. Pat Green : Genuinely? I think it was a combination of, “encouragement,” from Putin, who did the same thing, and his own magical thinking, self-delusion, which trump lapses into, when he panics. Add to this, that he sees the whole problem through the lens of his lobby groups, who just want the MONEY (It’s always about the MONEY) and, here we are; using our CHILDREN as Canaries, to see if it’s safe for the old farts of the GOP! I know, I know! You’re going to say, “But, if he wanted us to be making the money, he could have just done what other developed countries did, and SUPPORT the Lockdown, because they’re recovering now?” But, our UNITY was costing him poll numbers. He HAD TO, “Politicise,” Covid, to get back in the game (from his, political, childish point of view - not logic or reason), so by constantly undermining the Lockdown, he kept himself, “relevant,” but the result of that? . . . ALL of the PAIN of the Lockdown, with NONE of the payoff! All the other recovering countries have huge unemployment, economic downturn and other attendant consequences of Lockdown, just like us. But, for them, it was WORTH IT, to get BETTER . . . NATIONALLY. In truth, he STILL hasn’t grasped the reality of the situation. And, he’s mixing it all up, in his pathetic child brain, with foreign affairs, the protests, etc. Now, he’s paranoid, like all dictators are, and seeing everything as a plot against him personally . . . And, that’s it. That’s How Donny made America a, “shithole country,” banned from the developed world, and that no one in their RIGHT MIND would want to visit ANYWAY, right now. I’m only coming back to vote, and to see the look on his stupid, evil face when he loses ✌️👍
    1
  27887. 1
  27888. 1
  27889. 1
  27890. 1
  27891. 1
  27892. 1
  27893. 1
  27894. 1
  27895. 1
  27896. 1
  27897. 1
  27898. 1
  27899. 1
  27900. 1
  27901. 1
  27902. 1
  27903. 1
  27904. 1
  27905. 1
  27906. 1
  27907. 1
  27908. 1
  27909. 1
  27910. 1
  27911. 1
  27912. 1
  27913. 1
  27914. 1
  27915. 1
  27916. 1
  27917. 1
  27918. 1
  27919. 1
  27920. 1
  27921. 1
  27922. 1
  27923. 1
  27924. 1
  27925. 1
  27926. 1
  27927. 1
  27928. 1
  27929. 1
  27930. 1
  27931. 1
  27932. 1
  27933. 1
  27934. 1
  27935. 1
  27936. 1
  27937. 1
  27938. 1
  27939. 1
  27940. 1
  27941. 1
  27942. 1
  27943. 1
  27944. 1
  27945. 1
  27946. 1
  27947. 1
  27948. 1
  27949. 1
  27950. 1
  27951. 1
  27952. 1
  27953. 1
  27954. 1
  27955. 1
  27956. 1
  27957. 1
  27958. 1
  27959. 1
  27960. 1
  27961. 1
  27962. 1
  27963. 1
  27964. 1
  27965. 1
  27966. 1
  27967. 1
  27968. 1
  27969. 1
  27970. 1
  27971. 1
  27972. 1
  27973. 1
  27974. 1
  27975. 1
  27976. 1
  27977. 1
  27978. 1
  27979. 1
  27980. 1
  27981. 1
  27982. 1
  27983. 1
  27984. 1
  27985. 1
  27986. 1
  27987. 1
  27988. 1
  27989. 1
  27990. 1
  27991. 1
  27992. 1
  27993. 1
  27994. 1
  27995. 1
  27996. 1
  27997. 1
  27998. 1
  27999. 1
  28000. 1
  28001. 1
  28002. 1
  28003. 1
  28004. 1
  28005. 1
  28006.  @abdalrahmanassi4579  : While I agree that, “both-sidesism,” is rhetorical bollox, drawing egregiously false equivalencies between sides of a debate, conflict or war, I don’t think you’re going to get what you hope for out of this. Hamas has probably sealed the fate of the West Bank. Israel won’t just re-secure its borders and sit back for a years long round of hostage negotiations. Not when the most bellicose, right wing leader in Israel’s history is sitting at the helm. Now he has every excuse he’s been looking for and a humiliating invasion to wipe out. The two worst things you can give your enemy, especially when that enemy has all but infinite resources, are: 1) the excuse to do what he’s always wanted to and would have done long ago if the international community were on side, now with full impunity and the backing of all the allies that matter. 2) A humiliation that he desperately has to make up for. As far as Hamas is concerned, this might as well have been a giant suicide bombing, for all it will achieve. But the people who funded it and put them up to this, the Iranians (and maybe even the Russians too?) are going to get their sh*t ruined too. Again, with the full support of the international community, at least, to begin with. Of course, Israel will take it too far, on the basis that it’s better to ask forgiveness (from your rich allies) than permission (certainly a tried and tested political expedient that’s never let them down) and the entirety of all that land, to the Mediterranean coastline, will end up under Israeli occupation now. To be clear: I am not picking a side, here. I’m just stating what is. Unless Hamas has cooked up some incredibly clever plan which hasn’t been revealed yet, they’re now officially f*cked.
    1
  28007. 1
  28008. 1
  28009. 1
  28010. 1
  28011. 1
  28012. 1
  28013. 1
  28014. 1
  28015. 1
  28016. 1
  28017. 1
  28018. Slumerican Mutt : You ask, what has Trump done, that’s so bad? REALLY? * He gave $ HALF A TRILLION (yes! TRILLION) DOLLARS in “tax Breaks” to REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS. Vested interest??? PERMANENT Tax breaks to the 1%. TEMPORARY breaks, that will be WIPED OUT by inflation ANYWAY, to the gullible middle class. And you DIDN’T spot the problem? Even the REPUBLICAN VOTERS hated THAT blatant heist??? * Trump taunts a MADMAN, with NUCLEAR WEAPONS, and legs up his “diplomats” (the ones he hasn’t fired) EVERY TIME they get CLOSE to talks??? * Trump WORSHIPS Putin and won’t say ONE WORD against him, even though he MUDERS his own people, ROUTINELY and is a DICKtator, PRETENDING to run a “democracy”??? Meanwhile Trump attacks ALL of his “allies” AND his own people, in his own party, at the drop of a hat, because he “thinks” there will be no consequences, like a TYPICAL COWARD. * Trump speaks up for home grown NAZIS, because they shout, “HEIL TRUMP!” in the streets and claims, “There were good people on both sides,” AT A NAZI RALLY??? * And his financial CORRUPTION and INCOMPETENCE was WELL documented, BEFORE Trump even got into politics! THAT is a PROVEN matter of PUBLIC RECORD! With Trump being the ONLY person in HISTORY who managed to BANKRUPT a Las Vegas Casino??? * This is NOT “politics” to Trump, and HE doesn’t give a S**T about YOUR DUMB ASS!? Don’t you KNOW he was a Democrat? He DONATED TO THE CLINTONS: ALSO PUBLIC RECORD, sonny! THIS is Trump thinking he can make himself RICH, but YOU don’t SEE THAT??? Even though Trump SAID, “I will be the first president to leave office RICHER than when I came in.” Once again; PUBLIC RECORD, GENIUS. * And let’s not FORGET the RUSSIAN COLLUSION??? You will see for YOURSELF, soon enough. And WHEN it’s PROVEN, WOULD YOU STILL BACK HIM??? PROBABLY??? * And, though I could go ON, with PROVEN FACTS, I’ll finish on the POINT of THIS video: Trump is a CONFESSED sexual predator. Or, do YOU BELIEVE his buls**t LIE that the Access Hollywood tapes and the Howard Stern interviews were FAKED??? Only the CULT remains, because even the Republicans are SICK of his LIES, FANTASIES and INCOMPETENCE
    1
  28019. 1
  28020. 1
  28021. 1
  28022. 1
  28023. 1
  28024. 1
  28025. 1
  28026. 1
  28027. 1
  28028. 1
  28029. 1
  28030. 1
  28031. 1
  28032. 1
  28033. 1
  28034. 1
  28035. 1
  28036. 1
  28037. 1
  28038. 1
  28039. 1
  28040. 1
  28041. 1
  28042. 1
  28043. 1
  28044. 1
  28045. 1
  28046. 1
  28047. 1
  28048. 1
  28049. 1
  28050. 1
  28051. 1
  28052. 1
  28053. 1
  28054. 1
  28055. 1
  28056. 1
  28057. 1
  28058. 1
  28059. 1
  28060. 1
  28061. 1
  28062. 1
  28063. 1
  28064. 1
  28065. 1
  28066. 1
  28067. 1
  28068. 1
  28069. 1
  28070. 1
  28071. 1
  28072. 1
  28073. 1
  28074. 1
  28075. 1
  28076. 1
  28077. 1
  28078. 1
  28079. 1
  28080. 1
  28081. 1
  28082. 1
  28083. 1
  28084. 1
  28085. 1
  28086. 1
  28087. 1
  28088. 1
  28089. 1
  28090. 1
  28091. 1
  28092. 1
  28093. 1
  28094. 1
  28095. 1
  28096. 1
  28097. 1
  28098. 1
  28099. 1
  28100. 1
  28101. 1
  28102.  @Rovsau  : You appear to be labouring under the misapprehension that Unity’s leadership will behave logically in the future, despite all of the evidence being firmly to the contrary. Setting aside ethics or even reasonable business practices, you should look up the history of the man responsible for this decision. He clearly has not learned from, “teachable moments,” in the past. Nor did he and the rest of the, “leadership,” (several of whom also have extremely concerning records that got them tossed out of bigger senior positions in bigger companies, like Microsoft and Amazon) listen to repeated, urgent warnings from their staff, who are currently leaving in droves, disillusioned as they are. If you see someone with a record for mugging people suddenly hiding the weapon in their hand and trying to stuff it into their pocket, simply because you happened to look up at them and caught them just before they were going to mug you, are you really going to offer them the benefit of the doubt moving forward? Or, perhaps you’ll just do the smart thing and get away from them? Rather than continue on, knowing that they’re just waiting for your next moment of vulnerability? There’s a point where the assumption of mutual self interest becomes irrational. Or, to put it more directly: When people show you who they are, believe them. If I hear about game devs getting shafted by Unity after this, (other than those unable to pull out due to being too far committed to their projects) I’ll know it was as much their own fault as it was John Riccitiello’s.
    1
  28103. 1
  28104. 1
  28105. 1
  28106. 1
  28107. 1
  28108. 1
  28109. 1
  28110. 1
  28111. 1
  28112. 1
  28113. 1
  28114. 1
  28115. 1
  28116. 1
  28117. 1
  28118. 1
  28119. 1
  28120. 1
  28121. 1
  28122. 1
  28123. 1
  28124. 1
  28125. 1
  28126.  @GeneralSamov  : Mk101T👈 What he said, for a start. And, Liz Cheney is a big girl who can take it, and frankly, won’t be missed if she can’t (in my book). There’s only a week to go before the trial, at which much will change, and both sides of the GOP know it. So, we’re seeing the vicious fight for control of the party’s soul, and she’s the most senior Congress Woman to have voted for Impeachment, making her a natural target. But, she’s smart enough to know that she can still get corporate backers, and popular support from the Normals, and that no one supporting trump is going to come out of his Impeachment Trial with an, “enhanced,” career. They need to make their play right now, and all she needs to do is hang on. Remember, 74 million votes does NOT translate into 74 million Insurrectionists. I doubt trump would get two thirds that number today? Most Americans just want a relatively anonymous government, that leaves them alone to make money, enjoy their recreations and spend the money they make. Most don’t know the details of American politics or history and don’t care to know. The ultimate rebuke to trump will be Biden’s success. And, even the obstructionist tactics of the GOP will not be able to prevent that for some time to come, once the trial is done, and trump fades into the rear view mirror. When Christmas comes again, everyone will be comparing it to last years. Being able to party, not worrying about granny dropping dead, not anxious about street violence or another unforeseen crisis that we could have avoided had our POTUS not been clinically unable to avoid grabbing for a headline. The difference will be so striking that most Americans will say, “God forbid we ever return to the madness.” So, while I’m not saying it’s plane sailing from here on, neither am I quite as depressed about our prospects as we move into the shiny, Hydrogen Age, either. Granted, the longer I write, the more I move into territory of hope, over pragmatism. But, “the trial is the thing, in which to catch the conscience of the king Donny,” to paraphrase the Bard. It’s an unmatched opportunity, to crack open the GOP, and let ‘em have that Civil War they always wanted, only in their own ranks. So I remain hopeful, for now . . . ✌️
    1
  28127. 1
  28128. 1
  28129. 1
  28130. 1
  28131. 1
  28132. 1
  28133. 1
  28134. 1
  28135. 1
  28136. 1
  28137. 1
  28138. 1
  28139. 1
  28140. 1
  28141. 1
  28142. 1
  28143. 1
  28144. 1
  28145. 1
  28146. 1
  28147. 1
  28148. 1
  28149. 1
  28150. 1
  28151. 1
  28152. 1
  28153. 1
  28154. 1
  28155. 1
  28156. 1
  28157. 1
  28158. 1
  28159. 1
  28160. 1
  28161. 1
  28162. 1
  28163. 1
  28164. 1
  28165. 1
  28166. 1
  28167. 1
  28168. 1
  28169. 1
  28170. 1
  28171. 1
  28172. 1
  28173. 1
  28174. 1
  28175. 1
  28176. 1
  28177. 1
  28178. 1
  28179. 1
  28180. 1
  28181. 1
  28182. 1
  28183. 1
  28184. 1
  28185. 1
  28186. 1
  28187. 1
  28188. 1
  28189. 1
  28190. I am already ruing the day, General Hodges. I routinely implore my representatives to do more against Russia and to, at the very least, STOP actively encouraging them by acting so predictably and pusillanimously. NATO can win this round simply by encouraging all countries involved to use international maritime law to the fullest. Just as the Fins have done, all countries can act independently, without invoking any NATO flag. Russia simply cannot afford to keep losing these expensive ships with all that tech onboard and the spooks necessary to run it all. So long as they know they can rely on NATO support, should the need arise, and the support of the international community, they have nothing to lose. Incidents like these have been happening routinely in British waters and being, just as routinely, hushed up afterwards, which is just unacceptable in my view. As Jake Broe suggested, all of that seized Russian shipping and technology aboard can all be auctioned off, with the proceeds going toward repairing - even improving - the damaged infrastructure. As with their seized banking assets, the one thing Russia fears more than losing their money is the idea of their resources being SEEN to be turned back against them and used to fund their enemies’ efforts. The sheer embarrassment and humiliation of using the interest from their frozen bank assets to fund the Ukrainians is worse, to Putin, than losing the money. Anything that looks like an own goal or egg on Putin’s face is to be feared inside Russia. Heads will role and Putin is demolished in the eyes of the international community; made to look like the impotent little tin-pot dictator he really is, if only we’d find the resolve to show him that! And that is what we should be doing in every instance of his breaking international law. If we really want him to stop breaking the law, that is. Make Russia pay for repairs and for all of Ukraine’s war costs. We have the capacity at our fingertips.
    1
  28191. 1
  28192. 1
  28193. 1
  28194. 1
  28195. 1
  28196. 1
  28197. 1
  28198. 1
  28199. 1
  28200. 1
  28201. 1
  28202. 1
  28203. 1
  28204. 1
  28205. 1
  28206. 1
  28207. 1
  28208. 1
  28209. 1
  28210. 1
  28211. 1
  28212. 1
  28213. 1
  28214. 1
  28215. 1
  28216. 1
  28217. Kimberly Rea : You’re right about that. Trump relies upon the people around him to do the, “thinking,” but, at the same time, it does not pay to underestimate Trump. That, after all, is how he got in. Stupid people are often DEVIOUS, having learned through experience that people generally don’t like or trust them. Some of the people around Trump are pretty dumb too, but NOT all. And the experience and cunning of Congress and the Senate have been placed, increasingly, at Trump’s disposal. They have had to justify and compromise their “values” more and more, so as to get their “policies” addressed. We have to face up to a PAINFUL truth: That “third of the nation” to which you referred, are RACISTS, or so unknowledgeable about the issues of race, that it makes no difference. It has NOT been, in SPITE of Trump’s racism, but BECAUSE of it, that Trump was elected and they LOVE his racist statements and views. I have even had discussions with people who say they are not racist, “BUT”. That “but” it always a give away. And they GENUINELY BELIVE that we should be “concerned” that the country may, soon, have a majority of the population that is “NOT WIGHT.” I’ve turned this matter over in my mind, GENUINELY TRYING to see the justification for such a concern, so as to address it in argument. But I JUST CAN’T! People seem to believe that a change in the majority’s skin colour will lead to a change in CULTURE? They are, GENUINELY, THAT uneducated. We MUST fight this issue, HEAD ON! EDUCATION is the ONLY solution (CURE) for racism. In the meantime, WE MUST remove this dangerous, Stalinist president and his administration. Either Putin learns that there is a COST to attacking the most powerful democracy in the world, or we may as well just hand America over to him. Either Trump PAYS for his crimes, or we have NO LAW and ORDER, NO CONSTITUTION worth a DAMN. We CANNOT stand by, while Rome burns. We MUST FIGHT
    1
  28218. 1
  28219. 1
  28220. 1
  28221. 1
  28222. 1
  28223. 1
  28224. 1
  28225. 1
  28226. 1
  28227. 1
  28228. Whilst it is gratifying to see these repellant Tories wallowing in self pity at their self inflicted wounds, backed by nothing more than their own unjustified sense of self regard, it is also chilling. It’s not the unedifying spectacle of former leaders airing their permanent sense of grievance, whether they’re in power or out of it, or their willingness to be seen as saboteurs with no regard for the future of their own party, as that’s been a feature, not a bug, for the way they do business anyway. It’s the idea of either one of the alternatives seizing the reigns of power, even for a short-lived pre-election period! Johnson does not need explaining, as we’ve all seen the empirical evidence that he cannot run his own financial affairs without corruption, let alone a country. But the very idea that we would put a proto-Nazi like Cruella Braverman in the job of Home Secretary has been hard enough for Britain to stomach and I believe that many Brits would identify her as their least likeable or competent MP! The secret services have identified her as a security risk, siting SIX separate occasions when she broke the law and Home Office regulations, which got her fired! But the idea of a PM who actively, vocally despises a significant chunk of the electorate, calling them names and deliberately seeking to DIVIDE the nation, makes her unfit to sweep our roads, let alone hold ANY public office! I simply cannot believe she is, “popular,” amongst any group that doesn’t also sport Swastikas? And those same people would probably gleefully burn her at the stake once they’ve gotten their full use out of her!
    1
  28229. 1
  28230. 1
  28231. 1
  28232. 1
  28233. 1
  28234. 1
  28235. 1
  28236. 1
  28237. 1
  28238. 1
  28239. 1
  28240. 1
  28241. 1
  28242. 1
  28243. 1
  28244. 1
  28245. 1
  28246. 1
  28247. 1
  28248. 1
  28249. 1
  28250. 1
  28251. 1
  28252. 1
  28253. It sickens me that the Tories have chosen this as their hill to die on at all. Their fortunes are at an all time low and an election is looming, so they have decided to appeal to the lowest common denominator, with hot button, trigger and division, “politics,” using THE MOST exploited, vulnerable and downtrodden people on Earth as their pawns in that game. I would vote for almost ANY opposition party on the basis of their opposition to this bill alone! And that’s without all of the self dealing, lies and degenerate partying these people get up to and laugh in our faces about in the mean time. And, because it’s performative politics rather than any good faith attempts at solutions, they will cost the tax payer more money in waste and delays while they’re busy getting laughed out of the courts, leaving the entire issue in a quagmire for the Labour Party to face when they come into power. All we can hope and pray for is that Labour has a set of policies up and ready to role out, immediately upon taking office, set to address everything from policing our shores to accommodating refugees, through to swiftly processing claims, with a legal frame work and the personnel infrastructure necessary to see it through. Mr Marr is right that this problem is never going to go away, but just grow. And we need a system in place that acknowledges this, which is not reactive but proactive. I can grant the Tories this much: It’s easy for us to point out what will evidently NOT work, especially when their policies are informed by cooked up data, which is no better than a pack of lies created to get the racists excited and on side. But finding ones that will work will require compromise and sacrifice, politically and in terms of initial spending; though the benefits of immigration will be reaped in the long term, given that there’s roughly a million jobs that British people don’t want to do which desperate migrants will be delighted to do for us. Where your moral principles may be pricked by what sounds like an exploitative model, may be one of those policy places wherein that, “compromise,” of which I spoke will be required? But the fact of the matter is that there is a model of solution which would bring financial prosperity to Britain, with a path to citizenship for those who are willing to assimilate and work, which will be the vast majority of migrants. And if the law is not bogged down enforcing unworkable policies for a corrupted Home Office, they will find it easier to root out the criminals, with programs of international cooperation, working up the chain of the people traffickers and slavers. There’s a lot to do, and these goons in power have demonstrated that they aren’t even thinking about the problems logically or morally, but purely politically. So they are not fit for purpose. We await the grownups, to see if they can do any better, after an election.
    1
  28254. 1
  28255. 1
  28256. 1
  28257. 1
  28258. 1
  28259. 1
  28260. 1
  28261. 1
  28262. 1
  28263. 1
  28264. 1
  28265. 1
  28266. 1
  28267. 1
  28268. 1
  28269. 1
  28270. 1
  28271. 1
  28272. 1
  28273. 1
  28274. 1
  28275. 1
  28276. 1
  28277. 1
  28278. 1
  28279. 1
  28280. 1
  28281. 1
  28282. 1
  28283. 1
  28284. 1
  28285. 1
  28286. 1
  28287. 1
  28288. 1
  28289. 1
  28290. 1
  28291. 1
  28292. 1
  28293. 1
  28294. 1
  28295. 1
  28296. 1
  28297. 1
  28298. 1
  28299. 1
  28300. 1
  28301. 1
  28302. 1
  28303. 1
  28304. 1
  28305. 1
  28306. 1
  28307. 1
  28308. 1
  28309. 1
  28310. 1
  28311. 1
  28312. 1
  28313. 1
  28314. 1
  28315. 1
  28316. 1
  28317. 1
  28318. 1
  28319. 1
  28320. 1
  28321. 1
  28322. 1
  28323. 1
  28324. 1
  28325. 1
  28326. 1
  28327. 1
  28328. 1
  28329. 1
  28330. 1
  28331. 1
  28332. 1
  28333. 1
  28334. 1
  28335. 1
  28336. 1
  28337. 1
  28338. 1
  28339. 1
  28340. 1
  28341. 1
  28342. 1
  28343. 1
  28344. 1
  28345. 1
  28346. 1
  28347. 1
  28348. 1
  28349. 1
  28350. 1
  28351. 1
  28352. 1
  28353. 1
  28354. 1
  28355. 1
  28356. 1
  28357. 1
  28358. 1
  28359. 1
  28360. 1
  28361. 1
  28362. 1
  28363. 1
  28364. 1
  28365. 1
  28366. 1
  28367. 1
  28368. 1
  28369. 1
  28370. 1
  28371. 1
  28372. 1
  28373. 1
  28374. 1
  28375. 1
  28376. 1
  28377. 1
  28378. 1
  28379. 1
  28380. 1
  28381. 1
  28382. 1
  28383. 1
  28384. 1
  28385. 1
  28386. Conversion therapy is guilty of all the things it seeks to prevent. And its perpetrators are generally in need of therapy themselves, or sociopaths seeking money and power. I will always concede that, gender, “dysmorphia,” will be, in some cases, a genuine mental health condition that needs treatment from qualified, compassionate, professionals who are removed from all, “ideologies,” by both their professional oaths and their disinterested appointment by the state as a mental health professional, who’s job is to protect the interests of their patient above all other considerations. “Do no harm.” Only such professionals would be able to discern whether their patient needs a gender reassignment or needs to process damage from their history before being able to make that decision. As to your video on the Biblical concerns: You don’t need Hebrew to discern this issue, Prof Wilson. The New Testiment tells us, unambiguously, that we Christians do NOT live by the Old Testament laws. They have been, “fulfilled,” by Jesus and dispensed with. That is why we no longer put witches to death, or attempt to burn offerings at our church alters. We would be shown the door, outside of which the police would be waiting. Ignorant churches keep the old traditions alive (selectively) because they want your tithes. Those who use Old Testament teachings as dogma are charlatans. The Levites were disbanded by Jesus’ day and Leviticus was already dead lore. Only history, morality, philosophy, mythology and general education remain to be gleaned from the Old Testament for a modern Christian. Hence, it remains invaluable to a Christian, for understanding your faith, its place in history and its context in the world, but it is useless as a guide to life and worse than useless as a guide to Christianity! This issue frustrates me immensely. I will watch your video with great interest, but I do hope you do not fall into the trap of dealing with Old Testament laws as though they are relevant to Christianity? That is rather like disputing the colour of the car that ran me over, when simply establishing that I was run over is all that matters.
    1
  28387. 1
  28388. 1
  28389. 1
  28390. 1
  28391. 1
  28392. 1
  28393. 1
  28394. 1
  28395. 1
  28396. 1
  28397. 1
  28398. 1
  28399. 1
  28400. 1
  28401. 1
  28402. 1
  28403. 1
  28404. 1
  28405. 1
  28406. 1
  28407. In fairness, an all out war between the west and Russia would have no end in sight and could result in nuclear conflagration, either deliberately or by accident. So it has to be the very final resort. But consider what this war is actually about? Putin is desperate to seize control of the massive gas and oil reserves in Ukraine, because they have enough sitting under their country to rival, if not outstrip, Russia’s. So far, Putin has managed to scare off Shell and Exxon, who bought the rights to develop the biggest reserves in (you guessed it) Donbas and the Crimea. And now they’ve confirmed yet more massive reserves in the west of Ukraine, by the Carpathian Mountains. Putin can’t reach those and he has decided he must steal the entire country to maintain his stranglehold on Europe’s energy reserves. Naturally, he knows the west would rather buy from Ukraine, a democracy with free speech and free trade, closer to Germany than Russia, which is way better than propping up a dictatorship, which has already threatened to cut off the gas lines in the past. So this is a desperate panic move, caused by the coming financial hit we’re all going to suffer worldwide. We think it will be painful in the west, but Russian people will wind up going back to mile long cues for a loaf of bread, and getting locked up for complaining about it. All we really need to do is play the long game, let Putin sink what remains of his ailing economy into his Vietnam in Ukraine and squeeze his economy until his own people snap and bring him down. I know that sounds brutally cold, and doesn’t help the people of Ukraine, but it may well result in fewer deaths world wide? And we can maintain supplies and money to the Ukrainian armed forces in the mean time. Historically, in over a hundred years (basically since it became an issue) the west has NEVER allowed themselves to lose control over energy supplies. In that respect, I don’t believe Putin is going to be a special case. We certainly need to do more. I hope you are writing to your politicians and demanding they seize ALL Russian assets, deport ALL Russian oligarchs and use their resources to pay for the weapons and resources to fight their own Russian army? I am.
    1
  28408. 1
  28409. 1
  28410. 1
  28411. 1
  28412. 1
  28413. 1
  28414. 1
  28415. 1
  28416. 1
  28417. 1
  28418. 1
  28419. 1
  28420. 1
  28421. 1
  28422. 1
  28423. 1
  28424. 1
  28425. 1
  28426. 1
  28427. 1
  28428. 1
  28429. 1
  28430. 1
  28431. 1
  28432. 1
  28433. 1
  28434. 1
  28435. 1
  28436. 1
  28437. 1
  28438. 1
  28439. 1
  28440. 1
  28441. 1
  28442. 1
  28443. 1
  28444. 1
  28445. 1
  28446. 1
  28447. 1
  28448. 1
  28449. 1
  28450. 1
  28451. 1
  28452. 1
  28453. 1
  28454. 1
  28455. 1
  28456. 1
  28457. 1
  28458. 1
  28459. 1
  28460. 1
  28461. 1
  28462. 1
  28463. 1
  28464. 1
  28465. 1
  28466. Seriously, sincerely: We need to talk about communication. “You can always create more energy,” defies basic physics. “A sense of unproductive success,” is an oxymoron. I won’t keep going, but honestly? I do not doubt for a moment that this is really good advice, but maybe the CIA would benefit from running a course on Speaking Plain English? I get that CIA fosters a culture of, “professionalised discourse,” or whatever and probably has a term for it. But, as I’m realising that I was actually taught some of these same techniques in social services, I am also remembering the plain manner in which it was communicated to me. We called them, “Break Away Techniques,” and learned to keep furniture between ourselves and the aggressive client, checking the room for other vulnerable people, where the exits are, tone of voice, warning signs, choice of words, choice of actions AND, “the VALUE of plain language.” Yes, this is all great advice: YOU are more capable than you think you are under stress. That’s right. But, constantly pathologising language DOES NOT greater professionalism create, Yoda. I honestly reckon this guy is probably great at his job, a really effective trainer who may well have even saved lives by imparting his knowledge and experience to his trainees. But there were examples in this single presentation alone, in which the language used is distancing, confusing and incoherent. To me, that’s a shame, because it’s like watching you hand out pearls of wisdom wrapped in really tight plastic, that not everyone can or will open.
    1
  28467. 1
  28468. 1
  28469. 1
  28470. 1
  28471. 1
  28472. 1
  28473. 1
  28474. 1
  28475. 1
  28476. 1
  28477. 1
  28478. 1
  28479. 1
  28480. 1
  28481. 1
  28482. 1
  28483. 1
  28484. 1
  28485. 1
  28486. 1
  28487. 1
  28488. 1
  28489. 1
  28490. 1
  28491. 1
  28492. 1
  28493. 1
  28494. 1
  28495. 1
  28496. 1
  28497. 1
  28498. 1
  28499. 1
  28500. 1
  28501. 1
  28502. 1
  28503. 1
  28504. 1
  28505. 1
  28506. 1
  28507. 1
  28508. 1
  28509. 1
  28510. 1
  28511. 1
  28512. 1
  28513. 1
  28514. 1
  28515. 1
  28516. 1
  28517. 1
  28518. 1
  28519. 1
  28520. 1
  28521. 1
  28522. 1
  28523. 1
  28524. 1
  28525. 1
  28526. 1
  28527. 1
  28528. 1
  28529. 1
  28530. 1
  28531. 1
  28532. 1
  28533. 1
  28534. 1
  28535. 1
  28536. 1
  28537. 1
  28538. 1
  28539. 1
  28540. 1
  28541. 1
  28542. 1
  28543. 1
  28544. 1
  28545. 1
  28546. 1
  28547. 1
  28548. 1
  28549. 1
  28550. 1
  28551. 1
  28552. 1
  28553. 1
  28554. 1
  28555. 1
  28556. 1
  28557. 1
  28558. 1
  28559. 1
  28560. 1
  28561. 1
  28562. 1
  28563. 1
  28564. 1
  28565. 1
  28566. 1
  28567. 1
  28568. 1
  28569. 1
  28570. 1
  28571. 1
  28572. 1
  28573. 1
  28574. 1
  28575. 1
  28576. 1
  28577. 1
  28578. 1
  28579. 1
  28580. 1
  28581. 1
  28582. 1
  28583. 1
  28584. 1
  28585. 1
  28586. 1
  28587. 1
  28588. 1
  28589. 1
  28590. 1
  28591. 1
  28592. 1
  28593. 1
  28594. 1
  28595. 1
  28596. 1
  28597. 1
  28598. 1
  28599. 1
  28600. 1
  28601. 1
  28602. 1
  28603. 1
  28604. 1
  28605. 1
  28606. 1
  28607. 1
  28608. 1
  28609. 1
  28610. 1
  28611. 1
  28612. 1
  28613. 1
  28614. 1
  28615. Just imagine what a slap on the wrist, “censure,” would do; which is as good as saying we’re ending the Republic, right there and then? Given that loss of office will result in countless immediate indictments (both Federal & State) which will land him and his family in jail, what alternative does a, ”man,” with his established record of destroying the Constitution and breaking all of the laws he runs up against, HAVE? So long as he can count on enough of his base and the party to remain in denial, and HATE Dems and other races, just enough to make them cheer when he pisses on the rule of law, he will have NO CHOICE but to have Moscow ENSURE his, “re-election,” in a Putin Style, 2020 SHAM. It’s that, or disgrace and jail! And, half of the GOP are IMPLICATED with him, so they’re fighting for their OWN SURVIVAL. They simply CANNOT remove him. What else CAN he do? 2020 will HAVE TO be RIGGED, because too many Americans were persuaded to HATE their, “fellow Americans,” MORE than they hate (or even understand WHO ARE) America’s enemies . . . Just look at the shills on this thread, desperately trying to bury their SHAME, because they KNOW they’re killing America, but aren’t strong enough to ADMIT what they WANT! They WANT a Russian Style, Single Party system, with just enough FAKE Democracy to keep up appearances . . . Trump = Putin Mark Two; the Puppet Version, and they just DON’T CARE. In fact, they PREFER it that way. They’ll take that over the fictional, “brown menace,” any day . . . America’s Republic is OVER
    1
  28616. 1
  28617. 1
  28618. 1
  28619. 1
  28620. 1
  28621. 1
  28622. 1
  28623. 1
  28624. 1
  28625. 1
  28626. 1
  28627. 1
  28628. 1
  28629. 1
  28630. 1
  28631. 1
  28632. 1
  28633. 1
  28634. 1
  28635. 1
  28636. 1
  28637. 1
  28638. 1
  28639. 1
  28640. 1
  28641. 1
  28642. 1
  28643. 1
  28644. 1
  28645. 1
  28646. 1
  28647. 1
  28648. 1
  28649. 1
  28650. 1
  28651. 1
  28652. 1
  28653. 1
  28654. 1
  28655. 1
  28656. 1
  28657. 1
  28658. 1
  28659. 1
  28660. 1
  28661. 1
  28662. 1
  28663. 1
  28664. 1
  28665. 1
  28666. 1
  28667. 1
  28668. 1
  28669. 1
  28670. 1
  28671. 1
  28672. 1
  28673. 1
  28674. 1
  28675. 1
  28676. 1
  28677. 1
  28678. 1
  28679. 1
  28680. 1
  28681. 1
  28682. 1
  28683. 1
  28684. 1
  28685. 1
  28686. 1
  28687. 1
  28688. 1
  28689. 1
  28690. 1
  28691. 1
  28692. 1
  28693. 1
  28694. 1
  28695. 1
  28696. 1
  28697. 1
  28698. 1
  28699. 1
  28700. 1
  28701. 1
  28702. 1
  28703. 1
  28704. 1
  28705. 1
  28706. 1
  28707. 1
  28708. 1
  28709. 1
  28710. These are indisputable WAR CRIMES being committed almost EVERY DAY! The world should be doing far more to STOP THIS in its tracks. It effects every one of us, and we are already (ALL OF US!) financially invested contributors, paying for this war. If you pay taxes, buy fuel for your vehicle or pay to heat your home, some of that money is paying toward this battle for humanity in Ukraine, which gives every one of you a legitimate stake in the outcome and a seat at the decision making table. It’s up to ALL OF US to make our voices heard, to contact our representatives and DEMAND that our resources are used with greater commitment! If Ukraine had a navy and airforce to back its efforts, along with better missile defence, they could take Putin’s stick from him and silence his guns! This war could have been over in 2022 if the commitment had been there and our politicians STOPPED cowering every time Putin makes another empty threat! He only makes those threats because we act so scared when he does. Losing Ukraine will cost Putin his job and cause chaos inside Russia, WHERE IT BELONGS! Let us turn this tide fully back on the Russians and stop all of this slow, incremental hyper-caution! Time to defeat Russia QUICKLY, so they cannot prepare for it and all flea to South America, or do more harm before they are toppled! Time we stopped acting like such bitches and we KILL this terrorist state off and give Russia their first ever democracy! Tell your politicians this THE election issue of 2023! ✌️🇺🇦
    1
  28711. 1
  28712. 1
  28713. 1
  28714. I don’t think Braverman has nearly as much support within her Westminster bubble as she does in the loud, vociferous, yet tiny minority of the country? We fought and scraped through a war to end the threat of people like her and the fascist mob she whipped up at the weekend. Most of the country gets it. And, on immigration: WHEN will people FINALLY get it into their heads? We NEED population GROWTH! URGENTLY! The type of people who are willing to refuse the will of violent dictators and risk their lives to protect their families and get to Britain are primarily young, determined, honest, hard working, principled people, seeking to live in a democracy and contribute to society. These are the VERY PEOPLE Britain NEEDS right now. Young workers who will produce taxable income and prevent the growing aging population from facing pensions wipeouts and destitution in under funded hospitals, hospices and, “care homes,” in which a Health Secretary might well consign you to a DEATH SENTENCE, merely for existing, rather than spending a penny on your welfare! Sorry to get so excited about this, but I sometimes feel like I have woken up in a nightmare, wherein everyone seems to believe the opposite of simple truth! We should be doing everything in our power to stimulate young population growth, for the sake of the economy, our position in the world and our future as a nation with some power at the negotiating table. And, let’s face it? We have SO MUCH left to negotiate! Not just with Europe either.
    1
  28715. 1
  28716. 1
  28717. 1
  28718. 1
  28719. 1
  28720. Xerdar36 : I give you, the OFFER OF A LIFETIME!!! See below, for details. I think you would LIKE IT, if I NEVER WROTE ANOTHER WORD on YouTube, EVER AGAIN? . . . A Looohhht of allegations, with NOOOO, “substance,” “evidence,” or even, “rhetoric,” to back it up. That’s not an, “argument,” kid. THAT’S called, “Whining.” Have you noticed that Trump ONLY attacks Americans and American allies? . . . What does THAT tell you? I am a Conservative, who was NEVER a, “fan,” of Hillary OR Obama, but that was because of their ACTUAL, “politics.” I LEFT the Republican Party, upon Trump’s nomination, WARNING my fellow Reps, what was coming. The ones who got angry at me, have ALL, since, APOLOGISED. 25% of Republican Party Members have LEFT the Party, since Trump took office, siting LIES and RACISM among their main objections. MOST of them are under 50. What does THAT tell you? My CHALLENGE to YOU is this: Site ONE (JUST ONE!) act, action, “thing,” that Trump has DONE, which was AIMED at effecting the ECONOMY, which has NOT HARMED IT. And here’s what I offer, in return. If YOU can SHOW ME, JUST ONE “ECONOMIC” THING that Trump has ACTUALLY DONE, that did NOT harm American business interests, send American shares plummeting, did NOT enrich Trump or his family DIRECTLY, or HURT farmers and businesses in the rust belt, I WILL NEVER WRITE ANOTHER WORD ON YOUTUBE, EVER AGAIN, FOR THE REST OF MY LIFE . . . You have my WORD of Honour. . . I’ll wait . . . 😁 No cheating? . . .
    1
  28721. 1
  28722. Xerdar36 : Bzzzzz! Thanks for playing 😁. I ignored anything that DIDN’T speak to the, “CHALLENGE.” And, BOY, was there a LOT? I KNEW you’d TRY . . . eventually, after ALL those LAME attempts at, “baiting,” me, with changes in topic, sarcasm, answering the question WITH a question, etc, etc, etc. Look at ALL those, “triggered,” responses, which make you sound like Peter Lorre, in the final act of 40’s thriller, DESPERATELY throwing out one EXCUSE after another, before stepping backward, off the cliff of REALITY, into the pit of Hell, where Trump belongs. You couldn’t think of a DAMNED THING, could ya’? . . . That was entertaining, thanks 😆. You still HAVE 24 hours, but, it’s only, “fair,” that I PROVE your FAILURE, so far? But, I f THAT’S the BEST you’ve GOT, maybe you should just concede DEFEAT? One piece of advice for you, son, which I KNOW you will quote, in the future; “The Art of NEVER losing a game, is NOT to play,” kid. Now, let me show you WHY you are SO WRONG. And, pay attention. I DON’t wanna’ have to repeat myself: Even among Conservatives AND Trump Cultists, YOU picked the ONE thing that Trump has done, “AIMED AT THE ECONOMY,” that EVEN THEY have COMPLAINED ABOUT. I won’t embarrass you, by mentioning the innumeracy of your, “list,” there. I am dyslexic, myself, but being clever, I use the right tools for the right job. But, I AM forced to point out, for the sake of efficiency, if nothing else, that appointing Judge Gorsuch was NOT an action, “AIMED AT THE ECONOMY.” Nor is, “not being HRC”? Not off to a very good start, are you? But, at least it, “looks,” like a, “list,” so, good for you, son. Did you KNOW that your, “tax break,” ENDS in a little more than a year. Given that the price of GAS & FOOD has DOUBLED, in the last TWO YEARS, working voters WILL, “FEEL,” that loss. But, that 1.5 $ TRILLION (Yes! “$ TRILLION!”) in Tax Breaks, slipped into the Bill, LITERALLY, in the last HOUR of, “debate,” that goes to REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS (No vested interests THERE, huh?) is PERMANENT? No. Of COURSE you didn’t, because YOUR Propagandists, like the Slum Landlord, Sean Vanity suppresses such information and his cronies do as he does. And, because you don’t READ material from outside of your BUBBLE. So, a TEMPORARY Tax Break, meant as a SOP, which is BARELY keeping up with inflation, DOES NOT QUALIFY. Especially when Trump gave MASSIVE, PERMANENT, Tax Breaks to ALL of his gas and oil donors and GOP buddies, that have RAISED THE NATIONAL DEBT TO RECORD LEVELS, IN THE HISTORY OF THE WORLD! 🤣 I mean, COME ON? You’re NOT even TRYING. As to your REQUEST: I can give you MY LIST, after your time has expired, IF you then request it, again? But, NOT before! You must do your OWN homework, here, son. And I’m MORE than HAPPY to throw in detailed figures, if you like, but numbers are clearly not your strong suit? 24 hours remaining. Come ooohhhn? . . . You KNOW you WANT to? . . . 😜 🍊 🏆
    1
  28723. Xerdar36 : Notice: No insults, whatsoever, in this comment. What’s all this, “triggering,” talk? I never, “accused,” you of ANYTHING? READ my WORDS? Awfully defensive, aren’t we? So, you have not named ONE SINGLE THING, that Trump has done, which was AIMED AT THE ECONOMY, which did NOT HARM the AMERICAN ECONOMY. The ONE thing, out of ALL the things he HAS done, that YOU mentioned, is an EPIC FAIL. EVEN Republicans, who are NOT members of the 1% Club, were not happy about THAT HEIST. And, speaking of, “thinking,” it appears that the mere FACT that you found it IMPOSSIBLE to do such a SIMPLE, EASY, task, I don’t doubt, has raised questions for you? You’re intelligent enough to KNOW if this is just PRIDE, messing with your head? By, standing with Trump now, after ALL THE WORLD can READ this exchange, EVERYONE will KNOW that YOU ARE A TROLL, with NO, “IDEOLOGY,” but accepting PAY, to ATTACK AMERICAN DEMOCRACY. You are CLEARLY not an idiot. You have CLEARLY FAILED. And the WORLD can read that, so WHAT OTHER, “agenda,” could you POSSIBLY HAVE? You’re NOT DUMB. People can see that, too. So, their HONEST reaction to reading this is INEVITABLE. You need to ACTUALLY do some, “reading,” yourself. I am a conservative. I KNOW the Clintons were as crooked as a $3 dollar 25 cent bill. Some of the sh*t they did for the CIA, would BLOW your fuzzy little MIND! But, THAT kind of, “crooked,” has infested the very top of American politics since WW II. Trump, however, is a WHOLE NEW ORDER of CORRUPT, CRAZY and STUPID. He is GENUINELY going to achieve a DICTATORSHIP. Not because he’s, “smart,” but because he’s being PLAYED by Russia and China. READ and RESEARCH. If this is NOT, “pride,” or, “treason,” or just some obtuse desire on your part, to f**k with democracy, YOU KNOW I’M RIGHT. In the Information Age, the ONLY OPTION available to the corrupted, is to put it all out there and deny it, anyway. To stoke DIVISION and FACTIONALISM, because, “factions,” will overlook ANYTHING TO “WIN.” Don’t GET played, with everyone else. Ask yourself, what’s more likely. That s**t like Reagan’s Contra scandal, Nixon, White Water, etc, “just happened” to occur? A LOT of, “one offs,” where OUR PRESIDENTS jus HAPPENED to be CORRUPTED??? Or IS THERE a SYSTEM, GEARED UP for FACILITATING CORRUPTION, FOR ALL, “administrations”??? And WHAT IF, just ONE of those corrupted A-Holes, who gets into office because the democratic vote is STILL a THING, decides he’s gonna’ break up the system, which he doesn’t really comprehend, by going FULL ON DICTATOR??? WHAT THEN??? And, btw, you should know by now. I NEVER touch Click Bait. That’s WHY I have no Bots, Trojans, Worms, etc, on my tech
    1
  28724. 1
  28725. 1
  28726. Xerdar36 : You resent the fact that I forced you to think. “Troll,” is ONLY, “name calling,” if it is inaccurate in some way. The FACT that you are HERE, denying the FACTS of the NEWS, attacking the station as, “biased,” among other things and are incapable of backing up ANY of your allegations, DEFINES YOU. That is what a TROLL IS. If you support the Nazi ideology of Trump and his klan, THAT DEFINES YOU. Your problem is that you don’t, “like,” being IDENTIFIED. And once again, I am forced to REMIND YOU that PEOPLE CAN READ this exchange for themselves. The ONLY people who will CLAIM to agree with YOU, will be OTHER TROLLS, son, and you KNOW THIS. Whereas, anyone who agrees with me, is likely to come from a VERY DIFFERENT background to mine, have THOUGHT about the issues and will have at least SOME KNOWLEDGE of them, while NOT being INDOCTRINATED by HATE and PROPAGANDA, pushed by people WHO ADMIT (when challenged in court) that they are NOT REALLY, “journalists,” as Hannity and Alex Jones have, on SEVERAL occasions EACH. Alex Jones has WITHDRAWN more of his allegations in court, than ANY OTHER, “broadcaster,” in HISTORY and OPENLY ADMITS that he MAKES STUFF UP to, “Entertain and stir up him fans.” Check out the videos, available, RIGHT HERE, on YouTube. Trump is a PROVEN RACIST, CONDEMNED in open court for his RACIST business practices. EVERY SINGLE TIME he’s sued a writer or journalist for exposing his CORRUPTION he has been LAUGHED OUT OF COURT. It has been PROVED that he is IN BUSINESS with the Luchese, Mafia Family, in New York and that he has gone to EXTRAORDINARY LENGTHS to protect them, even after his OWN friend and employee was EXPOSED for using Trump Airlines as DRUG SMUGGLING OPERATION, bringing MASSIVE loads of Columbian Cocaine in to the USA and was JAILED for it, along with the WHOLE RING. His Empty Box Scam was exposed, by journalists. The FACT that he hired ILLEGAL LABOUR to build Trump Tower and then REFUSED TO PAY THEM, has been PROVED. He EVEN became the FIRST man in American HISTORY to break the adage, “The House ALWAYS wins,” by BANKRUPTING HIW OWN Casinos in Las Vegas, because of his skimming and STUPIDITY. ALL of that is PROVEN and KNOWN. Yet the CULT of Trump lives on, through the medium of LIES and PROPAGANDA, aimed at people who only have the time to catch the headlines, holding down three, low paid, jobs and looking after their kids. People with poor educations, who see a, “Billionaire,” on TV telling them that he’ll make THEM RICH, TOO, and the ONLY reason that their dreams never came true is because of BLACK PEOPLE. So, they believe, because they WANT to believe, because they have MASSIVE DEBTS to pay off on their homes, cars, “education for their kids?,” their businesses, their healthcare, their credit cards, etc, etc. The, “clever,” part of this SCAM is that America gets to PRETEND there’s, “prosperity,” with high employment figures, even though closer analysis SHOWS that ALL of the working class are in DEBT and MOST OF THEM WILL DIE IN DEBT. And THAT’S the Economic DESPERATION, which NAZIS ALWAYS EXPLOIT. The HIDDEN POVERTY. And WHAT do YOU have? Trump did a Tax Bill . . . Good for you. You CAN’T say, in ANY WAY, exactly, “HOW,” that Bill, “HELPED,” ANY of the poor Americans? You give NO supporting evidence? Even though I SPELLED OUT FOR YOU, exactly WHY it was a HEIST and in what way. And the TEMPORARY Tax Break Sop will END, when Trump no longer NEEDS your votes. Not long after the Mid Terms, when you will be faced with the rising prices of FOOD and the DOUBLING of GAS PRICES, which will NOT end. So EASILY bought off, you DESERVE a DICTATOR to do your thinking FOR you. Your, (single) “argument,” such as it is, has been DEMONSTRABLY DEMOLISHED, at EVERY LEVEL. Your whining about your, “feelings,” being hurt, is YOUR problem, so deal with it, son, as you’ll get NO apology from ME, for IDENTIFYING YOU, while actually, quite purposefully REFRAINING from, “name calling.” But, as I have CLEARLY gotten to you, as your TWO responses to me demonstrate, I will extend my offer, for ONE MORE 24 HOUR PERIOD: Show me ONE SINGLE THING, that Trump has done, that was AIMED at altering the economy, which has NOT done MEASURABLE, PALPABLE, HARM to American interests or the US economy, and I (with GREAT RELIEF) will NEVER write another WORD on YouTube, EVER AGAIN. I am quite sincere. And you SHOULD KNOW, by now, that you have MANY Trolleagues who would DEARLY WISH to SILENCE ME, even IF you PRETEND, “not to care,” about that? You’ll be a HERO to THEM, son . . . Try to remain dispassionate, and STICK to FACTS. And SEE for yourself. Most of Trump’s moves only make SENSE when you take into account his BIGOTRY and PERSONAL ANIMOSITY toward other races. THINK, son? THINK . . . 😁
    1
  28727. 1
  28728. Xerdar36 : I have expressed NO, “feelings,” whatever. Go back and check? You have discussed YOUR feelings and I have responded. You have GUESSED at MY, “feelings,” wrongly, and I have responded. But, to say that YOU OUGHT to be, “upset,” or something, because I called TRUMP NAMES??? What is he? Your DAD??? Come OOHHHN??? . . . If you were, “thinking,” INSTEAD of, “feeling,” THAT REALLY should not have BOTHERED you. I mean, what’s NEXT? You going to accuse me of being, “racist,” against Orange People? Is THAT a, “thing,” now? 🤣 Next, you’ll be telling us that Kermit the Frog has a legitimate, “grievance,” and we should ALL sit around singing, “It isn’t Easy Being Green!” 😆 😂 🤣 So, because your, “arguments,” have been DEMOLISHED, you just want to make it personal? I’m not going there. I honestly thought you were brighter than THAT? I can TELL you are NOT American. Too many clues. I’ll grant that you ARE fairly smart, for a Cult Member, which is WHY I entertain this conversation. But, don’t let that go to your head. I can only guess that you got one of those emails, offering to, “Turn your comments into CASH,” so long as you never dis Putin or Trump? Did you EVER think about HOW they got your email address? I sent mine to the FBI; all they’d tell me about it was that it came from China . . . You could send yours to Interpol? You ARE European, after all? Perhaps, you’re a paid Troll? Or (worst case scenario, for you, at least) you COULD be just one of those people who feels, “aggrieved,” about EVERYTHING, and just find the politics of, “Victimhood,” satisfying. Maybe, you have massive debts, and want to BLAME the, “Migrants,” for that? Because, the only alternative is to take responsibility for your OWN decisions in life? You’re still young. About 25? You could make something of yourself, if you STOP playing the victim and falling for Trump’s propaganda? You’re bright, young, white and NOT in poverty. The world is your Oyster. “I KNOW there is still GOOD in you, I’ve SEEN it,” as Luke Skywalker said. Abandon the Dark Side and come to the LIGHT. Trump’s regime WILL collapse. And, IF it doesn’t, there will be a DICTATORSHIP in America. But, THINK about this: With the US, China AND Russia, UNITED AGAINST DEMOCRACY, what corner of the globe do you, “think,” that YOU will be, “safe,” in? Europe? Australia? They WON’T hold out for long, and YOU will die in a world-wide DICTATORSHIP, that YOU HELPED to build; now FREE of, “ideology,” except for that Double Think stuff, with which it plies the compliant masses with, so as to CONTROL them, while NEVER, “believing,” ANY of it, themselves. Is THAT how you want YOUR LIFE to be remembered? On the WRONG side of HISTORY? One of the Nazis cum Stalinists cum Maoists, of this story? Set aside your feelings, JUST LONG ENOUGH, to THINK it through? And when you’re done thinking, set even THAT aside, and THINK with your SOUL? . . .
    1
  28729. 1
  28730. Xerdar36 : You keep stepping sideways, and show evidence that you don’t know your man, remotely as well as you, “think,” you do. The example I ask for, AS YOU KNOW, was, “ANY ACTION taken by Trump, AIMED DIRECTLY AT THE ECONOMY.” You STILL have NOT given ONE. ANYONE can argue, “success,” from the START, in terms of getting his way? How about convincing the Electoral College to hand him the presidency, even though he LOST the election? The POINT, here, my boy, is that EVERY SINGLE THING Trump has done to the economy has HARMED IT. So far as, “canny negotiating,” goes and your inaccurate recollection of his bankruptcies . . . Trump has NEVER, “negotiated,” ANYTHING. Truly. People of low IQ’s who want to play at being something they’re NOT, are TARGETS for smarter people, with track records of dishonesty, to, “handle their business,” FOR THEM. His LAWYERS handled his SIX bankruptcies, once he let go of the MESS he made. EVERY SINGLE ONE of the people, who have worked for Trump, done deals with Trump, or have researched Trump (WITHOUT a current vested INTEREST in Trump) says the SAME THING. You will NOT FIND a SINGLE PERSON, who will say a SINGLE positive thing about Trump, WHO KNWS THE GUY! Not, unless they are WORKING FOR HIM NOW, or trying to avoid PROSECUTION, for having worked with him. Tell you what. Why not read the book, The Making of Donald Trump? It is written by a Republican Party member, Financial Expert, who currently advises GOVERNMENTS on fiscal policy. He is also a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist, AND, most importantly, HE KNOWS DONNY and has known him for MANY YEARS. From back in the days when Trump was a REGULAR DONAR to the Clintons. He was one of the FIRST PEOPLE to say that Trump did NOT even understand the Casino Business and PROVED IT, by making stuff up about how it all worked, in a recorded conversation, while Donny just PRETENDED to understand him, and went along with it. He said Donny would be the FIRST PERSON IN HISTORY to have a Casino go BANKRUPT in Vegas; explaining the important distinction between Hotels, attached to Casinos, etc and the ACTUAL CASINO going BANKRUPT. And guess WHAT? . . . The author of that book is called David Cay Johnston and his book is FREE at the Library, if you’re short of cash? It’s available on iTunes, in audiobook form and printed. He PROVES Donny’s Mafia connections, his scams, his stupidity, his cruelty, his vindictiveness and his UTTER INCAPACITY to do, “Business.” AND, it’s an entertaining read. You’ll see that he even held his own infant nephew hostage, in a dispute over daddy’s will, with his own brother, by withdrawing the baby’s healthcare, when it was new born, critically ill and facing DEATH. The BEST part? It’s ALL from the public record, kid. That’s right! When Donny did his usual, and tried to SUPPRESS the book, by suing Johnston, he was LAUGHED OUT OF COURT. And, as per usual, he shot himself in the foot, by drawing attention to it. It’s STILL on the Best Seller list. I DARE you to take a LOOK at the TRUTH? Do YOU have the STOMACH for THAT. The FACTS, PROVEN IN A COURT OF LAW? The TRUTH, that Donny’s lawyers advised him NOT to sue Johnston over, but were too afraid to simply TELL HIM that it was HOPELESS, because it was just a compilation of the PUBLIC RECORD, and ALREADY ESTABLISHED FACTS??? I doubt you will . . . In the same way that you CAN’T answer my initial question. Because Trump fans don’t WANT the TRUTH. They NEED the FANTASY. Now, son . . . TELL me? Have I called you names? You can’t, SERIOUSLY, say that disrespecting Trump is disrespecting YOU? So, please? . . . get off that bandwagon, of the Politics of VICTIMHOOD, MAN UP, and DEAL WITH THE TRUTH
    1
  28731. 1
  28732. Xerdar36 : Trump REALITY REVERSAL, now? You’re running out of ideas? 🤔 You have NOT answered my question, which was HOW this conversation STARTED! And I’m STILL WAITING for you to ADMIT that you CAN’T! I HAVE, “answered,” your question. I TOLD YOU I VOTED DEMOCRAT, EVEN THOUGH I AM A CONSERVATIVE AND EX-REPUBLICAN PARTY MEMBER. And, even though Trump’s extremists like to FANTASISE about, “illegals,” YOU CAN’T VOTE in an election UNLESS YOU ARE AMERICAN. (Was my FIRST answer REALLY too “subtle” for you? 🤣) People KNOW me, from my history, which is ALL OUT THERE, son. MY story has NEVER CHANGED. I moved HERE from England in 2006 and I’m a political historian, by trade. I am a CITIZEN. I’ve said it MANY TIMES. That’s ALL you’re getting on my background, which SHOULD be PLENTY, if you St Petersburg GOONS want to find me. And, at least I can go back to England, if this DICTATORSHIP is NOT removed. I have NOT called Trump ANY, “names,” that are NOT TRUE. So: NOT, “name calling.” Rather: FACT STATING. STOP HIDING. It’s MOST undignified. You HAVE your answer. Now, YOU answer the question? Or, JUST ADMIT that I’m RIGHT? I ALWAYS AM. It’s something of a blessing AND a curse. I don’t, “know,” everything, but I’m NOT too proud to say, “I don’t know,” if and when that’s the case. That’s WHY I’m NEVER WRONG. YOU, on the other hand, CLEARLY ARE; and you’re rather insecure, to boot. And it was very SLIPPERY of you, to rephrase my statement, like that? I NEVER said you were, “coming at ME, sideways.” You are simply, “STEPPING SIDEWAYS.” You are RUNNING AWAY. Running away from your DEFEAT; your, “arguments,” DEMOLISHED; utterly UNABLE to address the salient points; and VIRTUALLY IN TEARS when I state the brutal TRUTH about the soon to be EX-POTUS, Trump. You WON’T answer my question, which is the CLEAREST EVIDENCE that you CAN’T. That, and the fact that you keep throwing questions back at me, like chaff. You DAREN’T even ACKNOWLEDGE the BOOK I recommended. And you WHINE at my CONTEMPT for the Orange DICKtator, because free speech is one of Trump’s future TARGETS. What part of the world are YOU from? Don’t tell me? Eastern Europe, by any chance? Or some place, where the NAZIS are resurgent? I don’t HAVE to, “ask,” about you. You’re an open book. And it is my firm belief that you are a Troll. But, I do enjoy DISMANTLING Trolly Fantasies, since I can’t play golf these days, so . . . I TRIPLE DARE YOU! Answer the question, or ADMIT defeat? 😁
    1
  28733. 1
  28734. 1
  28735. 1
  28736. 1
  28737. 1
  28738. 1
  28739. 1
  28740. 1
  28741. 1
  28742. 1
  28743. 1
  28744. 1
  28745. 1
  28746. 1
  28747. 1
  28748. 1
  28749. 1
  28750. 1
  28751. 1
  28752. 1
  28753. 1
  28754. 1
  28755. 1
  28756. 1
  28757. 1
  28758. 1
  28759. 1
  28760. 1
  28761. 1
  28762. 1
  28763. 1
  28764. 1
  28765. 1
  28766. 1
  28767. The only thing that is actually “new” in Tory politics of late is this active, open hostility senior ministers express toward giant cross sections of society. That scares people. When did it become okay to actively attack voters from the dispatch box, with open anger and a list of epithets? That, combined with all of the now exposed graft and policy failures, is genuinely frightening the voters! And they wonder why they’re losing voters? That stuff may work well in America, from where the Tories have been importing all of their most recent ideas. But deliberate attempts to divide the population, with attacks on its most concerned citizens, are actively forcing voters to seek a sane alternative. Imagine if you went to your GP and said, “I’ve sought a second opinion and two other doctors have confirmed that you took out my appendix when there was no need and I just had a stomach bug,” and that doctor responds by saying, “That’s just rubbish coming from your “woke” agenda and your anti-medical attitude, so get the f*ck out of my practice and take your communist, freedom hating, Guardian reading bollox with you before I have those removed too!” . . . 😧. . . 🤷‍♂️ . . . 😵‍💫 . . . 🤦‍♂️ It’s a result of lazy, default thinking, that young educated people are being, “indoctrinated into wokeness,” because of a Tory refusal to accept logical arguments and desire to stick to talking points. When your default setting is to defend the indefensible, you find yourself not just at odds with the most outspoken educated people, but actively hostile towards a significant section of the population at any given time. And people don’t want insanely hostile leaders who are incapable of agreeing to disagree, let alone actively and outspokenly seeking to do HARM to sections of society!
    1
  28768. 1
  28769. 1
  28770. David V : I respect you (always have) so please bear with me on this one?: The Dems have now become the, “threat,” to America, being too close to the system, and hopeful of power. The GOP are NOT going to risk Trump’s unseating? They have SHOWN us they will fix everything. Now, the Dems are perpetuating the MYTH that there can even BE, “Free Elections,” instead of a Putin Style Data Gathering exercise. Do you THINK they will let Trump get unseated, indicted, and jailed along with his WHOLE family? And then RAT OUT EVERYONE, from Bill Barr to Devin Nunes, so that half of the GOP wind up in JAIL too? So the GOP end up SO disgraced and unelectable, that whatever remains of them, is forced to disband and hide, forever, from history, like escaped Nazis? It’s just NOT going to be ALLOWED, when it’s SO EASY to have Putin and all those hostile allies of Putin, use all that 2016 experience to assist the gangsters who are now ALREADY on the inside, with access to EVERYTHING this time around. Forestalling the Revolution, by acting like there still is a Republic, plays right into their hands. That Impeachment SHAM was the final blow, to a Republic that’s been failing on Life Support, since 2016. I guarantee you that Trump will, “win,” if we play along and assist this Soft Coup, perpetuating THEIR LIES. But, I also understand why people won’t want to OWN the TRUTH. Accepting the facts leaves you faced with the responsibility to DO SOMETHING. The Ukrainians did it, a decade ago, with no weapons, simply by halting their country and filling the streets, so their Putin Puppet was forced to FLEE back to Moscow. And Putin is in no position to punish America, by invading us. KNOWING that it CAN be done makes it even scarier, I guess? Because people were killed in the Ukrainian Revolution. All I ask, from all right minded people, is that they STOP perpetuating the myth that the GOP will ALLOW real, “elections”??? That forestalls the response to the facts. There are NO, “legal,” “lawful,” or, “Constitutional,” remedies to a Soft Coup, and it’s subsequent Dictatorship. But, while people are acting like they still HAVE a Republic, there can be NO remedies whatsoever . . . ✌️ Peace out, bro 👍
    1
  28771. 1
  28772. 1
  28773. 1
  28774. 1
  28775. 1
  28776. 1
  28777. 1
  28778. 1
  28779. 1
  28780. 1
  28781. 1
  28782. 1
  28783. 1
  28784. 1
  28785. 1
  28786. 1
  28787. 1
  28788. 1
  28789. 1
  28790. 1
  28791. 1
  28792. 1
  28793. 1
  28794. 1
  28795. 1
  28796. 1
  28797. 1
  28798. 1
  28799. 1
  28800. 1
  28801. 1
  28802. 1
  28803. 1
  28804. 1
  28805. 1
  28806. 1
  28807. 1
  28808. 1
  28809. 1
  28810. 1
  28811. 1
  28812. 1
  28813. 1
  28814. 1
  28815. 1
  28816. 1
  28817. 1
  28818. 1
  28819. 1
  28820. 1
  28821. 1
  28822. 1
  28823. 1
  28824. 1
  28825. 1
  28826. 1
  28827. 1
  28828. 1
  28829. 1
  28830. 1
  28831. 1
  28832. 1
  28833. 1
  28834.  @Spacey7  : So, Ukraine can win this thing without, “good,” or, “bad,” and rely on, “interests,” and, “history,” instead. After all, Putin’s objectives seem so unclear to the world and to his own people, because he can’t say openly what they are: Ukraine’s massive gas and oil reserves. They are still completely undeveloped and Putin needs to keep it that way. Shell, Exxon and BP have confirmed that Ukraine has as much gas and oil as, if not more than, Russia. He doesn’t want a Democracy competing from a geographically more convenient position. Especially since he’s threatened to turn off the gas lines to Europe before now. If you doubt me, check the oil companies public records as to where their finds are located, and how much they spent on a deal with Ukraine to develop those finds? They are offshore in Crimea, in the Donbas region (ringin’ any bells?) and now even bigger reserves have been located by the Carpathian Mountains to the west of Ukraine, where Putin has been unable to reach the area or, “influence,” them. So, now he thinks he’s a Bond Villain and he can steal the entire country? When, ever since, “energy security,” has been a thing, in over a hundred years, has the west EVER allowed themselves to lose dominance over energy reserves? Does Putin think he’s exceptional? Does he actually believe his own propaganda now? All we know for sure is that he has threatened us with nukes, but he has also backed down EVERY SINGLE TIME the west has stood up to him. So, all we need focus on is getting the mad man’s finger off that trigger, in case of accidents. But only a fool allows a mad man to point a loaded weapon at their head a second time. Putin must be deposed. He’s underestimated his enemy and is leading his oligarchs to ruin, along with his country. They will, “suggest retirement,” soon. So long as our resolve only grows and shows no sign of weakening.
    1
  28835. 1
  28836. 1
  28837. 1
  28838. 1
  28839. 1
  28840. 1
  28841. 1
  28842. 1
  28843. 1
  28844. 1
  28845. 1
  28846. 1
  28847. 1
  28848. 1
  28849. 1
  28850. 1
  28851. 1
  28852. 1
  28853. 1
  28854. 1
  28855. 1
  28856. 1
  28857. 1
  28858. 1
  28859. 1
  28860. 1
  28861. 1
  28862. 1
  28863. 1
  28864. 1
  28865. 1
  28866. 1
  28867. 1
  28868. 1
  28869. 1
  28870. 1
  28871. 1
  28872. 1
  28873. 1
  28874. 1
  28875. 1
  28876. 1
  28877. 1
  28878. 1
  28879. 1
  28880. 1
  28881. 1
  28882. 1
  28883. 1
  28884. 1
  28885. 1
  28886. 1
  28887. 1
  28888. 1
  28889. 1
  28890. 1
  28891. 1
  28892. 1
  28893. 1
  28894. 1
  28895. 1
  28896. 1
  28897. 1
  28898. 1
  28899. 1
  28900. 1
  28901. 1
  28902. 1
  28903. 1
  28904. 1
  28905. 1
  28906. 1
  28907. 1
  28908. 1
  28909. 1
  28910. 1
  28911. 1
  28912. 1
  28913. 1
  28914. 1
  28915. 1
  28916. 1
  28917. 1
  28918. 1
  28919. 1
  28920. 1
  28921. 1
  28922. 1
  28923. 1
  28924. 1
  28925. 1
  28926. 1
  28927. 1
  28928. 1
  28929. 1
  28930. 1
  28931. 1
  28932. 1
  28933. 1
  28934. 1
  28935. 1
  28936. 1
  28937. 1
  28938. 1
  28939. 1
  28940. 1
  28941. 1
  28942. 1
  28943. 1
  28944. 1
  28945. 1
  28946. 1
  28947. 1
  28948. 1
  28949. 1
  28950. 1
  28951. 1
  28952. 1
  28953. 1
  28954. 1
  28955. 1
  28956. 1
  28957. 1
  28958. 1
  28959. 1
  28960. 1
  28961. 1
  28962. Putin sucks. He’s sick, cruel and evil. His historical notions are childish, pride manufactured, narcissistic distortions of the facts and he has literally thrown the entire planet into economic and physical chaos. He is doing more actual harm than Hitler and Stalin put together and his body count will exceed theirs (if it doesn’t already?) by the time he’s done. He and the people that make him possible should be removed from civilised society, so that the rest of the planet can get on with solving its urgent problems and growing its capacity to take care of its populations, rather than having to suffer the anxiety of his disruptions, the economic costs of his incredible tantrums and the blood spilled, all on account of a toddler with a nuclear gun who’s throwing all of his toys out of his pram! Drop a Daisy Cutter on the Kremlin when their having one of those televised Doctor Evil shows, in which his terrified cabinet members each have to take turns making speeches about why they agree with everything Putin says, so that the trap door under their chair doesn’t open and drop them into a fiery pit at the press of a button on Putin’s desk, and do the world a MASSIVE favour. Why are we waiting for three or more years for Russia’s hoarded gold to run out, before the sanctions take full effect anyway? Just invade Moscow and the Russian people will support you, so long as you explain that you are liberating them and intend to hand Russia over to a UN organised election. Get on with it please! We’re all heartily SICK of Putin’s selfish antics.
    1
  28963. 1