Comments by "@level Joe" (@leveljoe) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1.  @lesmowhomever174  No, I didn't attend. Caveat Emptor Did you get your worthless degree or did you flunk out?
    1
  2.  @June-tb4vi  what are you talking about? Did you bother to read the comment that I replied to?
    1
  3.  @technowey  Not exactly debunked. Investigations are still happening, take AZ for example. Seems a little premature to come to a conclusion before ingestions are finished. ...and don't reply to me with a long list of "DoNaLd TrUmP", please focus on election security if you can.
    1
  4. They must be the top 1% they were talking about...
    1
  5. ​ @catc8927  It's not a national issue when the middle class was almost destroyed by Green and his pals. Then you need to realize there hasn't been changes to Medicaid. Sooooo....
    1
  6. ​ @jeremybackup5758 it's the law of the land.
    1
  7. None of them would have died if Billy Bob Clinton had done his job.
    1
  8. That has been covered. Half the comments are on reparation, and the other half are on the correction. If they couldn't read it the first time, do you think they'll get it after you post the same thing as the 100 people before you? lol
    1
  9. Anarchy!!!
    1
  10.  @Tmanaz480  Yeah, Biden would never call anyone fat, oh, wait...
    1
  11. “We cannot let this, we’ve never allowed any crisis from the Civil War straight through to the pandemic of 17, all the way around, 16, we have never, never let our democracy sakes second fiddle, way they, we can both have a democracy and ... correct the public health.” ...Joe Biden
    1
  12.  @michaelmurray9908  I see your point, the capitol officer who shot Ashley Babbitt should be charged as a terrorist.
    1
  13.  @countryside8122  Trump admirers Hitlery? No, they didn't get along.
    1
  14. We aren't doing anything about the crimes from the poorest people in our country either. Millions of people are here illegally, and lawmakers could care less. All depends how you look at it...
    1
  15. @@responsibleworld OJ Simpson has left the chat...
    1
  16. Seems unreasonable to expect Trump to pay a repatriation tax considering he is a US citizen living in the US. Has Biden changed the tax code that Trump benefited from, or is Biden busy benefiting for it too?
    1
  17. "Im not willing to be bipartisan." Yeah, he's a Democrat.
    1
  18.  @GreenWitch1  lol *might
    1
  19.  @GreenWitch1  Hope indicates a level of doubt.
    1
  20. ​ @charliebrown5611  It's the law of the land, did you know that?
    1
  21. @@A-Concerned-Citizen Removing tumors from what exactly? Did you think tumors produced children?
    1
  22.  @EricCartman915  That's not what has happened here, is it?
    1
  23.  @sovelissskirata8105  Still no book, chapter, and verse. Are you done playing?
    1
  24. @FirstNameLastName-wt5to  She isn't happy with this child and wants a re-do. Isn't it strange when the left fights for the right to abort, it is always an extremely rare exception to the norm that they use to prop open the door, but once the door is opened, it's anything goes. Any time, on demand, at the taxpayers' expense, up to birth. She is being propped up and used by the left
    1
  25.  @sovelissskirata8105  You didn't say which version because it doesn't exist.
    1
  26.  @sovelissskirata8105  If the woman died it would be murder, not mischief. The Bible is clear on that.
    1
  27.  @sovelissskirata8105  How many times do I need to post a quote? I did the first time you asked. I actually didn't need another quote because your quote fits the bill better than I could ask for, but it's still there if you had bothered to look.
    1
  28.  @sovelissskirata8105  lol Who is cherry picking? We have been discussing the entirety of what you posted. So if I am "cherry picking" it's because you did first. Sort of like where you ignore that causing the loss of the child is punishable even in your example.
    1
  29.  @sovelissskirata8105  scroll up Your passage described her as a "pregnant woman". Why? If a pregnant woman is only a woman, there would be no recourse from the father due to her losing a baby. For that matter, if a pregnant woman is only a woman, why does your passage describe or even mention that she is pregnant? Even you said "the father" So if there is no "baby" ( because a pregnant woman is only a woman), what is he a father of? You are lost in web of lies.
    1
  30.  @sovelissskirata8105  Your cherry picking. What version of the Bible are you using? lol What's so hard?
    1
  31.  @sovelissskirata8105  Just so you're good, I'll switch to the oldest version of the King James Bible. The 1611 version. It uses "smiteth" for kill, as in verse 12 and 15. There is NOTHING in 22-25 about a miscarriage. No smiteth of babies, so no, no miscarriage. You're not being honest. What's more, in verse 26 it says, "...smite out the eye of his seruant (servant)." and in verse 27 it says, "...smite out the man seruants tooth." Clearly when parts of the body are lost and/or destroyed, the word "smite" is used to describe the loss. Why not "smite the woman's fruit" for an injured or dead baby? Because that ISN'T what the oldest and best version (according to you) is saying. It is obviously a description of a premature birth (not pregnancy). Looks like you were cherry picking, doesn't it. Since you need a red herring, I'll help you find my quote the same way you initially help me find yours. It's in Psalms 139, I'm sure you won't be "pretty lazy and bad faith arguing" and you'll find the exact verse yourself. Don't cherry pick now!
    1
  32.  @sovelissskirata8105  Now that we've established that the "life for life" is the life of the baby and the life of those that killed the baby, and that the baby has a right to life because there is punishment(s) for ending that baby's life, we can now move on. Unless you don't want to?!
    1
  33.  @sovelissskirata8105  You want me to quote it?! That's pretty lazy and bad faith arguing according to you. I wouldn't want to offend you by doing that heavy lifting. As for the baby not surviving a preterm birth, well yeah, that's why it clearly delineates what the form of punishment is for thst loss of life. You didn't understand smiteth?! Why not, it's the oldest and best version of the King James Bible. Sorry that it doesn't have the modern vernacular that your... interpretation had (as if a version older than the one I was using would, but you did claim it would). ...just more lies by you. As for Psalms, are you using the 1611 version? It sure doesn't sound like it?! Most of the words you are asking about are not even in the passage, not to mention you cherry picked a part of it. That means it's out of context (according to you). Remember, you set the bar... Pretty lazy! Are you seriously still suggesting that the baby is not alive in the womb?! That has been determined in your exodus passage that it is. ...I guess if your not in agreement we shouldn't move on to Psalms. That could be a red herring if we moved on. I know how strict you are.
    1
  34.  @sovelissskirata8105  Insults??? I used no comparison of you that you didn't use of me first. It's amazing that you failed to recognize your own words. The Bible uses smiteth for the killing of an adult. If the woman died it would state so by the use of smiteth. No use of smiteth = no death of the woman. Life for life follows mischief. Mischief is the posdible death of the baby. And no, a miscarriage and a premature birth are not the same thing in anyone's world, then or now. In a miscarriage the child is dead at birth. In a premature birth the child is alive.
    1
  35. @sovelissskirata8105  It is fruit departed as in the living fruit has left her body. Not as in her fruit has passed on. You really shouldn't try to give a modern meaning to an old concept. The meaning of words change. If the baby was born dead it would follow the wording of the rest of the verse and say smite or it would follow the wording of exodus 23 26 and say "cast her young." The people at that time were not foolish animals . They followed patterns of speach and had names for miscarriages/ "cast their young" and names for premature birth/ "fruit depart" or the child has come out living. In Hebrew the passage is, “w?yase û ye ladêhâ” And the literal translation is " the child comes forth". The noun is "yeled" which means child or youth and it comes from the root word "yalad" which means to bear or beget and the Bible uses it multiple times to indicate "gave birth". The verb is "yasa" which means " to go or come out" and the Bible uses it hundreds and hundreds of times to describe the emergence of something living. How's your hebrew?! Apparently not very good. " miscarriage is a premature" A woman can have miscarriage on her due date, they are absolutely not the same thing. This is very basic.
    1
  36.  @sovelissskirata8105  ...but in Hebrew they don't use departed, so try again.
    1
  37.  @sovelissskirata8105  ...but in Hebrew, they don't use smite, try again.
    1
  38. @sovelissskirata8105  We are not using NIV per your earlier complaint. You can't pick and choose, pulling what you like and leaving what you don't. You made an issue with me using the standard kjv because it wasn't as old as your King James version, and now you don't want to use any king James at all?! That's ludicrous! You're moving the goalpost again. It's a sure sign that you know you're on the wrong side of this. This isn't new, though. You wanted to use the Bible when you thought it would help you, and you rejected it when it worked against you. I did warn you from the start that the Bible would not help you. I called your bluff.
    1
  39.  @sovelissskirata8105  The child is absolutely living when the original Hebrew is used. "Yasa" is used over a thousand times to indicate the emergence of a living thing. When interpretation is removed ( just like you wanted), it is premature birth and only premature birth. You poor fella...
    1
  40. @sovelissskirata8105  Why are you owed civility when you have failed to extend it to anyone here?
    1
  41.  @sovelissskirata8105  I asked you what a specific verse meant to you, and you called that cherry picking. That made it clear you didn't wish to speak with civility. It was and still is, projection. You behaved as if I would not discuss any of the rest of that chapter when I was the one to include more of it. You've made a joke of the Bible by picking and choosing what parts you will accept (the true definition of cherry picking), and I owe you nothing. That one verse is at the center of this whole discussion and without knowing what you thought it was telling you, there was no way to move forward. I ignored it, and I eventually received an answer. You couldn't even post the passage, so I did. You NEVER said which version you were using, ever, but you made it clear that "older" was better so I used the oldest (the 1611 King James), which thoroughly confused you. You continued to ignore the most obvious and most widely accepted meaning based on the terminology used in that entire chapter. Why? Because I used what you used, an interpretation. Ok, I removed the "interpretation" and went to the original language. Apparently the most exact language (the original Hebrew) was " moving the goalposts" because it demonstrates you are wrong. lol Who was it that wanted an older version of the King James and then refused to use it? You If you have questions. You need to type them out so I can read them. I'm not psychic. To answer your new question... Why does the husband demand punishment... Because the harm done to his wife was enough to interupt the gestation. It jeopardized the life and health and long term viability of his offspring. The act could have caused life long consequences for the woman, husband, and child. I can only guess that you're asking that question because you're unable to extrapolate those consequences I've listed ( or others) from your own life experiences. That is yet another sign of inexperience. What age range are you? I'm guessing 17-25. You are bull headed enough, but lack the subtly and temperance of a full adult. Am I right? I'm asking because it would explain a great deal of your stubbornness while faced with overwhelming evidence. You were also crying and threatening to quit posting. Like I care... I'm guessing that you'll now disparage my age, oh well...
    1
  42.  @sovelissskirata8105  Where did I say the child was fine?
    1
  43.  @sovelissskirata8105  "I don't think..." I can't argue against that.
    1
  44.  @sovelissskirata8105  What's a cherry pick-up?
    1
  45.  @sovelissskirata8105  Who are you arguing with? None of that happened. It's all still there, so you'll need to back up your claims with some quotes. I guess that ranting last post is all you've got left.
    1
  46.  @sovelissskirata8105  "I copy pasted straight from the Bible app. It's an older version of the King James Bible." So a bible app is older than the King James Bible? Suuuure...
    1
  47.  @sovelissskirata8105  "should be cherry pick- yup you did. Fixed." What kind of word salad is that?
    1
  48.  @sovelissskirata8105  So, is it "husband" now? You were using "father". I see you had to edit your posts. Why are you covering your tracks?
    1
  49. Simple and accurately put. Lawyers ensuring job security.
    1
  50. ​ @Agntculboik9  "...on the poor that can't read?" YES
    1