Comments by "@level Joe" (@leveljoe) on "Supreme Court Hears Case On ‘Mandatory Repatriation Tax’ Under 2017 Tax Cuts u0026 Jobs Act" video.

 @m.madisoncammue5619 My ancestors were not here for slavery, so no, they didnt do jack for my ancestors anymore than mine did for yours.
7
 @frenzii8332 They didn't say anything about reparations.
2
 @thagrandpubah Who is "we"?
2
 @unsolicitedditkapics9722 Its hard to tell, and it could go either way.
1
Pay your way.
1
That has been covered. Half the comments are on reparation, and the other half are on the correction. If they couldn't read it the first time, do you think they'll get it after you post the same thing as the 100 people before you? lol
1
Anarchy!!!
1
Seems unreasonable to expect Trump to pay a repatriation tax considering he is a US citizen living in the US. Has Biden changed the tax code that Trump benefited from, or is Biden busy benefiting for it too?
1
Simple and accurately put. Lawyers ensuring job security.
1
 @Agntculboik9 "...on the poor that can't read?" YES
1
@frenzii8332 Especially when all the other comments say practically the same thing, " Its repatriation, not reparation." You just know most of them read through the comments and were like, "Oh, I'm going to look smart and repost the same thing."
1
 @unsolicitedditkapics9722 The lack of sentence structure should tell you all you need to know.
1
Do you think they'll get it after you've told them the 100th time.
1
At leat they were once grapes. Todays newer generations are nothing more than weeds sucking all the water out of the soil and producing nothing usable except for more weeds.
1
feather hat need reading wigwam
1
@techoperatives2232 3rd
1
That has been covered. Half the comments are on reparation, and the other half are on the correction. If they couldn't read it the first time, do you think they'll get it after you post the same thing as the 100 people before you? lol
1