Comments by "" (@commonsense6967) on "Time to GET OUT! INVOLUNTARY Condo Terminations" video.

  1. OK, but a developer seeing an opportunity is hardly the same as setting fire to a building. But it will be interesting to see which corporations are allowed to buy up the Maui land. Or whether the governent will only allow the land to be re-wilded and exist as a "monument", like the Twin Towers/Ground Zero. And the CA wildfires, which almost killed my daughters' horse, demolished homes and businesses. These were "set"fires, IMO. (She disagrees.) The WEF seems to be advancing their population concentration plan of, originally, Agenda21.
    6
  2.  @erty7012 They had to be informed and sign documents agreeing to the arrangement at the time of purchase; so yes, the owners knew (or should have known) of the risks.
    3
  3. I almost bought a condo for investment purposes here in FL when the 2008 housing crash decimated the condo prices particularly hard. They were decent, $35,000-45,000, and would have been bargains except for the uncontrollable HOAs and maintenance costs. I decided not to.
    2
  4. Me either. Owning someplace with an HOA is a negative for many buyers.
    1
  5.  @bwrscott1 I inherited a couple lots in NC with an HOA. I'd NEVER live or buy anywhere with an HOA! They are huge ripoffs and attract control freaks to their boards, usually retired, with toomuch time ontheir hands.
    1
  6. Miami was like that in many areas since the 1980's, though.
    1
  7.  @colettespencer3357 But FL has laws preventing citizens ofCommunist countries from buying property in FL. CA, OTOH, is pretty much owned by the CCP now.
    1
  8. Less than that!
    1
  9. Only South FL.
    1
  10. But isn't that the case about everything?! This is one of the least harmful examples.
    1
  11. That's horrible! We havetopaycapitalgains ( federal tax) on profits from selling investment real estate, but it's usually "only" 20% or so in the US.
    1