Comments by "" (@commonsense6967) on "Supreme Court Hears Arguments Concerning Legality Of Texas Abortion Law" video.

  1. I hope the red states do, unless the SCOTUS follows Constitutional law. (SECEDE, that is, not "succeed".)
    3
  2.  @amberstewart177  Well, the main problem is, we'd have no defense against the totalitarian Marxist administration, who have completely taken over the US forces, and have the UN blue helmets at their disposal, as well.
    2
  3. IMO, these headlines are misleading. The Justices are shooting down this plaintiff's arguments. (At least hte part I'm listening to.)
    1
  4. What they're arguing here isn't about whether abortion after 6 weeks pregnancy (Texas' law) is or isn't constitutional. Instead, it sounds like they're arguing that this numbskull attorney is trying to bring court clerks into his argument, which is inappropriate.
    1
  5.  @nuqwestr  I agree with you that abortion rights should be returned to the states, like many of our current federal laws, btw, that once were under state jurisdiction. OTOH, the only way the states or federal government might constitutionally give parental rights automatically to the father is and has always been via marriage. Is the couple married at the time of conception? The husband is considered to have parental rights. Otherwise, no. (Unless the expectant mother agrees.) Otherwise, he's just the sperm donor. Sorry, but it is what it is and should be. As for consciousness, who knows when that begins, and what's the point? The Texas law makes good sense and is fair to both the mother and the baby, the two subjects most directly involved in abortion. For the first 6 weeks, the mother gets to choose. After that, the baby's rights take precedence, based on the fact that 6 weeks is the usual time at which the baby's heartbeat can be detected.
    1