Comments by "David Cooks" (@davidcooks2379) on "" video.

  1. Johnson was very good on Ukraine, while Starmer hasn't said almost anything at all. So until the war is clearly won by Ukraine we'd better keep Johnson. Starmer might be too passive regarding weapons delivery and strategic ambitions, he'll end up just following Macron and Scholz in giving up to Russia.
    2
  2.  @ADifferentBias  if you listen to Ukrainian reporters they are so relieved that he stayed. Johnson challenged Biden on weapons supply, he sent plenty of weapons. He replied to Putin's threats without fear (just the right way to talk to this mafioso). Also, Johnson came to Kiyv, which was a huge sign of support. I only heard Starmer talk about taking more refugees and defense of NATO as an organisation. But NATO does nothing for Ukraine. So if you are not in NATO then you get no support? This way only countries that don't need NATO will be in NATO. Like Finland and Sweden. And small countries that need help establishing democracy and getting rid of corruption, are doomed to stay under Russian control
    1