Comments by "" (@ozymandiasultor9480) on "HistoryLegends" channel.

@danne322 Russia colonized Asia? You mean Siberia that was almost devoid of population? And? You can buy You can buy Chechnya? First, learn to write the name of that part of Russia, second, try to buy Russian territory, third I bet that your country whatever it is is a minuscule micro-state compared with Russia... You can't buy Russian territory or take it by force, and that is a fact.
56
@elcastigador1768 You need new glasses if the map looks the same to you.
42
@elcastigador1768 Parrot, stop copy-pasting the same stupid comment.
31
@danne322 Oh, how funny... probably that is funny for people who have less than 10 ganglia in the head.
28
@keithknight42 Sure, it will change something, thermonuclear war will start. That is so smart...
18
@user1qaz2wsx3edc Russia is not a bully, Russia is a liberator determined to end Western greed and kleptocracy in this hemisphere.
6
@TonicVideos17 Wagner are not mercenaries, mercenaries by definition are soldiers who will go to war for whoever will pay them enough, Wagner works only for Russia, and in that war which is a war for the liberation of territories where Russians and Russophiles live and liberation of Ukraine of that ultra-nationalistic junta that was put on power by the USA via a coup in 2014, Wagner did a lot of good things.
5
@jamesdale9253 Sure, that is why now they are provoking, maybe that is better solution.
4
"Wagner" are not mercenaries. Mercenaries by definition go to war for some side that will pay them, no matter what side that is. Wagner works only for Russia, so there is no difference between Wagner and any paid army in the world.
3
@BennyYahoo-l2b And the USA has territorial claims in the Ukraine too.
2
This has nothing to do with the topic, but that marching... I have never seen soldiers of any country march so funny...
2
@BennyYahoo-l2b So does the USA... they want Ukraine for themself.
1
Volunteer brigade? Yeah, that will change exactly nothing.
1
@MrM-dl5zm No, that is not true. Russia attacked Ukraine because, after the USA coup in 2014 Ukraine started tormenting, torturing, and killing big Russian minority in Donbas, Russia is simply defending Russians and not allowing to NATO to engulf Ukraine. They have the right to defend their existence, the real occupier is the USA and NATO.
1
@MrM-dl5zm Keep repeating USA-made lies.
1
@MrM-dl5zm fools, the USA is using you to the max.
1
@MrM-dl5zm Nonsense.
1
@MrM-dl5zm Maybe Russia should train volunteers who want to fight against Poland... Just to feel that.
1
@jamesdale9253 That story is something that the USA spin doctors invented. Russia has nothing to gain, just a lot of problems if Russia attacks Poland or any country where there are not as many Russians as in Ukraine. Besides Poland is part of NATO so Russia would never attack Poland, has no reason. Those are stories of the USA and how Russia suddenly wants to attack countries just because. The case with Ukraine is very different.
1
@jamesdale9253 That story is something that the USA spin doctors invented. Russia has nothing to gain, just a lot of problems if Russia attacks Poland or any country where there are not as many Russians as in Ukraine. Besides Poland is part of NATO so Russia would never attack Poland, has no reason. Those are stories of the USA and how Russia suddenly wants to attack countries just because. The case with Ukraine is very different.
1
@jamesdale9253 you tube is erasing my comment about the stupidity of that way of thinking, so think whatever you want. It is of no importance, Russia is just defending itself in Ukraine.
1
@keithknight42 NATO has been in Ukraine since 2014 and Ukraine is just NATO proxy.
1
@sharingsharedudebro1236 Russia will get the Russian part of Ukraine, no matter how much it is in percentages.
1
@unsalbulent If Poland attacks Russia, that will be the start of a thermonuclear war. I hope they are not so stupid.
1
@FriedrichBarb Sure, when the shaped charge was invented, all thought that is the end of tanks, but better protection was invented and tanks were back in the game.
1
@David-ns4ym No tank can survive new anti-tank rounds... Why do you think the USA didn't send a few Abrams tanks? Leopard 2, celebrated, and those rounds are going like a hot knife in butter. And you think Russian tanks are so bad, but you selected exactly those, American, Israeli Korean... It makes no difference, now tanks, any tank can be destroyed at least to that degree that if the crew is lucky they will escape...some of them... Who knows when tanks will again appear, and those new, I bet that they will be such that there will be no human crew... Why should a tank have a human crew inside when all can be done from a distance? But Abrams can survive...sure... Let the USA send a dozen of their best Abrams tanks and soon there will be Abrams Square and the stocks of the company who makes those "wonder" tanks will go down... That is why they are sending those old F-16S, they knew those will do nothing, some will be destroyed on the ground, and most who will be so lucky to go to air...Russia has excellent SAM systems, S-400 will destroy any of those, or some advanced Russian jet. That regime in Ukraine, that is a boomerang that will hit the country that is using it, the USA over its head... Cluster bombs? So Russia will be able to use the same weaponry, a fair game... And who will suffer? Ukraine... I am sure the USA is ready to fight to the last Ukrainian, it is not like Americans are dying there, at least not too many just some instructors, and some mercs, and no one cares about those.
1
@David-ns4ym Russia is not even trying to "conquer" Ukraine... Was the USA trying to conquer Serbia when they started that illegal war against that small country and made Kosovo a separate state just because Albanians wanted Kosovo to be separate? Russia will liberate Donbas, that big landbridge from Donabs to Crimea, and maybe Odeas which is a Russian city to connect Transnistria with Russia proper. Are you even aware how easy Russia is fighting with that proxy of the USA, almost the whole of NATO (Not my country though, we gave no weaponry to that regime of that beggar, not a single bullet), and a dozen other countries who are giving weaponry and money to that regime the USA put on power via that coup in 2014... And Rissia is using just a fragment of its military power, some 20 percent... If Russia wanted they can take the whole of Eastern Ukraine, and historically it is Russian, but no, they will do what the USA did, the USA made a precedent by making Kosovo, and Russia will use it. And the USA, can't do sh*t... They will watch and later will claim it was all part of their plan, Russia to take those parts because they can't change anything. I am glad that militaristic plutocracy is put to shame.
1
@-John-Doe- Look what you wrote "The role of the tank-not to be indestructible" "The role of the tank - to provide immediate and irreplaceable firepower for extended periods of time." That is the same... And if I claimed that the tank should be indestructible (the thread is big, I can't go and search for some comment I wrote) that is my mistake, no, tasks are destructible, and they were always destructible, but not as easy and fast as today. "Drones, Mines, and Missiles aren’t the same tool as a tank." that sentence is a truism and we should not waste time on that. But imagine a tank, a very small tank that has no people inside, something like a drone tank that does the same thing that tank does, but people, soldiers are not in jeopardy... That is not the same as the tank with people in it, but as far as I can predict, probably that is the future.
1
@-John-Doe- Yes, you understand what I had on mind, some type of unmanned tankette, or some really developed futuristic vehicle which can hide easily, change its color, be armored at the vital element really good, and armed with some kind of tank gun, missiles, SAM... who knows...But, my point, and obviously yours is that this war is proving that things are changing fast on the military stage, especially when forces that have bing knowledge and investment in weaponry collide, and a lot of interests are under question.
1
@Shizuka935 Your sentence is written in such a way that people who are reading it can't know, do you think tanks are obsolete or not? "The tank its obsolete"... that is wrong... It is obsolete or it is not obsolete? I can see that you think that tanks with good protection, shield, and gun are good, but we saw that even Leopard 2 can be destroyed and I bet Abrams too...all tanks can be destroyed so easily today that big tanks battles are a thing from the past.
1
Very true... And they have the face to talk something against the Russian attempt to overthrow those ultranationalists in Ukraine that the USA put in power via a coup in 2014. Hypocrisy on the highest level.
1
@juliankraus1011 And? So what? That was done a long time ago, the descendants of those people are now Russians or some ethnicity that lives in Russia. You think Russians should give those small groups of people their land? That is beyond naive... Then Americans of European descent should give all of North and South America to those Native Americans and return no matter whether their ancestors lived there for centuries? get real, touch the grass, and stop writing comments full of hatred toward Russia, accusing Russians of things that all European powers were doing. Look what that Belgian king, Leopold II, or some with such a name did to what is not known as Zair. At least Russians were not so cruel as some... You are a bigot and hater.
1
@philipbrening433 Really? You have some credible source, where you get that info, or as usual, your source of information is "trust me, bro"...
1
@bkh8528 Oh, American, of course... They are all about spreading freedom, democracy, and their influence... All good stuff... No matter that the USA itself is not a democracy, it went from republic to militaristic plutocracy... Somewhere between 2 world wars, but it became really obvious what they are after WWII when they became rich... because of that war...
1
@DutchTunisian You are speaking about a gray area... Tell me, were you holding such a position when in Serbia Milshevic tried to make ethnic cleansing and the USA and NATO had to intervene, and the USA made a precedent, gave to those Albanians in Kosovo rich to separate that part of Serbia? Was there something gray? Because that same thing is happening in Ukraine, the ultranationalists that the USA put of power via a coup in 2014 started tormenting, torturing, and killing Russians and Russophiles, abolished all rights that the big Russian minority had, abolished their language and Zelensky openly said that whoever feels like Russian and wants to talk Russian should go to Russia... What is gray about that? And Russia tolerated that for 8 years, the straw that broke the camel's back was not blatant disregard for the Minsk agreement, but a promise that Ukraine will be part of NATO, a military organization that lost its reason to exist because it was made as a military alliance that should have protected Western Europe of communist Soviet Union. The Soviet Union is gone for more than 3 decades, Russia is not a communist country and it is not the Soviet Union, but the USA enlarged NATO, from 14 members now NATO has 32, 33 members... Why? If there is no enemy what is the purpose of NATO? The USA had to invent a new enemy, the new-old enemy Russia, and after Russian intervention, that war in Ukraine started, USA used that to scare its NATO partners, how suddenly Russia wants to attack and occupy countries for "reasons" and that Putin is a homicidal maniac that is ready to attack countries... Why would Russia do that? It has enormous territory and attacking and especially holding some country is just a problem for Russia, it has the same logic as swallowing a porcupine, a lot of problems and nothing to gain. Things are most of the time grayish, but in this case, for those who follow both sides, things are pretty clear and are not so gray.
1
@philipbrening433 That is your credible source? Get real...
1
@DutchTunisian You think Russia is destroying the whole of Ukraine? Russia is using just a fragment of its military power and is targeting military objects... That is what can be expected of a war... What do you think the USA would have backed if Serbia was a bit stronger or would start as you are saying "destroying the whole country"? No, Russia showed an incredible ability to restrain and not use what they have at their disposal. And war is war, it is a messy thing, but Russia could have secured internet communication, phones, water food, and gather double that side of an army which still will be maybe just half what Russia has in peace, 1.3 million soldiers, and started indiscriminate destruction. BUT Russia did not do that.
1
@DutchTunisian I mention Serbia and Kosovo because that is the situation when the USA made a precedent about changing borders, and now the USA had no moral stance from which it can preach how territories in which Russians and Russophiles live can't be separated and it is bad... They did it, so a country with enough military power can do that. And if you start will legitimacy, let me remind you that the war of the USA against Serbia wasn't exactly legal.
1
@DutchTunisian And if you think you are smarter than most, chances are that you are the one who is driving in the street that is only for one direction, chances are that you are wrong, not all those who think the opposite.
1
@DutchTunisian No, those countries joined NATO in times when it was very possible that the Soviet Union could raise again and were scared of that possibility, it has nothing to do with contemporary Russia. And again, the communist Soviet Union, is not Russia, a religious country that has a religious leader. You gulp too much wester propaganda.
1
@DutchTunisian Russ ai has nothing to gain from this war? Sure it has things to gain, to separate parts in which Russians and Russophiles are majority, and to ensure that Ukraine will never be part of NATO. My country will surely put VETO to the admission of Ukraine in NATO, that is our democratic right, as it was our democratic right not to give any weaponry to Ukraine, to that regime, first because Ukraine is not in NATO and never will be there are least half a dozen NATO countries that will put VETO to such idiotic idea, and second, we know what kind of regime it is, so we gave not a single bullet to those ultranationalists.
1
@DutchTunisian Chechnya was an internal affair, one Russian province was endangered by separatists, irredentists, and Islamists, and Georgia, that was prevented attempt, Russia prevented the USA to do what they did in Ukraine... Now should I mention all wars and copus that the USA did... The list is too long... And about old Russian borders...never say never... We will see, or maybe our children will see...
1
@DutchTunisian Surr abdool... I am getting sick of talking with such as you. Get lost.
1
@LouisBILLET-v3q You live in some other reality where Russia isn't wiping the floor with Ukies and by extension with the USA, NATO, and a dozen other countries that give weaponry and money to Ukrainian ultranationalists. Russia is winning big time, considering how big the force is Russia has to fight, they are winning and they will win. No matter that my country is in NATO we gave no weaponry to Ukraine, not a single bullet, first because Ukraine is not a member of NATO and never will be, there are at least half a dozen NATO countries, mine dirts that would put VETO to the admission of Ukraine in NATO, second we know what kind of regime that is. You are either living under a rock and are totally uninformed that Russia is winning, or you simply want that, but your wishes don't correlate with reality. I sure am glad that Russia is putting on shame the USA, small Britain, France, Germany, and all those spineless European countries that support that junta in Ukraine, I am glad whenever I hear of all unsuccessful attempts of all those to beat Russia, and I am glad that Russia is wiping the floor with you.
1
It is a game between the engineers who are inventing defensive capabilities of tanks and those who make missiles for the destruction of tanks. Now those who make anti-tank weaponry have the advantage, but scientists, and engineers are working, and soon we will see some new invention that will tip the scale and tanks will be relevant again... That is old game in the war and weapon industry, so no one can say that tanks are definitely obsolete.
1