Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Youtube CENSORS Scientist to Help Big Pharma" video.

  1. The Fauci mask thing is actually nothing substantial which is why it gets no serious commentary any more. However you are on the right path and it goes back to the Nicholas Wade article. The really major issue is what PART of the virology research industry have been up to. DW News did really great short documentary on Gain on Function research. -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0nuyPQzU18 The very first thing they point out is that its NOT 1 type of research but 3. 1) Making viruses and infectious contagions more deadly to humans; and 2) Making viruses and infectious contagions more transmissible BETWEEN humans; and 3) Making viruses and infectious contagions from the natural environment more readily transmissible TO humans. What they show is that a section of the "virology" research industry have done is MODIFY that definition and dropped the 3rd type. There was a moratorium placed on Gain of Function because a lot of people became concerned these scientists were doing stuff that was just too dangerous. Like that nightmare H5N1 avian flu they whipped up in 2011. The change in definition was done to get around that moratorium and some of the researchers could keep doing as they wanted. About the Nicholas Wade article. Now being honest there are claims by many he got stuff wrong, BUT remember the name he mentioned repeatedly. If you have forgotten you'll find it here on the now famous Lancet Letter that was published in support of the Chinese researchers. As in this letter right here -> https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30418-9/fulltext#%20 How come that same name keeps coming up? Like on these 2 NIH project reports supporting COVID virus research in China!!!! https://reporter.nih.gov/search/xQW6UJmWfUuOV01ntGvLwQ/project-details/9491676 https://reporter.nih.gov/search/xQW6UJmWfUuOV01ntGvLwQ/project-details/9819304 Fauci and masks is a red herring and nothing worth pursuing. Its no longer relevant. The real issue is how part of the virology and infectious disease research community altered one of their own key definitions so that they could keep doing research that others said was too dangerous to continue.
    1