Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "BBC News" channel.

  1.  -VXLKRYEx-  WTF is that meant to mean? "based redpilled"????? Here's 2 words Dunning Kruger.
    1
  2.  @oktc68  Great comment but the trolls will be coming. They don't care that we could have done with COVID months ago if they had just done what was needed. Unfortunately pandering to idiots who have no concept of being responsible is going to destroy western society.
    1
  3.  -VXLKRYEx-  Yeah sure zoomer boy. Actually a Gen-X. We think of you lot as Gen-Y or Gen-Z because we actually learnt to spell and understand that thing called the alphabet. Maybe you're Gen-Y or as I like to call them Gen-WHY didn't their parents use birth control or Gen-WHY don't they tell us AGAIN how tech savvy they are with the tech that we developed. Maybe you're Gen-Z or as I like to call them Gen-Zero grasp of reality, Gen-Zero brain function or Gen-ZERO relationships cos they are too busy watching internet porn.
    1
  4.  -VXLKRYEx-  Can you read? Gen-X zoomer boy Gen-X. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Were you born stupid or did you take special classes?
    1
  5. @Miki Miki You r first sentence made sense - it should not have been let out of Wuhan. EVERYTHIGN after that point is just rambling conspiracy garbage. *About the only thing anyone can say with certainty is that a lot of scumbags like Big Pharma, Government, conspiracy promoters, religious freaks and ESPECIALLY CONSPIRACY FREEAKS are all taking advantage of this disaster.*
    1
  6.  @romariocoffie4702  I honestly don't know how stupid and smug a person can be and think they are right while being so stupidly wrong. Your words - "Protests are by the people for the people regardless how the state feels about it and any need to suppress a non violent protest because you don’t “approve” of it is definition of facism" 1: It is idiotic to ever claim that any protest is actually for anything other than the people protesting. The utter arrogance of anyone to claim they represent the "good of the public" is beyond being ridiculous. That's what dictators claim when they say "we are making sacrifices for a everyone's good" as they haul people away. Anytime a minority claims to represent the majority it can be called man many things DEMOCRACY is NOT one of them. NONE OF THESE PROTESTERS REPRESENT THE MAJORITY - they are a minority and the rest of us are tired of their selfish crap. 2: These protests were NOT non-violent. How blind to basic facts are you? GET YOUR BASIC FACTS RIGHT BEFORE LECTURING ANYBODY Because like so many I'm FK-ING over morns claiming stupid things.
    1
  7.  @romariocoffie4702  Which one of your 5 moronic brainless idiotic comments do you want answered? The smug idiotic one you started with. The ignorant of reality second one The bullshit deflection I never said that crap even though I suggested it third one The I'm not smug your smug answer of a 3 year old 4th one Or the utterly I made no points in the first place but I want to you answer my amazing claim of "AHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA" 5th one. Go back to school and get educated on how to be a child. That way you can move on from the kindergarten level temper tantrum.
    1
  8.  @romariocoffie4702  I'm not attacking your ideas I AM ATTACKING YOUR IDIOITC LIES. Like all you conspiracy clowns your just plain simple LIARS
    1
  9.  Gmmonica godsgotthis  Try ranting a whole lot less and people might want to have a conversation with you.
    1
  10. Yep we have been through the neo-con era to be followed by the neo-liberal era to arrive at the neo-feudalism era.
    1
  11.  @mimihuang968  Dude it has little to do with corporations and a WHOLE LOT OF the top 1% dominating the rest of society. That's been going on for 1000s and 1000s of years. The only thing that ever seems to change is the LABEL the top 1% put on themselves.
    1
  12.  @davidadiwego4608  Putting it mildly FK-off. Take your attitude and simply FK-off. Take your ignorance of the reality of what's happening and FK-off. Don't you dare talk about intellectual dishonesty when your playing statistical misdirection games. NASA Says Climate Change is real -> https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ NOAA Says Climate Change is real -> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide Even the Pentagon says Climate Change its real -> https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/29/2002084200/-1/-1/F1/CLIMATE-CHANGE-REPORT-2019.PDF YOU'RE A DISGUSTING LIAR - just FK-off.
    1
  13.  @colinhubble6667  Good answer.
    1
  14. Imagine how much those of us who have ever been FKD over by HR don't care. Imagine all the people who Elon Musk has treated like crap and how much they don't care. Imagine all the people who have been hurt by misinformation posted on Twitter and how much they don't care. Imagine all the people who have been abused by Elon Musk fans whenever they have questioned what he says and HOW MUCH THEY DON'T CARE.
    1
  15. Another Australian here. I was amazed at that map they showed at the start considering what we have had in our news over recent years. There's not only the student issue but the issue of ex-pat Chinese and their money.
    1
  16. Vice President Henry A. Wallace in the New York Times, April 9, 1944 “The really dangerous American fascist... is the man who wants to do in the United States in an American way what Hitler did in Germany in a Prussian way. The American fascist would prefer not to use violence. His method is to poison the channels of public information. With a fascist the problem is never how best to present the truth to the public but how best to use the news to deceive the public into giving the fascist and his group more money or more power... They claim to be super-patriots, but they would destroy every liberty guaranteed by the Constitution. They demand free enterprise, but are the spokesmen for monopoly and vested interest. Their final objective, toward which all their deceit is directed, is to capture political power so that, using the power of the state and the power of the market simultaneously, they may keep the common man in eternal subjection."
    1
  17.  @Ne0dymm  YO SHIT-4-BRAINS WHO CAN'T SPELL where do people get arrested for praying in their own home? and where do they get arrested for hurting peoples feelings internet or anywhere else?
    1
  18.  Davidson  Yeah in what way am I being foolish. Like s few others in this thread we can see the morons because all they do is make claims without anything to back it up. Trolls like you ought to just stay of the internet all together.
    1
  19.  @paulkoon4624  Wake up - geriatric and obese people are some of the most susceptible for a whole range of ailments. But just like other diseases can strike at the fittest in society so can COVID - AND IT HAS. There have been plenty of younger people who got it and some of them died. Al lot of the medical people who died weren't obese of geriatric. Come on these FACTs are old news.
    1
  20.  @gunsack2427  Seriously how are people as ignorant of reality as people like you are? They can only burn off when its safe to do so or have you forgotten the times when they risked it and instead of burning off the fuel load they started major blazes. They are engaging the Aboriginal elders in helping land control you ignorant clown. EFFING reality deniers like you should just STFU, we've had enough of your crap. When everybody can no longer deny what's happening is gonna get ugly for people like you. Enjoy your ignorance for the moment, it wont last.
    1
  21.  @Aa-ron01  Do you understand even the basics of climate change, because a lot of people don't. Its pretty simple if you heat up the planet you evaporate more water and sooner or later it will fall out of the sky. Basically it turbocharges the weather. In a nutshell the side of the earth the faces the sun is getting energy pumped into/onto it by a monstrous nuclear furnace. The other side of the planet is dumping excess energy off into space. We are still getting the same amount from the sun on one side but not dumping as much on the other as a result the entire planet has slowly heated up. When its hotter there's more evaporation. If you have more evaporation you have more clouds and eventually you have these events with huge amounts of rain and snow. It was always called climate change by the scientific community it was journalists who called it global warming because that was easier for them to type. Your remark on vegetation is half right. Vegetation doesn't absorb surface water what it does is allow it to be absorbed. The problem with soil (particularly Australian soils) is that when it dries out it switches from water absorbing to water repelling and if you dry it right out its hard to get it back to water absorbing. What vegetation does is help keep moisture in the soil. So it keeps the soil in a water absorbing state so that when it rains the water can soak into the soil. If its dried out then rain can simply run off the land into the creeks and rivers taking topsoil with it. Its one reason why our environmental scientists (not the greenie tree hugging clowns) have been telling us for a while that we have to stop simply clearing land for pasture as we have done. They've now got the evidence that keeping 20% of native trees and vegetation makes our land more productive as it helps maintain the moisture in the soil. Trying to convince people that's true is the next problem.
    1
  22.  @gunsack2427  Look just farq-off with your ignorance. They have started engaging the aboriginal elders. And that still doesn't get round the problem that the season for back burning is getting shorter. I grew up in country Victoria and half my family are farmers so I know about working the land moron.
    1
  23.  @mim0381  What they mean by once in a century is the amount of rain that's falling and how fast its coming down. Its not the pattern of flood and drought that's unusual its the severity of those patterns. If you heat up the planet you get more evaporation and if you get more evaporation you'll get more rain and more snow and bigger storm systems. Its called the water cycle and heating up the planet drives that cycle harder. Its like putting your foot on the accelerator - more air & fuel makes the engine run harder and faster. And when you hit the tree it hurts more. This is why scientists always called it climate change not global warming. It was journalists who re-labelled it global warming and caused a lot of the confusion.
    1
  24.  @wolfiestreet6899  Well that's a complete pile of bullshit. We have fairly accurate records in some places going back 100s of years. One of the "so called" scandals was when they adjusted the data to take into account the time of day that people took temperature measurements. The Murdoch press tried to blow the whole of climate science up over that and failed. Plus with research into tree rings, soil layers and ice cores they have very accurate data going back several million years. So that's an absolute bullshit claim on your behalf.
    1
  25.  @gunsack2427  Seriously farq-off we've had that bullshit claim again and again and again. For the 50,000th time climate isn't about what the weather was last week or last year its how its changed over many years and decades. HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO EXPLAIN THESE THINGS TO YOU PEOPLE? Do you not understand that we have had enough of the denial industry? The tobacco companies knew back in the 1950s that tobacco caused cancer. The actual tobacco companies had done the research themselves so that they knew what the claims would be. Exon did the research into climate change back in the 1970s & 80s just the same. Phillip Morris uses a lobbying think tank in Washington called the Heritage Foundation to do the PR work for tobacco. The same Heritage Foundation is the leader in climate change denial often using the same paid hacks to lie about it as they did with tobacco. You clowns scream and yell conspiracy all the time yet you can't see the obvious one right there in front of you. The entire climate change denial is EXACTLY the same as tobacco denial. Its about protecting a bunch of rich people and their investments. And by the way not only does NASA say it s real as well as NOAA so doe the US Military. NASA -> https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ NOAA -> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide Pentagon -> https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/29/2002084200/-1/-1/F1/CLIMATE-CHANGE-REPORT-2019.PDF
    1
  26.  @stefanbroughton2292  If you don't want to be called a brainless moron then don't preach garbage. The scientific community NEVER called it global warming that was what journalists called it. And its not something that was started in the 1970s. the first waring came in the late 1890s (yeah 120years ago). The Ozone hole is healing it is NOT yet healed and wont be for decades. China does NOT produce CFCs in any great quantity. They got caught and got shut down on that. The science is in and its done and Murdoch's bullshit artists and other liars can claim all they like - IT WONT CHANGE THE FACTS. The can claim NASA is wrong, but sorry its real -> https://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/ The can claim NOAA is wrong, but sorry its real -> https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-atmospheric-carbon-dioxide But I am yet to see any climate change denier even comment on the Pentagon report that says climate change is real and that its going to cost billions extra to maintain their bases -> https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/29/2002084200/-1/-1/F1/CLIMATE-CHANGE-REPORT-2019.PDF
    1
  27. ​ @ldm3027  EVERY CLAIM YOU MADE IS BULLSHlT - 100% BULLSHlT Where do you get this $100/ton from? IN THE VIDEO Douglas Chan COO Climeworks who have built this plant is STATING $300-400 a ton (5:00). Then you say there's 40bn tons a year in emissions and half gets absorbed by the natural environment. That leaves 20bn ADDITIONAL per year. You claim that removing 10bn tons will cost $1tr a year and that we'll have to pay that for 100+ years. What about the remaining 10bn tons of additional CO2 in the atmosphere? WHAT TF ARE WE MEANT TO DO ABOUT THAT? So not only do you make numbers up that you can't justify you then can't do basic math either. I suggest in future you don't argue with an engineer who can actually do math.
    1
  28.  @kausthubh  There's plenty of open unforested space space. I'm Australian we have several million square kilometers for starters. North Africa has massive amounts of open space and YES I damn well know how hard that will be. But that can also be mitigated with tree selection and planting arrangements. There's some pretty amazing videos here on YouTube on re-wilding and how they are reclaiming lots of open space. One of the really important things that has come out of that is variety. If you try and to it via monoculture it will be a disaster. HERE'S the inescapable fact. We have to get 3.5 Trillion tons of CO2 out of the atmosphere and do it fast. There's a clown down the list here (idm3027) who's pulling numbers out of his butt like it will only cost $100 a ton by DAC. IF THATS TRUE and lets not forget that Douglas Chan COO Climeworks is claiming they hope to get it down from $1000/ton to $3-400/ton, then at $100/ton its still going to cost $350 TRILLION. WHERE TF DOES ANYONE THINK THEY ARE GOING TO GET THAT $350 TRILLION? Then there's the actual energy costs. In how many places would we need new power stations to drive that AND WHO'S going to pay for those power stations. Then that's that whole problem of the environmental cost of all the materials required to build all those plants. I started with a degree in aerospace but have spent 30+ years working in industrial control systems and automation. I have spent time in both manufacturing and mining and I KNOW how much energy those industries consume. Do you know there's mor energy used in making a car than it consumes in its lifetime? people forget it take energy to dig all those materials out of the ground and process it into stuff that you can makes bits out of so you can assemble those bits into a car. Its the same for most manufactured goods. In fact a great way to help save the planet is to STOP manufacturing crap products and instead manufacture everything with better quality to last longer. It would massively reduce energy consumption. The other thing is to triple glaze all those glass towers we've build over the last century. mark Blyth the political economist at Brown U. mentioned an engineering report that said if America just triple glazed all its office blocks and skyscrapers the saving in energy would help America get most of the way to meeting the Paris Accords. Architects might be good for designing aesthetically nice buildings but they don't know a damn thing about energy efficiency.
    1
  29.  @RobertGonzalez-j1v  Do the math its not that hard. At $1000 per ton removing 2.5 Trillion tons costs $2.5 Quadrillion BUT wait by the mid 2030s it will be 3.5 Trillion tons and by the early 2040s 4.5 Trilllion tons. This guy said they could get it down to $300 per ton. So what even if he got it down to $100 per ton then its still gonna cost $350 Trillion for the basics and 100s of $Trillions after that. The combined wealth of the planet cannot afford that. Being able to use basic arithmetic to get a simple estimate is a necessary skill for an engineer. Here in Australia right now there's calls to go nuclear and 7 sites have been identified. I know those sites and I know I can put an EPR 2 at 4 of those sites and 2 EPR 2s at the other 3 and that's 10 in total. Based of the costs at Hinkley Point C each reactor will be AU$48 Billion each. 10 x 48 = 480 So AU$480 Billion becomes your starting estimate and that simply asks the people pushing that idea to explain where they are going to get $480 Billion from? Because if these sorts of people pushing these sorts of solutions can't answer the basic cost questions then what's the point of discussing anything further?
    1
  30.  @freshdelicecookingtutorial6585  They are NOT invading its basic trespass as in being on someone else's property without permission or a valid or a legal reason. And what so many of the supporters of "economic refugees" don't get is that economic hardship might be understandable, but its NOT a legal reason for entering another country. Lack of food, lack of shelter, threats of violence, etc. are legal reasons, but NOT economics.
    1
  31.  @nm5310  1) What previous comment??? 2) On what do you base the claim? (your words) "all populations are vast majority women and children (65-85%)" No doubt that might be true for some countries but NOT ALL. 3) In Australia many of the arrivals we have had have been unattached men and YES we have seen that as problematic and YES we don't discuss it openly enough. We also get a lot of families. That boat that sank off Greece had over 100 children on board. So there were some families on the boat.
    1
  32.  @nm5310  I don't mind the longness of that comment at all. I've read through it several times and I agree with all of it. I was really surprised by the number of displaced people. Last I heard was a few years back and they put it around 60 million and growing. So I expected it to be higher but 108 million is where the world needs to STOP and start thinking. You've actually described WHY Australia came down so hard on the boat people issue. The vast majority of those arriving were unaccompanied men. It was kept quite but there were several very ugly incidents in Australia with unaccompanied men coming from cultures where women are seen as property. They simply had no idea of how Western liberal societies operate. Your final paragraph goes right to the core of why Australia reacted as it did. These people had access to enough money to pay the people smugglers. We traced some of that funding back to people already in Australia and that infuriated people. There were millions of dollars leaving the country every week and most of it wasn't helping anyone because it was ending up in the hands of a couple of Pakistani mobsters. The other thing that infuriated people was the money spent on legal claims which was funded by Australia. The concept of "NO - your claim does not meet the criteria." means NOTHING to certain people. You might know it better or explain it better but there is a certain psychology where people define themselves by the attention they get from helping people. My mother made a comment about Mother Terresa many years ago. She said (paraphrasing) "Mother Terresa is a hypocrite. She fights against government funded contraception programs because it would mean fewer orphans for her to take care of and get attention." There's a condition called "Munchausen by proxy" where people seek attention for the illness of others. I think this is something similar where certain people like the attention they get from fighting causes. I think Nigel Farage did that with Brexit. I don't think he cared about it at all except that it got him a lot of attention. We have people in Australia who define their existence on fighting certain causes to the death. I met a lawyer at a social event about 20 years ago when there were a lot of boat people arriving out of Southern China. They explained part of the problem was that they destroyed any and all documentation they had. It makes it almost impossible to identify who they are or where they are from and evaluate their claims, but that never deterred the lawyers supporting their claims and filing claim after claim after claim. We now call these people undocumented arrivals and they are still a problem. Those lawyers actually made the situation WORSE not better and it lead to the "Pacific Solution" that we get condemned for. A significant event was the Tampa Affair, and there's a Wikipedia page on it that's fairly accurate. What's not there is that Australia flipped it back on the international community to asses the 400+ claims which were done under UN supervision. Initially the UN only passed about 20 of the 400+ but over time that number increased but it cost heaps to work out who people were. An odd personal story out of that time. A friend of my father is married to a German and her family in Europe called her up and asked what sort of disgusting racist nation was she was living in. Around 2010 her family were in Australia and all they wanted to know was how did Australia mange to shut down the people smuggling. The answer is unfortunately harsh - we had to be as ruthless as the people smugglers. We simply made it a rule that unless there are exceptional circumstances if you arrive in Australia via a people smuggler we will not let you settle in Australia. It has the tragic outcome that people we should take in miss out and a lot of it stems from how the lawyers behaved that got us so frustrated that we reacted the way we did.
    1
  33.  @Lennybird91  Fair call and this is NOT uncommon and many countries have done it. Some of the North Korean stuff is insane. But have a look at some of the political spin news stories coming out of America these days. The other day I saw a vid panning Ted Cruz on a staged stunt he did at a bar. I'm Australian and we do it at times. Just recently the American LCS Ship the Canberra had its commissioning ceremony here in Australia as its named after our capital city. I saw a news item where an Australian Navy officer stood there and talked about how impressive the ship was and how it displayed our ongoing links to America and how firm they were. All gee golly gosh stuff. Just days before that happened I watched a review of the LCS Independence class on the YT Channel "Sub Brief" and he pointed out the many issues with the Independence-class and also pointed out how the Canberra was the first ship in US Navy history to have its decommissioning date set BEFORE its commissioning ceremony. So yeah Putin's stuff is super cringeworthy and totally staged BUT WE ALL DO SIMILAR. Its just that we are better at disguising it.
    1
  34.  @ABanRocks  You make an incredibly valid point and its been repeated all through history. if you look at some of last century's list of maniacs - Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot,... and then go back thought history you have to wonder WHY-TF anyone follows these clowns AND YET THEY DO.
    1
  35.  @Baddy187  Don't play the superior culture crap moron IT IGNORES 1000s of years of history. We can start pointing out all the barbarity that Europe has endured for the last 2000 years. I'm of Anglo-Saxon descent, should we discuss the great tradition of hang, drawing and quartering. Do you know that for most of the last 1000 years executioners were not valued on how quick they could lop of a head. Most were valued for how long they could make an execution last. Our ancestors used to work 6 days and go to church Sunday morning. Sunday afternoon was usually spent being entertained by the executions. DON'T EVER PLAY THE SUPERIOR CULTURE CARD its stupid and ignorant and it totally ignores historical fact. As for Afghanistan. My bet is you younger and don't remember the 1970s or 80s when it was the most modern society in the Islamic world until the civil war that the Russians jumped into. It might not have been as modern or developed as the West but for certain its been a disaster since. SO STOP BEING IGNORANT, STUPID AND RACIST
    1
  36. I'm Australian and we have similar issues with our corporations that have been privatised. I have heard stories from other places. I'm an engineer and started looking into economics and why they do what they do. It came from frustration of clowns with economics degrees interfering in projects. One of the best people to explain what's wrong with economics is a Brit by the name of Gary Stevenson. He's from a working class background but rose through to become Citibank's top trader in the world. He is one of a group of maverick economists, across the world, now trying to enlighten people to how economists think and operate and why things like this are going on. Because economics has a common curriculum across the developed world the problems are very common no matter where you look. Almost all the text books economic students have are published by Harvard, Yale, Oxford, LSE,... or they are written by people who went to Harvard, Yale, Oxford, LSE,... Its one of the huge issues that's resulting in this stuff and why people like Gary are speaking out. He has a channel here on YT called GarysEconomics: https://www.youtube.com/@GarysEconomics
    1
  37. @left_blank Probably the thumb drive they show plugging in. They probably need to go and put money on it first.
    1
  38. It could be worse. She could have been like the Brits who recently complained that climate change was upsetting panelists. It was compared to the film "Don't look up!"
    1
  39. You've just told the same story other countries have been telling for decades. I remember a news story on Indonesia a few years ago and they had received $30 Billion from the IMF and over $20 Billion has simply disappeared. The building of monuments for politicians to hand their names on is a giant issue everywhere. the Chinese are just getting in on a game the rest of the world has been playing for decades. I'm an Australian engineer and in the engineering game there is nothing better than an egotistical clown wanting to put their name on a monument using ither people's money. We have cases of it here in Australia. They tore down the Sydney football stadium instead of renovating it. By the time the site was levelled they had worked out the rebuild costs and it was so over the planned budget its now just a flat wasted area. Another of our cities, Brisbane has won the 3032 Olympics. They actually didn't win everyone else pulled out when they realised the costs. But our idiots pushed on and so far their planning is ridiculous. We've had programs like 60 minutes tell these same Chinese stories about things in the Pacific. And its the same sorts of similar stories. They find an idiot wanting to put their name on a monument.
    1
  40. I'm an aerospace engineer and that is THE MOST ANNOYING aspect of technological journalism right now. They are so technically ILLTERATE its staggering they have a job at all. I don't know what they teach in journalism course now days, but it DOES NOT INCLUDE "how to learn about your subject and not BE IGNORANT and report garbage."
    1
  41.  @francois-xavieresperance5007  Interesting comments. What was the article you pointed out - that comment seems to have been deleted. The really big issue I see is that we are tying ourselves even harder to America and the problem there is they showed with Trump there is a significant part of their population who will screw anyone in a heartbeat. I was actually working in Canada when Trump tore up NAFTA and hit them with tariffs. There was simply no warning. Trump just did something that would rate with his base. The Canadians might not ever trust them again after that and we should be very careful. I actually went to college in America on a sports scholarship. I love the place and the people BUT when it comes to politics they are so tribal and its almost impossible to get them to see how destructive that is.
    1
  42.  @LouisTsuiful  2 words princess BULL SHIT. Its staggering how ignorant some people are. The PLAN might have a lot of ships but it doesn't have the raw fire power of the USN. 2 Aircraft Carriers versus 11 7 Ballistic missile submarines versus 14 and another 4 missile subs 12 Nuclear powered attack submarines versus 50 Forget the 60 conventional attack subs out in the Pacific they are worthless. The USN has 70 Arleigh Burke destroyers backed up by 22 Ticonderoga cruisers. If the PLAN only tried to take on 1/2 of the USN it would still be a massacre. The open ocean is where America's real strength is not the hills and deserts of the Middle East.
    1
  43.  @francois-xavieresperance5007  So briefly what was that article about. Most likely the YouTube algorithm didn't like the link.
    1
  44.  @francois-xavieresperance5007  That's fairly blunt across a whole field of issues. The pacific is almost lost as it is to China. Australia, America and others have been very slack and taken for granted all those small island states would always be in our camp. China turned up a decade ago and started funding projects as part of "belt & road." They are no so entrenched its almost impossible to get them out, because so many of those nations now OWE China for the loans (as in the debts). China now has an economic strangle hold on quite a few of them. We found that out very rudely when they all blasted off at Australia over climate change. China was a guest at that conference and it was obvious they were pulling strings to test out their influence. What's truly scary is that the West has totally ignored what China was doing. We all forget that the UN general Assembly is like the US Senate. Every country gets 1 vote irrespective of population size. So 1.4 Billion Chinamen get 1 vote while all those small Pacific nations get over a dozen with barley a million people. What I expect is that China will eventually go for economic sanctions on America and we are going to be stunned on how many nations vote with them. It will only be then will people realise what "belt & road" actually is. I've been trying to tell people for a while how scary this is. They actually learnt this from the Japanese who manipulated the international whaling commission in the same way. Plus to add into that are the immense issues China is going to face over the next 20years. First with its skewed demographics that have resulted form the 1 child policy. Second form its idiotic construction of ghost cities which has sponged up a staggering amount of cash. Third from all the wealthy Chinese who are getting their money out of China as fast as they can. Fourth that massive army they have produces no food or products to sell they are just 1 enormous sponge on resources. If you take a look at the Soviet collapse one of its major factors was the massive military it had in terms of people. Military personnel produce nothing but costs that the rest of society has to provide. Because America's military is more technology bases it doesn't have as many people as some think. Plus because of how America works its military produces a lot of economic turnover which Russia's never did and China's does not do. Plus all those foreign companies that have factories in China can now chase even cheaper labor in India and Africa.
    1
  45.  @neworder736  What are the words for arrogant, ignorant and dickhead in your language? I'd like to be able to tell you "Don't ever be so arrogant or ignorant or that much of a dickhead to think you know how to speak another persons language" and not be misunderstood.
    1
  46. @qwertyuiop123 That's EVERY COUNTRY that's every invaded or colonised some other place.
    1
  47.  @ypatel1070  This is a complex problem and simple solutions won't do much. The plenty of ways to put it but curing symptoms wont cure the disease.
    1
  48.  @ypatel1070  I didn't mean that the starvation was complex I meant the overall situation. The starvation is the result of other more complex things and is therefore more like a symptom. We can send food, medicine and other supplies but wont fix the underlying causes. Blocking the money is the immediate underlying the cause. Getting them food and supplies NOW is a priority. Sorting out the money is a necessity or this will just keep happening.
    1
  49. I don't know why this is so surprising. In Australia we've been through this already and found our forces committed a number of crimes including a number of illegal killings. We've had to admit that having people in that environment for all that time just built up pressure to the point where some of them cracked. Its like nobody learnt the lessons from Vietnam.
    1
  50. Its actually what we should have expected. Since European settlement there's almost not a single part of Australia that hasn't flooded at some time. Even some of our desert areas have flooded. When our droughts break its usually in a big way, but this is something bigger than expected. 2 weeks ago it was as dry as dry could be. A bush fire would have been massive. What's surprised people is just how much fell in an insanely short time.
    1