Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "FRONTLINE PBS | Official" channel.

  1. 1
  2. 1
  3. 1
  4. 1
  5. 1
  6. 1
  7. 1
  8. 1
  9. 1
  10. 1
  11.  @wolfejar  FYI - I'm Australian but went to college in America in the late 80s when Reagan was in the WH. It wasn't that hard to see then that what he was doing was going to have some very serious outcomes eventually. I did engineering but a bunch of my frat brothers were pre-law and they used to drag me into all sorts of discussions mostly the amendments. I'd studied Orwell (1984 & Animal Farm) in high school as almost every Australian does. I used to argue any country could slide into a totalitarian nightmare if it wasn't careful and it was fairly clear to me American's had a number of false beliefs. The number 1 false belief was that the US Constitution (despite being brilliant) was indestructible and it would keep America safe. What do we now know? Can the US government get around the Constitution? 2 words "Patriot Act" What have you just highlighted? A piece of legislation that was brilliant and did the job got dumped and 23 years later the consequences have landed like a sledge hammer to a skull. What did I see back in the late 80s? Reagan pulling apart the health system, the savings & loans system and other things with the idiotic stupidity that the private sector does everything better. If that concept was true then why did the Great Depression happen or any of the other stock market crashes happen. I was there in America when one of those happened. A bunch of my frat brothers lost bad. The money they had made from summer jobs was in the stock market. They went to class one day and by by the time they got home it was over. I did aerospace engineering and was there when Challenger crashed. I'd actually been in Florida and watched Columbia take of only weeks earlier. In the aftermath (when they were choosing to replace it or not) Kelly Johnson (famous for the SR71, U2,...) said "DON'T replace it. Use the $4 Billion to do something better." I got into an argument with a bunch of my frat brothers at the time. I repeated what Kelly Johnson said and they screamed back that America HAD to have 4 shuttles to counter the Soviet threat. After that was the idiocy surrounding Space Station Freedom. Yeah the reason America hasn't gone back to the moon (and a lot of other things) is because decisions were being made for the wrong reasons with no consideration of lessons learned from history combined with not considering long term effects.
    1
  12. 1
  13. 1
  14. 1
  15.  @yvonneplant9434  I agree. Way back not long after Trump won 2016 Masha was on the Australian TV program "Planet America" and gave the best explanation that I saw anyone give on that whole fiasco. Masha explained that in Putin's experience elections are decided before election day. Election day is just a confirmation exercise and that's how it works in the Russian version of democracy. Way to often we think (and particularly Americans) there is one version of democracy. In Putin's brain Hilary had already won months and months beforehand. Everything else was just theatre because that how he thinks. So what was Putin doing hacking emails handing stuff to Trump's people? We all tend to forget that Hilary in her career of upsetting people had also slapped Russia (including Putin) with sanctions while she was SecState. PLUS Putin hated the fact that America had undermined and helped trash his glorious Soviet Empire. So he hated her. PLUS Soviet political strategy all through the cold war was "We are unpredictable while America is predictable." So having a lose cannon like Trump in the White House wasn't what Putin wanted. Putin wanted a predictable America he could play the classic Soviet games with. Just imagine what would have happened if Comey had kept quiet about finding the laptop with emails and then Hilary had won. Consider what Trump and the GOP would have done once the Russians started releasing proof that Comey had withheld vital information that helped Hilary win. Can you imagine how Trump and the GOP would have taken that? That's what is great about people like Masha, Julia and Konstantin Kisin. They understand Russian culture because they were all born into Russian culture. For almost 30 years we have been trying to put Russian politics into a Western Democratic Model. Its like trying to run Apple Software on a Windows PC - it doesn't work.
    1
  16. 1
  17. 1
  18. 1
  19. 1
  20. 1
  21. 1
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. I did aerospace engineering but work in industrial control systems including safety related subsystems. You're NOT wrong, but not quite right either. People who hide pertinent information FOR ANYTHING that results in the deaths of others need to face CRIMINAL CHARGES. Murder charges versus manslaughter or other charges would be dependent on what they knew and what they hid. One of the key things we do as part of standard engineering processes are called HAZOPs (Hazard & Operability Studies). The purpose is to identify hazards and work out mitigation strategies. Once you work out a strategy (or solution) the next step is called FMEA (Failure Mode Effects Analysis). Its where we assess the components in a system or subsystem and consider the known types of failure and assess what the effects are. That comment by the Boeing Engineer that asked what happens if the AOA Sensor fails is exactly what should have been the start of an FMEA. That question should have been assigned to a person or team and there should be a readily traceable set of paperwork. For a critical safety functions or systems. Option 1 You're designing as per standards or guidelines using certified components, which is always my preferred option. Certified components become certified from FMEAs and testing. Using certified components comes with added costs but also come with all the safety information. Option 2 You are taking responsibility for everything including FMEAs, certification and anything else. Option 3 Ignore the Question. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♀️ If you consider the comment by one of the Boeing engineers (at 30:30) ASKING about "what would happen if the AOA sensor failed" that tells me NO ONE DID an FMEA on that system. Because if they had there would be a paper trail and by now someone would have found it. I can't imagine any circumstance where experienced engineers WOULD NOT have realised this system would eventually crash a plane. Its part of basic safety ideology that any failure you can reasonably describe will eventually happen. You assume the failure WILL EVENTUALLY HAPPEN and then assess what then happens. I actually wrote to Ralph Nader (who lost a relative in one of these accidents) and explained my background and qualifications. I told him what his people needed to look for in terms of design paper work and reports. THEY NEVER GOT BACK TO ME. I do hope they got the right people with the right advice.
    1
  27. 1
  28. 1