Comments by "Tony Wilson" (@tonywilson4713) on "Patrick Boyle" channel.

  1. AS AN ENGINEER: My red flags for technology scams are: 1: Any person who dropped out of their university or college like Elizabeth Holmes. 2: People claiming: "This is a game changing technology." 3: People claiming: "This is a disruptive technology." 4: People claiming: "This technology will change (or is changing) the world." Note: This is incredibly prevalent among IT people who struggle to separate the realms of the internet for reality. This is most notable among the Crypto people who have confused the technology of blockchain for the security of real state backed money. 5: People claiming: "This technology is so simple a child can understand it." or any other claim along the line of "I swear its not that hard!" which is one of Elon Musk's favorite lines. 6: People claiming: "Our technology uses the latest in AI." Note: AI itself is a terribly misused term. Nobody has yet developed anything like software that can think. What there is are software packages that can mimic well defined tasks like comparing images/pictures. 7: Any technology you once saw in sci-fi being promoted as an original idea. Elizabeth Holmes Theranos "one drop of blood" came from the film "Gattaca." Elon Musk's Hyperloop was originally described by Robert Goddard in 1904. Pods in tubes was in many sci-fi films and TV shows notably Logan's Run (1976) and Space 1999 (1975-77). These I would call Yellow or Orange flags. Its not that they are run from its they are be careful. 8: People claiming: "This technology is not like that technology its an improvement that works." Sometimes people do take a failed technology and work out why it failed and fix the problem. 9: Any technology that defies the basic laws of physics. Sorry by the Universe doesn't believe in magic. Occasionally somebody finds a way to make use of the basic laws of physics in a way nobody thought of before, but that's rare. 10: Anybody spruiking a technology and you hear the phrase "self trained." If they say in addition things like: "My Father/Uncle/Boss was a qualified X/Y/Z and I learned from them," then they did have informal training and are probably practical and many great inventions have come from informal practical education. Its still something to be wary of, BUT if they are that mindset "I didn't need to go to college because I was too smart for the teachers (similar to Elizabeth Holmes)" then run and run fast.
    96
  2. 21
  3. 11
  4. 8
  5. 7
  6. 6
  7. 6
  8. 4
  9. 3
  10. 3
  11. This is the 3rd of your fraud videos I have watched (along with Rogue Traders & Ponzi) and its amazing at what people ARE ALLOWED to get away with. Elizabeth Holmes technology was obviously bullshit. Her father was a VP at Enron. The flags should have been out from day 1 that it was bullshit. All of these had warning flags that they were bullshit. I saw your vid on Greensill because that is news here in Australia AND THAT had warning signs. I saw this the other day and I love your opinion on water trading. ->https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oyFRoxuf4g Note" The renowned guru who fathered our water trading scheme "trained at Harvard" the same place with the professor who built the Texas power system. It took me 3 goes to get through that doco because its so upsetting. I expected it to be a doco about global water issues and instead it was all about how Australia is doing a Texas Power Grid on water and then selling that scheme to the world. The farmer on that doco is a dairy farmer. Since since 1985 our population ahs grown from 15 to 25 million and we now have huge export markets to China (for baby formula) and Japan (for frozen cream & other products). So demand for dairy production has skyrocketed. Its outpaced out nations needs with the exports. Yet in 1985 we had over 22,000 dairy farmers and now have less than 9,000 dairy farmers. I am an engineer and did Economics 101 as an elective. What they taught me was that when demand goes up prices go up (basic supply-demand concepts). People have to produce more to meet the demand. Dairy farming should be one of the greatest and safest jobs in Australia and yet they're going out of business. I'm just the ass hole engineer you're the financial wiz can you explain it? Can you explain when dairy farming should be a boom industry instead its a nightmare.
    3
  12. 2
  13. 2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. 2
  20. @Dor Dor Great information. All those people who claim that real estate property always goes up over the long term totally ignore historical FACTS and how it unfolds. I'm Australian and In the aftermath of 2008 a documentary that HAD WARNED 2008 was going to happed was re-aired. In it was a German economist who had housing data for various European cities going back 400-600 years. He pointed out that every 80 (or so) years housing markets collapse almost back to zero. Irrespective of economic system people invariably put money into property it increases in value until it causes a system collapse. 2008 should have reset the Western Economic system and instead we bailed out the banks who then doubled down. Crazier the Chinese followed what the West has done with a real estate boom. In Australia (my country) the main markets of Sydney and Melbourne are now so overpriced that they cannot do anything but collapse. Houses that only 20-30 years ago cost $300,000 are now costing $1.2 million and they are impossible to pay off. Our banks are addicted to the profits from home loans and because interest rates are so low, they have to loan out more money to make the same profits. Its incredibly simple math. The interest on $300,000 at 8% is the same as the interest on $1,200,000 at 2%. This is also why 0.5% interest rate increase is so harmful. Going from 8% to 8.5% on $300,000 is $1,500. Going from 2% to 2.5% on $1,200,000 is $6,000. Its staggering how much people don't understand the practical nature of this symbol -> % Add into that increases in power & water and household spending collapses, WHICH WE ARE SEEING. Our retail market has been under stress for 20+ years. Their incomes are falling as their rents go up because of the higher energy prices. THAT'S EASY MATH. What might save Australia is that we're a massive exporter of raw materials, energy and FOOD. BUT that only works if other countries can pay us.
    2
  21. 2
  22. 1
  23. 1
  24. 1
  25. 1
  26. 1
  27. 1
  28.  @Ln-cq8zu  I'm actually an aerospace engineer and during my senior year at college we had a special guest lecturer on day. He was an alum who'd just completed a project to assess what it would take to terraform Mars. This was 1987 and despite the loss of Challenger we thought this guy was going to pep us up and spell out the future. He started with "Forget it an here's why!" He then explained to us what they'd worked out. The single biggest problem is just how much stuff you need which is staggering numbers. If you want I'll show a few things. But then even if we wanted to build inside some domes, there's the massive issue that we have NEVER been able to build a self contained self sustaining biological environment. They tried again and again with biodome and it failed again and again. There are some people working on much simpler systems where they know they have to manage things and they do show some promise. But then that leads to the next problem: Where do you the stuff you need? Where do you get the stuff to make the dome and then where do you get the air to fill it. If you want a hemispherical dome with 1km³ of volume and you do need to start with cubic kilometers if you want a reasonable colony. Because you need volume for your colony to live and grow food and do other stuff. That dome has a radius of 781.6meters and a surface area of over 3.8km². Where do you get that much material to build it? A cubic kilometer of air weighs 1.3 Million tons. YES TONS. We don't tend to think of air as having weight but it has 1.3kg/m³. And a cubic kilometer is 1,000,000,000 cubic meters. Sorry but Elon's Mars fantasy fails basic math every time.
    1
  29. 1
  30. 1
  31. 1
  32. 1
  33. 1
  34.  @omid_tau  Not really his department. You'd be far better off making this to the news and or political commentary channels. And if you are so concerned about innocent lives then you'd better go after EVERY other nation on the planet, because at some time or other they have all done something they'd prefer NOBODY examines closely. Right now do you think the Ukrainians haven't killed any innocent Russians? It might not be anything like what the Russians have done but its a war and ugly things happen in wars. I'm Australian and we are having to face up to some ugly parts of our past. Some more recent than we'd like to admit. We were part of the coalition forces in both Afghanistan and Iraq where numerous human rights abuses including the murder of innocents. happened. Even after the abuses at Abu Ghraib and Bagram AFB, as well as the water boarding and extraordinary rendition programs WERE MADE PUBLIC, we stayed beside the Americans. We are also largely silent on other nations that commit human rights abuses because of "political strategies or sensitivities." There's a country I dare NOT mention in the middle east or I might get a label placed on me that has occupied land ILLEGALLY for decades and treated the locals as sub-human. There is almost not a country, cultural group, or tribe on the planet without some very ugly parts to its history. In fact every tribal or cultural group that still exists today had to do something at some point just to survive. There are many peoples we only know about from archeology because they were wiped out by other competing tribes.
    1
  35. 1
  36. @David Rosenberg Do you watch any of Mark Blyth the Political Economist at Brown U? He was one of the very few who got both Brexit & Trump right. He just wrote a book called Angrynomics. This is his 4 minute primer on it -> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MXJD5rE4omY There's a for longer talks on it as well. Recently he mentioned a Rand report that said the top 1% of America have made of with over $47,000,000,000,000 since 1975. Here's the Time article on it and the link to the actual Rand report. https://time.com/5888024/50-trillion-income-inequality-america/ https://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/WRA516-1.html If you can't get your head around what 47 Trillion looks like try this. There used to be a game show called "who wants to be millionaire and on it the had a box with $1,000,000 in cash in it. That box was just over 1 cubic foot. A standard 20 ft container has just over 1,100, which means a 20ft container could be filled with a billion dollars. The 20ft container is the actual standard the measure ships with - TEU (twenty foot equivalent). The Ship that was caught in the Suez canal recently is the largest container chip ever built. The previous generation where 11,000 TEU and the current generation is 24,000 TEU. So basically the top 1% of America have made of with 2 boatloads of cash. Its only 2 boatloads because the current generation of container ships is twice as large as the previous generation. If you try and use smaller vessels you need a fleet. 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♀️
    1
  37. 1
  38. 1
  39. 1
  40. 1